XML 19 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
5 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]  
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
(4)   Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the accounting standard update (“ASU”) regarding when to perform step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. This ASU modifies step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the previously existing guidance, which required that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal year, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed results of operations and financial position.
     In October 2009, the FASB issued an ASU regarding revenue recognition for multiple deliverable arrangements. This method allows a vendor to allocate revenue in an arrangement using its best estimate of selling price if neither vendor specific objective evidence nor third party evidence of selling price exists. Accordingly, the residual method of revenue allocation will no longer be permissible. This ASU must be adopted no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed results of operations and financial position.