XML 31 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitment and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Commitment and Contingencies  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

On August 16, 2010 a  Complaint  (“Complaint”)  was filed  in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego Central Division  against the Company,  the Company’s Chairman,   Freedom Environmental Services, Inc. and the BMXP Holdings Inc.  Shareholder’s Business Trust, a Nevada Business Trust (collectively “Defendants”) by Princeton Research, Inc. and Jan Vandersande  (collectively “Plaintiffs”) seeking to recover general damages in excess of $25,000, punitive damages in excess of $25,000 and attorney’s fees. The Complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty, fraud and deceit in connection with the late distribution of  shares of the Company to beneficiaries  of the BMXP Holdings Inc.  Shareholder’s Business Trust.

 

On June 29, 2011 the Company and BMXP Holdings Inc.  Shareholder’s Business Trust entered into a settlement agreement with the Plaintiffs (“Settlement”) whereby litigation was dismissed with prejudice and a general release of claims  was granted to the Defendants by the Plaintiffs and to the Plaintiffs by the Defendants.

 

Pursuant to the Settlement, the Plaintiffs will be granted one year to exclusively identify for the Company companies suitable for merger with or acquisition by the Company (“Target Companies”) provided however that the Company may also identify Target Companies over the term of the Settlement.

 

In the event that the Company completes a merger or acquisition of a Target Company identified by the Plaintiffs (“Transaction”) , the Plaintiffs shall be compensated in accordance with the terms and conditions of that Transaction.

 

In the event that the Company completes a merger or acquisition of a Target Company that is not identified by the Plaintiffs within one year from June 27, 2011 or in the event controlling interest in the Company is sold within one year from June 27, 2011  then Plaintiffs shall be entitled to receive the greater of:

 

(a)

5% of any consideration received by the Company and Bombardier Pacific Ventures in connection with such merger or sale  or

 

(b)

$25,000 in cash

 

In the event that an acquisition, merger or sale as contemplated under the Settlement is not completed within one year from June 27, 2011 the Plaintiffs shall receive $30,000 from the Company.

 

On February 3, 2011, a Complaint (“Complaint”) was filed in the U.S. District Court Middle District of the State of Pennsylvania against the Company, the Company’s Chairman and Entest. by 18KT.TV LLC (“Plaintiffs”). The Complaint is seeking damages from the Company and Entest in excess of $125,000 and alleges breach of contract, unjust enrichment and breach of implied in fact contract by the Company and Entest in connection with agreements entered into with the plaintiffs by both the Company and Entest.

 

On  October 24,2011 a  Complaint  (“Complaint”)  was filed  in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego Central Division  against the Company,  the Company’s Chairman,  and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company LLC by Rick Plote. The Complaint seeks damages from the defendants jointly and severally of no less than $615, 000 and alleges breach of written agreement, breach of written guarantee and fraud in connection with the defendant’s failure to transfer 4,000,000 common shares of the Company beneficially owned by the company’s Chairman and CEO and pledged by the Company’s Chairman to secure payment of a promissory note issued by an unaffiliated third party.