XML 24 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
3 Months Ended
Mar. 29, 2015
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

1.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Business and Basis of Accounting

 

The McClatchy Company (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is a 21st century news and information publisher of well-respected publications such as the Miami HeraldThe Kansas City StarThe Sacramento BeeThe Charlotte Observer,  The (Raleigh) News and Observer, and the (Fort Worth) Star-Telegram. We operate media companies in 28 U.S. markets in 14 states, providing each of our communities with high-quality news and advertising services in a wide array of digital and print formats. We are headquartered in Sacramento, California, and our Class A Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol MNI.

 

We also own 15.0% of CareerBuilder LLC, which operates the nation’s largest online jobs website, CareerBuilder.com, and 33.3% of HomeFinder.com, LLC, which operates the online real estate website HomeFinder.com. 

 

Preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and pursuant to the rules and regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the Company and our subsidiaries. Intercompany items and transactions are eliminated. 

 

In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, that are necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented.  The financial statements contained in this report are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.  These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2014 (“Form 10-K”). Each of the fiscal periods included herein comprise 13 weeks for the first-quarter periods.

 

Reclassifications and Corrections

 

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation in our condensed consolidated financial statements related to; i) the presentation of the Anchorage Daily News, Inc. (“Anchorage”) as a discontinued operation (see Note 2, Divestiture), ii) a correction of reporting wholesale fees associated with sales of certain third-party digital advertising products and services on a net basis, as a reduction of associated digital classified advertising revenues, rather than in other operating expenses, and iii) the early retrospective adoption of ASU No. 2015-03 relating to the classification of unamortized debt issuance costs, as described below. For the three months ended March 30, 2014, net revenues and other operating expenses included within operating loss were reduced by $4.5 million to correct the presentation of advertising sales related to certain third-party digital advertising products and services previously reported on a gross basis to a net basis, with wholesale fees reported as a reduction of the associated digital classified advertising revenues instead of other operating expenses. As of December 28, 2014, we reclassified unamortized debt issuance costs of $12.1 million from other assets to a reduction in long-term debt on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as a result of the retrospective adoption of ASU No. 2015-03. There were no other changes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

We account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value.  The hierarchy below lists three levels of fair value based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. We categorize each of our fair value measurements in one of these three levels based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  These levels are:

 

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date.

 

Level 2 – Observable inputs to the valuation methodology are other than Level 1 inputs and are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date and fair value can be determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.

 

Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs in situations where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability, and the reporting entity makes estimates and assumptions related to the pricing of the asset or liability including assumptions regarding risk.

 

Our policy is to recognize significant transfers between levels at the actual date of the event or circumstance that caused the transfer.  The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

 

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable.  The carrying amount of these items approximates fair value.

 

Long-term debt.  The fair value of our long-term debt is determined using quoted market prices and other inputs that were derived from available market information, including the current market activity of our publicly-traded notes and bank debt, trends in investor demand for debt and market values of comparable publicly-traded debt. These are considered to be Level 2 inputs under the fair value measurements and disclosure guidance, and may not be representative of actual value. At March 29, 2015, the estimated fair value and carrying value of our long-term debt was $899.2 million and $995.9 million, respectively.

 

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). Our non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are assets held for sale, goodwill, intangible assets not subject to amortization and equity method investments. All of these were measured using Level 3 inputs. We utilize valuation techniques that seek to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

During the three months ended March 30, 2014, we completed the acquisition of a new production facility, which was valued at $6.5 million and we incurred $13.5 million in accelerated depreciation (i) related to the production equipment associated with outsourcing our printing process at one newspaper and (ii) resulting from moving the printing operations for another newspaper to the new production facility. No similar transactions were recorded during the three months ended March 29, 2015.

 

Depreciation expense with respect to property, plant and equipment is summarized below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 29,

 

March 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Depreciation expense

 

$

11,523

 

$

25,982

 

 

Assets held for sale

 

During the three months ended March 29, 2015, we identified and began to actively market for sale one of our production facilities at one of our newspapers. These assets consist primarily of land and buildings. During the three months ended March 30, 2014, we identified and began to actively market for sale one of our production facilities for a newspaper at which we outsourced our printing to a third-party. These assets consist primarily of undeveloped land and buildings. In connection with classifying these assets as assets held for sale, the carrying values of the land and buildings were reduced to their estimated fair value less selling costs, as determined based on the current market conditions and the selling prices. As a result, an impairment charge of $0.9 million was recorded in the three months ended March 30, 2014, and is included in other operating expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. 

 

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

 

Intangible assets (primarily advertiser lists, subscriber lists and developed technology), mastheads and goodwill consisted of the following: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 28,

 

Amortization

 

March 29,

 

(in thousands)

    

2014

    

Expense

    

2015

 

Intangible assets subject to amortization

 

$

833,254 

 

$

 -

 

$

833,254 

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

(615,378)

 

 

(12,140)

 

 

(627,518)

 

 

 

 

217,876 

 

 

(12,140)

 

 

205,736 

 

Mastheads

 

 

193,039 

 

 

 -

 

 

193,039 

 

Goodwill

 

 

996,115 

 

 

 -

 

 

996,115 

 

Total

 

$

1,407,030 

 

$

(12,140)

 

$

1,394,890 

 

 

Amortization expense with respect to intangible assets is summarized below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 29,

 

March 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Amortization expense

 

 $

12,140 

 

 $

14,313 

 

 

The estimated amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal year 2015 and the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Expense

Year

    

(in thousands)

2015 (Remainder)

    

 $

36,236 

2016

 

 

47,986 

2017

 

 

48,907 

2018

 

 

47,275 

2019

 

 

23,769 

2020

 

 

418 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

Our accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”) and reclassifications from AOCL, net of tax, consisted of the following: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Other

    

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and

 

Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post-

 

Related to

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retirement

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Liability

 

Investments

 

Total

 

Balance at December 28, 2014

 

$

(407,552)

 

$

(9,051)

 

$

(416,603)

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

 —

 

 

(247)

 

 

(247)

 

Amounts reclassified from AOCL

 

 

2,881 

 

 

 

 

2,881 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

2,881 

 

 

(247)

 

 

2,634 

 

Balance at March 29, 2015

 

$

(404,671)

 

$

(9,298)

 

$

(413,969)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount Reclassified from AOCL (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

    

 

 

 

March 29,

 

March 30,

 

Affected Line in the Condensed

AOCL Component

    

2015

 

2014

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Minimum pension and post-retirement liability

 

$

4,802 

 

$

3,136 

 

Compensation

 

 

 

(1,921)

 

 

(1,254)

 

Benefit for income taxes

 

 

$

2,881 

 

$

1,882 

 

Net of tax

 

Income Taxes

 

We account for income taxes using the liability method.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

 

We recognize accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense.  Accrued penalties are recognized as a component of income tax expense.

 

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

 

Basic EPS excludes dilution from common stock equivalents and reflects income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS is based upon the weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock and dilutive common stock equivalents in the period.  Common stock equivalents arise from dilutive stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock and are computed using the treasury stock method.  Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents are excluded from diluted EPS.  The weighted average anti-dilutive stock options that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future, but were not included in the weighted average share calculation, consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 29,

 

March 30,

 

(shares in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Anti-dilutive stock options

    

4,565 

 

3,668 

 

 

Cash Flow Information

 

Cash paid for interest and income taxes consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 29,

 

March 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Interest paid (net of amount capitalized)

    

$

12,695 

    

$

16,907 

 

Income taxes paid (net of refunds)

 

 

178,581 

 

 

4,691 

 

 

Other non-cash investing activities from continuing operations as of March 29, 2015, and March 30, 2014, related to purchases of property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) on credit, were $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU 2014-08 raises the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. It is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have an impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model from entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance. This new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when and how revenue is recognized. The new model will require revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. It is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” ASU 2014-15 requires management to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnotes disclosures in certain circumstances. It is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have an impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-04, "Compensation – Retirement Benefits: Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets." ASU 2015-04 provides practical expedient, which permits a reporting entity with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end, to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity’s fiscal year-end and apply that practical expedient consistently from year to year. It is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, "Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement." ASU 2015-05 provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The new guidance does not change the accounting for service contracts. It is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

Effective December 29, 2014, we adopted the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” that was issued in April 2015. ASU 2015-03 amends existing guidance to require the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of deferred charges. It was effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015, however early adoption was permitted. As of March 29, 2015, and December 28, 2014, we reclassified unamortized debt issuance costs of $11.7 million and $12.1 million, respectively, from other assets to a reduction in long-term debt on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. There were no other changes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.