| UNITED STATES |
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
____________
FORM
(Mark One)
For the quarterly period ended
or
For the transition period from ___________________ to ___________________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
| ||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
| (I.R.S. employer identification number) |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
|
|
|
( | ||
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) | ||
Not applicable (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | ||||
Title of each class |
| Trading Symbol(s) |
| Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
☑ |
| Accelerated filer☐
|
Non-accelerated filer ☐ |
| Smaller reporting company
|
|
| Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common stock:
| FIRST BANCORP. |
|
|
|
|
|
INDEX PAGEPART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION | PAGE |
Item 1. Financial Statements: |
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited) as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 |
5 |
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) – Quarters ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 |
6 |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) – Quarters ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 |
7 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) – Six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 |
8 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) – Quarters ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 |
9 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) | 10 |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 92 |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 162 |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 162 |
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 163 |
Item 1A. Risk Factors | 163 |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 164 |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 165 |
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures | 165 |
Item 5. Other Information | 165 |
Item 6. Exhibits | 165 |
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
| |
|
2
Forward Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which are subject to the safe harbor created by such sections. When used in this Form 10-Q or future filings by First BanCorp. (the “Corporation,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in the Corporation’s press releases or in other public or stockholder communications made by the Corporation, or in oral statements made on behalf of the Corporation with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases “would,” “intends,” “will likely result,” “expect,” “should,” “anticipate,” “look forward,” “believes,” and other terms of similar meaning or import in connection with any discussion of future operating, financial or other performance are meant to identify “forward-looking statements.”
First BanCorp. wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such “forward-looking statements,” which speak only as of the date made, and to advise readers that these forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, estimates, and assumptions by us that are difficult to predict. Various factors, some of which are beyond our control, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements.
Factors that could cause results to differ from those expressed in the Corporation’s forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, risks described or referenced below in Part I, Item 1A., “Risk Factors,” in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K”) and the following:
uncertainty as to any consequences of the unprecedented resignation of the governor of Puerto Rico, such as an adverse effect on the economy of Puerto Rico, the timing of the receipt of disaster relief funds allocated to Puerto Rico, and the future credibility of the Puerto Rico government;
uncertainty as to the ultimate outcomes of actions taken, or those that may be taken, by the Puerto Rico government, or the oversight board established by the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) to address the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s financial problems, including the filing of a form of bankruptcy under Title III of PROMESA, which provides a court-supervised debt restructuring process similar to U.S. bankruptcy protection, the designation by the PROMESA oversight board of Puerto Rico municipalities as instrumentalities covered under PROMESA, the effects of measures included in the Puerto Rico government fiscal plan, or any revisions to it, on our clients and loan portfolios, and any potential impact from future economic or political developments in Puerto Rico;
changes in economic and business conditions, including those caused by past or future natural disasters, that directly or indirectly affect the financial health of the Corporation’s customer base in the geographic areas we serve;
the actual pace and magnitude of economic recovery in the Corporation’s service areas that were affected by Hurricanes Irma and Maria during 2017 compared to management’s current views on the economic recovery;
uncertainty about whether the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “New York FED” or “Federal Reserve”) will continue to provide approvals for receiving dividends from FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”), and for the Corporation to, make payments of dividends on non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and common stock, or payments on trust-preferred securities or subordinated debt, or to incur, increase or guarantee debt or repurchase any capital securities, despite the consents that have enabled the Corporation to receive quarterly dividends from FirstBank since the second quarter of 2016, to pay quarterly interest payments on the Corporation’s subordinated debentures associated with its trust-preferred securities since the second quarter of 2016, to pay monthly dividends on the non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock since December 2016, and to pay quarterly dividends on common stock since December 2018;
a decrease in demand for the Corporation’s products and services, resulting in lower revenues and earnings because of the continued economic recession in Puerto Rico;
uncertainty as to the availability of certain funding sources, such as brokered certificates of deposits (“brokered CDs”);
the Corporation’s reliance on brokered CDs to fund operations and provide liquidity;
the weakness of the real estate markets and of the consumer and commercial sectors and their impact on the credit quality of the Corporation’s loans and other assets, which have contributed and may continue to contribute to, among other things, higher than targeted levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provisions for loan and lease losses, and may subject the Corporation to further risk from loan defaults and foreclosures;
the estimated or actual impact of changes in accounting standards or assumptions in applying those standards, including the new credit loss accounting standard that is effective in 2020;
3
the ability of FirstBank to realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets;
adverse changes in general economic conditions in Puerto Rico, the United States (“U.S.”), the U.S. Virgin Islands (“USVI”), and the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”), including the interest rate environment, market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real estate prices, and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which may reduce interest margins, affect funding sources and demand for all of the Corporation’s products and services, and reduce the Corporation’s revenues and earnings and the value of the Corporation’s assets;
uncertainty related to the likely discontinuation of the London Interbank Offered Rate at the end of 2021;
an adverse change in the Corporation’s ability to attract new clients and retain existing ones;
the risk that additional portions of the unrealized losses in the Corporation’s investment portfolio are determined to be other-than-temporary, including additional impairments on the Corporation’s remaining $8.3 million exposure to the Puerto Rico government’s debt securities held as part of the available-for-sale securities portfolio;
uncertainty about legislative, tax or regulatory changes that affect financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the U.S., the USVI and the BVI, which could affect the Corporation’s financial condition or performance and could cause the Corporation’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from prior results and anticipated or projected results;
changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of the U.S. federal government and the Puerto Rico and other governments, including those determined by the Board of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”), the New York FED, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), government-sponsored housing agencies, and regulators in Puerto Rico, and the USVI and BVI;
the risk of possible failure or circumvention of controls and procedures and the risk that the Corporation’s risk management policies may not be adequate;
the Corporation’s ability to identify and address cyber-security risks such as data security breaches, malware, “denial of service” attacks, “hacking” and identity theft, a failure of which could disrupt our business and may result in misuse or misappropriation of confidential or proprietary information, and could result in the disruption or damage to our systems, increased costs and losses or an adverse effect to our reputation;
the risk that the FDIC may increase the deposit insurance premium and/or require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund, causing an additional increase in the Corporation’s non-interest expenses;
the impact on the Corporation’s results of operations and financial condition of business acquisitions and dispositions;
a need to recognize impairments on the Corporation’s financial instruments, goodwill and other intangible assets relating to business acquisitions;
the effect of changes in the interest rate scenario on the Corporation’s businesses, business practices and results of operations;
the risk that the impact of the occurrence of any of these uncertainties on the Corporation’s capital would preclude further growth of the Bank and preclude the Corporation’s Board of Directors from declaring dividends;
uncertainty as to whether FirstBank will be able to continue to satisfy its regulators regarding, among other things, its asset quality, liquidity plans, maintenance of capital levels and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and related requirements; and
general competitive factors and industry consolidation.
The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any “forward-looking statements” to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements except as required by the federal securities laws.
Investors should refer to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, as well as “Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors,” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for a discussion of these factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.
4
FIRST BANCORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
| June 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 | ||
(In thousands, except for share information) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks | $ |
| $ | ||
Money market investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions |
|
|
| ||
Other short-term investments |
|
|
| ||
Total money market investments |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged with creditors’ right to repledge |
|
|
| ||
Other investment securities available for sale |
|
|
| ||
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
|
| ||
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
|
|
|
(fair value 2019 - $123,114; 2018 - $125,658) |
|
|
| ||
Equity securities |
|
|
| ||
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $172,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
(2018 - $196,362) |
|
|
| ||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market |
|
|
| ||
Total loans, net |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
| ||
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) |
|
|
| ||
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments |
|
|
| ||
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
| ||
Other assets |
|
|
| ||
Total assets | $ |
| $ | ||
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits | $ |
| $ | ||
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
| ||
Total deposits |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
| ||
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) |
|
|
| ||
Other borrowings |
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERSʼ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, authorized, 50,000,000 shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock: 22,004,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
shares issued, 1,444,146 shares outstanding, aggregate liquidation value of $36,104 |
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $0.10 par value, authorized, 2,000,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
222,055,625 shares issued (2018 - $221,789,509) |
|
|
| ||
Less: Treasury stock (at par value) |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Common stock outstanding, 217,328,179 shares outstanding (2018 - 217,235,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
shares outstanding) |
|
|
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
| ||
Retained earnings, includes legal surplus reserve of $80,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 |
|
|
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $7,752 as of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
and December 31, 2018 |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Total stockholdersʼ equity |
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and stockholdersʼ equity | $ |
| $ | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. |
5
FIRST BANCORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
(In thousands, except per share information) | |||||||||||
Interest and dividend income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Money market investments and interest-bearing cash accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Advances from FHLB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total interest expense |
|
|
| ||||||||
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
| ||||||||
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage banking activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Insurance commission income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total non-interest income |
|
|
| ||||||||
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees’ compensation and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Business promotion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Professional fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Taxes, other than income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net loss on OREO and OREO expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Credit and debit card processing expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Communications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other non-interest expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
| ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Diluted | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
FIRST BANCORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |||||||||
Net income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on debt securities on which an |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") has been recognized |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| |||
All other unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities arising during the period |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
Total comprehensive income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
FIRST BANCORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income | $ |
| $ | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
| ||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
| ||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
| ||
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
| ||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
| ||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
| ( | |
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments |
| ( |
|
| |
Net gain on sales of premises and equipment and other assets |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Net gain on sales of loans |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Net amortization/accretion of premiums, discounts and deferred loan fees and costs |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Originations and purchases of loans held for sale |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Sales and repayments of loans held for sale |
|
|
| ||
Loans held for sale valuation adjustments |
|
|
| ||
Amortization of broker placement fees |
|
|
| ||
Net amortization/accretion of premium and discounts on investment securities |
|
|
| ||
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable |
| ( |
|
| |
Increase in accrued interest payable |
|
|
| ||
Decrease in other assets |
|
|
| ||
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities |
| ( |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal collected on loans |
|
|
| ||
Loans originated and purchased |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Proceeds from sales of loans held for investment |
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from sales of repossessed assets |
|
|
| ||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Proceeds from principal repayments and maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from principal repayments of held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
| ||
Additions to premises and equipment |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment and other assets |
|
|
| ||
Net redemptions/purchase of other investment securities |
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims |
|
|
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
| ||
Change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Repayment of junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
| ( | |
Repurchase of outstanding common stock |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Dividends paid on common stock |
| ( |
|
| |
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
| ||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ |
| $ | ||
Cash and cash equivalents include: |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks | $ |
| $ | ||
Money market instruments |
|
|
| ||
| $ |
| $ | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
FIRST BANCORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Preferred Stock | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock issued as compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock issued for exercised warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock withheld for taxes |
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Restricted stock grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Restricted stock forfeited |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
Balance at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-In-Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock issued for exercised warrants |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
Common stock withheld for taxes |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Restricted stock grants |
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Common stock issued as compensation |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
Restricted stock forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Balance at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Dividends on common stock ($0.03 per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2019; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.06 per share for the six-month period ended June 30, 2019) |
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ||
Dividends on preferred stock |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
per Accounting Standards Update No. ("ASU") 2016-01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | |||
Balance at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
per ASU 2016-01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
Balance at end of period |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholdersʼ equity | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
FIRST BANCORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) of First BanCorp. (the “Corporation”) have been prepared in conformity with the accounting policies stated in the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2018, which are included in the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been reflected. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The results of operations for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
Adoption of New Accounting Requirements and Recently Issued but Not Yet Effective Accounting Requirements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued the following accounting pronouncements and guidance relevant to the Corporation’s operations:
Lease Accounting
In February 2016, the FASB updated the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or the “Codification”) to replace ASC Topic 840, “Leases (Topic 840)” (“ASC Topic 840”), with new guidance for the financial reporting about leasing transactions. Under the new guidance, a lessee is required to recognize a right-of-use asset (“ROU”) and a lease liability for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Similar with the practice before the adoption of this guidance, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However, unlike previous guidance, which required the recognition of only capital leases on the balance sheet, the guidance requires both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. The guidance also requires disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative information and additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. The FASB issued an update in January 2018 providing an optional transition practical expedient under which an entity need not evaluate under new ASC Topic 842, “Leases” (“ASC Topic 842”), land easements that existed or expired before the entity’s adoption of ASC Topic 842 and were not previously accounted for as leases. In addition, the FASB issued an update in July 2018 that provides entities with an additional and optional transition method that allows entities to adopt the new standard prospectively as of the effective date, without adjusting comparative periods presented. Also, the amendments provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying asset, to not separate non lease components, subject to certain circumstances. Also in July 2018, the FASB issued an update that makes various technical corrections to clarify how to apply certain aspects of the new leases standard, such as reassessment of lease classification, variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, lease term and purchase options, and certain transition adjustments, among others. The guidance on leases took effect for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.
The update affected the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements since the Corporation has operating and lease arrangements for which it is a lessee. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. The Corporation adopted this guidance in 2019, and elected the optional transition approach to not apply the new lease standard in comparative periods presented and the package of practical expedients, which allows the Corporation not to reassess prior conclusions about lease classification and initial direct costs. The adoption of this standard in January 2019 resulted in the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases of $
10
Amortization of Premiums and Discounts on Callable Debt Securities
In March 2017, the FASB updated the Codification to shorten the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. With respect to securities held at a discount, the amendments do not require an accounting change; thus, the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The amendments in this update more closely align the amortization period of premiums and discounts to expectations incorporated in market pricing on the underlying securities. In most cases, market participants price securities to the call date that produces the worst yield when the coupon is above current market rates (that is, the security is trading at a premium) and price securities to maturity when the coupon is below market rates (that is, the security is trading at a discount) in anticipation that the borrower will act in its economic best interest. As a result, the amendments more closely align interest income recorded on bonds held at a premium or a discount with the economics of the underlying instrument. For public business entities, the amendments in this update took effect for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of this guidance during the first quarter of 2019, did not have a material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statement of financial condition or results of operations. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation does not have callable debt securities held at a premium.
Derivatives and Hedging
In August 2017, the FASB updated the Codification to: (i) expand hedge accounting for nonfinancial and financial risk components and amend measurement methodologies to more closely align hedge accounting with a company’s risk management activities; (ii) decrease the complexity of preparing and understanding hedge results by eliminating the separate measurement and reporting of hedge ineffectiveness; (iii) enhance transparency, comparability, and understanding of hedge results through enhanced disclosures and a change in the presentation of hedge results to align the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item; and (iv) reduce the cost and complexity of applying hedge accounting by simplifying the manner in which assessments of hedge effectiveness may be performed. This update took effect for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance requires companies to apply requirements to existing hedging relationships on the date of adoption, and the effect of the adoption should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 815, Derivative and Hedging,” to provide further clarification on previously issued updates. This Update addresses the following areas of the guidance: (i) partial-term fair value hedges; (ii) fair value hedge basis adjustments; (iii) not-for-profit entities and private companies; and (v) first-payments-received cash flow hedging. As June 30, 2019, all of the derivatives held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges. The adoption of this guidance during the first quarter of 2019 did not have an effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statement of financial condition or results of operations.
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
In February 2018, the FASB updated the Codification to provide entities with an option to reclassify to retained earnings, tax effects that were stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income, pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”). This guidance took effect for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. This guidance could be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the corporate tax rate in the Tax Act is recognized. The adoption of this guidance during the first quarter of 2019 did not have an effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Financial Instruments – Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB updated the Codification to introduce new guidance for the accounting for credit losses. The guidance includes an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. It also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination. The CECL model will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost; and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, loan commitments, financial guarantees, and net investments in leases, as well as reinsurance and trade receivables. Upon initial recognition of the exposure, the CECL model requires an entity to estimate the credit losses expected over the life of an exposure (or pool of exposures). The estimate of expected credit losses (“ECL”) should consider historical information, current information, and reasonable and supportable forecasts, including estimates of prepayments. Financial instruments with similar risk characteristics should be grouped together when estimating ECL. The guidance does not prescribe a specific method to make the estimate, so its application will require significant judgment.
11
Generally, upon initial recognition of a financial asset, the estimate of the ECL will be recorded through an allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) with an offset to current earnings. Subsequently, the ECL will need to be reassessed each period, and both negative and positive changes to the estimate will be recognized through an adjustment to the allowance for loan and lease losses and earnings.
The guidance amends the current OTTI model for available-for-sale debt securities. The new available-for-sale debt security model will require an estimate of ECL only when the fair value is below the amortized cost of the asset. The length of time the fair value of an available-for-sale debt security has been below the amortized cost will no longer affect the determination of whether a credit loss exists. As such, the new available-for-sale debt security model is not an OTTI model. In addition, credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities will now be limited to the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value. The available-for-sale debt security model will also require the use of an allowance to record ECL (and subsequent recoveries).
The purchased financial assets with credit deterioration (“PCD”) model will apply to purchased financial assets (measured at amortized cost or available-for-sale) that have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination. This represents a change from the scope of what are considered purchased credit-impaired assets under today’s model. In contrast to the accounting for originated or purchased assets that do not qualify as PCD, the initial estimate of ECL for a PCD will be recognized through an allowance for loan and lease losses with an offset to the cost basis of the related financial asset at acquisition (i.e., there will be no effect on net income at initial recognition). Subsequently, the accounting will follow the applicable CECL or available-for-sale debt security impairment model with all adjustments of the allowance for loan and lease losses recognized through earnings. Beneficial interests classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale will need to apply the PCD model if the beneficial interest meets the definition of PCD or if there is a significant difference between contractual and expected cash flows at initial recognition.
In general, the new guidance will require modified retrospective application to all outstanding instruments, with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to opening retained earnings as of the beginning of the first period in which the guidance becomes effective. However, prospective application is required for PCD assets previously accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30, “Receivables,” and for debt securities for which an OTTI was recognized prior to the date of adoption.
This guidance also expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, public business entities will need to disclose, among other things, the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination (i.e., by vintage year).
In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments- Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments,” in part to clarify the accounting treatment for the measurement of credit losses under ASC 326, “Financial Instruments.” This update provides clarification on the following areas of the guidance: (i) accrued interest; (ii) recoveries; (iii) projections of the interest rate environment; (iv) consideration of prepayments; and (v) other topics.
In May 2019, the FASB issued an update that allows entities to irrevocably elect, upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, the fair value option on financial instruments that: (i) were previously recorded at amortized cost and (ii) are within the scope of ASC Topic 326-20, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses Measured at Amortized Cost,” if the instruments are eligible for the fair value option under ASC Topic 825-10, “Financial Instruments-Overall.”
The guidance will be effective for public business entities that are SEC filers in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the guidance is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
The Corporation developed a project plan in order to comply on a timely basis with the implementation of this new CECL impairment model and expects to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of 2020. The implementation process is being conducted by a working group composed of members from multiple areas across the Corporation and includes the selection and development of loss forecasting models, evaluation of technical accounting topics, updates to the Corporation’s allowance documentation, reporting processes and related internal controls, and evaluation of the overall operational readiness for the adoption. This process is expected to continue for the reminder of 2019. Currently, the Corporation is in the process of conducting and validating the results of parallel runs pursuant to the provisions of the CECL standard alongside the Corporation’s current processes for estimation of the allowance for loan and leases losses.
12
The Corporation’s approach for estimating ECL for applicable loans and debt securities includes the following key components:
An initial forecast period (“reasonable and supportable period”) between 2 and 4 years, varying by portfolio geographies, for all portfolio segments and classes of financing receivables and off-balance-sheet credit exposures. This period reflects management’s expectations of losses based on forward-looking economic scenarios over that time.
A historical loss forecast period covering the remaining contractual life, adjusted for prepayments, by portfolio segments and classes of financing receivables based on the change in key historic economic variables during representative historical expansionary and recessionary periods.
A reversion period connecting the initial loss estimate covered by the reasonable and supportable period to historical loss forecast based on economic conditions at measurement date.
The Corporation will utilize discounted cash flow (“DCF”) methods to measure credit impairment for loans modified in a TDR, unless they are collateral dependent and measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The DCF methods would provide the estimated life-time credit losses.
For available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities, the Corporation will utilize the DCF methods to measure the allowance for credit losses.
The Corporation expects an overall increase in the ACL, with a higher increase for longer duration residential mortgage loan portfolios. We will recognize an ACL for available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities. The ACL on available-for-sale securities will be subject to a limitation based on the fair value of the security. We continue to evaluate the results of modeled loss estimates and continue to conduct refinements to the approach, including considerations around imprecision and uncertainty, based on management’s judgment on the inherent risks around processes and assumptions in estimating the ACL.
The amount of the change in the ACL will be impacted by the Corporation’s loan portfolio and debt securities mix, credit quality, economic conditions and forecasts at the adoption date. The Corporation expects to have a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for the change in the ACL, which will impact capital. An increase in the ACL will result in a reduction to the Corporation’s and banking subsidiary regulatory capital ratios, however, as of this date, we are not able to provide a precise estimate of the impact. Banking regulatory agencies have permitted institutions to limit the initial regulatory capital day-one impact by allowing a three-year phase in period for this impact, on a straight-line basis.
The working group provides periodic updates to the Corporation’s CECL Management Committee, which has oversight responsibilities for the implementation efforts. The CECL Management Committee also reports to the Corporation’s Board of Directors Audit Committee progress of the implementation plan.
13
Subsequent Measurement of Goodwill
In January 2017, the FASB updated the Codification to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the current two-step goodwill impairment test. This guidance provides that a goodwill impairment test shall be conducted by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. Entities must recognize an impairment charge for goodwill equal to the excess of the carrying amount over the reporting unit’s fair value. Entities have the option to perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The effect of this guidance will depend upon the performance of the reporting units that have goodwill and the market conditions affecting the fair value of each reporting unit going forward.
Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement
In August 2018, the FASB updated the Codification and amended ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” to add, remove, and modify fair value measurement disclosure requirements. The disclosure requirements that are removed for public entities include: (i) transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; (ii) the policy for determining when transfers between any of the three levels have occurred; and (iii) the valuation processes used for Level 3 measurements. The disclosure requirements that are modified for public entities include: (i) for certain investments in entities that calculate the net asset value, revisions to require disclosures about the timing of liquidation and lapses of redemption restrictions, if the latter has been communicated to the reporting entity; and (ii) revisions to clarify that the disclosure of Level 3 measurement uncertainty should communicate information about the uncertainty as of the balance sheet date. The additional or new disclosure requirements include: (i) the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period must be included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 instruments held as of the balance sheet date; and (ii) the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used for Level 3 measurements must be disclosed, but an entity has the option to disclose other quantitative information in place of the weighted average to the extent that it would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of certain unobservable inputs.
This update is effective for all entities in fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for any of the removed or modified disclosures immediately even if adoption of the new disclosures is delayed until the effective date. In the third quarter of 2018, the Corporation early adopted the disclosure requirements that were removed or modified by this guidance.
Collaborative Arrangements
In November 2018, the FASB issued new guidance to clarify the interaction between Collaborative Arrangements (“ASC Topic 808”) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC Topic 606”) standards. The guidance (i) clarifies that certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants should be accounted for under the ASC Topic 606 guidance; (ii) adds unit of account guidance to ASC Topic 808 to align with ASC Topic 606; and (iii) clarifies presentation guidance for transactions with a collaborative arrangement participant that is not accounted for under ASC Topic 606. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 1, 2019, including interim reporting periods within these annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
14
NOTE 2 – UPDATE ON EFFECTS OF NATURAL DISASTERS
Two strong hurricanes affected the Corporation’s service areas during September 2017. The following summarizes the more significant continuing financial repercussions of these natural disasters for the Corporation and for its major subsidiary, FirstBank.
Credit Quality and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
During the first quarter of 2019, the Corporation recorded a loan loss reserve release of approximately $
The significant overall uncertainties in the early assessments of hurricane-related credit losses have been largely addressed in the 18-month period after the hurricanes, and the hurricanes’ effect on credit quality is now reflected in the normal process for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses and not through a separate hurricane-related qualitative reserve. Some uncertainties remain, however, including the resolution of insurance claims for certain individual customers.
Casualty Losses and Related Insurance
The Corporation incurred a variety of costs to operate in disaster response mode, and some facilities and their contents, including certain OREO properties, were damaged by the hurricanes. The Corporation maintains insurance for casualty losses, as well as for reasonable and necessary disaster response costs and certain revenue lost through business interruption. Insurance claim receivables were established for some of the individual costs, when incurred, based on management’s understanding of the underlying coverage and when realization of the claim was deemed probable.
During the second quarter of 2019, the Corporation reached settlement on certain claims arising from the hurricanes. As a result, the Corporation received insurance proceeds of approximately $
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had an insurance claim receivable of $
condition. Management also believes that there is a possibility that some gains will be recognized with respect to casualty and lost revenue claims in future periods, but this is contingent on reaching agreements on the Corporation’s claims with the insurance carriers.
During the first quarter of 2019, the Corporation recorded a $
15
| The calculations of earnings per common share for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
Weighted-Average Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Average potential dilutive common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Average common shares outstanding - assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
Diluted | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
|
|
Earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares issued and outstanding. Net income attributable to common stockholders represents net income adjusted for any preferred stock dividends, including any dividends declared, and any cumulative dividends related to the current dividend period that have not been declared as of the end of the period. Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding exclude unvested shares of restricted stock that do not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights.
Potential dilutive common shares consist of unvested shares of restricted stock that do not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights, warrants outstanding during the period and common stock issued under the assumed exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential dilutive common shares are issued and outstanding and the proceeds from the exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributable to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the numbers of potential dilutive shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Potential dilutive common shares also include performance units that do not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights if the performance condition is met as of the end of the reporting period. Unvested shares of restricted stock, stock options, and warrants outstanding during the period that result in lower potential dilutive shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share.
On May 17, 2018, the U.S. Treasury exercised its warrant to purchase
16
On May 24, 2016, the Corporation’s stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the First BanCorp. Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Omnibus Plan”), to, among other things, increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Omnibus Plan, extend the term of the Omnibus Plan to May 24, 2026 and re-approve the material terms of the performance goals under the Omnibus Plan for purposes of the then-effective Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the “awards”) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, cash-based awards and other stock-based awards. The Omnibus Plan authorizes the issuance of up to
Restricted Stock
Under the Omnibus Plan, the Corporation may grant restricted stock to plan participants, subject to forfeiture upon the occurrence of certain events until the dates specified in the participant’s award agreement. While the restricted stock is subject to forfeiture and does not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights, restricted stock participants may exercise full voting rights. The restricted stock granted under the Omnibus Plan is typically subject to a vesting period. During the first six months of 2019, the Corporation awarded to its independent directors
| The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity in the first six months of 2019 under the Omnibus Plan: | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six-Month Period Ended | |||
|
| June 30, 2019 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Number of shares |
|
| Weighted-Average |
|
| of restricted |
|
| Grant Date |
|
| stock |
|
| Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested shares outstanding at beginning of year |
| $ | |||
Granted |
|
| |||
Forfeited | ( |
|
| ||
Vested | ( |
|
| ||
Unvested shares outstanding as of June 30, 2019 |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, the Corporation recognized $
During the first six months of 2018, the Corporation awarded
Stock-based compensation accounting guidance requires the Corporation to reverse compensation expense for any awards that are forfeited due to employee or director turnover. Quarterly changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may have a significant effect on stock-based compensation, as the effect of adjusting the rate for all expense amortization is recognized in the period in which the forfeiture estimate is changed. If the actual forfeiture rate is higher than the estimated forfeiture rate, an adjustment is made to increase the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in a decrease in the expense recognized in the financial statements. If the actual forfeiture rate is lower than the estimated forfeiture rate, an adjustment is made to decrease the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in an increase in the expense recognized in the financial statements.
Performance Units
Under the Omnibus Plan, the Corporation may award performance units to Omnibus Plan participants. During the first six months of 2019, the Corporation granted
During the first six months of 2018, the Corporation awarded
The fair value of the performance units awarded during the first six months of 2019 and 2018 was based on the market price of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock on the date of the grant. For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, the Corporation recognized $
Salary stock
Also, effective April 1, 2013, the Corporation’s Board of Directors determined to increase the salary amounts paid to certain executive officers, primarily by paying the increased salary amounts in the form of shares of the Corporation’s common stock issued under the Omnibus Plan, instead of cash. During the first six months of 2018, the Corporation issued
During the first six months of 2019, the Corporation withheld
18
NOTE 5 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment Securities Available for Sale
|
| June 30, 2019 | |||||||||||||||
|
| Amortized cost |
| Noncredit Loss Component of OTTI Recorded in OCI |
|
|
| Fair value |
|
| |||||||
|
|
| Gross Unrealized |
|
| Weighted- | |||||||||||
|
|
|
| gains |
| losses |
|
| average yield% | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Due within one year | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
agencies obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Due within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
government obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”) certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ginnie Mae (“GNMA”) certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Due within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
issued or guaranteed by the FHLMC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and GNMA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Other mortgage pass-through |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
trust certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total MBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
available for sale | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
| December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||
|
| Amortized cost |
| Noncredit Loss Component of OTTI Recorded in OCI |
| Gross Unrealized |
| Fair value |
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Weighted- | |||||||||||
|
|
|
| gains |
| losses |
|
| average yield% | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Due within one year | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
agencies obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Due within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
government obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
GNMA certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
FNMA certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Due within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| obligations issued or guaranteed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| by the FHLMC and GNMA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
trust certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total MBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| available for sale | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Maturities of MBS are based on the period of final contractual maturity. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options. The weighted-average yield on investment securities available for sale is based on amortized cost and, therefore, does not give effect to changes in fair value. The net unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale and the noncredit loss component of OTTI are presented as part of OCI.
|
| As of June 30, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Less than 12 months |
| 12 months or more |
| Total | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Unrealized |
|
|
| Unrealized |
|
|
| Unrealized | ||||||
|
| Fair Value |
| Losses |
| Fair Value |
| Losses |
| Fair Value |
| Losses | ||||||
| (In thousands) |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Puerto Rico-government obligations | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
| U.S. Treasury and U.S. government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| agenciesʼ obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| MBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| FHLMC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| issued or guaranteed by the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FHLMC and GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Other mortgage pass-through |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| trust certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of December 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Less than 12 months |
| 12 months or more |
| Total | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Unrealized |
|
|
| Unrealized |
|
|
| Unrealized | ||||||
|
| Fair Value |
| Losses |
| Fair Value |
| Losses |
| Fair Value |
| Losses | ||||||
(In thousands) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Puerto Rico-government obligations | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
agenciesʼ obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
MBS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
FHLMC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
issued or guaranteed by the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FHLMC and GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Other mortgage pass-through |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
trust certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
21
Assessment for OTTI
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies, U.S. government-sponsored entities (“GSEs”), and the U.S. Treasury accounted for approximately
The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis;
Any adverse change to the credit conditions and liquidity of the issuer, taking into consideration the latest information available about the financial condition of the issuer, credit ratings, the failure of the issuer to make scheduled principal or interest payments, any recent legislation and government actions affecting the issuer’s industry; and actions taken by the issuer to deal with the present economic climate;
Changes in the near term prospects of the underlying collateral for a security, if any, such as changes in default rates, loss severity given default, and significant changes in prepayment assumptions; and
The level of cash flows generated from the underlying collateral, if any, supporting the principal and interest payments of the debt securities.
OTTI losses on available-for-sale debt securities were recorded in the first six months of 2019 and 2018.
22
The following tables summarize the roll-forward of credit losses on debt securities held by the Corporation for which a portion of an OTTI was also recognized in OCI as of the indicated dates: |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Credit impairments |
|
|
| ||
|
| March 31, |
|
| recognized in earnings on |
| June 30, |
| |||
|
| 2019 |
|
| securities that have been |
| 2019 |
| |||
|
| Balance |
|
| previously impaired |
| Balance |
| |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Private label MBS | $ |
|
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| Credit impairments |
|
|
| ||
|
| December 31, |
| recognized in earnings on |
| June 30, |
| |||
|
| 2018 |
| securities that have been |
| 2019 |
| |||
|
| Balance |
| previously impaired |
| Balance |
| |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Private label MBS | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| Credit impairments |
|
|
| ||
|
| March 31, |
| recognized in earnings |
| June 30, |
| |||
|
| 2018 |
| on securities that have been |
| 2018 |
| |||
|
| Balance |
| previously impaired |
| Balance |
| |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Private label MBS | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| Credit impairments |
|
|
| ||
|
| December 31, |
| recognized in earnings |
| June 30, |
| |||
|
| 2017 |
| on securities that have been |
| 2018 |
| |||
|
| Balance |
| previously impaired |
| Balance |
| |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Private label MBS | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s available-for-sale investment securities portfolio included bonds of the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (“PRHFA”) at an amortized cost of $
The Corporation performed an OTTI assessment on its private label MBS, which are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in the United States.
Based on the expected cash flows, and since the Corporation does not have the intention to sell the securities and has sufficient capital and liquidity to hold these securities until a recovery of the fair value occurs, only the credit loss component, if any, is reflected in earnings. Significant assumptions in the valuation of the private label MBS were as follows:
| As of |
| As of | ||||||
| June 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 | ||||||
| Weighted |
| Range |
| Weighted |
| Range | ||
| Average |
| Minimum | Maximum |
| Average |
| Minimum | Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
| ||||||
Prepayment rate |
|
|
| ||||||
Projected Cumulative Loss Rate |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Investments Held to Maturity
|
| June 30, 2019 | |||||||||||||
|
| Amortized cost |
|
|
|
| Fair value |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| Gross Unrecognized |
|
|
| ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| gains |
| losses |
|
| Weighted- average yield% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Municipal Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| After 1 to 5 years | $ |
|
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| |||||
| After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| held to maturity | $ |
|
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| December 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||
|
| Amortized cost |
|
|
| Fair value |
|
| ||||||
|
|
| Gross Unrecognized |
|
|
| ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
| gains |
| losses |
|
| Weighted- average yield% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Municipal Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| After 1 to 5 years | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| |||||
| After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| held to maturity | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
| As of June 30, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less than 12 months |
| 12 months or more |
| Total | ||||||||||||
|
|
| Unrecognized |
|
|
| Unrecognized |
|
|
| Unrecognized | ||||||
| Fair Value |
| Losses |
| Fair Value |
| Losses |
| Fair Value |
| Losses | ||||||
|
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Municipal Bonds | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of December 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less than 12 months |
| 12 months or more |
| Total | ||||||||||||
|
|
| Unrecognized |
|
|
| Unrecognized |
|
|
| Unrecognized | ||||||
| Fair Value |
| Losses |
| Fair Value |
| Losses |
| Fair Value |
| Losses | ||||||
|
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Municipal Bonds | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation determines the fair market value of Puerto Rico Municipal Bonds based on a discounted cash flow analysis using risk-adjusted discount rates. A security with similar characteristics traded in the open market is used as a proxy for each municipal bond. Then, the cash flow is discounted at the average spread over the discount curve exhibited by the proxy security at the end of each quarter, plus any corresponding discount rate adjustments to reflect recent transactions or market yield expectations for these type of transactions.
All of the Puerto Rico Municipal Bonds were performing and current as to scheduled contractual payments as of June 30, 2019. Approximately
During the second quarter of 2019, the PROMESA oversight board announced the designation of the Puerto Rico’s 78 municipalities as covered instrumentalities under PROMESA. Meanwhile, the latest fiscal plan certified by the PROMESA oversight board did not contemplate a restructuring of the debt of Puerto Rico’s municipalities, but the plan did call for the gradual elimination of budgetary subsidies provided to municipalities by the central government. Furthermore, municipalities are also likely to be affected by the negative economic and other effects resulting from expense, revenue or cash management measures taken by the Puerto Rico government to address its fiscal and liquidity shortfalls, or measures included in fiscal plans of other government entities, such as the fiscal plans of the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (“GDB”) and the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”). Given the uncertain effect that the negative fiscal situation of the Puerto Rico central government and the measures taken, or to be taken, by other government entities may have on municipalities, the Corporation cannot be certain whether future impairment charges relating to these securities will be required.
From time to time, the Corporation has securities held to maturity with an original maturity of three months or less that are considered cash and cash equivalents and are classified as money market investments in the consolidated statements of financial condition. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Corporation had no outstanding securities held to maturity that were classified as cash and cash equivalents.
26
NOTE 6 – EQUITY SECURITIES
Institutions that are members of the FHLB system are required to maintain a minimum investment in FHLB stock. Such minimum investment is calculated as a percentage of aggregate outstanding mortgages, and the FHLB requires an additional investment that is calculated as a percentage of total FHLB advances, letters of credit, and the collateralized portion of outstanding interest-rate swaps. The stock is capital stock issued at $
As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Corporation had investments in FHLB stock with a book value of $
The FHLB of New York issued the shares of FHLB stock owned by the Corporation. The FHLB of New York is part of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, a national wholesale banking network of 11 regional, stockholder-owned congressionally chartered banks. The FHLBs are all privately capitalized and operated by their member stockholders. The system is supervised by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which is intended to ensure that the FHLBs operate in a financially safe and sound manner, remain adequately capitalized and able to raise funds in the capital markets, and carry out their housing finance mission.
As of each of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Corporation has equity securities with a readily determinable fair value of approximately $
NOTE 7 – LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT
|
| As of June 30, |
| As of December 31, | ||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
(In thousands) |
| |||||
Residential mortgage loans, mainly secured by first mortgages | $ |
| $ | |||
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Construction loans |
|
|
| |||
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
| |||
Commercial and Industrial loans (1) |
|
|
| |||
Total commercial loans |
|
|
| |||
Finance leases |
|
|
| |||
Consumer loans |
|
|
| |||
Loans held for investment |
|
|
| |||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Loans held for investment, net | $ |
| $ |
(1)
27
Loans held for investment on which accrual of interest income had been discontinued were as follows: | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of |
| As of | ||
| June 30, |
| December 31, | |||
(In thousands) | 2019 |
| 2018 | |||
Nonaccrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Residential mortgage | $ |
| $ | ||
| Commercial mortgage |
|
|
| ||
| Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
| ||
| Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Land |
|
|
| ||
| Construction-residential |
|
|
| ||
| Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Auto loans |
|
|
| ||
| Finance leases |
|
|
| ||
| Other consumer loans |
|
|
| ||
Total nonaccrual loans held for investment (1)(2)(3) | $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
(2)
(3)
28
The Corporation’s aging of the loans held for investment portfolio is as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| 30-59 Days Past Due |
| 60-89 Days Past Due |
| 90 days or more Past Due (1)(2)(3) |
| Total Past Due |
|
|
|
| Total loans held for investment |
| 90 days past due and still accruing (1)(2)(3) | |||||||||
As of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| Current |
|
| |||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA government-guaranteed loans (2) (3) (4) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Other residential mortgage loans (2)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial mortgage loans (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Other consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total loans held for investment | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
As of December 31, 2018 | 30-59 Days Past Due |
| 60-89 Days Past Due |
| 90 days or more Past Due (1)(2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total loans held for investment |
| 90 days past due and still accruing (1)(2)(3) | |||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
| Total Past Due |
|
| Purchased Credit- Impaired Loans |
|
| Current |
|
| ||||||||||
Residential mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA government-guaranteed loans (2) (3) (4) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Other residential mortgage loans (2)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial mortgage loans (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-commercial (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-residential (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Other consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total loans held for investment | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
|
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
29
The Corporation’s commercial and construction loans credit quality indicators as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are summarized below: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial Credit Exposure - Credit Risk Profile Based on Creditworthiness Category: | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Substandard |
| Doubtful |
| Loss |
| Total Criticized Asset (1) |
| Total Portfolio | |||||
June 30, 2019 | Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Construction - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Construction - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial Credit Exposure - Credit Risk Profile Based on Creditworthiness Category: | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Substandard |
| Doubtful |
| Loss |
| Total Criticized Asset (1) |
| Total Portfolio | |||||
December 31, 2018 | Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Construction - commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Construction - residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
The Corporation considers a loan as a criticized asset if its risk rating is Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. These categories are defined as follows:
Special Mention – A Special Mention asset has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Corporation’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose the Corporation sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.
Substandard – A Substandard asset is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful – Doubtful classifications have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable on the basis of currently known facts, conditions and values. A Doubtful classification may be appropriate in cases where significant risk exposures are perceived, but loss cannot be determined because of specific reasonable pending factors, which may strengthen the credit in the near term.
Loss – Assets classified Loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this asset even though partial recovery may occur in the future. There is little or no prospect for near term improvement and no realistic strengthening action of significance pending.
The Corporation periodically reviews its loan classifications to evaluate if they are properly classified, and to determine impairment, if any. The frequency of these reviews will depend on the amount of the aggregate outstanding debt, and the risk rating classification of the obligor. In addition, during the renewal and annual review process of applicable credit facilities, the Corporation evaluates the corresponding loan grades.
30
The Corporation has a Loan Review Group that reports directly to the Corporation’s Risk Management Committee and administratively to the Chief Risk Officer, which performs annual comprehensive credit process reviews of the Bank’s commercial portfolios. This group evaluates the credit risk profile of portfolios, including the assessment of the risk rating representative of the current credit quality of the loans, and the evaluation of collateral documentation. The monitoring performed by this group contributes to the assessment of compliance with credit policies and underwriting standards, the determination of the current level of credit risk, the evaluation of the effectiveness of the credit management process and the identification of any deficiency that may arise in the credit-granting process. Based on its findings, the Loan Review Group recommends corrective actions, if necessary, that help in maintaining a sound credit process. The Loan Review Group reports the results of the credit process reviews to the Risk Management Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors.
|
| Consumer Credit Exposure - Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity | |||||||||||||
|
| Residential Real Estate |
| Consumer | |||||||||||
June 30, 2019 | FHA/VA/ Guaranteed (1) |
| Other residential loans |
| Auto |
| Finance Leases |
| Other Consumer | ||||||
(In thousands) |
|
| |||||||||||||
Performing | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
Purchased Credit-Impaired (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Nonaccrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Consumer Credit Exposure - Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity | |||||||||||||
|
|
| Residential Real Estate |
| Consumer | ||||||||||
December 31, 2018 | FHA/VA/ Guaranteed (1) |
| Other residential loans |
| Auto |
| Finance Leases |
| Other Consumer | ||||||
(In thousands) |
|
| |||||||||||||
Performing | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
Purchased Credit-Impaired (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Nonaccrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
(2)
31
Impaired Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Impaired Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Impaired Loans - With a Related Specific Allowance |
| With No Related Specific Allowance |
| Impaired Loans Total | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Recorded Investment (1) |
| Unpaid Principal Balance |
| Related Specific Allowance |
| Recorded Investment (1) |
| Unpaid Principal Balance |
| Recorded Investment (1) |
| Unpaid Principal Balance |
| Related Specific Allowance | ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA-Guaranteed loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Other residential mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Other consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Impaired Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Impaired Loans - With a Related Specific Allowance |
| With No Related Specific Allowance |
| Impaired Loans Total | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Recorded Investment (1) |
| Unpaid Principal Balance |
| Related Specific Allowance |
| Recorded Investment (1) |
| Unpaid Principal Balance |
| Recorded Investment (1) |
| Unpaid Principal Balance |
| Related Specific Allowance | ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA-Guaranteed loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Other residential mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Other consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | 53,976 | |||||||
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable. |
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Recorded Investment (1) |
| Interest Income on Accrual Basis |
| Interest Income on Cash Basis |
| Total Interest Income | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA-Guaranteed loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Other residential mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Recorded Investment (1) |
| Interest Income on Accrual Basis |
| Interest Income on Cash Basis |
| Total Interest Income | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA-Guaranteed loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Other residential mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable. |
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Recorded Investment (1) |
| Interest Income on Accrual Basis |
| Interest Income on Cash Basis |
| Total Interest Income | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-month Period Ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA-Guaranteed loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Other residential mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Recorded Investment (1) |
| Interest Income on Accrual Basis |
| Interest Income on Cash Basis |
| Total Interest Income | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA-Guaranteed loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Other residential mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
(1) Excludes accrued interest receivable. |
34
The following tables show the activity for impaired loans for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018: | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||
|
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Impaired Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
Loans determined impaired during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Charge-offs (1) |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Loans sold, net of charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | |||||
Increases to existing impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Foreclosures |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Loans no longer considered impaired |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Loans transferred to held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | |||||
Paid in full, partial payments and other |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Balance at end of period |
|
|
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
35
PCI Loans
The Corporation acquired PCI loans accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30, “Receivables – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC Topic 310-30”), as part of a transaction that closed on February 27, 2015 in which FirstBank acquired
Under ASC Topic 310-30, the acquired PCI loans were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics (i.e., delinquency status and loan terms). Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Since the loans are accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30, they are not considered nonaccrual and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. The Corporation recognizes additional losses on this portfolio when it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all cash flows expected as of the acquisition date.
The carrying amounts of PCI loans were as follows: | ||||||
|
| As of | ||||
| June 30, |
| December 31, | |||
| 2019 |
| 2018 | |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential mortgage loans | $ |
| $ | |||
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
| |||
Total PCI loans | $ |
| $ | |||
Allowance for loan losses |
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Total PCI loans, net of allowance for loan losses | $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present PCI loans by past due status as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As of June 30, 2019 | 30-59 Days |
| 60-89 Days |
| 90 days or more |
| Total Past Due |
|
|
|
| Total PCI loans |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Current |
|
| |||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As of December 31, 2018 | 30-59 Days |
| 60-89 Days |
| 90 days or more |
| Total Past Due |
|
|
|
| Total PCI loans |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Current |
|
| |||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| $ |
|
(1)
36
Initial Fair Value and Accretable Yield of PCI Loans
At acquisition of PCI loans, the Corporation estimated the cash flows the Corporation expected to collect on the loans. Under the accounting guidance for PCI loans, the difference between the contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the non-accretable difference. This difference is neither accreted into income nor recorded on the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition. The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loans, using the effective-yield method.
Changes in Accretable Yield of Acquired Loans
Subsequent to the acquisition of loans, the Corporation is required to periodically evaluate its estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. These evaluations, performed quarterly, require the continued use of key assumptions and estimates, similar to the initial estimate of fair value. Subsequent changes in the estimated cash flows expected to be collected may result in changes in the accretable yield and non-accretable difference or reclassifications from non-accretable yield to accretable yield. Increases in the cash flows expected to be collected will generally result in an increase in interest income over the remaining life of the loan or pool of loans. Decreases in expected cash flows due to further credit deterioration will generally result in an impairment charge recognized in the Corporation’s provision for loan and lease losses, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan and lease losses. As of each June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the reserve related to PCI loans amounted to $
Changes in the accretable yield of PCI loans for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Accretion recognized in earnings |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Balance at end of period | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the carrying amount of PCI loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30 were as follows: | |||||||||||||
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
|
|
| June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 |
| June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at beginning of period | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
Accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Collections |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Foreclosures |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Ending balance, net of allowance for loan losses | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the allowance for loan losses related to PCI loans were as follows: | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
|
|
| June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 |
| June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Balance at the end of period |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
38
Purchases and Sales of Loans
During the first six months of 2019, the Corporation purchased $
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation sells residential mortgage loans (originated or purchased) to GNMA and GSEs such as FNMA and FHLMC, which generally securitize the transferred loans into MBS for sale into the secondary market. During the first six months of 2019, the Corporation sold $
For loans sold to GNMA, the Corporation holds an option to repurchase individual delinquent loans issued on or after January 1, 2003 when the borrower fails to make any payment for three consecutive months. This option gives the Corporation the ability, but not the obligation, to repurchase the delinquent loans at par without prior authorization from GNMA.
Under ASC Topic 860, “Transfer and Servicing,” once the Corporation has the unilateral ability to repurchase the delinquent loan, it is considered to have regained effective control over the loan and is required to recognize the loan and a corresponding repurchase liability on the balance sheet regardless of the Corporation’s intent to repurchase the loan. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, rebooked GNMA delinquent loans included in the residential mortgage loan portfolio amounted to $
During the first six months of 2019 and 2018, the Corporation repurchased, pursuant to its repurchase option with GNMA, $
Loan sales to FNMA and FHLMC are without recourse in relation to the future performance of the loans. The Corporation repurchased at par loans previously sold to FNMA and FHLMC in the amount of $
In addition, during the first six months of 2019, the Corporation sold $
During the first six months of 2018, the Corporation purchased a $
million, a $
39
Loan Portfolio Concentration
The Corporation’s primary lending area is Puerto Rico. The Corporation’s banking subsidiary, FirstBank, also lends in the USVI and BVI markets and in the United States (principally in the state of Florida). Of the total gross loans held for investment of $
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $
In addition, as of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $
The Corporation also has credit exposure to USVI government entities. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $
The Corporation cannot predict at this time the ultimate effect that the current fiscal situation and political environment of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the uncertainty about the ultimate outcomes of the debt restructuring process, the various legislative and other measures adopted and to be adopted by the Puerto Rico government and the PROMESA oversight board in response to such fiscal situation, and the uncertainty about the timing of the receipt of disaster relief funds, will have on the Puerto Rico economy, the Corporation’s clients, and the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss mitigation program in Puerto Rico that is similar to the U.S. government’s Home Affordable Modification Program guidelines. Depending upon the nature of borrowers’ financial condition, restructurings or loan modifications through this program, as well as other restructurings of individual commercial, commercial mortgage, construction, and residential mortgage loans, fit the definition of a TDR. A restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include, among others, the extension of the maturity of the loan and modifications of the loan rate. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s total TDR loans held for investment of $
40
The Corporation’s loss mitigation programs for residential mortgage and consumer loans can provide for one or a combination of the following: movement of interest past due to the end of the loan, extension of the loan term, deferral of principal payments and reduction of interest rates either permanently or for a period of up to six years (increasing back in step-up rates). Additionally, in certain cases, the restructuring may provide for the forgiveness of contractually-due principal or interest. Uncollected interest is added to the end of the loan term at the time of the restructuring and not recognized as income until collected or when the loan is paid off. These programs are available only to those borrowers who have defaulted, or are likely to default, permanently on their loans and would lose their homes in a foreclosure action absent some lender concession. Nevertheless, if the Corporation is not reasonably assured that the borrower will comply with its contractual commitment, properties are foreclosed.
Prior to permanently modifying a loan, the Corporation may enter into trial modifications with certain borrowers. Trial modifications generally represent a period during which the borrower makes monthly payments under the anticipated modified payment terms prior to a formal modification. Upon successful completion of a trial modification, the Corporation and the borrower enter into a permanent modification. TDR loans that are participating in or that have been offered a binding trial modification are classified as TDRs when the trial offer is made and continue to be classified as TDRs regardless of whether the borrower enters into a permanent modification. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation classified an additional $
For the commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and construction loan portfolios, at the time of a restructuring, the Corporation determines, on a loan-by-loan basis, whether a concession was granted for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulty. Concessions granted for loans in these portfolios could include: reductions in interest rates to rates that are considered below market; extension of repayment schedules and maturity dates beyond original contractual terms; waivers of borrower covenants; forgiveness of principal or interest; or other contractual changes that are considered to be concessions. The Corporation mitigates loan defaults for these loan portfolios through its collection function. The function’s objective is to minimize both early stage delinquencies and losses upon default of loans in these portfolios. In the case of the commercial and industrial, commercial mortgage, and construction loan portfolios, the Corporation’s Special Asset Group (“SAG”) focuses on strategies for the accelerated reduction of non-performing assets through note sales, short sales, loss mitigation programs, and sales of OREO.
In addition, the Corporation extends, renews, and restructures loans with satisfactory credit profiles. Many commercial loan facilities are structured as lines of credit, which generally have one-year terms and, therefore, are required to be renewed annually. Other facilities may be restructured or extended from time to time based upon changes in the borrower’s business needs, use of funds, and timing of completion of projects, and other factors. If the borrower is not deemed to have financial difficulties, extensions, renewals, and restructurings are done in the normal course of business and not considered concessions, and the loans continue to be recorded as performing.
41
Selected information on all of the Corporation's TDR loans held for investment based on the recorded investment by loan class and modification type is summarized in the following tables. This information reflects all of the Corporation's TDRs held for investment: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| As of June 30, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate below market |
| Maturity or term extension |
| Combination of reduction in interest rate and extension of maturity |
| Forgiveness of principal and/or interest |
| Forbearance Agreement |
| Other (1) |
| Total | ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Non - FHA/VA residential mortgage loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Commercial Mortgage loans (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
(1)
(2)
|
| As of December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate below market |
| Maturity or term extension |
| Combination of reduction in interest rate and extension of maturity |
| Forgiveness of principal and/or interest |
| Forbearance Agreement |
| Other (1) |
| Total | ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Non - FHA/VA residential mortgage loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Commercial Mortgage loans (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Commercial and Industrial loans (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
(1)
(2)
(3)
42
| The following table presents the Corporation's TDR loans held for investment activity: | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Beginning balance of TDRs |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ | ||||||
New TDRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Increases to existing TDRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Charge-offs post modification (1) |
|
| ( |
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
| ( | ||
Foreclosures |
|
| ( |
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
| ( | ||
TDRs transferred to held for sale, net of charge-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | |||||
Paid-off, partial payments and other |
|
| ( |
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
| ( | ||
Ending balance of TDRs |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
(1)
43
The following tables provide a breakdown of the TDR loans held for investment by those in accrual and nonaccrual status: |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of June 30, 2019 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accrual |
| Nonaccrual (1) |
| Total TDRs | |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Commercial mortgage loans (2) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Land |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
| |||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
| |||||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings | $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
(2)
| As of December 31, 2018 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accrual |
| Nonaccrual (1) |
| Total TDRs | |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Commercial mortgage loans (2) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commercial and Industrial loans (3) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Land |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-commercial |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Construction-residential |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings | $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
(2)
(3)
44
TDR loans exclude restructured residential mortgage loans that are government-guaranteed (e.g., FHA/VA loans) totaling $
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2019 | ||||||
| Number of contracts |
| Pre-modification Outstanding Recorded Investment |
| Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment | ||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage loans |
| $ |
| $ | |||
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
| |||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
| |||
Construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
| |||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
| |||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
| |||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
| |||
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings |
| $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 | ||||||
| Number of contracts |
| Pre-modification Outstanding Recorded Investment |
| Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment | ||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage loans |
| $ |
| $ | |||
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
| |||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
| |||
Construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
| |||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
| |||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
| |||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
| |||
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings |
| $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2018 | ||||||
| Number of contracts |
| Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment |
| Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment | ||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage loans |
| $ |
| $ | |||
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
| |||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
| |||
Construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
| |||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
| |||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
| |||
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings |
| $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018 | ||||||
| Number of contracts |
| Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment |
| Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment | ||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage loans |
| $ |
| $ | |||
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
| |||
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
|
| |||
Construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
|
| |||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
| |||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
| |||
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings |
| $ |
| $ | |||
| |||||||
|
46
Recidivism, or the borrower defaulting on its obligation pursuant to a modified loan, results in the loan once again becoming a nonaccrual loan. Recidivism on a modified loan occurs at a notably higher rate than do defaults on new origination loans, so modified loans present a higher risk of loss than do new origination loans. The Corporation considers a loan to have defaulted if the borrower has failed to make payments of either principal, interest, or both for a period of
| Quarter Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||||
| Number of contracts |
| Recorded Investment |
| Number of contracts |
| Recorded Investment | ||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage loans |
| $ |
|
| $ | ||||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||||
| Number of contracts |
| Recorded Investment |
| Number of contracts |
| Recorded Investment | ||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-FHA/VA residential mortgage loans |
| $ |
|
| $ | ||||
Consumer loans - Auto |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Consumer loans - Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Finance leases |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
| $ |
|
| $ |
47
For certain TDR loans, the Corporation splits the loans into two new notes, A and B notes. The A note is restructured to comply with the Corporation’s lending standards at current market rates, and is tailored to suit the customer’s ability to make timely interest and principal payments. The B note includes the granting of the concession to the borrower and varies by situation. The B note is fully charged off but the obligation is not forgiven to the borrower, and payments collected are accounted for as recoveries of previous charged-off amounts. A partial charge-off may be recorded if the B note is collateral dependent and the source of repayment is independent of Note A. At the time of the restructuring, the A note is identified and classified as a TDR loan. If the loan performs for at least six months according to the modified terms, the A note may be returned to accrual status. The borrower’s payment performance prior to the restructuring is included in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of the restructuring. In the periods following the calendar year in which a loan is restructured, the A note may no longer be reported as a TDR loan if it is in accrual status, is in compliance with its modified terms, and yields a market rate (as determined and documented at the time of the restructuring).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(In thousands) | June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 | |||
Beginning balance | $ |
| $ | |||
New TDR loan splits |
|
|
| |||
Paid-off and partial payments |
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Ending balance | $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 | |||
Allowance for loan losses at the beginning of the year | $ |
| $ | |||
Charges to the provision for loan losses |
|
|
| |||
Net charge-offs |
|
|
| ( | ||
Allowance for loan losses at the end of the year | $ |
| $ |
48
The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Residential Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial & Industrial Loans |
| Construction Loans |
| Consumer Loans |
| Total | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Quarter ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allowance for loan and lease losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Beginning balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Charge-offs |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Provision (release) |
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| |||||
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: specific reserve for impaired loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: PCI loans (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: general allowance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: impaired loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: PCI loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: loans with general allowance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Residential Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial & Industrial Loans |
| Construction Loans |
| Consumer Loans |
| Total | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Allowance for loan and lease losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Beginning balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Charge-offs |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Provision (release) |
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| |||||
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: specific reserve for impaired loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: PCI loans (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: general allowance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: impaired loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: PCI loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: loans with general allowance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
49
| Residential Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial & Industrial Loans |
| Construction Loans |
| Consumer Loans |
| Total | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Quarter ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allowance for loan and lease losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Beginning balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Charge-offs |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: specific reserve for impaired loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: PCI loans (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: general allowance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: impaired loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: PCI loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: loans with general allowance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Residential Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial & Industrial Loans |
| Construction Loans |
| Consumer Loans |
| Total | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allowance for loan and lease losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Beginning balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Charge-offs (2) |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Provision (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: specific reserve for impaired loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: PCI loans (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: general allowance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: impaired loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: PCI loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Ending balance: loans with general allowance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
(2)
50
The tables below present the allowance for loan and lease losses and the carrying value of loans by portfolio segment as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018: |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
As of June 30, 2019 | Residential Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial and Industrial Loans |
|
|
| Consumer Loans |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| Construction Loans |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
| |||||||||||
Impaired loans without specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||
Impaired loans with specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
|
| % | ||||||
PCI loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value of PCI loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||
Allowance for PCI loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for PCI loans to carrying value |
| % |
| % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Loans with general allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
|
| % |
| % | ||||||
Total loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance (1) |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
|
| % |
| % | ||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
As of December 31, 2018 | Residential Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial and Industrial Loans |
|
|
| Consumer Loans |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| Construction Loans |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans without specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCI loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value of PCI loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
Allowance for PCI loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for PCI loans to carrying value |
| % |
| % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans with general allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance (1) |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
51
NOTE 9 – LOANS HELD FOR SALE
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| June 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| ||
(In thousands) |
|
| |||||
Residential mortgage loans | $ |
| $ |
| |||
Construction loans |
|
|
|
| |||
Commercial and Industrial loans (1) |
|
|
|
| |||
Commercial mortgage loans (1) |
|
|
|
| |||
Total | $ |
| $ |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
The following table presents OREO inventory as of the dates indicated: | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, |
|
| December 31, | |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | |||
(In thousands) |
|
| ||||
OREO |
|
|
|
|
| |
OREO balances, carrying value: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential (1) | $ |
| $ | |||
Commercial |
|
|
| |||
Construction |
|
|
| |||
Total | $ |
| $ |
(1)
52
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases is as follows: | |||
|
| As of | |
|
| June 30, | |
|
| 2019 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Operating lease ROU asset | $ | ||
Operating lease liability | $ | ||
Operating lease weighted-average remaining lease term (in years) |
| ||
Operating lease weighted-average discount rate |
| ||
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases is as follows: | |||
|
| Six-months period ended | |
|
| June 30, | |
|
| 2019 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow from operating leases (1) | $ | ||
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities (2) |
|
(1)
(2)
Maturities under lease liabilities as of June 30, 2019, were as follows: | ||
|
|
|
| Amount | |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
2019 | $ | |
2020 |
| |
2021 |
| |
2022 |
| |
2023 |
| |
2024 and later years |
| |
Total lease payments |
| |
Less: imputed interest |
| ( |
Total present value of lease liability | $ |
53
NOTE 12 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
One of the market risks facing the Corporation is interest rate risk, which includes the risk that changes in interest rates will result in changes in the value of the Corporation’s assets or liabilities and will adversely affect the Corporation’s net interest income from its loan and investment portfolios. The overall objective of the Corporation’s interest rate risk management activities is to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes in interest rates.
The Corporation designates a derivative as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or economic undesignated hedge when it enters into the derivative contract. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, all derivatives held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges. These undesignated hedges are recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or loss recognized in current earnings.
The following summarizes the principal derivative activities used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate cap agreements - Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value of the interest rate cap increases as the reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements for protection from rising interest rates.
Forward Contracts - Forward contracts are primarily sales of to-be-announced (“TBA”) MBS that will settle over the standard delivery date and do not qualify as “regular way” security trades. Regular-way security trades are contracts that have no net settlement provision and no market mechanism to facilitate net settlement and that provide for delivery of a security within the time frame generally established by regulations or conventions in the market place or exchange in which the transaction is being executed. The forward sales are considered derivative instruments that need to be marked to market. The Corporation uses these securities to economically hedge the FHA/VA residential mortgage loan securitizations of the mortgage-banking operations. The Corporation also reports as forward contracts the mandatory mortgage loan sales commitments that it enters into with GSEs that require or permit net settlement via a pair-off transaction or the payment of a pair-off fee. Unrealized gains (losses) are recognized as part of Mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statement of income.
Interest Rate Lock Commitments – Interest rate lock commitments are agreements under which the Corporation agrees to extend credit to a borrower under certain specified terms and conditions in which the interest rate and the maximum amount of the loan are set prior to funding. Under the agreement, the Corporation commits to lend funds to a potential borrower, generally on a fixed rate basis, regardless of whether interest rates change in the market.
To satisfy the needs of its customers, the Corporation may enter into non-hedging transactions. In these transactions, the Corporation generally participates as a buyer in one of the agreements and as a seller in the other agreement under the same terms and conditions.
In addition, the Corporation enters into certain contracts with embedded derivatives that do not require separate accounting as these are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract. When the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and designated as a trading or non-hedging derivative instrument.
54
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of all derivative instruments: |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notional Amounts (1) | ||||
|
| As of |
| As of | ||
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
(In thousands) |
| |||||
Undesignated economic hedges: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Written interest rate cap agreements | $ |
| $ | |||
Purchased interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
| |||
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
|
| |||
Forward Contracts: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Sale of TBA GNMA MBS pools |
|
|
| |||
Forward loan sales commitments |
|
|
| |||
| $ |
| $ |
(1)
55
The following table summarizes for derivative instruments their fair values and location in the consolidated statements of financial condition: | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Asset Derivatives |
| Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||||
| Statement of |
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
|
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||||
| Financial |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
| Condition Location |
| Fair Value |
| Fair Value |
| Statement of Financial Condition Location |
| Fair Value |
| Fair Value | ||||
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undesignated economic hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written interest rate cap agreements | Other assets |
| $ |
| $ |
| Accounts payable and other liabilities |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Purchased interest rate cap agreements | Other assets |
|
|
|
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate lock commitments | Other assets |
|
|
|
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of TBA GNMA MBS pools | Other assets |
|
|
|
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
| ||||
Forward loan sales commitments | Other assets |
|
|
|
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| $ |
| $ |
|
|
| $ |
| $ |
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of income: | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Loss) or Gain |
| (Loss) or Gain | ||||||||
| Location of Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
| Recognized in Statement |
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||
| of Income on Derivatives |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||
UNDESIGNATED ECONOMIC HEDGES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements | Interest income - Loans |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ | |||
Interest rate lock commitments | Mortgage Banking Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Forward contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of TBA GNMA MBS pools | Mortgage Banking Activities |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Forward loan sales commitments | Mortgage Banking Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total (loss) gain on derivatives |
|
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
Derivative instruments are subject to market risk. As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve, and the level of interest rates, as well as the expectations for rates in the future.
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had not entered into any derivative instrument containing credit-risk-related contingent features.
56
NOTE 13 – OFFSETTING OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Corporation enters into master agreements with counterparties, primarily related to derivatives and repurchase agreements, that may allow for netting of exposures in the event of default. In an event of default, each party has a right of set-off against the other party for amounts owed under the related agreement and any other amount or obligation owed with respect to any other agreement or transaction between them. The following tables present information about the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities as well as derivative assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets |
| Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| Financial Instruments |
| Cash Collateral |
|
| |||||||||
As of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
| Net Amount | |||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
| |||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ | |||||
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets |
| Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| Financial Instruments |
| Cash Collateral |
|
| |||||||||
As of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
| Net Amount | |||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
| |||||||||||||||
Derivatives | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ | |||||
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities |
| Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| Financial Instruments |
| Cash Collateral |
|
| |||||||||
As of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
| Net Amount | |||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
| |||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities |
| Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| Financial Instruments |
| Cash Collateral |
|
| |||||||||
As of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
| Net Amount | |||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
| |||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
NOTE 14 – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
Goodwill as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 amounted to $
There have been no significant events related to the Florida reporting unit that could indicate potential goodwill impairment since the date of the last evaluation; therefore, no goodwill impairment evaluation was performed during the first six months of 2019. Goodwill and other indefinite life intangibles are reviewed at least annually for impairment.
In connection with the acquisition of the FirstBank-branded credit card loan portfolio, in the second quarter of 2012, the Corporation recognized a purchased credit card relationship intangible of $
The core deposit intangible of $
In the first quarter of 2016, FirstBank Insurance Agency acquired certain insurance customer accounts and related customer records and recognized an insurance customer relationship intangible of $
59
|
| As of |
| As of | ||
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Core deposit intangible: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Gross amount | $ |
| $ | |||
Accumulated amortization (1) |
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Net carrying amount | $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining amortization period (in years) |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationship intangible: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Gross amount | $ |
| $ | |||
Accumulated amortization (2) |
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Net carrying amount | $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining amortization period (in years) |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance customer relationship intangible: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Gross amount | $ |
| $ | |||
Accumulated amortization (3) |
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Net carrying amount | $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining amortization period (in years) |
|
|
|
(1)
(2)
(3)
The estimated aggregate annual amortization expense related to the intangible assets for future periods is as follows: | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Amount |
|
|
|
| (In thousands) |
|
| 2019 | $ |
| |
| 2020 |
|
| |
| 2021 |
|
| |
| 2022 |
|
| |
| 2023 |
|
| |
| 2024 and after |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
60
NOTE 15 – NON CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (“VIE”) AND SERVICING ASSETS
The Corporation transfers residential mortgage loans in sale or securitization transactions in which it has continuing involvement, including servicing responsibilities and guarantee arrangements. All such transfers have been accounted for as sales as required by applicable accounting guidance.
When evaluating the need to consolidate counterparties to which the Corporation has transferred assets, or with which the Corporation has entered into other transactions, the Corporation first determines if the counterparty is an entity for which a variable interest exists. If no scope exception is applicable and a variable interest exists, the Corporation then evaluates if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE and whether the entity should be consolidated or not.
Below is a summary of transactions with VIEs for which the Corporation has retained some level of continuing involvement:
GNMA
The Corporation typically transfers first lien residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA securitization transactions in which the loans are exchanged for cash or securities that are readily redeemed for cash proceeds and servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the issuer and, under seller/servicer agreements, the Corporation is required to service the loans in accordance with the issuers’ servicing guidelines and standards. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation serviced loans securitized through GNMA with a principal balance of $
Trust-Preferred Securities
In 2004, FBP Statutory Trust I, a financing trust that is wholly owned by the Corporation, sold to institutional investors $
During the first quarter of 2018, the Corporation completed the repurchase of $
The Collins Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act eliminated certain TRuPs from Tier 1 Capital; however, these instruments may remain in Tier 2 capital until the instruments are redeemed or mature. Under the indentures, the Corporation has the right, from time to time, and without causing an event of default, to defer payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures by extending the interest payment period at any time and from time to time during the term of the subordinated debentures for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. During the second quarter of 2016, the Corporation, having received approval from the Federal Reserve, paid $
61
Grantor Trusts
During 2004 and 2005, an unaffiliated party, referred to in this subsection as the seller, established a series of statutory trusts to effect the securitization of mortgage loans and the sale of trust certificates (the “Grantor Trusts”). The seller initially provided the servicing for a fee, which is senior to the obligations to pay trust certificate holders. The seller then entered into a sales agreement through which it sold and issued the trust certificates in favor of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary. Currently, the Bank is the sole owner of the trust certificates; the servicing of the underlying residential mortgages that generate the principal and interest cash flows is performed by another third party, which receives a servicing fee. The trust certificates are variable-rate securities indexed to
Investment in unconsolidated entity
On February 16, 2011, FirstBank sold an asset portfolio consisting of performing and nonaccrual construction, commercial mortgage and commercial and industrial loans with an aggregate book value of $
CPG/GS has used cash proceeds on the loan to cover operating expenses and debt service payments, including those related to the refinanced loan described above, which must be substantially repaid before proceeds can be used for other purposes, including the return of capital to both PRLP and FirstBank. FirstBank will not receive any return on its equity interest until PRLP receives an aggregate amount equivalent to its initial investment and a priority return of at least
The Bank has determined that CPG/GS is a VIE in which the Bank is not the primary beneficiary. In determining the primary beneficiary of CPG/GS, the Bank considered applicable guidance that requires the Bank to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary (or consolidator) of CPG/GS based on whether it has both the power to direct the activities of CPG/GS that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, CPG/GS that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Bank determined that it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of CPG/GS as it does not have the right to manage or influence the loan portfolio, foreclosure proceedings, or the construction and sale of the property; therefore, the Bank concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of CPG/GS.
Servicing Assets
The Corporation sells residential mortgage loans to GNMA, which generally securitizes the transferred loans into MBS. Also, certain conventional conforming loans are sold to FNMA or FHLMC with servicing retained. The Corporation recognizes as separate assets the rights to service loans for others, whether those servicing assets are originated or purchased. Servicing assets are included as part of Other assets in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
The changes in servicing assets are shown below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |||||
|
|
|
62
Balance at beginning of period | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| |||||
Capitalization of servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Amortization |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
| |
Temporary impairment recoveries (charges), net |
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
| ||||
Other (1) |
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
| |||
Balance at end of period | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Amount represents adjustments related to the repurchase of loans serviced for others. |
|
Changes in the impairment allowance were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended |
| ||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
| |||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||
Temporary impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
OTTI of servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
| |||
Recoveries |
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
| |
Balance at end of period | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||
|
|
The components of net servicing income are shown below: |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||||
Servicing fees | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| |||||
Late charges and prepayment penalties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Adjustment for loans repurchased |
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
| |||
Other |
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
| ||||
Servicing income, gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Amortization and impairment of servicing assets |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
| |
Servicing income, net | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
The Corporation’s servicing assets are subject to prepayment and interest rate risks. Key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value at the time of sale of the related mortgages ranged as follows: | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Maximum |
| Minimum | ||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2019: |
|
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Discount rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018: |
|
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Discount rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | % |
| % | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||
Carrying amount of servicing assets | $ |
| |
Fair value | $ |
| |
Weighted-average expected life (in years) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate (weighted-average annual rate) |
| % | |
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change | $ |
| |
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change | $ |
| |
|
|
|
|
Discount rate (weighted-average annual rate) |
| % | |
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change | $ |
| |
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change | $ |
|
64
The following table summarizes deposit balances as of the dates indicated: | |||||
| June 30, |
|
| December 31, | |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Type of account: |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing checking accounts | $ |
| $ | ||
Savings accounts |
|
|
| ||
Interest-bearing checking accounts |
|
|
| ||
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
| ||
Brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) |
|
|
| ||
Total | $ |
| $ | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs mature as follows: | ||
| June 30, | |
| 2019 | |
(In thousands) |
| |
|
|
|
Three months or less | $ | |
Over three months to six months |
| |
Over six months to one year |
| |
One year to three years |
| |
Three years to five years |
| |
Total | $ | 515,691 |
|
The following were the components of interest expense on deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 | ||
(In thousands) |
|
|
| ||||||||
Interest expense on deposits | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
Accretion of premium from acquisition |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Amortization of broker placement fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total interest expense on deposits | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
65
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) as of the dates indicated consisted of the following: | ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| June 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 | |||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Short-term fixed-rate repurchase agreement (1) | $ |
| $ | |||
Long-term fixed-rate repurchase agreements (2)(3)(4) |
|
|
| |||
|
| $ |
| $ | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Repurchase agreements mature as follows: | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, 2019 | |
|
|
| (In thousands) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| One to three years | $ | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the securities underlying such agreements were delivered to the dealers with which the repurchase agreements were transacted.
Repurchase agreements as of June 30, 2019, grouped by counterparty, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
| Weighted-Average |
|
|
| Counterparty |
| Amount |
| Maturity (In Months) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JP Morgan Chase |
| $ |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
The following is a summary of the advances from the FHLB as of the indicated dates: | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||
| (In thousands) | 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Long-term | $ |
| $ | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Advances from FHLB mature as follows: | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| As of | |
|
| June 30, 2019 | |
| (In thousands) |
|
|
| Over three to six months | $ | |
| Over six months to one year |
| |
| Over one to three years |
| |
| Over three to four years |
| |
| Total | $ | |
|
|
|
|
NOTE 19 – OTHER BORROWINGS
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
|
| (In thousands) | ||||
Floating rate junior subordinated debentures (FBP Statutory Trust I) (1) | $ |
| $ | |||
Floating rate junior subordinated debentures (FBP Statutory Trust II) (2) |
|
|
| |||
| $ |
| $ |
(1)
(2)
67
NOTE 20 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common Stock
As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Corporation had
On May 16, 2019, the Corporation’s Board of Directors, after receiving regulatory approval, declared a quarterly cash dividend of $
Preferred Stock
The Corporation has
Effective January 17, 2012, the Corporation delisted all of its outstanding series of non-convertible, non-cumulative preferred stock from the New York Stock Exchange. The Corporation has not arranged for listing and/or registration on another national securities exchange or for quotation of the Series A through E Preferred Stock in a quotation medium. In December 2016, for the first time since July 2009, the Corporation paid dividends on its non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, after receiving regulatory approval. Since then, the Corporation has continued to pay monthly dividend payments on the non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock. The Corporation has received regulatory approval to pay the monthly dividends on the Corporation’s Series A through E Preferred Stock through December 2019, subject to conditions established in the agreement with regulators. The Corporation intends to request approval in future periods to continue monthly dividend payments on the non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock.
On October 3, 2017, the Federal Reserve terminated the Written Agreement entered into on June 3, 2010 by the Corporation and the Federal Reserve. However, the Corporation has agreed with its regulators to continue to obtain approval before paying dividends, receiving dividends from the Bank, making payments on subordinated debt or TRuPs, incurring or guaranteeing debt or purchasing or redeeming any corporate stock.
Treasury stock
During the first six months of 2019 and 2018, the Corporation withheld an aggregate of
68
FirstBank Statutory Reserve (Legal Surplus)
The Banking Law of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of
NOTE 21 - INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and USVI income taxes, as well as applicable U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp. is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. and USVI income tax purposes and, accordingly, is generally subject to U.S. and USVI income tax only on its income from sources within the U.S. and USVI or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in those jurisdictions. Any such tax paid in the U.S. and USVI is also creditable against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 2011, as amended (the “2011 PR Code”), the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are generally not entitled to file consolidated tax returns and, thus, the Corporation is generally not entitled to utilize losses from one subsidiary to offset gains in another subsidiary. Accordingly, in order to obtain a tax benefit from a net operating loss (“NOL”), a particular subsidiary must be able to demonstrate sufficient taxable income within the applicable NOL carry-forward period. Pursuant to the 2011 PR Code, the carry-forward period for NOLs incurred during taxable years that commenced after December 31, 2004 and ended before January 1, 2013 is 12 years; for NOLs incurred during taxable years commencing after December 31, 2012, the carryover period is 10 years. The 2011 PR Code provides a dividend received deduction of
On December 10, 2018, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law Act 257 (“Act 257”) to amend some of the provisions of the 2011 PR Code, as amended. Act 257 introduced various changes to the income tax regime in the case of individuals and corporations, and the sales and use taxes, which took effect on January 1, 2019, including, among others, (i) a reduction in the Puerto Rico maximum corporate tax rate from 39% to 37.5%; (ii) an increase in the net operating and capital losses usage limitation from 80% to 90%; (iii) amendments to the provisions related to “pass-through” entities that provide that corporations that own 50% or more of a partnership will not be able to claim a current or carryover non partnership NOL deduction against a partnership distributable share, adversely impacting a tax action taken in 2017 for FirstBank Insurance under which the Corporation was previously allowed to offset pass-through income earned by FirstBank Insurance with net operating losses at the holding company level; and (iv) other limitations on certain deductions, such as meals and entertainment deductions.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate, mainly by investing in government obligations and MBS exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business through an International Banking Entity (“IBE”) unit of the Bank, and through the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, whose interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico income taxation. The IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico on the specific activities identified in the IBE Act. An IBE that operates as a unit of a bank pays income taxes at the corporate standard rates to the extent that the IBE’s net income exceeds
For the second quarter and first six months of 2019, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $
69
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2019, the Corporation calculated the provision for income taxes by applying the estimated annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year to ordinary income or loss. In the computation of the consolidated worldwide annual estimated effective tax rate, ASC Topic 740-270, “Income Taxes” (“ASC Topic 740-270”), requires the exclusion of legal entities with pre-tax losses from which a tax benefit cannot be recognized. The Corporation’s estimated annual effective tax rate in the first six months of 2019, excluding entities from which a tax benefit cannot be recognized and discrete items, was
The Corporation’s deferred tax asset amounted to $
The Corporation has U.S. and USVI sourced NOL carryforwards. Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the “Section 382”) limits the ability to utilize U.S. and USVI NOLs for income tax purposes in such jurisdictions following an event that is considered to be an ownership change. Generally, an “ownership change” occurs when certain shareholders increase their aggregate ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage over a three-year testing period. Upon the occurrence of a Section 382 ownership change, the use of NOLs attributable to the period prior to the ownership change is subject to limitations and only a portion of the U.S. and USVI NOLs may be used by the Corporation to offset its annual U.S. and USVI taxable income, if any. In 2017, the Corporation completed a formal ownership change analysis within the meaning of Section 382 covering a comprehensive period, and concluded that an ownership change had occurred during such period. The Section 382 limitation has resulted in higher U.S. and USVI income tax liabilities than we would have incurred in the absence of such limitation. The Corporation has mitigated to an extent the adverse effects associated with the Section 382 limitation as any such tax paid in the U.S. or USVI can be creditable against Puerto Rico tax liabilities or taken as a deduction against taxable income. However, our ability to reduce our Puerto Rico tax liability through such a credit or deduction depends on our tax profile at each annual taxable period, which is dependent on various factors. For the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, the Corporation incurred an income tax expense of approximately $
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation did not have Unrecognized Tax Benefits recorded on its books. The Corporation classifies all interest and penalties, if any, related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The statute of limitations under the 2011 PR Code is four years; the statute of limitations for U.S. and USVI income tax purposes is three years after a tax return is due or filed, whichever is later. The completion of an audit by the taxing authorities or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Corporation’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to the results of operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. For U.S. and USVI income tax purposes, all tax years subsequent to 2014 remain open to examination. For Puerto Rico tax purposes, all tax years subsequent to 2014 remain open to examination.
70
The following table presents changes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss by Component (1) | ||||||||||
| Quarter ended |
| Six-month period | ||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
| |||||||||
Unrealized net holding losses on debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance | $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
Ending balance | $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses on equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ( | |||
Reclassification to retained earnings per ASU 2016-01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Ending balance | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||
______________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) All amounts presented are net of tax. |
71
NOTE 23 – FAIR VALUE
Fair Value Measurement
The FASB authoritative guidance for fair value measurement defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy for classifying financial instruments. The hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are observable or unobservable. Three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair value:
|
Level 1 | Valuations of Level 1 assets and liabilities are obtained from readily-available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include equity securities that trade in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities and corporate debt securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. |
|
|
Level 2 | Valuations of Level 2 assets and liabilities are based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) MBS for which the fair value is estimated based on the value of identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments, and (iii) derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
Level 3 | Valuations of Level 3 assets and liabilities are based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined by using pricing models for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgments estimation. |
|
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Investment securities available for sale and marketable equity securities held at fair value
The fair value of investment securities was the market value based on quoted market prices (as is the case with Treasury notes, non-callable U.S. Agency debt securities, and equity securities with readily determinable fair values), when available (Level 1), or, when available, market prices for identical or comparable assets (as is the case with MBS and callable U.S. agency debt) that are based on observable market parameters, including benchmark yields, reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids, offers and reference data, including market research operations (Level 2). Observable prices in the market already consider the risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon discounted cash flow models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the instrument, as is the case with certain private label MBS held by the Corporation (Level 3).
Derivative instruments
The fair value of most of the Corporation’s derivative instruments is based on observable market parameters and takes into consideration the credit risk component of paying counterparties, when appropriate. On interest caps, only the seller’s credit risk is considered. The caps were valued using a discounted cash flow approach based on the related LIBOR and swap rate for each cash flow.
A credit spread is considered for those derivative instruments that are not secured. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was immaterial.
72
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of June 30, 2019 |
| As of December 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Measurements Using |
| Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Securities | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Noncallable U.S. agency debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Callable U.S. agency debt securities and MBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Puerto Rico government obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Private label MBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Derivatives, included in assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Forward loan sales commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, included in liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
| Quarter Ended June 30, | ||||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
Level 3 Instruments Only | Securities |
| Securities | |||
(In thousands) | Available For Sale(1) |
| Available For Sale(1) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance | $ |
| $ | |||
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
| |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
| ( | ||
Principal repayments and amortization |
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Ending balance | $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Amounts mostly related to private label MBS. | |||||
|
|
|
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | ||||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
Level 3 Instruments Only | Securities |
| Securities | |||
(In thousands) | Available For Sale(1) |
| Available For Sale(1) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance | $ |
| $ | |||
Total gains (realized/unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
| |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
| |||
Principal repayments and amortization |
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Ending balance | $ |
| $ | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Amounts mostly related to private label MBS. | |||||
|
74
The tables below present qualitative information for significant assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018: |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, 2019 |
|
| ||||||||
| Fair Value |
| Valuation Technique |
| Unobservable Input |
| Range |
| Weighted Average | ||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
| Minimum | Maximum |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private label MBS | $ |
| Discounted cash flows |
| Discount rate |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Prepayment rate |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Projected Cumulative Loss Rate |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico government obligations |
|
| Discounted cash flows |
| Discount rate |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Prepayment rate |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| December 31, 2018 |
|
| ||||||||
| Fair Value |
| Valuation Technique |
| Unobservable Input |
| Range |
| Weighted Average | ||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
| Minimum | Maximum |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private label MBS | $ |
|
| Discounted cash flows |
| Discount rate |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Prepayment rate |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Projected Cumulative Loss Rate |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico government obligations |
|
| Discounted cash flows |
| Discount rate |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Prepayment rate |
|
|
75
Information about Sensitivity to Changes in Significant Unobservable Inputs
Private label MBS: The significant unobservable inputs in the valuation include probability of default, the loss severity assumption, and prepayment rates. Shifts in those inputs would result in different fair value measurements. Increases in the probability of default, loss severity assumptions, and prepayment rates in isolation would generally result in an adverse effect on the fair value of the instruments. Meaningful and possible shifts of each input were modeled to assess the effect on the fair value estimation.
Puerto Rico Government Obligations: The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement is the assumed prepayment rate of the underlying residential mortgage loans that collateralize these obligations, which are guaranteed by the PRHFA. A significant increase (decrease) in the assumed rate would lead to a higher (lower) fair value estimate. The fair value of these bonds was based on a discounted cash flow analysis that contemplates the credit quality of the holder of second mortgages and a discount for liquidity constraints on the bonds considering the absence of an active market for them. Due to the guarantee of the PRHFA and other applicable contractual safeguards, no additional credit spread is applied for debt service default.
There were changes in unrealized gains and losses recorded in earnings for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that were still held at the end of each period.
Additionally, fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis to evaluate certain assets in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost or market accounting (e.g., loans held for sale carried at the lower-of-cost or fair value and repossessed assets) or write downs of individual assets (e.g., goodwill and loans).
As of June 30, 2019, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table: | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Losses recorded for the Quarter Ended |
| Losses recorded for the Six-Month Period Ended | ||
|
| Carrying value as of June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2019 | |||||||||
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( | ||||
OREO (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||||
Loans held for sale (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Consists mainly of impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairments were generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values were derived from external appraisals that took into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g., absorption rates), which are not market observable. | ||||||||||||||
(2) | The fair values were derived from appraisals that took into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g., absorption rates and net operating income of income producing properties), which are not market observable. Losses were related to market valuation adjustments after the transfer of the loans to the OREO portfolio. | ||||||||||||||
(3) | Nonaccrual commercial and construction loans transferred to held for sale in 2018 and still in inventory at period end. The value of these loans was primarily derived from broker price opinions that the Corporation considered. |
76
As of June 30, 2018, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table: | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Losses recorded |
| Losses recorded | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| for the Quarter Ended |
|
| for the Six-Month Period Ended |
|
| Carrying value as of June 30, 2018 |
| June 30, 2018 |
| June 30, 2018 | |||||||||
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( | ||||
OREO (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||||
Loans held for sale (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Consists mainly of impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairments were generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values were derived from external appraisals that took into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g., absorption rates), which are not market observable. | ||||||||||||||
(2) | The fair values were derived from appraisals that took into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g., absorption rates and net operating income of income producing properties), which are not market observable. Losses were related to market valuation adjustments after the transfer of the loans to the OREO portfolio. | ||||||||||||||
(3) | The value of these loans was primarily derived from external appraisals, adjusted for specific characteristics of the loans. |
Qualitative information regarding the fair value measurements for Level 3 financial instruments as of June 30, 2019 are as follows: | |||
|
|
|
|
| June 30, 2019 | ||
| Method |
| Inputs |
Loans | Income, Market, Comparable Sales, Discounted Cash Flows |
| External appraised values; probability weighting of broker price opinions; management assumptions regarding market trends or other relevant factors |
OREO | Income, Market, Comparable Sales, Discounted Cash Flows |
| External appraised values; probability weighting of broker price opinions; management assumptions regarding market trends or other relevant factors |
77
The following tables present the carrying value, estimated fair value and estimated fair value level of the hierarchy of financial instruments as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018: | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Carrying Amount in Statement of Financial Condition June 30, 2019 |
| Fair Value Estimate June 30, 2019 |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks and money |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
market investments (amortized cost) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
Investment securities available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for sale (fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Investment securities held to maturity (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Equity Securities (fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Loans held for sale (lower of cost or market) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Loans held for investment (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses |
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment, net of allowance | $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Derivatives, included in assets (fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Securities sold under agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to repurchase (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Advances from FHLB (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Other borrowings (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Derivatives, included in liabilities (fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Carrying Amount in Statement of Financial Condition December 31, 2018 |
| Fair Value Estimate December 31, 2018 |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks and money |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
market investments (amortized cost) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
Investment securities available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for sale (fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Investment securities held to maturity (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Equity securities (fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Loans held for sale (lower of cost or market) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Loans held for investment (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses |
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment, net of allowance | $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Derivatives, included in assets (fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Securities sold under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
agreements to repurchase (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Advances from FHLB (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Other borrowings (amortized cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Derivatives, included in liabilities (fair value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
NOTE 24 – REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
Revenue Recognition
In accordance with ASC Topic 606, “Revenues from Contracts with Customers,” revenues are recognized when control of promised goods or services is transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Corporation expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the scope of ASC Topic 606, the Corporation performs the following five steps: (i) identifies the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identifies the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determines the transaction price; (iv) allocates the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognizes revenue when (or as) the Corporation satisfies a performance obligation. The Corporation only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it is entitled in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC Topic 606, the Corporation assesses the goods or services that are promised within each contract, identifies those that contain performance obligations, and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Corporation then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.
Disaggregation of Revenue
(In thousands) | Mortgage Banking |
| Consumer (Retail) Banking |
| Commercial and Corporate |
| Treasury and Investments |
| United States Operations |
| Virgin Islands Operations |
| Total | ||||||||
Quarter ended June 30, 2019: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Insurance commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Merchant-related income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Credit and debit card fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Not in scope of Topic 606 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| |||||||
Total non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Revenue | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | Mortgage Banking |
| Consumer (Retail) Banking |
| Commercial and Corporate |
| Treasury and Investments |
| United States Operations |
| Virgin Islands Operations |
| Total | ||||||||
Quarter ended June 30, 2018: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Insurance commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Merchant-related income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Credit and debit card fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| |||||||
Not in scope of Topic 606 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| |||||||
Total non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Revenue | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
(In thousands) | Mortgage Banking |
| Consumer (Retail) Banking |
| Commercial and Corporate |
| Treasury and Investments |
| United States Operations |
| Virgin Islands Operations |
| Total | ||||||||
Six-month period ended June 30, 2019: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Insurance commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Merchant-related income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Credit and debit card fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Not in scope of Topic 606 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 44,766 | |||||||
Total Revenue | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | Mortgage Banking |
| Consumer (Retail) Banking |
| Commercial and Corporate |
| Treasury and Investments |
| United States Operations |
| Virgin Islands Operations |
| Total | ||||||||
Six-month period ended June 30, 2018: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net interest income (1) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Insurance commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Merchant-related income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Credit and debit card fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Not in scope of Topic 606 (1) |
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 43,256 | |||||||
Total Revenue | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Most of the Corporation’s revenue is not within the scope of ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The guidance explicitly excludes net interest income from financial assets and liabilities, as well as other noninterest income from loans, leases, investment securities and derivative financial instruments. |
80
For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, substantially all of the Corporation’s revenue within the scope of ASC Topic 606 was related to performance obligations satisfied at a point in time.
The following is a discussion of revenues under the scope of ASC Topic 606.
Service Charges and Fees on Deposit Accounts
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts relate to fees generated from a variety of deposit products and services rendered to customers. Charges include, but are not limited to, overdraft fees, non-sufficient fund fees, dormant fees and monthly service charges. Such fees are recognized concurrently with the event on a daily basis or on a monthly basis depending upon the customer’s cycle date. These depository arrangements are considered day-to-day contracts that do not extend beyond the services performed, as customers have the right to terminate these contracts with no penalty or, if any, nonsubstantive penalties.
Insurance Commissions
For insurance commissions, which include regular and contingent commissions paid to the Corporation’s insurance agency, the agreements contain a performance obligation related to the sale/issuance of the policy and ancillary administrative post-issuance support. The performance obligation will be satisfied as the policies are issued and revenue will be recognized at that point in time. In addition, contingent commission income was found to be constrained, as defined under the new standard. Contingent commission income will be included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur or payments are received. For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, the Corporation recognized revenue of $
Merchant-related Income
For merchant-related income, the determination of which included the consideration of a 2015 sale of merchant contracts that involved sales of point of sale (“POS”) terminals and entry into a marketing alliance under a revenue-sharing agreement, the Corporation concluded that control of the POS terminals and merchant contracts was transferred to the customer at the contract’s inception. With respect to the related revenue-sharing agreement, the Corporation satisfies the marketing alliance performance obligation over the life of the contract, and the associated transaction price is recognized as the entity performs and any constraints over the variable consideration are resolved.
Credit and Debit Card Fees
Credit and debit card fees primarily represent revenues earned from interchange fees and ATM fees. Interchange and network revenues are earned on credit and debit card transactions conducted with payment networks. ATM fees are primarily earned as a result of surcharges assessed to non-FirstBank customers who use a FirstBank ATM. Such fees are generally recognized concurrently with the delivery of services on a daily basis.
Other Fees
Other fees primarily include revenues generated from wire transfers, lockboxes, and bank issuances of checks. Such fees are recognized concurrently with the event or on a monthly basis.
81
Contract Balances
A contract liability is an entity’s obligation to transfer goods or services to a customer in exchange for consideration from the customer. During 2015, the Bank entered into a long-term strategic marketing alliance with another entity to which the Bank sold its merchant contracts portfolio and related POS terminals. Merchant services are marketed through FirstBank’s branches and offices in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Under the marketing and referral agreement, FirstBank shares with this entity revenues generated by the merchant contracts over the term of the 10-year agreement. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, this contract liability amounted to $
A contract asset is the right to consideration for transferred goods or services when the amount is conditioned on something other than the passage of time. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there were no receivables from contracts with customers or contract assets recorded on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Other
Except for the contract liabilities noted above, the Corporation did not have any significant performance obligations as of June 30, 2019. The Corporation also did not have any material contract acquisition costs and did not make any significant judgments or estimates in recognizing revenue for financial reporting purposes.
NOTE 25 – SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | ||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
| (In thousands) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings | $ |
| $ | ||
Income tax |
|
|
| ||
Operating cash flow from operating leases |
| 4,876 |
|
| |
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to OREO |
|
|
| ||
Additions to auto and other repossessed assets |
|
|
| ||
Capitalization of servicing assets |
|
|
| ||
Loan securitizations |
|
|
| ||
Loans held for investment transferred to held for sale |
|
|
| ||
Loans held for sale transferred to held for investment |
|
|
| ||
Right-of-use asset obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities |
|
|
| ||
Adoption of lease accounting standard: |
|
|
|
|
|
Right-of-use assets operating leases |
|
|
| ||
Right-of-use liabilities operating leases |
|
|
|
82
NOTE 26 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
Based upon the Corporation’s organizational structure and the information provided to the Chief Executive Officer and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors of the Corporation, the operating segments are based primarily on the Corporation’s lines of business for its operations in Puerto Rico, the Corporation’s principal market, and by geographic areas for its operations outside of Puerto Rico. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments; United States Operations; and Virgin Islands Operations. Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors, such as the Corporation’s organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution channels, and the economic characteristics of the products, were also considered in the determination of the reportable segments.
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for large customers represented by specialized and middle-market clients and the public sector. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, and floor plan financings, as well as other products, such as cash management and business management services. The Mortgage Banking segment consists of the origination, sale, and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. In addition, the Mortgage Banking segment includes mortgage loans purchased from other local banks and mortgage bankers. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan centers. The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s investment portfolio and treasury functions that are executed to manage and enhance liquidity. This segment lends funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking, Mortgage Banking and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending activities and borrows from those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking and the United States Operations segments also lend funds to other segments. The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments, the Consumer (Retail) Banking, and the United States Operations segments are allocated based on market rates. The difference between the allocated interest income or expense and the Corporation’s actual net interest income from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury and Investments segment. The United States Operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland, including commercial and retail banking services. The Virgin Islands Operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by the Corporation in the USVI and BVI, including commercial and retail banking services.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those referred to in Note 1, “Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2018, which are included in the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based on net interest income, the provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest income, and direct non-interest expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average volume of their interest-earning assets less the allowance for loan and lease losses.
83
The following table presents information about the reportable segments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | Mortgage Banking |
| Consumer (Retail) Banking |
| Commercial and Corporate |
| Treasury and Investments |
| United States Operations |
| Virgin Islands Operations |
| Total | |||||||
For the quarter ended June 30, 2019: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision) releases for loan and lease losses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Direct non-interest expenses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Segment income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
(In thousands) | Mortgage Banking |
| Consumer (Retail) Banking |
| Commercial and Corporate |
| Treasury and Investments |
| United States Operations |
| Virgin Islands Operations |
| Total | |||||||
For the quarter ended June 30, 2018: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision) release for loan and lease losses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Direct non-interest expenses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Segment income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | Mortgage Banking |
| Consumer (Retail) Banking |
| Commercial and Corporate |
| Treasury and Investments |
| United States Operations |
| Virgin Islands Operations |
| Total | |||||||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( | |||
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Direct non-interest expenses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Segment income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
(In thousands) | Mortgage Banking |
| Consumer (Retail) Banking |
| Commercial and Corporate |
| Treasury and Investments |
| United States Operations |
| Virgin Islands Operations |
| Total | |||||||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||||
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | ||
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Direct non-interest expenses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Segment income (loss) | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
84
The following table presents a reconciliation of the reportable segment financial information to the consolidated totals: | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
|
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||
|
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income for segments and other |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
Other operating expenses (1) |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( | |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total consolidated net income |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets for segments |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
Average non-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total consolidated average assets |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Expenses pertaining to corporate administrative functions that support the operating segment, but are not specifically attributable to or managed by any segment are not included in the reported financial results of the operating segments. The unallocated corporate expenses include certain general and administrative expenses and related depreciation and amortization expenses. | |||||||||||||
|
85
NOTE 27 – REGULATORY MATTERS, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Corporation and FirstBank are each subject to various regulatory capital requirements imposed by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial statements and activities. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Corporation’s and FirstBank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Corporation’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments and adjustment by the regulators with respect to minimum capital requirements, components, risk weightings, and other factors.
On October 3, 2017, the New York FED terminated the Written Agreement entered into on June 3, 2010 by the Corporation and the New York FED. However, the Corporation has agreed with the New York FED to continue to obtain the approval of the New York FED before paying dividends, receiving dividends from the Bank, making payments on subordinated debt or TRuPs, incurring or guaranteeing debt or purchasing or redeeming any corporate stock.
Although the Corporation and FirstBank became subject to the U.S. Basel III capital rules (“Basel III rules”) beginning on January 1, 2015, certain elements of the Basel III have been deferred by the federal banking agencies. The Corporation and FirstBank compute risk-weighted assets using the Standardized Approach required by the Basel III rules.
The Basel III rules require the Corporation to maintain an additional capital conservation buffer of
Under the fully phased-in Basel III rules, in order to be considered adequately capitalized and not subject to the above described limitations, the Corporation is required to maintain: (i) a minimum CET1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least
86
In addition, as required under the Basel III rules, the Corporation’s TRuPs were fully phased-out from Tier 1 capital as of January 1, 2016. However, the Corporation’s TRuPs may continue to be included in Tier 2 capital until the instruments are redeemed or mature.
The Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (collectively “the agencies”) have issued several rulemakings over the last two years to simplify certain aspects of the capital rule. For example, the capital rule included transitional arrangements for certain requirements. Under such transitional arrangements in the capital rule, any amount of mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions that a banking organization did not deduct from common equity tier 1 capital was risk weighted at 100 percent until January 1, 2018. In 2017, the agencies adopted a rule (transition rule) to allow non-advanced approaches banking organizations, such as the Corporation and FirstBank, to continue to apply the transition treatment in effect in 2017 (including the 100 percent risk weight for mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions) while the agencies considered the simplifications proposal.
On July 9, 2019, the agencies adopted a final rule that supersedes the regulatory capital transition rules and eliminates the transition provisions that are no longer operative. The final rule will be generally effective April 1, 2020 and eliminates: (i) the 10 percent common equity tier 1 capital deduction threshold, which applies individually to holdings of mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions in the form of common stock; (ii) the 15 percent common equity tier 1 capital deduction threshold, which applies to the aggregate amount of such items; (iii) the 10 percent threshold for non-significant investments, which applies to holdings of regulatory capital of unconsolidated financial institutions; and (iv) the deduction treatment for significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions that are not in the form of common stock. Instead of the current capital rule's treatments for mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions, the final rule requires non-advanced approaches banking organizations to deduct from common equity tier 1 capital any amount of mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions that individually exceed 25 percent of common equity tier 1 capital of the banking organization (the 25 percent common equity tier 1 capital deduction threshold). The final rule retains the deferred requirement that requires a banking organization to apply a 250 percent risk weight to non-deducted mortgage servicing assets or temporary difference deferred tax assets.
Please refer to the discussion in “Part I, – Item 1, – Business – Supervision and Regulation,” included in the 2018 Form 10-K for a more complete discussion of supervision and regulatory matters and activities that affect the Corporation and its subsidiaries.
87
The regulatory capital positions of the Corporation and FirstBank as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows: | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Regulatory Requirements | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Actual |
| For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
| To be Well-Capitalized-General Thresholds | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| Amount |
| Ratio |
| Amount |
| Ratio |
| Amount |
| Ratio | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Capital (to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First BanCorp. | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| N/A |
| N/A | ||||||
FirstBank | $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||||
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First BanCorp. | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| N/A |
| N/A | ||||||
FirstBank | $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||||
Tier I Capital (to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First BanCorp. | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| N/A |
| N/A | ||||||
FirstBank | $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||||
Leverage ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First BanCorp. | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| N/A |
| N/A | ||||||
FirstBank | $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Capital (to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First BanCorp. | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| N/A |
| N/A | ||||||
FirstBank | $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||||
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First BanCorp. | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| N/A |
| N/A | ||||||
FirstBank | $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||||
Tier I Capital (to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First BanCorp. | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| N/A |
| N/A | ||||||
FirstBank | $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||||
Leverage ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First BanCorp. | $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| N/A |
| N/A | ||||||
FirstBank | $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
The Corporation enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include commitments to extend credit. As of June 30, 2019, commitments to extend credit amounted to approximately $
As of June 30, 2019, First BanCorp. and its subsidiaries were defendants in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. On at least a quarterly basis, the Corporation assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with threatened and outstanding legal cases, matters and proceedings, utilizing the latest information available. For cases, matters and proceedings where it is both probable the Corporation will incur a loss and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the Corporation establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is adjusted as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For cases, matters or proceedings where a loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.
Any estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that some of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence in some of the current proceedings of multiple defendants whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the numerous unresolved issues in the proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, the Corporation’s estimate will change from time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate.
While the final outcome of legal cases, matters, and proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, management believes that the final disposition of the Corporation’s legal cases, matters or proceedings, to the extent not previously provided for, will not have a material negative adverse effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial position as a whole.
If management believes that, based on available information, it is at least reasonably possible that a material loss (or additional material loss in excess of any accrual) will be incurred in connection with any legal actions, the Corporation discloses an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, either individually or in the aggregate, as appropriate, if such an estimate can be made, or discloses that an estimate cannot be made. Based on the Corporation’s assessment as of June 30, 2019, no such disclosures were necessary. However in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these cases, matters and proceedings, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporation’s consolidated financial position on a particular period.
Set forth below is a description of the Corporation’s significant legal proceedings:
Ramírez Torres, et al. v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al. FirstBank Puerto Rico has been named a defendant in a punitive class action complaint, filed in February 2017 at the Court of First Instance in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The Complaint seeks damages and preliminary injunctive relief on behalf of the purported class (“Plaintiffs”) against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and other financial institutions with insurance agency subsidiaries in Puerto Rico (“Defendants”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have been unjustly enriched by failing to reimburse them for "good experience" commissions allegedly paid by Antilles Insurance Company and Puerto Rico Home Insurance Company. In March 2017, FirstBank Puerto Rico filed a Motion to Dismiss and a Motion for Declaratory Judgment and Third-Party Complaint against Antilles Insurance Company and the Insurance Commissioner's Office. All other co-defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint and opposed the request for preliminary injunctive relief. Antilles Insurance Company filed a Motion against the Third-Party Complaint filed by FirstBank Puerto Rico, which FirstBank Puerto Rico opposed. The Insurance Commissioner's Office filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. In July 2017, the Court issued a Judgment granting the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants, dismissing the Complaint with prejudice, except the Third-Party Complaint filed by FirstBank Puerto Rico which was dismissed without prejudice. In August 2017, Plaintiffs filed an appeal before the Puerto Rico Court of Appeals and FirstBank Puerto Rico and other co-defendants filed their Oppositions to Plaintiffs’ appeal. In March 2018, the Court of Appeals entered a Judgment revoking the lower court’s Judgment. One co-defendant filed for reconsideration, which was denied, and all other co-defendants filed their respective Petitions of Certiorari before the Puerto Rico Supreme Court, which also denied review. Co-defendants have filed for reconsideration. All Motions for Reconsideration were denied, and the case was remanded to the Court of First Instance for the continuation of proceedings. A Class certification hearing scheduled for May 2, 2019 was changed to a status hearing. Parties discussed their respective positions, specifically that prior to celebrating any other hearing, it is imperative that the Court enters to resolve FirstBank’s suit seeking Declaratory Judgment. Memorandums of law regarding the validity of the Antilles Insurance policy endorsement were filed on June 3, 2019 in compliance with a court order. A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for September 2019.
89
NOTE 28 – FIRST BANCORP. (HOLDING COMPANY ONLY) FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Statements of Financial Condition | |||||
(Unaudited) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of June 30, |
|
| As of December 31, | |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
|
|
| |||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks | $ |
| $ | ||
Money market investments |
|
|
| ||
Other investment securities |
|
|
| ||
Investment in First Bank Puerto Rico, at equity |
|
|
| ||
Investment in First Bank Insurance Agency, at equity |
|
|
| ||
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust I |
|
|
| ||
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust II |
|
|
| ||
Other assets |
|
|
| ||
Total assets | $ |
| $ | ||
Liabilities and Stockholdersʼ Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings | $ |
| $ | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
|
| ||
Stockholdersʼ equity |
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and stockholdersʼ equity | $ |
| $ |
90
Statements of Income |
| |||||||||||
(Unaudited) |
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended |
| ||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on money market investments | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||
Dividend income from banking subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income before income taxes and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
| ( |
|
|
|
| ( |
| ||
Comprehensive income | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| ||||
|
|
NOTE 29 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Corporation has performed an evaluation of events occurring subsequent to June 30, 2019; management has determined that there were no events occurring in this period that require disclosure in or adjustment to the accompanying financial statements.
91
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Quarter ended |
|
| Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||
(In thousands, except for per share and financial ratios) | June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||||
|
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
Condensed Income Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Total interest income | $ | 169,510 |
| $ | 155,633 |
| $ | 335,982 |
| $ | 305,051 | |
| Total interest expense |
| 26,964 |
|
| 25,162 |
|
| 53,255 |
|
| 49,887 | |
| Net interest income |
| 142,546 |
|
| 130,471 |
|
| 282,727 |
|
| 255,164 | |
| Provision for loan and lease losses |
| 12,534 |
|
| 19,536 |
|
| 24,354 |
|
| 40,080 | |
| Non-interest income |
| 22,223 |
|
| 20,472 |
|
| 44,766 |
|
| 43,256 | |
| Non-interest expenses |
| 92,937 |
|
| 90,216 |
|
| 182,909 |
|
| 176,243 | |
| Income before income taxes |
| 59,298 |
|
| 41,191 |
|
| 120,230 |
|
| 82,097 | |
| Income tax expense |
| 18,011 |
|
| 10,159 |
|
| 35,629 |
|
| 17,917 | |
| Net income |
| 41,287 |
|
| 31,032 |
|
| 84,601 |
|
| 64,180 | |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders |
| 40,618 |
|
| 30,363 |
|
| 83,263 |
|
| 62,842 | |
Per Common Share Results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Net earnings per common share-basic | $ | 0.19 |
| $ | 0.14 |
| $ | 0.38 |
| $ | 0.29 | |
| Net earnings per common share-diluted | $ | 0.19 |
| $ | 0.14 |
| $ | 0.38 |
| $ | 0.29 | |
| Cash dividends declared | $ | 0.03 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 0.06 |
| $ | - | |
| Average shares outstanding |
| 216,674 |
|
| 215,737 |
|
| 216,507 |
|
| 215,194 | |
| Average shares outstanding diluted |
| 216,978 |
|
| 216,666 |
|
| 216,965 |
|
| 216,483 | |
| Book value per common share | $ | 9.74 |
| $ | 8.59 |
| $ | 9.74 |
| $ | 8.59 | |
| Tangible book value per common share (1) | $ | 9.57 |
| $ | 8.40 |
| $ | 9.57 |
| $ | 8.40 | |
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Profitability: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Return on Average Assets |
| 1.33 |
|
| 1.01 |
|
| 1.38 |
|
| 1.06 | |
| Interest Rate Spread |
| 4.42 |
|
| 4.11 |
|
| 4.43 |
|
| 4.07 | |
| Net Interest Margin |
| 4.90 |
|
| 4.49 |
|
| 4.91 |
|
| 4.45 | |
| Interest Rate Spread - tax equivalent basis (2) |
| 4.59 |
|
| 4.28 |
|
| 4.61 |
|
| 4.25 | |
| Net Interest Margin - tax equivalent basis (2) |
| 5.07 |
|
| 4.67 |
|
| 5.09 |
|
| 4.62 | |
| Return on Average Total Equity |
| 7.77 |
|
| 6.65 |
|
| 8.09 |
|
| 6.93 | |
| Return on Average Common Equity |
| 7.90 |
|
| 6.78 |
|
| 8.23 |
|
| 7.07 | |
| Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets |
| 17.12 |
|
| 15.17 |
|
| 17.05 |
|
| 15.24 | |
| Tangible common equity ratio (1) |
| 16.64 |
|
| 14.78 |
|
| 16.64 |
|
| 14.78 | |
| Dividend payout ratio |
| 16.00 |
|
| - |
|
| 15.60 |
|
| - | |
| Efficiency ratio (3) |
| 56.40 |
|
| 59.77 |
|
| 55.85 |
|
| 59.06 | |
Asset Quality: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans held for investment |
| 1.89 |
|
| 2.57 |
|
| 1.89 |
|
| 2.57 | |
| Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans (4) |
| 1.07 |
|
| 1.07 |
|
| 1.09 |
|
| 1.14 | |
| Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs |
| 51.68 |
|
| 83.64 |
|
| 50.00 |
|
| 80.34 | |
| Non-performing assets to total assets (4) |
| 3.06 |
|
| 5.02 |
|
| 3.06 |
|
| 5.02 | |
| Nonaccrual loans held for investment to total loans held for investment (4) |
| 2.78 |
|
| 4.85 |
|
| 2.78 |
|
| 4.85 | |
| Allowance to total nonaccrual loans held for investment (4) |
| 67.96 |
|
| 52.97 |
|
| 67.96 |
|
| 52.97 | |
| Allowance to total nonaccrual loans held for investment, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| excluding residential real estate loans |
| 139.16 |
|
| 86.53 |
|
| 139.16 |
|
| 86.53 | |
Other Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Common Stock Price: End of period | $ | 11.04 |
| $ | 7.65 |
| $ | 11.04 |
| $ | 7.65 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of June 30, 2019 |
| As of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Total loans, including loans held for sale | $ | 9,147,585 |
| $ | 8,901,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Allowance for loan and lease losses |
| 172,011 |
|
| 192,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Money market and investment securities |
| 2,090,440 |
|
| 2,139,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Intangible assets |
| 37,206 |
|
| 38,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Deferred tax asset, net |
| 290,326 |
|
| 319,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total assets |
| 12,537,196 |
|
| 12,243,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Deposits |
| 9,182,181 |
|
| 8,994,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Borrowings |
| 1,024,150 |
|
| 1,074,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total preferred equity |
| 36,104 |
|
| 36,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total common equity |
| 2,119,310 |
|
| 2,049,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
| (2,438) |
|
| (40,415) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total equity |
| 2,152,976 |
|
| 2,044,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)Non-GAAP financial measures (as defined below). Refer to "Capital" below for additional information about the components and a reconciliation of these measures.
(2)On a tax-equivalent basis and excluding the changes in fair value of derivative instruments (see "Net Interest Income" below for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures).
(3)Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.
(4)Loans used in the denominator in calculating each of these ratios include purchased credit-impaired ("PCI") loans. However, the Corporation separately tracks and reports PCI loans and excludes these from nonaccrual loan and non-performing asset amounts.
92
The following MD&A relates to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of First BanCorp. (the “Corporation” or “First BanCorp.”) and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and the notes thereto. This section also presents certain financial measures that are not based in generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). See “Risk Management - Basis of Presentation” below for information about why the non-GAAP financial measures are being presented and the reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures for which the reconciliation is not presented earlier.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
First BanCorp. is a diversified financial holding company headquartered in San Juan, Puerto Rico offering a full range of financial products to consumers and commercial customers through various subsidiaries. First BanCorp. is the holding company (the “Holding Company”) of FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”) and FirstBank Insurance Agency. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Corporation operates offices in Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands (the “USVI”) and British Virgin Islands (the “BVI”), and the State of Florida (USA), concentrating on commercial banking, residential mortgage loan originations, finance leases, credit cards, personal loans, small loans, auto loans, and insurance agency activities.
OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
First BanCorp.'s results of operations depend primarily on its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, including investment securities and loans, and the interest expense incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by various factors, including: the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the re-pricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities. The Corporation's results of operations also depend on the provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy, the deposit insurance premium and other costs), non-interest income (mainly service charges and fees on deposits, and insurance income), gains (losses) on sales of investments, gains (losses) on mortgage banking activities, and income taxes.
The Corporation had net income of $41.3 million, or $0.19 per diluted common share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, compared to $31.0 million, or $0.14 per diluted common share, for the same period in 2018.
The key drivers of the Corporation’s GAAP financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same period in 2018, include the following:
Net interest income increased by $12.1 million to $142.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, compared to $130.5 million for the same period in 2018. The increase in net interest income was driven primarily by: (i) an $8.7 million increase in interest income on consumer loans, mainly due to a $310.4 million increase in the average balance of this portfolio, primarily auto loans, finance leases, and personal loans; and (ii) a $6.6 million increase in interest income on commercial and construction loans, primarily due to the growth in the average balance of the performing commercial portfolio and, to a lesser extent, higher short-term market interest rates compared to 2018 levels. These increases were partially offset by: (i) a $1.8 million increase in total interest expense, driven by the effect of higher market interest rates on the cost of retail CDs, brokered CDs, and FHLB advances, partially offset by the decline of $365.7 million in the average balance of brokered CDs and the effect of a $100 million repurchase agreement that was called prior to maturity in the third quarter of 2018; and (ii) a $1.5 million decrease in interest income on residential mortgage loans, mainly due to a $120.6 million decrease in the average balance of this portfolio.
The net interest margin increased to 4.90% for the second quarter of 2019, compared to 4.49% for the same period a year ago, primarily related to higher loan yields, an improved funding mix driven by the increase in the proportion of interest-earning assets funded by the growth in non-interest-bearing deposits, and an increase in the proportion of higher-yielding loans, such as consumer loans, to total interest-earning assets. See “Results of Operations - Net Interest Income” below for additional information.
The provision for loan and lease losses decreased by $7.0 million to $12.5 million for the second quarter of 2019, compared to $19.5 million for the same period in 2018. The decrease was driven by: (i) a $4.6 million decrease in the provision for consumer loans, primarily related to a decrease in charge-offs related to auto and personal loans, the effect in the second quarter of 2018 of refinements in the measure of qualitative factors used in the determination of the general reserve for consumer loans, and improvements in delinquency migration patterns; and (ii) a $3.0 million decrease in the provision for residential mortgage loans, reflecting the effect of improvements in delinquent loan levels, and the overall decrease in the size of this portfolio. These variances were partially offset by a $0.6 million increase in the provision for commercial and construction loans, primarily due to the effect in the second quarter of 2018 of a $1.8 million net loan loss reserve release associated with revised estimates of the hurricane-related qualitative reserve for commercial and construction loans, as well as the effect in the second quarter of 2018 of a net reserve release of $1.6 million related to refinements to the measurement of
93
qualitative factors in the estimation process of the general allowance for loan losses for commercial loans, partially offset by lower charges to specific reserves on impaired loans in the second quarter of 2019.
Net charge-offs totaled $24.3 million for the second quarter of 2019, or 1.07% of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $23.4 million, or 1.07% of average loans for the same period in 2018. Charge-offs for the second quarter of 2019 include an $11.4 million charge-off taken on a commercial mortgage loan in the Florida region against a previously-established specific reserve. The overall increase of $3.2 million in net charge-offs of commercial and construction loans for the second quarter of 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, was offset by decreases of $1.6 million and $0.7 million in net charge-offs of consumer and residential mortgage loans, respectively. See “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” and “Risk Management” below for an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios.
The Corporation recorded non-interest income of $22.2 million for the second quarter of 2019, compared to $20.5 million for the second quarter of 2018. The increase was primarily driven by: (i) a $0.6 million gain from hurricane-related insurance proceeds recorded in the second quarter of 2019; (ii) a $0.5 million increase in service charges on deposits, primarily related to an increase in returned items, overdraft, and cash management transactions; and (iii) a $0.4 million increase in credit and debit card interchange fee income due to higher transaction volumes. See “Results of Operation - Non-Interest Income” below for additional information.
Non-interest expenses for the second quarter of 2019 were $92.9 million, compared to $90.2 million for the same period in 2018. The increase was driven by: (i) a $2.1 million increase in occupancy and equipment expenses, reflecting an increase of $1.8 million in depreciation and amortization expenses, including software license fees, and a $0.4 million increase related to a write-down of previously capitalized costs associated with changes in the scope and requirements of a technology-related project; (ii) a $1.5 million increase in professional fees, reflecting an increase of $0.7 million in outsourced technology services, a $0.4 million increase in attorneys’ collection fees, and a $0.6 million decrease in legal and audit-related fees; (iii) a $1.3 million increase in employees’ compensation and benefits expenses, primarily due to salary merit increases and adjustments related to the Corporation’s annual salary review process that took effect in July 2018, higher headcount, and higher matching contributions to the employees’ retirement plans.
These variances were partially offset by: (i) a $1.0 million decrease in the FDIC insurance premium expense, reflecting, among other things, the effect of improved earnings trends and reductions in brokered CDs; (ii) a $0.6 million decrease related to the reversal of previously accrued amounts for local supervisory assessments, based on the most recent assessment bill; and (iii) a $0.6 million decrease in losses from other real estate owned (“OREO”) operations, primarily reflecting a $2.6 million decrease in adverse fair value adjustments to the value of OREO properties, partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in income recognized from rental payments associated with income-producing properties and higher losses on sales. See “Non-Interest Expenses” below for additional information.
For the second quarter of 2019, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $18.0 million, compared to $10.2 million for the same period in 2018. The increase was driven by higher pre-tax earnings generated in the second quarter of 2019 and, to a lesser extent, an increase in the effective tax rate attributable to a higher proportion of taxable to exempt income in 2019. The Corporation’s estimated annual effective tax rate for the first six months of 2019, excluding entities from which a tax benefit cannot be recognized and discrete items, was 29%, compared to 25% for the first six months of 2018. The estimated annual effective tax rate, including all entities for 2019, was 29% (30% excluding discrete items), compared to 24% for the first six months of 2018 (25% excluding discrete items). As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had a deferred tax asset of $290.3 million (net of a valuation allowance of $92.8 million, including a valuation allowance of $60.0 million against the deferred tax assets of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary, FirstBank). See “Income Taxes” below for additional information.
As of June 30, 2019, total assets were $12.5 billion, an increase of $293.6 million from December 31, 2018. The increase was mainly due to a $246.3 million increase in total loans, consisting of a growth of $175.3 million in the Puerto Rico region, a $70.2 million increase in the Florida region, and a $0.8 million increase in the Virgin Islands region. On a portfolio basis, the increase consisted of a $171.1 million growth in commercial and construction loans and a $168.2 million growth in consumer loans, partially offset by a $93.1 million decrease in residential mortgage loans. In addition, there was an increase of $154.1 million in cash and cash equivalents and a $57.3 million increase related to the recognition of a right-of-use asset for operating leases in accordance with the adoption of the Accounting Standards Update No. (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” These increases were partially offset by a $139.3 million decrease in total investment securities driven by prepayments of U.S. agencies MBS, and U.S. agencies bonds that matured or were called prior to maturity. See “Financial Condition and Operating Data Analysis” below for additional information.
94
As of June 30, 2019, total liabilities were $10.4 billion, an increase of $185.4 million from December 31, 2018. The increase was mainly due a $137.5 million increase in government deposits, an $89.9 million increase in deposits, excluding brokered CDs and government deposits, and a $57.3 million increase related to the effect of the right-of-use liability for operational leases recorded in connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-02 in 2019. These increases were partially offset by the repayment at maturity of a $50.1 million short-term repurchase agreement and a $39.9 million decrease in brokered CDs. See “Risk Management – Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy” below for additional information about the Corporation’s funding sources.
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s stockholders’ equity was $2.2 billion, an increase of $108.3 million from December 31, 2018. The increase was mainly driven by the earnings generated in the first six months of 2019 and a $38.0 million increase in the fair value of available-for-sale investment securities recorded as part of Other comprehensive income, partially offset by common and preferred stock dividends declared in the first half of 2019 totaling $14.4 million. The Corporation’s Total Capital, Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Leverage ratios were 24.25%, 20.63%, 21.03%, and 15.64%, respectively, as of June 30, 2019, compared to Total Capital, Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Leverage ratios of 24.00%, 20.30%, 20.71%, and 15.37%, respectively, as of December 31. 2018. See “Risk Management – Capital” below for additional information.
Total loan production, including purchases, refinancings, renewals and draws from existing revolving and non-revolving commitments, but excluding the utilization activity on outstanding credit cards, was $885.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, compared to $726.8 million for the same period in 2018. The increase primarily reflects higher commercial and consumer loan originations in the Puerto Rico region.
Total non-performing assets were $384.1 million as of June 30, 2019, a decrease of $83.0 million from December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily attributable to: (i) a $12.9 million reduction related to the split loan restructuring of a commercial mortgage loan in Puerto Rico; (ii) charge-offs on nonaccrual commercial and constructions loans amounting to $20.8 million, including a charge-off of $11.4 million on a commercial mortgage loan in the Florida region; (iii) a $17.8 million decrease in nonaccrual residential mortgage loans; (iv) sales and repayments of nonaccrual commercial and construction loans held for sale totaling $9.0 million during the first six months of 2019; (v) collections on nonaccrual commercial and construction loans of $8.4 million during the first six months of 2019; and (vi) a $2.6 million decrease in nonaccrual consumer loans. In addition, there was a $13.3 million decrease in the balance of the OREO properties portfolio. See “Risk Management – Non-Accruing and Non-Performing Assets” below for additional information.
Adversely classified commercial and construction loans, including loans held for sale, decreased by $61.0 million to $295.0 million as of June 30, 2019. The decrease was driven by the upgrade in the credit risk classification of several commercial loans totaling $18.5 million, charge-offs, collections, and the aforementioned reduction of $9.0 million related to sales and repayments of nonaccrual loans held for sale.
95
The Corporation’s financial results for the second quarter and first six months of 2019 and 2018 included the following items that management believes are not reflective of core operating performance, are not expected to reoccur with any regularity or may reoccur at uncertain times and in uncertain amounts (the “Special Items”):
Quarter and Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2019
A $0.8 million ($0.5 million after-tax) benefit recorded in the second quarter of 2019 resulting from hurricane-related insurance recoveries related to repairs and maintenance costs, and impairments, associated with facilities in the British Virgin Islands.
Positive effect in earnings of $6.4 million ($4.0 million after-tax) recorded in the first quarter of 2019 related to net loan loss reserve releases resulting from revised estimates of the qualitative reserves associated with the effects of Hurricanes Maria and Irma, primarily related to consumer and commercial loans. See “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” below for additional information.
Expense recovery of $2.3 million recorded in the first quarter of 2019 related to an employee retention benefit payment (the “Benefit”) received by the Bank by virtue of the Disaster Tax Relief and Airport Extension Act of 2017, as amended (the “Disaster Tax Relief Act”). The Benefit was recorded as an offset to employees’ compensation and benefits expenses and will not be treated as taxable income by virtue of the Disaster Tax Relief Act.
Quarter and Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018
Net loan loss reserve releases of $2.1 million ($1.3 million after-tax) and $8.5 million ($5.2 million after-tax) for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, respectively, in connection with revised estimates of the qualitative reserves associated with the effects of Hurricanes Maria and Irma. See “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” below for additional information.
Hurricane-related expenses of $0.7 million ($0.4 million after-tax) and $2.3 million ($1.4 million after-tax) for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, respectively.
Gain of $2.3 million on the repurchase and cancellation of $23.8 million in variable rate trust-preferred securities (“TRuPs”), reflected in the consolidated statement of income as Gain on early extinguishment of debt. The gain, realized at the holding company level, had no effect on the income tax expense in 2018. See “Non-Interest Income” below for additional information.
96
The following table reconciles for the second quarter and first six months of 2019 and 2018 the reported net income to adjusted net income, a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the Special Items identified above:
|
| Quarter ended June 30, |
| Six-month period ended June 30, | ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income, as reported (GAAP) | $ | 41,287 |
| $ | 31,032 |
| $ | 84,601 |
| $ | 64,180 | |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Hurricane-related loan loss reserve release |
| - |
|
| (2,057) |
|
| (6,425) |
|
| (8,464) | |
Hurricane-related expenses |
| - |
|
| 654 |
|
| - |
|
| 2,250 | |
Benefit from hurricane-related insurance recoveries |
| (820) |
|
| - |
|
| (820) |
|
| - | |
Employee retention benefit - Disaster Tax Relief Act |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (2,317) |
|
| - | |
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (2,316) | |
Income tax impact of adjustments (1) |
| 308 |
|
| 547 |
|
| 2,717 |
|
| 2,423 | |
Adjusted net income (Non-GAAP) (2) | $ | 40,775 |
| $ | 30,176 |
| $ | 77,756 |
| $ | 58,073 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)See "Basis of Presentation" below for the individual tax impact related to each reconciling item.
(2)The Corporation is no longer considering the effect of loans transferred to held for sale as a Special Item, and, thus, this effect is no longer presented as an adjustment from GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, such as adjusted net income, adjusted provision for loan and lease losses, and adjusted provision to net-charge-offs ratio.
97
Critical Accounting Policies and Practices
The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of applying these principles conform to GAAP. The Corporation’s critical accounting policies relate to: 1) the allowance for loan and lease losses; 2) other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”); 3) income taxes; 4) the classification and values of financial instruments; 5) income recognition on loans; 6) loans acquired; and 7) loans held for sale. These critical accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the amounts recorded for assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently require greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than those originally reported.
The Corporation’s critical accounting policies are described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in First BanCorp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K”). There have not been any material changes in the Corporation’s critical accounting policies since December 31, 2018.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First BanCorp. on its interest-earning assets over the interest incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First BanCorp.’s net interest income is subject to interest rate risk due to the repricing and maturity mismatch of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Net interest income for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019 was $142.5 million and $282.7 million, respectively, compared to $130.5 million and $255.2 million for the comparable periods in 2018. On a tax-equivalent basis and excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, net interest income for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019 was $147.5 million and $293.0 million, respectively, compared to $135.6 million and $265.1 million for the comparable periods in 2018.
The following tables include a detailed analysis of net interest income. Part I presents average volumes (based on the average daily balance) and rates on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis, the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-related assets and liabilities have affected the Corporation’s net interest income. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes in (i) volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior period rates), and (ii) rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior period volumes). Rate-volume variances (changes in rate multiplied by changes in volume) have been allocated to either the changes in volume or the changes in rate based upon the effect of each factor on the combined totals.
98
The net interest income is computed on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis and excluding the change in the fair value of derivative instruments. For the definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure, refer to the discussion in “Basis of Presentation” below.
Part I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Average Volume |
| Interest income (1) / expense |
| Average Rate (1) | ||||||||||||
| Quarter ended June 30, | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Money market and other short-term investments | $ | 590,517 |
| $ | 780,346 |
| $ | 3,440 |
| $ | 3,387 |
| 2.34 | % |
| 1.74 | % |
| Government obligations (2) |
| 720,106 |
|
| 822,416 |
|
| 7,254 |
|
| 7,103 |
| 4.04 | % |
| 3.46 | % |
| Mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") |
| 1,285,812 |
|
| 1,313,082 |
|
| 10,316 |
|
| 10,825 |
| 3.22 | % |
| 3.31 | % |
| Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock |
| 41,720 |
|
| 40,812 |
|
| 657 |
|
| 656 |
| 6.32 | % |
| 6.45 | % |
| Other investments |
| 3,030 |
|
| 2,625 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 2 |
| 0.93 | % |
| 0.31 | % |
| Total investments (3) |
| 2,641,185 |
|
| 2,959,281 |
|
| 21,674 |
|
| 21,973 |
| 3.29 | % |
| 2.98 | % |
| Residential mortgage loans |
| 3,075,037 |
|
| 3,195,633 |
|
| 41,350 |
|
| 42,842 |
| 5.39 | % |
| 5.38 | % |
| Construction loans |
| 91,711 |
|
| 121,136 |
|
| 1,511 |
|
| 1,106 |
| 6.61 | % |
| 3.66 | % |
| Commercial and Industrial and Commercial mortgage loans |
| 3,809,702 |
|
| 3,627,829 |
|
| 54,693 |
|
| 48,349 |
| 5.76 | % |
| 5.35 | % |
| Finance leases |
| 360,224 |
|
| 272,096 |
|
| 6,735 |
|
| 4,901 |
| 7.50 | % |
| 7.22 | % |
| Consumer loans |
| 1,698,944 |
|
| 1,476,653 |
|
| 48,477 |
|
| 41,625 |
| 11.44 | % |
| 11.31 | % |
| Total loans (4) (5) |
| 9,035,618 |
|
| 8,693,347 |
|
| 152,766 |
|
| 138,823 |
| 6.78 | % |
| 6.41 | % |
| Total interest-earning assets | $ | 11,676,803 |
| $ | 11,652,628 |
| $ | 174,440 |
| $ | 160,796 |
| 5.99 | % |
| 5.53 | % |
| Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Brokered CDs | $ | 509,102 |
| $ | 874,766 |
| $ | 2,782 |
| $ | 3,865 |
| 2.19 | % |
| 1.77 | % |
| Other interest-bearing deposits |
| 6,181,141 |
|
| 6,080,949 |
|
| 16,321 |
|
| 13,109 |
| 1.06 | % |
| 0.86 | % |
| Other borrowed funds |
| 284,150 |
|
| 384,150 |
|
| 4,034 |
|
| 4,778 |
| 5.69 | % |
| 4.99 | % |
| FHLB advances |
| 740,000 |
|
| 715,000 |
|
| 3,827 |
|
| 3,410 |
| 2.07 | % |
| 1.91 | % |
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 7,714,393 |
| $ | 8,054,865 |
| $ | 26,964 |
| $ | 25,162 |
| 1.40 | % |
| 1.25 | % |
| Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 147,476 |
| $ | 135,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.59 | % |
| 4.28 | % |
| Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5.07 | % |
| 4.67 | % |
|
| Average Volume |
| Interest income (1) / expense |
| Average Rate (1) | ||||||||||||
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Money market and other short-term investments | $ | 540,559 |
| $ | 699,854 |
| $ | 6,269 |
| $ | 5,643 |
| 2.34 | % |
| 1.63 | % |
| Government obligations (2) |
| 742,553 |
|
| 810,368 |
|
| 14,730 |
|
| 13,296 |
| 4.00 | % |
| 3.31 | % |
| MBS |
| 1,309,650 |
|
| 1,286,756 |
|
| 22,213 |
|
| 21,450 |
| 3.42 | % |
| 3.36 | % |
| FHLB stock |
| 41,825 |
|
| 40,874 |
|
| 1,353 |
|
| 1,349 |
| 6.52 | % |
| 6.66 | % |
| Other investments |
| 3,054 |
|
| 2,670 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 4 |
| 0.86 | % |
| 0.30 | % |
| Total investments (3) |
| 2,637,641 |
|
| 2,840,522 |
|
| 44,578 |
|
| 41,742 |
| 3.41 | % |
| 2.96 | % |
| Residential mortgage loans |
| 3,098,574 |
|
| 3,210,984 |
|
| 83,169 |
|
| 86,192 |
| 5.41 | % |
| 5.41 | % |
| Construction loans |
| 88,615 |
|
| 119,996 |
|
| 2,840 |
|
| 2,028 |
| 6.46 | % |
| 3.41 | % |
| Commercial and Industrial and Commercial mortgage loans |
| 3,767,329 |
|
| 3,657,985 |
|
| 107,975 |
|
| 93,538 |
| 5.78 | % |
| 5.16 | % |
| Finance leases |
| 351,058 |
|
| 266,140 |
|
| 13,121 |
|
| 9,561 |
| 7.54 | % |
| 7.24 | % |
| Consumer loans |
| 1,669,009 |
|
| 1,480,455 |
|
| 94,555 |
|
| 81,931 |
| 11.42 | % |
| 11.16 | % |
| Total loans (4) (5) |
| 8,974,585 |
|
| 8,735,560 |
|
| 301,660 |
|
| 273,250 |
| 6.78 | % |
| 6.31 | % |
| Total interest-earning assets | $ | 11,612,226 |
| $ | 11,576,082 |
| $ | 346,238 |
| $ | 314,992 |
| 6.01 | % |
| 5.49 | % |
| Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Brokered CDs | $ | 516,141 |
| $ | 958,545 |
| $ | 5,469 |
| $ | 8,220 |
| 2.14 | % |
| 1.73 | % |
| Other interest-bearing deposits |
| 6,103,478 |
|
| 6,051,489 |
|
| 31,126 |
|
| 25,725 |
| 1.03 | % |
| 0.86 | % |
| Other borrowed funds |
| 305,457 |
|
| 399,235 |
|
| 9,048 |
|
| 9,160 |
| 5.97 | % |
| 4.63 | % |
| FHLB advances |
| 740,000 |
|
| 715,000 |
|
| 7,612 |
|
| 6,782 |
| 2.07 | % |
| 1.91 | % |
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 7,665,076 |
| $ | 8,124,269 |
| $ | 53,255 |
| $ | 49,887 |
| 1.40 | % |
| 1.24 | % |
| Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 292,983 |
| $ | 265,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.61 | % |
| 4.25 | % |
| Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5.09 | % |
| 4.62 | % |
(1)On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis. The adjusted tax-equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate of 37.5% (39% for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018) and adding to it the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The tax-equivalent adjustment recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest income, interest rate spread and net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes these measures provide useful information to investors by allowing them to make peer comparisons. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are excluded from interest income and interest expense because the changes in valuation do not affect interest received or paid.
(2)Government obligations include debt issued by government-sponsored agencies.
(3)Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from the average volumes.
(4)Average loan balances include the average of nonaccrual loans.
(5)Interest income on loans includes $1.9 million and $2.1 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $4.0 million and $3.9 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late fees related to the Corporation’s loan portfolio.
99
Part II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter ended June 30, |
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
|
| 2019 compared to 2018 |
| 2019 compared to 2018 | ||||||||||||||
|
| Increase (decrease) |
| Increase (decrease) | ||||||||||||||
|
| Due to: |
| Due to: | ||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | Volume |
| Rate |
| Total |
| Volume |
| Rate |
| Total | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest income on interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Money market and other short-term investments | $ | (968) |
| $ | 1,021 |
| $ | 53 |
| $ | (1,581) |
| $ | 2,207 |
| $ | 626 |
| Government obligations |
| (960) |
|
| 1,111 |
|
| 151 |
|
| (1,245) |
|
| 2,679 |
|
| 1,434 |
| MBS |
| (222) |
|
| (287) |
|
| (509) |
|
| 385 |
|
| 378 |
|
| 763 |
| FHLB stock |
| 14 |
|
| (13) |
|
| 1 |
|
| 31 |
|
| (27) |
|
| 4 |
| Other investments |
| - |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
| Total investments |
| (2,136) |
|
| 1,837 |
|
| (299) |
|
| (2,409) |
|
| 5,245 |
|
| 2,836 |
| Residential mortgage loans |
| (1,622) |
|
| 130 |
|
| (1,492) |
|
| (3,017) |
|
| (6) |
|
| (3,023) |
| Construction loans |
| (378) |
|
| 783 |
|
| 405 |
|
| (778) |
|
| 1,590 |
|
| 812 |
| Commercial and Industrial and Commercial mortgage loans |
| 2,498 |
|
| 3,846 |
|
| 6,344 |
|
| 2,863 |
|
| 11,574 |
|
| 14,437 |
| Finance leases |
| 1,641 |
|
| 193 |
|
| 1,834 |
|
| 3,160 |
|
| 400 |
|
| 3,560 |
| Consumer loans |
| 6,337 |
|
| 515 |
|
| 6,852 |
|
| 10,643 |
|
| 1,981 |
|
| 12,624 |
| Total loans |
| 8,476 |
|
| 5,467 |
|
| 13,943 |
|
| 12,871 |
|
| 15,539 |
|
| 28,410 |
| Total interest income |
| 6,340 |
|
| 7,304 |
|
| 13,644 |
|
| 10,462 |
|
| 20,784 |
|
| 31,246 |
| Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Brokered CDs |
| (1,810) |
|
| 727 |
|
| (1,083) |
|
| (4,265) |
|
| 1,514 |
|
| (2,751) |
| Other interest-bearing deposits |
| 219 |
|
| 2,993 |
|
| 3,212 |
|
| 223 |
|
| 5,178 |
|
| 5,401 |
| Other borrowed funds |
| (1,334) |
|
| 590 |
|
| (744) |
|
| (2,485) |
|
| 2,373 |
|
| (112) |
| FHLB advances |
| 122 |
|
| 295 |
|
| 417 |
|
| 243 |
|
| 587 |
|
| 830 |
| Total interest expense |
| (2,803) |
|
| 4,605 |
|
| 1,802 |
|
| (6,284) |
|
| 9,652 |
|
| 3,368 |
| Change in net interest income | $ | 9,143 |
| $ | 2,699 |
| $ | 11,842 |
| $ | 16,746 |
| $ | 11,132 |
| $ | 27,878 |
|
Portions of the Corporation’s interest-earning assets, mostly investments in obligations of some U.S. government agencies and sponsored entities, generate interest that is exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. Also, interest and gains on sales of investments held by the Corporation’s international banking entities (“IBEs”) are tax-exempt under Puerto Rico tax law (see “Income Taxes” below for additional information). To facilitate the comparison of all interest data related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to an adjusted tax equivalent basis. The tax equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate (37.5% for 2019 and 39% for 2018) and adding to it the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by Puerto Rico tax law.
Management believes that the presentation of net interest income excluding the effects of the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments (“valuations”) provides additional information about the Corporation’s net interest income and facilitates comparability and analysis. The changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments have no effect on interest due or interest earned on interest-bearing liabilities or interest-earning assets, respectively.
100
The following table reconciles net interest income in accordance with GAAP to net interest income, excluding valuations, and net interest income on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis. The table also reconciles net interest spread and net interest margin on a GAAP basis to these items excluding valuations and on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 |
| June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income - GAAP | $ | 169,510 |
|
| $ | 155,633 |
|
| $ | 335,982 |
|
| $ | 305,051 |
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments |
| 1 |
|
|
| - |
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
| - |
|
Interest income excluding valuations |
| 169,511 |
|
|
| 155,633 |
|
|
| 335,987 |
|
|
| 305,051 |
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment |
| 4,929 |
|
|
| 5,163 |
|
|
| 10,251 |
|
|
| 9,941 |
|
Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding valuations |
| 174,440 |
|
|
| 160,796 |
|
|
| 346,238 |
|
|
| 314,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense - GAAP |
| 26,964 |
|
|
| 25,162 |
|
|
| 53,255 |
|
|
| 49,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income - GAAP | $ | 142,546 |
|
| $ | 130,471 |
|
| $ | 282,727 |
|
| $ | 255,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income excluding valuations - Non-GAAP | $ | 142,547 |
|
| $ | 130,471 |
|
| $ | 282,732 |
|
| $ | 255,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding valuations - Non-GAAP | $ | 147,476 |
|
| $ | 135,634 |
|
| $ | 292,983 |
|
| $ | 265,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases | $ | 9,035,618 |
|
| $ | 8,693,347 |
|
| $ | 8,974,585 |
|
| $ | 8,735,560 |
|
Total securities, other short-term investments and interest-bearing cash balances |
| 2,641,185 |
|
|
| 2,959,281 |
|
|
| 2,637,641 |
|
|
| 2,840,522 |
|
Average Interest-Earning Assets | $ | 11,676,803 |
|
| $ | 11,652,628 |
|
| $ | 11,612,226 |
|
| $ | 11,576,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities | $ | 7,714,393 |
|
| $ | 8,054,865 |
|
| $ | 7,665,076 |
|
| $ | 8,124,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Yield/Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield on interest-earning assets - GAAP |
| 5.82 | % |
|
| 5.36 | % |
|
| 5.83 | % |
|
| 5.31 | % |
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities - GAAP |
| 1.40 | % |
|
| 1.25 | % |
|
| 1.40 | % |
|
| 1.24 | % |
Net interest spread - GAAP |
| 4.42 | % |
|
| 4.11 | % |
|
| 4.43 | % |
|
| 4.07 | % |
Net interest margin - GAAP |
| 4.90 | % |
|
| 4.49 | % |
|
| 4.91 | % |
|
| 4.45 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield on interest-earning assets excluding valuations - Non-GAAP |
| 5.82 | % |
|
| 5.36 | % |
|
| 5.83 | % |
|
| 5.31 | % |
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities |
| 1.40 | % |
|
| 1.25 | % |
|
| 1.40 | % |
|
| 1.24 | % |
Net interest spread excluding valuations - Non-GAAP |
| 4.42 | % |
|
| 4.11 | % |
|
| 4.43 | % |
|
| 4.07 | % |
Net interest margin excluding valuations - Non-GAAP |
| 4.90 | % |
|
| 4.49 | % |
|
| 4.91 | % |
|
| 4.45 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and excluding valuations - Non-GAAP |
| 5.99 | % |
|
| 5.53 | % |
|
| 6.01 | % |
|
| 5.49 | % |
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities |
| 1.40 | % |
|
| 1.25 | % |
|
| 1.40 | % |
|
| 1.24 | % |
Net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations - Non-GAAP |
| 4.59 | % |
|
| 4.28 | % |
|
| 4.61 | % |
|
| 4.25 | % |
Net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations - Non-GAAP |
| 5.07 | % |
|
| 4.67 | % |
|
| 5.09 | % |
|
| 4.62 | % |
101
Interest income on interest-earning assets primarily represents interest earned on loans held for investment and investment securities.
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities primarily represents interest paid on brokered CDs, branch-based deposits, repurchase agreements, advances from the FHLB and junior subordinated debentures.
Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives represent changes in the fair value of derivatives, primarily interest rate caps used for protection against rising interest rates.
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, net interest income increased $12.1 million to $142.5 million, and $27.6 million to $282.7 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2018. The $12.1 million increase in net interest income for the second quarter of 2019, compared to the same period in 2018, was primarily due to:
An $8.7 million increase in interest income on consumer loans, mainly due to a $310.4 million increase in the average balance of this portfolio, primarily auto loans, finance leases, and personal loans, and, to a lesser extent, higher yield on new loan originations.
A $6.6 million increase in interest income on commercial and construction loans, primarily due to the growth in the average balance of the performing commercial portfolio and, to a lesser extent, higher short-term market interest rates compared to the levels during the first six months of 2018. The aggregate average balance of the commercial and construction loan portfolios increased by $152.4 million, compared to the second quarter of 2018, net of reductions in nonaccrual commercial and construction loans.
Partially offset by:
A $1.8 million increase in total interest expense, primarily reflecting: (i) a $3.2 million increase in interest expense on non-brokered interest-bearing deposits, driven by the effect of higher market interest rates on the cost of retail CDs; and (ii) a $0.4 million increase in interest expense on FHLB advances, primarily related to the higher average cost of new FHLB advances obtained since the end of the second quarter of 2018 as compared to FHLB advances that matured during such period. The increases were partially offset by: (i) a $1.1 million decrease in interest expense on brokered CDs, primarily related to a $365.7 million decrease in the average balance that more than offset higher costs of new issuances, and (ii) a $0.9 million decrease in interest expense on repurchase agreements that reflects both the effect of a $100 million repurchase agreement that was called prior to maturity in the third quarter of 2018 that carried a cost of 1.96% and the downward repricing of variable-rate repurchase agreements. Over the last 12 months, the Corporation repaid $458.7 million of maturing brokered CDs with an all-in cost of 1.63% and new issuances amounted to $151.1 million with an all-in cost of 2.74%.
A $1.5 million decrease in interest income on residential mortgage loans, primarily associated with a $120.6 million decrease in the average balance of this portfolio.
The $27.6 million increase in net interest income for the first six months of 2019, compared to the same period in 2018, was primarily due to:
A $16.2 million increase in interest income on consumer loans, primarily due to a $273.5 million increase in the average balance of this portfolio in the first six months of 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, primarily auto loans, finance leases, and personal loans, and, to a lesser extent, higher yields on new loan originations.
A $15.1 million increase in interest income on commercial and construction loans, primarily attributable to higher short-term market interest rates, compared to 2018 first six months levels, which is reflected in both the repricing of variable-rate commercial loans and higher yields on new loan originations. In addition, there was an increase of $78.0 million in the aggregate average balance of these portfolios, net of reductions in nonaccrual commercial and construction loans.
102
A $2.0 million increase in interest income on investment securities, primarily due to the gradual reinvestment of liquidity, obtained from the growth in average non-interest bearing deposits and proceeds from maturing debt securities, into higher yielding U.S. agencies debt securities, In addition, approximately $0.5 million of the increase was related to lower U.S. agencies MBS premium amortization, resulting from lower prepayment rates, and approximately $0.3 million of the increase was related to the upward repricing of certain variable-rate Puerto Rico municipal bonds held by the Corporation and accounted for as held-to-maturity securities.
A $0.6 million increase in interest income from interest-bearing cash balances, primarily deposits maintained at the New York FED, due to increases in the Federal Funds target rate. The Federal Funds target rate has increased two times since the end of the second quarter of 2018 from a range of 1.75% - 2.00% to its current range of 2.25% - 2.50%.
Partially offset by:
A $3.4 million increase in interest expense driven by: (i) a $5.4 million increase in interest expense on non-brokered interest-bearing deposits, driven by higher market interest rates on the cost of retail CDs and savings deposits, and (ii) a $0.8 million increase in interest expense on FHLB advances, primarily related to the higher average cost of new FHLB advances obtained since the end of the second quarter of 2018, as compared to FHLB advances that matured during such period. The aforementioned increases were partially offset by a $2.8 million decrease in interest expense on brokered CDs, primarily related to a $442.4 million decrease in the average balance that more than offset higher costs of new issuances.
A $3.0 million decrease in interest income on residential mortgage loans, primarily associated with a $112.4 million decrease in the average balance of this portfolio.
The net interest margin increased by 41 basis points to 4.90% for the second quarter of 2019, compared to the same period in 2018, and increased by 46 basis points to 4.91% for the first six months of 2019, compared to the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily driven by higher loan yields, an improved funding mix, driven by the increase in the proportion of interest-earning assets funded by the growth in non-interest-bearing deposits, the gradual reinvestment of liquidity into higher-yielding investment securities, and an increase in the proportion of higher-yielding loans, such as consumer loans, to total interest-earning assets. The average balance of non-interest bearing deposits increased by $332.0 million to $2.4 billion for the first half of 2019, compared to $2.1 billion for the first half of 2018.
On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis, net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 increased by $11.8 million to $147.5 million, compared to the same period in 2018, and by $27.9 million to $293.0 million for the first six months of 2019, compared to the same period in 2018.
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that the Corporation considers adequate to absorb probable incurred losses inherent in the portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is also based upon a number of additional factors, including trends in charge-offs and delinquencies, current economic conditions, the fair value of the underlying collateral and the financial condition of the borrowers, and, as such, includes amounts based on judgments and estimates made by the Corporation. Important factors that influence this judgment are re-evaluated quarterly to respond to changing conditions.
103
As described in Note 2, “Update on Effects of Natural Disasters,” two strong hurricanes affected the Corporation’s service areas during September 2017. These hurricanes caused widespread property damage, flooding, power outages, and water and communication service interruptions, and severely disrupted normal economic activity in the affected areas. During the first quarter of 2019, the Corporation recorded a net loan loss reserve release of approximately $6.4 million in connection with revised estimates associated with the effects of the hurricanes. Approximately $3.0 million of the $6.4 million reserve release recorded in the first quarter of 2019 was attributable to the updated payment patterns and credit risk analyses applied to consumer borrowers subject to payment deferral programs that expired early in 2018. In addition, there was a $3.4 million reserve release recorded in the first quarter of 2019 associated with the resolution of uncertainties surrounding the repayment prospects of a hurricane-affected commercial customer. The significant overall uncertainties in the early assessments of hurricane-related credit losses have been largely addressed in the 18-month period after the hurricanes, and the hurricanes’ effect on credit quality is now reflected in the normal process for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses and not through a separate hurricane-related qualitative reserve. For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, the Corporation recorded net loan loss reserve releases of $2.1 million and $8.5 million, respectively, related to revised estimates of the hurricane-related qualitative reserves. The methodologies that the Corporation used to determine the hurricane-related qualitative estimate and for the review of individual large commercial credits are discussed in detail in Note 1, “Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Corporation’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, which are included in the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On a non-GAAP basis, excluding the aforementioned effects of reserve releases associated with the hurricane-related qualitative reserves, the provision for loan and lease losses of $12.5 million for the second quarter of 2019 decreased by $9.1 million, as compared to the adjusted provision of $21.6 million for the second quarter of 2018. The $9.1 million decrease in the adjusted provision for loan and lease losses was driven by the following factors:
A $4.6 million decrease in the provision for consumer loans, primarily related to a decrease in charge-offs taken on auto and personal loans, the effect in the second quarter of 2018 of refinements in the measure of qualitative factors used in the determination of the general reserve for consumer loans, as further explained below, and improvements in delinquency migration patterns.
A $3.3 million decrease in the provision for residential mortgage loans reflecting the effect of improvements in delinquent loan levels, and the overall decrease in the size of this portfolio.
A $1.2 million decrease in the provision for commercial and construction loans, primarily due to lower charges to specific reserves on impaired loans in the second quarter of 2019, partially offset by the effect in the second quarter of 2018 of a net reserve release of $1.6 million related to refinements to the measurement of qualitative factors in the estimation process of the general allowance for loans losses for commercial loans.
During the second quarter of 2018, and as part of the Corporation’s plan to remediate a material weakness identified in the preparation of financial statements included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, an independent third party engaged by the Corporation completed its assessment of the commercial allowance for loan losses framework and the appropriateness of assumptions used in the analysis. The Corporation reviewed the assessment and decided to implement certain enhancements, which include, among others, a revised procedure whereby historical loss rates for each commercial loan regulatory-based credit risk category (i.e., pass, special mention, substandard, and doubtful) are now calculated using the historical charge-offs and portfolio balances over their average loss emergence period (the “raw loss rate”) for each credit risk classification. However, when not enough loss experience is observed in a particular risk-rated category and the calculation results in a loss rate for such risk-rated category that is lower than the loss rate of a less severe risk-rated category, the Corporation now uses the loss rate of such less severe category. Accordingly, during the second quarter of 2018, the Corporation applied the raw loss rate determined for loans rated pass to the commercial real estate loans rated special mention, instead of the lower raw loss rate that resulted for the special mention category.
As of March 31, 2018, the historical losses and portfolio balances of special mention loans were allocated to pass or substandard categories based on the historical proportion of loans in this risk category that ultimately cured or resulted in being uncollectible.
104
In addition, during the second quarter of 2018, the Corporation implemented refinements to the measurement of qualitative factors in the estimation process of the allowance for loan losses for commercial and consumer loans, primarily consisting of the incorporation of a basis point adjustment derived from the difference between the average raw loss rate and the highest loss rates observed during a look-back period that management determined was appropriate to use for each region to identify any relevant effect during an economic cycle.
Although the net effect of these refinements was immaterial to the total provision expense, on a portfolio basis these enhancements resulted in a $1.6 million decrease in the provision for commercial and construction loans in the second quarter of 2018, offset by a $1.6 million increase in the provision for consumer loans.
On a non-GAAP basis, excluding the aforementioned effects of reserve releases associated with the hurricane-related qualitative reserves, the adjusted provision for loan and lease losses decreased by $17.8 million to $30.8 million for the first six months of 2019, as compared to the adjusted provision of $48.5 million for the first six months of 2018. The $17.8 million decrease in the adjusted provision for loan and lease losses was driven by the following factors:
A $21.1 million decrease in the adjusted provision for commercial and construction loans, primarily reflecting: (i) the effect in the first half of 2018 of a $5.6 million charge to the provision related to $57.2 million in nonaccrual loans transferred to held for sale; (ii) commercial and construction loan reserve releases of approximately $2.0 million in the first six months of 2019 related to improvements in historical loss rates used for the determination of general reserves; and (iii) the effect in the first six months of 2018 of charges to the provision totaling $8.5 million related to the downgrade of three large commercial loans totaling $110.3 million.
Partially offset by:
A $2.8 million increase in the adjusted provision for residential mortgage loans, mainly reflecting the effect of updated appraisals indicating lower collateral values and the effect in 2018 of reserve releases related to lower specific reserve requirements for residential mortgage TDR loans.
A $0.5 million increase in the adjusted provision for consumer loans reflecting, among other things, the $1.6 million charge in 2018 related to the above-mentioned refinements in the measurement of qualitative factors used in the determination of the general reserve for consumer loans and the increase in size of the auto, finance leases, and personal loan portfolios.
See “Basis of Presentation” below for a reconciliation of the GAAP provision for loan and lease losses to the non-GAAP adjusted provision for loan and lease losses excluding the effect of the hurricane-related reserve releases. Also see “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management” below for an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses, non-performing assets, impaired loans and related information, and see “Financial Condition and Operating Data Analysis – Loan Portfolio and Risk Management — Credit Risk Management” below for additional information concerning the Corporation’s loan portfolio exposure in the geographic areas where the Corporation does business.
105
Non-Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
| (In thousands) |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Service charges on deposit accounts | $ | 5,887 |
| $ | 5,344 |
| $ | 11,603 |
| $ | 10,432 |
| Mortgage banking activities |
| 4,395 |
|
| 4,835 |
|
| 8,022 |
|
| 9,000 |
| Insurance income |
| 2,025 |
|
| 1,780 |
|
| 6,275 |
|
| 5,135 |
| Other operating income |
| 9,916 |
|
| 8,513 |
|
| 18,866 |
|
| 16,373 |
| Non-interest income before gain on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| early extinguishment of debt |
| 22,223 |
|
| 20,472 |
|
| 44,766 |
|
| 40,940 |
| Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 2,316 |
| Total | $ | 22,223 |
| $ | 20,472 |
| $ | 44,766 |
| $ | 43,256 |
Non-interest income primarily consists of income from service charges on deposit accounts, commissions derived from various banking and insurance activities, gains and losses on mortgage banking activities, interchange and other fees related to debit and credit cards, and net gains and losses on investments and impairments.
Service charges on deposit accounts include monthly fees, overdraft fees, and other fees on deposit accounts, as well as corporate cash management fees.
Income from mortgage banking activities includes gains on sales and securitizations of loans, revenues earned for administering residential mortgage loans originated by the Corporation and subsequently sold with servicing retained, and unrealized gains and losses on forward contracts used to hedge the Corporation’s securitization pipeline. In addition, lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments to the Corporation’s residential mortgage loans held-for-sale portfolio and servicing rights portfolio, if any, are recorded as part of mortgage banking activities.
Insurance income consists mainly of insurance commissions earned by the Corporation’s subsidiary, FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc.
The other operating income category is composed of miscellaneous fees such as debit, credit card and point of sale (“POS”) interchange fees, as well as contractual shared revenues from merchant contracts sold in 2015.
The gain on early extinguishment of debt is related to the repurchase and cancellation in the first quarter of 2018 of $23.8 million in TRuPs of FBP Statutory Trust I that were auctioned in a public sale at which the Corporation was invited to participate. The Corporation repurchased and cancelled the repurchased TRuPs, resulting in a commensurate reduction in the related amount of the floating rate junior subordinated debentures. The Corporation’s winning bid equated to 90% of the $23.8 million par value. The 10% discount resulted in a gain of $2.3 million, which is reflected in the consolidated statements of income as a Gain on early extinguishment of debt. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation still had floating rate junior subordinated debentures (“subordinated debt”) outstanding in the aggregate amount of $184.2 million.
106
Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2019 amounted to $22.2 million, compared to $20.5 million for the same period in 2018. The $1.7 million increase in non-interest income was primarily related to:
A $1.4 million increase in Other operating income in the table above, primarily related to: (i) a $0.6 million gain from hurricane-related insurance proceeds recorded in the second quarter of 2019; (ii) a $0.4 million increase in credit and debit card interchange fee income due to higher transaction volumes: and (iii) a $0.2 million increase in non-deferrable loan fees.
A $0.5 million increase in service charges on deposits, primarily related to an increase in returned items and overdraft transactions as well as an increase in the number of cash management transactions of commercial clients.
A $0.2 million increase in insurance commission income.
Partially offset by:
A $0.4 million decrease in revenues from mortgage banking activities, primarily related to the effect in the second quarter of 2018 of a $0.6 million adjustment recorded to decrease the valuation allowance of mortgage servicing rights and a $0.4 million increase in the mortgage servicing rights amortization expense. These variances were partially offset by a $0.5 million increase in gains from sales of residential mortgage loans. Total loans sold in the secondary market to U.S. government-sponsored entities (“GSEs”), amounted to $97.6 million with a related net gain of $3.3 million, net of realized losses of $0.5 million on To-Be-Announced (“TBA”) hedges settled during the second quarter of 2019, compared to total loans sold in the secondary market of $96.4 million with a related gain of $2.8 million, including realized gains of $0.2 million on TBA hedges settled during the second quarter of 2018.
Non-interest income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2019 amounted to $44.8 million, compared to $43.3 million for the same period in 2018. The $1.5 million increase in non-interest income was primarily due to:
A $2.5 million increase in Other operating income in the table above, primarily related to: (i) a $1.0 million increase in in transaction fee income from ATM, POS, credit and debit card interchange fees, and merchant-related activities due to higher transaction volumes; (ii) the $0.6 million gain from hurricane-related insurance proceeds recorded in the second quarter of 2019; (iii) the effect of a $0.6 million lower of cost or market adjustment recorded in the first quarter of 2018 to reduce the carrying value of a construction loan held for sale; (iv) a $0.3 million increase in non-deferrable loans fees; and (v) a $0.2 million gain recorded on the sale of $4.8 million in nonaccrual commercial loans held for sale in the first quarter of 2019. These variances were partially offset by the effect in the first quarter of 2018 of a $0.8 million gain on the sale of fixed assets of a closed banking branch in Florida.
A $1.2 million increase in service charges on deposits, primarily related to the increase in returned items and overdraft transactions, as well as an increase in the number of cash management transactions of commercial clients.
A $1.1 million increase in insurance commission income.
Partially offset by:
The effect in 2018 of the $2.3 million gain recorded on the repurchase and cancellation of $23.8 million in TRuPs.
A $0.9 million decrease in revenues from mortgage banking activities, driven by the effect in the first six months of 2018 of adjustments totaling $1.3 million recorded to decrease the valuation allowance of mortgage servicing rights and a $0.5 million increase in the mortgage servicing rights amortization expense. These variances were partially offset by an increase of $0.7 million in gains from sales of residential mortgage loans. Total loans sold in the secondary market to U.S. GSEs, amounted to $174.9 million with a related net gain of $5.5 million, net of realized losses of $1.1 million on TBA hedges settled during the first half of 2019, compared to total loans sold in the secondary market of $170.9 million with a related gain of $4.7 million, including realized gains of $0.6 million on TBA hedges settled during the first half of 2018.
107
Non-Interest Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the components of non-interest expenses: | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Employees' compensation and benefits | $ | 40,813 |
| $ | 39,555 |
| $ | 80,109 |
| $ | 80,239 |
| Occupancy and equipment |
| 15,834 |
|
| 13,746 |
|
| 31,889 |
|
| 28,851 |
| FDIC deposit insurance premium |
| 1,482 |
|
| 2,443 |
|
| 3,180 |
|
| 5,092 |
| Taxes, other than income taxes |
| 3,737 |
|
| 3,637 |
|
| 7,557 |
|
| 7,493 |
| Professional fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Collections, appraisals and other credit-related fees |
| 1,946 |
|
| 1,650 |
|
| 3,663 |
|
| 3,249 |
| Outsourcing technology services |
| 5,798 |
|
| 5,127 |
|
| 11,318 |
|
| 10,250 |
| Other professional fees |
| 3,927 |
|
| 3,416 |
|
| 7,000 |
|
| 6,754 |
| Credit and debit card processing expenses |
| 3,820 |
|
| 3,766 |
|
| 7,974 |
|
| 7,303 |
| Business promotion |
| 3,940 |
|
| 4,016 |
|
| 7,646 |
|
| 6,592 |
| Communications |
| 1,714 |
|
| 1,582 |
|
| 3,466 |
|
| 3,064 |
| Net loss on OREO and OREO operations |
| 5,043 |
|
| 5,655 |
|
| 8,786 |
|
| 5,845 |
| Other |
| 4,883 |
|
| 5,623 |
|
| 10,321 |
|
| 11,511 |
| Total | $ | 92,937 |
| $ | 90,216 |
| $ | 182,909 |
| $ | 176,243 |
Non-interest expenses for the second quarter of 2019 were $92.9 million, compared to $90.2 million for the same period in 2018. The $2.7 million increase in non-interest expenses was mainly due to:
A $2.1 million increase in occupancy and equipment expenses, primarily related to a $1.8 million increase in depreciation and amortization expenses, including software license fees, and a $0.4 million increase related to a write-down of previously capitalized costs associated with changes in the scope and requirements of a technology-related project. These variance were partially offset by a $0.2 million hurricane-related insurance recovery related to repairs and maintenance costs incurred in prior periods on facilities affected by Hurricane Irma in the British Virgin Islands.
A $1.5 million increase in professional fees, reflecting an increase of $0.7 million in outsourced technology services, a $0.4 million increase in attorneys’ collection fees, and a $0.6 million decrease in legal and audit-related fees.
A $1.3 million increase in employees’ compensation and benefits, primarily due to salary merit increases and adjustments related to the Corporation’s annual salary review process that took effect in July 2018, higher headcount, and higher matching contributions to the employees’ retirement plan.
Partially offset by:
A $1.0 million decrease in the FDIC insurance premium expense, reflecting, among other things, the effect of improved earnings trends and reductions in brokered CDs.
A $0.6 million decrease related to the reversal of previously accrued amounts for local supervisory assessments, based on the most recent assessment bill, included as part of Other in the table above.
A $0.6 million decrease in losses from OREO operations, primarily reflecting a $2.6 million decrease in adverse fair value adjustments to the value of OREO properties, partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in income recognized from rental payments associated with income-producing properties and higher losses on sales.
108
Non-interest expenses for the first six months of 2019 were $182.9 million, compared to $176.2 million for the same period in 2018. The $6.7 million increase in non-interest expenses was principally attributable to:
A $2.9 million increase in losses from OREO operations, primarily related to a $1.8 million decrease in income recognized from rental payments associated with income-producing properties, and a $0.7 million increase in OREO operating expenses, primarily insurance, repairs and maintenance fees.
A $3.0 million increase in occupancy and equipment expenses, primarily related to an increase of $2.9 million in depreciation and amortization expenses, including software licenses fees, reflecting the effect of certain projects placed in production related to, among other things, enhancements to the technology infrastructure, including online banking, data security, ERP system matters, and modeling and data management software that support the implementation of new accounting pronouncements, a $0.4 million increase related to a write-down of previously capitalized costs associated with changes in the scope and requirements of a technology-related project, and a $0.6 million increase in electricity-related expenses. These increases were partially offset by the effect in 2018 of approximately $2.3 million of hurricane-related expenses, mostly attributable to repairs and security matters.
A $1.7 million increase in professional fees, reflecting, among other things, an increase of $1.1 million in outsourced technology services fees and a $0.9 million increase in legal and audit-related fees.
A $1.1 million increase in business promotion expenses, primarily reflecting a $0.5 million increase in sponsorship-related activities, a $0.2 million increase related to marketing activities, and a $0.2 million increase in charitable contributions.
A $0.7 million increase in credit and debit card processing expenses, mainly due to higher transaction volumes.
Partially offset by:
A $1.9 million decrease in the FDIC insurance premium expense, reflecting, among other things, the effect of improved earnings trends and reductions in brokered CDs.
A $1.2 million decrease in “Other” in the table above, reflecting a $0.6 million decrease related to the reversal of previously accrued amounts for local supervisory assessments, and a $0.3 million decrease in amortization and impairment of intangible assets.
A $0.1 million decrease in employees’ compensation and benefits, reflecting the effect in the first quarter of 2019 of the $2.3 million expense recovery related to the Benefit available to eligible employers under the Disaster Tax Relief Act. In addition, there was a $1.8 million decrease in stock-based compensation as the Corporation ceased paying additional salary amounts in the form of stock in accordance with the previously-disclosed revised executive compensation program in effect since July 1, 2018. The decrease was partially offset by increases in compensation costs related to salary merit increases and adjustments related to the Corporation’s annual salary review exercise that took effect in July 2018, a higher headcount, and an increase of approximately $0.8 million in the matching contribution to the employees’ retirement plan.
109
Income Taxes
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and USVI income taxes, as well as applicable U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp. is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. and USVI income tax purposes and, accordingly, is generally subject to U.S. and USVI income tax only on its income from sources within the U.S. and USVI or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in those jurisdictions. Any such tax paid in the U.S. and USVI is also creditable against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 2011, as amended (the “2011 PR Code”), the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are generally not entitled to file consolidated tax returns and, thus, the Corporation is generally not entitled to utilize losses from one subsidiary to offset gains in another subsidiary. Accordingly, in order to obtain a tax benefit from a net operating loss (“NOL”), a particular subsidiary must be able to demonstrate sufficient taxable income within the applicable NOL carry-forward period. Pursuant to the 2011 PR Code, the carry-forward period for NOLs incurred during taxable years that commenced after December 31, 2004 and ended before January 1, 2013 is 12 years; for NOLs incurred during taxable years commencing after December 31, 2012, the carryover period is 10 years. The 2011 PR Code provides a dividend received deduction of 100% on dividends received from “controlled” subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations.
On December 10, 2018, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law Act 257 (“Act 257”) to amend some of the provisions of the 2011 PR Code, as amended. Act 257 introduced various changes to the income tax regime in the case of individuals and corporations, and the sales and use taxes, which took effect on January 1, 2019, including, among others, (i) a reduction in the Puerto Rico maximum corporate tax rate from 39% to 37.5%; (ii) an increase in the net operating and capital losses usage limitation from 80% to 90%; (iii) amendments to the provisions related to “pass-through” entities that provide that corporations that own 50% or more of a partnership will not be able to claim a current or carryover non partnership NOL deduction against a partnership distributable share, adversely impacting a tax action taken in 2017 for FirstBank Insurance under which the Corporation was previously allowed to offset pass-through income earned by FirstBank Insurance with net operating losses at the holding company level; and (iv) other limitations on certain deductions, such as meals and entertainment deductions.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate, mainly by investing in government obligations and MBS exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business through an International Banking Entity (“IBE”) unit of the Bank, and through the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, whose interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico income taxation. The IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico on the specific activities identified in the IBE Act. An IBE that operates as a unit of a bank pays income taxes at the corporate standard rates to the extent that the IBE’s net income exceeds 20% of the bank’s total net taxable income.
For the second quarter and first six months of 2019, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $18.0 million and $35.6 million, respectively, compared to $10.2 million and $17.9 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2018. The variance in the income tax expense for the second quarter and first six months of 2019, when compared to the same periods in 2018, was primarily related to a higher proportion of taxable to exempt income.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2019, the Corporation calculated the provision for income taxes by applying the estimated annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year to ordinary income or loss. In the computation of the consolidated worldwide annual estimated effective tax rate, ASC Topic 740-270, “Income Taxes” (“ASC Topic 740-270”), requires the exclusion of legal entities with pre-tax losses from which a tax benefit cannot be recognized. The Corporation’s estimated annual effective tax rate in the first six months of 2019, excluding entities from which a tax benefit cannot be recognized and discrete items, was 29% compared to 25% for the first six months of 2018. The estimated annual effective tax rate, including all entities, for 2019 was 29% (30% excluding discrete items), compared to 24% for the first six months of 2018 (25% excluding discrete items).
The Corporation’s deferred tax asset amounted to $290.3 million as of June 30, 2019, net of a valuation allowance of $92.8 million, and management concluded, based upon the assessment of all positive and negative evidence, that it is more likely than not that the Corporation will generate sufficient taxable income within the applicable NOL carry-forward periods to realize such amount. The deferred tax asset of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary, FirstBank, amounted to $290.2 million as of June 30, 2019, net of a valuation allowance of $60.0 million, compared to a deferred tax asset of $319.8 million, net of a valuation allowance of $68.1 million, as of December 31, 2018.
110
The Corporation has U.S. and USVI sourced NOL carryforwards. Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the “Section 382”) limits the ability to utilize U.S. and USVI NOLs for income tax purposes in such jurisdictions following an event that is considered to be an ownership change. Generally, an “ownership change” occurs when certain shareholders increase their aggregate ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage over a three-year testing period. Upon the occurrence of a Section 382 ownership change, the use of NOLs attributable to the period prior to the ownership change is subject to limitations and only a portion of the U.S. and USVI NOLs may be used by the Corporation to offset its annual U.S. and USVI taxable income, if any. In 2017, the Corporation completed a formal ownership change analysis within the meaning of Section 382 covering a comprehensive period, and concluded that an ownership change had occurred during such period. The Section 382 limitation has resulted in higher U.S. and USVI income tax liabilities than we would have incurred in the absence of such limitation. The Corporation has mitigated to an extent the adverse effects associated with the Section 382 limitation as any such tax paid in the U.S. or USVI can be creditable against Puerto Rico tax liabilities or taken as a deduction against taxable income. However, our ability to reduce our Puerto Rico tax liability through such a credit or deduction depends on our tax profile at each annual taxable period, which is dependent on various factors. For the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, the Corporation incurred an income tax expense of approximately $1.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively, related to its U.S. operations, compared to $1.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2018. The limitation did not impact the USVI operations for the second quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS
Assets
The Corporation’s total assets were $12.5 billion as of June 30, 2019, an increase of $293.6 million from December 31, 2018. The increase, as further discussed below, was mainly due to a $246.3 million increase in total loans, a $154.1 million increase in cash and cash equivalents, and the effect of the recognition of a right-of-use asset for operating leases, amounting to $57.3 million as of June 30, 2019, in connection with the adoption of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Account Standards Update No. (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” in the first quarter of 2019. These increases were partially offset by a $139.3 million decrease in total investment securities, driven by prepayments of $100.0 million of U.S. agencies MBS and $75.4 million of U.S. agencies bonds that matured or were called prior to maturity, partially offset by a $38.0 million increase in the fair value of available-for sale investment securities. In addition, there was a $29.5 million decrease in the net deferred tax asset.
Loan Portfolio |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, as of the dates indicated: | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||
(In thousands) | 2019 |
| 2018 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans | $ | 3,070,746 |
| $ | 3,163,208 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Commercial mortgage loans |
| 1,550,364 |
|
| 1,522,662 | |
Construction loans |
| 100,244 |
|
| 79,429 | |
Commercial and Industrial loans |
| 2,279,685 |
|
| 2,148,111 | |
Total commercial loans |
| 3,930,293 |
|
| 3,750,202 | |
Finance leases |
| 370,907 |
|
| 333,536 | |
Consumer loans |
| 1,742,009 |
|
| 1,611,177 | |
Total loans held for investment |
| 9,113,955 |
|
| 8,858,123 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
| (172,011) |
|
| (196,362) | |
Total loans held for investment, net | $ | 8,941,944 |
| $ | 8,661,761 | |
Loans held for sale |
| 33,630 |
|
| 43,186 | |
Total loans, net | $ | 8,975,574 |
| $ | 8,704,947 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s total loan portfolio, before allowance, amounted to $9.1 billion, an increase of $246.3 million when compared to December 31, 2018. The increase consisted of a $175.3 million growth in the Puerto Rico region, a $70.2 million increase in the Florida region, and a $0.8 million increase in the Virgin Islands region. On a portfolio basis, the increase consisted of a $171.1 million growth in commercial and construction loans, and a $168.2 million growth in consumer loans, partially offset by a $93.0 million decrease in the residential mortgage loan portfolio.
The increase in total loans in the Puerto Rico region consisted of a $174.9 million growth in consumer loans and a $78.5 million increase in commercial and constructions loans, partially offset by a reduction of $78.1 million in residential mortgage loans. The increase in commercial and construction loans was mainly related to certain large originations in the first half of 2019, including the origination of three new floor plan lines of credit with an outstanding balance of $51.3 million as of June 30, 2019, the origination of a $37.3 million commercial mortgage loan, and an aggregate increase of $37.0 million in the outstanding balance of commercial and industrial credit facilities extended to two commercial customers. The increase was partially offset by the sale of a $20.0 million commercial and industrial loan participation, repayments that reduced the balance of two commercial loans by approximately $10.8 million, sales and repayments of nonaccrual commercial and construction loans held for sale totaling $9.0 million, and charge-offs recorded in the first half of 2019. The decrease in residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico primarily reflects the effect of collections, charge-offs and approximately $17.9 million of foreclosures recorded in the first half of 2019, which more than offset the volume of non-conforming residential mortgage loan originations maintained in the loans held for investment portfolio. The increase in consumer loans was driven by new loan originations.
The increase in total loans in the Florida region consisted of an $83.9 million growth in commercial and construction loans, despite a charge-off of $11.4 million taken on a commercial mortgage loan during the second quarter of 2019, partially offset by reductions of $8.1 million in consumer loans and $5.6 million in residential mortgage loans. In recent years, the Corporation has invested in facilities, increased its resources dedicated to commercial and corporate banking functions and invested in a technology platform in Florida as the Corporation expects to achieve continued growth in this region.
The increase in total loans in the Virgin Islands region consisted of an $8.7 million increase in commercial and construction loans and a $1.4 million increase in consumer loans, partially offset by a $9.3 million decrease in residential mortgage loans. The increase in commercial and construction loans was driven by the origination of a $4.6 million commercial and industrial term loan in the first quarter of 2019.
112
As shown in the table above, as of June 30, 2019, the loans held for investment portfolio was comprised of commercial and construction loans (43%), residential real estate loans (34%), and consumer and finance leases (23%). Of the total gross loan portfolio held for investment of $9.1 billion as of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had credit risk concentration of approximately 74% in Puerto Rico, 21% in the United States (mainly in the state of Florida), and 5% in the Virgin Islands, as shown in the following table:
As of June 30, 2019 | Puerto Rico |
| Virgin Islands |
| United States |
| Total | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
| |||||||||
Residential mortgage loans | $ | 2,235,828 |
| $ | 242,937 |
| $ | 591,981 |
| $ | 3,070,746 |
Commercial mortgage loans |
| 1,031,597 |
|
| 70,131 |
|
| 448,636 |
|
| 1,550,364 |
Construction loans |
| 31,191 |
|
| 12,585 |
|
| 56,468 |
|
| 100,244 |
Commercial and Industrial loans |
| 1,416,447 |
|
| 107,789 |
|
| 755,449 |
|
| 2,279,685 |
Total commercial loans |
| 2,479,235 |
|
| 190,505 |
|
| 1,260,553 |
|
| 3,930,293 |
Finance leases |
| 370,907 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 370,907 |
Consumer loans |
| 1,643,248 |
|
| 48,233 |
|
| 50,528 |
|
| 1,742,009 |
Total loans held for investment, gross | $ | 6,729,218 |
| $ | 481,675 |
| $ | 1,903,062 |
| $ | 9,113,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
| 32,092 |
|
| 311 |
|
| 1,227 |
|
| 33,630 |
Total loans, gross | $ | 6,761,310 |
| $ | 481,986 |
| $ | 1,904,289 |
| $ | 9,147,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018 | Puerto Rico |
| Virgin Islands |
| United States |
| Total | ||||
(In thousands) |
|
| |||||||||
Residential mortgage loans | $ | 2,313,230 |
| $ | 252,363 |
| $ | 597,615 |
| $ | 3,163,208 |
Commercial mortgage loans |
| 1,014,023 |
|
| 74,585 |
|
| 434,054 |
|
| 1,522,662 |
Construction loans |
| 26,069 |
|
| 11,303 |
|
| 42,057 |
|
| 79,429 |
Commercial and Industrial loans |
| 1,351,661 |
|
| 95,900 |
|
| 700,550 |
|
| 2,148,111 |
Total commercial loans |
| 2,391,753 |
|
| 181,788 |
|
| 1,176,661 |
|
| 3,750,202 |
Finance leases |
| 333,536 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 333,536 |
Consumer loans |
| 1,505,720 |
|
| 46,838 |
|
| 58,619 |
|
| 1,611,177 |
Total loans held for investment, gross | $ | 6,544,239 |
| $ | 480,989 |
| $ | 1,832,895 |
| $ | 8,858,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
| 41,794 |
|
| 199 |
|
| 1,193 |
|
| 43,186 |
Total loans, gross | $ | 6,586,033 |
| $ | 481,188 |
| $ | 1,834,088 |
| $ | 8,901,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
Residential Real Estate Loans
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio held for investment decreased by $92.5 million, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2018, reflecting reductions in all regions as principal repayments, charge-offs and foreclosures exceeded the volume of new non-conforming residential mortgage loan originations maintained in the held for investment portfolio. The residential mortgage loan portfolio held for investment decreased by $77.4 million, $9.4 million, and $5.6 million in the Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Florida regions, respectively. Approximately 80% of the $193.7 million in residential mortgage loans originated in Puerto Rico during the first six months of 2019 consisted of conforming loan originations and refinancings.
The majority of the Corporation’s outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands consisted of fixed-rate loans that traditionally carried higher yields than residential mortgage loans in Florida. In the Florida region, approximately 56% of the residential mortgage loan portfolio consisted of adjustable-rate mortgages. In accordance with the Corporation’s underwriting guidelines, residential mortgage loans are primarily fully-documented loans, and the Corporation does not originate negative amortization loans.
Commercial and Construction Loans
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s commercial and construction loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, increased by $171.1 million to $3.9 billion, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2018. In the Florida region, commercial and construction loans increased by $83.9 million, mainly attributable to new loan originations, despite the aforementioned charge-off of $11.4 million taken on a commercial mortgage loan. As explained above, the increase in the Puerto Rico region of $78.5 million was mainly related to certain large originations in the first half of 2019, including the origination of three new floor plan lines of credit with an outstanding balance of $51.3 million and the origination of a $37.3 million commercial mortgage loan. The commercial and construction loan portfolio in the Virgin Islands region increased by $8.7 million.
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $60.4 million outstanding in loans extended to the Puerto Rico government, its municipalities and public corporations, compared to $61.6 million as of December 31, 2018. Approximately $46.3 million of the outstanding loans as of June 30, 2019 consisted of loans extended to municipalities in Puerto Rico, which in most cases are supported by assigned property tax revenues. The vast majority of revenues of the municipalities included in the Corporation’s loan portfolio are independent of the Puerto Rico central government. These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as are required for the payment of all of their respective general obligation bonds and notes. Late in 2015, the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (the “GDB”) and the Municipal Revenue Collection Center (“CRIM”) signed and perfected a deed of trust. Through this deed, the GDB, as fiduciary, is bound to keep the CRIM funds separate from any other deposits and must distribute the funds pursuant to applicable law. The CRIM funds are deposited at another commercial depository financial institution in Puerto Rico. In addition to loans extended to municipalities, the Corporation’s exposure to the Puerto Rico government as of June 30, 2019 included a $14.2 million loan granted to an affiliate of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”).
The Corporation also has credit exposure to USVI government entities. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $64.0 million in loans to USVI government instrumentalities and public corporations, compared to $55.8 million as of December 31, 2018. Of the amount outstanding as of June 30, 2019, public corporations of the USVI owed approximately $40.8 million and an independent instrumentality of the USVI government owed approximately $23.2 million. As of June 30, 2019, all loans were currently performing and up to date on principal and interest payments.
114
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s total exposure to shared national credit (“SNC”) loans (including unused commitments) amounted to $865.6 million. As of June 30, 2019, approximately $243.4 million of the SNC exposure related to the portfolio in Puerto Rico and $622.2 million related to the portfolio in the Florida region.
The composition of the Corporationʼs construction loan portfolio held for investment as of June 30, 2019 by category and geographic location follows: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Puerto Rico |
| Virgin Islands |
| United States |
| Total | ||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |||||||||
Loans for residential housing projects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-rise (1) | $ | 523 |
| $ | 956 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 1,479 |
Single-family, detached |
| - |
|
| 1,248 |
|
| 8,269 |
|
| 9,517 |
Total for residential housing projects |
| 523 |
|
| 2,204 |
|
| 8,269 |
|
| 10,996 |
Construction loans to individuals secured by residential properties |
| 109 |
|
| 1,023 |
|
| - |
|
| 1,132 |
Loans for commercial projects |
| 16,549 |
|
| 7,487 |
|
| 44,900 |
|
| 68,936 |
Land loans - residential |
| 8,197 |
|
| 1,871 |
|
| 3,298 |
|
| 13,366 |
Land loans - commercial |
| 5,814 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 5,814 |
Total construction loan portfolio, gross |
| 31,192 |
|
| 12,585 |
|
| 56,467 |
|
| 100,244 |
Allowance for loan losses |
| (2,300) |
|
| (718) |
|
| (8) |
|
| (3,026) |
Total Construction Loan Portfolio, net | $ | 28,892 |
| $ | 11,867 |
| $ | 56,459 |
| $ | 97,218 |
| |||||||||||
(1) Mid-rise relates to buildings of up to 7 stories. | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents further information related to the Corporation’s construction portfolio as of and for the six-month period ended June 30, 2019: | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
| |
|
| Total undisbursed funds under existing commitments | $ | 142,509 |
|
|
| Construction loans held for investment in nonaccrual status | $ | 6,936 |
|
|
| Net charge offs (recoveries) - Construction loans | $ | (71) |
|
|
| Allowance for loan losses - Construction loans | $ | 3,026 |
|
|
| Nonaccrual construction loans to total construction loans, including held for sale |
| 6.92% |
|
|
| Allowance for loan losses - construction loans to total construction loans held for investment |
| 3.02% |
|
|
| Net charge-offs (annualized) to total average construction loans (1) |
| -0.16% |
|
|
|
| |||
|
| (1) Loan loss recoveries exceeded charge-offs during the first six months of 2019. |
|
115
Consumer Loans and Finance Leases
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s consumer loan and finance lease portfolio increased by $168.2 million to $2.1 billion, as compared to the portfolio balance as of December 31, 2018. The increase primarily reflects increases in auto loans, finance leases, personal loans, and credit card loans which increased by $88.6 million, $37.4 million, $36.0 million, and $11.2 million, respectively, partially offset by reductions in home equity lines of credit and boat loans of $3.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The increase was primarily associated with consumer loan originations in the Puerto Rico region during the first half of 2019.
Loan Production
First BanCorp. relies primarily on its retail network of branches to originate residential and consumer loans. The Corporation supplements its residential mortgage originations with wholesale servicing released mortgage loan purchases from mortgage bankers. The Corporation manages its construction and commercial loan originations through centralized units and most of its originations come from existing customers, as well as through referrals and direct solicitations.
The following table provides a breakdown of First BanCorp.’s loan production, including purchases, refinancings, renewals and draws from existing revolving and nonrevolving commitments, for the periods indicated:
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate | $ | 126,076 |
| $ | 140,344 |
| $ | 241,280 |
| $ | 261,118 |
Commercial and industrial and commercial mortgage |
| 491,280 |
|
| 377,277 |
|
| 1,018,014 |
|
| 712,352 |
Construction |
| 18,868 |
|
| 8,949 |
|
| 28,916 |
|
| 19,633 |
Finance leases |
| 42,001 |
|
| 41,533 |
|
| 84,711 |
|
| 69,011 |
Consumer |
| 309,709 |
|
| 242,379 |
|
| 585,720 |
|
| 431,809 |
Total loan production | $ | 987,934 |
| $ | 810,482 |
| $ | 1,958,641 |
| $ | 1,493,923 |
|
116
The Corporation is experiencing continued loan demand and has continued its targeted origination strategy. During the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, total loan originations, including purchases, refinancings, and draws from existing revolving and non-revolving commitments, amounted to approximately $987.9 million and $2.0 billion, respectively, compared to $810.5 million and $1.5 billion, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2018.
Residential mortgage loan originations and purchases for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019 amounted to $126.1 million and $241.3 million, respectively, compared to $140.3 million and $261.1 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2018. These statistics include purchases from mortgage bankers of $5.1 million and $9.3 million for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, respectively, compared to $15.2 million and $29.7 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2018. The decrease in residential mortgage loan originations and purchases of $14.3 million in the second quarter of 2019, as compared to the same period of 2018, reflects a decline of approximately $16.5 million in Puerto Rico, partially offset by increases of $1.9 million and $0.3 million in the Florida and Virgin Islands regions, respectively. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2019, the decrease includes a reduction of $10.4 million in the Puerto Rico region, primarily related to a lower volume of purchases from mortgage bankers, and reductions of $7.6 million and $1.8 million in Florida and the Virgin Islands regions, respectively.
Commercial and construction loan originations (excluding government loans) for the second quarter of 2019 and 2018 amounted to $508.3 million and $383.8 million, respectively, while the originations for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $1.0 billion and $716.0 million, respectively. The increase in the second quarter of 2019, compared to the same period in 2018, reflects increases of approximately $132.8 million and $1.1 million in the Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands regions, respectively, partially offset by a decrease of $9.4 million in Florida. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2019, the increase of $323.3 million, compared to the same period in 2018, reflects increases of $240.9 million, $72.9 million, and $9.5 million in Puerto Rico, Florida, and the Virgin Islands regions, respectively.
Government loan originations for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019 amounted to $1.9 million and $7.7 million, respectively, compared to $2.4 million and $16.0 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2018. Government loan originations in those periods were mainly related to the utilization of an arranged overdraft line of credit of a government entity in the Virgin Islands region.
Originations of auto loans (including finance leases) for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019 amounted to $172.2 million and $336.1 million, respectively, compared to $141.0 million and $242.4 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2018. The increases were primarily attributable to the Puerto Rico region with increases of $36.9 million and $101.3, respectively, million for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same periods in 2018. Personal loan originations, other than credit cards, for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019 amounted to $77.0 million and $142.6 million, respectively, compared to $59.2 million and $97.5 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2018. Most of the increase in personal loan originations was reflected in the Puerto Rico region. The utilization activity on the outstanding credit card portfolio for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019 amounted to approximately $102.5 million and $191.8 million, respectively, compared to $83.7 million and $160.9 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2018.
Investment Activities
As part of its liquidity, revenue diversification and interest rate risk management strategies, First BanCorp. maintains an investment portfolio that is classified as available for sale or held to maturity. The Corporation’s total available-for-sale investment securities portfolio as of June 30, 2019 amounted to $1.8 billion, a decrease of $138.9 million from December 31, 2018. The decrease was mainly driven by prepayments of $100.0 million of U.S. agencies MBS and $75.4 million of U.S. agencies bonds that matured or were called prior to maturity, partially offset by a $38.0 million increase in the fair value of available-for sale investment securities attributable to changes in market interest rates.
As of June 30, 2019, approximately 99% of the Corporation’s available-for-sale securities portfolio was invested in U.S. government and agency debentures and fixed-rate U.S. government sponsored-agency MBS (mainly GNMA, Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) and Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”) fixed-rate securities). In addition, as of June 30, 2019, the Corporation owned bonds of the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (“PRHFA”), classified as available for sale, in the aggregate amount of $8.3 million, carried on the Corporation’s books at their aggregate fair value of $7.0 million, which were current as to contractual payments as of June 30, 2019. Approximately $4.3 million (fair value - $2.9 million) of these bonds consisted of a residential pass-through mortgage-backed security issued by the PRHFA that is collateralized by second mortgages originated under a program launched by the Puerto Rico government in 2010. This bond was structured as a zero-coupon bond for the first ten years (up to July 2019).
117
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio amounted to $144.7 million, down $0.1 million from December 31, 2018. Held-to-maturity investment securities consisted of financing arrangements with Puerto Rico municipalities issued in bond form, which are accounted for as securities, but are underwritten as loans with features that are typically found in commercial loans. These obligations typically are not issued in bearer form, are not registered with the SEC, and are not rated by external credit agencies. These bonds have seniority to the payment of operating costs and expenses of the municipality and are supported by assigned property tax revenues. Approximately 70% of the Corporation’s municipality bonds consisted of obligations issued by three of the largest municipalities in Puerto Rico. These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as are required for the payment of all of their respective general obligation bonds and loans.
See “Risk Management – Exposure to Puerto Rico Government” below for information and details about the Corporation’s total direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government, including the municipalities.
The following table presents the carrying value of investments as of the indicated dates: | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
(In thousands) |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments | $ | 97,853 |
| $ | 7,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agencies obligations |
| 540,719 |
|
| 608,656 |
Puerto Rico government obligations |
| 6,991 |
|
| 6,952 |
MBS |
| 1,255,478 |
|
| 1,326,460 |
Other |
| 500 |
|
| 500 |
Total investment securities available for sale, at fair value |
| 1,803,688 |
|
| 1,942,568 |
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Municipal Bonds |
| 144,672 |
|
| 144,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities, including $41.7 and $41.9 million of FHLB stock |
|
|
|
|
|
as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively |
| 44,227 |
|
| 44,530 |
Total money market investments and investment securities | $ | 2,090,440 |
| $ | 2,139,503 |
MBS as of the indicated dates consisted of: | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||
(In thousands) | 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates | $ | 330,545 |
| $ | 349,778 |
GNMA certificates |
| 171,067 |
|
| 182,777 |
FNMA certificates |
| 683,144 |
|
| 714,044 |
Collateralized mortgage obligations issued or |
|
|
|
|
|
guaranteed by FHLMC and GNMA |
| 58,215 |
|
| 65,947 |
Other mortgage pass-through certificates |
| 12,507 |
|
| 13,914 |
Total MBS | $ | 1,255,478 |
| $ | 1,326,460 |
118
The carrying values of investment securities classified as available for sale and held to maturity as of June 30, 2019 by contractual maturity (excluding MBS) are shown below: | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Carrying |
| Weighted | ||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount |
| Average Yield % | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agencies obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year | $ | 189,391 |
| 1.35 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
| 166,725 |
| 2.02 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
| 155,424 |
| 2.89 |
|
Due after ten years |
| 29,179 |
| 2.70 |
|
|
| 540,719 |
| 2.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico government and municipalities obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
Due after one year through five years |
| 5,957 |
| 4.96 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
| 57,108 |
| 6.04 |
|
Due after ten years |
| 88,598 |
| 6.07 |
|
|
| 151,663 |
| 6.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investment Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
Due after one year through five years |
| 500 |
| 2.96 |
|
Total |
| 692,882 |
| 2.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS |
| 1,255,478 |
| 2.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale and held to maturity | $ | 1,948,360 |
| 2.79 |
|
|
|
119
Net interest income of future periods could be affected by prepayments of MBS. Any acceleration in the prepayments of MBS would lower yields on these securities, as the amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition of these securities would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration of the prepayments of MBS would increase yields on securities purchased at a discount, as the amortization of the discount would accelerate. These risks are directly linked to future period market interest rate fluctuations. Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by the Corporation’s investment in callable securities. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had approximately $226.7 million in debt securities (U.S. agency and Puerto Rico government securities) with embedded calls and with an average yield of 2.74%. See “Risk Management” below for further analysis of the effects of changing interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest income and the interest rate risk management strategies followed by the Corporation. Also refer to Note 5 – Investment Securities, to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Corporation’s investment portfolio.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risks are inherent in virtually all aspects of the Corporation’s business activities and operations. Consequently, effective risk management is fundamental to the success of the Corporation. The primary goals of risk management are to ensure that the Corporation’s risk-taking activities are consistent with the Corporation’s objectives and risk tolerance, and that there is an appropriate balance between risk and reward in order to maximize stockholder value.
The Corporation has in place a risk management framework to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks assumed in conducting its activities. First BanCorp.’s business is subject to eleven broad categories of risks: (1) liquidity risk; (2) interest rate risk; (3) market risk; (4) credit risk; (5) operational risk; (6) legal and compliance risk; (7) reputational risk; (8) model risk; (9) capital risk; (10) strategic risk; and (11) information technology risk. First BanCorp. has adopted policies and procedures designed to identify and manage the risks to which the Corporation is exposed.
The Corporation’s risk management policies are described below as well as in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy
Liquidity is the ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, fund asset growth and business operations, and meet contractual obligations through unconstrained access to funding at reasonable market rates. Liquidity management involves forecasting funding requirements and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet liquidity needs and accommodate fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to changes in the Corporation’s business operations or unanticipated events.
The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the parent company, which is the holding company that owns the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiary. As of June 30, 2019, FirstBank could not pay any dividend to the holding company, except upon receipt of required regulatory approvals. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Corporation reinstated quarterly dividend payments on its common stock. During the first half of 2019, the Corporation continued to pay quarterly interest payments on the subordinated debentures associated with its TRuPs, the monthly dividend income on its non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, and quarterly dividends on its common stock pursuant to regulatory approvals.
The Asset and Liability Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s liquidity policy, as well as approving operating and contingency procedures and monitoring liquidity on an ongoing basis. The Management Investment and Asset Liability Committee (the “MIALCO”), using measures of liquidity developed by management that involve the use of several assumptions, reviews the Corporation’s liquidity position on a monthly basis. The MIALCO oversees liquidity management, interest rate risk and other related matters.
120
The MIALCO, which reports to the Board of Directors’ Asset and Liability Committee, is composed of senior management officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Risk Officer, the Retail Financial Services Director, the Risk Manager of the Treasury and Investments Division, the Financial Analysis and Asset/Liability Director and the Treasurer. The Treasury and Investments Division is responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s funding activities and strategy, monitoring liquidity availability on a daily basis, and reviewing liquidity measures on a weekly basis. The Treasury and Investments Accounting and Operations area of the Comptroller’s Department is responsible for calculating the liquidity measurements used by the Treasury and Investment Division to review the Corporation’s liquidity position on a monthly basis. The Financial Analysis and Asset/Liability Director estimates the liquidity gap for longer periods.
To ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of potential operating environments and market conditions, the Corporation conducts its liquidity management and business activities in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on the continued development of customer-based funding, the maintenance of direct relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and the maintenance of the ability to liquidate certain assets when, and if, requirements warrant.
The Corporation develops and maintains contingency funding plans. These plans evaluate the Corporation’s liquidity position under various operating circumstances and are designed to help ensure that the Corporation will be able to operate through periods of stress when access to normal sources of funds is constrained. The plans project funding requirements during a potential period of stress, specify and quantify sources of liquidity, outline actions and procedures for effectively managing liquidity through a difficult period, and define roles and responsibilities for the Corporation’s employees. Under the contingency funding plan, the Corporation stresses the balance sheet and the liquidity position to critical levels that mimic difficulties in generating funds or even maintaining the current funding position of the Corporation and the Bank and are designed to help ensure the ability of the Corporation and the Bank to honor its respective commitments. The Corporation has established liquidity triggers monitored by the MIALCO in order to maintain the ordinary funding of the banking business. MIALCO developed contingency funding plans for the following four scenarios: local market event, credit rating downgrade, an economic cycle downturn event, and a concentration event. They are reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors’ Asset and Liability Committee.
The Corporation manages its liquidity in a proactive manner and maintains a sound liquidity position. It uses multiple measures to monitor the liquidity position, including core liquidity, basic liquidity, and time-based reserve measures. As of June 30, 2019, the estimated core liquidity reserve (which includes cash and free liquid assets) was $1.8 billion, or 14.5% of total assets, compared to $1.9 billion, or 15.6% of total assets as of December 31, 2018. The basic liquidity ratio (which adds available secured lines of credit to the core liquidity) as of June 30, 2019 was approximately 17.6% of total assets, compared to 19.0% of total assets as of December 31, 2018. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $381.2 million available for additional credit from the FHLB. Unpledged liquid securities as of June 30, 2019, mainly fixed-rate MBS and U.S. agency debentures, amounted to approximately $1.0 billion. The Corporation does not rely on uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal funds lines) to fund its operations and does not include them in the basic liquidity measure. As of June 30, 2019, the holding company had $27.8 million of cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents at the Bank level as of June 30, 2019 were approximately $733.3 million. The Bank had $515.7 million in brokered CDs as of June 30, 2019, of which approximately $243.2 million mature over the next twelve months. Liquidity at the Bank level is highly dependent on bank deposits, which fund 74% of the Bank’s assets (or 70% excluding brokered CDs).
121
Sources of Funding
The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to protect the Corporation’s liquidity from market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds are deposits, including brokered CDs, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB.
The Asset Liability Committee of the Board of Directors reviews credit availability on a regular basis. The Corporation has also sold mortgage loans as a supplementary source of funding. Long-term funding has also been obtained in the past through the issuance of notes and long-term brokered CDs. The cost of these different alternatives, among other things, is taken into consideration.
The Corporation has continued reducing the amounts of its outstanding brokered CDs. As of June 30, 2019, the amount of brokered CDs had decreased by $39.9 million to $515.7 million from brokered CDs of $555.6 million as of December 31, 2018. At the same time as the Corporation focuses on reducing its reliance on brokered CDs, it is seeking to add core deposits. During the first six months of 2019, the Corporation increased deposits, excluding brokered CDs and government deposits, by $89.8 million to $7.6 billion, as further discussed below.
The Corporation continues to have access to financing through counterparties to repurchase agreements, the FHLB, and other agents, such as wholesale funding brokers. While liquidity is an ongoing challenge for all financial institutions, management believes that the Corporation’s available borrowing capacity and efforts to grow retail deposits will be adequate to provide the necessary funding for the Corporation’s business plans in the foreseeable future.
The Corporation’s principal sources of funding are:
Brokered CDs – Historically, a large portion of the Corporation’s funding has been brokered CDs issued by FirstBank. Total brokered CDs decreased during the first six months of 2019 by $39.9 million to $515.7 million as of June 30, 2019.
The average remaining term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs outstanding as of June 30, 2019 was approximately 1.2 years.
The use of brokered CDs has historically been important for the growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits in Puerto Rico. The brokered CD market is very competitive and liquid, and has enabled the Corporation to obtain substantial amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy has enhanced the Corporation’s liquidity position, since brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and can be obtained faster than regular retail deposits.
122
The following table presents contractual maturities of time deposits with denominations of $100,000 or higher as of June 30, 2019: | |||||
|
|
| Total |
| |
|
|
| (In thousands) |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Three months or less | $ | 364,156 |
| |
| Over three months to six months |
| 294,487 |
| |
| Over six months to one year |
| 571,212 |
| |
| Over one year |
| 1,084,687 |
| |
| Total | $ | 2,314,542 |
|
CDs in denominations of $100,000 or higher include brokered CDs of $515.7 million issued to deposit brokers in the form of large CDs that are generally participated out by brokers in amounts of less than the FDIC insurance limit.
Government deposits – As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $785.4 million of Puerto Rico public sector deposits ($644.1 million in transactional accounts and $141.3 million in time deposits), compared to $677.3 million as of December 31, 2018. Approximately 41% is from municipalities and municipal agencies in Puerto Rico and 59% is from public corporations and the Puerto Rico government and agencies.
In addition, as of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $252.9 million of government deposits in the Virgin Islands, compared to $223.4 million as of December 31, 2018.
Retail deposits – The Corporation’s deposit products also include regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts and retail CDs. Deposits, excluding brokered CDs and government deposits, increased by $89.8 million to $7.6 billion as of June 30, 2019, compared to $7.5 billion as of December 31, 2018, reflecting increases of $92.4 million in the Puerto Rico region and $7.4 million in the Virgin Islands region, partially offset by a decrease of $10.0 million in the Florida region. The increase in the Puerto Rico region reflects, among other things, a growth of $121.7 million in time deposits.
Refer to Net Interest Income above for information about average balances of interest-bearing deposits, and the average interest rate paid on deposits for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - The Corporation’s investment portfolio is funded in part with repurchase agreements. The Corporation’s outstanding securities sold under repurchase agreements amounted to $300.0 million as of June 30, 2019, compared to $350.1 million as of December 31, 2018. During the first quarter of 2019, the Corporation repaid a $50.1 million short-term repurchase agreement carried at a cost of 2.85%. One of the Corporation’s strategies has been the use of structured repurchase agreements and long-term repurchase agreements to reduce liquidity risk and manage exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the final maturities of its liabilities while keeping funding costs at reasonable levels. In addition to these repurchase agreements, the Corporation has been able to maintain access to credit by using cost-effective sources such as FHLB advances. See Note 17 – Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for further details about repurchase agreements outstanding by counterparty and maturities.
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $200 million of reverse repurchase agreements with a counterparty under a master netting arrangement that provides for a right of setoff that meets the conditions of ASC Topic 210-20-45-11, “Balance Sheet – Offsetting – Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements,” for a net presentation. These repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements are presented net on the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Under the Corporation’s repurchase agreements, as is the case with derivative contracts, the Corporation is required to pledge cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines due to changes in interest rates, a liquidity crisis or any other factor, the Corporation is required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity.
Given the quality of the collateral pledged, the Corporation has not experienced margin calls from counterparties arising from credit-quality-related write-downs in valuations.
Advances from the FHLB – The Bank is a member of the FHLB system and obtains advances to fund its operations under a collateral agreement with the FHLB that requires the Bank to maintain qualifying mortgages and/or investments as collateral for advances taken. As of each of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the outstanding balance of FHLB advances was $740.0 million. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $381.2 million available for additional credit on FHLB lines of credit.
Trust-Preferred Securities – In 2004, FBP Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation and not consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements, sold to institutional investors $100 million of its variable-rate TRuPs. FBP
123
Statutory Trust I used the proceeds of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.1 million of FBP Statutory Trust I variable rate common securities, to purchase $103.1 million aggregate principal amount of the Corporation’s junior subordinated deferrable debentures.
Also in 2004, FBP Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation and not consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements, sold to institutional investors $125 million of its variable-rate TRuPs. FBP Statutory Trust II used the proceeds of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.9 million of FBP Statutory Trust II variable rate common securities, to purchase $128.9 million aggregate principal amount of the Corporation’s junior subordinated deferrable debentures.
The trust-preferred debentures are presented in the Corporation’s consolidated statement of financial condition as Other borrowings. The variable-rate TRuPs are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The $100 million junior subordinated deferrable debentures issued by the Corporation in April 2004 and the $125 million issued in September 2004 mature on June 17, 2034 and September 20, 2034, respectively; however, under certain circumstances, the maturity of the subordinated debentures may be shortened (such shortening would result in a mandatory redemption of the variable-rate TRuPs). The Collins Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act eliminated certain TRuPs from Tier 1 Capital. Bank holding companies, such as the Corporation, were required to fully phase out these instruments from Tier I capital by January 1, 2016; however, they may remain in Tier 2 capital until the instruments are redeemed or mature.
As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Corporation had subordinated debentures outstanding in the aggregate amount of $184.2 million.
During the second quarter of 2016, the Corporation received approval from the Federal Reserve and paid $31.2 million for all the accrued but deferred interest payments, plus the interest for the 2016 second quarter, on the Corporation’s junior subordinated deferrable debentures associated with its TRuPs. Subsequently, the Corporation has received quarterly regulatory approvals and made scheduled quarterly interest payments. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation was current on all interest payments due related to its subordinated debentures. On October 3, 2017, the New York FED terminated the Written Agreement entered into on June 3, 2010 between the Corporation and the Federal Reserve. However, the Corporation has agreed with its regulators to continue to obtain approval before paying dividends, receiving dividends from the Bank, making payments on subordinated debt or TRuPs, incurring or guaranteeing debt or purchasing or redeeming any corporate stock. The Corporation has received approval to make the subordinated debentures’ quarterly payments through December 2019, subject to conditions established in the agreement with regulators.
Other Sources of Funds and Liquidity - The Corporation’s principal uses of funds are for the origination of loans and the repayment of maturing deposits and borrowings. In connection with its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation has invested in technology and personnel to enhance the Corporation’s secondary mortgage market capabilities.
The enhanced capabilities improve the Corporation’s liquidity profile as they allow the Corporation to derive liquidity, if needed, from the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still highly liquid, in large part because of the sale of mortgages through guarantee programs of the U.S. Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), U.S. Veterans Administration (“VA”), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), FNMA and FHLMC. During the first half of 2019, the Corporation sold approximately $115.0 million of FHA/VA mortgage loans to GNMA, which packages them into MBS. Any regulatory actions affecting GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC could adversely affect the secondary mortgage market.
Although currently not in use, other potential sources of short-term funding for the Corporation include commercial paper and federal funds purchased. Furthermore, in previous years, the Corporation entered into several financing transactions to diversify its funding sources, including the issuance of notes payable and, as noted above, junior subordinated debentures as part of its longer-term liquidity and capital management activities. No assurance can be given that these sources of liquidity will be available in the future and, if available, will be on comparable terms or terms favorable to the Corporation.
Effect of Credit Ratings on Access to Liquidity
The Corporation’s liquidity is contingent upon its ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. The Corporation’s current credit ratings and any downgrade in credit ratings can hinder the Corporation’s access to new forms of external funding and/or cause external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect results of operations. Also, changes in credit ratings may further affect the fair value of unsecured derivatives whose value takes into account the Corporation’s own credit risk.
The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be affected by credit rating downgrades. Furthermore, given the Corporation’s non-reliance on corporate debt or other instruments directly linked in terms of pricing or volume
124
to credit ratings, the liquidity of the Corporation has not been affected in any material way by downgrades. The Corporation’s ability to access new non-deposit sources of funding, however, could be adversely affected by credit downgrades.
The Corporation’s credit as a long-term issuer is currently rated B+ by S&P and B+ by Fitch. At the FirstBank subsidiary level, long-term issuer ratings are B3 by Moody’s, six notches below their definition of investment grade, BB- by S&P, three notches below their definition of investment grade, and B+ by Fitch, four notches below their definition of investment grade. The Corporation’s credit ratings are dependent on a number of factors, both quantitative and qualitative, and are subject to change at any time. The disclosure of credit ratings is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold the Corporation’s securities. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were $740.3 million as of June 30, 2019, an increase of $154.1 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2018. The following discussion highlights the major activities and transactions that affected the Corporation’s cash flows during the first six months of 2019 and 2018.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
First BanCorp.’s operating assets and liabilities vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount and timing of cash flows. Management believes cash flows from operations, available cash balances and the Corporation’s ability to generate cash through short- and long-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund the Corporation’s operating liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.
For the first six months of 2019 and 2018, net cash provided by operating activities was $157.1 million and $158.3 million, respectively. Net cash generated from operating activities was higher than net income, largely as a result of adjustments for items such as the provision for loan and lease losses, depreciation and amortization, as well as the cash generated from sales of loans held for sale.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
The Corporation’s investing activities primarily relate to originating loans to be held for investment, as well as, purchasing, selling and repaying available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2019, net cash used in investing activities was $132.6 million, primarily due to liquidity used to fund commercial and consumer loan originations, partially offset by principal collected on loans and U.S. agency MBS prepayments.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, net cash used in investing activities was $57.4 million, primarily reflecting the effect of purchases of U.S. agency debt securities, partially offset by U.S. agency MBS prepayments and proceeds from sales of adversely-classified commercial loans and seasoned residential mortgage loans.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
The Corporation’s financing activities primarily include the receipt of deposits and the issuance of brokered CDs, the issuance and payments of long-term debt, the issuance of equity instruments and activities related to its short-term funding. For the first six months of 2019, net cash provided by financing activities was $129.6 million, mainly reflecting the increase in non-brokered and government deposits, partially offset by the repayment of a matured short-term repurchase agreement in the amount of $50.1 million and dividends paid on common and preferred stock.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, net cash provided by financing activities was $71.2 million, mainly reflecting the effect of the increase in non-brokered deposits, partially offset by repayments of maturing brokered CDs and a $100 million short-term repurchase agreement, as well as the repurchase of TRuPs.
125
Capital
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s stockholders’ equity was $2.2 billion, an increase of $108.3 million from December 31, 2018. The increase was mainly driven by the earnings generated in the first half of 2019 and the $38.0 million increase in the fair value of available-for-sale investment securities recorded as part of Other comprehensive income, partially offset by common and preferred stock dividends declared in the first half of 2019 totaling $14.4 million. As mentioned above, on October 3, 2017, the Federal Reserve terminated the Written Agreement entered into on June 3, 2010 between the Corporation and the Federal Reserve. However, the Corporation has agreed with its regulators to continue to obtain approval before paying dividends, receiving dividends from the Bank, making payments on subordinated debt or TRuPs, incurring or guaranteeing debt or purchasing or redeeming any corporate stock. The Corporation received regulatory approvals to pay the monthly dividends on the Corporation’s Series A through E Preferred Stock and quarterly dividends on common stock through December 2019, subject to conditions established in the agreement with regulators. The Corporation intends to request approval in future periods to continue to pay monthly dividend payments on the non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock and quarterly dividends on common stock.
Set forth below are First BanCorp.ʼs and FirstBankʼs regulatory capital ratios as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018: | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Banking Subsidiary | |||
| First BanCorp. |
| FirstBank | To be well capitalized - General thresholds | ||||
|
|
| Fully |
|
|
| Fully |
|
|
|
| Phased-in |
|
|
| Phased-in |
|
As of June 30, 2019 | Actual |
| Pro-forma (1) |
| Actual |
| Pro-forma (1) |
|
Total capital ratio (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) | 24.25% |
| 23.84% |
| 23.74% |
| 23.33% | 10.00% |
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) | 20.63% |
| 20.26% |
| 19.09% |
| 18.75% | 6.50% |
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) | 21.03% |
| 20.65% |
| 22.48% |
| 22.08% | 8.00% |
Leverage ratio | 15.64% |
| 15.64% |
| 16.75% |
| 16.75% | 5.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Banking Subsidiary | |||
| First BanCorp. |
| FirstBank | To be well capitalized - General thresholds | ||||
|
|
| Fully |
|
|
| Fully |
|
|
|
| Phased-in |
|
|
| Phased-in |
|
As of December 31, 2018 | Actual |
| Pro-forma (1) |
| Actual |
| Pro-forma (1) |
|
Total capital ratio (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) | 24.00% |
| 23.50% |
| 23.51% |
| 23.02% | 10.00% |
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) | 20.30% |
| 19.86% |
| 18.76% |
| 18.35% | 6.50% |
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) | 20.71% |
| 20.26% |
| 22.25% |
| 21.76% | 8.00% |
Leverage ratio | 15.37% |
| 15.37% |
| 16.53% |
| 16.53% | 5.00% |
| ||||||||
(1) Certain adjustments required under Basel III rules were phased-in through the end of 2018, although certain elements of the Basel III rules were deferred by the federal banking agencies until April 1, 2020. The ratios shown in this column were calculated assuming fully phased-in adjustments as if they were effective as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. |
126
Although the Corporation and FirstBank became subject to the Basel III rules beginning on January 1, 2015, certain elements of the Basel III rules have been deferred by the federal banking agencies. The Corporation and FirstBank compute risk-weighted assets using the Standardized Approach required by the Basel III rules.
The Basel III rules require the Corporation to maintain an additional capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of additional Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (“CET1”) to avoid limitations on both (i) capital distributions (e.g., repurchases of capital instruments, dividends and interest payments on capital instruments,) and (ii) discretionary bonus payments to executive officers and heads of major business lines.
Under the Basel III rules, in order to be considered adequately capitalized and not subject to the above described limitations, the Corporation is required to maintain: (i) a minimum CET1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 4.5%, plus the 2.5% “capital conservation buffer,” resulting in a required minimum CET1 ratio of at least 7%; (ii) a minimum ratio of total Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer, resulting in a required minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%; (iii) a minimum ratio of total Tier 1 plus Tier 2 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer, resulting in a required minimum total capital ratio of 10.5%; and (iv) a required minimum leverage ratio of 4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average on-balance sheet (non-risk adjusted) assets.
In addition, as required under the Basel III rules, the Corporation’s TRuPs were fully phased-out from Tier 1 capital as of January 1, 2016. However, the Corporation’s TRuPs may continue to be included in Tier 2 capital until the instruments are redeemed or mature.
The Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (collectively “the agencies”) have issued several rulemakings over the last two years to simplify certain aspects of the capital rule. For example, the capital rule included transitional arrangements for certain requirements. Under such transitional arrangements in the capital rule, any amount of mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions that a banking organization did not deduct from common equity tier 1 capital was risk weighted at 100 percent until January 1, 2018. In 2017, the agencies adopted a rule (transition rule) to allow non-advanced approaches banking organizations, such as the Corporation and FirstBank, to continue to apply the transition treatment in effect in 2017 (including the 100 percent risk weight for mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions) while the agencies considered the simplifications proposal.
On July 9, 2019, the agencies adopted a final rule that supersedes the regulatory capital transition rules and eliminates the transition provisions that are no longer operative. The final rule will be generally effective April 1, 2020 and eliminates: (i) the 10 percent common equity tier 1 capital deduction threshold, which applies individually to holdings of mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions in the form of common stock; (ii) the 15 percent common equity tier 1 capital deduction threshold, which applies to the aggregate amount of such items; (iii) the 10 percent threshold for non-significant investments, which applies to holdings of regulatory capital of unconsolidated financial institutions; and (iv) the deduction treatment for significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions that are not in the form of common stock. Instead of the current capital rule's treatments for mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions, the final rule requires non-advanced approaches banking organizations to deduct from common equity tier 1 capital any amount of mortgage servicing assets, temporary difference deferred tax assets, and investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions that individually exceed 25 percent of common equity tier 1 capital of the banking organization (the 25 percent common equity tier 1 capital deduction threshold). The final rule retains the deferred requirement that requires a banking organization to apply a 250 percent risk weight to non-deducted mortgage servicing assets or temporary difference deferred tax assets. The table above presents, on a pro-forma basis, regulatory capital ratios incorporating changes required by this final rule as if they were effective as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP financial measures generally used by the financial community to evaluate capital adequacy. Tangible common equity is total equity less preferred equity, goodwill, core deposit intangibles, purchased credit card relationship assets and insurance customer relationship intangible asset. Tangible assets are total assets less intangible assets such as goodwill, core deposit intangibles, purchased credit card relationships and insurance customer asset relationships. See “Basis of Presentation” below for additional information.
127
The following table is a reconciliation of the Corporation’s tangible common equity and tangible assets as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively: | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||
| (In thousands, except ratios and per share information) | 2019 |
| 2018 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total equity - GAAP | $ | 2,152,976 |
| $ | 2,044,704 |
| Preferred equity |
| (36,104) |
|
| (36,104) |
| Goodwill |
| (28,098) |
|
| (28,098) |
| Purchased credit card relationship intangible |
| (4,659) |
|
| (5,702) |
| Core deposit intangible |
| (3,903) |
|
| (4,335) |
| Insurance customer relationship intangible |
| (546) |
|
| (622) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tangible common equity | $ | 2,079,666 |
| $ | 1,969,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total assets - GAAP | $ | 12,537,196 |
| $ | 12,243,561 |
| Goodwill |
| (28,098) |
|
| (28,098) |
| Purchased credit card relationship intangible |
| (4,659) |
|
| (5,702) |
| Core deposit intangible |
| (3,903) |
|
| (4,335) |
| Insurance customer relationship intangible |
| (546) |
|
| (622) |
| Tangible assets | $ | 12,499,990 |
| $ | 12,204,804 |
| Common shares outstanding |
| 217,328 |
|
| 217,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tangible common equity ratio |
| 16.64% |
|
| 16.14% |
| Tangible book value per common share | $ | 9.57 |
| $ | 9.07 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) In May 2017, the U.S. Treasury sold its remaining shares of common stock in First BanCorp. As a result, senior officers forfeited approximately 2.4 million of restricted shares that they held. |
128
The Banking Law of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of FirstBank’s net income for the year be transferred to a legal surplus reserve until such surplus equals the total of paid-in-capital on common and preferred stock. Amounts transferred to the legal surplus reserve from Retained earnings are not available for distribution to the Corporation, including for payment as dividends to the stockholders, without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that, when the expenditures of a Puerto Rico commercial bank are greater than receipts, the excess of the expenditures over receipts must be charged against the undistributed profits of the bank, and the balance, if any, must be charged against the legal surplus reserve, as a reduction thereof. If there is no legal surplus reserve sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the capital account and the Bank cannot pay dividends until it can replenish the legal surplus reserve to an amount of at least 20% of the original capital contributed. During the fourth quarter of 2018, $20.5 million was transferred to the legal surplus reserve. FirstBank’s legal surplus reserve, included as part of Retained earnings in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition, amounted to $80.2 million as of June 30, 2019. There were no transfers to the legal surplus reserve during the first six months of 2019.
Off -Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. These transactions are designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage the Corporation’s credit, market and liquidity risks, (3) diversify the Corporation’s funding sources, and (4) optimize capital.
As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval processes used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation’s commitments to extend credit amounted to approximately $1.3 billion, of which $658.2 million related to credit card loans. Commercial and financial standby letters of credit amounted to approximately $52.2 million.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents information about the maturities of the Corporation’s contractual obligations and commitments, which consist of CDs, long-term contractual debt obligations, commitments to sell mortgage loans and commitments to extend credit: | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contractual Obligations and Commitments | |||||||||||||
| As of June 30, 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Total |
| Less than 1 year |
| 1-3 years |
| 3-5 years |
| After 5 years | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit | $ | 3,049,450 |
| $ | 1,657,326 |
| $ | 1,082,684 |
| $ | 308,270 |
| $ | 1,170 |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (1) |
| 100,000 |
|
| - |
|
| 100,000 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
Advances from FHLB |
| 740,000 |
|
| 250,000 |
|
| 290,000 |
|
| 200,000 |
|
| - |
Other borrowings |
| 184,150 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 184,150 |
Operating leases |
| 73,519 |
|
| 9,429 |
|
| 17,091 |
|
| 11,991 |
|
| 35,008 |
Total contractual obligations | $ | 4,147,119 |
| $ | 1,916,755 |
| $ | 1,489,775 |
| $ | 520,261 |
| $ | 220,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell mortgage loans | $ | 3,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit | $ | 4,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit | $ | 1,145,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
| 47,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction undisbursed funds |
| 142,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments | $ | 1,335,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Reported net of reverse repurchase agreement by counterparty, when applicable, pursuant to ASC Topic 210-20-45-11. |
129
The Corporation has obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts, such as debt and lease agreements, and under other commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value and to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional disbursements. There have been no significant or unexpected draws on existing commitments. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can cancel the unused credit facility at any time and without cause.
Interest Rate Risk Management
First BanCorp. manages its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income and to maintain stability of profitability under varying interest rate scenarios. The MIALCO oversees interest rate risk, and, in doing so, the MIALCO assesses, among other things, current and expected conditions in world financial markets, competition and prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity, the pipeline of loan originations, securities market values, recent or proposed changes to the investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and related costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives, such as swaps and caps, and any tax or regulatory issues that may be pertinent to these areas. The MIALCO approves funding decisions in light of the Corporation’s overall strategies and objectives.
On a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs a consolidated net interest income simulation analysis to estimate the potential change in future earnings from projected changes in interest rates. These simulations are carried out over a one-to-five-year time horizon and assume upward and downward yield curve shifts. The rate scenarios considered in these simulations reflect gradual upward and downward interest rate movements of 200 basis points during a twelve-month period. Simulations are carried out in two ways:
(1) Using a static balance sheet, as the Corporation had on the simulation date, and
(2) Using a dynamic balance sheet based on recent patterns and current strategies.
The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and liabilities by maturity or re-pricing structure and their corresponding interest rate yields and costs. As interest rates rise or fall, these simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and expected future funding sources and costs, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates, deposit decay and other factors, which may be important in projecting net interest income.
The Corporation uses a simulation model to project future movements in the Corporation’s balance sheet and income statement. The starting point of the projections corresponds to the actual values on the balance sheet on the date of the simulations.
These simulations are highly complex, and are based on many assumptions that are intended to reflect the general behavior of the balance sheet components over the period in question. It is unlikely that actual events will match these assumptions in most cases. For this reason, the results of these forward-looking computations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Several benchmark and market rate curves were used in the modeling process, primarily the LIBOR/SWAP curve, Prime, Treasury, FHLB rates, brokered CD rates, repurchase agreements rates and the mortgage commitment rate of 30 years.
As of June 30, 2019, the 12-month net interest income was forecasted assuming the June 30, 2019 interest rate curves remain constant. Then, net interest income was estimated under rising and falling rate scenarios. For the rising rate scenario, a gradual (ramp) parallel upward shift of the yield curve was assumed during the first 12 months (the “+200 ramp” scenario). Conversely, for the falling rate scenario, a gradual (ramp) parallel downward shift of the yield curve was assumed during the first 12 months (the “-200 ramp” scenario). However, given the current low levels of interest rates, a full downward shift of 200 basis points would represent an unrealistic scenario. Therefore, under the falling rate scenario, rates move downward up to 200 basis points, but without reaching zero. The resulting scenario shows interest rates close to zero in most cases, reflecting a flattening yield curve instead of a parallel downward scenario.
The Libor/Swap curve for June 2019, as compared to December 2018, reflected a 57 basis points reduction in the short-term horizon, between 1 to 12 months, while market rates also decreased by 83 basis points in the medium term, that is, between 2 to 5 years. In the long-term, that is, over a 5-year-time horizon, market rates decreased by 73 basis points, causing a more flattened yield curve. The U.S. Treasury curve in the short-term decreased by 44 basis points and in the medium-term horizon decreased by 75 basis points, as compared to the December 2018 end of month levels. The long-term horizon decreased by 58 basis points as compared to December 2018 end of month levels.
130
The following table presents the results of the simulations as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Consistent with prior years, these exclude non-cash changes in the fair value of derivatives: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Interest Income Risk |
| Net Interest Income Risk | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Projected for the next 12 months) |
| (Projected for the next 12 months) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Static Simulation |
| Growing Balance Sheet |
| Static Simulation |
| Growing Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Change |
| % Change |
| Change |
| % Change |
| Change |
| % Change |
| Change |
| % Change | ||||||||
+ 200 bps ramp | $ | 17.1 |
| 3.02 | % |
| $ | 18.2 |
| 3.08 | % |
| $ | 5.7 |
| 1.05 | % |
| $ | 8.7 |
| 1.50 | % |
- 200 bps ramp | $ | (21.3) |
| (3.76) | % |
| $ | (18.0) |
| (3.04) | % |
| $ | (7.2) |
| (1.31) | % |
| $ | (9.1) |
| (1.57) | % |
The Corporation continues to manage its balance sheet structure to control the overall interest rate risk. As of June 30, 2019, the simulations showed that the Corporation continues to maintain an asset-sensitive position. The Corporation has continued repositioning the balance sheet and improving the funding mix, driven by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits with low rate elasticity, and reductions in brokered CDs and short-term repurchase agreements. The above-mentioned growth in deposits, along with proceeds from US agency MBS and loan repayments, and proceeds from U.S. agency bonds that matured or were called prior to maturity during the first half of 2019 has helped the Corporation to fund the continued increases in the loan portfolio, mainly in consumer and commercial loans, along with continue maintaining adequate liquidity levels.
Taking into consideration the above-mentioned facts for modeling purposes, the net interest income for the next 12 months under a growing balance sheet scenario was estimated to increase by $18.2 million in the rising rate scenario when compared against the Corporation’s flat or unchanged interest rate forecast scenario. Under the falling rate, growing balance sheet scenario, the net interest income was estimated to decrease by $18.0 million.
Derivatives
First BanCorp. uses derivative instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates that are beyond management’s control.
The following summarizes major strategies, including derivative activities that the Corporation uses in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate cap agreements - Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value of the interest rate cap increases as the reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements for protection from rising interest rates.
Forward Contracts - Forward contracts are sales of TBAs that will settle over the standard delivery date and do not qualify as “regular-way” security trades. Regular-way security trades are contracts that have no net settlement provision and no market mechanism to facilitate net settlement and provide for delivery of a security within the timeframe generally established by regulations or conventions in the market-place or exchange in which the transaction is being executed. The forward sales are considered derivative instruments that need to be marked-to-market. The Corporation uses these securities to economically hedge the FHA/VA residential mortgage loan securitizations of the mortgage-banking operations. The Corporation also reports as forward contracts the mandatory mortgage loan sales commitments that it enters into with GSEs that require or permit net settlement via a pair-off transaction or the payment of a pair-off fee. Unrealized gains (losses) are recognized as part of Mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statements of income.
Interest Rate Lock Commitments – Interest rate lock commitments are agreements under which the Corporation agrees to extend credit to a borrower under certain specified terms and conditions in which the interest rate and the maximum amount of the loan are set prior to funding. Under the agreement, the Corporation commits to lend funds to a potential borrower, generally on a fixed rate basis, regardless of whether interest rates change in the market.
For detailed information regarding the volume of derivative activities (e.g., notional amounts), location and fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of financial condition and the amount of gains and losses reported in the consolidated statements of income, see Note 12 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities in the accompanying consolidated unaudited financial statements.
131
The following tables summarize the fair value changes in the Corporation’s derivatives, as well as the sources of the fair values: | |||||
| Asset Derivatives |
| Liability Derivatives | ||
| Six-Month Period Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2019 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of the beginning of the period | $ | 1,018 |
| $ | (1,000) |
Changes in fair value during the period |
| (608) |
|
| 519 |
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2019 | $ | 410 |
| $ | (481) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Payment Due by Period |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
| Maturity Less Than One Year |
| Maturity 1-3 Years |
| Maturity 3-5 Years |
| Maturity in Excess of 5 Years |
| Total Fair Value |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pricing from observable market inputs - Asset Derivatives |
|
| $ | 314 |
| $ | 76 |
| $ | 20 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 410 |
| ||
Pricing from observable market inputs - Liability Derivatives |
|
| (387) |
|
| (76) |
|
| (18) |
|
| - |
|
| (481) |
| |||
|
|
|
| $ | (73) |
| $ | - |
| $ | 2 |
| $ | - |
| $ | (71) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate caps, are subject to market risk. As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, in part, on the level of interest rates, as well as the expectations for rates in the future.
As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, all of the derivative instruments held by the Corporation were considered undesignated economic hedges.
The use of derivatives involves market and credit risk. The market risk of derivatives stems principally from the potential for changes in the value of derivative contracts based on changes in interest rates. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential for default of the counterparty. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties that it considers to be of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. Master netting agreements incorporate rights of set-off that provide for the net settlement of contracts with the same counterparty in the event of default.
Credit Risk Management
First BanCorp. is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to its portfolio of loans receivable and off-balance-sheet instruments, mainly derivatives and loan commitments. Loans receivable represents loans that First BanCorp. holds for investment and, therefore, First BanCorp. is at risk for the term of the loan. Loan commitments represent commitments to extend credit, subject to specific conditions, for specific amounts and maturities. These commitments may expose the Corporation to credit risk and are subject to the same review and approval process as for loans made by the Bank. See “Contractual Obligations and Commitments” above for further details. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential that the counterparty will default on its contractual obligations. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties that it considers to be of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. For further details and information on the Corporation’s derivative credit risk exposure, see “Interest Rate Risk Management,” above. The Corporation manages its credit risk through its credit policy, underwriting, independent loan review and quality control procedures, statistical analysis, comprehensive financial analysis, and established management committees. The Corporation also employs proactive collection and loss mitigation efforts. Furthermore, personnel performing structured loan workout functions are responsible for mitigating defaults and minimizing losses upon default within each region and for each business segment. In the case of the commercial and industrial (“C&I”), commercial mortgage and construction loan portfolios, the Special Asset Group (“SAG”) focuses on strategies for the accelerated reduction of non-performing assets through note sales, short sales, loss mitigation programs, and sales of OREO. In addition to the management of the resolution process for problem loans, the SAG oversees collection efforts for all loans to prevent migration to the nonaccrual and/or adversely classified status. The SAG utilizes relationship officers, collection specialists and attorneys. In the case of residential construction projects, the workout function monitors project specifics, such as project management and marketing, as deemed necessary.
The Corporation may also have risk of default in the securities portfolio. The securities held by the Corporation are principally fixed-rate U.S. agencies MBS and U.S. Treasury and agency securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments is backed by mortgages, a guarantee of a U.S. GSE or the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
Management, consisting of the Corporation’s Commercial Credit Risk Officer, Retail Credit Risk Officer, Chief Lending Officer and other senior executives, has the primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve the Corporation’s credit risk goals and objectives. These goals and objectives are documented in the Corporation’s Credit Policy.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-Performing Assets
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses represents the estimate of the level of reserves appropriate to absorb inherent incurred credit losses. The amount of the allowance is determined by empirical analysis and judgments regarding the quality of each individual loan portfolio. All known relevant internal and external factors that affect loan collectability are considered, including analyses of historical charge-off experience, migration patterns, changes in economic conditions, and changes in loan collateral values. For example, factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, Florida (USA), the USVI and the BVI may contribute to delinquencies and defaults above the Corporation’s historical loan and lease losses. Such factors are subject to regular review and may change to reflect updated performance trends and expectations, particularly in times of severe stress. The process includes judgments and quantitative elements that may be subject to significant change.
133
The allowance for loan and lease losses provides for probable incurred losses that have been identified with specific valuation allowances for individually evaluated impaired loans and probable incurred losses believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio that have not been specifically identified. An internal risk rating is assigned to each business loan at the time of approval and is subject to subsequent periodic reviews by the Corporation’s senior management. The allowance for loan and lease losses is reviewed on a quarterly basis as part of the Corporation’s continued evaluation of its asset quality.
The ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans held for investment decreased to 1.89% as of June 30, 2019, compared to 2.22% as of December 31, 2018. The change for each portfolio follows:
The allowance to total loans ratio for the residential mortgage loan portfolio decreased from 1.61% as of December 31, 2018 to 1.57% as of June 30, 2019, primarily due to lower nonaccrual and delinquency loan levels.
The allowance to total loans ratio for the commercial mortgage portfolio decreased from 3.65% as of December 31, 2018 to 2.99% as of June 30, 2019 reflecting, among other things, the effect of the $11.4 million charge-off taken in the second quarter of 2019 on a commercial mortgage loan in the Florida region against a previously-established specific reserve.
The allowance to total loans ratio for the C&I portfolio decreased from 1.52% as of December 31, 2018 to 0.95% as of June 30, 2019, reflecting the effect of a $3.4 million reserve release associated with the resolution of uncertainties surrounding the repayment prospects of a hurricane-affected commercial customer and a charge-off of $5.7 million taken in the first quarter of 2019 on a C&I loan in Puerto Rico against a previously-established specific reserve.
The allowance to total loans ratio for the construction loan portfolio decreased from 4.52% as of December 31, 2018 to 3.02% as of June 30, 2019, primarily as a result of a higher proportion of Florida construction loans to total construction loans. The historical loss rates applied to the construction portfolio in the Florida region are generally lower than rates applied to the construction loan portfolio in the Puerto Rico region.
The allowance to total loans ratio for the consumer loan portfolio decreased from 2.77% as of December 31, 2018 to 2.49% as of June 30, 2019, reflecting, among other things, the effect in the first quarter of 2019 of a $3.0 million release of the hurricane-related qualitative reserve resulting from updated payment patterns and credit risk analyses applied to consumer borrowers subject to payment deferral programs that expired early in 2018.
As discussed above, the significant overall uncertainties that complicated management’s early assessments of hurricane-related credit losses have been largely addressed in the 18-month period since the hurricanes, and the hurricanes’ effect on credit quality is now reflected in the normal process for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses and not through a separate hurricane-related qualitative reserve.
The ratio of the total allowance to nonaccrual loans held for investment was 67.96% as of June 30, 2019, compared to 62.15% as of December 31, 2018.
Substantially all of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the USVI and BVI or the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of Florida), the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio and the value of the collateral supporting the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and conditions within each specific area’s real estate market. The real estate market in Puerto Rico experienced readjustments in value driven by reduced demand and general adverse economic conditions. The Corporation sets adequate loan-to-value ratios following its regulatory and credit policy standards.
134
As shown in the following table, the allowance for loan and lease losses amounted to $172.0 million as of June 30, 2019, or 1.89% of total loans, compared with $196.4 million, or 2.22% of total loans, as of December 31, 2018. See “Results of Operation - Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” above for additional information.
|
| Quarter Ended |
|
| Six-Month Period Ended |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| June 30, |
|
| June 30, |
|
| ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of period | $ | 183,732 |
|
| $ | 225,856 |
|
| $ | 196,362 |
|
| $ | 231,843 |
|
| |
Provision (release) for loan and lease losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential Mortgage (1) |
| 586 |
|
|
| 3,599 |
|
|
| 7,225 |
|
|
| 4,046 |
|
| |
Commercial Mortgage (2) |
| 4,541 |
|
|
| 2,184 |
|
|
| 4,662 |
|
|
| 10,845 |
|
| |
Commercial and Industrial (3) |
| (594) |
|
|
| 75 |
|
|
| (5,603) |
|
|
| 731 |
|
| |
Construction (4) |
| (542) |
|
|
| 507 |
|
|
| (637) |
|
|
| 5,271 |
|
| |
Consumer and Finance Leases (5) |
| 8,543 |
|
|
| 13,171 |
|
|
| 18,707 |
|
|
| 19,187 |
|
| |
Total provision for loan and lease losses (6) |
| 12,534 |
|
|
| 19,536 |
|
|
| 24,354 |
|
|
| 40,080 |
|
| |
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential Mortgage |
| (4,768) |
|
|
| (5,544) |
|
|
| (10,941) |
|
|
| (8,915) |
|
| |
Commercial Mortgage |
| (11,688) |
|
|
| (3,897) |
|
|
| (14,088) |
|
|
| (10,707) |
|
| |
Commercial and Industrial |
| (358) |
|
|
| (5,110) |
|
|
| (6,669) |
|
|
| (7,040) |
|
| |
Construction |
| (72) |
|
|
| (818) |
|
|
| (279) |
|
|
| (5,995) |
|
| |
Consumer and Finance Leases |
| (11,027) |
|
|
| (12,327) |
|
|
| (24,296) |
|
|
| (24,399) |
|
| |
Total charge offs |
| (27,913) |
|
|
| (27,696) |
|
|
| (56,273) |
|
|
| (57,056) |
|
| |
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential Mortgage |
| 580 |
|
|
| 689 |
|
|
| 1,206 |
|
|
| 1,024 |
|
| |
Commercial Mortgage |
| 90 |
|
|
| 38 |
|
|
| 218 |
|
|
| 87 |
|
| |
Commercial and Industrial |
| 275 |
|
|
| 1,376 |
|
|
| 1,370 |
|
|
| 1,438 |
|
| |
Construction |
| 309 |
|
|
| 138 |
|
|
| 350 |
|
|
| 151 |
|
| |
Consumer and Finance Leases |
| 2,404 |
|
|
| 2,098 |
|
|
| 4,424 |
|
|
| 4,468 |
|
| |
Total recoveries |
| 3,658 |
|
|
| 4,339 |
|
|
| 7,568 |
|
|
| 7,168 |
|
| |
Net charge-offs |
| (24,255) |
|
|
| (23,357) |
|
|
| (48,705) |
|
|
| (49,888) |
|
| |
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period | $ | 172,011 |
|
| $ | 222,035 |
|
| $ | 172,011 |
|
| $ | 222,035 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to period end total loans held for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
investment |
| 1.89 | % |
|
| 2.57 | % |
|
| 1.89 | % |
|
| 2.57 | % |
| |
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans outstanding during the period |
| 1.07 | % |
|
| 1.07 | % |
|
| 1.09 | % |
|
| 1.14 | % |
| |
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs during the period |
| 0.52x |
|
|
| 0.84x |
|
|
| 0.50x |
|
|
| 0.80x |
|
| |
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs during the period, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
excluding effect of the hurricane-related qualitative reserve releases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in the second quarter of 2018 and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (7) |
| 0.52x |
|
|
| 0.92x |
|
|
| 0.63x |
|
|
| 0.97x |
|
|
(1)Net of a $0.2 million and $0.3 million net loan loss reserve releases for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, respectively, associated with revised estimates of the effects of Hurricanes Maria and Irma.
(2)Net of a $1.7 million and $1.9 million net loan loss reserve releases for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, respectively, associated with revised estimates of the effects of Hurricanes Maria and Irma.
(3)Net of loan loss reserve releases of $3.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2019, and $0.2 million and $4.0 million for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, respectively, associated with revised estimates of the effects of Hurricanes Maria and Irma.
(4)Net of a $0.1 million net loan loss reserve release for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, associated with revised estimates of the effects of Hurricanes Maria and Irma.
(5)Net of loan loss reserve releases of $3.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2019 and $2.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 associated with revised estimates of the effects of Hurricanes Maria and Irma.
(6)Net of loan loss reserve releases of $6.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2019, and $2.1 million and $8.5 million for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, respectively, associated with revised estimates of the effects of Hurricanes Maria and Irma
(7)Non-GAAP financial measure, see "Basis of Presentation" below for a reconciliation of this measure.
135
The following table sets forth information concerning the allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses by loan category and the percentage of loan balances in each category to the total of such loans as of the dates indicated: | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of |
| As of |
| ||||||||
| June 30, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount |
| Percent of loans in each category to total loans |
| Amount |
| Percent of loans in each category to total loans | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans | $ | 48,284 |
|
| 34 | % | $ | 50,794 |
|
| 36 | % |
Commercial mortgage loans |
| 46,373 |
|
| 17 | % |
| 55,581 |
|
| 17 | % |
Construction loans |
| 3,026 |
|
| 1 | % |
| 3,592 |
|
| 1 | % |
Commercial and Industrial loans |
| 21,644 |
|
| 25 | % |
| 32,546 |
|
| 24 | % |
Consumer loans and finance leases |
| 52,684 |
|
| 23 | % |
| 53,849 |
|
| 22 | % |
| $ | 172,011 |
|
| 100 | % | $ | 196,362 |
|
| 100 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See "Results of Operations - Provision for Loan and Lease Losses" above for information about enhancements to the |
| |||||||||||
methodology to calculate the allowance for loan and lease losses implemented in the second quarter of 2018. |
|
136
The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of the Corporation's allowance for loan and lease losses as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 by loan category and by whether the allowance and related provision were calculated individually or through a general valuation allowance. |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
As of June 30, 2019 | Residential Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
|
|
|
|
| Consumer and Finance Leases |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| Construction Loans |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| C&I Loans |
|
|
|
| Total |
| ||||||||||
Impaired loans without specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs | $ | 106,195 |
| $ | 79,600 |
| $ | 28,854 |
| $ | 3,245 |
| $ | 1,213 |
|
| $ | 219,107 |
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
| 284,821 |
|
| 127,909 |
|
| 51,283 |
|
| 2,784 |
|
| 25,924 |
|
|
| 492,721 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
| 18,788 |
|
| 9,023 |
|
| 3,880 |
|
| 574 |
|
| 4,570 |
|
|
| 36,835 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance |
| 6.60 | % |
| 7.05 | % |
| 7.57 | % |
| 20.62 | % |
| 17.63 | % |
|
| 7.48 | % |
PCI loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value of PCI loans | $ | 138,367 |
| $ | 3,339 |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 141,706 |
|
Allowance for PCI loans |
| 11,063 |
|
| 371 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
|
| 11,434 |
|
Allowance for PCI loans to carrying value |
| 8.00 | % |
| 11.11 | % |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
|
| 8.07 | % |
Loans with general allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans | $ | 2,541,363 |
| $ | 1,339,516 |
| $ | 2,199,548 |
| $ | 94,215 |
| $ | 2,085,779 |
|
| $ | 8,260,421 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
| 18,433 |
|
| 36,979 |
|
| 17,764 |
|
| 2,452 |
|
| 48,114 |
|
|
| 123,742 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance |
| 0.73 | % |
| 2.76 | % |
| 0.81 | % |
| 2.60 | % |
| 2.31 | % |
|
| 1.50 | % |
Total loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans | $ | 3,070,746 |
| $ | 1,550,364 |
| $ | 2,279,685 |
| $ | 100,244 |
| $ | 2,112,916 |
|
| $ | 9,113,955 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
| 48,284 |
|
| 46,373 |
|
| 21,644 |
|
| 3,026 |
|
| 52,684 |
|
|
| 172,011 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance (1) |
| 1.57 | % |
| 2.99 | % |
| 0.95 | % |
| 3.02 | % |
| 2.49 | % |
|
| 1.89 | % |
As of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Residential Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
|
|
|
|
| Consumer and Finance Leases |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| Construction Loans |
|
|
|
| |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| C&I Loans |
|
|
| Total |
| ||||||||||
Impaired loans without specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs | $ | 110,238 |
| $ | 43,358 |
| $ | 30,030 |
| $ | 2,431 |
| $ | 2,340 |
| $ | 188,397 |
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
| 293,494 |
|
| 184,068 |
|
| 61,162 |
|
| 4,162 |
|
| 28,986 |
|
| 571,872 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
| 19,965 |
|
| 17,684 |
|
| 9,693 |
|
| 760 |
|
| 5,874 |
|
| 53,976 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance |
| 6.80 | % |
| 9.61 | % |
| 15.85 | % |
| 18.26 | % |
| 20.26 | % |
| 9.44 | % |
PCI loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value of PCI loans | $ | 143,176 |
| $ | 3,464 |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
| $ | 146,640 |
|
Allowance for PCI loans |
| 10,954 |
|
| 400 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 11,354 |
|
Allowance for PCI loans to carrying value |
| 7.65% |
|
| 11.55% |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 7.74 | % |
Loans with general allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans | $ | 2,616,300 |
| $ | 1,291,772 |
| $ | 2,056,919 |
| $ | 72,836 |
| $ | 1,913,387 |
| $ | 7,951,214 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
| 19,875 |
|
| 37,497 |
|
| 22,853 |
|
| 2,832 |
|
| 47,975 |
|
| 131,032 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance |
| 0.76 | % |
| 2.90 | % |
| 1.11 | % |
| 3.89 | % |
| 2.51 | % |
| 1.65 | % |
Total loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans | $ | 3,163,208 |
| $ | 1,522,662 |
| $ | 2,148,111 |
| $ | 79,429 |
| $ | 1,944,713 |
| $ | 8,858,123 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
| 50,794 |
|
| 55,581 |
|
| 32,546 |
|
| 3,592 |
|
| 53,849 |
|
| 196,362 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance (1) |
| 1.61 | % |
| 3.65 | % |
| 1.52 | % |
| 4.52 | % |
| 2.77 | % |
| 2.22 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Loans used in the denominator include PCI loans of $141.7 million and $146.6 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. However, the | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporation separately tracks and reports PCI loans and excludes these loans from the amounts of nonaccrual loans, impaired loans, TDRs and non-performing assets. |
137
The following tables show the activity for impaired loans held for investment during the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018: | ||||||||||||
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| (In thousands) |
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Impaired Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance as of beginning of period | $ | 732,871 |
| $ | 746,280 |
| $ | 760,269 |
| $ | 790,308 |
| Loans determined impaired during the period |
| 11,653 |
|
| 34,273 |
|
| 22,355 |
|
| 95,681 |
| Charge-offs (1) |
| (15,627) |
|
| (13,207) |
|
| (29,048) |
|
| (30,420) |
| Loans sold, net of charge-offs |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (4,121) |
| Increases to existing impaired loans |
| 362 |
|
| 77 |
|
| 1,615 |
|
| 7,075 |
| Foreclosures |
| (4,950) |
|
| (7,777) |
|
| (12,934) |
|
| (19,452) |
| Loans no longer considered impaired |
| (551) |
|
| (2,433) |
|
| (703) |
|
| (3,940) |
| Loans transferred to held for sale |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (57,213) |
| Paid in full, partial payments and other |
| (11,930) |
|
| (17,079) |
|
| (29,726) |
|
| (37,784) |
| Balance as of end of period | $ | 711,828 |
| $ | 740,134 |
| $ | 711,828 |
| $ | 740,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, includes charge-offs totaling $9.7 million associated with the $57.2 million in nonaccrual loans transferred to held for sale. |
138
Nonaccrual Loans and Non-performing Assets
Total non-performing assets consist of nonaccrual loans (generally loans held for investment or loans held for sale on which the recognition of interest income has been discontinued when the loan became 90 days past due or earlier if the full and timely collection of interest or principal is uncertain), foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties, and non-performing investment securities, if any. When a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, any interest previously recognized and not collected is reversed and charged against interest income. Cash payments received on certain loans that are impaired and collateral dependent are recognized when collected in accordance with the contractual terms of the loans. The principal portion of the payment is used to reduce the principal balance of the loan, whereas the interest portion is recognized on a cash basis (when collected). However, when management believes that the ultimate collectability of principal is in doubt, the interest portion is applied to the outstanding principal. The risk exposure of this portfolio is diversified as to individual borrowers and industries, among other factors. In addition, a large portion is secured with real estate collateral.
Nonaccrual Loans Policy
Residential Real Estate Loans — The Corporation generally classifies real estate loans in nonaccrual status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Commercial and Construction Loans — The Corporation places commercial loans (including commercial real estate and construction loans) in nonaccrual status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more or when collection of all of the principal or interest is not expected due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower.
Finance Leases — Finance leases are classified in nonaccrual status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Consumer Loans — Consumer loans are classified in nonaccrual status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more. Credit card loans continue to accrue finance charges and fees until charged-off at 180 days delinquent.
Purchased Credit Impaired Loans — PCI loans are recorded at fair value at acquisition. Since the initial fair value of these loans included an estimate of credit losses expected to be realized over the remaining lives of the loans, the subsequent accounting for PCI loans differs from the accounting for non-PCI loans. Therefore, the Corporation separately tracks and reports PCI loans and excludes these from the amounts of nonaccrual loans, impaired loans, TDR loans, and non-performing assets.
Other Real Estate Owned
OREO acquired in settlement of loans is carried at the lower of cost (carrying value of the loan) or fair value less estimated costs to sell off the real estate. Appraisals are obtained periodically, generally, on an annual basis.
Other Repossessed Property
The other repossessed property category generally includes repossessed boats and autos acquired in settlement of loans. Repossessed boats and autos are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value.
Loans Past-Due 90 Days and Still Accruing
These are accruing loans that are contractually delinquent 90 days or more. These past-due loans are either current as to interest but delinquent as to the payment of principal or are insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA, VA or other government-guaranteed programs for residential mortgage loans. Loans past-due 90 days and still accruing also include PCI loans with individual delinquencies over 90 days, primarily related to mortgage loans acquired from Doral Bank in 2015 and from Doral Financial in 2014.
TDRs are classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loans. A loan on nonaccrual and restructured as a TDR will remain on nonaccrual status until the borrower has proven the ability to perform under the modified structure, generally for a minimum of six months, and there is evidence that such payments can and are likely to continue as agreed. Performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events that coincide with the restructuring, are included in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of the restructuring or after a shorter performance period. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is uncertain, the loan remains classified as a nonaccrual loan.
139
The following table presents non-performing assets as of the dates indicated: |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, | ||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2019 |
| 2018 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential mortgage | $ | 129,501 |
|
| $ | 147,287 |
| |
Commercial mortgage |
| 77,495 |
|
|
| 109,536 |
| |
Commercial and Industrial |
| 21,327 |
|
|
| 30,382 |
| |
Construction |
| 6,936 |
|
|
| 8,362 |
| |
Finance leases |
| 994 |
|
|
| 1,329 |
| |
Consumer |
| 16,852 |
|
|
| 19,077 |
| |
Total nonaccrual loans held for investment | $ | 253,105 |
|
| $ | 315,973 |
| |
OREO |
| 118,081 |
|
|
| 131,402 |
| |
Other repossessed property |
| 5,744 |
|
|
| 3,576 |
| |
Total non-performing assets, excluding nonaccrual loans held for sale | $ | 376,930 |
|
| $ | 450,951 |
| |
Nonaccrual loans held for sale |
| 7,144 |
|
|
| 16,111 |
| |
Total non-performing assets, including nonaccrual loans held for sale (1) (2) | $ | 384,074 |
|
| $ | 467,062 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing (3) (4) | $ | 142,113 |
|
| $ | 158,257 |
| |
Non-performing assets to total assets |
| 3.06 | % |
|
| 3.81 | % | |
Nonaccrual loans held for investment to total loans held for investment |
| 2.78 | % |
|
| 3.57 | % | |
Allowance for loan and lease losses | $ | 172,011 |
|
| $ | 196,362 |
| |
Allowance to total nonaccrual loans held for investment |
| 67.96 | % |
|
| 62.15 | % | |
Allowance to total nonaccrual loans held for investment, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
excluding residential real estate loans |
| 139.16 | % |
|
| 116.41 | % | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)PCI loans accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30 of $141.7 million and $146.6 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, are excluded and not considered nonaccrual due to the application of the accretion method, under which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using an estimated cash flow analysis.
(2)Nonaccrual loans exclude $482.0 million and $478.9 million of TDR loans that were in compliance with the modified terms and in accrual status as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
(3)It is the Corporation's policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by the FHA, guaranteed by the VA, and other government-insured loans as past-due loans 90 days and still accruing as opposed to nonaccrual loans since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $39.8 million of residential mortgage loans insured by the FHA that were over 15 months delinquent, and were no longer accruing interest as of June 30, 2019, taking into consideration the FHA interest curtailment process.
(4)Amount includes PCI loans with individual delinquencies over 90 days and still accruing with a carrying value as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 of approximately $27.0 million and $29.4 million, respectively, primarily related to loans acquired from Doral Bank in the first quarter of 2015 and from Doral Financial in the second quarter of 2014.
140
The following table shows non-performing assets by geographic segment as of the dates indicated: | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, | |||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2019 |
| 2018 | |||
Puerto Rico: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Nonaccrual loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential mortgage | $ | 108,152 |
| $ | 120,707 | |
Commercial mortgage |
| 26,535 |
|
| 44,925 | |
Commercial and Industrial |
| 17,709 |
|
| 26,005 | |
Construction |
| 4,857 |
|
| 6,220 | |
Finance leases |
| 994 |
|
| 1,329 | |
Consumer |
| 15,684 |
|
| 18,037 | |
Total nonaccrual loans held for investment |
| 173,931 |
|
| 217,223 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREO |
| 111,990 |
|
| 124,124 | |
Other repossessed property |
| 5,560 |
|
| 3,357 | |
Total non-performing assets, excluding nonaccrual loans held for sale | $ | 291,481 |
| $ | 344,704 | |
Nonaccrual loans held for sale |
| 7,144 |
|
| 16,111 | |
Total non-performing assets, including nonaccrual loans held for sale (1) | $ | 298,625 |
| $ | 360,815 | |
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing (2) | $ | 140,099 |
| $ | 153,269 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Nonaccrual loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential mortgage | $ | 11,178 |
| $ | 12,106 | |
Commercial mortgage |
| 18,118 |
|
| 19,368 | |
Commercial and Industrial |
| 3,618 |
|
| 4,377 | |
Construction |
| 2,079 |
|
| 2,142 | |
Consumer |
| 426 |
|
| 710 | |
Total nonaccrual loans held for investment |
| 35,419 |
|
| 38,703 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREO |
| 5,636 |
|
| 6,704 | |
Other repossessed property |
| 105 |
|
| 76 | |
Total non-performing assets | $ | 41,160 |
| $ | 45,483 | |
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing | $ | 2,014 |
| $ | 5,258 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Nonaccrual loans held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential mortgage | $ | 10,171 |
| $ | 14,474 | |
Commercial mortgage |
| 32,842 |
|
| 45,243 | |
Consumer |
| 742 |
|
| 330 | |
Total nonaccrual loans held for investment |
| 43,755 |
|
| 60,047 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREO |
| 455 |
|
| 574 | |
Other repossessed property |
| 79 |
|
| 143 | |
Total non-performing assets | $ | 44,289 |
| $ | 60,764 | |
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing | $ | - |
| $ | - |
(1)PCI loans accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30 of $141.7 million and $146.6 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, are excluded and not considered nonaccrual due to the application of the accretion method, under which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using an estimated cash flow analysis.
(2)Amounts includes PCI loans with individual delinquencies over 90 days and still accruing with a carrying value as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 of approximately $27.0 million and $29.4 million, respectively, primarily related to loans acquired from Doral Bank in the first quarter of 2015 and from Doral Financial in the second quarter of 2014.
141
Total nonaccrual loans, including nonaccrual loans held for sale, were $260.2 million as of June 30, 2019. This represents a decrease of $71.8 million from $332.1 million as of December 31, 2018. The decrease in nonaccrual loans was primarily attributable to: (i) a decrease of $12.9 million related to the restructuring at maturity of a commercial mortgage loan that financed multiple properties in Puerto Rico; (ii) charge-offs on nonaccrual commercial and constructions loans amounting to $20.8 million, including a charge-off of $11.4 million on a commercial mortgage loan and a $5.7 million on a commercial and industrial loan, both taken against previously-established specific reserves; (iii) a $17.8 million decrease in nonaccrual residential mortgage loans; (iv) sales and repayments of nonaccrual commercial and construction loans held for sale totaling $9.0 million during the first six months of 2019; (v) collections on nonaccrual commercial and construction loans of $8.4 million during the first six months of 2019; and (vi) a $2.6 million decrease in nonaccrual consumer loans.
Nonaccrual commercial mortgage loans, including nonaccrual commercial mortgage loans held for sale, decreased by $36.3 million to $84.6 million as of June 30, 2019 from $120.9 million as of December 31, 2018. The decrease primarily reflects a $12.9 million reduction related to the restructuring at maturity of a commercial mortgage loan that financed multiple properties in Puerto Rico. The Bank restructured this loan, which had a book value of $22.4 million as of December 31, 2018, into two separate loans supported by sources of repayment that are independent for each loan: (i) a $10.7 million loan, which is collateral dependent, carries a current market rate of interest, and was placed in accrual status after consideration of the satisfactory historical payment performance of the borrower and the Bank’s assessment of full collectability of principal and interest; and (ii) an $11.6 million loan, also collateral dependent, for which the Bank granted a forbearance period and recorded a partial charge-off of $2.1 million at the time of the restructuring supported by a full faith and credit evaluation. The latter, which had a book value of $9.6 million as of June 30, 2019, remained in nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2019. In addition, the decrease reflects the effect of a charge-off of $11.4 million taken on a commercial mortgage loan in the Florida region with a previously-established specific reserve, and the sales and repayments of commercial mortgage nonaccrual loans held for sale totaling $4.2 million during the first six months of 2019 and collections on commercial mortgage nonaccrual loans held for investment totaling $5.6 million during the first six months of 2019. Total inflows of nonaccrual commercial mortgage loans were $0.7 million for the first half of 2019, compared to $75.7 million for the same period in 2018.
Nonaccrual C&I loans, including nonaccrual C&I loans held for sale, decreased by $10.8 million to $21.3 million as of June 30, 2019 from $32.1 million as of December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily related to charges-offs amounting to $6.6 million, including the aforementioned charge-off of $5.7 million taken on a C&I loan with a previously-established specific reserve in Puerto Rico, collections on nonaccrual C&I loans held for investment of $2.5 million during the first six months of 2019, and sales and repayments of nonaccrual C&I loans held for sale totaling $1.7 million. Total inflows of non-performing C&I loans were $0.7 million during the first half of 2019, compared to $4.1 million for the same period in 2018.
Nonaccrual construction loans, including nonaccrual construction loans held for sale, decreased by $4.4 million to $6.9 million as of June 30, 2019 from $11.4 million as of December 31, 2018, mainly due to the repayment of a $3.0 million nonaccrual construction loan held for sale during the first quarter of 2019. The inflows of non-performing construction loans held for investment during the first half of 2019 amounted to $0.1 million, compared to inflows of $0.3 million for the same period in 2018.
The following tables present the activity of commercial and construction nonaccrual loans held for investment:
|
|
|
| Commercial Mortgage |
| Commercial & Industrial |
| Construction |
|
| Total | |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Quarter ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Beginning balance |
| $ | 93,192 |
| $ | 22,507 |
| $ | 7,700 |
| $ | 123,399 | ||
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Additions to nonaccrual |
| 231 |
|
| 598 |
|
| 76 |
|
| 905 | ||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Loans returned to accrual status |
|
| (933) |
|
| (374) |
|
| (528) |
|
| (1,835) | |
| Nonaccrual loans transferred to OREO |
|
| (180) |
|
| (13) |
|
| (151) |
|
| (344) | |
| Nonaccrual loans charge offs |
|
| (11,672) |
|
| (339) |
|
| (15) |
|
| (12,026) | |
| Loan collections |
|
| (3,143) |
|
| (1,052) |
|
| (146) |
|
| (4,341) | |
Ending balance |
| $ | 77,495 |
| $ | 21,327 |
| $ | 6,936 |
| $ | 105,758 |
142
|
|
| Commercial Mortgage |
| Commercial & Industrial |
| Construction |
|
| Total | |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Beginning balance | $ | 109,536 |
| $ | 30,382 |
| $ | 8,362 |
|
| 148,280 | ||
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Additions to nonaccrual |
| 725 |
|
| 737 |
|
| 143 |
|
| 1,605 | |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Loans returned to accrual status |
| (12,115) |
|
| (498) |
|
| (528) |
|
| (13,141) | |
| Nonaccrual loans transferred to OREO |
| (1,002) |
|
| (227) |
|
| (610) |
|
| (1,839) | |
| Nonaccrual loans charge offs |
| (14,067) |
|
| (6,574) |
|
| (116) |
|
| (20,757) | |
| Loan collections |
| (5,582) |
|
| (2,493) |
|
| (315) |
|
| (8,390) | |
Ending balance | $ | 77,495 |
| $ | 21,327 |
| $ | 6,936 |
| $ | 105,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial Mortgage |
| Commercial & Industrial |
| Construction |
|
| Total | |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Quarter ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Beginning balance |
| $ | 115,179 |
| $ | 85,325 |
| $ | 16,236 |
| $ | 216,740 | ||
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Additions to nonaccrual |
| 72,097 |
|
| 1,357 |
|
| 75 |
|
| 73,529 | ||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Loans returned to accrual status |
|
| (34,602) |
|
| (2,233) |
|
| (899) |
|
| (37,734) | |
| Nonaccrual loans transferred to OREO |
|
| (862) |
|
| (215) |
|
| (241) |
|
| (1,318) | |
| Nonaccrual loans charge offs |
|
| (3,897) |
|
| (5,061) |
|
| (784) |
|
| (9,742) | |
| Loan collections |
|
| (5,301) |
|
| (2,286) |
|
| (239) |
|
| (7,826) | |
Ending balance |
| $ | 142,614 |
| $ | 76,887 |
| $ | 14,148 |
| $ | 233,649 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
| Commercial Mortgage |
| Commercial & Industrial |
| Construction |
|
| Total | |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Beginning balance |
| $ | 156,493 |
| $ | 85,839 |
| $ | 52,113 |
| $ | 294,445 | ||
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Additions to nonaccrual |
| 75,665 |
|
| 4,129 |
|
| 271 |
|
| 80,065 | ||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Loans returned to accrual status |
|
| (37,753) |
|
| (2,233) |
|
| (899) |
|
| (40,885) | |
| Nonaccrual loans transferred to OREO |
|
| (2,318) |
|
| (1,348) |
|
| (299) |
|
| (3,965) | |
| Nonaccrual loans charge offs |
|
| (10,707) |
|
| (5,592) |
|
| (5,961) |
|
| (22,260) | |
| Loan collections |
|
| (11,552) |
|
| (3,908) |
|
| (296) |
|
| (15,756) | |
| Reclassification |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (781) |
|
| (781) | |
| Loans transferred to loans held for sale, net of charge-offs |
|
| (27,214) |
|
| - |
|
| (30,000) |
|
| (57,214) | |
Ending balance |
| $ | 142,614 |
| $ | 76,887 |
| $ | 14,148 |
| $ | 233,649 |
143
The following tables present the activity of commercial and construction nonaccrual loans held for sale for the indicated periods: | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial Mortgage |
|
| |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Quarter ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
| |||
Beginning balance |
| $ | 7,381 |
|
| ||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Loan collections |
|
| (237) |
|
| |
Ending balance |
| $ | 7,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial Mortgage |
| Commercial & Industrial |
| Construction |
|
| Total | |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Beginning balance |
| $ | 11,371 |
| $ | 1,725 |
| $ | 3,015 |
| $ | 16,111 | ||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Loan collections and other |
|
| (514) |
|
| (662) |
|
| (3,015) |
|
| (4,191) | |
| Nonaccrual loans sold |
|
| (3,713) |
|
| (1,063) |
|
| - |
|
| (4,776) | |
Ending balance |
| $ | 7,144 |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
| $ | 7,144 |
|
|
|
| Commercial Mortgage |
| Construction |
|
| Total | ||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Quarter ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Beginning balance |
| $ | 27,213 |
| $ | 37,732 |
| $ | 64,945 | ||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Nonaccrual loans sold |
|
| (10,399) |
|
| - |
|
| (10,399) | |
Ending balance |
| $ | 16,814 |
| $ | 37,732 |
| $ | 54,546 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial Mortgage |
| Construction |
|
| Total | ||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Beginning balance |
| $ | - |
| $ | 8,290 |
| $ | 8,290 | ||
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Loans transferred from held for investment |
| 27,213 |
|
| 30,000 |
|
| 57,213 | ||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Lower of cost or market adjustment |
|
| - |
|
| (558) |
|
| (558) | |
| Nonaccrual loans sold |
|
| (10,399) |
|
| - |
|
| (10,399) | |
Ending balance |
| $ | 16,814 |
| $ | 37,732 |
| $ | 54,546 |
144
Total nonaccrual commercial and construction loans, including nonaccrual loans held for sale, with a book value of $112.9 million as of June 30, 2019, were being carried (net of reserves and accumulated charge-offs) at 50.4% of unpaid principal balance.
Nonaccrual residential mortgage loans decreased by $17.8 million to $129.5 million as of June 30, 2019 from $147.3 million as of December 31, 2018. The decrease was driven primarily by loans brought current, loans transferred to the OREO portfolio, collections (including two loans individually in excess of $1 million paid-off in the first quarter, which totaled $3.3 million), and charge-offs that, in the aggregate, offset the inflows in the first half of 2019. The inflows of non-performing residential mortgage loans during the first half of 2019 amounted to $23.2 million, compared to inflows of $43.7 million for the same period in 2018.
The following tables presents the activity of residential nonaccrual loans held for investment: |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
|
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||
|
|
|
| June 30, |
|
| June 30, | ||||||
(In thousands) |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2018 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Beginning balance |
| $ | 132,049 |
| $ | 171,380 |
| $ | 147,287 |
| $ | 178,291 | |
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Additions to nonaccrual |
|
| 11,709 |
|
| 16,776 |
|
| 23,169 |
|
| 43,737 |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Loans returned to accrual status |
|
| (4,668) |
|
| (11,987) |
|
| (14,038) |
|
| (31,108) |
| Nonaccrual loans transferred to OREO |
|
| (4,445) |
|
| (6,708) |
|
| (11,735) |
|
| (16,837) |
| Nonaccrual loans charge-offs |
|
| (2,507) |
|
| (4,064) |
|
| (6,864) |
|
| (6,864) |
| Loan collections |
|
| (2,637) |
|
| (2,858) |
|
| (8,318) |
|
| (5,461) |
| Reclassification |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 781 |
Ending balance |
| $ | 129,501 |
| $ | 162,539 |
| $ | 129,501 |
| $ | 162,539 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
The amount of nonaccrual consumer loans, including finance leases, decreased by $2.6 million during the first half of 2019 to $17.8 million compared to $20.4 million as of December 31, 2018. The inflows of nonaccrual consumer loans during the first half of 2019 were $22.6 million, a decrease of $8.6 million, compared to inflows of $31.2 million for the same period in 2018.
As of June 30, 2019, approximately $38.4 million of the loans placed in nonaccrual status, mainly commercial loans, were current, or had delinquencies of less than 90 days in their interest payments, including $24.3 million of TDRs maintained in nonaccrual status until the restructured loans meet the criteria of sustained payment performance under the revised terms for reinstatement to accrual status and there is no doubt about full collectability. Collections on these loans are being recorded on a cash basis through earnings, or on a cost-recovery basis, as conditions warrant.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2019, interest income of approximately $1.7 million related to nonaccrual loans with a carrying value of $69.6 million as of June 30, 2019, mainly non-performing construction and commercial loans, was applied against the related principal balances under the cost-recovery method.
As of June 30, 2019, approximately $110.7 million, or 43.7%, of total nonaccrual loans held for investment, have been charged-off to their net realizable value and no specific reserve was allocated, as shown in the following table: |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | Residential Mortgage Loans |
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
| C&I Loans |
| Construction Loans |
| Consumer and Finance Leases |
| Total |
| ||||||
As of June 30, 2019 |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charged-off to realizable value | $ | 54,386 |
| $ | 44,943 |
| $ | 7,288 |
| $ | 3,244 |
| $ | 853 |
| $ | 110,714 |
|
Other nonaccrual loans held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for investment |
| 75,115 |
|
| 32,552 |
|
| 14,039 |
|
| 3,692 |
|
| 16,993 |
|
| 142,391 |
|
Total nonaccrual loans held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for investment | $ | 129,501 |
| $ | 77,495 |
| $ | 21,327 |
| $ | 6,936 |
| $ | 17,846 |
| $ | 253,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to nonaccrual loans held for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investments |
| 37.28 | % |
| 59.84 | % |
| 101.49 | % |
| 43.63 | % |
| 295.21 | % |
| 67.96 | % |
Allowance to nonaccrual loans held for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investments, excluding nonaccrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charged-off to realizable value |
| 64.28 | % |
| 142.46 | % |
| 154.17 | % |
| 81.96 | % |
| 310.03 | % |
| 120.80 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charged-off to realizable value | $ | 60,648 |
| $ | 36,386 |
| $ | 8,440 |
| $ | 2,431 |
| $ | 675 |
| $ | 108,580 |
|
Other nonaccrual loans held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for investment |
| 86,639 |
|
| 73,150 |
|
| 21,942 |
|
| 5,931 |
|
| 19,731 |
|
| 207,393 |
|
Total nonaccrual loans held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for investment | $ | 147,287 |
| $ | 109,536 |
| $ | 30,382 |
| $ | 8,362 |
| $ | 20,406 |
| $ | 315,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to nonaccrual loans held for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investments |
| 34.49 | % |
| 50.74 | % |
| 107.12 | % |
| 42.96 | % |
| 263.89 | % |
| 62.15 | % |
Allowance to nonaccrual loans held for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investments, excluding nonaccrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charged-off to realizable value |
| 58.63 | % |
| 75.98 | % |
| 148.33 | % |
| 60.56 | % |
| 272.92 | % |
| 94.68 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
Total loans in early delinquency (i.e., 30-89 days past due loans, as defined in regulatory report instructions) amounted to $146.9 million as of June 30, 2019, an increase of $10.4 million compared to $136.6 million as of December 31, 2018. The variances by major portfolio categories follow:
Consumer loans in early delinquency increased by $1.3 million to $60.7 million as of June 30, 2019 from $59.5 million as of December 31, 2018, and residential mortgage loans in early delinquency increased by $6.9 million to $80.1 million as of June 30, 2019 from $73.2 million as of December 31, 2018.
Commercial and construction loans in early delinquency increased by $2.2 million to $6.1 million as of June 30, 2019 from $3.9 million as of December 31, 2018.
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss mitigation program in Puerto Rico that is similar to the U.S. government’s Home Affordable Modification Program guidelines. Depending upon the nature of borrowers’ financial condition, restructurings or loan modifications through this program, as well as other restructurings of individual commercial, commercial mortgage, construction, and residential mortgage loans fit the definition of a TDR. A restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include, among others, the extension of the maturity of the loan and modifications of the loan rate. See Note 7 – Loans Held for Investment, to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information and statistics about the Corporation’s TDR loans.
TDR loans are classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loans. Loans in accrual status may remain in accrual status when their contractual terms have been modified in a TDR if the loans had demonstrated performance prior to the restructuring and payment in full under the restructured terms is expected. Otherwise, loans on nonaccrual status and restructured as a TDR will remain on nonaccrual status until the borrower has proven the ability to perform under the modified structure, generally for a minimum of six months, and there is evidence that such payments can, and are likely to, continue as agreed. Performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events that coincide with the restructuring, are included in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of the restructuring or after a shorter performance period. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is uncertain, the loan remains classified as a nonaccrual loan. Loan modifications increase the Corporation’s interest income by returning a nonaccrual loan to performing status, if applicable, increase cash flows by providing for payments to be made by the borrower, and limit increases in foreclosure and OREO costs.
147
The following table provides a breakdown between accrual and nonaccrual TDRs: |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | As of June 30, 2019 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accrual |
| Nonaccrual (1) |
| Total TDRs | |||
Non-FHA/VA Residential Mortgage loans | $ | 271,067 |
| $ | 55,636 |
| $ | 326,703 | |
Commercial mortgage loans (2) |
| 125,793 |
|
| 27,573 |
|
| 153,366 | |
Commercial and Industrial loans |
| 63,216 |
|
| 7,294 |
|
| 70,510 | |
Construction loans |
| 1,503 |
|
| 3,460 |
|
| 4,963 | |
Consumer loans - Auto |
| 10,385 |
|
| 5,739 |
|
| 16,124 | |
Finance leases |
| 1,597 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 1,622 | |
Consumer loans - Other |
| 8,485 |
|
| 616 |
|
| 9,101 | |
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings | $ | 482,046 |
| $ | 100,343 |
| $ | 582,389 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Included in nonaccrual loans are $24.3 million in loans that are performing under the terms of the restructuring agreement but are reported in nonaccrual status until the restructured loans meet the criteria of sustained payment performance under the revised terms for reinstatement to accrual status and are deemed fully collectible. | ||||||||
(2) | Excludes commercial mortgage TDR loans held for sale amounting to $7.1 million as of June 30, 2019. | ||||||||
|
|
The OREO portfolio, which is part of non-performing assets, decreased by $13.3 million to $118.1 million as of June 30, 2019 from $131.4 million as of December 31, 2018. The following tables show the composition of the OREO portfolio as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, as well as the activity during the six-month period ended June 30, 2019 of the OREO portfolio by geographic region:
OREO Composition by Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | As of June 30, 2019 |
| ||||||||||
| Puerto Rico |
| Virgin Islands |
| Florida |
|
| Consolidated |
| |||
Residential | $ | 45,120 |
| $ | 1,116 |
| $ | 323 |
| $ | 46,559 |
|
Commercial |
| 57,596 |
|
| 3,872 |
|
| 132 |
|
| 61,600 |
|
Construction |
| 9,274 |
|
| 648 |
|
| - |
|
| 9,922 |
|
| $ | 111,990 |
| $ | 5,636 |
| $ | 455 |
| $ | 118,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | As of December 31, 2018 |
| ||||||||||
| Puerto Rico |
| Virgin Islands |
| Florida |
|
| Consolidated |
| |||
Residential | $ | 47,428 |
| $ | 1,369 |
| $ | 442 |
| $ | 49,239 |
|
Commercial |
| 67,185 |
|
| 4,521 |
|
| 132 |
|
| 71,838 |
|
Construction |
| 9,511 |
|
| 814 |
|
| - |
|
| 10,325 |
|
| $ | 124,124 |
| $ | 6,704 |
| $ | 574 |
| $ | 131,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREO Activity by Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | Six-month period ended June 30, 2019 |
| ||||||||||
| Puerto Rico |
| Virgin Islands |
| Florida |
|
| Consolidated |
| |||
Beginning Balance | $ | 124,124 |
| $ | 6,704 |
| $ | 574 |
| $ | 131,402 |
|
Additions |
| 19,378 |
|
| - |
|
| 759 |
|
| 20,137 |
|
Sales |
| (21,909) |
|
| (694) |
|
| (864) |
|
| (23,467) |
|
Write-down adjustments |
| (9,603) |
|
| (374) |
|
| (14) |
|
| (9,991) |
|
Ending Balance | $ | 111,990 |
| $ | 5,636 |
| $ | 455 |
| $ | 118,081 |
|
148
Net Charge-offs and Total Credit Losses
Net charge-offs totaled $48.7 million for the first six months of 2019, or 1.09% of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $49.9 million, or an annualized 1.14%, for the same period in 2018. Net charge-offs for the first six months of 2018 included charge-offs totaling $9.7 million associated with the transfer to held for sale of $57.2 million in nonaccrual commercial and construction loans.
Commercial mortgage loans net charge-offs in the first six months of 2019 were $13.9 million, or an annualized 1.79% of average commercial mortgage loans, compared to $10.6 million, or an annualized 1.34% of average loans, for the first six months of 2018. Commercial mortgage loans net charge-offs for the first six months of 2019 included an $11.4 million charge-off taken on a commercial mortgage loan in Florida and a $2.1 million charge-off associated with a split loan restructuring in Puerto Rico. Commercial mortgage loans net charge-offs for the first six months of 2018 included $4.6 million associated with $27.2 million in nonaccrual commercial mortgage loans transferred to held for sale.
Commercial and industrial loans net charge-offs in the first six months of 2019 totaled $5.3 million, or an annualized 0.48% of related average loans, compared to $5.6 million, or an annualized 0.54%, for the first six months of 2018. Commercial and industrial loans net charge-offs for the first six months of 2019 included a $5.7 million charge-off taken against a previously-established specific reserve associated with a commercial and industrial loan in Puerto Rico.
Construction loans net recoveries for the first six months of 2019 were $0.1 million, or an annualized 0.16% of related average loans, compared to net charge-offs of $5.8 million, or an annualized 9.74% of average loans, for the first six months of 2018. The variance was primarily related to the $5.1 million charge-off recorded in the first quarter of 2018 on a $30.0 million nonaccrual construction loan transferred to held for sale in the Virgin Islands.
Residential mortgage loans net charge-offs for the first six months of 2019 were $9.7 million, or an annualized 0.63% of related average loans, compared to $7.9 million, or an annualized 0.49% of related average loans, for the first six months of 2018. Approximately $6.4 million in charge-offs for the first six months of 2019 resulted from valuations for impairment purposes of residential mortgage loans considered homogeneous given high delinquency and loan-to-value levels, compared to $7.3 million for the first half of 2018. Net charge-offs on residential mortgage loans for the first half of 2019 also included $3.3 million related to foreclosures, compared to $1.1 million in the first half of 2018.
Net charge-offs of consumer loans and finance leases for the first six months of 2019 were $19.9 million, or an annualized 1.97% of average consumer loans and finance leases, compared to $19.9 million, or an annualized 2.28% of average loans, in the first six months of 2018.
The following table presents annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans held-in-portfolio for the indicated periods: | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
|
| June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 |
| June 30, 2019 |
| June 30, 2018 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage | 0.54 | % |
| 0.61 | % |
| 0.63 | % |
| 0.49 | % | |
Commercial mortgage | 2.97 | % |
| 0.98 | % |
| 1.79 | % |
| 1.34 | % | |
Commercial and industrial | 0.01 | % |
| 0.73 | % |
| 0.48 | % |
| 0.54 | % | |
Construction (1) | (1.03) | % |
| 2.25 | % |
| (0.16) | % |
| 9.74 | % | |
Consumer and finance leases | 1.68 | % |
| 2.34 | % |
| 1.97 | % |
| 2.28 | % | |
Total loans | 1.07 | % |
| 1.07 | % |
| 1.09 | % |
| 1.14 | % | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(1) For the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, recoveries in construction loans exceeded charge-offs. |
149
The following table presents net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans held in various portfolios by geographic segment for the indicated periods: | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
|
| Six-Month Period Ended |
| ||||||
|
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||
|
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||
PUERTO RICO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential mortgage |
| 0.79 | % |
| 0.81 | % |
| 0.87 | % |
| 0.62 | % | |
Commercial mortgage |
| 0.12 | % |
| 1.44 | % |
| 0.52 | % |
| 1.95 | % | |
Commercial and Industrial |
| 0.02 | % |
| 1.04 | % |
| 0.77 | % |
| 0.78 | % | |
Construction (1) |
| (0.31) | % |
| 6.59 | % |
| 1.07 | % |
| 3.59 | % | |
Consumer and finance leases |
| 1.66 | % |
| 2.34 | % |
| 1.98 | % |
| 2.30 | % | |
Total loans |
| 0.78 | % |
| 1.40 | % |
| 1.12 | % |
| 1.32 | % | |
VIRGIN ISLANDS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential mortgage |
| 0.01 | % |
| 0.41 | % |
| 0.05 | % |
| 0.57 | % | |
Commercial mortgage (2) |
| (0.20) | % |
| (0.11) | % |
| (0.29) | % |
| (0.13) | % | |
Commercial and Industrial (3) |
| (0.01) | % |
| 0.67 | % |
| - | % |
| 0.32 | % | |
Construction (4) |
| (0.53) | % |
| - | % |
| (0.27) | % |
| 24.49 | % | |
Consumer and finance leases |
| 1.47 | % |
| 2.30 | % |
| 1.12 | % |
| 2.43 | % | |
Total loans |
| 0.11 | % |
| 0.51 | % |
| 0.09 | % |
| 2.30 | % | |
FLORIDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Residential mortgage (5) |
| (0.14) | % |
| (0.09) | % |
| (0.03) | % |
| (0.04) | % | |
Commercial mortgage (6) |
| 10.13 | % |
| (0.01) | % |
| 5.10 | % |
| (0.01) | % | |
Commercial and Industrial |
| - | % |
| 0.02 | % |
| - | % |
| 0.03 | % | |
Construction (7) |
| (1.59) | % |
| (1.73) | % |
| (0.92) | % |
| (1.05) | % | |
Consumer and finance leases |
| 2.28 | % |
| 2.27 | % |
| 2.39 | % |
| 1.78 | % | |
Total loans |
| 2.36 | % |
| 0.02 | % |
| 1.24 | % |
| 0.04 | % |
(1)For the quarter ended June 30, 2019, recoveries in construction loans in Puerto Rico exceeded charge-offs.
(2)For the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, recoveries in commercial mortgage loans in the Virgin Islands exceeded charge-offs.
(3)For the quarter ended June 30, 2019, recoveries in commercial and industrial loans in the Virgin Islands exceeded charge-offs.
(4)For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2019, recoveries in construction loans in the Virgin Islands exceeded charge-offs.
(5)For the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, recoveries in residential mortgage loans in Florida exceeded charge-offs.
(6)For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, recoveries in commercial mortgage loans in Florida exceeded charge-offs.
(7)For the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, recoveries in construction loans in Florida exceeded charge-offs.
The above ratios are based on annualized charge-offs and are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire year or in subsequent periods.
Total credit losses (equal to net charge-offs plus losses on OREO operations) for the first six months of 2019 amounted to $57.5 million, or a loss rate of 1.26% on an annualized basis to average loans and repossessed assets, compared to credit losses of $55.7 million, or a loss rate of 1.37% on an annualized basis, for the same period in 2018.
150
The following table presents information about the OREO inventory and credit losses for the periods indicated: | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quarter Ended |
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREO balances, carrying value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential | $ | 46,559 |
|
| $ | 57,579 |
|
| $ | 46,559 |
|
| $ | 57,579 |
|
Commercial |
| 61,600 |
|
|
| 75,844 |
|
|
| 61,600 |
|
|
| 75,844 |
|
Construction |
| 9,922 |
|
|
| 9,932 |
|
|
| 9,922 |
|
|
| 9,932 |
|
Total | $ | 118,081 |
|
| $ | 143,355 |
|
| $ | 118,081 |
|
| $ | 143,355 |
|
OREO activity (number of properties): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning property inventory |
| 715 |
|
|
| 755 |
|
|
| 694 |
|
|
| 708 |
|
Properties acquired |
| 202 |
|
|
| 89 |
|
|
| 321 |
|
|
| 219 |
|
Properties disposed |
| (205) |
|
|
| (89) |
|
|
| (303) |
|
|
| (172) |
|
Ending property inventory |
| 712 |
|
|
| 755 |
|
|
| 712 |
|
|
| 755 |
|
Average holding period (in days) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
| 406 |
|
|
| 414 |
|
|
| 406 |
|
|
| 414 |
|
Commercial |
| 1,586 |
|
|
| 1,197 |
|
|
| 1,586 |
|
|
| 1,197 |
|
Construction |
| 1,452 |
|
|
| 1,508 |
|
|
| 1,452 |
|
|
| 1,508 |
|
Total average holding period (in days) |
| 1,109 |
|
|
| 904 |
|
|
| 1,109 |
|
|
| 904 |
|
OREO operations gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market adjustments, impairments (net of insurance recoveries), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and gains (losses) on sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential | $ | (1,301) |
|
| $ | (1,950) |
|
| $ | (1,424) |
|
| $ | (1,771) |
|
Commercial |
| (1,556) |
|
|
| (2,266) |
|
|
| (3,691) |
|
|
| (2,441) |
|
Construction |
| (347) |
|
|
| (894) |
|
|
| (624) |
|
|
| (1,057) |
|
|
| (3,204) |
|
|
| (5,110) |
|
|
| (5,739) |
|
|
| (5,269) |
|
Other OREO operations expenses |
| (1,839) |
|
|
| (545) |
|
|
| (3,047) |
|
|
| (576) |
|
Net Loss on OREO operations | $ | (5,043) |
|
| $ | (5,655) |
|
| $ | (8,786) |
|
| $ | (5,845) |
|
CHARGE-OFFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential charge offs, net |
| (4,188) |
|
|
| (4,855) |
|
|
| (9,735) |
|
|
| (7,891) |
|
Commercial charge offs, net |
| (11,681) |
|
|
| (7,593) |
|
|
| (19,169) |
|
|
| (16,222) |
|
Construction charge offs, net |
| 237 |
|
|
| (680) |
|
|
| 71 |
|
|
| (5,844) |
|
Consumer and finance leases charge offs, net |
| (8,623) |
|
|
| (10,229) |
|
|
| (19,872) |
|
|
| (19,931) |
|
Total charge offs, net |
| (24,255) |
|
|
| (23,357) |
|
|
| (48,705) |
|
|
| (49,888) |
|
TOTAL CREDIT LOSSES (1) | $ | (29,298) |
|
| $ | (29,012) |
|
| $ | (57,491) |
|
| $ | (55,733) |
|
LOSS RATIO PER CATEGORY (2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
| 0.72 | % |
|
| 0.84 | % |
|
| 0.71 | % |
|
| 0.59 | % |
Commercial |
| 1.37 | % |
|
| 1.06 | % |
|
| 1.19 | % |
|
| 1.00 | % |
Construction |
| 0.43 | % |
|
| 4.77 | % |
|
| 1.12 | % |
|
| 10.51 | % |
Consumer |
| 1.67 | % |
|
| 2.33 | % |
|
| 1.96 | % |
|
| 2.27 | % |
TOTAL CREDIT LOSS RATIO (3) |
| 1.28 | % |
|
| 1.54 | % |
|
| 1.26 | % |
|
| 1.37 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Equal to net loss on OREO operations plus charge-offs, net. | |||||||||||||||
(2) Calculated as net charge-offs plus market adjustments, impairments, and gains (losses) on sales of OREO divided by average loans and repossessed assets. | |||||||||||||||
(3) Calculated as net charge-offs plus net loss on OREO operations divided by average loans and repossessed assets. | |||||||||||||||
|
151
Operational Risk
The Corporation faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the activities that surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences, such as market conditions, security risks, and legal risks, the potential for operational and reputational loss has increased. To mitigate and control operational risk, the Corporation has developed, and continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and procedures that are designed to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose of these mechanisms is to provide reasonable assurance that the Corporation’s business operations are functioning within the policies and limits established by management.
The Corporation classifies operational risk into two major categories: business-specific and corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment group works with the various business units to ensure consistency in policies, processes and assessments. With respect to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, and legal and compliance, the Corporation has specialized groups, such as the Legal Department, Information Security, Corporate Compliance, and Operations. These groups assist the lines of business in the development and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the business groups.
Legal and Compliance Risk
Legal and compliance risk includes the risk of noncompliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the risk of adverse legal judgments against the Corporation, and the risk that a counterparty’s performance obligations will be unenforceable. The Corporation is subject to extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts its business, and this regulatory scrutiny has been significantly increasing over the years. The Corporation has established, and continues to enhance, procedures based on legal and regulatory requirements that are designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. The Corporation has a Compliance Director who reports to the Chief Risk Officer and is responsible for the oversight of regulatory compliance and implementation of an enterprise-wide compliance risk assessment process. The Compliance division has officer roles in each major business area with direct reporting responsibilities to the Corporate Compliance Group.
Concentration Risk
The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. However, the Corporation has diversified its geographical risk, as evidenced by its operations in the Virgin Islands and in Florida. Of the total gross loan portfolio held for investment of $9.1 billion as of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had credit risk of approximately 74% in Puerto Rico, 21% in the United States, and 5% in the Virgin Islands.
Update to the Puerto Rico Fiscal Situation
Economy Indicators and Projections
A significant portion of our financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which has been in an economic recession since 2006 that has been exacerbated by the effects of Hurricanes Irma and Maria in 2017. Based on the most recent information available included in the Fiscal Plan submitted by the Puerto Rico government and certified by the PROMESA oversight board on May 9, 2019 (the “New Fiscal Plan”), the Puerto Rico government projects growths in Puerto Rico’s gross national product (“GNP”) of 4.0% and 1.5% for fiscal years 2019 and 2020, respectively, and a contraction of 0.9%% for fiscal year 2021.
152
The Puerto Rico Economic Activity Index (the “EDB-EAI”) in May 2019 was 120.7, an increase of 0.42% compared to May 2018, the eleventh year-over-year increment after 67 consecutive months of negative growth, but a 0.3% reduction when compared to April 2019. The annual comparison is with respect to May 2018, when the electric energy system was still recovering from the effects of hurricanes Irma and Maria and the EDB-EAI presented a year-over-year decline of 1.2%. The EDB-EAI is a coincident index of economic activity for Puerto Rico made up of four indicators (cement sales, gasoline consumption, electric power generation and non-farm payroll employment). The cement sales for May 2019 totaled 1.1 million of 94-pound bags, an increase of 6.6% over the prior month, but an annual decline of 11.1%. Estimated gasoline consumption in May 2019 was 71.9 million gallons, a 1.9% decrease when compared with April 2019, and a decrease of 14.9% compared to the same period in 2018. Electric power generation for May 2019 totaled 1,548.7 million kilowatt-hours, an increase of 1.4% over the prior month, and an annual increase of 7.8% compared with the same period in 2018. Total non-farm payroll employment for May 2019 averaged 873,200 employees, a downturn of 0.2% compared to April 2019, but an annual increase of 1.7% compared with the same period in 2018. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate in Puerto Rico was 8.4% in June 2019, compared to 9.1% in June 2018. The average of the labor force participation rate in Puerto Rico was 44.86% from 1990 until 2018, reaching an all-time high of 49.8% in February 2007 and a record low of 38.50% in October 2017. Based on information published by the United States Department of Labor, the labor force estimate was 1.08 million people as of June 2019, a reduction of 1.12% when compared with June 2018. The New Fiscal Plan projects an 8.4% decline in population over the next six years. The New Fiscal Plan projects that inflation rates will reach 1.09%, 1.43%, 1.47%, 1.46% and 1.47% for fiscal years 2020 through 2024, respectively.
Based on information published by the Puerto Rico Treasury, the net revenues of the Puerto Rico government’s General Fund in May 2019 totaled $951.41 million, which was $11.98 million (or 1.3%) more than in May 2018. The net revenue to the General Fund from July 2018 to May 2019 totaled $10.234 billion, an increase of $2.06 billion (or 25.3%), compared with the same period of the previous fiscal year.
New Fiscal Plan
The New Fiscal Plan approved by the PROMESA oversight board on May 9, 2019 uses a six-year horizon and projects an 8.4% decline in population over the next six years (when compared to Fiscal Year 2018) with the assumption that the low historical rate of immigration in Puerto Rico will continue. In addition, the New Fiscal Plan established an annual emergency reserve of $130 million for 10 years. As mentioned above, it also assumes approximately $83 billion in disaster relief funding and projects to create a temporary fiscal surplus through fiscal year 2024. The New Fiscal Plan includes and maintains a series of structural reforms in areas such as: (i) human capital and labor; (ii) ease of doing business; (iii) power sector reform; and (iv) infrastructure reform. The New Fiscal Plan projects that around $83 billion of disaster relief funding in total, from federal and private sources, will be disbursed in the reconstruction effort. It will provide funding for individuals (e.g., for the reconstruction of houses, personal expenditures related to the hurricane such as clothing and supplies) and, the public (e.g., for the reconstruction of major infrastructure, roads, and schools), and will be used to cover part of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s (the “Commonwealth”) share of the cost of disaster relief funding (recipients often must match some portion of federal public assistance spend). Approximately $49 billion of the Commonwealth’s share is estimated to come from the Federal Emergency Management Administration’s Disaster Relief Fund for public assistance, hazard mitigation, mission assignments, and individual assistance. An estimated $8 billion will come from private and business insurance pay outs, and $6 billion is related to other federal funding. The New Fiscal Plan includes approximately $20 billion of funding from the Community Development Block Grants Disaster Relief program (“CDBG”), of which approximately $2.4 billion is estimated to be allocated to offset the Commonwealth and its entities’ expected cost-share requirements. This portion of CDBG funding will go towards covering part of the approximate 10% cost share burden on expenditures attributable to the Commonwealth, PREPA, Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA), and the Highways and Transportation Authority (HTA) from fiscal year 2019 to fiscal year 2025, given statutory requirements regarding the timeline of CDBG spending. The New Fiscal Plan also allocates $1.8 billion for Commonwealth-funded cost share, which includes $100 million per year from fiscal year 2020 to fiscal year 2025 to cover local costs in the event that fewer CDBG funds than anticipated become available.
153
On May 9, 2019, the PROMESA oversight board announced that it designated all of the island’s 78 municipalities as Covered Territorial Instrumentalities subject to the requirements of PROMESA. A group of 10 municipalities will be used as a pilot for assessing and enhancing municipal financial and budgetary practices, and for developing economic development strategies to address municipal fiscal challenges. As part of the pilot, the 10 municipalities will receive technical assistance from the PROMESA oversight board and participate in working meetings and listening sessions to receive feedback from stakeholders. The 10 municipalities were selected based upon a combination of factors, such as fiscal challenges, impact of the reduction of transfers from the Central Government, and their experience implementing innovative and creative initiatives and collaborating with other municipalities. As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation does not have credit exposure to these 10 municipalities. In addition, the PROMESA oversight board determined that the Governor must provide the PROMESA oversight board with an instrumentality fiscal plan and an instrumentality budget for CRIM.
Fiscal Budget Recent Developments
On July 1, 2019, the PROMESA oversight board announced that it certified a fiscal year 2020 consolidated budget of $20.2 billion, including General Fund, Special Revenue Fund and Federal Funds. The $9.1 billion General Fund, which is the fund the government uses for its day-to-day operations, increases by about 3.4% from the previous fiscal year, reflecting the need to cover healthcare costs in light of the reduction of federal Medicaid appropriations, and an increased focus on public safety. The $3.5 billion in Special Revenue Funds, which is comprised of revenue the government generates from fees and services dedicated to particular uses, reflects a more than 30% increase. The $7.6 billion in Federal Funds, reflecting a more than 17% decline in expected funding from the U.S. Government, primarily as a result of reduced appropriations to fund Puerto Rico’s Medicaid program. The budget includes spending in areas such as healthcare ($4.3 billion), education ($2.9 billion), pension payments (“pay-as-you -go or PayGo”) ($2.6 billion), public safety ($1.1 billion) and employer social security contributions ($46 million).
The government’s payroll expenses decrease 11% across fund types, to $3.8 billion. In addition, General Fund budget savings include a roughly 10% reduction from the previous year in the government’s back office expenses. The General Fund budget also includes a 30% cut in professional services expenses, and an about 13% reduction in spending for the Legislature. Moreover, the PROMESA oversight board reduced its own budget by 11% to fund payroll increases for the Department of Health and Emergency Medical Services, as well as funds to cover salary increases for firefighters.
Fiscal Situation Recent Developments
Several preliminary agreements have been executed between the PROMESA oversight board and various creditors of the Puerto Rico government, including pensioners and bondholders, including the restructuring of the GDB outstanding note obligations under Title VI of PROMESA, which was completed at a 55% recovery rate. In addition, the COFINA plan of adjustment under Title III proceedings was completed and provides in principle for an aggregate debt reduction of approximately one third of COFINA debt outstanding and savings of $17.5 billion in future debt service payments. Senior COFINA bondholders received a 93% recovery, while junior bondholders received a 53% recovery (an average recovery rate of approximately 70%). The Puerto Rico government and the PROMESA oversight board reached a restructuring agreement with a substantial portion of PREPA bondholders that, if eventually executed, would reduce PREPA’s debt service by approximately $3.0 billion or 40% over the next few years and represent a recovery rate of approximately 67.5%. Other preliminary agreements have been reached for smaller government issuers (i.e. PRIDCO) that include broad debt haircuts, as well as moratoriums on the payment of principal for a period of two years and maturity extensions.
On June 16, 2019, the PROMESA oversight board entered into a plan support agreement (“PSA”) with certain bondholders of the Puerto Rico government that provides a framework for a plan of adjustment to address $35 billion of claims against the Puerto Rico government. The PSA provides for more than a 60% average haircut for all $35 billion claims, a 36% haircut on pre-2012 General Obligation (GO) bonds, and a 27% haircut on Public Building Authority (PBA) bonds. Moreover, the 2012 and 2014 GO bonds issues have a settlement option of receiving a recovery rate of 45% and 35%, respectively. The deal, which has been rejected by the Puerto Rico government, will reduce the amount of Commonwealth-related bonds outstanding to less than $12 billion and will cut debt service payments by half over the next 30 years to $21 billion from $43 billion.
154
Other Developments
On April 23, 2019, the PROMESA oversight board filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to review the Court ruling on February 15, 2019 that the PROMESA oversight board had been unconstitutionally appointed because its seven members are principal U.S. officers and should have been selected by the U.S. President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate as required by the Appointments Clause. In addition, the PROMESA oversight board requested, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(d), that the Court extend the stay of its mandate, pending the Supreme Court’s final disposition, which allows the members of the PROMESA oversight board to continue operations until May 16, 2019. In the petition, the PROMESA oversight board also requested that the Court resolve the motion by May 3, 2019. While the above-mentioned Court ruling validated the PROMESA oversight board’s actions on Puerto Rico’s bankruptcy-like process under PROMESA, it stayed its ruling for 90 days to give the U.S. Congress the opportunity to either validate the existing board or reconstitute a new one to comply with the Appointments Clause.
On April 30, 2019, President Donald Trump announced his intent to nominate, for the consideration of the U.S. Senate, the current seven members of the PROMESA oversight board to complete the remainder of the three-year terms to which they were initially appointed in 2016.
On May 6, 2019, a U.S. Appeals Court gave the PROMESA oversight board another 60 days to allow for the constitutional reappointment of its members by President Donald Trump and the Senate with an expiration date of July 15, 2019.
On June 18, 2019, President Donald Trump sent the renominations of the seven (7) board members to the Senate. On the same day, the PROMESA oversight board requested the First Circuit to extend the stay pending its petition to the Supreme Court.
On July 4, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit extended indefinitely the stay that allows the PROMESA oversight board to operate until the U.S. Supreme Court reviews the five cases involving the constitutionality of its members, which is to be discussed during the second week of October 2019.
On July 24, 2019, Governor Ricardo Rosello Nevares announced his resignation as the governor of Puerto Rico effective August 2, 2019 at 5:00 PM. The resignation came after 12 days of protests and disruptions due to scandal involving leaked private communications, as well as corruption investigations and arrests within his administration. Pedro Pierluisi, who was appointed as Secretary of State by former governor Ricardo Rosello prior to his resignation, was sworn in as Governor of Puerto Rico on August 2, 2019 even though he had not been confirmed as secretary of state by the Puerto Rico Senate. On August 7, 2019, Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court concurred with the allegations made by the Puerto Rico Senate in its lawsuit filed on August 4, 2019 that the law under which Mr. Pierluisi was appointed governor was unconstitutional. The law had provided that confirmation of the appointment of a secretary of state did not require approval by both the Puerto Rico House of Representatives and Senate if the secretary of state has to step in as a governor. Consistent with the provisions regarding succession to the governor in the Constitution of Puerto Rico, the Secretary of Justice, Wanda Vazquez was sworn in as the new Governor of Puerto at 5 p.m. Wednesday, August 7, 2019.
On July 25, 2019, FEMA released a notification under release number HQ-19-078 announcing its decision to reinstate the manual drawdown process for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The letter confirmed that effective immediately, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico must receive approval from the agency to drawdown all grant funds for hurricanes Irma and Maria. The manual drawdown process will require the Government of Puerto Rico to submit funding drawdown requests on behalf of municipalities and state agencies prior to receiving FEMA grant funding. Additionally, the drawdown request must be accompanied with supporting documentation to certify the amount being requested for drawdown is eligible, allowable, reasonable and in alignment with federal procurement regulations.
On August 2, 2019, HUD announced it will appoint a federal financial monitor to oversee the disbursement and use of the nearly $20 billion allocated to Puerto Rico through the aforementioned CDBG.
155
Exposure to Puerto Rico Government
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $213.4 million of direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government, its municipalities and public corporations, compared to $214.6 million as of December 31, 2018. As of June 30, 2019, approximately $190.9 million of the exposure consisted of loans and obligations of municipalities in Puerto Rico that are supported by assigned property tax revenues and for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality have been pledged to their repayment, compared to $191.9 million as of December 31, 2018. Approximately 76% of the Corporation’s municipality exposure consisted primarily of senior priority obligations concentrated in three of the largest municipalities in Puerto Rico. These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as are required for the payment of all of their respective general obligation bonds and notes. During the second quarter of 2019, the PROMESA oversight board announced the designation of the Commonwealth’s 78 municipalities as covered instrumentalities under PROMESA. Meanwhile, the latest fiscal plan certified by the PROMESA oversight board did not contemplate a restructuring of the debt of Puerto Rico’s municipalities but the plan did call for the gradual elimination of budgetary subsidies provided to municipalities. Furthermore, municipalities are also likely to be affected by the negative economic and other effects resulting from expense, revenue or cash management measures taken to address the Puerto Rico government’s fiscal and liquidity shortfalls, as well as measures included in fiscal plans of other government entities. In addition to municipalities, the total direct exposure also included a $14.2 million loan to an affiliate of PREPA and obligations of the Puerto Rico government, specifically bonds of the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority, at an amortized cost of $8.3 million as part of its available-for-sale investment securities portfolio (fair value of $7.0 million as of June 30, 2019).
The following table details the Corporation’s total direct exposure to the Puerto Rico Government according to their maturities: | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of June 30, 2019 | |||||||
|
|
| Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
| Total | |
|
|
| (Amortized cost) |
|
| Loans |
|
| Exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After 5 to 10 years | $ | 4,000 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 4,000 | |
After 10 years |
| 4,298 |
|
| - |
|
| 4,298 | |
Total Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority |
| 8,298 |
|
| - |
|
| 8,298 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Corporations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Affiliate of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After 1 to 5 years |
| - |
|
| 14,164 |
|
| 14,164 | |
Total Public Corporations |
| - |
|
| 14,164 |
|
| 14,164 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipalities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After 1 to 5 years |
| 5,957 |
|
| 31,263 |
|
| 37,220 | |
After 5 to 10 years |
| 53,016 |
|
| 15,008 |
|
| 68,024 | |
After 10 years |
| 85,699 |
|
| - |
|
| 85,699 | |
Total Municipalities |
| 144,672 |
|
| 46,271 |
|
| 190,943 | |
Total Direct Government Exposure | $ | 152,970 |
| $ | 60,435 |
| $ | 213,405 | |
|
|
156
In addition, as of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $110.0 million in exposure to residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the PRHFA, compared to $112.1 million as of December 31, 2018. Residential mortgage loans guaranteed by the PRHFA are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. The Puerto Rico government guarantees up to $75 million of the principal under the mortgage loan insurance program. According to the most recently-released audited financial statements of the PRHFA, as of June 30, 2016, the PRHFA’s mortgage loans insurance program covered loans in an aggregate amount of approximately $576 million. The regulations adopted by the PRHFA require the establishment of adequate reserves to guarantee the solvency of the mortgage loan insurance fund. As of June 30, 2016, the most recent date as to which information is available, the PRHFA had a restricted net position for such purposes of approximately $77.4 million.
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $785.4 million of public sector deposits in Puerto Rico, compared to $677.3 million as of December 31, 2018. Approximately 41% is from municipalities and municipal agencies in Puerto Rico and 59% is from public corporations and the central government and agencies in Puerto Rico.
Exposure to USVI government
The Corporation has operations in the USVI and has credit exposure to USVI government entities.
The USVI is experiencing a number of fiscal and economic challenges, exacerbated by the impact of Hurricane Irma in the third quarter of 2017, that could adversely affect the ability of its public corporations and instrumentalities to service their outstanding debt obligations. PROMESA does not apply to the USVI and, as such, there is currently no federal legislation permitting the restructuring of the debts of the USVI and its public corporations and instrumentalities.
To the extent that the fiscal condition of the USVI government continues to deteriorate, the U.S. Congress or the government of the USVI may enact legislation allowing for the restructuring of the financial obligations of the USVI government entities or imposing a stay on creditor remedies, including by making PROMESA applicable to the USVI.
As of June 30, 2019, the Corporation had $64.0 million in loans to USVI government instrumentalities and public corporations, compared to $55.8 million as of December 31, 2018. Of the amount outstanding as of June 30, 2019, public corporations of the USVI owed approximately $40.8 million and an independent instrumentality of the USVI government owed approximately $23.2 million. As of June 30, 2019, all loans were currently performing and up to date on principal and interest payments.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires the measurement of the financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
Unlike most industrial companies, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rate movements are not necessarily correlated with changes in the prices of goods and services.
157
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Corporation has included in this Form 10-Q the following financial measures that are not recognized under GAAP, which are referred to as non-GAAP financial measures:
1.Net interest income, interest rate spread, and net interest margin are reported excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and on a tax-equivalent basis in order to provide to investors additional information about the Corporation’s net interest income that management uses and believes should facilitate comparability and analysis of the periods presented. The changes in the fair value of derivative instruments have no effect on interest due or interest earned on interest-bearing liabilities or interest-earning assets, respectively. The tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt assets and assumes a marginal income tax rate. Income from tax-exempt earning assets is increased by an amount equivalent to the taxes that would have been paid if this income had been taxable at statutory rates. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest income, interest rate spread, and net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis. This adjustment puts all earning assets, most notably tax-exempt securities and tax-exempt loans, on a common basis that facilitates comparison of results to the results of peers. See “Results of Operations – Net Interest Income” above for the table that reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure “net interest income excluding fair value changes and on a tax-equivalent basis” with net interest income calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The table also reconciles the non-GAAP financial measures “net interest spread and margin excluding fair value changes and on a tax-equivalent basis” with net interest spread and margin calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
2.The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP financial measures generally used by the financial community to evaluate capital adequacy. Tangible common equity is total equity less preferred equity, goodwill, core deposit intangibles, and other intangibles, such as the purchased credit card relationship intangible asset and the insurance customer relationship intangible asset. Tangible assets are total assets less goodwill, core deposit intangibles, and other intangibles, such as the purchased credit card relationship intangible asset and the insurance customer relationship intangible asset. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase method of accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Accordingly, the Corporation believes that disclosure of these financial measures is useful to investors. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets, or the related measures, should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity, total assets, or any other measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets, and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. See “Risk Management – Capital” above for a reconciliation of the Corporation’s tangible common equity and tangible assets.
3.Adjusted provision for loan and lease losses and the ratio of the adjusted provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs are non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the effects related to the net loan loss reserve release of $6.4 million for the first six months of 2019, and $2.1 million and $8.5 million for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, respectively, resulting from revised estimates of the qualitative reserve associated with the effects of Hurricanes Maria and Irma. Management believes that this information helps investors understand the adjusted measures without regard to items that are not expected to reoccur with any regularity or may reoccur at uncertain times and in uncertain amounts on reported results and facilitates comparisons with prior periods. See below for the reconciliation of the adjusted provision for loan and leases losses and the ratio of the adjusted provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs.
4.Adjusted net income reflects the effect of the following exclusions:
The $0.8 million total benefit recorded in the second quarter of 2019 resulting from hurricane-related insurance recoveries related to impairments, repairs and maintenance costs incurred on facilities affected by Hurricane Irma in the British Virgin Islands.
Net loan loss reserve releases of $6.4 million for the first six months of 2019, and $2.1 million and $8.5 million for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, respectively, resulting from revised estimates of the hurricane-related qualitative reserves.
The $2.3 million expense recovery recognized in the first quarter of 2019 related to the employee retention benefit payment received by the Bank under the Disaster Tax Relief and Airport Extension Act of 2017, as amended.
Exclusion of hurricane-related expenses of $0.7 million and $2.3 million in the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, of 2018, respectively.
158
The gain of $2.3 million on the repurchase and cancellation of $23.8 million in TRuPs recorded in the first quarter of 2018.
The tax-related effects of all the pre-tax items mentioned in the above bullets as follows:
-Tax expense of $0.3 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2019 related to the benefit of hurricane-related insurance recoveries (calculated based on the statutory tax rate of 37.5% for 2019).
-Tax expense of $2.4 million in the first six months of 2019 and $0.8 million and $3.3 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2018, respectively, related to reserve releases associated with the hurricane-related qualitative reserve (calculated based on the statutory tax rate of 37.5% for 2019 and 39% for 2018).
-Tax benefit of $0.3 million and $0.9 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2018, respectively, associated with hurricane-related expenses (calculated based on the statutory tax rate of 39% for 2018).
-The employee retention benefit recognized in the first quarter of 2019 will not be treated as taxable income by virtue of the Disaster Tax Relief and Airport Extension Act of 2017.
-The gain realized on the repurchase and cancellation of TRuPs in 2018 recorded at the holding company level, had no effect on the income tax expense in 2018.
Management believes that adjustments to net income of items that are not reflective of core operating performance, are not expected to reoccur with any regularity or may reoccur at uncertain times and in uncertain amounts facilitates comparisons with prior periods and provides an alternate presentation of the Corporation’s performance.
The Corporation uses these non-GAAP financial measures and believes that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance the ability of analysts and investors to analyze trends in the Corporation’s business and understand the performance of the Corporation. In addition, the Corporation may utilize these non-GAAP financial measures as a guide in its budgeting and long-term planning process. Any analysis of these non-GAAP financial measures should be used only in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP.
159
See “Overview of Results of Operations” above for the reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure “adjusted net income” to the GAAP financial measure. The following tables reconcile the non-GAAP financial measures “adjusted provision for loan and lease losses,“ and “adjusted provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs ratio,” to the GAAP financial measures for the second quarter of 2018 and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
2019 First Six-Months |
| As reported (GAAP) |
| Hurricane-related Qualitative Reserve Release |
| Adjusted (Non-GAAP) |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses | $ | 24,354 | $ | 6,425 | $ | 30,779 |
|
Residential mortgage |
| 7,225 |
| - |
| 7,225 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
| 4,662 |
| - |
| 4,662 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
| (5,603) |
| 3,422 |
| (2,181) |
|
Construction |
| (637) |
| - |
| (637) |
|
Consumer |
| 18,707 |
| 3,003 |
| 21,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
2018 Second Quarter |
| As reported (GAAP) |
| Hurricane-related Qualitative Reserve Release |
| Adjusted (Non-GAAP) |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses | $ | 19,536 | $ | 2,057 | $ | 21,593 |
Residential mortgage |
| 3,599 |
| 238 |
| 3,837 |
Commercial mortgage |
| 2,184 |
| 1,680 |
| 3,864 |
Commercial and industrial |
| 75 |
| 198 |
| 273 |
Construction |
| 507 |
| (59) |
| 448 |
Consumer |
| 13,171 |
| - |
| 13,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 First Six-Months |
| As reported (GAAP) |
| Hurricane-related Qualitative Reserve Release |
| Adjusted (Non-GAAP) |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses | $ | 40,080 | $ | 8,464 | $ | 48,544 |
Residential mortgage Loans |
| 4,046 |
| 374 |
| 4,420 |
Commercial mortgage Loans |
| 10,845 |
| 1,925 |
| 12,770 |
Commercial and industrial Loans |
| 731 |
| 4,020 |
| 4,751 |
Construction Loans |
| 5,271 |
| 102 |
| 5,373 |
Consumer Loans |
| 19,187 |
| 2,043 |
| 21,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Provision for Loan and Lease | |||||
|
| Losses to Net Charge-Offs | |||||
|
| (GAAP to Non-GAAP reconciliation) | |||||
|
|
| Six-Month Period Ended | ||||
|
|
| June 30, 2019 | ||||
|
| Provision for Loan |
|
| Net Charge-Offs | ||
|
| and Lease Losses |
|
| |||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses and net charge-offs (GAAP) |
| $ | 24,354 |
|
| $ | 48,705 |
Less Special items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurricane-related qualitative reserve release |
|
| 6,425 |
|
|
| - |
Provision for loan and lease losses and net charge-offs, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
excluding special items (Non-GAAP) |
| $ | 30,779 |
|
| $ | 48,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs (GAAP) |
|
| 50.00 | % |
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
excluding special items (Non-GAAP) |
|
| 63.19 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Provision for Loan and Lease |
|
| Provision for Loan and Lease | |||||||||
| Losses to Net Charge-Offs |
|
| Losses to Net Charge-Offs | |||||||||
| (GAAP to Non-GAAP reconciliation) |
| (GAAP to Non-GAAP reconciliation) | ||||||||||
| Quarter Ended |
|
| Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||
| June 30, 2018 |
|
| June 30, 2018 | |||||||||
| Provision for Loan |
| Net Charge-Offs |
| Provision for Loan |
|
| Net Charge-Offs | |||||
| and Lease Losses |
|
| and Lease Losses |
|
| |||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses and net charge-offs (GAAP) | $ | 19,536 |
|
| $ | 23,357 |
| $ | 40,080 |
|
| $ | 49,888 |
Less Special items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurricane-related qualitative reserve release |
| 2,057 |
|
|
| - |
|
| 8,464 |
|
|
| - |
Provision for loan and lease losses and net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
excluding special items (Non-GAAP) | $ | 21,593 |
|
| $ | 23,357 |
| $ | 48,544 |
|
| $ | 49,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs (GAAP) |
| 83.64 | % |
|
|
|
|
| 80.34 | % |
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
excluding special items (Non-GAAP) |
| 92.45 | % |
|
|
|
|
| 97.31 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding market risk to which the Corporation is exposed, see the information contained in Part I – Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Management.”
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
First BanCorp.’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of First BanCorp.’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2019. Based on this evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
162
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Not applicable.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The Corporation’s business, operating results and/or the market price of our common and preferred stock may be significantly affected by a number of factors. For a detailed discussion of certain risk factors that could affect the Corporation’s future operations, financial condition or results for future periods see the risk factors below and in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risk factors could also cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also refer to the discussion in “Forward Looking Statements” and Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in this report for additional information that may supplement or update the discussion of risk factors in the Corporation’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to the Corporation or are currently deemed by the Corporation to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Corporation’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Uncertainty as to the Consequences of the Resignation of Puerto Rico’s Governor on the Corporation’s Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
On July 24, 2019, the governor of Puerto Rico Ricardo Rosello Nevares resigned his position effective August 2, 2019, in an unprecedented response to 12 days of protests that disrupted the activities of the Puerto Rico government after a leak of communications between the governor and some of his senior advisors that many Puerto Ricans regarded as offensive. The leaks and various arrests relating to allegations of fraud in the days leading up to the governor’s resignation resulted in various resignations by other senior government officials. Pedro Pierluisi, who was appointed as Secretary of State by former governor Ricardo Rosello, was sworn in as Governor of Puerto Rico on August 2, 2019 even though he had not been confirmed as secretary of state by the Puerto Rico Senate. On August 7, 2019, Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court concurred with the allegations made by the Puerto Rico Senate in its lawsuit filed on August 4, 2019 that the law under which Mr. Pierluisi was appointed governor was unconstitutional. The law had provided that confirmation of the appointment of a secretary of state did not require approval by both the Puerto Rico House of Representatives and Senate if the secretary of state has to step in as a governor. Consistent with the provisions regarding succession to the governor in the Constitution of Puerto Rico, the Secretary of Justice, Wanda Vazquez was sworn in as the new Governor of Puerto at 5 p.m. Wednesday, August 7, 2019. It is uncertain what effect the change in Puerto Rico government leadership and the allegations of fraud by Puerto Rico government officials will have on the credibility of the Puerto Rico government, Puerto Rico’s economy, the receipt of disaster relief funds allocated to Puerto Rico by the United States Congress, the Puerto Rico government’s fiscal plan, the extent of the oversight of Puerto Rico performed by the PROMESA oversight board, or the relationship between the PROMESA oversight board and the new Puerto Rico government. Deterioration in economic conditions, or any other negative outcome related to the current political environment in Puerto Rico, may adversely affect the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.
163
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
a) Not applicable.
b) Not applicable.
c) Purchase of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers. The following table provides information relating to the Corporation’s purchases of shares of its common stock in the second quarter of 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Number of |
|
| Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares Purchased |
|
| That May Yet be |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average |
|
| as Part of Publicly |
|
| Purchased Under |
|
|
| Total number of |
|
| Price |
|
| Announced Plans |
|
| These Plans or |
|
Period |
| shares purchased (1) |
|
| Paid |
|
| Or Programs |
|
| Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2019 |
| 1,236 |
| $ | 11.14 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
May 2019 |
| 912 |
|
| 10.55 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
June 2019 |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
Total |
| 2,148 |
| $ | 10.89 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Reflects the withholding of shares of common stock to cover minimum tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock. The Corporation intends to continue to satisfy statutory tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of outstanding restricted stock through the withholding of shares. |
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See the Exhibit Index below, which is incorporated by reference herein:
Exhibit Index
31.1 – CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 – CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.1 – Interactive Data File (Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019, furnished in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language)
165
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized:
First BanCorp.
Registrant
Date: August 9, 2019By:/s/ Aurelio Alemán
Aurelio Alemán
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 9, 2019By:/s/ Orlando Berges
Orlando Berges
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
166