XML 31 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Values
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements  
Fair Values
Note 17. Fair Values
 
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value
Certain of our assets and liabilities are measured at fair value either (i) on a recurring basis, as of each quarter-end, or (ii) on a nonrecurring basis, as a result of impairment or other events. Generally, loans held-for-sale, real estate held-for-sale, and interest rate swaps are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, while impaired loans and securities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These fair values are determined using a variety of inputs and methodologies, which are detailed below.
 
As discussed in Note 2, the “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures” Topic of the Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in determining fair value under GAAP, which includes the following classifications, in order of priority:
 
 
·
Level 1 generally includes only unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
 
 
·
Level 2 inputs are those which, other than Level 1 inputs, are observable for identical or similar assets or liabilities.
 
 
·
Level 3 inputs generally include anything which does not meet the criteria of Levels 1 and 2, particularly any unobservable inputs.
 
 
The following table summarizes our assets and liabilities, including those of CT Legacy REIT and our consolidated securitization vehicles, which are recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
 
         
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
         
Quoted Prices
   
Other
   
Significant
 
   
Total
   
in Active
   
Observable
   
Unobservable
 
   
Fair Value at
   
Markets
   
Inputs
   
Inputs
 
   
December 31, 2011
   
(Level 1)
   
(Level 2)
   
(Level 3)
 
Measured on a recurring basis:
                   
                         
CT Legacy REIT's loans held-for-sale
    $30,875       $—       $—       $30,875  
                                 
Securitization vehicles' real estate held-for-sale
    $10,342       $—       $—       $10,342  
                                 
CT Legacy REIT's interest rate hedge liabilities
    ($8,817 )     $—       ($8,817 )     $—  
Securitization vehicles' interest rate hedge liabilities
    ($24,942 )     $—       ($24,942 )     $—  
                                 
Measured on a nonrecurring basis:
                         
                                 
CT Legacy REIT's impaired loans: (1)
                         
Senior mortgages
    $11,638       $—       $—       $11,638  
Subordinate interests in mortgages
    19,335                   19,335  
Mezzanine loans
                       
      $30,973       $—       $—       $30,973  
                                 
Securitization vehicles' impaired securities held-to-maturity (2)
    $6,776       $—       $—       $6,776  
                                 
Securitization vehicles' impaired loans: (1)
                         
Senior mortgages
    $16,927       $—       $—       $16,927  
Subordinate interests in mortgages
    5,419                   5,419  
Mezzanine loans
    20,539                   20,539  
      $42,885       $—       $—       $42,885  
     
(1)
Loans receivable against which we have recorded a provision for loan losses as of December 31, 2011.
(2) 
Securities which were other-than-temporarily impaired during the three months ended December 31, 2011.
 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each type of asset and liability which was recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2011:
 
Loans held-for-sale: Loans held-for-sale are valued based on expected net proceeds from a sale of the asset.
 
Real estate held-for-sale: Real estate held-for-sale is valued based on expected proceeds from a sale of the asset.
 
Interest rate hedge liabilities: Interest rate hedges are valued using advice from a third party derivative specialist, based on a combination of observable market-based inputs, such as interest rate curves, and unobservable inputs such as credit valuation adjustments due to the risk of non-performance by both us and our counterparties. See Notes 10 and 11 for additional details on our interest rate hedges.
 
Impaired securities held-to-maturity: Securities which are other-than-temporarily impaired are generally valued by a combination of (i) obtaining assessments from third-party dealers and, (ii) in cases where such assessments are unavailable or, in the opinion of management, deemed not to be indicative of fair value, discounting expected cash flows using internal cash flow models and estimated market discount rates. In the case of internal models, expected cash flows of each security are based on management’s assumptions regarding the collection of principal and interest on the underlying loans and securities. The table above includes only securities which were impaired during the three months ended December 31, 2011. Previously impaired securities have been subsequently adjusted for amortization, and are therefore no longer reported at fair value as of December 31, 2011.
 
 
As of December 31, 2011, two of our consolidated securitization vehicles’ securities were other-than-temporarily impaired and therefore reported at fair value based on dealer valuations. One security had a 2005 vintage and was rated “D” by Standard and Poor, “Caa3” by Moody, and “CC” by Fitch Ratings, Inc. This security was valued at 33% of its face amount. The other security had a 2002 vintage and was rated “D” from Standard and Poor and “Caa1” from Moody. This security was valued at 37% of its face amount.
 
Impaired loans: The loans identified for impairment are collateral dependent loans. Impairment on these loans is measured by comparing management’s estimation of fair value of the underlying collateral to the book value of the respective loan. These valuations require significant judgments, which include assumptions regarding capitalization rates, leasing, creditworthiness of major tenants, occupancy rates, availability of financing, exit plan, loan sponsorship, actions of other lenders and other factors deemed necessary by management. The table above includes all impaired loans, regardless of the period in which impairment was recognized.
 
Additional details of CT Legacy REIT’s loans which were recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2011 are described below:
 
Senior mortgage loans: One of CT Legacy REIT’s senior mortgage loans with a principal balance of $24.7 million was reported at fair value as of December 31, 2011. This hotel loan matured in September 2011 and has a coupon of 2.0% per annum as of December 31, 2011.
 
Subordinate interests in mortgages: Three of CT Legacy REIT’s subordinate interests in mortgage loans with an aggregate principal balance of $83.8 million are reported at fair value as of December 31, 2011, including two hotel loans ($43.4 million), and one condominium loan ($40.4 million). These loans have a weighted average maturity of May 2013 and a weighted average coupon of 3.1% per annum as of December 31, 2011.
 
Mezzanine loans: One of CT Legacy REIT’s mezzanine loans with a principal balance of $152.3 million is reported at fair value as of December 31, 2011. This hotel loan matures in May 2012 and has a coupon of 3.7% per annum as of December 31, 2011.
 
Additional details of our consolidated securitization vehicles’ loans which were recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2011 are described below:
 
Senior mortgage loans: One of our consolidated securitization vehicles’ senior mortgage loans with a principal balance of $33.2 million was reported at fair value as of December 31, 2011, which is classified as a mixed-use/other loan. The loan has a maturity of May 2015 and a coupon of 2.3% per annum as of December 31, 2011.
 
Subordinate interests in mortgages: Eight of our consolidated securitization vehicles’ subordinate interests in mortgage loans with an aggregate principal balance of $108.6 million are reported at fair value as of December 31, 2011, including three hotel loans ($60.9 million), two office loans ($27.8 million), one multifamily loan ($5.5 million), one retail loan ($4.4 million) and one mixed-use/other loan ($10.2 million). The loans have a weighted average maturity of November 2011 and a weighted average coupon of 3.2% per annum as of December 31, 2011.
 
Mezzanine loans: Two of our consolidated securitization vehicles’ mezzanine loans with an aggregate principal balance of $96.2 million are reported at fair value as of December 31, 2011, including one hotel loans ($75.5 million) and one retail loan ($20.7 million). The loans have a weighted average maturity of May 2011 and a weighted average coupon of 2.8% per annum as of December 31, 2011.
 
 
 
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs (in thousands):
 
   
Loans
   
Real Estate
 
   
Held-for-Sale
   
Held-for-Sale
 
December 31, 2010
    $5,750       $8,055  
Loan Satisfactions
    (5,750 )      
Transfer from loans receivable
    32,331        
Consolidation of additional securitization vehicles
          3,342  
                 
Adjustments to fair value included in earnings:
               
Valuation allowance on loans held-for-sale
    (1,456 )      
Impairment of real estate held-for-sale
          (1,055 )
                 
December 31, 2011
    $30,875       $10,342  
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In addition to the above disclosures for assets and liabilities which are recorded at fair value, GAAP also requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the statement of financial position, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the estimated market discount rate and the estimated future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. Rather, these fair values reflect the amounts that management believes are realizable in an orderly transaction among willing parties. These disclosure requirements exclude certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments.
 
 
The following table details the carrying amount, face amount, and approximate fair value of the financial instruments described above:
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
                               
(in thousands)
 
December 31, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
   
Carrying
Amount
   
Face
Amount
   
Fair
Value
   
Carrying
Amount
   
Face
Amount
   
Fair
Value
 
Financial assets:
                                   
Cash and cash equivalents
    $34,818       $34,818       $34,818       $24,449       $24,449       $24,449  
Securities held-to-maturity
                      3,455       36,015       5,518  
Loans receivable, net
    19,282       19,282       17,354       606,318       979,057       499,176  
                                                 
CT Legacy REIT
                                               
Restricted cash
    12,985       12,985       12,985                    
Securities held-to-maturity
    2,602       29,251       1,638                    
Loans receivable, net
    206,514       435,973       180,439                    
                                                 
Securitization Vehicles
                                               
Securities held-to-maturity
    358,972       490,940       350,180       504,323       594,434       475,272  
Loans receivable, net
    612,598       815,716       570,936       2,891,379       3,147,755       2,548,715  
                                                 
Financial liabilities:
                                               
Repurchase obligations
                      372,582       372,680       372,680  
Senior credit facility
                      98,124       98,124       14,719  
Junior subordinated notes
                      132,190       143,753       2,875  
Secured notes
    7,847       7,847       6,436                    
Participations sold
    19,282       19,282       17,354       259,304       259,304       81,589  
                                                 
CT Legacy REIT
                                               
Repurchase obligations
    58,464       58,464       54,556                    
Mezzanine loan
    55,111       55,111       71,475                    
Participations sold
    97,465       97,465                          
                                                 
Securitization Vehicles
                                               
Securitized debt obligations
    1,211,407       1,210,992       767,619       3,621,229       3,620,446       2,717,787  
 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments, excluding those described above that are carried at fair value, for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
 
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount of cash on deposit and in money market funds is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value.
 
Securities held-to-maturity: These investments, other than securities that have been other-than-temporarily impaired, are recorded on a held-to-maturity basis and not at fair value. The fair values presented above have been estimated by a combination of (i) obtaining assessments from third party dealers and, (ii) in cases where such assessments are unavailable or, in the opinion of management, deemed not to be indicative of fair value, discounting expected cash flows using internal cash flow models and estimated market discount rates. The expected cash flows of each security are based on management’s assumptions regarding the collection of principal and interest on the underlying loans and securities.
 
Loans receivable, net: Other than impaired loans, these assets are recorded at their amortized cost and not at fair value. The fair values presented above were estimated by management taking into consideration factors including capitalization rates, leasing, occupancy rates, availability and cost of financing, exit plan, sponsorship, actions of other lenders and indications of market value from other market participants.
 
Restricted cash: The carrying amount of restricted is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value.
 
Secured notes: These notes are recorded at their total face balance and not at fair value. The fair value was estimated based on the rate at which a similar credit facility would be priced today.
 
Participations sold: These liabilities are recorded at their amortized cost and not at fair value. The fair values presented above are consistent with those presented for the related loan assets.
 
 
Repurchase obligations: These facilities are recorded at their total face balance and not at fair value. The fair value was estimated based on the rate at which a similar credit facility would be priced today.
 
Mezzanine loan: This instrument is recorded at its amortized cost and not at fair value. The fair value was estimated based on the rate at which a similar credit facility would be priced today.
 
Securitized debt obligations: These obligations are recorded at the face value of outstanding obligations to third parties and not at fair value. The fair values presented above have been estimated by obtaining assessments from third party dealers.