XML 22 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL (Block)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Goodwil And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure Text Block

2. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

Goodwill and certain intangible assets are not amortized for book purposes. They may be, however, amortized for tax purposes. The Company accounts for its acquired broadcasting licenses as indefinite-lived intangible assets and, similar to goodwill, these assets are reviewed at least annually for impairment. At the time of each review, if the fair value is less than the carrying value of goodwill and certain intangibles (such as broadcasting licenses), then a charge is recorded to the results of operations.

There was no material change in the carrying value of broadcasting licenses or goodwill since the year ended December 31, 2016, other than as described below.

The Company recorded a $13.5 million loss in the first quarter of 2017 in net gain/loss on sale or disposal of assets as a result of the Company permanently discontinuing the operation of one of its stations and returning the station’s broadcasting license to the FCC for cancellation, in order to facilitate the Merger.

Additionally, the carrying value of the broadcasting licenses at December 31, 2016, included the broadcasting licenses of a consolidated Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) of approximately $15.7 million. These consolidated assets and liabilities of the VIE related to a pending acquisition of four radio stations in Charlotte, North Carolina. On October 17, 2016, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement and a time brokerage agreement (“TBA”) to operate three of the four radio stations that were held in a trust (“Charlotte Trust”). As such, the amounts of the consolidated VIE at December 31, 2016, represented only the assets and liabilities of the three stations held in the Charlotte Trust.

Upon the completion of this transaction on January 6, 2017, the Company deconsolidated broadcasting licenses attributable to the VIE and recorded broadcasting licenses of all four radio stations based upon the preliminary purchase price allocation. Refer to Note 9, Business Combinations, for additional information.

During the second quarter of 2017, the Company performed its annual impairment test of its goodwill and determined that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeded its fair value for the Boston, Massachusetts market and recorded an impairment loss of $0.4 million. A contributing factor to the impairment was a decline in the advertising dollars in the Boston, Massachusetts market and its effect on the Company’s operations, coupled with an increase in the carrying value of its assets.

The following table presents the changes in broadcasting licenses as described above:

Broadcasting Licenses
Carrying Amount
June 30,December 31,
20172016
(amounts in thousands)
Beginning of period balance as of January 1,$823,195$807,381
Disposition of FCC broadcasting license(13,500)-
Consolidation (deconsolidation) of a VIE(15,738)15,738
Acquisition of radio stations17,174-
Acquisitions - other-112
Disposition of radio stations previously reflected as held for sale-(36)
Ending period balance$811,131$823,195

The following table presents the changes in goodwill primarily as a result of acquisitions of radio stations and the Company’s annual impairment test.

Goodwill Carrying Amount
June 30,December 31,
20172016
(amounts in thousands)
Goodwill balance before cumulative loss
on impairment as of January 1,$158,333$158,244
Accumulated loss on impairment as of January 1,(125,615)(125,615)
Goodwill beginning balance after cumulative loss
on impairment as of January 1,32,71832,629
Loss on impairment during year(441)-
Acquisition of radio stations43-
Adjustment to acquired goodwill associated with an assumed fair value liability-92
Disposition of radio stations previously reflected as assets held for sale-(3)
Ending period balance$32,320$32,718

Broadcasting Licenses Impairment Test

The Company performs its annual broadcasting license impairment test during the second quarter of each year by evaluating its broadcasting licenses for impairment at the market level using the direct method.

During the second quarter of the current year and each of the past several years, the Company completed its annual impairment test for broadcasting licenses and determined that the fair value of its broadcasting licenses was greater than the amount reflected in the balance sheet for each of the Company’s markets and, accordingly, no impairment was recorded.  The annual impairment test in 2017 did not include the new market added during the first quarter of 2017. For the new market added during the first quarter of 2017, similar valuation techniques that are used in the testing process were applied to the valuation of the broadcasting licenses under purchase price accounting.

Each market’s broadcasting licenses are combined into a single unit of accounting for purposes of testing impairment, as the broadcasting licenses in each market are operated as a single asset. The Company determines the fair value of the broadcasting licenses in each of its markets by relying on a discounted cash flow approach (a 10-year income model) assuming a start-up scenario in which the only assets held by an investor are broadcasting licenses. The Company’s fair value analysis contains assumptions based upon past experience, reflects expectations of industry observers and includes judgments about future performance using industry normalized information for an average station within a certain market. These assumptions include, but are not limited to: (1) the discount rate; (2) the market share and profit margin of an average station within a market, based upon market size and station type; (3) the forecast growth rate of each radio market; (4) the estimated capital start-up costs and losses incurred during the early years; (5) the likely media competition within the market area; (6) the tax rate; and (7) future terminal values.

The methodology used by the Company in determining its key estimates and assumptions was applied consistently to each market. Of the seven variables identified above, the Company believes that the assumptions in items (1) through (3) above are the most important and sensitive in the determination of fair value.

The following table reflects the estimates and assumptions used in the second quarter of each year (no interim tests were performed in these years):

Estimates And Assumptions
SecondSecond
QuarterQuarter
20172016
Discount rate9.25%9.5%
Operating profit margin ranges expected
for average stations in the markets
where the Company operates19% to 40%14% to 40%
Long-term revenue growth rate range
of the Company's markets 1.0% to 2.0%1.0% to 2.0%

The Company has made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the fair value of its broadcasting licenses. These estimates and assumptions could be materially different from actual results.

If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by the industry or the Company, or if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of the Company’s broadcasting licenses below the amount reflected in the balance sheet, the Company may be required to conduct an interim test and possibly recognize impairment charges, which may be material, in future periods.

Goodwill Impairment Test

The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment test during the second quarter of each year by evaluating its goodwill for each reporting unit.

As described above, the Company elected to early adopt the amended accounting guidance which simplifies the test for goodwill impairment. The amended guidance eliminates the second step of the goodwill impairment test, which reduces the cost and complexity of evaluating goodwill for impairment. Under the former accounting guidance, the second step of the impairment test required the Company to compute the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Under the amended guidance, if the carrying amount of goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company will consider the goodwill to be impaired.

The Company has determined that a radio market is a reporting unit and the Company assesses goodwill in each of the Company’s markets. Under the amended guidance, if the fair value of any reporting unit is less than the amount reflected on the balance sheet, the Company will recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The loss recognized will not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.

Under the amended guidance, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative assessment for each reporting unit. These qualitative factors include, but are not limited to: (1) macroeconomic conditions; (2) radio broadcasting industry considerations; (3) financial performance of reporting units; (4) Company-specific events; and (5) a sustained decrease in the Company’s share price. If the quantitative assessment is necessary, the Company determines the fair value of the goodwill allocated to each reporting unit.

To determine the fair value, the Company uses a market approach and, when appropriate, an income approach in computing the fair value of each reporting unit. The market approach calculates the fair value of each market’s radio stations by analyzing recent sales and offering prices of similar properties expressed as a multiple of cash flow. The income approach utilizes a discounted cash flow method by projecting the subject property’s income over a specified time and capitalizing at an appropriate market rate to arrive at an indication of the most probable selling price. Management believes that these approaches are commonly used and appropriate methodologies for valuing broadcast radio stations. Factors contributing to the determination of the reporting unit’s operating performance were historical performance and/or management’s estimates of future performance.

The following table reflects the estimates and assumptions used in the second quarter of each year (no interim tests were performed in these years):

Estimates And Assumptions
SecondSecond
QuarterQuarter
20172016
Discount rate9.25%9.5%
Long-term revenue growth rate range
of the Company's markets 1.0% to 2.0%1.0% to 2.0%
Market multiple used in the market
valuation approach7.5x to 8.0x7.5x to 8.0x

During the second quarter of the current year, the Company’s quantitative assessment indicated that the goodwill allocated to its Boston, Massachusetts market was impaired.

The Company also performed a reasonableness test on the fair value results for goodwill on a combined basis by comparing the carrying value of the Company’s assets to the Company’s enterprise value based upon its stock price, shares outstanding, total debt and preferred stock outstanding, and cash on hand. The Company determined that the results were reasonable.

If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by the industry or the Company, or if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of the Company’s goodwill below the amount reflected in the balance sheet, the Company may be required to conduct an interim test and possibly recognize impairment charges, which could be material, in future periods.