EX-99.77C VOTES 3 windsor1209proxyresults.txt PROXY INFO Windsor Funds Shareholder Report Proxy Voting Results At a special meeting of shareholders on July 2, 2009, fund shareholders approved the following two proposals: Proposal 1- Elect trustees for each fund.* The individuals listed in the table below were elected as trustees for each fund. All trustees with the exception of Messrs. McNabb and Volanakis (both of whom already served as directors of The Vanguard Group, Inc.) served as trustees to the funds prior to the shareholder meeting. Trustee For Withheld Percentage For John J. Brennan 1,462,617,078 41,395,188 97.2% Charles D. Ellis 1,458,717,131 45,295,136 97.0% Emerson U. Fullwood 1,462,442,012 41,570,254 97.2% Rajiv L. Gupta 1,460,115,928 43,896,339 97.1% Amy Gutmann 1,463,668,659 40,343,607 97.3% JoAnn Heffernan Heisen 1,461,679,414 42,332,852 97.2% F. William McNabb III 1,464,260,763 39,751,504 97.4% Andre F. Perold 1,459,755,929 44,256,337 97.1% Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. 1,461,179,223 42,833,043 97.2% Peter F. Volanakis 1,464,881,112 39,131,154 97.4% * Results are for all funds within the same trust Proposal 2: - Update and standardize the funds' fundamental policies regarding: (a) Purchasing and selling real estate. (b) Issuing senior securities. (c) Borrowing money. (d) Making loans. (e) Purchasing and selling commodities. (f) Concentrating investments in a particular industry or group of industries. (g) Eliminating outdated fundamental investment policies not required by law. The revised fundamental policies are clearly stated and simple, yet comprehensive, making oversight and compliance more efficient than under the former policies. The revised fundamental policies will allow the funds to respond more quickly to regulatory and market changes, while avoiding the costs and delays associated with successive shareholder meetings. For Abstain Against Broker Percentage Non-Votes For Windsor Fund 2a 591,976,834 12,012,414 30,298,706 16,146,865 91.0% 2b 590,999,439 13,072,969 30,215,545 16,146,866 90.9% 2c 585,308,550 13,121,695 35,857,706 16,146,868 90.0% 2d 586,552,119 12,915,618 34,820,214 16,146,868 90.2% 2e 588,761,329 12,383,944 33,142,682 16,146,865 90.5% 2f 589,794,808 13,263,025 31,230,121 16,146,865 90.7% 2g 594,936,766 12,615,999 26,735,187 16,146,868 91.5% Windsor II Fund 2a 777,186,280 14,023,991 24,795,542 37,571,634 91.05% 2b 774,442,220 16,012,659 25,550,928 37,571,639 90.73% 2c 757,734,429 15,655,158 42,616,226 37,571,634 88.77% 2d 768,579,658 16,037,876 31,388,282 37,571,631 90.04% 2e 769,863,470 15,350,994 30,791,352 37,571,632 90.19% 2f 772,406,246 15,458,422 28,141,146 37,571,634 90.49% 2g 782,735,917 14,666,451 18,601,768 37,573,311 91.70% Proposal 3 - Institute procedures to prevent holding investments in companies that, in the judgment of the board, substantially contribute to genocide or crimes against humanity, the most egregious violations of human rights. The trustees recommended a vote against this proposal because it called for procedures that duplicate existing practices and procedures of the Vanguard funds. For Abstain Against Broker Percentage Non Votes For Windsor Fund 62,897,474 23,504,407 547,886,058 16,146,880 9.7%