XML 33 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:
 
Level 1 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
 
Level 2 — Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
 
Level 3 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
 
The following describes the valuation methodologies used for the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
 
Securities Obtained and Pledged as Collateral/Obligation to Return Securities Obtained as Collateral
 
The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities obtained as collateral and the associated obligation to return securities obtained as collateral are based upon prices obtained from a third-party pricing service, which are indicative of market activity.  Securities obtained as collateral are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
 
MBS and CRT Securities
 
The Company determines the fair value of its Agency MBS based upon prices obtained from third-party pricing services, which are indicative of market activity, and repurchase agreement counterparties.
 
For Agency MBS, the valuation methodology of the Company’s third-party pricing services incorporate commonly used market pricing methods, trading activity observed in the marketplace and other data inputs.  The methodology also considers the underlying characteristics of each security, which are also observable inputs, including: collateral vintage, coupon, maturity date, loan age, reset date, collateral type, periodic and life cap, geography, and prepayment speeds.  Management analyzes pricing data received from third-party pricing services and compares it to other indications of fair value including data received from repurchase agreement counterparties and its own observations of trading activity observed in the marketplace.
 
In determining the fair value of the Company’s Non-Agency MBS and CRT securities, management considers a number of observable market data points, including prices obtained from pricing services and brokers as well as dialogue with market participants.  In valuing Non-Agency MBS, the Company understands that pricing services use observable inputs that include, in addition to trading activity observed in the marketplace, loan delinquency data, credit enhancement levels and vintage, which are taken into account to assign pricing factors such as spread and prepayment assumptions.  For tranches of Legacy Non-Agency MBS that are cross-collateralized, performance of all collateral groups involved in the tranche are considered.  The Company collects and considers current market intelligence on all major markets, including benchmark security evaluations and bid-lists from various sources, when available.
 
The Company’s Legacy Non-Agency MBS, RPL/NPL MBS and CRT securities are valued using various market data points as described above, which management considers directly or indirectly observable parameters.  Accordingly, these securities are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Term Notes Backed by MSR Related Collateral

The Company’s valuation process for term notes backed by MSR related collateral considers a number of factors, including a comparable bond analysis performed by a third-party pricing service which involves determining a pricing spread at issuance of the term note. The pricing spread is used at each subsequent valuation date to determine an implied yield to maturity of the term note, which is used to derive an indicative market value for the security. This indicative market value is further reviewed by the Company and may be adjusted to ensure it reflects a realistic exit price at the valuation date given the structural features of these securities. At June 30, 2018, the indicative implied yields used in the valuation of these securities ranged from 5.6% to 6.8%. The weighted average indicative yield to maturity was 5.96%. Other factors taken into consideration include indicative values provided by repurchase agreement counterparties, estimated changes in fair value of the related underlying MSR collateral and the financial performance of the ultimate parent or sponsoring entity of the issuer, which has provided a guarantee that is intended to provide for payment of interest and principal to the holders of the term notes should cash flows generated by the related underlying MSR collateral be insufficient. As this process includes significant unobservable inputs, these securities are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Residential Whole Loans, at Fair Value
 
The Company determines the fair value of its residential whole loans held at fair value after considering valuations obtained from a third-party that specializes in providing valuations of residential mortgage loans trading activity observed in the marketplace. The Company’s residential whole loans held at fair value are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Swaps
 
All of the Company’s Swaps are cleared by a central clearing house. Valuations provided by the clearing house are used for purposes of determining the fair value of the Company’s Swaps. Such valuations obtained are tested with internally developed models that apply readily observable market parameters.   As the Company’s Swaps are subject to the clearing house’s margin requirements, no credit valuation adjustment was considered necessary in determining the fair value of such instruments.  Beginning in January 2017, variation margin payments on the Company’s cleared Swaps are treated as a legal settlement of the exposure under the Swap contract. Previously such payments were treated as collateral pledged against the exposure under the Swap contract. The effect of this change is to reduce what would have otherwise been reported as fair value of the Swap. Swaps are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Changes to the valuation methodologies used with respect to the Company’s financial instruments are reviewed by management to ensure any such changes result in appropriate exit price valuations.  The Company will refine its valuation methodologies as markets and products develop and pricing methodologies evolve.  The methods described above may produce fair value estimates that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values.  Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those used by market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.  The Company uses inputs that are current as of the measurement date, which may include periods of market dislocation, during which price transparency may be reduced.  The Company reviews the classification of its financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy on a quarterly basis, and management may conclude that its financial instruments should be reclassified to a different level in the future.

 
The following tables present the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, on the consolidated balance sheets by the valuation hierarchy, as previously described:

Fair Value at June 30, 2018
 
(In Thousands)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency MBS
 
$

 
$
2,362,897

 
$

 
$
2,362,897

Non-Agency MBS
 

 
3,242,967

 

 
3,242,967

CRT securities
 

 
571,955

 

 
571,955

Term notes backed by MSR related collateral
 

 

 
381,390

 
381,390

Residential whole loans, at fair value
 

 

 
1,502,986

 
1,502,986

Securities obtained and pledged as collateral
 
253,721

 

 

 
253,721

Swaps
 

 
11,183

 

 
11,183

Total assets carried at fair value
 
$
253,721

 
$
6,189,002

 
$
1,884,376

 
$
8,327,099

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligation to return securities obtained as collateral
 
$
253,721

 
$

 
$

 
$
253,721

Total liabilities carried at fair value
 
$
253,721

 
$

 
$

 
$
253,721



Fair Value at December 31, 2017
 
(In Thousands)
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Agency MBS
 
$

 
$
2,824,681

 
$

 
$
2,824,681

Non-Agency MBS
 

 
3,533,966

 

 
3,533,966

CRT securities
 

 
664,403

 

 
664,403

Term notes backed by MSR related collateral
 

 

 
381,804

 
381,804

Residential whole loans, at fair value
 

 

 
1,325,115

 
1,325,115

Securities obtained and pledged as collateral
 
504,062

 

 

 
504,062

Swaps
 

 
679

 

 
679

Total assets carried at fair value
 
$
504,062

 
$
7,023,729

 
$
1,706,919

 
$
9,234,710

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obligation to return securities obtained as collateral
 
$
504,062

 
$

 
$

 
$
504,062

Total liabilities carried at fair value
 
$
504,062

 
$

 
$

 
$
504,062


 
Changes in Level 3 Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents additional information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 about the Company’s Residential whole loans, at fair value, which are classified as Level 3 and measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 
Residential Whole Loans, at Fair Value (1)
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
1,555,619

 
$
775,152

 
$
1,325,115

 
$
814,682

Purchases and capitalized advances
 
6,175

 
4,831

 
317,300

 
10,164

Changes in fair value recorded in Net gain on residential whole loans held at fair value
 
4,599

 
4,262

 
18,346

 
7,209

Collection of principal, net of liquidation gains/losses
 
(54,184
)
 
(15,652
)
 
(100,868
)
 
(35,695
)
  Repurchases
 
(867
)
 
(450
)
 
(1,061
)
 
(756
)
  Transfer to REO
 
(42,802
)
 
(24,071
)
 
(90,292
)
 
(51,532
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
1,468,540

 
$
744,072

 
$
1,468,540

 
$
744,072



(1) Excludes approximately $34.4 million and $239.2 million of residential whole loans held at fair value for which the closing of the purchase transaction had not occurred as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The following table presents additional information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 about the Company’s investments in term notes backed by MSR related collateral held at fair value, which are classified as Level 3 and measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 
 
Term Notes Backed by MSR Related Collateral
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017 (1)
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
332,040

 
$
282,332

 
$
381,804

 
$

Purchases
 
49,350

 

 
149,350

 
150,000

  Collection of principal
 

 
(8,371
)
 
(150,000
)
 
(17,019
)
Changes in unrealized gain/losses
 

 

 
236

 

  Transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 (1)
 

 

 

 
140,980

Balance at end of period
 
$
381,390

 
$
273,961

 
$
381,390

 
$
273,961


(1) Investments in term notes backed by MSR related collateral were transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 as there had been very limited secondary market trading in these securities since issuance. Transfers between levels are deemed to take place on the first day of the reporting period in which the transfer has taken place.

The Company did not transfer any assets or liabilities from one level to another during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Fair Value Methodology for Level 3 Financial Instruments

Residential Whole Loans, at Fair Value

The following tables present a summary of quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s residential whole loans held at fair value for which it has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

 
 
June 30, 2018
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Fair Value (1)
 
Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Input
 
Weighted Average (2)
 
Range
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential whole loans, at fair value
 
$
673,765

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
5.5
%
 
4.5-8.2%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prepayment rate
 
3.9
%
 
0.9-13.5%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Default rate
 
2.5
%
 
0.0-20.8%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss severity
 
13.0
%
 
0.0-100.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
794,715

 
Liquidation model
 
Discount rate
 
8.2
%
 
6.1-50.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annual change in home prices
 
3.1
%
 
(0.6)-11.2%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liquidation timeline
(in years)
 
1.8

 
0.1-4.5
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current value of underlying properties (3)
 
$
829

 
$1-$12,400
Total
 
$
1,468,480

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
December 31, 2017
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Fair Value (1)
 
Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Input
 
Weighted Average (2)
 
Range
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential whole loans, at fair value
 
$
358,871

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Discount rate
 
5.5
%
 
4.5-13.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prepayment rate
 
4.1
%
 
1.15-15.1%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Default rate
 
2.9
%
 
0.0-6.5%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss severity
 
13.8
%
 
0.0-100.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
592,940

 
Liquidation model
 
Discount rate
 
8.0
%
 
6.1-50.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annual change in home prices
 
2.5
%
 
(8.0)-8.8%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liquidation timeline
(in years)
 
1.6

 
0.1-4.5
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current value of underlying properties (3)
 
$
772

 
$0-$9,900
Total
 
$
951,811

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1) Excludes approximately $34.5 million and $373.3 million of loans for which management considers the purchase price continues to reflect the fair value of such loans at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
(2) Amounts are weighted based on the fair value of the underlying loan.
(3) The simple average value of the properties underlying residential whole loans held at fair value valued via a liquidation model was approximately$384,000 and $336,000 as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.



The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
 
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated Fair Value
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated Fair Value
(In Thousands)
Financial Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agency MBS
 
$
2,362,897

 
$
2,362,897

 
$
2,824,681

 
$
2,824,681

Non-Agency MBS
 
3,242,967

 
3,242,967

 
3,533,966

 
3,533,966

CRT securities
 
571,955

 
571,955

 
664,403

 
664,403

MSR related assets
 
381,390

 
381,390

 
492,080

 
493,026

Residential whole loans, at carrying value
 
1,906,242

 
1,987,218

 
908,516

 
988,688

Residential whole loans, at fair value
 
1,502,986

 
1,502,986

 
1,325,115

 
1,325,115

Securities obtained and pledged as collateral
 
253,721

 
253,721

 
504,062

 
504,062

Cash and cash equivalents
 
54,880

 
54,880

 
449,757

 
449,757

Restricted cash
 
3,298

 
3,298

 
13,307

 
13,307

Swaps
 
11,183

 
11,183

 
679

 
679

Financial Liabilities (1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Repurchase agreements
 
5,892,228

 
5,900,049

 
6,614,701

 
6,623,255

Securitized debt
 
518,655

 
518,659

 
363,944

 
366,109

Obligation to return securities obtained as collateral
 
253,721

 
253,721

 
504,062

 
504,062

Senior Notes
 
96,794

 
102,231

 
96,773

 
103,729



(1) Carrying value of securitized debt, Senior Notes and certain repurchase agreements is net of associated debt issuance costs.

In addition to the methodologies used to determine the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value on a recurring basis discussed on pages 43-48, the following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in arriving at the fair value of the Company’s other financial instruments presented in the above table that are not reported at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
Residential Whole Loans, at Carrying Value:  The Company generally determines the fair value of its residential whole loans held at carrying value after considering portfolio valuations obtained from a third-party who specializes in providing valuations of residential mortgage loans and trading activity observed in the market place. Given the short duration of the Company’s Rehabilitation loans, these investments are determined to have a carrying value which approximates fair value. The Company’s residential whole loans held at carrying value are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash:  Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are comprised of cash held in overnight money market investments and demand deposit accounts.  At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s money market funds were invested in securities issued by the U.S. Government or its agencies, instrumentalities, and sponsored entities, and repurchase agreements involving the securities described above.  Given the overnight term and assessed credit risk, the Company’s investments in money market funds are determined to have a fair value equal to their carrying value.

Corporate Loan: The Corporate loan was repaid during the three months ended June 30, 2018. The Company had determined the fair value of this loan at December 31, 2017 after considering recent past and expected future loan performance, recent financial performance of the borrower and estimates of the current value of the underlying collateral which included certain MSRs and other assets of the borrower that had been pledged to secure the borrowing. The Company’s investment in this term loan was classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Repurchase Agreements:  The fair value of repurchase agreements reflects the present value of the contractual cash flows discounted at market interest rates at the valuation date for repurchase agreements with a term equivalent to the remaining term to interest rate repricing, which may be at maturity.  Such interest rates are estimated based on LIBOR rates observed in the market.  The Company’s repurchase agreements are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Securitized Debt:  In determining the fair value of securitized debt, management considers a number of observable market data points, including prices obtained from pricing services and brokers as well as dialogue with market participants. Accordingly, the Company’s securitized debt is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Senior Notes:  The fair value of the Senior Notes is determined using the end of day market price quoted on the NYSE at the reporting date.  The Company’s Senior Notes are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

The Company holds REO at the lower of the current carrying amount or fair value less estimated selling costs. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s REO had an aggregate carrying value of $192.2 million and $152.4 million, and an aggregate estimated fair value of $214.8 million and $175.8 million, respectively. The Company classifies fair value measurements of REO as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.