10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Mark One

[x] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ________.

Commission file number 000-24939

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	95-4703316 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
135 North Los Robles Ave., 7th Floor, Pasadena, California  (Address of principal executive offices)	91101  (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:

(626) 768-6000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
NONE	NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [x] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [x]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the regis-trant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 or Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [x]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filed, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filed [x]  Accelerated filer [ ]  Non-accelerated filer [ ]

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates is approximately $1,745,341,271 (based on the June 30, 2005 closing price of Common Stock of $33.59 per share).

As of February 28, 2006, 56,674,229 shares of East West Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock were outstanding.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [x]

DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders - Part III

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.

2005 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I 3

Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	23
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	24
Item 2.	Properties	24
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	24
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	24

PART II 25

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters	25
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	26
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	61
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	61
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	61
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	61
Item 9B.	Other Information	64

PART III 64

Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	64
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	64
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	65
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	65
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	65

PART IV 66

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 66

SIGNATURES	111
EXHIBIT INDEX	112

2

PART I

 Certain matters discussed in this Annual Report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “1933 Act” and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act” and as such, may involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which the Company operates and projections of future performance. The Company’s actual results, performance, or achievements may differ significantly from the results, performance, or achievements expected or implied in such forward-looking statements. For discussion of some of the factors that might cause such differences, see “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.” The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation to update any forward looking statements to reflect the occurrence of events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Organization

East West Bancorp, Inc. East West Bancorp, Inc. (referred to herein on an unconsolidated basis as “East West” and on a consolidated basis as the “Company” or “we”) is a bank holding company incorporated in Delaware on August 26, 1998 and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company commenced business on December 30, 1998 when, pursuant to a reorganization, it acquired all of the voting stock of East West Bank, or the “Bank”. The Bank is the Company’s principal asset. In addition to the Bank, the Company has seven other subsidiaries, namely East West Insurance Services, Inc., East West Capital Trust I, East West Capital Trust II, East West Capital Statutory Trust III, East West Capital Trust IV, East West Capital Trust V, and East West Capital Trust VI.

East West Insurance Services, Inc. On August 22, 2000, East West completed the acquisition of East West Insurance Services, Inc. or, the “Agency”, in a stock exchange transaction. The Agency provides business and consumer insurance services to the Southern California market. The Agency runs its operations autonomously from the operations of the Company.

Other Subsidiaries of East West Bancorp, Inc. The Company has established six other subsidiaries as statutory business trusts, East West Capital Trust I and East West Capital Trust II in 2000, East West Capital Statutory Trust III in 2003, East West Capital Trust IV and East West Capital Trust V in 2004, and East West Capital Trust VI in 2005, collectively referred to as the “Trusts”. In six separate private placement transactions, the Trusts have issued either fixed or variable rate capital securities representing undivided preferred beneficial interests in the assets of the Trusts. East West is the owner of all the beneficial interests represented by the common securities of the Trusts. The purpose of issuing the capital securities was to provide the Company with a cost-effective means of obtaining Tier I capital for regulatory purposes. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN No. 46R”), the Trusts are not consolidated into the accounts of the Company.

East West’s principal business is to serve as a holding company for the Bank and other banking or banking-related subsidiaries which East West may establish or acquire. East West has not engaged in any other activities to date. As a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries, East West’s principal source of funds is, and will continue to be, dividends that may be paid by its subsidiaries. East West’s other sources of funds include proceeds from the issuance of its common stock in connection with stock option and warrant exercises and employee stock purchase plans. At December 31, 2005, the Company had $8.28 billion in total consolidated assets, $6.72 billion in net consolidated loans, and $6.26 billion in total consolidated deposits.

3

The principal office of the Company is located at 135 N. Los Robles Ave., 7^th Floor, Pasadena, California 91101, and the telephone number is (626) 768-6000.

East West Bank. East West Bank was chartered by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board in June 1972, as the first federally chartered savings institution focused primarily on the Chinese-American community, and opened for business at its first office in the Chinatown district of Los Angeles in January 1973. From 1973 until the early 1990's, the Bank conducted a traditional savings and loan business by making predominantly long-term, single family residential and commercial and multifamily real estate loans. These loans were made principally within the ethnic Chinese market in Southern California and were funded primarily with retail savings deposits and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. The Bank has emphasized commercial lending since its conversion to a state-chartered commercial bank on July 31, 1995. The Bank now also provides loans for commercial, construction, and residential real estate projects and for the financing of international trade for companies in California.

Acquisitions of existing banks have contributed to the Bank’s growth. On May 28, 1999, the Bank completed its acquisition of First Central Bank, N.A. for an aggregate cash price of $13.5 million. First Central Bank had three branches in Southern California--one branch located in the Chinatown sector of Los Angeles, one branch in Monterey Park and one branch in Cerritos. The Bank acquired approximately $55.0 million in loans and assumed approximately $92.6 million in deposits.

On January 18, 2000, the Bank completed its acquisition of American International Bank for an aggregate cash price of $33.1 million. American International Bank had eight branches in Southern California. The Bank acquired approximately $107.9 million in loans and assumed approximately $170.8 million in deposits.

On January 16, 2001, the Bank completed the acquisition of Prime Bank for a combination of shares and cash valued at $16.6 million. Prime Bank was a one-branch commercial bank located in the Century City area of Los Angeles. The Bank acquired approximately $45.0 million in loans and assumed approximately $98.1 million in deposits.

On March 14, 2003, the Bank completed its acquisition of Pacific Business Bank for an aggregate cash price of $25.0 million. Pacific Business Bank operated four branches in Southern California located in Santa Fe Springs, Carson, El Monte, and South El Monte. The Bank acquired approximately $110.1 million in loans and $134.9 million in deposits.

On August 6, 2004, the Bank completed its acquisition of Trust Bancorp, parent company of Trust Bank, in an all-stock transaction valued at $32.9 million. Trust Bank operated four branches in Southern California, located in Monterey Park, Rowland Heights, West Covina and Arcadia. The Bank acquired approximately $164.0 million in loans and assumed $193.4 million in deposits through this acquisition.

On September 6, 2005, the Bank completed its acquisition of United National Bank (“UNB”), a commercial bank headquartered in San Marino, California. The purchase price was $177.9 million with sixty percent paid in stock and the remainder in cash. UNB provided community banking services through eleven branches, with eight located in Southern California, two in Northern California and one in Houston, Texas. The Bank acquired approximately $665.0 million in net loans receivable and assumed $865.1 million in deposits through this acquisition.

4

On December 23, 2005, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Standard Bank, a federal savings bank headquartered in Monterey Park, California. Standard Bank provides banking services to the community through six branches in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. At December 31, 2005, Standard Bank had total assets of $922.6 million, net loans of $500.3 million and total deposits of $747.0 million. Under the terms of the agreement, the shareholders of Standard Bank will receive consideration of two times book value, or approximately $204 million. The shareholders of Standard Bank will receive a minimum of 65% and up to 100% of the merger consideration in shares of East West Bancorp common stock. The acquisition is expected to close in the first quarter of 2006, subject to requisite regulatory approvals.

The Bank has also grown through strategic partnerships and additional branch locations. On August 30, 2001, the Bank entered into an exclusive ten-year agreement with 99 Ranch Market to provide retail banking services in their stores throughout California. 99 Ranch Market is the largest Asian-focused chain of supermarkets on the West Coast, with twenty-one full service stores in California, two in Washington, and affiliated licensee stores in Arizona, Georgia, Hawaii, Nevada, and Indonesia. Tawa Supermarket Companies or “Tawa” is the parent company of 99 Ranch Market. Tawa’s property development division owns and operates many of the shopping centers where 99 Ranch Market stores are located. We are currently providing in-store banking services to eight 99 Ranch Market locations in Southern California and one in Northern California.

On January 20, 2003, the Bank opened its first overseas office in Beijing, China. The Beijing representative office serves to further develop the Bank’s existing international banking capabilities. In addition to facilitating traditional letters of credit and trade finance business, the Beijing office allows the Bank to assist existing clients, as well as develop new business relationships. Through this office, the Bank intends to focus on growing its export-import lending volume by aiding domestic exporters in identifying and developing new sales opportunities to China-based customers as well as capturing additional letters of credit business generated from China-based exports through broader correspondent banking relationships with a variety of Chinese financial institutions.

Banking Services

The Bank was the second largest independent commercial bank in Southern California as of December 31, 2005, and one of the largest banks in the United States that focuses on the Chinese-American community. Through its network of 56 banking locations, the Bank provides a wide range of personal and commercial banking services to small and medium-sized businesses, business executives, professionals, and other individuals. The Bank offers multilingual services to its customers in English, Cantonese, Mandarin, Vietnamese, and Spanish. The Bank also offers a variety of deposit products which includes the traditional range of personal and business checking and savings accounts, time deposits and individual retirement accounts, travelers' checks, safe deposit boxes, and MasterCard and Visa merchant deposit services.

The Bank’s lending activities include residential and commercial real estate, construction, commercial, trade finance, accounts receivable, small business administration, or the “SBA”, inventory and working capital loans. It provides commercial loans to small and medium-sized businesses with annual revenues that generally range from several million to $200 million. In addition, the Bank provides short-term trade finance facilities for terms of less than one year primarily to U.S. importers and manufacturers doing business in the Asia Pacific region. The Bank’s commercial borrowers are engaged in a wide variety of manufacturing, wholesale trade, and service businesses.

5

The Company’s management has identified four principal operating segments within the organization: retail banking, commercial lending, treasury, and residential lending. Although all four operating segments offer financial products and services, they are managed separately based on each segment’s strategic focus. While the retail banking segment focuses primarily on retail operations through the Bank’s branch network, certain designated branches have responsibility for generating commercial deposits and loans. The commercial lending segment, which includes commercial real estate, primarily generates commercial loans and deposits through the efforts of commercial lending officers located in the Northern and Southern California production offices. The treasury department’s primary focus is managing the Bank’s investments, liquidity, and interest rate risk; while the residential lending segment is mainly responsible for the Bank’s portfolio of single family and multifamily loans. Information about the financial results of our operating segments can be found in Note 24 of our consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein.

Market Area and Competition

The Bank concentrates on marketing its services in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, Orange County, the San Francisco Bay area, San Mateo County, the Silicon Valley area in Santa Clara County and Alameda County, with a particular focus on regions with a high concentration of ethnic Chinese. The ethnic Chinese markets within the Bank’s primary market area have experienced rapid growth in recent years.According to information provided by the California State Department of Finance, there were an estimated 4.7 million Asians and Pacific Islanders residing in California, or 13.2% of the total population, as of March 2004. As California continues to gain momentum as the hub of the Pacific Rim, the Bank provides important competitive advantages to its customers participating in the Asia Pacific marketplace. We believe that our customers benefit from our understanding of Asian markets and cultures, our corporate and organizational ties throughout Asia, as well as our international banking products and services. We believe that this approach, combined with the extensive ties of our management and Board of Directors to the growing Asian and ethnic Chinese communities, provides us with an advantage in competing for customers in our market area.

The banking and financial services industry in California generally, and in our market areas specifically, is highly competitive. The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems, and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial services providers.

The Bank competes for loans, deposits, and customers with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations and savings banks, securities and brokerage companies, mortgage companies, insurance companies, finance companies, money market funds, credit unions, and other nonbank financial service providers. Some of these competitors are larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets, including foreign-ownership, and offer a broader range of financial services than the Bank. The Bank has 55 branches in California located in the following counties: Los Angeles, Orange, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara and Alameda. Neither the deposits nor loans of the offices of the Bank exceed 1% of the deposits or loans of all financial services companies located in the counties in which it operates.

Additionally, the Bank has one branch in Houston, Texas as a result of the UNB acquisition in September 2005.

6

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the AICPA issued Statement of Position No. 03-3 (“SOP 03-3”), Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. SOP 03-3 addresses the accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and the cash flows expected to be collected from purchased loans or debt securities if those differences are attributable, in part, to credit quality. SOP 03-3 requires purchased loans and debt securities to be recorded initially at fair value based on the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected with no carryover of any valuation allowance previously recognized by the seller. Interest income should be recognized based on the effective yield from the cash flows expected to be collected. To the extent that the purchased loans or debt securities experience subsequent deterioration in credit quality, a valuation allowance would be established for any additional cash flows that are not expected to be received. However, if more cash flows subsequently are expected to be received than originally estimated, the effective yield would be adjusted on a prospective basis. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans and debt securities acquired by the Company after December 15, 2004. The adoption of this Statement on January 1, 2005 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. This Statement supersedes Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance and is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. This Statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.

This Statement requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award - the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available). If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.

The revised accounting for stock-based compensation requirements must be adopted by the Company on January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R allows for two alternative transition methods. The Company intends to follow the modified prospective method, which requires application of the new statement to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of the required effective date shall be recognized as the requisite services are rendered on or after the effective date. The compensation cost of that portion of awards shall be based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro-forma disclosures under the original SFAS No. 123. Had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R in prior periods, the impact on net income and earnings per share would have been approximately similar to the pro forma net income and earnings per share as disclosed in Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein. Stock option expense for fiscal 2006 is estimated to be $1.0 million, net of tax, which may change as a result of future stock option grants, forfeitures and/or other items.

7

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which addresses accounting for changes in accounting principle, changes in accounting estimates, changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions and error correction.  SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle and error correction unless impracticable to do so.  SFAS No. 154 states an exception to retrospective application when a change in accounting principle, or the method of applying it, may be inseparable from the effect of a change in accounting estimate.  When a change in principle is inseparable from a change in estimate, such as depreciation, amortization or depletion, the change to the financial statements is to be presented in a prospective manner.  SFAS No. 154 and the required disclosures are effective for accounting changes and error corrections in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.

In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position (“FSP”) Nos. FAS 115-1 and 124-1 to address the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary and the measurement of an impaired loss.  This FSP nullified certain requirements of Emerging Issues Task Force 03-1 The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (EITF 03-1), and references existing guidance on other than temporary impairment.  Furthermore, this FSP creates a three step process in determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss.  The FSP is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005.  It is not anticipated that adoption will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

During December 2005, the FASB issued FSP Statement of Position (“SOP”) 94-6-1, Terms of Loan Products That May Give Rise to a Concentration of Credit Risk, which addresses the circumstances under which the terms of loan products give rise to such risk and the disclosures or other accounting considerations that apply for entities that originate, hold, guarantee, service, or invest in loan products with terms that may give rise to a concentration of credit risk. The guidance under this FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 19, 2005 and for loan products that are determined to represent a concentration of credit risk, disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, should be provided for all periods presented.  The adoption of this FSP did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Economic Conditions, Government Policies, Legislation, and Regulation

The Company’s profitability, like most financial institutions, is primarily dependent on interest rate differentials. In general, the difference between the interest rates paid by the Bank on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings, and the interest rates received by the Bank on our interest-earning assets, such as loans extended to our clients and securities held in our investment portfolio, will initially comprise the major portion of the Company’s earnings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the control of the Company and the Bank, such as inflation, recession and unemployment, and the impact which future changes in domestic and foreign economic conditions might have on the Company and the Bank cannot be predicted.

The Company’s business is also influenced by the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government and the policies of regulatory agencies, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the “FRB”. The FRB implements national monetary policies (with objectives such as curbing inflation and combating recession) through its open-market operations in U.S. Government securities by adjusting the required level of reserves for depository institutions subject to its reserve requirements, and by varying the target federal funds and discount rates applicable to borrowings by depository institutions. The actions of the FRB in these areas influence the growth of bank loans, investments, and deposits and also affect interest earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The nature and impact of any future changes in monetary and fiscal policies on the Company cannot be predicted.

8

From time to time, legislation is enacted which have the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities, or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other financial services providers, such as recent federal legislation permitting affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies and securities firms. The Company cannot predict whether any potential legislation will be enacted, and if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have on our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, litigation and investigations have been initiated by some state authorities that assert certain state laws are not preempted by federal law and therefore such state laws apply to federally chartered banks and thrifts. If changes result from these actions, federally chartered banks like ours could be subject to additional regulation and compliance costs. See “Item 1. BUSINESS - Supervision and Regulation.”

Supervision and Regulation

General

The Company and the Bank are extensively regulated under both federal and certain state laws. This regulation is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the deposit insurance fund and not for the benefit of stockholders of the financial institution. Set forth below is a summary description of the material laws and regulations which relate to our operations. The description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable laws and regulations.

The Company

As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to regulation and examination by the FRB under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, or the “BHCA”. The Company is required to file with the FRB periodicreports and such additional information as the FRB may require. The FRB’s bank holding company rating system emphasizes risk management and evaluation of the potential impact of nondepository entities on safety and soundness.

The FRB may require us to terminate an activity or terminate control of or liquidate or divest certain subsidiaries, affiliates or investments if the FRB believes the activity or the control of the subsidiary or affiliate constitutes a significant risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of our banking subsidiary. The FRB also has the authority to regulate provisions of certain bank holding company debt, including the authority to impose interest ceilings and reserve requirements on such debt. Under certain circumstances, we must file written notice and obtain FRB approval prior to purchasing or redeeming our equity securities. Further, we are required by the FRB to maintain certain levels of capital. See “Capital Standards.”

The Company is required to obtain prior FRB approval for the acquisition of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of voting securities or substantially all of the assets of any bank or bank holding company. Prior FRB approval is also required for the merger or consolidation of the company and another bank holding company.

The Company is prohibited by the BHCA, except in certain statutorily prescribed instances, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting shares of any company that is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or furnishing services to our subsidiaries. However, subject to prior FRB approval, we may engage in any, or acquire shares of companies engaged in, activities that the FRB deems to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. The Company may also engage in these and certain other activities pursuant to our election of financial holding company status.

9

It is the policy of the FRB that each bank holding company serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary bank(s) and it may not conduct operations in an unsafe or unsound manner. A bank holding company’s failure to meet its obligations to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks will generally be considered by the FRB to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a violation of FRB regulations or both.

The Company is also a bank holding company within the meaning of the California Financial Code. As such, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to examination by, and may be required to file reports with, the California Department of Financial Institutions (the “DFI”).

Financial Holding Companies

Bank holding companies that elect to become a financial holding company may affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities without prior FRB notice or approval that are determined by the FRB to be financial in nature or are incidental or complementary to activities that are financial in nature. “Financial in nature” activities include:

·   lending, exchanging, transferring, investing for others, or safeguarding financial assets other than money or securities;

·   providing any device or other instrumentality for transferring money or other financial assets;

·   arranging, effecting or facilitating financial transactions for the account of third parties;

·   securities underwriting;

·   dealing and market making;

·   sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies;

·   insurance underwriting and agency sales;

·   merchant banking investments; and

·   activities that the FRB, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines from time to time to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.

In order to elect or retain financial holding company status, all of a bank holding company’s depository institution subsidiaries must be well capitalized, well managed, and, except in limited circumstances, be in satisfactory compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act, or the “CRA”. Failure to sustain compliance with these requirements or correct any non-compliance within a fixed time period could lead to divestiture of subsidiary banks or require all activities to conform to those permissible for a bank holding company. A bank holding company that is not also a financial holding company can only engage in banking and such other activities determined by the FRB to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.

The Company elected to become a financial holding company on July 17, 2000 and is currently in compliance with the financial holding company election requirements.

10

The Bank

As a California chartered bank, the Bank is subject to primary supervision, periodic examination, and regulation by the DFI. In September 2004, the Bank became a member bank of the Federal Reserve System and the FRB replaced the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the “FDIC” as the Bank’s primary federal regulator. If, as a result of an examination of the Bank, the DFI or the FRB should determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of the Bank’s operations are unsatisfactory or that the Bank or its management is violating or has violated any law or regulation, various remedies are available to the DFI and the FRB. Such remedies include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in capital, to restrict the growth of the Bank, to assess civil monetary penalties, to remove officers and directors, and ultimately to cause the termination of the Bank’s FDIC deposit insurance, which for a California chartered bank would result in a revocation of the Bank’s charter.

The DFI also possesses broad powers to take corrective and other supervisory actions to resolve the problems of California state-chartered banks. These enforcement powers include cease and desist orders, the imposition of fines, the ability to take possession of a bank and the ability to close and liquidate a bank.

 Any changes in federal or state banking laws or the regulations of the banking agencies could have a material adverse impact on the Company, the Bank and our operations. For example, in January 2006, the federal banking agencies jointly issued proposed guidance for banks and thrifts with high and increasing concentrations of commercial real estate (“CRE”), construction, and development loans. The implementation of these guidelines in final form could result in increased reserves and capital costs for banks and thrifts with “CRE concentration.” Management believes that the Bank’s CRE portfolio as of December 31, 2005 does not have the risks associated with high CRE concentration due to mitigating factors, including low loan-to-value ratios, adequate debt coverage ratios and a wide variety of property types.

 Because Californiapermits commercial banks chartered by the state to engage in any activity permissible for national banks, the Bank can form subsidiaries to engage in the many so-called “closely related to banking” or “nonbanking” activities commonly conducted by national banks in operating subsidiaries, but also expanded financial activities to the same extent as a national bank. However, in order to form a financial subsidiary, the Bank must be well-capitalized and would be subject to the same capital deduction, risk management and affiliate transaction rules as applicable to national banks. Generally, a financial subsidiary is permitted to engage in activities that are “financial in nature” or incidental thereto, even though they are not permissible for the national bank to conduct directly within the bank. The definition of “financial in nature” includes, among other items, underwriting, dealing in or making a market in securities, including, for example, distributing shares of mutual funds. The subsidiary may not, however, engage as principal in underwriting insurance (other than credit life insurance), issue annuities or engage in real estate development or investment or merchant banking. Presently, none of the Bank’s subsidiaries are financial subsidiaries.

 Federal Home Loan Bank System

 The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (the “FHLB”). Among other benefits, each FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned region. Each FHLB is financed primarily from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. Each FHLB makes available loans or advances to its members in compliance with the policies and procedures established by the Board of Directors of the individual FHLB. As a FHLB member, the Bank is required to own a certain amount of capital stock in the FHLB. At December 31, 2005, the Bank was in compliance with the stock requirements and our investment in FHLB capital stock totaled $45.7 million.

11

Federal Reserve System

The Federal Reserve Board requires all depository institutions to maintain non-interest bearing reserves at specified levels against their transaction accounts (primarily checking and non-personal time deposits). At December 31, 2005, the Bank was in compliance with these requirements. As a member of the FRB of San Francisco, the Bank is required to own capital stock in the FRB. At December 31, 2005, the Bank’s investment in FRB capital stock totaled $12.3 million.

Interstate Banking and Branching

Banks have the ability, subject to certain state restrictions, to acquire by acquisition or merger branches outside their home states. The establishment of new interstate branches is also possible in those states with laws that expressly permit it. Interstate branches are subject to certain laws of the states in which they are located. Competition may increase further as banks branch across state lines and enter new markets.

Securities Registration

The Company’s securities are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC,” under the Exchange Act of 1933 and file periodic reports under the Exchange Act of 1934. As such, the Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading, corporate governance, and other requirements and restrictions of the Exchange Act.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses accounting oversight and corporate governance matters, including:

·   required executive certification of financial presentations;

·   increased requirements for board audit committees and their members;

·   enhanced disclosure of controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting;

·   enhanced controls on, and reporting of, insider trading;

·   increased penalties for financial crimes and forfeiture of executive bonuses in certain circumstances; and

·   the prohibition of accounting firms from providing various types of consulting services to public clients and requiring accounting firms to rotate partners among public client assignments every five years.

This legislation and its implementing regulations resulted in increased costs of compliance, including certain outside professional costs. The Company incurred implementation cost of approximately $900 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2004 as a result of implementing the regulations related to this legislation.

 Dividends and Other Transfers of Funds

Dividends from the Bank constitute the principal source of income to the Company. A FRB policy statement on the payment of cash dividends states that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the holding company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the holding company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The FRB also indicated that it would be inappropriate for a company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Furthermore, under the federal prompt corrective action regulations, the FRB may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if the holding company’s bank subsidiary is classified as “undercapitalized.” See “Prompt Corrective Action and Other Enforcement Mechanisms” below.

12

The Bank is subject to various statutory and regulatory restrictions on its ability to pay dividends. Under such restrictions, the amount available for payment of dividends to the Company by the Bank totaled $229.2 million at December 31, 2005. In addition, the Bank’s regulators have the authority to prohibit the Bank from paying dividends, depending upon the Bank’s financial condition, if such payment is deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.

Capital Standards

The federal banking agencies have adopted risk-based minimum capital guidelines intended to provide a measure of capital that reflects the degree of risk associated with a banking organization’s operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets and transactions which are recorded as off-balance sheet items. Under these guidelines, nominal dollar amounts of assets and credit equivalent amounts of off-balance sheet items are multiplied by one of several risk adjustment percentages, which range from 0% for assets with low credit risk to 100% for assets with relatively high credit risk.

The risk-based capital ratio is determined by classifying assets and certain off-balance sheet financial instruments into weighted categories, with higher levels of capital being required for those categories perceived as representing greater risk. Under the capital guidelines, a banking organization’s total capital is divided into tiers. “Tier I capital” consists of (1) common equity, (2) qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, (3) a limited amount of qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock and (4) minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries (including trust-preferred securities), less goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Qualifying Tier I capital may consist of trust-preferred securities, subject to the FRB’s final rule adopted March 4, 2005, which changed the criteria and quantitative limits for inclusion of restricted core capital elements in Tier I capital. “Tier II capital” consists of hybrid capital instruments, perpetual debt, mandatory convertible debt securities, a limited amount of subordinated debt, preferred stock that does not qualify as Tier I capital, a limited amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses and a limited amount of unrealized holding gains on equity securities. “Tier III capital” consists of qualifying unsecured subordinated debt. The sum of Tier II and Tier III capital may not exceed the amount of Tier I capital.

The risk-based capital guidelines require a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets of 8% and a minimum ratio of Tier I capital to risk-adjusted assets of 4%. In addition to the risk-based guidelines, federal banking regulators require banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of Tier I capital to total assets, referred to as the leverage ratio. For a banking organization rated in the highest of the five categories used by regulators to rate banking organizations, the minimum leverage ratio of Tier I capital to total assets must be 3%.

A bank that does not achieve and maintain the required capital levels may be issued a capital directive by the FDIC to ensure the maintenance of required capital levels. As discussed above, the Company is required to maintain certain levels of capital, as is the Bank. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Capital” for information regarding the regulatory capital guidelines as well as the Company’s and the Bank’s actual capitalization as of December 31, 2005.

The risk-based capital guidelines are based upon the 1988 capital accord of the international Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. A new international accord, referred to as Basel II, which emphasizes internal assessment of credit, market and operational risk; supervisory assessment and market discipline in determining minimum capital requirements, currently becomes mandatory in 2008 only for banks with over $250 billion in assets or total on-balance-sheet foreign exposure of $10 billion or more. Alternative capital requirements are under consideration by the U.S. federal banking agencies for smaller U.S. banks which may be negatively impacted competitively by certain provisions of Basel II.

13

Prompt Corrective Action

Federal banking agencies possess broad powers to take corrective and other supervisory action to resolve the problems of insured depository institutions, including but not limited to those institutions that fall within any undercapitalized category. Each federal banking agency has promulgated regulations defining the following five categories in which an insured depository institution will be placed, based on its capital ratios:

·   “well capitalized;”

·   “adequately capitalized;”

·   “undercapitalized;”

·   “significantly undercapitalized;” and

·   “critically undercapitalized.”

The regulations use an institution’s risk-based capital, leverage capital and tangible capital ratios to determine the institution’s capital classification. An institution is treated as well capitalized if its total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio is 10.00% or more; its core capital to risk-weighted assets ratio is 6.00% or more; and its core capital to adjusted total assets ratio is 5.00% or more. At December 31, 2005, the Company’s and the Bank’s capital ratios exceed these minimum percentage requirements for well capitalized institutions.

An institution that, based upon its capital levels, is classified as well capitalized, adequately capitalized, or undercapitalized may be treated as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition or an unsafe or unsound practice warrants such treatment. At each successive lower capital category, an insured depository institution is subject to more restrictions. The federal banking agencies, however, may not treat a significantly undercapitalized institution as critically undercapitalized unless its capital ratio actually warrants such treatment.

Safety and Soundness Standards

In addition to measures taken under the prompt corrective action provisions, commercial banking organizations may be subject to potential enforcement actions by the federal regulators and/or state regulations for state banks, for unsafe or unsound practices in conducting their businesses or for violations of any law, rule, regulation, or any condition imposed in writing by the agency or any written agreement with the agency. Finally, pursuant to an interagency agreement, the FDIC can examine any institution that has a substandard regulatory examination score or is considered undercapitalized - without the express permission of the institution’s primary regulator.

The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines designed to assist the federal banking agencies in identifying and addressing potential safety and soundness concerns before capital becomes impaired. The guidelines set forth operational and managerial standards relating to: (i) internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems, (ii) loan documentation, (iii) credit underwriting, (iv) asset growth, (v) earnings, and (vi) compensation, fees and benefits. In addition, the federal banking agencies have also adopted safety and soundness guidelines with respect to asset quality and earnings standards. These guidelines provide six standards for establishing and maintaining a system to identify problem assets and prevent those assets from deteriorating. Under these standards, an insured depository institution should: (i) conduct periodic asset quality reviews to identify problem assets, (ii) estimate the inherent losses in problem assets and establish reserves that are sufficient to absorb estimated losses, (iii) compare problem asset totals to capital, (iv) take appropriate corrective action to resolve problem assets, (v) consider the size and potential risks of material asset concentrations, and (vi) provide periodic asset quality reports with adequate information for management and the board of directors to assess the level of asset risk. These guidelines also set forth standards for evaluating and monitoring earnings and for ensuring that earnings are sufficient for the maintenance of adequate capital and reserves.

14

Premiums for Deposit Insurance

Through the Bank Insurance Fund, or “BIF”, and the Savings Association Insurance Fund, or “SAIF”, the FDIC insures our customer deposits up to prescribed limits for each depositor. The amount of FDIC assessments paid by each BIF member institution is based on its relative risk of default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other factors. Specifically, the assessment rate is based on the institution’s capitalization risk category and supervisory subgroup category. An institution’s capitalization risk category is based on the FDIC’s determination of whether the institution is well capitalized, adequately capitalized or less than adequately capitalized. An institution’s supervisory subgroup category is based on the FDIC’s assessment of the financial condition of the institution and the probability that FDIC intervention or other corrective action will be required.

The assessment rate currently ranges from zero to 27 cents per $100 of domestic deposits. The FDIC may increase or decrease the assessment rate schedule on a semi-annual basis. Due principally to continued growth in deposits, the BIF is nearing its minimum ratio of 1.25% of insured deposits as mandated by law. If the ratio drops below 1.25%, it is likely the FDIC will be required to assess premiums on all banks. Any increase in assessments or the assessment rate could have a material adverse effect on earnings, depending on the amount of the increase. Furthermore, the FDIC is authorized to raise insurance premiums under certain circumstances.

The FDIC is authorized to terminate a depository institution’s deposit insurance upon a finding by the FDIC that the institution’s financial condition is unsafe or unsound or that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or has violated any applicable rule, regulation, order or condition enacted or imposed by the institution’s regulatory agency. The termination of deposit insurance for one or more of the Company’s subsidiary depository institutions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s earnings, depending on the collective size of the particular institutions involved.

All FDIC-insured depository institutions must pay an annual assessment to provide funds for the payment of interest on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation, a federal corporation chartered under the authority of the Federal Housing Finance Board. The bonds, commonly referred to as FICO bonds, were issued to capitalize the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. The FICO assessment rate for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 was 1.34 basis points for each $100 of assessable deposits. The FICO assessments are adjusted quarterly to reflect changes in the assessment bases of the FDIC’s insurance funds and do not vary depending on a depository institution’s capitalization or supervisory evaluations.

The enactment in February, 2006, of the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2006, or the “FDIRA”, provides, among other things, for the merger of the BIF and the SAIF into the Deposit Insurance Fund; future inflation adjustment increases in the standard maximum deposit insurance amount of $100,000; the increase of retirement account coverage to $250,000; changes in the formula and factors to be considered by the FDIC in calculating the FDIC reserve ratio, assessments and dividends, and a one-time aggregate assessment credit for depository institutions in existence on December 31, 1996 (or their successors) which paid assessments to recapitalize the insurance funds after the banking crises of the late 1980s and early 1990s. The FDIC is to issue regulations implementing the provisions of FDIRA. At that time it is uncertain what effect FDIRA and the forthcoming regulations will have on the Bank.

15

Loans-to-One Borrower Limitations

With certain limited exceptions, the maximum amount that a California bank may lend to any borrower at any one time (including the obligations to the bank of certain related entities of the borrower) may not exceed 25% (and unsecured loans may not exceed 15%) of the bank’s shareholder equity, allowance for loan losses, and any capital notes and debentures of the bank.

Extensions of Credit to Insiders and Transactions with Affiliates

The Federal Reserve Act and FRB Regulation O place limitations and conditions on loans or extensions of credit to:

·   a bank’s or bank holding company’s executive officers, directors and principal shareholders (i.e., in most cases, those persons who own, control or have power to vote more than 10% of any class of voting securities),

·   any company controlled by any such executive officer, director or shareholder, or

·   any political or campaign committee controlled by such executive officer, director or principal shareholder.

Loans and leases extended to any of the above persons must comply with loan-to-one-borrower limits, require prior full board approval when aggregate extensions of credit to the person exceed specified amounts, must be made on substantially the same terms (including interest rates and collateral) as, and follow credit-underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-insiders, and must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. In addition, Regulation O provides that the aggregate limit on extensions of credit to all insiders of a bank as a group cannot exceed the bank’s unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Regulation O also prohibits a bank from paying an overdraft on an account of an executive officer or director, except pursuant to a written pre-authorized interest-bearing extension of credit plan that specifies a method of repayment or a written pre-authorized transfer of funds from another account of the officer or director at the Bank. California has laws and the DFI has regulations which adopt and also apply Regulation O to the Bank.

The Bank also is subject to certain restrictions imposed by Federal Reserve Act Sections 23A and 23B and FRB Regulation W on any extensions of credit to, or the issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on behalf of, any affiliates, the purchase of, or investments in, stock or other securities thereof, the taking of such securities as collateral for loans, and the purchase of assets of any affiliates. Such restrictions prevent any affiliates from borrowing from the Bank unless the loans are secured by marketable obligations of designated amounts. Further, such secured loans and investments by the Bank to or in any affiliate are limited, individually, to 10.0% of the Bank’s capital and surplus (as defined by federal regulations), and such secured loans and investments are limited, in the aggregate, to 20.0% of the Bank’s capital and surplus. Some of the entities included in the definition of an affiliate are parent companies, sister banks, sponsored and advised companies, investment companies whereby the Bank’s affiliate serves as investment advisor, and financial subsidiaries of the Bank. Additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates may be imposed on the Bank under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal law and the supervisory authority of the federal and state banking agencies. See “Item 1. BUSINESS - Supervision and Regulation - Prompt Corrective Action and Safety and Soundness Standards.

USA PATRIOT Act

The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and its implementing regulations significantly expanded the anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws. Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are subject to prohibitions regarding specified financial transactions and account relationships, as well as additional enhanced due diligence and “know your customer” standards in their dealings with foreign financial institutions, foreign customers and private banking customers. For example, the enhanced due diligence policies, procedures, and controls generally require financial institutions to take reasonable steps:

16

·   to conduct enhanced scrutiny of account relationships to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transaction;

·   to ascertain the identity of the nominal and beneficial owners of, and the source of funds deposited into, each account as needed to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transactions;

·   to ascertain for any foreign bank, the shares of which are not publicly traded, the identity of the owners of the foreign bank, and the nature and extent of the ownership interest of each such owner; and

·   to ascertain whether any foreign bank provides correspondent accounts to other foreign banks and, if so, the identity of those foreign banks and related due diligence information.

Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are required to establish and maintain anti-money laundering programs which include:

·   the establishment of a customer identification program;

·   the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls;

·   the designation of a compliance officer;

·   an ongoing employee training program; and

·   an independent audit function to test the programs.

The Bank has adopted comprehensive policies and procedures to address the requirements of the USA PATRIOT Act. Material deficiencies in anti-money laundering compliance can result in public enforcement actions by the banking agencies, including the imposition of civil money penalties and supervisory restrictions on growth and expansion. Such actions could have serious reputation consequences for the Company andthe Bank.

Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations

Examination and enforcement by the bank regulatory agencies for non-compliance with consumer protection laws and their implementing regulations have become more intense in nature. The Bank is subject to many federal consumer protection statutes and regulations, some of which are discussed below.

Privacy policies are required by federal banking regulations which limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. Pursuant to those rules, financial institutions must provide:

·   initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates;

·   annual notices of their privacy policies to current customers; and

·   a reasonable method for customers to “opt out” of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties.

These privacy protections affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors.

In addition, state laws may impose more restrictive limitations on the ability of financial institution to disclose such information. California has adopted such a privacy law that among other things generally provides that customers must “opt in” before information may be disclosed to certain nonaffiliated third parties.

17

The Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, or “FACT Act”, requires financial firms to help deter identity theft, including developing appropriate fraud response programs, and gives consumers more control of their credit data. It also reauthorizes a federal ban on state laws that interfere with corporate credit granting and marketing practices. In connection with FACT Act, financial institution regulatory agencies proposed rules that would prohibit an institution from using certain information about a consumer it received from an affiliate to make a solicitation to the consumer, unless the consumer has been notified and given a chance to opt out of such solicitations. A consumer’s election to opt out would be applicable for at least five years.

The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, or “Check 21”, facilitates check truncation and electronic check exchange by authorizing a new negotiable instrument called a “substitute check,” which is the legal equivalent of an original check. Check 21 does not require banks to create substitute checks or accept checks electronically; however, it does require banks to accept a legally equivalent substitute check in place of an original. In addition to its issuance of regulations governing substitute checks, the Federal Reserve has issued final rules governing the treatment of remotely created checks (sometimes referred to as “demand drafts”) and electronic check conversion transactions (involving checks that are converted to electronic transactions by merchants and other payees).

The Equal Credit Opportunity Act, or “ECOA”, generally prohibits discrimination in any credit transaction, whether for consumer or business purposes, on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (except in limited circumstances), receipt of income from public assistance programs, or good faith exercise of any rights under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.

The Truth in Lending Act, or “TILA”, is designed to ensure that credit terms are disclosed in a meaningful way so that consumers may compare credit terms more readily and knowledgeably. As a result of the TILA, all creditors must use the same credit terminology to express rates and payments, including the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, the amount financed, the total of payments and the payment schedule, among other things.

The Fair Housing Act, or “FH Act”, regulates many practices, including making it unlawful for any lender to discriminate in its housing-related lending activities against any person because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, handicap or familial status. A number of lending practices have been found by the courts to be, or may be considered, illegal under the FH Act, including some that are not specifically mentioned in the FH Act itself.

The Community Reinvestment Act, or “CRA”, is intended to encourage insured depository institutions, while operating safely and soundly, to help meet the credit needs of their communities. The CRA specifically directs the federal regulatory agencies, in examining insured depository institutions, to assess a bank’s record of helping meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound banking practices. The CRA further requires the agencies to take a financial institution’s record of meeting its community credit needs into account when evaluating applications for, among other things, domestic branches, mergers or acquisitions, or holding company formations. The agencies use the CRA assessment factors in order to provide a rating to the financial institution. The ratings range from a high of “outstanding” to a low of “substantial noncompliance.” In its last examination for CRA compliance, as of May 3, 2004, the Bank was rated “satisfactory.”

The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, or “HMDA”, grew out of public concern over credit shortages in certain urban neighborhoods and provides public information that will help show whether financial institutions are serving the housing credit needs of the neighborhoods and communities in which they are located. The HMDA also includes a “fair lending” aspect that requires the collection and disclosure of data about applicant and borrower characteristics as a way of identifying possible discriminatory lending patterns and enforcing anti-discrimination statutes. The Federal Reserve Board amended regulations issued under HMDA to require the reporting for 2004 of certain pricing data with respect to higher priced mortgage loans. The expanded 2004 HMDA data is being reviewed by federal banking agencies and others from a fair lending perspective. We do not expect that the HMDA data reported by the Bank will raise material issues regarding the Bank’s compliance with the fair lending laws.

18

The term “predatory lending,” much like the terms “safety and soundness” and “unfair and deceptive practices,” is far-reaching and covers a potentially broad range of behavior. As such, it does not lend itself to a concise or a comprehensive definition. Typically, however, predatory lending involves at least one, and perhaps all three, of the following elements:

·   making unaffordable loans based on the assets of the borrower rather than on the borrower’s ability to repay an obligation (“asset-based lending”)

·   inducing a borrower to refinance a loan repeatedly in order to charge high points and fees each time the loan is refinanced (“loan flipping”)

·   engaging in fraud or deception to conceal the true nature of the loan obligation from an unsuspecting or unsophisticated borrower.

FRB regulations aimed at curbing such lending significantly widen the pool of high-cost home-secured loans covered by the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994, or “HOEPA”, a federal law that requires extra disclosures and consumer protections to borrowers. Lenders that violate the rules face cancellation of loans and penalties equal to the finance charges paid.

The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, or “RESPA”, requires lenders to provide borrowers with disclosures regarding the nature and cost of real estate settlements. Also, RESPA prohibits certain abusive practices, such as kickbacks, and places limitations on the amount of escrow accounts. Penalties under the above laws may include fines, reimbursements and other penalties.

Due to heightened regulatory concern related to compliance with the FACT, ECOA, TILA, FH Act, CRA, HMDA, HOEPA and RESPA generally, the Bank may incur additional compliance costs or be required to expend additional funds for investments in its local community.

Proposed Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Products

On December 20, 2005, the federal banking agencies issued for comment proposed guidance on residential mortgage products that allow borrowers to defer repayment of principal and sometimes interest, including “interest only” mortgage loans, and “payment option” adjustable rate mortgages where a borrower has flexible payment options, including payments that have the potential for negative amortization. While acknowledging that innovations in mortgage lending can benefit some consumers, the federal banking agencies in their joint press release stated their concern that these and other practices described in the guidance can present unique risks that institutions must appropriately manage. The proposed guidance states that management should (1) assess a borrower’s ability to repay the loan, including any balances added through negative amortization, at the fully indexed rate that would apply after the introductory period, (2) recognize that certain nontraditional mortgages are untested in a stressed environment and warrant strong risk management standards as well as appropriate capital and loan loss reserves, and (3) ensure that borrowers have sufficient information to clearly understand loan terms and associated risks prior to making a product or payment choice. It is uncertain at this time whether guidance will be adopted in final form and, if adopted, whether and to what extent final guidance may differ from the proposal and what effect the final guidance may have on financial institutions originating such residential mortgage products, including the Bank.

19

Employees

 East West does not have any employees other than officers who are also officers of the Bank. Such employees are not separately compensated for their employment with the Company. As of December 31, 2005, the Bank had a total of 1,078 full-time employees and 59 part-time employees and the Agency had a total of 14 full-time employees. None of the employees are represented by a union or collective bargaining group. The managements of the Bank and Agency believe that their employee relations are satisfactory.

Available Information

 The Company also maintains an internet website at www.eastwestbank.com. The Company makes its website content available for information purposes only. It should not be relied upon for investment purposes.

 We make available free of charge through our website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and proxy statements for its annual shareholder meetings, as well as any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company files such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s SEC reports can be accessed through the investor information page of its website. None of the information contained in or hyperlinked from our website is incorporated into this Form 10-K. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding SEC registrants, including the Company.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

 The following table sets forth the executive officers of the Company, their positions, and their ages. Each officer is appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company or the Bank and serves at their pleasure.

Name	Age (1)	Position with Company or Bank
Dominic Ng	47	Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank
Wellington Chen	46	Executive Vice President and Director of Corporate Banking Division of the Bank
K.Y. Cheng	53	Executive Vice President and Director of International Trade Banking
Donald S. Chow	55	Executive Vice President and Director of Commercial Lending of the Bank
Robert L. Dingle, Jr.	54	Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Bank
Agatha Fung	46	Executive Vice President and Head of International Banking of the Bank
Julia S. Gouw	46	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank

Douglas P. Krause	49	Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of the Company and the Bank
Michael W. Lai	55	Executive Vice President, Northern California, of the Bank
William J. Lewis	62	Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Bank
David L. Spigner	45	Executive Vice President and Chief Strategic Officer of the Bank
Andy Yen	48	Executive Vice President and Director of Business Banking of the Bank

________________

(1)   As of February 28, 2006

20

Dominic Ng serves as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of East West Bancorp, Inc. and East West Bank. Prior to taking the helm of East West in 1992, Mr. Ng was President and Chief Executive Officer of Seyen Investment, Inc. and before that spent over a decade as a CPA with Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Ng serves on the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Los Angeles Branch, the Board of Directors of Mattel, Inc., the Board of Trustees of the Asia Society, and the Board of Governors of the Bowers Museum.

Wellington Chen serves as Executive Vice President and Director of Corporate Banking Division. Prior to joining the Bank in 2003, Mr. Chen was Senior Executive Vice President of Far East National Bank (Far East), heading up their Commercial Banking and Consumer Banking groups. He also served on the Board of Directors of Far East. Mr. Chen began his career with Far East in 1986 where he held a variety of branch and credit management positions. Prior to that, Mr. Chen spent three years with Security Pacific National Bank where he began his banking career as an asset-based lending auditor. Mr. Chen serves on the Board of Directors of the Pasadena Tournament of Roses Foundation.

K. Y. Cheng serves as Executive Vice President and Director of International Trade Banking. Prior to joining the Bank in 1999, Mr. Cheng was the general manager of the Pacific Rim Business Division at Union Bank of California. Mr. Cheng has over 25 years of experience in banking and has focused his career on international, corporate and correspondent banking. He has also held positions at Wells Fargo Bank, First Interstate Bank and Mitsui Manufacturing Bank. He serves as Vice Chairman of the Board of the International Bankers Association of California and Chairman of the Board of the National Association of Chinese American Bankers. He also serves as Executive Director of the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation and is a member of the Pacific Council on International Policy.

Donald S. Chow serves as Executive Vice President and Director of Commercial Lending of East West Bank. Mr. Chow joined the Bank in 1993 as First Vice President and Commercial Lending Manager and was promoted to Senior Vice President in 1994. Mr. Chow has over 30 years of experience in commercial lending. Before joining the Bank, Mr. Chow was First Vice President and Senior Credit Officer for Mitsui Manufacturers Bank, from 1987 to 1993, and prior to that spent over 14 years with Security Pacific National Bank where he held a number of management positions in the commercial lending area.

Robert L. Dingle, Jr. serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of East West Bank. Prior to joining East West in November 2005, Mr. Dingle held CIO positions at IndyMac Bank, Resource Bancshares, First Union and Directors Mortgage. He also worked with Booz, Allen & Hamilton and Southwest Bancshares. Mr. Dingle has over 25 years of experience in the financial services industry.

21

Agatha Fung serves as Executive Vice President and Head of International Banking of East West Bank.  In October 2005, Ms. Fung joined East West from CITIC International Financial Holdings in Hong Kong where she held positions as Head of Business Banking of CITIC Ka Wah Bank and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of HKCB Finance. Ms. Fung has over 20 years of banking experience and has also held senior management positions at Standard Chartered Bank and Citibank in both Hong Kong and Tokyo.

Julia S. Gouw serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of East West Bancorp, Inc. and East West Bank.  Ms. Gouw joined the Bank in 1989 as Vice President and Controller and was promoted to her current position in 1994. She was ranked among the top ten bank CFOs in the nation by U.S. Banker in January 2006.  Prior to joining East West, Ms. Gouw spent over five years as a CPA with KPMG LLP. She serves on the Board of Visitors of the UCLA School of Medicine and chairs the Executive Advisory Board of the Iris Cantor-UCLA Women’s Health Center. Ms. Gouw is also on the Board of Directors of Huntington Memorial Hospital.

Douglas P. Krause serves as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of East West Bancorp, Inc. and East West Bank. Prior to joining the Bank in 1996 as Senior Vice President, Mr. Krause was Corporate Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Metrobank, from 1991 to 1996. Prior to that, Mr. Krause was with the law firms of Dewey Ballantine, and Jones, Day, Reavis and Pogue where he specialized in financial services.  Mr. Krause also serves on the governing boards of the Port of Los Angeles and of the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority; he is the chairman of the Audit Committees of both Commissions.  Mr. Krause is also a member and subcommittee chair of the UCC Committee of the California Bar Association.

Michael W. Lai serves as Executive Vice President of East West Bank’s Northern California operations. Mr. Lai has over 25 years of experience in banking and has held a number of senior management positions. Before joining the Bank in 2000, Mr. Lai managed several private investments and provided consulting services to various financial institutions related to business organization and financing issues. Prior to that, Mr. Lai served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of United Savings Bank from 1994 to 1996, and as Senior Vice President, Chief Credit Officer and Director from 1991 to 1994. Mr. Lai has also worked in various management capacities for financial institutions located in New York and Hong Kong.

William J. Lewis serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer. Mr. Lewis joined the Bank in 2002 with over 30 years of experience in banking, including a number of senior management positions.  He was Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of PriVest Bank from 1998 to 2002 and held the same positions with Eldorado Bank from 1994 to 1998. Prior to this, Mr. Lewis was with Sanwa Bank for over 12 years where he administered a 35 branch region.  Before that, Mr. Lewis spent 13 years with First Interstate Bank where he held a variety of branch and credit management positions.

David L. Spigner serves Executive Vice President and Chief Strategic Officer. Prior to joining the Bank in April 2004, Mr. Spigner served as Managing Principal of Strategic Business Management, a management consulting practice of which the Bank was a client. His career includes eight years in management consulting, five of which he worked for Deloitte & Touche LLP. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Lil Tots, LLC for five years and prior to that spent three years as President of Seyen Trading Inc.

Andy Yen serves as Executive Vice President and Director of Business Banking Division of East West Bank. Mr. Yen joined the Bank in September 2005 through its merger with United National Bank. Before being promoted to President of UNB in 2001, Mr. Yen was the Executive Vice President from 1998 to 2000; and Senior Vice President from 1992 to 1997, overseeing both the operations and lending functions of UNB. Mr. Yen also served as a member of the Board of Directors of UNB from 1992 to 2005. Mr. Yen has over 20 years experience in commercial and real estate lending and also held positions at Tokai Bank of California and Trans National Bank before he joined UNB.

22

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results

 In addition to other information contained in this Annual Report, the following discusses certain factors which may affect the Company’s financial results and operations and should be considered in evaluating the Company:

 Our California business focus and economic conditions in California could adversely affect our operations. The Company’s operations are located primarily in California. As a result of this geographic concentration, the Company’s results depend largely upon economic conditions in this area. A deterioration in economic conditions or a natural or manmade disaster in the Company’s market area could have a material adverse impact on the quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, the demand for its products and services, and its financial condition and results of operations.

 Changes in market interest rates could adversely affect our earnings. The Company’s earnings are impacted by changing interest rates. Changes in interest rates impact the level of loans, deposits and investments, the credit profile of existing loans, the rates received on loans and investment securities, and the rates paid on deposits and borrowings. Significant fluctuations in interest rates may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

 We are subject to government regulations that could limit or restrict our activities, which in turn could adversely impact our operations. The financial services industry is subject to extensive federal and state supervision and regulation. Significant new laws or changes in existing laws may cause the Company’s results to differ materially. Further, federal monetary policy, particularly as implemented through the Federal Reserve System, significantly affects credit conditions for the Company and a material change in these conditions could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

 Failure to manage our growth may adversely affect our performance. The Company’s financial performance and profitability depends on our ability to manage our recent growth and possible future growth. In addition, any future acquisitions and our continued growth may present operating and other issues that could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 Competition may adversely affect our performance. The banking and financial services businesses in the Company’s market areas are highly competitive. The Company faces competition in making loans, attracting deposits, and promoting its other products and services. The increasingly competitive environment is a result of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems, and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. The results of the Company in the future may differ depending on the nature or level of competition.

 If a significant number of borrowers, guarantors and related parties fail to perform as required by the terms of their loans, we will sustain losses.  A significant source of risk arises from the possibility that losses will be sustained because borrowers, guarantors and related parties may fail to perform in accordance with the terms of their loans. The Company has adopted underwriting and credit monitoring procedures and credit policies, including the establishment and review of the allowance for credit losses, that management believe are appropriate to minimize this risk by assessing the likelihood of nonperformance, tracking loan performance, and diversifying the Company’s credit portfolio. These policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

23

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company currently neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. The Company uses the premises, equipment, and furniture of the Bank. The Agency also currently conducts its operations in one of the administrative offices of the Bank. The Company is currently reimbursing the Bank for the Agency’s use of this facility.

Due to current growth and future anticipated needs, we entered into a new lease in 2004 for the relocation of the Bank’s corporate headquarters. The new headquarters consist of 88,000 square feet of office space at 135 North Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, California. This lease expires in 2020. The move to the new facility was completed in February 2006. Additionally, in February 2006, we entered into a 10 year lease for 41,000 square feet of office space in El Monte, California. This facility will house our credit administration and loan servicing departments.

All other significant administrative locations, with the exception of the space currently occupied by the Agency and the Northern California administrative office, are owned by the Bank. Additionally, the Bank owns the buildings and land at 9 of its retail branch offices. For other locations, lease expiration dates range from 2006 to 2021, exclusive of renewal options. The Company believes that its existing facilities are adequate for its present purposes. The Company believes that, if necessary, it could secure alternative facilities on similar terms without adversely affecting its operations.

At December 31, 2005, the Bank’s consolidated investment in premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, totaled $38.6 million. Total occupancy expense, inclusive of rental payments and furniture and equipment expense, for the year ended December 31, 2005, was $15.1 million. Total annual rental expense (exclusive of operating charges and real property taxes) was approximately $7.0 million during 2005.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Neither the Company nor the Bank is involved in any material legal proceedings. The Bank, from time to time, is party to litigation which arises in the ordinary course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the origination and servicing of loans, and other issues related to the business of the Bank. After taking into consideration information furnished by counsel to the Company and the Bank, management believes that the resolution of such issues would not have a material adverse impact on the financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Company or the Bank.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There was no submission of matters to a vote of security holdersduring the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2005.

24

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 Market Information

 East West Bancorp, Inc. commenced trading on the NASDAQ National Market on February 8, 1999 under the symbol “EWBC.” The following table sets forth the range of sales prices for the Company’s common stock for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. All sales prices have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split that became effective on or about June 21, 2004.

	2005				2004
	High		Low		High		Low
First quarter	$	42.29	$	34.86	$	28.05	$	24.45
Second quarter		37.29		30.68		31.13		26.55
Third quarter		38.43		32.09		37.25		29.70
Fourth quarter		38.88		31.57		43.68		33.40

  The foregoing reflects information available to the Company and does not necessarily include all trades in the Company’s stock during the periods indicated. The closing price of our common stock on February 28, 2006 was $37.69 per share, as reported by the Nasdaq National Market.

Issuance of Common Stock

 On September 7, 2005, we issued 3,138,701 shares of common stock at a price of $34.00 in conjunction with the acquisition of UNB.

Holders

 As of February 28, 2006, 56,674,229 shares of the Company’s common stock were held by approximately 1,247 shareholders of record.

Dividends

 We declared and paid cash dividends of $0.05 per share during each of the four quarters of 2004 and 2005. We also declared a dividend of $0.05 per share in the first quarter of 2006. Refer to “Item 1. BUSINESS - Supervision and Regulation - Dividends and Other Transfer of Funds” for information regarding dividend payment restrictions.

25

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein.

	2005			2004			2003			2002			2001
Summary of Operations:	(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest and dividend income	$	411,399		$	252,070		$	178,543		$	167,288		$	183,695
Interest expense		131,284			52,897			35,232			48,979			83,348
Net interest income		280,115			199,173			143,311			118,309			100,347
Provision for loan losses		15,870			16,750			8,800			10,200			6,217
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		264,245			182,423			134,511			108,109			94,130
Noninterest income		29,649			30,371			31,081			23,364			20,260
Noninterest expense		123,533			91,461			75,932			62,657			61,790
Income before provision for income taxes		170,361			121,333			89,660			68,816			52,600
Provision for income taxes		61,981			43,311			30,668			20,115			13,730
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle		108,380			78,022			58,992			48,701			38,870
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax (1)		-			-			-			788			(87	)
Net income	$	108,380		$	78,022		$	58,992		$	49,489		$	38,783
Basic earnings per share (2)	$	2.03		$	1.54		$	1.23		$	1.05		$	0.84
Diluted earnings per share (2)	$	1.97		$	1.49		$	1.19		$	1.00		$	0.81
Dividends per share (2)	$	0.20		$	0.20		$	0.20		$	0.14		$	0.06
Average number of shares outstanding, basic (2)		53,454			50,654			48,112			47,192			46,066
Average number of shares outstanding, diluted (2)		55,034			52,297			49,486			49,260			48,108
At Year End:
Total assets	$	8,278,256		$	6,028,880		$	4,055,433		$	3,321,489		$	2,825,303
Loans receivable, net		6,724,320			5,080,454			3,234,133			2,313,199			2,132,838
Investment securities available-for-sale		869,837			534,452			445,142			531,607			323,099
Deposits		6,258,587			4,522,517			3,312,667			2,926,352			2,417,974
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		617,682			860,803			281,300			34,000			104,000
Stockholders' equity		734,138			514,309			361,983			302,117			244,415
Shares outstanding (2)		56,519			52,501			48,857			47,764			46,752
Book value per share (2)	$	12.99		$	9.80		$	7.41		$	6.33		$	5.23
Financial Ratios:
Return on average assets		1.55	%		1.57	%		1.64	%		1.63	%		1.47	%
Return on average equity		18.27			17.86			18.12			18.29			17.73
Dividend payout ratio		9.88			12.93			16.31			12.87			7.13
Average stockholders' equity to average assets		8.48			8.77			9.04			8.92			8.26
Net interest margin		4.22			4.24			4.26			4.14			4.02
Efficiency ratio (3)		36.53			35.64			38.57			39.64			45.07
Asset Quality Ratios:
Net chargeoffs to average loans		0.08	%		0.12	%		0.06	%		0.11	%		0.21	%
Nonperforming assets to year end total assets		0.36			0.10			0.16			0.37			0.20
Allowance for loan losses to year end total gross loans		1.01			0.99			1.20			1.50			1.28

____________

(1)   In 2002, this figure represents the remaining balance of negative goodwill at December 31, 2001. On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires companies to cease amortizing goodwill that existed at June 30, 2001. 

(2)   Prior period amounts have been restated to reflect the 2 for 1 stock split on June 21, 2004.

(3)   Represents noninterest expense, excluding the amortization of intangibles and investments in affordable housing partnerships, divided by the aggregate of net interest income before provision for loan losses and noninterest income.

26

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion provides information about the results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, and capital resources of East West Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, or the “Company”. This information is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our financial condition and the results of our operations. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein. Information related to share volume and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split that became effective on or about June 21, 2004.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the banking industry. The financial information contained within these statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on approximate measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. All our significant accounting principles are described in Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein and are essential to understanding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Some of our accounting principles require significant judgment to estimate values of either assets or liabilities. In addition, certain accounting principles require significant judgment in applying complex accounting principles to individual transactions to determine the most appropriate treatment. We have established procedures and processes to facilitate making the judgments necessary to prepare financial statements.

The following is a summary of the more judgmental and complex accounting estimates and principles. In each area, we have identified the variables most important in the estimation process. We have used the best information available to make the estimations necessary to value the related assets and liabilities. Actual performance that differs from our estimates and future changes in the key variables could change future valuations and impact net income.

 Investment Securities

The classification and accounting for investment securities are discussed in detail in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein. Under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, investment securities generally must be classified as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. The appropriate classification is based partially on our ability to hold the securities to maturity and largely on management’s intentions with respect to either holding or selling the securities. The classification of investment securities is significant since it directly impacts the accounting for unrealized gains and losses on securities. Unrealized gains and losses on trading securities flow directly through earnings during the periods in which they arise, whereas for available-for-sale securities, they are recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity (accumulated other comprehensive income or loss) and do not affect earnings until realized. The fair values of our investment securities are generally determined by reference to quoted market prices and reliable independent sources.

We are obligated to assess, at each reporting date, whether there is an “other-than-temporary” impairment to our investment securities. Such impairment must be recognized in current earnings rather than in other comprehensive income. We examine all individual securities that are in an unrealized loss position at each reporting date for other-than-temporary impairment. Specific investment level factors we examine to assess impairment include the severity and duration of the loss, an analysis of the issuers of the securities and if there has been any cause for default on the securities and any change in the rating of the securities by the various rating agencies. Additionally, we reexamine the financial resources and overall ability the Company has and the intent management has to hold the securities until their fair values recover.

27

Aside from the corporate debt security that was determined to be impaired, resulting in a $60 thousand writedown during the first quarter of 2005, we did not have any other investment securities that were deemed to be “other-than-temporarily” impaired as of December 31, 2005. Investment securities are discussed in more detail in Note 5 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein.

 Allowance for Loan Losses

Our allowance for loan loss methodologies incorporate a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative, in establishing an allowance for loan loss that management believes is appropriate at each reporting date. Quantitative factors include our historical loss experience, delinquency and chargeoff trends, collateral values, changes in nonperforming loans, and other factors. Quantitative factors also incorporate known information about individual loans, including borrowers’ sensitivity to interest rate movements and borrowers’ sensitivity to quantifiable external factors including commodity and finished good prices as well as acts of nature (earthquakes, floods, fires, etc.) that occur in a particular period. Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in our markets and, in particular, the state of certain industries. Size and complexity of individual credits, loan structure, extent and nature of waivers of existing loan policies and pace of portfolio growth are other qualitative factors that are considered in our methodologies.

During the third quarter of 2005, we enhanced our migration analysis methodology by increasing the number of risk-rated loan pools from six to eighteen categories and extending the loss horizon from five to thirteen years. A more detailed discussion of this enhanced methodology can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Allowance for Loan Losses.” As we add new products, increase the complexity of our loan portfolio, and expand our geographic coverage, we will continue to enhance our methodologies to keep pace with the size and complexity of the loan portfolio. Changes in any of the factors cited above could have a significant impact on the loan loss calculation. We believe that our methodologies continue to be appropriate given our size and level of complexity. This discussion should also be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein including the section entitled “Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses.”

 Loan Sales

We routinely sell, and occasionally securitize, residential mortgage loans to secondary market investors. When mortgage loans are sold, we generally retain the right to service these loans and we may retain residual and other interests, which are considered retained interests in the sold or securitized loans. The gain on sale recorded on these loans depends, in part, on our allocation of the previous carrying amount of the loans to the retained interests. Previous carrying amounts are allocated in proportion to the relative fair values of the loans sold and the interests retained. The fair values of retained interests are estimated based upon the present value of the associated expected future cash flows taking into consideration future prepayment rates, discount rates, expected credit losses, and other factors that impact the value of the retained interests.

We may also record mortgage servicing assets, or “MSA”, when the benefits of servicing are expected to be more than adequate compensation to a servicer. The Company determines whether the benefits of servicing are expected to be more than adequate compensation to a servicer by discounting all of the future net cash flows associated with the contractual rights and obligations of the servicing agreement. The expected future net cash flows are discounted at a rate equal to the return that would adequately compensate a substitute servicer for performing the servicing. In addition to the anticipated rate of loan prepayments and discount rates, other assumptions such as the cost to service the underlying loans, foreclosure costs, ancillary income and float rates are also used in determining the value of the MSAs. Mortgage servicing assets are discussed in more detail in Notes 1 and 11 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein.

28

Overview

2005 was a year of both record earnings and strategic acquisitions for East West Bank. We achieved our ninth year of record earnings, achieving record net interest income, net earnings and earnings per share in 2005. Since our initial public offering in 1998, our net income has increased six-fold, from $18.0 million in 1998 to $108.4 million in 2005. The significant increase in our net income over the past several years was driven primarily by the steady annual growth in net interest income derived from our lending and deposit gathering activities. Other factors contributing to this achievement include our ability to balance rapid growth with sound underwriting standards resulting in sustained strong asset quality; our steadfast focus on controlling operating expenses which have favorably impacted our efficiency ratios; and our consistent ability to effectively integrate operations and maximize returns from past acquisitions.

During 2005, we completed another successful acquisition—our largest acquisition to date. United National Bank was headquartered in San Marino, California and provided community banking services through eleven branches, with eight located in Southern California, two in Northern California and one in Houston, Texas. As of the transaction closing date of September 6, 2005, UNB had total assets of $946.9 million, net loans of $665.0 million, and total deposits of $865.1 million. We were able to successfully integrate all of UNB’s systems into our infrastructure shortly after the closing of the transaction. The acquisition added several thousand deposit customers to our existing customer base, generating additional lending and deposit opportunities for the Company. The acquisition resulted in total goodwill of $99.5 million and core deposit premium of $15.0 million.

Additionally, on December 23, 2005, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Standard Bank, a federal savings bank headquartered in Monterey Park, California. Standard Bank provides banking services to the community through six branches in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. At December 31, 2005, Standard Bank had total assets of $922.6 million net loans of $500.3 million and total deposits of $747.0 million. Under the terms of the agreement, the shareholders of Standard Bank will receive consideration of two times book value, or approximately $204 million. The shareholders of Standard Bank will receive a minimum of 65% and up to 100% of the merger consideration in shares of East West Bancorp common stock. The acquisition is expected to close in the first quarter of 2006, subject to requisite regulatory approvals. The impact of this acquisition to 2006 earnings is expected to be approximately $0.02 per share.

Net income surpassed the $100 million mark for the first time during 2005, totaling $108.4 million for the year, a 39% increase from $78.0 million, earned during 2004. On a per diluted share basis, we earned $1.97, or a 32% increase from $1.49 per diluted share earned during 2004. Our return on average assets in 2005 was 1.55%, compared to 1.57% in 2004 and return on average equity was 18.27% in 2005, compared to 17.86% in 2004. Management expects net income per diluted common share for 2006 to be approximately 14% higher than in 2005 based on a projected loan growth of 15% to 17% and deposit growth of approximately 14% to 16%. Our earnings projection for 2006 also assumes a stable or marginally increasing interest rate environment and continued operating efficiency.

29

Net interest income increased 41% to $280.1 million during 2005, compared with $199.2 million during 2004. The increase in net interest income is predominantly due to continued loan growth and steady increases in interest rates by the Federal Reserve during 2005 partially offset by notable increases in market interest rates paid on our deposits and borrowings. Our net interest margin decreased 2 basis points to 4.22% during 2005, compared to 4.24% during 2004. Assuming a stable or marginally increasing interest rate environment during 2006, we anticipate the net interest margin for 2006 to be in the range of 4.15% to 4.25%.

Noninterest income decreased 2% to $29.6 million during 2005 from $30.4 million in the prior year, primarily due to lower net gain on sales of fixed assets in 2005. During 2004, we recorded gains from the disposition of fixed assets in the amount of $3.0 million compared to $52 thousand recorded in 2005. The decrease in gain on sales of fixed assets was partially offset by an increase in net gain on investment securities available-for-sale, which increased 90% to $4.3 million in 2005. The increase in net gain on investment securities available-for-sale was due to improved market conditions. Additionally, we experienced growth in branch fees and letters of credit fees primarily due to overall increases in our asset and deposit base.

As a result of our continued expansion during 2005, total noninterest expense increased 35% to $123.5 million in 2005, compared with $91.5 million for the prior year. This increase is primarily driven by a 37% increase in compensation and employee benefits and a 39% increase in occupancy and equipment expenses. The increases in both compensation and occupancy expense can be attributed to the recent acquisitions of United National Bank during the year and Trust Bank in late 2004. Furthermore, we continued to add relationship and operational personnel during the year to enhance and support our loan and deposit growth. Despite the sizable increase in overall expenses, our efficiency ratio, which represents noninterest expense (excluding the amortization of intangibles and investments in affordable housing partnerships) divided by the aggregate of net interest income before provision for loan losses and noninterest income, only increased 2% to 36.53% during 2005, compared to 35.64% during 2004. We believe this to be a reflection of our ability to efficiently and effectively utilize our resources and operating platform to support our continuing growth. Due to the overall growth of the Bank and the recent relocation of our corporate headquarters, we anticipate noninterest expenses for 2006 to increase by 20% to 25%, but expect our efficiency ratio to remain in the 36% to 38% range.

Total consolidated assets at December 31, 2005 increased 37% to $8.28 billion, compared with $6.03 billion at December 31, 2004. A 32% growth in gross loans was the primary driver of this increase. Excluding the impact of the UNB acquisition as well as loan sales and securitizations, organic loan growth was 25%, or $1.29 billion, during 2005. We attribute overall loan growth to the expansion of relationships throughout California, the addition of seasoned and skilled banking professionals, and increased loan origination volume from our branch network. We estimate loan growth in 2006 to be 15% to 17%, reflecting the core rate of growth in the Bank’s lending markets, the addition of new client relationships, and the utilization of additional lending programs and products.

Total average assets increased 40% to $7.00 billion in 2005, compared to $4.98 billion in 2004, due primarily to average loan growth. Total average loans grew to $5.89 billion during 2005, an increase of 41% over the prior year. All loan sectors experienced double-digit growth year-over-year. This increase in average loan growth was driven largely by increases in commercial real estate and residential multifamily loans. Total average deposits rose 37% during 2005 to $5.18 billion, compared to $3.78 billion in 2004. We experienced gains in all deposit categories during 2005, with the most significant contributions coming from time, money market and noninterest bearing demand deposits.

30

Total nonperforming assets were $30.1 million, or 0.36% of total assets at December 31, 2005, compared with $5.9 million, or 0.10% of total assets, at December 31, 2004. The allowance for loan losses totaled $68.6 million at December 31, 2005, or 1.01% of outstanding total loans. Net loan chargeoffs totaled $4.7 million, or 0.08% of average loans, during 2005, compared with $5.1 million, or 0.12% of average loans, during 2004. We anticipate our overall asset quality to remain sound throughout 2006. We project that nonperforming assets will continue to be below 0.50% of total assets and that net chargeoffs will remain below 0.35% of average loans in 2006.

We continue to be well-capitalized under all regulatory guidelines with a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 9.0%, a total risk-based capital ratio of 11.2%, and a Tier I leverage ratio of 8.1% at December 31, 2005. During 2005, we raised $20.6 million in additional regulatory capital through the issuance of trust preferred securities in a trust preferred offering. Trust preferred securities currently qualify as Tier I capital for regulatory purposes. We also issued $75.0 million in subordinated debt through a private placement transaction. Subordinated debt qualifies as Tier II capital for regulatory purposes. The net proceeds from the trust preferred and subordinated debt offerings were used to partially fund the acquisition of UNB and also to support the continued growth of the Bank.

Results of Operations

Net income for 2005 totaled $108.4 million, compared with $78.0 million for 2004 and $59.0 million for 2003, representing an increase of 39% for 2005 and 32% for 2004. On a per diluted share basis, net income was $1.97, $1.49 and $1.19 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increases in net earnings during both 2005 and 2004 are primarily attributable to higher net interest income, partially offset by higher operating expenses and higher provision for income taxes.

Our return on average total assets declined to 1.55% in 2005, compared to 1.57% in 2004 and 1.64% in 2003, while the return on average stockholders’ equity increased to 18.27% in 2005, compared with 17.86% in 2004 and 18.12% in 2003.

Table 1: Components of Net Income

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
	(In millions)
Net interest income	$	280.1		$	199.2		$	143.3
Provision for loan losses		(15.9	)		(16.8	)		(8.8	)
Noninterest income		29.7			30.4			31.1
Noninterest expense		(123.5	)		(91.5	)		(75.9	)
Provision for income taxes		(62.0	)		(43.3	)		(30.7	)
Net income	$	108.4		$	78.0		$	59.0
Return on average total assets		1.55	%		1.57	%		1.64	%
Return on average stockholders' equity		18.27	%		17.86	%		18.12	%

31

Net Interest Income

Our primary source of revenue is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans, investment securities and other earning assets less the interest expense on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income in 2005 totaled $280.1 million, a 41% increase over net interest income of $199.2 million in 2004.

Total interest and dividend income during 2005 increased 63% to $411.4 million compared with $252.1 million during 2004, primarily due to a 41% growth in average earning assets combined with increased yields on all categories of earning assets. The net growth in average earning assets was fueled by a 41% growth in average loans, increasing to $5.89 billion in 2005, from $4.17 billion in 2004. Increases in all deposit categories, FHLB advances, repurchase agreements, and long-term debt funded the growth in average earning assets.

Total interest expense during 2005 increased 148% to $131.3 million compared with $52.9 million a year ago. The increase in interest expense during 2005 is primarily attributable to higher rates paid on all categories of deposits and borrowings. The increased volume of average time deposits, money market accounts, FHLB advances, and long-term debt also contributed significantly to higher interest expense in 2005 compared to 2004.

Net interest margin, defined as net interest income divided by average earning assets, remained relatively stable, decreasing 2 basis points to 4.22% during 2005, from 4.24% during 2004. The overall yield on earning assets increased 83 basis points to 6.19% in 2005, from 5.36% in 2004, due to several consecutive Federal Reserve interest rate increases during 2005. Similarly, our overall cost of funds in 2005 increased by 105 basis points to 2.55%, compared to 1.50% for 2004. The combined impact of an increasing interest rate environment and increased competition in the deposit market were the primary drivers of our increased cost of funds during 2005. To help fund our loan growth during 2005, we increased our utilization of time deposits and FHLB advances, further contributing to the overall increase in our cost of funds for the year. We also continue to rely heavily on noninterest-bearing demand deposits as a significant funding source, with average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increasing 22% to $1.16 billion during 2005, compared with $950.9 million during 2004.

Comparing 2004 to 2003, our net interest margin decreased 2 basis points to 4.24% in 2004, compared to 4.26% in 2003 primarily due to a 40% growth in average earning assets. In 2004, our overall yield on earning assets increased 5 basis points to 5.36%, from 5.31% in 2003, due to Federal Reserve interest rate increases during the second half of 2004 as well as the higher proportion of loans to total average assets during 2004 relative to 2003. Our overall cost of funds also increased 5 basis points to 1.50% during 2004, compared to 1.45% during 2003, in response to the increasing interest rate environment. Our increased reliance on FHLB advances and time deposits accounted for the majority of the increase in our cost of funds during 2004.

32

The following table presents the net interest spread, net interest margin, average balances, interest income and expense, and the average yields and rates by asset and liability component for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

Table 2: Summary of Selected Financial Data

	Year Ended December 31,
				2005								2004								2003
						Average								Average								Average
	Average					Yield			Average					Yield			Average					Yield
	Balance			Interest		Rate			Balance			Interest		Rate			Balance			Interest		.
	(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Short-term investments	$	8,554			275		3.21	%	$	54,739		$	639		1.17	%	$	139,985		$	1,830		1.31	%
Securities purchased under resale agreement		15,961			1,118		7.00	%		-			-		-			-			-		-
Investment securities (1)(2)(3)		673,930			25,912		3.84	%		440,456			14,597		3.31	%		457,234			16,309		3.57	%
Loans receivable (1)(4)		5,886,398			381,327		6.48	%		4,170,524			235,385		5.64	%		2,754,620			159,910		5.81	%
FHLB and FRB stock		59,361			2,767		4.66	%		35,811			1,449		4.05	%		11,025			494		4.48	%
Total interest-earning assets		6,644,204			411,399		6.19	%		4,701,530			252,070		5.36	%		3,362,864			178,543		5.31	%
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		110,264								89,857								80,643
Allowance for loan losses		(59,355	)							(44,273	)							(39,135	)
Other assets		301,472								232,913								196,093
Total assets	$	6,996,585							$	4,980,027							$	3,600,465
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking accounts		356,567			2,943		0.83	%	$	291,761		$	1,175		0.40	%	$	267,981			776		0.29	%
Money market accounts		710,562			15,785		2.22	%		416,548			4,797		1.15	%		224,951			1,710		0.76	%
Savings deposits		333,588			953		0.29	%		322,511			486		0.15	%		290,251			362		0.12	%
Time deposits less than $100,000		840,340			20,149		2.40	%		708,231			11,390		1.61	%		632,920			10,410		1.64	%
Time deposits $100,000 or greater		1,772,071			53,756		3.03	%		1,090,166			20,048		1.84	%		843,179			16,688		1.98	%
Federal funds purchased		45,190			1,767		3.91	%		3,028			61		2.01	%		3,044			47		1.54	%
FHLB advances		913,184			26,603		2.91	%		648,529			11,801		1.82	%		146,822			2,959		2.02	%
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		80,894			2,562		3.17	%		-			-		-			-			-		-
Long-term debt		104,770			6,766		6.46	%		39,857			3,139		7.88	%		21,161			2,280		10.77	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		5,157,166			131,284		2.55	%		3,520,631			52,897		1.50	%		2,430,309			35,232		1.45	%
Nonnterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		1,162,159								950,890								796,800
Other liabilities		84,077								71,771								47,711
Stockholders' equity		593,183								436,735								325,645
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	6,996,585							$	4,980,027							$	3,600,465
Interest rate spread							3.64	%							3.86	%							3.86	%
Net interest income and net interest margin				$	280,115		4.22	%				$	199,173		4.24	%				$	143,311		4.26	%

__________

(1) Includes amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investment securities and loans receivable totaling $(213) thousand, $1.6 million, and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Also includes the amortization of deferred loan fees totaling $4.2 million, $2.8 million, and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.

 (2)   Average balances exclude unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities.

 (3)   The yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis as the effects are not material.

 (4)   Average balances include nonperforming loans.

33

Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Margin

Changes in our net interest income are a function of changes in rates and volumes of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table sets forth information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense for the years indicated. The total change for each category of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability is segmented into the change attributable to variations in volume (changes in volume multiplied by old rate) and the change attributable to variations in interest rates (changes in rates multiplied by old volume). Nonaccrual loans are included in average loans used to compute this table.

Table 3: Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Margin

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005 vs. 2004									2004 vs. 2003
	Total			Changes Due to						Total			Changes Due to
	Change			Volume (1)			Rates (1)			Change			Volume (1)			Rates (1)
	(In thousands)
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS:
Short-term investments	$	(364	)	$	(846	)	$	482		$	(1,191	)	$	(1,013	)	$	(178	)
Securities purchased under resale agreement		1,118			1,118			-			-			-			-
Investment securities		11,315			8,689			2,626			(1,712	)		(584	)		(1,128	)
Loans receivable, net		145,942			107,374			38,568			75,475			80,031			(4,556	)
FHLB and FRB stock		1,318			1,071			247			955			1,007			(52	)
Total interest and dividend income	$	159,329		$	117,406		$	41,923		$	73,527		$	79,441		$	(5,914	)
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES:
Checking accounts	$	1,768		$	309		$	1,459		$	399		$	74		$	325
Money market accounts		10,988			4,744			6,244			3,087			1,924			1,163
Savings deposits		467			17			450			124			43			81
Time deposits less than $100,000		8,759			2,412			6,347			980			1,216			(236	)
Time deposits $100,000 or greater		33,708			16,536			17,172			3,360			4,469			(1,109	)
Federal funds purchased		1,706			1,598			108			14			-			14
FHLB advances		14,802			5,986			8,816			8,842			9,156			(314	)
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		2,562			2,562			-			-			-			-
Long-term debt		3,627			3,812			(185	)		859			1,599			(740	)
Total interest expense	$	78,387		$	37,976		$	40,411		$	17,665		$	18,481		$	(816	)
CHANGE IN NET INTEREST INCOME	$	80,942		$	79,430		$	1,512		$	55,862		$	60,960		$	(5,098	)

________

(1)Changes in interest income/expense not arising from volume or rate variances are allocated proportionately to rate and volume.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses amounted to $15.9 million for 2005 compared to $16.8 million for 2004 and $8.8 million for 2003. Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the allowance for credit losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the factors discussed under the “Allowance for Loan Losses” section of this report.

34

Noninterest Income

Table 4: Components of Noninterest Income

	2005		2004		2003
	(In millions)
Letters of credit fees and commissions	$	8.59	$	7.98	$	7.12
Branch fees		7.45		6.99		7.23
Net gain on investment securities available-for-sale		4.29		2.26		1.95
Income from life insurance policies		3.20		2.99		3.29
Ancillary loan fees		2.47		2.80		2.48
Income from secondary market activities		1.58		1.95		6.06
Net gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets		0.05		3.03		(0.17	)
Other operating income		2.02		2.37		3.12
Total noninterest income	$	29.65	$	30.37	$	31.08

Noninterest income includes all revenues earned from sources other than interest income. These sources include service charges and fees on deposit accounts, fees and commissions generated from trade finance activities and the issuance of letters of credit, ancillary fees on loans, net gain on investment securities available-for-sale, disposals of fixed assets, income from secondary market activities, and other miscellaneous noninterest-related revenues.

Noninterest income decreased 2% to $29.6 million during 2005 from $30.4 million in the prior year primarily due to lower gain on sales of fixed assets in 2005 partially offset by net gains on available-for-sale securities. During 2005, we recorded a gain on disposal of fixed assets in the amount of $52 thousand, compared to $3.0 million recorded in 2004. The gain on sale in 2004 resulted from the sale of three office buildings, including two corporate offices located in San Marino, California. These facilities were sold as part of our overall plan to expand and relocate our corporate offices to Pasadena, California.

Letters of credit fees and commissions, which represent revenues from trade finance operations as well as fees related to the issuance and maintenance of standby letters of credit, increased 8% to $8.6 million in 2005, from $8.0 million in 2004. Overall, the increase in letters of credit fees and commissions is due to a 42% increase in the volume of trade finance transactions, primarily export trade activities, during 2005 relative to 2004.

Branch fees, which represent revenues derived from branch operations, totaled $7.4 million in 2005, a 7% increase from $7.0 million earned in 2004. The increase in branch fees during 2005 is due to the overall growth of our deposit base, which increased 37% from 2004 based on the average deposit balance for the year.

Net gain on investment securities available-for-sale increased 90% to $4.3 million in 2005, compared with the $2.3 million recorded in 2004, due largely to more favorable market conditions. The gain on sale of investment securities during 2005 primarily resulted from the sale of U.S. Government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities with a net carrying value of $127.0 million, which were sold for a gain of $3.7 million. Additionally, in 2005, we sold $113.7 million in securities acquired from UNB at a net gain of $178 thousand. Reflected in the net gain on investment securities during 2005 was an impairment writedown amounting to $60 thousand on a corporate debt security. Sales of investment securities during 2005 provided additional liquidity to sustain the increase in our loan production activity during the year, replacing lower yields on investment securities with higher yields on loans.

35

Income earned on life insurance policies increased 7% to $3.2 million in 2005 from $3.0 million in 2004. The increase in income from life insurance policies in 2005 is primarily due to additional policies acquired or entered into during the year. In addition to $3.4 million in new life insurance contracts purchased during 2005, we also acquired insurance policies with a cash surrender value totaling $10.2 million related to our acquisition of UNB in September 2005. Approximately $1.3 million of these policies acquired through UNB were redeemed shortly after the acquisition primarily due to poor or inconsistent market performance. At December 31, 2005, the aggregate cash surrender value of the Company’s life insurance policies amounted to $82.2 million compared to $67.3 million at December 31, 2004.

Ancillary loan fees consist of revenues earned from the servicing of mortgages, fees related to the monitoring and disbursement of construction loan proceeds, and other miscellaneous loan income. Ancillary loan fees decreased 12% to $2.5 million in 2005, compared to $2.8 million in 2004.

Other noninterest income, which includes insurance commissions and insurance-related service fees, branch rental income, and income from operating leases, decreased 15% to $2.0 million in 2005, compared to $2.4 million in 2004. The decrease in other noninterest income is primarily due to the reduction in revenues generated from insurance commissions and insurance-related service fees which decreased 25% to $940 thousand in 2005, from $1.2 million in 2004. Also contributing to the decrease in noninterest income in 2005 was the loss of rental income from the sale of an office building in 2004.

Comparing 2004 to 2003, noninterest income decreased 2% to $30.4 million. The primary contributor to the decrease in noninterest income in 2004 was the decrease in revenues from secondary market activities of $4.3 million, or 76%. Also contributing to the decrease in noninterest income were the following: (1) a $245 thousand, or 3%, reduction in branch service-related fees due to lower fee structures resulting from competitive market pressures; (2) a $293 thousand, or 9%, decrease in income from life insurance policies due to lower overall rates paid on existing policies; and (3) a $749 thousand, or 24%, decrease in other operating income resulting from the expiration of certain revenue generating operating leases. Partially offsetting these decreases were (1) a $3.2 million, or 1914%, increase in net gain on disposal of fixed assets, resulting from the sale of three buildings in 2004; (2) an $856 thousand, or 12%, increase in letters of credit fees and commissions, resulting from higher volume of trade finance activities and additional issuances of standby letters of credit in 2004; (3) a $322 thousand, or 13%, increase in ancillary loan fees, primarily due to increased loan production volume; and (4) a $311 thousand, or 16%, increase in net gains on investment securities available-for-sale.

Noninterest Expense

Table 5: Components of Noninterest Expense

	2005			2004			2003
	(In millions)
Compensation and employee benefits	$	53.67		$	39.13		$	31.84
Occupancy and equipment expense		15.06			10.86			10.31
Deposit-related expenses		8.45			4.91			3.89
Amortization of investments in affordable housing partnerships		6.47			7.43			6.68
Amortization of premiums on deposits acquired		3.91			2.22			1.99
Data processing		2.75			2.12			1.87
Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments		1.00			0.80			0.72
Other operating expenses		32.22			23.99			18.63
Total noninterest expense	$	123.53		$	91.46		$	75.93
Efficiency Ratio (1)		36.53	%		35.64	%		38.57	%

_______

(1) Excludes the amortization of intangibles and investments in affordable housing partnerships.

36

Noninterest expense, which is comprised primarily of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy and other operating expenses increased 35% to $123.5 million during 2005, compared to $91.5 million during 2004.

Compensation and employee benefits increased 37% to $53.7 million in 2005, compared to $39.1 million in 2004, primarily due to increased staffing levels resulting from the acquisition of UNB in September 2005 and the addition of relationship officers and operational personnel throughout the year. Also, we recorded a full year of compensation expense in 2005 related to the acquisition of Trust Bank in August 2004, compared to the partial year expense incurred in 2004. Moreover, the impact of annual salary adjustments and related cost increases for existing employees further contributed to the rise in compensation expense and employee benefits during 2005 as compared to the prior year.

Occupancy and equipment expenses increased 39% to $15.1 million during 2005, compared with $10.9 million during 2004. The increase in occupancy expenses can be attributed to additional rent expense from the combined fifteen branches acquired from Trust Bank and UNB. Additionally, we entered into a new lease agreement during the third quarter of 2004 for the relocation and expansion of our corporate headquarters, increasing rent, common area maintenance, and depreciation expenses.

Deposit-related expenses increased 72% to $8.5 million during 2005, compared with $4.9 million during 2004. Deposit-related expenses, which represent various business-related expenses paid by the Bank on behalf of its commercial account customers, are eventually recouped by the Bank through account analysis charges to individual customer accounts. The increase in deposit-related expenses is directly correlated to the growth in the volume of commercial deposit accounts during 2005.

The amortization of investments in affordable housing partnerships decreased 13% to $6.5 million in 2005, from $7.4 million in 2004. No additional investments in affordable housing partnerships were purchased during 2005 and total investments in affordable housing partnerships decreased to $31.0 million as of December 31, 2005, compared to $37.5 million as of December 31, 2004.

The amortization of premiums on deposits acquired increased 77% to $3.9 million during 2005, compared with $2.2 million in 2004. The increase in amortization expense is due to additional deposit premiums of $15.0 million recorded in connection with the acquisition of UNB in September 2005. Additionally, we recorded a full year of amortization expense in 2005 related to the acquisition of Trust Bank in August 2004, compared to the partial year expense incurred in 2004. Premiums on acquired deposits are amortized over their estimated useful lives.

Data processing expenses increased 29% to $2.7 million in 2005, compared with $2.1 million in 2004. The increase in data processing expenses is primarily due to increased transaction volume stemming from our overall growth, both internally and externally through acquisitions.

Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments increased 24% to $996 thousand in 2005, compared to $802 thousand in 2004. Although there was a decrease in the SAIF annualized Financing Corporation, or “FICO”, average assessment rate to 1.39 basis points during 2005, compared with 1.51 basis points during 2004, deposit insurance premiums increased during 2005 as a result of the significant growth in the Bank’s assessable deposit base.

Other operating expenses include advertising and public relations, telephone and postage, stationery and supplies, bank and item processing charges, insurance expenses, legal, consulting and other professional fees, and charitable contributions. Other operating expenses increased 34% to $32.2 million in 2005, compared with $24.0 million in 2004. This increase in other operating expenses is largely due to expenses incurred to support our continued overall expansion, both organically and through acquisitions. Additionally, we amplified our advertising, public relations, and marketing efforts, incurring an additional $2.2 million in such expenses during 2005, relative to 2004, to enhance our overall image and visibility in the community and in the industry. This amount also includes our pledge of $1.0 million to the Bowers Museum of Cultural Art in Orange County, California for the creation of an art gallery focused on exhibits on Asian history and culture.

37

Comparing 2004 to 2003, noninterest expense increased $15.5 million, or 20%, to $91.5 million. The increase is comprised primarily of the following: (1) an increase in compensation and employee benefits of $7.3 million, or 23%, primarily due to the acquisition of Trust Bank in August 2004 as well as the impact of salary adjustments and related costs for existing employees; (2) an increase in occupancy expenses of $543 thousand, or 5%, reflecting additional rent expense from the four branches acquired from Trust Bank, additional expenses related to the relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters, and higher computer and software related expenses associated with the upgrade of the Company’s hardware and related desktop operating system as well as the conversion of the Bank’s teller platform system during 2004; (3) an increase in deposit-related expenses of $1.0 million, or 26%, attributable to the growth in commercial deposit accounts; (4) an increase in amortization expense of real estate investments of $750 thousand, or 11%, reflecting the $16.1 million in additional affordable housing investment purchases made in 2004; (5) an increase in the amortization of premiums of acquired deposits of $226 thousand, or 11%, due to additional deposit premiums acquired in connection with the acquisitions of Trust Bank in 2004 and PBB in 2003; and (6) an increase in other operating expenses of $5.4 million, or 29%, due primarily to our continued overall growth and expansion, both organically and through acquisitions, as well as higher consulting and professional fees related to our implementation and compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Company’s efficiency ratio increased 2% to 36.53% in 2005, compared to 35.64% in 2004. Despite our continued expansion and growth, we have managed to sustain our operational efficiencies as a result of past and ongoing infrastructure investments compounded by a general company-wide effort to monitor overall operating expenses.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes increased 43% to $62.0 million in 2005, compared with $43.3 million in 2004. The increase in the provision for income taxes is primarily attributable to a 40% increase in pretax earnings during 2005. The provision for income taxes in 2005 also reflects the utilization of federal affordable housing tax credits totaling $5.6 million, compared to $5.9 million utilized in 2004. The 2005 provision reflects an effective tax rate of 36.4%, compared with 35.7% for 2004.

Comparing 2004 to 2003, the provision for income taxes increased 41% to $43.3 million in 2004, compared with $30.7 million in 2003. This increase is primarily attributable to a 35% increase in pretax earnings in 2004. The provision for income taxes in 2004 also reflects the utilization of affordable housing tax credits totaling $5.9 million, compared to $4.9 million utilized in 2003. The 2004 provision reflects an effective tax rate of 35.7%, compared with 34.2% for 2003.

As previously reported, the California Franchise Tax Board, or “FTB”, announced on December 31, 2003 that it is taking the position that certain tax deductions related to regulated investment companies will be disallowed pursuant to California Senate Bill 614 and California Assembly Bill 1601, which were signed into law in the fourth quarter of 2003. East West Securities Company, Inc., a regulated investment company, or “RIC”, formed and funded in July 2000 to raise capital in an efficient and economical manner was dissolved on December 30, 2002 as a result of, among other reasons, proposed legislation to change the tax treatments of RICs. The Fund provided state tax benefits beginning in 2000 until the end of 2002, when the RIC was officially dissolved. While the Company’s management continues to believe that the tax benefits realized in previous years were appropriate and fully defensible under the existing tax codes at that time, the Company has deemed it prudent to participate in the voluntary compliance initiative, or “VCI” offered by the State of California to avoid certain potential penalties should the FTB choose to litigate its recently announced position about the tax treatment of RICs for periods prior to enactment of the legislation described above and should the FTB be successful in that litigation.

38

Pursuant to the VCI program, we filed amended California income tax returns on April 15, 2004 for all affected years and paid the resulting taxes and interest due to the FTB. This amounted to an aggregate payment of $14.2 million for tax years 2000, 2001, and 2002. We continue to believe that the tax deductions are appropriate and, as such, we have also filed refund claims for the amounts paid with the amended returns. These refund claims are reflected as assets in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As a result of these actions—amending our California income tax returns and subsequent related filing of refund claims—we retain our potential exposure for assertion of an accuracy-related penalty should the FTB prevail in its position, in addition to our risk of not being successful in our refund claim for taxes and interest. Our potential exposure to all other penalties, however, has been eliminated through this course of action.

The Franchise Tax Board is currently in the process of reviewing and assessing our refund claims for taxes and interest for tax years 2000 through 2002. Management is continuing to pursue these claims, to monitor developments in the law in this area, and to monitor the status of tax claims with respect to other registered investment companies.

Operating Segment Results

The Company has identified four principal operating segments for purposes of management reporting: retail banking, commercial lending, treasury, and residential lending. Although all four operating segments offer financial products and services, they are managed separately based on each segment’s strategic focus. While the retail banking segment focuses primarily on retail operations through the Bank’s branch network, certain designated branches have responsibility for generating commercial deposits and loans. The commercial lending segment, which includes commercial real estate, primarily generates commercial loans and deposits through the efforts of commercial lending officers located in the Bank’s northern and southern California production offices. The treasury department’s primary focus is managing the Bank’s investments, liquidity, and interest rate risk; the residential lending segment is mainly responsible for the Bank’s portfolio of single family and multifamily residential loans.

Future changes in the Company’s management structure or reporting methodologies may result in changes in the measurement of operating segment results. For more information about our segments, including information about the underlying accounting and reporting process, please see Note 24 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein.

Retail Banking

Retail banking’s pre-tax income increased 115% to $65.4 million in 2005 from $30.4 million in 2004. Net interest income increased 77% to $138.2 million in 2005 from $78.2 million in 2004. Additionally, noninterest income for retail banking increased 9% to $15.7 million in 2005 from $14.5 million in 2004. These increases in both net interest income and noninterest income were primarily due to our overall growth, and were partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense of 31% to $65.3 million in 2005 from $49.8 million in 2004. The increase in noninterest expense is primarily a result of an increase in compensation and employee benefits of 27% to $31.7 million in 2005 from $24.9 million in 2004 and an increase in commercial deposit related expenses of 70% to $8.2 million in 2005 from $4.8 million in 2004. The increase in compensation and employee benefits is a result of increasing staffing levels due to the acquisitions of UNB and Trust Bank and the addition of relationship officers and operational personnel throughout the year. The increase in commercial deposit related expenses of $3.4 million is a result of the growth in volume of commercial deposit accounts we experienced during 2005.

39

Commercial Lending

Commercial lending’s pre-tax income increased 11% to $74.8 million in 2005 from $67.4 million in 2004. Net interest income increased 28% to $90.0 million in 2005 from $70.4 million in 2004. This increase in net interest income is primarily due to the growth of our commercial loans, including commercial real estate. The increase in net interest income was partially offset by a decrease in noninterest income and an increase in noninterest expense. Noninterest income for commercial lending decreased $1.8 million or 8% to $21.4 million in 2005 from $23.2 million in 2004. Noninterest expense increased $6.1 million or 33% to $24.8 million in 2005 from $18.7 million in 2004. The increase in noninterest expense is largely a result of an increase in compensation and employee benefits. Compensation and employee benefits increased 30% to $18.0 million in 2005 from $13.8 million in 2004. The increase in compensation and employee benefits is a result of increasing staffing levels due to the acquisitions of UNB and Trust Bank and the addition of relationship officers and operational personnel throughout the year.

Treasury

Treasury’s pre-tax income decreased 2% to $30.0 million in 2005 from $30.1 million in 2004. Net interest income decreased 8% to $27.6 million in 2005 from $29.9 million in 2004, while noninterest income for treasury increased 154% to $4.4 million in 2005 from $1.7 million in 2004. The decrease in net interest income is largely a result of increased market rates paid on borrowings, as compared to increases in interest earned on investment securities. The significant increase in noninterest income is a result of net gains on sales of investment securities, primarily mortgaged-backed securities. Additionally, noninterest expense increased 35% to $1.0 million in 2005 from $758 thousand in 2004. The increase in noninterest expense is largely a result of an increase in data processing of $212 thousand to $223 thousand in 2005 from $11 thousand in 2004.

Residential Lending

Residential lending’s pre-tax income decreased 12% to $14.4 million in 2005 from $16.5 million in 2004. Net interest income increased 13% to $19.9 million in 2005 from $17.7 million in 2004. The increase in net interest income is due to the growth in volume in single family and multifamily loans we experienced during the year and also reflects the impact of continued increases in interest rates. Noninterest income for residential lending remained unchanged at $4.4 million for 2005 and 2004. Noninterest expense increased 56% to $6.0 million in 2005 from $3.8 million in 2004. The increase in noninterest expense is primarily a result of an increase in compensation and employee benefits of 36% to $3.6 million in 2005 from $2.7 million in 2004. The increase in compensation and employee benefits is a result of the addition of loan officers and back office personnel throughout the year. Additionally, other noninterest expense increased 124% to $2.0 million in 2005 from $884 thousand in 2004, largely a result of increased guarantee fees related to loans securitizations.

40

Balance Sheet Analysis

Total assets increased $2.25 billion, or 37%, to $8.28 billion during the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in total assets was primarily attributable to a 32% growth in gross loans and a 63% increase in investment securities available-for-sale. Gross loans rose to a record $6.79 billion at December 31, 2005, compared to $5.13 billion at December 31, 2004. We attribute overall loan growth to the continued expansion of lending relationships with new customers as well as cross-selling to existing customers, increased loan origination volume from our branch network, and the addition of personnel to enhance and support loan and deposit growth. Additionally, the recent acquisition of UNB contributed to our loan growth, year-over-year. We were able to fund the increase in loans and available-for-sale securities through deposit growth totaling $1.74 billion, supplemented by increases in net borrowings of $173.4 million and long-term debt of $95.6 million.

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

Income from investing activities provides a significant portion of our total income. We aim to maintain an investment portfolio with an adequate mix of fixed-rate and adjustable-rate securities with relatively short maturities to minimize overall interest rate risk. Our investment securities portfolio consists of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government agency securities, U.S. Government sponsored enterprise debt securities, mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt, and U.S. Government sponsored enterprise equity securities. We currently classify our entire investment portfolio as available-for-sale, and accordingly, these securities are carried at their estimated fair values with the corresponding changes in fair values recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, as a component of stockholders’ equity.

 Total investment securities available-for-sale increased 63% to $869.8 million as of December 31, 2005. Total repayments/maturities and proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities amounted to $194.6 million and $251.9million, respectively, during 2005. Proceeds from repayments, maturities, sales, and redemptions were applied towards additional investment securities purchases totaling $458.7 million as well as funding a portion of loan originations made during 2005. We acquired investment securities with a net carrying value of $115.8 million through our acquisition of UNB in September 2005. The entire portfolio obtained from UNB was sold shortly after acquisition, for a net gain of $178 thousand. We recorded net gains totaling $4.3 million and $3.0 million on sales of available-for-sale securities during 2005 and 2004, respectively. At December 31, 2005, investment securities available-for-sale with a carrying value of $834.1 million were pledged to secure public deposits, FHLB advances, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

During the first quarter of 2005, we recorded a $60 thousand impairment writedown on a corporate debt security held in our available-for-sale investment portfolio. The amortized cost of this security at the time of the writedown was $1.0 million. This security was subsequently sold in the second quarter of 2005 for an additional loss of $39 thousand.

Additionally, during the year ended 2005, we securitized $209.6 million of our multifamily loans through FNMA for liquidity and capital management purposes. All of the resulting securities were retained in our available-for-sale investment portfolio. The securitizations were accounted for as guaranteed mortgage securitizations which did not generate any gains or losses to operations.

41

The following table sets forth the carrying values of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

	At December 31,
	2005		2004		2003
	(In thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities	$	1,497	$	2,496	$	26,228
U.S. Government agency securities and U.S Government sponsored
enterprise debt securities		610,237		336,614		273,105
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities		189,915		107,988		22,092
Other mortgage-backed securities		14,104		25,664		45,669
Corporate debt securities		17,812		18,288		30,050
U.S. Goverment sponsored enterprise equity securities		35,868		42,448		46,053
Residual interest in securitized loans		404		954		1,945
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	869,837	$	534,452	$	445,142

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the carrying values, weighted average yields, and contractual maturity distribution, excluding periodic principal payments, of our investment securities available-for-sale portfolio at December 31, 2005:

Table 7: Yields and Maturities ofInvestment Securities Available-For-Sale

	Within						After One But					After Five But					After
		One Year					Within Five Years					Within Ten Years					Ten Years					Total
		Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield
		(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities		$	1,497		3.98	%	$	-		-		$	-		-		$	-		-		$	1,497		3.98	%
U.S. Government agency securities and U.S.
Government sponsored enterprise debt securities			380,991		3.44	%		209,460		3.74	%		19,786		4.97	%		-		-			610,237		3.59	%
Government sponsored enterprise
mortgage-backed securities			655		4.71	%		1		8.52	%		17,261		5.93	%		171,998		4.61	%		189,915		4.71	%
Other mortgage-backed securities			-		-			-		-			-		-			14,104		4.98	%		14,104		4.98	%
Corporate debt securities			-		-			7,829		5.13	%		-		-			9,983		4.90	%		17,812		5.00	%
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise equity securities			-		-			1,444		3.57	%		-		-			34,424		4.89	%		35,868		4.84	%
Residual interest in securitized loans			404		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			404		-
Total		$	383,547		3.43	%	$	218,734		3.78	%	$	37,047		5.40	%	$	230,509		4.69	%	$	869,837		3.94	%

Loans

We offer a broad range of products designed to meet the credit needs of our borrowers. Our lending activities consist of single family residential loans, multifamily residential loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial business loans which include trade finance products, and consumer loans. Net loans receivable increased $1.64 billion, or 32% to $6.72 billion at December 31, 2005. The increase in loans during 2005 was funded primarily through growth in deposits, borrowings, and long-term debt.

42

We experienced strong loan demand throughout 2005. Excluding the impact of $676.6 million in gross loans acquired from UNB in the third quarter of 2005, $209.6 million in loans securitized and $95.6 million in loan sales, organic net loan growth during 2005 amounted to $1.29 billion, or 25%, compared to year-end 2004. All categories of loans experienced double-digit growth during the year, with the commercial real estate, multifamily residential, and single family residential loan sectors contributing the largest dollar volume growth.

The organic growth in loans, excluding loans acquired from UNB, loans securitized and loans sold, is comprised of increases in single family residential loans of $274.1 million or 84%, multifamily residential loans of $282.4 million or 25%, commercial real estate loans of $309.1 million or 12%, construction loans of $214.1 million or 61%, commercial business loans of $132.2 million or 30%, trade finance loans of $54.9 million or 35%, and consumer loans, including home equity lines of credit, of $22.4 million or 12%.

The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:

Table 8: Composition of Loan Portfolio

	December 31,
	2005						2004						2003						2002						2001
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
Residential, single family	$	509,151			7.5	%	$	327,554			6.4	%	$	146,686			4.5	%	$	108,508			4.6	%	$	316,504			14.7	%
Residential, multifamily		1,239,836			18.3	%		1,121,107			21.8	%		809,311			24.7	%		628,303			26.8	%		377,224			17.5	%
Commercial and industrial real estate		3,321,520			48.9	%		2,556,827			49.8	%		1,558,594			47.6	%		983,481			41.9	%		868,989			40.2	%
Construction		640,654			9.4	%		348,501			6.8	%		179,544			5.5	%		176,221			7.5	%		161,953			7.5	%
Total real estate loans		5,711,161			84.1	%		4,353,989			84.8	%		2,694,135			82.3	%		1,896,513			80.8	%		1,724,670			79.9	%
Other loans:
Commercial business		643,296			9.5	%		438,537			8.6	%		311,133			9.5	%		246,798			10.5	%		276,563			12.8	%
Trade finance		230,771			3.4	%		155,809			3.0	%		120,809			3.7	%		89,573			3.8	%		86,768			4.0	%
Automobile		8,543			0.1	%		10,151			0.2	%		13,696			0.4	%		15,890			0.7	%		13,714			0.6	%
Other consumer		200,254			2.9	%		175,008			3.4	%		133,454			4.1	%		97,034			4.2	%		58,413			2.7	%
Total other loans		1,082,864			15.9	%		779,505			15.2	%		579,092			17.7	%		449,295			19.2	%		435,458			20.1	%
Total gross loans		6,794,025			100.0	%		5,133,494			100.0	%		3,273,227			100.0	%		2,345,808			100.0	%		2,160,128			100.0	%
Unearned fees, premiums and discounts, net		(1,070	)					(2,156	)					152						2,683						267
Allowance for loan losses		(68,635	)					(50,884	)					(39,246	)					(35,292	)					(27,557	)
Loan receivable, net	$	6,724,320					$	5,080,454					$	3,234,133					$	2,313,199					$	2,132,838

Single Family Residential Loans.We offer first prime mortgage loans secured by one-to-four unit residential properties located in our primary lending areas. At December 31, 2005, $509.2 million or 8% of the loan portfolio was secured by one-to-four family residential real estate properties, compared to $327.6 million or 6% at December 31, 2004. Residential single family loan origination activity continued to grow in 2005, resulting in $320.1 million in new loan originations during 2005. As compared to 2004, we experienced an increase in the origination of adjustable-rate loans over fixed-rate loans as interest rates continued to steadily increase in 2005. Since we generally only sell fixed-rate loans in the secondary market, the rising rate environment continued to constrain our secondary marketing efforts during 2005. Specifically, we sold approximately $93.9 million in conforming and non-conforming residential single family loans through our secondary marketing efforts during 2005, compared to $87.4 million sold in 2004. If interest rates continue to rise, we anticipate a contraction in our secondary marketing activities during 2006.

43

We offer both fixed and adjustable rate (“ARM”) single family residential mortgage loan programs. Primarily, we offer ARM loan programs that have six-month, three-, five-, or seven-year initial fixed periods. We originate single family residential mortgage loans under three different types of programs, full/alternative documentation, reduced documentation and no documentation loans. The underwriting criteria for these loan programs vary in income and asset documentation levels. Our underwriting criteria for all the loans in our single family residential mortgage loan programs include minimum FICO scores and maximum loan-to-value ratios. Additionally, our full/alternative documentation loan program requires verification of employment and income. Reduced documentation loans are primarily intended for borrowers who are self-employed. Generally, we require reduced documentation borrowers to have more equity in the property and higher amounts of liquid reserves. Finally, our no documentation loan program is designed for borrowers who demonstrate excellent credit quality and have the ability to place a large down payment or have high equity in the property. Of the $320.1 million single family residential mortgage loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2005, 11% or $35.6 million were full/alternative documentation loans, 45% or $142.5 million were reduced documentation loans and 44% or $142.0 million were no documentation loans.

Multifamily Real Estate Loans. We continue to place emphasis in the origination of multifamily loans and originated $574.6 million multifamily loans in the year ended December 31, 2005. Although real estate lending activities are collateralized by real property, these transactions are subject to similar credit evaluation, underwriting and monitoring standards as those applied to commercial business loans. Multifamily real estate loans accounted for $1.24 billion or 18% and for $1.12 billion or 22% of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

We securitized $209.6 million of multifamily loans through FNMA during the year. The securitizations were undertaken for liquidity and capital management purposes, with all of the resulting securities retained in our available-for-sale investment portfolio. The securitizations were all accounted for as guaranteed mortgage securitizations which did not generate any gains or losses to operations. We also recorded $2.5 million in mortgage servicing assets in connection with these multifamily securitizations since the Bank continues to service the underlying loans.

We offer both fixed and ARM multifamily loan programs. Primarily, we offer ARM multifamily loan programs that have six-month, three-, or five-year initial fixed periods. We originate these prime multifamily mortgage loans under two different types of programs, full documentation and reduced documentation loans. The underwriting criteria for these loan programs vary in income and asset documentation levels, similar to the programs mentioned in the single family residential loan programs. Underwriting criteria generally include minimum FICO scores, maximum loan-to-value ratios and minimum debt coverage ratios.

Additionally, we own single family and multifamily residential mortgage loans that have contractual features that may increase our credit exposure. These mortgage loans include option adjustable rate mortgage loans that may subject borrowers to significant future payment increases or create the potential for negative amortization of the principal balance.

Interest only mortgage loans allow interest-only payments for fixed period of time. At the end of the interest only period, the loan payment includes principal payments and increases significantly. The borrower’s new payment once the loan becomes amortizing (i.e., includes principal payments) will be greater than if the borrower had been making principal payments since the origination of the loan. The longer the interest only period, the larger the amortizing payment will be when the interest-only period ends.

44

Option adjustable rate mortgage loans permit different repayment options. The monthly payment is set as the initial interest rate for the first year of the loan. After that point, the borrower can make a minimum payment that is limited to a 7.5% increase in payment. If the minimum payment is not adequate to cover the interest amount due on the mortgage loan, the loan would have negative amortization, which will result in an increase in the mortgage loans’ principal balance. These loans completely re-amortize every five years and the monthly payment is reset at that point. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, there was no negative amortization on any loans held in our portfolio. We did not originate these loans and they were purchased several years ago.

Our total exposure related to these products included in loans receivable for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 is summarized as follows:

Table 9: Nontraditional Mortgage Products

	Unpaid Principal Balance as of
	December 31,
	2005		2004
	(In thousands)
Interest only residential, multifamily loans	$	9,213	$	5,845
Option adjustable rate mortgages
Residential, single family loans		2,844		3,030
Residential, multifamily loans		81,348		83,301

All of the loans we originate are subject to our underwriting guidelines and loan origination standards. Generally, loans obtained from third party originators, including the higher risk loans in the preceding table, are closed and funded in our name and are also subject to our same underwriting guidelines and loan origination standards. We believe our strict underwriting criteria and procedures adequately consider the unique risks which may come from these products. We conduct a variety of quality control procedures and periodic audits to ensure compliance with our origination standards, including our criteria for lending and legal requirements.

Commercial Real Estate Loans. We continue to place emphasis in the origination of commercial real estate loans. Although real estate lending activities are collateralized by real property, these transactions are subject to similar credit evaluation, underwriting and monitoring standards as those applied to commercial business loans. Commercial real estate loans accounted for $3.32 billion or 49%, and $2.56 billion or 50%, of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Construction Loans. We offer loans to finance the construction of income-producing or owner-occupied buildings. At December 31, 2005, construction loans accounted for $640.7 million or 9% of our loan portfolio. This compares with $348.5 million or 7% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2004. Total unfunded commitments related to construction loans increased 95% to $720.2 million at December 31, 2005, compared to $369.6 million at December 31, 2004.

Commercial Business Loans. We finance small and middle-market businesses in a wide spectrum of industries throughout California. Included in commercial business loans are loans for working capital, accounts receivable lines, inventory lines SBA guaranteed small business loans and lease financing. At December 31, 2005, commercial business loans accounted for a total of $643.3 million or 9% of our loan portfolio compared to $438.5 million or 12% at December 31, 2004. Total unfunded commitments related to commercial business loans increased 92% to $473.2 million at December 31, 2005, compared to $246.0 million at year-end 2004.

45

Trade Finance Products. We offer a variety of international finance and trade services and products, including letters of credit, revolving lines of credit, import loans, bankers' acceptances, working capital lines, domestic purchase financing, and pre-export financing. At December 31, 2005, these loans to finance international trade totaled $230.8 million or 3% of our loan portfolio. A substantial portion of this business involves California-based customers engaged in import activities. In addition, we also offer Ex-Im financing to various exporters. These loans are guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States. Of this amount, a significant portion represents loans made to borrowers on the import side of international trade. At December 31, 2005, such loans amounted to $214.6 million, compared with $141.1 million at December 31, 2004. These financings are generally made through letters of credit ranging from $100 thousand to $1 million. All trade finance transactions are U.S. dollar denominated. At December 31, 2005, total unfunded commitments related to trade finance loans increased 63% to $200.9 million, compared to $123.3 million at December 31, 2004.

Affordable Housing.We are engaged in a variety of lending and credit enhancement programs to finance the development of affordable housing projects, which are generally eligible for federal low income housing tax credits. As of December 31, 2005, we had outstanding $271.8 million of letters of credit, which were issued to enhance the ratings of revenue bonds used to finance affordable housing projects. This compares to $291.3 million as of year-end 2004. Credit facilities for individual projects generally range in size from $1 million to $10 million.

Contractual Maturity of Loan Portfolio. The following table presents the maturity schedule of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2005. All loans are shown maturing based upon contractual maturities, and include scheduled repayments but not potential prepayments. Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity, and overdrafts are reported as due within one year. Loan balances have not been reduced for undisbursed loan proceeds, unearned discounts, and the allowance for loan losses. Nonaccrual loans of $24.1 million are included in the within one year category.

Table 10: Maturity of Loan Portfolio

			After One
	Within		But Within		More Than
	One Year		Five Years		Five Years		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential, single family	$	87,400	$	245,118	$	176,633	$	509,151
Residential, multifamily		233,111		573,226		433,499		1,239,836
Commercial and industrial real estate		525,232		1,171,685		1,624,603		3,321,520
Construction		512,861		122,832		4,961		640,654
Commercial business		474,159		139,940		29,197		643,296
Trade finance		218,861		11,910		-		230,771
Other consumer		84,310		99,436		25,051		208,797
Total	$	2,135,934	$	2,364,147	$	2,293,944	$	6,794,025

As of December 31, 2005, outstanding loans, including projected prepayments, scheduled to be repriced within one year, after one but within five years, and in more than five years, excluding nonaccrual loans, are as follows:

Table 11: Loans Scheduled to be Repriced

			After One
	Within		But Within		More Than
	One Year		Five Years		Five Years		Total
	(In thousands)
Total fixed rate	$	136,724	$	208,397	$	414,510	$	759,631
Total variable rate		4,380,480		1,098,284		531,481		6,010,245
Total	$	4,517,204	$	1,306,681	$	945,991	$	6,769,876

46

Nonperforming Assets

Loans are continually monitored by management and the Board of Directors. Generally, our policy is to place a loan on nonaccrual status if either (i) principal or interest payments are past due in excess of 90 days; or (ii) the full collection of principal or interest becomes uncertain, regardless of the length of past due status. When a loan reaches nonaccrual status, any interest accrued on the loan is reversed and charged against current income. In general, subsequent payments received are applied to the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Nonaccrual loans that demonstrate a satisfactory payment trend for several months are returned to full accrual status subject to management’s assessment of the full collectibility of the account.

Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more but not on nonaccrual, restructured loans and other real estate owned, net. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets were 0.36% and 0.10% at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Nonaccrual loans totaled $24.1 million and $4.9 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Loans totaling $36.0 million were placed on nonaccrual status during 2005. These additions to nonaccrual loans were offset by $5.0 million in net chargeoffs, $4.8 million in payoffs and principal paydowns and $7.0 million in loans that were brought current. Additions to nonaccrual loans during 2005 were comprised of $23.2 million in commercial real estate loans, $4.6 million in construction loans, $3.0 million in trade finance loans, $3.0 million in commercial business loans, and $2.2 million in residential and other consumer loans.

We also had $5.7 million in loans past due 90 days or more but not on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2005, as compared to $681 thousand at December 31, 2004.

There were no restructured loans or loans that had their original terms modified at December 31, 2005 and 2004.

Other real estate owned, or “OREO” includes properties acquired through foreclosure or through full or partial satisfaction of loans. We had one OREO property at December 31, 2005 and 2004, with a carrying value of $299 thousand, representing a condominium unit that was held as partial collateral for a commercial business loan.

The following table sets forth information regarding nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more but not on nonaccrual, restructured loans and other real estate owned as of the dates indicated:

Table 12: Nonperforming Assets

	December 31,
	2005			2004			2003			2002			2001
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans	$	24,149		$	4,924		$	5,311		$	8,855		$	3,658
Loans past due 90 days or more but not on nonaccrual		5,670			681			636			-			-
Total nonperforming loans		29,819			5,605			5,947			8,855			3,658
Restructured loans		-			-			638			3,304			2,119
Other real estate owned, net		299			299			-			-			-
Total nonperforming assets	$	30,118		$	5,904		$	6,585		$	12,159		$	5,777
Total nonperforming assets to total assets		0.36	%		0.10	%		0.16	%		0.37	%		0.20	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans		230.17	%		907.83	%		659.93	%		398.55	%		753.34	%
Nonperforming loans to total gross loans		0.44	%		0.11	%		0.18	%		0.38	%		0.17	%

47

We evaluate loan impairment according to the provisions of SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended. Under SFAS No. 114, loans are considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled interest payments. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as an expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, less costs to sell. If the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the deficiency will be charged off against the allowance for loan losses or, alternatively, a specific allocation will be established.

At December 31, 2005, we classified $24.1 million of our loans as impaired, compared with $5.6 million at December 31, 2004. Specific reserves on impaired loans amounted to $1.3 million at December 31, 2005, compared to $1.1 million at December 31, 2004. Our average recorded investment in impaired loans during 2005 and 2004 was $19.9 million and $7.7 million, respectively. During 2005 and 2004, gross interest income that would have been recorded on impaired loans, had they performed in accordance with their original terms, totaled $1.6 million and $496 thousand, respectively. Of this amount, actual interest recognized on impaired loans, on a cash basis, was $604 thousand and $272 thousand, respectively.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We are committed to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level that is commensurate with estimated and known risks in the loan portfolio. In addition to regular, quarterly reviews of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management performs an ongoing assessment of the risks inherent in the loan portfolio. While we believe that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at December 31, 2005, future additions to the allowance will be subject to a continuing evaluation of estimated and known, as well as inherent, risks in the loan portfolio.

The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses which is charged against current period operating results, and is decreased by the amount of net chargeoffs during the year. At December 31, 2005, the allowance for loan losses amounted to $68.6 million, or 1.01% of total loans, compared with $50.9 million, or 0.99% of total loans, at December 31, 2004. The $17.8 million increase in the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2005, from year-end 2004, reflects $15.9 million in additional loss provisions and $9.3 million in loss reserves acquired from UNB, reduced by $4.7 million in net chargeoffs during the year. Moreover, we reclassified $2.7 million from the allowance for loan losses to other liabilities during 2005, representing additional loss allowances required for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit related primarily to our trade finance and affordable housing activities.

The provision for loan losses of $15.9 million recorded in 2005 represents a 5% decrease from the $16.8 million in loss provisions recorded during 2004. Net chargeoffs amounting to $4.7 million represent 0.08% of average loans outstanding during 2005. This compares to net chargeoffs of $5.1 million, or 0.12% of average loans outstanding, during 2004. We continue to record loss provisions to compensate for both the continued growth of our loan portfolio, which grew 32% during 2005, and our continued lending focus on increasing our portfolio of commercial real estate, commercial business, trade finance, and construction loans.

48

The following table summarizes activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:

Table 13: Allowance for Loan Losses

	At or for the Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003			2002			2001
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance balance, beginning of year	$	50,884		$	39,246		$	35,292		$	27,557		$	23,848
Allowance from acquisitions		9,290			1,583			2,821			-			1,550
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments
and letters of credit		(2,738	)		(1,566	)		(6,129	)		-			-
Provision for loan losses		15,870			16,750			8,800			10,200			6,217
Gross chargeoffs:
Residential, single family		168			-			-			-			-
Commercial and industrial real estate		1,899			-			-			-			-
Commercial business		4,175			5,734			2,565			3,423			5,920
Automobile		97			119			190			113			8
Other consumer		103			7			22			4			-
Total gross chargeoffs		6,442			5,860			2,777			3,540			5,928
Gross recoveries:
Residential, single family		23			9			40			40			77
Residential, multifamily		90			26			197			522			1,296
Commercial and industrial real estate		34			3			264			130			60
Commercial business		1,454			507			697			324			435
Automobile		119			186			41			58			2
Other consumer		51			-			-			1			-
Total gross recoveries		1,771			731			1,239			1,075			1,870
Net chargeoffs		4,671			5,129			1,538			2,465			4,058
Allowance balance, end of year	$	68,635		$	50,884		$	39,246		$	35,292		$	27,557
Average loans outstanding	$	5,886,398		$	4,170,524		$	2,754,620		$	2,309,909		$	1,974,857
Total gross loans outstanding, end of year	$	6,794,025		$	5,133,494		$	3,273,227		$	2,345,808		$	2,160,128
Net chargeoffs to average loans		0.08	%		0.12	%		0.06	%		0.11	%		0.21	%
Allowance for loan losses to total gross
loans at end of year		1.01	%		0.99	%		1.20	%		1.50	%		1.28	%

Prior to the third quarter of 2005, we utilized two primary methodologies to determine the overall adequacy of the allowance - the classification migration model and the individual loan review analysis methodology. The results from these two methodologies were compared to various ancillary analyses, including historical loss analyses, peer group comparisons, and analyses based on the federal regulatory interagency policy for loan and lease losses to determine an overall allowance requirement amount. Largely in response to the significant growth of the Bank’s loan portfolio in the past couple of years, we refined the classification migration analysis in the third quarter of 2005 to take into consideration the increasing diversity and risk profiles of loans within the same loan categories. As a result of our enhanced approach to the classification migration analysis, management has determined that the individual loan review analysis methodology and separate historical loss analyses are no longer necessary in determining the overall adequacy of the allowance since the results of these analyses have been incorporated into the enhanced migration model.

Under the classification migration approach implemented prior to the third quarter of 2005, we utilized only six risk-rated loan pools. This now has been expanded to eighteen categories. Automobile loans and homogeneous loans, which are predominantly consumer-related credits (i.e. home equity lines, overdraft protection, and credit card loans), remain unchanged under the enhanced model. All other categories (i.e. single family residential, multifamily residential, commercial real estate, construction, and commercial business) have been broken down into additional subcategories. For example, instead of one commercial real estate loan category, this category has been segmented into six subcategories based on industry sector, namely, retail, office, industrial, land, hotel/motel, and other miscellaneous. By sectionalizing loan categories into smaller subgroups, we are better able to isolate and identify the risk associated with each subgroup based on historical loss trends.

49

In addition to increasing the number of loan categories, we have also expanded the loss horizon from five to thirteen years in order to better capture the Bank’s historical loss trends to make the analysis more complete and accurate. The thirteen-year loss horizon was selected because this represents the timeframe when the Bank started to monitor and track losses incurred in the loan portfolio. We continue to utilize minimum loss rates as a self-correcting mechanism to better reflect the loss potential for certain categories that have little or no historical losses. Similar to the previous periods, minimum loss rates are established based on relative risk profiles for certain loan categories. However, in contrast to previous periods, the current minimum loss rates utilized under the enhanced methodology more closely reflect historical loss rates than previously utilized minimum loss rates as a result of the expanded loss horizon. For example, minimum loss rates on construction loans will be higher than minimum loss rates established for commercial real estate loans due to their riskier credit profiles. Even within various subgroups in a broad loan category such as commercial real estate, minimum loss rates are also established based on the relative risk profile of various industry sectors. Commercial real estate loans in the retail sector, for example, will have a lower minimum loss rate than commercial real estate loans in the hotel/motel sector. The allowance requirement for each pool continues to be based on the higher of historical loss factors or established minimum loss rates for each classification category (i.e. pass, special mention, substandard, and doubtful).

Besides quantitative adjustments, the enhanced classification migration methodology also utilizes qualitative adjustments which were previously considered in conjunction with the individual loan review analysis methodology. These qualitative adjustments include, but are not limited to, credit concentrations, delinquency, nonaccrual and problem loan trends, qualification of lending management and staff, and quality of the loan review system. Qualitative adjustments can be either positive or negative, and generally range from -2% to 5%. Total net qualitative adjustments for each loan pool are reflected as a percent adjustment and are calculated on top of the required allowance amount based on historical losses or minimum loss rates. By incorporating various qualitative adjustments into the migration methodology, we have essentially integrated the principles of the individual loan review analysis methodology.

Previously, we used a 10% estimation risk factor to compensate for the modeling risk associated with the classification migration and individual loan review analysis models. Additionally, we also used a 5% economic risk factor in consideration of the tenuous state of the national economy, recent corporate scandals, continuing geopolitical instability in the Middle East, and the unfavorable impact of Fed rate increases on consumer cash flows. The estimation and economic risk factors were considered unallocated reserves under the old method and totaled $6.7 million as of December 31, 2004. With the enhanced migration model, both the estimation and economic risk factors are included in the qualitative adjustments for each loan category. Although a certain degree of subjectivity is still inevitable in determining the adequacy of the loan loss allowance, it is management’s opinion that the new expanded classification migration method is more accurate in assessing the allowance requirement for each loan subcategory.

The following table reflects management’s allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category and the ratio of each loan category to total loans as of the dates indicated. Due to the changes in methodology discussed above, a trend comparison of the allowance requirement for individual loan types at December 31, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004 is no longer meaningful. We will resume this analysis in the first quarter of 2006 when the allowance requirement as of March 31, 2006 will be derived in the same manner as the requirement at year-end 2005.

50

Table 14: Allowance for Loan Losses by Loan Category

		At December 31,
		2005			2004			2003			2002			2001
		Amount	%		Amount	%		Amount	%		Amount	%		Amount	%
		(Dollars in thousands)< font style="DISPLAY: inline; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman">
Residential, single family	$	1,401	7.5%	$	586	6.4%	$	259	4.5%	$	386	4.6%	$	$ 184	14.7%
Residential, multifamily		5,152	18.3%		3,703	21.8%		2,487	24.7%		3,142	26.8%		1,914	17.5%
Commercial and industrial real estate		22,241	48.9%		15,053	49.8%		12,958	47.6%		7,748	41.9%		8,221	40.2%
Construction		10,751	9.4%		7,082	6.8%		3,781	5.5%		4,410	7.5%		3,024	7.5%
Commercial business (1)		28,132	12.9%		16,486	11.6%		13,761	13.2%		14,494	14.3%		10,248	16.8%
Automobile		205	0.1%		510	0.2%		486	0.4%		40	0.7%		39	0.6%
Consumer and other		753	2.9%		741	3.4%		321	4.1%		115	4.2%		8	2.7%
Other risks		-	-		6,723	-		5,193	-		4,957	-		3,919	-
Total	$	68,635	100.0%	$	50,884	100.0%	$	39,246	100.0%	$	35,292	100.0%	$	$ 27,557	100.0%

_______

(1) Includes trade finance loans.

Deposits

We offer a wide variety of deposit account products to both consumer and commercial customers. Time deposit products, consisting primarily of retail fixed-rate certificates of deposit, comprised 50% of the deposit portfolio at both December 31, 2005 and 2004. Other deposit products, which include noninterest bearing demand accounts, interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts and money market accounts, accounted for the remainder of the deposit portfolio at both December 31, 2005 and 2004.

Deposits increased $1.74 billion, or 38%, to $6.26 billion at December 31, 2005. Organic deposit growth, excluding the $865.1 million in deposits acquired from UNB, increased $871.0 million, or 19% during the year. This organic deposit growth was comprised of noninterest bearing demand accounts of $107.1 million or 10%, money market accounts of $418.2 million or 82%, and time deposits of $396.3 million or 18%. These increases were partially offset by decreases in savings accounts of $43.5 million or 13% and interest-bearing checking accounts of $7.0 million or 2% during the year. The net growth in non-time deposit accounts can be attributed to the Bank’s efforts to expand its small- and mid-sized commercial customer base through programs at the retail branches that better align with the needs of these customers, while the growth in time deposits is due to the introduction of various new products and promotions during the year.

Brokered deposits increased 56% to $551.6 million at December 31, 2005 from $354.3 million at December 31, 2004. Our increased reliance on brokered deposits during 2005 is directly correlated to our substantial loan growth during the year.

Public deposits increased 61% to $408.6 million at December 31, 2005, compared to $254.1 million as of December 31, 2004. The balance of public funds is comprised predominantly of deposits from the State of California.

Time deposits greater than $100 thousand totaled $2.22 billion, accounting for 35% of the deposit portfolio at December 31, 2005. These accounts, consisting primarily of deposits by consumers and public funds, had a weighted average interest rate of 3.54% at December 31, 2005. The following table provides the remaining maturities at December 31, 2005 of time deposits greater than $100 thousand:

51

Table 15: Time Deposits Greater than $100,000

	(In thousands)
3 months or less	$	1,260,300
Over 3 months through 6 months		579,870
Over 6 months through 12 months		311,457
Over 12 months		69,081
Total	$	2,220,708

Borrowings

We use borrowings, which include federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and FHLB advances, to manage our liquidity position. Such borrowings increased 20% to $1.03 billion at December 31, 2005, an increase of $173.4 million from December 31, 2004. Federal funds purchased, which are generally short-term in nature, totaled $91.5 million at December 31, 2005. We had no outstanding federal funds purchased as of December 31, 2004.

During 2005, we entered into six long-term transactions involving sales of securities under repurchase agreements totaling $325.0 million. These repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were sold. The terms for these repurchase agreements range from seven to ten years. These repurchase agreements are all initially floating rate for the first one to three years, ranging from the three-month Libor minus 80 basis points to the three-month Libor minus 125 basis points. Thereafter, the rates are fixed for the remainder of the term, with interest rates ranging from 4.08% to 4.55%. We did not have any outstanding securities sold under repurchase agreements at December 31, 2004.

FHLB advances decreased 28% to $617.7 million as of December 31, 2005, representing a decrease of $243.1 million from December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2005, $280.0 million of total outstanding FHLB advances represent overnight advances, compared to $100.0 million as of December 31, 2004.

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt, which is comprised of both subordinated debt and junior subordinated debt, totaled $153.1 million at December 31, 2005. This compares to total long-term debt of $57.5 million at December 31, 2004. Junior subordinated debt is issued in connection with various trust preferred security offerings.

On April 28, 2005, the Bank issued $50.0 million in subordinated debt in a private placement transaction. The subordinated debt issuance has a 10-year term and bears interest per annum at a rate based on the three-month Libor rate plus 110 basis points, payable on a quarterly basis. The subordinated debt was issued through the Bank and qualifies as Tier II capital for regulatory reporting purposes. On September 23, 2005, we amended the subordinated debt agreement entered into on April 28, 2005. Pursuant to the amendment, we issued an additional $25.0 million in subordinated debt and changed the maturity date of the instrument from April 29, 2015 to September 23, 2015. At December 31, 2005, we had subordinated debt totaling $75.0 million. We did not have any subordinated debt at December 31, 2004.

52

We had junior subordinated debt totaling $78.1 million and $57.5 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. On September 6, 2005, the Company completed an offering of trust preferred securities totaling $20.6 million, in a private placement transaction. Similar to previous trust offerings, these securities were issued through a newly formed statutory business trust, East West Capital Trust VI, or “Trust VI”, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Trust VI issued junior subordinated debt of $20.0 million and common stock of $619 thousand to the Company, both of which is classified as junior subordindated debt. The securities issued by Trust VI have a scheduled maturity date of September 6, 2035 and an interest rate of 5.99% per annum as of December 31, 2005. The interest rate adjusts quarterly based on the three-month Libor plus 150 basis points. These additional issuances of capital securities provide the Bank with a cost-effective means of obtaining Tier I capital for regulatory purposes.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations

In the course of our business, we may enter into or be a party to transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet and are considered to be off-balance sheet arrangements. Off-balance sheet arrangements are any contractual arrangements whereby an unconsolidated entity is a party, under which we have: (1) any obligation under a guarantee contract; (2) a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets; (3) any obligation under certain derivative instruments; or (4) any obligation under a material variable interest held by us in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to us, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

Loan Securitizations and Sales

In the ordinary course of business, the Company sells loans with or without recourse. For loans sold with recourse, the recourse component is considered a guarantee. In certain situations, the Company could also have an obligation for loans sold without recourse. Additional information pertaining to our loan sales is included in Note 18 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein.

From time to time, we securitize certain real estate loans, a portion of which are sold to investors. Securitizations provide us with a source of liquidity and also reduce our credit exposure to borrowers. Securitizations involve the sale of loans to a qualifying special-purpose entity, or “QSPE”, typically a trust. Generally, in a securitization, we transfer financial assets to a QSPE that is legally isolated from the Company. The QSPE, in turn, issues interest-bearing securities, commonly called asset-backed securities, which are secured by future collections on the sold loans. The QSPE sells securities to investors, which entitle them to receive specified cash flows during the term of the securities. The QSPE uses proceeds from the sale of these securities to pay the purchase price for the sold loans. The proceeds from the issuance of the securities are then distributed to the Company as consideration for the loans transferred.

When we sell or securitize loans, we generally retain the right to service the loans and we may retain residual and other interests, which are considered retained interests in the securitized assets. Retained interests may provide credit enhancement to the investors and represent the Company’s maximum risk exposure associated with these transactions. Investors in the securities issued by the QSPE have no further recourse against the Company if cash flows generated by the securitized assets are inadequate to service the obligations of the QSPE. Additional information pertaining to our securitization transactions and related retained interests is included in Note 5 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein.

53

Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies

As a financial service provider, we routinely enter into commitments to extend credit to customers, such as loan commitments, commercial letters of credit for foreign and domestic trade, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees. Many of these commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. The same credit policies are used in extending these commitments as in extending loan facilities to customers. Under some of these contractual agreements, the Company may also have liabilities contingent upon the occurrence of certain events. A schedule of significant commitments to extend credit to customers is as follows:

Table 16: Significant Commitments

	December 31, 2005
	(In thousands)
Undisbursed loan commitments	$	1,715,725
Standby letters of credit		364,722
Commercial letters of credit		40,430

A discussion of significant contractual arrangements under which the Company may be held contingently liable is included in Note 18 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein. In addition, the Company has commitments and obligations under post-retirement benefit plans as described in Note 20 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere herein.

Contractual Obligations

The following table presents, as of December 31, 2005, the Company’s significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations, within the categories described below, by payment date. With the exception of operating lease obligations, these contractual obligations are included in the consolidated balance sheets. The payment amounts represent the amounts and interest contractually due to the recipient.

Table 17: Contractual Obligations

	Payment Due by Period
	Less than						After		Indeterminate
Contractual Obligations	1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		5 years		Maturity		Total
	(In thousands)
Deposits	$	3,056,702	$	112,088	$	32,349	$	876	$	3,110,087	$	6,312,102
Federal funds purchased		91,521		-		-		-		-		91,521
FHLB advances		537,025		88,842		1,003		-		-		626,870
Securities sold under repurchase
agreements		11,020		22,041		22,041		372,179		-		427,281
Notes payable		-		-		-		-		8,833		8,833
Long-term debt obligations		9,811		19,621		19,621		298,149		-		347,202
Operating lease obligations		6,966		12,968		9,758		27,545		-		57,237
Total contractual obligations	$	3,713,045	$	255,560	$	84,772	$	698,749	$	3,118,920	$	7,871,046

54

Capital Resources

Our primary source of capital is the retention of net after tax earnings. At December 31, 2005, stockholders' equity totaled $734.1 million, a 43% increase from the year-end 2004 balance of $514.3 million. The increase is comprised of the following: (1) net income of $108.4 million recorded during 2005; (2) stock compensation costs amounting to $3.1 million related to our Restricted Stock Award Program; (3) tax benefits of $5.7 million resulting from the exercise of nonqualified stock options; (4) net issuance of common stock totaling $9.2 million, representing 915,811 shares, pursuant to various stock plans and agreements; (5) issuance of common stock totaling $112 thousand, or 3,303 shares, in lieu of Board of Director retainer fees; (6) issuance of common stock totaling $106.7 million, or 3,138,701 shares, in connection with the UNB acquisition. These transactions were offset by (1) payments of quarterly cash dividends totaling $10.7 million and (2) an increase of $2.6 million in unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities.

Private Placement Offerings

As previously mentioned, during the year, the Bank issued $75.0 million in subordinated debt with a 10-year term, in a private placement transaction. This instrument was issued through the Bank and qualifies as Tier II capital for regulatory reporting purposes.

On September 6, 2005, the Company also issued $20.0 million in additional junior subordinated debt in a separate private placement offering. Similar to previous trust offerings, these securities were issued through a newly formed statutory business trust, East West Capital Trust VI, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. As of December 31, 2005, total junior subordinated debt issued by the Company through its various trust preferred offerings amounted to $78.1 million. These issuances of capital securities qualify as Tier I capital for regulatory reporting purposes.

In-Store Banking Agreement

 On August 30, 2001, we entered into a ten-year agreement with 99 Ranch Market to provide in-store retail banking services to their stores throughout California. 99 Ranch Market is the largest Asian-focused chain of supermarkets on the West Coast, with twenty-two full service stores in California, two in Washington, and affiliated licensee stores in Arizona, Georgia, Hawaii, Nevada, and Indonesia. Tawa Supermarket Companies, or “Tawa,” is the parent company of 99 Ranch Market. In conjunction with this agreement, we issued 600,000 warrants to senior executives of 99 Ranch Market to purchase common stock of the Company at a price of $13.34 per share. These warrants vest over six years and are intended to provide direct benefit to 99 Ranch Market executives who make a significant contribution to the success of the in-store banking operations. The estimated total fair value of the issued warrants was $2.7 million. As of December 31, 2005, 360,000 warrants out of the 600,000 warrants initially issued have been exercised. We have not experienced nor do we anticipate any material increases in overhead expenses or capital investments as a result of this agreement with 99 Ranch Market.

 In order to further align the interests of both parties, senior executives of 99 Ranch Market have also made a significant investment in the Company, including the purchase of 800,000 newly issued shares of East West Bancorp, Inc. common stock totaling $7.9 million. The shares were sold for cash at a price of $9.86 per share. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with this transaction. The shares were restricted. Upon the two-year anniversary of the closing on August 30, 2001, 40% of the shares became available for sale. After each of the next three anniversaries, 20% of the total shares will become available for sale. All shares can be freely traded on the fifth year anniversary. The total estimated fair value of the purchased shares was $6.9 million. As of December 31, 2005, 640,000 shares out of the 800,000 restricted shares initially granted have vested.

55

Risk-Based Capital

We are committed to maintaining capital at a level sufficient to assure our shareholders, our customers and our regulators that our company and our bank subsidiary are financially sound. We are subject to risk-based capital regulations adopted by the federal banking regulators in January 1990. These guidelines are used to evaluate capital adequacy and are based on an institution’s asset risk profile and off-balance sheet exposures. According to the regulations, institutions whose Tier I and total capital ratios meet or exceed 6% and 10%, respectively, are deemed to be “well-capitalized.” At December 31, 2005, the Bank’s Tier I and total capital ratios were 8.8% and 11.0%, respectively, compared to 9.5% and 10.6%, respectively, at December 31, 2004.

The following table compares East West Bancorp, Inc.'s and East West Bank’s actual capital ratios at December 31, 2005, to those required by regulatory agencies for capital adequacy and well-capitalized classification purposes:

Table 18: Regulatory Required Ratios

							Minimum			Well
	East West			East West			Regulatory			Capitalized
	Bancorp			Bank			Requirements			Requirements
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		11.2	%		11.0	%		8.0	%		10.0	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		9.0	%		8.8	%		4.0	%		6.0	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)		8.1	%		8.0	%		4.0	%		5.0	%

ASSET LIABILITY AND MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT

Liquidity

Liquidity management involves our ability to meet cash flow requirements arising from fluctuations in deposit levels and demands of daily operations, which include funding of securities purchases, providing for customers’ credit needs and ongoing repayment of borrowings. Our liquidity is actively managed on a daily basis and reviewed periodically by the Asset/Liability Committee and the Board of Directors. This process is intended to ensure the maintenance of sufficient funds to meet the needs of the Bank, including adequate cash flow for off-balance sheet instruments.

Our primary sources of liquidity are derived from financing activities which include the acceptance of customer and brokered deposits, federal funds facilities, repurchase agreement facilities, and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. These funding sources are augmented by payments of principal and interest on loans, the routine liquidation of securities from the available-for-sale portfolio and securitizations of loans. Primary uses of funds include withdrawal of and interest payments on deposits, originations and purchases of loans, purchases of investment securities, and payment of operating expenses.

During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, we experienced net cash inflows of $144.2 million and $87.5 million, respectively, from operating activities. Net cash inflows from operating activities during 2005 and 2004 were primarily due to net income earned during the year.

56

Net cash outflows from investing activities totaled $1.22 billion and $1.76 billion during 2005 and 2004, respectively. Net cash outflows from investing activities for both periods can be attributed primarily to the substantial growth in our loan portfolio and purchases of available-for-sale securities. These activities were partially offset by repayments, maturities, redemptions and net sales proceeds from investment securities available-for-sale.

We experienced net cash inflows from financing activities of $1.14 billion and $1.62 billion during 2005 and 2004, respectively. Deposit growth, proceeds from repurchase agreements, and proceeds from long-term debt, partially offset by a decrease in FHLB advances and dividends paid on the Company’s common stock accounted for the net cash inflows from financing activities during 2005. During 2004, net cash inflows can be attributed largely to deposit growth, a net increase in FHLB advances, and proceeds from the issuance of common stock and long-term debt in private placement transactions, partially offset by dividends paid on common stock.

As a means of augmenting our liquidity, we have established federal funds lines with six correspondent banks and several master repurchase agreements with major brokerage companies. At December 31, 2005, the Company’s available borrowing capacity includes $253.5 million in federal funds line facilities, $52.1 million in repurchase arrangements and $1.89 billion in unused FHLB advances. We believe our liquidity sources to be stable and adequate to meet our operating needs and other cash commitments. At December 31, 2005, we were not aware of any information that was reasonably likely to have a material effect on our liquidity position.

The liquidity of East West Bancorp, Inc. is primarily dependent on the payment of cash dividends by its subsidiary, East West Bank, subject to limitations imposed by the Financial Code of the State of California. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, total dividends paid by the Bank to East West Bancorp, Inc. amounted to $10.7 million and $10.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2005, approximately $229.2 million of undivided profits of the Bank were available for dividends to the Company.

Interest Rate Sensitivity Management

Our success is largely dependent upon our ability to manage interest rate risk, which is the impact of adverse fluctuations in interest rates on our net interest income and net portfolio value. Although in the normal course of business we manage other risks, such as credit and liquidity risk, we consider interest rate risk to be our most significant market risk and could potentially have the largest material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The fundamental objective of the asset liability management process is to manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations while maintaining adequate levels of liquidity and capital. Our strategy is formulated by the Asset/Liability Committee, which coordinates with the Board of Directors to monitor our overall asset and liability composition. The Committee meets regularly to evaluate, among other things, the sensitivity of our assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses on the available-for-sale portfolio (including those attributable to hedging transactions, if any), purchase and securitization activity, and maturities of investments and borrowings.

57

Our overall strategy is to minimize the adverse impact of immediate incremental changes in market interest rates (rate shock) on net interest income and net portfolio value. Net portfolio value is defined as the present value of assets, minus the present value of liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments. The attainment of this goal requires a balance between profitability, liquidity and interest rate risk exposure. To minimize the adverse impact of changes in market interest rates, we simulate the effect of instantaneous interest rate changes on net interest income and net portfolio value on a monthly basis. The table below shows the estimated impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income and market value of equity as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, assuming a parallel shift of 100 to 200 basis points in both directions:

Table 19: Rate Shock Table

	Net Interest Income						Net Portfolio Value
	Volatility (1)						Volatility (2)
Change in Interest Rates	December 31,			December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
(Basis Points)	2005			2004			2005			2004
+200		1.10	%		7.00	%		(12.5	)%		(7.8	)%
+100		0.90	%		3.90	%		(5.2	)%		(3.2	)%
-100		(1.6	)%		(4.0	)%		2.90	%		2.10	%
-200		(4.1	)%		(8.2	)%		3.80	%		2.00	%

_______

(1) The percentage change represents net interest income for twelve months in a stable interest rate environment versus net interest income in the various rate scenarios.

(2)  The percentage change represents net portfolio value of the Bank in a stable rate environment versus net portfolio value in the various rate scenarios.

All interest-earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and related derivative contracts are included in the interest rate sensitivity analysis at December 31, 2005 and 2004. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, our estimated changes in net interest income and net portfolio value were within the ranges established by the Board of Directors.

Our primary analytical tool to gauge interest rate sensitivity is a simulation model used by many major banks and bank regulators, and is based on the actual maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The model attempts to predict changes in the yields earned on assets and the rates paid on liabilities in relation to changes in market interest rates. As an enhancement to the primary simulation model, prepayment assumptions and market rates of interest provided by independent broker/dealer quotations, an independent pricing model and other available public sources are incorporated into the model. Adjustments are made to reflect the shift in the Treasury and other appropriate yield curves. The model also factors in projections of anticipated activity levels by product line and takes into account our increased ability to control rates offered on deposit products in comparison to our ability to control rates on adjustable-rate loans tied to published indices.

58

The following tables provide the outstanding principal balances and the weighted average interest rates of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2005. The information presented below is based on the repricing date for variable rate instruments and the expected maturity date for fixed rate instruments.

Table 20: Expected Maturity for Financial Instruments

	Expected Maturity or Repricing Date by Year																					Fair Value at
																After						December 31,
	2006			2007			2008			2009			2010			2010			Total			2005
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Securities purchased under
resale agreements	$	--		$	50,000		$	--		$	--		$	--		$	--		$	50,000		$	49,670
Weighted average rate		--	%		7.00	%		--			--			--			--			7.00	%
Investment securities available-
for-sale (fixed rate)	$	384,073		$	96,957		$	--		$	1			--		$	36,605		$	517,636		$	513,947
Weighted average rate		2.80	%		3.17	%		--			9.00	%		--			5.48	%		3.06	%
Investment securities available-
for-sale (variable rate)	$	356,333			--			--			--			--			--		$	356,333		$	355,890
Weighted average rate		4.49	%		--			--			--			--			--			4.49	%
Total gross loans	$	4,550,569		$	347,549		$	535,130		$	424,001		$	560,115		$	376,661		$	6,794,025		$	6,736,853
Weighted average rate		7.24	%		5.92	%		5.95	%		5.90	%		6.38	%		6.51	%		6.87	%
Liabilities:
Checking accounts	$	472,610			--			--			--			--			--		$	472,610		$	472,610
Weighted average rate		1.04	%		--			--			--			--			--			1.04	%
Money market accounts	$	978,678			--			--			--			--			--		$	978,678		$	978,678
Weighted average rate		2.79	%		--			--			--			--			--			2.79	%
Savings deposits	$	326,807			--			--			--			--			--		$	326,807		$	326,807
Weighted average rate		0.26	%		--			--			--			--			--			0.26	%
Time deposits	$	3,005,597		$	98,250		$	15,957		$	2,086		$	25,952		$	658		$	3,148,500		$	3,134,090
Weighted average rate		3.45	%		3.16	%		0.70	%		3.32	%		3.17	%		4.31	%		3.42	%
Federal funds purchased	$	91,500			--			--			--			--			--		$	91,500		$	91,500
Weighted average rate		4.03	%		--			--			--			--			--			4.03	%
FHLB advances	$	530,155		$	61,527		$	25,000		$	1,000			--			--		$	617,682		$	613,394
Weighted average rate		3.57	%		2.38	%		4.55	%		4.98	%		--			--			3.49	%
Securities sold under
repurchase agreements	$	325,000			--			--			--			--			--		$	325,000		$	319,120
Weighted average rate		3.39	%		--			--			--			--			--			3.39	%
Subordinated debt	$	75,000			--			--			--			--			--		$	75,000		$	72,190
Weighted average rate		5.35	%		--			--			--			--			--			5.35	%
Junior subordinated debt
Weighted average rate		--			--			--			--			--		$	20,750		$	20,750		$	32,045
(fixed rate)		--			--			--			--			--			10.91	%		10.91	%
Junior subordinated debt
Weighted average rate	$	55,000			--			--			--			--			--		$	55,000		$	59,130
(variable rate)		6.43	%		--			--			--			--			--			6.43	%

Expected maturities of assets are contractual maturities adjusted for projected payment based on contractual amortization and unscheduled prepayments of principal as well as repricing frequency. Expected maturities for deposits are based on contractual maturities adjusted for projected rollover rates and changes in pricing for deposits with no stated maturity dates. We utilize assumptions supported by documented analyses for the expected maturities of our loans and repricing of our deposits. We also rely on third party data providers for prepayment projections for amortizing securities. The actual maturities of these instruments could vary significantly if future prepayments and repricing differ from our expectations based on historical experience.

59

The fair values of short-term investments approximate their book values due to their short maturities. For securities purchased under resale agreements, fair values are calculated by discounting future cash flows based on expected maturities or repricing dates utilizing estimated market discount rates. Bid quotations from securities brokers or third party data providers are the basis for fair values of investment securities available-for-sale. The fair values of loans are estimated for portfolios with similar financial characteristics and takes into consideration discounted cash flows based on expected maturities or repricing dates utilizing estimated market discount rates as projected by third party data providers.

Transaction deposit accounts, which include checking, money market and savings accounts, are presumed to have equal book and fair values because the interest rates paid on these accounts are based on prevailing market rates. The fair values of time deposits are based upon the discounted values of contractual cash flows, which are estimated using current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining terms. For federal funds purchased, fair value approximates book value due to their short maturities. The fair value of FHLB advances is estimated by discounting the cash flows through maturity or the next repricing date based on current rates offered by the FHLB for borrowings with similar maturities. The fair values of securities sold under repurchase agreements are calculated by discounting future cash flows based on expected maturities or repricing dates, utilizing estimated market discount rates and taking into consideration the call features of each instrument. For both subordinated and junior subordinated debt instruments, fair values are estimated by discounting cash flows through maturity based on current market rates.

The Asset/Liability Committee is authorized to utilize a wide variety of off-balance sheet financial techniques to assist in the management of interest rate risk. We sometimes use derivative financial instruments as part of our asset and liability management strategy, with the overall goal of minimizing the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our net interest margin and stockholders’ equity. The use of derivatives has not had a material effect on our operating results or financial position.

In August and November 2004, we entered into four equity swap agreements with a major investment brokerage firm to hedge against market fluctuations in a promotional equity index certificate of deposit product that we offered to Bank customers for a limited time during the latter half of 2004. This product, which has a term of 5 1/2 years, pays interest based on the performance of the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, or the “HSCEI”. The combined notional amounts of the equity swap agreements total $24.6 million with termination dates similar to the stated maturity date on the underlying certificate of deposit host contracts. For the equity swap agreements, we agreed to pay interest based on the one-month Libor minus a spread on a monthly basis and receive any increase in the HSCEI at swap termination date. Under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, a certificate of deposit that pays interest based on changes in an equity index is a hybrid instrument with an embedded derivative (i.e. equity call option) that must be accounted for separately from the host contract (i.e. the certificate of deposit). In accordance with SFAS No. 133, both the embedded equity call options on the certificates of deposit and the freestanding equity swap agreements are marked-to-market every month with resulting changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of income.

 On April 1, 2005, the Company amended the four equity swap agreements entered into in 2004 effectively removing the swap payable leg. The amendments to the swap agreements changed the terms of the agreements such that instead of paying interest based on the one-month Libor minus a spread on a monthly basis for the remaining terms of the agreements, we prepaid this amount based on the current market value of the cash streams. The total amount paid in conjunction with these swap agreement amendments was $4.2 million on April 1, 2005. The fair value of the embedded derivatives amounted to $3.5 million and $3.3 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and is included in interest-bearing deposits on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the equity swap agreements totaled $3.5 million and $(422) thousand as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The fair value of the equity swap agreements and embedded equity call options are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the change in value of the HSCEI based upon the life of the individual swap agreement.

60

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISKS

For quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding market risks in our portfolio, see, "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Asset Liability and Market Risk Management."

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 The financial statements of the Company, including the "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm," are included in this report immediately following Part IV.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

There have been no significant changes in our internal controls during the quarter ended December 31, 2005 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation as of December 31, 2005 under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as December 31, 2005.

61

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2005, the Company's internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm who also audited the Company's consolidated financial statements. Deloitte & Touche LLP’s attestation report on management's assessment of the Company's internal control over financial reporting appears on page 63 hereof.

62

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

East West Bancorp, Inc.

Pasadena, California

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that East West Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company and our report dated March 10, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California

March 10, 2006

63

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

On March 9, 2006, the Compensation Committee for the Company approved the 2006 annual base salaries, cash bonus payments for 2005 work and grants of incentive stock for the Company’s executive officers. This information for the Company’s named executives is set forth as Exhibit 10.13 “Named Executive Officer Compensation.”

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Information concerning directors and executive officers of the Company, to the extent not included under “Item 1 under the heading "Executive Officers of the Registrant" appearing at the end of Part I of this report, will appear in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2006 Proxy Statement”), and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "ELECTION OF DIRECTORS," if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period.  Additionally, information on compensation arrangements for the Board of Directors of the Company is set forth as Exhibit 10.12 “Director Compensation.”

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer, controller, and persons performing similar functions. The code of ethics is posted on our internet website at www.eastwestbank.com.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company's Board of Directors has determined that John Kooken and Keith Renken, Directors, are the Company's Audit Committee Financial Experts, as defined under Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated by the SEC in furtherance of Section 407. Both Mr. Kooken and Mr. Renken are independent of management.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

On March 9, 2006, the Compensation Committee for the Company approved the 2006 annual base salaries, cash bonus payments for 2005 work and grants of incentive stock for the Company’s executive officers. This information for the Company’s named executives is set forth as Exhibit 10.13 “Named Executive Officer Compensation.” Additional information concerning executive compensation will appear in the 2006 Proxy Statement, and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference from the sections entitled "COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS” and “COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS," if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period.

64

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and information related to the Company’s equity compensation plans will appear in the 2006 Proxy Statement, and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference from the sections entitled "BENEFICIAL STOCK OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT" and “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans,” if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions will appear in the 2006 Proxy Statement, and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS," if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services will appear in the 2006 Proxy Statement, and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS,” if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period.

65

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The following financial statements included in the registrant's 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders are included. Page number references are to the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders.

East West Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries:	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	68
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2005 and 2004	69
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003	70
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003	71
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003	72
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	73

(a)(2) Financial statement schedules

Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, not material or because the information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

(a)(3)Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description
2	Plan of Reorganization and Merger Agreement between East West Bancorp, Inc., East West Bank and East West Merger Co., Inc.*
3(i)	Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant*
3(i).1	Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant&
3(ii)	Bylaws of the Registrant*
4.1	Specimen Certificate of Registrant*
4.2	Registration Rights Agreement*
4.3	Warrant Agreement with Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc.*
4.4	Registration Rights Agreement with Ho Yuan Chen and Chang-Hua Kang Chen@
4.5	Warrant Agreement with Ho Yuan Chen and Chang-Hua Kang Chen@
10.1	Employment Agreement with Dominic Ng*+
10.2	Employment Agreement with Julia Gouw*+
10.5	Employment Agreement with Douglas P. Krause!+
10.6	East West Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan and Forms of Agreements*+
10.6.1	Amended East West Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan^+
10.6.2	1998 Non-Qualified Stock Option Program for Employees and Independent Contractors^+
10.6.3	Performance-Based Bonus Plan^+
10.6.4	1999 Spirit of Ownership Restricted Stock Program^+
10.6.5	2003 Directors’ Restricted Stock Program^+
10.7	East West Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan*+

66

10.8	Employment Agreement with William J. Lewis!+
10.10	Employment Agreement with Donald Sang Chow#+
10.10.1	Amendment to Employment Agreement with Donald Sang Chow#+
10.10.2	Amendment to Employment Agreement with Donald Sang Chow!+
10.11	Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans%+
10.12	Director Compensation%+
10.13	Named Executive Officer Compensation%+

10.14	Employment Agreement with Wellington Chen!+
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant%
23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm%
31.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002%
31.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002%
32.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002%
32.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002%

__________________________

*	Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the Commission on November 13, 1998 (File No. 333-63605).
#	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 filed with the Commission on March 30, 2000 (File No. 000-24939).
@	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002 (File No. 000-24939).
&	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Commission on March 28, 2003 (File No. 000-24939).
!	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Commission on March 11, 2005 (File No. 000-24939).
^	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 9, 2005 (File No. 000-24939).
+	Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
%	A copy of this exhibit is being filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

67

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

East West Bancorp, Inc.

Pasadena, California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of East West Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of East West Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 10, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California

March 10, 2006

68

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

	December 31,
	2005			2004
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	151,192		$	93,075
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		-			100
Securities purchased under resale agreement		50,000			-
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value (with amortized cost of
$873,969 in 2005 and $534,459 in 2004)		869,837			534,452
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $68,635 in 2005
and $50,884 in 2004		6,724,320			5,080,454
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		45,707			47,482
Investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost		12,285			6,923
Other real estate owned, net		299			299
Investment in affordable housing partnerships		31,006			37,463
Premises and equipment, net		38,579			19,749
Due from customers on acceptances		6,074			13,277
Premiums on deposits acquired, net		18,853			7,723
Goodwill		143,254			43,702
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies		82,191			67,319
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		82,073			57,439
Deferred tax assets		22,586			19,423
TOTAL	$	8,278,256		$	6,028,880
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Customer deposit accounts:
Noninterest-bearing	$	1,331,992		$	1,097,851
Interest-bearing		4,926,595			3,424,666
Total deposits		6,258,587			4,522,517
Federal funds purchased		91,500			-
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		617,682			860,803
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		325,000			-
Notes payable		8,833			11,018
Bank acceptances outstanding		6,074			13,277
Accrued interest payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		83,347			49,480
Long-term debt		153,095			57,476
Total liabilities		7,544,118			5,514,571
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 18)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock (par value of $0.001 per share)
Authorized -- 200,000,000 shares
Issued -- 61,419,622 shares in 2005 and 57,361,807 shares in 2004
Outstanding -- 56,519,438 shares in 2005 and 52,500,766 shares in 2004		61			57
Additional paid in capital		389,004			260,152
Retained earnings		393,846			296,175
Deferred compensation		(8,242	)		(5,422	)
Treasury stock, at cost -- 4,900,184 shares in 2005 and 4,861,041 shares in 2004		(37,905	)		(36,649	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(2,626	)		(4	)
Total stockholders' equity		734,138			514,309
TOTAL	$	8,278,256		$	6,028,880

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

69

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005		2004		2003
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
Loans receivable, including fees	$	381,327	$	235,385	$	159,910
Investment securities available-for-sale		25,912		14,597		16,309
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock		2,275		1,322		494
Securities purchased under resale agreement		1,118		-		-
Investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock		492		127		-
Short-term investments		275		639		1,830
Total interest and dividend income		411,399		252,070		178,543
INTEREST EXPENSE
Customer deposit accounts		93,586		37,896		29,946
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		26,603		11,801		2,959
Long-term debt		6,766		3,139		2,280
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		2,562		-		-
Federal funds purchased		1,767		61		47
Total interest expense		131,284		52,897		35,232
NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		280,115		199,173		143,311
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		15,870		16,750		8,800
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		264,245		182,423		134,511
NONINTEREST INCOME
Letters of credit fees and commissions		8,592		7,979		7,123
Branch fees		7,446		6,987		7,232
Net gain on investment securities available-for-sale		4,291		2,262		1,951
Income from life insurance policies		3,204		2,993		3,286
Ancillary loan fees		2,474		2,800		2,478
Income from secondary market activities		1,579		1,949		6,058
Net gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets		52		3,030		(167	)
Other operating income		2,011		2,371		3,120
Total noninterest income		29,649		30,371		31,081
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Compensation and employee benefits		53,669		39,136		31,844
Occupancy and equipment expense		15,059		10,857		10,314
Deposit-related expenses		8,452		4,908		3,889
Amortization of investments in affordable housing partnerships		6,468		7,427		6,677
Amortization of premiums on deposits acquired		3,914		2,215		1,989
Data processing		2,747		2,122		1,868
Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments		996		802		722
Other operating expenses		32,228		23,994		18,629
Total noninterest expense		123,533		91,461		75,932
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		170,361		121,333		89,660
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		61,981		43,311		30,668
NET INCOME	$	108,380	$	78,022	$	58,992
EARNINGS PER SHARE
BASIC	$	2.03	$	1.54	$	1.23
DILUTED	$	1.97	$	1.49	$	1.19
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING
BASIC		53,454		50,654		48,112
DILUTED		55,034		52,297		49,486

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

70

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(In thousands, except share data)

	Common Stock		Additional Paid In Capital		Retained Earnings			Deferred Compensation			Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax			Comprehensive Income			Total Stockholders' Equity
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2003	$	53	$	155,878	$	178,873		$	-		$	(35,955	)	$	3,268					$	302,117
Comprehensive income
Net income for the year						58,992											$	58,992			58,992
Net unrealized loss on investment securities available-for-sale															(1,933	)		(1,933	)		(1,933	)
Total comprehensive income																	$	57,059
Stock compensation costs				12					430												442
Tax benefit from option exercises				4,084																	4,084
Issuance of 1,090,602 shares pursuant to various stock
plans and agreements		1		11,435					(3,609	)											7,827
Issuance of 4,344 shares in lieu of
Board of Director retainer fees				82																	82
Cancellation of 1,290 shares due to
forfeitures of issued restricted stock									26			(31	)								(5	)
Dividends paid on common stock						(9,623	)														(9,623	)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2003		54		171,491		228,242			(3,153	)		(35,986	)		1,335						361,983
Comprehensive income
Net income for the year						78,022											$	78,022			78,022
Net unrealized loss on investment securities available-for-sale															(1,339	)		(1,339	)		(1,339	)
Total comprehensive income																	$	76,683
Stock compensation costs									1,460												1,460
Tax benefit from option exercises				5,456																	5,456
Issuance of 844,459 shares pursuant to various stock
plans and agreements				11,731					(4,392	)											7,339
Issuance of 1,622,844 shares pursuant to private placement		2		38,487																	38,489
Issuance of 3,288 shares in lieu of
Board of Director retainer fees				100																	100
Cancellation of 26,853 shares due to
forfeitures of issued restricted stock									663			(663	)								-
Issuance of 1,199,578 shares pursuant to
Trust Bank acquisition		1		32,887																	32,888
Dividends paid on common stock						(10,089	)														(10,089	)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2004		57		260,152		296,175			(5,422	)		(36,649	)		(4	)					514,309
Comprehensive income
Net income for the year						108,380											$	108,380			108,380
Net unrealized loss on investment securities available-for-sale															(2,622	)		(2,622	)		(2,622	)
Total comprehensive income																	$	105,758
Stock compensation costs									3,074												3,074
Tax benefit from option exercises				5,701																	5,701
Issuance of 915,811 shares pursuant to various stock
plans and agreements		1		16,326					(7,150	)											9,177
Issuance of 3,303 shares in lieu of
Board of Director retainer fees				112																	112
Cancellation of 39,143 shares due to
forfeitures of issued restricted stock									1,256			(1,256	)								-
Issuance of 3,138,701 shares pursuant to
United National Bank acquisition		3		106,713																	106,716
Dividends paid on common stock						(10,709	)														(10,709	)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2005	$	61	$	389,004	$	393,846		$	(8,242	)	$	(37,905	)	$	(2,626	)				$	734,138
														Year Ended December 31,
Disclosure of reclassification amount:															2005			2004			2003
														(In thousands)
Unrealized holding loss on securities arising during the year, net of tax benefit of $96 in 2005, $5 in 2004, and $461 in 2003														$	(133	)	$	(7	)	$	(636	)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income, net of tax expense of
$1,802 in 2005, $964 in 2004, and $938 in 2003															(2,489	)		(1,332	)		(1,297	)
Net unrealized loss on securities, net of tax benefit of $1,898 in 2005, $970 in 2004, and $1,400 in 2003														$	(2,622	)	$	(1,339	)	$	(1,933	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

71

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  (In thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	108,380		$	78,022		$	58,992
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		10,328			11,457			12,139
Stock compensation costs		3,074			1,460			442
Deferred tax benefit		(10,982	)		(1,988	)		(3,238	)
Provision for loan losses		15,870			16,750			8,800
Net gain on sales of investment securities, loans and other assets		(5,921	)		(6,859	)		(7,842	)
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends		(2,176	)		(1,111	)		(449	)
Originations of loans held for sale		(42,200	)		(90,881	)		(280,371	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		42,407			91,923			284,322
Tax benefit from stock options exercised		5,701			5,456			4,084
Net change in accrued interest receivable and other assets		5,770			(9,738	)		(18,016	)
Net change in accrued expenses and other liabilities		13,942			(7,006	)		14,891
Total adjustments		35,813			9,463			14,762
Net cash provided by operating activities		144,193			87,485			73,754
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net loan originations		(1,250,789	)		(1,719,662	)		(737,877	)
Purchases of:
Securities purchased under resale agreements		(50,000	)		-			-
Investment securities available-for-sale		(458,720	)		(460,763	)		(213,738	)
Loans receivable		(1,988	)		(2,639	)		(82,043	)
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(25,725	)		(37,384	)		(7,377	)
Federal Reserve Bank stock		(5,362	)		(6,923	)		-
Investments in affordable housing partnerships		(12	)		(5,170	)		(11,711	)
Premises and equipment		(12,563	)		(4,938	)		(3,491	)
Proceeds from sale of:
Investment securities available-for-sale		251,936			279,147			78,545
Loans receivable		54,366			-			1,555
Premises and equipment		3			10,560			1
Maturity of interest-bearing deposits in other banks		100			1,090			5,036
Repayments, maturity and redemption of investment securities available-for-sale		194,635			164,743			224,469
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		33,636			9,534			171
Cash obtained from acquisitions, net of cash paid		49,077			16,460			3,713
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,221,406	)		(1,755,945	)		(742,747	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits		871,000			1,016,592			251,406
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased		91,500			(12,000	)		12,000
Net (decrease) increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(242,750	)		556,700			244,900
Proceeds from securities sold under repurchase agreements		325,000			-			-
Repayment of notes payable		(2,185	)		(2,085	)		(1,200	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		95,000			25,000			10,000
Payment of debt issue cost		(85	)		-			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in private placement		-			38,489			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock pursuant to various stock plans and agreements		8,559			7,339			7,827
Dividends paid on common stock		(10,709	)		(10,089	)		(9,623	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,135,330			1,619,946			515,310
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		58,117			(48,514	)		(153,683	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR		93,075			141,589			295,272
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR	$	151,192		$	93,075		$	141,589
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	123,435		$	52,014		$	36,147
Income tax payments, net of refunds		63,881			52,494			34,262
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of common stock pursuant to acquisition		106,716			32,888			-
Issuance of common stock in lieu of Board of Director retainer fees		112			100			82
Issuance of common stock to employees		618			-			-
Guaranteed mortgage loan securitizations		209,563			24,619			-
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		-			299			-
Affordable housing investment financed through notes payable		-			10,911			1,292

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

72

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.   SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

OPERATIONS SUMMARY

East West Bancorp, Inc. (referred to herein on an unconsolidated basis as “East West” and on a consolidated basis as the “Company” or “we”) is a registered bank holding company that offers a full range of banking services to individuals and small to mid-size businesses through its subsidiary bank, East West Bank and its subsidiaries (the “Bank”). The Bank is the Company’s principal asset. The Bank operates 55 banking locations throughout California and one in Houston, Texas, and specializes in financing international trade and lending for commercial, construction, and residential real estate projects. Included in the Bank’s 56 locations are nine in-store branches located in 99 Ranch Market stores in Southern and Northern California. The Bank’s revenues are derived from providing financing for residential and commercial real estate and business customers, as well as investing activities. Funding for lending and investing activities is obtained through acceptance of customer deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowing activities.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation- The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the banking industry. The following is a summary of significant principles used in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements. In preparing the financial statements, management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, including the allowance for loan losses, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the disclosure of income and expenses for the periods presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation- The financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, East West Bank and East West Insurance Services, Inc. All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company also has six wholly-owned subsidiaries that are statutory business trusts (the “Trusts”). In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN No. 46R”), the Trusts are not consolidated into the accounts of East West Bancorp, Inc.

Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreements- The Company purchases securities under resale agreements with terms that range from one day to several years. These agreements are collateralized by mortgage-backed securities and mortgage or commercial loans that are generally held by a third party custodian. The purchases are overcollateralized to ensure against unfavorable market price movements. In the event that the fair market value of the securities decreases below the carrying amount of the related repurchase agreement, the counterparty is required to designate an equivalent value of additional securities. The counterparties to these agreements are nationally recognized investment banking firms that meet credit eligibility criteria and with whom a master repurchase agreement has been duly executed. Resale agreements which are short-term in nature, or have terms of up to 90 days, are included in cash and cash equivalents. Resale agreements with terms greater than 90 days are separately categorized.

Investment Securities - The Company classifies its investment securities as either trading account securities, if the securities are intended to be sold within a short period of time, or available-for-sale securities. Trading account securities are typically investment grade securities which are generally held by the Bank for a period of seven days or less. Trading account securities are carried at market value. Realized and unrealized gains or losses on trading account securities are included in noninterest income. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, there were no trading account securities in the investment portfolio.

73

Investment securities available-for-sale are reported at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, excluded from operations and reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax, in stockholders’ equity. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on securities are recorded as yield adjustments on such securities using the effective interest method. The specific identification method is used for purposes of determining cost in computing realized gains and losses on investment securities sold.

We are obligated to assess, at each reporting date, whether there is an “other-than-temporary” impairment to our investment securities. Such impairment must be recognized in current earnings rather than in other comprehensive income. We examine all individual securities that are in an unrealized loss position at each reporting date for other-than-temporary impairment. Specific investment level factors we examine to assess impairment include the severity and duration of the loss, an analysis of the issuers of the securities and if there has been any cause for default on the securities and any change in the rating of the securities by the various rating agencies. Additionally, we reexamine the financial resources and overall ability the Company has and the intent management has to hold the securities until their fair values recover.

Derivative Financial Instruments - As part of its asset and liability management strategy, the Company may use derivative financial instruments to mitigate exposure to risk. Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended and interpreted. Pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, all derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, are to be recognized on the balance sheets at fair value. Depending on the nature of the derivative, the corresponding change in fair value is either reported in current earnings or accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

LoansReceivable- Loans receivable that the Company has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until maturity, are stated at their outstanding principal, reduced by an allowance for loan losses and net deferred loan fees or costs on originated loans and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Nonrefundable fees and direct costs associated with the origination or purchase of loans are deferred and netted against outstanding loan balances. The deferred net loan fees and costs are recognized in interest income as an adjustment to yield over the loan term using the effective interest method. Discounts or premiums on purchased loans are accreted or amortized to interest income using the effective interest method over the remaining period to contractual maturity adjusted for anticipated prepayments. Interest on loans is calculated using the simple-interest method on daily balances of the principal amount outstanding. Accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed against current earnings. In general, subsequent payments received are applied to the outstanding principal balance of the loan. A loan is returned to accrual status when the borrower has demonstrated a satisfactory payment trend subject to management’s assessment of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.

74

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value. Origination fees on loans held for sale, net of certain costs of processing and closing the loans, are deferred until the time of sale and are included in the computation of the gain or loss from the sale of the related loans. A valuation allowance is established if the market value of such loans is lower than their cost and operations are charged for valuation adjustments.

Lease Financing Transactions - Loans receivable include the Company’s share of aggregate rentals on lease financing transactions and residual values, net of unearned income. Lease financing transactions are primarily direct financing leases. Unearned income on lease financing transactions is amortized utilizing the interest method.

Allowance for Loan Losses- The allowance for loan losses is established as management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.  Additionally, nonclassified loans are also considered in the allowance for loan losses calculation and are factored in based on the historical loss experience adjusted for various qualitative factors.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all scheduled payments of principal or interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for real estate, construction, and commercial loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as an expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, less costs to sell. If the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the deficiency will be charged off against the allowance for loan losses or, alternatively, a specific allocation will be established. Consumer and other homogeneous smaller balance loans are reviewed on a collective basis for impairment. 

Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco Stock- As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of San Francisco, the Bank is required to own common stock in the FHLB of San Francisco based upon our balance of residential mortgage loans and outstanding FHLB advances. FHLB stock is carried at cost and may be sold back to the FHLB at its carrying value. Both cash and stock dividends received are reported as dividend income.

Investment in Federal Reserve Bank Stock - As a member of the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) of San Francisco, the Bank is required to maintain stock in the FRB of San Francisco based on a specified ratio relative to our capital. FRB stock is carried at cost and may be sold back to the FRB at its carrying value. Cash dividends received are reported as dividend income.

75

Mortgage Servicing Assets - Mortgage servicing assets are recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The fair values of servicing assets represent either the price paid if purchased, or the allocated carrying amounts based on relative values when retained in a sale. Servicing assets are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. The fair value of servicing assets is determined based on the present value of estimated net future cash flows related to contractually specified servicing fees. The Company utilizes the services of an outside third party to provide independent valuations of its servicing assets. In conjunction with this process, servicing assets are stratified based on one or more predominant risk characteristics of the underlying financial assets, including maturity and interest rates. The resulting strata are assessed for impairment, which is measured as the excess of cost over fair value. Impairment, if it occurs, is recognized through a valuation allowance for each strata. Evaluation of impairment is conducted on a quarterly basis.

Other Real Estate Owned- Other real estate owned (“OREO”) represents real estate acquired through foreclosure, is considered held for sale, and is recorded at fair value at the time of foreclosure. Loan balances in excess of fair value of the real estate acquired at the date of foreclosure are charged against the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the real estate is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Any subsequent operating expenses or income, reduction in estimated values, and gains or losses on disposition of such properties are charged to current operations. Revenue recognition upon disposition of a property is dependent on the sale having met certain criteria relating to the buyer’s initial investment in the property sold.

Investment in Affordable Housing Partnerships - The Company owns limited partnership interests in projects of affordable housing for lower income tenants. The investments in which the Company has significant influence or has a limited partnership interest that exceeds 5% are recorded using the equity method of accounting. The remaining investments are being amortized using the level-yield method over the life of the related tax credits. The tax credits are being recognized in the consolidated financial statements to the extent they are utilized on our income tax returns.

Premises and Equipment- The Company’s premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed based on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets. The ranges of useful lives for the principal classes of assets are as follows:

Buildings and building improvements	25 years
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	3 to 10 years
Leasehold improvements	Term of lease or useful life, whichever is shorter

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment annually or when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. An asset is considered impaired when the expected undiscounted cash flows over the remaining useful life is less than the net book value. When impairment is indicated for an asset, the amount of impairment loss is the excess of the net book value over its fair value.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - The Company has goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, as a result of various past acquisitions. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized and is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis or on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Premiums on deposits, which represent the intangible value of depositor relationships resulting from deposit liabilities assumed in acquisitions, are amortized over the projected useful lives of the deposits. Core deposit intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment on goodwill and premiums on deposits is permanently recognized by writing down the asset to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value.

76

Federal Funds Purchased- The Company borrows federal funds purchased as part of its short-term financing strategy. Federal funds purchased are generally overnight borrowing and mature within one to three business days from the transaction date.

Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements- The Company sells securities under repurchase agreements. These transactions are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were sold. The Company may have to provide additional collateral to the counterparty, as necessary.

Long-Term Debt - Long-term debt consists of both junior subordinated debt and subordinated debt. The Company has established six statutory business trusts that are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. In six separate private placement transactions, the Trusts issued both fixed and variable rate capital securities representing undivided preferred beneficial interests in the assets of the Trusts. The Company is the owner of all the beneficial interests represented by the common securities of the Trusts. The purpose of issuing the capital securities was to provide the Company with a cost-effective means of obtaining Tier I capital for regulatory reporting purposes.

Effective December 31, 2003, we adopted FIN No. 46R. FIN No. 46R requires that variable interest entities be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of expected loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns or both. As a consequence of adopting the provisions of FIN No. 46R, the Trusts are no longer being consolidated by the Company. Junior subordinated debt represents liabilities of the Company to the Trusts and is included in long-term debt on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Income Taxes- Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.

Stock-Based Compensation - The Company issues stock-based compensation to certain employees, officers, and directors. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, encourages, but does not require, companies to account for stock-based compensation using the fair value method, which generally results in compensation expense recognition. As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company continues to account for its fixed stock options using the intrinsic-value method, prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations, which generally does not result in compensation expense recognition. Under the intrinsic value method, compensation cost for stock options is measured at the date of grant as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our stock over the exercise price of the options. (See Note 1 under the caption “RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS” for information on SFAS No. 123R Share-Based Payment.)

77

Had compensation cost for these plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates of options consistent with the method defined in SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income, as reported	$	108,380		$	78,022		$	58,992
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included
in reported net income, net of related tax effects		1,783			847			256
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards
subject to SFAS No. 123, net of related tax effects		(3,657	)		(2,186	)		(1,464	)
Net income, pro forma	$	106,506		$	76,683		$	57,784
Basic earnings per share
As reported	$	2.03		$	1.54		$	1.23
Pro forma	$	1.99		$	1.51		$	1.20
Diluted earnings per share
As reported	$	1.97		$	1.49		$	1.19
Pro forma	$	1.94		$	1.47		$	1.17

The weighted average fair value for options granted during 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $9.30, $6.55 and $4.28, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
Expected dividend yield		0.50	%		0.80	%		1.20	%
Expected volatility		28.20	%		30.50	%		33.40	%
Risk-free interest rate		4.00	%		2.40	%		2.30	%
Contractual lives		7 years			7 years			7 years
Expected lives		3.5 years			3.5 years			3.5 years

In addition, the Company grants restricted stock awards to employees. The Company records the cost of the restricted shares at market value. The restricted stock grants are reflected as a component of common stock and additional paid-in capital with an offsetting amount of deferred compensation in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity. Awarded restricted shares are subject to various vesting schedules and are based on continued employment from the date of grant. The Company becomes entitled to an income tax deduction in an amount equal to the taxable income reported by the holders of the restricted shares when the restrictions are released and the shares are issued. The deferred compensation cost reflected in stockholders’ equity is being amortized as compensation expense over the related vesting schedule of the various restricted stock grants. Restricted shares are forfeited if officers and employees terminate prior to the lapsing of restrictions. The Company records forfeitures of restricted stock as treasury share repurchases and any compensation cost previously recognized is reversed in the period of forfeiture.

78

Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities - Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company; (2) the transferee has the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets; and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through either (a) an agreement that entitles and obligates the Company to repurchase or redeem them before their maturity or (b) the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets. The difference between the net proceeds received and the allocated carrying amount of the financial assets being sold or securitized is recognized as a gain or loss on sale.

Stock Split -All share and per share information in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend approved by the Board of Directors on May 18, 2004. All shareholders of record on June 3, 2004 received one additional share of common stock for each share held by them at that date.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) -Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, or resulted from issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company.

Comprehensive Income - The term “comprehensive income” describes the total of all components of comprehensive income including net income. “Other comprehensive income” refers to revenues, expenses, and gains and losses that are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net income because they have been recorded directly in equity under the provisions of other Financial Accounting Standards Board statements. The Company presents the comprehensive income disclosure as a part of the statements of changes in stockholders’ equity by identifying each element of other comprehensive income, including net income.

Reclassifications- Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period noninterest income and noninterest expense in order to conform to the current period presentation.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the AICPA issued Statement of Position No. 03-3 (“SOP 03-3”), Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. SOP 03-3 addresses the accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and the cash flows expected to be collected from purchased loans or debt securities if those differences are attributable, in part, to credit quality. SOP 03-3 requires purchased loans and debt securities to be recorded initially at fair value based on the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected with no carryover of any valuation allowance previously recognized by the seller. Interest income should be recognized based on the effective yield from the cash flows expected to be collected. To the extent that the purchased loans or debt securities experience subsequent deterioration in credit quality, a valuation allowance would be established for any additional cash flows that are not expected to be received. However, if more cash flows subsequently are expected to be received than originally estimated, the effective yield would be adjusted on a prospective basis. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans and debt securities acquired by the Company after December 15, 2004. The adoption of this Statement on January 1, 2005 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. This Statement supersedes Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance and is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. This Statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.

79

This Statement requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award - the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available). If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.

The revised accounting for stock-based compensation requirements must be adopted by the Company on January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R allows for two alternative transition methods. The Company intends to follow the modified prospective method, which requires application of the new statement to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of the required effective date shall be recognized as the requisite services are rendered on or after the effective date. The compensation cost of that portion of awards shall be based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro-forma disclosures under the original SFAS No. 123. Had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R in prior periods, the impact on net income and earnings per share would have been approximately similar to the pro forma net income and earnings per share as disclosed above. Stock option expense for fiscal 2006 is estimated to be $1.0 million, net of tax, which may change as a result of future stock option grants, forfeitures and/or other items.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which addresses accounting for changes in accounting principle, changes in accounting estimates, changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions and error correction.  SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle and error correction unless impracticable to do so.  SFAS No. 154 states an exception to retrospective application when a change in accounting principle, or the method of applying it, may be inseparable from the effect of a change in accounting estimate.  When a change in principle is inseparable from a change in estimate, such as depreciation, amortization or depletion, the change to the financial statements is to be presented in a prospective manner.  SFAS No. 154 and the required disclosures are effective for accounting changes and error corrections in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.

In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position (“FSP”) Nos. FAS 115-1 and 124-1 to address the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss.  This FSP nullified certain requirements of Emerging Issues Task Force 03-1 The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (EITF 03-1), and references existing other than temporary guidance.  Furthermore, this FSP creates a three step process in determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss.  The FSP is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005.  It is not anticipated that adoption will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

80

During December 2005, the FASB issued FSP Statement of Position (“SOP”) 94-6-1, Terms of Loan Products That May Give Rise to a Concentration of Credit Risk, which addresses the circumstances under which the terms of loan products give rise to such risk and the disclosures or other accounting considerations that apply for entities that originate, hold, guarantee, service, or invest in loan products with terms that may give rise to a concentration of credit risk. The guidance under this FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 19, 2005 and for loan products that are determined to represent a concentration of credit risk, disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, should be provided for all periods presented.  The adoption of this FSP did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

2.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

The Company has completed several business acquisitions that have all been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities were adjusted to and recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired, if identifiable, was recorded as a premium on purchased deposits, and if not identifiable, was recorded as goodwill. The estimated tax effect of differences between tax bases and fair values has been reflected in deferred income taxes. The following table provides detailed information on acquisitions from 2003 through 2005:

	Pacific Business				United National
	Bank		Trust Bank		Bank
	(In thousands)
Date of acquisition	March 14, 2003		August 6, 2004		September 6, 2005
Purchase price	$	25,000	$	32,888	$	177,860
Type of transaction		All-Cash		All-Stock		Stock and Cash
Value of assets acquired	$	153,350	$	232,931	$	944,152
Value of liabilities assumed	$	140,082	$	217,561	$	880,787
Goodwill	$	9,679	$	15,145	$	99,451
Premium on deposits acquired	$	2,053	$	2,373	$	15,044

On September 6, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of United National Bank (“UNB”), a commercial bank headquartered in San Marino, California. The purchase price was $177.9 million with sixty percent paid in stock and the remainder in cash. The Company acquired net loans receivable with a fair value of $666.7 million and total deposits with a fair value of $865.1 million.

On December 23, 2005, the Company signed a definitive agreement to acquire Standard Bank, a federal savings bank headquartered in Monterey Park, California. Under the terms of the agreement, the shareholders of Standard Bank will receive consideration of two times book value, or approximately $204 million. The acquisition will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and the shareholders of Standard Bank will receive a minimum of 65% and up to 100% of the merger consideration in shares of East West Bancorp common stock.

81

3.CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents include cash, amounts due from banks, and short-term investments with original maturities of less than three months. Short-term investments, which include federal funds sold, are recorded at cost, which approximates market.

The composition of cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2005 and 2004 is presented as follows:

	December 31,
	2005		2004
	(In thousands)
Cash	$	151,192	$	70,575
Federal funds sold		-		22,500
Total cash and cash equivalents	$	151,192	$	93,075

4. SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER RESALE AGREEMENT

In September 2005, the Company entered into a long-term transaction involving the purchase of securities under a resale agreement totaling $50.0 million. The resale agreement has a term of ten years with an interest rate that is fixed at 7.00% for the first two years and thereafter becomes a floating rate based on the three-month Libor plus 275 basis points. Additionally, there are no interest payments if the 30-year and 10-year 30/360 USD semiannual swap rates are inverted. The counterparty has the right to a quarterly call after the first two years. The collateral for the resale agreement consists of U.S. Government agency securities, U.S. Government sponsored enterprise debt securities and AA or better rated mortgage-backed securities.

Resale agreements are recorded at the amounts at which the securities were acquired. The Company’s policy is to obtain possession of securities purchased under resale agreements that is equal to or greater than the principal amount loaned. The market value of the underlying securities, which collateralize the related receivable on resale agreements, is monitored, including accrued interest. Additional collateral may be requested from the counterparty when determined to be appropriate.

Total interest income on the resale agreement was $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

82

5. INVESTMENT SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE 

An analysis of the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio is presented as follows:

			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(In thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
As of December 31, 2005:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	1,497	$	-	$	-		$	1,497
U.S. Government agency securities and U.S. Government
sponsored enterprise debt securities		615,105		-		(4,868	)		610,237
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed
securities		189,147		2,526		(1,758	)		189,915
Other mortgage-backed securities		14,119		-		(15	)		14,104
Corporate debt securities		17,998		41		(227	)		17,812
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise equity securities		36,103		-		(235	)		35,868
Residual interest in securitized loans		-		404		-			404
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	873,969	$	2,971	$	(7,103	)	$	869,837
As of December 31, 2004:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	2,507	$	-	$	(11	)	$	2,496
U.S. Government agency securities and U.S. Government
sponsored enterprise debt securities		338,458		204		(2,048	)		336,614
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed
securities		106,669		1,503		(184	)		107,988
Other mortgage-backed securities		25,759		-		(95	)		25,664
Corporate debt securities		18,991		-		(703	)		18,288
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise equity securities		42,075		512		(139	)		42,448
Residual interest in securitized loans		-		954		-			954
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	534,459	$	3,173	$	(3,180	)	$	534,452

The following table shows the Company’s investment portfolio’s gross unrealized losses and related fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(In thousands)	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
As of December 31, 2005
U.S. Government agency securities and U.S.
Government sponsored enterprise debt securities	$	321,877	$	(1,147	)	$	288,360	$	(3,721	)	$	610,237	$	(4,868	)
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise
mortgage-backed securities		33,897		(598	)		50,647		(1,160	)		84,544		(1,758	)
Other mortgage-backed securities		2,912		(15	)		-		-			2,912		(15	)
Corporate debt securities		2,981		(19	)		9,983		(208	)		12,964		(227	)
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise equity
securities		35,868		(235	)		-		-			35,868		(235	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	397,535	$	(2,014	)	$	348,990	$	(5,089	)	$	746,525	$	(7,103	)
As of December 31, 2004
U.S. Treasury securities	$	2,174	$	(11	)	$	-	$	-		$	2,174	$	(11	)
U.S. Government agency securities and U.S.
Government sponsored enterprise debt securities		229,521		(1,815	)		20,002		(233	)		249,523		(2,048	)
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise
mortgage-backed securities		48,690		(184	)		-		-			48,690		(184	)
Other mortgage-backed securities		-		-			25,664		(95	)		25,664		(95	)
Corporate debt securities		920		(80	)		14,568		(623	)		15,488		(703	)
U.S. Government sponsored enterprise equity
securities		8,227		(139	)		-		-			8,227		(139	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	289,532	$	(2,229	)	$	60,234	$	(951	)	$	349,766	$	(3,180	)

83

All individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer at December 31, 2005 had investment grade ratings upon purchase. The issuers of these securities have not, to our knowledge, established any cause for default on these securities and the various rating agencies have reaffirmed these securities’ long term investment grade status at December 31, 2005.

There are 24 securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer. These unrealized losses are primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and individually were less than 3% of their respective amortized cost basis. Of these securities, 22 are AAA-rated U.S. Government sponsored enterprise debt securities. The remaining 2 securities are A to AA-rated corporate debt securities. These securities have fluctuated in value since their purchase dates as market interest rates have fluctuated. However, the Company has the ability, and management intends to hold these securities until their fair values recover to cost. Therefore, in management’s opinion, all securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the past twelve months or longer as of December 31, 2005 are not other-than-temporarily impaired, and therefore, no impairment charges as of December 31, 2005 are warranted.

As a result of our periodic reviews for impairment, the Company recorded a $60 thousand impairment writedown on a corporate debt security that was held in the available-for-sale investment portfolio at an amortized cost of $1.0 million in 2005. During 2004, the Company recorded a $757 thousand impairment writedown on a preferred stock that was held in the available-for-sale investment portfolio at an amortized cost of $4.7 million.

The scheduled maturities of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2005 are presented as follows:

	Amortized		Estimated
(In thousands)	Cost		Fair Value
Due within one year	$	385,154	$	383,547
Due after one year through five years		221,159		218,734
Due after five years through ten years		37,100		37,047
Due after ten years		230,556		230,509
Total	$	873,969	$	869,837

Actual maturities of mortgage-backed securities can differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations. In addition, such factors as prepayments and interest rates may affect the yields on the carrying values of mortgage-backed securities.

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities during 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $251.9 million, $279.1 million and $78.5 million, respectively. Gross realized gains were $4.4 million, $3.1 million and $2.0 million during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company recorded gross realized losses amounting to $119 thousand, $41 thousand and $3 thousand in 2005, 2004, and 2003. The tax expense on the sale of investment securities available-for-sale was $1.8 million, $651 thousand, and $820 thousand for December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company securitized $209.6 million and $24.6 million in residential mortgage loans through the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) in guaranteed mortgage securitizations. The resulting securities were retained in the Company’s available-for-sale securities portfolio. Accordingly, no gain or loss resulted from these transactions. The Company recorded $2.5 million and $278 thousand in mortgage servicing assets as a result of the 2005 and 2004 securitizations, respectively, as the Bank continues to service the underlying loans.

84

At December 31, 2005 and 2004, investment securities available-for-sale with a carrying value of $834.1 million and $388.2 million, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, FHLB advances, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

The residual interest in securitized loans was retained by the Company in a securitization of residential single family loans we executed in September of 2002. The fair value of the residual interest in securitized loans is subject to credit, prepayment, and interest rate risk on the underlying loans. Fair value is estimated based on a discounted cash flow analysis. These cash flows are projected over the lives of the receivables using prepayment, default, and interest rate assumptions that approximate current market rates and conditions. At December 31, 2005, the fair value of the residual interest was $404 thousand. The fair value is estimated based on a weighted average remaining life of 1.84 years, a projected prepayment rate of 40%, a credit loss rate of 1.24% and a weighted average discount rate of 20%.

6.DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Warrants- At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase the common stock of various companies. The Company received these warrants in connection with certain lending relationships, primarily with small, privately-held companies. In management’s opinion, the fair value of these warrants is approximately zero.

Equity Linked Certificate of Deposits- During the third and fourth quarters of 2004, the Company entered into four equity swap agreements with a major investment brokerage firm to hedge against market fluctuations in a promotional equity index certificate of deposit product that was offered to customers for a limited time during the latter half of 2004. This product, which has a term of 5 1/2 years, pays interest based on the performance of the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (the “HSCEI”). The combined notional amounts of the equity swap agreements total $24.6 million with termination dates similar to the stated maturity date on the underlying certificate of deposit host contracts. For the equity swap agreements, the Company agreed to pay interest based on the one-month Libor minus a spread on a monthly basis and receive any increase in the HSCEI at swap termination date. Under SFAS No. 133, a certificate of deposit that pays interest based on changes in an equity index is a hybrid instrument with an embedded derivative (i.e. equity call option) that must be accounted for separately from the host contract (i.e. the certificate of deposit). In accordance with SFAS No. 133, both the embedded equity call options on the certificates of deposit and the freestanding equity swap agreements are marked-to-market every month with resulting changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of income.

On April 1, 2005, the Company amended the four equity swap agreements entered into in 2004, effectively removing the swap payable leg. The amendments to the swap agreements changed the terms of the agreements such that instead of paying interest based on the one-month Libor minus a spread on a monthly basis for the remaining terms of the agreements, this amount was prepaid based on the current market value of the cash streams. The total amount paid on April 1, 2005 in conjunction with these swap agreement amendments was $4.2 million. The combined fair value of the embedded derivatives at December 31, 2005 and 2004 amounted to $3.5 million and $3.3 million, respectively, and is included in interest-bearing deposits on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the equity swap agreements totaled $3.5 million and $(422) thousand as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the net impact on the consolidated statements of income related to these swap agreements was an expense of $114 thousand. The fair value of the equity swap agreements and embedded equity call options are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the change in value of the HSCEI based upon the life of the individual swap agreement.

85

7.LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The following is a summary of loans receivable:

	December 31,
	2005			2004
	(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
Residential, single family	$	509,151		$	327,554
Residential, multifamily		1,239,836			1,121,107
Commercial and industrial real estate		3,321,520			2,556,827
Construction		640,654			348,501
Total real estate loans		5,711,161			4,353,989
Other loans:
Commercial business		643,296			438,537
Trade finance		230,771			155,809
Automobile		8,543			10,151
Other consumer		200,254			175,008
Total other loans		1,082,864			779,505
Total gross loans		6,794,025			5,133,494
Unearned fees, premiums and discounts, net		(1,070	)		(2,156	)
Allowance for loan losses		(68,635	)		(50,884	)
Loans receivable, net	$	6,724,320		$	5,080,454

Included in residential single family loans are loans held for sale totaling $3.7 million and $4.3 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, commercial business loans included finance leases totaling $257 thousand and $1.1 million, respectively. Accrued interest on loans receivable amounted to $30.6 million and $19.4 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Loans serviced for others amounted to $809.2 million and $561.8 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Loans serviced for others are off balance sheet and not included in the loans receivable balance.

At December 31, 2005 and 2004, loans receivable totaling $4.18 billion and $3.55 billion, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, FHLB advances, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

At December 31, 2005 and 2004, one of the Company’s directors was the guarantor for a commercial loan that amounted to $247 thousand and $222 thousand, respectively. Both the terms of the loan and the credit underwriting procedures for this loan are substantially the same as those for comparable transactions.

We offer first mortgage loans secured by one-to-four unit residential properties located in our primary lending areas. We originated $320.1 million in new residential single family loans during 2005. We offer both fixed and adjustable rate (“ARM”) single family residential mortgage loan programs. Primarily, we offer ARM loan programs that have six-month, three-, five-, or seven-year initial fixed periods. We originate single family residential mortgage loans under three different types of programs, full/alternative documentation, reduced documentation and no documentation loans. The underwriting criteria for these loan programs vary in income and asset documentation levels. Our underwriting criteria for all the loans in our single family residential mortgage loan programs include minimum FICO scores and maximum loan-to-value ratios. Additionally, our full/alternative documentation loan program requires verification of employment and income. Reduced documentation loans are primarily intended for borrowers who are self-employed. Generally, we require reduced documentation borrowers to have more equity in the property and higher amounts of liquid reserves. Finally, our no documentation loan program is designed for borrowers who demonstrate excellent credit quality and have the ability to place a large down payment or have high equity in the property. Of the $320.1 million single family residential mortgage loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2005, 11% or $35.6 million were full/alternative documentation loans, 45% or $142.5 million were reduced documentation loans and 44% or $142.0 million were no documentation loans.

86

We also offer multifamily residential loans. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we originated $574.6 million multifamily residential loans. We offer both fixed and ARM multifamily loan programs. Primarily, we offer ARM multifamily loan programs that have six-month, three-, or five-year initial fixed periods. We originate these prime multifamily mortgage loans under two different types of programs, full documentation and reduced documentation loans. The underwriting criteria for these loan programs vary in income and asset documentation levels, similar to the programs mentioned in the single family residential loan programs. Underwriting criteria generally include minimum FICO scores, maximum loan-to-value ratios and minimum debt coverage ratios.

Additionally, we own single family and multifamily residential mortgage loans that have contractual features that may increase our credit exposure. These mortgage loans include option adjustable rate mortgage loans that may subject borrowers to significant future payment increases or create the potential for negative amortization of the principal balance.

Interest-only mortgage loans allow interest-only payments for fixed period of time. At the end of the interest-only period, the loan payment includes principal payments and increases significantly. The borrower’s new payment once the loan becomes amortizing (i.e., includes principal payments) will be greater than if the borrower had been making principal payments since the origination of the loan. The longer the interest-only period, the larger the amortizing payment will be when the interest-only period ends.

Option adjustable rate mortgage loans permit different repayment options. The monthly payment is set as the initial interest rate for the first year of the loan. After that point, the borrower can make a minimum payment that is limited to a 7.5% increase in payment. If the minimum payment is not adequate to cover the interest amount due on the mortgage loan, the loan would have negative amortization, which will result in an increase in the mortgage loans’ principal balance. These loans completely re-amortize every five years and the monthly payment is reset at that point. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, there was no negative amortization on any loans held in our portfolio. We did not originate these loans and they were purchased several years ago.

 Our total exposure related to these products included in loans receivable for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 is summarized as follows:

	Unpaid Principal Balance as of
	December 31,
	2005		2004
	(In thousands)
Interest only residential, multifamily loans	$	9,213	$	5,845
Option adjustable rate mortgages
Residential, single family loans		2,844		3,030
Residential, multifamily loans		81,348		83,301

All of the loans we originate are subject to our underwriting guidelines and loan origination standards. Generally, loans obtained from third party originators, including the higher risk loans in the preceding table, are closed and funded in our name and are also subject to our same underwriting guidelines and loan origination standards. We believe our strict underwriting criteria and procedures adequately consider the unique risks which may come from these products. We conduct a variety of quality control procedures and periodic audits to ensure compliance with our origination standards, including our criteria for lending and legal requirements.

87

An analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
	(In thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	50,884		$	39,246		$	35,292
Allowance from acquisitions		9,290			1,583			2,821
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit		(2,738	)		(1,566	)		(6,129	)
Provision for loan losses		15,870			16,750			8,800
Gross chargeoffs		(6,442	)		(5,860	)		(2,777	)
Gross recoveries		1,771			731			1,239
Balance, end of year	$	68,635		$	50,884		$	39,246

Generally, impaired loans include loans that are designated as nonaccrual or restructured. When the value of an impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the deficiency will be charged off against the allowance for loan losses or alternatively, a specific allocation will be established.

There were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans are impaired. The following table provides information on impaired loans for the periods indicated:

	As of and for the Year Ended
	December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
	(In thousands)
Recorded investment with related allowance	$	10,681		$	3,009		$	-
Recorded investment with no related allowance		13,468			2,596			5,949
Allowance on impaired loans		(1,310	)		(1,060	)		-
Net recorded investment in impaired loans	$	22,839		$	4,545		$	5,949
Average total recorded investment in impaired loans	$	19,865		$	7,660		$	6,104

The following is a summary of interest foregone on impaired loans for the years ended December 31:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
	(In thousands)
Interest income that would have been recognized had impaired
loans performed in accordance with their original terms	$	1,629		$	496		$	317
Less: Interest income recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis		(604	)		(272	)		(257	)
Interest foregone on impaired loans	$	1,025		$	224		$	60

Nonaccrual Loans - Nonaccrual loans totaled $24.1 million and $4.9 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Loans Past Due 90 Days or More but not on Nonaccrual- At December 31, 2005 and 2004, loans past due 90 days or more but not on nonaccrual amounted to $5.7 million and $681 thousand, respectively. These loans represent trade finance loans that are fully guaranteed by another banking institution.

88

Restructured Loans - The Company had no restructured loans as of December 31, 2005 and 2004.

Other Real Estate Owned- As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company owned one OREO property with a carrying value of $299 thousand.

Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit - The allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to these unfunded credit facilities. The determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the unfunded credit facilities including an assessment of the probability of commitment usage, credit risk factors for loans outstanding to these same customers, and the terms and expiration dates of the unfunded credit facilities. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit amounted to $11.1 million and $7.7 million, respectively.

Net adjustments to the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit are included in the provision for loan losses.

Credit Risk and Concentrations- Substantially all of the Company’s real estate loans are secured by real properties located in California. Declines in the California economy and in real estate values could have a significant effect on the collectibility of the Company’s loans and on the level of allowance for loan losses required. In addition, although most of the Company’s trade finance activities are related to trade with Asian countries, all of its loans are made to companies domiciled in the United States.

8.INVESTMENTS IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARTNERSHIPS

The Company has invested in certain limited partnerships that were formed to develop and operate apartment complexes designed as high-quality affordable housing for lower income tenants throughout the United States. The Company’s ownership in each limited partnership varies from 1% to 20%. Seven of the investments, with a net carrying value of $17.5 million at December 31, 2005, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, as the Company has significant influence or has a limited partnership interest that exceeds 5%. The costs of the remaining investments owned as of December 31, 2005, with a net carrying value of $13.5 million, are being amortized using a level-yield method over the lives of the related tax credits. Each of the partnerships must meet the regulatory requirements for affordable housing for a minimum 15-year compliance period to fully utilize the tax credits. If the partnerships cease to qualify during the compliance period, the credits may be denied for any period in which the projects are not in compliance and a portion of the credits previously taken may be subject to recapture with interest.

The remaining federal tax credits to be utilized over a maximum of 10 years are $33.0 million as of December 31, 2005. The Company’s usage of federal tax credits approximated $5.6 million, $5.9 million and $4.9 million during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Investment amortization amounted to $6.5 million, $7.4 million and $6.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The Company finances the purchase of certain real estate tax credits generated by partnerships which own multiple properties currently under construction. These transactions were financed with non-recourse notes which are collateralized by the Company’s partnership interests in the real estate investment tax credits. The notes are payable upon demand and, if defaulted, interest will be imposed at an annual rate equal to the lesser of 18% per annum or the higher rate permitted by applicable law. No interest is due if the notes are paid on demand. At December 31, 2005, outstanding notes payable related to the purchase of real estate tax credits amounted to $8.8 million, compared with $11.0 million at December 31, 2004. The Company has no liabilities in addition to these notes payable or any contingent liabilities to the partnerships.

89

9.PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment consist of the following:

	December 31,
	2005			2004
	(In thousands)
Land	$	10,970		$	5,440
Office buildings		9,552			7,565
Leasehold improvements		13,638			6,511
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		26,019			18,768
Total cost		60,179			38,284
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(21,600	)		(18,535	)
Net book value	$	38,579		$	19,749

Depreciation expense on premises and equipment was $4.0 million, $2.9 million and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

10.GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The carrying amount of goodwill amounted to $143.3 million and $43.7 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The change in the carrying value of goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2005 primarily represents goodwill of $99.5 million arising from the acquisition of United National Bank in September 2005. The Company did not recognize any impairment losses as a result of its annual impairment test of goodwill as of December 31, 2005.

The Company also has premiums on acquired deposits which represent the intangible value of depositor relationships resulting from deposit liabilities assumed in various acquisitions. The gross carrying amount of deposit premiums totaled $31.9 million and $16.9 million, respectively, and the related accumulated amortization totaled $13.0 million and $9.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2005 and 2004. The Company amortizes premiums on acquired deposits based on the projected useful lives of the related deposits. The weighted average amortization period for premiums on acquired deposits from UNB is 5.8 years. Total amortization expense on deposit premiums was $3.9 million, $2.2 million and $2.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Estimated future amortization expense of premiums on acquired deposits for the succeeding five years is as follows:

Estimate For The Year Ending December 31,	Amount
	(In thousands)
2006	$	5,977
2007		4,825
2008		3,345
2009		1,578
2010		1,356

90

11.MORTGAGE SERVICING ASSETS

In estimating the fair value of mortgage servicing assets at December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company used a weighted-average prepayment speed of 10.2% and 12.9%, respectively, and a weighted-average discount rate of 9.9% and 9.1%, respectively. Mortgage servicing assets which are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets had a carrying value of $4.3 million and $2.3 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, the fair value of mortgage servicing assets approximated carrying value. During 2005, a valuation allowance for impairment of mortgage servicing assets of $280 thousand was recorded. There was no valuation allowance for impairment of mortgage servicing assets as of December 31, 2004. The Company capitalized $2.8 million, $1.1 million and $1.7 million of mortgage servicing assets during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The related amortization expense on servicing assets amounted to $543 thousand, $382 thousand and $108 thousand during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Estimated future amortization of mortgage servicing assets for the succeeding five years is as follows:

Estimate For The Year Ending December 31,	Amount
	(In thousands)
2006	$	921
2007		737
2008		590
2009		472
2010		377

12.CUSTOMER DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS

Customer deposit account balances are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2005		2004
	(In thousands)
Demand deposits (noninterest-bearing)	$	1,331,992	$	1,097,851
Checking accounts (interest-bearing)		472,610		334,747
Money market accounts		978,678		507,949
Savings deposits		326,807		340,399
Total core deposits		3,110,087		2,280,946
Time deposits:
Less than $100,000		927,792		747,858
$100,000 or greater		2,220,708		1,493,713
Total time deposits		3,148,500		2,241,571
Total deposits	$	6,258,587	$	4,522,517

91

At December 31, 2005, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows:

	$100,000 or		Less Than
	Greater		$100,000		Total
	(In thousands)
2006	$	2,151,627	$	853,970	$	3,005,597
2007		57,064		41,186		98,250
2008		5,592		10,365		15,957
2009		474		1,612		2,086
2010		5,551		20,401		25,952
Thereafter		400		258		658
Total	$	2,220,708	$	927,792	$	3,148,500

Accrued interest payable was $6.4 million and $1.3 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Interest expense on customer deposits by account type is summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2005		2004		2003
	(In thousands)
Checking accounts	$	2,939	$	1,175	$	776
Money market accounts		15,785		4,797		1,710
Savings deposits		953		486		362
Time deposits:
Less than $100,000		20,149		11,390		10,410
$100,000 or greater		53,760		20,048		16,688
Total	$	93,586	$	37,896	$	29,946

13.FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED

Federal funds purchased generally mature within one to three business days from the transaction date. At December 31, 2005, federal funds purchased totaled $91.5 million. There were no outstanding federal funds purchased as of December 31, 2004.

The following table provides information on federal funds purchased for the periods indicated:

	As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at end of year	$	91,500		$	-		$	12,000
Average balance outstanding during the year	$	45,190		$	3,028		$	3,044
Maximum balance outstanding at any month-end	$	182,000		$	19,500		$	12,000
Weighted average interest rate during the year		3.91	%		1.76	%		1.40	%
Weighted average interest rate at end of year		4.03	%		-	%		1.00	%

As a means of augmenting its liquidity, the Company has established federal funds lines with six correspondent banks. The Company’s available borrowing capacity from federal funds line facilities amounted to $253.5 million and $130.0 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

92

14.FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES

FHLB advances and their related weighted average interest rates are summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2005					December 31, 2004
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
Maturing during year ending December 31,	(Dollars in thousands)
2005	$	-		-		$	648,122		1.95	%
2006		530,155		3.57	%		150,144		2.35	%
2007		61,527		2.38	%		61,537		2.38	%
2008		25,000		4.55	%		-		-
2009		1,000		4.98	%		1,000		4.98	%
Total	$	617,682		3.49	%	$	860,803		2.05	%

All outstanding FHLB advances at December 31, 2005, amounting to $617.7 million, are at fixed interest rates. Of this amount, $280.0 million represent overnight borrowings. Some FHLB advances are secured by real estate loans and investment securities available-for-sale.

The Company’s available borrowing capacity from unused FHLB advances totaled $1.89 billion and $1.03 billion at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

15. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

During 2005, the Company entered into six long-term transactions involving the sale of securities under repurchase agreements totaling $325.0 million. The terms for these repurchase agreements range from seven to ten years. The rates are all initially floating rate for the first one to three years, ranging from the three-month Libor minus 80 basis points to the three-month Libor minus 125 basis points. Thereafter, the rates are fixed for the remainder of the term, with interest rates ranging from 4.08% to 4.55%. The counterparty has the right to one call when the rates change from floating to fixed, for each of the repurchase agreements.

These transactions are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were sold. The collateral for these agreements consist of U.S. Government agency and U.S. Government sponsored enterprise debt and mortgage-backed securities.  The Company may have to provide additional collateral for the repurchase agreements, as necessary.

The following table provides information on securities sold under repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2005:

			Rate at
	Amount		December 31, 2005			Call Dates
	(Dollars in thousands)
Maturing during 2012	$	50,000		3.45	%		August 2007 - August 2008
Maturing during 2015		275,000		3.38	%		September 2006
	$	325,000		3.39	%

Total interest expense recorded on repurchase agreements was $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company did not enter into transactions involving the sale of securities under repurchase agreements during 2004.

93

 The Company also has master repurchase agreements with other major brokerage companies. The Company’s available borrowing capacity from repurchase agreements totaled $52.1 million and $81.1 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

16.CAPITAL RESOURCES

Junior Subordinated Debt - The Company has formed six statutory business trusts for the purpose of issuing junior subordinated debt to third party investors. In addition to the issuance of junior subordinated debt, the Trusts also issued common stock to the Company which is recorded along with the junior subordinated debt on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as a component of long-term debt. As of December 31, 2005, the Trusts issued total junior subordinated debt of $75.8 million and total common stock of $2.3 million to the Company. As of December 31, 2004, the Trusts issued total junior subordinated debt of $55.8 million and total common stock of $1.7 million to the Company.

The proceeds from these issuances represent liabilities of the Company to the Trusts and are reported in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of long-term debt. Interest payments on these securities are made either quarterly or semi-annually and are deductible for tax purposes. These securities are not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For regulatory reporting purposes, these securities qualify for Tier I capital treatment.

 The table below summarizes pertinent information related to outstanding junior subordinated debt issued by each Trust as of December 31, 2005 and 2004:

			Rate at		Balance at
		Stated	December 31,		December 31,
Trust Name	Maturity Date (1)	Interest Rate	2005		2005		2004
(Dollars in thousands)
East West Capital Trust I	March 2030	10.88%, fixed	10.88%	$	$10,750	$	10,750
East West Capital Trust II	July 2030	10.95%, fixed	10.95%		10,000		10,000
East West Capital Statutory Trust III	December 2033	3-month Libor + 2.85%	7.35%		10,000		10,000
East West Capital Trust IV	June 2034	3-month Libor + 2.55%	6.74%		10,000		10,000
East West Capital Trust V	November 2034	3-month Libor + 1.80%	6.18%		15,000		15,000
East West Capital Trust VI	September 2035	3-month Libor + 1.50%	5.99%		20,000		-
				$	$75,750	$	55,750

_____

(1) All of the above debt instruments are subject to various call options.

Subordinated Debt - On April 28, 2005, the Company issued $50.0 million in subordinated debt in a private placement transaction. On September 23, 2005, the Company issued an additional $25.0 million in subordinated debt, as an amendment to the $50.0 million subordinated debt agreement. The additional $25.0 million in subordinated debt has a maturity date of September 23, 2015 and the amendment also extended the maturity of the original $50.0 million subordinated debt to the same date. The stated interest rate on the subordinated debt is based on the three-month Libor plus 110 basis points, payable on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 2005, the interest rate on this debt instrument was 5.35%. The subordinated debt was issued through the Bank and qualifies as Tier II capital for regulatory reporting purposes and is included as a component of long-term debt in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

94

17.INCOME TAXES

The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following components:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
	(In thousands)
Current income tax expense:
Federal	$	55,700		$	33,300		$	24,988
State		17,263			11,999			8,918
Total current income tax expense		72,963			45,299			33,906
Deferred income tax benefit:
Federal		(8,724	)		(1,821	)		(2,915	)
State		(2,258	)		(167	)		(323	)
Total deferred income tax benefit		(10,982	)		(1,988	)		(3,238	)
Provision for income taxes	$	61,981		$	43,311		$	30,668

The difference between the effective tax rate implicit in the consolidated financial statements and the statutory federal income tax rate can be attributed to the following:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
Federal income tax provision at statutory rate		35.0	%		35.0	%		35.0	%
State franchise taxes, net of federal tax effect		5.7			6.3			6.2
Tax credits		(3.3	)		(4.7	)		(5.3	)
Other, net		(1.0	)		(0.9	)		(1.7	)
Effective income tax rate		36.4	%		35.7	%		34.2	%

95

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax (assets) liabilities are presented below:

	December 31,
	2005									2004
	Federal			State			Total			Federal			State			Total
	(In thousands)
Deferred tax liabilities:
Premiums on deposits acquired	$	6,562		$	2,032		$	8,594		$	2,639		$	818		$	3,457
Depreciation		866			331			1,197			871			330			1,201
FHLB stock dividends		2,924			906			3,830			2,053			636			2,689
Deferred loan fees		13,337			4,131			17,468			11,366			3,520			14,886
Affordable housing partnership tax loss		12,577			3,956			16,533			10,355			3,207			13,562
Purchased loan discounts		793			246			1,039			650			201			851
Mortgage servicing assets		1,061			329			1,390			-			-			-
California franchise tax		1,212			-			1,212			-			-			-
Other, net		1,009			4,623			5,632			1,434			1,911			3,345
Total gross deferred tax liabilities		40,341			16,554			56,895			29,368			10,623			39,991
Deferred tax assets:
Bad debt deduction		(27,644	)		(8,563	)		(36,207	)		(20,503	)		(6,330	)		(26,833	)
Affordable housing partnership book loss		(12,666	)		(4,013	)		(16,679	)		(10,469	)		(3,242	)		(13,711	)
Deferred compensation accrual		(11,200	)		(3,483	)		(14,683	)		(6,060	)		(1,901	)		(7,961	)
California franchise tax		-			-			-			(3,304	)		-			(3,304	)
Unrealized loss on securities		(2,236	)		(742	)		(2,978	)		(734	)		(262	)		(996	)
Net operating loss carryforwards		(1,444	)		-			(1,444	)		(2,191	)		-			(2,191	)
Other, net		(7,010	)		(480	)		(7,490	)		(4,219	)		(199	)		(4,418	)
Total gross deferred tax assets		(62,200	)		(17,281	)		(79,481	)		(47,480	)		(11,934	)		(59,414	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	(21,859	)	$	(727	)	$	(22,586	)	$	(18,112	)	$	(1,311	)	$	(19,423	)

At December 31, 2005, the Bank had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $4.1 million which expire through 2020. These net operating loss carryforwards were acquired in connection with the Bank’s acquisition of American International Bank (“AIB”). Federal and state tax laws related to a change in ownership, such as the acquisition of AIB, place limitations on the annual amount of operating loss carryovers that can be utilized to offset post-acquisition operating income. Under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, which has been adopted under California law, if during any three-year period there is more than a 50% change in ownership of the Bank, then the future use of any pre-change net operating losses or built-in losses of the Bank would be subject to an annual percentage limitation based on the value of the Bank at an ownership change date.

18.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Credit Extensions- In the normal course of business, there are various outstanding commitments to extend credit which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. While the Company does not anticipate losses as a result of these transactions, commitments to extend credit are included in determining the appropriate level of the allowance for unfunded commitments and credit exposures.

96

Loan commitments are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the agreement. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Because many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future funding requirements. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, undisbursed loan commitments amounted to $1.72 billion and $1.02 billion, respectively. In addition, the Bank has committed to fund mortgage and commercial loan applications in process amounting to $472.4 million and $421.8 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Substantially all commitments are for loans to be held in the portfolio.

Commercial letters of credit are issued to facilitate domestic and foreign trade transactions while standby letters of credit are issued to make payments on behalf of customers when certain specified future events occur. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, commercial and standby letters of credit totaled $405.2 million and $348.3 million, respectively. The Bank issues standby letters of credit, or “SBLCs” and financial guarantees to support the obligations of its customers to beneficiaries. Based on historical trends, the probability that it will have to make payments under standby letters of credit is low. Additionally, in many cases, the Bank holds collateral in various forms against these standby letters of credit. As part of its risk management activities, the Bank continuously monitors the creditworthiness of the customer as well as its SBLC exposure; however, if the customer fails to perform the specified obligation to the beneficiary, the beneficiary may draw upon the standby letters of credit by presenting documents that are in compliance with the letter of credit terms. In that event, the Bank either repays the money borrowed or advanced, makes payment on account of the indebtedness of the customer or makes payment on account of the default by the customer in the performance of an obligation, to the beneficiary up to the full notional amount of the standby letters of credit. The customer is obligated to reimburse the Bank for any such payment. If the customer fails to pay, the Bank would, as applicable, liquidate collateral and/or set off accounts.

Credit card lines are unsecured commitments that are not legally binding. Management reviews credit card lines at least annually, and upon evaluation of the customers’ creditworthiness, the Bank has the right to terminate or change certain terms of the credit card lines.

The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as in extending loan facilities to customers. It evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit amounted to $11.1 million and $7.7 million, respectively. These amounts are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Guarantees- From time to time, the Company sells loans with recourse in the ordinary course of business. For loans that have been sold with recourse, the recourse component is considered a guarantee. When the Company sells a loan with recourse, it commits to stand ready to perform if the loan defaults, and to make payments to remedy the default. Loans sold with recourse, comprised entirely of residential single family loans, totaled $31.6 million and $39.1 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company’s recourse reserve related to these loans totaled $76 thousand and $59 thousand as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The Company also sells loans without recourse that may have to be subsequently repurchased if a defect that occurred during the loan’s origination process results in a violation of a representation or warranty made in connection with the sale of the loan. When a loan sold to an investor without recourse fails to perform according to its contractual terms, the investor will typically review the loan file to determine whether defects in the origination process occurred and if such defects give rise to a violation of a representation or warranty made to the investor in connection with the sale. If such a defect is identified, the Company may be required to either repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor for losses sustained. If there are no such defects, the Company has no commitment to repurchase the loan. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the amount of loans sold without recourse totaled $777.6 million and $522.8 million, respectively, which substantially represents the unpaid principal balance of the Company’s loans serviced for others portfolio.

97

Lease Commitments - The Company conducts a portion of its operations utilizing leased premises and equipment under operating leases. Rental expense amounted to $7.0 million, $4.9 million and $4.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases are estimated as follows:

Estimate For The Year Ending December 31,		Amount
		(In thousands)
2006	$	6,966
2007		6,969
2008		5,999
2009		5,348
2010		4,410
Thereafter		27,545
Total	$	57,237

Litigation- Neither the Company nor the Bank is involved in any material legal proceedings at December 31, 2005. The Bank, from time to time, is a party to litigation which arises in the ordinary course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the origination and servicing of loans, and other issues related to the business of the Bank. After taking into consideration information furnished by counsel to the Company and the Bank, management believes that the resolution of such issues will not have a material adverse impact on the financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Company or the Bank.

Regulated Investment Company-On December 31, 2003, the California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) announced that it is taking the position that certain tax deductions relating to regulated investment companies will be disallowed pursuant to California Senate Bill 614 and California Assembly Bill 1601, which were signed into law in the fourth quarter of 2003. East West Securities Company, Inc. (the “Fund”), a regulated investment company (“RIC”) formed and funded in July 2000 to raise capital in an efficient and economical manner was dissolved on December 30, 2002 as a result of, among other reasons, proposed legislation to change the tax treatments of RICs. The Fund provided state tax benefits beginning in 2000 until the end of 2002, when the RIC was officially dissolved. While the Company’s management continues to believe that the tax benefits realized in previous years were appropriate and fully defensible under the existing tax codes at that time, the Company has deemed it prudent to participate in the voluntary compliance initiative, or “VCI,” offered by the State of California to avoid certain potential penalties should the FTB choose to litigate its position about the tax treatment of RICs for periods prior to enactment of the legislation described above and should the FTB be successful in that litigation.

Pursuant to the VCI program, the Company filed amended California income tax returns on April 15, 2004 for all affected years and paid the resulting taxes and interest due to the FTB. This amounted to an aggregate payment of $14.2 million for tax years 2000, 2001, and 2002. The Company’s management continues to believe that the tax deductions are appropriate and, as such, refund claims have also been filed for the amounts paid with the amended returns. These refund claims are reflected as assets in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As a result of these actions—amending the Company’s California income tax returns and subsequent related filing of refund claims—the Company retains its potential exposure for assertion of an accuracy-related penalty should the FTB prevail in its position, in addition to our risk of not being successful in our refund claim for taxes and interest. The Company’s potential exposure to all other penalties, however, has been eliminated through this course of action.

98

The Franchise Tax Board is currently in the process of reviewing and assessing our refund claims for taxes and interest for tax years 2000 through 2002. Management is continuing to pursue these claims, to monitor developments in the law in this area, and to monitor the status of tax claims with respect to other registered investment companies.

19.STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

Stock Options - The Company adopted the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) on June 25, 1998. Pursuant to amendments under the Plan, the Company may grant stock options, restricted stock, or any form of award deemed appropriate not to exceed 7,000,000 shares of common stock over a ten-year period. The stock options awarded under the Plan are granted with a three-year or four-year vesting period and a seven-year or ten-year contractual life.

A summary of the Company’s stock options as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is presented below:

	2005					2004					2003
				Weighted					Weighted					Weighted
				Average					Average					Average
				Exercise					Exercise					Exercise
	Shares			Price		Shares			Price		Shares			Price
Outstanding at beginning of year		3,556,454		$	11.79		3,940,750		$	10.64		4,604,266		$	9.87
Granted		179,810			36.70		170,800			27.14		148,500			17.12
Exercised		(474,711	)		8.43		(501,694	)		7.56		(667,002	)		7.06
Forfeited		(52,370	)		22.44		(53,402	)		15.46		(145,014	)		12.78
Outstanding at end of year		3,209,183		$	13.51		3,556,454		$	11.79		3,940,750		$	10.64
Options exercisable at year-end		2,503,418					2,388,129					2,219,850
Weighted average fair value of options
granted during the year	$	9.30				$	6.55				$	4.28

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005:

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
	Number		Weighted		Weighted		Number		Weighted
	of		Average		Average		of		Average
	Outstanding		Remaining		Exercise		Exercisable		Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices	Options		Contractual Life		Price		Options		Price
$5.00 to $9.99		1,075,657		2.8 years	$	5.44		1,075,657	$	5.44
$10.00 to $14.99		784,347		5.7 years		12.57		652,547		12.49
$15.00 to $19.99		1,034,714		3.7 years		16.87		742,614		16.88
$25.00 to $29.99		132,375		5.1 years		26.58		30,225		26.60
$30.00 to $34.99		52,728		6.5 years		33.88		1,500		32.96
$35.00 to $39.99		128,362		6.2 years		37.62		625		35.14
$40.00 to $44.99		1,000		5.9 years		42.97		250		42.97
$5.00 to $44.99		3,209,183		4.1 years	$	13.51		2,503,418	$	10.96

Restricted Stock - As part of the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, the Company granted restricted stock with various vesting schedules and a ten-year or seven-year contractual life to directors, officers and employees during 2005 and previous years. Non-cash compensation costs amounted to $3.1 million, $1.5 million and $442 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

99

A summary of the Company’s restricted stock as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, including changes during the years then ended, is as follows:

	2005					2004
				Weighted					Weighted
				Average					Average
	Shares			Price		Shares			Price
Outstanding at beginning of year		268,006		$	27.30		165,574		$	21.64
Granted		202,529			35.31		129,285			33.98
Vested		-			-		-			-
Forfeited		(39,143	)		32.36		(26,853	)		24.60
Outstanding at end of year		431,392		$	30.60		268,006		$	27.30

Of the total shares of restricted stock granted in 2005 and 2004, as presented in the table above, 3,522 and 3,290 shares, respectively, were granted to outside directors.

Stock Purchase Plan - The Company adopted the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”) providing eligible employees of the Company and its subsidiaries participation in the ownership of the Company through the right to purchase shares of its common stock at a discount. Under the terms of the Purchase Plan, prior to April 2005, employees could purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at the lesser of 85% of the per-share market price at the date of grant or exercise, subject to an annual limitation of common stock valued at $25,000. In April 2005, the terms of the Purchase Plan were amended to allow the employees to purchase shares at 90% of the per-share market price at the date of exercise, maintaining the annual common stock value limitation of $25,000. As of December 31, 2005, the Purchase Plan qualifies as a non-compensatory plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and, accordingly, no compensation expense is recognized under the plan.

The Purchase Plan covers a total of 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. During 2005 and 2004, 100,330 shares totaling $3.0 million and 93,480 shares totaling $1.9 million, respectively, were sold to employees under the Purchase Plan.

Warrants - During 2001, in conjunction with an exclusive ten-year agreement with 99 Ranch Market, the Company issued 600,000 warrants to certain senior executives of 99 Ranch Market to purchase common stock of the Company at a price of $13.34 per share (see Note 21). These warrants vest over six years. At December 31, 2005, warrants to purchase a total of 240,000 shares remain outstanding.

20.EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its employees. The Company’s contributions to the plan are determined annually by the Board of Directors in accordance with plan requirements. For tax purposes, eligible participants may contribute up to a maximum of 15% of their compensation, not to exceed the dollar limit imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. For the plan years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company contributed $1.9 million, $1.5 million, and $1.2 million, respectively.

During 2002, the Company adopted a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). The SERP is a defined benefit plan pursuant to which the Company will pay supplemental pension benefits to certain executive officers designated by the Board of Directors upon retirement based upon the officers’ years of service and compensation. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, $1.7 million, $1.5 million, and $1.2 million, respectively, of benefits were accrued and expensed. The SERP is funded through life insurance contracts on the participating officers, though the plan does not require formal funding. At December 31, 2005, the life insurance contracts related to the SERP had an aggregate cash surrender value of $33.1 million. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the vested benefit obligation under the SERP was $1.5 million- and $1.0 million, respectively.

100

21.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND EARNINGS PER SHARE

Authorized Shares - On May 25, 2005, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 100,000,000 to 200,000,000. The additional authorized shares provide the Company greater flexibility for stock splits and stock dividends, issuances under employee benefit plans, financings, corporate mergers and acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes.

Stock Split - On May 18, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. Shareholders of record at the close of business on June 3, 2004 received one additional share of common stock for each share of common stock held by them on that date. The additional shares were distributed by the Company’s transfer agent on or about June 21, 2004. Prior to the stock split, the Company had 25,141,002 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

In-Store Banking Agreement - During 2001, in conjunction with its exclusive ten-year agreement with 99 Ranch Market to provide in-store banking services to targeted locations throughout California, the Company issued 600,000 warrants to senior executives of 99 Ranch Market to purchase common stock of the Company at a price of $13.34 per share. These warrants vest over six years and are intended to provide direct benefit to 99 Ranch Market executives that make a significant contribution to the success of the in-store banking operations. The estimated fair value of the warrants when issued was $2.7 million.

To further align the interests of both parties, senior executives of 99 Ranch Market have also made a significant investment in the Company, including the purchase of 800,000 newly issued shares of the Company’s common stock totaling $7.9 million. The shares were sold for cash at a price of $9.86 per share. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with this transaction. The shares were restricted and became available for sale commencing two years from the transaction date of August 30, 2001. Upon the two-year anniversary, 40% of the shares became available for sale. After each of the next three anniversaries, 20% of the total shares will become available for sale. All shares can be freely traded on the fifth year anniversary. The total estimated fair value of the purchased shares when issued was $6.9 million.

The excess of the combined fair values of the issued warrants and the purchased shares over the total consideration paid by the senior executives of 99 Ranch Market for the newly issued shares is accounted for as an intangible asset and is being amortized over the life of the agreement.

Stock Repurchase Program - Since 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $42.0 million of the Company’s common stock under six different Stock Repurchase Programs. The Company did not repurchase any shares during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.

Quarterly Dividends - The Company declared and paid cash dividends of $0.05 per share during each of the four quarters of 2005 and 2004, totaling $10.7 million and $10.1 million, respectively. On January 27, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share for the first quarter of 2006. The total dividend amounted to $2.8 million and was paid on or about February 22, 2006 to shareholders of record on February 8, 2006.

101

Earnings Per Share - The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is presented below:

	Net		Number		Per Share
	Income		of Shares		Amounts
	(In thousands, except per share data)
2005
Basic earnings per share	$	108,380		53,454	$	2.03
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		-		1,318
Restricted stock		-		146
Stock warrants		-		116
Diluted earnings per share	$	108,380		55,034	$	1.97
2004
Basic earnings per share	$	78,022		50,654	$	1.54
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		-		1,416
Restricted stock		-		82
Stock warrants		-		145
Diluted earnings per share	$	78,022		52,297	$	1.49
2003
Basic earnings per share	$	58,992		48,112	$	1.23
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		-		1,228
Restricted stock		-		38
Stock warrants		-		108
Diluted earnings per share	$	58,992		49,486	$	1.19

22.REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Risk-Based Capital - In September 2004, the Bank became a member bank of the Federal Reserve System and the FRB replaced the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) as the Bank’s primary federal regulator. The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain specific total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that notification which management believes have changed the category of the Bank.

102

 The actual and required capital amounts and ratios at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are presented as follows:

											To Be Well Capitalized
						For Capital Adequacy					Under Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Purposes					Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2005:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated Company	$	804,032		11.2	%	$	576,763		8.0	%		N/A		N/A
East West Bank	$	789,251		11.0	%	$	576,081		8.0	%	$	720,101		10.0	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated Company	$	649,739		9.0	%	$	288,382		4.0	%		N/A		N/A
East West Bank	$	634,958		8.8	%	$	288,040		4.0	%	$	432,060		6.0	%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Consolidated Company	$	649,739		8.1	%	$	319,156		4.0	%		N/A		N/A
East West Bank	$	634,958		8.0	%	$	319,505		4.0	%	$	399,382		5.0	%
As of December 31, 2004:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated Company	$	576,232		10.9	%	$	421,903		8.0	%		N/A		N/A
East West Bank	$	557,143		10.6	%	$	421,584		8.0	%	$	526,980		10.0	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated Company	$	518,405		9.8	%	$	210,951		4.0	%		N/A		N/A
East West Bank	$	498,396		9.5	%	$	210,792		4.0	%	$	316,188		6.0	%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Consolidated Company	$	518,405		9.1	%	$	228,334		4.0	%		N/A		N/A
East West Bank	$	498,396		8.7	%	$	228,362		4.0	%	$	285,452		5.0	%

On March 1, 2005, the FRB adopted a final rule that allows the continued inclusion of trust preferred securities in the Tier I capital of bank holding companies. However, under the final rule, after a five-year transition period, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other capital elements would be limited to 25 percent of Tier I capital elements, net of goodwill. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, trust preferred securities comprised 11.7% and 10.8%, respectively, of the Bank’s Tier I capital.

Reserve Requirement - The Bank is required to maintain a percentage of its deposits as reserves at the Federal Reserve Bank. The daily average reserve requirement was approximately $14.7 million and $7.9 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

103

23.FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company has determined the estimated fair values of financial instruments using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

	December 31,
	2005					2004
	Carrying					Carrying
	Notional or		Estimated			Notional or		Estimated
	Contract Amount		Fair Value			Contract Amount		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	151,192	$	151,192		$	93,075	$	93,075
Interest-bearing deposit in other banks		-		-			100		100
Securities purchased under resale agreement		50,000		49,670			-		-
Investment securities available-for-sale		869,837		869,837			534,452		534,452
Loans receivable, net		6,724,320		6,736,853			5,080,454		5,104,234
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock		45,707		45,707			47,482		47,482
Investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock		12,285		12,285			6,923		6,923
Accrued interest receivable		35,279		35,279			22,228		22,228
Equity swap agreements		24,551		3,539			24,596		(422	)
Financial Liabilities:
Customer deposit accounts:
Demand, savings and money market deposits		3,110,087		3,110,087			2,280,946		2,280,946
Time deposits		3,148,500		3,134,090			2,241,571		2,232,845
Federal funds purchased		91,500		91,500			-		-
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		617,682		613,394			860,803		858,183
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		325,000		319,120			-		-
Notes payable		8,833		8,833			11,018		11,018
Accrued interest payable		10,285		10,285			2,437		2,437
Long-term debt		153,095		163,365			57,476		65,403
Off-balance sheet financial instruments:
Commitments to extend credit		1,715,725		9,369			1,021,326		5,118
Standby letters of credit		364,722		3,417			315,623		3,583
Commercial letters of credit		40,430		(328	)		32,707		(123	)

The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value are explained below:

Cash and Cash Equivalents- The carrying amounts approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Interest-bearing Deposits in Other Banks- The carrying amounts approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

104

Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreement- For securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of 90 days or less, the carrying amounts approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. At December 31, 2005, the securities purchased under resale agreements are long-term in nature and the fair value is estimated by discounting the cash flows through maturity based on the current market rates at each reporting date.

Investment Securities Available-For-Sale-Fair values are based on quoted market prices from securities brokers, dealers in the respective instruments, or other third party data providers.

Loans Receivable, net - Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics, primarily fixed and adjustable rate interest terms. The fair values of fixed-rate mortgage loans are based upon discounted cash flows utilizing applicable risk-adjusted spreads relative to the current pricing for 15- and 30-year conventional loans as well as anticipated prepayment schedules. The fair values of adjustable-rate mortgage loans are based upon discounted cash flows utilizing discount rates that approximate the risk-adjusted pricing of available mortgage-backed securities having similar rates and repricing characteristics as well as anticipated prepayment schedules. No adjustments have been made for changes in credit within the loan portfolio. It is management’s opinion that the allowance for loan losses pertaining to performing and nonperforming loans results in a fair valuation of such loans.

Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock- The carrying amount approximates fair value, as the stock may be sold back to the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank at carrying value.

Accrued Interest Receivable - The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates fair value due to its short-term nature.

Equity Swap Agreements - The fair value of equity swap agreements and embedded equity call options are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on expectations of LIBOR rates and the change in value of the HSCEI based upon the life of the individual swap agreement.

Deposits-The fair values of deposits are estimated based upon the type of deposit products. Demand, savings and money market accounts are presumed to have equal book and fair values, since the interest rates paid on these accounts are based on prevailing market rates. The estimated fair values of time deposits are based upon the contractual discounted cash flows, which are estimated using current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining terms.

Federal Funds Purchased- The carrying amounts approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances- The fair value of FHLB advances is estimated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows, using rates currently offered by the FHLB of San Francisco for fixed-rate credit advances with similar remaining maturities at each reporting date.

Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements- For securities sold under repurchase agreements with original maturities of 90 days or less, the carrying amounts approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. At December 31, 2005, the securities sold under repurchase agreements are long-term in nature and the fair value is calculated by discounting future cash flows based on expected maturities or repricing dates, utilizing estimated market discount rates at each reporting date. The call features of these instruments are also considered in the determination of fair values.

Notes Payable- The carrying amount of notes payable approximates fair value as these notes are payable on demand.

105

 Accrued Interest Payable - The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates fair value due to its short-term nature.

 Long-Term Debt -The fair values of long-term debt are estimated by discounting the cash flows through maturity based on prevailing market rates at each reporting date.

 Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby and Commercial Letters ofCredit - The fair values of commitments are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparty’s credit standing.

The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of each reporting date. Although the Company is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date, and therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

24.SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company utilizes an internal reporting system to measure the performance of various operating segments within the Bank and the Company overall. The Company has identified four principal operating segments for purposes of management reporting: retail banking, commercial lending, treasury, and residential lending. Information related to the Company’s remaining centralized functions and eliminations of intersegment amounts have been aggregated and included in “Other.” Although all four operating segments offer financial products and services, they are managed separately based on each segment’s strategic focus. While the retail banking segment focuses primarily on retail operations through the Bank’s branch network, certain designated branches have responsibility for generating commercial deposits and loans. The commercial lending segment, which includes commercial real estate, primarily generates commercial loans and deposits through the efforts of commercial lending officers located in the Bank’s northern and southern California production offices. The treasury department’s primary focus is managing the Bank’s investments, liquidity, and interest rate risk; the residential lending segment is mainly responsible for the Bank’s portfolio of single family and multifamily residential loans.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Operating segment results are based on the Company’s internal management reporting process, which reflects assignments and allocations of capital, certain operating and administrative costs and the provision for loan losses. Net interest income is based on the Company’s internal funds transfer pricing system which assigns a cost of funds or a credit for funds to assets or liabilities based on their type, maturity or repricing characteristics. Noninterest income and noninterest expense, including depreciation and amortization, directly attributable to a segment are assigned to that business. Indirect costs, including overhead expense, are allocated to the segments based on several factors, including, but not limited to, full-time equivalent employees, loan volume and deposit volume. The provision for credit losses is allocated based on actual losses incurred and an allocation of the remaining provision based on new loan originations for the period. The Company evaluates overall performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes not including nonrecurring gains and losses.

Future changes in the Company’s management structure or reporting methodologies may result in changes in the measurement of operating segment results.  Results for prior periods have been restated for comparability for changes in management structure or reporting methodologies.

106

The following tables present the operating results and other key financial measures for the individual operating segments for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

	Year Ended December 31, 2005
	Retail			Commercial						Residential
	Banking			Lending			Treasury			Lending			Other			Total
	(In thousands)
Interest income	$	138,988		$	183,372		$	30,017		$	54,534		$	4,488		$	411,399
Charge for funds used		(81,714	)		(104,539	)		(25,268	)		(34,658	)		--			(246,179	)
Interest spread on funds used		57,274			78,833			4,749			19,876			4,488			165,220
Interest expense		(62,441	)		(8,213	)		(60,630	)		--			--			(131,284	)
Credit on funds provided		143,327			19,398			83,454			--			--			246,179
Interest spread on funds provided		80,886			11,185			22,824			--			--			114,895
Net interest income	$	138,160		$	90,018		$	27,573		$	19,876		$	4,488		$	280,115
Depreciation and amortization	$	6,573		$	516		$	(1,450	)	$	1,029		$	3,660		$	10,328
Goodwill		106,722			7,115			--			28,459			958			143,254
Segment pretax profit		65,411			74,764			29,954			14,448			(14,216	)		170,361
Segment assets		2,373,194			2,583,452			984,650			2,041,132			295,828			8,278,256
		Year Ended December 31, 2004
		Retail			Commercial						Residential
		Banking			Lending			Treasury			Lending			Other			Total
		(In thousands)
Interest income	$	79,491		$	116,115		$	16,447		$	36,945		$	3,072		$	252,070
Charge for funds used		(34,447	)		(49,205	)		(1,097	)		(19,292	)		--			(104,041	)
Interest spread on funds used		45,044			66,910			15,350			17,653			3,072			148,029
Interest expense		(29,097	)		(3,397	)		(20,403	)		--			--			(52,897	)
Credit on funds provided		62,232			6,889			34,920			--			--			104,041
Interest spread on funds provided		33,135			3,492			14,517			--			--			51,144
Net interest income	$	78,179		$	70,402		$	29,867		$	17,653		$	3,072		$	199,173
Depreciation and amortization	$	4,298		$	390		$	213		$	1,244		$	5,312		$	11,457
Goodwill		32,058			2,137			--			8,549			958			43,702
Segment pretax profit		30,379			67,374			30,672			16,479			(23,571	)		121,333
Segment assets		1,693,638			2,420,489			614,709			1,104,954			195,090			6,028,880
		Year Ended December 31, 2003
		Retail			Commercial						Residential
		Banking			Lending			Treasury			Lending			Other			Total
		(In thousands)
Interest income	$	48,210		$	80,260		$	18,467		$	30,265		$	1,341		$	178,543
Charge for funds used		(17,052	)		(28,402	)		(10,360	)		(14,242	)		--			(70,056	)
Interest spread on funds used		31,158			51,858			8,107			16,023			1,341			108,487
Interest expense		(25,707	)		(1,078	)		(8,447	)		--			--			(35,232	)
Credit on funds provided		49,271			2,537			18,248			--			--			70,056
Interest spread on funds provided		23,564			1,459			9,801			--			--			34,824
Net interest income	$	54,722		$	53,317		$	17,908		$	16,023		$	1,341		$	143,311
Depreciation and amortization	$	3,776		$	154		$	314		$	1,680		$	6,215		$	12,139
Goodwill		20,814			1,388			--			5,550			958			28,710
Segment pretax profit		6,413			49,150			18,344			23,997			(8,244	)		89,660
Segment assets		1,094,071			1,702,460			523,089			552,993			182,820			4,055,433

107

25.PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The financial information of East West Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:

BALANCE SHEETS
	December 31,
	2005			2004
	(In thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,633		$	17,732
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value		-			920
Loans receivable		-			450
Investments in affordable housing partnerships		208			520
Investment in subsidiaries		797,042			551,493
Investment in nonbank entity		250			250
Goodwill		958			958
Other assets		5,484			875
TOTAL	$	813,575		$	573,198
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Long-term debt	$	78,095		$	57,476
Other liabilities		1,342			1,413
Total liabilities		79,437			58,889
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock (par value $0.001 per share)
Authorized -- 200,000,000 shares
Issued -- 61,419,622 shares in 2005 and 57,361,807 shares in 2004
Outstanding -- 56,519,438 shares in 2005 and 52,500,766 shares in 2004		61			57
Additional paid in capital		389,004			260,152
Retained earnings		393,846			296,175
Deferred compensation		(8,242	)		(5,422	)
Treasury stock, at cost: 4,900,184 shares in 2005 and 4,861,041 shares in 2004		(37,905	)		(36,649	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(2,626	)		(4	)
Total stockholders' equity		734,138			514,309
TOTAL	$	813,575		$	573,198

STATEMENTS OF INCOME
	Year Ended December 31,
	2005		2004		2003
	(In thousands)
Dividends from subsidiaries	$	10,850	$	10,184	$	10,645
Interest income		168		338		250
Other income		95		21		31
Total income		11,113		10,543		10,926
Interest expense		4,764		3,139		2,280
Compensation and net occupancy reimbursement to subsidiary		3,098		2,290		1,990
Other expense		1,013		1,255		1,090
Total expense		8,875		6,684		5,360
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed income
of subsidiaries		2,238		3,859		5,566
Income tax benefit		2,260		1,658		1,299
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		103,882		72,505		52,127
Net income	$	108,380	$	78,022	$	58,992

108

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	108,380		$	78,022		$	58,992
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		(103,882	)		(72,505	)		(52,127	)
Depreciation and amortization		350			355			360
Stock compensation costs		3,074			1,460			442
Loss on investment securities available-for-sale		99			-			-
Net change in other assets		1,757			12,115			(217	)
Net change in other liabilities		(72	)		214			(249	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		9,706			19,661			7,201
Cash flows from investing activities:
Repayment of loans receivable		450			-			-
Purchase of investment securities		-			-			(1,000	)
Proceeds from sale of investment securities		895			-			-
Capital contributions to subsidiaries, net		(37,000	)		(73,810	)		(10,288	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(35,655	)		(73,810	)		(11,288	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock pursuant to private placement		-			38,489			-
Proceeds from issuance of common pursuant to various stock
plans and agreements		8,559			7,339			7,827
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		20,000			25,000			10,000
Dividends paid on common stock		(10,709	)		(10,089	)		(9,623	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		17,850			60,739			8,204
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(8,099	)		6,590			4,117
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		17,732			11,142			7,025
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	9,633		$	17,732		$	11,142
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures
Interest paid	$	4,631		$	2,955		$	2,234
Income tax payments, net of refunds		64,774			52,670			34,247
Noncash financing activities:
Issuance of common stock pursuant to acquisitions		106,716			32,888			-
Issuance of common stock in lieu of Board of Director retainer fees		112			100			82
Issuance of common stock to employees		618			-			-

109

26.QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

Reclassifications have been made to the 2004 quarterly financial statements to conform to the current presentation.

	Quarters Ended
	December 31,		September 30,		June 30,		March 31,
	(In thousands, except per share data)
2005
Interest and dividend income	$	126,587	$	106,287	$	93,769	$	84,756
Interest expense		45,236		34,705		28,809		22,534
Net interest income		81,351		71,582		64,960		62,222
Provision for loan losses		2,500		4,500		4,500		4,370
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		78,851		67,082		60,460		57,852
Noninterest income		7,358		7,827		7,964		6,500
Noninterest expense		37,108		30,306		28,401		27,718
Income before provision for income taxes		49,101		44,603		40,023		36,634
Provision for income taxes		18,286		16,020		14,560		13,115
Net income	$	30,815	$	28,583	$	25,463	$	23,519
Basic earnings per share	$	0.55	$	0.54	$	0.49	$	0.45
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.54	$	0.52	$	0.47	$	0.44
2004
Interest and dividend income	$	76,763	$	66,815	$	56,347	$	52,145
Interest expense		17,512		13,980		11,343		10,062
Net interest income		59,251		52,835		45,004		42,083
Provision for loan losses		5,000		5,000		3,000		3,750
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		54,251		47,835		42,004		38,333
Noninterest income		8,872		7,208		6,254		8,037
Noninterest expense		27,351		23,242		20,532		20,336
Income before provision for income taxes		35,772		31,801		27,726		26,034
Provision for income taxes		13,123		11,402		9,697		9,089
Net income	$	22,649	$	20,399	$	18,029	$	16,945
Basic earnings per share	$	0.43	$	0.40	$	0.36	$	0.35
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.42	$	0.39	$	0.35	$	0.33

110

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: March 10, 2006

EAST WEST BANCORP INC.

(Registrant)

By/s/ DOMINIC NG

Dominic Ng

Chairman of the Board, President

and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ DOMINIC NG Dominic Ng	Chairman of the Board, President, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)	March 10, 2006
/s/ JULIA S. GOUW Julia S. Gouw	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Director (principal financial and accounting officer)	March 10, 2006
/s/ PEGGY T. CHERNG Peggy T. Cherng	Director	March 10, 2006
/s/ RUDOLPH I. ESTRADA Rudolph I. Estrada	Director	March 10, 2006
/s/ JOHN KOOKEN John Kooken	Director	March 10, 2006
/s/ HERMAN Y. LI Herman Y. Li	Director	March 10, 2006
/s/ JACK C. LIU Jack C. Liu	Director	March 10, 2006
/s/ KEITH W. RENKEN Keith W. Renken	Director	March 10, 2006

111

Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description
2	Plan of Reorganization and Merger Agreement between East West Bancorp, Inc., East West Bank and East West Merger Co., Inc.*
3(i)	Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant*
3(i).1	Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant&
3(ii)	Bylaws of the Registrant*
4.1	Specimen Certificate of Registrant*
4.2	Registration Rights Agreement*
4.3	Warrant Agreement with Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc.*
4.4	Registration Rights Agreement with Ho Yuan Chen and Chang-Hua Kang Chen@
4.5	Warrant Agreement with Ho Yuan Chen and Chang-Hua Kang Chen@
10.1	Employment Agreement with Dominic Ng*+
10.2	Employment Agreement with Julia Gouw*+
10.5	Employment Agreement with Douglas P. Krause!+
10.6	East West Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan and Forms of Agreements*+
10.6.1	Amended East West Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan^+
10.6.2	1998 Non-Qualified Stock Option Program for Employees and Independent Contractors^+
10.6.3	Performance-Based Bonus Plan^+
10.6.4	1999 Spirit of Ownership Restricted Stock Program^+
10.6.5	2003 Directors’ Restricted Stock Program^+
10.7	East West Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan*+
10.8	Employment Agreement with William J. Lewis!+
10.10	Employment Agreement with Donald Sang Chow#+
10.10.1	Amendment to Employment Agreement with Donald Sang Chow#+
10.10.2	Amendment to Employment Agreement with Donald Sang Chow!+
10.11	Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans%+
10.12	Director Compensation%+
10.13	Named Executive Officer Compensation%+
10.14	Employment Agreement with Wellington Chen!+
10.15	Agreement and Plan of Merger By and Among East West Bancorp, Inc., East West Bank and Standard Bank%
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant%
23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm%
31.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002%
31.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002%
32.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002%
32.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002%

__________________________

*	Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the Commission on November 13, 1998 (File No. 333-63605).
#	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 filed with the Commission on March 30, 2000 (File No. 000-24939).
@	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002 (File No. 000-24939).
&	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Commission on March 28, 2003 (File No. 000-24939).
!	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Commission on March 11, 2005 (File No. 000-24939).
^	Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 9, 2005 (File No. 000-24939).
+	Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
%	A copy of this exhibit is being filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

EX-10.12

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following compensation arrangements have been established for the Board of Directors of the Company: All outside directors will receive an annual retainer of $20,000. The chairpersons of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Credit / Finance Committee, and the Nominating / Governance Committee will for this service receive retainers of $10,000, of $7,000, of $5,000, and of $5,000 respectively. Outside directors also receive a meeting fee of $1,000 for each Board and Committee meeting attended. Outside directors also receive an annual grant of $20,000 of restricted stock, which stock has 3-year cliff vesting. Directors have the option to receive their $20,000 annual retainer in the form of stock at a 25% premium (i.e., $25,000 of stock) if they agree to hold the stock for at least one year. No separate compensation is paid to directors who are also employees of the Company.

EX-10.13

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

 On March 9, 2006 the following adjustments to base salary, cash bonus payments for 2005 work, and grants of incentive stock were approved for the Company's CEO and the persons expected to be named executive officers in the its Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Adjustments to salary are effective as of March 1, 2006. Cash bonuses are paid on or about March 15, 2006.

Executive Officer	Title	2006 Salary	2005 Cash Bonus	Shares of Non-qualified Stock Options	Restricted Stock Award
Dominic Ng	Chairman, President and CEO	$750,000	$1,500,000	45,000	41,000 (1)
Julia S. Gouw	Executive Vice President and CFO	$273,000	$200,000	16,273	4,068
Douglas Krause	Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary	$210,000	$150,000	13,561	3,390
Wellington Chen	Executive Vice President and Director of Corporate Banking	$225,000	$120,000	8,679	2,170
William J. Lewis	Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer	$206,000	$150,000	4,340	0

_____

(1) Performance restricted stock vesting in 2 years. Number of shares that will vest depends on meeting performance criteria. 41,000 shares is for the performance maximum if pre-established earnings per share performance goals are met.

 Stock options are all non-qualified options issued under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan of the Company; the restricted stock is also issued under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan of the Company. Options vest over 4 years as follows: 1/3 after 2 years, 1/3 after 3 years, and 1/3 after 4 years. The restricted stock granted to the CEO vests 20% per year for 5 years. The restricted stock of the other named officers vests 50% after 4 years and 50% after 5 years.

 The Company also approved company performance goals and individual performance goals for the CEO and the other named executive officers. The CEO's goals are set under the Performance-Based Bonus Plan approved by shareholders in 2002 and are based on earnings per share, return on equity, and return on assets; the bonus award will range from 0% to 250% of base salary. The goals of the other named executives are based 60% on overall corporate goals and 40% on individual department performance goals. The corporate goals are earnings per share, growth in demand deposits, return on equity, return on assets, growth in non-interest income, holding down of expenses, growth in trade finance loans, growth in commercial business loans, and strategic/operational goals.

 The Company will provide additional information regarding the compensation paid to the named executive officers for the 2005 fiscal year in its Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

EX-10.15

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

BY AND AMONG

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.,

EAST WEST BANK

AND

STANDARD BANK

Effective as of December 23, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER1

ARTICLE ICERTAIN DEFINITIONS2

SECTION 1.01 Certain Definitions2

ARTICLE IITHE MERGER7

SECTION 2.01 The Merger7

SECTION 2.02 Effective Date and Effective Time8

ARTICLE IIICONSIDERATION; EXCHANGE PROCEDURES8

SECTION 3.01 Effect on Capital Stock8

SECTION 3.02 Conversion of SB Common Stock9

SECTION 3.03 No Fractional Shares12

SECTION 3.04 Exchange Procedures12

SECTION 3.05 Anti-Dilution Provisions13

SECTION 3.06 Dissenters’ Rights14

ARTICLE IVACTIONS PENDING ACQUISITION14

SECTION 4.01 Forbearances of SB14

SECTION 4.02 Forbearances of EWBC17

ARTICLE VREPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES18

SECTION 5.01 Disclosure Schedules18

SECTION 5.02 Standard18

SECTION 5.03 Representations and Warranties of SB18

SECTION 5.04 Representations and Warranties of EWBC and EWB29

ARTICLE VICOVENANTS33

SECTION 6.01 Reasonable Best Efforts33

SECTION 6.02 Shareholders’ Approval33

SECTION 6.03 Registration of Securities34

SECTION 6.04 Press Releases35

SECTION 6.05 Access; Information35

SECTION 6.07 Acquisition Proposals36

SECTION 6.08 Certain Policies36

SECTION 6.09 Regulatory Applications37

SECTION 6.10 Indemnification by EWBC37

SECTION 6.11 Benefit Plans39

SECTION 6.12 Future Employment39

SECTION 6.13 Notification of Certain Matters40

SECTION 6.14 Human Resources Issues40

SECTION 6.15 Assistance with Third-Party Agreements40

SECTION 6.16 Additional Agreements41

SECTION 6.17 Tax Treatment of the Merger41

SECTION 6.18 Non-Solicitation & Confidentiality Agreements41

SECTION 6.19 Other Shareholder Agreements41

SECTION 6.20 Minimum ALL41

SECTION 6.21 Pre-Closing Adjustments and Minimum Closing Shareholders’ Equity41

SECTION 6.22 FIRPTA Certificate42

ARTICLE VIICONDITIONS TO CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER42

SECTION 7.01 Conditions to the Parties’ Obligations to Effect the Merger42

SECTION 7.02 Conditions to Obligation of SB to Effect the Merger43

SECTION 7.03 Conditions to Obligation of EWBC43

ARTICLE VIII TERMINATION44

SECTION 8.01 Termination by Mutual Consent44

SECTION 8.02 Termination by Either EWBC, EWB or SB44

SECTION 8.03 Effect of Termination and Abandonment45

ARTICLE IXMISCELLANEOUS46

SECTION 9.01 Survival46

SECTION 9.02 Waiver; Amendment46

SECTION 9.03 Counterparts46

SECTION 9.04 Governing Law, Jurisdiction and Venue46

SECTION 9.05 Expenses47

SECTION 9.06 Notices47

SECTION 9.07 Entire Understanding; No Third Party Beneficiaries48

SECTION 9.08 Effect48

SECTION 9.09 Severability48

SECTION 9.10 Enforcement of the Agreement48

SECTION 9.11 Interpretation49

[

EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT ASHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT A-1PERSONS EXECUTING SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT BNON-SOLICITATION & CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT B-1PERSONS EXECUTING NON-SOLICITATION & CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT CAGREEMENT OF MERGER

EXHIBIT DAFFILIATE AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER effective as of December 23, 2005, and as amended (“Agreement”), by and among East West Bancorp, Inc. (“EWBC”), East West Bank (“EWB”) and Standard Bank (“SB”).

RECITALS:

A.EWBC. EWBC is a duly organized and existing corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware and registered as a bank holding company pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, having its principal place of business in San Marino, California.

B.EWB. EWB is a duly organized and existing California state-chartered commercial bank and a member bank of the Federal Reserve System, having its principal place of business in San Marino, California, and all of the outstanding capital stock of which is owned by EWBC.

C.SB. SB is a duly organized and existing federal savings association chartered by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), whose deposit accounts are insured to the extent allowed by law by the Savings Association Insurance Fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

D.BOARD DETERMINATIONS AND ACTIONS.   The respective boards of EWBC, EWB and SB have determined that it is in the best interests of their respective companies and shareholders to consummate a strategic business combination of EWB and SB on the terms and subject to the conditions provided for in this Agreement based their compatible business plans, the potential synergies of their business operations, the continuity of employee, customer and shareholder bases and the prospects for continued ownership in the combined enterprise.

E.CONTINUITY OF OWNERSHIP IN COMBINED ENTERPRISE. .   The respective boards of EWBC, EWB and SB have determined that it is in the best interests of their respective companies and shareholders to realize the long term benefits of the combined business enterprise contemplated by this Agreement and not to seek or accept any proposals contemplating a transaction that would discontinue ownership by a majority of the shareholders of any party to this Agreement in their respective businesses or in the business of the combined enterprise contemplated herein.

F.SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT. As condition to, and simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the beneficial owners of SB Common Stock listed in Exhibit A-1 hereto, have executed and delivered to EWBC a Shareholder Agreement pursuant to which such holders will have agreed, among other actions, to vote their shares of SB Common Stock in favor of the strategic business combination contemplated by Agreement and the Merger, to vote against any other transaction, and to take all actions to cause the completion of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, in the form of Exhibit A hereto (“Shareholder Agreement”).

G.INTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES. It is the intention of the parties to this Agreement that the business combination contemplated hereby be accounted for under the purchase accounting method and be treated as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

H.NON-SOLICITATION & CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT. A non-solicitation and confidentiality agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B (the “Non-Solicitation & Confidentiality Agreement”), shall be executed by the Persons listed on Exhibit B-1 hereto.

I.REQUIRED APPROVALS. The Merger requires certain shareholder and regulatory approvals and may be effected only after the necessary approvals have been obtained.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants, representations, warranties and agreements contained herein the parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

SECTION 1.01 Certain Definitions. The following terms are used in this Agreement with the meanings set forth below:

“Acquisition Proposal” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.07.

“Agreement” means this Agreement, as amended or modified from time to time in accordance with Section 9.02.

“Agreement of Merger” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.01(b).

“ALL” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(u).

“Average Share Price” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.02(a).

“Bank Insurance Fund” means the Bank Insurance Fund maintained by the FDIC.

“Bank Secrecy Act” means the Currency and Foreign Transaction Reporting Act (31 U.S.C. Section 5311 et seq.) as amended.

“Benefit Plans” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(n).

“Business Combination” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.05.

“Business Day” means Monday through Friday of each week, except a legal holiday recognized as such by the U.S. Government or any day on which banking institutions in the State of California are authorized or obligated to close.

“California Secretary” means the California Secretary of State.

“Cash Portion” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.02(a).

“CFC” means the California Financial Code.

“CGCL” means the California General Corporation Law.

“Code” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.

“Commissioner” means the California Commissioner of Financial Institutions.

“Community Reinvestment Act” means the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended.

“Competing Proposal” is defined in Recital F.

“Costs” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.10.

“Derivatives Contract” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(r).

“Disclosure Schedule” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.01.

“Dissenters Set Aside” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.02(a).

“Dissenters’ Shares” means shares of SB Common Stock held by a SB shareholder with respect to which such shareholder, in accordance with the HOLA and 12 C.F.R. Section 552.14, perfects such shareholder’s right to dissent to the Merger.

“Dissenting Shareholder” means any holder of Dissenters’ Shares.

“Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.02.

“Effective Time” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.02.

“Environmental Laws” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(p).

“Equal Credit Opportunity Act” means the Equal Credit Act (15 U.S.C. Section 1691 et seq.) as amended.

“ERISA” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

“ERISA Affiliate” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(n).

“EWB” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.

“EWB Articles” means the Articles of Incorporation of EWB, as amended.

“EWB By-Laws” means the by-laws of EWB, as amended.

“EWB Common Stock” means the common stock of EWB, 100% of which is owned by EWBC.

“EWB Plan” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.11(c).

“EWBC” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.

“EWBC By-Laws” means the by-laws of EWBC, as amended.

“EWBC Certificate” means the Certificate of Incorporation of EWBC, as amended.

“EWBC Common Stock” means the common stock, par value $.001 per share, of EWBC.

“EWBC Disclosure Schedule” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.01.

“EWBC Loan Property” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.04(k).

“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.

“Exchange Agent” means U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, as provided in Section 3.02(a).

“Exchange Fund” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.04(a).

“Fair Housing Act” means the Fair Housing Act (420 U.S.C. Section 3601, et seq.), as amended.

“Fairness Review” is defined in Section 6.03.

“FDIC” means the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

“Federal Reserve Board” means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco acting under delegated authority.

“Former SB Employees” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.11.

“GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles.

“Governmental Authority” means any court, administrative agency or commission or other federal, state or local governmental authority or instrumentality.

“Hazardous Substance” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(p).

“Home Mortgage Disclosure Act” means the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (12 U.S.C. Section 2801 et seq.), as amended.

“HOLA” means the Home Owners’ Loan Act, as amended.”

“Indemnified Party” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.10(a).

“Insurance Policies” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(t).

“Lien” means any charge, mortgage, pledge, security interest, restriction, claim, lien or encumbrance.

"Liquidated Damages Amount" means 1% of Shareholders' Equity multiplied by two (2)

“Material Adverse Effect” means, with respect to EWBC, EWB or SB, any effect that (i) is material and adverse to the financial position, results of operations or business of EWBC and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole or SB, as the case may be, or (ii) would materially impair the ability of any of EWBC, EWB or SB to perform its obligations under this Agreement or otherwise materially threaten or materially impede the consummation of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement; provided, however, that a Material Adverse Effect shall not be deemed to include the impact of (a) changes in banking and similar laws of general applicability or interpretations thereof by Governmental Authorities, (b) changes in GAAP or regulatory accounting requirements applicable to banks and their holding companies generally, (c) changes in general economic conditions affecting banks and their holding companies generally, except to the extent such changes disproportionately affect SB (d) any modifications or changes to valuation policies and practices in connection with the Merger or restructuring charges taken in connection with the Merger, in each case in accordance with GAAP and (e) with respect to SB, the effects of any action or omission taken with the prior consent of EWBC or EWB.

“Merger” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.

“Merger Consideration” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.02(a).

“Minimum Closing Shareholders’ Equity is defined in Section 6.21.

“Nasdaq” means The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.’s National Market System.

“National Labor Relations Act” means the National Labor Relations Act, as amended.

“New Plan” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.12(b).

“Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreements” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.

“Options” means options to purchase SB Common Stock outstanding as of September 30, 2005 issued pursuant to the Standard Savings Bank, FSB Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

“OTS” means the Office of Thrift Supervision.

“Pension Plan” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(n).

“Permit” is defined in Section 6.03.

“Per Share Cash Consideration” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.02(a).

“Per Share Stock Consideration” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.02(a).

“Person” means any individual, bank, corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company, business trust, limited liability company or unincorporated organization.

“Pre-Closing Adjustments” is defined in Section 6.21.

“Registration Statement” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.03.

“Regulatory Authorities” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(j).

“Regulatory Filings” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(h).

“Rights” means, with respect to any Person, securities or obligations convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for, or giving any Person any right to subscribe for or acquire, or any options, calls or commitments relating to, or any stock appreciation right or other instrument the value of which is determined in whole or in part by reference to the market price or value of, shares of capital stock of such Person.

“Savings Association Insurance Fund” means the Savings Association Insurance Fund maintained by the FDIC.

“SB” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.

“SB Charter” means the Charter of SB, as amended.

“SB By-Laws” means the By-Laws of SB, as amended.

“SB Common Stock” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.02(a)

“SB Disclosure Schedule” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.01.

“SB Loan Property” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.03(p).

“SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

“SEC Documents” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.04(h).

“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.

“Shareholders' Equity” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.02(a).

“Stock Portion” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.02(a).

“Subsidiary” has the meaning ascribed to those terms in Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X of the SEC.

“Surviving Bank” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.01(a).

“Tax” and “Taxes” mean all federal, state, local or foreign taxes, charges, fees, levies or other assessments, however denominated, including, without limitation, all net income, gross income, gains, gross receipts, sales, use, ad valorem, goods and services, capital, production, transfer, franchise, windfall profits, license, withholding, payroll, employment, disability, employer health, excise, estimated, severance, stamp, occupation, property, environmental, unemployment or other taxes, custom duties, fees, assessments or charges of any kind whatsoever, imposed on the income, properties or operations of SB or its Subsidiaries by any taxing authority whether arising before, on or after the Effective Date, together with any interest, additions or penalties thereto and any interest in respect of such interest and penalties.

“Tax Returns” means any return, amended return or other report (including elections, declarations, disclosures, schedules, estimates and information returns) required to be filed on or before the Effective Date with respect to any Taxes of SB.

“Transaction Expenses” means all insurance premiums contemplated by the provisions of Section 6.10(a) and accrued or paid by SB prior to the Effective Time and all fees and expenses of all attorneys, accountants, investment bankers and other advisors and agents for SB for services rendered solely in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement accrued or paid by SB prior to the Effective Time.

“Treasury Shares” shall mean any shares of SB Common Stock held by SB or by EWBC or any of their respective Subsidiaries, in each case other than in a fiduciary (including custodial or agency) capacity or as a result of debts previously contracted in good faith.

“USA Patriot Act” means the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-56).

“Shareholder Agreement” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.

ARTICLE II

THE MERGER

SECTION 2.01 The Merger.

(a)The Combination. At the Effective Time, SB shall merge with and into EWB, pursuant to CFC Section 4881, the separate existence of SB as a federal savings association shall cease, and EWB shall survive and continue to exist as a California state-chartered bank (EWB, as the surviving bank in the Merger, sometimes being referred to herein as the “Surviving Bank”). EWBC may, at any time prior to the Effective Time (including, to the extent permitted by applicable law, after SB’s shareholders have approved this Agreement), change the method of effecting the combination of EWB with SB (including, without limitation, the provisions of this Article II) if and to the extent it deems such change to be necessary, appropriate or desirable; provided, however, that no such change shall (i) alter or change the amount or kind of consideration to be issued to the holders of SB Common Stock as provided for in this Agreement (the “Merger Consideration”), (ii) adversely affect the tax treatment of SB’s shareholders as a result of receiving the Merger Consideration, (iii) impede or unreasonably delay consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or (iv) otherwise be materially prejudicial to the interests of the shareholders of SB.

(b)Filings. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in Article VII, the Merger shall become effective upon the Effective Time on the Effective Date, in accordance with CFC Section 4885 upon the filing of an Agreement of Merger between SB and EWB as the Surviving Bank, in the form of Exhibit C hereto (“Agreement of Merger”), with the Commissioner, after certification by the California Secretary.

(c)Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws. The articles of incorporation and by-laws of the Surviving Bank immediately after the Merger shall be those of EWB as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time.

(d)Directors and Officers of the Surviving Bank. The directors and officers of EWB immediately after the Merger shall be the directors and officers of EWB immediately prior to the Effective Time, until such time as their successors shall be duly elected and qualified.

(e)Effect of the Merger. At the Effective Time, the effect of the Merger shall be as provided in CGCL Section 1107, CFC Sections 4888 and 4889, 12 U.S.C. Section 1464(d)(3) and 12 C.F.R. Section 552.13, including any regulations or rules promulgated thereunder. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, and subject thereto, at the Effective Time, all the property, rights, privileges, powers and franchises of SB shall vest in the Surviving Bank, all debts, liabilities, obligations, restrictions, disabilities and duties of SB shall become the debts, liabilities, obligations, restrictions, disabilities and duties of the Surviving Bank and the charter of SB as a federal savings association shall automatically terminate.

SECTION 2.02 Effective Date and Effective Time. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in Article VII (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the consummation of the Merger, but subject to the fulfillment or waiver of those conditions), the parties shall cause the filings contemplated by Section 2.01 to be made (i) no later than the third Business Day after such satisfaction or waiver or (ii) such other date to which the parties may agree in writing. The Merger provided for herein shall become effective upon such filing or filings and on such date as may be specified therein and in accordance CFC Section 4887. The date of such effectiveness is herein called the “Effective Date”. The “Effective Time” of the Merger shall be the time as set forth in such filing.

ARTICLE III

CONSIDERATION; EXCHANGE PROCEDURES

SECTION 3.01 Effect on Capital Stock. Subject to the other provisions of this Article III, at the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any additional action on the part of the holders of shares of EWBC Common Stock and EWB Common Stock:

(a)EWBC Common Stock. Each share of EWBC Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall remain an issued and outstanding share of common stock of EWBC, and shall not be affected by the Merger;

(b)EWB Common Stock. Each share of EWB Common Stock, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall remain an issued and outstanding share of common stock of the Surviving Bank, and shall not be affected by the Merger;

(c)SB Common Stock. Each share of SB Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than any Dissenters’ Shares and Treasury Shares, as defined below) shall be converted into the right to receive the Per Share Stock Consideration or the Per Share Cash Consideration, as provided in Section 3.02;

(d)Dissenters’ Shares. Any shares of SB Common Stock that are shares subject to appraisal rights within the meaning of 12 C.F.R. Section 552.14 (“Dissenters’ Shares”) shall not be converted into or represent a right to receive EWBC Common Stock or cash hereunder unless and until such shares have lost their status as dissenting shares under 12 C.F.R. Section 552.14, at which time such shares shall be converted into cash or EWBC Common Stock pursuant to Section 3.02; and

(e)Cancellation of Certain Shares. Any shares of SB Common Stock held by EWBC (or any of its Subsidiaries) or by SB, other than those held in a fiduciary capacity or as a result of debts previously contracted (“Treasury Shares”), shall be cancelled and retired at the Effective Time and no Per Share Cash Consideration or Per Share Stock Consideration shall be paid or issued in exchange therefore.

SECTION 3.02 Conversion of SB Common Stock.

(a)The Process. At the Effective Time, the conversion of each outstanding share of SB Common Stock shall proceed as follows:

(i)The terms used herein shall have the following meanings:

“Shareholders’ Equity” means the shareholders’ equity of SB as set forth in its September 30, 2005 financial statements.

“Average Share Price” shall mean the volume weighted average of the closing price of EWBC Common Stock as reported in The Wall Street Journal (Western Edition) for the 60 trading days of the Nasdaq (“NASDAQ”) ending with the fifth trading day prior to the Effective Date.

“Cash Portion” shall mean the dollar amount derived by multiplying the Merger Consideration by the percentage, expressed to four decimal points and up to a maximum of 35%, of the SB Common Stock outstanding at the Effective Time for which holders have elected to receive the Per Share Cash Consideration.

“Dissenters Set Aside” shall mean the combination of the Per Share Cash Consideration and the Per Share Stock Consideration multiplied by the number of Dissenting Shares.

“Merger Consideration” shall be an amount equal to the sum of two times Shareholders' Equity plus the amount of the increase in SB’s shareholders’ equity as a result of the exercise of Options to purchase SB Common Stock exercised after the effective date of this Agreement and prior to the Effective Time; less: (a) payments made or accrued by SB prior to the Effective Time under the New Plan as provided in Section 6.12(b); (b) dividends not accrued by SB as of September 15, 2005 and paid by SB after September 30, 2005 and prior to the Effective Time; (c) payments made by SB after September 30, 2005 under its profit sharing plan to the extent such payments were not accrued by SB on its September 30, 2005 financial statements; and (d) the amount by which the Minimum Closing Shareholders’ Equity is less than Shareholders’ Equity as of the Effective Time.

“Per Share Cash Consideration” shall mean the amount derived by dividing the Cash Portion by the total number of shares of SB Common Stock for which holders have elected to receive cash.

“Per Share Stock Consideration” shall mean the number of shares of EWBC Common Stock derived by dividing the Stock Portion, rounded to the nearest whole share, by the sum of the total number of shares of SB Common Stock for which holders have either (i) elected to receive EWBC Common Stock or (ii) have failed to make any election.

“Stock Portion” shall mean the product of (a) the Merger Consideration times (b) the percentage, expressed to four decimal points, of the SB Common Stock for which holders have elected to receive the Per Share Stock Consideration or have failed to make an election to receive either the Per Share Stock Consideration or the Per Share Cash Consideration, but in no event less than 65%, denominated in a number of shares of EWBC Common Stock issuable in the Merger derived as follows:

·   If the Average Share Price is less than $36.00, then the number of shares of EWBC Common Stock shall be derived by dividing the Stock Portion by $36.00;

·   If the Average Share Price is at least $36.00 and not greater than $42.00, the number of shares of EWBC Common Stock shall be derived by dividing the Stock Portion by the Average Share Price;

·   If the Average Share Price is greater than $42.00, the number of shares of EWBC Common Stock shall be derived by dividing the Stock Portion by $42.00.

“SB Common Stock” shall mean all of the 227,400 shares of SB Common Stock now issued and outstanding, excluding any Treasury Shares, plus any shares of common stock that are issued by SB prior to the Effective Time.

(ii)The Merger Consideration shall be allocated as follows: (a) all shares of SB Common Stock for which the holders have made an election to receive the Per Share Stock Consideration will be converted into EWBC Common Stock; (b) all shares of SB Common Stock (other than Dissenters’ Shares) for which the holders have failed to make an election to receive either the Per Share Stock Consideration or the Per Share Cash Consideration will be converted into the EWBC Common Stock; and (c) all shares of SB Common Stock electing to receive Per Share Cash Consideration shall be converted into the Per Share Cash Consideration. If, however, after giving effect to (ii)(a) and (ii)(b) of this paragraph, the 35% maximum cash election is exceeded, those shares of SB Common Stock for which an election for the Per Share Cash Consideration has been made will receive an adjusted Per Share Cash Consideration and additional Per Share Stock Consideration derived as follows: The dollar amount of the excess cash election shall be deducted pro-rata from the shares electing the Per Share Cash Consideration, and a number of additional shares of EWBC Common Stock shall be issuable pro-rata with respect to those shares electing the Per Share Cash Consideration derived by dividing the dollar amount of the excess cash election by the applicable Average Share Price used to determine the Stock Portion.

(iii)EWBC shall set aside cash from the Cash Portion and the Stock Portion an amount of cash and EWBC Common Stock equal to the Dissenters Set Aside. EWBC shall deliver to U. S. Stock Transfer Corporation (the “Exchange Agent”) the remaining Stock Portion and Cash Portion. Each share of SB Common Stock (except for Dissenters’ Shares) shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into the right to receive the Per Share Cash Consideration and Per Share Stock Consideration.

(iv)At the Effective Time, each share of SB Common Stock shall be converted into, and become exchangeable for the Per Share Stock Consideration or the Per Share Cash Consideration and the holders of certificates formerly representing shares of SB Common Stock shall cease to have any rights as SB shareholders. Except as provided above, until such certificates are surrendered for exchange, the certificates of each holder shall, after the Effective Time, represent for all purposes only the right to receive the Per Share Stock Consideration or the Per Share Cash Consideration, as applicable.

(v)If, subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement but prior to the Effective Time, the outstanding shares of EWBC Common Stock shall, through a reclassification, recapitalization, stock dividend, stock split or reverse stock split, have been increased, decreased, changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or securities, appropriate adjustment will be made to the Stock Portion.

(b)Stock Transfer Books and Exchange. At the Effective Time, the stock transfer books of SB shall be closed as to holders of SB Common Stock immediately prior to the Effective Time and no transfer of SB Common Stock by any such holder shall thereafter be made or recognized on the stock transfer books of SB or the Surviving Bank. If, after the Effective Time, certificates are properly presented in accordance with Article III of this Agreement to the Exchange Agent, such certificates shall be canceled and exchanged for certificates representing the number of whole shares of EWBC Common Stock and a check representing the amount of cash into which SB Common Stock represented thereby was converted in the Merger, plus any payment for a fractional share of EWBC Common Stock.

(c)Calculations. Any calculation of a portion of a share of EWBC Common Stock shall be rounded to the nearest ten-thousandth of a share, and any cash payment shall be rounded to the nearest cent. For purposes of this Section 3.02, the shares of EWBC Common Stock issued for SB Common Stock as consideration in the Merger shall be deemed to be “approximately equal” to the Stock Portion if such number is within 1,000 shares of EWBC Common Stock of such amount.

SECTION 3.03 No Fractional Shares. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, no fractional shares of EWBC Common Stock and no certificates or scrip therefore, or other evidence of ownership thereof, will be issued in the Merger; instead, EWBC shall pay to each holder of SB Common Stock who would otherwise be entitled to a fractional share of EWBC Common Stock (after taking into account all certificates of SB Common Stock delivered by such holder) an amount in cash (without interest) determined by multiplying such fraction by the Average Share Price. No holder will be entitled to dividends, voting rights or any other rights as a shareholder in respect of any fractional share of EWBC Common Stock.

SECTION 3.04 Exchange Procedures.

(a)Exchange Agent. No later than the Effective Time, EWBC shall deposit with the Exchange Agent, the Stock Portion and the Cash Portion of the Merger Consideration (the “Exchange Fund”). The Exchange Agent shall not be entitled to vote or exercise any rights of ownership with respect to EWBC Common Stock held by it from time to time hereunder, except that it shall receive and hold all dividends or other distributions paid or distributed with respect to such shares for the account of the persons entitled thereto.

(b)Exchange of Certificates and Cash. Each holder of a certificate formerly representing SB Common Stock (other than Dissenters’ Shares or Treasury Shares) who surrenders or has surrendered such certificate (or customary affidavits and indemnification regarding the loss or destruction of such certificate), together with duly executed transmittal materials, to the Exchange Agent shall, upon acceptance thereof, be entitled to a certificate representing EWBC Common Stock and cash into which the shares of SB Common Stock shall have been converted pursuant hereto, as well as cash in lieu of any fractional shares of EWBC Common Stock to which such holder would otherwise be entitled. The Exchange Agent shall accept such SB certificate upon compliance with such reasonable and customary terms and conditions as the Exchange Agent may impose to cause an orderly exchange thereof in accordance with normal practices. Until surrendered as contemplated by this Section 3.04, each certificate representing SB Common Stock shall be deemed from and after the Effective Time to evidence only the right to receive cash and EWBC Common Stock upon such surrender. EWBC shall not be obligated to deliver the consideration to which any former holder of SB Common Stock is entitled as a result of the Merger until such holder surrenders a certificate or certificates representing such shares of SB Common Stock for exchange as provided herein. If any certificate for shares of SB Common Stock, or any check representing cash and/or declared but unpaid dividends, is to be issued in a name other than that in which a certificate surrendered for exchange is issued, the certificate so surrendered shall be properly endorsed and otherwise in proper form for transfer and the person requesting such exchange shall affix any requisite stock transfer tax stamps to the certificate surrendered or provide funds for their purchase or establish to the satisfaction of the Exchange Agent that such taxes are not payable.

(c)Affiliates. Certificates surrendered for exchange by any person constituting an “affiliate” of EWBC for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act, shall not be exchanged for certificates representing whole shares of EWBC Common Stock until EWBC has received an Affiliate Agreement from such person.

(d)No Liability. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Exchange Agent nor any party hereto shall be liable to any former holder of SB Common Stock for any amount properly delivered to a public official pursuant to applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar laws.

(e)Voting and Dividends. Former shareholders of record of SB shall not be entitled to vote after the Effective Time at any meeting of EWBC shareholders until such holders have exchanged their certificates representing SB Common Stock for certificates representing EWBC Common Stock in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Until surrendered for exchange in accordance with the provisions of this Section 3.04, each certificate previously representing shares of SB Common Stock (other than Dissenters’ Shares and Treasury Shares) shall from and after the Effective Time represent for all purposes only the right to receive shares of EWBC Common Stock, cash and cash in lieu of fractional shares, as set forth in this Agreement. No dividends or other distributions declared or made after the Effective Time with respect to EWBC Common Stock with a record date after the Effective Time shall be paid to the holder of any certificate of SB Common Stock with respect to the shares of EWBC Common Stock represented thereby, until the holder of such certificate of SB Common Stock shall surrender such certificate. Subject to the effect of applicable laws, following surrender of any such certificates of SB Common Stock for which shares of EWBC Common Stock are to be issued, there shall be paid to the holder of the certificates without interest, (i) the amount of any cash payable with respect to a fractional share of EWBC Common Stock to which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 3.03 and the amount of dividends or other distributions with a record date after the Effective Time theretofore paid with respect to such whole shares of EWBC Common Stock, and (ii) at the appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other distributions with a record date after the Effective Time but prior to surrender and a payment date subsequent to surrender payable with respect to such whole shares of EWBC Common Stock.

(f)Withholding Rights. EWBC or the Exchange Agent shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement to any holder of shares of SB Common Stock such amounts as EWBC or the Exchange Agent is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of such payment under the Code, or any provision of state, local or foreign tax law. To the extent that amounts are so withheld by EWBC or the Exchange Agent, such withheld amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of the shares of SB Common Stock in respect of which such deduction and withholding was made by EWBC or the Exchange Agent.

SECTION 3.05 Anti-Dilution Provisions. In the event EWBC or SB changes (or establishes a record date for changing) the number of shares of EWBC Common Stock or SB Common Stock issued and outstanding prior to the Effective Date as a result of a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or similar transaction with respect to the outstanding EWBC Common Stock or SB Common Stock, as the case may be, and the record date therefore shall be prior to the Effective Date, the Stock Portion and Per Share Stock Consideration shall be proportionately adjusted. If, between the date hereof and the Effective Time, EWBC shall merge, be acquired or consolidate with, by or into any other corporation (a “Business Combination”) and the terms thereof shall provide that EWBC Common Stock shall be converted into or exchanged for the shares of any other corporation or entity, then provision shall be made as part of the terms of such Business Combination so that shareholders of SB who would be entitled to receive shares of EWBC Common Stock pursuant to this Agreement shall be entitled to receive, in lieu of each share of EWBC Common Stock issuable to such shareholders as provided herein, the same kind and amount of securities or assets as shall be distributable upon such Business Combination with respect to one share of EWBC Common Stock (provided that nothing herein shall be construed so as to release the acquiring entity in any such Business Combination from its obligations under this Agreement as the successor to EWBC).

SECTION 3.06 Dissenters’ Rights.

(a)Any Dissenting Shareholder who shall be entitled to be paid the value of such shareholder’s shares of SB Common Stock, as provided in 12 C.F.R. Section 552.14, shall not be entitled to the Merger Consideration in respect thereof provided for under Section 3.02 unless and until such Dissenting Shareholder shall have failed to perfect or shall have effectively withdrawn or lost such Dissenting Shareholder’s right to dissent from the Merger under HOLA, and shall be entitled to receive only the payment provided for by 12 C.F.R. Section 552.14 with respect to such Dissenters’ Shares.

(b)If any Dissenting Shareholder shall fail to perfect or shall have effectively withdrawn or lost such right to dissent, each share of SB Common Stock of such Dissenting Shareholder shall be converted at EWBC’s discretion into the right to receive the Per Share Cash Consideration or the Per Share Stock Consideration to be necessary or appropriate to preserve the status of the Merger as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

(c)SB shall give EWB prompt notice upon receipt by SB of any written demands for dissenters’ rights, withdrawal of such demands, and any other documents received or instruments served relating to Dissenting Shares and shall give EWB the opportunity to direct all negotiations and proceedings with respect to such demands. SB shall not voluntarily make any payment with respect to any demands for dissenters’ rights and shall not, except with the prior written consent of EWB, settle or offer to settle such demands. Each holder of Dissenting Shares who becomes entitled to payment for his or her Dissenting Shares shall receive payment therefore from EWB and such Dissenting Shares shall be canceled.

ARTICLE IV

ACTIONS PENDING ACQUISITION

SECTION 4.01 Forbearances of SB. From the date hereof until the Effective Time, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement, without the prior written consent of EWBC, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, SB will not:

(a)Ordinary Course. Except as set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 4.01(a), and pursuant to the terms of Section 6.21 hereof, conduct the business of SB other than in the ordinary and usual course or fail to use its best efforts to preserve intact its business organizations and assets and maintain its rights, franchises and existing relations with customers, suppliers, employees and business associates, take any action that would adversely affect or delay the ability of SB, EWBC or any Subsidiaries of EWBC to perform any of their obligations on a timely basis under this Agreement, or take any action that would be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on SB.

(b)Capital Stock. (i) receive any new capital contribution; (ii) issue, sell or otherwise permit to become outstanding, or authorize the creation of, any additional shares of stock or any Rights other than the exercise of Options specified on Schedule 5.03(b) of the SB Disclosure Schedule, (iii) enter into any agreement with respect to the foregoing or (iv) permit any additional shares of stock to become subject to grants of employee or director stock options, other Rights or similar stock-based employee rights.

(c)Dividends; Etc. (i) except for dividends declared and paid in accordance with the past practices of SB, make, declare, pay or set aside for payment any dividend on or in respect of, or declare or make any distribution on any shares of stock or (ii) directly or indirectly adjust, split, combine, redeem, reclassify, purchase or otherwise acquire, any shares of its capital stock.

(d)Compensation; Employment Agreements; Etc. Enter into or amend or renew any employment, consulting, severance or similar agreements or arrangements with any director, officer or employee of SB or grant any salary or wage increase or increase any employee benefit (including incentive or bonus payments), except (i) for normal individual increases in compensation to employees in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, provided that no such increase shall result in an annual adjustment of more than 5%, (ii) for other changes that are required by applicable law, (iii) to satisfy contractual or other obligations existing as of the date hereof and set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 4.01(d), or (iv) for grants of awards to newly hired employees consistent with past practice.

(e)Hiring and Terminations. Hire any person as an employee of SB or promote any employee, except (i) to satisfy contractual or regulatory obligations existing as of the date hereof and set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 4.01(e) and (ii) persons hired to fill any vacancies arising after the date hereof and whose employment is terminable at the will of SB, other than any person to be hired who would have a base salary, including any guaranteed bonus or any similar bonus, considered on an annual basis of more than $50,000.

(f)Benefit Plans. Enter into, establish, adopt or amend (except (i) as may be required by applicable law or (ii) to satisfy contractual obligations existing as of the date hereof and set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 4.01(f) or (iii) payments under SB’s profit sharing plan paid in accordance with SB’s past practices) any pension, retirement, stock option, stock purchase, savings, profit sharing, deferred compensation, consulting, bonus, group insurance or other employee benefit, incentive or welfare contract, plan or arrangement, or any trust agreement (or similar arrangement) related thereto, in respect of any employee, officer, director, consultant or other service provider of SB or take any action to accelerate the vesting or exercisability of any stock options, restricted stock or other compensation or benefits payable thereunder.

(g)Dispositions. Except as set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 4.01(g), as permitted by Section 4.01(a) and in accordance with Section 6.21, sell, transfer, mortgage, encumber or otherwise dispose of or discontinue any of its assets, deposits, business or properties except in the ordinary course of business and in a transaction that, together with all other such transactions, is not material to SB.

(h)Acquisitions. Acquire (other than by way of foreclosures or acquisitions of control in a bona fide fiduciary capacity or in satisfaction of debts previously contracted in good faith, in each case in the ordinary and usual course of business consistent with past practice) all or any portion of the assets, business, deposits or properties of any other entity except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and in a transaction that, together with all other such transactions, is not material to SB.

(i)Capital Expenditures. Except as set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 4.01(i), make any capital expenditures other than capital expenditures in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice in amounts not exceeding $25,000 individually or $50,000 in the aggregate.

(j)Governing Documents. Amend the SB Charter or the SB By-Laws.

(k)Accounting Methods. Implement or adopt any change in its accounting principles, practices or methods, other than as may be required by GAAP.

(l)Contracts. Except as set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 4.01(l), as permitted under Section 4.01(a) and Section 6,10(a) with respect to the payment of insurance premiums or in accordance with Section 6.21, enter into, renew or terminate, or make any payment not then required under, any contract or agreement that calls for aggregate annual payments of $25,000 or more and which is not terminable at will or with 60 days or less notice without payment of a premium or penalty, other than loans and other transactions made in the ordinary course of the banking business.

(m)Claims. Enter into any settlement or similar agreement with respect to, or take any other significant action with respect to the conduct of, any action, suit, proceeding, order or investigation to which SB is or becomes a party after the effective date of this Agreement, which settlement, agreement or action involves payment by SB of an amount, individually or for all such settlements, that is material to SB and/or would impose any material restriction on the business of the Surviving Bank or create precedent for claims that are reasonably likely to be material to SB.

(n)Adverse Actions. Knowingly take any action which could result in (i) any of its representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement being or becoming untrue at any time at or prior to the Effective Time, (ii) any of the conditions to the Merger set forth in Article VII not being satisfied or (iii) a material violation of any provision of this Agreement except as may be required by applicable law or regulation.

(o)Risk Management. Except as required by applicable law or regulation of the OTS, (i) implement or adopt any material change in its interest rate and other risk management policies, procedures or practices, (ii) fail to follow its existing policies or practices with respect to managing its exposure to interest rate and other risk or (iii) fail to use commercially reasonable means to avoid any material increase in its aggregate exposure to interest rate risk.

(p)Indebtedness. Incur any indebtedness for borrowed money (other than deposits, Federal Funds borrowings and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco) or assume, guarantee, endorse or otherwise as an accommodation become responsible for the obligations of any other Person.

(q)Loans. Make any loan, loan commitment or renewal or extension thereof to any Person which would, when aggregated with all outstanding loans, commitments for loans or renewals or extensions thereof made to such Person and any affiliate or immediate family member of such Person, exceed $500,000 (or $1,000,000 in the case of renewals of existing, passed rated credit) without submitting complete loan package information to the chief credit officer of EWB for review with a right of comment at least two full Business Days prior to taking such action.

(r)Investments. (i) Other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice in individual amounts not to exceed $1,000,000 or in securities transactions as provided in (ii) below, make any investment either by contributions to capital, property transfers or purchase of any property or assets of any Person or (ii) other than purchases of direct obligations of the United States of America or obligations of U.S. government agencies which are entitled to the full faith and credit of the United States of America, in any case with a remaining maturity at the time of purchase of two years or less, purchase or acquire securities of any type; provided, however, that in the case of investment securities, SB may purchase investment securities if, within five Business Days after SB requests in writing (which shall describe in detail the investment securities to be purchased and the price thereof) that EWB consent to making of any such purchase, EWB has approved such request in writing or has not responded in writing to such request.

(s)Taxes. Take any action which would materially adversely affect the tax position of SB or its successor after the Merger.

(t)Commitments. Agree or commit to do any of the foregoing.

SECTION 4.02 Forbearances of EWBC. From the date hereof until the Effective Time, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement, without the prior written consent of SB, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, EWBC will not, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries not to:

(a)Ordinary Course. Take any action reasonably likely to have an adverse effect on EWBC’s ability to perform any of its material obligations under this Agreement.

(b)Adverse Actions. Knowingly take any action that is intended or is reasonably likely to result in (i) any of its representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement being or becoming untrue in any material respect at any time at or prior to the Effective Time, (ii) any of the conditions to the Merger set forth in Article VII not being satisfied or (iii) a material violation of any provision of this Agreement except as may be required by applicable law or regulation.

(c)Commitments. Agree or commit to do any of the foregoing.

ARTICLE V

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

SECTION 5.01 Disclosure Schedules. SB shall deliver a schedule to EWBC (the “SB Disclosure Schedule”) and EWBC shall deliver a schedule to SB (the “EWBC Disclosure Schedule”), (collectively, the “Disclosure Schedules”) on or prior to the effective date of this Agreement, setting forth, among other things, items the disclosure of which is necessary or appropriate either in response to an express disclosure requirement contained in a provision of this Agreement or as an exception to one or more representations or warranties contained in Section 5.03 or Section 5.04, respectively, or to one or more of their respective covenants contained in Article VI. If delivered after the date hereof, any material adverse disclosure not previously provided to EWBC shall entitle EWBC to terminate the Agreement in its sole discretion as provided in Article VIII. Items listed on the Disclosure Schedules shall only be considered exceptions to the specific Sections for which such item is scheduled.

SECTION 5.02 Standard. No representation or warranty of EWBC, EWB or SB contained in Sections 5.03 or 5.04, respectively, shall be deemed untrue or incorrect, and no party hereto shall be deemed to have breached a representation or warranty, as a consequence of the existence of any fact, event or circumstance unless such fact, circumstance or event, individually or taken together with all other facts, events or circumstances inconsistent with any representation or warranty contained in Section 5.03 or 5.04, has had or is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on the party making such representation or warranty.

SECTION 5.03 Representations and Warranties of SB. Subject to Sections 5.01 and 5.02 and except as set forth in the SB Disclosure Schedule with respect to a particular Section, SB hereby represents and warrants to EWBC and EWB:

(a)Organization, Standing and Authority. SB is a federally chartered savings association duly licensed by and in good standing with the OTS, and its deposits are insured by the FDIC through the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund in the manner and to the fullest extent provided by law.

(b)SB Capital Stock. As of the date hereof, the only authorized capital stock of SB consists of 3,500,000 shares of SB Common Stock, of which 227,400 shares are issued and outstanding. There are 1,500,000 shares of preferred stock authorized with none of such preferred stock outstanding. As of the date hereof, no shares of SB Common Stock were held in treasury by SB or otherwise owned by SB. SB has no stock option plan nor any stock option issued, granted, outstanding or exercisable except as provided in Schedule 5.03(b) of the SB Disclosure Schedule. The outstanding shares of SB Common Stock have been duly authorized and are validly issued and outstanding, and subject to no preemptive rights (and were not issued in violation of any preemptive rights). There are no authorized shares of SB Common Stock that are reserved for issuance except as provided in Schedule 5.03(b) of the SB Disclosure Schedule. SB does not have any other Rights issued or outstanding with respect to SB Common Stock. SB does not have any commitment to authorize, issue or sell any SB Common Stock.

(c)Subsidiaries; Equity Investments.

(i)SB has no Subsidiaries.

(ii)SB does not own beneficially, directly or indirectly, any equity securities or similar interests of any Person or any interests of any Person or any interest in a partnership or joint venture of any kind, except as shown on SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(c).

(d)Corporate Power. SB has the corporate power and authority to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and to own all its properties and assets; and SB has the corporate power and authority and has taken all corporate action necessary to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

(e)Corporate Authority and Approvals. Subject to approval hereof by the SB shareholders, this Agreement has been authorized by all necessary corporate action of SB. Subject to receipt of the required approvals, consents or waivers of Governmental Authorities referred to in Section 5.03(g), this Agreement is a valid and binding agreement of SB enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, subject as to enforcement in bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights and to general equity principles.

(i)The affirmative vote or written consent of at least 66.7% of the outstanding shares of SB Common Stock is the only shareholder vote or consent required for approval of this Agreement and consummation of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby.

(ii)The SB Disclosure Schedule lists all directors of SB and all holders of more than 5% of the SB Common Stock and identifies all SB loans to and deposits from such persons and, to the knowledge of SB, identifies all SB loans to and deposits from affiliates or companies controlled by such Persons.

(f)Board Resolutions. As of the date hereof, with respect to each of clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) below, SB’s board of directors, by resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote at a meeting duly called and held, has duly (i) determined that this Agreement and the Merger are advisable and fair to and in the best interests of SB and its shareholders, (ii) approved this Agreement and the Merger and (iii) recommended that its shareholders approve this Agreement and the Merger.

(g)Regulatory Approvals; No Violations.

(i)No consents or approvals of, or waivers by, or filings or registrations with, any Governmental Authority or with any third party are required to be made or obtained by SB or any Subsidiary of SB in connection with the execution, delivery or performance by SB of this Agreement or to consummate the Merger except for (A) filings of applications or notices with, and approvals or waivers by, the Federal Reserve Board, the OTS and any other Regulatory Authority, as may be required, (B) filings with state securities authorities and (C) the approval of this Agreement by the holders of at least 66.67% of the outstanding shares of SB Common Stock. As of the date hereof, SB is not aware of any reason why the approvals set forth in Section 7.01(b) will not be received without the imposition of a condition, restriction or requirement of the type described in Section 7.01(b), except as described on SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(g).

(ii)Subject to receipt of the approvals referred to in Section 5.03(g)(i), and the expiration of related waiting periods, and required filings under federal and state securities laws, the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by SB and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby do not and will not (A) constitute a breach or violation of, or a default under, or give rise to any Lien, any acceleration of remedies or any right of termination under, any law, rule or regulation or any judgment, decree, order, governmental permit or license, or agreement, indenture or instrument of SB or to which SB or any of its respective properties is subject or bound, (B) constitute a breach or violation of, or a default under, the SB Charter or the SB By-Laws (or similar governing documents), or (C) require any consent or approval under any such law, rule, regulation, judgment, decree, order, governmental permit or license, agreement, indenture or instrument.

(h)Financial Reports; Undisclosed Liabilities.

(i)The consolidated balance sheet of SB as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flow and changes in financial position of SB for the three years then ended, audited by Deloitte & Touche, and the consolidated balance sheet of SB as of September 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flow and changes in financial position of SB for the nine month period then ended, fairly present the financial position of SB as of such dates and the results of the operations of SB for the periods then ended, all in accordance with GAAP consistently applied (or in accordance with regulatory accounting principles to the extent different from GAAP and required by a Regulatory Authority to which SB is subject). The books and records of SB have been, and are being, maintained in accordance with GAAP and any other applicable legal and accounting requirements.

(ii)SB has timely filed all reports, registrations and statements, together with any amendments required to be made with respect thereto, required to be filed since December 31, 2002 with any Regulatory Authority (collectively, the “Regulatory Filings”) and all other material reports and statements required to be filed by it since December 31, 2002, including, without limitation, any report or statement required to be filed pursuant to the laws of the United States and the rules and regulations of the OTS and any other Regulatory Authority, and has paid all fees and assessments due and payable in connection therewith. As of their respective dates, such reports, registrations and statements complied in all material respects with all the laws, rules and regulations of the applicable Regulatory Agency with which they were filed.

(iii)Since December 31, 2004, SB has not incurred any liability other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement.

(iv)Since December 31, 2004, (A) SB has conducted its business in the ordinary and usual course consistent with past practice (excluding the incurrence of expenses related to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby) and (B) no event has occurred or circumstance arisen that, individually or taken together with all other facts, circumstances and events (described in any paragraph of this Section 5.03 or otherwise), has had or could be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to SB.

(i)Litigation. Except as set forth on SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(i), no litigation, claim or other proceeding before any court or governmental agency is pending against SB and, to SB’s knowledge, no such litigation, claim or other proceeding has been threatened and there are no facts which could reasonably give rise to such litigation, claim or other proceeding.

(j)Regulatory Matters. Except as set forth on SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(j):

(i)SB is not, directly or indirectly, party to or subject to any order, decree, agreement, memorandum of understanding or similar arrangement with, or a commitment letter or similar submission to, or extraordinary supervisory letter from, any federal or state governmental agency or authority charged with the supervision or regulation of financial institutions or issuers of securities or engaged in the insurance of deposits (including, without limitation, the OTS) or the supervision or regulation of it (collectively, the “Regulatory Authorities”). SB has paid all assessments made or imposed by any Regulatory Authority.

(ii)SB has not been advised by, nor does it have any knowledge of facts which could give rise to an advisory notice by, any Regulatory Authority that such Regulatory Authority is contemplating issuing or requesting (or is considering the appropriateness of issuing or requesting) any such order, decree, agreement, memorandum of understanding, commitment letter, supervisory letter or similar submission.

(k)Compliance With Laws. Except as set forth on SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(k), SB:

(i)is in compliance with all applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes, laws, regulations, ordinances, rules, judgments, orders or decrees applicable thereto or to the employees conducting such businesses, including, without limitation, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, Title III of the USA Patriot Act and all other applicable fair lending laws and other laws relating to discriminatory business practices;

(ii)has all permits, licenses, authorizations, orders and approvals of, and has made all filings, applications and registrations with, all Governmental Authorities that are required in order to permit it to own or lease its properties and to conduct its businesses as presently conducted; all such permits, licenses, certificates of authority, orders and approvals are in full force and effect and, to SB’s knowledge, no suspension or cancellation of any of them is threatened; and

(iii)has received, since December 31, 2004, no notification or communication from any Governmental Authority (A) asserting that SB is not in compliance with any of the statutes, regulations or ordinances which such Governmental Authority enforces or (B) threatening to revoke any license, franchise, permit or governmental authorization (nor, to SB’s knowledge, do any grounds for any of the foregoing exist).

(l)Contracts; Defaults.

(i)Except as set forth on SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(l), SB is not a party to, bound by or subject to any agreement, contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding (whether written or oral) (i) that is a “material contract” within the meaning of Item 601(b)(10) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K or (ii) that materially restricts the conduct of business by SB. Except as set forth on SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(l), SB is not in default under any contract, agreement, commitment, arrangement, lease, insurance policy or other instrument to which it is a party, by which its assets, business, or operations may be bound or affected, or under which it or its assets, business, or operations receives benefits, and there has not occurred any event that, with the lapse of time or the giving of notice or both, would constitute such a default. No power of attorney or similar authorization given directly or indirectly by SB is currently outstanding. SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(l) also sets forth a true and complete list of all third party consents or waivers required to be obtained so as not to be in default under any contract, agreement, commitment, arrangement, lease, insurance policy or other instrument to which SB is a party as a result of the transaction contemplated hereby.

(ii)SB is not party to any oral or written (A) consulting agreement not terminable on 30 days’ or less notice, (B) agreement with any executive officer or other key employee of SB the benefits of which are contingent, or the terms of which are materially altered, upon the occurrence of a transaction involving SB of the nature contemplated by this Agreement, (C) agreement with respect to any employee of SB providing any term of employment or compensation guarantee, (D) agreement or plan, including any stock option plan, stock appreciation rights plan, restricted stock plan or stock purchase plan, any of the benefits of which will be increased, or the vesting of the benefits of which will be accelerated, by the occurrence of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the value of any of the benefits of which will be calculated on the basis of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (E) agreement which requires the payment of referral fees or commissions or other fees in connection with deposits, loans or any other business, (F) agreement containing covenants that limit the ability of SB to compete in any line of business or with any person, or that involves any restriction on the geographic area in which, or method by which, SB may carry on its business (other than as may be required by law or any Regulatory Authorities) or exclusive dealing contract that limits the ability of SB to contract with certain persons or to directly engage in certain activities, or (G) agreement which requires further payments over the remaining term of the contract in excess of $100,000.

(m)No Brokers. No action has been taken by SB that would give rise to any valid claim against any party hereto for a brokerage commission, finder’s fee or other like payment with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(n)Employee Benefit Plans.

(i)All benefit and compensation plans, contracts, policies or arrangements covering current or former employees, including officers, of SB and current or former directors, consultants and other service providers of SB including, but not limited to, “employee benefit plans” within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA, and deferred compensation, stock option, stock purchase, stock appreciation rights, stock based, incentive and bonus plans (the “Benefit Plans”), are set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(n). True and complete copies of all Benefit Plans and all amendments thereto and all documents related thereto have been provided or made available to EWBC, including but not limited to (i) the Form 5500 for each Benefit Plan (if applicable) for each of the three most recent plan years for which such forms are required to have been filed, (ii) the most recent determination letter from the IRS (if applicable) for such Benefit Plan, (iii) a copy of the most recent summary plan description required for such Benefit Plan under ERISA (if applicable), (iv) a copy of the trust instruments(s), insurance contract(s) and other funding agreement(s) forming a part of any Benefit Plan, and (v) the latest financial statements of the Benefit Plan (if applicable).

(ii)All Benefits Plans have been operated and administered in accordance with their terms and applicable law, including, but not limited to, ERISA and the Code. Except as set forth on SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(n)(ii), each Benefit Plan which is an “employee pension benefit plan” within the meaning of Section 3(2) of ERISA (“Pension Plan”) and which is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code does so qualify, and SB has received a favorable determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service with respect to such qualification covering all tax law changes with respect to which Internal Revenue Service determination letters can be issued, and no circumstances have occurred that are likely to result in revocation of any such favorable determination letter or the loss of the qualification of such Pension Plan under Section 401(a) of the Code. There is no pending or threatened litigation relating to any of the Benefits Plans. Neither SB nor any ERISA Affiliate (as defined below) has engaged in a transaction, taken any action or failed to take any action or to meet any requirement with respect to any Benefit Plan or Pension Plan that, assuming the taxable period of such transaction expired as of the date hereof, could subject SB to a tax or penalty imposed by any of Sections 4971, 4972, 4975, 4976, 4977, 4978, 4979, 4980, 4980B, 4980D, 4980E, 4980F, or 4980G, of the Code or Sections 409 or 502(i) of ERISA.

(iii)No liability under of Title IV of ERISA has been or is expected to be incurred by SB with respect to any ongoing, frozen or terminated “single-employer plan”, within the meaning of Section 4001(a)(15) of ERISA, currently or formerly maintained by it, or the single-employer plan of any entity which is considered one employer with SB under Section 4001 of ERISA or Section 414 of the Code (an “ERISA Affiliate”), and SB is not aware of any condition that presents a significant risk to SB or any ERISA Affiliate of incurring any liability thereunder. Neither SB nor any ERISA Affiliate has ever participated in any “multiemployer plan” within the meaning of Section 3(37) of ERISA. SB has not incurred, and it does not expect to incur, any withdrawal liability with respect to a multiemployer plan under Subtitle E of Title IV of ERISA (regardless of whether based on contributions of an ERISA Affiliate). No notice of a “reportable event,” within the meaning of Section 4043 of ERISA for which the 30-day reporting requirement has not been waived, has been required to be filed for any Pension Plan or by any ERISA Affiliate within the 12-month period ending on the date hereof or will be required to be filed in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(iv)All contributions required to be made under the terms of any Benefit Plan have been timely made. All contributions to each Benefit Plan in respect of all current and prior plan years have been accrued in accordance with GAAP and are reflected in SB’s financial statements. Neither any Pension Plan nor any single-employer plan of an ERISA Affiliate has an “accumulated funding deficiency” (whether or not waived) within the meaning of Section 412 of the Code or Section 302 of ERISA, and neither SB nor any ERISA Affiliate has an outstanding funding waiver. SB has not provided, nor is it required to provide, security to any Pension Plan or to any single-employer plan of an ERISA Affiliate pursuant to Section 401(a)(29) of the Code.

(v)Under each Pension Plan which is a single-employer plan, as of the last day of the most recent plan year ended prior to the date hereof, the actuarially determined present value of all “benefit liabilities,” within the meaning of Section 4001(a)(16) of ERISA (as determined on the basis of the actuarial assumptions contained in the Pension Plan’s most recent actuarial valuation and on a termination basis), did not exceed the lesser of the actuarial value or the then current value of the assets of such Pension Plan, and there has been no material change in the financial condition of such Pension Plan since the last day of the most recent plan year.

(vi)SB has no obligation to provide any current or former employee, officer, director, consultant or other service provider health, disability or life benefits beyond his or her retirement or other termination of service under any Benefit Plan, other than healthcare continuation coverage mandated by applicable law. SB may amend or terminate any Benefit Plan at any time without incurring any liability thereunder.

(vii)Except as set forth on SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(n)(vii), none of the execution of this Agreement, shareholder approval of this Agreement or consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will, either alone or in combination with any other event, (A) entitle any current or former employee, officer, director, consultant or other service provider of SB to severance pay or any other payment or benefit, or any increase in severance pay or any other payment or benefit upon any termination of employment or other relationship after the date hereof, (B) accelerate the time of payment or vesting or trigger any payment or funding (through a grantor trust or otherwise) of compensation or benefits under, increase the amount payable or trigger any other material obligation pursuant to, any of the Benefit Plans, (C) result in any breach or violation of, or a default under, any of the Benefit Plans or (D) result in any payment that would be a “parachute payment” to a “disqualified individual” as those terms are defined in Section 280G of the Code, without regard to whether such payment is reasonable compensation for personal services performed or to be performed in the future. SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(n)(vii) categorizes any such exceptions according to the categories above and sets forth the amounts of any such payments to the persons listed thereon.

(viii)No Benefit Plan that is subject to section 409A of the Code fails to meet any requirement of Section 409A of the Code that would result in any Benefit Plan participant having liability for additional interest or the 20% addition to tax under such section of the Code.

(o)Labor Matters. SB is not a party to nor bound by any collective bargaining agreement, contract or other agreement or understanding with a labor union or labor organization, nor is it the subject of a proceeding asserting that it has committed an unfair labor practice (within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act) or seeking to compel SB to bargain with any labor organization as to wages or conditions of employment, nor is there any strike or other labor dispute involving it or, to SB’s knowledge, threatened, nor is SB aware of any activity involving its employees seeking to certify a collective bargaining unit or engaging in other organizational activity.

(p)Environmental Matters. (i) SB has complied at all times with applicable Environmental Laws; (ii) no real property (including buildings or other structures) currently or formerly owned or operated by SB, or any property in which SB has held a security interest, Lien or a fiduciary or management role (“SB Loan Property”), has been contaminated with, or has had any release of, any Hazardous Substance that could reasonably be expected to result in liability to SB arising out of any Environmental Law; (iii) neither SB nor any Subsidiary of SB could be deemed the owner or operator of any SB Loan Property under any Environmental Law which such SB Loan Property has been contaminated with, or has had any release of, any Hazardous Substance; (iv) SB is not subject to liability for any Hazardous Substance disposal or contamination on any third party property; (v) SB has not received any notice, demand letter, claim or request for information alleging any violation of, or liability under, any Environmental Law; (vi) SB is not subject to any order, decree, injunction or other agreement with any Governmental Authority or any third party relating to any Environmental Law; (vii) there are no circumstances or conditions (including the presence of asbestos, underground storage tanks, lead products, polychlorinated biphenyls, prior manufacturing operations, dry-cleaning, or automotive services) involving SB, any currently or formerly owned or operated property, or any SB Loan Property, that could reasonably be expected to result in any claims, liability or investigations against SB, result in any restrictions on the ownership, use, or transfer of any property pursuant to any Environmental Law, or adversely affect the value of any SB Loan Property and (viii) SB has made available to EWBC copies of all environmental reports, studies, sampling data, correspondence, filings and other environmental information in its possession or reasonably available to it relating to SB, and any currently or formerly owned or operated property or any SB Loan Property.

As used herein, the term “Environmental Laws” means any federal, state or local law, regulation, order, decree, permit, authorization, opinion, common law or agency requirement relating to: (A) the protection or restoration of the environment, health, safety, or natural resources, (B) the handling, use, presence, disposal, release or threatened release of any Hazardous Substance or (C) noise, odor, wetlands, indoor air, pollution, contamination or any injury or threat of injury to persons or property in connection with any Hazardous Substance and the term “Hazardous Substance” means any substance in any concentration that is: (A) listed, classified or regulated pursuant to any Environmental Law, (B) any petroleum product or by-product, asbestos-containing material, lead-containing paint or plumbing, polychlorinated biphenyls, radioactive materials or radon or (C) any other substance which is or may be the subject of regulatory action by any Governmental Authority in connection with any Environmental Law.

(q)Tax Matters.

(i)Except as set forth SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(q)(i), SB has:

(A)duly and timely filed (including applicable extensions granted without penalty) all Tax Returns required to be filed by it, and such Tax Returns are true, correct and complete;

(B)timely paid in full all Taxes required to be paid by it; and

(C)made adequate provision in the financial statements of SB (in accordance with GAAP) for all Taxes not yet due.

(ii)Except as set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(q)(ii), no deficiencies for any Taxes have been proposed, asserted, assessed or, threatened in writing against or with respect to SB.

(iii)Except as set forth in SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(q)(iii) of the:

(A)there are no Liens for Taxes upon the assets of SB except for statutory Liens for current Taxes not yet due;

(B)SB has not requested any extension of time within which to file any Tax Returns in respect of any fiscal year which have not since been filed and no request for waivers of the time to assess any Taxes are pending or outstanding;

(C)no federal, state, local or foreign audits or other administrative proceedings or court proceedings are presently pending with regard to any Taxes (other than federal or state income Taxes) of SB, and SB has not received a written notice of any claims, audits or proceedings with respect to such Taxes;

(D)with respect to each taxable period of SB, the federal and state income Tax Returns of SB have not been audited by the Internal Revenue Service or appropriate state tax authorities or the time for assessing and collecting income Tax with respect to such taxable period has closed and such taxable period is not subject to review;

(E)SB has not filed or been included in a combined, consolidated or unitary income Tax Return other than one in which SB was the parent of the group filing such Tax Return;

(F)SB is not a party to any agreement providing for the allocation, sharing, or indemnification of Taxes;

(G)SB is not required to include in income any adjustment pursuant to Section 481(a) of the Code (or any similar or corresponding provision or requirement of state, local or foreign income Tax law), by reason of the voluntary change in accounting method (nor has any taxing authority proposed any such adjustment or change of accounting method);

(H)no closing agreements, private letter rulings, technical advice memoranda or similar agreement or ruling have been entered into or issued by any taxing authority with respect to SB within five years of the effective date of this Agreement, and no such agreement or ruling has been applied for and is currently pending;

(I)SB has not amended any Tax Returns or entered into any settlement or compromise of any income tax liability of SB;

(J)SB has not granted in writing any power of attorney which is currently in force with respect to any Taxes or Tax Returns;

(K)SB has not constituted either a “distributing corporation” or a “controlled corporation” (within the meaning of Section 355(a)(1)(A) of the Code) in a distribution of stock to which Section 355 of the Code (or so much of Section 356 of the Code as relates to Section 355 of the Code) applies and which occurred within two years of the effective date of this Agreement;

(L)no claim has been made in writing in any jurisdiction where SB does not file Tax Returns that any such entity is, or may be, subject to Tax by that jurisdiction;

(M)SB has not filed a consent pursuant to Section 341(f) of the Code or agreed to have Section 341(f)(2) of the Code apply to any disposition of a subsection (f) asset (as such term is defined in Section 341(f)(4) of the Code) owned by SB;

(N)SB has not executed or entered into a closing agreement pursuant to Section 7121 of the Code or any predecessor provision thereof or any similar provision of state, local or foreign law;

(O)SB has not been a “United States real property holding corporation” within the meaning of Section 897(c)(2) during the applicable period specified in 897(c)(1)(A)(ii) of the Code;

(P)SB has not engaged in a “reportable transaction” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.6011-4; and

(Q)as of the date hereof, SB has no reason to believe that any conditions exist or will exist that might prevent or impede the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

(r)Risk Management Instruments. SB is not a party to nor has it agreed to enter into an exchange traded or over-the-counter equity, interest rate, foreign exchange or other swap, forward, future, option, cap, floor or collar or any other contract that is not included on the balance sheet and is a derivatives contract (including various combinations thereof) (each, a “Derivatives Contract”) or owns securities that (i) are referred to generically as “structured notes,” “high risk mortgage derivatives,” “capped floating rate notes” or “capped floating rate mortgage derivatives” or (ii) are likely to have changes in value as a result of interest or exchange rate changes that significantly exceed normal changes in value attributable to interest or exchange rate changes, except for those Derivatives Contracts and other instruments legally purchased or entered into in the ordinary course of business, consistent with safe and sound banking practices and regulatory guidance. All of such Derivatives Contracts or other instruments, are legal, valid and binding obligations of SB, as the case may be, enforceable in accordance with their terms (except as enforcement may be limited by general principles of equity whether applied in a court of law or a court of equity and by bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights and remedies generally), and are in full force and effect. SB has duly performed in all material respects all of their material obligations thereunder to the extent that such obligations to perform have accrued; and, to SB’s knowledge, there are no breaches, violations or defaults or allegations or assertions of such by any party thereunder which have had or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on SB.

(s)Books and Records. The books and records of SB have been fully, properly and accurately maintained in all material respects, and there are no material inaccuracies or discrepancies of any kind contained or reflected therein, and they fairly present the financial position of SB.

(t)Insurance. SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(t) sets forth a true and complete list of all of the insurance policies, binders, or bonds maintained by SB (“Insurance Policies”). SB is insured with reputable insurers against such risks and in such amounts as the management of SB reasonably has determined to be prudent in accordance with industry practices against such risks as companies engaged in a similar business would customarily be insured. Insurance applications for policies that are currently in force are complete and accurate. All the Insurance Policies are in full force and effect; SB is not in material default thereunder; and all claims thereunder have been filed in due and timely fashion.

(u)Allowance For Loan Losses. SB’s Allowance for Loan Losses (“ALL”) is, and shall be as of the Effective Date, in compliance with SB’s existing methodology for determining the adequacy of its ALL as well as the standards established by applicable Governmental Authorities and the Financial Accounting Standards Board and is and shall be adequate under all such standards.

(v)Trust Business. SB does not have trust powers.

(w)Real Property.

(i)SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(w) contains a complete and correct list of (A) all real property or premises owned on the date hereof, in whole or in part by SB and all indebtedness secured by any encumbrance thereon, and (B) all real property or premises leased in whole or in part by SB and together with a list of all applicable leases and the name of the lessor. None of such premises or properties have been condemned or otherwise taken by any public authority and no condemnation or taking is threatened or contemplated and none thereof is subject to any claim, contract or law which might affect its use or value for the purposes now made of it. None of the premises or properties of SB is subject to any current or potential interests of third parties or other restrictions or limitations that would impair or be inconsistent in any material respect with the current use of such property by SB, as the case may be.

(ii)Each of the leases referred to in the SB Disclosure Schedule is valid and existing and in full force and effect, and no party thereto is in default and no notice of a claim of default by any party has been delivered to SB or is now pending, and there does not exist any event that with notice or the passing of time, or both, would constitute a default or excuse performance by any party thereto, provided that with respect to matters relating to any party other than SB, the foregoing representation is based on the knowledge of SB.

(x)Title. SB has good title to its properties and assets (other than (i) property as to which it is lessee and (ii) real estate owned as a result of foreclosure, transfer in lieu of foreclosure or other transfer in satisfaction of a debtor’s obligation previously contracted) except (1) statutory Liens not yet delinquent which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings, and Liens for taxes not yet due, (2) pledges of assets in the ordinary course of business to secure public deposits, (3) for those assets and properties disposed of for fair value in the ordinary course of business since the date of SB’s call report dated as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and (4) defects and irregularities of title and encumbrances that do not materially impair the use thereof for the purposes for which they are held.

(y)Intellectual Property. SB owns or possesses valid and binding licenses and other rights to use (without payment) all material trade secrets, trade names, trademarks, service marks, inventions and processes used in its businesses; and SB has received no notice of conflict with respect thereto that asserts a right of others. SB has in all material respects performed all the obligations required to be performed by it and is not in default in any material respect under any contract, agreement, arrangement or commitment relating to any of the foregoing.

(z)Past Actions. SB has not extended or renewed any extension of credit in material violation of its applicable policies, applicable laws, regulations or administrative orders or interpretations. Since December 31, 2003, there have not been any acts of dishonesty, self-dealing or any breach of any statutory, contractual or fiduciary duties, or duty of loyalty on the part of any of the directors, or officers of SB in connection with their duties and responsibilities at SB.

SECTION 5.04 Representations and Warranties of EWBC and EWB. Subject to Sections 5.01 and Section 5.02, EWBC hereby represent and warrant to SB as follows:

(a)Organization, Standing and Authority of EWBC. EWBC is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware. EWBC is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing in the states of the United States and foreign jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or assets or the conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified. EWBC has in effect all federal, state, local, and foreign governmental authorizations necessary for it to own or lease its properties and assets and to carry on its business as it is now conducted.

(b)Organization, Standing and Authority of EWB. EWB is duly licensed by and in good standing with the Commissioner, and its deposits are insured by the Bank Insurance Fund or the Savings Association Insurance Fund in the manner and to the fullest extent provided by law. EWB is duly authorized to conduct a general banking business and is qualified and in good standing in the states of the United States and foreign jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or assets or the conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified. EWB has in effect all federal, state, local, and foreign governmental authorizations necessary for it to own or lease its properties and assets and to carry on its banking business as it is now conducted.

(c)EWBC Stock.

(i)As of the date hereof, the authorized capital stock of EWBC consists solely of 200,000,000 shares of EWBC Common Stock, of which, as of December 19, 2005, 56,519,891 shares are issued and outstanding, and 5,000,000 shares of EWBC Preferred Stock, of which no shares are issued and outstanding.

(ii)As of the date hereof, the authorized capital stock of EWB consists of 50,000,000 shares of EWB Common Stock, of which 23,775,000 are issued and outstanding.

(iii)The shares of EWBC Common Stock to be issued in exchange for shares of SB Common Stock in the Merger, when issued in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and the issuance thereof is not subject to any preemptive right.

(d)Subsidiaries. Each of EWBC’s Subsidiaries has been duly organized and is validly existing in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its organization, and is duly qualified to do business and in good standing in the jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or the conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified and it owns, directly or indirectly, all the issued and outstanding equity securities of each of its Significant Subsidiaries.

(e)Corporate Power. EWBC and each of its Subsidiaries has the corporate power and authority to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and to own all its properties and assets; each of EWBC and EWB has the corporate power and authority to execute, deliver and perform their obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

(f)Corporate Authority. This Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby have been authorized by all necessary corporate action of the boards of directors of EWBC and EWB. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by each of EWBC and EWB and this Agreement is a valid and legally binding agreement of EWBC and EWB enforceable in accordance with its terms (except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights or by general equity principles).

(g)Regulatory Approvals; No Violations.

(i)No consents or approvals of, or waivers by, or filings or registrations with, any Governmental Authority or with any third party are required to be made or obtained by EWBC or any of its Subsidiaries in connection with the execution, delivery or performance by EWBC or EWB of this Agreement or to consummate the Merger except for (A) filings of applications or notices with and approvals or waivers by the Federal Reserve Board, the OTS, the California Secretary and the Commissioner, as may be required, (B) filings with the SEC and state securities authorities, as may be required, (C) the approval of the listing on Nasdaq of the EWBC Common Stock to be issued in the Merger, (D) such filings as are required to be made or approvals as are required to be obtained under the securities or “Blue Sky” laws of various states in connection with the issuance of EWBC Common Stock in the Merger, and (E) the filing of the executed Agreement of Merger with the Commissioner. As of the date hereof, EWBC is not aware of any reason why the approvals set forth in Section 7.01(b) will not be received in a timely manner and without the imposition of a condition, restriction or requirement of the type described in Section 7.01(b).

(ii)Subject to receipt, or the making, of the consents, approvals and filings referred to in the preceding paragraph and expiration of the related waiting periods, the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by EWBC and EWB and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not (A) constitute a breach or violation of, or a default under, or give rise to any Lien, any acceleration of remedies or any right of termination under, any law, rule or regulation or any judgment, decree, order, governmental permit or license, or Agreement, indenture or instrument of EWBC or of any of its Subsidiaries or to which EWBC or any of its Subsidiaries or properties is subject or bound, (B) constitute a breach or violation of, or a default under, the EWBC Certificate or EWBC By-Laws (or similar governing documents) or any of its Subsidiaries or (C) require any consent or approval under any such law, rule, regulation, judgment, decree, order, governmental permit or license, agreement, indenture or instrument.

(h)Financial Reports and SEC Documents; Material Adverse Effect.

(i)EWBC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and all other reports, registration statements, definitive proxy statements or information statements filed or to be filed by it subsequent to December 31, 2004 under the Securities Act, or under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act in the form filed or to be filed (collectively, “SEC Documents”) with the SEC, as of the date filed or to be filed, (A) complied or will comply in all material respects as to form with the applicable requirements under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the case may be and (B) did not and will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and each of the balance sheets contained in or incorporated by reference into any such SEC Document (including the related notes and schedules thereto) fairly presents, or will fairly present, the financial position of EWBC and its Subsidiaries as of its date, and each of the statements of income and changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows or equivalent statements in such SEC Documents (including any related notes and schedules thereto) fairly presents, or will fairly present, the results of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and changes in cash flows, as the case may be, of EWBC and its Subsidiaries for the periods to which they relate, in each case in accordance with GAAP consistently applied during the periods involved, except in each case as may be noted therein.

(ii)Since December 31, 2004, EWBC and its Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses in the ordinary and usual course consistent with past practice (excluding the incurrence of expenses related to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby) and no event has occurred or circumstance arisen that, individually or taken together with all other facts, circumstances and events (described in any paragraph of this Section 5.04 or otherwise), is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to EWBC or its Subsidiaries.

(iii)Except as disclosed on EWBC Disclosure Schedule 5.04(h), since December 31, 2004, neither EWBC nor any of its Subsidiaries have incurred any liability other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement.

(i)Litigation. Except as set forth on EWBC Disclosure Schedule 5.04(i), no litigation, claim or other proceeding before any court or governmental agency is pending against EWBC or its Subsidiaries, and to EWBC and its Subsidiaries’ knowledge, no such litigation, claim or other proceeding has been threatened and there are no facts which could reasonably give rise to such litigation, claim or other proceeding.

(j)No Brokers. No action has been taken by EWBC or its Subsidiaries that would give rise to any valid claim against any party hereto for a brokerage commission, finder’s fee or other like payment with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(k)Environmental Matters. (i) EWBC and its Subsidiaries have complied at all times with applicable Environmental Laws; (ii) no real property (including buildings or other structures) currently or formerly owned or operated by EWBC or any of its Subsidiaries, or any property in which EWBC or any of its Subsidiaries has held a security interest, Lien or a fiduciary or management role (collectively, “EWBC Loan Property”), has been contaminated with, or has had any release of, any Hazardous Substance; (iii) neither EWBC nor any of its Subsidiaries could be deemed the owner or operator of any EWBC Loan Property under any Environmental Law which such EWBC Loan Property has been contaminated with, or has had any release of, any Hazardous Substance; (iv) neither EWBC nor any of its Subsidiaries is subject to liability for any Hazardous Substance disposal or contamination on any third party property; (v) neither EWBC nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any notice, demand letter, claim or request for information alleging any violation of, or liability under, any Environmental Law; (vi) neither EWBC nor any of its Subsidiaries is subject to any order, decree, injunction or other agreement with any Governmental Authority or any third party relating to any Environmental Law; and (vii) to EWBC’s knowledge, there are no circumstances or conditions (including the presence of asbestos, underground storage tanks, lead products, polychlorinated biphenyls, prior manufacturing operations, dry-cleaning, or automotive services) involving EWBC or its Subsidiaries, any currently or formerly owned or operated property, or any EWBC Loan Property, that could reasonably be expected to result in any claims, liability or investigations against EWBC or its Subsidiaries, result in any restrictions on the ownership, use, or transfer of any property pursuant to any Environmental Law, or adversely affect the value of any EWBC Loan Property.

(l)Insurance. EWBC and its Subsidiaries are insured with reputable insurers against such risks and in such amounts as the management of EWBC and its Subsidiaries reasonably has determined to be prudent in accordance with industry practices.

ARTICLE VI

COVENANTS

SECTION 6.01 Reasonable Best Efforts. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, each of EWBC, EWB and SB agrees to use their reasonable best efforts in good faith to take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or desirable, or advisable under applicable laws, so as to permit consummation of the Merger as promptly as practicable and otherwise to enable consummation of the transactions contemplated in this Agreement, including the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Article VII hereof, and shall cooperate fully with the other parties hereto to that end.

SECTION 6.02 Shareholders’ Approval.

(a)SB and EWB shall prepare a joint prospectus and proxy statement to be mailed as promptly as possible to SB shareholders in connection with the required approval of the SB shareholders of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby (referred to together hereafter as the “Information Statement”). SB shall (i) duly call, give notice of, convene, and hold a meeting of its shareholders to be held as soon as practicable following the date hereof for the purpose of obtaining the requisite shareholder approvals required in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby; and (ii) through its board of directors, unanimously recommend to its shareholders approval of such matters. The Information Statement shall include such information as is required in connection with the registration of the EWBC Common Stock to be issued at the Effective Time or such information as is required in connection with a permit application pursuant to Section 25121 of the CGCL, as determined by the mutual agreement of the parties. The Information Statement shall include the recommendation of the board of directors of SB in favor of the Agreement and the Merger and the conclusion of the board of directors of SB that the terms and conditions of the Merger are fair and reasonable to the SB. Anything to the contrary contained herein notwithstanding, SB shall not include in the Information Statement any information with respect to EWB or its affiliates or associates, the form and content of which information shall not have been approved by EWB prior to such inclusion. SB represents and covenants that the Information Statement and any amendment or supplement thereto, at the date of mailing to shareholders of SB and the date of the meeting of SB’s shareholders to be held in connection with the Agreement and the Merger will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided, however, that SB makes no representations or covenants with respect to information provided to SB in writing by EWB specifically for inclusion in the Information Statement and EWB hereby represents that any such information so provided by EWB will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The parties shall cooperate with each other in the preparation of the Information Statement and SB shall provide EWB an opportunity to review and comment upon a final draft of the Information Statement prior to its mailing to SB’s shareholders.

(b)Certain SB shareholders have executed the Shareholder Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A providing that they shall vote all SB Common Stock in which they have a beneficial interest in favor of the Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated in this Agreement.

SECTION 6.03 Registration of Securities. The EWBC Common Stock to be exchanged for the SB Common Stock shall, as mutually agreed upon by the parties, either be: (i) registered with the SEC pursuant to a form of registration (the “Registration Statement”) mutually agreed upon by the parties; or (ii) exempt from registration with the SEC as a result of a fairness review (“Fairness Review”) under Section 25142 of the CGCL, as amended. As expeditiously as practicable after the Effective Time the parties shall make a determination of whether to register the securities or seek a fairness review, and in any event within thirty (30) days of such determination, EWBC shall:

(a)As applicable, either: (i) prepare and file with the SEC a Registration Statement and use its best efforts to cause such Registration Statement to become and remain effective for one year from the Effective Time and shall use its best efforts to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC in preparing and filing such Registration Statement or; (ii) prepare and file a permit application with the California Department of Corporations pursuant to Section 25121 of the CGCL, including exhibits and a request for a hearing before the California Commissioner of Corporations, and shall use its best efforts to comply with the rules and regulations of the California Commissioner of Corporations in preparing and filing such permit application;

(b)As applicable, either; (i) prepare and file with the SEC such amendments and post-effective amendments to the Registration Statement as may be necessary to keep the Registration Statement effective for a period of not less than one year from the date of issuance of the EWBC Common covered by such Registration Statement or; (ii) take any action requested by the California Commissioner of Corporations in connection with the required hearing and thereafter to obtain the permit to be issued pursuant to Section 25121 of the CDCL (“Permit”);

(c)As applicable, make every reasonable effort to obtain the withdrawal of any order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement or the Permit at the earliest practicable time;

(d)As applicable, either on or prior to the date on which the Registration Statement is declared effective or on or prior to obtaining the Permit, use its best efforts to register or qualify the EWBC Common Stock covered by such Registration Statement or Permit under all applicable state laws;

(e)Use its reasonable best efforts to list, on the Nasdaq the shares of EWBC Common Stock to be issued to the shareholders in the Merger.

All of the costs and expenses of each registration or permit hereunder will be borne by EWBC, including all registration and filing fees and the fees and expenses of EWBC’s counsel and accountants.

SECTION 6.04 Press Releases. EWBC and SB shall consult with each other before issuing any press release with respect to the Merger or this Agreement and shall not issue any such press release or make any such public statements without the prior consent of the other party, which shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided, however, that a party may, without the prior consent of the other party (but after such consultation, to the extent practicable in the circumstances), issue such press release or make such public statements as may upon the advice of outside counsel be required by law or the rules or regulations of Nasdaq. EWBC and SB shall cooperate to develop all public announcement materials and make appropriate management available at presentations related to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement as reasonably requested by the other party.

SECTION 6.05 Access; Information.

(a)SB agrees that upon reasonable notice and subject to applicable laws relating to the exchange of information, it shall afford EWBC and EWBC’s officers, employees, counsel, accountants and other authorized representatives such access during normal business hours throughout the period prior to the Effective Time to the books, records (including, without limitation, Tax Returns and work papers of independent auditors), properties and personnel and to such other information as EWBC may reasonably request and, during such period, it shall furnish promptly to EWBC all information concerning its business, properties and personnel as EWBC may reasonably request.

(b)Without limiting the generality of Section 6.05(a), prior to the Effective Time, EWBC and its respective representatives shall have the right to conduct a review to determine (i) that the assets, books, records and operations of SB are in satisfactory condition and will not in a material way adversely impact EWBC after consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and (ii) the accuracy of the representations and warranties and the satisfaction of the conditions to closing as provided hereunder.

(c)SB agrees that, subject to applicable laws, it shall cooperate in good faith with EWBC on mutually agreed operating issues which the parties agree have priority.

(d)EWBC agrees that, upon reasonable notice and subject to applicable laws relating to the exchange of information, it shall afford SB and its authorized representatives such access to EWBC’s books and records as SB may reasonably request.

SECTION 6.06 Confidential Information. Each party agrees that it will not, and will cause its representatives not to, use any information obtained pursuant to Section 6.05 (as well as any other information obtained prior to the date hereof in connection with the entering into of this Agreement) for any purpose unrelated to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Subject to the requirements of law, each party shall keep confidential, and shall cause its representatives to keep confidential, all information and documents obtained pursuant to Section 6.05 (as well as any other information obtained prior to the date hereof in connection with the entering into of this Agreement) unless such information (i) was already known to such party, (ii) becomes available to such party from other sources not known by such party to be bound by a confidentiality obligation, (iii) is disclosed with the prior written approval of the party to which such information pertains or (iv) is or becomes readily ascertainable from publicly available sources. In the event that this Agreement is terminated or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall otherwise fail to be consummated, (A) each party shall promptly cause all copies of documents or extracts thereof containing information and data as to another party hereto to be returned to the party which furnished the same; (B) SB shall not, on the one hand, nor shall EWBC or EWB, on the other hand, and each of the parties shall cause its respective representatives not to, use any confidential information to solicit customers of the other party; and (C) for one year after such termination, SB shall not, on the one hand, nor shall EWBC or EWB, on the other hand, and each of the parties shall cause its respective representatives not to, solicit the services of any employee of such other party for purposes of engaging them as an employee, agent, consultant or independent contractor of such soliciting party, provided, however, that neither party will be barred from retaining the services, in any capacity, of any current employee of the other party in the event such employee approaches such party with the intent of securing employment with such party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall prevent the parties hereto from any general advertising or recruitment activities not directed specifically at the employees of the other party hereto. No investigation by any party of the business and affairs of any other party shall affect or be deemed to modify or waive any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement in this Agreement, or the conditions to any party’s obligation to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

SECTION 6.07 Acquisition Proposals. SB agrees that its officers, directors and affiliates shall not, and it shall direct and use its reasonable best efforts to cause its employees, agents and representatives not to, directly or indirectly, initiate, solicit or otherwise encourage any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer with respect to a merger, reorganization, share exchange, consolidation or similar transaction involving, or any purchase of all or substantially all of the assets of SB or more than 10% of the outstanding equity securities, of SB (any such proposal or offer being hereinafter referred to as an “Acquisition Proposal”). SB further agrees that it and none of its officers, directors and affiliates shall, and it shall direct and use its reasonable best efforts to cause its employees, agents and representatives not to, directly or indirectly, engage in any negotiations concerning, or provide any confidential information or data to, or have any discussions with, any Person relating to an Acquisition Proposal, or otherwise facilitate any effort or attempt to make or implement an Acquisition Proposal. SB agrees that it will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any parties conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposals.  SB agrees that it will take the necessary steps to promptly inform the individuals referred to in the foregoing sentence of the obligations undertaken in this Section 6.07.  SB agrees that it will notify EWBC promptly, but in no event later than the second succeeding Business Day, if any such inquiries, proposals or offers are received by, any such information is requested from, or any such discussions or negotiations are sought to be initiated or continued with, any of its representatives, indicating, in connection with such notice, the name of such Person and the material terms and conditions of any proposal or offer.

SECTION 6.08 Certain Policies. Prior to the Effective Date, SB shall, consistent with GAAP and applicable banking laws and regulations, modify or change its loan, OREO, accrual, reserve, tax, litigation and real estate valuation policies and practices (including loan classifications and levels of reserves) so as to be applied on a basis that is consistent with that of EWBC.

SECTION 6.09 Regulatory Applications.

(a)Each of EWBC and SB shall cooperate and use their respective reasonable best efforts to prepare and file, or cause to be filed, all documentation, to effect all necessary notices, reports and other filings and to obtain all permits, consents, approvals and authorizations necessary or advisable to be obtained from any third parties and/or Governmental Authorities in order to consummate the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement; and any initial filings with Governmental Authorities (other than the Registration Statement) shall be made by EWBC as soon as reasonably practicable after the execution hereof but, provided that SB has cooperated as described above, in no event later than 45 days after the date hereof.  Each of EWBC and SB shall have the right to review in advance, and to the extent practicable each shall consult with the other, in each case subject to applicable laws relating to the exchange of information, with respect to all material written information submitted to any third party and/or any Governmental Authority in connection with the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.  In exercising the foregoing right, each of such parties agrees to act reasonably and as promptly as practicable.  Each party hereto agrees that it shall consult with the other parties hereto with respect to the obtaining of all material permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all third parties and/or Governmental Authorities necessary or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and each party shall keep the other parties apprised of the status of material matters relating to completion of the transactions contemplated hereby (including promptly furnishing the other with copies of notices or other communications received by EWBC or SB, as the case may be, from any third party and/or Governmental Authority with respect to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement).

(b)Each party agrees, upon request, to furnish the other parties with all information known to it (which knowledge shall be deemed to include knowledge which could be acquired after reasonable due inquiry) concerning itself, its Subsidiaries, directors, advisory directors, officers and shareholders and such other matters as may be reasonably necessary or advisable in connection with any filing, notice or application made by or on behalf of such other parties to any third party or Governmental Authority.

SECTION 6.10 Indemnification by EWBC.

(a)Following the Effective Time, EWBC or EWB shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless each present and former director and officer of SB (each, an “Indemnified Party”) against all costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages or liabilities (collectively, “Costs”) incurred in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, arising out of actions or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time (including, without limitation, the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or any related agreement, but excluding any Costs arising out of any violation or alleged violation of the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder) to the same extent as directors or officers under the EWB Articles and the EWB By-Laws, as in effect on the date hereof; provided that any determination required to be made with respect to whether an officer’s or director’s conduct complies with the standards set forth in the EWB Articles or the EWB By-Laws shall be made by independent counsel selected by EWBC and reasonably acceptable to the Indemnified Party; and provided, further, that in the absence of judicial precedent to the contrary, such counsel, in making such determination, shall presume such officer’s or director’s conduct complied with such standard and EWBC shall have the burden to demonstrate that such officer’s or director’s conduct failed to comply with such standard.

For a period of one to three years (as the parties may reasonably agree prior to the Effective Time) from the Effective Time, EWBC shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to provide that portion of director’s and officer’s liability insurance that serves to reimburse the present and former officers and directors (determined as of the Effective Time) of SB (as opposed to the portion that serves to reimburse SB) with respect to claims against such directors and officers arising from facts or events which occurred before the Effective Time, which insurance shall contain at least the same coverage and amounts, and contain terms and conditions no less advantageous, as that coverage currently provided by SB; provided, however, that officers and directors of SB may be required to make application and provide customary representations and warranties to EWBC’s insurance carrier for the purpose of obtaining such insurance.

(b)Any Indemnified Party wishing to claim indemnification under Section 6.10(a), upon learning of any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation described above, shall promptly notify EWBC thereof; provided that the failure so to notify shall not affect the obligations of EWBC under Section 6.10(a) unless and to the extent that EWBC is actually prejudiced as a result of such failure. In the event of any such claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation (whether arising before or after the Effective Time), (i) EWBC shall have the right to assume the defense thereof and EWBC shall not be liable to such Indemnified Party for any legal expenses or other counsel or any other expenses subsequently incurred by such Indemnified Party in connection with the defense thereof, provided, however, that any Indemnified Party shall have the right to employ counsel to represent such Indemnified Party if (A) the Indemnified Party and EWBC shall have so mutually agreed; (B) EWBC has failed within a reasonable time to retain counsel; (C) the Indemnified Party shall have reasonably concluded that there may be legal defenses available to it that are different from or in addition to those available to EWBC; or (D) the named parties in any such proceeding (including any impleaded parties) include both the Indemnified Party, on the one hand, and EWBC or any of its Subsidiaries, on the other hand, and representation of both sets of parties by the same counsel would be inappropriate due to actual or potential differing interests between them, and in any such events the fees and expenses of such separate counsel shall be paid by EWBC; (ii) the Indemnified Party will cooperate in the defense of any such matter and (iii) EWBC shall not be liable for any settlement effected without its prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; provided, further, that EWBC shall not have any obligation hereunder to any Indemnified Party if and when a court of competent jurisdiction shall ultimately determine, and such determination shall have become final, that the indemnification of such Indemnified Party in the manner contemplated hereby is prohibited by applicable law.

(c)If EWBC or any of its successors or assigns shall (i) consolidate with or merge into any other entity and shall not be the continuing or surviving entity of such consolidation or merger or (ii) transfer all or substantially all of its assets to any other entity, then and in each case, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and assigns of EWBC shall assume the obligations set forth in this Section 6.10.

SECTION 6.11 Benefit Plans.

(a)Prior to the Effective Time, SB shall take all action necessary to terminate any and all 401(k) Plans SB maintains and any other Benefit Plan that EWB may specify.

(b)EWB agrees that as of and following the Effective Time, the employees of SB as of the Effective Time who are offered and who accept employment with EWBC or EWB (the “Former SB Employees”) shall be eligible to participate in EWBC’s or EWB’s employee benefit plans in which the similarly situated employees of EWBC or EWB participate, to the same extent as such similarly situated employees of EWBC or EWB participate.

(c)With respect to each employee benefit plan, program, policy or arrangement maintained by EWBC or EWB for the benefit of current employees of EWBC or EWB (each such plan, program, policy or arrangement, an “EWB Plan”), EWBC and EWB agrees that for purposes of determining eligibility to participate and vesting (but not for benefit accrual purposes), service with SB shall be treated as service with EWBC or with EWB; provided, however, that such service shall not be recognized to the extent that such recognition would result in a duplication of benefits. To the extent permitted by any insurer of an EWB Plan, EWB shall cause such EWB Plan to waive (i) any pre-existing condition restriction that did not apply under the terms of any analogous Benefit Plan immediately prior to the Effective Time and (ii) any waiting period limitation or evidence of insurability requirement which would otherwise be applicable to a Former SB Employee on or after the Effective Time to the extent such Former SB Employee had satisfied any similar limitation or requirement under an analogous Benefit Plan prior to the Effective Time and shall cause such EWB Plan to give each Former SB Employee credit for amounts paid under any analogous Benefit Plan for purposes of applying deductibles, co-payments and out-of-pocket maximums as though such amounts had been paid in accordance with the terms and conditions of the EWB Plan.

SECTION 6.12 Future Employment.

(a)EWB shall have the right but not the obligation to offer employment immediately following the Effective Time to any and all persons who are expected to be officers and employees of SB immediately before the Effective Time. SB will provide EWBC and EWB with information regarding such persons’ current employment arrangements with SB and will otherwise assist EWBC and EWB in making such offers.

(b)SB shall establish an employee severance and retention plan (the "New Plan") that is acceptable to EWB for SB employees whose positions are eliminated and who do not accept other mutually agreeable employment with EWB and for retention payments payable to some or all SB employees who are offered employment with EWB. The New Plan shall replace and be in lieu of any existing employee severance and retention policies of SB. All severance payments under the New Plan shall provide for the execution of a severance agreement satisfactory to EWB as a condition to receipt of payments, which shall provide for (i) release of claims, (ii) confidentiality of information, and (iii) no solicitation of EWB customers or employees for a period of one year after the Effective Time. All retention bonus payments under the New Plan provide for the execution of a retention receipt agreement satisfactory to EWB as a condition to receipt of payments, which shall provide for (x) release of claims, (y) confidentiality of information, and (z) no solicitation of the Surviving Bank’s customers or employees for a period of one year after the Effective Time.

SECTION 6.13 Notification of Certain Matters. Each of SB and EWBC shall give prompt notice to the other of any fact, event or circumstance known to it that (i) is reasonably likely, individually or taken together with all other facts, events and circumstances known to it, to result in any Material Adverse Effect with respect to it or (ii) would cause or constitute a material breach of any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained herein.

SECTION 6.14 Human Resources Issues. SB agrees to cooperate with EWB with respect to any formal meetings or interviews with one or more employees called or arranged by SB and held for the purpose of discussing the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or their effect on such employees, with EWB given the opportunity to participate in such meetings or interviews. This section is not intended to apply to casual conversations about the transaction or informal meetings initiated by employees, or to prohibit discussion in general, but rather to allow EWB a role in the formal presentation of the transaction to employees, and an opportunity to participate in the significant, formal meetings at which the transaction is explained and discussed.

SECTION 6.15 Assistance with Third-Party Agreements.

(a)SB shall cooperate with and use all commercially reasonable efforts to assist EWB in (i) gaining access to and obtaining any required consents from all of its third-party vendors, landlords of all of their leased properties and other parties to material agreements, promptly after the effective date of this Agreement, and (ii) obtaining the cooperation of such third parties in a smooth transition in accordance with EWB’s timetable at or after the Effective Time. SB shall cooperate with EWB in minimizing the extent to which any contracts will continue in effect following the Effective Time, in addition to complying with the prohibition of Section 4.01(l) hereof.

(b)Without limiting Section 6.15(a), SB shall use all reasonable efforts to provide data processing and other processing support to assist EWB in performing all tasks reasonably required to result in a successful conversion of SB data and other files and records to EWB’s production environment at such time as EWB requests or after the Effective Time. Among other things, SB shall:

(i)cooperate with EWB to establish a mutually agreeable project plan to effectuate the conversion;

(ii)use its commercially reasonable efforts to have SB’s outside contractors continue to support both the conversion effort and its needs until the conversion can be established;

(iii)provide, or use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain from any outside contractors, all data or other files and layouts requested by EWB for use in planning the conversion, as soon as reasonably practicable;

(iv)provide reasonable access to personnel at corporate headquarters, data and other processing centers, all branches and, with the consent of outside contractors, at outside contractors, to enable the conversion effort to be completed on schedule; and

(v)to the extent reasonably practicable, give notice of termination, conditioned upon the completion of the transactions contemplated hereby, of the contracts of outside data and other processing contractors or other third-party vendors when directed to do so by EWB.

(vi)EWB agrees that all actions taken pursuant to this Section 6.15 shall be taken in a manner intended to minimize disruption to the customary business activities of SB.

SECTION 6.16 Additional Agreements. In case at any time after the Effective Time any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of this Agreement or to vest EWBC or EWB with full title to all properties, assets, rights, approvals, immunities and franchises of SB, the proper officers and directors of each party to this Agreement shall take all necessary or appropriate action.

SECTION 6.17 Tax Treatment of the Merger. The parties intend the Agreement to qualify as a tax-free reorganization for all U.S. federal income tax purposes. Each party will (and EWBC will cause each of its Subsidiaries to) both before and after the Effective Time (i) use reasonable efforts to cause the Agreement to so qualify; and (ii) refrain from taking any action that would reasonably be expected to cause the Agreement to fail to so qualify.

SECTION 6.18 Non-Solicitation & Confidentiality Agreements. SB shall deliver to EWBC Non-Solicitation & Confidentiality Agreements, substantially in the form of Exhibit B hereto, executed by each of the Persons listed on Exhibit B-1, on or before the Effective Date.

SECTION 6.19 Other Shareholder Agreements.

(a)SB shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause each person who is, at the time this Agreement is submitted to the SB shareholders for approval or consent, an “affiliate” of SB for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act to execute and deliver to EWB a written agreement (the “Affiliate Agreement”), in the form of Exhibit D hereto, providing that such person shall dispose of the EWB Common Stock to be received by such person in the Merger only in accordance with applicable law.

SECTION 6.20 Minimum ALL. As of the Effective Date, SB’s ALL shall not be less than 100% of the amount of its ALL as of September 30, 2005.

SECTION 6.21 Pre-Closing Adjustments and Minimum Closing Shareholders’ Equity. At or before the Effective Time, as determined by SB and EWBC, SB shall make such accounting entries or adjustments, including additions to its ALL and charge-offs of loans (collectively, “Pre-Closing Adjustments”) as EWBC shall direct as a result of its on-going review of SB (including its review of the information provided to it pursuant to Sections 6.05 and 6.15) or in order to implement its plans following the Effective Time or to reflect expenses and costs related to the Merger; provided, however, that unless the adjustment would otherwise be required by applicable law, rule or regulation, or by regulatory accounting principles and GAAP applied on a basis consistent with the financial statements of SB, no such adjustment shall (i) violate any law, rule or regulation applicable to EWBC, or (ii) otherwise materially disadvantage SB if the Merger was not consummated. As of the Effective Time, “Minimum Closing Shareholders’ Equity”, as calculated below, shall not be less than 100% of Shareholders’ Equity. “Minimum Closing Shareholders’ Equity” shall be calculated as follows: SB’s shareholders’ equity as of the Effective Time, calculated according to GAAP, shall be adjusted by: adding (a) payments made or accrued by SB prior to the Effective Time under the New Plan as provided in Section 6.12(b); (b) Transaction Expenses paid or accrued by SB prior to the Effective Time; and (c) Pre-Closing Adjustments; and by subtracting the amount of the increase in SB’s shareholders’ equity as a result of the exercise of Options.

SECTION 6.22 FIRPTA Certificate. SB shall have furnished to EWB and EWBC a certification that SB is not a United States real property holding corporation, dated not more than 30 days prior to the Effective Date, in compliance with Treasury Regulations Sections 1.1445-2(c)(3) and 1.897-2(h), in a form reasonably satisfactory to EWB.

ARTICLE VII

CONDITIONS TO CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER

SECTION 7.01 Conditions to the Parties’ Obligations to Effect the Merger. The respective obligations of the parties hereto to consummate the Merger is subject to the fulfillment or written waiver by the parties hereto prior to the Effective Time of each of the following conditions:

(a)Shareholder Approvals. This Agreement and the Merger have been duly approved by the affirmative written consents or the affirmative votes of the shareholders and the boards of directors of SB, EWB and EWBC in accordance with applicable law. Said approvals, including the Shareholder Agreement, shall continue in effect and shall not have been revoked.

(b)Regulatory Approvals. All regulatory approvals required to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger, shall have been obtained and shall remain in full force and effect and all statutory waiting periods in respect thereof shall have expired and no such approvals shall contain any conditions, restrictions or requirements which the board of directors of EWBC reasonably determines in good faith would (i) following the Effective Time, have a Material Adverse Effect on EWBC and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole or (ii) reduce the benefits of the transactions contemplated hereby to such a degree that EWBC would not have entered into this Agreement had such conditions, restrictions or requirements been known at the date hereof.

(c)No Injunction; No Litigation. No Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any statute, rule, regulation, judgment, decree, injunction or other order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) which is in effect and prohibits consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(f)Tax Opinion. SB and EWBC shall have received the opinion of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, dated the Effective Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to SB and EWBC, to the effect that, on the basis of facts, representations and assumptions set forth in such opinion, which are assumed in the opinion to be consistent with the state of facts existing at the Effective Time, the Merger more likely than not will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering its opinion, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, may require and rely upon representations contained in letters from EWBC, EWB or SB and/or their officers or principal shareholders as are customary for such opinions.

SECTION 7.02 Conditions to Obligation of SB to Effect the Merger. The obligation of SB to consummate the Merger is also subject to the fulfillment or written waiver prior to the Effective Time of each of the following additional conditions:

(a)Representations and Warranties; Agreements and Covenants. The representations and warranties of EWBC set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the effective date of this Agreement and as of the Effective Date as though made on and as of the Effective Date (except that representations and warranties that by their terms speak as of the effective date of this Agreement or some other date shall be true and correct as of such date). For purposes of this paragraph, such representations and warranties shall be deemed to be true and correct in all material respects unless the failure or failures of such representations and warranties to be true and correct in all material respects, either individually or in the aggregate, and without giving effect to any materiality, material adverse effect or similar qualifications set forth in such representations and warranties, will have or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on EWBC. EWBC shall have performed, in all material respects, each of its covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement. SB shall have received a certificate, dated the Effective Date, signed on behalf of EWBC and EWB by authorized executive officers of EWBC and EWB to such effect.

SECTION 7.03 Conditions to Obligation of EWBC. The obligation of EWBC and EWB to consummate the Merger is also subject to the fulfillment or written waiver prior to the Effective Time of each of the following conditions:

(a)Representations and Warranties; Agreements and Covenants. The representations and warranties of SB set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the effective date of this Agreement and as of the Effective Date as though made on and as of the Effective Date (except that representations and warranties that by their terms speak as of the effective date of this Agreement or some other date shall be true and correct as of such date). For purposes of this paragraph, such representations and warranties shall be deemed to be true and correct in all material respects unless the failure or failures of such representations and warranties to be true and correct in all material respects, either individually or in the aggregate, and without giving effect to any materiality, material adverse effect or similar qualifications set forth in such representations and warranties, will have or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on SB. SB shall have performed, in all material respects, each of its covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement.

(b)SB Disclosure Schedule. The SB Disclosure Schedule shall be updated and made current as of the day prior to the Effective Date and a draft of the updated SB Disclosure Schedule shall have been delivered to EWBC no later than 72 hours prior to the Effective Time; such update of the SB Disclosure Schedule shall not in any way affect the representations and warranties set forth in Section 5.03 and 7.03(a).

(c)Performance of Obligations of SB. SB shall have performed in all material respects all obligations required to be performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Effective Time.

(d)Consents. SB shall have obtained each of the material consents listed in SB Disclosure Schedule 5.03(l).

(e)Affiliate Agreements. All Affiliate Agreements required pursuant to Section 6.19 shall have been executed and delivered to EWB.

(f)Officers’ Certificate. EWBC and EWB shall have received a certificate from SB, dated the Effective Date, signed by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of SB verifying that SB is in compliance with all of the requirements of Sections 7.03(a), (b), (c) and (d).

ARTICLE VIII

TERMINATION

SECTION 8.01 Termination by Mutual Consent. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time by the mutual written consent of EWBC, EWB, and SB by action of their respective boards of directors.

SECTION 8.02 Termination by Either EWBC, EWB or SB.

(a)This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time by action of the board of directors of either EWBC or EWB, on the one hand, or SB, on the other hand, in the event:

(i)The SB Disclosure Schedule delivered after the date hereof contains a material adverse disclosure as determined in the sole discretion of the receiving party.

(ii)The Merger is not consummated by June 30, 2006 except to the extent that the failure of the Merger then to be consummated arises out of or results from the knowing action or inaction of (A) the party seeking to terminate pursuant to this Section 8.02(a), or (B) any of SB shareholders that are parties to the Shareholder Agreement (if SB is the party seeking to terminate), which action or inaction is in violation of their obligations under this Agreement.

(iii)The approval of any Governmental Authority required for consummation of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall have been denied by final and nonappealable action of such Governmental Authority or an application therefor shall have been permanently withdrawn at the invitation, request or suggestion of a Governmental Authority.

(b)This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time:

(i)by action of the EWBC board of directors: in the event of (A) a breach by SB of any representation or warranty contained herein, which breach cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days after the giving of written notice to SB of such breach, (B) a material breach by SB of any of the covenants or agreements contained herein, which breach cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days after the giving of written notice to SB of such breach, (C) SB or any of the other Persons described in Section 6.07 as affiliates, representatives or agents of SB shall take any of the actions that would be proscribed by Section 6.07, (D) SB shall have breached Section 6.07 or the SB board of directors shall have adopted any resolution inconsistent with its approval of this Agreement or the Merger, or failed to reconfirm its recommendation of this Agreement within five (5) Business Days after a written request by EWBC to do so or any SB shareholder that is a party to the Shareholder Agreement has taken any action inconsistent with the execution of the Shareholder Agreement, (E) the holders of at least 66.67% of the outstanding SB Common Stock fail to approve this Agreement and the Merger.

(ii)by action of the SB board of directors: in the event of (A) a breach by EWBC or EWB of any representation or warranty contained herein, which breach cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days after the giving of written notice to EWB of such breach, or (B) a material breach by EWBC or EWB of any of the covenants or agreements contained herein, which breach cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days after the giving of written notice to EWBC and EWB of such breach, or (C) in order to pursue an acquisition target other than, and instead of, SB, the EWBC board of directors shall have adopted any resolution inconsistent with its approval of this Agreement or the Merger, or failed to reconfirm its recommendation of this Agreement within five (5) Business Days after a written request by SB to do so.

(c)For purposes of Section 8.02(b), the representations and warranties contained herein shall be deemed to have been breached by any of SB, EWBC or EWB only if the failure of such representations and warranties to be true and correct, either individually or in the aggregate, and without giving effect to any materiality, material adverse effect or similar qualifications set forth in such representations and warranties, will have or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the breaching party.

SECTION 8.03 Effect of Termination and Abandonment. 

(a)In the event of termination of this Agreement and the abandonment of the Merger pursuant to this Article VIII, this Agreement (other than as set forth in Section 9.01) shall become void and of no effect with no liability or further obligation on the part of any party hereto (or of any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, legal and financial advisors or other representatives); provided, however, except as otherwise provided herein, no party shall otherwise be relieved of any liability or damages resulting from any breach of this Agreement. 

(b)In the event that this Agreement is terminated by EWBC pursuant to Section 8.02(b)(i) (A) or (B), then, no later than two (2) Business Days following such termination, SB shall pay the Liquidated Damaged Amount to EWB by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an EWB account specified by EWB.

(c)In the event that this Agreement is terminated by SB pursuant to Section 8.02(b)(ii) (A) or (B), then, no later than two (2) Business Days following the termination, EWB shall pay the Liquidated Damages Amount to SB by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an SB account specified by SB.

(d)SB and EWBC agree that the agreements contained in paragraphs (b) and (c) above are an integral part of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, that without such agreements EWBC and SB would not have entered into this Agreement, and that such amounts specified therein do not constitute a penalty.  If the applicable party fails to promptly pay to the other party the amounts due under paragraph (b) or (c) above within the time period specified therein, the party required to make payment thereunder shall pay all costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by the other party in connection with any action, including the filing of any lawsuit, taken to collect payment of such amounts, together with interest on the amount of any such unpaid amounts at the publicly announced prime rate of EWB from the date such amounts were required to be paid.

ARTICLE IX

MISCELLANEOUS

SECTION 9.01 Survival. All representations, warranties, agreements and covenants contained in this Agreement shall survive for one year following the Effective Time (other than Sections 6.06, 6.10, 6.11, 6.12, 6.16, 6.19, as specifically provided in Article VIII, this Article IX which shall survive the Effective Time indefinitely unless otherwise specifically provided therein) or the termination of this Agreement if this Agreement is terminated prior to the Effective Time.

SECTION 9.02 Waiver; Amendment. Prior to the Effective Time, any provision of this Agreement may be (i) waived in whole or in part by the party benefited by the provision or by all parties or (ii) amended or modified at any time, by an agreement in writing among the parties hereto executed in the same manner as this Agreement.

SECTION 9.03 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to constitute an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

SECTION 9.04 Governing Law, Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by, and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of California (however, not to the exclusion of any applicable Federal law), without regard to California statutes or judicial decisions regarding choice of law questions. The parties hereby irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of California and the federal courts of the United States of America located in the Southern District of the State of California solely in respect of the interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of this Agreement and of the documents referred to in this Agreement, and in respect of the transactions contemplated herein and therein, and hereby waive, and agree to assert, as a defense in any action, suit or proceeding for the interpretation or enforcement hereof or of any such documents, that it is not subject thereto or that such action, suit or proceeding may not be brought or is not maintainable in said courts or that the venue thereof may not be appropriate or that this Agreement or any such document may not be enforced in or by such courts, and the parties hereto irrevocably agree that all claims with respect to such action or proceeding shall be heard and determined in such California state or federal court. The parties hereby consent to and grant any such court jurisdiction over the person of such parties and over the subject matter of such dispute and agree that mailing of process or other papers in connection with any such action or proceeding in the manner provided in Section 9.06 or in such other manner as may be permitted by law, shall be valid and sufficient service thereof.

SECTION 9.05 Expenses. Each party hereto will bear all expenses incurred by it in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby except as otherwise specifically provided.

SECTION 9.06 Notices. All notices, requests and other communications hereunder to a party shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered, telecopied (with confirmation) or mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) to such party at its address set forth below or such other address as such party may specify by notice to the parties hereto.

If to SB:

ARTICLE II. Standard Bank

ARTICLE III. 228 West Garvey Avenue

ARTICLE IV. Monterey Park, CA 91754-1603

ARTICLE V. Attention: John M. Lee, Chairman of the Board,

President and Chief Executive Officer

ARTICLE VI. Telephone: (626) 281-6448

ARTICLE VII. Facsimile: (626) 280-1699

With a copy to:

Paul H. Irving, Esq. and

T. J. Grasmick, Esq.

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

11355 West Olympic Boulevard

Los Angeles, CA 90064

Telephone: (310) 312-4205

(310) 312-4369

Telecopy: (310) 312-4224

If to EWBC or EWB to:

ARTICLE VIII. Douglas P. Krause, Esq.

ARTICLE IX. Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

ARTICLE X. East West Bancorp, Inc.

ARTICLE XI. 415 Huntington Drive

ARTICLE XII. San Marino, CA 91108

ARTICLE XIII. Telephone: (626) 583-3587

ARTICLE XIV. Facsimile: (626) 799-2799

With a copy to:

ARTICLE XV. Stephanie E. Allen, Esq.

McAndrews, Allen & Matson

1100 South Coast Highway, Suite 308

ARTICLE XVI. Laguna Beach, CA 92651

ARTICLE XVII. Telephone: (949) 497-0292

ARTICLE XVIII. Facsimile: (949) 497-0291

ARTICLE XIX.

SECTION 9.07 Entire Understanding; No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement, the Disclosure Schedules attached hereto and incorporated herein, and the exhibits to the Agreement represent the entire understanding of the parties hereto and thereto with reference to the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby and this Agreement, the Disclosure Schedules attached hereto and incorporated herein, and the exhibits to the Agreement, supersede any and all other oral or written agreements heretofore made. Except for Sections 6.10, nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, is intended to confer upon any Person, other than the parties hereto or their respective successors, any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement.

SECTION 9.08 Effect. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed to require SB, EWBC, EWB or any Subsidiaries, affiliates or directors of any of them to take any action or omit to take any action which action or omission would violate applicable law (whether statutory or common law), rule or regulation.

SECTION 9.09 Severability. Except to the extent that application of this Section 9.09 would have a Material Adverse Effect on SB, EWBC or EWB, any term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability without rendering invalid or unenforceable the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement or affecting the validity or enforceability of any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.

SECTION 9.10 Enforcement of the Agreement. The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof in any court of the United States or any state having jurisdiction, this being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity.

SECTION 9.11 Interpretation. When a reference is made in this Agreement to Sections, Exhibits or Disclosure Schedules, such reference shall be to a Section of, or Exhibit or Disclosure Schedule to, this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents and headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and are not part of this Agreement. Whenever the words “include”, “includes” or “including” are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation”.

[Signature page follows this page]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in counterparts by their duly authorized officers, all as of the day and year first above written.

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.		EAST WEST BANK
By:	/s/ DOUGLAS P. KRAUSE	By:	/s/ DOUGLAS P. KRAUSE
Name:Douglas P. Krause		Name:Douglas P. Krause
Title:Executive Vice President		Title:Executive Vice President
STANDARD BANK
By:	/s/ JOHN M. LEE
Name:John M. Lee
Title:Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT A

SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT A-1

PERSONS EXECUTING SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT B

NON-SOLICITATION & CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT B-1

PERSONS EXECUTING NON-SOLICITATION & CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

John M. Lee

EXHIBIT C

AGREEMENT OF MERGER

EXHIBIT D

AFFILIATE AGREEMENT

40959084.2

EX-21.1

Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.

East West Bank	100%
East West Capital Trust I	100%
East West Capital Trust II	100%
East West Capital Statutory Trust III	100%
East West Capital Trust IV	100%
East West Capital Trust V	100%
East West Capital Trust VI	100%
East West Insurance Services, Inc.	100%
East West Leasing(1)	100%
American International Bancorp, Inc.(1)	100%
United National Bancorp, Inc. (1)	100%

___________

(1)    Not currently active

EX-31.1

CERTIFICATION

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Dominic Ng, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “registrant”);

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 10, 2006
	/s/ DOMINIC NG Dominic Ng President and Chief Executive Officer

 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-31.2

CERTIFICATION

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Julia S. Gouw, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “registrant”);

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 10, 2006
	/s/ JULIA S. GOUW Julia S. Gouw Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.1

CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dominic Ng, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(a)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 10, 2006
	/s/ DOMINIC NG Dominic Ng President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Julia Gouw, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(a)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 10, 2006
	/s/ JULIA S. GOUW Julia S. Gouw Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.