XML 155 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Acquisition of TelWorx Communications LLC
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Business Combinations [Abstract]  
Acquisition of TelWorx Communications LLC

8. Acquisition of TelWorx Communications LLC

The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary PCTelWorx, Inc. (“PCTelWorx”), completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain specified liabilities of TelWorx Communications LLC, TelWorx U.K. Limited, TowerWorx LLC and TowerWorx International, Inc. (“collectively “TelWorx”), pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of July 9, 2012 among the Company, PCTelWorx, TelWorx and Tim and Brenda Scronce, the principal owners of TelWorx. The business operations associated with these purchased assets are collectively referred to as “TelWorx” in this Form 10-Q. The acquired business is primarily a North Carolina-based business with expertise in delivering wireless and fiber optic solutions into the enterprise, defense, transportation, and the carrier market. The acquired business excels at global procurement, custom engineering of RF solutions, rapid delivery and deployment of systems, and value-added reselling of antennas, related RF components, and other communication elements. The acquisition includes TowerWorx, a provider of mobile towers for defense, industrial wireless, and other applications. The acquisition expands the Company’s products and markets addressed by its antenna and Connected Solutions™ product line. The fair value purchase price for TelWorx was $16.1 million, consisting of $16.0 million in cash paid at closing, $1.1 million of contingent consideration related to an indemnity holdback escrow and potential earn-out at fair value, net of $1.0 million cash recovered from Tim and Brenda Scronce in March 2013 pursuant to the working capital adjustment provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the legal settlement described below.

 

Following the closing of the acquisition, the Company’s management became aware of accounting irregularities with respect to the TelWorx financial statements, in part through an internal review conducted in connection with the calculation of post-closing purchase price adjustments and in part due to an anonymous tip received after the internal review began. With the oversight of the Audit Committee, management expanded its review into an internal investigation regarding these financial irregularities and outside counsel was retained to assist in the investigation. The Company’s outside counsel then retained a Big Four accounting firm to perform an independent forensic accounting investigation under counsel’s direction. The accounting irregularities in the TelWorx financial statements identified as a result of this investigation are believed to have been directed and/or permitted by management of the TelWorx Entities, principally Tim Scronce and those acting at his direction. The correction of the pre-acquisition accounting misstatements discovered in the investigation are reflected in the pro-forma adjustments in Footnote 4 – Acquisition of TelWorx Communications LLC in the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as well as this footnote.

The Company determined the amount of the corrections and the period in which they occurred through the forensic audit performed, which included tracing sales transactions to customer commitments and proof of delivery documents as well as reviewing the cost of sales records and aging of inventory at the acquisition date. The Company was authorized by the Board of Directors to seek restitution from the Scronces and other responsible parties. On March 27, 2013, the Company and the Scronces entered into a legal settlement over claims by the Company relating to the value of the acquisition and the accounting issues summarized above. The Company is still pursuing additional restitution from the other responsible parties. See Footnote 11 – TelWorx Legal Settlement for full details.

The Company, through PCTelWorx, offered employment to all former employees of TelWorx. The key managers entered into employment arrangements that include a non-competition covenant during their employment and for twelve months thereafter. The Company entered into a five-year lease agreement for the continued use of the operating facility and offices in Lexington, North Carolina and a two-year lease for an office facility in Pryor, Oklahoma. In May 2013, the Company gave notice of early termination of the facility lease in Lexington, North Carolina. The termination is effective October 2013. In July 2013, the Company signed a new lease for office space in Lexington, North Carolina. The new five-year lease is effective August 1, 2013.

 

The following is the allocation of the purchase price for the assets acquired from TelWorx at the date of the acquisition.

 

     Estimated Fair
Value July 9, 2012
as reported at
September 30, 2012
     Provisional
Adjustments
Subsequent to
September 30, 2012
    Estimated Fair
Value July 9, 2012
 

Tangible assets:

       

Accounts receivable

   $ 1,575       ($ 205   $ 1,370   

Inventory

     1,843         (465     1,378   

Prepaid expenses

     9         0        9   

Fixed assets

     248         0        248   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total tangible assets

     3,675         (670     3,005   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Intangible assets:

       

Goodwill

     9,491         3,059        12,550   

Trade names

     1,527         (268     1,259   

Technology

     458         12        470   

Customer relationships

     2,898         (2,781     117   

Backlog

     91         (58     33   

Non-compete

     262         (248     14   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

     14,727         (284     14,443   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

     18,402         (954     17,448   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital leases

     57         (20     37   

Accounts payable

     1,113         100        1,213   

Accrued liabilities

     85         33        118   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     1,255         113        1,368   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

   $ 17,147       ($ 1,067   $ 16,080   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company subsequently recorded a goodwill impairment of $12.5 million related to its TelWorx acquisition based on the results from our annual test of goodwill impairment conducted as of October 31, 2012. This amount represented the total goodwill associated with the acquisition. The Company considers its purchase accounting for the TelWorx acquisition to have been complete as of the quarter ended December 31, 2012. The chronology of the Company’s change purchase accounting fair value of $16.1 million on July 9, 2012 to a $12.5 million goodwill impairment in the quarter ended December 31, 2012 is as follows:

The Company based its purchase accounting fair value of intangible assets on future projections using the revenue and margin profile of TelWorx’ historical financial statements for 2010, 2011 and the six months ended June 30, 2012. They presented a profile of a business that yielded goodwill of $9.5 million, primarily attributed to the synergies expected to arise for the acquired TelWorx business after the Company’s acquisition of the business and the assembled workforce of the acquired business. The two primary synergies that the Company expected to accrue to the TelWorx business that the Company concluded were not typically available to a market participant were: (1) Increased TelWorx revenue as a result of customer confidence resulting from being part of a public company with significant cash and investments available for working capital with no debt. The vast majority of the competitors in the antenna and site solution market are smaller private companies with limited working capital and financial resources. (2) Lower raw material costs for TelWorx products as a result of having access to PCTEL’s supply chain for certain products. PCTEL has access through several of its large key customers, with which it has a preferred supplier relationship, to their supply chain and profits from the volume discounts that come with our customer’s significantly larger volume. There were no synergies identified that accrued to PCTEL.

The accounting irregularities discovered in the historical financial statements lowered the historical pre-acquisition sales and margins as well as the post-acquisition sales in the quarter ended September 30, 2012, the quarter in which the acquisition closed. The Company recalculated the allocation of the purchase price using future projections which have a new lower revenue and margin profile. The result was a $3.1 million increase of goodwill up to $12.5 million. At this time the Company remained confident that the acquisition would yield the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition , to which the goodwill was attributed.

 

The Company performs an annual impairment test of goodwill as of the end of the first month of the fiscal fourth quarter (October 31st), or at an interim date if an event occurs or if circumstances change that would indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred. In performing our annual impairment test, the Company first performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, including goodwill. If our qualitative assessment is indicative of possible impairment, then a two-step quantitative fair value assessment is performed at the reporting unit level. In the first step, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared with its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, then goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is performed. The second step is performed if the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The implied fair value of goodwill is then compared against the carrying value of goodwill to determine the amount of impairment.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2012, the Company observed that the orders in the 2013 sales projections used in the purchase accounting allocation for TelWorx were not converting to sales backlog at a pace that would support the projected 2013 base revenue used in the purchase accounting fair value of the TelWorx business at the acquisition date. Due to the Company’s short order to shipment cycles, such a variance would not become apparent until 60-90 days before 2013 began. Additionally, at the date of the acquisition the Company was not seeing funnel conversion variances in its antenna and site solutions products that operate in similar markets and therefore did not suspect that the site solution products would experience a dissimilar path. Specifically, 2013 base revenue and gross profit used in the Company’s purchase accounting was $18.5 million and $3.2 million (18% of revenue), respectively. At October 31, 2012, based on the Company’s historical order to ship cycle and historical rate of sales funnel conversion to actual sales (50%), there should have been approximately $1.0 million of Q1 2013 deliverable order backlog and a sales funnel of Q1 deliverable sales orders being tracked totaling at least $7.5 million. At October 31, 2012 the backlog was half the target, the sales funnel was 17% below the target, and the gross profit margin on the backlog and funnel were at 16% instead of 18%. All of these were indicators that the business was deteriorating from the projections used at the acquisition date for the purchase accounting. The Company reevaluated the projections and determined that they supported 2013 revenue of $15.0 million, at 16% margin, which was used in the goodwill test calculations, and adopted by the Board of Directors as TelWorx’ contribution to the 2013 Company financial plan. Management concluded the decline in projected revenue and gross margin levels were of a long-term nature. The decline was across a broad range of customers and products. Additionally, the decline in revenue was sufficiently large to not be recoverable in the short term based on historical revenue growth rates for the markets in which the Company’s antenna and site solutions products are sold. The Company considered this significant revenue decline at the annual goodwill test date to be an indicator of goodwill impairment requiring the performance of the two step quantitative fair value assessment, which resulted in a net present value of future cash flows that did not support a goodwill carrying value for this reporting unit. It is not as a result of the accounting irregularities previously discussed.

The following pro forma financial information gives effect to the acquisition of the TelWorx business as if the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2012. The pro forma financial information for TelWorx was derived from the unaudited historical accounting records of TelWorx.

 

     (unaudited)      (unaudited)  
     Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended  
     June 30, 2012      June 30, 2012  

REVENUES

   $ 23,841       $ 44,482   

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   $ 290       ($ 575

The Company made pro forma adjustments to the historical TelWorx revenue and earnings before income taxes that reduced revenue by $0.1 million and total combined earnings by $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and that reduced revenue by $0.4 million and total combined earnings by $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

The adjustments were made to apply a correction to the misstatements to revenue and profit before tax contained in the historical pre-acquisition TelWorx financial statements that were discovered in the course of the Company’s internal investigation by the forensic auditors. The forensic auditing procedures that identified the misstatements included the tracing of all significant sales transactions from the TelWorx operation back to customer commitment and proof of delivery documentation. The forensic audit dollar coverage obtained is approximately 50% of the operations’ revenue. Additionally there is also an adjustment to the costs associated with excess and obsolete inventory not used for a year or more at the acquisition date to the appropriate pre-acquisition period, consistent with the policy used by the Company after the acquisition. The forensic accounting procedures included the tracing of all significant inventory items at the date of the acquisition back to historical costing and usage records.

The pro forma information is presented for illustrative purposes only and may not be indicative of the results that would have been obtained had the acquisition actually occurred on January 1, 2012, nor is it necessarily indicative of the Company’s future consolidated results of operations or financial position.