XML 12 R6.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS [Abstract]  
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
3. 
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On March 20, 2007, the Paul Bergeron Trust (“Bergeron”) commenced a derivative action on behalf of the Trust, in Suffolk County Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Bergeron joined the Trust and affiliated entities, including the Managing Shareholder and a person who is an officer of the Managing Shareholder, alleging that the allocation of the proceeds from the sale of certain assets of the Trust and affiliated entities was unfair. The complaint was later amended to substitute other parties as the derivative plaintiffs and to add a claim that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the Trust and The Ridgewood Power Growth Fund (“Growth Fund”) by forming affiliated funds to finance the expansion of underlying projects in which each of the Trust and Growth Fund had an interest, rather than using alternative financing, which allegedly resulted in a misallocation of sale proceeds. In 2011, the defendants agreed to a settlement agreement with the derivative plaintiffs. The defendants disputed the allegations, asserted that the financing transactions were fair and denied all wrongdoing, but agreed to a disposition of the matter, which included assigning to the derivative plaintiffs, on behalf of the Trust and Growth Fund, all of the defendants' rights and claims for coverage from, and any claims for damages against, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”), the Managing Shareholder's excess insurance carrier. In early 2012, the Court gave its final approval of the settlement. The Court did not determine the merits of the plaintiffs' allegations, rendered no verdict and the settlement agreement is not an admission of any of the facts alleged by the plaintiffs or of any wrongdoing by the defendants.

The derivative plaintiffs are responsible for the managing, and ultimate disposition, of any claims against Liberty, and as a result, the Managing Shareholder is not able to predict when there will be a resolution of the claims, or if such resolution will include a payment to the Trust and Growth Fund. In June 2012, the derivative plaintiffs filed an amended claim in Suffolk County Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, against Liberty, to pursue claims that were assigned as part of the above-mentioned settlement, including among other things, breach of contract. The plaintiffs are seeking the award of damages, interest, costs and attorney fees, as well as the authority to enforce the 2012 settlement agreement against Liberty. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which were heard by the Court in March 2013. In August 22, 2013, the Court issued a decision in favor of Liberty and ordered that the matter be dismissed. In October 2013, the plaintiffs appealed the decision. A hearing on the appeal was held in May 2015; the Managing Shareholder is unable to predict when the appeal will be decided or the outcome.