In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.

2018-15,

“

Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)”

. The new guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs in a cloud computing arrangement service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred for an

internal-use

software license. Under that model, implementation costs are capitalized or expensed depending on the nature of the costs and the project stage during which they are incurred. Capitalized implementation costs are amortized over the term of the associated hosted cloud computing arrangement service contract on a straight-line basis, unless another systematic and rational basis is more representative of the pattern in which the entity expects to benefit from its right to access the hosted software. Capitalized implementation costs would then be assessed for impairment in a manner similar to long-lived assets. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Entities can choose to adopt the new guidance either prospectively to eligible costs incurred on or after the date the guidance is first applied or retrospectively. The Company intends to adopt the guidance on January 1, 2020, and

does not believe adoption will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.

2017-04,

“

Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment

”. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test and eliminates the need to determine the fair value of individual assets and liabilities to measure goodwill impairment. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. Entities will continue to have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. The guidance will be applied prospectively, and is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for any impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company intends to adopt the guidance on January 1, 2020. The Company continues to evaluate the guidance and does not believe adoption will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU

2016-13,

“

Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses in Financial Instruments,

” and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance in November 2018 within ASU No.

2018-09,

April 2019 within ASU No.

2019-04,

and May 2019 within ASU No.

2019-05.

The ASU amends the guidance on the impairment of financial instruments and adds an impairment model, known as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model. The CECL model requires an entity to recognize its current estimate of all expected credit losses, rather than incurred losses, and applies to trade receivables and other receivables. The CECL model is designed to capture expected credit losses through the establishment of an allowance account, which will be presented as an offset to the amortized cost basis of the related financial asset. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is applied using the modified-retrospective approach. The Company intends to adopt the guidance on January 1, 2020. The Company continues to evaluate the guidance and does not believe adoption will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.