10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2008

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File No. 0-24753

ECB Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

North Carolina	56-2090738
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Post Office Box 337, Engelhard, North Carolina 27824

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(252) 925-9411

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

On November 6, 2008, there were 2,846,789 outstanding shares of Registrant’s common stock.

This Form 10-Q has 40 pages.

Table of Contents

	Begins on Page
Index
Part 1 – Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007	3
Consolidated Income Statements for Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007	4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007	5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007	6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	33
Part II – Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	34
Item 1A. Risk Factors	34
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	34
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities	34
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	34
Item 5. Other Information	35
Item 6. Exhibits	35
Signatures	35
Exhibit Index	36
EX- 31.1	37
EX- 31.2	39
EX- 32	40

2

ECB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Balance Sheets

September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007*
	(unaudited)
Assets
Non-interest bearing deposits and cash	$	15,679		$	16,303
Interest bearing deposits		1,376			925
Overnight investments		20,875			4,775
Total cash and cash equivalents		37,930			22,003
Investment securities
Available-for-sale, at market value (cost of $156,771 and $126,616 at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)		154,077			125,888
Loans		524,337			454,198
Allowance for loan losses		(5,077	)		(4,083	)
Loans, net		519,260			450,115
Real estate and repossessions acquired in settlement of loans, net		697			66
Federal Home Loan Bank common stock, at cost		3,859			2,382
Bank premises and equipment, net		25,250			24,450
Accrued interest receivable		5,076			4,456
Bank owned life insurance		8,271			8,030
Other assets		13,348			6,499
Total	$	767,768		$	643,889
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits
Demand, noninterest bearing	$	94,308		$	95,596
Demand, interest bearing		95,238			103,347
Savings		17,416			18,492
Time		412,057			308,926
Total deposits		619,019			526,361
Accrued interest payable		2,972			2,525
Short-term borrowings		45,674			43,174
Long-term obligations		26,000			—
Other liabilities		8,017			4,988
Total liabilities		701,682			577,048
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, par value $3.50 per share; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2,887,996 at September 30, 2008 and 2,920,769 at December 31, 2007		10,108			10,184
Capital surplus		26,372			27,026
Retained earnings		31,283			30,099
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,677	)		(468	)
Total shareholders’ equity		66,086			66,841
Total	$	767,768		$	643,889

* Derived from audited consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

ECB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Income Statements

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	7,902	$	8,651	$	23,734	$	25,103
Interest on investment securities:
Interest exempt from federal income taxes		330		302		990		907
Taxable interest income		1,605		1,091		4,429		3,300
Dividend income		54		41		205		88
Other interest		73		125		188		499
Total interest income		9,964		10,210		29,546		29,897
Interest expense:
Deposits:
Demand accounts		209		527		690		1,363
Savings		23		23		68		71
Time		3,766		3,873		11,337		11,374
Short-term borrowings		388		467		1,237		1,850
Long-term obligations		188		—		437		—
Total interest expense		4,574		4,890		13,769		14,658
Net interest income		5,390		5,320		15,777		15,239
Provision for loan losses		440		—		1,340		(99	)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		4,950		5,320		14,437		15,338
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		792		736		2,427		2,270
Other service charges and fees		411		445		1,085		1,174
Mortgage origination brokerage fees		207		243		844		804
Net gain on sale of securities		118		—		212		—
Income from bank owned life insurance		76		72		241		217
Other operating income		171		86		621		383
Total noninterest income		1,775		1,582		5,430		4,848
Noninterest expenses:
Salaries		2,064		2,221		6,083		6,267
Retirement and other employee benefits		863		709		2,542		2,102
Occupancy		478		483		1,389		1,345
Equipment		433		411		1,269		1,458
Professional fees		168		53		464		527
Supplies		70		116		225		314
Telephone		177		146		515		415
FDIC deposit insurance		98		15		265		46
Other operating expenses		1,125		1,131		3,089		3,013
Total noninterest expenses		5,476		5,285		15,841		15,487
Income before income taxes		1,249		1,617		4,026		4,699
Income taxes		240		282		869		1,155
Net income	$	1,009	$	1,335	$	3,157	$	3,544
Net income per share - basic	$	0.35	$	0.46	$	1.09	$	1.22
Net income per share - diluted	$	0.35	$	0.46	$	1.09	$	1.22
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic		2,883,121		2,913,279		2,895,512		2,906,797
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted		2,888,466		2,919,190		2,901,730		2,914,825

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

ECB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

Nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	Common Stock			Capital surplus		Retained earnings			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Comprehensive income		Total
	Number	Amount
Balance January 1, 2007	2,902,242	$	10,119	$	26,680	$	27,333		$	(1,339	)			$	62,793
Unrealized gain, net of income tax of $(90)										144		$	144		144
Net income							3,544						3,544		3,544
Total comprehensive income												$	3,688
Stock options exercised	19,750		69		168										237
Stock based compensation					156										156
Cash dividends ($0.51 per share)							(1,535	)							(1,535	)
Balance September 30, 2007	2,921,992	$	10,188	$	27,004	$	29,342		$	(1,195	)			$	65,339

	Common Stock					Capital surplus			Retained earnings			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Comprehensive income			Total
	Number		Amount
Balance January 1, 2008	2,920,769		$	10,184		$	27,026		$	30,099		$	(468	)				$	66,841
Record postretirement benefit related to split-dollar insurance due to adoption of EITF 06-4										(387	)								(387	)
Unrealized loss, net of income tax benefit of $ 757													(1,209	)	$	(1,209	)		(1,209	)
Net income										3,157						3,157			3,157
Total comprehensive income															$	1,948
Stock based compensation				38			118												156
Repurchase of common stock	(35,273	)		(123	)		(763	)											(886	)
Issuance of restricted stock	2,500			9			(9	)											—
Cash dividends ($0.5475 per share)										(1,586	)								(1,586	)
Balance September 30, 2008	2,887,996		$	10,108		$	26,372		$	31,283		$	(1,677	)				$	66,086

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

ECB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2008			2007
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	3,157		$	3,544
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		999			1,138
Amortization of premium on investment securities, net		78			37
Provision for loan losses		1,340			(99	)
Gain on sale of securities		(144	)		(3	)
Stock based compensation		156			156
Impairment on equity investment		67			90
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(620	)		(401	)
(Gain) loss on disposal of premises and equipment		22			(3	)
Loss on sale of real estate and repossessions acquired in settlement of loans		73			24
Income from Bank owned life insurance		(241	)		(217	)
Increase in other assets		(1,720	)		(1,396	)
Increase in accrued interest payable		447			514
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities, net		834			(303	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,448			3,081
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of investment securities classified as available-for-sale		29,606			2,960
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities classified as available-for-sale		23,909			7,809
Purchases of investment securities classified as available-for-sale		(86,252	)		(8,289	)
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank common stock		(1,477	)		(546	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,821	)		(2,786	)
Proceeds from disposal of real estate and repossessions acquired in settlement of loans and real estate held for sale		212			170
Net loan originations		(71,401	)		(22,708	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(107,224	)		(23,390	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits		92,658			15,119
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings		28,500			(12,287	)
Dividends paid		(1,569	)		(1,516	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			237
Repurchase of common stock		(886	)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		118,703			1,553
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		15,927			(18,756	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		22,003			40,057
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	37,930		$	21,301
Cash paid during the period:
Interest	$	13,322		$	14,144
Taxes		1,360			1,454
Supplemental disclosures of noncash financing and investing activities:
Cash dividends declared but not paid	$	527		$	511
Unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred taxes		(1,209	)		144
Investment in SBIC transferred from other assets to available-for-sale securities		—			1,000
Transfer from loans to real estate and reposessions acquired in settlement of loans		916			36
Record postretirement benefit related to split-dollar insurance due to adoption of EITF 06-4		387			—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

ECB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ECB Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The East Carolina Bank (the “Bank”) (Bancorp and the Bank collectively referred to hereafter as the “Company”). The Bank has one wholly-owned subsidiary, ECB Financial Services, Inc., which formerly provided courier services to the Bank but is currently inactive. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheets and the reported amounts of income and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties held as collateral for loans.

All adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented have been included (such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature). The notes to consolidated financial statements in Bancorp’s annual report on Form 10-K should be referenced when reading these unaudited interim financial statements. Operating results for the period ended September 30, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period’s financial statements to place them on a comparable basis with the current year. Net income and shareholders’ equity previously reported were not affected by these reclassifications.

(2) Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For purposes of basic net income per share, restricted stock is considered “contingently issuable” and is not included in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

Diluted net income per share is computed by assuming the issuance of common shares for all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Restricted stock is considered outstanding for purposes of diluted net income per share. The amount of compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized is considered “proceeds” using the treasury stock method. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, diluted weighted average shares outstanding increased by 3,316 and 5,519, respectively, due to the dilutive impact of restricted stock. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, diluted weighted average shares outstanding increased by 2,627 and 5,911, respectively, due to the dilutive impact of restricted stock.

In computing diluted net income per share, it is assumed that all dilutive stock options are exercised during the reporting period at their respective exercise prices, with the proceeds from the exercises used by the Company to buy back stock in the open market at the average market price in effect during the reporting period. The difference between the number of shares assumed to be exercised and the number of shares bought back is added to the number of weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. The sum is used as the denominator to calculate diluted net income per share for the Company. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, diluted weighted average shares outstanding increased by 2,902 and 2,509, respectively, due to the dilutive impact of options. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, diluted weighted average shares outstanding increased by 2,718 due to the dilutive impact of options. The options had no dilutive effect on diluted weighted average shares for the three months ended

7

September 30, 2007. There were 58,799 anti-dilutive (not in the money) options outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 52,699 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. There were 58,799 anti-dilutive options outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 13,317 anti-dilutive options outstanding for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Share for the nine months ended September 30.

	Nine months ended September 30, 2008 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)	Per Share Amount
Basic net income per share	$	3,157	2,895,512	$	1.09
Effect of dilutive securities		—	6,218
Diluted net income per share	$	3,157	2,901,730	$	1.09

	Nine months ended September 30, 2007 (Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)	Per Share Amount
Basic net income per share	$	3,544	2,906,797	$	1.22
Effect of dilutive securities		—	8,028
Diluted net income per share	$	3,544	2,914,825	$	1.22

8

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Share for the three months ended September 30.

	Three months ended September 30, 2008 (Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)	Per Share Amount
Basic net income per share	$	1,009	2,883,121	$	0.35
Effect of dilutive securities		—	5,345
Diluted net income per share	$	1,009	2,888,466	$	0.35

	Three months ended September 30, 2007 (Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)	Per Share Amount
Basic net income per share	$	1,335	2,913,279	$	0.46
Effect of dilutive securities		—	5,911
Diluted net income per share	$	1,335	2,919,190	$	0.46

(3) Stock Compensation Plan

During 2008, the Company adopted the 2008 Omnibus Equity Plan (the Plan) which replaced the expired 1998 Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Plan provides for the issuance of up to an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock of the Company in the form of stock options, restricted stock awards and performance share awards.

Stock based compensation is accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Compensation cost charged to income was approximately $156 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. No income tax benefit was recognized for stock based compensation, as the Company does not have any outstanding nonqualified stock options.

Stock Options

Stock options may be issued as incentive stock options or as nonqualified stock options. The term of the option will be established at the time is it granted but shall not exceed ten years. Vesting will also be established at the time the option is granted. The exercise price may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the option is granted. It is the Company’s policy to issue new shares of stock to satisfy option exercises.

9

The weighted-average fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted-average estimated fair values of stock option grants and the assumptions that were used in calculating such fair values were based on estimates at the date of grant as follows:

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2008			2007
Weighted-average fair value of options granted During the year	$	5.84		$	8.73
Assumptions:
Average risk free interest rate		3.52	%		4.66	%
Average expected volatility		24.37	%		24.82	%
Expected dividend rate		2.40	%		2.40	%
Expected life in years		7.00			7.00

A summary of option activity under the Plan as of September 30, 2008, and changes during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 is presented below:

	Options Outstanding	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Outstanding at December 31, 2007	58,251	$	28.22
Granted	6,100	$	24.50
Forfeited	—	$	—
Exercised	—	$	—
Outstanding at September 30, 2008	64,351	$	27.87	6.66 years	$	68
Exercisable at September 30, 2008	30,745	$	26.08	5.07 years	$	68

No options were exercised during the nine month period ended September 30, 2008. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $422 thousand and $237 thousand was received for options exercised.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards are subject to restrictions and the risk of forfeiture if conditions stated in the award agreement are not satisfied at the end of a restriction period. During the restriction period, restricted stock covered by the award will be held by the Company. If the conditions stated in the award agreement are satisfied at the end of the restriction period, the restricted stock will become unrestricted and the certificate evidencing the stock will be delivered to the employee.

There were 8,713 shares of non-vested restricted stock as of December 31, 2007. 5,616 shares vested on January 1, 2008 and 500 shares vested on June 21, 2008. 2,500 shares were awarded on May 22, 2008 resulting in a balance of non-vested restricted stock of 5,097 shares as of September 30, 2008.

10

Unrecognized Compensation Cost

Anticipated total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding non-vested stock options and restricted stock grants will be recognized over the following periods:

	Stock Options		Restricted Stock Grants		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
October 1 – December 31, 2008	$	27	$	30	$	57
2009		49		12		61
2010		36		—		36
2011		22		—		22
2012		9		—		9
2013		2		—		2
Total	$	145	$	42	$	187

(4) Postretirement Benefits

The Company has a postretirement benefit plan whereby the Company pays postretirement health care benefits for certain of its retirees that have met minimum age and service requirements. Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the nine- and three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 includes the following components.

	Nine months ended September 30, (Dollars in thousands)
	2008			2007
Service cost	$	3		$	3
Interest cost		33			33
Prior service cost		(6	)		(6	)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost	$	30		$	30

	Three months ended September 30, (Dollars in thousands)
	2008			2007
Components of net periodic cost:
Service cost	$	1		$	1
Interest cost		11			11
Prior service cost		(2	)		(2	)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost	$	10		$	10

11

The Company expects to contribute $40 thousand to its postretirement benefit plan in 2008. No contributions were made in the first nine months of 2008. For additional information related to the plan, refer to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

(5) Other Than Temporary Impairment of Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities

The following table sets forth the amount of unrealized losses (that is, the amount by which cost or amortized cost exceeds fair value), and the related fair value of investments with unrealized losses, none of which are considered to be other than temporarily impaired. The table is segregated into investments that have been in continuous unrealized-loss position for less than 12 months from those that have been in a continuous unrealized-loss position for more than 12 months, as of September 30, 2008:

	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Government-Sponsored enterprises	$	20,250	$	658		—		—	$	20,250	$	658
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		19,025		704		3,075		95		22,100		799
Mortgage-backed securities		53,489		606		2,445		81		55,934		687
Equity securities		—		—		796		204		796		204
Corporate bonds		4,282		774		—		—		4,282		774
Total	$	97,046	$	2,742	$	6,316	$	380	$	103,362	$	3,122

As of September 30, 2008, management has concluded that the unrealized losses above (which consisted of 133 securities) are temporary in nature since they are not related to the underlying credit quality of the issuers, and the Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments for a time necessary to recover its cost. The losses above with the exception of the equity securities are on securities that have contractual maturity dates and are primarily related to market interest rates. Securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for longer than 1 year include fourteen (14) municipal obligations and two (2) mortgage-backed securities. The unrealized losses associated with these securities are not considered to be other-than-temporary because they are related to changes in interest rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or the issuer. There was one (1) equity security that has been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months. Based upon our ability and intent to hold the investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair vale, the Bank does not consider the investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

(6) Comprehensive Income

A summary of comprehensive income is as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net Income	$	1,009		$	1,335		$	3,157		$	3,544
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period		1,121			1,663			(2,178	)		235
Tax benefit (expense)		(432	)		(641	)		839			(91	)
Reclassification to realized (gains) losses		118			—			212			—
Tax (benefit) expense		(46	)		—			(82	)		—
Other comprehensive income (loss):		761			1,022			(1,209	)		144
Total comprehensive income	$	1,770		$	2,357		$	1,948		$	3,688

12

(7) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements that could impact the accounting, reporting, and/or disclosure of financial information by the Company.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The changes to current practice resulting from the application of this statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 became effective beginning January 1, 2008 and did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In February 2008, Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” was issued that delayed the application of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, until January 1, 2009. See disclosures about fair value measurements in note 8 below.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis. Subsequent changes in fair value of these financial assets and liabilities would be recognized in earnings whey they occur. SFAS No. 159 became effective beginning January 1, 2008. The Company elected not to measure any eligible items using the fair value option in accordance with SFAS No. 159 and therefore, SFAS No. 159 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB ratified the consensuses reached by the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) relating to EITF 06-4, “Accounting for the Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (“EITF 06-4”). Entities purchase life insurance for various reasons including protection against loss of key employees and to fund postretirement benefits. The two most common types of life insurance arrangements are endorsement split dollar life and collateral assignment split dollar life. EITF 06-4 covers the former and EITF 06-10 (which does not apply to the Company) covers the latter. EITF 06-4 states that entities with endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements that provide a benefit to an employee that extends to postretirement periods should recognize a liability for future benefits in accordance with SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” (if, in substance, a postretirement benefit plan exists) or Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 12, “Omnibus Opinion—1967” (if the arrangement is, in substance, an individual deferred compensation contract). Entities should recognize the effects of applying this Issue through either (a) a change in accounting principle through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings or to other components of equity or net assets in the statement of financial position as of the beginning of the year of adoption or (b) a change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all prior periods. EITF 06-4 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company recorded a liability of $387 thousand on January 1, 2008 to record the postretirement benefit related to split-dollar life insurance arrangements.

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of SFAS 160 is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

13

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations — a replacement of FASB No. 141.” SFAS 141R replaces SFAS 141, “Business Combinations,” and applies to all transaction and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. SFAS 141R requires an acquirer, upon initially obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets, liabilities and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is required to be recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition rather than at a later date when the amount of that consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable doubt. This fair value approach replaces the cost-allocation process required under SFAS 141 whereby the cost of an acquisition was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value. SFAS 141R requires acquirers to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as was previously the case under SFAS 141. Under SFAS 141R, the requirements of SFAS 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” would have to be met in order to accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase accounting. Pre-acquisition contingencies are to be recognized at fair value, unless it is a non-contractual contingency that is not likely to materialize, in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting and, instead, that contingency would be subject to the probable and estimable recognition criteria of SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” SFAS 141R is expected to have an impact on the Company’s accounting for business combinations closing on or after January 1, 2009.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS No. 161 expands disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. Expanded qualitative disclosures that will be required under SFAS No. 161 include: (1) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (2) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and related interpretations; and (3) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 also requires several additional quantitative disclosures in the financial statements. SFAS No. 161 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 and is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 140-3, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions” (“FSP 140-3”). This FSP provides guidance on accounting for a transfer of a financial asset and the transferor’s repurchase financing of the asset. This FSP presumes that an initial transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing are considered part of the same arrangement (linked transaction) under SFAS No. 140. However, if certain criteria are met, the initial transfer and repurchase financing are not evaluated as a linked transaction and are evaluated separately under Statement 140. FSP 140-3 will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years and earlier application is not permitted. Accordingly, this FSP is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of FSP 140-3 will have on its financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP 142-3”). This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations,” and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is prohibited. Accordingly, this FSP is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The Company does not believe the adoption of FSP 142-3 will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In May 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” (“SFAS No. 162”). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in

14

conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS No. 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The FASB has stated that it does not expect SFAS No. 162 will result in a change in current practice. The application of SFAS No. 162 is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities,” (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1 provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and must be included in the earnings per share computation. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period earnings per share data presented must be adjusted retrospectively. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of this FSP EITF 03-6-1 is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s financial statements.

The SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant and the staff of the FASB issued press release 2008-234 on September 30, 2008 (“Press Release”) to provide clarifications on fair value accounting. The press release includes guidance on the use of management’s internal assumptions and the use of “market” quotes. It also reiterates the factors in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 5M which should be considered when determining other-than-temporary impairment: the length of time and extent to which the market value has been less than cost; financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; and the intent and ability of the holder to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP SFAS 157-3”). This FSP clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (see Note 8) in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that asset is not active. The FSP is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. For the Company, this FSP is effective for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.

The Company considered the guidance in the Press Release and in FSP SFAS 157-3 when conducting its review for other-than-temporary impairment as of September 30, 2008 and determined that it did not result in a change to its impairment estimation techniques.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

(8) Fair Value

SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

SFAS 157 requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement costs). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques

15

refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Fair Value Hierarchy

Under SFAS 157, the Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1	Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2	Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3	Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

The Company adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008 and had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, loans held for investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

There were no changes to the techniques used to measure fair value during the period.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.

Loans

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are

16

considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” (SFAS 114). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market price and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At September 30, 2008, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with SFAS 157, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.

Foreclosed Assets

Foreclosed assets are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

Private Equity Investments

The Company has a portfolio of indirect (through funds) private equity and venture capital investments. The majority of these investments are not readily marketable. The investments are individually reviewed for impairment, on a quarterly basis, by comparing the carrying value to the estimated fair value. The Company bases its estimates of fair value for the majority of its indirect private equity and venture capital investments on the percentage ownership in the fair value of the entire fund, as reported by the fund management. In general, the Company does not have the benefit of the same information regarding the fund’s underlying investments as does fund management. Therefore, after indication that fund management adheres to accepted, sound and recognized valuation techniques, the Company generally utilizes the fair values assigned to the underlying portfolio investments by fund management. The impact on fair values of transfer restrictions is not considered by fund management, and the Company assumes it to be insignificant. For those funds where fair value is not reported by fund management, the Company derives the fair value of the fund by estimating the fair value of each underlying investment in the fund. In addition to using qualitative information about each underlying investment, as provided by fund management, the Company gives consideration to information pertinent to the specific nature of the debt or equity investment, such as relevant market conditions, offering prices, operating results, financial conditions, exit strategy and other qualitative information, as available. The lack of an independent source to validate fair value estimates, including the impact of future capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent limitation in the valuation process. The amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value that is determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired is charged to current earnings and the carrying value of the investment is written down accordingly. The Company classifies private equity investments subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3.

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis

September 30, 2008 (Dollars in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investment securities available-for-sale	$	154,077	$	796	$	153,281	$	—
Total assets at fair value	$	154,077	$	796	$	153,281	$	—
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
September 30, 2008 (Dollars in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Impaired loans in accordance with SFAS 114	$	9,379	$	—	$	8,615	$	764
Total assets at fair value	$	9,379	$	—	$	8,615	$	764
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

17

Certain other financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment) such other financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were not significant at September 30, 2008.

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Report and exhibits relating to plans, strategies, economic performance and trends, projections of results of specific activities or investments, expectations or beliefs about future events or results, and other statements that are not descriptions of historical facts, may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking information is inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, risk factors discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. Forward-looking statements may be identified by terms such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “forecasts”, “potential” or “continue,” or similar terms or the negative of these terms, or other statements concerning opinions or judgments of the Company’s management about future events. Factors that could influence the accuracy of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (a) pressures on the earnings, capital and liquidity of financial institutions resulting from current and future adverse conditions in the credit and equity markets and the banking industry in general, (b) the financial success or changing strategies of the Company’s customers, (c) actions of government regulators, (d) the level of market interest rates, (e) weather and similar conditions, particularly the effect of hurricanes on the Company’s banking and operations facilities and on the Company’s customers and the communities in which it does business, (f) changes in general economic conditions and the real estate values in our banking market (particularly changes that affect our loan portfolio, the abilities of our borrowers to repay their loans, and the values of loan collateral), (g) changes in competitive pressures among depository and other financial institutions or in our ability to compete effectively against larger financial institutions in our banking market. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. All forward-looking statements attributable to the Company are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this paragraph. The Company has no obligations, and does not intend, to update these forward-looking statements.

Executive Summary

ECB Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Engelhard, North Carolina. Our wholly owned subsidiary, The East Carolina Bank (the “Bank”) is a state-chartered community bank that was founded in 1919. For the purpose of this discussion, “we,” “us” and “our” refers to the Bank and the bank holding company as a single, consolidated entity unless the context otherwise indicates.

As of September 30, 2008, we had consolidated assets of approximately $767.8 million, total loans of approximately $524.3 million, total deposits of approximately $619.0 million and shareholders’ equity of approximately $66.1 million. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we had net income of $1.0 million or $0.35 basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to net income of $1.3 million, or $0.46 basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we had net income of $3.2 million or $1.09 basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to net income of $3.5 million or $1.22 basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

18

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are set forth in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Of these significant accounting policies, the Company considers its policy regarding the allowance for loan losses to be its most critical accounting policy, because it requires management’s most subjective and complex judgments. In addition, changes in economic conditions can have a significant impact on the allowance for loan losses and therefore the provision for loan losses and results of operations. The Company has developed appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio. The Company’s assessments may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, the results of regulatory examinations, and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers that is not known to management at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. For additional discussion concerning the Company’s allowance for loan losses and related matters, see “Asset Quality”.

We also consider our determination of retirement plans and other postretirement benefit cost to be a critical accounting estimate as it requires the use of estimates and judgments related to the amount and timing of expected future cash out-flows for benefit payments and cash in-flows for maturities and return on plan assets. Our retirement plans and other post-retirement benefit costs are actuarially determined based on assumptions on the discount rate, estimated future return on plan assets and the health care cost trend rate. Changes in estimates and assumptions related to mortality rates and future health care costs could have a material impact to our financial condition or results of operations. The discount rate is used to determine the present value of future benefit obligations and the net periodic benefit cost. The discount rate used to value the future benefit obligation as of each year-end is the rate used to determine the periodic benefit cost in the following year. For additional discussion concerning our retirement plans and other postretirement benefits refer to Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Three- and Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes components of income and expense and the changes in those components for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same periods in 2007.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Dollars in thousands)
	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008		Changes from the Prior Year					For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008		Changes from the Prior Year
			Amount			%				Amount			%
Gross interest income	$	9,964	$	(246	)	(2.4	)	$	29,546	$	(351	)	(1.2	)
Gross interest expense		4,574		(316	)	(6.5	)		13,769		(889	)	(6.1	)
Net interest income		5,390		70		1.3			15,777		538		3.5
Provision for loan losses		440		440		NA			1,340		1,439		NA
Net interest income after Provision for loan losses		4,950		(370	)	(7.0	)		14,437		(901	)	(5.9	)
Noninterest income		1,775		193		12.2			5,430		582		12.0
Noninterest expense		5,476		191		3.6			15,841		354		2.3
Income before income taxes		1,249		(368	)	(22.8	)		4,026		(673	)	(14.3	)
Income tax provision		240		(42	)	(14.9	)		869		(286	)	(24.8	)
Net income	$	1,009	$	(326	)	(24.4	)	$	3,157	$	(387	)	(10.9	)

19

Net Interest Income

Net interest income (the difference between the interest earned on assets, such as loans and investment securities, and the interest paid on liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings) is our primary source of operating income. Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $5.4 million, an increase of $70 thousand or 1.3% when compared to net interest income of $5.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net interest income was $15.8 million, an increase of $538 thousand or 3.5% when compared to net interest income of $15.2 million for the same period in 2007.

The level of net interest income is determined primarily by the average balances (volume) of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the various rate spreads between our interest-earning assets and our interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in net interest income from period to period result from increases or decreases in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, increases or decreases in the average interest rates earned and paid on such assets and liabilities, the ability to manage the interest-earning asset portfolio (which includes loans), and the availability of particular sources of funds, such as non interest bearing deposits.

Interest income decreased $246 thousand or 2.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same three months of 2007. Interest income decreased $351 thousand or 1.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same nine months in 2007. The decreases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 are due to the reduction of yields on our loan portfolio. The tax equivalent yield on average earning assets decreased 145 basis points for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to 5.80% from 7.25% for the same period in 2007. For the first nine months of 2008, the yield on average earning assets, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased 113 basis points to 6.11% compared to 7.24% at September 30, 2007. Management attributes the decrease in the yield on our earning assets to the decrease in short-term market interest rates. The Federal Reserve Board began cutting its target for the federal funds rate in September 2007 and through seven rate cuts lowered the rate by 325 basis points to its level of 2.00% as of September 30, 2008. Approximately $248.8 million or 47.4% of our loan portfolio consists of variable rate loans that adjust with the movement of the national prime rate. As a result, composite yield on our loans decreased approximately 183 basis points for the third quarter of 2008 compared to the third quarter of 2007 and 150 basis points for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in both yield and volume of the Bank’s investment portfolio during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared with the same periods of 2007 essentially offset the reduction of interest income earned on loans for the comparative periods due a lower national prime rate.

Our average cost of funds during the third quarter of 2008 was 3.11%, a decrease of 114 basis points when compared to 4.25% for the third quarter of 2007. Average rates paid on bank certificates of deposit decreased 122 basis points from 5.09% for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 to 3.87% for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, while our average cost of borrowed funds decreased 245 basis points during the third quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Total interest expense decreased $316 thousand or 6.5% during the third quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, primarily the result of decreased market rates paid on certificates of deposit. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our cost of funds was 3.34% a decrease of 96 basis points when compared to 4.30% for the same period in 2007. Average rates paid on bank certificates of deposit decreased 82 basis points from 5.04% to 4.22% for the first nine months of 2008, while our cost of borrowed funds decreased 323 basis points compared to the same period a year ago. Total interest expense decreased $889 thousand or 6.1% during the nine months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, primarily the result of decreased market rates paid on these liabilities and from the June 2007 retirement of trust preferred securities that carried an interest rate of LIBOR plus 345 basis points. The volume of average interest-bearing liabilities increased approximately $95.3 million for the nine months of 2008 compared with the same period in 2007.

20

The banking industry uses two key ratios to measure profitability of net interest income: net interest rate spread and net interest margin. The net interest rate spread measures the difference between the average yield on earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest rate spread does not consider the impact of non-interest-bearing deposits and gives a direct perspective on the effect of market interest rate movements. The net interest margin is defined as net interest income as a percentage of total average earning assets and takes into account the positive effects of investing non-interest bearing deposits in earning assets.

Margin pressure continued during the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in loan yields has been greater than the decrease in our cost of funds in this monetary policy easing cycle. We are continuing to experience the effect of repricing our interest-earning assets at much lower rates causing our yields to decrease faster than the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities over the past three- and nine- month periods. Our annualized net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis and net of the allowance for loan losses, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was 3.18% compared to 3.83% in the third quarter of 2007 while our net interest spread decreased 31 basis points during the same period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis and net of allowance for loan losses, was 3.31% compared to 3.74% in the nine months of 2007 while our net interest spread decreased 17 basis points. The decrease in our net interest margin and spread is the result of the Federal Reserve Board cutting the target for federal funds rate by 325 basis points beginning in September 2007.

A second factor causing our margin to decline is the change in deposit mix. Our funding growth year-over-year has been, primarily, in the form of CD’s and we have experienced a decline in transaction accounts. Balances in low cost, non-maturity deposit accounts are declining as customers who parked money in these accounts when rates were low moved to higher yielding CD’s before the Federal Reserve began cutting rates. Average interest-bearing liabilities, as a percentage of interest-earning assets for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were 84.3% and 80.5%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, average interest-bearing liabilities as a percentage of interest-earning assets were 83.7% compared to 81.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Average Consolidated Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis Fully on Tax Equivalent Basis

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

	Average Balance		2008 Yield/ Rate		Income/ Expense		Average Balance		2007 Yield/ Rate		Income/ Expense
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Loans – net (1)	$	514,267	6.10	%	$	7,902	$	433,057	7.93	%	$	8,651
Taxable securities		127,083	5.18	%		1,659		93,949	4.78	%		1,132
Non-taxable securities (2)		35,217	5.63	%		500		32,672	5.56	%		458
Other investments		16,238	1.78	%		73		7,774	6.38	%		125
Total interest- earning assets		692,805	5.80	%	$	10,134		567,452	7.25	%	$	10,366
Cash and due from banks		12,818						15,660
Bank premises and equipment, net		25,300						24,728
Other assets		20,417						18,674
Total assets	$	751,340					$	626,514
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing deposits	$	499,628	3.17	%	$	3,998	$	420,680	4.17	%	$	4,423
Short-term borrowings		58,163	2.65	%		388		35,873	5.16	%		467
Long-term obligations		26,000	2.87	%		188		—	—			—
Total interest- bearing liabilities		583,791	3.11	%		4,574		456,553	4.25	%		4,890
Non-interest-bearing deposits		96,061						100,365
Other liabilities		6,690						5,284
Shareholders’ equity		64,798						64,312
Total liabilities and Shareholders’ equity	$	751,340					$	626,514
Net interest income and net interest margin (FTE) (3)			3.18	%	$	5,560			3.83	%	$	5,476
Interest rate spread (FTE) (4)			2.69	%					3.00	%

(1) Average loans include non-accruing loans, net of allowance for loan losses. Amortization of deferred loan fees of $ (5) thousand and $181 thousand for periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are included in interest income.

(2) Yields on tax-exempt investments have been adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis (FTE) using the federal income tax rate of 34%. The taxable equivalent adjustment was $170 thousand and $156 thousand for periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

(3) Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total earning assets.

(4) Interest rate spread equals the earning asset yield minus the interest-bearing liability rate.

21

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

	Average Balance		2008 Yield/ Rate		Income/ Expense		Average Balance		2007 Yield/ Rate		Income/ Expense
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Loans – net (1)	$	491,543	6.46	%	$	23,734	$	421,413	7.96	%	$	25,103
Taxable securities		121,744	5.09	%		4,634		95,703	4.73	%		3,388
Non-taxable securities (2)		35,190	5.70	%		1,500		32,701	5.62	%		1,374
Other investments		9,507	2.64	%		188		11,112	6.00	%		499
Total interest- earning assets		657,984	6.11	%	$	30,056		560,929	7.24	%	$	30,364
Cash and due from banks		12,652						15,313
Bank premises and equipment, net		25,067						24,308
Other assets		19,170						18,445
Total assets	$	714,873					$	618,995
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing deposits	$	473,603	3.41	%	$	12,095	$	415,320	4.12	%	$	12,808
Short-term borrowings		57,906	2.86	%		1,237		40,371	6.13	%		1,850
Long-term obligations		19,482	3.00	%		437		—	—			—
Total interest- bearing liabilities		550,991	3.34	%		13,769		455,691	4.30	%		14,658
Non-interest-bearing deposits		90,041						94,536
Other liabilities		7,123						5,429
Shareholders’ equity		66,718						63,339
Total liabilities and Shareholders’ equity	$	714,873					$	618,995
Net interest income and net interest margin (FTE) (3)			3.31	%	$	16,287			3.74	%	$	15,706
Interest rate spread (FTE) (4)			2.77	%					2.94	%

(1) Average loans include non-accruing loans, net of allowance for loan losses. Amortization of deferred loan fees of $15 thousand and $611 thousand for periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are included in interest income.

(2) Yields on tax-exempt investments have been adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis (FTE) using the federal income tax rate of 34%. The taxable equivalent adjustment was $510 thousand and $467 thousand for periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

(3) Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total earning assets.

(4) Interest rate spread equals the earning asset yield minus the interest-bearing liability rate.

22

The following table presents the relative impact on net interest income of average outstanding balances (volume) of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the rates earned and paid by us on such assets and liabilities. Variances resulting from a combination of changes in rate and volume are allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amount of the change in each category.

Change in Interest Income and Expense on Tax Equivalent Basis

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

Increase (Decrease) in interest income and expense due to changes in:

	2008 compared to 2007
	Volume (1)		Rate (1)			Net
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loans	$	1,435	$	(2,184	)	$	(749	)
Taxable securities		416		111			527
Non-taxable securities (2)		35		7			42
Other investments		87		(139	)		(52	)
Interest income		1,973		(2,205	)		(232	)
Interest-bearing deposits		731		(1,156	)		(425	)
Short-term borrowings		219		(298	)		(79	)
Long-term obligations		94		94			188
Interest expense		1,044		(1,360	)		(316	)
Net interest income	$	929	$	(845	)	$	84

(1) The combined rate/volume variance for each category has been allocated equally between rate and volume variances.

(2) Yields on tax-exempt investments have been adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis (FTE) using the federal income tax rate of 34%. The taxable equivalent adjustment was $170 thousand and $156 thousand for periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

23

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

Increase (Decrease) in interest income and expense due to changes in:

	2008 compared to 2007
	Volume (1)			Rate (1)			Net
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loans	$	3,782		$	(5,151	)	$	(1,369	)
Taxable securities		957			289			1,246
Non-taxable securities (2)		105			21			126
Other investments		(52	)		(259	)		(311	)
Interest income		4,792			(5,100	)		(308	)
Interest-bearing deposits		1,643			(2,356	)		(713	)
Short-term borrowings		589			(1,202	)		(613	)
Long-term obligations		218			219			437
Interest expense		2,450			(3,339	)		(889	)
Net interest income	$	2,342		$	(1,761	)	$	581

(1) The combined rate/volume variance for each category has been allocated equally between rate and volume variances.

(2) Yields on tax-exempt investments have been adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis (FTE) using the federal income tax rate of 34%. The taxable equivalent adjustment was $510 thousand and $467 thousand for periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Provision for loan losses

The provision for loan losses charged to operations during the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2008 was $440 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively. During the second quarter of 2007 management implemented improvements to the methodology used to estimate the allowance for loan loss (“AFLL”). As a result, we recorded no provision expense for the third quarter of 2007 and recorded a negative provision expense of $99 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007. The Bank had net charge-offs of $102 thousand for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to net charge-offs of $124 thousand during the third quarter of 2007. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Bank had net charge-offs of $346 thousand and $275 thousand, respectively. We use the results of our allowance for loan loss model to estimate the dollar amount of provision expense needed to maintain the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses. Our management analyzes the adequacy of the allowance on a monthly basis and adjustments to the provision expense are made as necessary. Additional information regarding our allowance for loan losses is contained in this discussion under the caption “Asset Quality.”

Noninterest income

Noninterest income, principally charges and fees assessed for the use of our services, is a significant contributor to net income. The following table presents the components of noninterest income for the three- and nine-periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008		Changes from the Prior Year					For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008		Changes from the Prior Year
			Amount			%				Amount			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	792	$	56		7.6		$	2,427	$	157		6.9
Other service charges and fees		411		(34	)	(7.6	)		1,085		(89	)	(7.6	)
Mortgage origination brokerage fees		207		(36	)	(14.8	)		844		40		5.0
Net gain on sale of securities		118		118		NA			212		212		NA
Income from bank owned life insurance		76		4		5.6			241		24		11.1
Other operating income		171		85		98.8			621		238		62.1
Total noninterest income	$	1,775	$	193		12.2		$	5,430	$	582		12.0

24

Noninterest income increased $193 thousand or 12.2% to $1.8 million for the third quarter of this year compared to $1.6 million for the same period in 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 noninterest income increased $582 thousand or 12.0% to $5.4 million compared to $4.9 million for the same period in 2007. The increase in noninterest income in the third quarter of 2008 is primarily due to an increase in net gains on the sale of securities of $118 thousand. The year to date increase in noninterest income is primarily the result of an income distribution from Visa International’s initial public offering in the amount of $386 thousand. As a member bank of Visa, we received the proceeds for the redemption of approximately 9 thousand shares of class B common stock. The year to date increase in noninterest income also included a net gain on sale of securities of $212 thousand. The nine months of 2007 included nonrecurring income from the recapture of $240 thousand relating to the allowance for losses on unfunded loan commitments. The decrease in other service charges and fees compared to the prior year period is the result of decreased merchant discount income generated by our merchant services unit. Year to date mortgage loan origination brokerage fees increased $40 thousand compared to the previous year nine-month period.

Noninterest expense

Noninterest expense increased 3.6% and 2.3%, respectively for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods in 2007. The following table presents the components of noninterest expense for the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2008 and dollar and percentage changes from the prior year.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008		Changes from the Prior Year					For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008		Changes from the Prior Year
			Amount			%				Amount			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries	$	2,064	$	(157	)	(7.1	)	$	6,083	$	(184	)	(2.9	)
Retirement and other employee benefits		863		154		21.7			2,542		440		20.9
Occupancy		478		(5	)	(1.0	)		1,389		44		3.3
Equipment		433		22		5.4			1,269		(189	)	(13.0	)
Professional fees		168		115		217.0			464		(63	)	(12.0	)
Supplies		70		(46	)	(39.7	)		225		(89	)	(28.3	)
Telephone		177		31		21.2			515		100		24.1
FDIC deposit insurance		98		83		553.3			265		219		476.1
Other operating expenses		1,125		(6	)	(0.5	)		3,089		76		2.5
Total noninterest expenses	$	5,476	$	191		3.6		$	15,841	$	354		2.3

Salary expense, prior to adjustment for FASB 91 loan origination cost, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $21 thousand and increased $328 thousand, respectively, compared to the same prior year periods. The decrease for the third quarter is related to lower commissions paid for mortgage originations and financial brokerage services. The increase in the year to date expense is the result of successfully opening three new branches in the second and third quarters of 2007.

25

Employee related benefits expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $154 and $440 thousand, respectively, over the same prior year periods. Postretirement benefits increased $79 thousand during the third quarter of 2008 when compared to the third quarter of 2007 and increased $263 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the first nine months of 2007. Employee related insurance benefits increased by $60 thousand for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same three-month period of 2007 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 employee related insurance benefits increased $143 thousand due to increased health insurance premiums and the addition of dental insurance for employees. As of September 30, 2008, we had 225 full time equivalent employees and operated 24 full service banking offices, one loan production office and one mortgage loan origination office.

Occupancy expense decreased $5 thousand or 1.0% during the third quarter of 2008 compared to the third quarter of 2007 and increased $44 thousand or 3.3% in the first nine months of 2008 when compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in the year to date period is primarily due to cost associated with the three new branches opened mid year 2007.

Equipment expense increased during the third quarter of 2008 by $22 thousand or 5.4% compared to the third quarter of 2007 and when compared on a year-to-date basis, equipment expense decreased $189 thousand or 20.2%. The largest component of the year to date decrease was depreciation expense, which declined $161 thousand compared to the same periods of 2007. Early in 2007 management elected to outsource the Bank’s check processing function. We accelerated the remaining depreciation on our check processing equipment and software to coincide with our back-office change-over in June 2007 resulting in higher depreciation expense during the first nine months of 2007 compared to the same period of 2008.

Professional fees, which include consulting, audit and legal fees, increased $115 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007 and decreased $63 thousand when compared on a year to date basis to the prior year period. Legal expense during the third quarter increased $88 thousand and accounted for most of the increase in professional fees. On a year to date basis, consulting expense decreased $153 thousand in 2008 when compared to the same period in 2007. Loan related consulting expense during the first nine months of 2008 decreased $52 thousand over the prior year period while our Human Resources accounted for $76 thousand of the decrease. Audit and accounting fees in the third quarter of 2008 increased $18 thousand over audit fees incurred during the third quarter of 2007 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 audit fees increased $7 thousand over the prior year nine month period.

Supplies expense decreased $46 thousand in the third quarter of 2008 compared to same period of 2007 and for the comparative nine-month basis we experienced a decrease of $88 thousand, primarily the result of outsourcing our item processing in 2007 which required us to purchase various new forms and documents.

Other operating expenses decreased $6 thousand or 0.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, other operating expense increased $76 thousand or 2.5%.

Income taxes

Income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $240 thousand and $282 thousand, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 19.2% and 17.4%, respectively. For the nine-month period ending September 30, 2008, tax expense was $869 thousand compared to $1.2 million for the same period of 2007, which resulted in effective tax rates of 21.6% and 24.6%, respectively. The effective tax rates in both years differ from the federal statutory rate of 34.0% primarily due to tax-exempt interest income.

Balance Sheet

Our total assets were $767.8 million at September 30, 2008, $643.9 million at December 31, 2007 and $629.7 million at September 30, 2007. Deposit growth and borrowings primarily funded our year-over-year asset growth. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2008, we grew our loans $84.0 million or 19.1% while our

26

deposits grew by approximately $91.7 million or 17.4%. Year-over-year, our earning assets grew through loan originations and additions to our available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we experienced increased loan demand as loans outstanding increased $70.1 million and deposits increased by $92.7 million.

Loans

As of September 30, 2008, total loans had increased to $524.3 million, up 15.4% from total loans of $454.2 million at December 31, 2007 and up 19.1% from total loans of $440.3 million at September 30, 2007. The year-over-year and first nine months of 2008 increase in loan demand is primarily due to loan growth occurring in our branches in our newer markets. Loan growth can also be attributed to our branching efforts and the efforts of our lending team. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, loan demand on the Outer Banks of North Carolina continues to be flat due to the slowdown of new construction of vacation rental homes on the Outer Banks. However, vacation home rentals are up over last year.

Asset Quality

At September 30, 2008, our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans was 0.97%, up from 0.90% at December 31, 2007. In evaluating the allowance for loan losses, we prepare a statistically-based analysis of our current loan portfolio through the use of historical loss rates, homogeneous risk analysis grouping to include probabilities for loss in each group by risk grade, estimation of years to impairment in each homogeneous grouping, analysis of internal credit processes, past due loan portfolio performance and overall economic conditions, both regionally and nationally.

Homogeneous loan groups are assigned risk factors based on their perceived loss potential and on their respective risk ratings. The Bank utilizes a system of nine possible risk ratings. The risk ratings are established based on perceived probability of loss. All loans risk rated “doubtful” and “loss” are removed from their homogeneous group and individually analyzed for impairment as detailed in FAS 114. Other groups of loans based on loan size may be selected for impairment review. Loans are considered impaired if, based on current information and events, it is probable that the bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The measurement of impaired loans is based on either the fair value of the underlying collateral, the present value of the future cash flows discounted at the historical effective interest rate stipulated in the loan agreement, or the estimated market value of the loan. In measuring the fair value of the collateral, management uses a comparison to the recent selling price of similar assets, which is consistent with those that would be utilized by unrelated third parties.

A portion of the Bank’s allowance for loan losses is not allocated to any specific category of loans. This unallocated portion of the allowance reflects the elements of imprecision and estimation risk inherent in the calculation of the overall allowance. Due to the subjectivity involved in determining the overall allowance, including the unallocated portion, the portion of the allowance considered unallocated may fluctuate from period to period based on management’s evaluation of the factors affecting the assumptions used in calculating the allowance, including historical loss experience, current and expected economic conditions and geographic conditions. The Bank has identified an acceptable range for this unallocated portion to be 5% - 15% of the total reserve.

While we believe that our management uses the best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, unforeseen market conditions could result in adjustments to the allowance for loan losses, and net income could be significantly affected, if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination. Because these factors and management’s assumptions are subject to change, the allocation is not necessarily indicative of future loan portfolio

The following table presents an analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

27

Analysis of Changes in Allowance for Loan Losses

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
Total loans outstanding at end of period-gross	$	524,337		$	440,340
Average loans outstanding-gross	$	496,002		$	426,112
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	4,083		$	4,725
Loans charged off:
Real estate		(201	)		(93	)
Installment loans		(21	)		(33	)
Commercial and all other loans		(183	)		(161	)
Total charge-offs		(405	)		(287	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Real estate		1			—
Installment loans		4			12
Credit cards and related plans		7			—
Commercial and all other loans		47			—
Total recoveries		59			12
Net charge offs		(346	)		(275	)
Provision for loan losses		1,340			(99	)
Adjustment for unfunded loan reserve		—			—
Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	5,077		$	4,351
Ratios:
Annualized net charge offs to average loans during the period		0.09	%		0.09	%
Allowance for loan losses to loans at period end		0.97	%		0.99	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans at period end		42.7	%		1,738	%

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets consist of loans not accruing interest, restructured debt and real estate acquired in settlement of loans and other repossessed collateral. It is our policy to place loans on nonaccrual status when any portion of principal or interest becomes 90 days past due, or earlier if full collection of principal and interest becomes doubtful. When loans are placed on nonaccrual status, interest receivable is reversed against interest income in the current period. Interest payments received thereafter are applied as a reduction to the remaining principal balance so long as doubt exists as to the ultimate collection of the principal. Loans are removed from nonaccrual status when they become current as to both principal and interest and when the collectability of principal or interest is no longer doubtful. Nonperforming assets were $12.2 million and $0.5 million, or 2.33% and 0.12% of loans outstanding at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, as nonaccrual loans increased by $11.3 million during the third quarter. On September 30, 2008, our nonperforming assets consisting of nonperforming loans (nonaccruing and restructured loans) totaled of $11.9 million and we had $338 thousand in foreclosed properties. The increase in nonperforming loans during the third quarter of 2008 is principally the result of three relationships moving into foreclosure status.

Loans Considered Impaired under SFAS No. 114

We review our nonperforming loans and other groups of loans based on loan size or other factors for impairment under SFAS No. 114. Loans are considered impaired if, based on current information, circumstances or events, it is probable that the Bank will not collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. However, treating a loan as impaired does not necessarily mean that we expect to incur a loss on that loan, and our impaired loans may include loans that currently are performing in accordance with their terms. For example, if we believe it is probable that a loan will be collected, but not according to its original agreed upon payment schedule, we may treat that loan as impaired even though we

28

expect that the loan will be repaid or collected in full. At September 30, 2008, we had loans totaling $15.5 million (which includes $11.8 million in nonperforming loans) which were considered to be impaired under SFAS No. 114 compared to $10.4 million at December 31, 2007. The increase of approximately $5.1 million in loans considered impaired under SFAS No.114 is primarily made up of the addition of a commercial real estate loan collateralized by ocean front property. As indicated in the table below, when we believe a loss is probable on an impaired loan, a portion of our reserve is allocated to that probable loss.

The following table sets forth the number and volume of loans considered impaired under SFAS No. 114 and their associated reserve allocation, if any, at September 30, 2008.

	Number of Loans	Loan Balances Outstanding		Allocated Reserves
	(Dollars in millions)
Non-accruals loans	18	$	11.7	$	0.6
Restructured loans	1		.1		.1
Total nonperforming loans	19	$	11.8	$	0.7
Other impaired loans with allocated reserves	7		2.4		.5
Impaired loans without allocated reserves	6		1.3		—
Total impaired loans	32	$	15.5	$	1.2

Investment Securities and Other Assets

The composition of our securities portfolio reflects our investment strategy of maintaining an appropriate level of liquidity while providing a relatively stable source of income. Our securities portfolio also provides a balance to interest rate risk and credit risk in other categories of the balance sheet while providing a vehicle for investing available funds, furnishing liquidity and supplying securities to pledge as required collateral for certain deposits and borrowed funds. We use two categories to classify our securities: “held-to-maturity” and “available-for-sale.” Currently, none of our investments are classified as held-to-maturity. While we have no plans to liquidate a significant amount of our securities, the securities classified as available-for-sale may be sold to meet liquidity needs should management deem it to be in our best interest.

Our investment securities totaled $154.1 million at September 30, 2008, $125.9 million at December 31, 2007 and $124.6 million at September 30, 2007. The increase in investment securities of $29.5 million or 23.7% when compared to September 30, 2007 is principally due to a $30 million leverage strategy implemented during the first quarter of 2008 as we took advantage of favorable spreads between yields on securities and borrowing cost from the Federal Home Loan Bank. Management expects the leverage strategy to produce approximately $500 thousand of additional net interest income during 2008 on a pretax basis. Additions to the investment securities portfolio depend to a large extent on the availability of investable funds that are not otherwise needed to satisfy loan demand. Investable funds not otherwise utilized are temporarily invested as federal funds sold or as interest-bearing balances at other banks, the level of which is affected by such considerations as near-term loan demand and liquidity needs.

At September 30, 2008, the securities portfolio had unrealized net losses of approximately $2.7 million, which are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. Our securities portfolio at September 30, 2008 consisted of U.S. government sponsored agencies, collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), mortgage-backed securities (MBS), corporate bonds, equity securities and tax-exempt municipal securities.

We currently have the ability to hold our available-for-sale investment securities to maturity except for equity securities. However, should conditions change, we may sell unpledged securities. We consider the overall quality of the securities portfolio to be high. All securities held are traded in liquid markets. As of September 30,

29

2008, we owned securities from issuers in which the aggregate amortized cost from such issuers exceeded 10% of our shareholders’ equity. As of September 30, 2008 the amortized cost and market value of the securities from such issuers were as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Market Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Federal National Mortgage Corporation	$	54,493	$	53,937
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		31,571		31,268
Federal Home Loan Banks		9,991		9,981
Government National Mortgage Association		19,267		19,134

At September 30, 2008, we held $8.3 million in bank owned life insurance, compared to $8.0 million at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007.

Deposits and Other Borrowings

Deposits

Deposits totaled $619.0 million as of September 30, 2008 compared to deposits of $526.4 million at December 31, 2007 and up 17.4% compared to deposits of $527.4 million at September 30, 2007. We attribute our deposit growth during the nine months and twelve months ended September 30, 2008 to increased utilization of the wholesale CD market and public funds. We believe that we can improve our core deposit funding by improving our branching network and providing more convenient opportunities for customers to bank with us. We anticipate that our deposits will continue to increase during 2008.

Other Borrowings

Short-term borrowings include sweep accounts, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (the “FHLB”) having maturities of one year or less, Federal Funds purchased and repurchase agreements. Our short-term borrowings totaled $45.7 million at September 30, 2008, compared to $43.2 million on December 31, 2007, a net increase of $2.5 million.

The following table details the maturities and rates of our borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”), as of September 30, 2008.

Borrow Date	Type	Principal	Term	Rate	Maturity
(Dollars in thousands)
January 25, 2008	Fixed rate	20,000	1 year	2.90	January 26, 2009
February 28, 2008	Fixed rate	10,000	1 year	2.57	February 27, 2009
March 12, 2008	Fixed rate	4,000	1 year	2.44	March 12, 2009
March 12, 2008	Fixed rate	5,000	2 years	2.56	March 12, 2010
March 12, 2008	Fixed rate	6,500	3 years	2.89	March 14, 2011
February 29, 2008	Fixed rate	5,000	4 years	3.18	February 29, 2012
March 12, 2008	Fixed rate	2,000	4 years	3.25	March 12, 2012
March 12, 2008	Fixed rate	7,500	5 years	3.54	March 12, 2013

Total Borrowings: $    60,000             Composite rate: 2.90%

Long-Term Obligations

Long-term obligations consist of advances from FHLB with maturities greater than one year. Our long-term borrowing from the FHLB totaled $26.0 million on September 30, 2008, compared to no long-term FHLB advances on December 31, 2007 or September 30, 2007. The increase of long-term FHLB advances is associated with the leverage transaction executed during the first quarter of 2008.

30

Liquidity

Liquidity refers to our continuing ability to meet deposit withdrawals, fund loan and capital expenditure commitments, maintain reserve requirements, pay operating expenses and provide funds for payment of dividends, debt service and other operational requirements. Liquidity is immediately available from five major sources: (a) cash on hand and on deposit at other banks; (b) the outstanding balance of federal funds sold; (c) lines for the purchase of federal funds from other banks; (d) lines of credit established at the FHLB, less existing advances; and (e) our investment securities portfolio. All our debt securities are of investment grade quality and, if the need arises, can be promptly liquidated on the open market or pledged as collateral for short-term borrowing.

Consistent with our general approach to liquidity management, loans and other assets of the Bank are funded primarily using a core of local deposits, retail repurchase agreements and the Bank’s capital position. To date, these core funds, supplemented by FHLB advances and a modest amount of brokered deposits, have been adequate to fund loan demand in our market areas, while maintaining the desired level of immediate liquidity and an investment securities portfolio available for both immediate and secondary liquidity purposes. It is anticipated that funding sources in the future will include continued use of brokered deposits and, additionally, institutional deposits obtained through the Internet.

We are a member of the FHLB. Membership, along with a blanket collateral commitment of our one-to-four family residential mortgage loan portfolio, as well as our commercial real estate loan portfolio, provided us the ability to draw up to $153.6 million and $128.8 million of advances from the FHLB at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. At September 30, 2008, we had outstanding FHLB advances totaling $60.0 million compared to $28.0 million and $14.0 million at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively.

As a requirement for membership, we invest in stock of the FHLB in the amount of 1% of our outstanding residential loans or 5% of our outstanding advances from the FHLB, whichever is greater. That stock is pledged as collateral for any FHLB advances drawn by us. At September 30, 2008, we owned 38,591 shares of the FHLB’s $100 par value capital stock, compared to 23,822 and 17,747 shares at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively. No ready market exists for such stock, which is carried at cost.

We also had unsecured federal funds lines in the aggregate amount of $31.0 million available to us at September 30, 2008 under which we can borrow funds to meet short-term liquidity needs. At September 30, 2008, we had no borrowings outstanding under these federal funds lines. Another source of funding is loan participations sold to other commercial banks (in which we retain the servicing rights). We believe that our liquidity sources are adequate to meet our operating needs.

Net cash provided by operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $4.4 million, compared to net cash provided by operations of $3.1 million for the same period in 2007. Net cash used in investing activities increased to $107.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to $23.4 million for the same period in 2007 primarily due to the increase in net loan originations and the purchase of investment securities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $118.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to net cash provided of $1.5 million for the same period in 2007. Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2008 were $37.9 million compared to $21.3 million at September 30, 2007.

Capital Resources

Shareholders’ Equity

Shareholders’ equity decreased by approximately $755 thousand to $66.1 million at September 30, 2008 from $66.8 million at December 31, 2007. We generated net income of $3.2 million, experienced an increase in net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities of $1.2 million, repurchased 35,273 shares of common stock totaling $886 thousand and recognized stock based compensation of $156 thousand on incentive stock awards. We declared

31

cash dividends of $1.6 million or $0.5475 per share during the first nine months of 2008. We recorded a liability of $387 thousand to record the postretirement benefit related to split-dollar life insurance arrangements due to adoption of EITF 06-4.

We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by our federal banking regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by these regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines involving quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

On October 14, 2008, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“UST”) announced that, using the authority granted to it under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (“TARP”) mandated by The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, and as a part of its efforts to address instability in the financial markets, it would implement a voluntary capital purchase program under which it would make equity investments in banks and bank holding companies, including healthy institutions. The purpose of the program is to increase the flow of financing to businesses and consumers and support the national economy. Under the TARP capital purchase program, UST will purchase preferred stock in companies that choose to participate in amounts ranging from a minimum of 1% to a maximum of 3% of each participating company’s “risk-weighted assets.” Companies that sell preferred stock to UST are expected to use the cash proceeds they receive primarily to fund additional lending activities, though proceeds also may be used by companies for other purposes, including the acquisition of weaker financial institutions.

Although our capital ratios at September 30, 2008, were above the level at which banks and bank holding companies are classified as “well capitalized” under the capital adequacy guidelines of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) for insured banks, and the Federal Reserve Board (the “FRB”) for bank holding companies, we have chosen to apply for participation in the TARP capital purchase program. Filing an application does not obligate us to participate in the capital purchase program or to sell any capital stock to UST. Under the current terms of the program, following our receipt of notification of acceptance of our application we will have 30 days within which to decide whether we will participate. During that time, we will continue to assess the relative benefits and costs of participation and make our final decision.

Quantitative measures established by the FDIC to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of Total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (each as defined in the regulations). As a bank holding company, we also are subject, on a consolidated basis, to the capital adequacy guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board. The capital requirements of the Federal Reserve Board are similar to those of the FDIC governing the Bank. As of September 30, 2008, we and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which we are subject.

During the first nine months of 2008, we experienced a decline in our Tier 1 capital ratios when compared to the periods ending December 31, and September 30, 2007. This decline is primarily due to the large increase in assets we had during the first nine months of the year.

Based on the most recent notification from the FDIC, the Bank is well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

32

Our and the Bank’s actual capital ratios are presented in the following table:

	To be well capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions Ratio			Minimum required for capital adequacy purposes Ratio			Our Ratio		Bank’s Ratio
As of September 30, 2008:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	³	5.00	%	³	3.00	%	9.00	%	9.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	³	6.00	%	³	4.00	%	11.30		11.30
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	³	10.00	%	³	8.00	%	12.15		12.15
As of December 31, 2007:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	³	5.00	%	³	3.00	%	10.66	%	8.98	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	³	6.00	%	³	4.00	%	12.94		10.90
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	³	10.00	%	³	8.00	%	13.72		11.69
As of September 30, 2007:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	³	5.00	%	³	3.00	%	10.61	%	8.92	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	³	6.00	%	³	4.00	%	12.87		10.82
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	³	10.00	%	³	8.00	%	13.71		11.66

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk reflects the risk of economic loss resulting from adverse changes in market price and interest rates. This risk of loss can be reflected in diminished current market values and/or reduced potential net interest income in future periods.

The Company’s market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its lending and deposit-taking activities. The structure of the Company’s loan and deposit portfolios is such that a significant decline in interest rates may adversely impact net market values and net interest income. The Company does not maintain a trading account nor is the Company subject to currency exchange risk or commodity price risk. Interest rate risk is monitored as part of the Company’s asset/liability management function.

Management does not believe there has been any significant change in the overall analysis of financial instruments considered market risk sensitive, as measured by the factors of contractual maturities, average interest rates and estimated fair values, since the analysis prepared and presented in conjunction with the Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures in accordance with Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that we are able to record, process, summarize and report in a timely manner the information required to be disclosed in reports we file under the Exchange Act.

We review our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal control over financial reporting, on an ongoing basis and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness. In connection with the above evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, no change in our internal control over financial reporting was identified that occurred during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

33

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not Applicable.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table contains information regarding repurchases of shares of our outstanding common stock during the third quarter of 2008.

ISSUER REPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid Per Share (1)		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)	(d) Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
Month #1 7/01/08 through 07/31/08	500	$	21.75	500	109,904
Month #2 08/01/08 through 08/31/08	400	$	22.81	400	109,504
Month #3 09/01/08 through 09/30/08	—		—	—	145,000
Total	900	$	22.22	900	145,000

(1) Reflects weighted average price paid per share.

(2) On September 19, 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized our repurchase of up to 146,000 shares of our outstanding common stock and our adoption of a stock trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. That authorization expired in September 2008 and, on September 16, 2008 our Board renewed its approval for the repurchase of up to 145,000 shares of our common stock during the following twelve months and we entered into a new stock trading plan. The shares may be purchased from time to time in open market transactions or solicited or unsolicited privately negotiated transactions, subject to factors such as stock price, our operating results and financial condition, general economic and market conditions, and our available cash. The Board’s actions approving share repurchases and the stock trading plans did not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of shares, and purchases could be suspended or discontinued at any time at our discretion. The Board’s authorization expires on September 16, 2009.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

34

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) (furnished herewith)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) (furnished herewith)
32	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (furnished herewith)

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	ECB BANCORP, INC.
	(Registrant)
Date: November 10, 2008	By:	/s/ Arthur H. Keeney III
		Arthur H. Keeney III
		President & CEO
Date: November 10, 2008	By:	/s/ Gary M. Adams
		Gary M. Adams
		Senior Vice President & CFO

35

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) (furnished herewith)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) (furnished herewith)
32	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (furnished herewith)

36

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur H. Keeney III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ECB Bancorp, Inc. (“registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

37

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 10, 2008	/s/ Arthur H. Keeney III
	Arthur H. Keeney III
	President and Chief Executive Officer

38

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Gary M. Adams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ECB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 10, 2008	/s/ Gary M. Adams
	Gary M. Adams
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

39

EX-32

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge (i) the Form 10-Q filed by ECB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Issuer”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the period presented therein.

Date: November 10, 2008	/s/ Arthur H. Keeney III
	Arthur H. Keeney III
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 10, 2008	/s/ Gary M. Adams
	Gary M. Adams
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

40