United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005

-or-

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 0-24763

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	59-3429602
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

121 West Forsyth Street, Suite 200

Jacksonville, Florida 32202

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(904) 598-7000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Unchanged

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Form 10-Q Report Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004	1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004	3
	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Partners’ Capital and Comprehensive Income (Loss) as of June 30, 2005	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	34
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	53
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	53
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	54
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	54
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	54
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	54
Item 5.	Other Information	54
Item 6.	Exhibits	54
SIGNATURE		56

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004

(in thousands, except unit data)

	2005			2004
	(unaudited)
Assets
Real estate investments at cost:
Land	$	817,591		806,207
Buildings and improvements		1,927,265		1,915,655
		2,744,856		2,721,862
Less: accumulated depreciation		364,362		338,609
		2,380,494		2,383,253
Properties in development		378,701		426,216
Operating properties held for sale		24,473		4,916
Investments in real estate partnerships		567,666		179,677
Net real estate investments		3,351,334		2,994,062
Cash and cash equivalents		26,252		95,320
Notes receivable		22,715		25,646
Tenant receivables, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $3,694 and $3,393 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		57,640		60,911
Deferred costs, less accumulated amortization of $29,046 and $25,735 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		39,783		41,002
Acquired lease intangible assets, net		12,164		14,172
Other assets		15,956		12,711
	$	3,525,844		3,243,824
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
Liabilities:
Notes payable		1,223,352		1,293,090
Unsecured line of credit		265,000		200,000
Bridge Loan		275,000		—
Accounts payable and other liabilities		112,164		102,443
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net		4,684		5,161
Tenants’ security and escrow deposits		10,027		10,049
Total liabilities		1,890,227		1,610,743
Limited partners’ interest in consolidated partnerships		2,028		1,827
Partners’ Capital:
Series D preferred units, par value $100: 500,000 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004		49,158		49,158
Series E preferred units, par value $100: 700,000 units issued, 300,000 units outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004		29,238		29,238
Series F preferred units, par value $100: 240,000 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004		23,366		23,366
Preferred units of general partner, par value $0.01: 800,000 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, liquidation preference $250		200,000		200,000
General partner; 63,279,799 and 62,808,979 units outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		1,320,493		1,304,008
Limited partners; 1,347,418 and 1,488,364 units outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		27,855		30,775
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(16,521	)	(5,291	)
Total partners’ capital		1,633,589		1,631,254
Commitments and contingencies	$	3,525,844		3,243,824

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

1

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

(in thousands, except per unit data)

(unaudited)

	2005			2004
Revenues:
Minimum rent	$	72,704		68,497
Percentage rent		270		337
Recoveries from tenants		20,716		19,019
Management, acquisition and other fees		16,848		1,766
Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships		946		1,944
Total revenues		111,484		91,563
Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization		21,166		19,394
Operating and maintenance		13,240		12,376
General and administrative		9,402		7,221
Real estate taxes		10,148		9,498
Other expenses		534		663
Total operating expenses		54,490		49,152
Other expense (income)
Interest expense, net of interest income of $543 and $880 in 2005 and 2004, respectively		22,317		18,606
Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development		(3,598	)	(3,667	)
Total other expense		18,719		14,939
Income before minority interests		38,275		27,472
Minority interest of limited partners		(82	)	(91	)
Income from continuing operations		38,193		27,381
Discontinued operations:
Operating income from discontinued operations		993		2,115
Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development		7,739		2,483
Income from discontinued operations		8,732		4,598
Net income		46,925		31,979
Preferred unit distributions		(5,775	)	(6,478	)
Net income for common unit holders	$	41,150		25,501
Income per common unit - basic:
Continuing operations	$	0.50		0.34
Discontinued operations		0.14		0.07
Net income for common unit holders per unit	$	0.64		0.41
Income per common unit - diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.49		0.34
Discontinued operations		0.14		0.07
Net income for common unit holders per unit	$	0.63		0.41

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

(in thousands, except per unit data)

(unaudited)

	2005			2004
Revenues:
Minimum rent	$	144,406		135,956
Percentage rent		819		788
Recoveries from tenants		42,041		38,291
Management, acquisition and other fees		20,167		3,377
Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships		3,337		4,689
Total revenues		210,770		183,101
Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization		41,501		38,771
Operating and maintenance		26,460		24,986
General and administrative		18,054		13,104
Real estate taxes		20,432		19,473
Other expenses		1,963		1,150
Total operating expenses		108,410		97,484
Other expense (income)
Interest expense, net of interest income of $1,044 and $1,717 in 2005 and 2004, respectively		42,593		39,657
Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development		(10,140	)	(7,650	)
Total other expense		32,453		32,007
Income before minority interests		69,907		53,610
Minority interest of limited partners		(158	)	(169	)
Income from continuing operations		69,749		53,441
Discontinued operations:
Operating income from discontinued operations		1,766		4,327
Gain on sale of operating properties and properties in development		16,733		2,495
Income from discontinued operations		18,499		6,822
Net income		88,248		60,263
Preferred unit distributions		(11,550	)	(12,956	)
Net income for common unit holders	$	76,698		47,307
Income per common unit - basic:
Continuing operations	$	0.90		0.65
Discontinued operations		0.29		0.12
Net income for common unit holders per unit	$	1.19		0.77
Income per common unit - diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.89		0.65
Discontinued operations		0.29		0.12
Net income for common unit holders per unit	$	1.18		0.77

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Partners’ Capital and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

For the six months ended June 30, 2005

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Preferred Units			General Partner Preferred and Common Units		Limited Partner		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Total Partners’ Capital
Balance at December 31, 2004	$	101,762		1,504,008		30,775		(5,291	)	1,631,254
Comprehensive income:
Net income		4,225		82,228		1,795		—		88,248
Change in fair value of derivative instruments								(11,516	)	(11,516	)
Amortization of loss on derivative instruments								286		286
Total comprehensive income		—		—		—		—		77,018
Cash distributions for dividends		—		(69,390	)	(1,499	)	—		(70,889	)
Preferred unit distribution		(4,225	)	(7,325	)	—		—		(11,550	)
Common Units issued as a result of common stock issued by Regency including stock-based compensation, net of repurchases		—		7,756		—		—		7,756
Common Units exchanged for common stock of Regency		—		3,639		(3,639	)	—		—
Reallocation of limited partners’ interest		—		(423	)	423		—		—
Balance at June 30, 2005	$	101,762		1,520,493		27,855		(16,521	)	1,633,589

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	2005			2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	88,248		60,263
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		42,417		40,266
Deferred loan cost and debt premium amortization		1,144		1,209
Services provided by Regency in exchange for Common Units		9,513		7,075
Minority interest of limited partners		158		169
Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships		(3,337	)	(4,689	)
Net gain on sale of properties		(29,637	)	(11,129	)
Distributions from operations of investments in real estate partnerships		7,766		7,266
Hedge settlement		—		(5,720	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Tenant receivables		3,271		12,304
Deferred leasing costs		(5,720	)	(3,665	)
Other assets		(4,393	)	2,607
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(11,194	)	5,714
Tenants’ security and escrow deposits		(22	)	237
Net cash provided by operating activities		98,214		111,907
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of real estate		—		(23,419	)
Development of real estate		(116,692	)	(182,160	)
Proceeds from sale of real estate investments		92,983		62,909
Repayment of notes receivable, net		2,932		11,146
Investments in real estate partnerships		(403,363	)	(1,218	)
Distributions received from investments in real estate partnerships		13,900		18,108
Net cash used in investing activities		(410,240	)	(114,634	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from Common Units issued as a result of Common Stock issued by Regency		3,554		11,501
Cash paid for conversion of Common Units by limited partner		—		(10,831	)
Contributions from limited partners in consolidated partnerships		25		72
Distributions to preferred unit holders		(11,550	)	(12,957	)
Cash distributions for dividends		(70,889	)	(65,138	)
Repayment of fixed rate unsecured notes		—		(200,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of fixed rate unsecured notes, net		—		148,646
Proceeds from unsecured line of credit and Bridge Loan, net		340,000		110,000
Proceeds from notes payable		—		5,852
Repayment of notes payable, net		(14,913	)	(2,350	)
Scheduled principal payments		(3,153	)	(2,770	)
Deferred loan costs		(116	)	(3,787	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		242,958		(21,762	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(69,068	)	(24,489	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		95,320		29,869
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	26,252		5,380

5

REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information - cash paid for interest (net of capitalized interest of $5,535 and $6,504 in 2005 and 2004, respectively)	$	43,086	42,521
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions:
Mortgage debt assumed by purchaser on sale of real estate	$	—	5,586
Common stock issued for partnership units exchanged	$	3,639	4,341
Mortgage loans assumed for the acquisition of real estate	$	—	4,148
Real estate contributed as investments in real estate partnerships	$	2,956	2,757
Exchangeable operating partnership units issued for the acquisition of real estate	$	—	13,400
Notes receivable taken in connection with sales of operating properties, properties in development and outparcels	$	—	6,893
Change in fair value of derivative instrument	$	11,516	—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Organization and Principles of Consolidation

Regency Centers, L.P. (“RCLP” or the “Partnership”) is the primary entity through which Regency Centers Corporation (“Regency” or the “Company”), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”), conducts all of its business and owns all of its assets.

The Partnership was formed in 1996 for the purpose of acquiring certain real estate properties. At June 30, 2005, Regency owns approximately 98% of the outstanding common units of the Partnership.

The Partnership’s ownership interests are represented by Units, of which there are i) five series of preferred Units, ii) common Units owned by the limited partners and iii) common Units owned by Regency which serves as the general partner. Each outstanding common Unit owned by a limited partner is exchangeable, on a one share per one Unit basis, for the common stock of Regency or for cash at Regency’s election.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and also partnerships in which it has a voting control. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are of a normal recurring nature, and in the opinion of management, are necessary to properly state the Partnership’s results of operations and financial position. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnership’s December 31, 2004 Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and updated under Form 8-K on June 13, 2005.

The Partnership is currently evaluating the recent EITF consensus on Issue No. 04-5 “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” (Note 1(m)).

7

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(b) Revenues

The Partnership leases space to tenants under agreements with varying terms. Leases are accounted for as operating leases with minimum rent recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease regardless of when payments are due. Tenant allowances are recorded as tenant improvements. Lease revenue recognition commences when the lessee is given possession of the leased space upon completion of tenant improvements. Accrued rents are included in tenant receivables.

Substantially all of the lease agreements contain provisions that grant additional rents based on tenants’ sales volume (contingent or percentage rent) and reimbursement of the tenants’ share of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance (“CAM”) costs. Percentage rents are recognized when the tenants achieve the specified targets as defined in their lease agreements. Recovery of real estate taxes, insurance and CAM costs are recognized as the respective costs are incurred in accordance with the lease agreements.

The Partnership accounts for profit recognition on sales of real estate in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) Statement No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” In summary, profits from sales will not be recognized by the Partnership unless a sale has been consummated; the buyer’s initial and continuing investment is adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; the Partnership has transferred to the buyer the usual risks and rewards of ownership; and the Partnership does not have substantial continuing involvement with the property.

The Partnership has been engaged by joint ventures to provide asset and property management services for such ventures’ shopping centers. The fees are market based and generally calculated as a percentage of either revenues earned or the estimated values of the properties and are recognized as services are provided.

(c) Real Estate Investments

Land, buildings and improvements are recorded at cost. All specifically identifiable costs related to development activities are capitalized into properties in development on the consolidated balance sheet. The capitalized costs include pre-development costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, and direct employee costs incurred during the period of development.

The Partnership incurs costs prior to land acquisition including acquisition contract deposits, as well as legal, engineering and other external professional fees related to evaluating the feasibility of developing a shopping center. These pre-development costs are included in properties in development. If the Partnership determines that the development of a particular shopping center is no longer probable, any related pre-development costs previously incurred are immediately expensed. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Partnership had capitalized pre-development costs of $11.8 million and $10.5 million, respectively.

8

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(c) Real Estate Investments (continued)

The Partnership’s method of capitalizing interest is based upon applying its weighted average borrowing rate to that portion of the actual development costs expended. The Partnership ceases cost capitalization when the property is available for occupancy upon substantial completion of tenant improvements. In no event would the Partnership capitalize interest on the project beyond 12 months after substantial completion of the building shell.

Maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the respective assets are reflected in operating and maintenance expense.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings and improvements, term of lease for tenant improvements, and three to seven years for furniture and equipment.

The Partnership allocates the purchase price of assets acquired (net tangible and identifiable intangible assets) and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values at the date of acquisition pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“Statement 141”). Statement 141 provides guidance on allocating a portion of the purchase price of a property to intangible assets. The Partnership’s methodology for this allocation includes estimating an “as-if vacant” fair value of the physical property, which is allocated to land, building and improvements. The difference between the purchase price and the “as-if vacant” fair value is allocated to intangible assets. There are three categories of intangible assets to be considered: (i) value of in-place leases, (ii) above and below-market value of in-place leases and (iii) customer relationship value.

The value of in-place leases is estimated based on the value associated with the costs avoided in originating leases comparable to the acquired in-place leases as well as the value associated with lost rental and recovery revenue during the assumed lease-up period. The value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the estimated weighted-average remaining lease lives.

Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties are recorded based on the present value of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimates of fair market lease rates for the comparable in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The value of above-market leases is amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The value of below-market leases is accreted as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including renewal options.

The Partnership allocates no value to customer relationship intangibles if it has pre-existing business relationships with the major retailers in the acquired property because the customer relationships associated with the acquired property provide no incremental value over the Partnership’s existing relationships.

9

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(c) Real Estate Investments (continued)

The Partnership follows the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“Statement 144”). In accordance with Statement 144, the Partnership classifies an operating property as held for sale when it determines that the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition and management is reasonably certain that a sale will be consummated. Operating properties held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. Depreciation and amortization are suspended during the held-for-sale period. The operations of properties held for sale are reclassified into discontinued operations for all periods presented.

In accordance with Statement 144, when the Partnership sells a property and will not have continuing involvement after disposition, its operations and gain on sale are reported in discontinued operations when the operations and cash flows are clearly distinguished. Once classified as discontinued operations, these properties are eliminated from ongoing operations. Prior periods are also restated to reflect the operations of these properties as discontinued operations. When the Partnership sells operating properties to its joint ventures or to third parties, and it will have continuing involvement, the operations and gains on sales are included in income from continuing operations.

The Partnership reviews its real estate portfolio for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable based upon expected undiscounted cash flows from the property. The Partnership determines impairment by comparing the property’s carrying value to an estimate of fair value based upon varying methods such as i) estimating future cash flows, ii) determining resale values by market, or iii) applying a capitalization rate to net operating income using prevailing rates in a given market. These methods of determining fair value can fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, including changes in the general economy of those markets in which the Partnership operates, tenant credit quality and demand for new retail stores. In the event that the carrying amount of a property is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value, the Partnership will write down the asset to fair value for “held-and-used” assets and to fair value less costs to sell for “held-for-sale” assets.

(d) Deferred Costs

Deferred costs include deferred leasing costs and deferred loan costs, net of accumulated amortization. Such costs are amortized over the periods through lease expiration or loan maturity. Deferred leasing costs consist of internal and external commissions associated with leasing the Partnership’s shopping centers. Net deferred leasing costs were $30.6 million and $30.8 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Deferred loan costs consist of initial direct and incremental costs associated with financing activities. Net deferred loan costs were $9.2 million and $10.2 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

10

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(e) Earnings per Unit and Treasury Stock

Basic net income per unit is computed based upon the weighted average number of common units outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per unit also includes common unit equivalents, if dilutive, for stock options and restricted stock granted by the Company to employees of the Partnership. See note 8 for the calculation of earnings per unit (“EPU”).

Repurchases of the Company’s common stock are recorded at cost and are reflected as Treasury stock in the Company’s consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity. Outstanding shares do not include treasury shares. Concurrent with the Treasury stock repurchases by Regency, the Partnership repurchases the same amount of general partnership units from Regency.

(f) Cash and Cash Equivalents

Any instruments which have an original maturity of 90 days or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. Cash distributions of normal operating earnings from investments in real estate partnerships are included in cash flows from operations in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

(g) Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires the Partnership’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(h) Stock-Based Compensation

Regency grants stock-based compensation to its employees, all of which are employed by the Partnership. When Regency issues common shares as compensation, it receives a comparable number of common units from the Partnership including stock options. Regency is committed to contribute to the Partnership all proceeds from the exercise of stock options or other stock-based awards granted under Regency’s Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Accordingly, Regency’s ownership in the Partnership will increase based on the amount of proceeds contributed to the Partnership, and for the common units it receives. As a result of the issuance of common units to Regency for stock-based compensation, the Partnership accounts for stock-based compensation in the same manner as Regency, as further described.

Prior to January 1, 2005, the Partnership followed the provisions of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure” (“Statement 148”). Statement 148 provided alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, Statement 148 amended the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“Statement 123”), to require more prominent and frequent disclosures in financial statements about the effects of stock-based compensation. As permitted under Statement 123 and Statement 148, the Partnership previously followed the accounting guidelines pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“Opinion 25”), for stock-based compensation and furnished the pro-forma disclosures as required under Statement 148.

On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“Statement 123(R)”), which is a revision of

11

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(h) Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

Statement 123. Statement 123(R) supersedes Opinion 25. Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair values. Pro-forma disclosure is no longer an alternative under Statement 123(R).

Statement 123(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2005. The Partnership elected the early adoption of Statement 123(R) effective January 1, 2005. As permitted by Statement 123(R), the Partnership has applied the “modified prospective” method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of Statement 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of Statement 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of Statement 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date.

The Partnership recorded stock-based compensation expense for the periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 as follows, the components of which are further described below (in thousands):

	For the three months Ended			For the six months Ended
	2005		2004	2005	2004
Stock Options	$	274	—	549	—
Dividend Equivalents		465	793	870	1,587
Restricted Stock		4,431	2,734	8,094	5,488
Total	$	5,170	3,527	9,513	7,075

The recorded amounts of stock-based compensation expense in 2005 represent amortization of deferred compensation related to share based payments in accordance with Statement 123(R). Compensation expense that is specifically identifiable to development activities is capitalized to the associated development project and is included above. Deferred compensation is recorded as a reduction to general partner preferred and common units in the statement of changes in partners’ capital.

12

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(h) Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

During 2004, as permitted by Statement 123, the Company accounted for share-based payments to employees using Opinion 25’s intrinsic value method and recognized no compensation cost for employee stock options in prior years. Had the Partnership adopted Statement 123(R) in 2004, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 in the disclosure of pro-forma net income and earnings per unit described as follows (in thousands except per unit data):

	For the three months ended June 30,		For the six months ended June 30,
	2004		2004
Net income for common unit holders as reported:	$	25,501	47,307
Add: stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income		3,527	7,075
Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards		4,346	9,076
Pro-forma net income	$	24,682	45,306
Earnings per unit:
Basic – as reported	$	0.41	0.77
Basic – pro-forma	$	0.40	0.74
Diluted – as reported	$	0.41	0.77
Diluted – pro-forma	$	0.40	0.73

The Company has a Long-Term Omnibus Plan (the “Plan”) under which the Board of Directors may grant stock options and other stock-based awards to officers, directors and other key employees of the Partnership. The Plan allows the Company to issue participants up to 5.0 million shares in the form of common stock or stock options, but limits the issuance of common stock excluding stock options to no more than 2.75 million shares. At June 30, 2005, there were approximately 3.3 million shares available for grant under the Plan either through options or restricted stock of which 1.8 million shares are limited to common stock awards other than stock options. The Plan also limits outstanding awards to no more than 12% of outstanding common stock.

Stock options are granted under the Plan with an exercise price equal to the stock’s fair market value at the date of grant. All stock options granted have ten-year lives, contain vesting terms of one to five years from the date of grant and some have dividend equivalent rights. Stock options granted prior to 2005 also contained “reload” rights, which allowed for an option holder to receive new options each time existing options were exercised if the existing options were exercised under specific criteria provided for in the Plan. In January 2005, the Company offered to acquire the “reload” rights of existing stock options from the option holders by issuing them additional stock options or restricted stock that will vest 25%

13

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(h) Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

per year and be expensed over a four-year period beginning in 2005 in accordance with Statement 123(R). As a result of the offer, on January 18, 2005, the Company granted 771,645 options to 37 employees with an exercise price of $51.36, the fair value on the date of grant, and granted 7,906 restricted shares to 11 employees representing value of $363,664, substantially canceling all of the “reload” rights on existing stock options. One employee chose to retain their reload rights. The stock option reload right buy-out program was not offered to the non-employee directors. Options granted under the reload buy-out plan do not earn dividend equivalents.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton closed-form (“Black Scholes”) option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Partnership uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The Partnership believes that the use of the Black-Scholes model meets the fair value measurement objectives of Statement 123(R) and reflects all substantive characteristics of the instruments being valued. The following table represents the assumptions used for the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the per share weighted average fair value of $5.90 and $6.17 for options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005, respectively:

	For the three months ended
	March 31, 2005		June 30, 2005
Expected dividend yield	4.3	%	3.9	%
Risk-free interest rate	3.7	%	3.5	%
Expected volatility	18.0	%	20.0	%
Expected life in years	4.4		2.5

14

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(h) Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

The following table reports stock option activity during the six month period ended June 30, 2005:

	Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Remaining Contractual Term	Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2005	1,675,163		$	44.32
Granted	771,645			51.36
Exercised	(90,557	)		34.54		$	1,430
Outstanding at March 31, 2005	2,356,251			47.00	5.94
Granted	7,680			56.07
Exercised	(196,083	)		43.82		$	4,281
Forfeited	(1,894	)		47.04
Outstanding at June 30, 2005	2,165,954		$	47.32	5.99	$	21,403
Exercisable at June 30, 2005	1,351,457		$	45.70	4.00	$	15,539

The following table presents information regarding unvested option activity during the six month period ended June 30, 2005:

	Non-vested Number of Options		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested at January 1, 2005	59,102		$	2.22
Granted	771,645		$	5.90
Less: 2005 Vesting	(16,250	)	$	2.22
Non-vested at June 30, 2005	814,497		$	5.71

As of June 30, 2005, there was $3.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 3.5 years.

15

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(h) Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

The Company grants restricted stock under the Plan to its employees as a form of long- term compensation and retention. The terms of each grant vary depending upon the participant’s responsibilities and position within the Company. The Company’s stock grants to date can be categorized into three types: (a) 4-year vesting, (b) performance-based vesting, and (c) 8-year cliff vesting. Four-year vesting grants vest 25% per year beginning in the year of grant. These grants are not subject to future performance measures, and are granted based upon past employee performance. Performance grants are subject to future performance measurements, primarily annual growth and compounded three-year growth in earnings. Performance grants must be earned, based upon the achievement of the performance criteria, before the actual number of shares to be vested are known. Once earned, performance grants vest over a term such that the period used to determine the number of shares earned combined with the vesting term equals 5 years. Eight-year cliff vesting grants fully vest at the end of the eighth year from the date of grant; however, as a result of the achievement of future performance, primarily growth in earnings, the vesting of these grants may be accelerated over a shorter term. Performance grants and 8-year cliff vesting grants are currently only granted to the eight top executives in the Company. The Partnership considers the likelihood of meeting the performance criteria based upon management’s estimates and analysis of future earnings growth, which determines the amounts recognized as expense on a periodic basis. Compensation expense is measured at the grant date and recognized ratably over the vesting period. Restricted stock grants also have certain dividend rights under the Plan, which are expensed in a manner similar to the underlying stock.

The following table reports restricted stock activity during the six month period ended June 30, 2005:

	Number of Shares		Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Unvested Shares at January 1, 2005	827,024
Shares Granted	440,746
Shares Vested and Distributed	(335,993	)	$	16,501
Shares Forfeited	(4,940	)
Unvested Shares at June 30, 2005	926,837		$	53,015

As of June 30, 2005, there was $31.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock granted under the Plan and is recorded as an offset to general partner preferred and common units in the statement of changes in partners’ capital. This unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized through 2009.

16

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(h) Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

The following table represents restricted stock granted in January 2005 and 2004 for individual and company level performance during 2004 and 2003, respectively. Shares granted in 2005 include 7,906 shares related to the stock option reload buy-out program discussed above.

	2005		2004
Weighted average fair value of stock at date of grant	$	51.38	39.97
4-year vesting grant		271,158	219,787
Performance-based grant		169,588	—
8-year vesting grant		—	64,649
Total stock grants		440,746	284,436

(i) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”) (revised December 2003 (“FIN 46R”)), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaced FIN 46, which was issued in January 2003. FIN 46R was applicable immediately to a variable interest entity created after January 31, 2003 and as of the first interim period ending after March 15, 2004 to those variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 and not already consolidated under FIN 46 in previously issued financial statements. The Partnership did not create any variable interest entities after January 31, 2003. The Partnership has adopted FIN 46R, analyzed the applicability of this interpretation to its structures and determined that they are not party to any significant variable interest entities.

(j) Segment Reporting

The Partnership’s business is investing in retail shopping centers through direct ownership or through joint ventures. The Partnership actively manages its portfolio of retail shopping centers and may from time to time make decisions to sell lower performing properties, or developments not meeting its long-term investment objectives. The proceeds of sales are reinvested into higher quality retail shopping centers through acquisitions or new developments, which management believes will meet its planned rate of return. It is management’s intent that all retail shopping centers will be owned or developed for investment purposes. The Partnership’s revenue and net income are generated from the operation of its investment portfolio. The Partnership also earns fees from third parties for services provided to manage and lease retail shopping centers owned through joint ventures.

17

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(j) Segment Reporting (continued)

The Partnership’s portfolio is located throughout the United States; however, management does not distinguish or group its operations on a geographical basis for purposes of allocating resources or measuring performance. The Partnership reviews operating and financial data for each property on an individual basis, therefore, the Partnership defines an operating segment as its individual properties. No individual property constitutes more than 10% of the Partnership’s combined revenue, net income or assets, and thus the individual properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment based upon their similarities with regard to both the nature and economics of the centers, tenants and operational processes, as well as long-term average financial performance. In addition, no single tenant accounts for 10% or more of revenue and none of the shopping centers are located outside the United States.

(k) Derivative Financial Instruments

The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” as amended by SFAS No. 149 (“Statement 133”). Statement 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives are accounted for depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The Partnership’s use of derivative financial instruments is normally to mitigate its interest rate risk on a related financial instrument or forecasted transaction through the use of interest rate swaps.

Statement 133 requires that changes in fair value of derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges be recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) while the ineffective portion of the derivative’s change in fair value be recognized immediately in earnings. Upon the settlement of a hedge, gains and losses associated with the transaction are recorded in OCI and amortized over the underlying term of the hedge transaction. Historically all of the Partnership’s derivative instruments have qualified for hedge accounting.

To determine the fair value of derivative instruments, the Partnership uses standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models and termination costs at each balance sheet date. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of value, and such value may never actually be realized.

18

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(l) Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” (“Statement 150”). Statement 150 affects the accounting for certain financial instruments, which requires companies having consolidated entities with specified termination dates to treat minority owners’ interests in such entities as liabilities in an amount based on the fair value of the entities. Although Statement 150 was originally effective July 1, 2003, the FASB has indefinitely deferred certain provisions related to classification and measurement requirements for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments that become subject to Statement 150 solely as a result of consolidation, including minority interests of entities with specified termination dates. As a result, Statement 150 has no impact on the Partnership’s consolidated statements of operations for the period ended June 30, 2005.

At June 30, 2005, the Partnership held a majority interest in two consolidated entities with specified termination dates of 2017 and 2049. The minority owners’ interests in these entities are to be settled upon termination by distribution or transfer of either cash or specific assets of the underlying entities. The estimated fair value of minority interests in entities with specified termination dates was approximately $5.4 million at June 30, 2005 as compared to their carrying value of $1.0 million. The Partnership has no other financial instruments that are affected by Statement 150.

(m) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2005, the FASB ratified the EITF’s consensus on Issue No. 04-5 “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.” This consensus establishes the presumption that general partners in a limited partnership control that limited partnership regardless of the extent of the general partners’ ownership interest in the limited partnership. The consensus further establishes that the rights of the limited partners can overcome the presumption of control by the general partners, if the limited partners have either (a) the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partners without cause or (b) substantive participating rights. Whether the presumption of control is overcome is a matter of judgment based on the facts and circumstances, for which the consensus provides additional guidance. This consensus is currently applicable to the Partnership for new or modified partnerships, and will otherwise be applicable to existing partnerships in 2006. This consensus applies to limited partnerships or similar entities, such as limited liability companies that have governing provisions that are the functional equivalent of a limited partnership. The Partnership is currently evaluating the effect of this consensus on its consolidation policies.

19

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(m) Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (“Statement 154”). Statement 154 requires restatement of prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. Statement 154 also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the change. Statement 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Partnership is not currently aware of any future potential accounting changes which would require the retrospective application described in Statement 154.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchange of Non-monetary Assets - an amendment of APB Opinion No 29 (“Statement 153”). The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that Opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. Statement 153 amends Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. Statement 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The impact of adopting Statement 153 is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations.

(n) Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2004 amounts to conform to classifications adopted in 2005.

20

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

2. Discontinued Operations

During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Partnership sold 100% of its interest in three properties for net proceeds of $27.1 million. The combined operating income and gains from these properties and properties classified as held for sale are included in discontinued operations. The revenues from properties included in discontinued operations were $2.5 million and $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The operating income and gains from properties included in discontinued operations are reported net of minority interest of exchangeable operating partnership units and income taxes as follows:

	For the three months ended
	June 30, 2005			June 30, 2004
	Operating Income		Gain on sale of properties	Operating Income	Gain on sale of properties
Operations and gain	$	1,033	8,315	2,251	3,466
Less: Income taxes		40	576	136	983
Discontinued operations, net	$	993	7,739	2,115	2,483

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Partnership sold 100% of its interest in five properties for net proceeds of $61.8 million. The combined operating income and gains from these properties and properties classified as held for sale are included in discontinued operations. The revenues from properties included in discontinued operations were $6.0 million and $9.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The operating income and gains from properties included in discontinued operations are reported net of minority interest of exchangeable operating partnership units and income taxes as follows:

	For the six months ended
	June 30, 2005			June 30, 2004
	Operating Income		Gain on sale of properties	Operating Income	Gain on sale of properties
Operations and gain	$	1,859	19,497	4,463	3,478
Less: Income taxes		93	2,764	136	983
Discontinued operations, net	$	1,766	16,733	4,327	2,495

21

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

3. Investments in Real Estate Partnerships

The Partnership accounts for all investments in which it owns 50% or less and does not have a controlling financial interest using the equity method. The Partnership has determined that these investments are not variable interest entities, and therefore, subject to the voting interest model in determining its basis of accounting. Major decisions, including property acquisitions and dispositions, financings, annual budgets and dissolution of the ventures are subject to the approval of all partners. The Partnership’s combined investment in these partnerships was $567.7 million and $179.7 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Any difference between the carrying amount of these investments and the underlying equity in net assets is amortized to equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships over the expected useful lives of the properties and other intangible assets which range in lives from 10 to 40 years. Net income from these partnerships, which includes all operating results, as well as gains and losses on sales of properties within the joint ventures, is allocated to the Partnership in accordance with the respective partnership agreements. Such allocations of net income are recorded in equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Investments in real estate partnerships are comprised primarily of joint ventures with three unrelated co-investment partners, as described below. In addition to earning its pro-rata share of net income in each of the partnerships, these co-investment partners pay the Partnership fees for asset management, property management, and acquisition and disposition services. During the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Partnership received fees from these joint ventures of $16.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Partnership received fees from these joint ventures of $19.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

The Partnership co-invests with the Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund in three joint ventures (collectively “Columbia”) in which it has ownership interests of 20% or 30%. As of June 30, 2005, Columbia owned 17 shopping centers, had total assets of $482.3 million, and net income of $6.8 million. The Partnership’s share of Columbia’s total assets and net income was $108.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, Columbia sold one shopping center to an unrelated party for $19.7 million with a loss of $242,176 related primarily to higher closing costs than expected.

The Partnership co-invests with the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (“CalSTRS”) in a joint venture called (“RegCal”) in which it has an ownership interest of 25%. As of June 30, 2005, RegCal owned four shopping centers, had total assets of $126.7 million, and net income of $1.3 million. The Partnership’s share of RegCal’s total assets and net income was $31.7 million and $390,768, respectively.

The Partnership co-invests with Macquarie CountryWide Trust of Australia (“MCW”) in three joint ventures, two in which it has an ownership interest of 25% (collectively, “MCWR”), and one in which it has an ownership interest of 35% (“MCWR II”).

22

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

3. Investments in Real Estate Partnerships (continued)

As of June 30, 2005, MCWR owned 50 shopping centers, had total assets of $740.7 million, and net income of $8.3 million. RCLP’s share of MCWR’s total assets and net income was $185.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, MCWR acquired one shopping center from an unrelated party for a purchase price of $24.4 million. The Partnership contributed $4.5 million for its proportionate share of the purchase price, which was net of loan financing placed on the shopping center by MCWR. In addition, MCWR acquired one property from the Partnership valued at $22.1 million, for which the Partnership received cash of $17.1 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, MCWR sold three shopping centers to unrelated parties for $34.7 million with a loss of $254,469 related primarily to higher closing costs than expected.

On June 1, 2005, Macquarie CountryWide-Regency II, LLC (MCWR II) closed on the acquisition of 100 retail shopping centers (the “First Washington Portfolio”) totaling approximately 12.6 million square feet located throughout 17 states and the District of Columbia from a joint venture between CalPERS and an affiliate of First Washington Realty, Inc. (the “Sellers”) pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated February 14, 2005. The total purchase price was approximately $2.8 billion, including the assumption of approximately $68.6 million of mortgage debt and the issuance of approximately $1.6 billion of new mortgage loans on the properties acquired. The First Washington Portfolio acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination by MCWR II. MCWR II is owned 64.95% by an affiliate of MCW, 34.95% by RCLP and 0.1% by Macquarie-Regency Management, LLC (“US Manager”). US Manager is owned 50% by RCLP and 50% by an affiliate of Macquarie Bank Limited. Including its share of US Manager, RCLP’s effective ownership is 35% and is reflected as such on the equity method in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. RCLP’s required equity investment in MCWR II was approximately $397 million and was paid in cash.

Upon closing of the acquisition into the joint venture, MCWR II paid us acquisition, due diligence and capital restructuring fees totaling $21.2 million, of which we recognized $13.8 million as fee income. RCLP only recognized fee income on that portion of the joint venture not owned by it, and as a result, recorded $7.4 million of the fee as a reduction to its investment in MCWR II. The Company has the ability to earn additional acquisition fees of approximately $9.2 million (the “Contingent Acquisition Fees”) subject to achieving certain targeted income levels in 2006 and 2007; and accordingly, the Contingent Acquisition Fee will only be recognized in 2006 and 2007 if earned. The Partnership will also earn recurring fees for asset and property management on a quarterly and monthly basis, respectively. To assist in the transition of the portfolio to RCLP, the Seller has agreed to provide property management services for up to two years on approximately 50% of the portfolio which will result in lower property management fee income to RCLP during the transition period. As of June 30, 2005, MCWR II had total assets of $2.9 billion and recorded a net loss of $3.6 million for the period inception to date. Our share of MCWR II’s total assets and net loss was $1.0 billion and $1.2 million, respectively. The loss incurred by MCWR II was the result of depreciation and amortization of the acquisition price recorded in accordance with Statement 141, and therefore, MCWR II is expected to continue to record a net loss on an on-going basis.

23

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

3. Investments in Real Estate Partnerships (continued)

Recognition of gains from sales to joint ventures is recorded on only that portion of the sales not attributable to the Partnership’s ownership interest. The gains and operations are not recorded as discontinued operations because of RCLP’s continuing involvement in these shopping centers. Columbia, RegCal, MCWR and MCWR II intend to continue to acquire retail shopping centers, some of which they may acquire directly from the Partnership. For those properties acquired from third parties, the Partnership is required to contribute its pro-rata share of the purchase price to the partnerships.

The Partnership’s investments in real estate partnerships as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consist of the following (in thousands):

	Ownership		2005		2004
Macquarie CountryWide-Regency (MCWR)	25	%	$	62,970	65,134
Macquarie CountryWide Direct (MCWR)	25	%		7,708	8,001
Macquarie CountryWide-Regency II (MCWR II)	35	%		392,221	—
Columbia Regency Retail Partners (Columbia)	20	%		40,344	41,380
Cameron Village LLC (Columbia)	30	%		21,685	21,612
Columbia Regency Partners II (Columbia)	20	%		2,051	3,107
RegCal, LLC (RegCal)	25	%		13,101	13,232
Other investments in real estate partnerships	50	%		27,586	27,211
Investments in Real Estate Partnerships			$	567,666	179,677

Summarized financial information for the unconsolidated investments on a combined basis, is as follows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2005		December 31, 2004
Balance Sheet:
Investment in real estate, net	$	3,958,604	1,320,871
Acquired lease intangible assets, net		269,971	79,240
Other assets		120,389	39,506
Total assets	$	4,348,964	1,439,617
Notes payable	$	2,360,546	665,517
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net		61,002	—
Other liabilities		67,299	24,471
Partners’ equity		1,860,117	749,629
Total liabilities and equity	$	4,348,964	1,439,617

Unconsolidated investments in real estate partnerships had notes payable of $2.4 billion as of June 30, 2005 and the Partnership’s proportionate share of these loans was $762.3 million. The loans are primarily non-recourse, but for those that are guaranteed by a joint venture, RCLP’s guarantee does not extend beyond its ownership percentage of the joint venture.

24

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

3. Investments in Real Estate Partnerships (continued)

The revenues and expenses for the unconsolidated investments on a combined basis are summarized as follows for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):

	2005			2004
Statements of Operations:
Total revenues	$	59,989		23,659
Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization		23,171		6,254
Operating and maintenance		8,612		3,505
General and administrative		1,846		771
Real estate taxes		6,928		2,605
Total operating expenses		40,557		13,135
Other expense (income):
Interest expense, net		13,967		3,673
Loss (gain) on sale of real estate		823		(35	)
Other income		(684	)	—
Total other expense (income)		14,106		3,638
Net income	$	5,326		6,886

The revenues and expenses for the unconsolidated investments on a combined basis are summarized as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):

	2005			2004
Statements of Operations:
Total revenues	$	100,626		46,121
Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization		33,830		11,958
Operating and maintenance		15,129		6,928
General and administrative		3,268		1,494
Real estate taxes		11,235		5,104
Total operating expenses		63,462		25,484
Other expense (income):
Interest expense, net		22,812		7,329
Loss (gain) on sale of real estate		497		(8,246	)
Other income		(684	)	—
Total other expense (income)		22,625		(917	)
Net income	$	14,539		21,554

25

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

4. Acquired Lease Intangibles

Acquired lease intangible assets are net of accumulated amortization of $4.6 million and $2.6 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. These assets have a remaining weighted average amortization period of approximately 5.5 years. The aggregate amortization expense from acquired leases was approximately $2 million and $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense from acquired leases was approximately $1.1 million and $488,741 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Acquired lease intangible liabilities are net of previously accreted minimum rent of $2.4 million and $1.9 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively and have a remaining weighted average amortization period of approximately 5.5 years.

5. Notes Payable and Unsecured Line of Credit

The Partnership’s outstanding debt at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consists of the following (in thousands):

	2005		2004
Notes Payable:
Fixed rate mortgage loans	$	206,330	275,726
Variable rate mortgage loans		67,987	68,418
Fixed rate unsecured loans		949,035	948,946
Total notes payable		1,223,352	1,293,090
Unsecured line of credit		265,000	200,000
Bridge loan		275,000	—
Total	$	1,763,352	1,493,090

The Partnership has an unsecured revolving line of credit (the “Line”) with a commitment of $500 million with the right to expand the Line by an additional $150 million subject to additional lender syndication. The Line has a three-year term with a one-year extension option at an interest rate of LIBOR plus .75%. At June 30, 2005, the balance on the Line was $265 million. Contractual interest rates on the Line, which are based on LIBOR plus .75%, were 4.0% and 3.1875% at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The spread paid on the Line is dependent upon the Partnership maintaining specific investment-grade ratings. The Partnership is also required to comply, and is in compliance, with certain financial covenants such as Minimum Net Worth, Total Liabilities to Gross Asset Value (“GAV”) and Secured Indebtedness to GAV and other covenants customary with this type of unsecured financing. The Line is used primarily to finance the development of real estate, but is also available for general working-capital purposes.

On June 1, 2005, the Partnership entered into a credit agreement that provided for a $275 million unsecured term loan maturing on March 1, 2006 (the “Bridge Loan”) which was used to partially fund its equity investment in MCWR II. Interest accrues at a floating rate of LIBOR plus .65%. In conjunction with the $350 million debt offering discussed below, the balance of the Bridge Loan was reduced to $95 million on July 18, 2005. On August 1, 2005, the Company issued common stock under a forward agreement and repaid the entire balance of the Bridge Loan discussed further below under note 7.

26

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

5. Notes Payable and Unsecured Line of Credit (continued)

On July 18, 2005, RCLP completed the sale of $350 million of ten-year senior unsecured notes. The notes are due August 1, 2015 and were priced at 99.858% to yield 5.25%. The proceeds of the offering were used to reduce the balance on the Bridge Loan and the Line. As a result of the forward-starting interest rate swaps initiated on April 1, 2005, totaling $196.7 million, the effective interest rate on the notes is 5.48%. On July 13, 2005, the interest rate swaps were settled for $7.3 million, which is recorded in OCI and will be amortized over ten years to interest expense.

Mortgage loans are secured by certain real estate properties and may be prepaid, but could be subject to a yield-maintenance premium. Mortgage loans are generally due in monthly installments of interest and principal and mature over various terms through 2017. Variable interest rates on mortgage loans are currently based on LIBOR plus a spread in a range of 125 to 150 basis points. Fixed interest rates on mortgage loans range from 5.22% to 8.95%.

The fair value of the Partnership’s notes payable and Line are estimated based on the current rates available to the Partnership for debt of the same remaining maturities. Notes payable with variable interest rates and the Line are considered to be at fair value, since the interest rates on such instruments reprice based on current market conditions. Fixed rate loans assumed in connection with real estate acquisitions are recorded in the accompanying financial statements at fair value.

Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Partnership for loans with similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of notes payable and the Line is $1.8 billion.

As of June 30, 2005, scheduled principal repayments on notes payable, the Line and the Bridge Loan were as follows (in thousands):

Scheduled Payments by Year	Scheduled Principal Payments		Term Loan Maturities	Total Payments
Current year	$	4,036	153,251	157,287
2006 (includes the Bridge Loan)		3,762	302,863	306,625
2007 (includes the Line)		3,542	324,604	328,146
2008		3,388	19,455	22,843
2009		3,347	53,004	56,351
2010		3,227	177,033	180,260
Beyond 5 Years		10,976	697,787	708,763
Unamortized debt premiums		—	3,077	3,077
Total	$	32,278	1,731,074	1,763,352

27

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

5. Notes Payable and Unsecured Line of Credit (continued)

The Partnership has approximately $153.3 million of debt maturing in 2005 of which $100 million was repaid from the proceeds of the $350 million unsecured debt offering previously discussed. The Partnership also renewed $25 million of variable rate debt during July, 2005 and extended the maturity date for two years. The balance of maturing debt of $28.3 million represents secured mortgage loans, which will be repaid upon maturity using proceeds from the Line.

The combined borrowings under the Line of $122 million and the Bridge Loan provided the funding of RCLP’s $397 million equity investment in MCWR II. Additionally, the Partnership borrowed $100 million on the Line to repay $100 million of maturing unsecured debt on July 15, 2005. On July 18, 2005, the Partnership issued $350 million of unsecured notes, the proceeds of which were used to reduce the Bridge Loan by $180 million to $95 million and to reduce the Line by approximately $170 million. The notes bear interest at 5.25% and mature August 1, 2015. On August 1, 2005, RCLP received proceeds of approximately $175.5 million from the sale of common shares, as further described below, which fully repaid the Bridge Loan and further reduced the balance of the Line.

6. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Partnership is exposed to capital market risk, such as changes in interest rates. In order to manage the volatility relating to interest rate risk, the Partnership may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time. The Partnership does not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

On April 1, 2005, the Partnership entered into three forward-starting interest rate swaps of approximately $65.6 million each with fixed rates of 5.029%, 5.05% and 5.05%. The Partnership designated the $196.7 million swaps as cash flow hedges to fix the rate on the unsecured notes issued during July 2005. The fair value of the swaps was a liability of $11.5 million as of June 30, 2005, and is recorded in other liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet. On July 13, 2005, the Partnership settled the swaps with a payment to the counter-parties for $7.3 million which will be included as an adjustment to interest expense as interest is incurred on the $350 million of ten-year unsecured notes sold July 18, 2005.

During 2003, the Partnership entered into two forward-starting interest rate swaps for a total of $144.2 million to fix the rate on a refinancing in April 2004. On March 31, 2004, the Partnership settled the swaps with a payment to the counter-party for $5.7 million.

All of these swaps qualify for hedge accounting under Statement 133, therefore the losses associated with the swaps have been included in OCI in the statement of changes in partners’ capital and the unamortized balance is amortized as additional interest expense over the ten year term of the hedged loan.

28

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

7. Regency’s Stockholders’ Equity and Partners’ Capital

(a) Preferred Units

Terms and conditions of the Preferred Units outstanding as of June 30, 2005 are summarized as follows:

Series	Units Outstanding	Issue Price	Amount Outstanding	Distribution Rate	Callable by Partnership	Exchangeable by Unit holder
Series D	500,000	$100.00	$50,000,000	7.450%	09/29/09	01/01/14
Series E	300,000	$100.00	30,000,000	8.750%	05/25/05	05/25/10
Series F	240,000	$100.00	24,000,000	8.750%	09/08/05	09/08/10
	1,040,000		$104,000,000

The Preferred Units, which may be called by RCLP at par after certain dates, have no stated maturity or mandatory redemption, and pay a cumulative, quarterly dividend at fixed rates. The Preferred Units may be exchanged by the holder for Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”) at an exchange rate of one share for one unit. The Preferred Units and the related Preferred Stock are not convertible into common stock of the Company. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the face value of total Preferred Units issued was $104 million with a weighted average fixed distribution rate of 8.13% and is recorded on the accompanying balance sheet net of original issuance costs.

On August 1, 2005, the Partnership redeemed the $30 million Series E Preferred Units and expensed related issuance costs of $762,180. The redemption was funded from the proceeds of the common stock sale completed August 1, 2005 as discussed below under Common Stock. The Partnership expects to redeem the $24 million Series F Preferred Units during September 2005 and expense their related issuance costs of $634,201. The redemption prices will be funded from the additional sale of 530,000 common shares related to the Forward Sale Agreement.

(b) Preferred Units of General Partner

Terms and conditions of the preferred stock outstanding as of June 30, 2005 are summarized as follows:

Series	Shares Outstanding	Depositary Shares	Par Value	Distribution Rate	Callable by Partnership
Series 3	300,000	3,000,000	$75,000,000	7.450%	04/03/08
Series 4	500,000	5,000,000	125,000,000	7.250%	08/31/09
	800,000	8,000,000	$200,000,000

29

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

(b) Preferred Units of General Partner (continued)

On August 2, 2005, the Company issued 3 million shares, or $75 million of 6.70% Series 5 Preferred Stock, the proceeds of which were used to reduce the balance of the Line. The Series 3 and 4 depositary shares and the Series 5 preferred shares are perpetual, are not convertible into common stock of the Company, are redeemable at par upon Regency’s election five years after the issuance date, and have a liquidation preference of $25 per share. None of the terms of the Series of Preferred Stock contain any unconditional obligations that would require the Company to redeem the securities at any time or for any purpose.

(c) Common Stock

On April 5, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement to sell 4,312,500 shares of its common stock to an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“Citigroup”) at $46.60 per share, in connection with a forward sale agreement (the “Forward Sale Agreement”). On August 1, 2005, the Company issued 3,782,500 shares to Citigroup for net proceeds of approximately $175.5 million. The proceeds from the offering were used to reduce the Company’s Line, repay the Bridge Loan and redeem the Series E Preferred Units. The remaining 530,000 shares under the Forward Sale Agreement are expected to settle on or before October 31, 2005 at which time the Company will deliver the shares and receive approximately $24.6 million in proceeds from Citigroup’s sale of shares. The net proceeds are intended to be used to redeem the Series F Preferred Units.

30

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

8. Earnings per Unit

The following summarizes the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively (in thousands except per unit data):

	2005		2004
Numerator:
Income from continuing operations	$	38,193	27,381
Discontinued operations		8,732	4,598
Net income		46,925	31,979
Less: Preferred unit distributions and original issuance costs		5,775	6,478
Net income for common unit holders		41,150	25,501
Less: Dividends paid on unvested restricted stock		406	349
Net income for common units holders—basic		40,744	25,152
Add: Dividends paid on Treasury Method restricted stock		81	57
Net income for common unit holders – diluted	$	40,825	25,209
Denominator:
Weighted average common units outstanding for basic EPU		63,947	61,047
Incremental units to be issued under common stock options using the Treasury method		227	150
Incremental units to be issued under unvested restricted stock using the Treasury method		147	107
Incremental units to be issued under Forward Equity Offering using the Treasury method		597	—
Weighted average common units outstanding for diluted EPU		64,918	61,304
Income per common unit – basic
Income from continuing operations	$	0.50	0.34
Discontinued operations		0.14	0.07
Net income for common unit holders per unit	$	0.64	0.41
Income per common unit – diluted
Income from continuing operations	$	0.49	0.34
Discontinued operations		0.14	0.07
Net income for common unit holders per unit	$	0.63	0.41

31

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

8. Earnings per Unit (continued)

The following summarizes the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively (in thousands except per unit data):

	2005		2004
Numerator:
Income from continuing operations	$	69,749	53,441
Discontinued operations		18,499	6,822
Net income		88,248	60,263
Less: Preferred unit distributions and original issuance costs		11,550	12,956
Net income for common unit holders		76,698	47,307
Less: Dividends paid on unvested restricted stock		813	699
Net income for common units holders—basic		75,885	46,608
Add: Dividends paid on Treasury Method restricted stock		139	131
Net income for common unit holders – diluted	$	76,024	46,739
Denominator:
Weighted average common units outstanding for basic EPU		63,880	60,884
Incremental units to be issued under common stock options using the Treasury method		154	249
Incremental units to be issued under unvested restricted stock using the Treasury method		127	123
Incremental units to be issued under Forward Equity Offering using the Treasury method		298	—
Weighted average common units outstanding for diluted EPU		64,459	61,256
Income per common unit – basic
Income from continuing operations	$	0.90	0.65
Discontinued operations		0.29	0.12
Net income for common unit holders per unit	$	1.19	0.77
Income per common unit – diluted
Income from continuing operations	$	0.89	0.65
Discontinued operations		0.29	0.12
Net income for common unit holders per unit	$	1.18	0.77

32

Regency Centers, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

9. Contingencies

The Partnership is involved in litigation on a number of matters and is subject to certain claims which arise in the normal course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. The Partnership is also subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations and is primarily concerned with dry cleaning plants that currently operate or have operated at its shopping centers. The Partnership believes that the tenants who currently operate plants do so in accordance with current laws and regulations, and that the ultimate disposition of currently known environmental matters will not have a material effect on its financial position. However, the Partnership has no assurance that existing environmental studies with respect to its shopping centers have revealed all potential environmental liabilities; that any previous owner, occupant or tenant did not create a material unknown environmental condition; that the current environmental condition of its properties will not be impacted by current occupants, nearby properties, or unrelated third parties; or that changes in or interpretations of environmental laws and regulations will not result in additional environmental liability.

33

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, the following information contains forward-looking statements as defined under federal securities laws. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which Regency Centers Corporation (“Regency” or the “Company”) operates, and management’s beliefs and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, changes in national and local economic conditions; financial difficulties tenants; competitive market conditions, including pricing of acquisitions and sales of properties and out-parcels; changes in expected leasing activity and market rents; timing of acquisitions, development starts and sales of properties and out-parcels; difficulties assimilating the acquisition, through our joint venture with Macquarie, of the 100 property First Washington portfolio; our inability to exercise voting control over the joint ventures through which we own or develop some of our properties; weather; consequences of any armed conflict or terrorist attach against the United States; the ability to obtain governmental approvals; and meeting development schedules. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto of Regency Centers, L.P. (“RCLP” or the “Partnership”) appearing elsewhere within.

Overview and Operating Philosophy

Regency is a qualified real estate investment trust (“REIT”), which began operations in 1993. Our primary operating and investment goal is long-term growth in earnings per share and total shareholder return, which we hope to achieve by focusing on a strategy of owning, operating and developing neighborhood and community shopping centers that are anchored by market-leading supermarkets and retailers located in areas with attractive demographics. We own and operate our shopping centers through our operating partnership, Regency Centers, L.P. (“RCLP”), in which we currently own approximately 98% of the operating partnership units. Regency’s operating, investing and financing activities are generally performed by RCLP, its wholly owned subsidiaries and its joint ventures with third parties.

Currently, our real estate investment portfolio before depreciation totals $7.2 billion with 383 shopping centers in 27 states and the District of Columbia, including approximately $4.0 billion in real estate assets composed of 176 shopping centers owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in 23 states and the District of Columbia. [Portfolio information is presented (a) on a combined basis, including unconsolidated joint ventures (“Combined Basis”), (b) on a basis that excludes the unconsolidated joint ventures (“Consolidated Properties”) and (c) on a basis that includes only the unconsolidated joint ventures (“Unconsolidated Properties”).] We believe that providing our shopping center portfolio information under these methods provides a more complete understanding of the properties that we own, including those that we partially own and for which we provide property and asset management services. At June 30, 2005, our gross leasable area (“GLA”) on a Combined Basis totaled 45.4 million square feet and was 93.6% leased. The GLA for the Consolidated Properties totaled 23.8 million square feet and was 92.1% leased. The GLA for the Unconsolidated Properties totaled 21.6 million square feet and was 95.4% leased.

We earn revenues and generate operating cash flow by leasing space to grocers and retail side-shop tenants in our shopping centers. We experience growth in revenues by increasing occupancy and rental rates at currently owned shopping centers, and by acquiring and developing new shopping centers. A neighborhood center is a convenient, cost-effective distribution platform for food retailers. Grocery-anchored centers generate substantial daily traffic and offer sustainable competitive advantages to their tenants. This high traffic generates increased sales, thereby driving higher occupancy, rental rates and rental-rate growth for Regency, which we expect to sustain our growth in earnings per share and increase the value of our portfolio over the long term.

34

We seek a range of strong national, regional and local specialty tenants, for the same reason that we choose to anchor our centers with leading grocers. We have created a formal partnering process — the Premier Customer Initiative (“PCI”) — to promote mutually beneficial relationships with our non-grocer specialty retailers. The objective of PCI is for Regency to build a base of specialty tenants who represent the “best-in-class” operators in their respective merchandising categories. Such tenants reinforce the consumer appeal and other strengths of a center’s grocery anchor, help to stabilize a center’s occupancy, reduce re-leasing downtime, reduce tenant turnover and yield higher sustainable rents.

We grow our shopping center portfolio through acquisitions and new shopping center development, where we acquire the land and construct the building. Development is customer driven, meaning we generally have an executed lease from the anchor before we start construction. Developments serve the growth needs of our market-leading grocers and anchors, and our specialty retail customers, resulting in modern shopping centers with long-term leases from the grocery anchors and produce attractive returns on our invested capital. This development process can require up to 36 months from initial land or redevelopment acquisition through construction, lease-up and stabilization of rental income, depending upon the size of the project. Generally, anchor tenants begin operating their stores prior to the completion of construction of the entire center, resulting in rental income during the development phase.

We intend to maintain a conservative capital structure to fund our growth programs without compromising our investment-grade ratings. Our approach is founded on our self-funding business model. This model utilizes center “recycling” as a key component. Our recycling strategy calls for us to re-deploy the proceeds from the sales of properties into new, higher-quality developments that we expect to generate sustainable revenue growth and more attractive returns. Our commitment to maintaining a high-quality shopping center portfolio dictates that we continually assess the value of all of our properties and sell those that no longer meet our long-term investment criteria.

Joint venturing of shopping centers also provides us with a capital source for new development, as well as the opportunity to earn fees for asset and property management services. As asset manager, we are engaged by our partners to apply similar operating, investment, and capital strategies to the portfolios owned by the joint ventures. Joint ventures grow their shopping center investments through acquisitions from third parties or direct purchases from Regency. Although selling properties to joint ventures reduces our ownership interest, we continue to share in the risks and rewards of centers that meet our long-term investment strategy. Regency is not subject to liability and has no obligations or liabilities of the joint ventures beyond its ownership percentage.

We have identified certain significant risks and challenges affecting our industry, and we are addressing them accordingly. An economic downturn could result in declines in occupancy levels at our shopping centers, which would reduce our rental revenues; however, we believe that our investment focus on grocery anchored shopping centers that provide daily necessities will minimize the impact of a downturn in the economy. Increased competition from super-centers such as Wal-Mart could result in grocery-anchor closings or consolidations in the grocery store industry. We closely monitor the operating performance and tenants’ sales in our shopping centers that operate near super-centers as well as those tenants operating retail formats that are incurring significant changes in competition or business practice such as the video rental format. However, a slowdown in our shopping center development program could reduce operating revenues and gains from sales. We believe that developing shopping centers in markets with strong demographics with leading grocery stores will enable us to continue to maintain our development program at historical averages.

35

Shopping Center Portfolio

The following tables summarize general operating statistics related to our shopping center portfolio, which we use to evaluate and monitor our performance. The portfolio information below is presented (a) on a Combined Basis, (b) for Consolidated Properties and (c) for Unconsolidated Properties:

	June 30, 2005		December 31, 2004
Number of Properties (a)	383		291
Number of Properties (b)	207		213
Number of Properties (c)	176		78
Properties in Development (a)	26		34
Properties in Development (b)	26		32
Properties in Development (c)	—		2
Gross Leaseable Area (a)	45,426,064		33,815,970
Gross Leaseable Area (b)	23,787,483		24,532,952
Gross Leaseable Area (c)	21,638,581		9,283,018
Percent Leased (a)	93.6	%	92.7	%
Percent Leased (b)	92.1	%	91.2	%
Percent Leased (c)	95.4	%	96.7	%

The Partnership seeks to reduce its operating and leasing risks through diversification which it achieves by geographically diversifying its shopping centers; avoiding dependence on any single property, market, or tenant, and owning a portion of its shopping centers through joint ventures.

36

The following table is a list of the shopping centers summarized by state and in order of largest holdings by presented on a Combined Basis:

	June 30, 2005						December 31, 2004
Location	# Properties	GLA	% of Total GLA		% Leased		# Properties	GLA	% of Total GLA		% Leased
California	66	8,530,144	18.8	%	93.1	%	51	6,527,802	19.3	%	91.9	%
Florida	50	6,035,278	13.3	%	95.1	%	50	5,970,898	17.7	%	94.9	%
Texas	37	4,772,843	10.5	%	90.0	%	32	3,968,940	11.7	%	89.3	%
Virginia	32	3,781,179	8.3	%	94.4	%	12	1,488,324	4.4	%	91.1	%
Georgia	33	2,992,545	6.6	%	94.7	%	36	3,383,495	10.0	%	97.4	%
Illinois	17	2,395,538	5.3	%	96.9	%	9	1,191,424	3.5	%	98.0	%
Colorado	19	2,342,827	5.2	%	96.7	%	15	1,639,055	4.8	%	98.0	%
Maryland	19	2,254,206	5.0	%	96.8	%	2	326,638	1.0	%	93.9	%
North Carolina	14	2,044,570	4.5	%	93.6	%	13	1,890,444	5.6	%	94.2	%
Ohio	14	1,876,129	4.1	%	86.3	%	14	1,876,013	5.5	%	87.7	%
Washington	13	1,324,586	2.9	%	98.8	%	11	1,098,752	3.2	%	97.6	%
Pennsylvania	12	1,319,480	2.9	%	95.5	%	2	225,697	0.7	%	100.0	%
Oregon	9	931,069	2.0	%	94.6	%	8	838,056	2.5	%	95.5	%
Delaware	5	655,687	1.4	%	90.7	%	2	240,418	0.7	%	99.9	%
Tennessee	6	636,534	1.4	%	94.3	%	7	697,034	2.1	%	70.4	%
Arizona	5	588,486	1.3	%	90.7	%	5	588,486	1.7	%	93.1	%
South Carolina	8	522,027	1.1	%	96.5	%	8	522,109	1.5	%	95.7	%
Wisconsin	3	372,382	0.8	%	94.4	%	—	—	—		—
Alabama	4	324,044	0.7	%	85.9	%	4	324,044	1.0	%	86.7	%
Kentucky	2	302,670	0.7	%	96.9	%	2	302,670	0.9	%	97.5	%
Minnesota	2	301,097	0.7	%	97.3	%	—	—	—		—
Michigan	3	282,408	0.6	%	94.5	%	4	368,348	1.1	%	93.4	%
Indiana	3	229,431	0.5	%	86.4	%	1	90,340	0.3	%	69.2	%
Connecticut	1	177,207	0.4	%	93.6	%	—	—	—		—
New Jersey	2	156,482	0.4	%	97.8	%	—	—	—		—
New Hampshire	2	141,068	0.3	%	49.1	%	2	138,488	0.4	%	50.0	%
Nevada	1	119,313	0.3	%	71.7	%	1	118,495	0.4	%	45.5	%
Dist. of Columbia	1	16,834	0.0	%	100.0	%	—	—	—		—
Total	383	45,426,064	100.0	%	93.6	%	291	33,815,970	100.0	%	92.7	%

37

The following table is a list of the shopping centers summarized by state and in order of largest holdings presented for Consolidated Properties:

	June 30, 2005						December 31, 2004
Location	# Properties	GLA	% of Total GLA		% Leased		# Properties	GLA	% of Total GLA		% Leased
California	41	5,011,225	21.1	%	90.9	%	44	5,479,470	22.3	%	90.5	%
Florida	37	4,574,756	19.2	%	94.9	%	38	4,684,299	19.1	%	94.6	%
Texas	29	3,636,125	15.3	%	89.1	%	29	3,652,338	14.9	%	88.8	%
Ohio	13	1,767,226	7.4	%	85.6	%	13	1,767,110	7.2	%	87.1	%
Georgia	16	1,532,294	6.4	%	96.5	%	17	1,656,297	6.8	%	96.1	%
Colorado	11	1,093,404	4.6	%	97.0	%	11	1,093,403	4.4	%	97.6	%
Virginia	9	1,016,787	4.3	%	88.8	%	8	925,491	3.8	%	86.4	%
North Carolina	9	970,506	4.1	%	96.4	%	9	970,508	3.9	%	97.5	%
Washington	8	707,568	3.0	%	99.4	%	9	747,440	3.0	%	97.3	%
Tennessee	6	636,534	2.7	%	94.3	%	6	633,034	2.6	%	67.4	%
Oregon	6	574,371	2.4	%	96.1	%	6	574,458	2.3	%	96.1	%
Arizona	4	480,839	2.0	%	88.6	%	4	480,839	2.0	%	91.6	%
Illinois	3	415,011	1.7	%	97.9	%	3	415,011	1.7	%	97.4	%
Michigan	3	282,408	1.2	%	94.5	%	4	368,348	1.5	%	93.4	%
Delaware	2	240,418	1.0	%	99.2	%	2	240,418	1.0	%	99.9	%
Pennsylvania	2	225,697	0.9	%	95.3	%	2	225,697	0.9	%	100.0	%
New Hampshire	2	141,068	0.6	%	49.1	%	2	138,488	0.6	%	50.0	%
South Carolina	2	140,900	0.6	%	90.2	%	2	140,982	0.6	%	85.7	%
Alabama	2	130,486	0.6	%	94.4	%	2	130,486	0.5	%	97.3	%
Nevada	1	119,313	0.5	%	71.7	%	1	118,495	0.5	%	45.5	%
Indiana	1	90,547	0.4	%	69.3	%	1	90,340	0.4	%	69.2	%
Total	207	23,787,483	100.0	%	92.1	%	213	24,532,952	100.0	%	91.2	%

38

The following table is a list of the shopping centers summarized by state and in order of largest holdings presented for Unconsolidated Properties owned in joint ventures:

	June 30, 2005						December 31, 2004
Location	# Properties	GLA	% of Total GLA		% Leased		# Properties	GLA	% of Total GLA		% Leased
California	25	3,518,919	16.3	%	96.1	%	7	1,048,332	11.3	%	99.1	%
Virginia	23	2,764,392	12.8	%	96.5	%	4	562,833	6.1	%	98.9	%
Maryland	19	2,254,206	10.4	%	96.8	%	2	326,638	3.5	%	93.9	%
Illinois	14	1,980,527	9.2	%	96.7	%	6	776,413	8.4	%	98.3	%
Florida	13	1,460,522	6.7	%	95.9	%	12	1,286,599	13.8	%	96.1	%
Georgia	17	1,460,251	6.7	%	92.8	%	19	1,727,198	18.6	%	98.6	%
Colorado	8	1,249,423	5.8	%	96.4	%	4	545,652	5.9	%	98.7	%
Texas	8	1,136,718	5.3	%	93.1	%	3	316,602	3.4	%	94.6	%
Pennsylvania	10	1,093,783	5.1	%	95.6	%	—	—	—		—
North Carolina	5	1,074,064	5.0	%	91.1	%	4	919,936	9.9	%	90.7	%
Washington	5	617,018	2.8	%	98.1	%	2	351,312	3.8	%	98.1	%
Delaware	3	415,269	1.9	%	85.7	%	—	—	—		—
South Carolina	6	381,127	1.8	%	98.9	%	6	381,127	4.1	%	99.3	%
Wisconsin	3	372,382	1.7	%	94.4	%	—	—	—		—
Oregon	3	356,698	1.6	%	92.1	%	2	263,598	2.8	%	94.3	%
Kentucky	2	302,670	1.4	%	96.9	%	2	302,670	3.3	%	97.5	%
Minnesota	2	301,097	1.4	%	97.3	%	—	—	—		—
Alabama	2	193,558	0.9	%	80.2	%	2	193,558	2.1	%	79.6	%
Connecticut	1	177,207	0.8	%	93.6	%	—	—	—		—
New Jersey	2	156,482	0.7	%	97.8	%	—	—	—		—
Indiana	2	138,884	0.6	%	97.5	%	—	—	—		—
Ohio	1	108,903	0.5	%	97.6	%	1	108,903	1.2	%	96.1	%
Arizona	1	107,647	0.5	%	100.0	%	1	107,647	1.1	%	100.0	%
Dist. of Columbia	1	16,834	0.1	%	100.0	%	—	—	—		—
Tennessee	—	—	—		—		1	64,000	0.7	%	100.0	%
Total	176	21,638,581	100.0	%	95.4	%	78	9,283,018	100.0	%	96.7	%

39

The following summarizes the four largest grocery tenants occupying our shopping centers at June 30, 2005:

Grocery Anchor	Number of Stores (a)	Percentage of Partnership- owned GLA (b)		Percentage of Annualized Base Rent (c)
Kroger	78	8.2	%	6.8	%
Safeway	80	7.8	%	4.6	%
Publix	60	6.2	%	4.0	%
Albertsons	39	2.9	%	2.2	%

(a) For the Combined Properties including stores owned by grocery anchors that are attached to our centers.

(b) For the Combined Properties.

(c) Annualized base rent includes the Consolidated Properties plus the Partnership’s pro-rata share of the Unconsolidated Properties which reflects our effective risk related to those tenants.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

We expect that cash generated from revenues, including gains from the sale of real estate, will provide the necessary funds on a short-term basis to pay our operating expenses, interest expense, scheduled principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, recurring capital expenditures necessary to maintain our shopping centers properly, and distributions to stock and unit holders. Net cash provided by operating activities was $98.2 million and $111.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, our gains from the sale of real estate were $29.6 million and $11.1 million, we incurred capital expenditures of $5.1 million and $4.6 million to maintain our shopping centers, paid scheduled principal payments of $3.2 million and $2.8 million to our lenders, and paid dividends and distributions of $82.4 million and $78.1 million to our share and unit holders, respectively.

Although base rent is supported by long-term lease contracts, tenants who file bankruptcy are able to cancel their leases and close the related stores. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our shopping centers files bankruptcy and cancels its leases, we could experience a significant reduction in our revenues. On February 21, 2005, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We currently lease seven stores to Winn-Dixie, three of which are owned directly by us and four are owned in joint ventures. Our annualized base rent from Winn-Dixie including our share of the joint ventures is $1.8 million or less than one-half of 1% of our annual base rents. Winn-Dixie currently owes the Partnership $76,468 in pre-petition rent related to common area expense reimbursements, and is current on all rent post-petition. Winn-Dixie continues to review their portfolio of stores, and has given us notice of rejection on two stores owned in a joint venture. It is possible that Winn-Dixie may reject additional stores owned by us. We are not aware at this time of the current or pending bankruptcy of any of our other tenants that would cause a significant reduction in our revenues, and no tenant represents more than 7% of our annual base rental revenues.

We expect to meet long-term capital requirements for redeemable preferred units, maturing debt, the acquisition of real estate, investments in joint ventures, and the renovation or development of shopping centers from: (i) residual cash generated from operating activities after the payments described above, (ii) proceeds from the sale of real estate, (iii) joint venturing of real estate, (iv) refinancing of debt, and (v) equity raised in the private or public markets. At June 30, 2005, we had $198.6 million available for equity securities under our shelf registration and RCLP had $180 million available for debt under its shelf registration. In July 2005, we increased the RCLP shelf to $600 million.

40

We intend to continue to grow our portfolio through new developments and acquisitions, either directly or through our joint venture relationships. Because development and acquisition activities are discretionary in nature, they are not expected to burden the capital resources we have currently available for liquidity requirements. Capital necessary to complete developments-in-process are funded from our line of credit. We expect that cash provided by operating activities, unused amounts available under our line of credit and cash reserves are adequate to meet short-term and committed long-term liquidity requirements.

Shopping Center Developments, Acquisitions and Sales

On a Combined Basis, we had 26 projects under construction or undergoing major renovations at June 30, 2005, which, when completed, will represent an investment of $597.1 million before the estimated reimbursement of certain tenant-related costs and projected sales proceeds from adjacent land and out-parcels of $95.5 million. Costs necessary to complete these developments are estimated to be $278.2 million. These costs are usually already committed as part of existing construction contracts, and will be expended through 2009. These developments are approximately 53% complete and 75% pre-leased. The costs necessary to complete these developments will be funded from the Company’s unsecured line of credit, which had $235 million of available funding at June 30, 2005.

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company sold 100% of its interest in five properties for net proceeds of $61.8 million. The combined operating income and gains from these properties and properties classified as held for sale are included in discontinued operations. The revenues from properties included in discontinued operations were $6.0 million and $9.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships

At June 30, 2005, we had investments in real estate partnerships of $567.7 million. The following is a summary of unconsolidated combined assets and liabilities of these partnerships, and our pro-rata share at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (in thousands):

	2005		2004
Number of Joint Ventures		12		11
RCLP’s Ownership		20%-50%		20%-50%
Number of Properties		176		78
Combined Assets	$	4,348,964	$	1,439,617
Combined Liabilities		2,488,847		689,988
Combined Equity		1,860,117		749,629
RCLP’s Share of:
Assets	$	1,389,191	$	374,430
Liabilities		804,920		179,459

41

We account for all investments in which we own 50% or less and do not have a controlling financial interest using the equity method. We have determined that these investments are not variable interest entities, and therefore, subject to the voting interest model in determining our basis of accounting. Major decisions, including property acquisitions and dispositions, financings, annual budgets and dissolution of the ventures are subject to the approval of all partners. Investments in real estate partnerships are primarily composed of joint ventures where we invest with three co-investment partners, as further described below. In addition to earning our pro-rata share of net income in each of these partnerships, these co-investment partners pay us fees for asset management, property management, and acquisition and disposition services. During the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we received fees from these joint ventures of $19.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively. Our investments in real estate partnerships as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consist of the following (in thousands):

	Ownership		2005		2004
Macquarie CountryWide-Regency (MCWR)	25	%	$	62,970	65,134
Macquarie CountryWide Direct (MCWR)	25	%		7,708	8,001
Macquarie CountryWide-Regency II (MCWR II)	35	%		392,221	—
Columbia Regency Retail Partners (Columbia)	20	%		40,344	41,380
Cameron Village LLC (Columbia)	30	%		21,685	21,612
Columbia Regency Partners II (Columbia)	20	%		2,051	3,107
RegCal, LLC (RegCal)	25	%		13,101	13,232
Other investments in real estate partnerships	50	%		27,586	27,211
Total			$	567,666	179,677

We co-invest with the Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund in three joint ventures (collectively “Columbia”), in which we have ownership interests of 20% or 30%. As of June 30, 2005, Columbia owned 17 shopping centers, had total assets of $482.3 million, and net income of $6.8 million. Our share of Columbia’s total assets and net income was $108.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Columbia sold one shopping centers during the six months ended June 30, 2005 for $19.7 million to an unrelated party with a loss of $242,176.

We co-invest with the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (“CalSTRS”) in a joint venture called (“RegCal”) in which we have a 25% ownership interest. As of June 30, 2005, RegCal owned four shopping centers, had total assets of $126.7 million, and had net income of $1.3 million. Our share of RegCal’s total assets and net income was $31.7 million and $390,768, respectively.

We co-invest with Macquarie CountryWide Trust of Australia (“MCW”) in three joint ventures, two in which we have an ownership interest of 25% (collectively, “MCWR”), and one in which we have an ownership interest of 35% (“MCWR II”).

As of June 30, 2005, MCWR owned 50 shopping centers, had total assets of $740.7 million, and net income of $8.3 million. Our share of MCWR’s total assets and net income was $185.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, MCWR acquired one shopping center from an unrelated party for a purchase price of $24.4 million. We contributed $4.5 million for our proportionate share of the purchase price, which was net of loan financing placed on the shopping center by MCWR. In addition, MCWR acquired one shopping center from us valued at $22.1 million, for which we received cash of $17.1 million. MCWR sold three shopping centers during the six months ended June 30, 2005 for $34.7 million to unrelated parties with a loss of $254,469.

On June 1, 2005, Macquarie CountryWide-Regency II, LLC (MCWR II) closed on the acquisition of 100 retail shopping centers (the “First Washington Portfolio”) totaling approximately 12.6 million square feet located throughout 17 states and the District of Columbia from a joint venture between CalPERS and an affiliate of First Washington Realty, Inc. (the “Sellers”) pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated February 14, 2005. The total purchase price was approximately $2.8 billion, including the assumption of approximately $68.6 million of mortgage debt and the issuance of approximately $1.6

42

billion of new mortgage loans on the properties acquired. The First Washington Portfolio acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination by MCWR II. MCWR II is owned 64.95% by an affiliate of MCW, 34.95% by RCLP and 0.1% by Macquarie-Regency Management, LLC (“US Manager”). US Manager is owned 50% by RCLP and 50% by an affiliate of Macquarie Bank Limited. Including its share of US Manager, RCLP’s effective ownership is 35% and is reflected as such in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. RCLP’s required equity investment in MCWR II was approximately $397 million and was paid in cash. The fair value of the consideration paid by MCW and RCLP was used as the valuation basis for the First Washington Portfolio. The costs of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in conjunction with the First Washington Portfolio were revalued based on their respective fair values as of the effective date of the acquisition in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (“Statement 141”).

Upon closing of the acquisition into the joint venture, MCWR II paid us acquisition, due diligence and capital restructuring fees totaling $21.2 million, of which we recognized $13.8 million as fee income. We only recognized fee income on that portion of the joint venture not owned by us and as a result, recorded $7.4 million of the fee as a reduction to our investment in MCWR II. We have the ability to earn additional acquisition fees of approximately $9.2 million (the “Contingent Acquisition Fees”) subject to achieving certain targeted income levels in 2006 and 2007; and accordingly, the Contingent Acquisition Fee will only be recognized in 2006 and 2007 if earned. We will also earn recurring fees for asset and property management on a quarterly and monthly basis, respectively. To assist in the transition of the portfolio to us, the Seller has agreed to provide property management services for up to two years on approximately 50% of the portfolio which will result in lower property management fee income to us during the transition period. As of June 30, 2005, MCWR II had total assets of $2.9 billion and net loss of $3.6 million. Our share of MCWR II’s total assets and net loss was $1.0 billion and $1.2 million, respectively.

Recognition of gains from sales to joint ventures is recorded on only that portion of the sales not attributable to our ownership interest. The gains and operations are not recorded as discontinued operations because of our continuing involvement in these shopping centers. Columbia, RegCal, MCWR, and MCWRII intend to continue to acquire retail shopping centers, some of which they may acquire directly from us. For those properties acquired from unrelated parties, we are required to contribute our pro-rata share of the purchase price to the partnerships.

On June 1, 2005, RCLP entered into a credit agreement that provided for a $275 million unsecured term loan maturing on March 1, 2006 (the “Bridge Loan”). The purpose of the Bridge Loan was to partially provide the financing necessary for RCLP’s 35% equity investment of $397 million in MCWR II. RCLP’s equity investment not funded from the Bridge Loan was drawn from its line of credit. The Bridge Loan facility was fully drawn on the closing date. Interest accrues at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 65 basis points, which is subject to adjustment based on the credit ratings assigned by RCLP’s rating agencies. Interest only is payable monthly, and principal is due at maturity, except that the loan is subject to mandatory prepayment from the net cash proceeds of any equity issuances.

On April 5, 2005, Regency entered into a forward stock purchase contract with an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“Citigroup”) pursuant to which Regency has agreed to issue 4.3 million of its common shares and Citibank has agreed to purchase the shares at $46.60 per share. The forward stock purchase contract will settle no later than October 31, 2005. On August 1, 2005, we completed the sale of 3.8 million shares to Citibank and received proceeds of $175.5 million. As a result of several debt and equity transactions completed in July and August, 2005, as further described below, the Bridge Loan was fully repaid on August 1, 2005.

Shopping center acquisitions, sales and the net acquisitions or sales activities within our investments in real estate partnerships are included in investing activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. Net cash used in investing activities was $410.2 million and $114.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

43

Notes Payable

Outstanding debt at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consists of the following (in thousands):

	2005		2004
Notes Payable:
Fixed rate mortgage loans	$	206,330	275,726
Variable rate mortgage loans		67,987	68,418
Fixed rate unsecured loans		949,035	948,946
Total notes payable		1,223,352	1,293,090
Unsecured line of credit		265,000	200,000
Bridge Loan		275,000	—
Total	$	1,763,352	1,493,090

Mortgage loans are secured and may be prepaid, but could be subject to yield maintenance premiums. Mortgage loans are generally due in monthly installments of interest and principal, and mature over various terms through 2017. Variable interest rates on mortgage loans are currently based on LIBOR, plus a spread in a range of 125 to 150 basis points. Fixed interest rates on mortgage loans range from 5.22% to 8.95% and average 7.10%.

We have an unsecured revolving line of credit (the “Line”) with a commitment of $500 million, and we have the right to expand the Line by an additional $150 million subject to additional lender syndication. The balance of the Line on June 30, 2005 was $265 million, $122 million of which was drawn for purposes of financing a portion of our $397 million equity investment into MCWR II. Contractual interest rates on the Line, which are based on LIBOR plus .75%, were 4.0% at June 30, 2005 and 3.1875% at December 31, 2004. The spread that we pay on the Line is dependent upon maintaining specific investment-grade ratings. We are also required to comply, and are in compliance, with certain financial covenants such as Minimum Net Worth, Total Liabilities to Gross Asset Value (“GAV”), Secured Indebtedness to GAV and other covenants customary with this type of unsecured financing. The Line is used primarily to finance the development and acquisition of real estate, but is also available for general working-capital purposes.

On February 15, 2005, we executed a commitment letter related to the Line which temporarily modified certain Line covenants related to our borrowing capacity and leverage in conjunction with the $275 million Bridge Loan as part of the First Washington Portfolio acquisition. The temporary modifications expire and the Bridge Loan matures on March 1, 2006. As of August 1, 2005, the Bridge Loan was fully repaid.

The combined borrowings under the Line of $122 million and the Bridge Loan provided the funding of our $397 million equity investment in MCWR II. On July 18, 2005, we issued $350 million of unsecured notes, the proceeds of which were used to reduce the Bridge Loan by $180 million to $95 million and to reduce the Line by approximately $170 million. The notes bear interest at 5.25% and mature August 1, 2015. On August 1, 2005, we received proceeds of approximately $175.5 million from the sale of Regency’s common shares, as further described below, which fully repaid the Bridge Loan and further reduced the balance of the Line.

44

As of June 30, 2005, scheduled principal repayments on notes payable, the Line and the Bridge Loan were as follows (in thousands):

Scheduled Payments by Year	Scheduled Principal Payments		Term Loan Maturities	Total Payments
Current year	$	4,036	153,251	157,287
2006 (includes the Bridge Loan)		3,762	302,863	306,625
2007 (includes the Line)		3,542	324,604	328,146
2008		3,388	19,455	22,843
2009		3,347	53,004	56,351
2010		3,227	177,033	180,260
Beyond 5 Years		10,976	697,787	708,763
Unamortized debt premiums		—	3,077	3,077
Total	$	32,278	1,731,074	1,763,352

We have approximately $153.3 million of debt maturing in 2005 of which $100 million was repaid from the proceeds of the $350 million unsecured debt offering previously discussed. We also renewed $25 million of variable rate debt during July, 2005 and extended the maturity date for 2 years. The balance of maturing debt of $28.3 million represent secured mortgage loans, which will be repaid upon maturity using proceeds from the Line.

Our investments in real estate partnerships had unconsolidated notes and mortgage loans payable of $2.4 billion at June 30, 2005, which mature through 2028. Our proportionate share of these loans was $762.3 million, of which 80.4% had average fixed interest rates of 5.1% and the balance had variable interest rates based upon a spread above LIBOR of 0.35% to 1.00%. The loans are primarily non-recourse, but for those that are guaranteed by a joint venture, our liability does not extend beyond our ownership percentage of the joint venture.

We are exposed to capital market risk such as changes in interest rates. In order to manage the volatility related to interest-rate risk, we originate new debt with fixed interest rates, or we consider entering into interest-rate hedging arrangements. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We account for derivative instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” as amended (“Statement 133”). At June 30, 2005, 66% of our total debt had fixed interest rates, compared with 82% at December 31, 2004. We intend to limit the percentage of variable interest-rate debt to be no more than 30% of total debt, which we believe to be an acceptable risk. At June 30, 2005, our variable rate debt represented 34% of our total debt due to the outstanding balance of the $275 million Bridge Loan. As a result of the debt and equity transactions that occurred subsequent to June 30, 2005 discussed elsewhere, and the related payoff of the Bridge Loan and reduction to the Line, the amount of variable rate debt was reduced to a level below our acceptable level of risk. Based upon the variable interest-rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2005, if variable interest rates were to increase by 1%, our annual interest expense would increase by $6.1 million.

On April 1, 2005, we entered into three forward-starting interest rate swaps of approximately $65.6 million each with fixed rates of 5.029%, 5.05% and 5.05%. We designated the $196.7 million swaps as cash flow hedges to fix the rate on $200 million of unsecured notes expected to be issued during July 2005, the proceeds of which were expected to be used to repay $100 million of fixed rate unsecured notes maturing on July 15, 2005 and reduce the Line. As described above, we issued $350 million of unsecured notes priced to yield 5.25%. The fair value of the swaps was a liability of $11.5 million as of June 30, 2005, and is recorded in other liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet. On July 13, 2005, the Company settled the swaps with a payment to the counter-parties for $7.3 million which will be included as an adjustment to interest expense as interest is incurred on the $350 million of ten-year unsecured notes sold July 18, 2005. The effective interest rate on the notes including the amortization of the swap settlement amount will be approximately 5.48%.

45

Equity Capital Transactions

From time to time, we issue equity in the form of exchangeable operating partnership units or preferred units of RCLP, or in the form of common or preferred stock of Regency Centers Corporation. As previously discussed, these sources of long-term equity financing allow us to fund our growth while maintaining a conservative capital structure. The following describes our equity capital transactions as of June 30, 2005.

Preferred Units

We have issued Preferred Units in various amounts since 1998, the net proceeds of which we used to reduce the balance of the Line. We issued Preferred Units primarily to institutional investors in private placements. The Preferred Units, which may be called by us in 2005 and 2009, have no stated maturity or mandatory redemption, and they pay a cumulative, quarterly dividend at fixed rates ranging from 7.45% to 8.75%. Generally, the Preferred Units may be exchanged by the holders for Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at an exchange rate of one share for one unit after ten years from the date of issue or as modified and agreed to by us. The Preferred Units and the related Preferred Stock are not convertible into Regency common stock. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the face value of total Preferred Units issued was $104 million, with a weighted average fixed distribution rate of 8.13%. Included in Preferred Units are original issuance costs of $2.2 million that will be expensed as the underlying Preferred Units are redeemed in the future. On August 1, 2005, we redeemed the $30 million Series E Preferred Units and expensed related issuance costs of $762,180. The redemption was funded from the proceeds of the common stock sale completed August 1, 2005 as discussed below under Common Stock. We expect to redeem the $24 million Series F Preferred Units during September 2005 and expense their related issuance costs of $634,201. The redemption prices will be funded from the additional sale of common shares expected to be completed in September as further discussed below under Common Stock.

Preferred Units of General Partner

At June 30, 2005 we had two series of Preferred stock outstanding. The Series 3 stock was issued in 2003 and represents 3 million depositary shares or 300,000 shares of 7.45% Series 3 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The Series 4 stock was issued in 2004 and represents 5 million depositary shares or 500,000 shares of 7.25% Series 4 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. On August 2, 2005, we issued 3 million shares, or $75 million of 6.70% Series 5 Preferred Stock, the proceeds of which were used to reduce the balance of the Line. All series of Preferred Stock are perpetual, are not convertible into common stock of the Company, are redeemable at par upon our election five years after the issuance date, and have a liquidation value of $25 per share. The terms of Preferred Stock do not contain any unconditional obligations that would require us to redeem the securities at any time or for any purpose.

Common Stock

On April 5, 2005, we entered into an agreement to sell 4,312,500 shares of our common stock at $46.60 per share to Citigroup, in connection with a forward sale agreement (the “Forward Sale Agreement”) which is required to be settled on or before October 31, 2005. The net proceeds from the offering will be used to repay a portion of the balance of the $275 million Bridge Loan and Line and redeem the Series E Preferred Units discussed above. On August 1, 2005, we completed the sale of 3,782,500 shares and received proceeds of $175.5 million. We expect complete the sale of the remaining 530,000 shares in September, at which time we will use the proceeds to redeem the Series F Preferred Units.

46

In summary, net cash provided by financing activities was $243.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and net cash used in financing activities was $21.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The financing transactions related to the debt and equity activity are discussed above and the investing activity is also discussed within Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Knowledge about our accounting policies is necessary for a complete understanding of our financial results, and discussion and analysis of these results. The preparation of our financial statements requires that we make certain estimates that impact the balance of assets and liabilities at a financial statement date and the reported amount of income and expenses during a financial reporting period. These accounting estimates are based upon, but not limited to, our judgments about historical results, current economic activity and industry standards. They are considered to be critical because of their significance to the financial statements and the possibility that future events may differ from those judgments, or that the use of different assumptions could result in materially different estimates. We review these estimates on a periodic basis to ensure reasonableness. However, the amounts we may ultimately realize could differ from such estimates.

Revenue Recognition and Tenant Receivables – Tenant Receivables represent revenues recognized in our financial statements, and include base rent, percentage rent, and expense recoveries from tenants for common area maintenance costs, insurance and real estate taxes. We analyze tenant receivables, historical bad debt levels, customer credit worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, we analyze the accounts of tenants in bankruptcy, and we estimate the recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims. Our reported net income is directly affected by our estimate of the recoverability of tenant receivables.

Capitalization of Costs - We have an investment services group with an established infrastructure that supports the due diligence, land acquisition, construction, leasing and accounting of our development properties. All direct costs related to these activities are capitalized. Included in these costs are interest and real estate taxes incurred during construction, as well as estimates for the portion of internal costs that are incremental and deemed directly or indirectly related to our development activity. If future accounting standards limit the amount of internal costs that may be capitalized, or if our development activity were to decline significantly without a proportionate decrease in internal costs, we could incur a significant increase in our operating expenses.

Real Estate Acquisitions - Upon acquisition of operating real estate properties, we estimate the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, building and improvements), and identified intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above- and below-market leases, in-place leases and tenant relationships) and assumed debt in accordance with Statement 141. Based on these estimates, we allocate the purchase price to the applicable assets and liabilities. We utilize methods similar to those used by independent appraisers in estimating the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. We evaluate the useful lives of amortizable intangible assets each reporting period and account for any changes in estimated useful lives over the revised remaining useful life.

Valuation of Real Estate Investments - Our long-lived assets, primarily real estate held for investment, are carried at cost unless circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted. The review involves a number of assumptions and estimates used to determine whether impairment exists. Depending on the asset, we use varying methods such as i) estimating future cash flows, ii) determining resale values by market, or iii) applying a capitalization rate to net operating income using prevailing rates in a given market. These methods of determining fair value can fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, including changes in the general economy of those markets in which we operate, tenant credit quality and demand for new retail stores. If we determine that the carrying amount of a property is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value, we will write down the asset to fair value for “held-and-used” assets and to fair value less costs to sell for “held-for-sale” assets.

47

Discontinued Operations - The application of current accounting principles that govern the classification of any of our properties as held for sale on the balance sheet, or the presentation of results of operations and gains on the sale of these properties as discontinued, requires management to make certain significant judgments. In evaluating whether a property meets the criteria set forth by SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“Statement 144”), the Partnership makes a determination as to the point in time that it can be reasonably certain that a sale will be consummated. Given the nature of all real estate sales contracts, it is not unusual for such contracts to allow potential buyers a period of time to evaluate the property prior to formal acceptance of the contract. In addition, certain other matters critical to the final sale, such as financing arrangements often remain pending even upon contract acceptance. As a result, properties under contract may not close within the expected time period, or may not close at all. Due to these uncertainties, it is not likely that the Partnership can meet the criteria of Statement 144 prior to the sale formally closing. Therefore, any properties categorized as held for sale represent only those properties that management has determined are likely to close within the requirements set forth in Statement 144. The Partnership also makes judgments regarding the extent of involvement it will have with a property subsequent to its sale, in order to determine if the results of operations and gain on sale should be reflected as discontinued. Consistent with Statement 144, any property sold to an entity in which the Partnership has significant continuing involvement (most often joint ventures) is not considered to be discontinued. In addition, any property which the Partnership sells to an unrelated third party, but retains a property or asset management function, is also not considered discontinued. Therefore, only properties sold, or to be sold, to unrelated third parties that the Partnership, in its judgment, has no continuing involvement with are classified as discontinued.

Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures – In addition to owning real estate directly, we invest in real estate through our co-investment joint ventures. Joint venturing provides us with a capital source to acquire real estate, and to earn our pro rata share of the net income from the joint ventures in addition to fees for services. As asset and property manager, we conduct the business of the shopping centers held in the joint ventures in the same way that we conduct the business of our wholly-owned shopping centers; therefore, the Critical Accounting Policies as described are also applicable to our investment in the joint ventures and the fees that we earn. We account for all investments in which we own 50% or less and do not have a controlling financial interest using the equity method. We have determined that these investments are not variable interest entities, and therefore, subject to the voting interest model in determining our basis of accounting. Major decisions, including property acquisitions and dispositions, financings, annual budgets and dissolution of the ventures are subject to the approval of all partners.

Income Tax Status - The prevailing assumption underlying the operation of our business is that we will continue to operate in order to qualify as a REIT, defined under the Internal Revenue Code. We are required to meet certain income and asset tests on a periodic basis to ensure that we continue to qualify as a REIT. As a REIT, we are allowed to reduce taxable income by all or a portion of our distributions to stockholders. We evaluate the transactions that we enter into and determine their impact on our REIT status. Determining our taxable income, calculating distributions, and evaluating transactions requires us to make certain judgments and estimates as to the positions we take in our interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code. Because many types of transactions are susceptible to varying interpretations under federal and state income tax laws and regulations, our positions are subject to change at a later date upon final determination by the taxing authorities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2005, the FASB ratified the EITF’s consensus on Issue No. 04-5 “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.” This consensus establishes the presumption that general partners in a limited partnership control that limited partnership regardless of the extent of the general partners’ ownership interest in the limited partnership. The consensus further establishes that the rights of the limited partners can overcome the presumption of control by the general partners, if the limited partners have either (a) the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or

48

otherwise remove the general partners without cause or (b) substantive participating rights. Whether the presumption of control is overcome is a matter of judgment based on the facts and circumstances, for which the consensus provides additional guidance. This consensus is currently applicable to us for new or modified partnerships, and will otherwise be applicable to existing partnerships in 2006. This consensus applies to limited partnerships or similar entities, such as limited liability companies that have governing provisions that are the functional equivalent of a limited partnership. We are currently evaluating the effect of this consensus on its consolidation policies.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (“Statement 154”). Statement 154 requires restatement of prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. Statement 154 also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the change. Statement 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We are not currently aware of any future potential accounting changes which would require the retrospective application described in Statement 154.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 153, Exchange of Non-monetary Assets - an amendment of APB Opinion No 29 (“Statement 153”). The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that Opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. Statement 153 amends Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. Statement 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The impact of adopting Statement 153 is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. We are not currently aware of any future potential accounting changes which would require the retrospective application described in Statement 154.

Results from Operations

Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2005 to 2004

Our revenues increased by $19.9 million, or 22%, to $111.5 million in 2005. As a result of MCWR II acquiring the First Washington Portfolio on June 1, 2005, we earned and recorded $13.8 million in fees related to acquisition, due diligence and debt placement services that we provided to MCWR II. MCWR II paid us approximately $21.2 million for these services, however, as previously discussed, the amount recognized as fee income includes only that portion of fees paid by the venture not owned by us. The increase in revenues was also related to changes in occupancy in the portfolio of stabilized and development properties, growth in re-leasing rental rates, operating properties acquired subsequent to June 30, 2004 that had no revenues during the comparable prior year period, and revenues from new developments commencing operations subsequent to June 30, 2004. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, our minimum rent increased by $4.2 million, or 6%, and our recoveries from tenants increased $1.7 million, or 9%. Percentage rent was $269,603 in 2005, compared with $336,689 in 2004.

Our operating expenses increased by $5.3 million, or 11%, to $54.5 million in 2005 related to increased operating and maintenance costs, general and administrative costs and depreciation expense, as further described below.

Our combined operating, maintenance, and real estate taxes increased by $1.5 million, or 7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 to $23.4 million. This increase was primarily due to shopping centers acquired during 2004 and new developments that only recently began operating and therefore did not incur operating expenses during the three month period ending on June 30, 2004.

Our general and administrative expenses were $9.4 million for the three months ended June 30,

49

2005, compared with $7.2 million in 2004, or 30% higher, related to an increase in the total number of employees in preparation for management of the acquisition of the First Washington Portfolio by MCWR II and higher costs associated with incentive compensation related to the Company’s decision to implement FAS 123R early resulting in the expensing of stock options and new grants of restricted stock as part of our long-term compensation plan.

Our depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 primarily related to new development properties placed in service and operating properties acquired subsequent to June 30, 2004 that had no operations during the comparable prior year period.

Our net interest expense increased to $22.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $18.6 million in 2004. Average interest rates on our outstanding debt were 5.95% at June 30, 2005 and 2004. Our weighted average outstanding debt at June 30, 2005 was $1.6 billion compared to $1.5 billion at June 30, 2004 primarily related to the financing associated with our $397 million equity investment in MCWR II.

Income from discontinued operations was $8.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 related to three properties sold to unrelated parties for net proceeds of $27.1 million and three properties classified as held-for-sale. Income from discontinued operations was $4.6 million in 2004 related to the operations of shopping centers sold or classified as held-for-sale in 2005 as well as 2004. In compliance with the adoption of Statement 144, if we sell an asset in the current year, we are required to reclassify its operating income into discontinued operations for all prior periods. This practice results in a reclassification of amounts previously reported as continuing operations into discontinued operations. Our income from discontinued operations is shown net of minority interest of exchangeable partnership units and income taxes.

Net income for common unit holders was $41.2 million in 2005, compared with $25.5 million in 2004 or a 61% increase for the reasons described above. Diluted earnings per unit were $0.63 in 2005, compared with $0.41 in 2004, or 54% higher.

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2005 to 2004

At June 30, 2005, on a Combined Basis, we were operating or developing 383 shopping centers, as compared to 291 shopping centers at the end of 2004. We identify our shopping centers as either development properties or stabilized properties. Development properties are defined as properties that are in the construction or initial lease-up process and have not reached their initial full occupancy (reaching full occupancy generally means achieving at least 93% leased and rent paying on newly constructed or renovated GLA). At June 30, 2005, on a Combined Basis, we were developing 26 properties, as compared to 34 properties at the end of 2004.

Our revenues increased by $27.7 million, or 15%, to $210.8 million in 2005. As a result of MCWR II acquiring the First Washington Portfolio on June 1, 2005, we recorded $13.8 million in fees related to acquisition, due diligence and debt placement services that we provided to MCWR II. MCWR II paid us approximately $21.2 million for these services, however, as previously discussed, the amount recognized as fee income includes only that portion of fees paid by the venture not owned by us. The increase in revenues was also related to changes in occupancy in the portfolio of stabilized and development properties, growth in re-leasing rental rates, operating properties acquired subsequent to June 30, 2004 that had no revenues during the comparable prior year period, and revenues from new developments commencing operations subsequent to June 30, 2004. In addition to collecting minimum rent from our tenants for the GLA that they lease from us, we also collect contingent rent based upon tenant sales, which we refer to as percentage rent. Tenants are also responsible for reimbursing us for their pro-rata share of the expenses associated with operating our shopping centers. In 2005, our minimum rent increased by $8.5 million, or 6%, and our recoveries from tenants increased $3.8 million, or 10%. Percentage rent was $818,649 in 2005, compared with $787,996 in 2004.

Our operating expenses increased by $10.9 million, or 11%, to $108.4 million in 2005 related to increased operating and maintenance costs, general and administrative costs and depreciation expense, as further described below.

50

Our combined operating, maintenance, and real estate taxes increased by $2.4 million, or 5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $46.9 million. This increase was primarily due to shopping centers acquired during 2004 and new developments that only recently began operating and therefore did not incur operating expenses during the six month period ending on June 30, 2004.

Our general and administrative expenses were $18.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared with $13.1 million in 2004, or 38% higher, related to an increase in the total number of employees in preparation for management of the acquisition of the First Washington Portfolio by MCWR II and higher costs associated with incentive compensation related to the Company’s decision to implement FAS 123R early resulting in the expensing of stock options and new grants of restricted stock as part of our long-term compensation plan.

Our depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 primarily related to new development properties placed in service and operating properties acquired subsequent to June 30, 2004 that had no operations during the comparable prior year period.

Our net interest expense increased to $42.6 in 2005 from $39.7 million in 2004. Average interest rates on our outstanding debt were 5.95% at June 30, 2005 and 2004. Our weighted average outstanding debt at June 30, 2005 was $1.6 billion compared to $1.5 billion at June 30, 2004 primarily related to the financing associated with our $397 million equity investment in MCWR II.

We account for profit recognition on sales of real estate in accordance with SFAS Statement No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” Profits from sales of real estate will not be recognized by us unless (i) a sale has been consummated; (ii) the buyer’s initial and continuing investment is adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; (iii) we have transferred to the buyer the usual risks and rewards of ownership; and (iv) we do not have substantial continuing involvement with the property. Gains from the sale of operating and development properties includes $5.7 million in gains from the sale of 12 out-parcels for proceeds of $10.9 million and $4.4 million in gains related to the sale of two development properties. For the period ended June 30, 2004, the gains from the sale of operating and development properties included $6.9 million from the sale of 13 out-parcels for proceeds of $14.9 million and $739,473 in gains for properties sold. These gains are included in continuing operations rather than discontinued operations because they were either properties that had no operating income, or they were properties sold to joint ventures where we have continuing involvement through our minority investment.

Income from discontinued operations was $18.5 million in 2005 related to five properties sold to unrelated parties for net proceeds of $61.8 million and three properties classified as held-for-sale. Income from discontinued operations was $6.8 million in 2004 related to the operations of shopping centers sold or classified as held-for-sale in 2005 as well as 2004. In compliance with the adoption of Statement 144, if we sell an asset in the current year, we are required to reclassify its operating income into discontinued operations for all prior periods. This practice results in a reclassification of amounts previously reported as continuing operations into discontinued operations. Our income from discontinued operations is shown net of minority interest of exchangeable partnership units and income taxes.

Preferred unit distributions were $11.6 million in 2005 which was a net decrease of $1.4 million as a result of redemptions of preferred units during 2004, offset by the issuance of Series 4 preferred units in August 2004.

Net income for common unit holders was $76.7 million in 2005, compared with $47.3 million in 2004 or a 62% increase for the reasons described above. Diluted earnings per unit were $1.18 in 2005, compared with $0.77 in 2004, or 53% higher.

51

Environmental Matters

We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations and we are primarily concerned with dry cleaning plants that currently operate or have operated at our shopping centers in the past. We believe that the tenants who currently operate plants do so in accordance with current laws and regulations. Generally, we use all legal means to cause tenants to remove dry cleaning plants from our shopping centers or convert them to environmentally approved systems. Where available, we have applied and been accepted into state-sponsored environmental programs. We have a blanket environmental insurance policy that covers us against third-party liabilities and remediation costs on shopping centers that currently have no known environmental contamination. We have also placed environmental insurance, where possible, on specific properties with known contamination, in order to mitigate our environmental risk. We believe that the ultimate disposition of currently known environmental matters will not have a material effect on Regency’s financial position, liquidity, or operations; however, we can give no assurance that existing environmental studies with respect to our shopping centers have revealed all potential environmental liabilities; that any previous owner, occupant or tenant did not create any material environmental condition not known to us; that the current environmental condition of the shopping centers will not be affected by tenants and occupants, by the condition of nearby properties, or by unrelated third parties; or that changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations or their interpretation will not result in additional environmental liability to us.

Inflation

Inflation has remained relatively low and has had a minimal impact on the operating performance of our shopping centers; however, substantially all of our long-term leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation. Such provisions include clauses enabling us to receive percentage rent based on tenants’ gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise; and/or escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases. Such escalation clauses are often related to increases in the consumer price index or similar inflation indices. In addition, many of our leases are for terms of less than ten years, which permits us to seek increased rents upon re-rental at market rates. Most of our leases require tenants to pay their share of operating expenses, including common-area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.

52

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market Risk

We are exposed to interest-rate changes primarily related to the variable interest rate on the Line and the refinancing of long-term debt, which currently contain fixed interest rates. Our interest-rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest-rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we borrow primarily at fixed interest rates and may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest-rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to mitigate our interest-rate risk on a related financial instrument. We have no plans to enter into derivative or interest-rate transactions for speculative purposes.

Our interest-rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal cash flows (in thousands), weighted average interest rates of remaining debt, and the fair value of total debt (in thousands) as of June 30, 2005, by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest-rate changes.

	2005			2006		2007		2008		2009		2010		Thereafter		Total	Fair Value
Fixed rate debt	$	132,287		24,576		27,208		22,843		56,351		180,260		708,763		1,152,288	1,212,162
Average interest rate for all fixed rate debt		7.18	%	7.17	%	7.15	%	7.16	%	7.12	%	6.80	%	6.21	%	—
Variable rate LIBOR debt	$	25,000		282,049		300,938		—		—		—		—		607,987	607,987
Average interest rate for all variable rate debt		3.56	%	3.23	%	3.23	%	—		—		—		—		—

As the table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of June 30, 2005, it does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not presented in the table above, the information presented above has limited predictive value. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest-rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at that time, and actual interest rates.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, and, based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with this evaluation that occurred during the period covered by this report and that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

53

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are a party to various legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation nor to our knowledge, is any litigation threatened against us, the outcome of which would, in our judgment based on information currently available to us, have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 2. N/A

Item 3. None

Item 4. None

Item 5. Other Information

The following table shows our consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the periods indicated:

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2005	2004
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges	2.2	1.9

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits:

4. Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures

4.1 Indenture dated as of July 18, 2005 among Regency Centers, L.P., Regency Centers Corporation, as Guarantor, and Wachovia Bank, National Association as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Regency Centers, L.P. filed August 5, 2005).

4.2 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 18, 2005 among Regency Centers, L.P. and Regency Centers Corporation, on the one hand, and Wachovia Capital Market, LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as representatives of the initial purchasers referenced therein, on the other hand (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Regency Centers, L.P. filed August 5, 2005).

10. Material Contracts

10.2 Credit Agreement dated June 1, 2005 by and among Regency Centers, L.P. as Borrower, Regency Centers Corporation as Guarantor, each of the Lenders signatory thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Agent (incorporated by reference to the exhibit with the same exhibit number in Regency Centers Corporations’ Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).

54

Item 6. Exhibits (continued)

10.3 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005 by and among Regency Centers, L.P., Macquarie CountryWide (US) No. 2 LLC, Macquarie-Regency Management, LLC, Macquarie CountryWide (US) No. 2 Corporation and Macquarie CountryWide Management Limited. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit with the same exhibit number in Regency Centers Corporations’ Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).

10.4 Purchase Agreement dated as of July 13, 2005 among Regency Centers, L.P. and Regency Centers Corporation, on the one hand, and Wachovia Capital Market, LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as representatives of the initial purchasers referenced therein, on the other hand. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit with the same exhibit number in Regency Centers Corporations’ Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).

31.1 Rule 13a-14 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2 Rule 13a-14 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

31.3 Rule 13a-14 Certification of Chief Operating Officer.

32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

32.2 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

32.3 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Operating Officer.

55

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 9, 2005	REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
	By: Regency Centers Corporation, General Partner
	By:	/s/ J. Christian Leavitt
		Senior Vice President and
		Principal Accounting Officer

56