XML 38 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
6 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
5.Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
The Company has interest rate risk relative to its outstanding borrowings (see Note 4).  The Company’s policy has been to manage interest cost using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt.  To manage this risk in a cost efficient manner, the Company uses derivative instruments, specifically interest rate swaps.
 
For each of the Company’s interest rate swaps, the Company has agreed to exchange with a counterparty the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount.  The interest rates on the portion of the Company’s outstanding debt covered by its interest rate swaps are fixed at the rates in the table below plus the Company’s credit spread.  The Company’s weighted average credit spread at January 31, 2014 was 1.50%.  All of the Company’s interest rate swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
 
A summary of the Company’s interest rate swaps at January 31, 2014 is as follows:
 
 
Trade Date
 
Effective Date
 
Term
(in Years)
  
 
Notional Amount
  
Fixed
Rate
 
August 10, 2010
May 3, 2013
  
2
  
$
200,000
   
2.73
%
July 25, 2011
May 3, 2013
  
2
   
50,000
   
2.00
%
July 25, 2011
May 3, 2013
  
3
   
50,000
   
2.45
%
September 19, 2011
May 3, 2013
  
2
   
25,000
   
1.05
%
September 19, 2011
May 3, 2013
  
2
   
25,000
   
1.05
%
December 7, 2011
May 3, 2013
  
3
   
50,000
   
1.40
%
March 18, 2013
May 3, 2015
  
3
   
50,000
   
1.51
%
April 8, 2013
May 3, 2015
  
2
   
50,000
   
1.05
%
April 15, 2013
May 3, 2015
  
2
   
50,000
   
1.03
%
April 22, 2013
May 3, 2015
  
3
   
25,000
   
1.30
%
April 25, 2013
May 3, 2015
  
3
   
25,000
   
1.29
%

 The Company does not hold or use derivative instruments for trading purposes.  The Company also does not have any derivatives not designated as hedging instruments and has not designated any non-derivatives as hedging instruments.

Companies may elect to offset related assets and liabilities and report the net amount on their financial statements if the right of setoff exists.  Under a master netting agreement, the Company has the legal right to offset the amounts owed to the Company against amounts owed by the Company under a derivative instrument that exists between the Company and a counterparty.  When the Company is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and also has a legally enforceable master netting agreement with that counterparty, its credit risk exposure is based on the net exposure under the master netting agreement.  If, on a net basis, the Company owes the counterparty, the Company regards its credit exposure to the counterparty as being zero.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments as of January 31, 2014 and August 2, 2013 were as follows:

(See Note 2)
Balance Sheet Location
 
January 31, 2014
  
August 2, 2013
 
Interest rate swaps
Other assets
 
$
377
  
$
883
 
Interest rate swaps
Long-term interest rate swap liability
 
$
9,761
  
$
11,644
 

The following table summarizes the offsetting of the Company’s derivative assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 31, 2014 and August 2, 2013:
 
 
 
Gross Asset Amounts
  
Liability Amount Offset
  
Net Asset Amount Presented
in the Balance Sheets
 
 
(See Note 2)
 
January 31,
2014
  
August 2,
2013
  
January 31,
2014
  
August 2,
2013
  
January 31,
2014
  
August 2,
2013
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$
611
  
$
1,159
  
$
(234
)
 
$
(276
)
 
$
377
  
$
883
 

The following table summarizes the offsetting of the Company’s derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 31, 2014 and August 2, 2013:
 
 
 
Gross Liability Amounts
  
Asset Amount Offset
  
Net Liability Amount Presented
in the Balance Sheets
 
 
(See Note 2)
 
January 31,
2014
  
August 2,
2013
  
January 31,
2014
  
August 2,
2013
  
January 31,
 2014
  
August 2,
2013
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$
10,537
  
$
13,120
  
$
(776
)
 
$
(1,476
)
 
$
9,761
  
$
11,644
 

The estimated fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap assets and liabilities incorporate the Company’s non-performance risk (see Note 2).  The adjustment related to the Company’s non-performance risk at January 31, 2014 and August 2, 2013 resulted in reductions of $23 and $123, respectively, in the fair value of the interest rate swap assets and liabilities.  The offset to the interest rate swap assets and liabilities is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”), net of the deferred tax asset, and will be reclassified into earnings over the term of the underlying debt.  As of January 31, 2014, the estimated pre-tax portion of AOCL that is expected to be reclassified into earnings over the next twelve months is $6,009.  Cash flows related to the interest rate swap are included in interest expense and in operating activities.
 
The following table summarizes the pre-tax effects of the Company’s derivative instruments on AOCL for the six months ended January 31, 2014 and the year ended August 2, 2013:
 
 
 
Amount of Income Recognized in AOCL on Derivatives (Effective Portion)
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
  
Year Ended
 
 
 
January 31, 2014
  
August 2, 2013
 
Cash flow hedges:
 
  
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$
1,377
  
$
23,620
 

The following table summarizes the pre-tax effects of the Company’s derivative instruments on income for the quarters and six-month periods ended January 31, 2014 and February 1, 2013:
  
 
Location of Loss
Reclassified from
AOCL into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
 
Amount of Loss Reclassified from AOCL into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Quarter Ended
Six Months Ended
 
January 31,
2014
February 1,
2013
January 31,
2014
February 1,
2013
Cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
Interest expense
 
$
1,984
  
$
7,030
  
$
4,026
  
$
7,030
 
 
Any portion of the fair value of the swaps determined to be ineffective will be recognized currently in earnings.  No ineffectiveness has been recorded in the six-month periods ended January 31, 2014 and February 1, 2013.