XML 27 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.1
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

6.

Fair Value Measurements

A three-tier fair value hierarchy is utilized to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels are defined as follows:

 

Level 1 Inputs - unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2 Inputs - quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and

 

Level 3 Inputs - unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions in measuring the asset or liability at fair value.

The following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

March 31, 2019

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketable securities

 

$

262

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

262

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

262

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

262

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,469

 

 

$

7,469

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,469

 

 

$

7,469

 

 

June 30, 2018

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketable securities

 

$

1,459

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,459

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

1,459

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,459

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

12,749

 

 

$

12,749

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

12,749

 

 

$

12,749

 

 

Level 1 investments:    

The Company holds an investment in marketable equity securities which is classified as available-for-sale marketable securities at Level 1 as the investments have readily determinable fair value (see below, Level 3 investments). An unrealized holding gain on the investments of $0.5 million as of June 30, 2018 was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to accumulated deficit on July 1, 2018 upon the adoption of ASU 2016-01 (see Note 3).   

Level 2 assets and liabilities:    

The Company includes U.S. government and sovereign obligations, most government agency securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, and state, municipal and provincial obligations for which quoted prices are available as Level 2. There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 for the periods presented.

The fair value of the borrowings under the Credit Agreement is estimated based on valuations provided by alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs which is considered Level 2.  Due to the short duration until maturity of the Credit Agreement, the fair value approximates the face amount of the Company’s indebtedness of $182.9 million and $200.0 million as of March 31, 2019, and June 30, 2018, respectively.

Level 3 assets and liabilities: 

At June 30, 2018, the Company reflected a liability for contingent consideration related to a certain acquisition completed in fiscal 2018. The fair value measurement of the contingent consideration obligation is determined using Level 3 inputs. These fair value measurements represent Level 3 measurements as they are based on significant inputs not observable in the market. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period.  Accordingly, changes in assumptions could have a material impact on the amount of contingent consideration expense the Company records in any given period.  Changes in the value of the contingent consideration obligations would be recorded in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.                

The change in the acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

2019

 

Beginning balance

 

$

12,749

 

Payments

 

 

(5,274

)

Accretion on discount

 

 

183

 

Adjustments

 

 

(189

)

Ending balance

 

$

7,469

 

 

There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 2 and Level 3 during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2019, or 2018. There were no impairments recorded for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2019, or 2018.