In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.

2018-07,

“

Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)

.” The ASU expands the scope of Topic 718, which currently only includes share-based payments issued to employees, to also include share-based payments issued to nonemployees for goods or services. The ASU supersedes Subtopic

505-50,

“

Equity—Equity-Based Payment to Non-Employees

.” Consequently, the accounting for share-based payments to nonemployees and employees will be substantially aligned. The ASU was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2019. Adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.

2016-02,

“

Leases (Topic 842),

” and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance in January 2018 within ASU No.

2018-01,

in July 2018 within ASU Nos.

2018-10

and

2018-11,

in December 2018 within ASU No.

2018-20,

and in March 2019 within ASU No.

2019-01

(collectively, the standard). The standard requires lessees to recognize operating leases on the balance sheet as a

right-of-use

asset and a lease liability. The liability is equal to the present value of the lease payments over the remaining lease term. The asset is based on the liability, subject to certain adjustments. Operating leases result in straight-line expense. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2019, and elected the transition method of adoption, which allowed the Company to apply the standard as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company opted to elect the package of practical expedients to not reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification and initial direct costs, and certain other practical expedients, including the use of hindsight to determine the lease term for existing leases and in assessing impairment of the

right-of-use

asset, and the exception for short-term leases. For its current classes of underlying assets, the Company did not elect the practical expedient under which the lease components would not be separated from the nonlease components. Nonlease components include certain maintenance services provided by the lessor and the related consideration is specified on a stand-alone basis in the applicable lease agreements. Adoption of the standard had a significant impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet due to the recognition of a

right-of-use

asset and lease liability of $45.8 million and $47.2 million, respectively, upon adoption. As the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate that can be readily determined, the Company used its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the implementation date in determining the present value of lease payments.