XML 24 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.2
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Note 8 – Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Estimates of fair value for financial assets and liabilities are based on the framework established in the accounting guidance for fair value measurements. The framework defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The framework discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The framework utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

 

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

 

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Thus, assets and liabilities categorized as Level 3 may be measured at fair value using inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable (Level 3). Management's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short duration of these financial instruments.

The following table summarizes the fair value measurement information about the Company’s long-term debt:

 

 

 

June 30, 2019

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Fair

 

 

Fair Value

(In thousands)

 

Amount

 

 

Value

 

 

Hierarchy

Term loan

 

$

772,000

 

 

$

770,070

 

 

Level 2

Senior notes due 2026

 

 

375,000

 

 

 

383,438

 

 

Level 2

Finance lease liabilities

 

 

7,086

 

 

 

7,086

 

 

Level 3

Notes payable

 

 

231

 

 

 

231

 

 

Level 3

Total debt

 

$

1,154,317

 

 

$

1,160,825

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Fair

 

 

Fair Value

(In thousands)

 

Amount

 

 

Value

 

 

Hierarchy

Term loan

 

$

992,000

 

 

$

952,300

 

 

Level 2

Finance lease liabilities

 

 

7,127

 

 

 

7,127

 

 

Level 3

Notes payable

 

 

1,111

 

 

 

1,111

 

 

Level 3

Total debt

 

$

1,000,238

 

 

$

960,538

 

 

 

 

The estimated fair value of the Company’s term loan debt is based on a relative value analysis performed as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The finance lease liabilities and note payable debt are fixed-rate debt, are not traded and do not have observable market inputs, therefore, the fair value is estimated to be equal to the carrying value.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had an interest rate cap agreement that was outstanding with a notional amount of $650 million, which expires on December 31, 2020. Using Level 2 inputs, the Company adjusts the carrying value of the interest rate cap agreement to estimated fair value quarterly based upon observable market-based inputs that reflect the present values of the difference between estimated future fixed rate payments and future variable receipts. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate cap agreement was $0.5 million and $5.0 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. As the Company elected to not apply hedge accounting, the change in fair value of its interest rate cap agreement was recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.