0001059262-16-000021.txt : 20160809 0001059262-16-000021.hdr.sgml : 20160809 20160809170038 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001059262-16-000021 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 8-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20160805 ITEM INFORMATION: Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year ITEM INFORMATION: Financial Statements and Exhibits FILED AS OF DATE: 20160809 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20160809 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SP Plus Corp CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001059262 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-AUTO RENTAL & LEASING (NO DRIVERS) [7510] IRS NUMBER: 161171179 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-50796 FILM NUMBER: 161819000 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 200 E. RANDOLPH STREET STREET 2: SUITE 7700 CITY: CHICAGO STATE: IL ZIP: 60601-7702 BUSINESS PHONE: 312-274-2000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 200 E. RANDOLPH STREET STREET 2: SUITE 7700 CITY: CHICAGO STATE: IL ZIP: 60601-7702 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: SP PLUS Corp DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 20131202 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: STANDARD PARKING CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 20030506 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: APCOA STANDARD PARKING INC /DE/ DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 20011126 8-K 1 form8-k2016forumselectionb.htm 8-K Document


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549


FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section l3 or l5(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of l934

August 5, 2016
Date of report (date of earliest event reported)

SP PLUS CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

000-50796
16-1171179
(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)

200 E. Randolph Street, Suite 7700, Chicago, Illinois 60601‑7702
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)  (Zip Code)

(312) 274-2000
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not Applicable
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):

[ ]     Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
[ ]      Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
[ ]      Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
[ ]      Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 
 







Item 5.03. Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year.

On August 5, 2016, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SP Plus Corporation (the “Company”) approved and adopted an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”). Because the Bylaws did not contain any forum selection provision, the Company risked uncertainty and expense from concurrent multi-jurisdictional litigation. The Amendment addresses this risk by adding new Article XII to the Bylaws, which includes, among other matters, a forum selection provision to specify that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole forum for (i) derivative actions on behalf of the Company; (ii) claims asserting a breach of fiduciary duty against the directors, officers, employees or stockholders of the Company; (iii) claims against the Company or its directors, officers or employees pursuant to Delaware law or the Company’s organizational documents; or (iv) claims against the Company governed by the internal affairs doctrine.

The Board determined that adoption of the forum selection provision is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for a number of reasons, including, among others, the importance of preventing the unnecessary diversion of corporate resources to address costly, wasteful and duplicative multi-forum litigation, facilitating increased consistency and predictability in litigation outcomes for the benefit of the Company and its stockholders and recent statutory developments in Delaware and case law developments in other jurisdictions upholding the Board’s authority to adopt such bylaws and their validity. The Board also determined that the Amendment preserves the ability of the Company to consent to an alternative forum and, importantly, preserves the ability of stockholders to bring, subject to applicable law, the kinds of litigation addressed by the Amendment.

The foregoing description of the Amendment to the Bylaws is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amendment to the Bylaws of the Company effective August 5, 2016, which is filed as Exhibit 3.1 hereto and incorporated herein by reference.






Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits
 
9.01(d)  Exhibits

3.1
Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of SP Plus Corporation effective August 5, 2016.






SIGNATURES
 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



 
SP PLUS CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
Date: August 9, 2016
By:      /s/ VANCE C. JOHNSTON
 
      Vance C. Johnston,
      Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 
 






EXHIBIT INDEX



3.1
Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of SP Plus Corporation effective August 5, 2016.



EX-3.1 2 exhibit31.htm EXHIBIT 3.1 Exhibit



Exhibit 3.1
Article XII
Forum for Adjudication of Certain Disputes
Section 12.01 Sole and Exclusive Forum in Delaware. Unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Corporation, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of the Corporation to the Corporation or the Corporation’s stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against the Corporation or any director or officer or other employee of the Corporation arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Corporation’s certificate of incorporation or these Bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time), or (iv) any action asserting a claim against the Corporation or any director or officer or other employee of the Corporation governed by the internal affairs doctrine shall, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, be the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, another court of the State of Delaware or, if no court of the State of Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware), in all cases subject to the court having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants. Any person or entity owning, purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions of this Article XII.
Section 12.02. Foreign Actions. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope of Section 12.01 above, is filed in a court other than the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, another court of the State of Delaware or the federal district court for the District of Delaware (a “Foreign Action”) in the name of any stockholder, such stockholder shall be deemed to have consented to (i) the personal jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, the other courts of the State of Delaware and the federal district court for the District of Delaware in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce Section 12.01 above (an “Enforcement Action”) and (ii) having service of process made upon such stockholder in any such Enforcement Action by service upon such stockholder’s counsel in the Foreign Action as agent for such stockholder.
Section 12.03. Severability. If any provision or provisions of this Article XII shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable as applied to any person or circumstance for any reason whatsoever, then, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the validity, legality and enforceability of such provisions in any other circumstance and of the remaining provisions of this Article XII (including, without limitation, each portion of any sentence of this Article XII containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable that is not itself held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable) and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.