UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER	333-56857
	333-56857-01
	333-56857-02

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY CORPORATION

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LLC

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

DELAWARE DELAWARE DELAWARE	52-2055893 39-1928505 39-1927923
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)	(I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)

P.O. BOX 990

RIPON, WISCONSIN 54971-0990

(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

(920) 748-3121

(REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of Alliance Laundry Corporation’s common stock outstanding as of November 13, 2007: 1,000 shares.

Alliance Laundry Systems LLC

Alliance Laundry Corporation

Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC

Form 10-Q

For The Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2007

Table of Contents

		Page No.
PART I	Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements, Unaudited
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (Restated)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 (Restated)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 (Restated)	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Member(s)’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 (Restated)	6
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	38
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	39
PART II	Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	43
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	43
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	43
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	43
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	43
Item 5.	Other Information	43
Item 6.	Exhibits	43
Signatures		44

2

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006 (Restated)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,613	$	11,221
Accounts receivable, net		26,737		24,523
Inventories, net		61,400		51,915
Beneficial interests in securitized accounts receivable		28,579		28,641
Deferred income tax asset, net		2,729		3,202
Prepaid expenses and other		3,187		4,804
Total current assets		133,245		124,306
Notes receivable, net		3,528		4,018
Property, plant and equipment, net		71,924		73,789
Goodwill		183,078		180,269
Beneficial interests in securitized financial assets		20,138		18,055
Deferred income tax asset, net		10,677		10,677
Debt issuance costs, net		8,703		10,318
Intangible assets, net		148,857		152,890
Total assets	$	580,150	$	574,322
Liabilities and Member(s)’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	230	$	526
Revolving credit facility		—		—
Accounts payable		34,802		27,636
Deferred income tax liability, net		—		216
Other current liabilities		34,710		37,085
Total current liabilities		69,742		65,463
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations:
Senior credit facility		215,000		224,000
Senior subordinated notes		149,500		149,430
Other long-term debt and capital lease obligations		2,140		2,159
Deferred income tax liability, net		6,502		6,137
Other long-term liabilities		10,693		10,742
Total liabilities		453,577		457,931
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 10)
Member(s)’ equity		126,573		116,391
Total liabilities and member(s)’ equity	$	580,150	$	574,322

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

3

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2007		September 30, 2006			September 30, 2007		September 30, 2006 (Restated)
Net revenues:
Equipment and service parts	$	111,396	$	92,529		$	320,856	$	248,738
Equipment financing, net		1,981		2,601			6,013		4,802
Net revenues		113,377		95,130			326,869		253,540
Cost of sales		86,479		74,257			244,380		196,162
Gross profit		26,898		20,873			82,489		57,378
Selling, general and administrative expense		15,728		13,010			47,761		36,837
Securitization, impairment and other costs		32		1,647			782		5,571
Total operating expenses		15,760		14,657			48,543		42,408
Operating income		11,138		6,216			33,946		14,970
Interest expense		9,410		9,591			25,871		22,833
Other expense, net		—		120			—		480
Income (loss) before taxes		1,728		(3,495	)		8,075		(8,343	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		523		532			2,631		(1,050	)
Net income (loss)	$	1,205	$	(4,027	)	$	5,444	$	(7,293	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

4

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006 (Restated)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	5,444		$	(7,293	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		14,222			16,420
Non-cash interest expense		719			316
Non-cash executive unit compensation		2,706			1,215
Non-cash trademark impairment		—			1,400
Non-cash inventory expense		—			2,726
Deferred income taxes		160			(1,584	)
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment		70			175
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,912	)		5,383
Inventories		(8,875	)		(13,722	)
Other assets		(228	)		(3,768	)
Accounts payable		6,561			3,126
Other liabilities		(5,657	)		(2,076	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		13,210			2,318
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(5,931	)		(4,046	)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired		—			(77,933	)
Proceeds on disposition of assets		1,178			1,129
Net cash used in investing activities		(4,753	)		(80,850	)
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities:
Principal payments on long-term debt		(9,428	)		(8,023	)
Net increase in revolving line of credit borrowings		—			6,000
Proceeds from senior term loan		—			60,000
Issuance of common stock		—			23,493
Repurchase of common stock		—			(30	)
Debt financing costs		—			(1,334	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(9,428	)		80,106
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		363			549
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(608	)		2,123
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		11,221			5,075
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	10,613		$	7,198
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	25,488		$	23,878
Cash paid for income taxes		1,442			79

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

5

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF MEMBER(S)’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Member(s)’ Equity			Minimum Pension Liability and Other Benefits			Unrealized Holding Gain on Residual Interests, Net		Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment			Total Member(s)’ Equity
Balances at December 31, 2005	$	94,583		$	(751	)	$	1	$	—		$	93,833
Equity contribution		23,493											23,493
Repurchased stock		(30	)		—			—		—			(30	)
Net loss (Restated)		(7,293	)		—			—		—			(7,293	)
Change in minimum pension liability, net					751								751
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—			—		(760	)		(760	)
Total comprehensive loss (Restated)													(7,302	)
Balances at September 30, 2006 (Restated)	$	110,753		$	—		$	1	$	(760	)	$	109,994
Balances at December 31, 2006 (Restated)	$	114,616		$	(25	)	$	—	$	1,800		$	116,391
Net income		5,444			—			—		—			5,444
Change in minimum pension liability, net		—			25			—		—			25
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—			—		4,713			4,713
Total comprehensive income												$	10,182
Balances at September 30, 2007	$	120,060		$	—		$	—	$	6,513		$	126,573

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

6

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

On January 27, 2005 ALH Holding Inc. (“ALH”), an entity formed by Teachers’ Private Capital, the private equity arm of Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (“OTPP”), acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interests in Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Alliance Holdings”). We refer to the acquisition of Alliance Holdings and the related management investments in ALH as the “Alliance Acquisition.”

In connection with the closing of the Alliance Acquisition, we issued $150.0 million of 8 1/2% senior subordinated notes due January 15, 2013 (the “Senior Subordinated Notes”), established a $250.0 million senior secured credit facility (the “Senior Credit Facility”) and repaid the $110.0 million aggregate principal amount of our then outstanding 9 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the “1998 Senior Subordinated Notes”). We refer to the above financing transactions (the “Financing Transactions”), taken together with the Alliance Acquisition, as the “Transactions.”

On July 14, 2006 we completed the acquisition of Laundry System Group NV’s commercial laundry division operations. See Note 4, “Acquisition and Related Activity,” for further discussion.

Throughout this quarterly report, we refer to Alliance Holdings, together with its consolidated operations, as “Company,” “Alliance,” “we,” “our,” and “us,” unless otherwise indicated. The reference to “Alliance Laundry” refers to our wholly-owned subsidiary, Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and its consolidated operations, unless otherwise indicated.

The unaudited financial statements as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 present the consolidated financial position and results of operations of Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC, including our wholly-owned subsidiary, Alliance Laundry Systems LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries.

These interim financial statements have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and disclosures normally included in Alliance Holdings’ annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such regulations, although the Company believes the disclosures provided are adequate to prevent the information presented from being misleading.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements contain all adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) for a fair statement of our financial position and operating results for the periods presented. See Note 2, “Restatement of Financial Statements,” for a description of the restatements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 and as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations to be expected for the full year. Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. This report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements presented in the Company’s December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (file no. 333-56857) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on October 26, 2007.

7

NOTE 2. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In August 2007, the Company identified errors in its reconciliation of unvouched payables which resulted in the understatement of the Company’s liabilities. An internal investigation was conducted by the Company’s management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Based on the results of that investigation, the Company determined that there were errors related to the accounting for unvouched payables and related transactions impacting inventory and cost of goods sold. Based upon the results of the internal investigation, the Company made the decision to restate its consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended March 31, 2007.

A more detailed explanation for those restatements can be found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 and in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2007, in each case as filed with the SEC on October 26, 2007. Restatements of interim periods for 2006 are reflected within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income herein.

As a result of the restatement, the Company obtained an amendment and waiver to its Senior Credit Facility. See Note 9, “Debt,” for further discussion.

There was no impact from the restatement to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The following table presents the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as adjusted to reflect the impact of the restatement:

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
	As Previously Reported			Effect of Restatement			Restated
Net revenues:
Equipment and service parts	$	248,738		$	—		$	248,738
Equipment financing, net		4,802			—			4,802
Net revenues		253,540			—			253,540
Cost of sales		194,002			2,160			196,162
Gross profit		59,538			(2,160	)		57,378
Selling, general and administrative expense		37,496			(659	)		36,837
Securitization, impairment and other costs		5,571			—			5,571
Total operating expenses		43,067			(659	)		42,408
Operating income		16,471			(1,501	)		14,970
Interest expense		22,833			—			22,833
Other expense, net		480			—			480
Loss before taxes		(6,842	)		(1,501	)		(8,343	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(480	)		(570	)		(1,050	)
Net loss	$	(6,362	)	$	(931	)	$	(7,293	)

8

The following table presents the major subtotals for the Company’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and the related impact of the restatement adjustments discussed above for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
	As Previously Reported			Restated
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	3,002		$	2,318
Investing activities		(80,870	)		(80,850	)
Financing activities		80,082			80,106
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(91	)		549
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		2,123			2,123
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		5,075			5,075
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	7,198		$	7,198

The correction of the errors related to the accounting for unvouched payables did not have any impact on the major subtotals in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as previously reported. The restated column above does reflect the correction of an immaterial error in the statement of cash flows resulting from an error in the calculation of the effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents. Cash flows from operations and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents were correctly reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006.

The following table presents the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive (Loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, reflecting the impact of the restatement:

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF

COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
	As Previously Reported			Restated
Net (loss)	$	(6,362	)	$	(7,293	)
Change in minimum pension liability and other benefits, net		751			751
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(760	)		(760	)
Total comprehensive (loss)	$	(6,371	)	$	(7,302	)

9

NOTE 3. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) is expected to issue a statement that would amend and clarify SFAS No. 140 (and related implementation guidance). The proposed statement will address permitted activities of qualifying special-purpose entities, including the degree of discretion allowable in determining the terms of beneficial interests issued after inception, and whether certain transfers can meet the criteria for sale accounting under SFAS No. 140 if the transferor or any consolidated affiliate provides liquidity support for the transferee’s beneficial interests. As the proposed statement has not been issued, the Company is unable to determine the effects of the related transition provisions, if any, on its existing securitization entity. However, in the event that transfers to its existing asset backed facility would no longer qualify as sales of financial assets in the future, the Company may recognize additional costs for a replacement facility or it may have other material financial statement effects. An exposure draft was issued in the third quarter of 2005 and a revised exposure draft is anticipated in the second quarter of 2008.

In March 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” SFAS No. 156 amends certain aspects of SFAS No. 140 by requiring that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. SFAS No. 156 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2007 and did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006 the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the Company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The provisions of FIN 48 have been adopted and did not affect the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See Note 12, “Income Taxes,” for further discussion.

In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the company on January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” SFAS No. 158 requires the recognition of a net liability or asset to report the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the balance sheet. The recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158 are effective as of December 31, 2007, as the Company does not have publicly traded equity securities. At this time, the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 158 on the Company’s consolidated financial position is being assessed.

In February 2007 the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value option permits a company to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. A company will report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings after adoption. Statement 159 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

10

NOTE 4. ACQUISITION AND RELATED ACTIVITY

On July 14, 2006 Alliance Laundry completed the acquisition of substantially all of Laundry System Group NV’s (“LSG”) commercial laundry division (“CLD”) operations pursuant to a share purchase agreement, dated May 23, 2006 (the “Share Purchase Agreement”), between Alliance Laundry and LSG, and a purchase agreement, dated May 23, 2006 (the “Purchase Agreement”), among Alliance Laundry, LSG, Cissell Manufacturing Company, Jensen USA Inc. and LSG North America, Inc. (together referred to as the “CLD Acquisition”). CLD markets commercial washer-extractors, tumbler dryers, and ironers worldwide under the IPSO and Cissell brand names. CLD’s European headquarters is in Wevelgem, Belgium, and it has manufacturing facilities in Belgium and sales offices in Belgium, Norway and Spain (the “European Operations”). CLD also had manufacturing facilities and sales offices in the United States which have been consolidated into Alliance Laundry’s operations. The aggregate consideration paid for the CLD Acquisition, net of cash acquired, was $87.2 million, including acquisition costs of approximately $6.0 million and costs to exit or dispose of certain CLD U.S. activities and assets of approximately $5.2 million. The CLD Acquisition resulted in approximately $40.4 million of goodwill, of which approximately $7.4 million is tax deductible, and $16.5 million of other intangible assets being recognized by the Company. Prior to July 14, 2006, CLD was a significant customer of and a significant supplier to Alliance Laundry.

The CLD Acquisition was funded with a $60.0 million increase in term loans under Alliance Laundry’s Senior Credit Facility, $3.2 million of incremental equity contributions from management investors and a $20.3 million equity contribution from OTPP.

The Company believes the addition of CLD’s IPSO and Cissell brands, the addition of CLD’s soft mount washer-extractor product line and having production facilities in Europe will significantly strengthen its ability to participate in the global laundry marketplace.

The sources and uses of funds in connection with the CLD Acquisition are summarized below:

Sources:
Cash from operations	$	3,752
Proceeds from Senior Term Loan		60,000
Proceeds from equity investors		23,493
Total sources	$	87,245
Uses:
Stated purchase price	$	75,700
Less: Cash acquired		(1,623	)
Working capital adjustment		1,988
Fees and expenses		5,959
Facility closure reserve		5,221
Total uses	$	87,245

11

The allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of net assets acquired is summarized below:

	Amount
Current assets, net of cash acquired	$	44,117
Property, plant and equipment		14,477
Goodwill		40,403
Other intangible assets		16,458
Debt issuance costs		1,335
Other noncurrent assets		1,574
Total assets		118,364
Current liabilities		19,010
Noncurrent liabilities		12,109
Total liabilities		31,119
Net assets acquired	$	87,245

The allocation of the CLD Acquisition price to intangible assets and associated lives is summarized below:

	Amount		Life
Intangible assets—trademarks and tradenames	$	2,977	Indefinite
Intangible assets—Europe customer agreements and distributor network		3,210	20 Years
Intangible assets—U.S. customer agreements and distributor network		1,017	5 Years
Intangible assets—engineering and manufacturing designs and processes		7,454	6.5 Years
Intangible assets—noncompete agreement		1,723	2 Years
Intangible assets—computer software and other		77	< 3 Years
Total	$	16,458

The incremental goodwill recognized in the CLD Acquisition is attributable to North American commercial laundry operations in the amount of $10.0 million and European Operations in the amount of $30.4 million. As a result of the CLD Acquisition we capitalized additional debt issuance costs in 2006 totaling $1.3 million.

Our allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the CLD Acquisition was finalized in the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The final purchase accounting adjustments were not material to the consolidated financial position of the Company.

In connection with the CLD Acquisition, the Company has undertaken certain restructurings of the acquired business. The restructuring activities include reductions in staffing levels, elimination of facilities and other costs associated with exiting certain activities of the acquired business. The estimated costs of these restructuring activities were recorded as costs of the CLD Acquisition and were provided for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.”

12

The following table summarizes the restructuring reserve, which is included within other current liabilities in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

	Balance at December 31, 2006		Additions		Adjustments			Utilized Cash			Balance at September 30, 2007
One-time termination benefits	$	2,278	$	44	$	—		$	(683	)	$	1,639
Other labor related costs		116		429		—			(418	)		127
Relocation of tooling and equipment		706		—		(389	)		(317	)		—
Other related expenses		85		136		—			(221	)		—
	$	3,185	$	609	$	(389	)	$	(1,639	)	$	1,766

On August 8, 2006 the Board of Directors of ALH Holding Inc. resolved to discontinue the Louisville, Kentucky operations (the “Discontinuation”) and close the Portland, Tennessee facility (the “Closure”). The decision was based on an analysis of each location’s manufacturing capabilities as well as the continuing investment requirements for each of the locations. The Company substantially completed the Discontinuation and Closure as of December 31, 2006.

On October 31, 2006 the Company signed an agreement for the sale of its Portland facility for approximately $0.8 million, which approximated its carrying value. This transaction was completed in January 2007 and was subject to customary closing conditions.

NOTE 5. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER ITEMS

Asset Impairment Charge

On March 20, 2006 the Board of Directors of ALH Holding Inc. resolved to discontinue the sale of Ajax finished goods, which discontinuance was completed in 2006. In connection with this discontinuation, we recorded a non-cash charge of $1.4 million for impairment in the quarter ended March 31, 2006 for the reduction in the value of the Ajax trademark resulting from such discontinuance. The non-cash impairment charge recorded in the quarter ended March 31, 2006 was a result of the Company’s determination that the best course of action for the Ajax trademark would be to sell this product line to a third party. This amount is recorded within the securitization, impairment and other costs line item of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities

On October 12, 2005 the Company committed to a plan to close its Marianna, Florida facility (the “Facility”) and consolidate the manufacture and design of the Facility’s product lines into its existing Ripon, Wisconsin operations. The Company substantially completed the Facility closure and consolidation as of July 30, 2006.

The total cash costs and expenses associated with the Facility closure and transition of product lines to Wisconsin are estimated to be approximately $10.5 million, comprised of (1) approximately $3.3 million of one-time termination benefits and relocation costs; (2) approximately $2.7 million of other labor related costs

13

including training and temporary living expenses; (3) approximately $2.1 million related to the relocation of the Facility’s tooling and equipment; and (4) approximately $2.4 million of other related expenses. Of the $10.5 million, $0.9 million was incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2007; $8.8 million was incurred in the year ended December 31, 2006 and $0.6 million was incurred in the period January 28, 2005 through December 31, 2005. The remaining $0.2 million is expected to be incurred prior to December 31, 2009 and relates primarily to continuing Facility costs prior to disposition.

The table below summarizes the costs incurred for each of the specified periods and also summarizes where such costs are reflected in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2007		September 30, 2006
Cash costs:
One-time termination benefits and relocation	$	325	$	2,257
Other labor related costs		90		2,110
Relocation of the Facility’s tooling and equipment		113		1,726
Other related expenses		339		1,850
Total cash costs		867		7,943
Noncash costs:
Pension curtailment benefit		—		(507	)
Retiree medical curtailment benefit		—		(619	)
Total noncash costs		—		(1,126	)
Total closure costs	$	867	$	6,817
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	85	$	2,646
Securitization, impairment and other costs		782		4,171
Total closure costs	$	867	$	6,817

NOTE 6. ASSET BACKED FACILITY

According to SFAS No. 125 and 140, a transfer of financial assets in which the transferor surrenders control over those assets is accounted for as a sale to the extent that consideration other than beneficial interests in the transferred assets is received in exchange. The Company sells all of its trade receivables and eligible note receivables to third parties through a special-purpose bankruptcy remote entity designed to meet the SFAS No. 125 and 140 requirements for sale treatment. Accordingly, the Company removes these receivables from its balance sheet at the time of transfer.

In a subordinated capacity, we retain rights to the residual portion of cash flows, including interest earned, from the note receivables sold. This retained beneficial interest is recorded at its estimated fair value at the balance sheet date. In determining the gain on sales of note receivables, the investment in the sold receivable pool is allocated between the portion sold and the portion retained, based on their relative fair values. The Company estimates the fair values of its retained interests based on the present value of expected future cash flows to be received, using its best estimate of key assumptions, including credit losses, prepayment rates, interest rates and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s retained interests are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss). Impairment losses are recognized when the estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of the retained interest in accordance with EITF 99-20.

14

On June 28, 2005, Alliance Laundry, through a special-purpose bankruptcy remote subsidiary, Alliance Laundry Equipment Receivables 2005 LLC (“ALER 2005”), and a trust, Alliance Laundry Equipment Receivables Trust 2005-A (“ALERT 2005A”), entered into a four year $330.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Asset Backed Facility”), backed by equipment loans and trade receivables originated by us. During the first four years of the Asset Backed Facility, Alliance Laundry is permitted, from time to time, to sell its trade receivables and certain equipment loans to the special-purpose subsidiary, which in turn will transfer them to the trust. The trust finances the acquisition of the trade receivables and equipment loans through borrowings under the Asset Backed Facility in the form of funding notes (the “Notes”), which are limited to an advance rate of approximately 95% for equipment loans and 60-70% for trade receivables. Funding availability for trade receivables is limited to a maximum of $60.0 million, while funding for equipment loans is limited at $330.0 million less the amount of funding outstanding for trade receivables. Funding for the trade receivables and equipment loans is subject to certain eligibility criteria, including concentration and other limits, which are standard for transactions of this type. After four years from the closing date, which is June 27, 2009, (or earlier in the event of a rapid amortization event or an event of default), the trust will not be permitted to request new borrowings under the facility and the outstanding borrowings will amortize over a period of up to nine years. As of September 30, 2007, the balance of variable funding notes due to lenders under the Asset Backed Facility for equipment loans was $232.2 million.

Additional advances under the Asset Backed Facility are subject to certain continuing conditions, including but not limited to (i) covenant restrictions relating to the weighted average life, weighted average interest rate, and the amount of fixed rate equipment loans held by the trust; (ii) the absence of a rapid amortization event or event of default, as defined; (iii) our compliance, as servicer, with certain financial covenants; and (iv) no event having occurred which materially and adversely affects our operations.

The variable funding notes issued under the Asset Backed Facility will commence amortization and borrowings under the Asset Backed Facility will cease prior to June 27, 2009 upon the occurrence of certain “rapid amortization events” which include: (i) a borrowing base shortfall exists and remains uncured; (ii) delinquency, dilution or default ratios on pledged receivables and equipment loans exceeding certain specified ratios in any given month; (iii) the days sales outstanding on receivables exceed a specified number of days; (iv) the occurrence and continuance of an event of default or servicer default under the Asset Backed Facility, including but not limited to, as servicer, a material adverse change in our business or financial condition and our compliance with certain required financial covenants; and (v) a number of other specified events.

The risk of loss to the note purchasers under the Asset Backed Facility resulting from default or dilution on the trade receivables and equipment loans is protected by credit enhancement, provided by us in the form of cash reserves, letters of credit and over collateralization. Further, the timely payment of interest and the ultimate payment of principal on the facility are guaranteed by Ambac Assurance Corporation. All of the residual beneficial interests in the trust and cash flows remaining from the pool of receivables and loans after payment of all obligations under the Asset Backed Facility would accrue to the benefit of Alliance Laundry. Except for the retained interests and amounts of the letters of credit outstanding from time to time as credit enhancement, the Company provides no support or recourse for the risk of loss relating to default on the assets transferred to the trust. The Company also retains the servicing rights and receives a servicing fee for the trade receivables and equipment loans sold, and we are paid an annual servicing fee equal to 1.0% of the aggregate balance of such trade receivables and equipment loans. Since the servicing fee adequately compensates the Company for the retained servicing rights, the Company does not record a servicing asset or liability. The servicing fee is recognized as collected over the remaining terms of the trade receivables and equipment loans sold.

15

The estimated fair value of Alliance Laundry’s beneficial interests in the accounts receivable and notes sold to ALERT 2005A are based on the amount and timing of expected distributions to Alliance Laundry as the holder of the trust’s residual equity interests. Such distributions may be substantially deferred or eliminated, and result in an impairment of our residual interests, if repayment of the variable funding notes issued by ALERT 2005A are accelerated upon an event of default or rapid amortization event described above.

At September 30, 2007 our retained interest in trade accounts receivable sold to ALER 2005 was $28.6 million and our estimated fair value of beneficial interests in notes sold was $20.1 million. We generally estimate the fair values of our retained interests based on the present value of expected future cash flows to be received, using our best estimate of key assumptions, including credit losses, prepayment rates, interest rates and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. These estimates are consistent with the methods used as of December 31, 2006.

NOTE 7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are summarized below:

	Goodwill
Balance at December 31, 2006	$	180,269
Change in CLD Acquisition Goodwill		726
Currency translation		2,083
Balance at September 30, 2007	$	183,078

Identifiable intangible assets, which are subject to amortization, consist primarily of customer agreements and distributor networks which are amortized over the assets’ estimated useful lives ranging from three to twenty years; engineering drawings, product designs and manufacturing processes, which are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from four to fifteen years; noncompete agreements which are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 2 years and computer software and patents which are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from three to twenty years. Intangible assets also include certain trademarks and tradenames, which have an indefinite life. Such assets are not amortized, but will be subject to an annual impairment test pursuant to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets was as follows:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2007		September 30, 2006
Amortization expense	$	5,101	$	3,972

16

The following is a summary of identifiable intangible assets as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:

	September 30, 2007						December 31, 2006 (Restated)
	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
Identifiable intangible assets:
Trademarks and tradenames	$	112,961	$	—	$	112,961	$	112,778	$	—	$	112,778
Customer agreements and distributor network		31,149		9,257		21,892		30,893		6,491		24,402
Engineering and manufacturing designs and processes		15,789		3,305		12,484		15,269		1,793		13,476
Noncompete agreements		1,910		1,154		756		1,772		406		1,366
Patents		331		22		309		276		14		262
Computer software and other		1,108		653		455		1,075		469		606
	$	163,248	$	14,391	$	148,857	$	162,063	$	9,173	$	152,890

NOTE 8. INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at cost using the first-in, first-out method but not in excess of net realizable value, and consist of the following:

	September 30, 2007			December 31, 2006 (Restated)
Materials and purchased parts	$	29,200		$	23,127
Work in process		6,243			7,826
Finished goods		28,747			23,363
Inventory reserves		(2,790	)		(2,401	)
	$	61,400		$	51,915

The Company recorded inventories acquired in the CLD Acquisition at fair market value. This resulted in a net write-up of $3.2 million. This amount was expensed in cost of sales in the third and fourth quarters of 2006 as this inventory was sold.

NOTE 9. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS

On January 25, 2006 the Company received $1.0 million in borrowings, evidenced by two promissory notes, pursuant to a Wisconsin Community Development Block Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated January 6, 2006, between the Wisconsin Department of Commerce, Alliance Laundry and Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin. The first promissory note, in the amount of $0.5 million bears interest at an annual rate of 2%, with monthly payments of interest and principal that commenced January 1, 2007 and a final installment to be paid on December 1, 2010, subject to the covenants of the Agreement. The second promissory note, in the amount of $0.5 million bears interest at an annual rate of 2%, with monthly payments of interest and principal commencing January 1, 2009 and a final installment to be paid on December 1, 2010, subject to the covenants of the Agreement. A portion or the entire amount of this second promissory note may be forgiven if the Company meets certain job creation and retention requirements as outlined in the promissory note.

On July 14, 2006 Alliance Laundry, Alliance Holdings, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as administrative agent and lender, and the other parties named therein as lenders, entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the credit agreement, dated as of January 27, 2005 (the “Credit Agreement”), among Alliance Laundry, Alliance Holdings, ALH Finance LLC, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as administrative

17

agent, and the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto. The Amendment amends the Credit Agreement under which the Company has outstanding $215.0 million of borrowings at September 30, 2007 to (i) provide for an additional $60.0 million of term loans under the Credit Agreement term loan facility; (ii) increase the revolving credit commitments to $55.0 million from $50.0 million under the Credit Agreement revolving credit facility; (iii) permit the acquisition of CLD; (iv) modify certain negative covenants in the Credit Agreement, including (a) adjusting the calculation of the consolidated leverage ratio, (b) adjusting the calculation of the consolidated interest coverage ratio, (c) increasing the annual ordinary course capital expenditures permitted by Alliance Laundry and its subsidiaries to $13.0 million from $10.0 million, for fiscal years 2007 through 2012, and (d) increasing the maximum permitted debt Alliance Laundry’s non-U.S. subsidiaries may incur without restriction to $5.0 million from $2.5 million; (v) revising the procedure for term loan borrowing; (vi) revising the term loan repayment schedule to require repayment in 22 quarterly installments of $0.6 million which commenced on September 30, 2006, and one installment of $222.1 million, or such lesser amount then outstanding, on January 27, 2012; and (vii) making conforming changes to the definitions contained therein. This Amendment did not affect interest rates charged under the Credit Agreement.

On July 14, 2006, as a result of the CLD Acquisition, the Company assumed certain capital lease obligations which consist primarily of a capital lease obligation of approximately $1.5 million for a laser cutter in its Wevelgem, Belgium facility. This capital lease commenced in November 2005 and requires monthly payments of approximately $36 thousand through October 2010.

On September 10, 2007, the Company entered into an amendment and waiver (the “Amendment and Waiver”) to the Company’s Senior Credit Facility. Among other things, the Amendment and Waiver waives, until November 13, 2007, the Company’s failure to timely provide its financial statements to the Administrative Agent for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007. The required financial statements were provided to the Administrative Agent on November 12, 2007. Waivers related to defaults arising from any potential restatement of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006, September 30, 2006 and March 31, 2007, are not subject to expiration.

The Amendment and Waiver also increases the consolidated leverage ratio used in the Senior Credit Facility by 0.25 from 5.75 to 1.00 to 6.00 to 1.00 for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2007. The Amendment and Waiver also provides a 25 basis point increase in the applicable interest rate under the Senior Credit Facility (subject to adjustment for certain ratings events) and provides for a 1% prepayment fee in the event the term loans under the Senior Credit Facility are refinanced at a lower rate during the twelve months following the effective date of the Amendment and Waiver.

As a result of the Amendment and Waiver, the Company incurred fees of $0.7 million which are included in interest expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007.

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Various claims and legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of business are pending or threatened against us. While the Company cannot predict the outcome of these matters, in the opinion of management, any liability arising thereunder will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations after giving effect to provisions already recorded. The accrual at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007 for the matters referred to above totaled $0.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

18

Environmental, Health and Safety Matters

We are subject to comprehensive and frequently changing federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations, including laws and regulations governing emissions of air pollutants, discharges of waste and storm water and the disposal of hazardous wastes. The Company is also subject to liability for the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination (including contamination caused by other parties) at the properties it owns or operates and at other properties where the Company or predecessors have arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances. As a result, we are involved, from time to time, in administrative and judicial proceedings and inquiries relating to environmental matters. There can be no assurance that we will not be involved in such proceedings in the future and that the aggregate amount of future clean-up costs and other environmental liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company believes that its facilities and operations are in material compliance with all environmental, health and safety laws.

NOTE 11. GUARANTEES

The Company, through its special-purpose bankruptcy remote subsidiary entered into the $330.0 million Asset Backed Facility as described in Note 6 above. Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Backed Facility, we provide credit enhancement to the note purchasers including an irrevocable letter of credit, which is an unconditional lending commitment of the lenders under the Senior Credit Facility, subject to certain limits. We are obligated under the reimbursement provisions of the Senior Credit Facility to reimburse the lenders for any drawings on the credit enhancement by the facility indenture trustee. If the credit enhancement is not replenished by us after a drawing, the trust will not be permitted to request new borrowings under the Asset Backed Facility and the Asset Backed Facility will begin to amortize. The amount of the irrevocable letter of credit related to the Asset Backed Facility at September 30, 2007 was $31.3 million.

We offer warranties to our customers depending upon the specific product and the product use. Standard product warranties vary from one to three years for most parts with certain components extending to five years. Certain customers have elected to buy without warranty coverage. The standard warranty program requires that we replace defective components within a specified time period from the date of installation. We also sell separately priced extended warranties associated with our products. We recognize extended warranty revenues over the period covered by the warranty in accordance with FTB 90-1, “Accounting for Separately Priced Extended Warranty and Product Maintenance Contracts.”

We record an estimate for future warranty related costs based on actual historical incident rates and costs per incident trends. Based on an analysis of these and other factors, the carrying amount of our warranty liability is adjusted as necessary. While our warranty costs have historically been within our calculated estimates, it is possible that future warranty costs could exceed those estimates.

19

The changes in the carrying amount of our total product warranty liability were as follows:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,194		$	4,109
Acquired product warranty liability		—			2,011
Currency translation adjustment		108			(5	)
Accruals for current and pre-existing warranties issued during the period		4,090			3,186
Settlements made during the period		(3,606	)		(2,331	)
Balance at end of period	$	7,786		$	6,970

NOTE 12. INCOME TAXES

The income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was determined by applying an estimated annual effective income tax rate of 32.6% to income before taxes. The estimated effective income tax rate was determined by applying statutory income tax rates to our annualized forecast of pretax income adjusted for certain permanent book to tax differences and tax credits. The effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was 12.6%, which was significantly impacted by a federal energy credit for 2006.

There are various factors that may cause our tax assumptions to change in the near term, and as a result the Company may have to increase or decrease its valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets. The Company cannot predict whether future U.S. federal, foreign and state income tax laws and regulations might be passed that could have a material effect on its results of operations. The Company will assess the impact of significant changes to the U.S. federal, foreign and state income tax laws and regulations on a regular basis and update the assumptions and estimates used to prepare its consolidated financial statements when new regulations and legislation are enacted.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”) an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“SFAS 109”) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no adjustment in its liability for unrecognized income tax benefits, including interest and penalties. Prior to January 27, 2005, the Company did not provide for U.S. federal income taxes or tax benefits as the Company was a partnership for tax reporting purposes and the payment of federal and most state taxes was the responsibility of the partners. The Company did not have any tax liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, as of January 1, 2007 and September 30, 2007. The Company intends to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of income tax expense.

During the next twelve months, the Company expects that its unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties) will not change significantly and will not impact the effective rate.

20

NOTE 13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company provides certain pension, healthcare and death benefits for eligible retirees and their dependents. The pension benefits are funded, while the healthcare and death benefits are not funded but are paid as incurred. Eligibility for coverage is based on meeting certain years of service and retirement qualifications. The components of periodic benefit costs for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in thousands):

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006			September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006
Service cost	$	409		$	336		$	34		$	15
Interest cost		905			769			36			24
Expected return on assets		(1,198	)		(826	)		—			19
Amortization of net obligation		—			(138	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—			(4	)		(4	)
Amortization of loss		—			—			8			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	116		$	141		$	74		$	54

The components of periodic benefit costs for these plans for the periods presented are as follows (in thousands):

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Nine Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006			September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006
Service cost	$	1,225		$	1,278		$	102		$	69
Interest cost		2,715			2,217			106			83
Expected return on assets		(3,593	)		(2,610	)		—			19
Amortization of net obligation		—			(138	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—			(12	)		(15	)
Amortization of loss		—			—			25			—
Curtailment gain		—			(513	)		—			(619	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	347		$	234		$	221		$	(463	)

Employer Contributions

In the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we made a voluntary contribution of approximately $1.8 million to the pension plan. No further contributions are expected for the remainder of 2007.

NOTE 14. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

On January 27, 2005 ALH established a stock option plan, primarily for the benefit of Alliance Laundry’s executive officers. ALH has granted a total of 127,972 stock options among certain members of management. The granted options entitle the members of management to purchase shares of ALH’s common stock at an option price which averages $103.10 per share, subject to certain requirements. As of September 30, 2007, stock options represented an aggregate of 8.7% of the fully diluted common shares of ALH common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options. Sixty-one percent (61%) of the options granted will vest in five equal annual installments on each of the first five anniversaries of the closing date, with the potential for accelerated vesting upon a change in control of Alliance Laundry. The remaining 39% of the options granted are “performance options” that have the opportunity to vest in five annual installments based on Alliance Laundry’s achievement of certain specified annual or cumulative earnings targets during fiscal years 2005 through 2009. The performance options may also vest based on the realization by ALH shareholders of certain specified values upon a subsequent sale of ALH.

21

A total of 9,633 unvested options were terminated and cancelled upon the retirement of an executive officer and ALH granted 7,605 new options to a new member of the executive staff in 2007. No further options have been issued since December 31, 2006 and no options were exercised in the period ended September 30, 2007. Based upon a valuation of all granted stock options, we recognized $0.9 million and $0.1 million of compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively and we recognized $2.7 million and $1.2 million of compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively. No expense was recognized for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 or for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 for the performance options as the specified annual targets for the respective periods were not attained and other earnings target requirements are currently not expected to be attained.

NOTE 15. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Based upon the information used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance, the Company has organized its business into three reportable segments. Commercial laundry equipment sales to domestic and international markets, which are serviced by the U.S. operations, are combined to form the commercial laundry segment. The commercial laundry segment also includes amounts related to our finance program which supports our commercial laundry operations. Our second reportable segment is consumer laundry, which includes consumer laundry equipment sales to domestic and Canadian distributors. Our third reportable segment is our European Operations, which were acquired in the July 14, 2006 CLD Acquisition. Service parts is not considered a separate segment as service operations results are not reviewed as a separate operating entity and service operations are required to support both commercial laundry and consumer laundry segments. However, the service operations are also not internally allocated to the commercial laundry equipment segment or the consumer laundry segment and as such, we have chosen to show the service operations separately. Similarly, worldwide eliminations are not considered a reportable segment. However, we do not actively manage or evaluate the worldwide eliminations as a portion of any other segment. For that reason, we have chosen not to commingle these amounts with other actively managed segments.

Our assets and liabilities, including inventory, trade receivables, property, plant and equipment and accounts payable are not reviewed by segment for commercial laundry, consumer laundry and service parts by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Such information would not be useful due to common manufacturing lines and significant shared components across all product lines for commercial laundry, consumer laundry and service parts. Assets are reviewed for the European Operations separate from the Company’s other reportable segments. As such, assets, capital expenditures and depreciation and amortization have been provided below for U.S. operations separate from European Operations.

The Company’s primary measure of operating performance is gross profit which does not include an allocation of any selling expenses. Such amounts are reviewed on a consolidated basis by management. In determining gross profit for our operating units, the Company does not allocate certain manufacturing costs, including manufacturing variances and warranty costs. Gross profit is determined by subtracting cost of sales from net sales. Cost of sales is comprised of the costs of raw materials and component parts, plus costs incurred at the manufacturing plant level, including, but not limited to, labor and related fringe benefits, depreciation, supplies, utilities, property taxes and insurance. Net sales and gross profit as determined by the Company for its operating segments for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in millions):

22

	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006 (Restated)
Net Revenues:
Commercial laundry	$	84.8		$	70.4
Consumer laundry		4.3			4.0
Service parts		12.6			12.1
European Operations		18.6			16.7
Worldwide eliminations		(6.9	)		(8.1	)
	$	113.4		$	95.1
Gross Profit:
Commercial laundry	$	27.1		$	23.4
Consumer laundry		—			—
Service parts		4.7			5.1
European Operations		4.6			6.0
Worldwide eliminations		—			(1.6	)
		36.4			32.9
Other manufacturing costs		(9.5	)		(12.0	)
Gross profit as reported	$	26.9		$	20.9
Depreciation and Amortization:
U.S. Operations	$	3.8		$	4.6
European Operations	$	1.0		$	0.6
Capital Expenditures:
U.S. Operations	$	1.1		$	1.4
European Operations	$	0.4		$	0.1
Assets:
U.S. Operations	$	484.2		$	487.5
European Operations	$	95.9		$	86.8

23

Net sales and gross profit as determined by the Company for its operating segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in millions):

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006 (Restated)
Net Revenues:
Commercial laundry	$	231.6		$	200.1
Consumer laundry		15.5			10.8
Service parts		39.1			34.0
European Operations		61.3			16.7
Worldwide eliminations		(20.6	)		(8.1	)
	$	326.9		$	253.5
Gross Profit:
Commercial laundry	$	76.8		$	66.1
Consumer laundry		(0.2	)		(0.2	)
Service parts		15.5			14.2
European Operations		15.7			6.0
Worldwide eliminations		0.1			(1.6	)
		107.9			84.5
Other manufacturing costs		(25.4	)		(27.1	)
Gross profit as reported	$	82.5		$	57.4
Depreciation and Amortization:
U.S. Operations	$	11.3		$	15.8
European Operations	$	2.9		$	0.6
Capital Expenditures:
U.S. Operations	$	4.9		$	3.9
European Operations	$	1.0		$	0.1
Assets:
U.S. Operations	$	484.2		$	487.5
European Operations	$	95.9		$	86.8

NOTE 16. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company follows the guidance of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 137, No. 138 and No. 139. SFAS No. 133 as amended requires the Company to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those instruments at fair value, and recognize changes in the fair value of derivatives in net income or other comprehensive income, as appropriate.

The Company recognized a loss reflecting changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps of $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and a loss of $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The Company recognized a loss reflecting changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps of $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to a loss of $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006.

24

During the third quarter of 2007, we entered into foreign exchange contracts with Fortis Bank NV to hedge a portion of our foreign exchange risk related to purchases by Alliance International BVBA from Alliance Laundry Systems LLC. The fair value of these foreign currency exchange contracts, which represents the amount that we would owe upon a settlement of these instruments, was sixty-two thousand dollars at September 30, 2007.

During the third quarter of 2007, we entered into commodity hedge contracts with LaSalle National Bank NA to hedge a portion of our nickel commodity risk related to stainless steel purchases by Alliance Laundry Systems LLC. The fair value of these commodity hedge contracts, which represents the amount that we would receive upon a settlement of these instruments, was $0.1 million at September 30, 2007.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESTATEMENT

As discussed more fully in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I, we have restated our previously reported consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the quarter ended March 31, 2007. This management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) should be read in conjunction with the restated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report and within our 2006 Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on October 26, 2007.

OVERVIEW

We believe that we are a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer in North America of commercial laundry equipment used in laundromats, multi-housing laundries and on-premise laundries. Under the well-known brand names of Speed Queen^®, UniMac^®, Huebsch^®, IPSO^®, and Cissell^®, we produce a full line of commercial washing machines and dryers with load capacities from 12 to 200 pounds. We have been a leader in the North American stand-alone commercial laundry equipment industry for more than ten years. With the addition of our European Operations and Alliance Laundry’s export sales to Europe, we believe that we are also a leader in the European stand-alone commercial laundry equipment industry.

The North American stand-alone commercial laundry equipment industry’s revenues are primarily driven by population growth and the replacement cycle of laundry equipment. With economic conditions having limited effect on the frequency of use, and therefore the useful life of laundry equipment, industry revenues have been relatively stable over time. Similarly, with a majority of our revenues generated by recurring sales of replacement equipment and service parts, we have experienced stable revenues even during economic slowdowns.

We have achieved steady revenues by building an extensive and loyal distribution network for our products, establishing a significant installed base of units and developing and offering a full innovative product line. As a result of our large installed base, a significant majority of our revenue is attributable to replacement sales of equipment and service parts.

We believe that continued population expansion in North America will continue to drive steady demand for garment and textile laundering by all customer groups that purchase commercial laundry equipment. We anticipate growth in demand for commercial laundry equipment in international markets as well, especially in

25

developing countries where laundry processing has historically been far less sophisticated than in North America. In addition, customers are increasingly trading up to equipment with enhanced functionality, thereby raising average selling prices. Customers are also moving toward equipment with increased water and energy efficiency as the result of government and consumer pressure and a focus on operating costs.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in this report. All dollar amounts are in thousands unless otherwise indicated.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Restatement of Financial Information. As previously disclosed on August 15, 2007, we were unable to file our Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 on a timely basis due to the continuance of procedures required to reconcile unvouched payables related to inventory and efforts to complete our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. Our review and evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures concluded that we did not maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2006, March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007. For additional information regarding our assessment of disclosure controls and procedures, see Item 4, “Controls and Procedures,” of this Form 10-Q and Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures,” of our 2006 Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on October 26, 2007.

As a result of management’s investigations, we identified errors in our reconciliation of unvouched payables related to inventory which resulted in the understatement of the Company’s accounts payable, inventory and cost of sales in previously reported financial statements. Consequently, management determined that our previously issued consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, and our condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, should be restated to correct for such errors and other departures from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q incorporate the effects of the adjustments associated with the correction of these errors. For further details regarding management’s investigations and restatement of financial results, see Note 2, “Restatement of Financial Statements,” which accompanies the financial statements in Item 1 of this report.

CLD Acquisition. On July 14, 2006 Alliance Laundry completed the acquisition of substantially all of Laundry System Group NV’s commercial laundry division (“CLD”) operations. Our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 include the acquired business’ performance. The comparative period for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 includes CLD performance subsequent to the July 14, 2006 acquisition.

Louisville, Kentucky Discontinuation and Portland, Tennessee Closure. On August 8, 2006 the Board of Directors of ALH resolved to discontinue the Louisville, Kentucky operations (the “Discontinuation”) and close the Portland, Tennessee facility (the “Closure”). The decision was based on an analysis of each location’s manufacturing capabilities as well as the continuing investment requirements for each of the locations. The Company substantially completed the Discontinuation and Closure as of December 31, 2006.

In connection with the CLD Acquisition, we have undertaken certain restructurings of the acquired business, including the Discontinuation and Closure referred to above. The following table summarizes the restructuring reserve, which is included within other current liabilities in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:

	Balance at December 31, 2006		Additions		Adjustments			Utilized Cash			Balance at September 30, 2007
One-time termination benefits	$	2,278	$	44	$	—		$	(683	)	$	1,639
Other labor related costs		116		429		—			(418	)		127
Relocation of tooling and equipment		706		—		(389	)		(317	)		—
Other related expenses		85		136		—			(221	)		—
	$	3,185	$	609	$	(389	)	$	(1,639	)	$	1,766

26

On October 31, 2006 the Company signed an agreement for the sale of its Portland facility for approximately $0.8 million, which approximated its carrying value. This transaction was completed in January 2007 and was subject to customary closing conditions.

Credit Agreement Amendment. On July 14, 2006 Alliance Laundry, Alliance Holdings, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as administrative agent and lender, and the other parties named therein as lenders, entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the credit agreement, dated as of January 27, 2005 (the “Credit Agreement”), among Alliance Laundry, Alliance Holdings, ALH Finance LLC, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as administrative agent, and the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto. The Amendment amends the Credit Agreement, under which the Company has outstanding $215.0 million of borrowings at September 30, 2007, to (i) provide for an additional $60.0 million of term loans under the Credit Agreement term loan facility; (ii) increase the revolving credit commitments to $55.0 million from $50.0 million under the Credit Agreement revolving credit facility; (iii) permit the acquisition of CLD; (iv) modify certain negative covenants in the Credit Agreement, including (a) adjusting the calculation of the consolidated leverage ratio, (b) adjusting the calculation of the consolidated interest coverage ratio, (c) increasing the annual ordinary course capital expenditures permitted by Alliance Laundry and its subsidiaries to $13.0 million from $10.0 million, for fiscal years 2007 through 2012, and (d) increasing the maximum permitted debt Alliance Laundry’s non-U.S. subsidiaries may incur without restriction to $5.0 million from $2.5 million; (v) revising the procedure for term loan borrowing; (vi) revising the term loan repayment schedule to require repayment in 22 quarterly installments of $0.6 million which commenced on September 30, 2006, and one installment of $222.1 million, or such lesser amount then outstanding, on January 27, 2012; and (vii) making conforming changes to the definitions contained therein. This Amendment did not affect interest rates charged under the Credit Agreement.

See the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of the MD&A for details of the Amendment and Waiver to the Senior Credit Facility dated September 10, 2007.

Marianna Facility Consolidation. On October 12, 2005 we announced our intention to close our Marianna, Florida facility (the “Facility”) and consolidate the manufacture and design of the Facility’s product lines into the Company’s existing Ripon, Wisconsin operations. The facility closure and transition was completed in 2006. The decision was based on an analysis of each facility’s manufacturing capabilities as well as the continuing investment requirements for each of the locations. We believe that efficiencies are being gained with the consolidation of the design and manufacturing of all of our U.S. based product lines within our Ripon, Wisconsin operations. For additional information about the Marianna, Florida facility closure, see Note 5 “Restructuring and Other Items.”

27

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth our consolidated net revenues for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006
	(Dollars in millions)
Net revenues:
Commercial laundry	$	84.8		$	70.4
Consumer laundry		4.3			4.0
Service parts		12.6			12.1
European Operations		18.6			16.7
Worldwide eliminations		(6.9	)		(8.1	)
	$	113.4		$	95.1

Net revenues. Net revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 increased $18.3 million, or 19.2%, to $113.4 million from $95.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. This increase was attributable to higher commercial laundry revenues of $14.4 million, higher consumer laundry revenue of $0.3 million, higher service parts revenue of $0.5 million, CLD Acquisition related sales of $1.9 million from the European Operations and lower worldwide sales eliminations of $1.2 million. The increase in commercial laundry revenues includes $11.2 million of higher North American commercial equipment revenue and $6.2 million of higher international revenue, partially offset by $2.4 million of lower net sales resulting from the acquisition of CLD’s U.S. operations and $0.6 million of lower earnings from our off-balance sheet equipment financing program. Base business revenue for North America, which excludes revenues from the CLD Acquisition, increased for coin-operated, on-premise laundry and multi-housing customers. Revenue for international customers was higher in Europe and the Middle East. The increase in service parts revenue includes $1.4 million of net sales resulting from the acquisition of CLD’s U.S. operations. The net revenue increases stated above include price increases of approximately $3.9 million for the U.S. operations.

Gross profit. Gross profit for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 increased $6.0 million, or 28.9%, to $26.9 million from $20.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. This increase was due to $5.1 million of margins from increased sales volumes in the base business, $3.9 million of price increases in the base business, $0.6 million of labor efficiency from the Marianna facility consolidation, $0.4 million of lower depreciation expense in the U.S. operations and $0.4 million of gross profit from the European Operations. Additionally, the prior year included $2.7 million of expense related to an inventory step-up to fair market value recorded as part of the CLD Acquisition and $0.5 million of Marianna transition related inefficiencies, with no similar expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. These increases in gross profit were offset by $0.6 million of lower earnings from our off-balance sheet equipment financing program and $7.0 million of higher raw material costs and product distribution costs within the base business. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues increased to 23.7% for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 from 21.9% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 increased $2.7 million, or 20.9%, to $15.7 million from $13.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was due primarily to an increase of $0.8 million in non-cash compensation, $0.7 million of increased selling, general and administrative expense resulting from the CLD Acquisition, $0.6 million of investigatory and audit costs

28

related to the restatements, $0.7 million of increased selling and marketing expenses in the base business to support the sales growth and $0.5 million of higher product engineering expense in the base business and $0.3 million of costs related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. Selling, general and administrative expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 includes costs related to the transfer of production lines from Marianna, Florida to Ripon, Wisconsin of $0.9 million, with no similar costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. As a result of these factors, selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of net revenues increased to 13.9% for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 13.7% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

Securitization, impairment and other costs. Securitization, impairment and other costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 decreased $1.6 million, or 98.1%, to $32.0 thousand from $1.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Securitization, impairment and other costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 are comprised of $1.6 million of Marianna plant closure costs. Securitization, impairment and other costs as a percentage of net revenues was 1.7% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

Operating income. As a result of the foregoing, operating income for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 increased $4.9 million, to operating income of $11.1 million compared to $6.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Operating income as a percentage of net revenues increased to 9.8% for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 6.5% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

Interest expense. Interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 decreased $0.2 million, or 1.9%, to $9.4 million from $9.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Interest expense in 2007 includes an unfavorable non-cash adjustment of $0.4 million to reflect adjustments in the fair values of an interest rate swap agreement. Under a previous interest rate swap agreement, 2006 interest expense included an unfavorable non-cash adjustment of $0.8 million. Interest expense as a percentage of net revenues decreased to 8.3% for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 10.1% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

Other expense, net. Other expense, net for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of $0.1 million consists of a mark to market loss related to two foreign exchange hedge agreements. The agreements were entered to control the foreign exchange risk associated with the initial acquisition price of CLD. There were no similar costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.

Income tax provision. The provision for income taxes for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 was $0.5 million as compared to a provision of $0.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The effective income tax rate was 30.3% for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as compared to negative 15.2% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The effective rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was significantly impacted by a federal manufacturer’s tax credit for energy efficient topload and frontload washers.

Net income (loss). As a result of the foregoing, our net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 was $1.2 million as compared to a net loss of $4.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Net income as a percentage of net revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 was a positive 1.1% as compared to a negative 4.2% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

29

The following table sets forth our consolidated net revenues for the periods indicated:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2007			September 30, 2006
	(Dollars in millions)
Net revenues:
Commercial laundry	$	231.6		$	200.1
Consumer laundry		15.5			10.8
Service parts		39.1			34.0
European Operations		61.3			16.7
Worldwide eliminations		(20.6	)		(8.1	)
	$	326.9		$	253.5

Net revenues. Net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased $73.4 million, or 28.9%, to $326.9 million from $253.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This increase was attributable to higher commercial laundry revenues of $31.5 million, higher consumer laundry revenue of $4.7 million, higher service parts revenue of $5.1 million and higher revenue of $44.6 million from the European Operations due to the CLD Acquisition, offset by $12.5 million of worldwide sales eliminations. The increase in commercial laundry revenues includes $16.2 million of higher North American commercial equipment revenue, $9.6 million of higher international revenue, $4.4 million of higher net sales resulting from the acquisition of CLD’s U.S. operations, and $1.2 million of higher earnings from our off-balance sheet equipment financing program. Revenue for North America was lower for the discontinued Ajax equipment product line, with revenue increases for coin-operated, on-premise laundry, and multi-housing customers. Revenue for international customers was higher in Europe, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East. The increase in consumer laundry revenue was due to continued growth in the number of retailers and sales per retailer. The increase in service parts revenue includes $4.6 million of net sales resulting from the acquisition of CLD’s U.S. operations. The net revenue increases stated above include price increases of approximately $10.6 million for the U.S. operations.

Gross profit. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased $25.1 million, or 43.8%, to $82.5 million from $57.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This increase was due to higher gross profit of $14.8 million from the European Operations due to the CLD Acquisition, $10.6 million of price increases in the U.S. operations, $1.8 million of increased gross profit resulting from CLD’s U.S. operations, $4.2 million of lower depreciation expense in the U.S. operations and $2.5 million of margins related to the higher service parts sales. Additionally, within the base business, gross profit increased due to $7.1 million of margins from increased sales volume and $1.2 million of higher earnings from our off-balance sheet equipment financing program. These increases in gross profit were offset by $0.7 million of increased medical costs and $16.4 million of higher raw material costs, product distribution costs and warranty expense within the base business. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues increased to 25.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from 22.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased $11.0 million, or 29.7%, to $47.8 million from $36.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was due primarily to approximately $8.2 million of increased selling, general and administrative expense resulting from the CLD Acquisition, an increase of $1.5 million in non-cash compensation, $1.4 million of increased base business engineering costs to support new and improved products, $1.4 million of selling and marketing costs to support increased base business sales and $1.2 million of investigatory and audit costs related to the restatements. Selling, general and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 includes $0.1 million of costs related to the transfer of production lines from Marianna, Florida to Ripon,

30

Wisconsin, compared to $2.6 million of similar costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. As a result of these factors, selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of net revenues increased to 14.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 14.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Securitization, impairment and other costs. Securitization, impairment and other costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 decreased $4.8 million, or 86.0%, to $0.8 million from $5.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Securitization, impairment and other costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are comprised of $0.8 million related to Marianna plant closure costs. Securitization, impairment and other costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 included a $1.4 million impairment charge related to a reduction in the value of the Ajax trademark and $4.2 million related to Marianna plant closure costs. Securitization, impairment and other costs as a percentage of net revenues decreased to 0.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 2.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Operating income. As a result of the foregoing, operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased $18.9 million, to operating income of $33.9 million compared to $15.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Operating income as a percentage of net revenues increased to 10.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 5.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Interest expense. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased $3.1 million, or 13.3%, to $25.9 million from $22.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Interest expense in 2007 includes an unfavorable non-cash adjustment of $0.7 million to reflect adjustments in the fair values of an interest rate swap agreement. Under a previous interest rate swap agreement, 2006 interest expense included an unfavorable non-cash adjustment of $0.2 million. The remaining interest expense increase of $2.6 million was primarily attributable to higher interest rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and interest related to an increase in the amount outstanding under our Senior Credit Facility to fund the CLD Acquisition. Interest expense as a percentage of net revenues decreased to 7.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 9.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Other expense, net. Other expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 of $0.5 million consists of a mark to market loss related to two foreign exchange hedge agreements. The agreements were entered to control the foreign exchange risk associated with the initial acquisition price of CLD. There were no similar costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Income tax provision (benefit). The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $2.6 million, as compared to a benefit of $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The effective income tax rate was 32.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to 12.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was significantly impacted by a federal manufacturer’s tax credit for energy efficient topload and frontload washers.

Net income (loss). As a result of the foregoing, our net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $5.4 million as compared to a net loss of $7.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Net income as a percentage of net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was a positive 1.7% as compared to a negative 2.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

31

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations and potential borrowings under our $55.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. Our principal uses of liquidity are to meet debt service requirements, finance our capital expenditures and provide working capital. We expect that capital expenditures in 2007 will not exceed $10.0 million. The aggregate scheduled maturities of long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations in subsequent years, after giving effect to the $60.0 million of additional term loans received in July of 2006, and after giving effect to the scheduled payments and $9.0 million of voluntary prepayments made year to date through September 30, 2007, are as follows:

Year	Long-term Debt		Capital Lease Obligation		Amount Due
2007	$	31	$	115	$	146
2008		669		463		1,132
2009		2,591		470		3,061
2010		2,563		412		2,975
2011		2,199		4		2,203
Thereafter		357,853		—		357,853
	$	365,906	$	1,464	$	367,370

The Senior Credit Facility and the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to dispose of assets, repay other indebtedness, incur liens, make capital expenditures and make certain investments or acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidation and otherwise restrict our operating activities. In addition, under the Senior Credit Facility, the Company is required to satisfy specified financial ratios and tests, including a maximum of total debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement governing the Senior Credit Facility) and a minimum interest coverage ratio.

The Senior Credit Facility requires us to comply with certain financial ratios and tests in order to comply with the terms of the agreement. The occurrence of any default of these covenants could result in acceleration of our obligations under the Senior Credit Facility ($215.0 million at September 30, 2007) and foreclosure on the collateral securing such obligations. Further, such an acceleration would constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes.

On September 10, 2007, the Company entered into an amendment and waiver (the “Amendment and Waiver”) to the Company’s Senior Credit Facility. Among other things, the Amendment and Waiver waives, until November 13, 2007, the Company’s failure to timely provide its financial statements to the Administrative Agent for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007. The required financial statements were provided to the Administrative Agent on November 12, 2007. Waivers related to defaults arising from any potential restatement of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006, September 30, 2006 and March 31, 2007, are not subject to expiration.

The Amendment and Waiver also increases the consolidated leverage ratio used in the Senior Credit Facility by 0.25 from 5.75 to 1.00 to 6.00 to 1.00 for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2007. The Amendment and Waiver also provides a 25 basis point increase in the applicable interest rate under the Senior Credit Facility (subject to adjustment for certain ratings events) and provides for a 1% prepayment fee in the event the term loans under the Senior Credit Facility are refinanced at a lower rate during the twelve months following the effective date of the Amendment and Waiver.

32

As a result of the Amendment and Waiver, the Company incurred fees of $0.7 million which are included in interest expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

At September 30, 2007, there were no borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. At September 30, 2007 letters of credit issued on our behalf under the Revolving Credit Facility totaled $33.0 million. At September 30, 2007 we had $22.0 million of our existing $55.0 million Revolving Credit Facility available, subject to certain limitations under the Senior Credit Facility. After considering such limitations, which relate primarily to the maximum ratio of consolidated debt to Adjusted EBITDA, we could have borrowed $20.0 million at September 30, 2007 in additional indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The maximum ratio of consolidated debt to Adjusted EBITDA under the Senior Credit Facility is 5.75 at September 30, 2007. We are in compliance with this and all other debt related covenants as of September 30, 2007. We believe, based on currently available information, that for the foreseeable future, cash flows from operations, together with available borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet our anticipated requirements for capital expenditures, working capital, interest payments, scheduled principal payments and other debt repayments while achieving all required covenant requirements under the Senior Credit Facility and Senior Subordinated Notes.

The Senior Credit Facility, after giving effect to the $60.0 million of additional term loans received in July of 2006, is repayable in the following aggregate annual amounts:

Year	Amount Due
2007	$	—
2008		550
2009		2,199
2010		2,199
2011		2,199
Thereafter		207,853
	$	215,000

The Senior Credit Facility is also subject to mandatory prepayment with the proceeds of certain debt incurrences, asset sales and a portion of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility). The Revolving Credit Facility will terminate on January 27, 2011.

Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal or to refinance our indebtedness, or to pay the interest or liquidated damages, if any thereon, or to fund planned capital expenditures, will depend upon our future performance, which, in turn, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors that are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that our business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures after satisfying certain liabilities arising in the ordinary course of business. If unable to do so, we may be required to refinance all or a portion of our debt, to sell assets or to obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that any such refinancing would be available or that any such sales of assets or additional financing could be obtained.

Our Asset Backed Facility provides for a total of $330.0 million in off-balance sheet financing for trade receivables and equipment loans. We have structured, and intend to continue to structure, the finance programs in a manner that qualifies for off-balance sheet treatment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. It is expected that under the Asset Backed Facility, we will continue to act as originator and servicer of the equipment financing promissory notes and the trade receivables.

33

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

One of our two principal sources of liquidity is potential borrowings under the $55.0 million Revolving Credit Facility under our Senior Credit Facility. We have presented EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA below because certain covenants in our Senior Credit Facility are tied to ratios based on these measures. “EBITDA” represents net income (loss) before interest expense, income tax provision (benefit) and depreciation and amortization (including non-cash interest income), and “Adjusted EBITDA” (as defined under the Senior Credit Facility) is EBITDA as further adjusted to exclude, among other things, certain non-recurring expenses and other non-recurring non-cash charges, which are further defined in our Senior Credit Facility. The Senior Credit Facility requires us to satisfy a maximum Consolidated Total Debt (as defined under the Senior Credit Facility) to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of 5.75 to 1.00 and a minimum Adjusted EBITDA to Consolidated Cash Interest Expense (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility) of 2.00 to 1.00. As of September 30, 2007 our Consolidated Total Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio was 5.45 to 1.00 and our Adjusted EBITDA to Consolidated Cash Interest Expense ratio was 2.18 to 1.00. To the extent that we fail to maintain either of these ratios within the limits set forth in the Senior Credit Facility, our ability to access amounts available under our Revolving Credit Facility would be limited, our liquidity would be adversely affected and our obligations under the Senior Credit Facility could be accelerated. In addition, any such acceleration would constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes (the “Notes Indenture”), and such an event of default under the Notes Indenture could lead to an acceleration of our obligations under the Senior Subordinated Notes.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and should not be considered, an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations, as determined by GAAP, and our calculations thereof may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies.

We have presented in the tables below a calculation of Consolidated Total Debt and Consolidated Cash Interest Expense, in each case, as defined in the Senior Credit Facility. The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Senior Credit Facility) set forth in the tables below uses as its starting point EBITDA and, as noted in the preceding paragraph, EBITDA represents net income (loss) before interest expense, income tax provision (benefit) and depreciation and amortization (including non-cash interest income). The calculations set forth below for Adjusted EBITDA and Consolidated Cash Interest Expense are, in each case, for the four fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2007.

34

The following table presents a calculation of the Consolidated Total Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio and the Adjusted EBITDA to Consolidated Cash Interest Expense ratio:

	Quarter Ended December 31, 2006 (Restated)			Quarter Ended March 31, 2007 (Restated)			Quarter Ended June 30, 2007			Quarter Ended September 30, 2007			Total
EBITDA	$	15,456		$	14,773		$	16,335		$	15,445		$	62,009
Finance program adjustments (a)		—			(822	)		(77	)		(595	)		(1,494	)
Other non-recurring charges (b)		1,181			752			716			668			3,317
Other non-cash charges (c)		222			972			832			902			2,928
Adjusted EBITDA	$	16,859		$	15,675		$	17,806		$	16,420		$	66,760
													September 30, 2007
Revolving Credit Facility														—
Senior Credit Facility														215,000
Senior Subordinated Notes														149,500
Other long-term debt and capital lease obligations														2,370
Unrestricted cash held by foreign subsidiaries (d)														(3,000	)
Consolidated Total Debt													$	363,870
Consolidated Total Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio														5.45
	Quarter Ended December 31, 2006			Quarter Ended March 31, 2007			Quarter Ended June 30, 2007			Quarter Ended September 30, 2007			Total
Interest expense	$	8,344		$	8,336		$	8,125		$	9,410		$	34,215
Non-cash interest		(644	)		(816	)		(597	)		(921	)		(2,978	)
Interest on letters of credit and permitted receivables financing		(221	)		(227	)		(231	)		(414	)		(1,093	)
Interest income		103			89			109			162			463
Consolidated Cash Interest Expense	$	7,582		$	7,382		$	7,406		$	8,237		$	30,607
Adjusted EBITDA to Consolidated Cash Interest Expense ratio														2.18

(a) We currently operate an off-balance sheet commercial equipment finance program in which newly originated equipment loans are sold to qualified special-purpose bankruptcy remote entities. In accordance with GAAP, we are required to record gains/losses on the sale of these equipment based promissory notes. In calculating Adjusted EBITDA, management determines the cash impact of net interest income on these notes. The finance program adjustments are the difference between GAAP basis revenues (as prescribed by SFAS No. 125/140) and cash basis revenues.

(b) Other non-recurring charges are described as follows:

• Other non-recurring charges consist of $1.3 million of costs associated with the closure of the Marianna, Florida production facility which are included in the securitization, impairment and other costs line of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and $1.2 million of investigatory and audit costs related to the restatements, $0.4 million of costs related to the transfer of the Marianna, Florida product lines to Ripon, Wisconsin and a periodic accrual of $0.4 million under the one time retention bonus agreement with certain management employees, all of which are included in the selling, general and administrative expense line of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

35

Under the retention bonus agreement, the executives were entitled to receive special retention bonus awards upon the second anniversary of the closing date of the Alliance Acquisition. These amounts, totaling $2.3 million, were paid to the named executives in the quarter ended March 31, 2007.

(c) Other non-cash charges are described as follows:

• Other non-cash charges are comprised of $0.5 million of costs associated with the inventory step-up to fair market value recorded at the CLD Acquisition date, which are included in the cost of sales line of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, $1.0 million of non-cash impairment charges related to the LSG Customer Agreement, which are included in the securitization, impairment and other costs line of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and $1.4 million of non-cash incentive compensation expense related to management incentive stock options, which is included in the selling, general and administrative expense line of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(d) As defined in the Amendment, Consolidated Total Debt is the aggregate principal amount of all funded debt for the relevant period minus the lesser of $3.0 million or the aggregate amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents held by the foreign subsidiaries.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations

On June 28, 2005, Alliance Laundry Equipment Receivables Trust 2005-A (“ALERT 2005A”), a trust formed by Alliance Laundry Equipment Receivables 2005 LLC (“ALER 2005”), a special-purpose bankruptcy remote subsidiary of Alliance Laundry, entered into a $330.0 million asset backed securitization funding facility (the “Asset Backed Facility”) backed by equipment loans and trade receivables originated by Alliance Laundry. We will sell or contribute all of the trade receivables and certain of the equipment loans that we originate to ALER 2005, which in turn will transfer them to the trust.

Funding availability for trade receivables is limited to a maximum of $60.0 million, while funding for equipment loan Notes is limited to $330.0 million less the amount of funding outstanding for trade receivable Notes. Funding of the Notes is subject to certain advance rate and eligibility criteria standard for transactions of this type. After June 27, 2009 (or earlier in the event of a rapid amortization event, an event of default or the termination of the Asset Backed Facility by Alliance Laundry), ALERT 2005A will not be permitted to request new borrowings under the Asset Backed Facility and the outstanding borrowings will amortize over a period of up to nine years thereafter. As of September 30, 2007, the balance of variable funding notes due to lenders under the Asset Backed Facility for equipment loans was $232.2 million.

Additional advances under the Asset Backed Facility are subject to certain continuing conditions, including but not limited to (i) the absence of a rapid amortization event or event of default, as defined in the Asset Backed Facility primary documents; (ii) compliance by Alliance Laundry, as servicer, with certain covenants, including financial covenants and (iii) no event having occurred which materially and adversely affects the operations of Alliance Laundry. In addition, advances under the Asset Backed Facility in respect of fixed rate equipment loans are subject to limitations on the weighted average interest rate and the aggregate loan balance of all fixed rate equipment loans then held by ALERT 2005A.

The risk of loss resulting from default or dilution on the trade receivables and equipment loans is protected by credit enhancement, provided in the form of cash reserves, letters of credit and overcollateralization. The timely payment of interest and the ultimate payment of principal on the Asset Backed Facility are guaranteed by Ambac Assurance Corporation. All of the residual beneficial interests in ALERT 2005A and cash flows remaining from the pool of receivables and loans after payment of all obligations under the Asset Backed Facility will accrue to the benefit of Alliance Laundry. Except for amounts of the letters of

36

credit outstanding from time to time as credit enhancement, Alliance Laundry will provide no support or recourse for the risk of loss relating to default on the assets transferred to ALERT 2005A. The amount of the irrevocable letter of credit related to the Asset Backed Facility at September 30, 2007 was $31.3 million. Alliance Laundry, as servicer, will be paid an annual servicing fee equal to 1.0% of the aggregate balance of such trade receivables and equipment loans.

Cash Flows

Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of $13.2 million was driven by cash generated by operations of $23.3 million (net income adjusted for depreciation, amortization and other non-cash adjustments) offset by working capital requirements of $10.1 million. Cash used in operations included $0.9 million of costs associated with the closure of the Marianna, Florida facility and the transfer of production lines to the Ripon, Wisconsin facility. Working capital requirements for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased for inventories and accounts payable, with a decrease in working capital for current liabilities. The working capital investment in inventories increased by $8.9 million due to seasonal inventory increases, purchases of raw materials at special pricing and reductions in consigned inventory arrangements. Working capital in accounts payable improved at September 30, 2007 by $6.6 million due to the increased inventory purchases and reductions in consigned inventory arrangements in the third quarter. Other current liabilities decreased $2.4 million due to the payment of executive retention bonuses, management incentive bonuses and semi-annual interest payments on the Senior Subordinated Notes, partially offset by increases in operating reserves and worker’s compensation reserves during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 were $5.9 million and $4.0 million, respectively. Capital spending in the first nine months of 2007 was principally related to Ripon, Wisconsin space requirements for acquired service part inventories and manufacturing capacity, product enhancements and computer infrastructure requirements. Capital spending in the first nine months of 2006 was principally related to the transfer of the Marianna, Florida product lines to Ripon, Wisconsin, product enhancements and computer purchases.

Proceeds on the disposition of assets within the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 includes $0.8 million of proceeds from the sale of the Portland, Tennessee facility.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The FASB is expected to issue a statement that would amend and clarify SFAS No. 140 (and related implementation guidance). The proposed statement will address permitted activities of qualifying special-purpose entities, including the degree of discretion allowable in determining the terms of beneficial interests issued after inception, and whether certain transfers can meet the criteria for sale accounting under SFAS No. 140 if the transferor or any consolidated affiliate provides liquidity support for the transferee’s beneficial interests. As the proposed statement has not been issued, we are unable to determine the effects of the related transition provisions, if any, on our existing securitization entity. However, in the event that transfers to our existing Asset Backed Facility would no longer qualify as sales of financial assets in the future, we may recognize additional costs for a replacement facility or it may have other material financial statement effects. An exposure draft was issued in the third quarter of 2005 and a new exposure draft is anticipated in the second quarter of 2008.

37

In March 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” SFAS No. 156 amends certain aspects of SFAS No. 140 by requiring that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. SFAS No. 156 was effective for us on January 1, 2007 and did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006 the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The provisions of FIN 48 have been adopted and did not affect our consolidated financial statements. See Note 12, “Income Taxes,” for further discussion.

In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the company on January 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” SFAS No. 158 requires the recognition of a net liability or asset to report the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the balance sheet. The recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158 are effective as of December 31, 2007 as we do not have publicly traded equity securities. At this time, the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 158 on our consolidated financial position is being assessed.

In February 2007 the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value option permits a company to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. A company will report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings after adoption. Statement 159 will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are potentially exposed to market risk associated with changes in interest and foreign exchange rates. From time to time we may enter into derivative financial instruments to hedge our interest rate exposures and to hedge exchange rate fluctuations between United States dollars and foreign currencies. An instrument will be treated as a hedge if it is effective in offsetting the impact of volatility in our underlying exposures. We do not enter into derivatives for speculative purposes. There have been no material changes in our market risk exposures as compared to those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (file no. 333-56857), except as noted below.

38

Effective March 4, 2005 we entered into a $67.0 million interest rate swap agreement with The Bank of Nova Scotia to hedge a portion of our interest rate risk related to our term loan borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility. Under the swap, which matures on March 4, 2008, we pay a fixed rate of 3.81%, and receive or pay quarterly interest payments based upon the three month LIBOR rate. Under the swap, we received $0.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The fair value of this interest rate swap agreement, which represents the amount that we would receive upon a settlement of this instrument, was $0.5 million at September 30, 2007.

Effective July 21, 2006, we entered into a $13.0 million interest rate swap agreement with The Bank of Nova Scotia to hedge a portion of our interest rate risk related to our term loan borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility. Under the swap, which matures on March 4, 2009, we pay a fixed rate of 5.65%, and receive or pay quarterly interest payments based upon the three month LIBOR rate. Under the swap, we paid twenty-nine thousand dollars during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The fair value of this interest rate swap agreement, which represents the amount that we would pay upon a settlement of this instrument, was $0.2 million at September 30, 2007.

During the third quarter of 2007, we entered into foreign exchange contracts with Fortis Bank NV to hedge a portion of our foreign exchange risk related to purchases by Alliance International BVBA from Alliance Laundry Systems LLC. The fair value of these foreign currency exchange contracts, which represents the amount that we would owe upon a settlement of these instruments was sixty-two thousand dollars at September 30, 2007.

During the third quarter of 2007, we entered into commodity hedge contracts with LaSalle National Bank NA to hedge a portion of our nickel commodity risk related to stainless steel purchases by Alliance Laundry Systems LLC. The fair value of these commodity hedge contracts, which represents the amount that we would receive upon a settlement of these instruments was $0.1 million at September 30, 2007.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of September 30, 2007. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures, and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.

As a result of the internal investigations conducted by management and the audit committee of the Board of Directors, and based on their evaluation, our Chief Financial Officer and our Chief Executive Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2007 because of the material weakness described below. Notwithstanding this material weakness, our management, including our Chief Financial Officer and our Chief Executive Officer, have concluded that our condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods covered by and included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are fairly stated in all material respects in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for each of the periods presented.

39

In connection with the assessment described above, management has identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, related to ineffective controls over the completeness and accuracy of unvouched payables and related transactions impacting inventory and cost of goods sold. The material weakness over the completeness and accuracy of unvouched payables is further described in the control deficiencies noted below:

1. We did not timely reconcile open receivers per our inventory management system with unvouched payables per our general ledger and such reconciliations were not adequately reviewed and validated. In addition, the procedures documenting the reconciliation of unvouched payables were not adequate.

2. We did not maintain sufficient personnel within the manufacturing accounting area with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of GAAP commensurate with our financial accounting and reporting requirements. This deficiency resulted in a material error in the accounting for unvouched payables related to the receipt of inventories.

3. We did not maintain effective policies and procedures relating to the computation of unvouched payables. Specifically, our policies and procedures did not provide for sufficient review and validation of the underlying assumptions and methodologies utilized in determining consignment inventory and unvouched payables.

These control deficiencies resulted in the misstatement of our unvouched payables and related transactions impacting inventory and cost of goods sold and related financial disclosures, and in the restatement of consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, each of the quarters of 2006 and the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. Additionally, these control deficiencies could result in misstatements of the aforementioned accounts and related disclosures that would result in a material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management has determined that these control deficiencies constitute a material weakness.

Plan for Remediation of Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company is currently in the process of developing and implementing remediation plans to address its material weakness. Specific remedial actions that have been or are being taken for each of the deficiencies that comprise the material weakness described above are as follows:

1. Establishment of requirements for timely reconciliation of unvouched payables, including:

• Hiring additional technical accounting personnel to address accounting and financial reporting requirements.

• During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, documented reconciliation processes and adequately trained the appropriate accounting personnel.

• Implementing a process that ensures the timely review and approval of accounting transactions by qualified accounting personnel.

• Requiring that analyses of all significant non-routine transactions be reviewed by senior management.

• Developing improved monitoring controls in the accounting department.

40

2. Improving technical accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles, including:

• During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, replaced the Plant Controller and hired a Cost Manager for the Ripon, Wisconsin manufacturing facility to address plant accounting and financial reporting requirements.

• Assessing the technical accounting capabilities of its personnel to ensure the right complement of knowledge, skills and training.

• Training technical accounting personnel on new policies and procedures related to unvouched payables.

3. Update the computation of unvouched payables and consignment inventory, including:

• Creating an enhanced database that more closely measures open receivers for inventory receipts and items cleared to vouched payables.

• During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, implemented new policies and procedures requiring a detailed and comprehensive review of the underlying information supporting the amounts removed from unvouched payables for consignment inventory.

• During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, enhanced communication and collaboration between the accounting department and the purchasing department.

• During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, separated inter-plant transfer and purchased finished goods receipts into separate accounts to facilitate control and monitoring activities.

• Assigning monitoring and control activities to the new Plant Controller and upgrading the accounting function through the hiring of additional accountants with relevant experience.

There have been changes as identified above in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, in paragraph 4 of such certifications, information concerning our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Such certifications should be read in conjunction with the information contained in this Item 4 “Controls and Procedures,” for a more complete understanding of the matters covered by such certifications.

We are continuing to perform the systems and process evaluation testing of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in order to allow management to report on the internal control over financial reporting which will be required for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

With the exception of the reported actual results, the information presented herein contains predictions, estimates or other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, including items specifically discussed in the “Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies” section of this document. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of our business to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “plan,” “seek,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe” or “continue” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. Although we believe that our plans, intentions

41

and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that such plans, intentions, expectations, objectives or goals will be achieved. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those included in forward-looking statements include: impact of competition; continued sales to key customers; possible fluctuations in the cost of raw materials and components; possible fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which affect the competitiveness of our products abroad; possible fluctuation in interest rates, which affects our earnings and cash flows; the impact of substantial leverage and debt service on us; possible loss of suppliers; risks related to our asset backed facility; dependence on key personnel; labor relations; potential liability for environmental, health and safety matters; potential future legal proceedings and litigation and other risks listed from time to time in our reports, including but not limited to our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (file no. 333-56857) filed with the SEC on October 26, 2007. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements contained in this report might not prove to be accurate and you should not place undue reliance upon them. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future results or otherwise. We do not undertake any obligation to update any such forward-looking statements unless required by law.

42

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings. Incorporated by reference from Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors. No material changes to the risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. Not Applicable.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities. None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. None.

Item 5. Other Information. None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

a) List of Exhibits.

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

43

SIGNATURES

Alliance Laundry Systems LLC has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ THOMAS F. L’ESPERANCE Thomas F. L’Esperance	Chief Executive Officer	11-13-07
/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS Bruce P. Rounds	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	11-13-07

Alliance Laundry Corporation has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ THOMAS F. L’ESPERANCE Thomas F. L’Esperance	Chief Executive Officer	11-13-07
/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS Bruce P. Rounds	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	11-13-07

Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ THOMAS F. L’ESPERANCE Thomas F. L’Esperance	Chief Executive Officer	11-13-07
/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS Bruce P. Rounds	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	11-13-07

44