XML 76 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 12 - Income Taxes
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

12.   INCOME TAXES


The Company’s effective tax rate was 30.4% for three months ended September 30, 2013 compared with 32.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease in the effective income tax rate in 2013 as compared to 2012 was partially the result of adjustments related to state income taxes, bank owned life insurance investment income and foreign taxes. Additionally, the effective income tax rates for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were impacted by the amount of other non-deductible expense and non-taxable income in each respective period, and also relative to the pre-tax income upon which the effective income tax rate was calculated. The Texas state tax is based on the Company’s gross margin with limited deductions. Because the Texas state tax allows only limited deductions the tax may not correlate, from year to year, with pre-tax income. The California state tax is based on the unitary income of the consolidated group which can vary disproportionately from pre-tax income depending on the apportionment of income among members of the unitary group. Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $4.5 million, compared with $4.0 million for the same period in 2012. The Company’s effective tax rate was 32.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with 32.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.


As of September 30, 2013, the Company had approximately $15.3 million in deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets are subject to an evaluation of whether it is more likely than not that they will be realized. The Company has not provided a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets at September 30, 2013 and  December 31, 2012 due to its ability to offset reversals of net deductible temporary differences against income taxes paid in previous years and expected to be paid in future years. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Because of historical losses that were recorded by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and if the Company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future, then the Company may not be able to conclude it is more likely than not that the benefits of the deferred tax assets will be fully realized and may be required to recognize a valuation allowance and a corresponding income tax expense equal to the portion of the deferred tax assets that may not be realized.


The U.S. Federal and California State net operating loss carryforward period of 20 years provides enough time to utilize the deferred tax assets pertaining to the existing net operating loss carryforwards and any net operating losses that would be created by the reversal of the future net deductions which have not yet been taken on a tax return.