XML 24 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Buildings and Land Held for Sale
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Property, Plant and Equipment Impairment or Disposal [Abstract]  
Disclosure of Long Lived Assets Held-for-sale
Buildings and Land Held and Used

In 2014, Lexicon reclassified its buildings and land in The Woodlands, Texas to assets held for sale on its consolidated balance sheet, as it intended to sell these assets. In 2015, Lexicon began negotiations with a commercial developer (the “Purchaser”) to enter into a sales agreement, which would include a leaseback component, requiring a change to Lexicon’s original plan of sale. This resulted in reclassification of its buildings and land to assets held and used in accordance with the accounting guidance regarding selling assets with a leaseback requirement.

In January 2016, Lexicon entered into a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Real Estate Agreement”) with the Purchaser. Under the Real Estate Agreement, Lexicon agreed to sell these assets to the Purchaser for a purchase price of $21.2 million, subject to the negotiation and execution by the parties of a leaseback agreement with respect to a portion of the property. In March 2016, the Purchaser terminated the Real Estate Agreement due to uncertainty in real estate and financing market conditions. Lexicon intends to explore other strategic alternatives with respect to its strategy to reduce facilities costs, including the potential sale of the facilities to an alternative third party. Due to the likelihood that any sale will require a leaseback of a portion of the property, the buildings and land remain classified as assets held and used as of June 30, 2016.

When events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of property and equity and intangible or other long-lived assets related to specifically acquired assets may not be recoverable, an evaluation of the recoverability of currently recorded costs is performed. When an evaluation is performed, the estimated value of undiscounted future net cash flows associated with the asset is compared to the assets carrying value to determine whether a write-down to fair value is required. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. The Company did not recognize any impairment of long-lived assets in the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.