XML 112 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Employee Benefit Plans
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Employee Benefit Plans

12. Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Plans

The Company maintains a defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom (the “U.K. Plan”). In 1997, membership to the U.K. Plan was closed and in 2003 the Company was allowed to stop accruing additional benefits to the participants. Benefits under the U.K. Plan were based on the employees’ years of service and compensation.

The Company also maintains a tax qualified pension plan in Japan (the “Japan Plan”) that covers certain of the Company’s Japanese employees. Benefits are based on years of service and compensation at retirement. Employees with less than twenty years of service to the Company receive a lump sum benefit payout. Employees with twenty or more years of service to the Company receive a benefit that is guaranteed for a certain number of years. Participants may, under certain circumstances, receive a benefit upon termination of employment.

Pension and other benefit costs reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations are based on a projected benefit method of valuation. The funded status of pension plan liabilities are included in other long term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company continues to fund each plan in sufficient amounts to meet current benefits as well as fund a portion of future benefits as permitted by regulatory authorities.

 

The net periodic pension cost for the U.K. Plan and Japan Plan included the following components (in thousands):

 

     U.K. Plan     Japan Plan  
     2012     2011     2010     2012      2011      2010  

Components of the net periodic pension cost:

              

Service cost

   $ —        $ —        $ —        $ 121       $ 106       $ 115   

Interest cost

     1,359        1,486        1,447        15         18         14   

Expected return on plan assets

     (1,270     (1,576     (1,467     —           —           —     

Amortization of the unrecognized transition obligation

     —          —          —          37         40         42   

Amortization of prior service cost

     —          —          —          3         2         —     

Amortization of actuarial losses

     392        224        204        —           —           —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost

   $ 481      $ 134      $ 184      $ 176       $ 166       $ 171   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The actuarial assumptions used to compute the net periodic pension cost for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, for the U.K. Plan and the Japan Plan were as follows:

 

     U.K. Plan     Japan Plan  
     2012     2011     2010     2012     2011     2010  

Weighted-average discount rate

     4.9     5.3     5.8     1.2     1.3     1.3

Weighted-average rate of compensation increase

     —          —          —          3.0     3.0     3.0

Weighted-average long-term rate of return on plan assets

     5.0     5.9     6.5     —          —          0.1

The actuarial assumptions used to compute the funded status as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for the U.K. Plan and the Japan Plan were as follows:

 

     U.K. Plan     Japan Plan  
     2012     2011     2012     2011  

Weighted-average discount rate

     4.3     4.9     1.3     1.2

Weighted-average rate of compensation increase

     —          —          3.0     3.0

Rate of inflation

     2.5     2.2     —          —     

The discount rates used are derived on (AA) corporate bonds that have a maturity approximating the terms of the related obligations. In estimating the expected return on plan assets, the Company considered the historical performance of the major asset classes held, or anticipated to be held, by the applicable pension plans and current forecasts of future rates of return for these asset classes.

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations and plan assets of the U.K. Plan and the Japan Plan (in thousands):

 

     U.K. Plan     Japan Plan  
     2012     2011     2012     2011  

Change in benefit obligation:

        

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

   $ 27,335      $ 27,341      $ 1,401      $ 1,155   

Service cost

     —          —          121        106   

Interest cost

     1,359        1,486        15        18   

Amendments and transfers

     —          —          417        —     

Actuarial (gains) losses

     5,008        (767     89        51   

Benefits paid

     (582     (645     (140     (10

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

     1,593        (80     (38     81   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

   $ 34,713      $ 27,335      $ 1,865      $ 1,401   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year

   $ 34,713      $ 27,335      $ 1,539      $ 1,124   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in plan assets:

        

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

   $ 24,590      $ 25,710      $ 582      $ 393   

Actual return (loss) on plan assets

     2,461        (1,247     9        (9

Employer contributions

     793        802        324        188   

Benefits paid

     (582     (645     (140     (10

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

     1,367        (30     52        20   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

   $ 28,629      $ 24,590      $ 827      $ 582   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Funded status at end of year

   $ (6,084   $ (2,745   $ (1,038   $ (819
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amount recognized in the financial statements consists of:

        

Accrued pension liabilities

   $ 6,084      $ 2,745      $ 1,038      $ 819   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss not yet recognized in net periodic pension cost

        

Net actuarial loss

   $ (11,197   $ (7,301   $ (110   $ (42

Prior service cost

   $ —        $ —        $ (281   $ (35

Net transition obligation

   $ —        $ —        $ (237   $ (550

Amounts expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic cost over the next fiscal year consists of:

        

Net actuarial loss

   $ 702      $ 381      $ —        $ —     

Prior service cost

   $ —        $ —        $ 16      $ 2   

Net transition obligation

   $ —        $ —        $ 26      $ 42   

The following table reflects the total expected benefit payments to plan participants and have been estimated based on the same assumptions used to measure the Company’s benefit obligations as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

 

     U.K. Plan      Japan Plan  

2013

   $ 549       $ 241   

2014

     1,028         152   

2015

     817         64   

2016

     970         70   

2017

     1,239         75   

2018-2022

     7,138         651   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 11,741       $ 1,253   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

In the U.K., funding valuations are conducted every three years in order to determine the future level of contributions. The Company’s latest funding valuation was completed in October 2010. Based on the results of the valuation, the Company’s annual contributions to the U.K. Plan are $0.8 million for a period of 10 years and 5 months beginning September 2010, including an additional one-time lump-sum payment of approximately $1.6 million which was paid in 2010. The Company anticipates that contributions for 2013 will be $0.8 million for the U.K. Plan and $0.1 million for the Japan Plan.

Fair Value of Plan Assets

In the U.K., the Company’s overall objective is to invest plan assets in a portfolio of diversified assets, primarily through the use of institutional collective funds, to achieve long-term growth. The strategic asset allocation uses a combination of risk controlled and index strategies in fixed income and global equities. The target allocations are approximately 57% to funds investing in global equities, approximately 31% to funds investing in global bonds, approximately 10% to alternative assets (including commodities, private equity and debt, real estate, infrastructure, hedge funds and currency funds), and approximately 2% in cash.

In Japan, the investment strategy is primarily focused on the preservation of principal invested in insurance contracts.

The following table summarizes the fair values of Plan assets as of December 31, 2012 by asset category (in thousands):

 

Asset Category

   Fair Value      Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant Other
Observable Inputs

(Level 2)
     Significant Other
Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)
 

U.K. Plan

           

Mutual Funds:

           

Balanced (1)

   $ 14,266       $  —         $ 14,266       $  —     

Growth (2)

     14,244         —           14,244         —     

Cash

     119         119         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 28,629       $ 119       $ 28,510       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Japan Plan

           

Insurance contracts (3)

   $ 827       $ —         $ 827       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 827       $ —         $ 827       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) This class comprises a diversified portfolio of global investments which seeks a balanced return between capital growth and fixed income and is allocated on a weighted average basis as follows: equities (47%), debt (41%), other assets (9%) and cash (3%).
(2) This class comprises a diversified portfolio of global investments which seeks long-term capital growth and is allocated on a weighted average basis as follows: equities (68%), other assets (10%), debt (21%), and cash (1%).
(3) This class represents funds invested in insurance contracts.

 

The following table summarizes the fair values of Plan assets as of December 31, 2011 by asset category (in thousands):

 

Asset Category

   Fair Value      Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

U.K. Plan

           

Mutual Funds:

           

Balanced (1)

   $ 12,353       $  —         $ 12,353       $  —     

Growth (2)

     12,136         —           12,136         —     

Cash

     101         101         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 24,590       $ 101       $ 24,489       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Japan Plan

           

Insurance contracts (3)

   $ 582       $ —         $ 582       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 582       $ —         $ 582       $   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) This class comprises a diversified portfolio of global investments which seeks a balanced return between capital growth and fixed income and is allocated on a weighted average basis as follows: equities (40%), debt (36%), other assets (17%) and cash (7%).
(2) This class comprises a diversified portfolio of global investments which seeks long-term capital growth and is allocated on a weighted average basis as follows: equities (60%), other assets (16%), debt (18%), and cash (6%).
(3) This class represents funds invested in insurance contracts.

The tables above present the fair value of plan assets in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. Certain pension plan assets are measured using net asset value per share (or its equivalent) and are reported as a level 2 investment above due to the Company’s ability to redeem its investments either at the balance sheet date or within limited time restrictions.

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company has defined contribution employee savings plans in the U.K. and the U.S. The Company matches the contributions of participating employees on the basis of percentages specified in each plan. Company matching contributions to the plans were $1.5 million, $1.8 million, and $1.4 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.