UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
or
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-24557
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
54-1874630 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
8270 Greensboro Drive, Suite 500 |
|
|
McLean, Virginia |
|
22102 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(703) 584-3400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
|
|
Accelerated filer x |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
31,961,777 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding as of May 5, 2014
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
29,211 |
|
$ |
18,285 |
| ||
Federal funds sold |
|
9,745 |
|
10,924 |
| ||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
38,956 |
|
29,209 |
| ||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
352,805 |
|
349,319 |
| ||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity (market value of $5,542 and $5,527 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively) |
|
6,351 |
|
6,477 |
| ||||
Investment securities - trading |
|
4,673 |
|
3,890 |
| ||||
Total investment securities |
|
363,829 |
|
359,686 |
| ||||
Other investments |
|
15,455 |
|
19,068 |
| ||||
Loans held for sale |
|
265,313 |
|
373,993 |
| ||||
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs |
|
2,345,702 |
|
2,040,168 |
| ||||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(29,093 |
) |
(27,864 |
) | ||||
Loans receivable, net |
|
2,316,609 |
|
2,012,304 |
| ||||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
27,000 |
|
20,389 |
| ||||
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
3,977 |
|
5,395 |
| ||||
Goodwill and intangibles, net |
|
37,390 |
|
10,144 |
| ||||
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
32,181 |
|
32,063 |
| ||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
42,627 |
|
31,979 |
| ||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,143,337 |
|
$ |
2,894,230 |
| ||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
534,064 |
|
$ |
433,749 |
| ||
Interest bearing deposits |
|
1,842,864 |
|
1,625,110 |
| ||||
Total deposits |
|
2,376,928 |
|
2,058,859 |
| ||||
Other borrowed funds |
|
382,854 |
|
475,232 |
| ||||
Mortgage funding checks |
|
6,474 |
|
6,528 |
| ||||
Escrow liabilities |
|
1,670 |
|
1,572 |
| ||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
|
22,966 |
|
31,507 |
| ||||
Total liabilities |
|
2,790,892 |
|
2,573,698 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock, $1 par value |
2014 |
2013 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shares authorized |
50,000,000 |
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shares issued and outstanding |
31,961,777 |
30,332,685 |
|
31,962 |
|
30,333 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
199,704 |
|
174,001 |
| ||||
Retained earnings |
|
113,055 |
|
111,323 |
| ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net |
|
7,724 |
|
4,875 |
| ||||
Total shareholders equity |
|
352,445 |
|
320,532 |
| ||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,143,337 |
|
$ |
2,894,230 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
24,890 |
|
$ |
21,009 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
2,477 |
|
4,555 |
| ||
Federal funds sold |
|
31 |
|
114 |
| ||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
3,085 |
|
2,393 |
| ||
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
39 |
|
56 |
| ||
Other investments |
|
138 |
|
79 |
| ||
Total interest income |
|
30,660 |
|
28,206 |
| ||
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deposits |
|
2,821 |
|
3,423 |
| ||
Other borrowed funds |
|
2,172 |
|
2,182 |
| ||
Total interest expense |
|
4,993 |
|
5,605 |
| ||
Net interest income |
|
25,667 |
|
22,601 |
| ||
Provision for loan losses |
|
1,926 |
|
(457 |
) | ||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
23,741 |
|
23,058 |
| ||
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
535 |
|
502 |
| ||
Loan fees |
|
212 |
|
219 |
| ||
Title insurance & other related income |
|
|
|
399 |
| ||
Investment fee income |
|
222 |
|
547 |
| ||
Realized and unrealized gains on mortgage banking activities |
|
7,383 |
|
6,327 |
| ||
Net realized gain on investment securities-trading |
|
169 |
|
38 |
| ||
Net realized loss on investment securities-available for sale |
|
(17 |
) |
|
| ||
Management fee income |
|
21 |
|
298 |
| ||
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
119 |
|
92 |
| ||
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate |
|
|
|
30 |
| ||
Other income |
|
24 |
|
22 |
| ||
Total non-interest income |
|
8,668 |
|
8,474 |
| ||
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Salary and benefits |
|
11,389 |
|
9,986 |
| ||
Occupancy |
|
2,630 |
|
2,081 |
| ||
Professional fees |
|
818 |
|
1,316 |
| ||
Depreciation |
|
966 |
|
745 |
| ||
Data processing & communications |
|
1,615 |
|
1,128 |
| ||
FDIC insurance premiums |
|
383 |
|
331 |
| ||
Mortgage loan repurchases and settlements |
|
|
|
62 |
| ||
Merger and acquisition expenses |
|
3,212 |
|
|
| ||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
200 |
|
49 |
| ||
Other operating expenses |
|
4,577 |
|
4,984 |
| ||
Total non-interest expense |
|
25,790 |
|
20,682 |
| ||
Income before income taxes |
|
6,619 |
|
10,850 |
| ||
Provision for income taxes |
|
2,329 |
|
3,670 |
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
4,290 |
|
$ |
7,180 |
|
Earnings per common share - basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Earnings per common share - diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic |
|
32,127 |
|
30,634 |
| ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted |
|
32,609 |
|
31,019 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
4,290 |
|
$ |
7,180 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period, net of tax expense of $1.7 million in 2014 and net of tax benefit of $857 thousand in 2013 |
|
2,988 |
|
(1,663 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Less: reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income net of tax benefit of $6 thousand in 2014 and $0 in 2013 |
|
11 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
2,999 |
|
(1,663 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $82 thousand in 2014 and net of tax expense of $460 thousand in 2013 |
|
(150 |
) |
854 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
7,139 |
|
$ |
6,371 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Income |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance, December 31, 2012 |
|
30,226 |
|
$ |
30,226 |
|
$ |
172,021 |
|
$ |
92,777 |
|
$ |
13,042 |
|
$ |
308,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Stock options exercised |
|
36 |
|
36 |
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Stock compensation expense, net of tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
366 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Dividends on common stock of $0.05 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,512 |
) |
|
|
(1,512 |
) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
(809 |
) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,180 |
|
|
|
7,180 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance, March 31, 2013 |
|
30,262 |
|
$ |
30,262 |
|
$ |
172,680 |
|
$ |
98,445 |
|
$ |
12,233 |
|
$ |
313,620 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2013 |
|
30,333 |
|
$ |
30,333 |
|
$ |
174,001 |
|
$ |
111,323 |
|
$ |
4,875 |
|
$ |
320,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Stock options exercised |
|
12 |
|
12 |
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Stock compensation expense, net of tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Shares issued from acquisition of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. |
|
1,617 |
|
1,617 |
|
25,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
26,808 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Dividends on common stock of $0.08 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,558 |
) |
|
|
(2,558 |
) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
2,849 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
4,290 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance, March 31, 2014 |
|
31,962 |
|
$ |
31,962 |
|
$ |
199,704 |
|
$ |
113,055 |
|
$ |
7,724 |
|
$ |
352,445 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
4,290 |
|
$ |
7,180 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation |
|
966 |
|
745 |
| ||
Amortization of premiums, discounts and intangibles |
|
267 |
|
(4 |
) | ||
Provision for loan losses |
|
1,926 |
|
(457 |
) | ||
Loans held for sale originated |
|
(562,594 |
) |
(1,508,921 |
) | ||
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale |
|
678,657 |
|
1,766,293 |
| ||
Realized and unrealized gains on mortgage banking activities |
|
(7,383 |
) |
(6,327 |
) | ||
Purchase of investment securities-trading |
|
(678 |
) |
(330 |
) | ||
Unrealized gain on investment securities-trading |
|
(169 |
) |
(38 |
) | ||
Unrealized loss on investment securities-available for sale |
|
17 |
|
|
| ||
Gain on sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
|
(30 |
) | ||
Stock compensation expense, net of tax benefits |
|
411 |
|
366 |
| ||
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
(119 |
) |
(92 |
) | ||
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
(7,218 |
) |
7,383 |
| ||
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable, escrow liabilities and other liabilities |
|
(10,986 |
) |
(4,880 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
97,387 |
|
260,888 |
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net purchases of premises and equipment |
|
75 |
|
(901 |
) | ||
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
10,617 |
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from maturity and call of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
1,500 |
|
469 |
| ||
Purchase of mortgage-backed secutiries available for sale |
|
(2,050 |
) |
|
| ||
Purchase of other investments |
|
(2,250 |
) |
(1 |
) | ||
Proceeds from the sale of other investments |
|
6,762 |
|
255 |
| ||
Redemptions of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
4,759 |
|
12,068 |
| ||
Redemptions of investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
125 |
|
575 |
| ||
Acquisitions, net of cash and cash equivalents |
|
36,472 |
|
|
| ||
Net increase (decrease) in loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs |
|
(67,959 |
) |
20,765 |
| ||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
(11,949 |
) |
33,230 |
| ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
22,865 |
|
(154,740 |
) | ||
Net decrease in other borrowed funds - short term |
|
(21,057 |
) |
(59,922 |
) | ||
Net increase (decrease) in mortgage funding checks |
|
(54 |
) |
(6,350 |
) | ||
Proceeds from FHLB advances |
|
75,000 |
|
|
| ||
Repayment of FHLB advances |
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
| ||
Stock options exercised |
|
113 |
|
329 |
| ||
Dividends on common stock |
|
(2,558 |
) |
(1,512 |
) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(75,691 |
) |
(222,195 |
) | ||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
9,747 |
|
71,923 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |
|
29,209 |
|
67,140 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
38,956 |
|
$ |
139,063 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest |
|
$ |
4,821 |
|
$ |
5,559 |
|
Income taxes |
|
3,703 |
|
3,451 |
| ||
Acquisition of noncash assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Assets acquired |
|
265,364 |
|
|
| ||
Liabilities assumed |
|
301,836 |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)
Note 1
Organization
Cardinal Financial Corporation (the Company or Cardinal) is incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia as a financial holding company whose activities consist of investment in its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The principal operating subsidiary of the Company is Cardinal Bank (the Bank), a state-chartered institution and its subsidiary, George Mason Mortgage, LLC (George Mason), a mortgage banking company based in Fairfax, Virginia. In addition to the Bank, the Company has one nonbank subsidiary, Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc. (CWS), an investment services subsidiary.
On January 16, 2014, the Company announced the completion of its acquisition of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. (UFBC), the holding company of The Business Bank (TBB), pursuant to a previously announced definitive merger agreement. The merger of UFBC into Cardinal was effective January 16, 2014. Under the terms of the merger agreement, UFBC shareholders received $19.13 in cash and 1.154 shares of the Companys common stock in exchange for each share of UFBC common stock they owned immediately prior to the merger. TBB, which was headquartered in Vienna, Virginia, merged into Cardinal Bank effective March 8, 2014 adding eight (8) banking locations in northern Virginia, one of the Companys target markets.
Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Regulation S-X, Article 10. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2014. The unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes to financial statements that are included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Note 2
Business Combinations
On January 16, 2014, the Company acquired UFBC, the holding company for The Business Bank, a commercial bank with approximately $356 million in assets, after purchase accounting adjustments, and 8 branches located within the northern Virginia region. For each share of UFBC common stock outstanding, the shareholders of UFBC received a fixed exchange ratio of $19.13 in cash and 1.154 shares of the Companys common stock. The total consideration for the acquisition was $54.3 million, which was comprised of $26.8 million in cash and 1.6 million shares of the Companys common stock.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company acquired all of the voting and common shares of UFBC Capital Trust I (the Trust), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary established for the sole purpose of issuing $5.0 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (trust preferred securities). These trust preferred securities are due in 2035 and have an interest rate of LIBOR (London Interbank Offering Rate) plus 2.10%, which adjusts quarterly. The Trust is an unconsolidated subsidiary
since the Company is not the primary beneficiary of this entity. The additional $155,000 that is payable by the Company to the Trust represents the Companys unfunded capital investment in the Trust.
Merger and acquisition expense was $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 which are primarily related to legal and accounting costs, contract termination expenses, system conversion and integration expenses, employee retention and severance payments.
The following table sets forth the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition at their estimated fair values as of the closing date of the transaction:
|
|
January 16, 2014 |
| |
|
|
(in thousands) |
| |
Assets acquired: |
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
63,313 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
16,278 |
| |
Loans |
|
238,272 |
| |
Premises and equipment |
|
7,652 |
| |
Accrued interest receivable |
|
522 |
| |
Goodwill |
|
24,706 |
| |
Other intangible assets |
|
2,740 |
| |
Other assets |
|
2,640 |
| |
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
356,123 |
|
Liabilities assumed: |
|
|
| |
Deposits: |
|
|
| |
Non-interest bearing |
|
90,206 |
| |
Savings, NOW and money market |
|
131,312 |
| |
Certificates of deposit |
|
73,686 |
| |
Total deposits |
|
295,204 |
| |
Junior subordinated debentures issued to Trust |
|
3,679 |
| |
Other liabilities |
|
2,953 |
| |
Total liabilities assumed |
|
$ |
301,836 |
|
Total consideration paid |
|
$ |
54,287 |
|
The fair value estimates are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the transaction if additional information relative to closing dates fair values becomes available. As the Company continues to analyze the acquired assets and liabilities, there may be adjustments recorded to the carrying values.
Fair Value Measurement of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
Below are the methods used to determine the fair values of the significant assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition.
Cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents was used as a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Investment securities available for sale. The estimated fair values of investment securities available-for-sale was based on reliable and unbiased evaluations by an industry-wide valuation service. This service uses evaluated pricing models that vary based on asset class and include available trade, bid, and other
market information. Generally, the methodology includes broker quotes, proprietary models, vast descriptive terms and conditions databases, as well as extensive quality control programs.
Loans. The acquired loan portfolio was segregated into one of two categories for valuation purposes: purchased credit impaired loans and performing loans. Purchased credit impaired loans were identified as those loans that were nonaccrual prior to the business combination and those loans that had been identified as potentially impaired. Potentially impaired loans were those loans that were identified during the credit review process where there was an indication that the borrower did not have sufficient cash flows to service the loan in accordance with its terms. Performing loans were those loans that were currently performing in accordance with the loan contract and do not appear to have any significant credit issues.
For loans that were identified as performing, the fair values were determined using a discounted cash flow analysis (the income approach). Performing loans were segmented into pools based on loan type (1-4 family residential, commercial, commercial owner occupied, construction and development), and further segmented based on payment type (fully amortizing, non-fully amortizing balloon, or interest only), rate type (fixed versus variable), and remaining maturity. The estimated cash flows expected to be collected for each loan was determined using a valuation model that included the following key assumptions: prepayment speeds, expected credit loss rates and discount rates. Prepayment speeds were influenced by many factors including, but not limited to, current yields, historic rate trends, payment types, interest rate type, and the duration of the individual loan. Expected credit loss rates were based on recent and historical default and loss rates observed for loans with similar characteristics, and further influenced by a credit review by management and a third party consultant on a selection of loans within the acquired portfolio. The discount rates used were based on rates market participants might charge for cash flows with similar risk characteristics at the acquisition date. The market rates were estimated using a build up approach which included assumptions with respect to loan servicing costs, interest rate volatility, and systemic risk, among other factors.
For loans that were identified as purchased credit impaired (PCI), either the above income approach was used or the asset approach was used. The income approach was used for PCI loans where there was an expectation that the borrower would more likely than not continue to pay based on the current terms of the loan contract. Management used the asset approach for all nonaccrual loans to reflect market participant assumptions. Under the asset approach, the fair value of each loan was determined based on the estimated values of the underlying collateral.
The methods used to estimate the Level 3 fair values of loans are extremely sensitive to the assumptions and estimates used. While management attempted to use assumptions and estimates that best reflected the acquired loan portfolios and current market conditions, a greater degree of subjectivity is inherent in these values than in those determined in active markets.
The difference between the fair value and the expected cash flows from acquired loans will be accreted to interest income over the remaining term of the loans in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. See Note 7 for further details.
Premises and equipment. The land and buildings acquired were recorded at fair value as determined by third party appraisals.
Other intangible assets. Other intangible assets consisting of core deposit intangibles (CDI) are measures of the value of non-interest checking, savings, interest-bearing checking, and money market deposits that are acquired in a business combination excluding certificates of deposit with balances over $250,000 and high yielding interest bearing deposit accounts, which the Company determines customer related intangible assets as non-existent. The fair value of the CDI stemming from any given business combination is based on the present value of the expected cost savings attributable to the core deposit funding, relative to an alternative funding source. The CDI is being amortized over an estimated useful life of 6.7 years to approximate the existing deposit relationships acquired.
Deposits. The fair values of deposit liabilities with no stated maturity (non-interest checking, savings, interest-bearing checking, and money market deposits) are equal to the carrying amounts payable on demand. The fair values of the certificates of deposit represent contractual cash flows, discounted to present value using interest rates currently offered by market participants on deposits with similar characteristics and remaining maturities.
Junior subordinated debentures issued to Trust. There is no active market for trust preferred securities issued by UFBC Capital Trust I; therefore, the fair value of junior subordinated debentures was estimated utilizing the income approach. Under the income approach, the expected cash flows over the remaining estimated life of the debentures were discounted at the prevailing market rate. The prevailing market rate was based on: (i) a third-party broker opinion; (ii) implied market yields for recent trust preferred sales; and (iii) new trust preferred issuances for instruments with similar long durations.
Note 3
Stock-Based Compensation
At March 31, 2014, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans, the 1999 Stock Option Plan (the Option Plan) and the 2002 Equity Compensation Plan (the Equity Plan).
In 1998, the Company adopted the Option Plan pursuant to which the Company may grant stock options for up to 625,000 shares of the Companys common stock to employees and members of the Companys and its subsidiaries boards of directors. As of November 23, 2008, the Option Plan expired, and therefore, there are no shares of common stock available to grant under this plan.
In 2002, the Company adopted the Equity Plan. The Equity Plan was amended in 2011 to increase the number of shares available under the plan and extend the term to 2021. The Equity Plan authorizes the granting of options, which may be incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, phantom stock awards and performance share awards to directors, eligible officers and key employees of the Company. There were 471,342 shares of the Companys common stock available for future grants and awards in the Equity Plan as of March 31, 2014.
Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the common stocks fair market value at the date of grant. Director stock options have ten year terms and vest and become fully exercisable at the grant date. Most employee stock options have ten year terms and vest and become fully exercisable in 20% increments beginning after their first year of service. Certain stock options granted to executive officers of the Company have ten year terms and vest in increments of 25% with immediate vesting of the first 25% on the date of grant and vesting of the remaining three increments on the anniversary date of the grant. Stock options granted to executive officers during the first quarter of 2014 have ten year terms with one-third of the options vested on the grant date and the remaining unvested options vesting over the next two years.
The Company has only made awards of stock options under the Option Plan and the Equity Plan.
Total expense related to the Companys share-based compensation plans for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $152,000 and $49,000, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share-based compensation arrangements was $51,000 and $17,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Options granted for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were 218,000 and 202,500, respectively. The weighted average per share fair value of stock option grants for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $5.60 and $5.96, respectively. The fair values of the options granted during all periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
Estimated option life |
|
6.5 Years |
|
6.5 Years |
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
2.17 - 2.34% |
|
1.23 - 1.43% |
|
Expected volatility |
|
37.40% |
|
39.50% |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
1.80% |
|
1.23% |
|
Expected volatility is based upon the average annual historical volatility of the Companys common stock. The estimated option life is derived from specific historical data to estimate the expected term of the option, such as employee option exercise and employee post-vesting departure behavior. The risk free interest rate is based upon the seven-year U.S. Treasury note rate in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield is based upon implied and historical dividend declarations.
Stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2014 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
| ||
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
| ||
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term (Years) |
|
Value |
| ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 |
|
1,011,553 |
|
$ |
12.03 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Granted |
|
218,000 |
|
16.83 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Exercised |
|
(12,210 |
) |
9.29 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Forfeited |
|
(1,800 |
) |
11.48 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at March 31, 2014 |
|
1,215,543 |
|
$ |
12.89 |
|
6.02 |
|
$ |
5,954,977 |
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2014 |
|
845,943 |
|
$ |
11.74 |
|
4.71 |
|
$ |
5,093,024 |
|
The intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and was $103,000 and $315,000, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Companys non-vested stock options and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2014 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
| |
|
|
|
|
Average |
| |
|
|
Number of |
|
Grant Date |
| |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2013 |
|
289,150 |
|
$ |
5.29 |
|
Granted |
|
218,000 |
|
5.60 |
| |
Vested |
|
(135,750 |
) |
5.30 |
| |
Forfeited |
|
(1,800 |
) |
4.45 |
| |
Balance at March 31, 2014 |
|
369,600 |
|
$ |
5.47 |
|
At March 31, 2014, there was $1.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years. The total fair value of shares that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $667,000 and $392,000, respectively.
Note 4
Segment Information
The Company operates in three business segments: commercial banking, mortgage banking, and wealth management services. As of June 30, 2013, the Company merged the remaining operations of its trust division and Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc., both of which had been included in the wealth management services segment, into CWS. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2013 include the operations of these subsidiaries.
The commercial banking segment includes both commercial and consumer lending and provides customers with such products as commercial loans, real estate loans, business financing and consumer loans. In addition, this segment provides customers with several choices of deposit products including demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The mortgage banking segment engages primarily in the origination and acquisition of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market on a best efforts basis. The wealth management services segment provides investment and financial advisory services to businesses and individuals, including financial planning, retirement/estate planning, and investment management.
Information about the reportable segments and reconciliation of this information to the consolidated financial statements at and for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Commercial |
|
Mortgage |
|
and |
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Banking |
|
Banking |
|
Trust Services |
|
Other |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
25,193 |
|
$ |
638 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
25,667 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
1,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,926 |
| ||||||
Non-interest income |
|
932 |
|
7,391 |
|
167 |
|
178 |
|
|
|
8,668 |
| ||||||
Non-interest expense |
|
15,792 |
|
8,293 |
|
112 |
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
25,790 |
| ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
2,895 |
|
(97 |
) |
19 |
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
2,329 |
| ||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,512 |
|
$ |
(167 |
) |
$ |
36 |
|
$ |
(1,091 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
3,095,847 |
|
$ |
321,958 |
|
$ |
2,301 |
|
$ |
387,898 |
|
$ |
(664,667 |
) |
$ |
3,143,337 |
|
Average Assets |
|
$ |
2,943,545 |
|
$ |
230,424 |
|
$ |
2,300 |
|
$ |
379,810 |
|
$ |
(534,206 |
) |
$ |
3,021,873 |
|
At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Commercial |
|
Mortgage |
|
and |
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Banking |
|
Banking |
|
Trust Services |
|
Other |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
22,397 |
|
$ |
398 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(194 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
22,601 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
(542 |
) |
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(457 |
) | ||||||
Non-interest income |
|
794 |
|
7,101 |
|
547 |
|
42 |
|
(10 |
) |
8,474 |
| ||||||
Non-interest expense |
|
10,052 |
|
9,201 |
|
677 |
|
762 |
|
(10 |
) |
20,682 |
| ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
4,599 |
|
(641 |
) |
(43 |
) |
(245 |
) |
|
|
3,670 |
| ||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,082 |
|
$ |
(1,146 |
) |
$ |
(87 |
) |
$ |
(669 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
7,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
2,748,303 |
|
$ |
563,798 |
|
$ |
2,373 |
|
$ |
331,641 |
|
$ |
(827,883 |
) |
$ |
2,818,232 |
|
Average Assets |
|
$ |
2,840,355 |
|
$ |
498,024 |
|
$ |
2,528 |
|
$ |
331,480 |
|
$ |
(825,615 |
) |
$ |
2,846,772 |
|
The Company did not have any operating segments other than those reported. Parent company financial information is included in the Other category and represents an overhead function rather than an operating segment. The parent companys most significant assets are its net investments in its
subsidiaries. The parent companys net interest expense is comprised of interest income from short-term investments and interest expense on trust preferred securities.
Note 5
Earnings Per Share
The following is the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. There were no antidilutive outstanding stock options excluded from the weighted average shares outstanding for the diluted earnings per share calculation for each of the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
(In thousands, |
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
except per share data) |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
4,290 |
|
$ |
7,180 |
|
Weighted average common shares - basic |
|
32,127 |
|
30,634 |
| ||
Weighted average common shares - diluted |
|
32,609 |
|
31,019 |
| ||
Earnings per common share - basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Earnings per common share - diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Weighted average shares for the basic earnings per share calculation is increased by the number of shares required to be issued under the Companys various deferred compensation plans. These plans provide for a Company match, such match must be in the common stock of the Company. Employees who participate in the Companys deferred compensation plans can allocate, at their discretion, their contributions to various investment options, including an option to invest in Company Common Stock. The incremental weighted average shares attributable to the deferred compensation plans included in diluted outstanding shares assumes the participants opt to invest all of their contributions into the Companys Common Stock investment option.
The following shows the composition of basic outstanding shares for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
31,686 |
|
30,242 |
|
Weighted average shares attributable to the deferred compensation plans |
|
441 |
|
392 |
|
Total weighted average shares - basic |
|
32,127 |
|
30,634 |
|
The following shows the composition of diluted outstanding shares for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic (from above) |
|
32,127 |
|
30,634 |
|
Incremental weighted average shares attributable to deferred compensation plans |
|
248 |
|
191 |
|
Weighted average shares attributable to stock options |
|
180 |
|
170 |
|
Incremental Shares from stock option plan |
|
54 |
|
24 |
|
Total weighted average shares - diluted |
|
32,609 |
|
31,019 |
|
Note 6
Investment Securities
The approximate fair value and amortized cost of investment securities at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are shown in the table below.
|
|
March 31, 2014 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
|
cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
value |
| ||||
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
U.S. government-sponsored agencies |
|
$ |
76,517 |
|
$ |
3,181 |
|
$ |
(731 |
) |
$ |
78,967 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
140,475 |
|
5,058 |
|
(11 |
) |
145,522 |
| ||||
Municipal securities |
|
115,585 |
|
4,946 |
|
(94 |
) |
120,437 |
| ||||
U.S. treasury securities |
|
4,998 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
5,007 |
| ||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,872 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
340,447 |
|
$ |
13,194 |
|
$ |
(836 |
) |
$ |
352,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
2,346 |
|
146 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
| ||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
(955 |
) |
3,050 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
6,351 |
|
$ |
146 |
|
$ |
(955 |
) |
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
|
cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
value |
| ||||
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
U.S. government-sponsored agencies |
|
$ |
75,562 |
|
$ |
2,914 |
|
$ |
(1,548 |
) |
$ |
76,928 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
144,609 |
|
3,566 |
|
(346 |
) |
147,829 |
| ||||
Municipal securities |
|
113,716 |
|
3,426 |
|
(404 |
) |
116,738 |
| ||||
U.S. treasury securities |
|
4,992 |
|
37 |
|
|
|
5,029 |
| ||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,795 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
341,674 |
|
$ |
9,943 |
|
$ |
(2,298 |
) |
$ |
349,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
2,472 |
|
145 |
|
|
|
2,617 |
| ||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
2,910 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
6,477 |
|
$ |
145 |
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
$ |
5,527 |
|
The fair value and amortized cost of investment securities by contractual maturity at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because many issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
March 31, 2014 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Available-for-Sale |
|
Held-to-Maturity |
| ||||||||
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
| ||||
Within One Year |
|
$ |
11,345 |
|
$ |
11,421 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
After 1 year but within 5 years |
|
34,980 |
|
36,612 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
After 5 years but within 10 years |
|
59,626 |
|
63,473 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
After 10 years |
|
94,021 |
|
95,777 |
|
4,005 |
|
3,050 |
| ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
140,475 |
|
145,522 |
|
2,346 |
|
2,492 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
340,447 |
|
$ |
352,805 |
|
$ |
6,351 |
|
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Available-for-Sale |
|
Held-to-Maturity |
| ||||||||
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
|
cost |
|
Value |
|
cost |
|
Value |
| ||||
Within One Year |
|
$ |
8,549 |
|
$ |
8,690 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
After 1 year but within 5 years |
|
30,120 |
|
31,672 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
After 5 years but within 10 years |
|
61,665 |
|
64,876 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
After 10 years |
|
96,731 |
|
96,252 |
|
4,005 |
|
2,910 |
| ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
144,609 |
|
147,829 |
|
2,472 |
|
2,617 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
341,674 |
|
$ |
349,319 |
|
$ |
6,477 |
|
$ |
5,527 |
|
The following table shows the Companys investment securities gross unrealized losses and their fair value, aggregated by investment category and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
At March 31, 2014
Investment Securities Available-for- |
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
| ||||||
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
$ |
29,878 |
|
$ |
(731 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
29,878 |
|
$ |
(731 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
781 |
|
(4 |
) |
319 |
|
(7 |
) |
1,100 |
|
(11 |
) | ||||||
Municipal securities |
|
7,371 |
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
7,371 |
|
(94 |
) | ||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
38,030 |
|
$ |
(829 |
) |
$ |
319 |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
$ |
38,349 |
|
$ |
(836 |
) |
Investment Securities Held-to- |
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
| ||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
$ |
(955 |
) |
$ |
3,050 |
|
$ |
(955 |
) |
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
$ |
(955 |
) |
$ |
3,050 |
|
$ |
(955 |
) |
At December 31, 2013
Investment Securities Available-for- |
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
| ||||||
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
$ |
38,554 |
|
$ |
(1,548 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
38,554 |
|
$ |
(1,548 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
46,563 |
|
(335 |
) |
318 |
|
(11 |
) |
46,881 |
|
(346 |
) | ||||||
Municipal securities |
|
30,452 |
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
30,452 |
|
(404 |
) | ||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
115,569 |
|
$ |
(2,287 |
) |
$ |
318 |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
$ |
115,887 |
|
$ |
(2,298 |
) |
Investment Securities Held-to- |
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
| ||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized loss |
| ||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,910 |
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
$ |
2,910 |
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,910 |
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
$ |
2,910 |
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
The Company completes reviews for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly. As of March 31, 2014, the majority of the investment securities portfolio consisted of securities rated AAA by a leading rating agency. Investment securities which carry a AAA rating are judged to be of the best quality and carry the smallest degree of investment risk. At March 31, 2014, 99% of the Companys mortgage-related securities are guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA).
The Company has $2.1 million in non-government non-agency mortgage-related securities. These securities are rated from AAA to AA. The various protective elements on the non agency securities may change in the future if market conditions or the financial stability of credit insurers changes, which could impact the ratings of these securities.
At March 31, 2014, certain of the Companys investment grade securities were in an unrealized loss position. Investment securities with unrealized losses are a result of pricing changes due to recent and negative conditions in the current market environment and not as a result of permanent credit impairment. Contractual cash flows for the agency mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed and/or funded by the U.S. government. Other mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities have third party protective elements and there are no negative indications that the contractual cash flows will not be received when due. The Company does not intend to sell nor does the Company believe it will be required to sell any of the temporarily impaired securities prior to the recovery of the amortized cost.
The Company owns four pooled trust preferred securities which were all previously classified as held-to-maturity within the investment securities portfolio. As a result of the issuance of the final rules to implement Section 619 of the Financial Reform Act, commonly known as the Volcker Rule (the Final Rule), only two of the four investments were exempt from the covered fund definition. For the two investments that were not exempt as a result of the Final Rule, the Company will be required to divest its investment in these particular pooled trust preferred securities prior to the effectiveness of the Final Rule on July 21, 2015. As a result of this new regulation, these two investments which have a par value of $2.7 million and a carrying value of $2.4 million at March 31, 2014, were reclassified to the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. The Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $300,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, which was determined based on the market bid price of these investments. No further impairment was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
The par value of the two pooled trust preferred securities still classified as held-to-maturity totaled $4.0 million at March 31, 2014. The collateral underlying these structured securities are instruments issued by financial institutions. The Company owns the A-3 tranches in each issuance. Each of the bonds is rated by more than one rating agency. One security has a composite rating of A- and the other security has a composite rating of BBB+. Observable trading activity remains limited for these types of securities. The Company has estimated the fair value of the securities through the use of internal calculations and through information provided by external pricing services. Given the level of subordination below the A-3 tranches, and the actual and expected performance of the underlying collateral, the Company expects to receive all contractual interest and principal payments recovering the amortized cost basis of each of the securities, and concluded that these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired. The Company continuously monitors the financial condition of the underlying issues and the level of subordination below the A-3 tranches. The Company also utilizes a multi-scenario model which assumes varying levels of additional defaults and deferrals and the effects of such adverse developments on the contractual cash flows for the A-3 tranches. In each of the adverse scenarios, there was no indication of a break to the A-3 contractual cash flows.
In one of the pooled trust preferred securities, 62% of the principal balance is subordinate to the Companys class of ownership, and it is estimated that a break in contractual cash flow would occur if $178 million of the remaining $236 million, or 75% of the performing collateral defaulted or deferred payment. In the other pooled trust preferred security, 57% of the principal balance is subordinate to the Companys class of ownership, and it is estimated that a break in contractual cash flow would occur if
$158 million of the remaining $243 million, or 65% of the performing collateral defaulted or deferred payment. Significant judgment is involved in the evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment. The Company does not intend to sell nor does the Company believe it is probable that it will be required to sell these pooled trust preferred securities prior to the recovery of its investment.
No other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized on the securities in the Companys investment portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Note 7
Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses
The loan portfolio at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 consist of the following:
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Originated |
|
Acquired |
|
Total |
|
Total |
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
251,984 |
|
$ |
39,224 |
|
$ |
291,208 |
|
$ |
219,156 |
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
1,064,996 |
|
126,957 |
|
1,191,953 |
|
1,048,579 |
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
390,415 |
|
24,296 |
|
414,711 |
|
363,063 |
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
319,000 |
|
13,288 |
|
332,288 |
|
299,484 |
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
109,223 |
|
5,822 |
|
115,045 |
|
109,481 |
| ||||
Consumer |
|
3,924 |
|
1,121 |
|
5,045 |
|
4,159 |
| ||||
|
|
2,139,542 |
|
210,708 |
|
2,350,250 |
|
2,043,922 |
| ||||
Net deferred fees |
|
(4,548 |
) |
|
|
(4,548 |
) |
(3,754 |
) | ||||
Loans receivable, net of fees |
|
2,134,994 |
|
210,708 |
|
2,345,702 |
|
2,040,168 |
| ||||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(28,924 |
) |
(169 |
) |
(29,093 |
) |
(27,864 |
) | ||||
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
2,106,070 |
|
$ |
210,539 |
|
$ |
2,316,609 |
|
$ |
2,012,304 |
|
During the period ended March 31, 2014, as a result of the Companys acquisition of UFBC, the loan portfolio was segregated between loans initially accounted for under the amortized cost method (referred to as originated loans) and loans acquired (referred to as acquired loans).
The loans segregated to the acquired loan portfolio were initially measured at fair value and subsequently accounted for under either Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 310-30 or ASC 310-20. The outstanding principal balance and related carrying amount of acquired loans included in the consolidated statement of condition are as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2014 |
| ||
Credit impaired acquired loans evaluated individually for future credit losses |
|
|
| ||
Outstanding principal balance |
|
$ |
|
20,264 |
|
Carrying amount |
|
15,980 |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
Other acquired loans |
|
|
| ||
Outstanding principal balance |
|
194,631 |
| ||
Carrying amount |
|
194,728 |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
Total acquired loans |
|
|
| ||
Outstanding principal balance |
|
214,895 |
| ||
Carrying amount |
|
210,708 |
| ||
The following table presents changes in the accretable discount, which includes income recognized from contractual interest cash flows.
(in thousands) |
|
|
| |
Balance at January 1, 2014 |
|
$ |
|
|
Recorded discount at acquisition date |
|
(3,872 |
) | |
Accretion |
|
(315 |
) | |
Balance at March 31, 2014 |
|
$ |
(4,187 |
) |
The Companys allowance for loan losses is based first on a segmentation of its loan portfolio by general loan type, or portfolio segments, as presented in the preceding table. For originated loans, certain portfolio segments are further disaggregated and evaluated collectively for impairment based on class segments, which are largely based on the type of collateral underlying each loan. The Company also maintains an allowance for loan losses for acquired loans when: (i) for loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, there is deterioration in credit quality subsequent to acquisition, and (ii) for loans accounted for under ASC 310-20, the inherent losses in the loans exceed the remaining credit discount recorded at the time of acquisition.
Activity in the Companys allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 is shown below.
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
27,864 |
|
$ |
27,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for loan losses |
|
1,926 |
|
(457 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial and industrial |
|
(783 |
) |
|
| ||
Residential |
|
|
|
(85 |
) | ||
Consumer |
|
(2 |
) |
|
| ||
Total loans charged off |
|
(785 |
) |
(85 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial and industrial |
|
7 |
|
298 |
| ||
Residential |
|
81 |
|
8 |
| ||
Consumer |
|
|
|
1 |
| ||
Total recoveries |
|
88 |
|
307 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net recoveries (charge offs) |
|
(697 |
) |
222 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ending balance, March 31, |
|
$ |
29,093 |
|
$ |
27,165 |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company recorded an allowance for loan losses for the acquired loan portfolio of $169,000. This amount represents credit deterioration post acquisition related to three acquired loans. There were no impairments recorded in the purchase credit impaired portfolio as of March 31, 2014.
An analysis of the allowance for loan losses based on loan type, or segment, and the Companys loan portfolio, which identifies certain loans that are evaluated for individual or collective impairment, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, are below:
Allowance for Loan Losses
At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
Commercial and |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Home Equity |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
| |||||||
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Beginning Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
3,329 |
|
$ |
16,076 |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
$ |
609 |
|
$ |
93 |
|
$ |
27,864 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
(262 |
) |
(521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
(785 |
) | |||||||
Recoveries |
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
| |||||||
Provision for loan losses |
|
893 |
|
449 |
|
380 |
|
205 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
1,926 |
| |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2014 |
|
$ |
3,962 |
|
$ |
16,004 |
|
$ |
5,721 |
|
$ |
2,707 |
|
$ |
609 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
$ |
29,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
3,924 |
|
16,004 |
|
5,721 |
|
2,576 |
|
609 |
|
90 |
|
28,924 |
|
Loans Receivable
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
Commercial and |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Home Equity |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
| |||||||
Loans Receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2014 |
|
$ |
291,208 |
|
$ |
1,191,953 |
|
$ |
414,711 |
|
$ |
332,288 |
|
$ |
115,045 |
|
$ |
5,045 |
|
$ |
2,350,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
299 |
|
$ |
1,738 |
|
$ |
496 |
|
$ |
346 |
|
$ |
51 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,930 |
|
Purchased Credit Impaired Loans |
|
4,990 |
|
8,379 |
|
1,688 |
|
448 |
|
467 |
|
8 |
|
15,980 |
| |||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
285,919 |
|
1,181,836 |
|
412,527 |
|
331,494 |
|
114,527 |
|
5,037 |
|
2,331,340 |
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
Commercial and |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Home Equity |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
| |||||||
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Beginning Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
525 |
|
$ |
17,990 |
|
$ |
7,675 |
|
$ |
857 |
|
$ |
266 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
27,400 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) | |||||||
Recoveries |
|
296 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
307 |
| |||||||
Provision for loan losses |
|
(790 |
) |
504 |
|
(371 |
) |
43 |
|
172 |
|
(15 |
) |
(457 |
) | |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2013 |
|
$ |
31 |
|
$ |
18,494 |
|
$ |
7,306 |
|
$ |
823 |
|
$ |
438 |
|
$ |
73 |
|
$ |
27,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
31 |
|
18,494 |
|
7,306 |
|
823 |
|
438 |
|
73 |
|
27,165 |
|
Loans Receivable
At March 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
Commercial and |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Home Equity |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
| |||||||
Loans Receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2013 |
|
$ |
218,281 |
|
$ |
850,710 |
|
$ |
355,919 |
|
$ |
242,722 |
|
$ |
114,407 |
|
$ |
3,429 |
|
$ |
1,785,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
59 |
|
$ |
4,359 |
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,855 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
218,222 |
|
846,351 |
|
354,482 |
|
242,722 |
|
114,407 |
|
3,429 |
|
1,779,613 |
|
The accounting policy related to the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy given the level of estimation, judgment and uncertainty in evaluating the levels of the allowance required for the inherent probable losses in the loan portfolio and the material effect such estimation, judgment and uncertainty can be on the consolidated financial results.
The Companys ongoing credit quality management process relies on a system of activities to assess and evaluate various factors that impact the estimation of the allowance for loan losses. These factors include, but are not limited to; current economic conditions; loan concentrations, collateral adequacy and value; past loss experience for particular types of loans, size, composition and nature of loans; migration of loans through our loan rating methodology; trends in charge-offs and recoveries. This process also contemplates a disciplined approach to managing and monitoring credit exposures to ensure that the structure and pricing of credit is always consistent with the Companys assessment of risk. The loan officer has frequent contact with the borrower and is a key player in the credit management process and must develop and diligently practice sound credit management skills and habits to ensure effectiveness. Under the direction of the Companys loan committee and the chief credit officer, the credit risk management function works with the loan officers and other groups within the Company to monitor the loan portfolio, maintain the watch list, and compile the analysis necessary to determine the allowance for loan losses.
Loans are added to the watch list when circumstances appear to warrant the inclusion of the relationship. As a general rule, loans are added to the watch list when they are deemed to be problem assets. Problem assets are defined as those that have been risk rated substandard or lower. Successful problem asset management requires early recognition of deteriorating credits and timely corrective or risk management actions. Generally, risk ratings are either approved or amended by the loan committee accordingly. Problem loans are maintained on the watch list until the loan is either paid off or circumstances around the borrowers situation improve to the point that the risk rating on the loan is adjusted upward.
In addition to internal activities, the Company also engages an external consultant on a quarterly basis to review the Companys loan portfolio. This external loan review function helps to ensure the soundness of the loan portfolio through a third party review of existing exposures in the portfolio, supporting the commercial loan officers in the execution of its credit management responsibilities, and monitoring the adherence to the Companys credit risk management standards.
The following tables report the Companys nonaccrual and past due loans at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. In addition, the credit quality of the loan portfolio is provided as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans - Originated Loan Portfolio
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
30-59 Days |
|
60-89 Days |
|
90 Days or |
|
Total Past Due |
|
Current |
|
Total Loans |
|
90 Days Past |
|
Nonaccrual |
| ||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
204 |
|
$ |
412 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
616 |
|
$ |
251,368 |
|
251,984 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,352 |
|
274,352 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
464 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
2,202 |
|
788,442 |
|
790,644 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,380 |
|
132,380 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
246 |
|
257,789 |
|
258,035 |
|
|
|
246 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Single family |
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
223,008 |
|
223,233 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,767 |
|
95,767 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Home equity lines |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
51 |
|
109,172 |
|
109,223 |
|
|
|
51 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Installment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,334 |
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Credit cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590 |
|
590 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
$ |
412 |
|
$ |
2,035 |
|
$ |
3,340 |
|
$ |
2,136,202 |
|
$ |
2,139,542 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,035 |
|
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans - Acquired Loan Portfolio
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
30-59 Days |
|
60-89 Days |
|
90 Days or |
|
Total Past Due |
|
Current |
|
Total Loans |
|
90 Days Past |
|
Nonaccrual |
| ||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
757 |
|
$ |
757 |
|
$ |
38,467 |
|
39,224 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
757 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,566 |
|
64,566 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
605 |
|
1,067 |
|
339 |
|
2,011 |
|
60,380 |
|
62,391 |
|
|
|
339 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,235 |
|
20,235 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Single family |
|
|
|
|
|
768 |
|
768 |
|
12,520 |
|
13,288 |
|
|
|
768 |
| ||||||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Home equity lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,822 |
|
5,822 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Installment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Credit cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
$ |
1,864 |
|
$ |
3,536 |
|
$ |
207,172 |
|
$ |
210,708 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,864 |
|
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans - Originated Loan Portfolio
At December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
30-59 Days |
|
60-89 Days |
|
90 Days or |
|
Total Past Due |
|
Current |
|
Total Loans |
|
90 Days Past |
|
Nonaccrual |
| ||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
316 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
417 |
|
$ |
218,739 |
|
219,156 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,631 |
|
279,631 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
82 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
1,820 |
|
767,128 |
|
768,948 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,144 |
|
120,144 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
525 |
|
242,394 |
|
242,919 |
|
|
|
525 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Single family |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
213,537 |
|
213,545 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,939 |
|
85,939 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Home equity lines |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
51 |
|
109,430 |
|
109,481 |
|
|
|
51 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Installment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,912 |
|
3,912 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Credit cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
$ |
316 |
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
$ |
2,821 |
|
$ |
2,041,101 |
|
$ |
2,043,922 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
The Company had no acquired loans as of December 31, 2013.
Additional information on the Companys impaired loans that were evaluated for specific reserves as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, including the recorded investment on the statement of condition and the unpaid principal balance, is shown below:
Impaired Loans - Originated Loan Portfolio
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
Recorded |
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
Related |
|
Interest Income |
| ||||
With no related allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
260 |
|
$ |
260 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
1,738 |
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial |
|
496 |
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Single family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
51 |
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
With related allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Single family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
By segment total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
260 |
|
$ |
260 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
1,738 |
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
496 |
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
51 |
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,545 |
|
$ |
6,833 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Impaired Loans - Acquired Loan Portfolio
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
Recorded |
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
Related |
|
Interest Income |
| ||||
With no related allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
764 |
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
737 |
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
18 |
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial |
|
2,112 |
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
11 |
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Single family |
|
422 |
|
550 |
|
|
|
1 |
| ||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
With related allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
40 |
|
$ |
39 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
|
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Single family |
|
346 |
|
335 |
|
131 |
|
8 |
| ||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
By segment total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
804 |
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
737 |
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
18 |
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
2,112 |
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
11 |
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
768 |
|
885 |
|
131 |
|
9 |
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
$ |
5,801 |
|
$ |
169 |
|
$ |
42 |
|
Impaired Loans
At December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
Recorded |
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
Related |
|
Interest Income |
| ||||
With no related allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
814 |
|
$ |
814 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
1,738 |
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial |
|
775 |
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Single family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
51 |
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
With related allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Single family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
By segment total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
814 |
|
$ |
814 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
Real estate - commercial |
|
1,738 |
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - construction |
|
775 |
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Home equity lines |
|
51 |
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
3,378 |
|
$ |
7,665 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
In order to maximize the collection of certain loans, the Company will attempt to work with borrowers when necessary to extend or modify loan terms to better align with the borrowers ability to repay. Extensions and modifications to loans are made in accordance with the Companys policy and conform to regulatory guidance. Each occurrence is unique to the borrower and is evaluated separately. The Company considers regulatory guidelines when restructuring a loan to ensure that prudent lending practices are followed. As such, qualification criteria and payment terms consider the borrowers current and prospective ability to comply with the modified terms of the loan.
A modification is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) if both of the following exist: (1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and (2) the Company has granted a concession to the borrower. The Company determines that a borrower may be experiencing financial difficulty if the borrower is currently in default on any of its debt, or if the Company is concerned that the borrower may not be able to perform in accordance with the current terms of the loan agreement in the foreseeable future. Many aspects of the borrowers financial situation are assessed when determining whether they are experiencing financial difficulty, particularly as it relates to commercial borrowers due to the complex nature of the loan structure, business/industry risk, and borrower/guarantor structures. Concessions may include the reduction of an interest rate at a rate lower than current market rate for a new loan with similar risk, extension of the maturity date, reduction of accrued interest, or principal forgiveness. When evaluating whether a concession has been granted, the Company also considers whether the borrower has
provided additional collateral or guarantors and whether such additions adequately compensate the Company for the restructured terms, or if the revised terms are consistent with those currently being offered to new loan customers. The assessments of whether a borrower is experiencing (or is likely to experience) financial difficulty and whether a concession has been granted is subjective in nature and managements judgment is required when determining whether a modification is a TDR.
Although each occurrence is unique to the borrower and is evaluated separately, for all portfolio segments, TDRs are typically modified through reductions in interest rates, reductions in payments, changing the payment terms from principal and interest to interest only, and/or extensions in term maturity.
Nonaccruing loans that are modified can be placed back on accrual status when both the principal and interest are current and it is probable that the Company will be able to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the loan agreement.
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had TDRs totaling $2.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively, all of which were on nonaccrual. Nonaccrual TDRs that are reasonably assured of repayment according to their modified terms may be returned to accrual status by the Company upon a detailed credit evaluation of the borrowers financial condition and prospects for repayment under the revised terms. Consistent with regulatory guidance, upon sustained performance and classification as a TDR over the Companys year-end, the loan will be removed from TDR status as long as the modified terms were market-based at the time of the modification. The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances on TDRs as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:
Troubled Debt Restructurings
At and For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
Commercial and |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Home Equity Lines |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2014 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,738 |
|
$ |
525 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,263 |
|
New TDRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Increases to existing TDRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Charge-Offs Post Modification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Sales, paydowns, or other decreases |
|
|
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(279 |
) | |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2014 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,738 |
|
$ |
246 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,984 |
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings
At and For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
Commercial and |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Real Estate - |
|
Home Equity |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2013 |
|
$ |
1,776 |
|
$ |
3,800 |
|
$ |
1,762 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
7,338 |
|
New TDRs |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570 |
| |||||||
Increases to existing TDRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Charge-Offs Post Modification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Sales, paydowns, or other decreases |
|
(1,776 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,362 |
) | |||||||
Ending Balance, March 31, 2013 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,359 |
|
$ |
1,187 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
5,546 |
|
At March 31, 2014, TDRs make up one relationship with the Bank. These loans are performing as expected post-modification. There are no acquired loans classified as TDRs. For restructured loans in the portfolio, the Company had no loan loss reserves as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Loans modified as TDRs within the previous 12 months and for which there was a payment default during the period are calculated by first identifying TDRs that defaulted during the period and then determining whether they were modified within the 12 months prior to the default. For the period ended March 31, 2014, one loan identified as a TDR had a payment default within the last twelve months. For the period ended December 31, 2013, one loan identified as a TDR had a payment default within the last twelve months.
One of the most significant factors in assessing the credit quality of the Companys loan portfolio is the risk rating. The Company uses the following risk ratings to manage the credit quality of its loan portfolio: pass, substandard, doubtful and loss. During 2011, the Company added an additional risk rating, other loans especially mentioned (OLEM), for the monitoring of credit quality. Other loans especially mentioned are those loans in which the borrower exhibits potential weakness that may, if not corrected or reversed, weaken the banks credit position at some future date. These loans may not show problems as yet due to the borrowers apparent ability to service the debt, but special circumstances surround the loans of which the Banks management should be aware. Substandard risk rated loans are those loans whose full final collectability may not appear to be a matter for serious doubt, but which nevertheless have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt and require close supervision by management. Loans that have a risk rating of doubtful have all the weakness inherent in one graded substandard with the added provision that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and value, highly questionable. A loss loan is one that is considered uncollectible and will be charged-off immediately. All other loans not rated other loans especially mentioned, substandard, doubtful or loss are considered to have a pass risk rating. Substandard and doubtful risk rated loans are evaluated for impairment. The following table presents a summary of the risk ratings by portfolio segment and class segment at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Internal Risk Rating Grades - Originated Loan Portfolio
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
Pass |
|
OLEM |
|
Substandard |
|
Doubtful |
|
Loss |
| |||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
250,162 |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
$ |
260 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Owner occupied |
|
274,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
785,045 |
|
3,861 |
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Residential |
|
132,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Commercial |
|
257,539 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Single family |
|
223,008 |
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Multi-family |
|
95,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Home equity lines |
|
109,172 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Installment |
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Credit cards |
|
590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
$ |
2,131,349 |
|
$ |
5,648 |
|
$ |
2,545 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Internal Risk Rating Grades - Acquired Loan Portfolio
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
Pass |
|
OLEM |
|
Substandard |
|
Doubtful |
|
Loss |
| |||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
37,858 |
|
$ |
562 |
|
$ |
804 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Owner occupied |
|
64,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
58,595 |
|
3,059 |
|
737 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Residential |
|
20,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Commercial |
|
1,367 |
|
582 |
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Single family |
|
12,520 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Home equity lines |
|
5,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Installment |
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Credit cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
$ |
202,076 |
|
$ |
4,203 |
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Internal Risk Rating Grades
At December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
Pass |
|
OLEM |
|
Substandard |
|
Doubtful |
|
Loss |
| |||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
217,755 |
|
$ |
587 |
|
$ |
814 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Real estate - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Owner occupied |
|
279,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Non-owner occupied |
|
753,872 |
|
13,338 |
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Real estate - construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Residential |
|
120,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Commercial |
|
242,144 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Real estate - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Single family |
|
213,537 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Multi-family |
|
85,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Home equity lines |
|
109,430 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Installment |
|
3,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Credit cards |
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
$ |
2,026,611 |
|
$ |
13,933 |
|
$ |
3,378 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Note 8
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company enters into rate lock commitments with its mortgage customers. The Company is also a party to forward mortgage loan sales contracts to sell loans servicing released. The rate lock commitment and forward sale agreement are undesignated derivatives and marked to fair value through earnings. The fair value of the rate lock derivative includes the servicing premium and the interest spread for the difference between retail and wholesale mortgage rates. Realized and unrealized gains on mortgage banking activities presents the gain recognized for the period presented and associated with these elements of fair value. On the date the mortgage loan closes, the loan held for sale is designated as the hedged item in a cash flow hedge relationship and the forward loan sale commitment is designated as the hedging instrument.
At March 31, 2014, accumulated other comprehensive income included an unrealized loss, net of tax, of $150,000 related to forward loan sales contracts designated as the hedging instrument in the cash flow hedge. Loans held for sale are generally sold within sixty days of closing and, therefore, all or substantially all of the amount recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income at March 31, 2014 which is related to the Companys cash flow hedges will be recognized in earnings during the second quarter of 2014. At March 31, 2014, the Company recognized minimal amounts due to hedge ineffectiveness.
At March 31, 2014, the Company had $327.2 million in residential mortgage rate lock commitments and associated forward sales, and $224.2 million in forward loan sales associated with $265.3 million of loans that had closed and were presented as held for sale.
Note 9
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The following tables disclose the derivative instruments location on the Companys statement of condition and the fair value of those instruments at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. In addition, the gains and losses related to these derivative instruments is provided for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
At March 31, 2014
(in thousands)
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair Value |
| ||
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Forward Loan Sales Commitments |
|
Accrued Interest Receivable and Other Assets |
|
1,169 |
|
Accrued Interest Payable and Other Liabilities |
|
1,136 |
| ||
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rate Lock and Forward Loan Sales Commitments |
|
Accrued Interest Receivable and Other Assets |
|
13,487 |
|
Accrued Interest Payable and Other Liabilities |
|
375 |
| ||
Rate Lock Commitments |
|
Accrued Interest Receivable and Other Assets |
|
375 |
|
Accrued Interest Payable and Other Liabilities |
|
403 |
| ||
Total Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
13,862 |
|
|
|
778 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
15,031 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,914 |
|
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
At December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair Value |
| ||
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Forward Loan Sales Commitments |
|
Accrued Interest Receivable and Other Assets |
|
5,489 |
|
Accrued Interest Payable and Other Liabilities |
|
4,043 |
| ||
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
5,489 |
|
|
|
4,043 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rate Lock and Forward Loan Sales Commitments |
|
Accrued Interest Receivable and Other Assets |
|
10,989 |
|
Accrued Interest Payable and Other Liabilities |
|
9 |
| ||
Rate Lock Commitments |
|
Accrued Interest Receivable and Other Assets |
|
9 |
|
Accrued Interest Payable and Other Liabilities |
|
1,554 |
| ||
Total Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
10,998 |
|
|
|
1,563 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
16,487 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,606 |
|
Impact of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Income
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
(in thousands)
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Forward Loan Sales Commitments |
|
$ |
(150 |
) |
Other Income |
|
$ |
(7,227 |
) |
Other Income |
|
$ |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(150 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(7,227 |
) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain |
| |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest Rate Lock Commitments |
|
$ |
13,083 |
|
Realized and unrealized gains on mortgage banking activities |
|
Forward Loan Sales Commitments |
|
28 |
|
Other Income |
| |
Rate Lock Commitments |
|
(28 |
) |
Other Income |
| |
Total |
|
$ |
13,083 |
|
|
|
Impact of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Income
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging |
|
Locations of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
Other Income |
|
$ |
145 |
|
Other Income |
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$39 |
|
Other Income |
|
$ |
|
Other Income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Loan Sales Commitments |
|
815 |
|
Other Income |
|
(2,886 |
) |
Other Income |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$854 |
|
|
|
$(2,886 |
) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain |
| |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest Rate Lock Commitments |
|
$ |
19,859 |
|
Realized and unrealized gains on mortgage banking activities |
|
Forward Loan Sales Commitments |
|
(328 |
) |
Other Income |
| |
Rate Lock Commitments |
|
328 |
|
Other Income |
| |
Total |
|
$ |
19,859 |
|
|
|
Note 10
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Information concerning total amortizable other intangible assets at March 31, 2014 is as follows:
|
|
Mortgage Banking |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
|
Gross Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
| ||
Balance at December 31, 2013 |
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
2014 activity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition of UFBC |
|
2,740 |
|
200 |
| ||
Balance at March 31, 2014 |
|
$ |
4,521 |
|
$ |
1,981 |
|
The aggregate amortization expense was $200,000 and $49,000 for three months ended March 31 2014 and 2013, respectively. The estimated amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
2014 (April December) |
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
|
|
| |
2015 |
|
634 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
2016 |
|
512 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
2017 |
|
391 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
2018 |
|
269 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
2019 and Thereafter |
|
178 |
| |
The carrying amount of goodwill at March 31, 2014 was as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Mortgage |
|
Total |
| |||
Balance at December 31, 2013 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
10,120 |
|
$ |
10,144 |
|
Acquisition of UFBC |
|
24,706 |
|
|
|
24,706 |
| |||
Balance at March 31, 2014 |
|
$ |
24,730 |
|
$ |
10,120 |
|
$ |
34,850 |
|
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or circumstances warrant.
Note 11
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments usually have fixed expiration dates up to one year or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. These instruments represent obligations of the Company to extend credit or guarantee borrowings and are not recorded on the
consolidated statements of financial condition. The rates and terms of these instruments are competitive with others in the market in which the Company operates.
The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. The Company evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis and requires collateral to support financial instruments when deemed necessary. The amount of collateral obtained upon extension of credit is based upon managements evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include deposits held by the Company, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of the contractual obligations by a customer to a third party. The majority of these guarantees extend until satisfactory completion of the customers contractual obligations. All standby letters of credit outstanding at March 31, 2014 are collateralized.
Commitments to extend credit of $1.8 billion primarily have floating rates as of March 31, 2014. At March 31, 2014, standby letters of credit were $31.4 million. Commitments to extend credit of $327.2 million as of March 31, 2014 are related to George Masons mortgage loan funding commitments and are of a short term nature.
These off-balance sheet financial instruments may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Credit risk is defined as the possibility of sustaining a loss because the other parties to a financial instrument fail to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract. The Companys maximum exposure to credit loss under standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. It is uncertain as to the amount, if any, that the Company will be required to fund on these commitments as many such arrangements expire with no amounts drawn.
George Mason provides for its estimated exposure to repurchase loans previously sold to investors for which borrowers failed to provide full and accurate information on their loan application or for which appraisals have not been acceptable or where the loan was not underwritten in accordance with the loan program specified by the loan investor, and for other exposure to its investors related to loan sales activities. The Company evaluates the merits of each claim and estimates its reserve based on actual and expected claims received and considers the historical amounts paid to settle such claims. George Mason has a reserve of $261,000 at each of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
The Company has derivative counter-party risk that may arise from the possible inability of George Masons third party investors to meet the terms of their forward sales contracts. George Mason works with third-party investors that are generally well-capitalized, are investment grade and exhibit strong financial performance to mitigate this risk. The Company does not expect any third-party investor to fail to meet its obligation. In addition, the Company has derivative counterparty risk relating to certain interest rate swaps it has with third parties. This risk may arise from the inability of the third party to meet the terms of the contracts. The Company monitors the financial condition of these third parties on an annual basis. The Company does not expect any of these third parties to fail to meet its obligations.
Note 12
Fair Value Measurements
The fair value framework under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring the fair value. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the measurement date.
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.
Level 3 Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
All classes of the Companys investment securities available-for-sale with the exception of its treasury securities, the Companys trading investment securities, which include cash equivalents and mutual funds, and bank-owned life insurance are recorded at fair value using reliable and unbiased evaluations by an industry-wide valuation service and therefore fall into the Level 2 category. This service uses evaluated pricing models that vary based on asset class and include available trade, bid, and other market information. Generally, the methodology includes broker quotes, proprietary models, vast descriptive terms and conditions databases, as well as extensive quality control programs. The Companys treasury securities are recorded at fair value using unadjusted quoted market prices for identical securities and therefore fall under the Level 1 category.
The Company has an interest rate swap to hedge against the change in fair value of one fixed rate commercial loan. This loan is recorded at fair value using published yield curve rates from a national valuation service. These observable rates and inputs are applied to a third party industry-wide valuation model, and therefore, the valuations fall into a Level 2 category. Commercial and residential loans are evaluated for impairment and the carrying value of such loans is recorded at fair value based on appraisals of the underlying collateral completed by third parties using Level 2 valuation inputs.
The Companys two other interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value using published yield curve rates from a national valuation service. These observable rates and inputs are applied to a third party industry-wide valuation model, and therefore, the valuations fall into a Level 2 category.
The Company records its interest rate lock commitments and forward loan sales commitments at fair value determined as the amount that would be required to settle each of these derivative financial instruments at the balance sheet date. In the normal course of business, George Mason enters into contractual interest rate lock commitments to extend credit to borrowers with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers lock-in a specified interest rate within the time frames established by the mortgage companies. All borrowers are evaluated for credit worthiness prior to the extension of the commitment. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time of the interest rate lock by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to the investor. To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, the mortgage companies enter into best efforts forward sales contracts to sell loans to investors. The forward sales contracts lock in an interest rate and price for the sale of loans similar to the specific rate lock commitments. Both the rate lock commitments to the borrowers and the forward sales contracts to the investors through to the date the loan closes are undesignated derivatives and accordingly, are marked to fair value through earnings. These valuations fall into a Level 2 category.
There were no significant transfers into and out of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 measurements in the fair value hierarchy during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of each reporting period. The valuation technique used for fair value measurements
using significant other observable inputs (Level 2) is the market approach for each class of assets and liabilities.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are shown below:
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
| ||||||||||
Description |
|
Balance |
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
U.S. treasury securities |
|
$ |
5,007 |
|
$ |
5,007 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored agencies |
|
78,967 |
|
|
|
78,967 |
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
145,522 |
|
|
|
145,522 |
|
|
| ||||
Municipal securities |
|
120,437 |
|
|
|
120,437 |
|
|
| ||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
| ||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
352,805 |
|
5,007 |
|
347,798 |
|
|
| ||||
Investment securities trading |
|
4,673 |
|
|
|
4,673 |
|
|
| ||||
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
32,181 |
|
|
|
32,181 |
|
|
| ||||
Derivative asset - rate lock and forward loan sales commitments |
|
14,656 |
|
|
|
14,656 |
|
|
| ||||
Derivative asset interest rate lock commitments |
|
375 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
| ||||
Derivative liability - rate lock and forward loan sales commitments |
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
| ||||
Derivative liability interest rate lock commitments |
|
403 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
| ||||
At December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
| ||||||||
Description |
|
Balance |
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
U.S. treasury securities |
|
$ |
5,029 |
|
$ |
5,029 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored agencies |
|
76,928 |
|
|
|
76,928 |
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
147,829 |
|
|
|
147,829 |
|
|
| ||||
Municipal securities |
|
116,738 |
|
|
|
116,738 |
|
|
| ||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
| ||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
349,319 |
|
5,029 |
|
344,290 |
|
|
| ||||
Investment securities trading |
|
3,890 |
|
|
|
3,890 |
|
|
| ||||
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
32,063 |
|
|
|
32,063 |
|
|
| ||||
Derivative asset - rate lock and forward loan sales commitments |
|
16,478 |
|
|
|
16,478 |
|
|
| ||||
Derivative asset interest rate lock commitments |
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
| ||||
Derivative liability - rate lock and forward loan sales commitments |
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
| ||||
Derivative liability interest rate lock commitments |
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
| ||||
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are not included in the tables above. These assets include the valuation of the Companys pooled trust preferred securities held in its held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio, loans receivable evaluated for impairment and other real estate owned.
At March 31, 2014
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
| |||||||
Description |
|
Balance |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| |||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
3,050 |
|
Loans receivable evaluated for impairment |
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
2,629 |
| |||
At December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
| ||||||||
Description |
|
Balance |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
$ |
2,910 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,910 |
|
Loans receivable evaluated for impairment |
|
3,378 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
3,077 |
| ||||
The Companys held-to-maturity portfolio includes investments in two pooled trust preferred securities, totaling $4.0 million of par value at March 31, 2014. The collateral underlying these structured securities are instruments issued by financial institutions. The Company owns the A-3 tranches in each issuance. Observable trading activity remains limited for these types of securities. The Company has estimated the fair value of the securities through the use of internal calculations and through information provided by external pricing services. Given the level of subordination below the A-3 tranches, and the actual and expected performance of the underlying collateral, the Company expects to receive all contractual interest and principal payments recovering the amortized cost basis of each of the two securities, and concluded that these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired. The Company also utilizes a multi-scenario model which assumes varying levels of additional defaults and deferrals and the
effects of such adverse developments on the contractual cash flows for the A-3 tranches. In each of the adverse scenarios, there was no indication of a break to the A-3 contractual cash flows.
The Companys loans receivable evaluated for impairment are measured at the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the loans coupon rate, or at the loans observable market price or fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The Company measures the collateral value on loans receivable evaluated for impairment by obtaining an updated appraisal of the underlying collateral and may discount further the appraised value, if necessary, to an amount equal to the expected cash proceeds in the event the loan is foreclosed upon and the collateral is sold. In addition, an estimate of costs to sell the collateral is assumed. The Company values other real estate owned by obtaining an updated appraisal of the property foreclosed upon, and discounts further the appraised value to an amount equal to the expected cash proceeds upon the sale of the property. Loans receivable evaluated for impairment and other real estate owned are valued using third party appraisal data that is based on market comparisons and may be subject to further adjustment for certain non-observable criteria.
Loans receivable evaluated for impairment that are measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs on a nonrecurring basis total $3.5 million at March 31, 2014. The total amount for each period presented represents the entire population of loans receivable evaluated for impairment, and of this amount, $3.5 million was determined to be impaired and recorded at fair value. Collateral is in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the Companys collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser using observable market data (Level 2). However, in certain instances, the Company applies a discount to the valuation of the collateral if the collateral being evaluated is in process of construction or a residence. In addition, the Company considers past experience of actual sales of collateral and may further discount the appraisal of the collateral being evaluated. This is considered a Level 3 valuation. The value of business equipment is based upon the net book value on the applicable businesss financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the consolidated statements of income.
Although management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique. Because of the wide range of valuation techniques and the numerous estimates and assumptions which must be made, it may be difficult to make reasonable comparisons between the Companys fair value information and that of other banking institutions. It is important that the many uncertainties be considered when using the estimated fair value disclosures and that, because of these uncertainties, the aggregate fair value amount should not be construed as representative of the underlying value of the Company.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The assumptions used and the estimates disclosed represent managements best judgment of appropriate valuation methods for estimating the fair value of financial instruments. These estimates are based on pertinent information available to management at the valuation date. In certain cases, fair values are not subject to precise quantification or verification and may change as economic and market factors and managements evaluation of those factors change.
The following summarizes the significant methodologies and assumptions used in estimating the fair values presented in the following table, and not disclosed elsewhere in this footnote.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents is used as a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity and Other Investments
Fair values for investment securities held-to-maturity are based on quoted market prices or prices quoted for similar financial instruments.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The estimated fair value is based upon the related purchase price commitments from secondary market investors.
Loans Receivable, Net
In order to determine the fair market value for loans receivable, the loan portfolio was segmented based on loan type, credit quality and maturities. For certain variable rate loans with no significant credit concerns and frequent repricings, estimated fair values are based on current carrying amounts. The fair values of other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, at interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The fair value analysis also included other assumptions to estimate fair value, intended to approximate those a market participant would use in an orderly transaction, with adjustments for discount rates, interest rates, liquidity, as appropriate. This method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value which is appropriate for this disclosure.
Deposits
The fair values for demand deposits are equal to the carrying amount since they are payable on demand at the reporting date. The carrying amounts of variable rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit (CDs) approximate their fair value at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed rate CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on CDs to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Other Borrowed Funds
The fair value of other borrowed funds is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently available for loans with similar terms.
Accrued Interest Receivable
The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.
The following summarizes the carrying amount of these financial assets and liabilities that the Company has not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
|
|
March 31, 2014 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
| |||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| |||||
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
38,956 |
|
38,956 |
|
38,956 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
| ||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
352,805 |
|
352,805 |
|
5,007 |
|
347,798 |
|
|
| |||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity and other investments |
|
21,806 |
|
20,997 |
|
|
|
17,947 |
|
3,050 |
| |||||
Loans held for sale |
|
265,313 |
|
265,313 |
|
|
|
265,313 |
|
|
| |||||
Loans receivable, net |
|
2,316,609 |
|
2,319,069 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
2,318,768 |
| |||||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
8,184 |
|
8,184 |
|
8,184 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
534,064 |
|
$ |
534,064 |
|
$ |
534,064 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest checking |
|
448,163 |
|
448,163 |
|
448,163 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Money market and statement savings |
|
586,802 |
|
586,802 |
|
586,802 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Certificates of deposit |
|
807,899 |
|
812,383 |
|
|
|
812,383 |
|
|
| |||||
Other borrowed funds |
|
382,854 |
|
397,908 |
|
|
|
397,908 |
|
|
| |||||
Accrued interest payable |
|
1,014 |
|
1,014 |
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
| |||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| |||||
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
29,209 |
|
$ |
29,209 |
|
$ |
29,209 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
349,319 |
|
349,319 |
|
5,029 |
|
344,290 |
|
|
| |||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity and other investments |
|
25,545 |
|
24,595 |
|
|
|
21,685 |
|
2,910 |
| |||||
Loans held for sale |
|
373,993 |
|
373,993 |
|
|
|
373,993 |
|
|
| |||||
Loans receivable, net |
|
2,012,304 |
|
2,024,835 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
2,024,534 |
| |||||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
7,939 |
|
7,939 |
|
7,939 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
433,749 |
|
$ |
433,749 |
|
$ |
433,749 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest checking |
|
398,136 |
|
398,136 |
|
398,136 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Money market and statement savings |
|
475,707 |
|
475,707 |
|
475,707 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Certificates of deposit |
|
751,267 |
|
756,191 |
|
|
|
756,191 |
|
|
| |||||
Other borrowed funds |
|
475,232 |
|
491,236 |
|
|
|
491,236 |
|
|
| |||||
Accrued interest payable |
|
869 |
|
869 |
|
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following presents managements discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the results of our operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report and the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Caution About Forward-Looking Statements
We make certain forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our profitability, liquidity, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, growth strategy, and financial and other goals. The words believes, expects, may, will, should, projects, contemplates, anticipates, forecasts, intends, or other similar words or terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant uncertainties because they are based upon or are affected by factors including:
· |
|
the risks of changes in interest rates on levels, composition and costs of deposits, loan demand, and the values and liquidity of loan collateral, securities, and interest sensitive assets and liabilities; |
· |
|
changes in assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses, reserves for repurchases of mortgage loans sold and other estimates; |
· |
|
changes in market conditions, specifically declines in the residential and commercial real estate market, volatility and disruption of the capital and credit markets, soundness of other financial institutions we do business with; |
· |
|
decrease in the volume of loan originations at our mortgage banking subsidiary as a result of the cyclical nature of mortgage banking, changes in interest rates, economic conditions, decreased economic activity, and slowdowns in the housing market which would negatively impact the income recorded on the sales of loans held for sale; |
· |
|
risks inherent in making loans such as repayment risks and fluctuating collateral values; |
· |
|
declines in the prices of assets and market illiquidity may cause us to record an other-than-temporary impairment or other losses, specifically in our pooled trust preferred securities portfolio resulting from increases in underlying issuers defaulting or deferring payments. |
· |
|
changes in operations within the wealth management services segment, its customer base and assets under management; |
· |
|
changes in operations of George Mason Mortgage, LLC as a result of the activity in the residential real estate market and any associated impact on the fair value of goodwill in the future; |
· |
|
legislative and regulatory changes, including the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and |
|
|
Consumer Protection Act (the Financial Reform Act) and implementation of the Volcker Rule, and other changes in banking, securities, and tax laws and regulations and their application by our regulators, and changes in the scope and cost of FDIC insurance and other coverages; |
· |
|
exposure to repurchase loans sold to investors for which borrowers failed to provide full and accurate information on or related to their loan application or for which appraisals have not been acceptable or when the loan was not underwritten in accordance with the loan program specified by the loan investor; |
· |
|
the risks of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, including, without limitation, the related time and costs of implementing such transactions, integrating operations as part of these transactions and possible failures to achieve expected gains, revenue growth and/or expense savings from such transactions; |
· |
|
the ability to successfully manage our growth or implement our growth strategies as we implement new or change internal operating systems or if we are unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to expand in the future; |
· |
|
the effects of future economic, business and market conditions; |
· |
|
governmental monetary and fiscal policies; |
· |
|
changes in accounting policies, rules and practices; |
· |
|
maintaining cost controls and asset quality as we open or acquire new branches; |
· |
|
maintaining capital levels adequate to support our growth; |
· |
|
reliance on our management team, including our ability to attract and retain key personnel; |
· |
|
competition with other banks and financial institutions, and companies outside of the banking industry, including those companies that have substantially greater access to capital and other resources; |
· |
|
demand, development and acceptance of new products and services; |
· |
|
problems with technology utilized by us; |
· |
|
changing trends in customer profiles and behavior; and |
· |
|
other factors described from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Because of these uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, our past results of operations do not necessarily indicate our future results.
In addition, this section should be read in conjunction with the description of our Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Overview
We are a financial holding company formed in 1997 and headquartered in Fairfax County, Virginia. We were formed principally in response to opportunities resulting from the consolidation of several Virginia-based banks. These bank consolidations were typically accompanied by the dissolution of local boards of directors and relocation or termination of management and customer service professionals and a general deterioration of personalized customer service.
On January 16, 2014, we announced the completion of our acquisition of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. (UFBC), the holding company of The Business Bank (TBB), pursuant to a previously announced definitive merger agreement. The merger of UFBC into Cardinal was effective January 16, 2014. Under the terms of the merger agreement, UFBC shareholders received $19.13 in cash and 1.154 shares of our common stock in exchange for each
share of UFBC common stock they owned immediately prior to the merger. TBB, which was headquartered in Vienna, Virginia, merged into Cardinal Bank effective March 8, 2014 adding eight (8) banking locations in northern Virginia, one of the Companys target markets. As a result of the acquisition, we added $329 million in total assets, $238 million in loans, and $295 million in deposits, after purchase accounting adjustments. The transaction generated $24.7 million in goodwill and $2.7 million in core deposit intangible assets subject to amortization. During March 2014, we integrated UFBCs systems into Cardinal with minimal disruption to our customer service and operations allowing us to begin to benefit from this transaction during the remainder of 2014.
We own Cardinal Bank (the Bank), a Virginia state-chartered community bank with 35 banking offices located in Northern Virginia and the greater Washington D.C. metropolitan area. The Bank offers a wide range of traditional bank loan and deposit products and services to both our commercial and retail customers. Our commercial relationship managers focus on attracting small and medium sized businesses as well as government contractors, commercial real estate developers and builders and professionals, such as physicians, accountants and attorneys.
Additionally, we complement our core banking operations by offering a wide range of services through our various subsidiaries, including mortgage banking through George Mason Mortgage, LLC (George Mason) and retail securities brokerage through Cardinal Wealth Services, Inc. (CWS).
Prior to June 30, 2013, the Bank had a trust division, Cardinal Trust and Investment Services. This division merged its remaining operations as of June 30, 2013 into CWS. In addition, as of June 30, 2013, Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc., formerly the Companys second nonbank subsidiary, merged its operations into CWS. During the second quarter of 2013, we exited the third party institutional custody and trustee component of our trust services division due to our limited opportunity to leverage this platform. As a result of our reorganization of the wealth management business segment, the remaining personal and commercial trust area of this business consolidated into CWS. In addition, the remaining Wilson/Bennett clients are now serviced on the CWS platform beginning in the third quarter of 2013. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2013 include the operations of these subsidiaries.
Net interest income is our primary source of revenue. We define revenue as net interest income plus noninterest income. As discussed further in the interest rate sensitivity section, we manage our balance sheet and interest rate risk exposure to maximize, and concurrently stabilize, net interest income. We do this by monitoring our liquidity position and the spread between the interest rates earned on interest-earning assets and the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. We attempt to minimize our exposure to interest rate risk, but are unable to eliminate it entirely. In addition to management of interest rate risk, we analyze our loan portfolio for exposure to credit risk. Loan defaults and foreclosures are inherent risks in the banking industry, and we attempt to limit our exposure to these risks by carefully underwriting and then monitoring our extensions of credit. In addition to net interest income, noninterest income is an important source of revenue for us and includes, among other things, service charges on deposits and loans, investment fee income, gains and losses on sales of investment securities available-for-sale, and gains on sales of mortgage loans.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) are complex and require management to apply significant judgment to various accounting, reporting, and disclosure matters. Management must use assumptions, judgments and estimates when applying these principles where precise measurements are not possible or practical. These policies are critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex judgments, assumptions and estimates. Changes in such judgments, assumptions and estimates may have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements. Actual results, in fact, could differ from initial estimates.
The accounting policies we view as critical are those relating to judgments, assumptions and estimates regarding the determination of the allowance for loan losses, accounting for purchased credit-impaired loans, the fair value measurements of certain assets and liabilities, accounting for economic hedging activities, accounting for impairment testing of goodwill, accounting for the impairment of amortizing intangible assets and other long-lived assets, and the valuation of deferred tax assets.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that represents managements best estimate of known and inherent losses in our loan portfolio. Both the amount of the provision expense and the level of the allowance for loan losses are impacted by many factors, including general and industry-specific economic conditions, actual and expected credit losses, historical trends and specific conditions of individual borrowers. Unusual and infrequently occurring events, such as weather-related disasters, may impact our assessment of possible credit losses. As a part of our analysis, we use comparative peer group data and qualitative factors such as levels of and trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, charged-off loans, changes in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in lending policy, experience and ability and depth of management, national and local economic trends and conditions, and concentrations of credit, competition, and loan review results to support our estimates.
For purposes of our analysis, we categorize our loans into one of five categories: commercial and industrial, commercial real estate (including construction), home equity lines of credit, residential mortgages, and consumer loans. Typically, financial institutions use their historical loss experience and trends in losses for each loan category which are then adjusted for portfolio trends and economical and environmental factors in determining their allowance for loan losses. Prior to 2008, we experienced minimal loss history within our loan portfolio and it has only been since the economic downturn that we have recorded a higher level of loan losses. Because of this, our allowance model uses the average loss rates of similar institutions (our custom peer group) as a baseline which is then adjusted based on our particular loan portfolio characteristics and environmental factors. The indicated loss factors resulting from this analysis are applied for each of the five categories of loans.
Our peer groups are defined by selecting commercial banking institutions of similar size within Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. This is known as our custom peer group. The commercial banking institutions comprising the custom peer group can change based on certain factors including but not limited to the characteristics, size, and geographic footprint of the institution. We have identified 20 banks for our custom peer group which are within $500 million to $5 billion in total assets, the majority of whom are geographically concentrated in the Washington metropolitan area in which we operate as this area has seen less of an economic downturn than other areas of the country. We evaluate the loan quality indicators of our custom peer group to those within our national FDIC peer group, all banks in Virginia, and all banks in
Maryland. These baseline peer group loss rates are then adjusted by an estimated loss emergence factor in order to determine loss coverage for pass-level credits. Finally, we make adjustments to these loss factors based on an analysis of our loan portfolio characteristics, trends, economic considerations and other conditions that should be considered in assessing our credit risk. Our peer loss rates are updated on at least an annual basis.
In addition, we individually assign loss factors to all loans that have been identified as having loss attributes, as indicated by deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower or a decline in underlying collateral value if the loan is collateral dependent. In certain cases, we apply, in accordance with regulatory guidelines, a 5% loss factor to loans classified as special mention, a 15% loss factor to loans classified as substandard and a 50% loss factor to loans classified as doubtful. Loans classified as loss loans are fully reserved or charged off. However, in most instances, we evaluate the impairment of certain loans on a loan by loan basis for those loans that are adversely risk rated. For these loans, we analyze the fair value of the collateral underlying the loan and consider estimated costs to sell the collateral on a discounted basis. If the net collateral value is less than the loan balance (including accrued interest and any unamortized premium or discount associated with the loan) we recognize an impairment and establish a specific reserve for the impaired loan. Because of the limited number of impaired loans in our portfolio, we are able to evaluate each impaired loan individually and therefore our specific reserves for impaired loans are generally less than those recommended by the listed regulatory guidelines above.
Credit losses are an inherent part of our business and, although we believe the methodologies for determining the allowance for loan losses and the current level of the allowance are appropriate, it is possible that there may be unidentified losses in the portfolio at any particular time that may become evident at a future date pursuant to additional internal analysis or regulatory comment. Additional provisions for such losses, if necessary, would be recorded in the commercial banking or mortgage banking segments, as appropriate, and would negatively impact earnings.
Allowance for Loan Losses - Acquired Loans
Acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30
For our acquired loans, to the extent that we experience a deterioration in borrower credit quality resulting in a decrease in our expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition of the loans, an allowance for loan losses would be established based on our estimate of future credit losses over the remaining life of the loans.
Acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-20
Subsequent to the acquisition date, we establish our allowance for loan losses through a provision for loan losses based upon an evaluation process that is similar to our evaluation process used for originated loans. This evaluation, which includes a review of loans on which full collectability may not be reasonably assured, considers, among other factors, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical net loan loss experience, carrying value of the loans, which includes the remaining net purchase discount or premium, and other factors that warrant recognition in determining our allowance for loan losses.
Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans
Purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans, which are the loans acquired in our acquisition of UFBC, are loans acquired at a discount (that is due, in part, to credit quality). These loans are initially recorded at fair value (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows)
with no allowance for loan losses. We account for interest income on all loans acquired at a discount (that is due, in part, to credit quality) based on the acquired loans expected cash flows. The acquired loans may be aggregated and accounted for as a pool of loans if the loans being aggregated have common risk characteristics. A pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flow. The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the investment in the loans, or the accretable yield, is recognized as interest income utilizing the level-yield method over the life of each pool. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition are recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the pool over its remaining life, while decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairment through a loss provision and an increase in the allowance for loan losses. Therefore, the allowance for loan losses on these impaired pools reflect only losses incurred after the acquisition (representing the present value of all cash flows that were expected at acquisition but currently are not expected to be received). At March 31, 2014, there was no reserve for impairment of PCI loans in our allowance for loan losses.
We periodically evaluate the remaining contractual required payments due and estimates of cash flows expected to be collected. These evaluations, performed quarterly, require the continued use of key assumptions and estimates, similar to the initial estimate of fair value. Changes in the contractual required payments due and estimated cash flows expected to be collected may result in changes in the accretable yield and non-accretable difference or reclassifications between accretable yield and the non-accretable difference. On an aggregate basis, if the acquired pools of PCI loans perform better than originally expected, we would expect to receive more future cash flows than originally modeled at the acquisition date. For the pools with better than expected cash flows, the forecasted increase would be recorded as an additional accretable yield that is recognized as a prospective increase to our interest income on loans.
Fair Value Measurements
We determine the fair values of financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Our investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value using reliable and unbiased evaluations by an industry-wide valuation service. This service uses evaluated pricing models that vary based on asset class and include available trade, bid, and other market information. Generally, the methodology includes broker quotes, proprietary models, vast descriptive terms and conditions databases, as well as extensive quality control programs. For certain of our held-to-maturity investment securities where there is minimal observable trading activity, we use a discounted cash flow approach to estimate fair value based on internal calculations and compare our results to information provided by external pricing sources.
We also fair value our interest rate lock commitments and forward loan sales commitments. The fair value of our interest rate lock commitments considers the expected premium (discount) to par and we apply certain fallout rates for those rate lock commitments for which we do not close a mortgage loan. In addition, we calculate the effects of the changes in interest rates from the date of the commitment through loan origination, and then period end, using applicable published mortgage-backed investment security prices. The fair value of the forward sales contracts to investors considers the market price movement of the same type of security between the trade date and the balance sheet date. At loan closing, the fair value of the interest rate lock commitment is included in the cost basis of loans held for sale, which are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.
Accounting for Economic Hedging Activities
We record all derivative instruments on the statement of condition at their fair values. We do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes. For derivatives designated as hedges, we contemporaneously document the hedging relationship, including the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, how effectiveness will be assessed at inception and at each reporting period and the method for measuring ineffectiveness. We evaluate the effectiveness of these transactions at inception and on an ongoing basis. Ineffectiveness is recorded through earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the fair value adjustment is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, except for the ineffective portion which is recorded in earnings. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, the fair value adjustments for both the hedged item and the hedging instrument are recorded through the income statement with any difference considered the ineffective portion of the hedge.
We discontinue hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective. In situations in which cash flow hedge accounting is discontinued, we continue to carry the derivative at its fair value on the statement of condition and recognize any subsequent changes in fair value in earnings over the term of the forecasted transaction. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur, we recognize immediately in earnings any gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income.
In the normal course of business, we enter into contractual commitments, including rate lock commitments, to finance residential mortgage loans. These commitments, which contain fixed expiration dates, offer the borrower an interest rate guarantee provided the loan meets underwriting guidelines and closes within the time frame established by us. Interest rate risk arises on these commitments and subsequently closed loans if interest rates change between the time of the interest rate lock and the delivery of the loan to the investor. Loan commitments related to residential mortgage loans intended to be sold are considered derivatives and are marked to market through earnings.
To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments, we economically hedge our commitments by entering into best efforts delivery forward loan sales contracts. During the rate lock commitment period, these forward loan sales contracts are marked to market through earnings and are not designated as accounting hedges. Exclusive of the fair value elements of the rate lock commitment related to servicing and the wholesale and retail rate spread, the changes in fair value related to movements in market rates of the rate lock commitments and the forward loan sales contracts generally move in opposite directions, and the net impact of changes in these valuations on net income during the loan commitment period is generally inconsequential. At the closing of the loan, the loan commitment derivative expires and we record a loan held for sale and continue to be obligated under the same forward loan sales contract. The forward sales contract is then designated as a hedge against the variability in cash to be received from the loan sale. Loans held for sale are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value.
Accounting for Impairment Testing of Goodwill
We have adopted ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This ASU permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting units fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step
goodwill impairment test. If an entity concludes it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it need not perform the two-step impairment test. We perform our annual review of the goodwill related to our mortgage banking segment during the third quarter. As a result of our acquisition of UFBC, we will perform our annual review of the goodwill associated with the commercial banking segment during the first quarter of 2015.
In the event we are required to perform a Step 1 fair value evaluation of the reporting unit, we make estimates of the discounted cash flows from the expected future operations of the reporting unit. This discounted cash flow analysis involves the use of unobservable inputs including: estimated future cash flows from operations; an estimate of a terminal value; a discount rate; and other inputs. Our estimated future cash flows are largely based on our historical actual cash flows. If the analysis indicates that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we do an analysis to compare the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of the goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all its assets and liabilities. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized.
Accounting for the Impairment of Amortizing Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets
We continually review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the remaining estimated useful life of such assets might warrant revision or that the balances may not be recoverable. We evaluate possible impairment by comparing estimated future cash flows, before interest expense and on an undiscounted basis, with the net book value of long-term assets, including amortizable intangible assets. If undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover assets, further analysis is performed in order to determine the amount of the impairment.
An impairment loss is then recorded for the excess of the carrying amount of the assets over their fair values. Fair value is usually determined based on the present value of estimated expected future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved.
Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets
We record a provision for income tax expense based on the amounts of current taxes payable or refundable and the change in net deferred tax assets or liabilities during the year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax effects of differing carrying values of assets and liabilities for tax and financial statement purposes that will reverse in future periods. When substantial uncertainty exists concerning the recoverability of a deferred tax asset, the carrying value of the asset is reduced by a valuation allowance. The amount of any valuation allowance established is based upon an estimate of the deferred tax asset that is more likely than not to be recovered. Increases or decreases in the valuation allowance result in increases or decreases to the provision for income taxes.
New Financial Accounting Standards
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2014-04, ReceivablesTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (ASU No. 2014-04), which clarifies when an in-substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and when a
creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan. An in-substance repossession or foreclosure occurs upon either the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure, or the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, this ASU requires interim and annual disclosure of both the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. ASU No. 2014-04 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Our adoption of ASU No. 2014-04 is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued ASU No. 2014-01, InvestmentsEquity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects (ASU No. 2014-01), which amends existing guidance to permit reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense or benefit. For those investments in qualified affordable housing projects not accounted for using the proportional amortization method, the investment should be accounted for as an equity method investment or a cost method investment in accordance with Subtopic 970-323. ASU No. 2014-01 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. Our adoption of ASU No. 2014-01 is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
2014 Economic Environment
The banking environment and the markets in which we conduct our businesses will continue to be strongly influenced by developments in the U.S. and global economies, as well as the continued implementation of rulemaking from recent financial reforms. The metropolitan Washington, D.C. area, the region in which we operate, continues to perform relatively well as compared to other geographic regions. Our credit quality continues to remain strong despite the challenging economic environment. At March 31, 2014, we had nonaccrual loans totaling $4.9 million, or 0.16% of total assets, and no loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest and still accruing. We had annualized net charge-offs of 0.17% of our average loans receivable for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
The interest rate environment and expectations that the Federal Reserve will moderate its qualitative easing (QE) programs may impact the results of our mortgage banking segment. Typically, during periods of increasing interest rates, mortgage originations decrease. The degree of the impact is dependent upon the severity and duration of QE pullback and increasing interest rates.
We expect challenging economic and operating conditions and an evolving regulatory regime to continue for the foreseeable future. These conditions could continue to affect the markets in which we do business and could adversely impact our results for the remainder of 2014. The degree of the impact is dependent upon the duration and severity of the aforementioned conditions.
Continued uncertainty and sluggish economic conditions could adversely affect our loan portfolio, including causing increases in delinquencies and default rates, which would adversely impact our charge-offs and provision for loan losses. Deterioration in real estate values and household incomes may also result in higher credit losses for us. Also, in the ordinary course of business, we may be subject to a concentration of credit risk to a particular industry, counterparty, borrower or issuer. A deterioration in the financial condition or prospects of a particular industry or a failure or downgrade of, or default by, any particular entity or group of entities could negatively impact our businesses, perhaps materially. The systems by which we set limits and monitor the level of our credit exposure to individual entities and industries also may not function as we have anticipated.
Market illiquidity and concerns over credit risk continue to impact the ratings of our pooled trust preferred securities. We hold investments of $7.1 million in par value of pooled trust preferred securities, which are significantly below book value as of March 31, 2014 due to the lack of liquidity in the market, deferrals and defaults of issuers, and continued investor apprehension for investing in these types of investments. As a result of the issuance of the final rules to complement Section 619 of the Financial Reform Act, commonly known as the Volcker Rule, which were released by federal banking agencies in late 2013 (the Final Rule), two of these investments are considered to be covered funds and are now required to be divested by us before July 2015. These investments have a par value of $2.7 million at March 31, 2014. During 2013, we recorded an other-than-temporary-impairment of $300,000 as a result of this new regulatory requirement. Additional impairment on these securities may be recorded in the future if the value of these securities deteriorates further.
Liquidity is essential to our business. The primary sources of funding for our Bank include customer deposits and wholesale funding. Our liquidity could be impaired by an inability to access the capital markets or by unforeseen outflows of cash, including deposits. This situation may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as general market disruption, negative views about the financial services industry generally, or an operational problem that affects a third party or us. Our ability to borrow from other financial institutions on favorable terms or at all could be adversely affected by disruptions in the capital markets or other events. While we believe we have a healthy liquidity position, any of the above factors could materially impact our liquidity position in the future.
The U.S. government continues to enact legislation and develop various programs and initiatives designed to regulate the financial services industry, stabilize the housing markets and stimulate the economy. The banking industry is awaiting many of the regulations resulting from the implementation of the Financial Reform Act. We remain unsure of the full impact this legislation will have on our business, operations or our financial condition.
Statements of Income
General
For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, we reported net income of $4.3 million and $7.2 million, respectively, a decrease of $2.9 million, or 40%. Net interest income after the provision for loan losses increased $683,000 to $23.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $23.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $1.9 million, an increase of $2.4 million, compared to a benefit of $457,000 for the same period of 2013, a result of the organic loan growth that occurred during the first quarter of 2014. Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $8.7 million and $8.5 million, respectively,
an increase of $194,000. This increase was primarily due to an increase in gains on mortgage banking activities and other fee income earned at our mortgage banking subsidiary. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, noninterest expense increased to $25.8 million, compared to $20.7 million for the same period of 2013. The increase in noninterest expense is primarily attributable to our acquisition of UFBC with merger and acquisition expenses of $3.2 million and an additional $1.5 million in expenses associated with the former operations of UFBC.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, basic and diluted earnings per common share were each $0.13. Basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2013 were each $0.23. Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were 32,608,599 and 31,019,110, respectively.
Return on average assets for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was 0.57% and 1.01%, respectively. Return on average equity for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was 4.79% and 9.12%, respectively.
General Business Segments
We operate in three business segments: commercial banking, mortgage banking, and wealth management services. As of June 30, 2013, we merged operations of our trust division and Wilson/Bennett Capital Management, Inc. into CWS, both of which had been included in the wealth management services segment. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2013 include the operations of these subsidiaries.
Net income attributable to the commercial banking segment for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $5.5 million compared to net income of $9.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Net interest income increased $2.8 million to $25.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to $22.4 million for the same period of 2013. Provision for loan losses increased $2.5 million to $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to a benefit of $542,000 for the same period of 2013. The increase in our provision expense was primarily related to organic growth within our loan portfolio during the first quarter of 2014. Noninterest income increased to $932,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $794,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Noninterest expense was $15.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to $10.1 million for the same period of 2013. The increase is primarily attributable to the UFBC acquisition, as this segment recorded $2.8 million in merger and acquisition expense and had operational expenses of $1.5 million related to UFBCs primary subsidiary, The Business Bank. We recorded $200,000 in core deposit intangible amortization related to the UFBC acquisition. Finally, branch expansion contributed $360,000 to the increase in noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2014. The remaining increase in noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was related to several business initiatives.
The mortgage banking segment reported a net loss of $167,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to a net loss of $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The decrease in the net loss is primarily a result of decreases in noninterest expense as a result of a 24% reduction in back office support positions which began in September 2013. Realized and unrealized gains associated with the fair value of commitments and loans held for sale increased slightly to $7.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $7.1 million for the same period of 2013.
Loan commitments are accounted for as derivative instruments and are recorded at fair value through earnings. This causes an unrealized gain to be recognized in income at the time of the commitment. When the loan actually closes, the unrealized gain is added to the basis of the ensuing loan held for sale (LHFS). At any point in time, the fair value of the locked commitments and the premium to the basis of existing LHFS represent unrealized gains that have been recognized in income, either in the current period or prior periods. At the time the loan is sold to investors, the investor buy price is equal to the basis of the loan held for sale, and there is no gain or loss recognized. However, this accounting creates a mismatch between the income recognition on loan production and the expense recognition for those same loans. Direct (e.g. commissions) and indirect loan expenses associated with originating, underwriting and closing loans are deferred and recognized at the time of investor purchase of the loan which often occurs in the quarter subsequent to the original commitment, creating a mismatch in the timing of the revenue and expense. These expenses are netted from the gain on sale from mortgage banking activities and contributed to the net loss recorded for the current quarter ended March 31, 2014.
During 2012 and 2013, we expanded the mortgage banking business segment through increases in loan origination officers and number of locations, which contributed to increases in noninterest expense. As a result of the changes in production levels due to the current economic environment within the markets in which we operate, we are actively monitoring each expense category at the mortgage subsidiary with the goal of returning George Mason to meaningful profitability during 2014.
The wealth management services segment, which includes CWS, recorded net income of $36,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to a net loss of $87,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. During 2013, we streamlined the business operations within this business segment, which contributed to the net loss reported.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is our primary source of revenue, representing the difference between interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. The level of net interest income is impacted primarily by variations in the volume and mix of these assets and liabilities, as well as changes in interest rates. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, net interest income was $25.7 million and $22.6 million, respectively. The yields on our loans receivable portfolio decreased 29 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the same period of 2013. This decrease was partially offset by the decrease in the rate of our interest-bearing deposits of 10 basis points as we have taken efforts to reduce our overall funding costs as a result of the current low interest rate environment. In addition, our funding costs related to other borrowed funds decreased 74 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the same three month period of 2013, again as a result of our efforts to reduce funding costs.
Our net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, which is calculated as net interest income divided by average interest earning assets, was 3.64% and 3.35% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our net interest margin was positively impacted as a result of the yield we earned in our loans held for sale portfolio. As the volume of our loans held for sale has decreased, we have used these funds for loans originated in our loans receivable portfolio contributing to our margin increase. In addition, our net interest margin was positively impacted through the contribution of earnings assets and interest-bearing liabilities from UFBC; the addition of these assets and liabilities added $2.3 million to net interest income and 0.01% to the net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Interest income on loans receivable increased $3.9 million to $24.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $21.0 million for the same three month period of 2013. The increase in interest income on loans receivable is primarily a result of the increase in the volume of the loans receivable portfolio. Interest income on loans held for sale was $2.5 million and $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, a decrease of $2.1 million, reflecting the significant decrease in origination activity within the mortgage banking segment during the past twelve months.
Interest income on investment securities increased $734,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013. The increase in interest income in our investment securities portfolio is attributable to our purchasing over $139 million in investment securities during the third and fourth quarters of 2013 as a result of having excess cash available to invest due to the decrease in the loans held for sale portfolio during these same periods.
Total interest expense decreased $612,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013. This decrease was primarily related to a decrease in wholesale funding. Average brokered certificates of deposit decreased $262.2 million as of March 31, 2014 as compared to March 31, 2013. We traditionally use this type of wholesale funding to support our loans held for sale originations. As the volume of mortgage loan originations has decreased, so has our reliance on this funding source.
The following tables present an analysis of average earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities with related components of interest income and interest expense on a tax equivalent basis.
Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates on Interest-Earning Assets and Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
(In thousands)
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Average |
| ||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Income/ |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Income/ |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Income/ |
|
Yield/ |
| ||||||
|
|
Balance |
|
Expense |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Expense |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Expense |
|
Rate |
| ||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loans (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
259,650 |
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
4.96 |
% |
$ |
218,584 |
|
$ |
2,192 |
|
4.00 |
% |
$ |
248,835 |
|
$ |
2,633 |
|
4.22 |
% |
Real estate - commercial |
|
1,159,091 |
|
12,623 |
|
4.36 |
% |
825,509 |
|
10,212 |
|
4.91 |
% |
737,218 |
|
10,189 |
|
5.53 |
% | ||||||
Real estate - construction |
|
397,199 |
|
4,829 |
|
4.86 |
% |
374,301 |
|
4,799 |
|
5.12 |
% |
304,367 |
|
3,981 |
|
5.23 |
% | ||||||
Real estate - residential |
|
304,546 |
|
3,109 |
|
4.08 |
% |
234,630 |
|
2,702 |
|
4.60 |
% |
216,572 |
|
2,740 |
|
5.06 |
% | ||||||
Home equity lines |
|
114,720 |
|
1,060 |
|
3.70 |
% |
116,539 |
|
1,068 |
|
3.72 |
% |
121,269 |
|
1,119 |
|
3.71 |
% | ||||||
Consumer |
|
6,465 |
|
83 |
|
5.21 |
% |
3,725 |
|
48 |
|
5.14 |
% |
3,054 |
|
39 |
|
5.07 |
% | ||||||
Total loans |
|
2,241,671 |
|
24,922 |
|
4.45 |
% |
1,773,288 |
|
21,021 |
|
4.74 |
% |
1,631,315 |
|
20,701 |
|
5.08 |
% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loans held for sale |
|
218,094 |
|
2,477 |
|
4.54 |
% |
496,038 |
|
4,555 |
|
3.67 |
% |
397,567 |
|
4,038 |
|
4.06 |
% | ||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
342,127 |
|
3,408 |
|
3.98 |
% |
244,297 |
|
2,624 |
|
4.30 |
% |
270,268 |
|
2,994 |
|
4.43 |
% | ||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
8,306 |
|
39 |
|
1.87 |
% |
11,121 |
|
56 |
|
2.01 |
% |
12,765 |
|
84 |
|
2.64 |
% | ||||||
Other investments |
|
15,521 |
|
133 |
|
3.40 |
% |
13,539 |
|
79 |
|
6.88 |
% |
16,456 |
|
49 |
|
1.19 |
% | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
|
31,790 |
|
31 |
|
0.40 |
% |
185,174 |
|
114 |
|
0.25 |
% |
38,436 |
|
21 |
|
0.22 |
% | ||||||
Total interest-earning assets and interest income (2) |
|
2,857,509 |
|
31,010 |
|
4.34 |
% |
2,723,457 |
|
28,449 |
|
4.18 |
% |
2,366,807 |
|
27,887 |
|
4.71 |
% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Noninterest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cash and due from banks |
|
35,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
16,752 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
24,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles, net |
|
32,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,472 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Accrued interest and other assets |
|
100,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
106,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
99,281 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(30,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(27,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(27,063 |
) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,021,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,846,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,484,509 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest - bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest - bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest checking |
|
420,285 |
|
534 |
|
0.52 |
% |
345,087 |
|
536 |
|
0.63 |
% |
183,179 |
|
291 |
|
0.64 |
% | ||||||
Money markets |
|
312,656 |
|
238 |
|
0.30 |
% |
277,927 |
|
211 |
|
0.30 |
% |
183,342 |
|
189 |
|
0.41 |
% | ||||||
Statement savings |
|
247,568 |
|
167 |
|
0.27 |
% |
209,820 |
|
139 |
|
0.27 |
% |
217,699 |
|
196 |
|
0.36 |
% | ||||||
Certificates of deposit |
|
754,081 |
|
1,882 |
|
1.01 |
% |
992,907 |
|
2,537 |
|
1.03 |
% |
967,728 |
|
2,883 |
|
1.19 |
% | ||||||
Total interest - bearing deposits |
|
1,734,590 |
|
2,821 |
|
0.66 |
% |
1,825,741 |
|
3,423 |
|
0.76 |
% |
1,551,948 |
|
3,559 |
|
0.92 |
% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Other borrowed funds |
|
375,775 |
|
2,173 |
|
2.34 |
% |
287,645 |
|
2,182 |
|
3.08 |
% |
342,475 |
|
2,373 |
|
2.79 |
% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities and interest expense |
|
2,110,365 |
|
4,994 |
|
0.96 |
% |
2,113,386 |
|
5,605 |
|
1.08 |
% |
1,894,423 |
|
5,932 |
|
1.26 |
% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Demand deposits |
|
519,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
377,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
291,659 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Other liabilities |
|
34,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
40,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
33,059 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Common shareholders equity |
|
357,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
314,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
265,368 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,021,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,846,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,484,509 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net interest income and net interest margin (2) |
|
|
|
$ |
26,016 |
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
$ |
22,844 |
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
$ |
21,955 |
|
3.71 |
% |
(1) Non-accrual loans are included in average balances and do not have a material effect on the average yield. Interest income on non-accruing loans was not material for the periods presented.
(2) Interest income for loans receivable and investment securities available-for-sale is reported on a fully taxable-equivalent basis at a rate of 33% for all periods presented.
Rate and Volume Analysis
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
(In thousands)
|
|
2014 Compared to 2013 |
|
2013 Compared to 2012 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Change Due to |
|
|
|
Change Due to |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Increase |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Increase |
| ||||||
|
|
Volume (3) |
|
Rate |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Volume (3) |
|
Rate |
|
(Decrease) |
| ||||||
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loans (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
406 |
|
$ |
620 |
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
$ |
(320 |
) |
$ |
(121 |
) |
$ |
(441 |
) |
Real estate - commercial |
|
4,010 |
|
(1,599 |
) |
2,411 |
|
1,303 |
|
(1,280 |
) |
23 |
| ||||||
Real estate - construction |
|
284 |
|
(254 |
) |
30 |
|
924 |
|
(106 |
) |
818 |
| ||||||
Real estate - residential |
|
797 |
|
(390 |
) |
407 |
|
234 |
|
(272 |
) |
(38 |
) | ||||||
Home equity lines |
|
(3 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(52 |
) |
1 |
|
(51 |
) | ||||||
Consumer |
|
34 |
|
1 |
|
35 |
|
8 |
|
1 |
|
9 |
| ||||||
Total loans |
|
5,528 |
|
(1,627 |
) |
3,901 |
|
2,097 |
|
(1,777 |
) |
320 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loans held for sale |
|
(2,552 |
) |
474 |
|
(2,078 |
) |
1,000 |
|
(483 |
) |
517 |
| ||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
1,051 |
|
(267 |
) |
784 |
|
(288 |
) |
(82 |
) |
(370 |
) | ||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
(14 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(17 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(17 |
) |
(28 |
) | ||||||
Other investments |
|
189 |
|
(135 |
) |
54 |
|
(163 |
) |
193 |
|
30 |
| ||||||
Federal funds sold |
|
(95 |
) |
12 |
|
(83 |
) |
80 |
|
13 |
|
93 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total interest income (2) |
|
4,107 |
|
(1,546 |
) |
2,561 |
|
2,715 |
|
(2,153 |
) |
562 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest - bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest checking |
|
115 |
|
(117 |
) |
(2 |
) |
249 |
|
(4 |
) |
245 |
| ||||||
Money markets |
|
26 |
|
1 |
|
27 |
|
96 |
|
(74 |
) |
22 |
| ||||||
Statement savings |
|
31 |
|
(3 |
) |
28 |
|
(13 |
) |
(44 |
) |
(57 |
) | ||||||
Certificates of deposit |
|
(611 |
) |
(44 |
) |
(655 |
) |
45 |
|
(391 |
) |
(346 |
) | ||||||
Total interest - bearing deposits |
|
(439 |
) |
(163 |
) |
(602 |
) |
377 |
|
(513 |
) |
(136 |
) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Other borrowed funds |
|
678 |
|
(687 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(398 |
) |
207 |
|
(191 |
) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total interest expense |
|
239 |
|
(850 |
) |
(611 |
) |
(21 |
) |
(306 |
) |
(327 |
) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net interest income (2) |
|
$ |
3,868 |
|
$ |
(696 |
) |
$ |
3,172 |
|
$ |
2,736 |
|
$ |
(1,847 |
) |
$ |
889 |
|
(1) Non-accrual loans are included in average balances and do not have a material effect on the average yield. Interest income on non-accruing loans was not material for the periods presented.
(2) Interest income for loans receivable and investment securities available-for-sale is reported on a fully taxable-equivalent basis at a rate of 33% for all periods presented.
(3) Changes attributable to rate/volume have been allocated to volume.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $1.9 million and a benefit of $457,000, respectively. The increase in our provision expense during 2014 compared to 2013 is primarily a result of our organic loan growth during the first quarter of 2014.
During 2014, we recorded charge-offs of $783,000 related to one commercial relationship that deteriorated during the first quarter. Recoveries from previously charged-off loans totaled $88,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, most of which were related to previously charged off residential real estate loans and home equity loans. Nonperforming loans at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, were $4.9 million and $2.3 million, respectively. The increase in nonperforming loans is directly related to those loans that were nonperforming at UFBC. Due to our assessment of the underlying credit related to these loans, we chose to maintain them on a status of nonaccrual post acquisition.
The allowance for loan losses was $29.1 million at March 31, 2014 and $27.9 million at December 31, 2013. Our allowance for loan losses ratio as a percent of total loans was 1.24% and 1.37% at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses ratio is due to $238 million in acquired loans that were added to the balance sheet during the first quarter of 2014 as these loans do not have an associated allowance. Our
allowance for loans losses ratio on the originated loans receivable portfolio was 1.36% at March 31, 2014.
A sluggish job market could adversely affect our home equity lines of credit, credit card and other loan portfolios, including causing increases in delinquencies and default rates, which we expect could impact our charge-offs and provision for loan losses. Deterioration in commercial and residential real estate values, employment data and household incomes may also result in higher credit losses in our commercial loan portfolio. Also, in the ordinary course of business, we may be subject to a concentration of credit risk to a particular industry, counterparty, borrower or issuer. At March 31, 2014, our commercial real estate (including construction lending) portfolio was 68% of our total loan portfolio. A deterioration in the financial condition or prospects of a particular industry or a failure or downgrade of, or default by, any particular entity or group of entities could negatively impact our businesses, perhaps materially, and the systems by which we set limits and monitor the level of our credit exposure to individual entities and industries may not function as we have anticipated.
Additional information on the allowance for loan losses, its allocation to the loans receivable portfolio and information on nonperforming loans can be found in the following tables.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
27,864 |
|
$ |
27,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for loan losses |
|
1,926 |
|
(457 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial and industrial |
|
(783 |
) |
|
| ||
Residential |
|
|
|
(85 |
) | ||
Consumer |
|
(2 |
) |
|
| ||
Total loans charged off |
|
(785 |
) |
(85 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial and industrial |
|
7 |
|
298 |
| ||
Residential |
|
81 |
|
8 |
| ||
Consumer |
|
|
|
1 |
| ||
Total recoveries |
|
88 |
|
307 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net (charge offs) recoveries |
|
(697 |
) |
222 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ending balance, March 31, |
|
$ |
29,093 |
|
$ |
27,165 |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
| ||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance at period end |
|
$ |
2,345,702 |
|
$ |
1,782,916 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable net of fees |
|
1.24 |
% |
1.52 |
% | ||
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans receivable |
|
0.12 |
% |
-0.05 |
% | ||
Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||||||
|
|
Allocation |
|
% of Total* |
|
Allocation |
|
% of Total* |
| ||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
3,962 |
|
12.39 |
% |
$ |
3,329 |
|
10.72 |
% |
Real estate - commercial |
|
16,004 |
|
50.72 |
% |
16,076 |
|
51.30 |
% | ||
Real estate - construction |
|
5,721 |
|
17.65 |
% |
5,336 |
|
17.77 |
% | ||
Real estate - residential |
|
2,707 |
|
14.14 |
% |
2,421 |
|
14.65 |
% | ||
Home equity lines |
|
609 |
|
4.90 |
% |
609 |
|
5.36 |
% | ||
Consumer |
|
90 |
|
0.20 |
% |
93 |
|
0.20 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
29,093 |
|
100.00 |
% |
$ |
27,864 |
|
100.00 |
% |
* Percentage of loan type to the total loan portfolio.
Nonperforming Loans
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
| ||
Nonaccruing loans |
|
$ |
4,947 |
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Loans contractually past-due 90 days or more and still accruing |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total nonperforming loans |
|
$ |
4,947 |
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income includes service charges on deposits and loans, realized and unrealized gains on mortgage banking activities, investment fee income, management fee income, and gains on sales of investment securities available-for-sale, and continues to be an important factor in our operating results.
Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $8.7 million and $8.5 million, respectively. Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on mortgage banking activities, which are reported net of commission & incentive expense, totaled $7.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $6.3 million for the same period of 2013. Noninterest income related to title insurance services and management fees from managed mortgage company affiliates has decreased to $21,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $697,000 for the same period of 2013 as George Mason has exited these lines of business. Investment fee income decreased $325,000 to $222,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $547,000 for the same period of 2013. The decrease in investment fee income is a result of the restructuring we completed in our wealth management business segment during 2013.
The increase in net gains from mortgage banking activities is mainly due to changes in the unrealized gains associated with the fair market value of our locked commitments and closed loans held for sale. For the first quarter of 2014, the unrealized gain decreased $5.9 million as compared to the year ago quarter. In accordance with GAAP, if a lender enters into a mortgage loan commitment with a customer and intends to sell the mortgage loan after it is funded, the written loan commitment is to be accounted for as a derivative instrument and is to be recorded at fair value through earnings. George Mason enters into commitments where individual loans are locked in at a specified interest rate for a fixed period. At the time of commitment, George Mason also enters into a best efforts forward contract with an investor to sell the loan at an agreed upon price if, and after, the loan is closed. This price represents the fair value of the interest rate lock commitment (IRLC) and is an unrealized gain that is included in earnings
during the period of the IRLC. This gain is also recognized earlier in earnings than the expenses associated with originating, underwriting and closing the loan, which, under GAAP, are recognized and deferred by the Company at the time of loan sale to the investor. When the loan actually closes, the unrealized gain is added to the basis of the ensuing LHFS. At any point in time (e.g. quarter end) the fair value of the existing IRLCs (not yet closed) and the premium to the basis of existing LHFS (loans closed but not yet purchased by investors) represent unrealized gains that have been recognized in income, either in the current period or prior periods. At the time the loan is sold to investors, the investor buy price is equal to the basis of the loan held for sale, and there is no gain or loss recognized. This accounting creates a mismatch between the income recognition on loan production and the expense recognition for those same loans.
As mentioned, direct costs associated with loan origination, such as commission and salaries, are recorded as a reduction to realized and unrealized gains on mortgage banking activities.
For the first quarter of 2014, we closed $551.4 million in mortgage originations. This compares to $1.08 billion in mortgage originations for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The decrease in mortgage originations is a result of an increased interest rate environment which has decreased existing home borrowers interest in refinancing their current mortgage. As a result, refinance activity has decreased to only 18% of our loan origination volume for the first quarter of 2014 compared to 48% for the same period of 2013. Because of the decrease in loan origination volumes, we have reduced our back office staffing by approximately 24% at our mortgage banking segment, which began last year. We continue to closely monitor each expense category at our mortgage subsidiary in relation to production expectations.
The increase in the cash surrender value of our bank-owned life insurance for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $119,000 and $92,000, respectively.
Noninterest income represented 25% and 27% of our total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense includes, among other things, salaries and benefits, occupancy costs, professional fees, depreciation, data processing, telecommunications and miscellaneous expenses. Noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $25.8 million, compared to $20.7 million for the same period of 2013, an increase of $5.1 million, or 25%. As previously mentioned, our merger and acquisition expenses related to the UFBC acquisition were $3.2 million for 2014. We also recognized an additional $1.5 million in noninterest expense related to UFBC during the first quarter of 2014, which is contributing to the increase in expenses in 2014 as compared to 2013.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014, salaries and benefits expense increased to $11.4 million from $10.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. The increase in salaries and benefits expense during 2014 compared to 2013 is primarily a result of the increase in staffing within our commercial banking segment as a result of the UFBC acquisition. Because the integration of UFBCs back office systems into Cardinals did not occur until March 2014, the staffing levels at UFBC remained near their preacquisition levels. We expect salary and benefits expense to decrease during the second quarter of 2014 as we have completed the UFBC integration.
Occupancy expense was $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, an increase of $549,000 when compared to the same period of 2013. The increase in occupancy expense during 2014 as compared to 2013 is primarily attributable to the eight additional branch office locations of UFBC. During the second quarter of 2014, we will consolidate select branch offices that overlap existing markets as a result of the UFBC acquisition. In addition, we added two branch offices in the last six months of 2013 which contribute to the increase in occupancy expense for 2014. The increases in depreciation expense and data processing & communications for 2014 compared to 2013 can also be attributed to the UFBC acquisition. Our expectation of cost savings associated with the UFBC acquisition is approximately 50% of their total expense base, of which we expect to begin to realize during the second quarter of 2014.
Professional fees decreased $498,000 to $818,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $1.3 million for the same period of 2013 as a result of the decrease in temporary staffing we had at George Mason to handle the increase in loan origination volume we experienced during the first quarter of 2013; all due to the increase in refinance activity during that period. The level of temporary staffing was maintained at George Mason until the beginning of the third quarter of 2013 when we experienced a significant decrease in loan origination volumes as a result of mortgage market conditions.
Income Taxes
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $2.3 million, compared to $3.7 million for the same period of 2013. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was 35.2% and 33.8%, respectively. Our effective tax rate is less than the statutory rate because of income we receive on tax-exempt investments. See also Critical Accounting Policies Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets.
Statements of Condition
Total assets were $3.14 billion and $2.89 billion at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. In connection with the closing of the UFBC acquisition, we added $329 million in total assets to our balance sheet. We recorded $24.7 million in goodwill and $2.7 million of core deposit intangibles. Additional information on the assets acquired and liabilities assumed can be found in the discussion below.
Investment Securities
Our investment securities portfolio is used as a source of income and liquidity. Investment securities were $363.8 million at March 31, 2014, compared to $359.7 million at December 31, 2013, an increase of $4.1 million. The increase in investment securities was a result of the securities we acquired in the UFBC acquisition during 2014. The investment securities portfolio consists of investment securities available-for-sale, investment securities held-to-maturity and trading securities. Investment securities available-for-sale are those securities that we intend to hold for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily until maturity. These securities are carried at fair value and may be sold as part of an asset/liability strategy, liquidity management or regulatory capital management. Investment securities held-to-maturity are those securities that we have the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. Investment securities-trading are securities we purchase to economically hedge against fair value changes in our nonqualified deferred compensation plan liability. These securities include cash equivalents, equities and mutual funds. See the following table for additional information on our investment securities portfolio.
Investment Securities
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
| ||
|
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
| ||
Available-for-sale at March 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
U.S. government-sponsored agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
One to five years |
|
$ |
26,548 |
|
$ |
27,766 |
|
2.98 |
% |
Five to ten years |
|
19,998 |
|
21,769 |
|
3.82 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
29,971 |
|
29,432 |
|
3.59 |
% | ||
Total U.S. government-sponsored agencies |
|
76,517 |
|
78,967 |
|
3.44 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mortgage-backed securities (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
One to five years |
|
241 |
|
245 |
|
4.71 |
% | ||
Five to ten years |
|
25,386 |
|
26,074 |
|
3.48 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
114,848 |
|
119,203 |
|
3.77 |
% | ||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
140,475 |
|
145,522 |
|
3.72 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tax exempt municipal securities (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Within one year |
|
4,443 |
|
4,515 |
|
3.89 |
% | ||
One to five years |
|
7,928 |
|
8,342 |
|
3.49 |
% | ||
Five to ten years |
|
35,359 |
|
37,020 |
|
3.57 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
60,738 |
|
62,969 |
|
3.59 |
% | ||
Taxable municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Within one year |
|
1,904 |
|
1,899 |
|
0.65 |
% | ||
Five to ten years |
|
4,269 |
|
4,684 |
|
4.99 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
944 |
|
1,008 |
|
5.33 |
% | ||
Total municipal securities |
|
115,585 |
|
120,437 |
|
3.61 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
U. S. treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Within one year |
|
4,998 |
|
5,007 |
|
2.36 |
% | ||
Total U.S. treasury securities |
|
4,998 |
|
5,007 |
|
2.36 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pooled trust preferred & corporate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
One to five years |
|
504 |
|
504 |
|
0.35 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
2,368 |
|
2,368 |
|
1.49 |
% | ||
Total pooled trust preferred & corporate securities |
|
2,872 |
|
2,872 |
|
1.29 |
% | ||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
340,447 |
|
$ |
352,805 |
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
| ||
|
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
| ||
Held-to-maturity at March 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mortgage-backed securities (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
One to five years |
|
$ |
589 |
|
$ |
625 |
|
4.62 |
% |
Five to ten years |
|
121 |
|
130 |
|
5.42 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
1,636 |
|
1,737 |
|
2.02 |
% | ||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
2,346 |
|
2,492 |
|
2.85 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
After ten years |
|
4,005 |
|
3,050 |
|
1.10 |
% | ||
Total pooled trust preferred securities |
|
4,005 |
|
3,050 |
|
1.10 |
% | ||
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
6,351 |
|
5,542 |
|
1.75 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total investment securities |
|
$ |
346,798 |
|
$ |
358,347 |
|
3.53 |
% |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
| ||
|
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
| ||
Available-for-sale at December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
U.S. government-sponsored agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
One to five years |
|
$ |
25,591 |
|
$ |
26,863 |
|
3.07 |
% |
Five to ten years |
|
20,000 |
|
21,404 |
|
3.82 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
29,971 |
|
28,661 |
|
3.59 |
% | ||
Total U.S. government-sponsored agencies |
|
75,562 |
|
76,928 |
|
3.47 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mortgage-backed securities (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
One to five years |
|
99 |
|
101 |
|
4.66 |
% | ||
Five to ten years |
|
25,883 |
|
26,134 |
|
3.57 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
118,627 |
|
121,594 |
|
3.78 |
% | ||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
144,609 |
|
147,829 |
|
3.74 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tax exempt municipal securities (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Within one year |
|
3,557 |
|
3,661 |
|
4.44 |
% | ||
One to five years |
|
4,529 |
|
4,809 |
|
3.83 |
% | ||
Five to ten years |
|
37,392 |
|
38,870 |
|
3.55 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
62,970 |
|
63,744 |
|
3.61 |
% | ||
Taxable municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Five to ten years |
|
4,273 |
|
4,602 |
|
4.99 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
995 |
|
1,052 |
|
5.33 |
% | ||
Total municipal securities |
|
113,716 |
|
116,738 |
|
3.69 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
U. S. treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Within one year |
|
4,992 |
|
5,029 |
|
2.36 |
% | ||
Total U.S. treasury securities |
|
4,992 |
|
5,029 |
|
2.36 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
After ten years |
|
2,795 |
|
2,795 |
|
1.49 |
% | ||
Total pooled trust preferred securities |
|
2,795 |
|
2,795 |
|
1.49 |
% | ||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
341,674 |
|
$ |
349,319 |
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
| ||
|
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
| ||
Held-to-maturity at December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mortgage-backed securities (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
One to five years |
|
$ |
663 |
|
$ |
703 |
|
4.63 |
% |
Five to ten years |
|
131 |
|
137 |
|
5.44 |
% | ||
After ten years |
|
1,678 |
|
1,777 |
|
2.02 |
% | ||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
2,472 |
|
2,617 |
|
2.90 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
After ten years |
|
4,005 |
|
2,910 |
|
1.11 |
% | ||
Total pooled trust preferred securities |
|
4,005 |
|
2,910 |
|
1.11 |
% | ||
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
6,477 |
|
5,527 |
|
1.79 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total investment securities |
|
$ |
348,151 |
|
$ |
354,846 |
|
3.58 |
% |
We complete reviews for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly. As of March 31, 2014, the majority of our investment securities portfolio consisted of securities rated AAA by a leading rating agency. Investment securities which carry a AAA rating are judged to be of the best quality and carry the smallest degree of investment risk. At March 31, 2014, 99% of our mortgage-related investment securities portfolio is guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA).
We have $2.1 million in non-government non-agency mortgage-related securities. These securities are rated from AAA to AA. The various protective elements on the non-agency securities may change in the future if market conditions or the financial stability of credit insurers changes, which could impact the ratings of these securities.
At March 31, 2014, certain of our investment grade securities were in an unrealized loss position. Investment securities with unrealized losses are a result of pricing changes in the current market environment and not as a result of permanent credit impairment. Contractual cash flows for the agency mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed and/or funded by the U.S. government. Other mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities have third party protective elements and there are no negative indications that the contractual cash flows will not be received when due. We do not intend to sell nor do we believe we will be required to sell any of our temporarily impaired securities prior to the recovery of their amortized cost.
We own four pooled trust preferred securities which were all previously classified as held-to-maturity within the investment securities portfolio. As a result of the issuance of the Final Rule, only two of the four investments were exempt from the covered fund definition. For the two investments that were not exempt as a result of the Final Rule, we will be required to divest our investment in these particular pooled trust preferred securities prior to the effectiveness of the Final Rule on July 21, 2015. As a result of this new regulation, these two investments which have a par value of $2.7 million and a carrying value of $2.4 million at March 31, 2014, were reclassified to the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. We recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $300,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, which was determined based on the market bid price of these investments. No further impairment was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
The par value of the two pooled trust preferred securities still classified as held-to-maturity totaled $4.0 million at March 31, 2014. The collateral underlying these structured securities are instruments issued by financial institutions. We own the A-3 tranches in each issuance. Each of the bonds are rated by more than one rating agency. One security has a composite rating of A-, one security has a composite rating of BBB+. Observable trading activity remains limited for these types of securities. We have estimated the fair value of these securities through the use of internal calculations and through information provided by external pricing services. Given the level of subordination below our A-3 tranches, and the actual and expected performance of the underlying collateral, we expect to receive all contractual interest and principal payments recovering the amortized cost basis of each of the securities, and concluded that these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired. We continuously monitor the financial condition of the underlying issues and the level of subordination below the A-3 tranches. We also utilize a multi-scenario model which assumes varying levels of additional defaults and deferrals and the effects of such adverse developments on the contractual cash flows
for the A-3 tranches. In each of the adverse scenarios, there was no indication of a break to the A-3 contractual cash flows.
In one of the pooled trust preferred securities issues, 59% of the principal balance is subordinate to our class of ownership, and it is estimated that a break in contractual cash flow would occur if $178 million of the remaining $236 million, or 75% of the performing collateral defaulted or deferred payment. In the other pooled trust preferred security, 57% of the principal balance is subordinate to our class of ownership, and it is estimated that a break in contractual cash flow would occur if $158 million of the remaining $243 million, or 65% of the performing collateral defaulted or deferred payment. Significant judgment is involved in the evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment. We do not intend to sell nor do we believe it is probable we will be required to sell these pooled trust preferred securities prior to the recovery of our investment.
No other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized on the securities in our investment portfolio as of March 31, 2014.
We hold $13.7 million in FHLB stock at March 31, 2014, which is included in other investments on the statement of condition.
Loans Receivable
Total loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs, were $2.3 billion and $2.04 billion at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. See the following table for details on the loans receivable portfolio. As a result of our acquisition of UFBC, we added $238 million in loans, net of negative $3.9 million fair value adjustments, for the period ended March 31, 2014. See further details regarding the acquired loans in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. For the quarter ended March 31, 2014, net new organic loan growth was approximately $67 million, representing annualized loan growth of 13%.
Loans held for sale at March 31, 2014 were $265.3 million compared to $374.0 million at December 31, 2013. The decrease in our loans held for sale balances at March 31, 2014 compared to December 31, 2013 is directly attributable to the decrease in loans closed during the first quarter of 2014. Loans closed at our mortgage subsidiary totaled $551.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $797.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2013. Loans held for sale are valued at the lower of cost or fair value.
Loans Receivable
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2014 |
|
December 31, 2013 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
291,208 |
|
12.39 |
% |
$ |
219,156 |
|
10.72 |
% |
Real estate - commercial |
|
1,191,953 |
|
50.72 |
% |
1,048,579 |
|
51.30 |
% | ||
Real estate - construction |
|
414,711 |
|
17.65 |
% |
363,063 |
|
17.77 |
% | ||
Real estate - residential |
|
332,288 |
|
14.14 |
% |
299,484 |
|
14.65 |
% | ||
Home equity lines |
|
115,045 |
|
4.90 |
% |
109,481 |
|
5.36 |
% | ||
Consumer |
|
5,045 |
|
0.20 |
% |
4,159 |
|
0.20 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Gross loans |
|
$ |
2,350,250 |
|
100.00 |
% |
2,043,922 |
|
100.00 |
% | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net deferred (fees) costs |
|
(4,548 |
) |
|
|
(3,754 |
) |
|
| ||
Less: allowance for loan losses |
|
(29,093 |
) |
|
|
(27,864 |
) |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
2,316,609 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,012,304 |
|
|
|
Deposits
Total deposits were $2.38 billion at March 31, 2014 compared to $2.06 billion at December 31, 2013. As a result of our acquisition of UFBC, we added $295 million in deposits, net of positive $1.2 million fair value adjustments to the certificates of deposit portfolio, for the period ended March 31, 2014. See the following table for details on certificates of deposit with balances of $100,000 or more.
We are a member of the Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS). CDARS allows our customers to access FDIC insurance protection on multi-million dollar certificates of deposit through our Bank. When a customer places a large deposit through CDARS, we place their funds into certificates of deposit with other banks in the CDARS network
in increments of less than $250,000 so that principal and interest are eligible for FDIC insurance protection. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $45.1 million and $72.7 million, respectively, in CDARS deposits, which are considered to be brokered deposits. The decrease in our CDARS deposits is primarily due to our repayment of obligations the Company had in the networks one-way buy program. Brokered certificates of deposit not in the CDARS network were $260.6 million and $228.5 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. We use this type of funding to lock in low cost term funding to support mortgage loans we originate and intend to sell.
Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 or More
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
Fixed Term |
|
No-Penalty* |
|
Total |
| |||
Maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
72,972 |
|
$ |
4,955 |
|
$ |
77,927 |
|
Over three months through six months |
|
47,310 |
|
4,783 |
|
52,093 |
| |||
Over six months through twelve months |
|
58,254 |
|
8,398 |
|
66,652 |
| |||
Over twelve months |
|
121,929 |
|
35,049 |
|
156,978 |
| |||
|
|
$ |
300,465 |
|
$ |
53,185 |
|
$ |
353,650 |
|
* No-Penalty certificates of deposit can be redeemed at anytime at the request of the depositor.
Borrowings
Other borrowed funds decreased $92.4 million to $382.9 million at March 31, 2014, compared to $475.2 million at December 31, 2013. FHLB advances increased to $240.0 million at March 31, 2014 compared to $215.0 million at December 31, 2013. Customer repurchase agreements increased $8.9 million to $103.5 million at March 31, 2014 compared to $94.6 million at December 31, 2013. We had federal funds purchased of $15.0 million outstanding at March 31, 2014 compared to $45.0 million at December 31, 2013. The following table provides information on our borrowings.
In connection with the acquisition, we acquired all of the voting and common shares of UFBC Capital Trust I (the Trust), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary established for the sole purpose of issuing $5.0 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (trust preferred securities). These trust preferred securities are due in 2035 and have an interest rate of LIBOR (London Interbank Offering Rate) plus 2.10%, which adjusts quarterly. The Trust is an unconsolidated subsidiary since we are not the primary beneficiary of this entity. The additional $155,000 that is payable by us to the Trust represents our unfunded capital investment in the Trust.
Short-Term Borrowings and Other Borrowed Funds
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Amount |
| |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Outstanding |
| |
Other short-term borrowed funds: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Customer repurchase agreements |
|
0.14 |
% |
$ |
103,547 |
|
Federal Funds Purchased |
|
0.47 |
% |
15,000 |
| |
Total other short-term borrowed funds and weighted average |
|
0.18 |
% |
$ |
118,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Other borrowed funds: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Trust preferred |
|
2.50 |
% |
$ |
24,307 |
|
FHLB advances - long term |
|
3.32 |
% |
240,000 |
| |
Other borrowed funds and weighted average rate |
|
3.24 |
% |
$ |
264,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total other borrowed funds and weighted average rate |
|
2.30 |
% |
$ |
382,854 |
|
Shareholders Equity
Shareholders equity at March 31, 2014 was $352.4 million compared to $320.5 million at December 31, 2013, an increase of $31.9 million, or 10%. The increase in shareholders equity at March 31, 2014 compared to December 31, 2013 is primarily attributable to shares issued as a result of our acquisition of UFBC. For each share of UFBC common stock outstanding, the shareholders of UFBC received a fixed exchange ratio of $19.13 in cash and 1.154 shares of our common stock. We issued 1.6 million shares of our common stock and added $25.2 million in additional paid in capital for a total of $26.8 million in additional capital. Net income of $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 also contributed to the increase in equity less dividends of $2.6 million that were declared during 2014. In addition, accumulated other comprehensive income increased $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Book value per share at March 31, 2014 was $11.03 compared to $10.57 at December 31, 2013. Tangible book value per share (which is book value per share less goodwill and other intangible assets) at March 31, 2014 was $9.86 compared to $10.23 at December 31, 2013.
Business Segment Operations
We provide banking and non-banking financial services and products through our subsidiaries. We operate in three business segments, commercial banking, mortgage banking and wealth management services. As of June 30, 2013, we merged operations of our trust division and Wilson/Bennett into CWS, both of which had been included in the wealth management services segment. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 include the operations of these subsidiaries prior to their closure.
Commercial Banking
The commercial banking segment includes both commercial and consumer lending and provides customers such products as commercial loans, real estate loans, and other business financing and consumer loans. In addition, this segment also provides customers with various deposit products including demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, the commercial banking segment recorded net income of $5.5 million compared to $9.1 million for the same period of 2013. See Statements of Income GeneralBusiness Segments above for additional information regarding the operating results for the commercial banking segment for the periods presented. At March 31, 2014, total assets for this segment were $3.01 billion, loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs, were $2.35 billion and total deposits were $2.38 billion. At March 31, 2013, total assets for this segment were $2.75 billion, loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs, were $1.78 billion and total deposits were $2.09 billion.
Mortgage Banking
The operations of the mortgage banking segment are conducted through George Mason. George Mason engages primarily in the origination and acquisition of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market on a best efforts basis.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the mortgage banking segment recorded net losses of $167,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. See Statements of Income GeneralBusiness Segments above for additional information regarding the operating results for the mortgage banking segment for the periods presented. At March 31, 2014, total assets for this segment were $322.0 million; loans held for sale were $265.3 million and mortgage funding checks were $6.5 million. At March 31, 2013, total assets for this segment were $563.8 million; loans held for sale were $534.7 million and mortgage funding checks were $45.3 million.
Wealth Management Services
The wealth management services segment provides investment and financial services to businesses and individuals, including financial planning, retirement/estate planning, and investment management.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the wealth management services segment recorded net income of $36,000 and a net loss of $87,000, respectively. See Statements of Income GeneralBusiness Segments above for additional information regarding the operating results for this business segment for the periods presented. At March 31, 2014, total assets were $2.3 million and managed and custodial assets were $179 million. At March 31, 2013, total assets were $2.4 million and managed and custodial assets were $324 million. The decrease in managed and custodial assets at March 31, 2014 compared to a year ago is a direct result of our wealth management reorganization.
Additional information pertaining to our business segments can be found in Note 4 to the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Capital Resources
Capital adequacy is an important measure of our financial stability and performance. Our objectives are to maintain a level of capitalization that is sufficient to sustain asset growth and promote depositor and investor confidence.
Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy utilizing a formula that takes into account the individual risk profile of the financial institution. The guidelines define capital as both Tier 1 (which includes common shareholders equity and certain debt obligations) and Tier 2 (which includes certain other debt obligations, a portion of the allowance for loan losses, and 45% of any unrealized gains in equity securities).
At March 31, 2014, our Tier 1 and total (Tier 1 and Tier 2) risk-based capital ratios were 10.72% and 11.71%, respectively. At December 31, 2013, our Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios were 11.85% and 12.89%, respectively. Our regulatory capital levels for the Bank and bank holding company meet those established for well-capitalized institutions. The decrease in our risk-based capital ratios at March 31, 2014 compared to December 31, 2013 was a primarily a result of the increase in risk weighted assets we acquired from UFBC during 2014.
The following table provides additional information pertaining to our capital ratios.
Capital Components
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
Prompt Corrective |
| |||||||||
|
|
Actual |
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
Action Provisions |
| |||||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
| |||||
Cardinal Financial Corporation (Consolidated): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
At March 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total risk-based capital |
|
$ |
353,010 |
|
11.71 |
% |
$ |
241,267 |
|
> |
8.00 |
% |
$ |
301,584 |
|
> |
10.00 |
% |
Tier I risk-based capital |
|
323,331 |
|
10.72 |
% |
120,633 |
|
> |
4.00 |
% |
180,950 |
|
> |
6.00 |
% | |||
Leverage capital ratio |
|
323,331 |
|
10.82 |
% |
119,561 |
|
> |
4.00 |
% |
149,451 |
|
> |
5.00 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
At December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total risk-based capital |
|
$ |
349,894 |
|
12.89 |
% |
$ |
217,111 |
|
> |
8.00 |
% |
$ |
271,389 |
|
> |
10.00 |
% |
Tier I risk-based capital |
|
321,513 |
|
11.85 |
% |
108,555 |
|
> |
4.00 |
% |
162,833 |
|
> |
6.00 |
% | |||
Leverage capital ratio |
|
321,513 |
|
11.70 |
% |
109,928 |
|
> |
4.00 |
% |
137,410 |
|
> |
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
Prompt Corrective |
| |||||||||
|
|
Actual |
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
Action Provisions |
| |||||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
| |||||
Cardinal Bank: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
At March 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total risk-based capital |
|
$ |
350,646 |
|
11.69 |
% |
$ |
238,985 |
|
> |
8.00 |
% |
$ |
298,732 |
|
> |
10.00 |
% |
Tier I risk-based capital |
|
320,967 |
|
10.70 |
% |
119,493 |
|
> |
4.00 |
% |
179,239 |
|
> |
6.00 |
% | |||
Leverage capital ratio |
|
320,967 |
|
10.74 |
% |
120,016 |
|
> |
4.00 |
% |
150,020 |
|
> |
5.00 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
At December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total risk-based capital |
|
$ |
343,392 |
|
12.73 |
% |
$ |
215,733 |
|
> |
8.00 |
% |
$ |
269,666 |
|
> |
10.00 |
% |
Tier I risk-based capital |
|
315,011 |
|
11.68 |
% |
107,867 |
|
> |
4.00 |
% |
161,800 |
|
> |
6.00 |
% | |||
Leverage capital ratio |
|
315,011 |
|
11.54 |
% |
109,212 |
|
> |
4.00 |
% |
136,515 |
|
> |
5.00 |
% |
Liquidity
Liquidity in the banking industry is defined as the ability to meet the demand for funds of both depositors and borrowers. We must be able to meet these needs by obtaining funding from depositors or other lenders or by converting non-cash items into cash. The objective of our liquidity management program is to ensure that we always have sufficient resources to meet the demands of our depositors and borrowers. Stable core deposits and a strong capital position provide the base for our liquidity position. We believe we have demonstrated our ability to attract deposits because of our convenient branch locations, personal service and pricing.
In addition to deposits, we have access to different wholesale funding markets. These markets include the brokered CD market, the repurchase agreement market and the federal funds market. We are a member of the Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS). CDARS allows our customers to access FDIC insurance protection on multi-million dollar certificates of deposit through our Bank. When a customer places a large deposit through CDARS, we place their funds into certificates of deposit with other banks in the CDARS network in increments of less than $250,000 so that principal and interest are eligible for FDIC insurance protection. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $45.1 million and $72.7 million, respectively, in CDARS deposits, which are considered to be brokered deposits. The decrease in our CDARS deposits is primarily due to our repayment of obligations the Company had in the networks one-way buy program. Brokered certificates of deposit not in the CDARS network were $260.6 million and $228.5 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
We also maintain secured lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Having diverse funding alternatives reduces our reliance on any one source for funding.
Cash flow from amortizing assets or maturing assets can also provide funding to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers.
We have established a formal liquidity contingency plan which establishes a liquidity management team and provides guidelines for liquidity management. For our liquidity management program, we first determine our current liquidity position and then forecast liquidity based on anticipated changes in the balance sheet. In this forecast, we expect to maintain a liquidity cushion. We also stress test our liquidity position under several different stress scenarios, from moderate to severe. Guidelines for the forecasted liquidity cushion and for liquidity cushions for each stress scenario have been established. We believe that we have sufficient resources to meet our liquidity needs.
Liquid assets, which include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and investment securities available for sale, totaled $391.8 million at March 31, 2014 or 12.5% of total assets. We held investments that are classified as held-to-maturity in the amount of $6.4 million at March 31, 2014. To maintain ready access to the Banks secured lines of credit, the Bank has pledged roughly half of its investment securities and a portion of its commercial real estate and residential real estate loan portfolios to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) with additional investment securities and certain loans in its commercial & industrial loan portfolio pledged to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Additional borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta at March 31, 2014 was $490.7 million. Borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was $101.8 million at March 31, 2014. These facilities are subject to the FHLB and the Federal Reserve approving disbursement to us. In addition, we have unsecured federal funds purchased lines of $315 million available to us. We anticipate maintaining liquidity at a level sufficient to protect depositors, provide for reasonable growth and fully comply with all regulatory requirements.
Contractual Obligations
We have entered into a number of long-term contractual obligations to support our ongoing activities. These contractual obligations will be funded through operating revenues and liquidity sources held or available to us and exclude contractual interest costs, where applicable.
The required payments under such obligations are detailed in the following table.
Contractual Obligations
At March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 |
|
1 - 3 Years |
|
3 - 5 Years |
|
More than 5 |
| |||||
Long-Term Debt Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
502,196 |
|
$ |
254,200 |
|
$ |
202,302 |
|
$ |
42,435 |
|
$ |
3,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
305,703 |
|
131,860 |
|
159,438 |
|
14,405 |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta |
|
240,000 |
|
10,000 |
|
125,000 |
|
75,000 |
|
30,000 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Trust preferred securities |
|
24,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,307 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Operating lease obligations |
|
37,662 |
|
8,738 |
|
12,638 |
|
8,114 |
|
8,172 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,109,868 |
|
$ |
404,798 |
|
$ |
499,378 |
|
$ |
139,954 |
|
$ |
65,738 |
|
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk and Credit Risk
We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized on the balance sheet.
The Banks maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit
policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. We evaluate each customers credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis and require collateral to support financial instruments when deemed necessary. The amount of collateral obtained upon extension of credit is based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include deposits held by us, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have expiration dates up to one year or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future funding requirements. These instruments represent obligations to extend credit or guarantee borrowings and are not recorded on the consolidated statements of condition. The rates and terms of these instruments are competitive with others in the market in which we do business.
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. Those lines of credit may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which we have committed.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments we issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. We hold certificates of deposit, deposit accounts, and real estate as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, commitments to extend credit were $1.80 billion and $1.49 billion, respectively. Standby letters of credit were $31.4 million and $28.0 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Commitments to extend credit of $327.2 million as of March 31, 2014 are related to the mortgage banking segments mortgage loan funding commitments and are of a short term nature, compared to $210.9 million as of December 31, 2013. The increase in mortgage loan funding commitments is related to the increased origination production at George Mason during the first quarter of 2014 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2013.
We have counter-party risk which may arise from the possible inability of George Masons third-party investors to meet the terms of their forward sales contracts. George Mason works with third-party investors that are generally well-capitalized, are investment grade and exhibit strong financial performance to mitigate this risk. We do not expect any third-party investor to fail to meet its obligation. In addition, we have derivative counterparty risk relating to three interest rate swaps we have with third parties. This risk may arise from the inability of the third party to meet the terms of the contract. We continuously monitor the financial condition of these third parties. We do not expect these third parties to fail to meet their obligations.
George Mason provides for its estimated exposure to repurchase loans previously sold to investors for which borrowers failed to provide full and accurate information on their loan application or for which appraisals have not been acceptable or when the loan was not underwritten in accordance with the loan program specified by the loan investor, and for other
exposure to its investors related to loan sales activities. We evaluate the merits of each claim and estimate the reserve based on actual and expected claims received and consider the historical amounts paid to settle such claims. We have taken steps to limit our exposure to such loan repurchases through agreements entered into with various investors. As a result, we receive a limited number of additional claims. As of March 31, 2014, the reserve for loan repurchases had a balance of $261,000.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to various business risks including interest rate risk. Our goal is to maximize net interest income without incurring excessive interest rate risk. Management of net interest income and interest rate risk must be consistent with the level of capital and liquidity that we maintain. We manage interest rate risk through an asset and liability committee (ALCO). ALCO is responsible for managing our interest rate risk in conjunction with liquidity and capital management.
We employ an independent consulting firm to model our interest rate sensitivity. We use a net interest income simulation model as our primary tool to measure interest rate sensitivity. Many assumptions are developed based on expected activity in the balance sheet. For maturing assets, assumptions are created for the redeployment of these assets. For maturing liabilities, assumptions are developed for the replacement of these funding sources. Assumptions are also developed for assets and liabilities that could reprice during the modeled time period. These assumptions also cover how we expect rates to change on non-maturity deposits such as interest checking, money market checking, and savings accounts as well as certificates of deposit. Based on inputs that include the current balance sheet, the current level of interest rates and the developed assumptions, the model then produces an expected level of net interest income assuming that market rates remain unchanged. This is considered the base case. Next, the model determines what net interest income would be based on specific changes in interest rates. The rate simulations are performed for a two year period and include ramped rate changes of down 100 basis points and up 200 basis points. The down 200 basis point scenario was discontinued given the current level of interest rates. In the ramped down rate change, the model moves rates gradually down 100 basis points over the first year and then rates remain flat in the second year.
For the up 200 basis point scenario, rates are gradually moved up 200 basis points in the first year and then rates remain flat in the second year. In both the up and down scenarios, the model assumes a parallel shift in the yield curve. The results of these simulations are then compared to the base case.
At March 31, 2014, our asset/liability position was neutral based on our interest rate sensitivity model. Our net interest income would decrease by less than 0.50% in a down 100 basis point scenario and would increase by less than 0.70% in an up 200 basis point scenario over a one-year time frame. In the two-year time horizon, our net interest income would decrease by less than 1.80% in a down 100 basis point scenario and would increase less than 1.80% in an up 200 basis point scenario.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our Asset/Liability Committee is responsible for reviewing our liquidity requirements and maximizing our net interest income consistent with capital requirements, liquidity, interest rate and economic outlooks, competitive factors and customer needs. Interest rate risk arises because the assets of the Bank and the liabilities of the Bank have different maturities and characteristics. In order to measure this interest rate risk, we use a simulation process that measures the impact of changing interest rates on net interest income. This model is run for the Bank by an independent consulting firm. The simulations incorporate assumptions related to expected activity in the balance sheet. For maturing assets, assumptions are developed for the redeployment of these assets. For maturing liabilities, assumptions are developed for the replacement of these funding sources. Assumptions are also developed for assets and liabilities that reprice during the modeled time period. These assumptions also cover how we expect rates to change on non-maturity deposits such as interest checking, money market checking, and savings accounts as well as certificates of deposit. Based on inputs that include the most recent period end balance sheet, the current level of interest rates and the developed assumptions, the model then produces an expected level of net interest income assuming that interest rates remain unchanged. This becomes the base case. Next, the model determines the impact on net interest income given specified changes in interest rates. The rate simulations are performed for a two year period and include ramped rate changes of down 100 basis points and up 200 basis points. The down 200 basis point scenario was discontinued given the current level of interest rates. In the ramped down rate change, the model moves rates gradually down 100 basis points over the first year and then rates remain flat in the second year.
For the up 200 basis point scenario, rates are gradually increased by 200 basis points in the first year and remain flat in the second year. In both the up and down scenarios, the model assumes a parallel shift in the yield curve. The results of these simulations are then compared to the base case.
At March 31, 2014, our asset/liability position was neutral based on our interest rate sensitivity model. Our net interest income would decrease by less than 0.50% in a down 100 basis point scenario and would increase by less than 0.70% in an up 200 basis point scenario over a one-year time frame. In the two-year time horizon, our net interest income would decrease by less than 1.80% in a down 100 basis point scenario and would increase less than 1.80% in an up 200 basis point scenario.
See also Interest Rate Sensitivity in Item 2 above for a discussion of our interest rate risk.
We have counter-party risk that may arise from the possible inability of George Masons third party investors to meet the terms of their forward sales contracts. George Mason works with third-party investors that are generally well-capitalized, are investment grade and exhibit strong financial performance to mitigate this risk. We do not expect any third-party investor to fail to meet its obligation. In addition, we have derivative counterparty risk relating to certain interest rate swaps we have with third parties. This risk may arise from the inability of the third party to meet the terms of the contracts. We monitor the financial condition of these third parties on an annual basis. We do not expect these third parties to fail to meet its obligation.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a 15(e) under the Exchange Act). As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based on and as of the date of such evaluation, these officers concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
The Company also maintains a system of internal accounting controls that is designed to provide assurance that assets are safeguarded and that transactions are executed in accordance with managements authorization and are properly recorded. This system is continually reviewed and is augmented by written policies and procedures, the careful selection and training of qualified personnel and an internal audit program to monitor its effectiveness. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
In the ordinary course of our operations, we become party to various legal proceedings. Currently, we are not party to any material legal proceedings, and no such proceedings except as noted above are, to managements knowledge, threatened against us.
Our operations are subject to many risks that could adversely affect our future financial condition and performance and, therefore, the market value of our securities, including the risk factors that are outlined in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) None.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) For the three months ended March 31, 2014, we did not purchase shares of our common stock.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
(a) None.
(b) None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
(a) None.
(b) None.
3.1 Bylaws of Cardinal Financial Corporation (restated in electronic format as of March 24, 2014).
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1 Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2 Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101 The following materials from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), include: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes (furnished herewith).
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2014 |
/s/ Bernard H. Clineburg |
|
Bernard H. Clineburg |
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2014 |
/s/ Mark A. Wendel |
|
Mark A. Wendel |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2014 |
/s/ Jennifer L. Deacon |
|
Jennifer L. Deacon |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Bylaws of Cardinal Financial Corporation (restated in electronic format as of March 24, 2014). |
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
32.1 |
|
Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
32.2 |
|
Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
The following materials from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), include: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes (furnished herewith). |
Exhibit 3.1
BYLAWS
OF
CARDINAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(restated in electronic format to reflect all amendments through February 19, 2014)
ARTICLE I
Shareholder Matters
Section 1.1. Annual Meetings.
A. The annual meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation shall be held at such a time and place as may be decided by the Board of Directors and indicated in the notice of the meeting.
B. At the annual meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation, Directors shall be elected and reports of the affairs of the Corporation shall be received and considered. Any other business may be transacted which is within the powers of the shareholders, except that, if any shareholder shall bring new business before the annual meeting, the shareholder must give advance notice as set forth in Section 1.6 of these Bylaws.
C. The Board of Directors may designate any place, either within or without the Commonwealth of Virginia, as the place of meeting for any annual meeting or for any special meeting. If no place is designated by the Board, the place of meeting shall be the principal office of the Corporation.
Section 1.2. Special Meetings. A special meeting of the shareholders may be called for any purpose or purposes whatsoever at any time, but only by the President or the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or the Board of Directors.
Section 1.3. Notice of Meetings. Notice of the time and place of every annual meeting or special meeting shall be mailed to each Shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting at his address as it appears on the records of the Corporation not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the date of such meeting (except as a different time may be specified by law).
Section 1.4. Quorum. A majority of the votes entitled to be cast on a matter by a voting group constitutes a quorum of such voting group for action on such matter. If there is not a quorum at the time for which a meeting shall have been called, the meeting may be adjourned from time to time by a majority of the shareholders present or represented by proxy without notice, other than by announcement at the meeting, until there is a quorum.
Section 1.5. Voting. Except as the Articles of Incorporation otherwise provide, at any meeting of the shareholders, each outstanding share, regardless of class, is entitled to one vote on each matter voted on at a shareholders meeting.
Section 1.6. Notice of Shareholder Business. (a) At an annual meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation, only such business shall be conducted as shall have been properly brought before the meeting. To be brought before an annual meeting, business must be (a) specified in the notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, (b) otherwise brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, or (c) otherwise properly brought before the meeting by a shareholder. For business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a shareholder, the Shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a shareholders notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Corporation, not less than sixty (60) days nor more than ninety (90) days prior to the date of the scheduled annual meeting, regardless of any postponements, deferrals or adjournments of that meeting to a later date; provided, however, that in the event that less than seventy (70) days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the scheduled annual meeting is given or made, notice by a shareholder, to be timely, must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the earlier of the day on which such notice of the date of the scheduled annual meeting was mailed or the day on which such public disclosure was made. A shareholders notice to the Secretary of the Corporation shall set forth as to each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting (a) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (b) the name and address, as they appear on the Corporations books of the shareholder proposing such business and of any other person or entity who is the record or beneficial owner of any shares of the Corporation and who, to the knowledge of the shareholder proposing such business, supports such proposal, (c) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are beneficially owned and owned of record by the shareholder proposing such business on the date of his notice to the Corporation and the number of shares so owned by any person or entity who, to the knowledge of the shareholder proposing such business, supports such proposal and (d) any material interest (financial or other) of such shareholder in such proposal. Notwithstanding anything in these Bylaws to the contrary, no business shall be conducted at any annual meeting except in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 1.6. The Chairman of an annual meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that business was not properly brought before the meeting and in accordance with the provisions of this Section 1.6. and if he should so determine, he shall so declare to the meeting and any such business not properly brought before the meeting shall not be transacted.
(b) Nothing in Section 1.6(a) shall be interpreted to mean that a shareholder shall not be permitted to ask pertinent questions or to express his or her views on any pertinent matter.
Section 1.7. Order of Business. All meetings of shareholders shall be conducted in accordance with such rules as are prescribed by the Chairman of the meeting and he shall determine the order of business at all meetings of the shareholders.
Section 1.8. Inspectors. The Board of Directors, in advance of any meeting of shareholders, may, but shall not be required to, appoint one or more inspectors to act at such meeting or any adjournment thereof. If any of the inspectors so appointed shall fail to appear or act, the Chairman of the meeting may appoint one or more inspectors. The inspectors shall determine the number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation outstanding and the voting power of each, the number of shares represented at the meeting, the existence of a quorum, the validity and effect of proxies, and shall receive votes, ballots or consents, hear and determine all challenges and questions arising in connection with the right to vote, count and tabulate all votes, ballots or consents, determine the results, and do such acts as are proper to conduct the election or vote with fairness to all shareholders. On request of the Chairman of the meeting, the inspectors shall make a report of any challenge, request or matter determined by them and shall execute a certificate of any fact found by them. No director or candidate for the office of director shall act as an inspector of an election of directors. Inspectors need not be shareholders.
ARTICLE II
Directors
Section 2.1. General Powers. The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed under the direction of the Board of Directors and, except as otherwise expressly provided by law or by the Articles of Incorporation, or by these Bylaws, all of the powers of the Corporation shall be exercised by or under the authority of said Board of Directors.
Section 2.2. Number and Qualification. The Board of Directors shall consist of eleven (11) Directors. Except for individuals who are on the Board of Directors on April 21, 2004 (who may be reelected one or more times, regardless of age) or as waived by the Board of Directors, no one who is seventy years of age or older shall be eligible to stand for election to the Board of Directors.
As more particularly described in the Articles of Incorporation, the directors shall be divided into three classes (A, B and C) as nearly equal in number as possible. The initial term of office for members of Class A shall expire at the first annual meeting of stockholders after their election; the initial term of office for members of Class B shall expire at the second annual meeting of stockholders after their election; and the initial term of office for members of Class C shall expire at the third annual meeting of stockholders after their election. At each annual meeting of stockholders following such initial classification and election, directors elected to succeed those directors whose terms expire shall be elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders after their election, and shall continue to hold office until their respective successors are elected and qualify.
In the event of any increase or decrease in the number of directors fixed by the Bylaws, all classes of directors shall be increased or decreased as equally as may be possible. Newly-created directorships resulting from an increase by not more than two in the authorized number of directors or any vacancies in the Board of Directors resulting from death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office, or other cause, shall be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office, whether or not a quorum. Each director so chosen shall hold office until the expiration of the term of the director, if any, whom he has been chosen to succeed or, if none, until the expiration of the term of the class assigned to the additional directorship to which he has been elected, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal. No decrease in the number of directors constituting the Board of Directors shall shorten the term of any incumbent director. Any director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed from office at any time but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of more than two-thirds of each class of the voting stock of the Corporation then outstanding at a meeting called for that purpose.
Section 2.3. Election of Directors. The Directors shall be elected at the annual meeting of shareholders, and shall hold their offices until their successors are elected in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation. Nominations for the election of Directors shall be given in the manner provided in Section 2.5.
Section 2.4. Honorary and Advisory Directors. The Board may appoint to the position of Honorary Director or the position of Advisory Director such person or persons as it deems appropriate. Honorary Directors shall be entitled to receive notice of, and to attend all meetings of the Board, but they shall not be Directors and shall not be entitled to vote, nor shall they be counted in determining a quorum of the Board. Advisory Directors shall be entitled only to notice of meetings of Advisory or other Boards of the Corporation to which they shall be appointed. Honorary and Advisory Directors shall receive such compensation as may be authorized by the Board of attendance at meetings of Advisory or other Boards to which such Advisory or Honorary Directors are appointed.
Section 2.5. Nominations. Only persons who are nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 2.5 shall be eligible for election as Directors. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors of the Corporation may be made by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, or by any shareholder of the Corporation entitled to vote for the election of Directors who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this Section 2.5(a). Such nominations, other than those made by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, shall be made pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a shareholders notice shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than sixty (60) days nor more than ninety (90) days prior to the date of the scheduled annual meeting, regardless of postponements, deferrals, or adjournments of that meeting to a later date; provided, however, in the event that less than seventy (70) days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on
the 10th day following the earlier of the day on which such notice of the date of the scheduled annual meeting was mailed or the day on which such public disclosure was made. Such shareholders notice shall set forth (a) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a Director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (iii) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are beneficially owned by such person and (iv) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of Directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (b) as to the shareholder giving the notice (i) the name and address of such shareholder and of any other person or entity who is the record or beneficial owner of shares of the Corporation and who, to the knowledge of the shareholder giving notice, supports such nominee(s) and (ii) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are beneficially owned and owned of record by such shareholder and by any other person or entity who is the record or beneficial owner of shares of the Corporation and who, to the knowledge of the shareholder giving the notice, supports such nominee(s). At the request of the Board of Directors any person nominated by the Board of Directors for election as a Director shall furnish to the Secretary of the Corporation the information required to be set forth in a shareholders notice of nomination which pertains to the nominee. No person shall be eligible for election as a Director of the Corporation unless in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 2.5(a). The Chairman of the meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that a nomination was not made in accordance with the procedures prescribed by the Bylaws, and if he should so determine, he shall so declare to the meeting and the defective nomination shall be disregarded.
Section 2.6. Meetings of Directors. Meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at places within or without the Commonwealth of Virginia and at times fixed by resolution of the Board of Directors, or upon call of the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the President. The Secretary, or officer performing his duties, shall give at least twenty-four (24) hours notice by telegraph, letter, telephone or in person, of all meetings of the Directors; provided, that notice need not be given of regular meetings held at times and places fixed by resolution of the Board. Regular meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at least once in every calendar quarter. Meetings may be held at any time without notice if all of the Directors are present, or if those not present waive notice either before or after the meeting. Neither the business to be transacted nor the purpose of any annual or special meeting of the Board of Directors need be specified in the notice or waiver of notice of such meeting.
Section 2.7. Quorum. A majority of the members of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum.
Section 2.8. Compensation. The Board of Directors shall fix the compensation of the Directors.
Section 2.9. Committees. The Board of Directors may create committees and appoint members of committees in accordance with Virginia law.
ARTICLE III
Officers
Section 3.1. Election. The Officers of the Corporation shall consist of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President, one or more Vice Presidents, a Secretary, a Chief Financial Officer, one or more Assistant Secretaries, and such other officers as may be elected as provided in Section 3.3 of this Article. All Officers shall be elected by the Board of Directors, and shall hold office until their successors are elected and qualify. Vacancies may be filled at any meeting of the Board of Directors. Subject to any applicable provision of Virginia law, more than one office may be combined in the same person as the Board of Directors may determine.
Section 3.2. Removal of Officers. Any Officer of the Corporation may be summarily removed with or without cause, at any time, by a resolution passed by affirmative vote of a majority of all of the Directors; provided that any such removal shall not affect an Officers right to any compensation to which he is entitled under any employment contract between him and the Corporation.
Section 3.3. Other Officers. Other Officers may from time to time be appointed by the Board of Directors, and such Officers shall hold office for such term as may be designated by the said Board of Directors.
Section 3.4. Chairman of the Board. The Chairman of the Board shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and shall preside at all meetings of the Directors and all meetings of the shareholders. He shall appoint all standing committees and temporary committees. He shall be a member ex- officio of all standing committees and shall have all powers and duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or by the Bylaws.
In the absence of the Chairman of the Board, the Vice Chairman shall preside at all meetings of the Directors and at meetings of the shareholders and in the absence of the Chairman of the Board, the duties and responsibilities of such offices shall devolve upon the Vice Chairman. The Board, at any time may assign the duties of the Vice Chairman to the Lead Director.
Section 3.5. President. The President shall have the duties assigned to him from time to time by the Chairman or the Board of Directors.
Section 3.6. Vice Presidents. The Corporation may have one or more Executive Vice Presidents, Senior Vice Presidents or Vice Presidents. The duties and responsibilities of such Vice President are those delegated to him or her by the Board of Directors or the Chairman.
Section 3.7. Secretary. The Secretary shall have the duties and responsibilities prescribed by law for the secretary of a Virginia corporation.
Section 3.8. Surety Bonds. All Officers and employees who shall have charge or possession of money, securities or property of the Corporation must, before entering upon their duties, be covered by a bond with a surety company approved by the Board of Directors and state and federal authorities. The costs of such bond shall be borne by the Corporation.
ARTICLE IV
Capital Stock
Section 4.1. Form. Shares of the Corporation shall, when fully paid, be evidenced by certificates containing such information as is required by law and approved by the Board of Directors. Alternatively, the Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of some or all shares without certificates. In such event, within a reasonable time after issuance, the Corporation shall mail to the shareholder a written confirmation of its records with respect to such shares containing the information required by law. When issued, certificates shall be signed by the Chief Executive Officer and by the Chief Financial Officer or Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, or by any other two Officers authorized by resolution of the Board of Directors. Any or all of the signatures on a share certificate may be facsimile. If any officer, transfer agent or registrar who has signed or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate shall have ceased to be such officer, transfer agent or registrar before such certificate is issued, it may be issued by the Corporation with the same effect as if such individual were such officer, transfer agent or registrar on the date of issue.
Section 4.2. Transfer of Stock. The Board of Directors may make rules and regulations concerning the issue, registration and transfer of shares and/or certificates representing the shares of the Corporation. Transfers of shares and/or of the certificates representing such shares shall be made upon the books of the Corporation by surrender of the certificates representing such shares, if any, accompanied by written assignments given by the record owners thereof or their attorneys-in-fact.
Section 4.3. Restrictions on Transfer of Stock. Any restrictions that may be imposed by law, by the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Corporation, or by an agreement among shareholders of the Corporation, or by an agreement among shareholders of the Corporation, shall be noted conspicuously on the front or back of all certificates representing shares of stock of the Corporation or shall be otherwise communicated in accordance with the requirements of law.
Section 4.4. Lost, Destroyed or Mutilated Certificates. The holder of stock of the Corporation shall immediately notify the Corporation of any loss, destruction, or mutilation of the certificate therefor, and the Corporation may in its discretion cause one or more new certificates or a written confirmation of its records for the same aggregate number of shares to be issued to such Stockholder upon the surrender of the mutilated certificate, or upon satisfactory proof of such loss or destruction accompanied by the deposit of a bond in such form and amount and with such surety as the Corporation may require.
Section 4.5. Holder of Record. The Corporation shall be entitled to treat the holder of record of any share or shares of stock as the holder thereof in fact and shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to or interest in such shares of stock on the part of any other person, whether or not it shall have express or other notice thereof, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.
Section 4.6. Record Date. The Board of Directors shall fix in advance the record date in order to make a determination of shareholders for any purpose, including the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any shareholders meeting or entitled to payment of any dividend or distribution to shareholders. Such record date shall not be more than seventy (70) days prior to the date on which the particular action requiring such determination of shareholders is to be taken.
Section 4.7. Control Share Acquisitions. Article 14.1 of the Virginia Stock Corporation Act shall not apply to the Corporation.
ARTICLE V
Miscellaneous Provisions
Section 5.1. Seal. The seal of the Corporation shall be circular in shape with the name of the Corporation around the circumference thereof, and the word SEAL in the center thereof.
Section 5.2. Examination of the Books and Records. The books and records of account of the Corporation, the minutes of the proceedings of the shareholders, the Board and Committees appointed by the Board of Directors and the records of the shareholders showing the names and addresses of all shareholders and the number of shares held by each, shall be subject to inspection during the normal business hours by any person who is a duly qualified Director of the Corporation at the time he makes such inspection. Shareholders shall have such rights to inspect records of the Corporation as are prescribed by applicable law.
Section 5.3. Checks, Notes and Drafts. Checks, notes, drafts, and other orders for the payment of money shall be signed by such persons as the Board of Directors from time to time may authorize.
Section 5.4. Voting of Stock Held. Unless otherwise provided by resolution of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or any Vice President may from time to time appoint an attorney or attorneys as agent or agents of the Corporation to cast in the name of the Corporation the votes which the Corporation may be entitled to cast as a shareholder or otherwise in any other corporation, any of whose stock or securities may be held by the Corporation, at meetings of the holders of the stock or other securities of such other corporation, or to consent in writing to any action by any such other corporation; and such Officers may instruct the person or persons so appointed as to the manner of casting such votes or giving such consent, and may execute or cause to be executed on behalf of the Corporation and under its corporate seal, or otherwise, such written proxies, consents, waivers, or other instruments as may be necessary or
proper in the premises; or any of such Officers may himself attend any meeting of the holders of stock or other securities of any such other corporation and there vote or exercise any or all other powers of the Corporation as the holder of such stock or other securities of such other corporation.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Bernard H. Clineburg, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 of Cardinal Financial Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 8, 2014 |
/s/ Bernard H. Clineburg |
|
Bernard H. Clineburg |
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Mark A. Wendel, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 of Cardinal Financial Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 8, 2014 |
/s/ Mark A. Wendel |
|
Mark A. Wendel |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 (the Form 10-Q) of Cardinal Financial Corporation (the Company), I, Bernard H. Clineburg, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(a) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
Date: May 8, 2014 |
/s/ Bernard H. Clineburg |
|
Bernard H. Clineburg |
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.2
STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 (the Form 10-Q) of Cardinal Financial Corporation (the Company), I, Mark A. Wendel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(a) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
Date: May 8, 2014 |
/s/ Mark A. Wendel |
|
Mark A. Wendel |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
V.>S;=QQ#.&TK]H;$Y)]O_IFQ/7TZR`KMN#9"U1F.@A`C7C.5BWJ=X5\_
ME[T11L;2.J>5JGF&W[C!3[//GZ9[I3>FY-PB(-0FPZ6US800PTHNJ0E4PVOX
M4B@MJ86E7A/3:$[S-DA6I!^&`R*IJ+$G3/0C#%44@O&%8EO):^LAFE?4@G]3
MBL:<:)(]@I-4;[9-CRG9`&(E*F'?6BA&DDU>UK72=%5!W8 V0VYKS-3=#=]#&&,E!FBN!3R-./ KE:<7@H+*01T_A/+3F/B`R`QZ5CD`
M@3)I5?+W(EC$,TZ9B?(A<_.AYOZ_09!?%O"Y((3R$T5$!OY..^NLB5`((+\0
MA/(3Y40&_C[>EWC E(XI*:5#X^B*;MV(J0>:&5>
MT-'6`.JE##?%<"L<$X&)Q$1AHJ,D3-D6F,Y3!GW8U:/"ZS,9_92Y0Y'H*DQJ
M3!I,6DP8)AP3@8G$1&&BHR3,UB009'OA/=BN1H994SHIMI_^`1_6PJ3VQ)6G
MBT61+V;D4M'@5EI,&"8<$X&)Q$1AHJ,DS)@6MB[,>*#`-:43XAQ6KRI,:D]\
MQI-%-DG)@*[!K;28,$PX)@(3B8G"1$=)F#$M:EV8\4!Q:TIGQ#FL7%68U)[X
MMQ(G6>^3`DT@LJ3_=44MW@S#A&,B,)&8*$QTE(0)TW+6A0F[2E)P-YZ2T4V9
MPW)3A4F-28-)BPG#A&,B,)&8*$QTE(097U?7R@?J6E-R`2T]BHZX<%W+M^)Z
ML:E/FUY*/O.!M]-BPC#AF`A,)"8*$QTE0<0%K6O%!],=)P.MC-Z$/8I%BTGM
MB8]VZ'\T#L70)_#P9A@F'!.!B<1$8:*C)$R6EK-`LJY"%4R"I[344>`R%B:U
M)R[93TE6S'J]%K?28L(PX9@(3"0F"A,=)6&V'RMC%0-EK-YG\#R*]EI591DH)?H@KXE^?D6K;9TGA*NC0J7M^N3W&>7B'%2W))JL\ZJ6FD\>;'*WT[>TR$]@XB4[9/5G8]1U\G3Q8W"I;/,MO@':L..(M%#C@Z$CP?K_O^^GC^GKZD&ZV.%XX4)E=!%DHM:OZ.2E\2#]]0CVB
M(PE"KR"B!U1VTX>(#+UWRB>%#^FGC^OK[V@2A"I]):1E;2(+`AP%H#@)_=6$
M$]3,4O/']?7W-0F25><,!KF*&4YR[-^PO\EI=:1;FF7<2-A9]&8$`OCZ*_:-
M$?2-39-E70>@;2OC(_T[KHYIP8V,'F"J/1,OS!4V?OBE9F737NQ8#0U;\^\)
M&G0*[9`]`_"!L;K](AJ::\N_^0\``/__`P!02P,$%``&``@````A`#:"6.;O
M"0``F38``!D```!X;"]W;W)K
$2*LNS+:C^`R+
M(/%1M>JV6]6H01`H@:N4D5R"*YF;0C)W^FF50.47YU"PD0"17((KFAN.5,-(
M9NX.4@>H#!#))<0$7'XN<%YFI_/<2`R)D9K5ME=]&AH4NQQL$,D5Q`A