-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, SawDLtuJmIGVY/gyJjhLjHH9MmT8bUrCB6vT9tziGqsBMphBT64umKc5GgZYylZJ 9PXXG7VFyAhfatYbmKUNjg== 0001071992-06-000013.txt : 20061109 0001071992-06-000013.hdr.sgml : 20061109 20061109121014 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001071992-06-000013 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 6 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20060930 FILED AS OF DATE: 20061109 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20061109 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CAPITAL BANK CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001071992 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: STATE COMMERCIAL BANKS [6022] IRS NUMBER: 562101930 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NC FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-30062 FILM NUMBER: 061200420 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4901 GLENWOOD AVENUE CITY: RALEIGH STATE: NC ZIP: 27612 BUSINESS PHONE: 9196456312 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: PO BOX 18949 CITY: RALEIGH STATE: NC ZIP: 27619-8949 10-Q 1 form10-q.htm CAPITAL BANK CORP 10-Q 093006 Capital Bank Corp 10-Q 093006


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from                     to                    
 

 
CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


North Carolina
 
000-30062
 
56-2101930
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(Commission
File Number)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)

333 Fayetteville Street, Suite 700
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
(Address of principal executive offices)

(919) 645-6400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):

Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
 
As of November 8, 2006 there were 11,507,167 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, no par value.





Capital Bank Corporation
Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006

INDEX


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page No.
 
 
Item 1. Financial Statements
 
Condensed consolidated statements of financial condition at September 30, 2006 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2005
1
Condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)
2
Condensed consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)
3
Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)
4-5
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)
6-12
 
 
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
12-24
 
 
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
24
 
 
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
25
 
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
26
 
 
Item 1A. Risk Factors
26
 
 
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
28
 
 
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
28
 
 
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
28
 
 
Item 5. Other Information
28
 
 
Item 6. Exhibits
29
 
 
Signatures
30











Capital Bank Corporation

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
 
 
September 30, 2006
 
December 31, 2005
 
(Dollars in thousands except share data)
   
(Unaudited)
 
   
 
         
ASSETS
             
Cash and due from banks:
             
Interest earning
 
$
12,679
 
$
4,603
 
Noninterest earning
   
38,908
   
30,544
 
Cash held in escrow
   
-
   
33,185
 
Federal funds sold and short term investments
   
20,523
   
8,757
 
Investment securities - available for sale, at fair value
   
189,627
   
149,266
 
Investment securities - held to maturity, at amortized cost
   
11,020
   
12,334
 
Loans - net of unearned income and deferred fees
   
1,003,835
   
668,982
 
Allowance for loan losses
   
(13,894
)
 
(9,592
)
Net loans
   
989,941
   
659,390
 
Premises and equipment, net
   
23,354
   
14,868
 
Bank owned life insurance
   
20,408
   
19,857
 
Deposit premium and goodwill, net
   
66,616
   
12,853
 
Deferred tax assets
   
8,098
   
6,305
 
Other assets
   
18,499
   
15,249
 
Total assets
 
$
1,399,673
 
$
960,906
 
               
LIABILITIES
           
Deposits:
           
Demand, noninterest bearing
 
$
108,052
 
$
77,847
 
Savings and interest bearing demand deposits
   
355,932
   
237,005
 
Time deposits
   
579,771
   
383,628
 
Total deposits
   
1,043,755
   
698,480
 
Repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased
   
28,582
   
14,514
 
Borrowings
   
111,027
   
93,173
 
Short-term debt
   
-
   
30,000
 
Subordinated debentures
   
30,930
   
30,930
 
Other liabilities
   
24,508
   
10,317
 
Total liabilities
   
1,238,802
   
877,414
 
               
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
           
Common stock, no par value; 20,000,000 authorized; 11,507,167 and 6,852,156 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively
   
141,532
   
70,985
 
Retained earnings
   
21,180
   
14,179
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
   
(1,841
)
 
(1,672
)
Total shareholders’ equity
   
160,871
   
83,492
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,399,673
 
$
960,906
 

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

- 1 -


CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)

   
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
 
 
       
 
                 
Interest income:
                         
Loans and loan fees
 
$
19,982
 
$
10,993
 
$
55,646
 
$
31,140
 
Investment securities
   
2,223
   
1,720
   
6,488
   
5,144
 
Federal funds and other interest income
   
463
   
365
   
1,313
   
498
 
Total interest income
   
22,668
   
13,078
   
63,447
   
36,782
 
Interest expense:
                     
Deposits
   
8,677
   
4,157
   
22,115
   
11,015
 
Borrowings and repurchase agreements
   
2,398
   
1,492
   
6,741
   
4,272
 
Total interest expense
   
11,075
   
5,649
   
28,856
   
15,287
 
Net interest income
   
11,593
   
7,429
   
34,591
   
21,495
 
Provision (credit) for loan losses
   
(215
)
 
(113
)
 
446
   
(522
)
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses
   
11,808
   
7,542
   
34,145
   
22,017
 
Noninterest income:
                     
Service charges and other fees
   
895
   
771
   
2,921
   
2,142
 
Mortgage fees and revenues
   
507
   
554
   
1,525
   
1,212
 
Net gain on sale of securities
   
128
   
-
   
128
   
7
 
Bank owned life insurance
   
183
   
161
   
597
   
385
 
Other noninterest income
   
545
   
304
   
1,714
   
963
 
Total noninterest income
   
2,258
   
1,790
   
6,885
   
4,709
 
Noninterest expense:
                     
Salaries and employee benefits
   
4,287
   
3,536
   
13,680
   
10,164
 
Occupancy
   
1,044
   
666
   
2,760
   
1,906
 
Furniture and equipment
   
675
   
356
   
1,729
   
1,093
 
Director fees
   
369
   
325
   
1,028
   
717
 
Data processing
   
214
   
301
   
814
   
930
 
Advertising
   
234
   
217
   
813
   
596
 
Amortization of deposit premiums
   
342
   
53
   
1,028
   
160
 
Professional fees
   
290
   
207
   
856
   
739
 
Telecommunications
   
194
   
145
   
579
   
428
 
Other expenses
   
1,420
   
923
   
3,937
   
2,638
 
Total noninterest expense
   
9,069
   
6,729
   
27,224
   
19,371
 
Net income before tax expense
   
4,997
   
2,603
   
13,806
   
7,355
 
Income tax expense
   
1,730
   
869
   
4,725
   
2,463
 
Net income
 
$
3,267
 
$
1,734
 
$
9,081
 
$
4,892
 
 
                     
Earnings per share - basic
 
$
0.28
 
$
0.26
 
$
0.78
 
$
0.72
 
Earnings per share - diluted
 
$
0.28
 
$
0.25
 
$
0.78
 
$
0.71
 
 
                     
Weighted average shares:
                     
Basic
   
11,611,476
   
6,800,813
   
11,622,442
   
6,762,292
 
Fully diluted
   
11,694,498
   
6,904,321
   
11,708,446
   
6,905,809
 

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 

- 2 -


CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)

 
 
Shares of
Common Stock
 
Common
Stock
 
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
 
(Dollars in thousands except share data)
                     
 
                     
Balance at January 1, 2005
   
6,612,787
 
$
68,341
 
$
305
 
$
9,092
 
$
77,738
 
Repurchase of outstanding common stock
   
(50,000
)
 
(892
)
 
-
   
-
   
(892
)
Issuance of common stock for services
   
99,258
   
1,588
   
-
   
-
   
1,588
 
Issuance of common stock for options exercised
   
133,659
   
1,241
   
-
   
-
   
1,241
 
Net income
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
4,892
   
4,892
 
Other comprehensive loss
               
(1,100
)
       
(1,100
)
Comprehensive income
                           
3,792
 
Dividends ($0.18 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(1,199
)
 
(1,199
)
Balance at September 30, 2005
   
6,795,704
 
$
70,278
 
$
(795
)
$
12,785
 
$
82,268
 
 
                     
 
                     
Balance at January 1, 2006
   
6,852,156
 
$
70,985
 
$
(1,672
)
$
14,179
 
$
83,492
 
Repurchase of outstanding common stock
   
(309,721
)
 
(5,038
)
 
-
   
-
   
(5,038
)
Issuance of common stock for acquisition of 1st State Bancorp, Inc.
   
4,882,630
   
74,499
   
-
   
-
   
74,499
 
Issuance of common stock for options exercised
   
82,102
   
951
   
-
   
-
   
951
 
Noncash compensation
   
-
   
135
   
-
   
-
   
135
 
Net income
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
9,081
   
9,081
 
Other comprehensive loss
               
(169
)
       
(169
)
Comprehensive income
                           
8,912
 
Dividends ($0.18 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(2,080
)
 
(2,080
)
Balance at September 30, 2006
   
11,507,167
 
$
141,532
 
$
(1,841
)
$
21,180
 
$
160,871
 

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


- 3 -


CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)

 
 
2006
 
2005
 
(Dollars in thousands)
         
 
         
Cash flows from operating activities:
         
Net income
 
$
9,081
 
$
4,892
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
           
Amortization of deposit premium
   
1.028
   
160
 
Depreciation
   
1,624
   
1,082
 
Net gains on sale of securities available for sale
   
(128
)
 
(7
)
(Gain) loss on disposal of premises, equipment and real estate owned
   
(124
)
 
-
 
Change in held for sale loans, net
   
(3,890
)
 
(5,310
)
Amortization of premiums on securities, net
   
104
   
235
 
Deferred income tax expense
   
4,705
   
794
 
Issuance of stock for compensation
   
-
   
1,588
 
Provision (credit) for loan losses
   
446
   
(522
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
           
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
   
3,024
   
(6,941
)
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
   
11,220
   
(78
)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
   
27,090
   
(4,107
)
 
         
Cash flows from investing activities:
         
Loan (originations) repayments, net
   
(97,506
)
 
11,958
 
Additions to premises and equipment
   
(4,094
)
 
(1,984
)
Net (purchase) sales of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
   
543
   
(47
)
Purchase of securities available for sale
   
(69,690
)
 
(24,262
)
Purchase of securities held to maturity
   
-
   
(1,560
)
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
   
12,542
   
16,370
 
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
   
125,992
   
4,399
 
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity
   
1,324
   
2,273
 
Net cash paid in merger transaction
   
(37,541
)
 
-
 
Proceeds from sales of premises, equipment and real estate owned
   
1,231
   
726
 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
   
(67,199
)
 
7,873
 
 
         
Cash flows from financing activities:
         
Net increase in deposits
   
73,239
   
48,207
 
Net increase (decrease) in repurchase agreements
   
14,068
   
(4,135
)
Net decrease in borrowings
   
(16,290
)
 
(3,795
)
Repayment of short-term debt
   
(30,000
)
 
-
 
Distribution of cash held in escrow
   
33,185
   
-
 
Dividends paid
   
(1,800
)
 
(1,188
)
Issuance of common stock for options and other plans
   
951
   
1,241
 
Repurchase of common stock
   
(5,038
)
 
(892
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
   
68,315
   
39,438
 
 
         
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
   
28,206
   
43,204
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
   
43,904
   
23,011
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 
$
72,110
 
$
66,215
 
(continued on next page)
   

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

- 4 -


CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)
 
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
(Dollars in thousands)
         
 
         
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
         
               
Transfer of loans and premises and equipment to other real estate owned
 
$
2,866
 
$
1,417
 
Dividends payable
 
$
691
 
$
408
 
Cash paid for:
           
Income taxes
 
$
371
 
$
2,379
 
Interest
 
$
28,230
 
$
15,123
 
 
         
Acquisition of 1st State Bancorp:
         
Fair value of assets acquired
 
$
430,131
 
$
-
 
Issuance of common stock
 
$
74,499
 
$
-
 
Cash paid, including transaction costs
 
$
46,639
 
$
-
 
Liabilities assumed
 
$
308,993
 
$
-
 

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



- 5 -


Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Significant Accounting Policies and Interim Reporting

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Capital Bank Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Capital Bank (the “Bank”). In addition, the Company has interests in three trusts, Capital Bank Statutory Trust I, II, and III (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Trusts”). The Trusts have not been consolidated with the financial statements of the Company. The interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by such accounting principles for complete financial statements and therefore should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities as well as the amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included and all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity as previously reported. The results of operations for the three and nine months period ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended.

The accounting policies followed are as set forth in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). The Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions and requires the Company to recognize management’s best estimate of the impact of a tax position only if it is considered “more likely than not,” as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“ SFAS”) No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, of being sustained on audit based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. FIN 48 is effective as of the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of FIN 48, but does not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (“SFAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 157 and determining how this framework for measuring fair value will affect the Company’s current accounting policies and procedures and our financial statements. The Company has not determined whether the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (“SFAS No. 158”). SFAS No. 158 requires employers to recognize a net liability or asset and an offsetting adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income to report the funded status of defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. SFAS No. 158 requires prospective application; thus, the recognition and disclosure requirements are effective for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2006. Additionally, SFAS No. 158 requires companies to measure plan assets and obligations at their year-end balance sheet date. This requirement is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending after December 31, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of SFAS No. 158, but does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 158 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

- 6 -


 
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 provides guidance on how prior year misstatements should be taken into consideration when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements for purposes of determining whether the current year’s financial statements are materially misstated. SAB 108 permits registrants to record the cumulative effect of initial adoption by recording the necessary “correcting” adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that year with the offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings only if material under the dual method. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending on or after November 15, 2006. The Company does not expect the adoption of SAB 108 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

From time to time, the FASB issues exposure drafts for proposed statements of financial accounting standards. Such exposure drafts are subject to comment from the public, to revisions by the FASB and to final issuance by the FASB as statements of financial accounting standards. The Company considers the effect of the proposed statements on the financial statements of the Company and monitors the status of changes to and proposed effective dates of exposure drafts.

2.  Acquisition of 1st State Bancorp

On January 3, 2006, the Company completed its acquisition of all the outstanding capital stock of 1st State Bancorp, Inc. (“1st State Bancorp”), the holding company for 1st State Bank. (“1st State Bank”). The total purchase price was approximately $121.1 million, including transaction costs of $6.3 million. The Company issued approximately 4.9 million shares of common stock and paid $40.3 million in cash in exchange for 100% of 1st State Bancorp’s outstanding common stock and stock options. The transaction was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

An unaudited summary of the preliminary estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows:
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
     
 
     
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses
 
$
230,600
 
Investment securities
   
110,007
 
Premises and equipment
   
7,925
 
Deposit premium
   
5,331
 
Goodwill
   
49,460
 
Other assets
   
26,808
 
Deposits
   
(272,037
)
Borrowings
   
(34,144
)
Other liabilities
   
(2,812
)
Investment in subsidiary, net of dividends to shareholders and capitalized acquisition costs
 
$
121,138
 

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of the Company and 1st State Bancorp as if the merger had occurred as of the beginning of the period for each period presented. The pro forma financial information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have occurred had the Company and 1st State Bancorp constituted a single entity during such periods.

 
 
Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2005
 
Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2005
 
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
         
 
         
Net interest income
 
$
10,435
 
$
30,262
 
Noninterest income
 
$
2,263
 
$
6,138
 
Noninterest expense
 
$
9,251
 
$
26,985
 
Net income
 
$
2,194
 
$
6,079
 
Net income per common share - basic
 
$
0.19
 
$
0.52
 
Net income per common share - diluted
 
$
0.19
 
$
0.52
 


- 7 -


3.  Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes net income and all other changes to the Company’s equity, with the exception of transactions with shareholders (“other comprehensive income”). The Company’s comprehensive income for the nine months periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are as shown in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited). The Company’s only components of other comprehensive income relate to unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, net of the applicable income tax effect and are as follows:

 
 
2006
 
2005
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
(Unaudited)
 
         
Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
         
Unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities
 
$
2,438
 
$
(1,060
)
Reclassification of gains recognized in net income
   
(128
)
 
-
 
Income tax benefit (expense)
   
(891
)
 
408
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
$
1,419
 
$
(652
)
 
         
Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
         
Unrealized losses on available for sale securities
 
$
(147
)
$
(1,783
)
Reclassification of gains recognized in net income
   
(128
)
 
(7
)
Income tax benefit
   
106
   
690
 
Other comprehensive loss
 
$
(169
)
$
(1,100
)

4.  Earnings Per Share

The Company is required to report both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS assumes the conversion, exercise or issuance of all potential common stock instruments, such as stock options, unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase earnings per share. For the Company, EPS is adjusted for outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method in order to compute diluted EPS. The following tables provide a computation and reconciliation of basic and diluted EPS for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively:

 
 
2006
 
2005
 
(Dollars in thousands except share data)
 
(Unaudited)
 
         
Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
         
Income available to shareholders - basic and diluted
 
$
3,267
 
$
1,734
 
Shares used in the computation of earnings per share:
         
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic
   
11,611,476
   
6,800,813
 
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock options
   
83,022
   
103,508
 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted
   
11,694,498
   
6,904,321
 
 
         
               
Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
         
Income available to shareholders - basic and diluted
 
$
9,081
 
$
4,892
 
Shares used in the computation of earnings per share:
         
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic
   
11,622,442
   
6,762,292
 
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock options
   
86,004
   
143,517
 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted
   
11,708,446
   
6,905,809
 

For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, options to purchase approximately 345,470 shares and 458,015 shares, respectively, of common stock were used in the diluted calculation. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, options to purchase approximately 65,250 shares and 80,850 shares, respectively, of common stock were not included in the diluted calculation because the option price exceeded the average fair market value of the associated shares of common stock.

- 8 -


5. Stock-Based Compensation
 
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payments (“SFAS No. 123R”), using the modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized in 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”) and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company began recognizing the cost of all new employee share-based awards on a straight-line basis over their respective vesting periods, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company previously accounted for stock options using the intrinsic value method in accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and SFAS No. 123. Under SFAS No. 123, the Company was required to disclose the pro forma effects on net income as if it had recorded compensation based on the fair value of options granted. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005, the Company disclosed net income and earnings per share, as reported and pro forma, as follows:
 
Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2005
 
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
As reported
 
$
1,734
 
 
 
 
Pro forma
 
$
1,701
 
Net income per share - basic
 
 
As reported
 
$
0.26
 
 
 
 
Pro forma
 
$
0.25
 
Net income per share - diluted
 
 
As reported
 
$
0.25
 
 
 
 
Pro forma
 
$
0.25
 
 
Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2005
 
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
As reported
 
$
4,892
 
 
 
 
Pro forma
 
$
4,773
 
Net income per share - basic
 
 
As reported
 
$
0.72
 
 
 
 
Pro forma
 
$
0.71
 
Net income per share - diluted
 
 
As reported
 
$
0.71
 
 
 
 
Pro forma
 
$
0.70
 
 
On December 29, 2005, the Compensation/Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the acceleration of vesting of all the outstanding unvested stock options awarded under the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan. As a result, options to purchase 67,200 shares of the Company’s common stock, which would otherwise have vested from time to time over the next five years, became immediately exercisable on December 30, 2005. As a result of the acceleration of vesting, approximately $331,000 of future compensation expense that would have been recognized in operating results under SFAS No. 123R over the next five years was eliminated. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 123R did not have a material impact on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

The Company has stock option plans providing for the issuance of up to 650,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock to officers and directors. At September 30, 2006, options for 186,709 shares of common stock remained available for future issuance. In addition, there were approximately 567,000 options which were assumed under various plans from previously acquired financial institutions, of which approximately 138,666 remain outstanding. Grants of options are made by the Board of Directors or its Compensation/Human Resources Committee. All grants must be at no less than fair market value on the date of grant, must be exercised no later than 10 years from the date of grant, and may be subject to certain vesting provisions. There were no new stock option grants in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and all options outstanding as of September 30, 2006 were fully vested.


- 9 -


The Company also administers the Capital Bank Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (“Deferred Compensation Plan”). Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, eligible directors may elect to defer all or part of their directors’ fees for a calendar year, in exchange for common stock of the Company, based on the year-end share price. The amount deferred, if elected, is equal to 125 percent of their total director’s fees. Each participant is fully vested in his account balance. The Deferred Compensation Plan generally provides for payment of share units either in shares of Company common stock or cash (at the Company’s option) after the participant ceases to serve as a director for any reason. The Deferred Compensation Plan is classified as a liability-based plan under SFAS No. 123R. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006, the Company recognized $86,000 and $181,000, respectively, of share-based expense related to the Deferred Compensation Plan.

The following is a summary of stock option information and the weighted average exercise price (“WAEP”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
 
 
 
Shares
 
WAEP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
   
495,822
 
$
11.65
 
Granted
   
-
   
-
 
Exercised
   
(82,102
)
 
11.59
 
Terminated
   
(12,832
)
 
10.57
 
Outstanding at September 30, 2006
   
400,888
 
$
11.69
 
 
         
Options exercisable at September 30, 2006
   
400,888
 
$
11.69
 

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s stock options at September 30, 2006:
 
Exercise Price
 
Number
Outstanding
 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
in Years
 
 
Number
Exercisable
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$6.62 - $9.00
   
135,538
   
3.67
   
135,538
 
$9.01 - $12.00
   
102,223
   
4.59
   
102,223
 
$12.01 - $15.00
   
33,750
   
2.27
   
33,750
 
$15.01 - $18.00
   
69,127
   
6.47
   
69,127
 
$18.01 - $18.37
   
60,250
   
8.24
   
60,250
 
 
   
400,888
   
4.95
   
400,888
 

The fair values of the options granted prior to January 1, 2006 had been estimated on the date of the grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Option pricing models require the use of highly subjective assumptions, including expected stock volatility, which when changed can materially affect fair value estimates. The expected life of the options used in this calculation was the period the options are expected to be outstanding. Expected stock price volatility was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock for a period approximating the expected life, the expected dividend yield was based on the Company’s historical annual dividend payout, and the risk-free rate was based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury issues. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the determining fair value for options granted in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively:

 
 
2006
 
2005
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividend yield
   
-
   
1.31
%
Expected volatility
   
-
   
27.17
%
Risk-free interest rate
   
-
   
4.03
%
Expected life
   
-
   
7 years
 


- 10 -


6. Investment Securities

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2006:
 
 
 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or Greater
 
Total
 
   
Fair Value
 
Unrealized Losses
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized Losses
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized Losses
 
 (Dollars in thousands)
                                     
 
                         
Description of Security
                         
Available for sale
                         
Direct obligations of U.S. government agencies
 
$
22,509
 
$
74
 
$
36,160
 
$
977
 
$
58,669
 
$
1,051
 
Municipal bonds
   
7,814
   
28
   
3,940
   
111
   
11,754
   
139
 
Mortgage-backed securities
   
11,867
   
66
   
58,488
   
2,044
   
70,355
   
2,110
 
 
   
42,190
   
168
   
98,588
   
3,132
   
140,778
   
3,300
 
Held to maturity
                         
Direct obligations of U.S. government agencies
   
-
   
-
   
3,895
   
101
   
3,895
   
101
 
Municipal bonds
   
-
   
-
   
286
   
14
   
286
   
14
 
Mortgage-backed securities
   
-
   
-
   
6,495
   
228
   
6,495
   
228
 
 
   
-
   
-
   
10,676
   
343
   
10,676
   
343
 
Total at September 30, 2006
 
$
42,190
 
$
168
 
$
109,264
 
$
3,475
 
$
151,454
 
$
3,643
 

The unrealized losses on the Company‘s investments in direct obligations of U.S. government agencies and mortgage-backed securities were primarily the result of interest rate changes. Mortgage-backed securities include securities issued by government agencies and corporate entities. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity. Accordingly, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2006.

7. Loans

The composition of the loan portfolio by loan classification at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is as follows:

 
 
September 30, 2006
 
December 31, 2005
 
(Dollars in thousands)
         
 
         
Commercial
 
$
825,122
 
$
555,198
 
Consumer
   
35,621
   
26,222
 
Home equity lines
   
88,806
   
65,566
 
Residential mortgages
   
54,219
   
21,863
 
 
   
1,003,768
   
668,849
 
Plus deferred loan costs, net
   
67
   
133
 
 
 
$
1,003,835
 
$
668,982
 

Loans held for sale as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $8.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively, and were included in the residential mortgage category.

8. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

To meet the financial needs of its customers, the Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business. These financial instruments are comprised of unused lines of credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.

- 11 -


The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company, upon extension of credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies but may include trade accounts receivable, property, plant, and equipment and income-producing commercial properties. Since many unused lines of credit expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The Company’s exposure to credit risk was as follows:
 
 
September 30, 2006
 
December 31, 2005
 
(Dollars in thousands)
         
 
         
Unused lines of credit
 
$
280,747
 
$
188,170
 
Standby letters of credit
   
6,412
   
8,563
 
Total commitments
 
$
287,159
 
$
196,733
 


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion presents an overview of the unaudited financial statements for the three and nine months periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 for Capital Bank Corporation (the “Company”) and it’s wholly owned subsidiary, Capital Bank (the “Bank”). This discussion and analysis is intended to provide pertinent information concerning financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources for the periods covered and should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and related footnotes contained in Part I, Item 1. of this report.

Information set forth below contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which statements represent the Company’s judgment concerning the future and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual operating results to differ materially. Such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” or “continue,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. The Company cautions that such forward-looking statements are further qualified by important factors that could cause the Company’s actual operating results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, as well as the factors set forth in Part II, Item 1A of this report, and the Company’s periodic reports and other filings with the SEC.

Overview

The Bank is a full-service state chartered community bank conducting business throughout North Carolina. The Bank’s business consists principally of attracting deposits from the general public and investing these funds in loans secured by commercial real estate, secured and unsecured commercial and consumer loans, single-family residential mortgage loans, and home equity lines. As a community bank, the Bank’s profitability depends primarily upon its levels of net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. When interest-earning assets approximate or exceed interest-bearing liabilities, any positive interest rate spread will generate net interest income. The Bank’s profitability is also affected by its provision for loan losses, noninterest income, and other operating expenses. Noninterest income primarily consists of miscellaneous service charges and ATM fees, fees generated from originating mortgage loans that are sold and the increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance. Operating expenses primarily consist of compensation and benefits, occupancy related expenses, advertising, data processing, professional fees, telecommunication and other expenses.

The Bank’s operations are influenced significantly by local economic conditions and by policies of financial institution regulatory authorities. The Bank’s cost of funds is influenced by interest rates on competing investments and by rates offered on similar investments by competing financial institutions in our market area, as well as general market interest rates. Lending activities are affected by the demand for financing, which in turn is affected by the prevailing interest rates.


- 12 -


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended, on pages 40-46. These policies are important in understanding management’s discussion and analysis. Some of the Company’s accounting policies require the Company to make estimates and judgments regarding uncertainties that may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.

The Company has identified five accounting policies as being critical in terms of significant judgments and the extent to which estimates are used: allowance for loan losses, investments, valuation allowances, goodwill and the impairment of long-lived assets. In many cases, there are several alternative judgments that could be used in the estimation process. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For more information on the Company’s critical accounting policies, refer to pages 17-18 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended.

Executive Summary

As discussed in more detail below, the following is a brief summary of our significant results for the quarter ended September 30, 2006:

 
l
The Company reported net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of $3.3 million compared to $1.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Fully diluted earnings per share were $0.28 and $0.25 for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

 
l
The increase in net income was primarily due to a $4.2 million increase in net interest income, which reflects the addition of the assets and liabilities acquired in the 1st State Bancorp merger transaction and a 34 basis point increase in the net interest margin, offset by a $2.3 million increase in noninterest expenses, which includes the costs associated with the assimilation of 1st State Bancorp’s employees and operations into the Company.

 
l
The credit for loan losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was $215,000 compared to a credit in the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of $113,000. The decrease in the credit for loan losses is primarily due to net recoveries for the quarter offset by the estimated inherent losses associated with the net growth in the loan portfolio during the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Net recoveries for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 were $102,000, or 0.04% of average loans, compared to net charge-offs of $118,000, or 0.07% of average loans, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

 
l
Net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 rose to $11.6 million, a 56.1% increase over the $7.4 million reported in the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The Company’s net interest margin widened to 3.91%, a 34 basis point increase over the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The increase in net interest income is primarily due to the incremental effects of 1st State Bancorp’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, higher organic loan and deposit growth for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and the current level of interest rates.

 
l
Noninterest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 increased $0.5 million to $2.3 million compared to $1.8 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2005. This increase is primarily due to higher service charges and other fees as a result of a higher volume of transaction accounts, including those acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction, $208,000 related to distributions from two limited partner investments, and $128,000 in net gains realized on the sale of investment securities.

 
l
Noninterest expense was $9.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to $6.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The increase is primarily due to higher salaries and employee benefits, which increased by $0.8 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The increase in salaries and employee benefits was primarily due to an increase in the number of personnel employed by the Company as a result of the 1st State Bancorp transaction and the transition to in-house operations as well as higher costs associated with the Company’s growth.


- 13 -


Financial Condition

Total consolidated assets of the Company at September 30, 2006 were $1.4 billion compared to $960.9 million at December 31, 2005, an increase of $438.8 million, or approximately 46%. The increase in total consolidated assets for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 is primarily due to a $330.6 million increase in the Bank’s loan portfolio, net of the allowance for loan losses, since December 31, 2005, which includes $230.6 million of net loans acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction. Total deposits as of September 30, 2006 were $1.04 billion, which represents growth of $345.3 million from December 31, 2005 and includes $267.0 million of total deposits acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction.
 
Total earning assets were $1.24 billion at September 30, 2006 compared to $843.9 million at December 31, 2005. Earning assets represented 88.4% and 87.8% of total assets as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. At September 30, 2006, investment securities were $200.6 million, which includes $7.8 million of investment securities acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction, compared to $161.6 million at December 31, 2005, an increase of $39.0 million due to new investment security purchases. Interest-earning cash, federal funds sold and short term investments were $33.2 million at September 30, 2006, an increase of $19.8 million from December 31, 2005. The Company has increased its holdings of short-term investment assets to maintain liquidity for loan fundings and future commitments. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had $33.1 million of cash held in escrow, which represented funds the Company was required to deposit with its transfer agent for payment to 1st State Bancorp shareholders as cash consideration in connection with the 1st State Bancorp merger transaction. Earning assets exclude bank owned life insurance, which increased from $19.9 million at December 31, 2005 to $20.4 million at September 30, 2006 due to the increase in cash surrender values.

The allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2006 was $13.9 million and represented approximately 1.38% of total loans at September 30, 2006. The allowance for loan losses increased $4.3 million from the December 31, 2005 balance of $9.6 million. The increase is primarily due to the addition of 1st State Bank’s $7.6 million allowance for loan losses offset by $3.8 million of net charge-offs during the first nine months of 2006. Management believes that the amount of the allowance is adequate to absorb the estimated probable losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. See “Asset Quality” for further discussion of the allowance for loan losses.

Total deposits as of September 30, 2006 were $1.04 billion, an increase of $345.3 million, or 49.4%, from December 31, 2005. The increase was primarily due to the infusion of $267.0 million of deposits acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction and organic deposit growth as a result of the Company’s focus on growing core deposits. As of September 30, 2006, the Company experienced an increase of $160.6 million, or 45.6%, in certificates of deposit (“CDs”) compared to December 31, 2005, which includes $139.8 million of CDs acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction. Total time deposits represented 55.5% of total deposits at September 30, 2006 compared to 54.9% at December 31, 2005. The Company introduced a new high yield checking account product, Smart Checking, during the second quarter of 2006. This product is designed to generate higher debit card interchange income to offset the higher yield offered. As of September 30, 2006, there were 3,178 Smart Checking accounts and $13.3 million of deposits associated with this new product.

Noninterest bearing demand deposit accounts (“DDA”) were $108.1 million at September 30, 2006, an increase of $30.2 million, or 38.8%, from December 31, 2005, which includes $19.8 million of noninterest bearing deposits acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction. The average balance of noninterest DDA accounts was $99.6 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to $76.7 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

Total consolidated shareholders’ equity was $160.9 million as of September 30, 2006, an increase of $77.4 million from December 31, 2005. The Company issued 4.9 million shares of common stock valued at $74.5 million in connection with the 1st State Bancorp transaction. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, the Company repurchased 309,721 shares of its common stock at an aggregate cost of $5.0 million. See Part II - Other Information, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for more information on the Company’s share repurchases. Retained earnings increased by $7.0 million reflecting $9.1 million of net income for the nine months period ended September 30, 2006 less $2.1 million of dividends paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Accumulated other comprehensive loss, which represents the unrealized loss on available for sale securities, net of related tax benefits, was $1.8 million, an increase of $0.2 million for the nine months period ended September 30, 2006, which is due to the effect that rising interest rates have on the fair value of the Company’s investment security portfolio. See Item 1. Financial Statements - Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for additional information.

- 14 -


Results of Operations

Quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to quarter ended September 30, 2005

For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company reported net income of $3.3 million, or $0.28 per diluted share, compared to net income of $1.7 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Net income increased by $1.5 million primarily due to higher loan and deposit balances on which net interest income and noninterest income are generated offset by higher operating expenses. The increased balances were primarily the result of the 1st State Bancorp transaction combined with organic loan and deposit growth. The Company’s net interest margin also improved in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as a result of the higher interest rates and the Company’s asset-sensitive position. The net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 decreased by 13 basis points compared to the net interest margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The Company expects further net interest margin compression in the near term and is taking steps to mitigate its exposure to interest rate volatility, including entering into a three year $100 million (notional) interest rate swap transaction in October 2006 that will be accounted for as a cash flow hedge.

Net interest income increased $4.2 million, or 56.1%, from $7.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, to $11.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Average earning assets increased $369.0 million to $1.21 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 from $844.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $339.7 million to $1.09 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 from $753.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis increased by 34 basis points to 3.91% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 from 3.57% for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The earned yield on average interest earnings assets was 7.53% and 6.22% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, while the interest rate on average interest bearing liabilities for those periods was 4.02% and 2.97%, respectively. The increase in the net interest margin is primarily attributed to increases in the benchmark federal funds rates as determined by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (“FOMC”). The Company’s balance sheet remains asset sensitive and, as a result, its interest earning assets reprice faster than its interest bearing liabilities. The Company cannot be certain of the direction of the benchmark federal funds rates as set by the FOMC. The FOMC did not change the benchmark federal funds rate during the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The Company expects its effective cost of interest bearing liabilities will increase during the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as a result of increased competition for funds in the Company’s primary markets.

The following table shows the Company’s effective yield on earning assets and cost of funds. Yields and costs are computed by dividing income or expense for the year by the respective daily average asset or liability balance.


- 15 -


Average Balances, Interest Earned or Paid, and Interest Yields/Rates
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
Taxable Equivalent Basis 1
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
(Dollars in thousands)
   
Average Balance
   
Amount Earned
   
Average Rate
   
Average Balance
   
Amount Earned
   
Average Rate
 
 
                         
Assets
                         
Loans receivable: 2
                         
Commercial
 
$
806,005
 
$
16,432
   
8.09
%
$
519,300
 
$
8,920
   
6.81
%
Consumer
   
30,910
   
701
   
9.00
%
 
31,686
   
635
   
7.95
%
Home equity
   
90,618
   
1,965
   
8.60
%
 
60,697
   
1,011
   
6.61
%
Residential mortgages 3
   
54,504
   
882
   
6.42
%
 
26,060
   
427
   
6.50
%
Total loans
   
982,037
   
19,980
   
8.07
%
 
637,743
   
10,993
   
6.84
%
Investment securities 4 
   
195,323
   
2,586
   
5.25
%
 
162,282
   
1,884
   
4.61
%
Federal funds sold and other interest on short-term investments
   
35,642
   
463
   
5.15
%
 
43,967
   
365
   
3.29
%
Total interest earning assets
   
1,213,002
 
$
23,029
   
7.53
%
 
843,992
 
$
13,242
   
6.22
%
Cash and due from banks
   
32,094
           
24,759
         
Other assets
   
133,897
           
63,453
         
Allowance for loan losses
   
(13,161
)
         
(10,062
)
       
Total assets
 
$
1,365,832
         
$
922,142
         
 
                         
Liabilities and Equity
                         
Savings deposits
 
$
38,137
 
$
48
   
0.50
%
$
16,831
 
$
22
   
0.52
%
Interest-bearing demand deposits
   
304,355
   
2,521
   
3.29
%
 
213,824
   
1,090
   
2.02
%
Time deposits
   
578,018
   
6,107
   
4.19
%
 
389,925
   
3,045
   
3.10
%
Total interest-bearing deposits
   
920,510
   
8,676
   
3.74
%
 
620,580
   
4,157
   
2.66
%
Borrowed funds
   
110,164
   
1,402
   
5.05
%
 
99,648
   
1,073
   
4.27
%
Subordinated debt
   
30,930
   
619
   
7.94
%
 
20,620
   
331
   
6.37
%
Repurchase agreements
   
31,562
   
378
   
4.75
%
 
12,605
   
88
   
2.77
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
   
1,093,166
 
$
11,075
   
4.02
%
 
753,453
 
$
5,649
   
2.97
%
Noninterest-bearing deposits
   
99,633
           
76,731
         
Other liabilities
   
11,132
           
10,352
         
Total liabilities
   
1,203,931
           
840,536
         
Shareholders’ equity
   
161,901
           
81,606
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,365,832
         
$
922,142
         
 
                         
Net interest spread 5 
           
3.51
%
         
3.25
%
Tax equivalent adjustment
     
$
363
         
$
164
     
Net interest income and net interest margin 6 
     
$
11,954
   
3.91
%
   
$
7,593
   
3.57
%

1 The taxable equivalent basis is computed using a blended federal and state tax rate of approximately 38%.
2 Loans receivable include nonaccrual loans for which accrual of interest has not been recorded.
3 Includes loans held for sale.
4 The average balance for investment securities excludes the effect of their mark-to-market adjustment, if any.
5 Net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
6 Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

- 16 -


Interest income on loans increased from $11.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 to $20.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to higher average loan balances, which increased by $344.3 million primarily due to loan balances acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction and organic loan growth, and higher loan yields. Yields on commercial, consumer, and home equity increased 128 basis points, 105 basis points and 199 basis points, respectively, in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Higher yields in 2006 reflect the increase in the prime rate charged by the Bank between those two periods. Variable rate loans made up approximately 70% of the total loan portfolio at September 30, 2006 and 2005.

Interest income on investment securities increased from $1.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 to $2.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to an increase in average balances outstanding between the periods, which increased by $33.0 million. The yield on investment securities on a tax-equivalent basis increased from 4.61% in the quarter ended September 30, 2005 to 5.25% in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to higher yields on new investment securities purchases as a result of the higher interest rate environment in 2006 compared to 2005.

Interest expense on deposits increased from $4.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 to $8.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to an increase in the average balance of interest bearing deposits outstanding, which increased $299.9 million primarily due to deposit balances acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction and organic deposit growth, and higher deposit rates. The average rate paid on time deposits increased from 3.10% for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 to 4.19% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, a 109 basis point rise, as new certificates were opened at higher rates due to the rising interest rate environment. Rates on shorter maturity CDs have increased significantly with the FOMC interest rate increases and management anticipates the Bank’s CD funding costs will continue to increase in the fourth quarter of 2006.

Interest expense on borrowings increased from $1.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 to $2.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The increase is primarily due to higher outstanding borrowing and subordinated debt balances and an increase in interest rates. The rate on borrowings and subordinated debentures for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 increased to 5.05% and 7.94%, respectively, from 4.27% and 6.37%, respectively, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. In July of 2003, the Bank entered into interest rate swap agreements on $25.0 million of its outstanding Federal Home Loan Bank advances to swap fixed rate borrowings to a variable rate. In the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the net effect of the swaps was a reduction of interest expense, however, as a result of the significant increase in short-term interest rates, the net effect of the swaps was an increase in interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. As short-term interest rates have increased following the FOMC rate increases, the overall effective rate on both borrowings and subordinated debt has increased.

For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the credit for loan losses was $215,000 compared to a credit of $113,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of $102,000. The decrease in the credit for loan losses was primarily due to net recoveries of $102,000 and the estimated inherent losses associated with the net growth in the loan portfolio during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and other factors as discussed more fully below under “Asset Quality.” Net charge-offs (recoveries) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 were ($102,000), or (0.04%) of average loans, compared to $118,000, or 0.07% of average loans, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

Noninterest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was $2.3 million compared to $1.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, an increase of $0.5 million. This increase was primarily due to a $124,000 increase in service charges and other fees as a result of a higher volume of transaction accounts, which were acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction, $208,000 related to distributions from two limited partner investments and $128,000 of net capital gains generated from investment security sales.

Noninterest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was $9.1 million compared to $6.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Salaries and employee benefits, representing the largest noninterest expense category, increased to $4.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, from $3.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of personnel employed by the Company as a result of the 1st State Bancorp transaction and the transition to in-house operations and increased benefit costs, offset by reductions in incentive compensation and supplemental retirement plan accruals. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had 322 full-time equivalent employees compared to 247 at September 30, 2005 and 256 at December 31, 2005.


- 17 -


Occupancy costs, the second largest component of noninterest expenses, increased $378,000 to $1.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 from $666,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The increase is primarily due to expenses associated with branches acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction and higher rent expense related to the Company’s new headquarters. Furniture and equipment expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 increased $319,000 from the same period in 2005 primarily due to higher equipment maintenance costs associated with the increase in branch locations and higher depreciation associated with computer equipment acquired for the Company’s operations center. Data processing expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 decreased $87,000 from the same period in 2005 primarily due to a reduction in external item processing costs as a result of bringing operations in-house in 2006. The Company anticipates data processing costs will continue to decrease in future periods as a result of consolidating the transaction processing at its operations center in Burlington, North Carolina.

Deposit premium amortization for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 increased $289,000 from the same period in 2005 primarily as a result of the deposit premium intangible associated with the 1st State Bancorp transaction, which was valued at $5.3 million as of the closing date and is being amortized over eight years. Professional fees for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 increased $83,000 from the same period in 2005 primarily due to higher legal fees and consulting expenses. Other expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 increased $497,000 from the same period in 2005 primarily due to increased costs associated with operational losses, travel and entertainment and office supplies and printing, which increased by $111,000, $122,000 and $103,000, respectively.

The Company’s effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was 34.6% compared to 33.4% for the same period in 2005. The increase in the effective rate is primarily due to lower proportion of tax exempt income to taxable income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Income tax expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $1.7 million and $0.9 million respectively. The Company forecasts its taxable and non-taxable income and calculates the effective tax rate for the entire year, which is then applied to the three month period.

Results of Operations

Nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, the Company reported net income of $9.1 million, or $0.78 per diluted share, compared to net income of $4.9 million, or $0.71 per diluted share, for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. Net income increased by $4.2 million primarily due to higher net interest income, which increased as a result of higher loan and deposit balances acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction and organic loan and deposit growth, an improved net interest margin and higher noninterest income offset by higher noninterest expenses.

Net interest income increased $13.1 million, or 60.9%, from $21.5 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005, to $34.6 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. Average earning assets increased $353.4 million to $1.18 billion for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 from $827.8 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $317.4 million to $1.06 billion for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 from $740.2 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. The net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis increased 45 basis points to 4.00% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 from 3.55% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. The earned yield on average interest earnings assets was 7.27% and 6.02% for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, while the interest rate on average interest bearing liabilities for those same periods was 3.65% and 2.76%, respectively. The increase in the net interest margin is primarily due to higher loan yields, which increased from 6.44% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 to 7.80% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 offset partially by higher deposits interest rates, which increased from 2.44% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 to 3.33% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. The increase in loan yields and deposit interest rates is primarily attributed to increases in the benchmark federal funds rates as determined by the FOMC.

The following table shows the Company’s effective yield on earning assets and cost of funds. Yields and costs are computed by dividing income or expense for the year by the respective daily average asset or liability balance.


- 18 -


Average Balances, Interest Earned or Paid, and Interest Yields/Rates
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
Taxable Equivalent Basis 1
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
(Dollars in thousands)
   
Average Balance
   
Amount Earned
   
Average Rate
   
Average Balance
   
Amount Earned
   
Average Rate
 
 
                         
Assets
                         
Loans receivable: 2
                         
Commercial
 
$
772,893
 
$
45,211
   
7,82
%
$
527,204
 
$
25,316
   
6.42
%
Consumer
   
30,272
   
1,977
   
8.73
%
 
31,606
   
1,796
   
7.60
%
Home equity
   
95,696
   
5,754
   
8.04
%
 
61,455
   
2,839
   
6.18
%
Residential mortgages 3
   
54,608
   
2,704
   
6.62
%
 
25,882
   
1,189
   
6.14
%
Total loans
   
953,469
   
55,646
   
7.80
%
 
646,147
   
31,140
   
6.44
%
Investment securities 4 
   
193,301
   
7,234
   
5.00
%
 
160,400
   
5,635
   
4.70
%
Federal funds sold and other interest on short-term
investments
   
34,434
   
1,313
   
5.10
%
 
21,225
   
498
   
3.14
%
Total interest earnings assets
   
1,181,204
 
$
64,193
   
7.27
%
 
827,772
 
$
37,273
   
6.02
%
Cash and due from banks
   
31,890
           
23,501
         
Other assets
   
134,935
           
58,881
         
Allowance for loan losses
   
(14,869
)
         
(10,410
)
       
Total assets
 
$
1,333,160
         
$
899,744
         
 
                         
Liabilities and Equity
                         
Savings deposits
 
$
41,143
 
$
160
   
0.52
%
$
16,607
 
$
63
   
0.51
%
Interest-bearing demand deposits
   
283,023
   
6,051
   
2.86
%
 
194,156
   
2,576
   
1.77
%
Time deposits
   
563,420
   
15,904
   
3.77
%
 
392,365
   
8,376
   
2.85
%
Total interest-bearing deposits
   
887,586
   
22,115
   
3.33
%
 
603,128
   
11,015
   
2.44
%
Borrowed funds
   
110,750
   
4,015
   
4.85
%
 
102,336
   
3,119
   
4.07
%
Subordinated debt
   
31,478
   
1,812
   
7.70
%
 
20,620
   
912
   
5.91
%
Repurchase agreements
   
27,766
   
914
   
4.40
%
 
14,139
   
241
   
2.28
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
   
1,057,580
 
$
28,856
   
3.65
%
 
740,223
 
$
15,827
   
2.76
%
Noninterest-bearing deposits
   
101,705
           
69,007
         
Other liabilities
   
12,854
           
10,918
         
Total liabilities
   
1,172,139
           
820,148
         
Shareholders’ equity
   
161,021
           
79,596
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,333,160
         
$
899,744
         
 
                         
Net interest spread 5 
           
3.62
%
         
3.26
%
Tax equivalent adjustment
     
$
746
         
$
491
     
Net interest income and net interest margin
     
$
35,337
   
4.00
%
   
$
21,986
   
3.55
%

1
The taxable equivalent basis is computed using a blended federal and state tax rate of approximately 38%.
2
Loans receivable include nonaccrual loans for which accrual of interest has not been recorded.
3
Includes loans held for sale.
4
The average balance for investment securities excludes the effect of their mark-to-market adjustment, if any.
5
Net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
6
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

- 19 -


For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, the provision for loan losses was $446,000 compared to a credit of $522,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005, an increase of approximately $1.0 million. The increase in 2006 was primarily due to the overall net growth of the loan portfolio and the related estimated inherent losses in the portfolio and higher net charge-offs. The Company revised its allowance for loan loss estimation methodology during the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 related to specific loan loss allocations, which reduced the allowance for loan losses in 2005. Net charge-offs for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 were $3.8 million compared to $355,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. Net charge-offs for the nine months period ended September 30, 2006 includes $2.9 million related to one 1st State Bank loan relationship that had been fully reserved by 1st State Bank as of December 31, 2005 and had no impact on the Bank’s loan loss provision for the nine months period ended September 30, 2006. See “Asset Quality” below for further discussion of the allowance for loan losses.

Noninterest income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, was $6.9 million compared to $4.7 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005, an increase of $2.2 million. Deposit service charges and fees increased by $779,000 as a result of a higher volume of transaction accounts, including accounts acquired in the 1st State Bancorp transaction. Mortgage fees and revenues increased by $313,000 primarily due to higher loan volumes and bank owned life insurance increased by $212,000 due to additional insurance purchased during the second quarter of 2005. Other noninterest income increased by $751,000 primarily due to higher brokerage income, which increased $237,000 due to higher investment product sales, $208,000 in distributions from two limited partner investments and a $138,000 gain on the sale of consolidated branch locations. The Company recognized $128,000 of net gains generated from investment security sales for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $7,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005.

Noninterest expense for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 was $27.2 million compared to $19.4 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. Salaries and employee benefits, representing the largest noninterest expense category, increased by $3.5 million to $13.7 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, from $10.2 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. This increase reflects an increase in the number of personnel employed by the Company as a result of the 1st State Bancorp transaction and the transition to in-house operations and increased benefit costs, offset by reductions in supplemental retirement plan accruals.

Occupancy costs and furniture and equipment expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 increased by $854,000 and $636,000, respectively, compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 primarily due to the 1st State Bancorp transaction, which increased the number of branches in the Company’s network and higher expenses associated with the Company’s new headquarters. Directors’ fees increased $311,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 primarily due to higher expense accruals associated with the directors’ supplemental retirement plan and the directors’ deferred compensation plan as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. Data processing expenses decreased $116,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2005 primarily due to a reduction in external item processing costs as a result of bringing operations in-house in 2006. Advertising expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 increased by $217,000 compared to the same period in 2005 primarily due to costs associated with the promotion of a new checking account product and the opening of the Company’s new headquarters. Deposit premium amortization for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 increased $868,000 compared to the same period in 2005 primarily due to the deposit premium intangible associated with the 1st State Bancorp transaction. Professional fees for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 increased by $117,000 compared to the same period in 2005 primarily due to higher legal and accounting fees and higher consulting expenses associated with the integration of 1st State Bank. Other expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 increased $1.3 million from the same period in 2005 primarily due to higher costs associated with operational losses, travel and entertainment, and office supplies and printing, which increased $217,000, $285,000 and $307,000, respectively.

The Company’s effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was 34.2% and 33.5%, respectively. The change in the effective tax rate was due to changes in forecasted levels of taxable and tax exempt income and the increase for these comparable periods primarily reflects a lower mix of tax exempt income. The Company recorded income tax expense of $4.7 million and $2.5 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.


- 20 -


Asset Quality

Determining the allowance for loan losses is based on a number of factors, many of which are subject to judgments made by management. At the origination of each commercial loan, management assesses the relative risk of the loan and assigns a corresponding risk grade. To ascertain that the credit quality is maintained after the loan is booked, the Bank has a procedure whereby a loan review officer performs an annual review of all unsecured loans over a predetermined loan amount, a sampling of loans within a lender’s authority, and a sampling of the entire loan pool. Loans are reviewed for credit quality, sufficiency of credit and collateral documentation, proper loan approval, covenant, policy and procedure adherence, and continuing accuracy of the loan grade. This officer reports directly to the Chief Credit Officer and the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. On an as needed basis, the Bank will hire an outside third party firm to review the Bank’s loan portfolio to ensure quality standards and reasonableness of risk assessment.

The Company estimates the amount of allowance needed to cover probable inherent losses in the portfolio by applying a loss allowance factor to each risk grade. Consumer loans and mortgages are not risk graded, but a loss allocation factor is utilized for these loans based on historical losses. The loss allocation factors have been developed based on the Bank’s historical losses and industry trends. In addition to this quantitative analysis, a qualitative assessment of the general economic trends, portfolio concentration and the trend of delinquencies are taken into consideration. The loan loss allowance is adjusted to an amount that management believes is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date presented.

Beginning in the second quarter of 2005, the Company began estimating a specific allowance for loan losses associated with certain commercial loans risk-rated 5 or worse with outstanding balances greater than $750,000. Management determines the level of specific allowance based on the facts and circumstances of each loan, including among other factors, payment history, collateral values, guarantor liquidity, and net worth. Of the $13.9 million allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2006, $2.6 million has been allocated to specific loans.

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely. Based on this allowance calculation, management recorded a credit of $215,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared to a credit of $113,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The Company added 1st State Bank’s allowance for loan losses, which was $7.6 million as of December 31, 2005, to the Company’s allowance for loan losses. The Company continued to see overall favorable improvements in key risk metrics and trends associated with the credit quality of loan portfolio during the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Past due loans as a percentage of the average loans increased slightly from 0.96% at June 30, 2006 to 0.97% at September 30, 2006. Past dues greater than 90 days as a percentage of total loans was 0.44% and 0.48% at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of loans was 0.61% and 0.65% at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively.
 
The following table presents an analysis of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively:


- 21 -



 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period
 
$
14,007
 
$
10,075
 
$
9,592
 
$
10,721
 
1st State Bank loan loss allowance acquired
   
-
   
-
   
7,637
   
-
 
Net charge-offs:
                 
Loans charged off:
                 
Commercial
   
114
   
116
   
3,961
   
212
 
Consumer
   
118
   
12
   
254
   
292
 
Home equity lines
   
29
   
-
   
55
   
-
 
Mortgage
   
68
   
34
   
102
   
144
 
Total charge-offs
   
329
   
162
   
4,3721
   
648
 
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
                 
Commercial
   
376
   
27
   
501
   
251
 
Consumer
   
10
   
17
   
36
   
42
 
Home equity
   
27
   
-
   
31
   
-
 
Mortgage
   
18
   
-
   
23
   
-
 
Total recoveries
   
431
   
44
   
591
   
293
 
Total net charge-offs (recoveries)
   
(102
)
 
118
   
3,7811
   
355
 
Loss provisions (credit) charged to operations
   
(215
)
 
(113
)
 
446
   
(522
)
Allowance for loan losses, end of period
 
$
13,894
 
$
9,844
 
$
13,894
 
$
9,844
 
 
                 
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans during the period (annualized)
   
(0.04
%)
 
0.07
%
 
0.53%1
   
0.07
%
Allowance as a percent of gross loans
   
1.38
%
 
1.54
%
       

1 Net charge-offs for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 includes $2.9 million related to one 1st State Bank loan relationship that was fully reserved by 1st State Bank as of December 31, 2005. Excluding the $2.9 million net charge-off, the ratio of net charge-offs to average loans during the nine month period ending September 30, 2006 was 0.12%.

The following table presents an analysis of nonperforming assets as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 and December 31, 2005:
 
 
 
September 30, 2006
 
September 30, 2005
 
December 31, 2005
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Nonaccrual loans:
             
Commercial and commercial real estate
 
$
3,885
 
$
3,915
 
$
5,040
 
Mortgage
   
1,453
   
1,711
   
1,628
 
Construction
   
71
   
1,302
   
737
 
Equity lines
   
440
   
592
   
497
 
Consumer
   
259
   
239
   
176
 
Total nonaccrual loans
   
6,108
   
7,759
   
8,078
 
Foreclosed property held
   
637
   
1,608
   
771
 
Total nonperforming assets
 
$
6,745
 
$
9,367
 
$
8,849
 
 
             
Nonperforming assets to total loans
   
0.67
%
 
1.20
%
 
1.32
%
Nonperforming assets to total assets
   
0.48
%
 
1.01
%
 
0.92
%
Allowance coverage of nonperforming loans
   
227
%
 
127
%
 
119
%


- 22 -


At September 30, 2006, nonperforming assets were $6.7 million, a decrease of $2.1 million from December 31, 2005. The majority of the Company’s nonperforming loans are secured by real estate and to a lesser extent the Company relies on the support of guarantors. The Company monitors the value of the underlying collateral and the liquidity of the guarantors on a periodic basis. Based on this review and analysis, the Company does not currently anticipate any material losses associated with the nonperforming loans existing at September 30, 2006.

A loan is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Uncollateralized loans are measured for impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the historical effective interest rate, while all collateral-dependent loans are measured for impairment based on the fair value of the collateral. There were no impaired loans at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

The Bank uses several factors in determining if a loan is impaired. Internal asset classification procedures include a review of significant loans and lending relationships by both management and third party credit review firms and includes the accumulation of related data such as loan payment status, borrowers’ financial data and borrowers’ operating factors such as cash flows, operating income or loss. The Company’s determination of the allowance for loan losses is subject to management’s judgment and analysis of many internal and external factors. While management is comfortable with the adequacy of the current allowance, changes in factors and management’s future evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses will change.

Foreclosed property decreased to $637,000 at September 30, 2006 from $771,000 at December 31, 2005. The decrease is primarily due to disposition of certain foreclosed properties. The Company is actively marketing all of its foreclosed property. All foreclosed assets are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. Foreclosed property as of September 30, 2006 excludes $776,000 related to two branch locations that are held for sale and are reported as other real estate owned pursuant to bank regulations and are also recorded at the lower of cost or fair value.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s liquidity management involves planning to meet the Company’s anticipated funding needs at a reasonable cost. Liquidity management is guided by policies formulated by the Company’s senior management and the Asset/Liability Management Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company had $72.1 million in its most liquid assets, cash and cash equivalents, as of September 30, 2006. The Company’s principal sources of funds are loan repayments, deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings and capital and, to a lesser extent, investment repayments. Core deposits (total deposits less certificates of deposits in the amount of $100,000 or more), one of the most stable sources of liquidity, together with equity capital, which totaled $977.7 million and $652.1 million at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, funded 69.9% of total assets at September 30, 2006 compared to 67.7% at December 31, 2005. In addition, the Company has the ability to take advantage of various other funding programs available from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, as well as access to funding through various brokered deposit programs, federal funds lines and security repurchase agreements.

The management of equity is a critical aspect of capital management in any business. The determination of the appropriate amount of equity is affected by a wide number of factors. The primary factor for a regulated financial institution is the amount of capital needed to meet regulatory requirements, although other factors, such as the “risk equity” the business requires and balance sheet leverage, also affect the determination.
 
On February 27, 2006, the Company announced that the Company’s Board of Directors had authorized the Company to acquire in the open market or in any private transaction, from time-to-time and in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, up to 1.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock. Management plans to utilize share repurchases to manage capital levels of the Company. The Company plans to effect the repurchase program through open-market purchases. During the first nine months of 2006, the Company repurchased 309,721 shares at a weighted average price of $16.27 per share. See Part II - Other Information, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for more information on the Company’s share repurchases.


- 23 -


To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum amounts and ratios. The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of September 30, 2006 and the minimum requirements are presented in the following table:

 
 
 
Actual
 
Minimum Requirements
To Be Well Capitalized
 
 
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
(Dollars in thousands)
                 
 
                 
Capital Bank Corporation
                 
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)
 
$
137,853
   
11.74
%
$
117,409
   
10.00
%
Tier I capital (to risk weighted assets)
   
123,586
   
10.53
%
 
70,445
   
6.00
%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
   
123,586
   
9.53
%
 
64,836
   
5.00
%
 
                     
Capital Bank
                     
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)
 
$
130,562
   
11.18
%
$
116,830
   
10.00
%
Tier I capital (to risk weighted assets)
   
116,295
   
9.95
%
 
70,098
   
6.00
%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
   
116,295
   
9.00
%
 
64,584
   
5.00
%

Consolidated capital ratios decreased from December 31, 2005 due to the increase in risk-weighted and total assets associated with the 1st State Bancorp transaction exceeding the tangible capital acquired. Total capital to risk weighted assets, Tier I capital to risk weighted assets and Tier I capital to average assets on a consolidated basis as of December 31, 2005 were 13.71%, 11.73% and 10.64%, respectively.

Shareholders’ equity was $160.9 million, or $13.98 per share, at September 30, 2006. Management believes this level of shareholders’ equity provides adequate capital to support the Company’s growth and to maintain a well capitalized position.


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As described in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended, asset/liability management involves the evaluation, monitoring and management of interest rate risk, liquidity and funding. While the Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the Company’s asset/liability management policies, the Asset and Liability Committee monitors loan, investment, and liability portfolios to ensure comprehensive management of interest rate risk and adherence to the policies.

The Company utilizes an outside asset/liability management advisory firm to help management evaluate interest rate risk and develop asset/liability management strategies. One tool used is a computer simulation model which projects the Company’s performance under different interest rate scenarios. Analyses are prepared quarterly which evaluate the Company’s performance under different interest rate scenarios (flat, rising and declining). The following tables illustrate the output from the Company’s simulation model based on the balance sheets as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The tables reflect rate-sensitive positions at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and are not necessarily indicative of positions on other dates. The projected results as of September 30, 2006 include the impact of the 1st State Bancorp transaction, which was completed on January 3, 2006.

The following table illustrates the Company’s interest rate sensitivity as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The carrying amounts of interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities are presented in periods in which they next reprice to market rates or mature and are aggregated to show the interest rate sensitivity gap. To reflect anticipated prepayments, certain asset and liability amounts were based on estimated cash flows rather than contractual cash flows. The Company continues to be “asset sensitive” at September 30, 2006 as its assets reprice faster than its liabilities.

- 24 -

 
 
 
Within One Year
 
One-Two Years
 
Two-Five Years
 
After Five Years
 
Total
 
(Dollars in thousands)
                     
 
                     
As of September 30, 2006
                     
Total assets
 
$
838,399
 
$
94,444
 
$
197,638
 
$
269,192
 
$
1,399,673
 
Total liabilities and equity
   
752,139
   
219,384
   
176,387
   
251,763
   
1,399,673
 
Interest rate sensitivity gap
 
$
86,260
 
$
(124,940
)
$
21,251
 
$
17,429
 
$
-
 
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap
 
$
86,260
 
$
(38,680
)
$
(17,429
)
$
-
     
 
                     
As of December 31, 2005
                     
Total assets
 
$
569,081
 
$
60,830
 
$
182,755
 
$
148,240
 
$
960,906
 
Total liabilities and equity
   
387,158
   
250,575
   
115,821
   
207,352
   
960,906
 
Interest rate sensitivity gap
 
$
181,923
 
$
(189,745
)
$
66,934
 
$
(59,112
)
$
-
 
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap
 
$
181,923
 
$
(7,822
)
$
59,112
 
$
-
     

As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, under the flat rate scenario, the Company’s projected net interest income for the next twelve months was $50.8 million and $34.9 million, respectively. The table below measures the impact on net interest income of both a gradual and immediate 200 basis point change in interest rates over the twelve months following the interest rate change. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 
 
Change in 12-Months Projected Net Interest Income versus Projected
Net Interest Income under No Rate Change
 
 
 
September 30, 2006
 
December 31, 2005
 
 
 
Dollar Change
 
Percent Change
 
Dollar Change
 
Percent Change
 
(Dollars in millions)
                 
 
                 
Basis point change:
                 
+ 200 gradual
 
$
4.1
   
8.1
%
$
2.9
   
8.3
%
+ 200 immediate
   
5.6
   
11.0
%
 
5.2
   
14.9
%
No rate change
                         
- 200 gradual
   
(1.4
)
 
(2.8
%)
 
(1.7
)
 
(4.9
%)
- 200 immediate
   
(2.0
)
 
(3.9
%)
 
(3.3
)
 
(9.5
%)

The table does not reflect the impact of hedging strategies discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended, or the $100 million (notional) interest rate swap entered into in October 2006.

 
Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives.

As required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that, as of the period covered by the report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in that they provide reasonable assurances that the information the Company is required to disclose in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the SEC’s rules and forms.

- 25 -


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Management has implemented changes in internal control over financial reporting as a result of remediation of matters identified through its review of internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act; however, it does not believe any of the changes implemented were material in nature.



PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or to which any of its property is subject. In addition, the Company is not aware of any threatened litigation, unasserted claims or assessments that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results or condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should consider the following material risk factors carefully before deciding to invest in the Company’s securities. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, that we may currently deem to be immaterial or that are similar to those faced by other companies in our industry or business in general, such as competitive conditions, may also impact our business operations. If any of the events described below occur, the Company’s business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In that event, the trading price of the Company’s common stock may decline, in which case the value of your investment may decline as well.

Our Results Are Impacted by the Economic Conditions of Our Principal Operating Regions

Our operations are concentrated throughout Central and Western North Carolina. As a result of this geographic concentration, our results may correlate to the economic conditions in these areas. Deterioration in economic conditions in any of these market areas, particularly in the industries on which these geographic areas depend, may adversely affect the quality of our loan portfolio and the demand for our products and services, and accordingly, our results of operations.

We Are Exposed to Risks in Connection with the Loans We Make

A significant source of risk for us arises from the possibility that losses will be sustained because borrowers, guarantors and related parties may fail to perform in accordance with the terms of their loans. We have underwriting and credit monitoring procedures and credit policies, including the establishment and review of the allowance for loan losses, that we believe are appropriate to minimize this risk by assessing the likelihood of nonperformance, tracking loan performance and diversifying our loan portfolio. Such policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses that could adversely affect our results of operations.

We Compete with Larger Companies for Business

The banking and financial services business in our market areas continues to be a competitive field and is becoming more competitive as a result of:

 
l
Changes in regulations;
 
l
Changes in technology and product delivery systems; and
 
l
The accelerating pace of consolidation among financial services providers.

We may not be able to compete effectively in our markets, and our results of operations could be adversely affected by the nature or pace of change in competition. We compete for loans, deposits and customers with various bank and nonbank financial services providers, many of which have substantially greater resources including higher total assets and capitalization, greater access to capital markets and a broader offering of financial services.


- 26 -


Our Trading Volume Has Been Low Compared with Larger Banks

The trading volume in the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market has been comparable to other similarly-sized banks. Nevertheless, this trading is relatively low when compared with more seasoned companies listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market or other consolidated reporting systems or stock exchanges. Thus, the market in the Company’s common stock may be limited in scope relative to other companies.

We Depend Heavily on Our Key Management Personnel

The Company’s success depends in part on its ability to retain key executives and to attract and retain additional qualified management personnel who have experience both in sophisticated banking matters and in operating a small to mid-size bank. Competition for such personnel is strong in the banking industry and we may not be successful in attracting or retaining the personnel we require. We expect to effectively compete in this area by offering financial packages that include incentive-based compensation and the opportunity to join in the rewarding work of building a growing bank.

Technological Advances Impact Our Business

The banking industry is undergoing technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to improving customer services, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources than we do to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or successfully market such products and services to our customers.

Government Regulations May Prevent or Impair Our Ability To Pay Dividends, Engage in Acquisitions or Operate in Other Ways

Current and future legislation and the policies established by federal and state regulatory authorities will affect our operations. We are subject to supervision and periodic examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the North Carolina State Banking Commission. Banking regulations, designed primarily for the protection of depositors, may limit our growth and the return to you, our investors, by restricting certain of our activities, such as:

 
l
The payment of dividends to our shareholders;
 
l
Possible mergers with or acquisitions of or by other institutions;
 
l
Our desired investments;
 
l
Loans and interest rates on loans;
 
l
Interest rates paid on our deposits;
 
l
The possible expansion of our branch offices; and/or
 
l
 
Our ability to provide securities or trust services.

We also are subject to capitalization guidelines set forth in federal legislation, and could be subject to enforcement actions to the extent that we are found by regulatory examiners to be undercapitalized. We cannot predict what changes, if any, will be made to existing federal and state legislation and regulations or the effect that such changes may have on our future business and earnings prospects. The cost of compliance with regulatory requirements including those imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission may adversely affect our ability to operate profitably.

There Are Potential Risks Associated with Future Acquisitions and Expansions

We intend to continue to explore expanding our branch system through selective acquisitions of existing banks or bank branches in the Research Triangle area and other North Carolina markets. We cannot say with any certainty that we will be able to consummate, or if consummated, successfully integrate, future acquisitions, or that we will not incur disruptions or unexpected expenses in integrating such acquisitions. In the ordinary course of business, we evaluate potential acquisitions that would bolster our ability to cater to the small business, individual and residential lending markets in North Carolina. In attempting to make such acquisitions, we anticipate competing with other financial institutions, many of which have greater financial and operational resources. In addition, since the consideration for an acquired bank or branch may involve cash, notes or the issuance of shares of common stock, existing shareholders could experience dilution in the value of their shares of our common stock in connection with such acquisitions. Any given acquisition, if and when consummated, may adversely affect our results of operations or overall financial condition.


- 27 -


In addition, we may expand our branch network through de novo branches in existing or new markets. These de novo branches will have expenses in excess of revenues for varying periods after opening, which could decrease our reported earnings.

Compliance with Changing Regulation of Corporate Governance and Public Disclosure May Result in Additional Risks and Expenses

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and new SEC regulations, are creating uncertainty for companies such as ours. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased expenses and a diversion of management time and attention. In particular, our efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related regulations regarding management’s required assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and our external independent registered public accounting firm's audit of that assessment has required the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. We expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of significant resources. Further, the members of our Board of Directors, members of the Audit or Compensation/Human Resources committees, our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and certain other of our executive officers could face an increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a result, our ability to attract and retain executive officers and qualified Board and committee members could be more difficult. In addition, it may become more difficult and more expensive to obtain director and officer liability insurance.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table lists all repurchases (both open market and private transactions) during the three months ended September 30, 2006 of any of the Company’s securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, by or on behalf of the Company, or any affiliated purchaser of the Company:

Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs 1
 
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
 
 
                   
July 2006
   
-
 
$
-
   
-
   
782,218
 
August 2006
   
30,200
 
$
16.98
   
30,200
   
752,018
 
September 2006
   
61,739
 
$
16.67
   
61,739
   
690,279
 

1 On February 27, 2006, the Company announced that on February 23, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors had authorized a program to repurchase (in the open market or in any private transaction), up to 1.0 million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The repurchase program is for a period of up to two years and supercedes the share repurchase program authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors on December 22, 2004, which authorized the repurchase of up to 100,000 shares. The Company did not acquire any shares under this former repurchase program. As of September 30, 2006, there were an aggregate of 690,279 shares remaining authorized for future repurchases.


Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Item 5. Other Information

None


- 28 -


Item 6. Exhibits
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 
 
Exhibit 4.1
 
In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, certain instruments respecting long-term debt of the registrant have been omitted but will be furnished to the Commission upon request.
 
 
 
Exhibit 10.1
 
Employment Agreement, dated August 2, 2006, between Capital Bank and Mark Redmond (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Capital Bank Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2006)
     
Exhibit 31.1
 
Certification of B. Grant Yarber pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
Exhibit 31.2
 
Certification of A. Christine Baker pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.1
 
Certification of B. Grant Yarber pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [This exhibit is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by that act, be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any document or filed herewith for purposes of liability under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as the case may be.]
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.2
 
Certification of A. Christine Baker pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [This exhibit is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by that act, be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any document or filed herewith for purposes of liability under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as the case may be.]
 

- 29 -


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Raleigh, North Carolina, on the 9th day of November 2006.
 
 
CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION
  
  
   
 
By:  /s/  A. Christine Baker
 
A. Christine Baker
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
(Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

 

- 30 -


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 
 
Exhibit 4.1
 
In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, certain instruments respecting long-term debt of the registrant have been omitted but will be furnished to the Commission upon request.
 
 
 
Exhibit 10.1
 
Employment Agreement, dated August 2, 2006, between Capital Bank and Mark Redmond (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Capital Bank Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2006)
     
Exhibit 31.1
 
Certification of B. Grant Yarber pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
Exhibit 31.2
 
Certification of A. Christine Baker pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.1
 
Certification of B. Grant Yarber pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [This exhibit is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by that act, be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any document or filed herewith for purposes of liability under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as the case may be.]
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.2
 
Certification of A. Christine Baker pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [This exhibit is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by that act, be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any document or filed herewith for purposes of liability under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as the case may be.]



- 31 -






EX-31.1 2 ex31-1.htm EXHIBIT 31.1 Exhibit 31.1


Exhibit 31.1
I, B. Grant Yarber, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 


 Date: November 9, 2006
CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION
  
  
   
 
By:  /s/  B. Grant Yarber
 
B. Grant Yarber
 
President and Chief Executive Officer


EX-31.2 3 ex31-2.htm EXHIBIT 31.2 Exhibit 31.2


Exhibit 31.2
I, A. Christine Baker, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 


 Date: November 9, 2006
CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION
  
  
   
 
By:  /s/  A. Christine Baker
 
A. Christine Baker
 
Chief Financial Officer


EX-32.1 4 ex32-1.htm EXHIBIT 32.1 Exhibit 32.1


Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B. Grant Yarber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
/s/ B. Grant Yarber
B. Grant Yarber
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 9, 2006
 
This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 

EX-32.2 5 ex32-2.htm EXHIBIT 32.2 Exhibit 32.2


Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Capital Bank Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A. Christine Baker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
/s/ A. Christine Baker
A. Christine Baker
Chief Financial Officer
November 9, 2006
 
This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 

GRAPHIC 6 logo02.jpg CAPITAL BANK CORP LOGO begin 644 logo02.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`2`!(``#_VP!#``,"`@,"`@,#`P,$`P,$!0@%!00$ M!0H'!P8(#`H,#`L*"PL-#A(0#0X1#@L+$!80$1,4%145#`\7&!84&!(4%13_ MVP!#`0,$!`4$!0D%!0D4#0L-%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04 M%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!04%!3_P``1"`!D`,P#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#]4Z***`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBO'/VB/B1KN@0^'_``1X(:-?'WC&=[33[B5=R:=`B[KB M]<=Q&I&`>K,.#@B@SJ35.+DR?XG?M%Z7X)\1)X0\/:3>>//B!*@>/PYHQ&Z! M3C#W4Q^2V3!!R_/(.,'- M7=F)"KGJP`ZU^2O[2G[4WBW]I#Q1-*=9WD]HIV7S>[_K0^K_BAX\_9QTC1M8M;CXN>//'7B#[ M/(+:1]=O[F,3`-Y9WH$A*[B.A(P.G//4?`'X7^$_^&8?"'Q!\4?$SQGX(N+V M-TNM5LO%$]M"':Z>-,JY:-0=J]1CN:_,&OT0\9_\HG/#W^_#_P"G)ZIJQY.& MQ/MI5*DH+W8M_D?2-EX6^-/@RP@U7P1\1M)^+.@NGF1Z;XG@CAFECZCR;^W^ M5V/0&1=H]?3L?A=^T5H_CW7Y?"FM:9?>!O'UNGF3>&M;`661>Q.`*_)S]F3]J_Q9^S?XG@DL[F;4O"DTH_M#099"8I%)^9X\\1R@=&'7`# M9%?K+XV\`^#_`-J'X:Z-JD%RR&:%-4\/^(K(F.[TZ9E#1S1L"""#C M0,2U8]?!8KZQ%NB]5O%N_P!SW_3R/5Z*\A_9W^)NL^+M.UWPKXR6.+X@>$+H M:=K'E+M2[5EW6]Y&.R3)\V,#!#<`8%>O4CVJ%=-TZSC8_,$N M99II748]8U!/IM'T]\KYY^*>H#X,_M&^%OB'>N(?"7B73QX4UFY;B.RN!*9; M.=SV5BTD18X"Y!-!RXC11D]DU?\`+\V<)_P5*UNZTG]FNSM;>1DAU/Q!:VER MH.`\8BGF`/K\\*'\*_)6OV]_;)^"]S\=/@'KV@:;'YNN6Q34=-CSC?/%D[/J MZ&1![L#7XC7-M-9W,MO<1/!/$YCDBE4JR,#@J0>00>U7$^1SJ$EB%)[-:$=? MKQ^SI\(-#^.G[!W@CPCXCDO(]*NHGED:QE$'O]^'_P!.3T,QRR2@ZLI*Z47IWV/6O^'6OP<_Y_?%/_@PB_\`C-?1?P=^ M$VD_!'P%8^$-"NK^ZTBR>1K?^T95ED0.Y=E!55XW,Q''1V.%50.222``*_<']DGX.2_`GX#>'?#=^`FKE&OM2P00MQ M*=S)GI\@VID==F>])GMY;7I5ZC]E14;+>_X;&3J,"Z'^VUHEQ:LB?V_X+NH; MV$'[YMKJ)HI"/4"5U!],CL*]ZKYY^#-Z/C'\??&GQ2MCYGAC2K,>$=`N`/DN MPDOFWEPGJOFA$5AP0I]"*^AJD]G#ZJ4ELV[?UY[A1110=04444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%8_B_PCH_CWPSJ7A[7[&+4]'U&$P7-K,/E=3[ MCD$'!!&""`0016Q10)I-69\T:9X@\<_LIQ#2/$EEJ?Q#^%EO\MAXDT^+S]4T M>`#Y8;R!>9HT&,3)R`#N'(4<)\7_`-E'X2?MEP3^-/AQXKTZP\2S+ON+O32L ML%RYY'VF`$-'(>[8#%X-/UQLM_:^BROI] MWN)SO,D#*7;W;-.YYU7"\\/9V4H]GT]'_7J?F%X]_P"">'QJ\"Q7]T-#L=>6_TW4H=@C0%F;9*R2'@'@+FOK7P-\'=9^/'_!.#P?X.T&XL[34;PK(L MU^[)$BI?R,Q)56/0'``KV#5/V3;NYTZ>PLOC-\2[>SG1HI;:\U>.]1HV!!7] M[$6P0<*S_``=^Q9;>$?#-GX>A^+'Q'31;0,L&GZ?J\=E"B%MQ7]U$'Y); M/S?Q&G<\VEE_L9RY8/EDFGJC@?A%^S%\(/V*+:'QA\0?%>GWWBF-2T%]J)$: M0'H1:6P+.[\XW`,W'`7D'M]0U7QW^U8(7!P96Y93P/O+7H?@/\`9@^&7PYU-=5TKPK;7&M@AO[7U5WOKO&=*\&>']/T/1+&'3-)L(5@ MMK2!<)&@Z`>OJ2>222 M/:=)_8*^#&G6<:7/AV]U?45!WZQ?:O=&\E;NY=)%`/\`NA1[8_"KX2Z[\*M7=$[FB*[AL<$KA<'KGCOVU?%>NVGPFN/!O@^![ MSQAXNBN+.UMXC\XMHX6ENW'_`&R7RQ_M3)2-I57"DZDHV:Z?UW/H!'61%96# M*PR&!R"/6G5\S_\`!/SXTCXN?L_Z;9WD_FZYX9(TB[#'YGC5?W$GT,>%SW:- MC7G'_!5N]N;'X1>#GMKB6W9M<()BM:=?W$,EO<&,%7.'P5SU!'0G&#S7R]I_ MQU\3_%K_`()N_$I_$6H7-]K6@ZA8V*:K(Q\V>$WEHR;WZLXW,I/4C:3DDDEB M*F+='2I'HVK/>RNUMH?IA17SE^S5X!T'XJ?LC?#73_%>GKK=HEHMTL=Q(XQ* M&E4-E2"3AV'7O7S1^S9\*?"OB_\`;,^,?A/6=*%_X=T?[7]@T^6>7R[?;=HB M[<-GA21R:!RQ4E[-J/Q^?E?L?I)445Q%.9!%*DAC;8X1@=K<'!]#R./>N3\8 M^)=%^"/PKU#5W@\C1/#FF_N;2-CEEC0+%"A.3N8A$7.>2*^//V&/BSXK\-_' MGXC?"WXD,;;Q)J]W)K\44AX%VRAYD3V>)D=1P`L3>M(UJ8F-*I"G+[7X=OOZ M'WI17%?&UVC^#'CYE8JR^'[\AE."#]GDKYI_X)67EQ>_L]^(9+B>2X<>*;A0 MTKEB!]DM.,F@J5?EKQHVW3=_0^RZ**\G_:PE>#]FKXE21NTL0?221@JHH&223P`!WK\[OAE^T;XBTK]MRWU_Q M)%-I_@WXGVD=MHZ3[E46BR/'I\NT]&9D;(Z#[4S=Q2.BOB8T'!2^T[>GG]]C M]%:**_,G]BK]HS7_`(`^(=$\!_$F22+P?XLMH=3T35+J3HZUK$:S7%[A(YIL\O`SCAH.A5=I)O M?2Z[H]SKY_\`A?XATSX@_&KQM\0;W4K2/3]*+>$]`26=%S'$X:]N`#_STG`0 M,.JP>]8_CC]JBZ\3^$=53P%X\2ZA`UG!>ZE:]E9I:_P"73Y_>V4$3*=O]T'S,]O+..M>+_M;_&9/CM^Q;\*O$TD MJR:LNL&RU55ZK=Q6\BR$@=-XVR`=A(*9XM;FH4:V'GU]Y>C>J^3/KO4/A]\; M?'OPXAT$^/O"7A[3]0L$MY;W2?#UR;R.%HP&"M)=LH8J<9`![@BO-?VC_@;H M'[/7_!/KQIX3\/F6>))+&XNKVXQYMW.VH6NZ1L<#@*H`Z*JCDY)^O/"G_(K: M/_UYP_\`H`KPG_@H7_R9_P"/O^X?_P"G"VI(];$4(1H5*F[Y7N[]#>_8J_Y- M7^''_8-_]J/7SK^R1_R?]\>_^W[_`-+HZ^BOV*O^35_AQ_V#?_:CU\U?LOZM M9Z#^W1^T1J>H3I:V%E!J-S<3R?=CC2\C9V/L`"?PH.>6D<+\O_23Z)^,>JV7 MCSXR^"OAW<7D$&CZ65\6:^)Y%5)5B?;8VYR<-OGS(5(^[`/6OG/_`(*#:>OP M]^(W@#XZ>#[RTEU73+N.SOTMYU)D*$O"7"G)5E\V)CCIM'I7N7PD^!7A;XQ: M!=_$CXC>$-/UO7_%UVVJP1ZK;B5[&P(5+.W&>!B%(V/`.YVSS70>,OV+_A%X ME\)ZQI5GX%T/1KR\M)((-1M+-4EMI&4A)%(YRIP??&*"JM&KB:4FDM=4[ZJV MW3^KLZ'QSXPT[X@_LR>)?$NDR^;INK>$[N\@;OM>T2_M:_P#)LWQ,_P"P%=?^@&NQ\"?% M'PE\3[6ZN?"7B+3_`!#!:N(YY-/G$HC8C(#8Z$BN._:U_P"39OB9_P!@*Z_] M`-2>O6DI4)N+NK/\CYG_`."?T7Q4?]G:$^#KGP?%I7]I76T:Y;W3SB3YM>6_$JZU;PA^UCX>U7]J6RDU?2SM.CW>A2[=(A1)`0WDE-[HK$%U+ M!^06#J0#ZK_P3Z^/?PZ^'?[/$&D>)O&FC:'J@U.ZE-I?7:QR!&*[6P>QP:Y+ M]J'7KC]O+XC>#_!7PJT^XU7P_HLLLFH>*Y;5X[*)I-@8AV4?*BQDXZNQPH.T M$UU/G9:M:.]_5'U=^U#X@_M#PSH7P]LK];*^\>WG]F278D"_9]-5 M?,OI@3@']SF,*^JOV2O^39OAG_V`K7_`-`% M&Q%"2Q<8PK+5*2EZIQ_X<^7/V9_VE]3E^'_C7X)_$KSM/\<:#I-]:V,EZ^-O$^F:#XJM M1`,3H/[KJ5)[!MP'`I;GJT)K"U)8:H]-XM]NJ]4SU*7XE^)?$ M_P`3/%'A3PCIVEK%X62V&I7VLS2CS[B>(3)#$L:G`$94M*2<%P`AP:[BS\)Z M29XM2N-`TJ#6'13--#`CL'X)`E**S`-T)`S@'`KE-0^$=Q;>/=7\6>&/$EQX M;O=`6L5S%=-"NR*90_,S)",NZHI;:ON<8&>.>:X5OB=XM\)ZQX*3QEHFG6^G^*KH:<#IDTCR:5>/&\ ML4,NX8F5A&RF50F&`^7!R/1/%WA73?'/A75_#NL0?:-+U6TEL[F('!:.12K8 M/8X/!['!KA=/^"MS<:KX3N/$WBF[\3VOA5S/I=M-;I#NN`C1I<7+*?WLJ1NR MJ0$7+,Q4D@@%457F]S;3\];_`"/4:\O^-?Q7N/AG?^#+6&YT738==U":TGU+ M7YC%:VJ1VDT^YF#+@L8@@R>KCKTKU"N`^*GP;T;XORZ"FNDRZ?IDEV\EGL!6 MY6>SFM64D_=P)RP(Y!44%U5-PM3WT_,T_A5XTN?B)\/M%\17>FMI%Q?Q%VM2 M68##LH9"RJQ1PH=25!*LIQ70:S>MIFD7UXBAVMX'E"GH2JDX_2LWP+X=N_"/ M@_2-$O=7N-?N+"W6W.I72*LTX7A6?'!;;@$]R,]ZU-3L5U/3;NS9BBW$3Q%A MU`8$9_6@J/-R*^]CQO\`9\^/&J?%Y[5+NSTR>&X\/V6MO?Z+*\D-I-/NW6,V M<@3(`"1NSC.57O[=7/\`P_\`",7@#P'X;\,07#W<.B:;;::EQ(H5I5AB6,,0 M.A(7./>N@H)I1G&"4W=GF%W\1?$/B7XA>)O"O@^STL-X9@MVU"]UB239+UFD.<;U`1N2-[X0_$>#XM?#O2/%-O92::+WS8Y;.5PY@FBE>& M9-PX8"2-P&`&0`<#.*R]4^%%W#XWUOQ5X8\1S>'=1URTBM=3C>T2ZAE:(%8; MA%8C9*JL5R2R$;9+*[.SR2.V! MEW=W1?!_]G>P^#.L1WNCZQNUYE\:?C1#\'UT& M:6Q-[:W-Y&=3E#8%A8&2.&2Z;GD))/`,`'AF/121Z;7GOC#X'>%OB'J&LW?B MFQ36FO[9;&-9AC[+;A3E$QW+O(Y8\_,HZ**"JO.XVI[GH5<]\0M8U+P]X(US M5=)6U:_L+22ZC6]5FB8(-S*0I!Y4$#GJ14G@7PW-X.\&Z+H5QJ4VLRZ;:1VA MO[A`DDX10H9@.-V`,^IYJWXDT5/$?A[5-)DD:&._M9;5I%&2@="I('MF@MW< M>S,?X6>(M3\7_#OP]KVKI:17NJV,-\8K)6$<:RH'5?F))(#`$]R.U;VLWK:9 MI%]>(H=K>!Y0IZ$JI./TJEX-\-Q^#O"&AZ!%,US%I5C!8I,XPT@BC5`Q`Z$[ M&=7U_469-.TJSFOKEE&2(HD+N1 M^"FJGP_\(Q>`/`?AOPQ!/4$B@4>;D5][?B>00_&GQ/HVF^`_$/B/1-. MM]`\7W]II\=K93N]YIKW?_'J9"PV3`DJK[0FPMD;P":]H@@CMH8X88UBAC4( MD:+M55'```Z"O*-*^`;1VO@_2M:\47NO>'?"5S%=Z78S6\<'M+UN/1I];LFU!8=0BM`6 MF@M!#+)-.BC[QC6+>5[J&QS70>#/&5IXVCU*[T^:"[TR*XB2TN[9]Z7$3VL$ MZN#[^<1QV`K1U;1(]6O=(N))"O\`9UTUTJ@`AR8)8=I]L3$_@*Y_X8_"O1?A M+I^L:=X?1[?3=0U.74UM&.4MFD1`T+LSPO\`X;A^+G_0WJ_SO[V'_#WJ_SO[V'_#WJ_SO[V'_#WJ_SO[V'_#WJ_SO[V'_#WJ_SO[V'_# MWJ_SO[V'_#WJ_SO[V? M;G[+OQ`UKXG_``=TSQ!X@N$NM3GGN$>2.)8P0LC*ORJ`.@%>LT44CZG#MRI1 );[!1110=!__9 ` end
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----