XML 27 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 refers to fair values determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 refers to fair values estimated using significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 includes fair values estimated using significant unobservable inputs. The following tables present the Company's financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis using the fair value hierarchy at March 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
 Fair Value Measurements at
March 31, 2021
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents$467,176 $— $— $467,176 
U.S. government and municipal obligations2,539 1,039 — 3,578 
Commercial paper— 5,699 — 5,699 
Derivative financial instruments— 57 — 57 
$469,715 $6,795 $— $476,510 
LIABILITIES:
Derivative financial instruments— (191)— (191)
$— $(191)$— $(191)
 
 Fair Value Measurements at
March 31, 2020
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents$338,489 $— $— $338,489 
U.S. government and municipal obligations31,341 — — 31,341 
Commercial paper— 14,644 — 14,644 
Corporate bonds4,597 — — 4,597 
$374,427 $14,644 $— $389,071 
LIABILITIES:
Contingent purchase consideration$— $— $(1,748)$(1,748)
Derivative financial instruments— (49)— (49)
$— $(49)$(1,748)$(1,797)
 
This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including marketable securities and derivative financial instruments.
The Company's Level 1 investments are classified as such because they are valued using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.
The Company's Level 2 investments are classified as such because fair value is calculated using market observable data for similar but not identical instruments, or a discounted cash flow model using the contractual interest rate as compared to the underlying interest yield curve. The Company classifies municipal obligations as Level 2 because the fair values are determined using quoted prices from markets the Company considers to be inactive. Commercial paper is classified as Level 2 because the Company uses market information from similar but not identical instruments and discounted cash flow models based on interest rate yield curves to determine fair value. The Company's derivative financial instruments consist of forward foreign exchange contracts and are classified as Level 2 because the fair values of these derivatives are determined using models based on market observable inputs, including spot prices for foreign currencies and credit derivatives, as well as an interest rate factor.
The Company's Level 3 liabilities at March 31, 2020 consisted of contingent purchase consideration related to the two acquisitions that occurred during the fiscal year 2020. The contingent purchase consideration related to the two acquisitions represented amounts deposited into escrow accounts, which were established to cover damages NetScout may have suffered related to any liabilities that NetScout did not agree to assume or as a result of the breach of representations and warranties of the sellers as described in the acquisition agreements. The contingent purchase consideration of $0.7 million and $1.0 million related to the Gigavation and Eastwind acquisitions, respectively were included as accrued other in the Company's consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2020. The $0.7 million related to the Gigavation acquisition was paid to the seller in February 2021. The $1.0 million related to the Eastwind acquisition was paid to the seller in April 2020.
During fiscal year 2019, the Company recorded a contingent consideration related to the divestiture of the Company's handheld network test (HNT) tools business in September 2018. The contingent consideration represented potential future earnout payments to the Company of up to $4.0 million over two years that were contingent on the HNT tools business achieving certain milestones. The fair value of the contingent consideration of $2.3 million was recognized on the divestiture date and was measured using unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The Company recorded an $0.8 million and a $1.6 million change in the fair value of the contingent consideration, which is included in other expense, net within the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 (in thousands):
Contingent
Purchase
Consideration
Balance at March 31, 2020$(1,748)
Additions to Level 3— 
Payments made1,748 
Balance at March 31, 2021$— 
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 (in thousands):
Contingent
Purchase
Consideration
Contingent
Consideration
Balance at March 31, 2019$— $762 
Additions to Level 3(1,800)— 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration— (762)
Payments received52 — 
Balance at March 31, 2020$(1,748)$— 
Accretion income related to the contingent consideration received as partial consideration for the divestiture of the HNT tools business for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 was $36 thousand and was included within interest income.