XML 48 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

NOTE 11FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

(a) Fair Value Hierarchy

Under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value measurements are characterized in one of three levels based upon the inputs used to arrive at the measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

·

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date.

·

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

·

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

 

When appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors including credit considerations. Such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used.

 

(b) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and other, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, accounts payable to affiliates and accrued interest approximate their fair values because of the short maturity or duration of these instruments, or because the instruments bear a variable rate of interest or a rate that approximates current rates. The fair value of the Partnership’s long-term debt is estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated current borrowing rates. The fair value of interest rate derivatives is calculated using the income approach which uses period-end market rates and applies a discounted cash flow valuation model.

 

The estimated fair value of the Partnership’s debt as at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows:

 

(unaudited)

 

March 31, 2015

 

December 31, 2014

 

(millions of dollars)

 

Carrying Value

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying Value

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Credit Facility due 2017

 

320 

 

320 

 

330 

 

330 

 

Term Loan Facility due 2018

 

500 

 

500 

 

500 

 

500 

 

Short-Term Loan Facility due 2015

 

170 

 

170 

 

170 

 

170 

 

4.65% Senior Notes due 2021, net

 

350 

 

368 

 

350 

 

375 

 

4.375% Senior Notes due 2025, net

 

349 

 

353 

 

-

 

-

 

5.09% Unsecured Senior Notes due 2015

 

75 

 

76 

 

75 

 

76 

 

5.29% Unsecured Senior Notes due 2020

 

100 

 

112 

 

100 

 

111 

 

5.69% Unsecured Senior Notes due 2035

 

150 

 

169 

 

150 

 

168 

 

3.82% Series D Senior Notes due 2017

 

20 

 

21 

 

20 

 

21 

 

 

 

2,034 

 

2,089 

 

1,695 

 

1,751 

 

 

Long-term debt is recorded at amortized cost and classified in Level II of the fair value hierarchy for fair value disclosure purposes. Interest rate derivative assets and liabilities are classified in Level II for all periods presented where the fair value is determined by using valuation techniques that refer to observable market data or estimated market prices.

 

Market risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates may result in fluctuations in the fair values or cash flows of financial instruments. The Partnership’s floating rate debt is subject to LIBOR benchmark interest rate risk. The Partnership uses interest rate derivatives to manage its exposure to interest rate risk. We regularly assess the impact of interest rate fluctuations on future cash flows and evaluate hedging opportunities to mitigate our interest rate risk.

 

The interest rate swaps are structured such that the cash flows of the derivative instruments match those of the variable rate of interest on the Term Loan Facility. The Partnership hedged interest payments on $150 million of variable-rate Term Loan Facility with interest rate swaps effective September 3, 2013 and maturing July 1, 2018, at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 2.79 percent. At March 31, 2015, the fair value of the interest rate swaps accounted for as cash flow hedges was a liability of $2 million (both on a gross and net basis) (December 31, 2014 - $1 million). The Partnership did not record any amounts in net income related to ineffectiveness for interest rate hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (2014 – nil). The change in fair value of interest rate derivative instruments recognized in other comprehensive income was a loss of $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (2014 – less than $1 million). For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the net realized loss related to the interest rate swaps was $1 million and was included in financial charges and other (2014 – $1 million).

 

The Partnership has no master netting agreements; however, contracts contain provisions with rights of offset. The Partnership has elected to present the fair value of derivative instruments with the right to offset on a gross basis in the balance sheet. Had the Partnership elected to present these instruments on a net basis, there would be no effect on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.