10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 001-14649

Trex Company, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	54-1910453
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
160 Exeter Drive Winchester, Virginia	22603-8605
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (540) 542-6300

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding at July 20, 2011 was 15,584,975 shares.

TREX COMPANY, INC.

INDEX

		Page
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements		1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010		1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and 2010		2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and 2010		3
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		4
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		10
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		13
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		14
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		15
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		15
Item 6.	Exhibits		16

i

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

TREX COMPANY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	19,416	$	27,270
Accounts receivable, net		46,902		53,332
Inventories		39,036		29,021
Prepaid expenses and other assets		2,861		1,539
Income taxes receivable		142		70
Deferred income taxes		949		1,004
Total current assets		109,306		112,236
Property, plant, and equipment, net		122,509		126,857
Goodwill		10,562		6,837
Other assets		1,253		1,885
Total assets	$	243,630	$	247,815
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	15,011	$	15,107
Accrued expenses		14,948		23,479
Accrued warranty		5,536		7,003
Current portion of long-term debt		86,887		590
Total current liabilities		122,382		46,179
Deferred income taxes		3,791		3,614
Accrued taxes		85		3,126
Non-current accrued warranty		5,460		7,469
Debt-related derivatives		—		312
Long-term debt		—		84,193
Other long-term liabilities		1,811		—
Total liabilities		133,529		144,893
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—		—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized; 15,584,363 and 15,458,002 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		156		155
Additional paid in capital		98,736		98,905
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		—		(184	)
Retained earnings		11,209		4,046
Total stockholders’ equity		110,101		102,922
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	243,630	$	247,815

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated

Financial Statements (Unaudited).

1

TREX COMPANY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010
Net sales	$	78,405	$	115,499	$	147,412		$	181,839
Cost of sales		54,863		85,628		100,840			136,755
Gross profit		23,542		29,871		46,572			45,084
Selling, general and administrative expenses		17,364		21,228		34,021			38,280
Income from operations		6,178		8,643		12,551			6,804
Interest expense, net		4,010		3,868		7,974			7,670
Income (loss) before income taxes		2,168		4,775		4,577			(866	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		62		—		(2,586	)		(134	)
Net income (loss)	$	2,106	$	4,775	$	7,163		$	(732	)
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.14	$	0.31	$	0.47		$	(0.05	)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		15,397,476		15,188,963		15,345,529			15,165,942
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.12	$	0.30	$	0.42		$	(0.05	)
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		17,153,179		15,880,484		16,982,058			15,165,942

2

TREX COMPANY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	7,163		$	(732	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		9,839			11,097
Debt discount amortization		4,645			3,895
Equity method losses		—			1,224
Derivatives		(127	)		—
Stock-based compensation		1,581			1,710
Deferred taxes		232			—
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		27			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		6,349			(22,412	)
Inventories		(10,015	)		(3,703	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(1,208	)		2,177
Accounts payable		(96	)		556
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(15,069	)		6,777
Income taxes receivable/payable		(52	)		7,699
Net cash provided by operating activities		3,269			8,288
Investing Activities
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(4,864	)		(4,303	)
Purchase of acquired company, net of cash acquired		(2,002	)		—
Notes receivable, net		36			48
Net cash used in investing activities		(6,830	)		(4,255	)
Financing Activities
Principal payments under mortgages and notes		(2,542	)		(267	)
Borrowings under line of credit		—			44,000
Principal payments under line of credit		—			(44,000	)
Repurchases of common stock		(3,037	)		(1,154	)
Proceeds from employee stock purchase and option plans		1,286			132
Net cash used in financing activities		(4,293	)		(1,289	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(7,854	)		2,744
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		27,270			19,514
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	19,416		$	22,258
Supplemental Disclosure:
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest	$	3,374		$	3,432
Cash paid (received) for income taxes, net	$	360		$	(7,515	)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated

Financial Statements (Unaudited).

3

TREX COMPANY, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

(unaudited)

1. BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION

Trex Company, Inc. (the “Company”) is the country’s largest manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railing products, which are marketed under the brand name Trex^®. We are incorporated in Delaware. Our principal executive offices are located at 160 Exeter Drive, Winchester, Virginia 22603, and our telephone number at that address is (540) 542-6300. The Company operates in one business segment.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 included in the annual report of Trex Company, Inc. on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company’s critical accounting policies are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

3. ACQUISITIONS

On May 2, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Iron Deck Corporation, a manufacturer of steel deck-framing systems located in Denver, Colorado. This acquisition enhances the Company’s goals of product extension and growth in market share.

4. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The Company’s comprehensive income was $2.1 million and $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $7.3 million and ($0.7) million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Comprehensive income consists of net income and changes in net unrealized gains and losses on debt-related derivative, net of tax.

5. INVENTORIES

Inventories, at LIFO (last-in, first-out) value, consist of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Finished goods	$	44,846		$	29,983
Raw materials		22,741			27,589
Total FIFO inventories		67,587			57,572
Reserve to adjust inventories to LIFO value		(28,551	)		(28,551	)
Total LIFO inventories	$	39,036		$	29,021

An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Since inventory levels and costs are subject to factors beyond management’s control, interim results are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.

4

6. ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Accrued compensation and benefits	$	3,025	$	6,687
Accrued interest		2,992		3,526
Accrued rent obligations		1,874		1,938
Accrued sales and marketing		2,607		2,584
Accrued taxes and penalties		160		200
Other		4,290		8,544
Total accrued expenses	$	14,948	$	23,479

7. DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Convertible notes	$	97,500		$	97,500
Real estate loan		—			2,541
		97,500			100,041
Less unamortized debt discount		(10,613	)		(15,258	)
		86,887			84,783
Less current portion		(86,887	)		(590	)
Total long-term debt	$	—		$	84,193

The Company’s outstanding debt consists of convertible bond notes and a revolving credit facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company used cash on hand to pay in full the $2.5 million real estate note. At June 30, 2011, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and additional available borrowing capacity of approximately $82 million.

As of June 30, 2011 the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants contained in its debt agreements. Failure to comply with our loan covenants might cause our lenders to accelerate our repayment obligations under our credit facility, which may be declared payable immediately based on a default and which could result in a cross-default under our $97.5 million principal amount of outstanding convertible notes.

The following table provides additional information regarding the Company’s convertible debt instruments:

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Principal amount of the liability component	$	97,500		$	97,500
Unamortized discount of liability component		(10,613	)		(15,258	)
Net carrying amount of liability component		86,887			82,242
Carrying amount of the equity component		23,860			23,860
Remaining amortization period of discount		12 months			18 months
Conversion price	$	21.78		$	21.78
Effective interest rate on liability component		18.41	%		18.41	%
If-converted value in excess of principal amount (a)	$	29,105			—
If-converted number of shares to be issued (a)		1,029			—

5

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Interest expense at coupon rate (6.0%)	$	1,462	$	1,462	$	2,925	$	2,925
Non-cash interest in accordance with ASC 470		2,322		1,947		4,645		3,895
Total interest expense recognized on convertible debt instruments	$	3,784	$	3,409	$	7,570	$	6,820

(a) If-converted value amounts are for disclosure purposes only. The if-converted value in excess of the principal amount and the if-converted number of shares to be issued illustrated above are based on the average stock price of $28.28 during the six months ended June 30, 2011, which exceeded the conversion price of $21.78.

The notes are convertible if a specified trading price of $28.31 of the Company’s common stock (the “trigger price”) is achieved and maintained for a specified period. If the holders exercise the conversion feature, the principal amount of the notes is settled in cash upon conversion and the conversion spread is settled in common shares. The trigger price condition was not satisfied during the second quarter of 2011.

8. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company considers the recorded value of its financial assets and liabilities, consisting primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and real estate loan to approximate the fair value of the respective assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011, the fair value of the Company’s 6.00% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 was estimated at $123.3 million based on quoted market prices.

The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to fluctuations in the interest rates on its variable-rate debt. At December 31, 2010, the fair value of our outstanding interest rate swap was $0.3 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, in conjunction with paying off its real estate note, the Company paid approximately $0.3 million to settle its interest rate swap. As a result of the settlement of its interest rate swap, the Company reclassified a $0.2 million loss (net of tax expense of $0.1 million) previously included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” to “Interest expense, net.”

9. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Numerator:
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	2,106	$	4,775	$	7,163	$	(732	)
Denominator:
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		15,397,476		15,188,963		15,345,529		15,165,942
Effect of dilutive securities: SARs and options		546,672		428,922		557,531		—
Convertible notes		1,148,303		144,328		1,029,066		—
Restricted stock		60,728		118,271		49,932		—
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		17,153,179		15,880,484		16,982,058		15,165,942
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.14	$	0.31	$	0.47	$	(0.05	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.12	$	0.30	$	0.42	$	(0.05	)

The Company has excluded the dilutive effect of stock options, stock appreciation rights, convertible notes and restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2010, due to a net operating loss for the period. As a result of the quarterly and year-to-date average stock price exceeding the conversion price of $21.78, the Company included 1,148,303 and 1,029,066 additional shares related to the convertible notes in the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company included 144,328 additional shares related to the convertible notes in the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding.

10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718, Share-Based Payment, (ASC 718). Under the transition method, compensation cost includes (a) compensation cost for all share-based

6

payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of ASC 718; and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718.

The Company has one stock-based compensation plan, the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was amended by its shareholders on May 7, 2008. The 2005 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. Stock-based compensation is granted to officers, directors and certain key employees in accordance with the provisions of the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan provides for grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock and performance share awards. As of June 30, 2011, the total aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the 2005 Plan is 3,150,000.

The fair value of each SAR is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing formula. For SARs issued in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the assumptions shown in the following table were used:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
Weighted-average fair value of grants	$	14.57		$	10.08
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Average risk-free interest rate		2.0	%		2.7	%
Expected term (years)		5			5
Expected volatility		65	%		67	%

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock-based compensation grants for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

	Stock Awards Granted		Weighted-Average Grant Price Per Share
Stock appreciation rights		88,540	$	26.21
Restricted stock		63,405	$	26.21

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Stock appreciation rights	$	0.4	$	0.5	$	0.8	$	0.9
Restricted stock		0.4		0.4		0.8		0.8
Total stock-based compensation	$	0.8	$	0.9	$	1.6	$	1.7

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards as of June 30, 2011 totaled $4.6 million. The cost of these unvested awards is being recognized over the requisite vesting period of 36 months from date of grant.

11. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was -56.5% and 15.5% respectively, which resulted in benefits of $2.6 and $0.1 million, respectively. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of approximately $2.6 million related to the favorable resolution of uncertain tax positions.

The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset, the effect of which is to substantially reduce the Company’s effective tax rate as the tax expense or benefit recorded at the statutory tax rate is offset by a corresponding expense or benefit resulting from the change in the valuation allowance. Accordingly, the Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, excluding the impact from the aforementioned one-time benefit, was 3.0% and 15.5% respectively.

The Company operates in multiple tax jurisdictions and, in the normal course of business, its tax returns are subject to examination by various taxing authorities. Such examinations may result in future assessments by these taxing authorities and the Company has accrued a liability when it believes that it is more likely than not that benefits of tax positions will not be realized. The Company believes that adequate provisions have been made for all tax returns subject to examination. As of

7

June 30, 2011, tax years 2005 through 2011 remain subject to examination by federal and certain state tax jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service recently completed an examination of the Company’s federal income tax returns for the tax years 2003 through 2008.

The Company has taken tax positions in certain taxing jurisdictions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease within the next 12 months. The Company does not expect any material change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.

12. SEASONALITY

The Company’s operating results have historically varied from quarter to quarter, in part due to seasonal trends in the demand for Trex^®. The Company has historically experienced lower net sales during the fourth quarter because holidays and adverse weather conditions in certain regions reduce the level of home improvement and construction activity.

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Contract Termination Costs

As of June 30, 2011, the minimum payments remaining under the Company’s lease relating to its reconsidered corporate relocation over the years ending December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 are $0.8 million, $1.9 million, $2.0 million, $2.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively, and $7.4 million thereafter. The minimum receipts remaining under the Company’s existing subleases over the years ending December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 are $0.8 million, $1.6 million, $1.3 million, and $1.0 million, respectively, and $0.0 thereafter. The Company accounts for the costs associated with the lease as contract termination costs.

The following table provides information about the Company’s liability related to the lease (in thousands):

	2011		2010
Balance as of January 1	$	567	$	485
Less: net rental receipts (payments)		20		107
Accretion of discount		22		20
Balance as of June 30	$	609	$	612

Product Warranty

The Company warrants that its products will be free from material defects in workmanship and material and will not check, split, splinter, rot or suffer structural damage from termites or fungal decay. With respect to the Company’s new Transcend product, the Company further warrants that the product will not fade in color more than a certain amount and will be resistant to permanent staining from food substances or mold (provided the stain is cleaned within seven days of appearance). Each of these warranties generally extends for a period of 25 years for residential use and 10 years for commercial use. If there is a breach of such warranties, the Company has an obligation either to replace the defective product or refund the purchase price. The Company establishes warranty reserves to provide for estimated future expenses as a result of product defects that result in claims. Reserve estimates are based on management’s judgment, considering such factors as historical experience and other available information. Management reviews and adjusts these estimates, if necessary, on a quarterly basis based on the differences between actual experience and historical estimates.

The Company continues to receive and settle claims related to material produced at its Nevada facility through mid-2006 that exhibits surface flaking and regularly monitors the adequacy of the remaining warranty reserve. If the level of future claims exceeds the Company’s expectations, it could result in additional increases to the warranty reserve and reduced earnings in future periods. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the expected number of remaining claims or the expected cost to settle claims may result in approximately a $1.1 million change in the warranty reserve.

The following is a reconciliation of the Company’s warranty reserve (in thousands):

	2011			2010
Beginning balance, January 1	$	14,472		$	11,524
Provision for estimated warranties		—			9,000
Settlements made during the period		(3,476	)		(5,115	)
Ending balance, June 30	$	10,996		$	15,409

8

Legal Matters

As reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, on January 19, 2009, a purported class action case was commenced against the Company in the Superior Court of California, Santa Cruz County, by the lead law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and certain other law firms (the “Lieff Cabraser Group”) on behalf of Eric Ross and Bradley S. Hureth and similarly situated plaintiffs. These plaintiffs generally allege certain defects in the Company’s products, and that the Company has failed to provide adequate remedies for defective products. On February 13, 2009, the Company removed this case to the United States District Court, Northern District of California. On January 21, 2009, a purported class action case was commenced against the Company in the United States District Court, Western District of Washington by the law firm of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (the “Hagens Berman Firm”) on behalf of Mark Okano and similarly situated plaintiffs, generally alleging certain product defects in the Company’s products, and that the Company has failed to provide adequate remedies for defective products. This case was transferred by the Washington Court to the California Court as a related case to the Lieff Cabraser Group’s case.

On July 30, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California preliminarily approved a settlement of the claims of the lawsuit commenced by the Lieff Cabraser Group involving surface flaking of the Company’s product, and on March 15, 2010, it granted final approval of the settlement. On April 14, 2010, the Hagens Berman Firm filed a notice to appeal the District Court’s ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On July 9, 2010, the Hagens Berman Firm dismissed their appeal, effectively making the settlement final.

On March 25, 2010, the Lieff Cabraser Group amended its complaint to add claims relating to alleged defects in the Company’s products and alleged misrepresentations relating to mold growth. The Hagens Berman firm has alleged similar claims in its original complaint. In its Final Order approving the surface flaking settlement, the District Court consolidated the two pending actions relating to the mold claims, and appointed the Hagens Berman Firm as lead counsel in this case. The Company believes that these claims are without merit, and will vigorously defend this lawsuit.

On December 15, 2010, a purported class action case was commenced against the Company in the United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky, by the lead law firm of Cohen & Malad, LLP (“Cohen & Malad”) on behalf of Richard Levin and similarly situated plaintiffs, and on June 13, 2011, a purported class action was commenced against the Company in the Marion Circuit/Superior Court of Indiana by Cohen & Malad on behalf of Ellen Kopetsky and similarly situated plaintiffs. On June 28, 2011, the Company removed the Kopetsky case to the United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana. The plaintiffs in both of these purported class actions generally allege certain defects in the Company’s products and alleged misrepresentations relating to mold growth. The Company believes that these claims are without merit, and will vigorously defend these lawsuits.

The Company has other lawsuits, as well as other claims, pending against it which are ordinary routine litigation and claims incidental to the business. Management has evaluated the merits of these other lawsuits and claims, and believes that their ultimate resolution will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or competitive position.

9

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements regarding our expected financial position and operating results, our business strategy, our financing plans, forecasted demographic and economic trends relating to our industry and similar matters are forward-looking statements. These statements can sometimes be identified by our use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” or similar expressions. We cannot promise you that our expectations in such forward-looking statements will turn out to be correct. Our actual results could be materially different from our expectations because of various factors, including the factors discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These statements are also subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company's actual operating results to differ materially. Such risks and uncertainties include the extent of market acceptance of the Company's products; the costs associated with the development and launch of new products and the market acceptance of such new products; the sensitivity of the Company's business to general economic conditions; the Company's ability to obtain raw materials at acceptable prices; the Company's ability to maintain product quality and product performance at an acceptable cost; the level of expenses associated with product replacement and consumer relations expenses related to product quality; and the highly competitive markets in which the Company operates.

Overview

General. Trex Company, Inc., (the “Company”), is the largest manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railing products, which are marketed under the brand name Trex^®. We offer a comprehensive set of aesthetically durable, low maintenance product offerings and believe that the range and variety of our product offerings allow consumers to design personal outdoor living space using Trex brand products.

We have seven decking products: Trex Transcend^®, Trex Accents^®, Trex Accents Fire Defense^®, Trex Brasilia^® , Trex Contours^®, Trex Escapes^® , Trex Origins^® ; two railing products: Trex Designer Series Railing^® and Trex Transcend Railing; two fencing products, Trex Seclusions^® and Trex Surroundings^®; and a cellular PVC outdoor trim product, TrexTrim™. In addition, we offer Trex Hideaway^®, which is a hidden fastening system for specially grooved boards; and Trex Elevations™, our newest product offering of steel deck framing.

Highlights related to the second quarter of 2011 include:

• We experienced a decrease in net sales of 32.1% in the quarter, compared to the second quarter of 2010, primarily driven by poor weather conditions in the spring, along with an unfavorable macroeconomic environment.

• We ended the second quarter with $19.4 million in cash and had no borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

• We completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Iron Deck Corporation, a manufacturer of steel deck-framing systems. We introduced this new product into the marketplace as Trex Elevations™.

Net Sales. Net sales consists of sales and freight, net of returns and discounts. The level of net sales is principally affected by sales volume and the prices paid for Trex products. Our branding and product differentiation strategy enables us to command premium prices over wood products.

Sales Incentives / Early Buy Program: As part of our normal business practice and consistent with industry practices, we have historically provided our distributors and dealers incentives to build inventory levels before the start of the prime deck-building season to ensure adequate availability of product to meet anticipated seasonal consumer demand and to enable production planning. These incentives, which together we reference as our “early buy program,” include prompt payment discounts or favorable payment terms. In addition, from time to time we may offer price discounts or volume rebates on specified products and other incentives based on increases in distributor purchases as part of specific promotional programs.

We launched our early buy program for the 2011 decking season in December 2010. The timing and terms of the 2011 program are generally consistent with the timing and terms of the 2010 program launched in December 2009. To qualify for early buy program incentives, customers must commit to the terms of the program which specify eligible products and quantities, order deadlines and available terms, discounts and rebates. There are no product return rights granted to our distributors except those granted pursuant to the warranty provisions of our agreements with distributors. In addition, our products are not susceptible to rapid changes in technology that may cause them to become obsolete. The early buy program can have a significant impact on our sales, receivables and inventory levels. We have provided further discussion of our receivables and inventory in the liquidity and capital resources section.

10

Gross Profit. Gross profit represents the difference between net sales and cost of sales. Cost of sales consists of raw materials costs, direct labor costs, manufacturing costs and freight. Raw materials costs generally include the costs to purchase and transport waste wood fiber, reclaimed polyethylene, or “PE material,” and pigmentation for coloring Trex products. Direct labor costs include wages and benefits of personnel engaged in the manufacturing process. Manufacturing costs consist of costs of depreciation, utilities, maintenance supplies and repairs, indirect labor, including wages and benefits, and warehouse and equipment rental activities.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The largest components of selling, general and administrative expenses are branding and other sales and marketing costs, which we use to build brand awareness of Trex. Sales and marketing costs consist primarily of salaries, commissions and benefits paid to sales and marketing personnel, consumer relations, advertising expenses and other promotional costs. General and administrative expenses include salaries and benefits of personnel engaged in research and development, procurement, accounting and other business functions, office occupancy costs attributable to these functions, and professional fees. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses have varied from quarter to quarter due, in part, to the seasonality of our business.

Results of Operations

The following table shows, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, selected statement of operations data as a percentage of net sales:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales		70.0			74.1			68.4			75.2
Gross profit		30.0			25.9			31.6			24.8
Selling, general and administrative expenses		22.1			18.4			23.1			21.1
Income from operations		7.9			7.5			8.5			3.7
Interest expense, net		5.1			3.3			5.4			4.2
Income (loss) before income taxes		2.8			4.2			3.1			(0.5	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		0.1			0.0			(1.8	)		(0.1	)
Net income (loss)		2.7	%		4.2	%		4.9	%		(0.4	)%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared With Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

Net Sales. Net sales in the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “2011 quarter”) decreased 32.1% to $78.4 million from $115.5 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “2010 quarter”). The decrease in net sales was attributable to a 39.5% decrease in sales volume which was partially offset by a 12.2% increase in the average price per unit. The increase in average price per unit was driven by a 2011 price increase for Transcend decking products and a shift in sales mix toward higher priced products. We believe the decrease in sales volume, as compared to the 2010 quarter, was a result of poor weather conditions in the spring that delayed the start of the deck building season in certain parts of the United States, along with an unfavorable macroeconomic environment.

Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased 21.2% to $23.5 million in the 2011 quarter from $30.0 million in the 2010 quarter. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales, gross margin, increased to 30.0% in the 2011 quarter from 25.9% in the 2010 quarter. Gross profit in the 2010 quarter was adversely affected by a $9.0 million increase to the warranty reserve and $1.9 million of charges related to two supply contracts. Excluding the aforementioned charges in the 2010, quarter gross profit decreased 42.2% to $23.5 million in the 2011 quarter from $40.7 million in the 2010 quarter. Excluding the aforementioned charges in the 2010 quarter, gross margin decreased to 30.0% in the 2011 quarter from 35.3% in the 2010 quarter. The elimination of the 2010 Transcend startup costs contributed 5% to gross margin. This was more than offset by capacity utilization, which reduced gross margin by 6% and other sales related items.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $3.9 million, or 18.2% to $17.4 million in the 2011 quarter from $21.2 million in the 2010 quarter. The 2010 quarter included a non-cash charge of $2.4 million related to the Company’s investment in Denplax, a partially-owned Spanish joint venture. The remaining decrease of $1.4 million in selling, general and administrative expenses in the 2011 quarter was primarily related to lower personnel-related expenses partially offset by an increase in branding expenditures. Personnel-related expenses decreased $1.9 million in the 2011 quarter driven by a decrease in incentive compensation. As a percentage of net sales, total selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 22.1% in the 2011 quarter from 18.4% in the 2010 quarter.

Interest Expense. Net interest expense increased $0.1 million to $4.0 million in the 2011 quarter from $3.9 million in the 2010 quarter. Net interest expense included $2.6 million and $2.2 million of charges to the 2011 and 2010 quarters,

11

respectively, in non-cash interest related primarily to the amortization of the convertible debt discount and financing costs. The offsetting decrease in net interest expense in the 2011 quarter is primarily due to a reduction in the average debt balance in the 2011 quarter. As a percentage of net sales, interest expense increased to 5.1% in the 2011 quarter from 3.3% in the 2010 quarter.

Provision for Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the 2011 quarter and 2010 quarter was 2.9% and 0.0%, respectively, which resulted in an expense of $62 thousand in the 2011 quarter. The effective tax rate was substantially lower than the statutory rate in both quarters due to the effect of the valuation allowance the Company maintains against its net deferred tax assets which substantially offsets statutory income tax.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared With Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

Net Sales. Net sales in the six months ended June 30, 2011 (the “2011 six-month period”) decreased 18.9% to $147.4 million from $181.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 (the “2010 six-month period”). The decrease in net sales was attributable to a 26.0% decrease in sales volume which was partially offset by a 14.3% increase in the average price per unit. The increase in average price per unit was driven by a 2011 price increase for Transcend decking products and a shift in sales mix toward higher priced products. We believe the decrease in sales volume, as compared to the 2010 six-month period, was a result of poor weather conditions in the spring that delayed the start of the deck building season in certain parts of the United States, along with an unfavorable macroeconomic environment.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 3.3% to $46.6 million in the 2011 six-month period from $45.1 million in the 2010 six-month period. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales, gross margin, increased to 31.6% in the 2011 six-month period from 24.8% in the 2010 six-month period. Gross profit in the 2010 six-month period was adversely affected by a $9.0 million increase to the warranty reserve and $1.9 million of charges related to two supply contracts. Excluding the aforementioned charges in the 2010 six-month period gross profit decreased 16.7% to $46.6 million in the 2011 six-month period from $55.9 million in the 2010 six-month period. Excluding the aforementioned charges in the 2010 six-month period, gross margin increased to 31.6% in the 2011 six-month period from 30.8% in the 2010 six-month period. The elimination of the 2010 Transcend startup costs contributed 7% to gross margin. This was partially offset by capacity utilization, which reduced gross margin by 2%, and other sales related items.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $4.3 million, or 11.1% to $34.0 million in the 2011 six-month period from $38.3 million in the 2010 six-month period. The 2010 six-month period included a non-cash charge of $2.4 million related to the Company’s investment in Denplax, a partially-owned Spanish joint venture. The remaining decrease of $1.9 million in selling, general and administrative expenses in the 2011 quarter was primarily related to lower personnel-related expenses. Personnel-related expenses decreased $1.2 million in the 2011 six-month period driven by a decrease in incentive compensation. As a percentage of net sales, total selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 23.1% in the 2011 six-month period from 21.1% in the 2010 six-month period.

Interest Expense. Net interest expense increased $0.3 million to $8.0 million for the 2011 six-month period from $7.7 million in the 2010 six-month period. Net interest expense included $5.2 million and $4.5 million of charges to the 2011 and 2010 six-month periods, respectively, related primarily to the amortization of the convertible debt discount and financing costs. The offsetting decrease in net interest expense in the 2011 six-month period is primarily due to a reduction in the average debt balance for the 2011 six-month period. As a percentage of net sales, interest expense increased to 5.4% in the 2011 six-month period from 4.2% in the 2010 six-month period.

Provision for Income Taxes. The Company’s effective tax rate for the 2011 and 2010 six-month periods was -56.5% and 15.5%, respectively, which resulted in benefits of $2.6 and $0.1 million, respectively. The abnormal effective tax rate for the 2011 six-month period was primarily the result of benefits recorded in the first quarter related to the favorable resolution of uncertain tax positions. Excluding these benefits, the effective tax rate for the six-months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately 3.0%. The effective tax rate was substantially lower than the statutory rate in both six-month periods due to the effect of the valuation allowance the Company maintains against its net deferred tax assets which substantially offsets statutory income tax.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We finance operations and growth primarily with cash flow from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and other loans, operating leases and normal trade credit terms from operating activities.

At June 30, 2011, we had $19.4 million of cash and cash equivalents.

We believe that cash on hand, cash from operations and borrowings expected to be available under the Company’s existing revolving credit facility will provide sufficient funds to fund planned capital expenditures, make scheduled principal and interest payments, fund the warranty reserve and meet other cash requirements. We currently expect to fund future capital expenditures from operations and financing activities. The actual amount and timing of future capital requirements may differ materially from our estimate depending on the demand for Trex and new market developments and opportunities.

12

Sources and Uses of Cash. Cash provided by operating activities for the 2011 six-month period was $3.3 million compared to $8.3 million for the 2010 six-month period, a $5.0 million reduction. Cash flow from operations during the 2010 six-month period benefited from a $7.5 million tax refund, a cash inflow that was not replicated in the 2011 six-month period. Also, the Company invested $6.3 million more cash to build inventory during the 2011 six-month period than it did during the 2010 six-month period. These unfavorable effects were offset by the favorable effect of reduced investment in accounts receivable, primarily due to lower sales volumes in the 2011 six-month period. We expect to collect all outstanding accounts receivable balances, net of existing allowances, during the next fiscal quarter.

Cash used in investing activities totaled $6.8 million in the 2011 six-month period, compared to cash used in investing activities of $4.3 million in the 2010 six-month period. In May 2011, we completed the acquisition of substantially all the assets of Iron Deck Corporation, a manufacturer of steel deck-framing systems. In the 2011 six-month period, capital expenditures consisted primarily of manufacturing equipment for process and productivity improvements, including retrofitting lines to produce new products.

Cash used by financing activities was $4.3 million in the six-month period compared to cash provided by financing activities of $1.3 million in the 2010 six-month period. Borrowings from the revolving credit facility were $44.0 million in the 2010 six-month period compared to no borrowings in the 2011 six-month period. We reduced debt by $2.5 million in the 2011 six-month period by extinguishing a real estate note.

Indebtedness. At June 30, 2011, our indebtedness, excluding the unamortized debt discount totaled $97.5 million and the annualized weighted average interest rate of such indebtedness was 6.0%.

Our ability to borrow under the revolving credit facility is tied to a borrowing base that consists of certain receivables and inventories. At June 30, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and an available borrowing capacity of approximately $82 million. The credit facility matures on December 31, 2011, but may be extended to December 31, 2012 if certain terms and conditions are met.

Debt Covenants. To remain in compliance with covenants contained within its debt agreements, we must maintain specified financial ratios based on levels of debt, capital, net worth, fixed charges, and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. At June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with these covenants. Failure to comply with our loan covenants might cause our lenders to accelerate our repayment obligations under our credit facility, which may be declared payable immediately based on a default and which could result in a cross-default under our $97.5 million principal amount of outstanding convertible notes.

Capital Requirements. Capital expenditures in the 2011 six-month period totaled $4.9 million, primarily for manufacturing equipment. We currently estimate that our capital expenditures in 2011 will be approximately $15 million.

Inventory in Distribution Channels. We sell our products through a tiered distribution system. We have approximately 20 distributors and two mass merchandisers to which we sell our products. These distributors in turn sell the products to approximately 3,500 dealers in the aggregate who in turn sell the products to end users. While we do not typically receive any information regarding inventory in the distribution channel from any dealers, we occasionally receive limited information from some but not all of our distributors regarding their inventory in the distribution channel. Because only a few distributors provide us with any information regarding their inventory, we cannot definitively determine the level of inventory in the distribution channels at any time. We do not believe that inventory levels as of June 30, 2011 are appreciably higher than inventory levels as of June 30, 2010. Changes in inventory levels in the distribution channel without a corresponding change in end-use demand could have an adverse effect on future sales.

Product Warranty. We continue to receive and settle claims related to material produced at its Nevada facility through mid-2006 that exhibits surface flaking and regularly monitor the adequacy of the remaining warranty reserve. If the level of future claims exceeds our expectations, it could result in additional increases to the warranty reserve and reduced earnings and cash flows in future periods. We estimate that a 10% change in the expected number of remaining claims or the expected cost to settle claims may result in approximately a $1.1 million change in the warranty reserve.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For information regarding our exposure to certain market risks, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” in Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There were no material changes to the Company’s market risk exposure during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

13

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer, who is the Company’s principal executive officer, and its Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, who is the Company’s principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. In addition, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

14

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

As reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, on January 19, 2009, a purported class action case was commenced against the Company in the Superior Court of California, Santa Cruz County, by the lead law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and certain other law firms (the “Lieff Cabraser Group”) on behalf of Eric Ross and Bradley S. Hureth and similarly situated plaintiffs. These plaintiffs generally allege certain defects in the Company’s products, and that the Company has failed to provide adequate remedies for defective products. On February 13, 2009, the Company removed this case to the United States District Court, Northern District of California. On January 21, 2009, a purported class action case was commenced against the Company in the United States District Court, Western District of Washington by the law firm of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (the “Hagens Berman Firm”) on behalf of Mark Okano and similarly situated plaintiffs, generally alleging certain product defects in the Company’s products, and that the Company has failed to provide adequate remedies for defective products. This case was transferred by the Washington Court to the California Court as a related case to the Lieff Cabraser Group’s case.

On July 30, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California preliminarily approved a settlement of the claims of the lawsuit commenced by the Lieff Cabraser Group involving surface flaking of the Company’s product, and on March 15, 2010, it granted final approval of the settlement. On April 14, 2010, the Hagens Berman Firm filed a notice to appeal the District Court’s ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On July 9, 2010, the Hagens Berman Firm dismissed their appeal, effectively making the settlement final.

On March 25, 2010, the Lieff Cabraser Group amended its complaint to add claims relating to alleged defects in the Company’s products and alleged misrepresentations relating to mold growth. The Hagens Berman firm has alleged similar claims in its original complaint. In its Final Order approving the surface flaking settlement, the District Court consolidated the two pending actions relating to the mold claims, and appointed the Hagens Berman Firm as lead counsel in this case. The Company believes that these claims are without merit, and will vigorously defend this lawsuit.

On December 15, 2010, a purported class action case was commenced against the Company in the United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky, by the lead law firm of Cohen & Malad, LLP (“Cohen & Malad”) on behalf of Richard Levin and similarly situated plaintiffs, and on June 13, 2011, a purported class action was commenced against the Company in the Marion Circuit/Superior Court of Indiana by Cohen & Malad on behalf of Ellen Kopetsky and similarly situated plaintiffs. On June 28, 2011, the Company removed the Kopetsky case to the United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana. The plaintiffs in both of these purported class actions generally allege certain defects in the Company’s products and alleged misrepresentations relating to mold growth. The Company believes that these claims are without merit, and will vigorously defend these lawsuits.

The Company has other lawsuits, as well as other claims, pending against it which are ordinary routine litigation and claims incidental to the business. Management has evaluated the merits of these other lawsuits and claims, and believes that their ultimate resolution will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or competitive position.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c) The following table provides information about our purchases of our common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 in accordance with Item 703 of Regulation S-K:

Period	(a) Total Number  of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1)		(b) Average Price  Paid per Share (or Unit) ($)		(c) Total Number  of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Program
April 1, 2011 – April 30, 2011		—	$	0.00		Not applicable		Not applicable
May 1, 2011 – May 31, 2011		18,680		29.58		Not applicable		Not applicable
June 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011		—		0.00		Not applicable		Not applicable
Quarter ended June 30, 2011		18,680	$	29.58

(1) Represents shares withheld by, or delivered to, the Company pursuant to provisions in agreements with recipients of restricted stock granted under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan allowing the Company to withhold, or the recipient to deliver to the Company, the number of shares having the fair value equal to tax withholding due.

15

Item 6. Exhibits

The Company files herewith the following exhibits:

3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Trex Company, Inc. (the “Company”). Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-63287) and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Trex Company, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Filed herewith.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Trex Company, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Filed herewith.
32	Certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350. Filed herewith.
101	The following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) condensed consolidated balance sheets, (ii) condensed consolidated statements of operations, (iii) condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements, tagged as blocks of text. Under Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this exhibit is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under those sections. Filed herewith.

16

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	TREX COMPANY, INC.
Date: August 1, 2011	By:	/s/ James E. Cline
		James E. Cline
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description
3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Trex Company, Inc. (the “Company”). Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-63287) and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Trex Company, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Filed herewith.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Trex Company, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Filed herewith.
32	Certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350. Filed herewith.
101	The following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) condensed consolidated balance sheets, (ii) condensed consolidated statements of operations, (iii) condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements, tagged as blocks of text. Under Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this exhibit is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under those sections. Filed herewith.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald W. Kaplan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trex Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 1, 2011

/s/ Ronald W. Kaplan

Ronald W. Kaplan

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James E. Cline, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trex Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function(s)):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 1, 2011

/s/ James E. Cline

James E. Cline

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32

Exhibit 32

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trex Company, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:

(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 1, 2011	/s/ Ronald W. Kaplan
	Ronald W. Kaplan
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 1, 2011	/s/ James E. Cline
	James E. Cline
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

XML



Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	3,000,000	3,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	40,000,000	40,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	15,584,363	15,458,002
Common stock, shares outstanding	15,584,363	15,458,002

XML



Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Operations (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Operations
Net sales	$ 78,405	$ 115,499	$ 147,412	$ 181,839
Cost of sales	54,863	85,628	100,840	136,755
Gross profit	23,542	29,871	46,572	45,084
Selling, general and administrative expenses	17,364	21,228	34,021	38,280
Income from operations	6,178	8,643	12,551	6,804
Interest expense, net	4,010	3,868	7,974	7,670
Income (loss) before income taxes	2,168	4,775	4,577	(866)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	62	0	(2,586)	(134)
Net income (loss)	$ 2,106	$ 4,775	$ 7,163	$ (732)
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$ 0.14	$ 0.31	$ 0.47	$ (0.05)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	15,397,476	15,188,963	15,345,529	15,165,942
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$ 0.12	$ 0.30	$ 0.42	$ (0.05)
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	17,153,179	15,880,484	16,982,058	15,165,942

XML



Document And Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jul. 20, 2011
Document And Entity Information
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2011
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Entity Registrant Name	TREX CO INC
Entity Central Index Key	0001069878
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		15,584,975

XML



Debt

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Debt

Debt

7. DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Convertible notes	$	97,500		$	97,500
Real estate loan		—			2,541
		97,500			100,041
Less unamortized debt discount		(10,613	)		(15,258	)
		86,887			84,783
Less current portion		(86,887	)		(590	)
Total long-term debt	$	—		$	84,193

The Company's outstanding debt consists of convertible bond notes and a revolving credit facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company used cash on hand to pay in full the $2.5 million real estate note. At June 30, 2011, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and additional available borrowing capacity of approximately $82 million.

As of June 30, 2011 the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants contained in its debt agreements. Failure to comply with our loan covenants might cause our lenders to accelerate our repayment obligations under our credit facility, which may be declared payable immediately based on a default and which could result in a cross-default under our $97.5 million principal amount of outstanding convertible notes.

The following table provides additional information regarding the Company's convertible debt instruments:

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Principal amount of the liability component	$	97,500		$	97,500
Unamortized discount of liability component		(10,613	)		(15,258	)
Net carrying amount of liability component		86,887			82,242
Carrying amount of the equity component		23,860			23,860
Remaining amortization period of discount		12 months			18 months
Conversion price	$	21.78		$	21.78
Effective interest rate on liability component		18.41	%		18.41	%
If-converted value in excess of principal amount (a)	$	29,105			—
If-converted number of shares to be issued (a)		1,029			—

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Interest expense at coupon rate (6.0%)	$	1,462	$	1,462	$	2,925	$	2,925
Non-cash interest in accordance with ASC 470		2,322		1,947		4,645		3,895
Total interest expense recognized on convertible debt instruments	$	3,784	$	3,409	$	7,570	$	6,820

(a) If-converted value amounts are for disclosure purposes only. The if-converted value in excess of the principal amount and the if-converted number of shares to be issued illustrated above are based on the average stock price of $28.28 during the six months ended June 30, 2011, which exceeded the conversion price of $21.78.

The notes are convertible if a specified trading price of $28.31 of the Company's common stock (the "trigger price") is achieved and maintained for a specified period. If the holders exercise the conversion feature, the principal amount of the notes is settled in cash upon conversion and the conversion spread is settled in common shares. The trigger price condition was not satisfied during the second quarter of 2011.

XML



Seasonality

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Seasonality

Seasonality

12. SEASONALITY

The Company's operating results have historically varied from quarter to quarter, in part due to seasonal trends in the demand for Trex^®. The Company has historically experienced lower net sales during the fourth quarter because holidays and adverse weather conditions in certain regions reduce the level of home improvement and construction activity.

XML



Acquisitions

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Acquisitions

Acquisitions

3. ACQUISITIONS

On May 2, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Iron Deck Corporation, a manufacturer of steel deck-framing systems located in Denver, Colorado. This acquisition enhances the Company's goals of product extension and growth in market share.

XML



Earnings Per Share

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Earnings Per Share

Earnings Per Share

9. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Numerator:
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	2,106	$	4,775	$	7,163	$	(732	)
Denominator:
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		15,397,476		15,188,963		15,345,529		15,165,942
Effect of dilutive securities: SARs and options		546,672		428,922		557,531		—
Convertible notes		1,148,303		144,328		1,029,066		—
Restricted stock		60,728		118,271		49,932		—
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		17,153,179		15,880,484		16,982,058		15,165,942
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.14	$	0.31	$	0.47	$	(0.05	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.12	$	0.30	$	0.42	$	(0.05	)

The Company has excluded the dilutive effect of stock options, stock appreciation rights, convertible notes and restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2010, due to a net operating loss for the period. As a result of the quarterly and year-to-date average stock price exceeding the conversion price of $21.78, the Company included 1,148,303 and 1,029,066 additional shares related to the convertible notes in the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company included 144,328 additional shares related to the convertible notes in the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding.

XML



Stock-Based Compensation

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718, Share-Based Payment, (ASC 718). Under the transition method, compensation cost includes (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of ASC 718; and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718.

The Company has one stock-based compensation plan, the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2005 Plan"), which was amended by its shareholders on May 7, 2008. The 2005 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. Stock-based compensation is granted to officers, directors and certain key employees in accordance with the provisions of the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan provides for grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock and performance share awards. As of June 30, 2011, the total aggregate number of shares of the Company's common stock that may be issued under the 2005 Plan is 3,150,000.

The fair value of each SAR is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing formula. For SARs issued in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the assumptions shown in the following table were used:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
Weighted-average fair value of grants	$	14.57		$	10.08
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Average risk-free interest rate		2.0	%		2.7	%
Expected term (years)		5			5
Expected volatility		65	%		67	%

The following table summarizes the Company's stock-based compensation grants for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

	Stock Awards Granted		Weighted-Average Grant Price Per Share
Stock appreciation rights		88,540	$	26.21
Restricted stock		63,405	$	26.21

The following table summarizes the Company's stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Stock appreciation rights	$	0.4	$	0.5	$	0.8	$	0.9
Restricted stock		0.4		0.4		0.8		0.8
Total stock-based compensation	$	0.8	$	0.9	$	1.6	$	1.7

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards as of June 30, 2011 totaled $4.6 million. The cost of these unvested awards is being recognized over the requisite vesting period of 36 months from date of grant.

XML



Financial Instruments

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Financial Instruments

Financial Instruments

8. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company considers the recorded value of its financial assets and liabilities, consisting primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and real estate loan to approximate the fair value of the respective assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011, the fair value of the Company's 6.00% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 was estimated at $123.3 million based on quoted market prices.

The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to fluctuations in the interest rates on its variable-rate debt. At December 31, 2010, the fair value of our outstanding interest rate swap was $0.3 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, in conjunction with paying off its real estate note, the Company paid approximately $0.3 million to settle its interest rate swap. As a result of the settlement of its interest rate swap, the Company reclassified a $0.2 million loss (net of tax expense of $0.1 million) previously included in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" to "Interest expense, net."

XML



Business And Organization

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Business And Organization

Business And Organization

1. BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION

Trex Company, Inc. (the "Company") is the country's largest manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railing products, which are marketed under the brand name Trex^®. We are incorporated in Delaware. Our principal executive offices are located at 160 Exeter Drive, Winchester, Virginia 22603, and our telephone number at that address is (540) 542-6300. The Company operates in one business segment.

XML



Comprehensive Income

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive Income

4. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The Company's comprehensive income was $2.1 million and $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $7.3 million and ($0.7) million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Comprehensive income consists of net income and changes in net unrealized gains and losses on debt-related derivative, net of tax.

XML



Inventories

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Inventories

Inventories

5. INVENTORIES

Inventories, at LIFO (last-in, first-out) value, consist of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Finished goods	$	44,846		$	29,983
Raw materials		22,741			27,589
Total FIFO inventories		67,587			57,572
Reserve to adjust inventories to LIFO value		(28,551	)		(28,551	)
Total LIFO inventories	$	39,036		$	29,021

An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management's estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Since inventory levels and costs are subject to factors beyond management's control, interim results are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.

XML



Commitments And Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Commitments And Contingencies

Commitments And Contingencies

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Contract Termination Costs

As of June 30, 2011, the minimum payments remaining under the Company's lease relating to its reconsidered corporate relocation over the years ending December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 are $0.8 million, $1.9 million, $2.0 million, $2.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively, and $7.4 million thereafter. The minimum receipts remaining under the Company's existing subleases over the years ending December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 are $0.8 million, $1.6 million, $1.3 million, and $1.0 million, respectively, and $0.0 thereafter. The Company accounts for the costs associated with the lease as contract termination costs.

The following table provides information about the Company's liability related to the lease (in thousands):

	2011		2010
Balance as of January 1	$	567	$	485
Less: net rental receipts (payments)		20		107
Accretion of discount		22		20
Balance as of June 30	$	609	$	612

Product Warranty

The Company warrants that its products will be free from material defects in workmanship and material and will not check, split, splinter, rot or suffer structural damage from termites or fungal decay. With respect to the Company's new Transcend product, the Company further warrants that the product will not fade in color more than a certain amount and will be resistant to permanent staining from food substances or mold (provided the stain is cleaned within seven days of appearance). Each of these warranties generally extends for a period of 25 years for residential use and 10 years for commercial use. If there is a breach of such warranties, the Company has an obligation either to replace the defective product or refund the purchase price. The Company establishes warranty reserves to provide for estimated future expenses as a result of product defects that result in claims. Reserve estimates are based on management's judgment, considering such factors as historical experience and other available information. Management reviews and adjusts these estimates, if necessary, on a quarterly basis based on the differences between actual experience and historical estimates.

The Company continues to receive and settle claims related to material produced at its Nevada facility through mid-2006 that exhibits surface flaking and regularly monitors the adequacy of the remaining warranty reserve. If the level of future claims exceeds the Company's expectations, it could result in additional increases to the warranty reserve and reduced earnings in future periods. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the expected number of remaining claims or the expected cost to settle claims may result in approximately a $1.1 million change in the warranty reserve.

The following is a reconciliation of the Company's warranty reserve (in thousands):

	2011			2010
Beginning balance, January 1	$	14,472		$	11,524
Provision for estimated warranties		—			9,000
Settlements made during the period		(3,476	)		(5,115	)
Ending balance, June 30	$	10,996		$	15,409

Legal Matters

As reported in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, on January 19, 2009, a purported class action case was commenced against the Company in the Superior Court of California, Santa Cruz County, by the lead law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and certain other law firms (the "Lieff Cabraser Group") on behalf of Eric Ross and Bradley S. Hureth and similarly situated plaintiffs. These plaintiffs generally allege certain defects in the Company's products, and that the Company has failed to provide adequate remedies for defective products. On February 13, 2009, the Company removed this case to the United States District Court, Northern District of California. On January 21, 2009, a purported class action case was commenced against the Company in the United States District Court, Western District of Washington by the law firm of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (the "Hagens Berman Firm") on behalf of Mark Okano and similarly situated plaintiffs, generally alleging certain product defects in the Company's products, and that the Company has failed to provide adequate remedies for defective products. This case was transferred by the Washington Court to the California Court as a related case to the Lieff Cabraser Group's case.

On July 30, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California preliminarily approved a settlement of the claims of the lawsuit commenced by the Lieff Cabraser Group involving surface flaking of the Company's product, and on March 15, 2010, it granted final approval of the settlement. On April 14, 2010, the Hagens Berman Firm filed a notice to appeal the District Court's ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On July 9, 2010, the Hagens Berman Firm dismissed their appeal, effectively making the settlement final.

On March 25, 2010, the Lieff Cabraser Group amended its complaint to add claims relating to alleged defects in the Company's products and alleged misrepresentations relating to mold growth. The Hagens Berman firm has alleged similar claims in its original complaint. In its Final Order approving the surface flaking settlement, the District Court consolidated the two pending actions relating to the mold claims, and appointed the Hagens Berman Firm as lead counsel in this case. The Company believes that these claims are without merit, and will vigorously defend this lawsuit.

On December 15, 2010, a purported class action case was commenced against the Company in the United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky, by the lead law firm of Cohen & Malad, LLP ("Cohen & Malad") on behalf of Richard Levin and similarly situated plaintiffs, and on June 13, 2011, a purported class action was commenced against the Company in the Marion Circuit/Superior Court of Indiana by Cohen & Malad on behalf of Ellen Kopetsky and similarly situated plaintiffs. On June 28, 2011, the Company removed the Kopetsky case to the United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana. The plaintiffs in both of these purported class actions generally allege certain defects in the Company's products and alleged misrepresentations relating to mold growth. The Company believes that these claims are without merit, and will vigorously defend these lawsuits.

The Company has other lawsuits, as well as other claims, pending against it which are ordinary routine litigation and claims incidental to the business. Management has evaluated the merits of these other lawsuits and claims, and believes that their ultimate resolution will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or competitive position.

XML



Accrued Expenses

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Accrued Expenses

Accrued Expenses

6. ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Accrued compensation and benefits	$	3,025	$	6,687
Accrued interest		2,992		3,526
Accrued rent obligations		1,874		1,938
Accrued sales and marketing		2,607		2,584
Accrued taxes and penalties		160		200
Other		4,290		8,544
Total accrued expenses	$	14,948	$	23,479

XML



Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$ 7,163	$ (732)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	9,839	11,097
Debt discount amortization	4,645	3,895
Equity method losses	0	1,224
Derivatives	(127)	0
Stock-based compensation	1,581	1,710
Deferred taxes	232	0
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment	27	0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	6,349	(22,412)
Inventories	(10,015)	(3,703)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(1,208)	2,177
Accounts payable	(96)	556
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(15,069)	6,777
Income taxes receivable/payable	(52)	7,699
Net cash provided by operating activities	3,269	8,288
Investing Activities
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(4,864)	(4,303)
Purchase of acquired company, net of cash acquired	(2,002)	0
Notes receivable, net	36	48
Net cash used in investing activities	(6,830)	(4,255)
Financing Activities
Principal payments under mortgages and notes	(2,542)	(267)
Borrowings under line of credit	0	44,000
Principal payments under line of credit	0	(44,000)
Repurchases of common stock	(3,037)	(1,154)
Proceeds from employee stock purchase and option plans	1,286	132
Net cash used in financing activities	(4,293)	(1,289)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(7,854)	2,744
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	27,270	19,514
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	19,416	22,258
Supplemental Disclosure:
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest	3,374	3,432
Cash paid (received) for income taxes, net	$ 360	$ (7,515)

XML



Basis Of Presentation

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Basis Of Presentation

Basis Of Presentation

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 included in the annual report of Trex Company, Inc. on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company's critical accounting policies are included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

XML



Income Taxes

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

11. INCOME TAXES

The Company's effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was -56.5% and 15.5% respectively, which resulted in benefits of $2.6 and $0.1 million, respectively. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of approximately $2.6 million related to the favorable resolution of uncertain tax positions.

The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset, the effect of which is to substantially reduce the Company's effective tax rate as the tax expense or benefit recorded at the statutory tax rate is offset by a corresponding expense or benefit resulting from the change in the valuation allowance. Accordingly, the Company's effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, excluding the impact from the aforementioned one-time benefit, was 3.0% and 15.5% respectively.

The Company operates in multiple tax jurisdictions and, in the normal course of business, its tax returns are subject to examination by various taxing authorities. Such examinations may result in future assessments by these taxing authorities and the Company has accrued a liability when it believes that it is more likely than not that benefits of tax positions will not be realized. The Company believes that adequate provisions have been made for all tax returns subject to examination. As of June 30, 2011, tax years 2005 through 2011 remain subject to examination by federal and certain state tax jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service recently completed an examination of the Company's federal income tax returns for the tax years 2003 through 2008.

The Company has taken tax positions in certain taxing jurisdictions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease within the next 12 months. The Company does not expect any material change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.

XML



Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 19,416	$ 27,270
Accounts receivable, net	46,902	53,332
Inventories	39,036	29,021
Prepaid expenses and other assets	2,861	1,539
Income taxes receivable	142	70
Deferred income taxes	949	1,004
Total current assets	109,306	112,236
Property, plant, and equipment, net	122,509	126,857
Goodwill	10,562	6,837
Other assets	1,253	1,885
Total assets	243,630	247,815
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Accounts payable	15,011	15,107
Accrued expenses	14,948	23,479
Accrued warranty	5,536	7,003
Current portion of long-term debt	86,887	590
Total current liabilities	122,382	46,179
Deferred income taxes	3,791	3,614
Accrued taxes	85	3,126
Non-current accrued warranty	5,460	7,469
Debt-related derivatives	0	312
Long-term debt	0	84,193
Other long-term liabilities	1,811	0
Total liabilities	133,529	144,893
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding	0	0
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized; 15,584,363 and 15,458,002 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively	156	155
Additional paid in capital	98,736	98,905
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	0	(184)
Retained earnings	11,209	4,046
Total stockholders' equity	110,101	102,922
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 243,630	$ 247,815