XML 41 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements        
We use a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy, which gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets, is comprised of the following three levels:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs, other than Level 1 inputs. Level 2 inputs would typically include quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 – Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the measurement and unobservable.
The following tables provide the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):  
 
Assets at Fair Value as of September 30, 2014
Asset Category
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash and cash equivalents (1)
$
437,446

 

 

 
$
437,446

Restricted cash (2)
6,938

 

 

 
6,938

Total
$
444,384

 

 

 
$
444,384

 
Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2013
Asset Category
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Cash and cash equivalents (1)
$
439,813

 

 

 
$
439,813

Restricted cash (2)
6,934

 

 

 
6,934

Total
$
446,747

 

 

 
$
446,747

 ________
(1)
Cash and cash equivalents include money market funds with original maturity dates of three months or less, which are Level 1 assets. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $167.4 million and $147.7 million, respectively, in money market funds.
(2)
Restricted cash is classified as “Prepaid expenses and other” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We believe that the carrying values of our financial instruments, which include accounts receivable and other financing commitments, approximate their fair values due primarily to their short-term maturities and low risk of counterparty default. The carrying value of our debt associated with the 2013 Credit Agreement approximates its fair value due to the variable rate on such debt.