Recently Issued Accounting Standards (Policies)	9 Months Ended
Recently Issued Accounting Standards (Policies)	Sep. 30, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Accounting Standards	Adoption of New Accounting Standards: Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2014-09"), and the related amendments, utilizing the modified retrospective approach, which created a new comprehensive revenue recognition standard that serves as the single source of revenue guidance for all contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Insurance contracts, lease contracts and investments are not within the scope of ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 is applicable to the Company's service fee and commission income. Service fee and commission income represents vehicle service agreement fees, GAP commissions, maintenance support service fees, warranty product commissions, homebuilder warranty service fees and homebuilder warranty commissions based on terms of various agreements with credit unions, consumers, businesses and homebuilders. With the exception of GAP commissions and homebuilder warranty service fees, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not change the way the Company recognized revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018. The new guidance affects IWS' GAP commissions and PWSC's homebuilder warranty service fees, which will be recognized more slowly as compared to the historic revenue recognition pattern prior to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2014-09. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2014-09, the Company also recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to increase accumulated deficit by $0.6 million and increase deferred service fees by $0.6 million. Prior periods have not been restated to conform to the current presentation. Refer to Note 15, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers," for further details. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("ASU 2016-01"). The amendments in ASU 2016-01 address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Most significantly, ASU 2016-01 requires (1) equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of an investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income (loss); however, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost, adjusted for observable price changes and impairments; and (2) an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income (loss) the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. The Company has elected to measure its investments in private companies at cost, adjusted for observable price changes and impairments. Previously, the Company recorded its equity investments at fair value with net unrealized gains or losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and its subordinated debt at fair value with the total change in fair value reported in net income (loss). As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-01, at January 1, 2018 cumulative net unrealized losses on equity investments of $0.0 million were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into accumulated deficit and a cumulative $40.5 million change in fair value of subordinated debt attributable to instrument-specific credit risk was reclassified from accumulated deficit to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Prior periods have not been restated to conform to the current presentation. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments ("ASU 2016-15"). The objective of ASU 2016-15 is to reduce diversity in the classification of cash receipts and payments for specific cash flow issues, including debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination and proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims. The adoption of the standard did not affect the Company's consolidated statements of cash flows. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash ("ASU 2016-18"). The objective of ASU 2016-18 is to explain the change during the period in the total cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Amounts generally described as restricted cash and cash equivalents should be included with the cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. As a result of the adoption of the standard, the change in restricted cash is included in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Effective July 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2018-07, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2018-07"). ASU 2018-07 was issued to simplify the accounting for share-based transactions by expanding the scope of Topic 718 from only being applicable to share-based payments to employees to also include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. During the third quarter of 2018, the Company granted restricted common stock awards to a nonemployee. Refer to Note 18, "Stock-Based Compensation," for further details. Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases ("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 was issued to improve the financial reporting of leasing transactions. Under current guidance for lessees, leases are only included on the balance sheet if certain criteria, classifying the agreement as a capital lease, are met. This update requires the recognition of a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability, discounted to the present value, for all leases that extend beyond 12 months. For operating leases, the asset and liability will be amortized over the lease term on a straight-line basis, with all cash flows included within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The accounting treatment for lessors will remain relatively unchanged. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 using the modified retrospective transition method and did not restate comparative periods. The adoption had a significant effect on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. Refer to Note 14, "Leases," for further information regarding the adoption of ASU 2016-02. (b) Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted: In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU 2016-13"). ASU 2016-13 replaces the current incurred loss model used to measure impairment losses with an expected loss model for trade, reinsurance, and other receivables as well as financial instruments measured at amortized cost. ASU 2016-13 will require a financial asset measured at amortized cost, including reinsurance balances recoverable, to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected by means of an allowance for credit losses that runs through net loss. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will also be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. However, the amendments would limit the amount of the allowance to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost. The measurement of credit losses on available-for-sale investments is similar under current GAAP, but the update requires the use of the allowance account through which amounts can be reversed, rather than through irreversible write-downs. On November 15, 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, which (1) provides a framework to stagger effective dates for future major accounting standards and (2) amends the effective dates for certain major new accounting standards to give implementation relief to certain types of entities. Specifically, per ASU 2019-10 the Company would adopt ASU 2016-13 beginning January 1, 2023, as the Company is considered to be a smaller reporting company. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2016-13 to determine the potential impact that adopting this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment ("ASU 2017-04"). ASU 2017-04 was issued to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill. This update changes the impairment test by requiring an entity to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount as opposed to comparing the carrying amount of goodwill with its implied fair value. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of ASU 2017-04 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-17, Consolidation (Topic 810): Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities ("ASU 2018-17"). Among other things, ASU 2018-17 changes how all entities that apply the variable interest entity ("VIE") guidance evaluate decision making fees. Under ASU 2018-17, when an entity determines whether a decision-making fee is a variable interest, it considers indirect interests held through related parties under common control on a proportionate basis rather than in their entirety. The new approach is consistent with how indirect interests held by related parties under common control are evaluated when determining whether a reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. ASU 2018-17 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2018-17 to determine the potential impact that adopting this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements. Financial Statement Impact of Adopting Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2016-02" or "ASC 842") The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective adoption method. The reported results for 2019 reflect the adoption of ASC 842 guidance while the reported results for 2018 were prepared and continue to be reported under the guidance of ASC 840, Leases, referred to herein as "previous guidance." ASC 842 provides guidance for both lessees and lessors. The Company is the lessee where it leases certain office properties from lessors. The Company is the lessor when it leases certain property to lessees. The guidance requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities in the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements, such as information about variable lease payments and options to renew and terminate leases. The amended guidance will require both operating and finance leases to be recognized in the balance sheet. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset (“ROU”) representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The guidance requires lessors to classify leases as a sales-type, direct financing, or operating lease. A lease is classified as a sales-type lease if any one of five criteria are met, each of which indicate that the lease, in effect, transfers control of the underlying asset to the lessee. If none of those five criteria are met, but two additional criteria are both met, indicating that the lessor has transferred substantially all the risks and benefits of the underlying asset to the lessee and a third party, the lease is classified as a direct financing lease. All leases that are not classified as sales-type or direct financing leases are classified as operating leases. The Company elected certain of the practical expedients that are permitted under the transition guidance which allowed the Company to carryforward the historical lease classification, not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases as of January 1, 2019 or reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases. In addition, the Company elected to adopt the "hindsight" practical expedient to determine the reasonably certain lease term for existing leases. The Company has revised its relevant policies and procedures, as applicable, to meet the new accounting, reporting and disclosure requirements of ASC 842 and have updated internal controls accordingly. The main difference between the guidance in ASU 2016-02 and prior guidance for lessees is the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for those leases classified as operating leases. Recognition of the right-of-use assets and liabilities had a material impact to the Company’s consolidated balance sheet upon adoption. However, since all its leases are operating leases under ASC 840 and the Company will carryforward the historical lease classification, the new standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of shareholder’s equity, or consolidated statements of cash flows. The adoption resulted in an increase of the ROU assets of approximately $2.7 million and lease liabilities of $2.9 million. The difference of $0.2 million relates to straight-line rent accruals and lease incentive liabilities that were reclassified to ROU assets for operating leases. The main difference between the guidance in ASU 2016-02 and prior guidance for lessors is a modification of what qualifies as a sales-type and direct financing lease. All the Company’s lessor leases are classified as operating leases.
Lease Accounting Policy	Lease Accounting Policy The Company determines lease classification at commencement date. Leases not classified as sales-type (lessor) or financing leases (lessor and lessee) are classified as operating leases. The primary accounting criteria the Company uses that results in operating lease classification are: (a) the lease does not transfer ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (b) the lease does not grant the lessee a purchase option that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, (c) using a seventy-five percent or more threshold, the lease term is not for a major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset, (d) using a ninety percent or more threshold, the present value of the sum of the lease payments and residual value guarantee from the lessee does not equal or substantially exceeds all of the fair value of the underlying asset. The Company has operating leases for office space which include fixed base rent payments, as well as variable rent payments to reimburse the landlord for operating expenses and taxes. The Company’s variable lease payments do not depend on a published index or rate, and therefore, are expensed as incurred. The Company includes only fixed payments for lease components in the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. There are no residual value guarantees. The Company does not currently have leases that meet the finance lease classification as defined under ASC 842. The Company treats contracts as a lease when the contract: (1) conveys the right to use a physically distinct asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration, (2) the Company directs the use of the asset and (3) the Company obtains substantially all the economic benefits of the asset. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are measured and recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. As the Company’s leases are office leases, the Company is unable to determine an implicit rate; therefore, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of future payments for those leases. The Company includes options to extend or terminate the lease in the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability when it is reasonably certain that such options will be exercised. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. As an accounting policy, the Company has elected not to apply the recognition requirements in ASC 842 to short-term leases (generally those with terms of twelve months or less). Instead, the Company recognizes the lease payments as expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term and any variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred.
Lease Accounting Policy	Lease Accounting Policy The Company determines lease classification at commencement date. Leases not classified as sales-type (lessor) or financing leases (lessor and lessee) are classified as operating leases. The primary accounting criteria the Company uses that results in operating lease classification are: (a) the lease does not transfer ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (b) the lease does not grant the lessee a purchase option that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, (c) using a seventy-five percent or more threshold, the lease term is not for a major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset, (d) using a ninety percent or more threshold, the present value of the sum of the lease payments and residual value guarantee from the lessee does not equal or substantially exceeds all of the fair value of the underlying asset. Rental income from operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis, based on contractual lease terms with fixed and determinable increases over the non-cancellable term of the related lease when collectability is reasonably assured. Rental expense for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, net of any applicable lease incentive amortization.