atax-10q_20160331.htm

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x

This report (including, but not limited to, the information contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”) contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this report, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used, statements which are not historical in nature, including those containing words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. This report also contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other industry data. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. We have not independently verified the statistical and other industry data generated by independent parties which are contained in this report and, accordingly, we cannot guarantee their accuracy or completeness.

These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those relating to:

Other risks, uncertainties and factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements we make. We are not obligated to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the industries in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described under the headings “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the America First Multifamily Investors, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and in Item 1A of Part II of this document.

	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,822,453		$	17,035,782
Restricted cash		8,753,563			8,950,374
Interest receivable		6,014,520			5,220,859
Mortgage revenue bonds held in trust, at fair value (Note 4)		535,399,114			536,316,481
Mortgage revenue bonds, at fair value (Note 4)		60,977,254			47,366,656
Public housing capital fund trusts, at fair value (Note 5)		60,505,340			60,707,290
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value (Note 6)		-			14,775,309
Real estate assets: (Note 7)
Land and improvements		17,983,300			17,887,505
Buildings and improvements		139,232,348			139,153,699
Real estate assets before accumulated depreciation		157,215,648			157,041,204
Accumulated depreciation		(17,670,045	)		(16,023,814	)
Net real estate assets		139,545,603			141,017,390
Investment in an unconsolidated entity (Note 8)		2,442,846			-
Other assets (Note 9)		42,992,145			35,720,342
Total Assets	$	874,452,838		$	867,110,483

Liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	$	5,555,619		$	5,667,948
Distribution payable		7,607,693			8,759,343
Unsecured lines of credit (Note 11)		27,984,639			17,497,000
Debt financing (Note 12)		430,307,422			451,496,716
Mortgages payable and other secured financing (Note 13)		69,053,487			69,247,574
Derivative swap, at fair value (Note 15)		2,227,074			1,317,075
Total Liabilities		542,735,934			553,985,656

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 17)

Redeemable Series A preferred units, $10.0 redemption value, 10.0 million authorized, 1.0 and 0.0 million issued and outstanding, respectively (Note 18)		9,980,965			-

Partnersʼ Capital
General Partner (Note 1)		527,043			399,077
Beneficial Unit Certificate holders		321,203,422			312,720,264
Total Partnersʼ Capital		321,730,465			313,119,341
Noncontrolling interest (Note 7)		5,474			5,486
Total Capital		321,735,939			313,124,827
Total Liabilities and Partnersʼ Capital	$	874,452,838		$	867,110,483

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015
Revenues:
Property revenues	$	5,074,104		$	4,302,301
Investment income		9,157,234			7,979,784
Contingent interest income		174,396			-
Other interest income		514,125			224,540
Gain on sale of securities		8,097			-
Total revenues		14,927,956			12,506,625
Expenses:
Real estate operating (exclusive of items shown below)		2,636,677			2,471,030
Depreciation and amortization		2,124,898			1,454,179
Amortization of deferred financing costs		532,187			338,599
Interest		4,770,135			3,936,176
General and administrative		2,332,371			1,807,481
Total expenses		12,396,268			10,007,465
Income from continuing operations		2,531,688			2,499,160
Income from discontinued operations		-			24,428
Net income		2,531,688			2,523,588
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		(12	)		(891	)
Net income - America First Multifamily Investors, L.P.	$	2,531,700		$	2,524,479

Net income		2,531,688			2,523,588
Redeemable Series A preferred unit distribution and accretion		(1,684	)		-
Net income available to Partners and noncontrolling interest	$	2,530,004		$	2,523,588

Net income (loss) available to Partners and noncontrolling interest allocated to:
General Partner	$	67,155		$	26,706
Limited Partners - Unitholders		2,462,861			2,643,939
Unallocated loss of Consolidated VIEs		-			(146,166	)
Noncontrolling interest		(12	)		(891	)
	$	2,530,004		$	2,523,588
Unitholdersʼ interest in net income per unit (basic and diluted):
Income from continuing operations	$	0.04		$	0.04
Income from discontinued operations		-			-
Net income, basic and diluted, per unit	$	0.04		$	0.04
Distributions declared, per unit	$	0.125		$	0.125
Weighted average number of units outstanding, basic and diluted		60,252,928			60,252,928

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

	General Partner			# of Units		Beneficial Unit Certificate Holders			Non-controlling Interest			Total			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	399,077			60,252,928	$	312,720,264		$	5,486		$	313,124,827		$	60,963,687
Reversal of net unrealized gain sale of securities		(2,364	)				(234,075	)					(236,439	)		(236,439	)
Distributions paid or accrued		(76,077	)				(7,531,616	)		-			(7,607,693	)		-
Net income (loss) allocated to Partners and noncontrolling interests:
Redeemable Series A Preferred Unit distribution accrued and accretion		(17	)				(1,667	)		-			(1,684	)		-
Net income (loss)		67,172					2,464,528			(12	)		2,531,688			-
Unrealized gain on securities		123,374					12,214,053			-			12,337,427			12,337,427
Unrealized gain on bond purchase commitment		15,878					1,571,935			-			1,587,813			1,587,813
Balance at March 31, 2016	$	527,043			60,252,928	$	321,203,422		$	5,474		$	321,735,939		$	74,652,488

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

	For the Three Months Ended,
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	2,531,688		$	2,523,588
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		2,124,898			1,693,299
Gain on sale of securities		(8,097	)		-
Non-cash loss on derivatives		1,110,407			899,873
Bond premium/discount amortization		(33,573	)		(36,933	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs		532,187			338,599
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions
Increase in interest receivable		(793,661	)		(1,684,804	)
(Increase) Decrease in other assets		(354,030	)		127,115
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(244,234	)		311,641
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,865,585			4,172,378
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(157,084	)		(91,968	)
Acquisition of mortgage revenue bonds		(11,500,000	)		(58,945,000	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage revenue bond		9,295,000			-
Proceeds from the sale of MBS Securities		14,997,069			-
Contributions to an unconsolidated entity		(2,442,846	)		-
Restricted cash - debt collateral paid		(750,000	)		1,370,000
Restricted cash - debt collateral released		484,334			-
Restricted cash - M24, M31, and M33 TEBS financing facilities released		327,862			2,474,249
Principal payments received on mortgage revenue bonds		1,523,757			202,888
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash		134,615			(46,780	)
Restructure and acquisition of interest rate derivative		-			10,500
Funding of notes receivable		(5,836,758	)		(39,337	)
Repayments of notes receivable		8,516			-
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		6,084,465			(55,065,448	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions paid		(8,759,343	)		(7,617,390	)
Proceeds from the sale of redeemable Series A Preferred Units		10,000,000			-
Payment of offering costs related to the sale of redeemable Series A preferred units		(19,052	)		-
Proceeds from debt financing		-			48,285,000
Principal payments on debt financing		(21,600,363	)		(25,761,768	)
Principal borrowing on other secured financing		-			1,425,261
Principal payments on mortgages payable		(234,752	)		(262,383	)
Principal borrowing on unsecured lines of credit		15,487,639			10,000,000
Principal payments on unsecured lines of credit		(5,000,000	)		-
Decrease in security deposit liability		62,399			46,780
Debt financing and other deferred costs		(99,907	)		(210,526	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(10,163,379	)		25,904,974
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		786,671			(24,988,096	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year, including cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations of $0 and $35,772, respectively		17,035,782			49,193,343
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year, including cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations of $0 and $25,023, respectively	$	17,822,453		$	24,205,247

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	3,646,802		$	2,833,471
Supplemental disclosure of non cash investing and financing activities:
Distributions declared but not paid	$	7,609,360		$	7,607,693
Capital expenditures financed through accounts and notes payable	$	17,360		$	56,806

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. (the “Company” or “Partnership”) was formed on April 2, 1998, under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act for the purpose of acquiring, holding, selling and otherwise dealing with a portfolio of mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for affordable multifamily and student housing residential properties (collectively “Residential Properties”) and commercial properties. The Partnership expects and believes the interest earned on these mortgage revenue bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. As a result, most of the income earned by the Partnership is exempt from federal income taxes. The Partnership may also invest in other types of securities that may or may not be secured by real estate and may make property loans secured by multifamily residential properties which are financed by mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership. The Partnership may, acquire real estate securing its mortgage revenue bonds or property loans through foreclosure in the event of a default or through the receipt of a fee simple deed in lieu of foreclosure. In addition, the Partnership may acquire interests in multifamily, student, and senior citizen residential properties (“MF Properties”) in order to position itself for future investments in mortgage revenue bonds issued to finance these properties or to operate the MF Property until its “highest and best use” can be determined by management. The Partnership expects to sell its interest in these MF Properties in connection with the future syndication of low income housing tax credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (“LIHTCs”) or to a tax-exempt organization and to acquire mortgage revenue bonds on these properties to provide debt financing to the new owners.

The general partner is America First Capital Associates Limited Partnership Two (“AFCA 2” or “General Partner”). The general partner of AFCA2 is The Burlington Capital Group LLC (“Burlington”). The Partnership has issued Beneficial Unit Certificates (“BUCs”) representing assigned limited partner interests to investors (“Unitholders”). In March 2016, the Partnership issued, in a private placement, 1.0 million newly-designated non-cumulative, non-voting, non-convertible Series A Preferred Units (“Series A Preferred Units”) which are redeemable and represents limited partnership interests in the Partnership pursuant to a subscription agreement with a financial institution resulting in $10.0 million in aggregate proceeds to the Partnership (Note 18).

The “Partnership,” as used herein, includes America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The “wholly-owned subsidiaries” include the MF Properties owned by a limited partnership in which one of the wholly-owned subsidiaries (a “Holding Company”) holds a 99% limited partner interest. All intercompany transactions are eliminated. On March 31, 2016, the consolidated subsidiaries of the Partnership (the “Consolidated Subsidiaries”) consist of:

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, two properties, Bent Tree and Fairmont Oaks, in which the Partnership did not hold an ownership interest but which owned multifamily properties financed with mortgage revenue bonds owned by the Partnership were variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and were sold in the fourth quarter of 2015. The Partnership had been determined to be the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, the “Consolidated VIEs”. The Partnership determined the sales qualified to be presented as discontinued operations. As such, the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 are presented as discontinued operations and all other significant transactions and accounts between the Partnership and the VIEs have been eliminated in consolidation (Notes 3, 7, and 10).

The General Partner does not believe that the consolidation of VIEs for reporting under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) impacts the Partnership’s status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or the status of Unitholders as partners of the Partnership, the treatment of the mortgage revenue bonds on the properties owned by Consolidated VIEs as debt, the nature of the interest payments, which it believes to be tax-exempt, received on the mortgage revenue bonds secured by the properties owned by Consolidated VIEs or the manner in which the Partnership’s income is reported to Unitholders on IRS Form K-1.

The unallocated deficit of the Consolidated VIEs was comprised of the accumulated historical net losses of the Consolidated VIEs since the applicable consolidation date. The unallocated deficit of the Consolidated VIEs and the Consolidated VIEs’ net losses subsequent to that date are not allocated to the General Partner and Unitholders as such activity is not contemplated by, or addressed in, the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated September 15, 2015, as amended (the “Amended and Restated LP Agreement”).

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Partnership invested and committed to invest, through its wholly owned subsidiary, ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, in Vantage Corpus Christi Holdings, LLC (“Vantage”), holding a limited membership interest in the entity. The investment will be used to assist with the construction of a multifamily property. The Partnership does not have a controlling interest in Vantage and therefore, accounts for its limited partnership interest under the equity method of accounting. The Partnership earns a return on its investment accruing immediately on its contributed capital which is guaranteed by an unrelated third party. Due to the guarantee, cash flows are expected to be sufficient to make the payments, therefore, the Partnership will record the return in the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Note 8).

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. These condensed consolidated financial statements and notes have been prepared consistently with the 2015 Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position on March 31, 2016, and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been made. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation.

In the first quarter of 2016, the Partnership began to classify its amortization of deferred financing costs as a separate line within the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Previously this amount had been classified within depreciation and amortization. Accordingly, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Partnership has reclassified the amortization of deferred financing costs and has included them in conformity with the three months ended March 31, 2016. This reclassification has no effect on the Partnership’s reported net income or partners’ capital in the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods presented.

The Amended and Restated LP Agreement of the Partnership contains provisions for the distribution of Net Interest Income, Net Residual Proceeds and Liquidation Proceeds, for the allocation of income or loss from operations and for the allocation of income and loss arising from a repayment, sale, or liquidation of investments. Income and losses will be allocated to each Unitholder on a periodic basis, as determined by the General Partner, based on the number of BUCs held by each Unitholder as of the last day of the period for which such allocation is to be made. Distributions of Net Interest Income and Net Residual Proceeds will be made to each Unitholder of record on the last day of each distribution period based on the number of BUCs held by each Unitholder as of such date. For purposes of the Amended and Restated LP Agreement, cash distributions, if any, received by the Partnership from its investment in MF Properties (Note 7) will be included in the Partnership’s Interest Income and cash distributions received by the Partnership from the sale of such properties will be included in the Partnership’s Residual Proceeds.

Series A Preferred Units were created pursuant to the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated LP Agreement (the “First Amendment”), which became effective on March 30, 2016 and is filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2016 and incorporated by reference. Holders of the Series A Preferred Units will be entitled to receive, when, as, and if declared by the General Partner out of funds legally available for the payment of distributions, non-cumulative cash distributions at the rate of 3.00% per annum of the $10.00 per unit purchase price of the Series A Preferred Units, payable quarterly. With respect to anticipated quarterly distributions and rights upon liquidation, dissolution, or the winding-up of the Partnership’s affairs, the Series A Preferred Units will rank senior to the Partnership’s BUCs and to any other class or series of Partnership interests or securities expressly designated as ranking junior to the Series A Preferred Units, and junior to any other class or series of Partnership interests or securities expressly designated as ranking senior to the Series A Preferred Units.

Cash distributions are currently made on a quarterly basis but may be made on a monthly or semiannual basis at the election of AFCA 2. On each distribution date, Net Interest Income is distributed 99% to the Unitholders and 1% to AFCA 2 and Net Residual Proceeds are distributed 100% to Unitholders except that Net Interest Income and Net Residual Proceeds representing contingent interest in an amount equal to 0.9% per annum of the principal amount of the mortgage revenue bonds on a cumulative basis (defined as Net Interest Income (Tier 2) and Net Residual Proceeds (Tier 2), respectively) are distributed 75% to the Unitholders and 25% to AFCA 2.

The Partnership reviewed and re-evaluated each entity in which it holds a variable interest to identify if any of the variable interests have become reportable VIEs or Consolidated VIEs pursuant to new guidance issued in 2015 that had an effective date of January 1, 2016. The Partnership re-evaluated its investments related to mortgage revenue bonds, property loans, and investment in an unconsolidated entity.

The Partnership invests in mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for Residential Properties and commercial properties throughout the United States. The Partnership owns 100% of these mortgage revenue bonds and each bond is secured by a first mortgage on the property. In certain cases, the Partnership has also made property loans to the property owners which may be secured by second mortgages on these properties. Although Residential Properties financed with mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership are owned by separate entities in which the Partnership has no equity ownership interest, the debt financing provided by the Partnership creates a variable interest in these ownership entities that may require the Partnership to report the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of these entities on a consolidated basis under GAAP. In addition, the Partnership evaluated its investment in an unconsolidated entity and concluded the limited membership interest created a variable interest. Once the Partnership concluded these entities were VIEs, it needed to evaluate whether the VIE should be consolidated.

For the Partnership to consolidate a VIE, it must be considered the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the Partnership considers the activities of the VIE which most significantly impact their economic performance and who has the power to control such activities. The Partnership also considers the related party relationship of the entities involved in the VIEs. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, with the exception of the PHCs (Note 5) MBS Securities (Note 6) and TEBS and TOB Trusts, the Partnership determined it is not the primary beneficiary of any of the VIEs and therefore the Partnership has no consolidated VIEs.

In the first quarter of 2016, the Partnership made an equity investment in Vantage. The Partnership has determined its limited membership interest in Vantage is a variable interest, but it is not the primary beneficiary of the entity, therefore, Vantage is a VIE at March 31, 2016.

The Partnership concluded it was the primary beneficiary of two properties, Bent Tree and Fairmont Oaks, and therefore, reported these two properties as Consolidated VIEs for the three months ended March 31, 2015. In the fourth quarter of 2015 the Partnership’s Consolidated VIEs, Bent Tree and Fairmont Oaks, were sold. As a result, these entities met the criteria for discontinued operations presentation in the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Partnership eliminated the Consolidated VIE segment in the fourth quarter of 2015 (see Notes 7, 10, and 21).

With the exception of Vantage, the PHCs (Note 5), MBS Securities (Note 6) and TEBS and TOB Trusts, the following table presents information regarding the Partnership’s variable interests in VIEs held by the Partnership on March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 that the Partnership did not consolidate:

	March 31, 2016
	Balance Sheet Classification				Maximum Exposure to Loss
	Mortgage Revenue Bond		Property Loan		Mortgage Revenue Bond		Property Loan
Ashley Square Apartments	$	5,600,695	$	1,482,000	$	5,084,000	$	5,078,342
Bridle Ridge		8,552,233		-		7,565,000		-
Bruton Apartments		20,454,301		-		18,145,000		-
Columbia Gardens		14,915,592		-		15,222,003		-
Glenview Apartments		6,829,007		-		6,723,000		-
Harden Ranch		7,725,305		-		6,960,000		-
Montclair Apartments		3,582,096		-		3,458,000		-
Santa Fe Apartments		4,933,037		-		4,736,000		-
Seasons at Simi Valley		6,803,653		-		6,320,000		-
Sycamore Walk		5,493,352		-		5,447,000		-
Tyler Park Apartments		6,636,002		-		6,065,947		-
Vantage at Braunfels, LLC		-		6,578,789		-		6,578,789
Vantage at Brooks, LLC		-		7,406,905		-		7,406,905
Westside Village Market		4,220,252		-		3,964,084		-
Willow Run		14,916,596		-		15,221,965		-
Woodlyn Village		4,917,283		-		4,351,000
	$	115,579,404	$	15,467,694	$	109,262,999	$	19,064,036

	December 31, 2015
	Balance Sheet Classification				Maximum Exposure to Loss
	Mortgage Revenue Bond		Property Loan		Mortgage Revenue Bond		Property Loan
Ashley Square Apartments	$	5,607,163	$	1,482,000	$	5,099,000	$	7,942,472
Bruton Apartments		20,046,839		-		18,145,000		-
Columbia Gardens		15,224,597		-		15,224,597		-
Cross Creek		9,034,294		3,624,614		6,101,605		3,624,614
Glenview Apartments		6,926,243		-		6,723,000		-
Harden Ranch		7,628,981		-		6,960,000		-
Montclair Apartments		3,569,573		-		3,458,000		-
Santa Fe Apartments		4,884,102		-		4,736,000		-
Seasons at Simi Valley		6,724,110		-		6,320,000		-
Sycamore Walk		5,447,000		-		5,447,000		-
Tyler Park Apartments		6,562,209		-		6,075,000		-
Vantage at Braunfels, LLC		-		4,364,787		-		4,364,787
Vantage at Brooks, LLC		-		3,533,104		-		3,533,104
Westside Village Market		4,172,340		-		3,970,000		-
Willow Run		15,224,591		-		15,224,591		-
Totals	$	111,052,042	$	13,004,505	$	103,483,793	$	19,464,977

The mortgage revenue bonds are classified on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as available-for-sale investments and are carried at fair value while property loans are presented on the balance sheet as other assets and are carried at the unpaid principal less any loan loss allowances. See Note 4 for additional information regarding the mortgage revenue bonds and Note 9 for additional information regarding the property loans. The maximum exposure to loss for the mortgage revenue bonds is equal to the unpaid principal balance on March 31, 2016. The maximum exposure to loss on the property loans at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is equal to the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest. The difference between the mortgage revenue bond’s carrying value and the maximum exposure to loss is a function of the unrealized gains or losses on the mortgage revenue bonds. The difference between the property loans’ carrying value and the maximum exposure is the value of loan loss allowances that have been previously recorded against the outstanding property loan balances.

Mortgage revenue bonds owned by the Partnership have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for Residential Properties and commercial properties. Mortgage revenue bonds are either held directly by the Partnership or are held in trusts created in connection with debt financing transactions (Note 12). The Partnership had the following investments in mortgage revenue bonds on March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

	March 31, 2016
Description of Mortgage Revenue Bonds Held in Trust	Cost Adjusted for Paydowns		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
Arbors at Hickory Ridge ⁽³⁾	$	11,546,822	$	2,000,796	$	-		$	13,547,618
Ashley Square ⁽¹⁾		5,084,000		516,695		-			5,600,695
Avistar at Chase Hill - Series A ⁽³⁾		9,913,418		1,125,098		-			11,038,516
Avistar at the Crest - Series A ⁽³⁾		9,616,015		1,498,546		-			11,114,561
Avistar at the Oaks - Series A ⁽³⁾		7,761,097		996,264		-			8,757,361
Avistar at the Parkway - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		13,300,000		583,196		-			13,883,196
Avistar in 09 - Series A ⁽³⁾		6,701,407		860,235		-			7,561,642
Avistar on the Boulevard - Series A ⁽³⁾		16,381,921		2,201,078		-			18,582,999
Avistar on the Hills - Series A ⁽³⁾		5,362,122		726,311		-			6,088,433
Bella Vista ⁽¹⁾		6,430,000		922,898		-			7,352,898
Bridle Ridge ⁽¹⁾		7,565,000		987,233		-			8,552,233
Brookstone ⁽¹⁾		7,467,724		1,569,277		-			9,037,001
Bruton Apartments ⁽²⁾		18,145,000		2,309,301		-			20,454,301
Columbia Gardens ⁽²⁾		15,222,003		-		(306,411	)		14,915,592
Concord at Gulfgate - Series A ⁽²⁾		17,060,000		1,375,668		-			18,435,668
Concord at Little York - Series A ⁽²⁾		12,480,000		874,828		-			13,354,828
Concord at Williamcrest - Series A ⁽²⁾		18,020,000		1,453,104		-			19,473,104
Copper Gate Apartments ⁽³⁾		5,185,000		690,953		-			5,875,953
Cross Creek ⁽¹⁾		6,107,366		3,167,507		-			9,274,873
Decatur Angle ⁽²⁾		23,000,000		2,080,032		-			25,080,032
Glenview Apartments - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		4,670,000		114,116		-			4,784,116
Greens Property - Series A ⁽³⁾		8,273,000		1,407,067		-			9,680,067
Harden Ranch - Series A ⁽³⁾		6,960,000		765,305		-			7,725,305
Heritage Square - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		11,185,000		1,390,428		-			12,575,428
Lake Forest ⁽¹⁾		8,736,000		1,298,086		-			10,034,086
Live 929 Apartments ⁽²⁾		40,770,518		6,794,144		-			47,564,662
Montclair Apartments - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		2,530,000		125,674		-			2,655,674
Pro Nova 2014-1 ⁽²⁾		10,044,200		885,700		-			10,929,900
Ohio Properties - Series A ⁽¹⁾		14,287,000		3,197,018		-			17,484,018
Renaissance - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		11,425,883		1,462,013		-			12,887,896
Runnymede ⁽¹⁾		10,350,000		1,851,305		-			12,201,305
Santa Fe Apartments - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		3,065,000		199,878		-			3,264,878
Silver Moon - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		7,971,455		1,432,372		-			9,403,827
Southpark ⁽¹⁾		11,819,121		4,338,026		-			16,157,147
The Palms at Premier Park Apartments ⁽³⁾		19,958,648		2,902,945		-			22,861,593
Tyler Park Townhomes - Series A ⁽³⁾		6,065,947		570,055		-			6,636,002
Vantage at Harlingen - Series B ⁽⁴⁾		24,575,000		2,268,925		-			26,843,925
Vantage at Judson -Series B ⁽⁴⁾		26,507,380		3,166,270		-			29,673,650
Westside Village Market - Series A ⁽³⁾		3,964,084		256,168		-			4,220,252
Willow Run ⁽²⁾		15,221,965		-		(305,369	)		14,916,596
Woodlynn Village ⁽¹⁾		4,351,000		566,283		-			4,917,283
Mortgage revenue bonds held in trust	$	475,080,096	$	60,930,798	$	(611,780	)	$	535,399,114

	March 31, 2016
Description of Mortgage Revenue Bonds	Cost Adjusted for Paydowns		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
Avistar at Chase Hill - Series B	$	960,929	$	98,609	$	-		$	1,059,538
Avistar at the Crest - Series B		755,798		99,068		-			854,866
Avistar at the Oaks - Series B		552,662		72,842		-			625,504
Avistar at the Parkway - Series B		125,000		494		-			125,494
Avistar in 09 - Series B		455,896		60,088		-			515,984
Avistar on the Boulevard - Series B		449,097		58,867		-			507,964
Companion at Thornhill Apartments		11,500,000		1,404,405		-			12,904,405
Concord at Gulfgate - Series B		2,125,000		124,242		-			2,249,242
Concord at Little York - Series B		960,000		3,364		-			963,364
Concord at Williamcrest - Series B		2,800,000		80,041		-			2,880,041
Crossing at 1415		7,925,000		345,376		-			8,270,376
Glenview Apartments - Series B		2,053,000		-		(8,109	)		2,044,891
Greens Property - Series B		942,560		165,321		-			1,107,881
Heights at 515		6,945,000		298,292		-			7,243,292
Heritage Square - Series B		520,000		39,156		-			559,156
Montclair Apartments - Series B		928,000		-		(1,578	)		926,422
Ohio Properties - Series B		3,559,200		614,470		-			4,173,670
Santa Fe Apartments - Series B		1,671,000		-		(2,841	)		1,668,159
Seasons at Simi Valley		6,320,000		483,653		-			6,803,653
Sycamore Walk		5,447,000		46,352		-			5,493,352
Mortgage revenue bonds	$	56,995,142	$	3,994,640	$	(12,528	)	$	60,977,254

	December 31, 2015
Description of Mortgage Revenue Bonds Held in Trust	Cost Adjusted for Paydowns		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss		Estimated Fair Value
Arbors at Hickory Ridge ⁽³⁾	$	11,565,657	$	1,767,508	$	-	$	13,333,165
Ashley Square ⁽¹⁾		5,099,000		508,163		-		5,607,163
Avistar at Chase Hill - Series A ⁽³⁾		9,935,552		1,133,024		-		11,068,576
Avistar at the Crest - Series A ⁽³⁾		9,637,485		1,301,224		-		10,938,709
Avistar at the Oaks - Series A ⁽³⁾		7,777,936		840,159		-		8,618,095
Avistar at the Parkway - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		13,300,000		330,251		-		13,630,251
Avistar in 09 - Series A ⁽³⁾		6,715,948		725,445		-		7,441,393
Avistar on the Boulevard - Series A ⁽³⁾		16,418,497		1,872,323		-		18,290,820
Avistar on the Hills - Series A ⁽³⁾		5,373,756		693,096		-		6,066,852
Bella Vista ⁽¹⁾		6,430,000		766,135		-		7,196,135
Bridle Ridge ⁽¹⁾		7,595,000		817,222		-		8,412,222
Brookstone ⁽¹⁾		7,468,668		1,436,203		-		8,904,871
Bruton Apartments ⁽²⁾		18,145,000		1,901,839		-		20,046,839
Columbia Gardens ⁽²⁾		15,224,597		-		-		15,224,597
Concord at Gulfgate - Series A ⁽²⁾		17,060,000		852,612		-		17,912,612
Concord at Little York - Series A ⁽²⁾		12,480,000		688,441		-		13,168,441
Concord at Williamcrest - Series A ⁽²⁾		18,020,000		1,182,543		-		19,202,543
Copper Gate Apartments ⁽³⁾		5,185,000		616,341		-		5,801,341
Cross Creek ⁽¹⁾		6,101,605		2,932,689		-		9,034,294
Decatur Angle ⁽²⁾		23,000,000		1,582,083		-		24,582,083
Glenview Apartments - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		4,670,000		210,572		-		4,880,572
Greens Property - Series A ⁽³⁾		8,294,000		1,138,270		-		9,432,270
Harden Ranch - Series A ⁽³⁾		6,960,000		668,981		-		7,628,981
Heritage Square - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		11,185,000		273,488		-		11,458,488
Lake Forest ⁽¹⁾		8,766,000		1,177,745		-		9,943,745
Live 929 Apartments⁽²⁾		40,801,557		5,829,855		-		46,631,412
Montclair Apartments - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		2,530,000		114,079		-		2,644,079
Pro Nova 2014-1 and 2014-2 ⁽²⁾		19,379,489		1,182,900		-		20,562,389
Ohio Properties - Series A ⁽¹⁾		14,311,000		2,690,867		-		17,001,867
Renaissance - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		11,450,959		1,233,077		-		12,684,036
Runnymede ⁽¹⁾		10,350,000		1,600,938		-		11,950,938
Santa Fe Apartments - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		3,065,000		154,067		-		3,219,067
Silver Moon - Series A ⁽⁴⁾		7,983,811		1,246,349		-		9,230,160
Southpark ⁽¹⁾		11,799,874		3,990,882		-		15,790,756
The Palms at Premier Park Apartments ⁽³⁾		20,001,272		2,505,091		-		22,506,363
Tyler Park Townhomes - Series A ⁽³⁾		6,075,000		487,209		-		6,562,209
Vantage at Harlingen - Series B ⁽⁴⁾		24,575,000		1,765,139		-		26,340,139
Vantage at Judson -Series B ⁽⁴⁾		26,540,000		2,613,606		-		29,153,606
Westside Village Market - Series A ⁽³⁾		3,970,000		202,340		-		4,172,340
Willow Run ⁽²⁾		15,224,591		-		-		15,224,591
Woodlynn Village ⁽¹⁾		4,351,000		466,471		-		4,817,471
Mortgage revenue bonds held in trust	$	484,817,254	$	51,499,227	$	-	$	536,316,481

	December 31, 2015
Description of Mortgage Revenue Bonds	Cost Adjusted for Paydowns		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
Avistar at Chase Hill - Series B	$	961,981	$	109,878	$	-		$	1,071,859
Avistar at the Crest - Series B		756,626		86,428		-			843,054
Avistar at the Oaks - Series B		553,244		63,533		-			616,777
Avistar at the Parkway - Series B		125,000		-		(979	)		124,021
Avistar in 09 - Series B		456,376		52,409		-			508,785
Avistar on the Boulevard - Series B		449,589		51,356		-			500,945
Concord at Gulfgate - Series B		2,125,000		76,802		-			2,201,802
Concord at Little York - Series B		960,000		-		(6,711	)		953,289
Concord at Williamcrest - Series B		2,800,000		-		(19,573	)		2,780,427
Crossing at 1415		7,925,000		214,091		-			8,139,091
Glenview Apartments - Series B		2,053,000		-		(7,329	)		2,045,671
Greens Property - Series B		943,214		142,442		-			1,085,656
Heights at 515		6,945,000		185,268		-			7,130,268
Heritage Square - Series B		520,000		6,185		-			526,185
Montclair Apartments - Series B		928,000		-		(2,506	)		925,494
Ohio Properties - Series B		3,562,190		514,997		-			4,077,187
Santa Fe Apartments - Series B		1,671,000		-		(5,965	)		1,665,035
Seasons at Simi Valley		6,320,000		404,110		-			6,724,110
Sycamore Walk		5,447,000		-		-			5,447,000
Mortgage revenue bonds	$	45,502,220	$	1,907,499	$	(43,063	)	$	47,366,656

In March 2016, the Partnership sold the Pro Nova 2014-2 bond for approximately $9.5 million, which approximated the mortgage revenue bond’s carrying value plus accrued interest. The Partnership used approximately $8.4 million of the proceeds from the sale to pay in full and collapse the TOB Trust, which securitized this mortgage revenue bond (Note 12).

The following table includes the details of the mortgage revenue bond acquisitions during the first quarter of 2016:

The following table provides the details of the mortgage revenue bond acquisitions during the first quarter of 2015:

The properties securing the Partnership’s mortgage revenue bonds are geographically dispersed throughout the United States with significant concentrations (geographic risk) in California and Texas. On March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the geographic concentration in California, as a percentage of the total mortgage revenue bond principal outstanding, was approximately 8%. On March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the geographic concentration in Texas, as a percentage of total mortgage revenue bond principal outstanding, was approximately 51%.

Valuation - As all of the Partnership’s investments in mortgage revenue bonds are classified as available-for-sale securities, they are carried on the balance sheet at their estimated fair values. On March 31, 2016, the weighted average base rate of the mortgage revenue bonds reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements was approximately 6.4% per annum. Due to the limited market for the mortgage revenue bonds, these estimates of fair value do not necessarily represent what the Partnership would actually receive if the mortgage revenue bonds were sold. There is no active trading market for the mortgage revenue bonds and price quotes for them are not typically available.

On March 31, 2016, management valued all of the Partnership’s mortgage revenue bonds using discounted cash flow and yield to maturity analyses and which encompasses judgment in its application. The key assumption in management’s yield to maturity analysis is the range of effective yields of the individual mortgage revenue bonds. The effective yield analysis for each mortgage revenue bond considers the current market yield on similar mortgage revenue bonds as well as the debt service coverage ratio of each underlying property serving as collateral for the mortgage revenue bond. At March 31, 2016, the range of effective yields on the individual mortgage revenue bonds was 4.0% to 12.0% per annum. At December 31, 2015, the range of effective yields on the individual mortgage revenue bonds was 4.2% to 12.1% per annum.

The Partnership calculated the sensitivity of the key assumption used in calculating the fair values of these mortgage revenue bonds. Assuming a 10% adverse change in the key assumption, the effective yields on the individual mortgage revenue bonds would increase to a range of 4.4% to 13.1% per annum and would result in additional unrealized losses on the mortgage revenue bond portfolio of approximately $35.3 million. This sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and is as of a specific point in time. The results of the sensitivity analysis may not be indicative of actual changes in fair value and should be used with caution. If available, the general partner may also consider price quotes on similar mortgage revenue bonds or other information from external sources, such as pricing services. Pricing services, broker quotes and management’s analyses provide indicative pricing only.

Unrealized gains or losses on these mortgage revenue bonds are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to reflect changes in their estimated fair values resulting from market conditions and fluctuations in the present value of the expected cash flows from the underlying properties.

The Partnership owns 100% of the Residual Participation Receipts (“LIFERs”) in three tender option bond trusts (“PHC TOB Trusts”). At March 31, 2016, the PHC TOB Trusts own approximately $57.8 million of Public Housing Capital Fund Certificates (“PHC Certificates”) issued by three trusts (“PHC Trusts”) sponsored by Deutsche Bank (“DB”). The assets held by the PHC Trusts consist of custodial receipts evidencing loans made to a number of local public housing authorities. Principal and interest on these loans are payable by the respective public housing authorities out of annual appropriations to be made to the public housing authorities by HUD under HUD’s Capital Fund Program established under the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 (the “Capital Fund Program”). The PHC Trusts have a first lien on these annual Capital Fund Program payments to secure the public housing authorities’ respective obligations to pay principal and interest on their loans. The loans payable by the public housing authorities are not debts of, or guaranteed by, the United States of America or HUD. Interest payable on the public housing authority debt held by the PHC Trusts is exempt from federal income taxes. The PHC Certificates issued by each of the PHC Trusts have been rated investment grade by Standard & Poor’s.

The Partnership determined that the three PHC TOB Trusts are VIEs and that the Partnership was the primary beneficiary of each of the three PHC TOB Trusts. As a result, the Partnership reports the PHC TOB Trusts on a consolidated basis and the senior floating-rate participation interests (“SPEARS”) as debt financing. In determining the primary beneficiary of these specific VIEs, the Partnership considered who has the power to control the activities of the VIEs which most significantly impact their financial performance, the risks that the entity was designed to create, and how each risk affects the VIE. The indenture for the PHC TOB Trusts stipulates that the Partnership has the sole right to cause the PHC TOB Trusts to sell the PHC Certificates. If they were sold, the extent to which the VIEs will be exposed to gains or losses would result from decisions made by the Partnership.

The Partnership had the following investments in the PHC Certificates on March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

Valuation - As all of the Partnership’s investments in PHC Certificates are classified as available-for-sale securities, they are carried on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at their estimated fair values. On March 31, 2016, the weighted average base rate of the PHC Trust Certificates was approximately 5.2% per annum. Due to the limited market for the PHC Certificates, these estimates of fair value do not necessarily represent what the Partnership would actually receive in a sale of the PHC Certificates. The estimates of the fair values of these PHC certificates is based on a yield to maturity analysis which begins with the current market yield rate for a “AAA” rated tax-free municipal bond for a term consistent with the weighted-average life of each of the Public Housing Capital Fund trusts adjusted largely for unobservable inputs the Partnership believes would be used by market participants. Management’s fair value estimates encompass judgment. Management’s estimates are compared to external pricing services when available.

At March 31, 2016 the range of effective yields on the PHC Certificates were 3.7% to 5.4% per annum. Additionally, the Partnership calculated the sensitivity of the key assumption used in calculating the fair values of these PHC Certificates. Assuming a 10% adverse change in the key assumption, the effective yields on the PHC Certificates would increase to a range of 4.1% to 6.0% per annum and would result in additional unrealized losses on the PHC Certificates of approximately $1.9 million. This sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and is as of a specific point in time. The results of the sensitivity analysis may not be indicative of actual changes in fair value and should be used with caution. If available, the Partnership may also consider other information from external sources, such as pricing services. Pricing services and management’s analysis provide indicative pricing only.

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the PHC Certificates held in the PHC TOB Trusts on March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

In January 2016, the Partnership sold its three remaining MBS Securities for approximating $15.0 million, which approximated the amortized cost, plus interest. The Partnership then collapsed the related three remaining MBS - TOB Trusts, with a carrying value of approximately $11.9 million, which were paid in full from the proceeds of these sales. In addition, the $11.0 million derivative related to the MBS Securities was sold for its current value and resulted in no cash proceeds to the Partnership and no gain or loss was recognized. The sale of the Partnership’s remaining three MBS Securities eliminated the MBS Securities segment in the first quarter of 2016 (Notes 12, 15, and 21).

At December 31, 2015, the Partnership determined that the three MBS TOB Trusts were VIEs and that the Partnership was the primary beneficiary of each of the VIEs. As a result, the MBS TOB Trusts were reported on a consolidated basis and the SPEARS as debt financing. In determining the primary beneficiary of these specific VIEs, the Partnership considered who had the power to control the activities of the VIEs which most significantly impacted their financial performance, the risks that the entity was designed to create, and how each risk affected the VIE. The indenture for the MBS TOB Trusts stipulates that the Partnership has the sole right to cause the MBS TOB Trusts to sell the MBS Securities.

The carrying value of the Partnership’s MBS Securities on March 31, 2016 was $0. The carrying value of the Partnership’s MBS Securities is as follows:

In the first quarter of 2016, the Partnership executed three broker agreements to sell three of the MF Properties, Arboretum, Eagle Village, and Woodland Park. Management has determined these potential sale transactions did not meet the criteria for discontinued operation presentation, and, are reported as part of the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

In March 2016, The Partnership executed an agreement to sell a parcel of land in Florida, carried at a cost of approximately $3.0 million.

To facilitate its investment strategy of acquiring additional mortgage revenue bonds secured by MF Properties, the Partnership has acquired through its subsidiary a 99% limited partner position in one limited partnership, 100% member positions in six limited liability companies that own the MF Properties, and owns one of the MF Properties directly. The financial statements of these properties are consolidated with those of the Partnership. The general partners of these partnerships are unaffiliated parties and their 1% ownership interest in these limited partnerships is reflected in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements as noncontrolling interests.

The Partnership had the following investments in MF Properties on March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

The owners of the Consolidated VIEs sold the two properties, Bent Tree and Fairmont Oaks, in the fourth quarter of 2015. The Partnership classified the Consolidated VIEs as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and has eliminated the Consolidated VIE segment as a reportable segment during the fourth quarter of 2015 (Notes 3, 10, and 21). No net income or loss from these properties accrued to the Unitholders or the General Partner.

On March 31, 2016, the Partnership reported approximately $7.4 million as land held for investment. In March 2016, The Partnership executed an agreement to sell a parcel of land in Florida. At March 31, 2016, the Partnership continues to assess the “highest and best use” of land held for investment and development.

In March 2016, ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, a subsidiary of the Partnership, closed on the first commitment, approximately $2.4 million, to provide equity totaling approximately $9.6 million to Vantage to build a new 288 unit multifamily residential property in Corpus Christi, Texas. The investment of approximately $2.4 million on March 31, 2016, which represents the Partnership’s maximum exposure to loss, is reported in Investment in an unconsolidated entity on the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Partnership, through its wholly owned subsidiary, ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, is the only limited equity investor in this limited liability company. The Partnership does not control Vantage and the Partnership will account for its investment by the equity method of accounting. An affiliate of Vantage provided the guarantee for ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC’s return on its investment. The return on the investment earned by the Partnership will be reported as investment income (Note 1).

The Partnership had the following Other Assets on March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

In addition to the mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership, property loans have been made to the owners of certain properties which secure the mortgage revenue bonds and are reported as property loans receivable in Other assets, net of loan loss allowance. The Partnership periodically, or as changes in circumstances or operations dictate, evaluates such property loans receivable for impairment. The value of the underlying property assets is ultimately the most relevant measure of value to support the property loan values. The Partnership utilizes a discounted cash flow model in estimating a property’s fair value. Discounted cash flow models containing varying assumptions are considered. The various models may assume multiple revenue and expense scenarios, various capitalization rates and multiple discount rates. Other information, such as independent appraisals, may be considered in estimating a property’s fair value. If the estimated fair value of the property, after deducting the amortized cost basis of any senior mortgage revenue bond, exceeds the principal balance of the property loan then no potential loss is indicated and no loan loss allowance for property loans is recorded by the Partnership. In estimating the property valuation, the most significant assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow model remain the same as discussed in the Form 10-K and include revenue and expense projections and capitalization rates.

See the Fair Value Measurement footnote (Note 16) for the detailed description of the fair value estimation process for all taxable mortgage bonds.

During the first quarter of 2016, the Partnership advanced net funds to Cross Creek, Foundation for Affordable Housing (“FAH”), Vantage at Brooks, LLC, and Vantage at Braunfels, LLC of approximately $6,000, $2,500, $3.7 million, and $2.1 million, respectively. During the first quarter of 2015, the Partnership advanced additional funds to Cross Creek of approximately $57,500. In addition, the Partnership received approximately $18,000 of principal from FAH during the first quarter of 2015. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Partnership placed interest to be earned on the Ashley Square, Cross Creek, and the Lake Forest operating property loans receivable on nonaccrual status. The discounted cash flow method used by management to establish the net realizable value of these property loans determined the collection of the interest earned since inception was not probable. On December 31, 2015, the Partnership reported an interest allowance equal to the accrued interest on Ashley Square, Cross Creek, and the Lake Forest operating property loans. In addition, the Partnership deferred less than 100% of the interest earned on the property loans on the Ohio Properties as, in management’s opinion, the remainder was considered to be collectible at December 31, 2015.

The following is a summary of the net taxable property loans due at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

	March 31, 2016
	Outstanding Balance		Accrued Interest		Loan Loss Allowances			Interest Allowance		Net Taxable Property Loans
Arbors at Hickory Ridge	$	191,264	$	43,563	$	-		$	-	$	234,827
Ashley Square		5,078,342		-		(3,596,342	)		-		1,482,000
Avistar (February 2013 portfolio)		274,496		61,162		-			-		335,658
Avistar (June 2013 portfolio)		251,622		56,065		-			-		307,687
Cross Creek		7,078,087		-		(3,447,472	)		-		3,630,615
Foundation for Affordable Housing		1,418,075		-		-			-		1,418,075
Greens Property		850,000		373,440		-			-		1,223,440
Lake Forest		4,623,704		-		(55,000	)		-		4,568,704
Ohio Properties		2,390,446		848,249		-			-		3,238,695
Vantage at Brooks LLC		7,199,424		207,481		-			-		7,406,905
Vantage at Braunfels LLC		6,347,305		231,484		-			-		6,578,789
	$	35,702,765	$	1,821,444	$	(7,098,814	)	$	-	$	30,425,395

	December 31, 2015
	Outstanding Balance		Accrued Interest		Loan Loss Allowances			Interest Allowance			Net Taxable Property Loans
Arbors at Hickory Ridge	$	191,264	$	39,950	$	-		$	-		$	231,214
Ashley Square		5,078,342		2,864,130		(3,596,342	)		(2,864,130	)		1,482,000
Avistar (February 2013 portfolio)		274,496		51,386		-			-			325,882
Avistar (June 2013 portfolio)		251,622		47,104		-			-			298,726
Cross Creek		7,072,087		2,352,851		(3,447,472	)		(2,352,852	)		3,624,614
Foundation for Affordable Housing		1,415,590		-		-			-			1,415,590
Greens Property		850,000		343,600		-			-			1,193,600
Lake Forest		4,623,704		3,080,446		(55,000	)		(3,059,610	)		4,589,540
Ohio Properties		2,390,448		1,235,017		-			(441,795	)		3,183,670
Vantage at Brooks LLC		3,454,664		78,440		-			-			3,533,104
Vantage at Braunfels LLC		4,272,306		92,481		-			-			4,364,787
	$	29,874,523	$	10,185,405	$	(7,098,814	)	$	(8,718,387	)	$	24,242,727

Based on the annual impairment analysis and the discounted cash flow analysis performed at December 31, 2015 and the related analysis of each property loan during the first quarter of 2016, a provision for loan loss was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2016, in the amount of approximately $21,000 for interest accrued on the notes receivable on the Lake Forest property. In management’s opinion, this amount was considered to be uncollectible. There was no provision for loan loss recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

In April 2015, the Partnership entered into brokerage contracts to sell the Consolidated VIEs. As a result, these entities met the criteria for discontinued operations and have been classified as such in the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. The sales of the Consolidated VIEs were closed in the fourth quarter of 2015 with the gains and results of operations of the Consolidated VIEs reported as part of the discontinued operations in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2015. No net income or loss from these property operations or sale accrued to the Unitholders or the General Partner during the first three months of 2016.

The following presents the revenues, expenses and income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

On March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership reported unsecured outstanding lines of credit (“LOC”) which total approximately $28.0 million and $17.5, respectively. Included in this balance are two unsecured LOC extended to the Partnership.

In January and February 2016, the Partnership entered into a First and Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement which modified certain provisions of the May 2015 Credit Agreement. The First Amendment revises the definitions and reporting requirements and the Second Amendment increases the principal commitments with respect to the unsecured line of credit by $2.5 million, to a total commitment of $40.0 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Partnership borrowed $11.5 million on this unsecured LOC to finance the purchase of the Companion at Thornhill Apartments mortgage revenue bond (Note 4). On March 31, 2016 the Partnership had outstanding debt of approximately $24.0 million at a rate of approximately 3.4% on this unsecured LOC.

On December 31, 2015, the Partnership held two $5.0 million LOCs. The first revolving LOC carried a variable interest rate which was approximately 3.5% and was paid in full and retired upon maturity in March 2016. The second revolving LOC also carries a variable interest rate which was approximately 3.7% on March 31, 2016 and matures in May 2017. The Partnership is required to make prepayments of the principal to reduce the second revolving LOC to $0 for fifteen consecutive calendar days during each calendar quarter. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Partnership fulfilled its prepayment obligation. On March 31, 2016 the Partnership had outstanding debt of approximately $4.0 million on this LOC. The Partnership has also fulfilled its second quarter 2016 prepayment obligation.

On March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership reported outstanding debt financing of approximately $430.3 million and approximately $451.5 million, respectively, through the use of various credit facilities.

TOB Trusts Securitization	Outstanding TOB Trust Financing at March 31, 2016		Year Acquired	Stated Maturity	Variable / Fixed	Reset Frequency	SIFMA Based Rate			Facility Fees			Period End Rate
PHC Certificates⁽¹⁾	$	43,145,000	2012	June-16	Variable	Weekly		0.95	%		1.62	%		2.57	%
Decatur Angle		22,848,215	2014	October-16	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.26	%
Live 929		37,911,261	2014	July-19	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.39	%
Bruton Apartments		17,247,389	2014	July-17	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.51	%
Pro Nova 2014-1		9,007,389	2014	July-17	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.01	%
Concord at Gulfgate		14,937,068	2015	February-18	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Concord at Little York		11,232,068	2015	February-18	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Concord at Williamcrest		15,607,068	2015	February-18	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Columbia Gardens		11,684,439	2015	December-17	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Willow Run		11,684,022	2015	December-17	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Total TOB Trust Financing\Period End Rate	$	195,303,919												3.42	%

⁽¹⁾ Comprised of three TOB Trusts

TOB Trusts Securitization	Outstanding TOB Trust Financing at December 31, 2015		Year Acquired	Stated Maturity	Variable / Fixed	Reset Frequency	SIFMA Based Rate			Facility Fees			Period End Rate
PHC Certificates ⁽¹⁾	$	43,985,000	2012	June-16	Variable	Weekly		0.68	%		1.62	%		2.30	%
MBS Securities - 1		2,585,000	2012	April-16	Variable	Weekly		0.16	%		0.94	%		1.10	%
MBS Securities - 2		4,090,000	2012	April-16	Variable	Weekly		0.16	%		0.94	%		1.10	%
MBS Securities - 3		5,270,000	2012	April-16	Variable	Weekly		0.16	%		0.94	%		1.10	%
Decatur Angle		22,847,450	2014	October-16	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.26	%
Live 929		37,935,981	2014	July-19	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.39	%
Bruton Apartments		17,246,899	2014	July-17	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.51	%
Pro Nova 2014-1		9,006,899	2014	July-17	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.01	%
Pro Nova 2014-2		8,371,899	2014	July-17	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.01	%
Concord at Gulfgate		14,936,685	2015	February-18	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Concord at Little York		11,231,685	2015	February-18	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Concord at Williamcrest		15,606,685	2015	February-18	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Columbia Gardens		11,699,209	2015	December-17	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Willow Run		11,698,732	2015	December-17	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				2.76	%
Total TOB Trust Financing\Period End Rate	$	216,512,124												3.26	%

⁽¹⁾ Comprised of three TOB Trusts

The Partnership executed a Master Trust Agreement with Deutsche Bank (“DB”) which allows the Partnership to execute multiple TOB Trust structures upon the approval and agreement of terms by DB. Under each TOB Trust structure issued through the Master Trust Agreement, the TOB trustee issues SPEARS and LIFERS.

Due to certain restrictions imposed by the Volcker Rule, the Partnership and DB executed a Master Trust Agreement and related documents to create Term TOB Trusts (“Term TOB Trusts”). The TOB Trustee issues SPEARS and LIFERS which represent beneficial interests in the securitized asset held by the TOB trustee. The Partnership purchases the LIFERS from each of these TOB Trusts which grants them certain rights to the securitized assets. The Master Trust Agreement with DB has covenants with which the Partnership is required to maintain compliance. If the Partnership were to be out of compliance with any of these covenants, it would trigger a termination event of the financing facilities.

The most restrictive covenant was that cash available to distribute for the trailing twelve months must be at least two times trailing twelve-month interest expense. On March 31, 2016 the Partnership was in compliance with all of these covenants.

The Partnership owns the PHC Certificate LIFERS issued by the PHC TOB Trusts and pledged the LIFERS to the trustee to secure certain reimbursement obligations of the Partnership as the holder of LIFERS. The Partnership is consolidating the PHC TOB Trust as it has determined it is the primary beneficiary of these variable interest entities. The PHC TOB Trusts issued SPEARS to unaffiliated investors. The SPEARS represent senior interests in the PHC TOB Trusts and have been credit enhanced by DB. The LIFERS entitle the Partnership to all principal and interest payments received by the PHC TOB Trusts.

On March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership posted approximately $2.2 million and $1.5 million of cash collateral in connection with the interest rate swaps (Note 15).

The following tables provide the detail related to the outstanding TEBS Financing, year acquired, stated maturity, and annual interest rates at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

To mitigate its exposure to interest rate fluctuations on the variable rate M33, M31, and M24 TEBS financings, the 2015, 2014, and 2010 Sponsors also entered into interest rate cap agreements (see Note 15).

At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership reported approximately $4.9 million and $4.8 million, respectively, as restricted cash on the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the M33 TEBS Financing facility.

At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership reported approximately $146,000 and $163,000, respectively, as restricted cash on the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the M31 TEBS Financing facility.

At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership reported approximately $35,100 and $365,000, respectively, as restricted cash on the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the M24 TEBS Financing facility.

For the M33, M31, and M24 TEBS Financings, the payment of interest on the Class A TEBS Certificates will be made from the interest payments received by Freddie Mac from the Bonds and Senior Custody Receipts held by Freddie Mac on designated interest payment dates prior to any payments of interest on the Class B TEBS Certificates held by the Sponsor. As the holder of the Class B TEBS Certificates, the Sponsor is not entitled to receive interest payments on the Class B TEBS Certificates at any particular rate, but will be entitled to all payments of principal and interest on the Bonds and Senior Custody Receipts held by Freddie Mac after payment of principal and interest due on the Class A TEBS Certificates and payment of all Facility Fees and associated expenses. Accordingly, the amount of interest paid to the Sponsor on the Class B TEBS Certificates is expected to vary over time, and could be eliminated altogether, due to fluctuations in the interest rate payable on the Class A TEBS Certificates, Facility Fees, expenses and other factors.

During the first quarter of 2016, the Partnership implemented Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30)”. The new accounting guidance changed the presentation of debt issuance costs in the financial statements to present them as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an Other Assets, applied retrospectively. The new accounting guidance did not change the presentation of debt issuance costs related to LOCs, so these continue to be reported as Other Assets.

The following tables provide summaries of the pre-adoption and post-adoption effects of this change on the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements on March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

The Partnership’s aggregate borrowings on March 31, 2016 contractually mature over the next five years and thereafter as follows:

The three MBS TOB Trusts and the TOB Trust collateralized by the Pro Nova 2014-2 mortgage revenue bond were paid in full and collapsed in January 2016 and March 2016, respectively. The Partnership expects to renew each TOB financing facility maturing in 2016 for another six-month term as it has the discretion to renew for six month periods per the terms of the agreement with DB. In addition, the Partnership plans to renew the M24 TEBS financing facility when it matures in 2017.

The Partnership reports the mortgage loans secured by certain MF Properties on its condensed consolidated financial statements as Mortgages payable and other secured financing. On March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the outstanding mortgage loans totaled approximately $69.1 million and $69.3 million, respectively.

The following is a summary of the Mortgages payable and other secured financing on the MF Properties:

Included in Mortgages Payable and Other Secured Financing is a $7.5 million secured LOC. The $7.5 million secured LOC matures on August 1, 2017 and carries a fixed interest rate of approximately 2.8% per annum plus the 30-day London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") which was approximately 0.1% per annum on March 31, 2016 and approximately 0.2% on December 31, 2015. The total borrowed on March 31, 2016 is $7.5 million and is secured by the Woodland Park MF Property, which has a carrying value of the total assets of approximately $14.2 million. In the event that the value of this property would not be sufficient to retire the secured line of credit, it is cross collateralized by assets owned by the Partnership’s wholly owned subsidiary. The carrying value of the total assets of the wholly owned subsidiary is approximately $83.4 million.

The Partnership’s mortgages payable and other secured financing on March 31, 2016 contractually mature over the next five years and thereafter as follows:

The majority of the 2016 mortgages payable and secured financing will be fully paid and retired if Arboretum is sold. If the sale is not executed, the Partnership plans to refinance the mortgage.

The general partner of the Partnership, AFCA 2, is entitled to receive an administrative fee from the Partnership equal to 0.45% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of any of its mortgage revenue bonds, property loans collateralized by real property, and other investments for which the owner of the financed property or other third party is not obligated to pay such administrative fee directly to AFCA 2. For the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 the Partnership paid or accrued administrative fees to AFCA 2 of approximately $687,000 and $620,000, respectively. In addition to the administrative fees paid directly by the Partnership, AFCA 2 receives administrative fees directly from the owners of properties financed by certain of the mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership. These administrative fees also equal 0.45% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of these mortgage revenue bonds and totaled approximately $16,500 for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. There were no such administrative fees received in for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 as the properties financed by these mortgage revenue bonds were sold in 2015.

AFCA 2 earns mortgage placement fees in connection with the acquisition of certain mortgage revenue bonds. These mortgage placement fees were paid by the owners of the respective properties and, accordingly, have not been reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements because these properties are not considered consolidated VIEs. During the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, AFCA 2 earned mortgage placement fees of approximately $388,000 and $534,000, respectively.

An affiliate of AFCA 2, America First Properties Management Company, LLC (“Properties Management”) provided property management services for seven of the MF Properties and seven of the properties collateralized by the mortgage revenue bonds, earning management fees of approximately $312,000 and $324,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For

the seven properties collateralized by the mortgage revenue bonds, these property management fees are not Partnership expenses, but are paid in each case by the owner of the Residential Properties. For MF Properties, the property management fees are reflected as real estate operating expenses on the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The property management fees are paid out of the revenues generated by the respective property prior to the payment of debt service on the Partnership's mortgage revenue bonds and property loans, if applicable.

An affiliate of AFCA 2, Farnam Capital Advisors, LLC, acts as an origination advisor and consultant to the borrowers when mortgage revenue bonds and financing facilities are acquired by the Partnership. For the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, approximately $194,000 and $267,000, respectively, in origination fees were paid by the borrower of certain acquired bonds and have not been reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

On March 31, 2016, the Partnership has eleven derivative agreements in order to mitigate its exposure to increases in interest rates on its variable-rate debt financing.

At March 31, 2016, the terms of the eleven derivative agreements are as follows:

Purchase Date	Initial Notional Amount		Effective Capped Rate			Maturity Date	Purchase Price		Fair Value⁽¹⁾		Variable Debt Financing Facility Hedged	Maximum Potential Cost of Borrowing			Counterparty
September-10	$	31,936,667		3.00	%	September-17	$	921,000	$	24	M24 TEBS		5.0	%	Bank of New York Mellon

September-10	$	31,936,667		3.00	%	September-17	$	845,600	$	24	M24 TEBS		5.0	%	Barclays Bank PLC

September-10	$	31,936,667		3.00	%	September-17	$	928,000	$	24	M24 TEBS		5.0	%	Royal Bank of Canada

August-13	$	93,305,000		1.50	%	September-17	$	793,000	$	5,759	M24 TEBS		3.5	%	Deutsche Bank

February-14	$	41,250,000		1.00	%	March-17	$	230,500	$	710	PHC TOB Trusts		3.3	%	SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

July-14	$	31,565,000		3.00	%	August-19	$	315,200	$	9,584	M31 TEBS		4.4	%	Barclays Bank PLC

July-14	$	31,565,000		3.00	%	August-19	$	343,000	$	9,594	M31 TEBS		4.4	%	Royal Bank of Canada

July-14	$	31,565,000		3.00	%	August-19	$	333,200	$	9,594	M31 TEBS		4.4	%	SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

July-15	$	28,095,000		3.00	%	August-20	$	210,000	$	36,019	M33 TEBS		4.3	%	Wells Fargo Bank

July-15	$	28,095,000		3.00	%	August-20	$	187,688	$	36,019	M33 TEBS		4.3	%	Royal Bank of Canada

July-15	$	28,095,000		3.00	%	August-20	$	174,900	$	36,019	M33 TEBS		4.3	%	SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

In conjunction with the sale of the MBS Securities the related $11.0 million derivative was sold for its current value which resulted in no cash proceeds and no gain or loss was recognized (Note 6).

The Partnership contracted for two no-cost interest rate swaps with DB related to the Decatur Angle and Bruton TOB financing facilities collateralized by mortgage revenue bonds that are used to provide financing for the construction of these properties. The swap related to the Decatur Angle TOB financing facility has a $23.0 million notional value, an October 15, 2016 effective date, and an October 15, 2021 termination date. The swap related to the Bruton TOB financing facility has an approximate $18.1 million notional value, an April 15, 2017 effective date, and an April 15, 2022 termination date. Both swaps are in place to mitigate the possible interest rate increases and swaps a variable rate based on LIBOR for an approximate 2% fixed rate. On March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of the Decatur Angle swap was a liability at approximately $1.2 million and $737,000, respectively.

On March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of the Bruton swap was a liability of approximately $988,000 and $580,000, respectively. The fair value of these swaps is reported as a liability on the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

These interest rate derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, they are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value included in current period earnings within interest expense. The change in the fair value of these derivative contracts resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $1.1 million and $900,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The valuation methodology used to estimate the fair value of the Partnership’s interest rate derivative agreements is disclosed in Note 16.

Current accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a framework for measuring fair value and provides for expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance:

Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, the fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:

The categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value.

Investments in Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Bond Purchase Commitments. The fair values of the Partnership’s investments in mortgage revenue bonds and mortgage bond purchase commitments have each been based on a discounted cash flow or yield to maturity analysis. There is no active trading market for the mortgage revenue bonds and price quotes for the mortgage revenue bonds are not available. If available, the Partnership may also consider price quotes on similar mortgage revenue bonds or other information from external sources, such as pricing services. The estimates of the fair values of these mortgage revenue bonds, whether estimated by the Partnership or based on external sources, are based largely on unobservable inputs the Partnership believes would be used by market participants. Additionally, the calculation methodology used by the external sources and the Partnership encompasses the use of judgment in its application. To validate changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s investments in mortgage revenue bonds between reporting periods, the Partnership looks at the key inputs such as changes in the current market yields on similar bonds as well as changes in the operating performance of the underlying property serving as collateral for each bond. The Partnership validates that the changes in the estimated fair value of the mortgage revenue bonds move with the changes in these monitored factors. Given these facts the fair value measurement of the Partnership’s investment in mortgage revenue bonds is categorized as a Level 3 input. There is also an approximately $1.6 million estimated fair market value adjustment related to forward bond purchase commitments that are categorized as a Level 3 input which were recorded in other comprehensive income during the quarter ended March 31, 2016. The fair value of the bond purchase commitment is determined in the same manner as the mortgage revenue bonds.

Investments in Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificates. The fair value of the Partnership’s investment in Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificates has been based on a yield to maturity analysis performed by the Partnership. There is no active trading market for the trusts’ certificates owned by the Partnership, but it will look at estimated values as determined by pricing services when available. The estimates of the fair values of these trusts’ certificates begin with the current market yield rate for a “AAA” rated tax-free municipal bond for a term consistent with the weighted-average life of each of the Public Housing Capital Fund trusts, adjusted largely for unobservable inputs the Partnership believes would be used by market participants. Additionally, the calculation

methodology used by external pricing services and the Partnership encompasses the use of judgment in its application. The Partnership validates that the changes in the estimated fair value of Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificates move with the changes in the market yield rates of investment grade rated mortgage revenue municipal bonds with terms of similar length. Given these facts the fair value measurement of the Partnership’s investment in Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificates is categorized as a Level 3 input.

Investments in Mortgage-Backed Securities. On and for the three months ended December 31, 2015, the fair value of the Partnership’s investment in mortgage-backed securities was based upon prices obtained from a third party pricing service, which are indicative of market activity. The valuation methodology of the Partnership’s third party pricing service incorporates commonly used market pricing methods, incorporates trading activity observed in the market place, and other data inputs. The methodology also considered the underlying characteristics of each security, which were also observable inputs, including: coupon; maturity date; loan age; reset date; collateral type; geography; and prepayment speeds. The Partnership analyzes pricing data received from the third party pricing service by comparing it to valuation information obtained from at least one other third party pricing service, ensuring they were within a tolerable range of difference which the Partnership estimates as 7.5%. The Partnership also looked at observations of trading activity in the market place when available. Given these facts, the fair value measurements of the Partnership’s investment in mortgage-backed securities were categorized as Level 2 inputs.

Taxable Bonds. The fair values of the Partnership’s investments in taxable bonds have each been based on a discounted cash flow or yield to maturity analysis. There is no active trading market for the taxable bonds and price quotes are not available. The estimates of the fair values of these taxable bonds, whether estimated by the Partnership or based on external sources, are based largely on unobservable inputs the Partnership believes would be used by market participants. Additionally, the calculation methodology used by the external sources and the Partnership encompasses the use of judgment in its application. To validate changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s investments in taxable bonds between reporting periods, management looks at the key inputs such as changes in the current market yields on similar bonds as well as changes in the operating performance of the underlying property serving as collateral for each bond. We validate that the changes in the estimated fair value of the taxable bonds move with the changes in these monitored factors. Given these facts the fair value measurement of the Partnership’s investment in taxable bonds is categorized as a Level 3 input.

Interest Rate Derivatives. The effect of the Partnership’s interest rate caps is to set a cap, or upper limit, on the base rate of interest paid on the Partnership’s variable rate debt equal to the notional amount of the derivative agreement. The effect of the Partnership’s interest rate swaps is to change a variable rate debt obligation to a fixed rate for that portion of the debt equal to the notional amount of the derivative agreement. The interest rate derivatives are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value included in current period earnings within interest expense. The fair value of the interest rate derivatives is based on a model whose inputs is not observable and therefore is categorized as a Level 3 input. The inputs in the valuation model include three-month LIBOR rates, unobservable adjustments to account for the SIFMA index, as well as any recent interest rate cap trades with similar terms.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

Gains and losses included in earnings for the period shown above are included in interest expense.

The Partnership calculates a fair value of each financial instrument using a discounted cash flow model based on the debt amortization schedules at the effective rate of interest for each period represented. This estimate of fair value is based on Level 3 inputs. The table below represents the fair value of the financial liabilities held on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

The Partnership, from time to time, may be subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are frequently covered by insurance. If it has been determined that a loss is probable, the estimated amount of the loss is accrued in the condensed consolidated financial statements. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

As part of the Partnership’s strategy of acquiring mortgage revenue bonds, the Partnership will enter into forward bond purchase commitments related to mortgage revenue bonds to be issued secured by properties under construction. Upon execution of the forward bond purchase commitment, the proceeds from the mortgage revenue bonds issued will be used to pay off the construction related debt and mortgage revenue bonds. The Partnership accounts for the forward bond purchase agreements as an available-for-sale security and, as such, records the estimated value of the forward bond purchase commitment as an asset or liability with changes in such valuation recorded in other comprehensive income.

On March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 the forward bond purchase commitments outstanding and the related fair values are as follows:

In October 2015, ATAX Vantage Holdings, LLC, a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, committed to loan approximately $17.0 million to an unrelated third party to build two new multifamily residential properties. The Partnership will fulfill its note commitment and fund approximately $3.5 million in 2016 (Note 9).

The Partnership provided a guarantee on the $2.8 million mortgage secured by the Abbington at Stones River, a 96 unit multifamily property located in Tennessee, in addition to providing an approximately $1.4 million property loan to FAH, the not-for-profit owner of the property. Based on the historical financial performance of the property and its estimated fair value, the Partnership estimates there is no value to record for this mortgage guarantee.

As the holder of residual interests issued in connection with its TEBS and TOB bond financing arrangements, the Partnership is required to guarantee certain losses that can be incurred by the trusts created in connection with these financings. These guarantees may result from a downgrade in the investment rating of mortgage revenue bonds held by the trust or of the senior securities issued by the trust, a ratings downgrade of the liquidity provider for the trust, increases in short term interest rates beyond pre-set maximums, an inability to re-market the senior securities or an inability to obtain liquidity for the trust. In the case of the TEBS, Freddie Mac will step in first on an immediate basis and the Partnership will have 10 to 14 days to remedy. In each of these cases, the trust will be collapsed. If the proceeds from the sale of the trust collateral are not sufficient to pay the principal amount of the senior securities with accrued interest and the other expenses of the trusts, the Partnership will be required to fund any such shortfall pursuant to its guarantee. In the event of a shortfall the maximum exposure to loss would be approximately $430.3 million prior to the consideration of the proceeds from the sale of the trust collateral. The Partnership has never been required to reimburse the financing facilities for any shortfall.

In connection with the sale of the Greens Property in 2012, the Partnership entered into guarantee agreements with the BC Partners under which the Partnership has guaranteed certain obligations of the general partner of the Greens of Pine Glen limited partnership, including an obligation to repurchase the interests of the BC Partners if certain “repurchase events” occur. A repurchase event is defined as any one of a number of events mainly focused on the completion of the property rehabilitation, property rent stabilization, the delivery of LIHTCs, tax credit recapture and foreclosure. No amount has been accrued for this contingent liability because the likelihood of a repurchase event is remote. The maximum exposure to the Partnership at March 31, 2016, under the guarantee provision of the repurchase clause is approximately $3.0 million and represents 75% of the equity contributed by BC Partners to date.

In connection with the Ohio Properties transaction in 2011, the Partnership entered into guarantee agreements with the BC Partners under which the Partnership has guaranteed certain obligations of the general partner of these limited partnerships, including an obligation to repurchase the interests of the BC Partners if certain “repurchase events” occur. A repurchase event is defined as any one of a number of events mainly focused on the completion of the property rehabilitation, property rent stabilization, the delivery of LIHTCs, tax credit recapture and foreclosure. No amount has been accrued for this contingent liability because the likelihood of a repurchase event is remote. The maximum exposure to the Partnership at March 31, 2016, under the guarantee provision of the repurchase clause is approximately $4.8 million and represents 75% of the equity contributed by BC Partners.

In March 2016, the Partnership issued, in a private placement, 1.0 million newly-designated non-cumulative, non-voting, non-convertible Series A Preferred Units which are redeemable and represents limited partnership interests in the Partnership.

Holders of the Series A Preferred Units will be entitled to receive, when, as, and if declared by the General Partner out of funds legally available for the payment of distributions, non-cumulative cash distributions at the rate of 3.00% per annum of the $10.00 per unit purchase price of the Series A Preferred Units, payable quarterly. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Partnership, the holders of the Series A Preferred Units are entitled to a liquidation preference in connection with their investments. With respect to anticipated quarterly distributions and rights upon liquidation, dissolution, or the winding-up of the Partnership’s affairs, the Series A Preferred Units will rank senior to the Partnership’s BUCs and to any other class or series of Partnership interests or securities expressly designated as ranking junior to the Series A Preferred Units, and junior to any other class or series of Partnership interests or securities expressly designated as ranking senior to the Series A Preferred Units.

The Series A Preferred Units have no stated maturity, are not subject to any sinking fund requirements, and will remain outstanding indefinitely unless repurchased or redeemed by the Partnership or holder. Upon the sixth anniversary of the closing of the sale of Series A Preferred Units to a subscriber, and upon each anniversary thereafter, the Partnership and each holder of Series A Preferred Units will have the right to redeem, in whole or in part, the Series A Preferred Units held by such holder at a per unit redemption price equal to $10.00 per unit plus an amount equal to all declared and unpaid distributions. The redeemable preferred units are recorded as mezzanine equity due to the holders redemption option which is outside the Partnership’s control. In addition, the costs of issuing the Series A Preferred Units are netted against the carrying value and amortized over the period until the first redemption date.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, “Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323)”, which simplifies the accounting for equity method investments. ASU 2016-07 eliminates the requirement in Topic 323 that an entity retroactively adopt the equity method of accounting if an investment previously accounted for under the cost method of accounting qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership or degree of influence. The guidance in ASU 2016-07 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Partnership has not elected early adoption, would apply this guidance prospectively, and has determined there would be no impact of the adoption of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)”, which refers to replacing one counterparty to a derivative instrument with a new counterparty. The amendments in this ASU clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under Topic 815, does not, in and of itself, require designation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continues to be met. For public business entities, the guidance in ASU 2016-05 will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Partnership has not elected early adoption, would apply this guidance retrospectively, and is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”, which revises this topic and will require a re-evaluation of lessee and lessor accounting models for capital and operating leases. In addition, the guidance in ASU 2016-02 includes embedded lease arrangements, lease terms and incentives, sale-leaseback agreements, and related disclosures. The guidance in ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Partnership would apply this guidance retrospectively and is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic 825-10)”, which amends this subtopic to simplify and clarify the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The guidance in the ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Partnership is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, ASU 2015-14 supersedes the Update 2014-09 by extending the effective date for all entities by one year. The guidance in ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition guidance in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in the exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015 the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for public business entities was revised to annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Partnership decided not to elect the permitted early adoption and is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this pronouncement on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern”. ASU 2014-15 is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership is still evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

On April 15, the Partnership entered into a Commercial Property Purchase Agreement to sell the Arboretum MF Property. A sixty day Inspection Period has commenced and, if successfully completed by the buyer, the transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2016.

The Partnership consists of four reportable segments, Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments, MF Properties, Public Housing Capital Fund Trusts, and MBS Investments. In addition to the four reportable segments, the Partnership also separately reports its consolidation and elimination information because it does not allocate certain items to the segments.

The Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments segment consists of the Partnership’s portfolio of mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for Residential Properties and commercial properties in their market areas. Such mortgage revenue bonds are held as investments. On March 31, 2016, the Partnership held sixty-four mortgage revenue bonds. The Residential Properties financed by sixty-three mortgage revenue bonds contain a total of 8,787 rental units. In addition, one bond is collateralized by commercial real estate (Note 3). In addition, the return earned on the Investment in an unconsolidated entity has been included in this segment (Note 8).

The MF Properties segment consists of indirect equity interests in multifamily, student housing, and senior citizen residential properties which are not currently financed by mortgage revenue bonds held by the Partnership but which the Partnership eventually intends to finance by such bonds through a restructuring. In connection with any such restructuring, the Partnership will be required to dispose of any equity interest held in such MF Properties. The Partnership’s interests in its current MF Properties are not currently classified as Assets held for sale because the Partnership does not believe it is probable a sale will occur and there is no definitive purchase agreement in existence that, under current guidance, can be recognized as a sale of real estate assets and, therefore, no sale is expected in the next twelve months. During the time the Partnership holds an interest in an MF Property, any net rental income generated by the MF Properties in excess of debt service will be available for distribution to the Partnership in accordance with its interest in the MF Property. On March 31, 2016, the Partnership consolidated the results of eight MF Properties containing a total of 2,217 rental units (Note 7).

Management’s goals with respect to the properties constituting the MF Properties reportable segments is to generate increasing amounts of net rental income from these properties that will allow them to (i) make all payments of base interest, and possibly pay contingent interest, on the properties, and (ii) distribute net rental income to the Partnership from the MF Properties segment until such properties can be refinanced with additional mortgage revenue bonds meeting the Partnership’s investment criteria. In order to achieve these goals, management of these multifamily residential properties is focused on: (i) maintaining high economic occupancy and increasing rental rates through effective leasing, reduced turnover rates and providing quality maintenance and services to maximize resident satisfaction; (ii) managing operating expenses and achieving cost reductions through operating efficiencies and economies of scale generally inherent in the management of a portfolio of multiple properties; and (iii) emphasizing regular programs of repairs, maintenance and property improvements to enhance the competitive advantage and value of its properties in their respective market areas.

The Amended and Restated LP Agreement authorizes the Partnership to make investments other than in mortgage revenue bonds provided that these other investments are rated in one of the four highest rating categories by a national securities rating agency and do not constitute more than 25% of the Partnership’s assets at the time of acquisition as required under the Amended and Restated LP Agreement. In addition, the amount of other investments is limited based on the conditions to the exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Partnership owned other investments, PHC Certificates and MBS Securities, which are reported as two separate segments.

The PHC Trusts segment consists of the assets, liabilities, and related income and expenses of the PHC Trusts. The Partnership consolidates the PHC Trusts due to its ownership of the LIFERS issued by the three PHC Trusts, which hold custodial receipts evidencing loans made to a number of local public housing authorities. Principal and interest on these loans are payable by the respective public housing authorities out of annual appropriations to be made to the public housing authorities by the HUD under HUD’s Capital Fund Program established under the Capital Fund Program.

The MBS Securities segment consisted of the assets, liabilities, and related income and expenses of the MBS TOB Trusts that the Partnership consolidated due to its ownership of the LIFERs issued by the MBS TOB Trusts. These MBS TOB Trusts are securitizations of state-issued mortgage-backed securities which were backed by residential mortgage loans. In January 2016, the Partnership sold its MBS Securities for approximating $15.0 million, approximately the outstanding amortized cost plus interest. The Partnership then collapsed the related three remaining MBS - TOB Trusts. The Partnership’s approximate $11.9 million TOB financing facilities, which were the securitization of these MBS TOB Trusts, were paid off in full in connection with this sale. The sale of the Partnership’s remaining three MBS Securities eliminates this operating segment in the first quarter of 2016 (Note 6).

The following table details certain key financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015
Total revenues
Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments	$	9,074,195		$	7,318,561
MF Properties		5,074,104			4,302,301
Public Housing Capital Fund Trust		730,902			732,903
MBS Securities Investments		48,755			152,860
Consolidation/eliminations		-			-
Total revenues	$	14,927,956		$	12,506,625

Interest expense
Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments	$	3,784,390		$	2,889,120
MF Properties		670,333			712,899
Public Housing Capital Fund Trust		300,720			296,460
MBS Securities Investments		14,692			37,697
Consolidation/eliminations		-			-
Total interest expense	$	4,770,135		$	3,936,176

Depreciation expense
Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments	$	-		$	-
MF Properties		1,646,231			1,454,179
Public Housing Capital Fund Trust		-			-
MBS Securities Investments		-			-
Consolidation/eliminations		-			-
Total depreciation expense	$	1,646,231		$	1,454,179

Income from continuing operations
Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments	$	2,317,325		$	2,349,522
MF Properties		(267,803	)		(394,532	)
Public Housing Capital Fund Trust		430,182			429,148
MBS Securities Investments		51,984			115,022
Consolidation/eliminations		-			-
Income from continuing operations	$	2,531,688		$	2,499,160

Net income (loss)
Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments	$	2,317,337		$	2,349,522
MF Properties		(267,803	)		(393,641	)
Public Housing Capital Fund Trust		430,182			429,148
MBS Securities Investments		51,984			115,022
Discontinued Operations		-			24,428
Consolidation/eliminations		-			-
Net income - America First Multifamily Investors, L. P.	$	2,531,700		$	2,524,479

The following table details certain key financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments on March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

In this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the “Partnership” refers to America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. and its Consolidated Subsidiaries at March 31, 2016. The “Partnership” refers to the Partnership and the Consolidated VIEs reported as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015. See Note 1 and Note 3 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Partnership’s critical accounting policies are the same as those described in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 except as noted below. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation.

The following table compares net income for the Partnership for the periods indicated:

The changes reported for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were related to an increase in the investment portfolio which was leveraged for the purpose of enhancing investor returns and realizing sales and redemptions of investments to deploy into alternative investment opportunities.

The summary of the Partnership’s comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2016 with the three months ended March 31, 2015 is as follows:

The Partnership generated Cash Available for Distribution (“CAD”) of approximately $6.3 million and $5.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition to the changes noted above, changes in depreciation and amortization, fair value of derivatives and interest rate derivative amortization, amortization of deferred financing costs, and bond purchase discount accretion net of the cash received, accounts for the majority of the changes when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See additional discussion of CAD in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis below.

The following table presents information regarding the investment activity of the Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

The following table presents information regarding the financing and derivative activity of the Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

As discussed in Notes 4 and 21 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements, the Partnership’s primary purpose is to acquire and hold as investments a portfolio of mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for Residential Properties and commercial properties in their market areas.

The following table compares total revenues, total interest expense and net income for the mortgage revenue bond investment segment for the periods indicated:

During the three months ended March 31, 2016 the Partnership reported approximately $2.1 million in additional recurring total revenue and $174,000 of contingent interest income when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015. The recurring revenue is due to the additional mortgage revenue bonds of approximately $194.6 million net par value added or restructured to the portfolio during the past twelve months. Offsetting this was the reduction of approximately $626,000 related to bonds restructured, paid in full, or sold for the same period. In addition, when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2016 with the three months ended March 31, 2015, approximately $1.4 million of the increase in total expenses was directly related to increased borrowings, the adjustment of the derivatives to fair value, increased amortization of deferred financing costs, and increased administrative fees and professional fees.

As discussed in Notes 5 and 21 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements, the terms of the Amended and Restated LP Agreement allow investments in addition to mortgage revenue bonds owned by the Partnership. The Partnership must limit its investment in these other securities to the extent necessary to maintain its exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the aggregate book value of these other securities may not exceed 25% of the total assets of the Partnership.

The PHC Certificates consist of custodial receipts evidencing loans made to a number of public housing authorities.

The following table compares total revenues and net income for the PHC Trusts segment for the periods indicated:

The slight decrease in total revenues when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2016 to the same period in 2015 was the result of principal reductions of the PHC Trust holdings owned by the Partnership. The slight increase in net income when comparing the first quarter of 2016 and 2015 was directly related to less interest expense due to the reduction in related borrowings.

As discussed in Notes 6 and 21 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements, the terms of the Amended and Restated LP Agreement allow investments in addition to mortgage revenue bonds owned by the Partnership. The Partnership must limit its investment in these other securities to the extent necessary to maintain its exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the aggregate book value of these other securities may not exceed 25% of the total assets of the Partnership.

The decrease in total revenues and net income when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2016, to the same period in 2015, was the result of the sale of the remainder of the MBS Securities in January 2016. The sale of the Partnership’s remaining three MBS Securities eliminated the MBS Securities segment in the first quarter of 2016 (see Notes 6, 12, 15, and 21 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements).

As discussed in Notes 7 and 21 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements, to facilitate its investment strategy of acquiring additional mortgage revenue bonds secured by multifamily, student, and senior citizen residential properties, the Partnership may acquire ownership positions in MF Properties with the intent to restructure the property ownership through a sale of the MF Properties.

The following table compares total revenues, total interest expense, and net income for the MF Properties segment for the periods indicated:

At March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiary owned eight and nine MF Properties, respectively, which contain a total of 2,217 and 2,169 rental units, respectively. The net increase in the net income when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was the result of offsetting factors. An increase of approximately $1.2 million in revenue and approximately $869,000 in operating expenses was attributable to adding the Suites on Paseo in September 2015. The MF Properties, excluding the Suites on Paseo, reported an increase in occupancy which resulted in approximately $280,000 increased revenue. Offsetting this increase is approximately $696,000 decrease in revenue and approximately $377,000 decrease in expenses for the same periods due to the sales of Glynn Place and The Colonial during the third and second quarter of 2015, respectively. The remaining change was primarily related to the existing MF Properties decrease in accrued taxes.

At March 31, 2016, Properties Management, an affiliate of AFCA 2, provides property management services for seven of the MF Properties and seven of the properties collateralized by the mortgage revenue bonds. Management believes this relationship provides greater insight and understanding of the underlying property operations and their ability to meet the Partnership’s debt service requirements.

The following tables outline certain information regarding the Residential Properties on which the Partnership holds mortgage revenue bonds as investments and owns the MF Properties. The table does not include information on the two Consolidated VIEs that are reported as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The narrative discussion that follows provides a brief operating analysis of each category for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

The owners of the following properties either do not meet the definition of a VIE and/or the Partnership has evaluated and determined it is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. As a result, the Partnership does not report the assets, liabilities and results of operations of these properties on a consolidated basis. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, these Residential Properties have met the stabilization criteria (see footnote 3 below the table). Debt service on the Partnership’s bonds for the non-consolidated stabilized properties was current on March 31, 2016.

		Total Revenue ⁽¹⁾ (000's)				Net Operating Income (000's)						Percentage Occupied						Economic Occupancy ⁽²⁾
		For the Period Ended March 31,				For the Period Ended March 31,				Number		Units on March 31,						For the Period Ended March 31,
Property Name	State	2016		2015		2016		2015		of Units		2016			2015			2016			2015
Non-Consolidated Properties-Stabilized ⁽³⁾
Glenview Apartments ⁽⁵⁾	CA	$	197		191	$	79		99		88		98	%		99	%		100	%		96	%
Harden Ranch	CA		286		291		158		178		100		98	%		99	%		98	%		100	%
Montclair Apartments ⁽⁵⁾	CA		135		139		58		66		80		99	%		98	%		100	%		98	%
Santa Fe Apartments ⁽⁵⁾	CA		177		179		83		82		89		98	%		100	%		98	%		98	%
Tyler Park Townhomes	CA		227		231		111		129		88		99	%		98	%		98	%		99	%
Westside Village Market	CA		148		156		56		85		81		99	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Lake Forest Apartments	FL		582		549		356		341		240		88	%		96	%		87	%		93	%
Ashley Square Apartments	IA		353		348		163		170		144		95	%		92	%		93	%		91	%
Brookstone Apartments	IL		352		346		219		153		168		100	%		99	%		96	%		93	%
Copper Gate	IN		279		249		148		115		128		100	%		95	%		99	%		96	%
Renaissance Gateway	LA		440		416		244		221		208		96	%		100	%		92	%		88	%
Live 929 Apartments	MD		1,706		1,691		1,075		1,048		575		91	%		92	%		89	%		88	%
Woodlynn Village	MN		162		145		100		84		59		97	%		93	%		97	%		89	%
Greens of Pine Glen Apartments	NC		384		369		210		198		168		96	%		93	%		89	%		90	%
Silver Moon ⁽⁶⁾	NM		252	n/a			133	n/a			151		88	%	n/a				81	%	n/a
Ohio Properties ⁽⁴⁾	OH		884		851		470		407		362		98	%		95	%		97	%		93	%
Bridle Ridge Apartments	SC		301		294		182		178		152		99	%		100	%		98	%		100	%
Cross Creek Apartments	SC		345		325		181		147		144		94	%		92	%		92	%		89	%
Palms at Premier Park	SC		590		620		396		398		240		94	%		90	%		81	%		98	%
Arbors of Hickory Ridge	TN		568		585		282		284		348		90	%		96	%		80	%		85	%
Avistar at Chase Hill	TX		486		514		213		273		232		88	%		94	%		77	%		82	%
Avistar at the Crest	TX		500		452		266		250		200		97	%		97	%		86	%		81	%
Avistar at the Oaks	TX		371		358		187		193		156		96	%		94	%		85	%		83	%
Avistar in 09	TX		291		297		171		179		133		95	%		96	%		87	%		91	%
Avistar on the Boulevard	TX		721		685		409		403		344		92	%		92	%		81	%		81	%
Avistar on the Hills	TX		306		291		157		160		129		97	%		96	%		89	%		89	%
Bella Vista Apartments	TX		306		309		153		157		144		94	%		99	%		94	%		93	%
Concord at Gulfgate ⁽⁵⁾	TX		658		457		360		288		288		84	%		89	%		77	%		81	%
Concord at Little York ⁽⁵⁾	TX		507		371		192		193		276		77	%		85	%		66	%		76	%
Concord at Williamcrest ⁽⁵⁾	TX		663		453		367		279		288		86	%		86	%		75	%		80	%
Runnymede Apartments	TX		641		616		302		300		252		99	%		98	%		98	%		95	%
South Park Ranch Apartments	TX		552		537		343		336		192		100	%		100	%		99	%		98	%
Vantage at Judson	TX		833		830		538		555		288		91	%		91	%		79	%		81	%
		$	15,203	$	14,145	$	8,362	$	7,949		6,535		93	%		94	%		87	%		89	%

When comparing the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, total revenue and net operating income of the non-consolidated stabilized properties increased. The increase is the result of three factors: renovated properties, new investments and existing properties. The properties which were renovated in 2015 and are now stabilized contribute approximately 51% of the increase in total revenue and approximately 31% of the increase in net operating income. The underlying property that collateralizes the new mortgage revenue bond contributes approximately 24% of the increase in total revenue and approximately 32% of the increase in net operating income. The existing properties contribute the remaining approximately 25% of the increase in total revenue and approximately 37% of the increase in net operating income. The increase in net operating income is the result of a decrease in repair and maintenance expenses.

The owners of the following properties do not meet the definition of a VIE and/or the Partnership has evaluated and determined it is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. As a result, the Partnership does not report the assets, liabilities and results of operations of these properties on a consolidated basis. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, these Residential Properties have not met the stabilization criteria (see footnote 3 below the table). On March 31, 2016, debt service on the Partnership’s bonds for the non-consolidated, non-stabilized properties was current.

		Total Revenue ⁽¹⁾ (000's)			Net Operating Income (000's)						Percentage of Occupied				Economic Occupancy ⁽²⁾
		For the Period Ended March 31,			For the Period Ended March 31,				Number		Units as of March 31,				For the Period Ended March 31,
Property Name	State	2016		2015	2016			2015	of Units		2016			2015	2016			2015
Non-Consolidated Properties-Non Stabilized ⁽³⁾
Seasons at Simi Valley ⁽⁴⁾	CA		212	n/a		110		n/a		69		99	%	n/a		149	%	n/a
Sycamore Walk ⁽⁴⁾	CA		206	n/a		85		n/a		112		100	%	n/a		102	%	n/a
Columbia Gardens ⁽⁴⁾	SC		286	n/a		139		n/a		188		83	%	n/a		78	%	n/a
Companion at Thornhill Apartments ⁽⁴⁾	SC		451	n/a		262		n/a		180		98	%	n/a		80	%	n/a
Willow Run ⁽⁴⁾	SC		260	n/a		118		n/a		200		88	%	n/a		69	%	n/a
Avistar at the Parkway ⁽⁴⁾	TX		236	n/a		31		n/a		236		44	%	n/a		37	%	n/a
Bruton Apartments ⁽⁵⁾	TX		37	n/a		(70	)	n/a		264		14	%	n/a		4	%	n/a
Crossing at 1415 ⁽⁴⁾	TX		123	n/a		(20	)	n/a		112		51	%	n/a		36	%	n/a
Decatur Angle ⁽⁵⁾	TX		277	n/a		(21	)	n/a		302		57	%	n/a		34	%	n/a
Heights at 515 ⁽⁴⁾	TX		176	n/a		49		n/a		97		65	%	n/a		58	%	n/a
Heritage Square Apartments ⁽⁵⁾	TX		378	n/a		270		n/a		204		96	%	n/a		79	%	n/a
Vantage at Harlingen ⁽⁵⁾	TX		656	n/a		400		n/a		288		78	%	n/a		67	%	n/a
		$	3,298	n/a	$	1,353		n/a		2,252		69	%	n/a		55	%	n/a

When comparing the first three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, total revenue and net operating income of the non-consolidated non-stabilized properties increased as new collateral was added to our property portfolio with the purchase of approximately $168.0 million of new mortgage revenue bonds. The underlying properties that collateralize these mortgage revenue bonds were either under renovation or have not been fully stabilized. The mortgage revenue bonds collateralized by Concord at Gulfgate, Concord at Little York and Concord at Williamcrest were added to the portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2015, while the mortgage revenue bonds collateralized by Seasons at Simi Valley, Sycamore Walk, Columbia Gardens, Willow Run, Avistar at the Parkway, Crossing at 1415, Heights at 515 and Vantage at Harlingen were added or construction was completed during the period between April 1 and December 31, 2015. The mortgage revenue bond collateralized by Companion at Thornhill Apartments was added to the portfolio in January 2016 and Bruton, Decatur Angle, and Heritage Square are in their stabilization and lease-up phases.

Eight MF Properties are owned by the Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiary. The Partnership owns one MF Property, and the subsidiary holds a 99% limited partner interest in one limited partnership and 100% of the membership interests in six limited liability companies. The properties are encumbered by mortgages payables and other secured financing with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $69.1 million on March 31, 2016. The Partnership reports the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of these properties on a consolidated basis. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, these MF Properties have met the stabilization criteria (see footnote 3 below the table).

		Total Revenue ⁽¹⁾ (000's)				Net Operating Income (000's)						Percentage of Occupied						Economic Occupancy ⁽²⁾
		For the Period Ended March 31,				For the Period Ended March 31,				Number		For the Period Ended March 31,						For the Period Ended March 31,
Property Name	State	2016		2015		2016		2015		of Units		2016			2015			2016			2015
MF Properties-Stabilized ⁽³⁾
Suites on Paseo ⁽⁴⁾	CA	$	1,206	n/a		$	337	n/a			394		92	%	n/a				79	%	n/a
Eagle Village	IN		557		483		238		189		511		86	%		68	%		90	%		81	%
Woodland Park	KS		483		462		284		256		236		94	%		87	%		91	%		89	%
Northern View	KY		444		347		234		142		270		90	%		77	%		89	%		80	%
Arboretum	NE		883		852		461		458		145		98	%		97	%		93	%		93	%
The 50/50	NE		974		958		567		372		475		98	%		99	%		98	%		98	%
Residences at DeCordova	TX		301		283		190		170		110		96	%		95	%		95	%		89	%
Residences at Weatherford	TX		224		218		127		85		76		99	%		100	%		101	%		98	%
		$	5,072	$	3,603	$	2,438	$	1,672		2,217		93	%		85	%		90	%		90	%

When comparing the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, total revenue of the stabilized MF Properties, which include the student housing residential properties, increased approximately $1.5 million while the net operating income increased approximately $766,000. Approximately $337,000 of the increase in net operating income was due to the exchange of the mortgage revenue bond for the Suites on Paseo MF Property in the third quarter of 2015. The remaining increase is directly related to improved overall economic occupancy reported by the remaining stabilized MF Properties excluding the Suites on Paseo.

The tables and following discussions of the Partnership’s change in total revenues, total expenses, and net income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands) should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements and Notes thereto included in Item 1 of this report as well as the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The following table compares revenue for the Partnership for the periods presented:

Discussion of the Total Revenues For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015

Property revenues. The property revenues reported a net increase of approximately $772,000 when comparing the first quarter of 2016 and the first quarter of 2015 due to offsetting factors. An increase of approximately $1.2 million was attributable to adding the Suites on Paseo in September 2015 and approximately $280,000 is directly related to the increased in occupancy of the existing MF Properties excluding the Suites on Paseo. Offsetting this increase is approximately $696,000 decrease in revenue for the same periods due to the 2015 sales of Glynn Place and The Colonial during the third and second quarter of 2015, respectively. The MF Properties averaged monthly rent of approximately $510 per unit in the first quarter of 2016 as compared with $465 per unit in the first quarter of 2015.

Investment income. Investment income includes interest earned on mortgage revenue bonds, PHC Certificates, and MBS Securities. This income increased in the first quarter of 2016 as compared to the first quarter of 2015 by approximately $1.2 million due to offsetting factors. The increase in investment income of approximately $2.1 million was the result of the additional mortgage revenue bonds of approximately $194.6 million net par value added or restructured to the portfolio during the past twelve months. Offsetting this increase was the reduction of approximately $694,000 related to the Suites on Paseo mortgage revenue bond exchanged for the Suites on Paseo MF Property in September 2015 and the MBS Securities sold in January 2016. The remaining reduction was related to the reduction of mortgage revenue bonds as principal payments were received.

Contingent interest income. The contingent interest income was received from Ashley Square during the first quarter of 2016 due to available excess cash as per the trust indenture. No contingent interest income was received during the first quarter of 2015.

Other interest income. Other interest income is comprised mainly of interest income on property loans held by the Partnership. The increase in other interest income from the first quarter of 2016 as compared to the first quarter of 2015 is attributable to taxable interest income from the increase in property loans (see Note 9 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements).

Gain on sale of securities. The net gain reported in the first quarter of 2016 is the result of the sales of the Pro Nova 2014-2 mortgage revenue bond and the MBS Securities. There was no gain realized on the sale of securities in the first quarter of 2015 (see Notes 4 and 6 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements).

The following table compares expenses for the Partnership for the periods presented:

Discussion of the Total Expenses for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015

Real estate operating expenses. Real estate operating expenses associated with the MF Properties is comprised principally of real estate taxes, property insurance, utilities, property management fees, repairs and maintenance, and salaries and related employee expenses of on-site employees. There was a net increase in real estate operating expenses from the first quarter of 2015 to the first quarter of 2016. Approximately $869,000 of the increase is related to the addition of the Suites on Paseo property in September 2015. Offsetting this increase was approximately $377,000 related to the sales of Glynn Place and The Colonial during third and second quarter of 2015, respectively. The remaining change was mostly related to the existing MF Properties decrease in accrued taxes due to changes in county property assessments.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation results primarily from the MF Properties. Amortization consists of in-place lease intangible assets recorded as part of the acquisition-method of accounting for the acquisition of MF Properties. The net increase in depreciation and amortization when comparing the first quarter of 2016 to the first quarter of 2015 was the result of offsetting factors. There was an approximate $460,000 increase in in-place lease amortization and approximately $383,000 increase in depreciation related to the Suites on Paseo. Offsetting these increases is approximately $271,000 decrease related to the sales of Glynn Place and The Colonial during third and second quarter of 2015, respectively. The remaining increase is related to additional depreciation expense reported due to the improvements and asset additions.

Amortization of deferred financing costs. Deferred financing costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the life of the related debt financing or mortgage payable. The net increase in the amortization of deferred financing costs when comparing the first quarter of 2015 with the first quarter of 2016 is primarily related to the M33 TEBS financing facility which closed in July 2015 (see Note 1 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements).

Interest expense. The net increase in interest expense in the first quarter of 2016 as compared to the first quarter of 2015 was approximately $834,000 million. An increase of approximately $306,000 resulted from higher average outstanding debt principal between the two quarters and an increase of approximately $259,000 is the direct result of the increase in annual effective interest rates. The Partnership's borrowing cost averaged approximately 2.8% per annum for the first quarter of 2016 and approximately 2.6% per annum for the first quarter of 2015. An increase of approximately $211,000 resulted from the change in the mark to market adjustment of the Partnership's derivatives. These interest rate derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, they are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value included in current period earnings within interest expense (see Notes 11, 12, 13, and 15 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements).

General and administrative expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses when comparing the first quarter of 2016 to the first quarter of 2015 is attributable to approximately $58,000 increased administrative fees payable to AFCA 2 related to the acquisition of the mortgage revenue bonds. In addition, the Partnership realized an increase of approximately $286,000 in professional fees during the same comparable periods.

The following table compares income from discontinued operations for the Partnership for the periods presented:

Discussion of Net Income from Discontinued Operations for the Three months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015

In April 2015, separate brokerage contracts were executed to list the Consolidated VIEs, Bent Tree and Fairmont Oaks, for sale. As a result, management determined these Consolidated VIEs met the criteria for discontinued operations presentation and were classified as such in the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Consolidated VIEs were sold in 2015, so there are no discontinued operations to report for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Interest earned on the mortgage revenue bonds, interest earned and reported as discontinued operations, and mortgage investment income earned on the PHC Certificates and the MBS Securities represents the Partnership’s principal source of cash flow. The Partnership may also receive interest payments on its property loans, earnings on temporary investments and cash distributions from equity interests held in MF Properties. Interest is primarily comprised of fixed rate base interest payments received on the Partnership’s mortgage revenue bonds, PHC Certificates and MBS Securities which provides fairly constant cash receipts. Certain of the mortgage revenue bonds may also generate payments of contingent interest to the Partnership from time to time when the underlying Residential Properties generate excess cash flow. In addition, the Partnership’s cash is affected when it acquires or disposes of its investments in mortgage revenue bonds. For additional details, see the Cash Flows from Investing Activities section of the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows which is incorporated by reference herein.

Similarly, the economic performance of MF Properties will affect the amount of cash distributions, if any, received by the Partnership from its ownership of these properties. The economic performance of the Residential Properties depends on the rental and occupancy rates of the property and on the level of operating expenses. For discussions related to economic risk, see the Market Opportunities section below and also Item 1A in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Other sources of cash available to the Partnership included proceeds from debt financing, mortgages, and the sale of additional Partnership securities. On March 31, 2016, the Partnership had outstanding unsecured LOCs of approximately $28.0 million, debt financing of approximately $430.3 million under separate credit facilities, and mortgages payable and other secured financing of approximately $69.1 million secured by six MF Properties.

In March 2016, the Partnership issued, in a private placement, 1.0 million newly-designated non-cumulative, non-voting, non-convertible Series A Preferred Units (“Series A Preferred Units”) which are redeemable and represents limited partnership interests in the Partnership pursuant to a subscription agreement with a financial institution resulting in $10.0 million in aggregate proceeds to the Partnership The Partnership will use the proceeds received in the private placement to acquire mortgage revenue bonds that are issued by state and local housing authorities to provide construction and/or permanent financing for affordable multifamily, student housing, and commercial properties that are likely to receive consideration as “qualified investments” under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”), as amended (see Note 18 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements).

The Consolidated VIEs’, which are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented, and MF Properties’ primary uses of cash are: (i) the payment of general, administrative, and operating expenses; (ii) the payment of interest and principal on debt and mortgage financing facilities; and (iii) the payment of distributions to the Unitholders. The Partnership also uses cash to acquire additional investments.

The Consolidated VIEs’, which are reported as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015, and MF Properties’ primary uses of cash were for operating expenses. The Partnership also uses cash for general and administrative expenses and to acquire additional investments. For discussions related to economic risk, see the Market Opportunities and Challenges section below and also Item 1A in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. For additional details, see the Cash Flows from Operating Activities section of the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows which are incorporated by reference herein.

(ii) Payment of interest and principal on debt and mortgage financing facilities

The Partnership utilizes leverage for the purpose of enhancing investor returns. Management uses target constraints for each type of short term financing utilized by the Partnership to manage an overall 65% leverage constraint. The amount of leverage utilized is dependent upon several factors, including the assets being leveraged, the tenor of the leverage program, whether the financing is subject to market collateral calls, and the liquidity and marketability of the financing collateral. While short term variations from targeted levels may occur within financing classes, overall Partnership leverage will not exceed 65%. On March 31, 2016 the overall leverage constraint of the Partnership, total outstanding debt divided by total partnership assets using the par value of the mortgage revenue bonds and the MF Properties at cost, was approximately 64%. For additional details, see the Cash Flows from Financing Activities section of the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows which is incorporated by reference herein.

On March 31, 2016, the total costs of borrowing by investment type were as follows:

Distributions to the Unitholders may increase or decrease at the determination of the General Partner. The per unit cash available for distribution primarily depends on the amount of interest and other cash received by the Partnership from its portfolio of mortgage revenue bonds and other investments, the amount of the Partnership’s outstanding debt and the effective interest rates paid by the Partnership on this debt, the level of operating and other cash expenses incurred by the Partnership and the number of units outstanding. See additional discussion and details in the Cash Available for Distribution section below.

For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership’s realized CAD per unit was $0.10 and $0.09, respectively.

The Partnership continues to work with the Partnership’s primary lenders to finance a portion of the acquisition of mortgage revenue bonds and believes that upon completion of its current investment and financing plans, the Partnership will be able to generate sufficient CAD to maintain cash distributions to the Unitholders at the current level of $0.50 per unit per year without the use of other available cash. However, if leverage plans are delayed, actual results may vary from current projections. If the actual CAD generated continues to be less than the regular distribution to Unitholders, such distribution amount may need to be reduced. There is no assurance that the Partnership will be able to generate CAD at levels in excess of the current annual distribution rate. See additional discussion in the “Cash Available for Distributions” section below.

The management of the Partnership believes the current credit environment continues to create opportunities to acquire existing mortgage revenue bonds from distressed holders at attractive yields. The Partnership continues to evaluate potential investments in mortgage revenue bonds which are available on the secondary market. The Partnership believes many of these bonds will meet its investment criteria and that the Partnership has a unique ability to analyze and close on these opportunities while maintaining an ability and willingness to also participate in primary market transactions.

Current credit and real estate market conditions may also create opportunities to acquire quality MF Properties. The Partnership’s ability to restructure existing debt together with the ability to improve the operations of the multifamily residential properties through an affiliated property management company can position these MF Properties for an eventual financing with mortgage revenue bonds. The Partnership believes it can selectively acquire MF Properties, restructure debt and improve operations in order to create value to the Unitholders in the form of a strong mortgage bond investment.

On the other hand, continued economic weakness in some markets may limit the Partnership’s ability to access additional debt financing that the Partnership uses to partially finance its investment portfolio or otherwise meet its liquidity requirements. Occupancy rates and rents are directly affected by the supply of, and demand for, multifamily residential properties in the market area in which a property is located. This, in turn, is affected by several factors such as local or national economic conditions, the amount of new multifamily residential property construction and the affordability of single-family homes. In addition, factors such as government regulation (including zoning laws), inflation, real estate and other taxes, labor problems and natural disasters can affect the economic operations of a multifamily residential property.

Some properties have experienced a loss of occupancy due to market conditions. Overall economic occupancy (which is adjusted to reflect rental concessions, delinquent rents, and non-revenue units such as model units and employee units) of the stabilized Residential Properties that the Partnership has financed with mortgage revenue bonds was approximately 82% and 90% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Overall economic occupancy of the stabilized MF Properties was approximately 90% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and, 2015. Based on the growth statistics in the markets in which these properties operate, the Partnership expects to see a modest improvement in property operations and profitability.

Management utilizes a calculation of CAD as a means to determine the Partnership’s ability to make distributions to Unitholders. The Partnership believes that CAD provides relevant information about its operations and is necessary, along with net income, for understanding its operating results. To calculate CAD, the Partnership adds back non-cash expenses consisting of amortization expense related to debt financing costs and bond issuance costs, interest rate derivative expense or income, provision for loan losses, impairments on bonds, losses related to VIEs including depreciation expense, and income received in cash from transactions which have been eliminated in consolidation, to the Partnership’s net income (loss) as computed in accordance with GAAP and deducts Tier 2 income (see Note 2 to the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements) attributable to the Partnership as defined in the Amended and Restated LP Agreement. Net income is the GAAP measure most comparable to CAD. There is no generally accepted methodology for computing CAD, and the Partnership’s computation of CAD may not be comparable to CAD reported by other companies. Although the Partnership considers CAD to be a useful measure of its operating performance, CAD is a non-GAAP measure that should not be considered as an alternative to net income or net cash flows from operating activities which are calculated in accordance with GAAP, or any other measures of financial performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP.

The following table shows the calculation of CAD (and a reconciliation of the Partnership’s net income as determined in accordance with GAAP to its CAD):

There was no non-recurring CAD per unit earned by the Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

As discussed in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, the debt and mortgage obligations of the Partnership consist of scheduled principal payments on the TOB financing facilities, the TEBS credit facilities with Freddie Mac, and payments on the MF Property mortgages payable and other secured financing.

Our contractual obligations presented in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, have not materially changed during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

For a discussion on recently issued accounting pronouncements, please see footnote 19 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

There have been no material changes in market risk, except as discussed below, from the information provided under “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Item 7A of the Partnership’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Partnership’s interest rate cap agreements at March 31, 2016:

Purchase Date	Initial Notional Amount		Effective Capped Rate			Maturity Date	Purchase Price		Fair Value⁽¹⁾		Variable Debt Financing Facility Hedged	Maximum Potential Cost of Borrowing			Counterparty
September-10	$	31,936,667		3.00	%	September-17	$	921,000	$	24	M24 TEBS		5.0	%	Bank of New York Mellon

September-10	$	31,936,667		3.00	%	September-17	$	845,600	$	24	M24 TEBS		5.0	%	Barclays Bank PLC

September-10	$	31,936,667		3.00	%	September-17	$	928,000	$	24	M24 TEBS		5.0	%	Royal Bank of Canada

August-13	$	93,305,000		1.50	%	September-17	$	793,000	$	5,759	M24 TEBS		3.5	%	Deutsche Bank

February-14	$	41,250,000		1.00	%	March-17	$	230,500	$	710	PHC TOB Trusts		3.3	%	SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

July-14	$	31,565,000		3.00	%	August-19	$	315,200	$	9,584	M31 TEBS		4.4	%	Barclays Bank PLC

July-14	$	31,565,000		3.00	%	August-19	$	343,000	$	9,594	M31 TEBS		4.4	%	Royal Bank of Canada

July-14	$	31,565,000		3.00	%	August-19	$	333,200	$	9,594	M31 TEBS		4.4	%	SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

July-15	$	28,095,000		3.00	%	August-20	$	210,000	$	36,019	M33 TEBS		4.3	%	Wells Fargo Bank

July-15	$	28,095,000		3.00	%	August-20	$	187,688	$	36,019	M33 TEBS		4.3	%	Royal Bank of Canada

July-15	$	28,095,000		3.00	%	August-20	$	174,900	$	36,019	M33 TEBS		4.3	%	SMBC Capital Markets, Inc

In conjunction with the sale of the MBS Securities the related $11.0 million derivative was sold for its current value which resulted in no cash proceeds to the Partnership and no gain or loss recognized. See Note 6 to the Partnership condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Partnership contracted for two no-cost interest rate swaps with DB related to the Decatur Angle and Bruton TOB financing facilities collateralized by mortgage revenue bonds that are used to provide financing for the construction of these properties. The swap related to the Decatur Angle TOB financing facility has a $23.0 million notional value, an October 15, 2016 effective date, and an October 15, 2021 termination date. The swap related to the Bruton TOB financing facility has an approximate $18.1 million notional value, an April 15, 2017 effective date, and an April 15, 2022 termination date. Both swaps are in place to mitigate the possible interest rate increases and swaps a variable rate based on LIBOR for an approximate 2% fixed rate. On March 31, 2016 the fair value of the Decatur Angle swap is a liability of approximately $1.2 million and the fair value of the Bruton swap is a liability of approximately $988,000. The fair value of these swaps has been recorded as a liability on the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s current disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that (i) information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Partnership’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that there were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

The risk factors affecting the Partnership are described in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of the Partnership’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10‑K. There have been no material changes from these previously disclosed risk factors for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 except those as follows:

Holders of the Series A Preferred Units may be required to bear the risks of an investment for an indefinite period of time.

Holders of the Series A Preferred Units may be required to bear the financial risks of an investment in the Series A Preferred Units for an indefinite period of time. In addition, the Series A Preferred Units will rank junior to all Partnership current and future indebtedness (including indebtedness outstanding under the Partnership’s senior bank credit facility) and other liabilities, and any other senior securities we may issue in the future with respect to assets available to satisfy claims against the Partnership.

The Series A Preferred Units are subordinated to existing and future debt obligations, and the interests could be diluted by the issuance of additional units, including additional Series A Preferred Units, and by other transactions.

The Series A Preferred Units are subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness, including indebtedness outstanding under senior bank credit facility. As of March 30, 2016, there were outstanding borrowings of approximately $24.0 million and we had the ability to borrow an additional $16 million under our senior bank credit facility. The Partnership may incur additional debt under its senior bank credit facility or future credit facilities. The payment of principal and interest on its debt reduces cash available for distribution to Unitholders, including the Series A Preferred Units.

The issuance of additional units pari passu with or senior to the Series A Preferred Units would dilute the interests of the holders of the Series A Preferred Units, and any issuance of senior securities, parity securities, or additional indebtedness could affect the Partnership’s ability to pay distributions on or redeem the Series A Preferred Units.

The voting rights as a holder of Series A Preferred Units will be extremely limited. Our BUCs are the only class of our partnership interests carrying full voting rights.

There is no public market for the Series A Preferred Units, which may prevent an investor from liquidating its investment.

The Series A Preferred Units have been, and are being offered in a private placement and have not registered the Series A Preferred Units with the SEC or any state securities commission. The Series A Preferred Units may not be resold unless the Partnership registers the securities with the SEC or an exemption from the registration requirement is available. It is not expected that any market for the Series A Preferred Units will develop or be sustained in the future. The lack of any public market for the Series A Preferred Units severely limits the ability to liquidate the investment, except for the right to put the Series A Preferred Units to the Partnership under certain circumstances.

Market interest rates may adversely affect the value of the Series A Preferred Units.

One of the factors that will influence the value of the Series A Preferred Units will be the distribution rate on the Series A Preferred Units (as a percentage of the price of the units) relative to market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates, which are currently at low levels relative to historical rates, may lower the value of the Series A Preferred Units and also would likely increase the Partnership’s borrowing costs.

Under certain circumstances, holders of the Series A Preferred Units may have to repay amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution if the distribution would cause the Partnership’s liabilities to exceed the fair value of its assets. Liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interests and liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are not counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is permitted.

Delaware law provides that for a period of three years from the date of an impermissible distribution, limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated Delaware law will be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution amount. A purchaser of Series A Preferred Units who becomes a limited partner is liable for the obligations of the transferring limited partner to make contributions to the Partnership that are known to such purchaser of units at the time it became a limited partner and for unknown obligations if the liabilities could be determined from our Amended and Restated LP Agreement.

Risks Relating to the Partnership’s Investment Objective and Principal Investment Strategies

The Partnership’s portfolio investment decisions may create CRA strategy risks.

Portfolio investment decisions take into account the Partnership’s goal of holding mortgage revenue bonds and other securities in designated geographic areas and will not be exclusively based on the investment characteristics of such assets, which may or may not have an adverse effect on the Partnership’s investment performance. CRA qualified assets in geographic areas sought by the Partnership may not provide as favorable return as CRA qualified assets in other geographic areas. The Partnership may sell assets for reasons relating to CRA qualification at times when such sales may not be desirable, and may hold short-term investments that produce relatively low yields pending the selection of long-term investments believed to be CRA-qualified.

There is no guarantee investors will receive CRA credit for their investment in the Series A Preferred Units.

The CRA requires the three federal bank supervisory agencies, the FRB, the OCC, and the FDIC, to encourage the institutions they regulate to help meet the credit needs of their local communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Each agency has promulgated rules for evaluating and rating an institution’s CRA performance which, as the following summary indicates, vary according to an institution’s asset size. An institution’s CRA performance can also be adversely affected by evidence of discriminatory credit practices regardless of its asset size.

For an institution to receive CRA credit with respect to an investment in the Series A Preferred Units, the Partnership must hold CRA-qualifying investments that relate to the institution’s delineated CRA assessment area. The Partnership expects that an investment in its units will be considered a qualified investment under the CRA, but neither the Partnership nor the General Partner has received an interpretative letter from the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”) stating that an investment in the Partnership is considered eligible for regulatory credit under the CRA. Moreover, there is no guarantee that future changes to the CRA or future interpretations by the FFIEC will not affect the continuing eligibility of the Partnership’s investments. So that the Partnership itself may be considered a qualified investment, the Partnership will seek to invest only in investments that meet the prevailing community investing standards put forth by U.S. regulatory agencies.

In this regard, the Partnership expects that a majority of its investments will be considered eligible for regulatory credit under the CRA, but there is no guarantee that an investor will receive CRA credit for its investment in the Series A Preferred Units. For example, a state banking regulator may not consider the Partnership eligible for regulatory credit. If CRA credit is not given, there is a risk that an investor may not fulfill its CRA requirements.

There is no guarantee that the assets held by the Partnership will be considered qualified investments under the CRA by the bank regulatory authorities.

In most cases, “qualified investments,” as defined by the CRA, are required to be responsive to the community development needs of a financial institution’s delineated CRA assessment area or a broader statewide or regional area that includes the institution’s assessment area. For an institution to receive CRA credit with respect to the Series A Preferred Units, the Partnership must hold CRA qualifying investments that relate to the institution’s assessment area.

As defined in the CRA, qualified investments are any lawful investments, deposits, membership shares, or grants that have as their primary purpose community development. The term “community development” is defined in the CRA as: (1) affordable housing (including multifamily rental housing) for low- to moderate-income individuals; (2) community services targeted to low- or moderate-income individuals; (3) activities that promote economic development by financing businesses or farms that meet the size eligibility standards of 13 C.F.R. §121.802(a)(2) and (3) or have gross annual revenues of $1 million or less; or (4) activities that revitalize or stabilize low- or moderate-income geographies, designated disaster areas, or distressed or underserved non-metropolitan middle-income geographies designated by the federal banking regulators.

Investments are not typically designated as qualifying investments at the time of issuance by any governmental agency. Accordingly, the General Partner must evaluate whether each potential investment may be qualifying investments with respect to a specific Unitholder. The final determinations that assets held by the Partnership are qualifying investments are made by the federal and, where applicable, state bank supervisory agencies during their periodic examinations of financial institutions. There is no assurance that the agencies will concur with the General Partner’s evaluation of any of the Partnership’s assets as qualifying investments.

Each investor will be a limited partner of the Partnership, not just of the investments in its Designated Target Region(s). The financial returns on an investor’s investment will be determined based on the performance of all the assets in the Partnership’s geographically diverse portfolio, not just by the performance of the assets in the Designated Target Region(s) selected by the investor.

In determining whether a particular investment is qualified, the General Partner will assess whether the investment has as its primary purpose community development. The General Partner will consider whether the investment: (1) provides affordable housing for low- to moderate-income individuals; (2) provides community services targeted to low- to moderate-income individuals; (3) funds activities that (a) finance businesses or farms that meet the size eligibility standards of the Small Business Administration’s Development Company or Small Business Investment Company programs or have annual revenues of $1 million or less and (b) promote economic development; or (4) funds activities that revitalize or stabilize low- to moderate-income areas. For institutions whose primary regulator is the FRB, OCC, or FDIC, the General Partner may also consider whether an investment revitalizes or stabilizes a designated disaster area or an area designated by those agencies as a distressed or underserved non-metropolitan middle-income area.

An activity may be deemed to promote economic development if it supports permanent job creation, retention, and/or improvement for persons who are currently low- to moderate-income, or supports permanent job creation, retention, and/or improvement in low- to moderate-income areas targeted for redevelopment by federal, state, local, or tribal governments. Activities that revitalize or stabilize a low- to moderate-income geography are activities that help attract and retain businesses and residents. The General Partner maintains documentation, readily available to a financial institution or an examiner, supporting its determination that a Partnership asset is a qualifying investment for CRA purposes.

There may be a time lag between sale of the Series A Preferred Units and the Partnership’s acquisition of a significant volume of investments in a particular geographic area. The length of time will depend upon the depth of the market for CRA qualified investments in the relevant areas. In some cases, the General Partner expects that CRA qualified investments will be immediately available. In others, it may take weeks or months to acquire a significant volume of CRA qualified investments in a particular area. The General Partner believes that investments in the Series A Preferred Units during these time periods will be considered CRA qualified investments, provided the purpose of the Partnership includes serving the investing institution’s assessment area(s) and the Partnership is likely to achieve a significant volume of investments in the region after a reasonable period of time. As the Partnership continues to operate, it may dispose of assets that were acquired for CRA qualifying purposes, in which case the General Partner will normally attempt to acquire a replacement asset that would be a qualifying investment.

Obligations of U.S. Government agencies, authorities, instrumentalities, and sponsored enterprises (such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) have historically involved little risk of loss of principal if held to maturity. However, the maximum potential liability of the issuers of some of these securities may greatly exceed their current resources and no assurance can be given that the U.S. Government would provide financial support to any of these entities if it is not obligated to do so by law.

The investment in the Series A Preferred Units is not a deposit or obligation of, or insured or guaranteed by, any entity or person, including the U.S. Government and the FDIC. An investment in the Partnership may be particularly appropriate for banks and other financial institutions that are subject to the CRA; institutional investors, such as pension plans, that find the Partnership meets their asset management needs; and socially responsible investors who desire to channel their investments in ways that help communities. The value of the Partnership’s assets will vary, reflecting changes in market conditions, interest rates, and other political and economic factors. There is no assurance that the Partnership can achieve its investment objective, since all investments are inherently subject to market risk. There also can be no assurance that either the Partnership’s investments or units of the Partnership will receive investment test credit under the CRA.

The Partnership faces legislative and regulatory risks in connection with its assets and operations, including under the CRA.

Many aspects of the Partnership’s investment objectives are directly affected by the national and local legal and regulatory environments. Changes in laws, regulations, or the interpretation of regulations could all pose risks to the successful realization of the Partnership’s investment objectives.

It is not known what changes, if any, may be made to the CRA in the future and what impact these changes could have on regulators or the various states that have their own versions of the CRA. Changes in the CRA might affect Partnership operations and might pose a risk to the successful realization of the Partnership’s investment objectives. In particular, repeal of the CRA would significantly reduce the attractiveness of an investment in the Partnership’s units for regulated investors. There is no guarantee that an investor will receive CRA credit for is investment in the Series A Preferred Units. If CRA credit is not given, there is a risk that an investor may not fulfill its CRA obligations.

The following exhibits are filed as required by Item 15(a)(3) of this report. Exhibit numbers refer to the paragraph numbers under Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

3.1 America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as of September 15, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the registrant with the Commission on September 18, 2015).

3.2 First Amendment to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. dated March 30, 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K (No. 000-24843), filed by the Partnership on March 31, 2016).

10.1 First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated January 7, 2016 between America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. and Bankers Trust Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (No. 000-24843), filed by the Partnership on January 13, 2016).

10.2 Waiver Letter dated January 7, 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K (No. 000-24843), filed by the Partnership on January 13, 2016).

10.3 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated February 10, 2016 between America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. and Bankers Trust Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (No. 000-24843), filed by the Partnership on February 17, 2016).

10.4 Form of Restricted Unit Award Agreement under the America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-209811), filed by the Partnership on February 29, 2016).

10.5 Form of Phantom Unit Award Agreement under the America First Multifamily Investors, L.P. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-209811), filed by the Partnership on February 29, 2016).

31.1 Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101 The following materials from the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 are filed herewith, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets on March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Such materials are presented with detailed tagging of notes and financial statement schedules.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Delaware		47-0810385
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1004 Farnam Street, Suite 400		Omaha, Nebraska 68102
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)
(402) 444-1630
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Large accelerated filer	o		Accelerated filer	x
Non- accelerated filer	o	(do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015
Net income	$	2,531,688		$	2,523,588
Reversal of net unrealized gain on sale of securities		(236,439	)		-
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities		12,337,427			(1,057,235	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on bond purchase commitments		1,587,813			(576,225	)
Comprehensive income	$	16,220,489		$	890,128

Comprehensive income (loss) allocated to:
General Partner	$	204,060		$	10,372
Limited Partners - Unitholders		16,016,441			1,026,813
Unallocated loss of Consolidated Property VIEs		-			(146,166	)
Comprehensive income - America First Multifamily Investors, L.P.		16,220,501			891,019
Comprehensive loss allocated to noncontrolling interest		(12	)		(891	)
Comprehensive income	$	16,220,489		$	890,128

	General Partner			# of Units		Beneficial Unit Certificate Holders			Unallocated Deficit of Consolidated VIEs			Non-controlling Interest			Total			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	578,238			60,252,928	$	330,457,117		$	(21,091,456	)	$	(15,995	)	$	309,927,904		$	51,698,418
Distributions paid or accrued		(76,077	)				(7,531,616	)		-			-			(7,607,693	)		-
Net income (loss)		26,706					2,643,939			(146,166	)		(891	)		2,523,588			-
Unrealized loss on securities		(10,572	)				(1,046,663	)		-			-			(1,057,235	)		(1,057,235	)
Unrealized loss on bond purchase commitments		(5,762	)				(570,463	)		-			-			(576,225	)		(576,225	)
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	512,533			60,252,928	$	323,952,314		$	(21,237,622	)	$	(16,886	)	$	303,210,339		$	50,064,958

	March 31, 2016
Description of PHC Certificates	Cost Adjusted for Paydowns		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss		Estimated Fair Value
PHC Certificate Trust I	$	26,181,896	$	1,802,550	$	-	$	27,984,446
PHC Certificate Trust II		11,093,435		556,822		-		11,650,257
PHC Certificate Trust III		20,523,164		347,473		-		20,870,637
	$	57,798,495	$	2,706,845	$	-	$	60,505,340

Item 1	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	35
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	47
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	48

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A	Risk Factors	49
Item 6	Exhibits	52

SIGNATURES		53

Property Name	Month Acquired	Location	Units	Maturity Date	Base Interest Rate			Principal Outstanding at March 31, 2015
Suites on Paseo Series B	March	San Diego, CA	394	12/1/2033		9.00	%		5,500,000
Concord at Gulfgate - Series A	January	Houston, TX	288	2/1/2032		6.00	%		17,060,000
Concord at Gulfgate - Series B	January	Houston, TX	288	3/1/2032		12.00	%		2,125,000
Concord at Little York - Series A	January	Houston, TX	276	2/1/2032		6.00	%		12,480,000
Concord at Little York - Series B	January	Houston, TX	276	3/1/2032		12.00	%		960,000
Concord at Williamcrest - Series A	January	Houston, TX	288	2/1/2032		6.00	%		18,020,000
Concord at Williamcrest - Series B	January	Houston, TX	288	3/1/2032		12.00	%		2,800,000

	Weighted Average Lives (Years)		Investment Rating	Weighted Average Interest Rate over Life	Principal Outstanding March 31, 2016
Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificate I		9.06	AA-	5.33%	$	24,923,137
Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificate II		8.42	A+	4.29%		11,465,660
Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificate III		9.56	BBB	5.42%		20,898,432
Total Public Housing Capital Fund Trust Certificates					$	57,287,229

	December 31, 2015
Agency Rating of MBS Securities ⁽¹⁾	Cost adjusted for amortization of premium		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
“AAA”	$	5,052,348	$	-	$	(34,648	)	$	5,017,700
“AA”		9,900,682		-		(143,073	)		9,757,609
	$	14,953,030	$	-	$	(177,721	)	$	14,775,309

	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Property loans receivable	$	35,702,765		$	29,874,523
Less: Loan loss allowance		(7,098,814	)		(7,098,814	)
Deferred financing costs - net		489,712			487,023
Fair value of derivative contracts		143,370			344,177
Taxable bonds at fair market value		4,938,104			4,824,060
Bond purchase commitments - fair value adjustment (Notes 4 & 17)		7,222,173			5,634,360
Other assets		1,594,835			1,655,013
Total other assets	$	42,992,145		$	35,720,342

	2015
Rental revenues	$	804,068
Expenses		779,640
Net income from discontinued operations	$	24,428

	Outstanding TEBS Financing at March 31, 2016		Year Acquired		Stated Maturity	Variable / Fixed	Reset Frequency	SIFMA Based Rate			Facility Fees			Period End Rate
M24 TEBS Financing	$	60,787,787		2010	September-17	Variable	Weekly		0.46	%		1.91	%		2.37	%
M31 TEBS Financing ⁽¹⁾		92,191,475		2014	July-19	Variable	Weekly		0.44	%		1.42	%		1.86	%
M33 TEBS Financing ⁽¹⁾		82,024,241		2015	July-20	Variable	Weekly		0.44	%		1.26	%		1.70	%
Total TEBS Financing\Period End Rate	$	235,003,503													1.94	%
⁽¹⁾ Facility fees are variable

	Outstanding TEBS Financing at December 31, 2015		Year Acquired		Stated Maturity	Variable / Fixed	Reset Frequency	SIFMA Based Rate			Facility Fees			Period End Rate
M24 TEBS Financing	$	60,735,743		2010	September-17	Variable	Weekly		0.04	%		1.91	%		1.95	%
M31 TEBS Financing ⁽¹⁾		92,280,069		2014	July-19	Variable	Weekly		0.02	%		1.42	%		1.44	%
M33 TEBS Financing ⁽¹⁾		81,968,780		2015	July-20	Variable	Weekly		0.02	%		1.26	%		1.28	%
Total TEBS Financing\Period End Rate	$	234,984,592													1.51	%
⁽¹⁾ Facility fees are variable

Pre-adoption balance sheet	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
Assets:
Other assets	$	47,944,524	$	41,124,454
Liabilities:
Debt financing	$	434,830,925	$	456,431,288
Mortgages payable and other secured financing	$	69,482,362	$	69,717,114




Post-adoption balance sheet	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
Assets:
Other assets	$	42,992,145	$	35,720,342
Liabilities:
Debt financing ¹	$	430,307,422	$	451,496,716
Mortgages payable and other secured financing²	$	69,053,487	$	69,247,574

¹ Reflects a reduction of $4.5 million and $4.9 million as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
² Reflects a reduction of $0.4 million and $0.5 million as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

2016	$	68,468,998
2017		154,181,206
2018		2,287,714
2019		129,045,308
2020		80,847,700
Total	$	434,830,926

MF Property Mortgage Payables	Outstanding Mortgage Payable at March 31, 2016		Year Acquired	Stated Maturity	Variable / Fixed	Reset Frequency	Variable Based Rate			Facility Fees			Period End Rate
Arboretum	$	16,582,688	2011	March 2017	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				3.75	%
Eagle Village ⁽¹⁾		7,989,154	2010	September 2018	Variable	Monthly		0.50	%		3.00	%		3.50	%
Residences of DeCordova		1,791,995	2012	June 2017	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.75	%
Residences of Weatherford		5,763,979	2011	June 2017	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.75	%
The 50/50 UNL Student Housing-- Mortgage ⁽²⁾		25,371,844	2013	March 2020	Variable	Monthly		3.50	%	N/A				3.50	%
The 50/50 UNL Student Housing-- TIF Loan		4,053,827	2014	December 2019	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.65	%
Woodland Park ⁽¹⁾		7,500,000	2014	August 2017	Variable	Monthly		0.44	%		2.75	%		3.19	%
Total Mortgage Payable\Period End Rate	$	69,053,487												3.73	%

MF Property Mortgage Payables	Outstanding Mortgage Payable at December 31, 2015		Year Acquired	Stated Maturity	Variable / Fixed	Reset Frequency	Variable Based Rate			Facility Fees			Period End Rate
Arboretum		16,683,146	2011	March 2017	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				3.75	%
Eagle Village ⁽¹⁾		8,037,133	2010	September 2018	Variable	Monthly		0.25	%		3.00	%		3.25	%
Residences of DeCordova		1,807,246	2012	June 2017	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.75	%
Residences of Weatherford		5,820,623	2011	June 2017	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.75	%
The 50/50 UNL Student Housing-- Mortgage ⁽²⁾		25,363,647	2013	March 2020	Variable	Monthly		3.25	%	N/A				3.25	%
The 50/50 UNL Student Housing-- TIF Loan		4,035,779	2014	December 2019	Fixed	N/A	N/A			N/A				4.65	%
Woodland Park ⁽¹⁾		7,500,000	2014	August 2017	Variable	Monthly		0.19	%		2.75	%		2.94	%
Total Mortgage Payable\Period End Rate	$	69,247,574												3.58	%

2016	$	17,127,962
2017		14,947,499
2018		7,606,911
2019		29,799,990
Total	$	69,482,362

	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2016
Description	Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets and Liabilities
Mortgage revenue bonds	$	596,376,368		$	-	$	-	$	596,376,368
Bond purchase commitments		7,222,173			-		-		7,222,173
PHC Certificates		60,505,340			-		-		60,505,340
Taxable bonds		4,938,104			-		-		4,938,104
Interest rate derivatives		(2,083,704	)		-		-		(2,083,704	)
Total Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value	$	666,958,281		$	-	$	-	$	666,958,281

	For Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant
	Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Mortgage Revenue Bonds			Bond Purchase Commitments		PHC Certificates			Taxable Bonds			Interest Rate Derivatives			Total
Beginning Balance January 1, 2016	$	583,683,137		$	5,634,360	$	60,707,290		$	4,824,060		$	(972,898	)	$	653,875,949
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings		-			-		-			-			(1,110,407	)		(1,110,407	)
Included in other comprehensive (loss) income		11,351,627			1,587,813		869,344			116,456			-			13,925,240
Purchases		11,500,000			-		-			-			-			11,500,000
Sale of securities		(9,747,125	)		-		-			-			(399	)		(9,747,524	)
Settlements		(411,270	)		-		(1,071,294	)		(2,412	)		-			(1,484,976	)
Ending Balance March 31, 2016	$	596,376,369		$	7,222,173	$	60,505,340		$	4,938,104		$	(2,083,704	)	$	666,958,282
Total amount of losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets or liabilities still held as of March 31, 2016	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	(1,110,407	)	$	(1,110,407	)

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
Description	Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets and Liabilities
Mortgage revenue bonds	$	583,683,137		$	-	$	-	$	583,683,137
Bond purchase commitments		5,634,360			-		-		5,634,360
PHC Certificates		60,707,290			-		-		60,707,290
MBS Securities		14,775,309			-		14,775,309		-
Taxable bonds		4,824,060			-		-		4,824,060
Interest rate derivatives		(972,898	)		-		-		(972,898	)
Total Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value	$	668,651,258		$	-	$	14,775,309	$	653,875,949

	For Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant
	Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Mortgage Revenue Bonds			Bond Purchase Commitments			PHC Certificates			Taxable Bonds			Interest Rate Derivatives			Total
Beginning Balance January 1, 2015	$	449,024,137		$	5,780,413		$	61,263,123		$	4,616,565		$	267,669		$	520,951,907
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings		-			-			-			-			(899,873	)		(899,873	)
Included in other comprehensive income		74,600			(576,225	)		(976,532	)		(205,351	)		-			(1,683,508	)
Purchases		58,945,000			-			-			-			-			58,945,000
Refund of interest rate derivative cost		-			-			-			-			(10,500	)		(10,500	)
Settlements		(145,039	)		-			(13,650	)		-			-			(158,689	)
Ending Balance March 31, 2015	$	507,898,698		$	5,204,188		$	60,272,941		$	4,411,214		$	(642,704	)	$	577,144,337
Total amount of losses for the period included in earning attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets or liabilities still held as of March 31, 2015	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	(899,873	)	$	(899,873	)

	March 31, 2016				December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial Liabilities:
Debt financing and unsecured LOCs	$	458,292,061	$	460,227,159	$	468,993,716	$	475,415,345
Mortgages payable and other secured financing	$	69,053,487	$	68,999,002	$	69,247,574	$	67,735,213

Bond Purchase Commitments	Commitment Date	Maximum Committed Amounts for 2017 through 2018		Maximum Committed Amounts for 2016		Rate			Closing Date ⁽¹⁾	Fair Value at March 31, 2016		Fair Value at December 31, 2015
15 West Apartments	July-14	$	-	$	9,900,000		6.25	%	Q2 2016		1,101,821		945,009
Villas at Plano Gateway Apartments	December-14		-		20,000,000		6.00	%	Q3 2016		1,772,800		1,469,213
Palo Alto	July-15		19,540,000		-		5.80	%	Q3 2017		1,995,034		1,439,600
Village at Rivers Edge	May-15		11,000,000		-		6.00	%	Q2 2017		785,062		636,560
Village at Avalon	November-15		17,900,000		-		5.80	%	Q2 2018		1,567,456		1,143,978
Total		$	48,440,000	$	29,900,000					$	7,222,173	$	5,634,360
⁽¹⁾ The closing date is actual and estimated.

Recent Investment Activity	Year	#	Amount in 000's		Retired Debt or Note in 000's		Tier 2 income in 000's ⁽¹⁾		Notes to the Partnership's consolidated financial statements
Mortgage Revenue Bond and MBS Securities Sales and Redemptions
MBS Securities	2016	3	$	15,081	$	11,945	$	-	6
Mortgage revenue bond - Pro Nova 2014-2	2016	1	$	9,479	$	8,375	$	-	4

Mortgage Revenue Bonds and other Asset Acquisitions
Mortgage revenue bonds	2016	1	$	11,500	N/A		N/A		4
Investment in equity interest	2016	1	$	2,443	N/A		N/A		8

MF Property
MF Properties executed brokerage agreements	2016	3		-		-		-	7
Land with executed brokerage agreement	2016	1		-		-		-	7
MF Properties executed brokerage agreement	2015	1		-		-		-	7

⁽¹⁾ See Item 2, "Cash Available for Distribution" section of the Partnership's report.

Recent Financing and Derivative Activity	Year	#	Amount of Change in Debt or Derivative in 000's		Secured	Maximum SIFMA Cap Rate⁽¹⁾			Notes to the Partnership's consolidated financial statements
Unsecured LOCs	2016	3	$	10,488	No	N/A			11
TOB Financing with DB paid in full and collapsed	2016	4		20,320	Yes	N/A			12
Interest rate derivative sold	2016	1		11,000	N/A		1.0	%	15
Redeemable Series A preferred units	2016	1		10,000	N/A	N/A			18
TOB Financing with DB	2015	4		48,285	Yes	N/A			12
Unsecured LOCs	2015	2		10,000	No	N/A			11
Mortgages payable and other secured financing	2015	1		1,425	Yes	N/A			11
Interest rate derivative revised	2015	2		11,000	N/A		1.0	%	15

⁽¹⁾ See Items 2 and 3, "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" sections of the Partnership's report.

	For the Three Months Ending March 31,
	2016		2015
Mortgage Revenue Bond Investments
Total revenues	$	9,074,195	$	7,318,561
Total interest expense	$	3,784,390	$	2,889,120
Net income	$	2,317,337	$	2,349,522

Date: May 2, 2016	By:	/s/ Chad L. Daffer
		Chad L. Daffer
		Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 2, 2016	By:	/s/ Craig S. Allen
		Craig S. Allen
		Chief Financial Officer