XML 49 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

22. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Operating Leases

 

The Company leases office space in 50 cities in 26 countries. The terms of these office-related leases provide that the Company pay base rent and a share of operating expenses and real estate taxes in excess of defined amounts. These leases expire at various dates through 2024. The Company also leases certain computer equipment and cars, the terms of which are accounted for as operating leases. Rent expense, which includes the base rent, operating expenses and real estate taxes, and the costs of equipment leases for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $27.1 million, $28.1 million, and $32.7 million, respectively. The Company broadened the definition of rent expense in 2013 to also include maintenance costs. Under the broader definition, total expense was $32.4 million, $32.1 million, and $34.4 million in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Minimum future office space and equipment lease payments due in each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

     Office Leases      Equipment
Leases
     Total  

Year ending December 31,

        

2014

   $ 30,274       $ 764       $ 31,038   

2015

     26,475         628         27,103   

2016

     21,586         356         21,942   

2017

     15,331         50         15,381   

2018

     14,191         4         14,195   

Thereafter

     59,839         —           59,839   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 167,696       $ 1,802       $ 169,498   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

The aggregate minimum future payments on office leases are $167.7 million. The Company has contractual arrangements to receive aggregate sublease income of $3.2 million related to certain leases that expire at various dates through 2016. This sublease income primarily relates to properties that were part of prior office consolidations and closings.

 

Certain leases provide for renewal options and payments of real estate taxes and other occupancy costs. In addition, certain leases contain rent escalation clauses that require additional rental amounts in later years of the term. Rent expense for leases with rent escalation clauses is recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term.

 

The Company has an obligation at the end of the lease term to return the office to the landlord in its original condition, which are recorded at fair value at the time the liability is incurred. The Company had $1.7 million and $1.8 million of asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Litigation

 

The Company has contingent liabilities from various pending claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of the Company’s business, some of which involve claims for damages that are substantial in amount. Some of these matters are covered by insurance. Based upon information currently available, the Company believes the ultimate resolution of such claims and litigation, including the “UK Employee Benefit Trust” matter discussed below, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

UK Employee Benefits Trust

 

On January 27, 2010, HM Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) in the United Kingdom notified the Company that it was challenging the tax treatment of certain of the Company’s contributions in the United Kingdom to an Employee Benefits Trust between 2002 and 2008. HMRC alleges that these contributions should have been subject to Pay As You Earn tax and Class 1 National Insurance Contributions in the United Kingdom; and HMRC is proposing an adjustment to the Company’s payroll tax liability for the affected years. The aggregate amount of HMRC’s proposed adjustment is approximately £3.9 million (equivalent to $6.5 million at December 31, 2013). The Company has appealed the proposed adjustment. At this time, the Company believes that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome with respect to the proposed adjustment is not probable and the potential amount of any loss cannot be reasonably estimated. The Company also believes that the amount of any final adjustment would not be material to the Company’s financial condition.