XML 69 R50.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Fair Value Measurements, Guarantees, and Concentration of Credit Risk (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Assets and Liabilities Measured On Recurring Basis [Table Text Block]
The following table presents, by level within the fair value hierarchy, certain of our significant financial assets and liabilities. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, margin deposits, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. Therefore, these assets and liabilities are not presented in the following table.
Fair Value Measurements Using
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Quoted
Prices In
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(Millions)
Assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2020:
Measured on a recurring basis:
ARO Trust investments$235 $235 $235 $— $— 
Additional disclosures:
Long-term debt, including current portion(22,344)(27,043)— (27,043)— 
Guarantees(40)(27)— (11)(16)
Assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2019:
Measured on a recurring basis:
ARO Trust investments$201 $201 $201 $— $— 
Additional disclosures:
Long-term debt, including current portion(22,288)(25,319)— (25,319)— 
Guarantees(41)(27)— (11)(16)
Fair Value Measurements, Nonrecurring [Table Text Block]
The following table presents impairments of assets and equity-method investments associated with certain nonrecurring fair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, except as specifically noted.
Impairments
Year Ended December 31,
SegmentDate of MeasurementFair Value202020192018
(Millions)
Impairment of certain assets:
Certain capitalized project costs (1)Transmission & Gulf of MexicoDecember 31, 2020$42 $170 
Certain gathering assets (2)Northeast G&PDecember 31, 202012 
Certain pipeline project (3)Transmission & Gulf of MexicoDecember 31, 201922 $354 
Certain gathering assets (4)WestDecember 31, 201925 20 
Certain gathering assets (4)WestJune 30, 201940 59 
Certain idle gathering assets (5) WestMarch 31, 2019— 12 
Certain gathering assets (6)WestDecember 31, 2018470 $1,849 
Certain idle pipeline assets (7)OtherJune 30, 201825 66 
Other impairments and write-downs (8)19 
Impairment of certain assets
$182 $464 $1,915 
Impairments
Year Ended December 31,
SegmentDate of MeasurementFair Value202020192018
(Millions)
Impairment of equity-method investments:
RMM (9)WestDecember 31, 2020$421 $108 
RMM (10)WestMarch 31, 2020557 243 
Brazos Permian II (10)WestMarch 31, 2020— 193 
Caiman II (11)Northeast G&PMarch 31, 2020191 229 
Appalachia Midstream Investments (11)Northeast G&PMarch 31, 20202,700 127 
Aux Sable (11)Northeast G&PMarch 31, 202039 
Laurel Mountain (11)Northeast G&PMarch 31, 2020236 10 
Discovery (11)Transmission & Gulf of MexicoMarch 31, 2020367 97 
Laurel Mountain (12)Northeast G&PSeptember 30, 2019242 $79 
Appalachia Midstream Investments (13)Northeast G&PSeptember 30, 2019102 17 
Pennant (14)Northeast G&PAugust 31, 201911 17 
UEOM (15)Northeast G&PMarch 17, 20191,210 74 
UEOM (15)Northeast G&PDecember 31, 20181,293 $32 
Other
(1)
Impairment of equity-method investments
$1,046 $186 $32 
______________
(1)Relates to capitalized project development costs for the Northeast Supply Enhancement project. As previously disclosed, approvals required for the project from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection have been denied and we have not refiled at this time. Beginning in May 2020, we discontinued capitalization of costs related to this project. Considering that the customer precedent agreements and FERC certificate for the project remain in effect, we had previously concluded that the probability of completing the project was sufficient to not require impairment. However, recent developments in the political and regulatory environments have caused us to slightly lower that assessed probability such that the capitalized project costs now required impairment. The estimated fair value of the materials within the capitalized project costs considered other internal uses and salvage values for the Property, plant, and equipment – net. The remaining capitalized costs were determined to have no fair value.

(2)Relates to a gathering system in the Marcellus Shale region, that is more likely than not to be sold in the short term. The estimated fair value of the Property, plant, and equipment – net and Intangible assets – net of accumulated amortization was determined using a market approach, which incorporated an indication of interest by a third party. These inputs resulted in a fair value measurement within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
(3)Relates to the Constitution proposed pipeline project extending from Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, to the Iroquois Gas Transmission and the Tennessee Gas Pipeline systems in New York. Although Constitution received a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the FERC to construct and operate the proposed pipeline and obtained, among other approvals, a waiver of the water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act for the New York portion of the project, the members of Constitution, following extensive evaluation and discussion, determined that the underlying risk-adjusted return for this greenfield pipeline project had diminished in such a way that further development was no longer supported. The estimated fair value of the Property, plant, and equipment – net was based on probability-weighted third-party quotes. Our partners’ $209 million share of this impairment is reflected within Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

(4)Relates to a gas gathering system in the Eagle Ford Shale region with expected declines in asset utilization and possible idling of the gathering system. We designated these operations as held for sale, included in Other current assets and deferred charges, as of December 31, 2019. As a result, we measured the fair value of the disposal group using the expected sales price under a contract with a third party. These inputs resulted in a fair value measurement within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value of the Property, plant, and equipment – net at June 30, 2019, was determined using a market approach, which incorporated indications of interest from third parties.

(5)Reflects impairment of Property, plant, and equipment – net that is no longer in use for which the fair value was determined to be lower than the carrying value.

(6)Relates to our gathering operations in the Barnett Shale region. Certain of our contractual gathering rates, primarily those in the Barnett Shale region, are based on a percentage of the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) natural gas prices. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we determined there was a sustained decline in the forward price curves for natural gas. During this same period, a large producer customer in the Barnett Shale region removed their remaining drilling rig. These factors gave rise to an impairment evaluation of these assets, which incorporated management’s projections of future drilling activity and gathering rates, taking into consideration the information previously noted as well as recently available information regarding producer drilling cost assumptions in the basin. The resulting estimate of future undiscounted cash flows was less than our carrying value, necessitating the estimation of the fair value of the Property, plant, and equipment – net and Intangible assets – net of accumulated amortization. To arrive at the fair value, we utilized an income approach with a discount rate of 8.5 percent, reflecting an estimated cost of capital and risks associated with the underlying assets.

(7)Relates to certain idle pipelines. The estimated fair value of the Property, plant, and equipment – net was determined by a market approach incorporating information derived from bids received for these assets, which we marketed for sale together with certain other assets. These inputs resulted in a fair value measurement within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. We sold these assets in the fourth quarter of 2018. (See Note 3 – Acquisitions and Divestitures.)

(8)Reflects multiple individually insignificant impairments and write-downs of other certain assets that may no longer be in use or are surplus in nature for which the fair value was determined to be lower than the carrying value.

(9)During the fourth quarter of 2020, RMM renegotiated service contracts with a significant customer in connection with the customer’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. The renegotiated contracts result in lower service rates and lower projected future cash flows. As a result, we evaluated this investment for other-than-temporary impairment. The fair value was measured using an income approach. We utilized a discount rate of 18 percent in our analysis.
(10)Following the previously described declining market conditions during the first quarter of 2020, we evaluated these investments for other-than-temporary impairment. The fair value was measured using an income approach. Both investees operate in primarily oil-driven basins where significant expected reductions in producer activities led to reduced estimates of expected future cash flows. Our fair value estimates also reflected discount rates of approximately 17 percent for these investments. We also considered any debt held at the investee level, and its impact to fair value. The industry weighted-average discount rates utilized were significantly influenced by the recent market declines previously discussed.

(11)Following the previously described declining market conditions during the first quarter of 2020, we evaluated these investments for other-than-temporary impairment. The impairments within our Northeast G&P segment are primarily associated with operations in wet-gas areas where producer drilling activities are influenced by NGL prices which historically trend with crude oil prices. The fair values of our investments in Caiman II and Aux Sable Liquid Products LP (Aux Sable) were estimated using a market approach, reflecting valuation multiples ranging from 5.0x to 6.2x EBITDA (weighted-average 6.0x). The fair values of the other investments, including gathering systems that are part of Appalachia Midstream Investments, were estimated using an income approach, with discount rates ranging from 9.7 percent to 13.5 percent (weighted-average 12.6 percent). We also considered any debt held at the investee level, and its impact to fair value. The assumed valuation multiples and industry weighted-average discount rates utilized were both significantly influenced by the recent market declines previously discussed.

(12)Relates to a gas gathering system in the Marcellus Shale region that was adversely impacted by lower sustained forward natural gas price expectations and changes in expected producer activity. The estimated fair value was determined using an income approach. We utilized a discount rate of 10.2 percent in our analysis.

(13)Relates to a certain gathering system held in Appalachia Midstream Investments that was adversely impacted by changes in the timing of expected producer activity. The estimated fair value was determined using an income approach. We utilized a discount rate of 9 percent in our analysis.

(14)The estimated fair value of Pennant Midstream, LLC (Pennant) was determined by a market approach based on recent observable third-party transactions. These inputs resulted in a fair value measurement within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

(15)The estimated fair value at March 17, 2019, was determined by a market approach based on the transaction price for the purchase of the remaining interest in UEOM as finalized just prior to the signing and closing of the acquisition in March 2019 (see Note 3 – Acquisitions and Divestitures). These inputs resulted in a fair value measurement within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value at December 31, 2018, was determined by a market approach based on our analysis of inputs in the principal market.
Concentration of receivables, net of allowances, by product or service [Table Text Block]
The following table summarizes concentration of receivables, net of allowances:
 December 31,
 20202019
 (Millions)
NGLs, natural gas, and related products and services$638 $613 
Transportation of natural gas and related products254 277 
Accounts Receivable related to revenues from contracts with customers
892 890 
Other107 106 
Trade accounts and other receivables - net$999 $996