XML 69 R35.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Jun. 30, 2013
Jun. 30, 2013
Recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Dec. 31, 2012
Recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Jun. 30, 2013
Recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Level 1 [Member]
Dec. 31, 2012
Recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Level 1 [Member]
Jun. 30, 2013
Recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Level 2 [Member]
Dec. 31, 2012
Recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Level 2 [Member]
Jun. 30, 2013
Recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Level 3 [Member]
Dec. 31, 2012
Recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Level 3 [Member]
Jun. 30, 2013
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Jun. 30, 2013
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Level 1 [Member]
Jun. 30, 2013
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Level 2 [Member]
Jun. 30, 2013
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Level 3 [Member]
Assets at Fair Value [Abstract]                            
Interest rate derivative     $ 55 [1]   $ 0 [1]   $ 55 [1]   $ 0 [1]          
Intangible assets, net                     57,789 [2] 0 [2] 0 [2] 57,789 [2]
Assets fair value     55   0   55   0   57,789 0 0 57,789
Impairment loss (4,222) (4,222)                 (4,222) [2]      
Fair value adjustment, assets                     (4,222)      
Liabilities at Fair Value [Abstract]                            
Contingent consideration     0 [3] 7,950 [3] 0 [3] 0 [3] 0 [3] 0 [3] 0 [3] 7,950 [3]        
Interest Rate Derivatives     69 [1]   0 [1]   69 [1]   0 [1]          
Liabilities fair value     69   0   69   0          
Change in amount of contingent consideration     7,950 [3]                      
Fair value adjustment, liabilities     $ 7,950                      
[1] The fair values of interest rate derivatives are the amount the company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts, considering quoted market prices of comparable agreements. (Also see Note 8)
[2] At June 30, 2013, a trade name originally determined to have an indefinite life was deemed to be impaired and an expense was recorded on a separate line in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. (Also see Note 5)
[3] The Monte Carlo simulation was used with a normal probability distribution of the best estimate of EBITDA for 2013 to approximate fair value. At June 30, 2013, the EBITDA target is not expected to occur and as such, the $7,950 of contingent consideration was deemed unlikely to be paid, and a benefit was recorded on a separate line in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.