XML 16 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Shareholders' Equity
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Shareholders' Equity [Abstract]  
Shareholders' Equity
NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
Capital Requirements
 
Salisbury and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional and discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Salisbury and the Bank's financial statements.  Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Salisbury and the Bank must meet specific guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.  Salisbury and the Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
 
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Salisbury and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined) and total and Tier 1 capital (as defined) to risk-weighted assets (as defined).  Management believes, as of June 30, 2011, that Salisbury and the Bank meet all of their capital adequacy requirements.
 
The Bank was classified, as of its most recent notification, as "well capitalized".  The Bank's actual regulatory capital position and minimum capital requirements as defined "To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions" and "For Capital Adequacy Purposes" are as follows:
 
   
Actual
  
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
  
To be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
Amount
  
Ratio
  
Amount
  
Ratio
  
Amount
  
Ratio
 
June 30, 2011
                  
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
                  
Salisbury
 $52,605   13.93% $30,207   8.0%  n/a   - 
Bank
  43,002   11.19   30,754   8.0  $38,443   10.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
                        
Salisbury
  48,513   12.85   15,104   4.0   n/a   - 
Bank
  38,910   10.12   15,377   4.0   23,066   6.0 
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
                        
Salisbury
  48,513   8.45   23,407   4.0   n/a   - 
Bank
  38,910   6.79   23,361   4.0   29,201   5.0 
June 30, 2010
                        
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
                        
Salisbury
 $50,393   13.39% $30,108   8.0%  n/a   - 
Bank
  40,817   10.88   30,042   8.0  $37,553   10.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
                        
Salisbury
  46,582   12.38   15,054   4.0   n/a   - 
Bank
  37,006   9.86   15,613   4.0   23,420   6.0 
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
                        
Salisbury
  46,582   8.35   22,318   4.0   n/a   - 
Bank
  37,006   6.63   22,318   4.0   27,898   5.0 
 
Restrictions on Cash Dividends to Common Shareholders
 
Salisbury's ability to pay cash dividends is dependent on the Bank's ability to pay cash dividends to Salisbury. There are certain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends and other payments by the Bank to Salisbury. Under Connecticut law, the Bank cannot declare a cash dividend except from net profits, defined as the remainder of all earnings from current operations.  The total of all cash dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year shall not, unless specifically approved by the Banking Commissioner, exceed the total of its net profits of that year combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two years.
 
Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”)  Supervisory Letter SR 09-4, February 24, 2009, revised March 27, 2009, notes that, as a general matter, the Board of Directors of a Bank Holding Company (“BHC”) should inform the Federal Reserve and should eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce dividends if (1) net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (2) the prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (3) the BHC will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Moreover, a BHC should inform the Federal Reserve reasonably in advance of declaring or paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period (e.g., quarter) for which the dividend is being paid or that could result in a material adverse change to the BHC capital structure.
 


 
 
Further restrictions on cash dividends are imposed on Salisbury because of Salisbury's participation in the United States Treasury Department's (“Treasury”) Troubled Asset Relief Program's Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”). These preclude the payment of any common stock cash dividends if Salisbury is not paying the preferred stock dividend.  Additionally, the common stock dividend may not be increased without prior approval from the Treasury for the first three years Salisbury is a CPP participant unless all CPP preferred shares are redeemed or transferred to third parties.
 
Preferred Stock
 
In March 2009, Salisbury issued to the Treasury $8,816,000 of Preferred Stock under the CPP.
 
The Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes and ranks senior to the Common Stock. The Preferred Stock pays a cumulative dividend of 5 percent per annum for the first five years it is outstanding and thereafter at a rate of 9 percent per annum. The Preferred Stock is non-voting, other than voting rights on matters that could adversely affect the Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock is redeemable at one hundred percent of the issue price plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.
 
As part of the CPP, Salisbury issued to the Treasury a 10-year Warrant to purchase 57,671 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $22.93 per share. If the Warrant were fully exercised, Salisbury estimates that the ownership percentage of the current shareholders would be diluted by approximately 3.3% percent.