XML 61 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Fair Value [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

12.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy to classify and disclose all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, in periods subsequent to their initial measurement.  These tiers include:  Level 1, defined as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. 

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis include derivative instruments and restricted assets.  The Company’s derivative instruments are pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swaps and pay-fixed, receive-variable diesel fuel hedges.  The Company’s interest rate swaps are recorded at their estimated fair values based on quotes received from financial institutions that trade these contracts.  The Company verifies the reasonableness of these quotes using similar quotes from another financial institution as of each date for which financial statements are prepared.  The Company uses a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model to determine the estimated fair value of the diesel fuel hedges.  The assumptions used in preparing the DCF model include:  (i) estimates for the forward DOE index curve; and (ii) the discount rate based on risk-free interest rates over the term of the hedge contracts.  The DOE index curve used in the DCF model was obtained from financial institutions that trade these contracts and ranged from $2.56 to $2.92 at September 30, 2015 and from $2.96 to $3.41 at December 31, 2014.  The weighted average DOE index curve used in the DCF model was $2.76 and $3.04 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.  Significant increases (decreases) in the forward DOE index curve would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.  For the Company’s interest rate swaps and fuel hedges, the Company also considers the Company’s creditworthiness in its determination of the fair value measurement of these instruments in a net liability position and the banks’ creditworthiness in its determination of the fair value measurement of these instruments in a net asset position.  The Company’s restricted assets are valued at quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, which the Company receives from the financial institutions that hold such investments on its behalf.  The Company’s restricted assets measured at fair value are invested primarily in U.S. government and agency securities. 

The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, were as follows: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement at September 30, 2015 Using

 

 

Total

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

Interest rate swap derivative instruments – net liability position

 

$

(14,483)

 

$

-

 

$

(14,483)

 

$

-

Fuel hedge derivative instruments – net liability position

 

$

(6,883)

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

(6,883)

Restricted assets

 

$

42,520 

 

$

-

 

$

42,520 

 

$

-

Contingent consideration

 

$

(53,109)

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

(53,109)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2014 Using

 

 

Total

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

Interest rate swap derivative instruments – net liability position

 

$

(7,094)

 

$

-

 

$

(7,094)

 

$

-

Fuel hedge derivative instrument – net liability position

 

$

(1,979)

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

(1,979)

Restricted assets

 

$

40,870 

 

$

-

 

$

40,870 

 

$

-

Contingent consideration

 

$

(70,165)

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

(70,165)

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value for Level 3 derivatives for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

Beginning balance

$

(1,979)

 

$

2,199 

Realized losses (gains) included in earnings

 

2,165 

 

 

(841)

Unrealized losses included in AOCL

 

(7,069)

 

 

(1,010)

Ending balance

$

(6,883)

 

$

348 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value for Level 3 liabilities related to contingent consideration for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

Beginning balance

$

70,165 

 

$

55,550 

Contingent consideration recorded at acquisition date

 

515 

 

 

4,814 

Payment of contingent consideration recorded at acquisition date

 

(190)

 

 

(470)

Payment of contingent consideration recorded in earnings

 

-

 

 

(450)

Adjustments to contingent consideration

 

(19,809)

 

 

(2,813)

Interest accretion expense

 

2,428 

 

 

1,022 

Ending balance

$

53,109 

 

$

57,653 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Note 5 regarding non-recurring fair value measurements.