XML 74 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTE 15    FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

(a)    Fair Value Hierarchy

Under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value measurements are characterized in one of three levels based upon the input used to arrive at the measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

When appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors including credit considerations. Such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management's best estimate is used.

(b)    Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and other, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and accrued interest approximate their fair values because of the short maturity or duration of these instruments, or because the instruments bear a variable rate of interest or a rate that approximates current rates. The fair value of the Partnership's long-term debt is estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated current borrowing rates.

The estimated fair values of the Partnership's and its subsidiary's long-term debt as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

 
  2012

  2011

   
December 31 (millions of dollars)
 
Carrying Value

 
Fair Value

 
Carrying Value

 
Fair Value

   

Senior Credit Facility due 2017   312   312   363   363    
4.65% Senior Notes due 2021   349   372   349   368    
6.89% Series C Senior Notes due 2012       3   3    
3.82% Series D Senior Notes due 2017   27   30   27   29    

    688   714   742   763    

The Partnership's Senior Credit Facility results in exposures to changing interest rates. Until December 12, 2011, the Partnership used derivatives to assist in managing its exposure to interest rate risk.

The interest rate swaps and options were structured such that the cash flows matched those of the Senior Credit Facility. There were no amounts hedged at December 31, 2012 and 2011. $300 million of variable-rate debt was hedged by an interest rate swap through December 12, 2011, where the fixed interest rate paid was 4.89 percent. $75 million of variable-rate debt was hedged by an interest rate swap through February 28, 2011, where the fixed interest rate paid was 3.86 percent. In addition to these fixed rates, the Partnership paid an applicable margin in accordance with the Senior Credit Facility agreement.

Financial instruments are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized into one of three categories based upon a fair value hierarchy. The Partnership has classified all of its derivative financial instruments as Level II for all periods presented where the fair value is determined by using valuation techniques that refer to observable market data or estimated market prices. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the fair value of the interest rate swaps accounted for as hedges was nil. In 2012, the Partnership recorded interest expense of nil on the interest rate swaps and options (2011 – $14 million; 2010 – $17 million).

Market risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates may result in fluctuations in the fair values or cash flows of financial instruments. Our interest rate exposure results from our Senior Credit Facility, which is subject to variability in LIBOR interest rates. We regularly assess the impact of interest rate fluctuations on future cash flows and evaluate hedging opportunities to mitigate our interest rate risk.

Counterparty credit risk represents the financial loss that the Partnership and our pipeline systems would experience if a counterparty to a financial instrument failed to meet its obligations in accordance with the terms and conditions of the financial instruments with the Partnership or its pipeline systems. Our maximum counterparty credit exposure with respect to financial instruments at the balance sheet date consists primarily of the carrying amount, which approximates fair value, of non-derivative financial assets, such as accounts receivable, as well as the fair value of derivative financial assets. At December 31, 2012, the Partnership's maximum counterparty credit exposure consisted of accounts receivable of $8 million (2011 – $8 million).