UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 20-F

o	REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from      to
OR
o	SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the transition period from                       to                        

Commission File Number: 1-14852

GRUMA, S.A.B. de C.V.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

United Mexican States

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Calzada del Valle, 407 Ote.

Colonia del Valle

San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León

66220, México

(Address of principal executive offices)

Investor Relations

Calzada del Valle, 407 Ote.

Colonia del Valle

San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León

66220, México

Tel: (52) 81 8399-3349

Facsimile: (52) 81 8399-3359

Email: ir@gruma.com

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:	Name of exchange on which registered:
Series B Common Shares, without par value	New York Stock Exchange*
American Depositary Shares, each representing four Series B Common Shares, without par value	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

563,650,709 Series B Common Shares, without par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

o Yes    No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

o Yes    No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes xo No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. o GAAP x IFRS Other o

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17 o    Item 18 o

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o    No x

*         Not for trading but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

INDEX

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS			2
PART I			3
	ITEM 1	IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS	3
	ITEM 2	OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE	3
	ITEM 3	KEY INFORMATION	3
	ITEM 4	INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY	19
	ITEM 5	OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS	39
	ITEM 6	DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES	56
	ITEM 7	MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	64
	ITEM 8	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	66
	ITEM 9	THE OFFER AND LISTING	70
	ITEM 10	ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	71
	ITEM 11	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	89
	ITEM 12	DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES	94
PART II			95
	ITEM 13.	DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES	95
	ITEM 14.	MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS	95
	ITEM 15.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	95
	ITEM 16A.	AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT	96
	ITEM 16B.	CODE OF ETHICS	96
	ITEM 16C.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	96
	ITEM 16D.	EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES	97
	ITEM 16E.	PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS	97
	ITEM 16F.	CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT	97
	ITEM 16G.	CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	97
	ITEM 16H.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE	99
PART III			99
	ITEM 17.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	99
	ITEM 18.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	99
	ITEM 19.	EXHIBITS	99

i

INTRODUCTION

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. is a publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable) organized under the laws of the United Mexican States, or Mexico.

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, references to “pesos” or “Ps.” are to Mexican pesos, references to “U.S. dollars,” “U.S.$,” “dollars” or “$” are to United States dollars and references to “bolivars” and “Bs.” are to the Venezuelan bolivar.  “We,” “our,” “us,” “our company,” “GRUMA” and similar expressions refer to Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries, except when the reference is specifically to Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. (parent company only) or the context otherwise requires.

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

This Annual Report contains our audited consolidated financial statements as of January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011. The consolidated financial statements have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers, S.C., an independent registered public accounting firm and were approved by our shareholders at the annual general shareholders’ meeting held on April 26, 2012.

We publish our financial statements in pesos and prepare our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). The consolidated annual financial statements herein are our first financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Through 2010 we prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the Normas de Información Financiera (Mexican Financial Reporting Standards), commonly referred to as “Mexican FRS” or “MFRS”. Our date of transition to IFRS was January 1, 2010. IFRS 1—“First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” has been applied in preparing these financial statements. See Note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements for an analysis of the valuation, presentation and disclosure effects of adopting IFRS and a reconciliation between Mexican FRS and IFRS as of January 1 and December 31, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Following the Company’s adoption of IFRS, the Company is no longer required to reconcile its financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS to U.S. GAAP.

The financial statements of our entities are measured using the currency of the main economic environment where the entity operates (functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Mexican pesos, which corresponds to our presentation currency. Prior to the peso translation, the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries with functional currency from a hyperinflationary environment are adjusted for inflation in order to reflect changes in purchasing power of the local currency. Subsequently, assets, liabilities, equity, income, costs, and expenses are translated to the presentation currency at the closing rate at the date of the most recent balance sheet. To determine the existence of hyperinflation, we evaluate the qualitative characteristics of the economic environment, as well as the quantitative characteristics established by IFRS, including an accumulated inflation rate equal or higher than 100% in the past three years.

MARKET SHARE

The information contained in this Annual Report regarding our market positions is based primarily on our own estimates and internal analysis and data obtained from AC Nielsen. Market position information for the United States is also based on data from Technomic. For Mexico, information is also based on data from Información Sistematizada de Canales y Mercados or “ISCAM”, Asociación Nacional de Tiendas de Autoservicio y Departamentales (National Supermarkets and Department Stores Association) or “ANTAD”, Asociación Nacional de Abarroteros Mayoristas (National Groceries Wholesalers Association) or “ANAM”, and reports from industry chambers. For Venezuela, information is also based on data obtained from LatinPanel Venezuela. For Europe, information is also based on data from Symphony IRI Group. While we believe our internal research and estimates are reliable, they have not been verified by any independent source and we cannot ensure their accuracy.

1

EXCHANGE RATE

This annual report contains translations of various peso amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for your convenience. You should not construe these translations as representations by us that the peso amounts actually represent the U.S. dollar amounts or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated. Unless otherwise indicated, we have translated U.S. dollar amounts from pesos (i) as of December 31, 2011 at the exchange rate of Ps. 13.95 to U.S.$1.00, which was the rate established by Banco de México on December 30, 2011 and (ii) as of March 31, 2012 at the exchange rate of Ps. 12.81 to U.S.$1.00, which was the rate established by Banco de México on March 30, 2012.

OTHER INFORMATION

Certain figures included in this Annual Report have been rounded for ease of presentation.  Percentage figures included in this Annual Report are not all calculated on the basis of such rounded figures; some are calculated on the basis of such amounts prior to rounding.  For this reason, percentage amounts in this Annual Report may vary from those obtained by performing the same calculations using the figures in our audited consolidated financial statements.  Certain numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that preceded them due to rounding.

All references to “tons” in this Annual Report refer to metric tons.  One metric ton equals 2,204 pounds.  Estimates of production capacity contained herein assume the operation of relevant facilities on the basis of 360 days a year, on three shifts, and assume only regular intervals for required maintenance.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, including the statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”  Some of these statements contain words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “strategy,” “plans” and other similar words.  Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations as reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved.  Actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements as a result of risks, uncertainties and other factors discussed in “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”  These risks, uncertainties and factors include:  general economic and business conditions, including changes in exchange rates, and conditions that affect the price and availability of corn, wheat and edible oils; potential changes in demand for our products; price and product competition; and other factors discussed herein.

2

PART I

ITEM 1Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable.

Not applicable.

ITEM 3Key Information.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables present our selected consolidated financial data as of and for each of the years indicated.  The data as of December 31, 2010 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 are derived from and should be read together with our audited consolidated financial statements included herein and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

Selected financial information for 2010 differs from the information we previously published for 2010, as a result of the implementation of IFRS. See Note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements for an analysis of the valuation, presentation and disclosure effects of adopting IFRS and a reconciliation between Mexican FRS and IFRS as of January 1 and December 31, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Pursuant to the transitional relief granted by the SEC in respect of the first-time application of IFRS, historical financial data for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 has been omitted, and no audited consolidated financial statements and financial information prepared under IFRS for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been included in this annual report.

	2010			2011
	(thousands of Mexican Pesos, except per share amounts)
Income Statement Data:
IFRS:
Net sales	Ps.	46,232,454		Ps.	57,644,749
Cost of sales		(31,563,342	)		(40,117,952	)
Gross profit		14,669,112			17,526,797
Selling and administrative expenses		(12,100,365	)		(13,984,486	)
Other expense, net		(518,732	)		(203,850	)
Operating income		2,050,015			3,338,461
Comprehensive financing cost, net		(1,163,203	)		(427,200	)
Equity in earnings of associated companies		592,235			3,329
Gain from divestment in associated companies		—			4,707,804
Income before income tax		1,479,047			7,622,394
Income tax expense		(839,561	)		(1,806,572	)
Consolidated net income		639,486			5,815,822
Attributable to:
Shareholders		431,779			5,270,762
Non-controlling interest		207,707			545,060
Per share data(1):
Basic and diluted earnings per share		0.77			9.35

3

	2010			2011
	(thousands of Mexican pesos, except per share amounts and operating data)
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
IFRS:
Property, plant and equipment, net	Ps.	17,930,173		Ps.	20,515,633
Total assets		38,927,394			44,542,618
Short-term debt(2)		2,192,871			1,633,207
Long-term debt(2)		15,852,538			11,472,110
Total liabilities		28,205,120			26,829,834
Common stock		6,972,425			6,972,425
Total equity(3)		10,722,274			17,712,784
Other Financial Information:
IFRS:
Capital expenditures		1,115,161			2,386,966
Depreciation and amortization		1,502,534			1,596,643
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities		3,291,138			1,751,314
Investing activities		(802,208	)		6,779,129
Financing activities		(4,234,431	)		(7,429,059	)

(1)  Based upon weighted average of outstanding shares of our common stock (in thousands), as follows:  563,651 shares for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 563,651 shares for the year ended December 31, 2011.  Each of our American Depositary Shares represents four Series B Common Shares.

(2)  Short-term debt consists of bank loans and the current portion of long-term debt.  Long-term debt consists of bank loans, our senior unsecured perpetual bonds and debentures.

(3)  Total equity includes non-controlling interests as follows: Ps.3,778 million as of December 31, 2010 and Ps.4,282 million as of December 31, 2011.

4

	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011
	(thousands of tons)
Operating Data:
Sales volume:
Gruma Corporation (corn flour, tortillas and other)(1)	1,329	1,337	1,312	1,395	1,464
GIMSA (corn flour, and other)	1,753	1,821	1,874	1,890	1,959
Gruma Venezuela (corn flour, wheat flour and other)	480	465	459	523	528
Molinera de México (wheat flour)	488	494	508	530	564
Gruma Centroamérica (corn flour and other)	220	213	208	201	229
Production capacity:
Gruma Corporation (corn flour and tortillas)(2)	2,063	2,093	2,096	2,314	2,482
GIMSA (corn flour, and other)(3)	2,964	2,964	2,964	2,965	2,965
Gruma Venezuela (corn flour, wheat flour and other)(4)	808	823	909	823	823
Molinera de México (wheat flour)	894	894	894	811	837
Gruma Centroamérica (corn flour and other)	319	307	307	343	350
Number of employees	18,767	19,060	19,093	19,825	21,318

(1) Net of intercompany transactions.

(2) Includes 59 thousand tons of temporarily idled production capacity at December 31, 2011.

(3) Includes 477 thousand tons of temporarily idled production capacity at December 31, 2011.

(4) Includes 71 thousand tons of temporarily idled production capacity at December 31, 2011.

Dividends

Our ability to pay dividends may be limited by Mexican law, our estatutos sociales, or bylaws, and by financial covenants contained in some of our credit agreements.  Because we are a holding company with no significant operations of our own, we have distributable profits to pay dividends to the extent that we receive dividends from our subsidiaries.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will pay dividends or of the amount of any such dividends.  See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

Pursuant to Mexican law and our bylaws, the declaration, amount and payment of dividends are determined by a majority vote of the holders of the outstanding shares represented at a duly convened shareholders’ meeting.  The amount of any future dividend would depend on, among other things, operating results, financial condition, cash requirements, losses for prior fiscal years, future prospects, the extent to which debt obligations impose restrictions on dividends and other factors deemed relevant by the board of directors and the shareholders.

5

In addition, under Mexican law, companies may only pay dividends:

·from earnings included in year-end financial statements that are approved by shareholders at a duly convened meeting;

·after any existing losses applicable to prior years have been made up or absorbed into shareholders’ equity;

·after at least 5% of net profits for the relevant fiscal year have been allocated to a legal reserve until the amount of the reserve equals 20% of a company’s paid-in capital stock; and

·after shareholders have approved the payment of the relevant dividends at a duly convened meeting.

Holders of our American Depositary Receipts, or ADRs, on the applicable record date are entitled to receive dividends declared on the shares represented by American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, evidenced by such ADRs.  The depositary will fix a record date for the holders of ADRs in respect of each dividend distribution.  We pay dividends in pesos and holders of ADSs will receive dividends in U.S. dollars (after conversion by the depositary from pesos, if not then restricted under applicable law) net of the fees, expenses, taxes and governmental charges payable by holders under the laws of Mexico and the terms of the deposit agreement.

The ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us is limited by the laws of each country in which they were incorporated and by their constitutive documents.  For example, our ability to repatriate dividends from Gruma Venezuela may be adversely affected by exchange controls and other recent events.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela—Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risks.”  In the case of Gruma Corporation, our principal U.S. subsidiary, its ability to pay dividends in cash is prohibited upon the occurrence of any default or event of default under its principal credit agreements.  See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

During 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 we did not pay any dividends to shareholders. In 2007 we paid dividends to shareholders, in nominal terms, of Ps.410 million (per share Ps.0.85).

Exchange Rate Information

Mexico has had a free market for foreign exchange since 1994, when the government suspended intervention by the Banco de México, and allowed the peso to float freely against the U.S. dollar.  From the beginning of 2004 until August 2008, the Mexican peso was relatively stable, ranging from Ps.9.92 to Ps.11.63.  Between October 1, 2008 and March 2, 2009, the Mexican peso depreciated in value from Ps.10.97 to Ps.15.40.  From March 2009 to the end of May 2011, the Mexican peso appreciated in value from Ps.15.40 to Ps.11.58. From June 2011 to the end of March 2012, the Mexican peso depreciated in value from 11.58 to 12.81.  There can be no assurance that the government will maintain its current policies with regard to the peso or that the peso will not depreciate or appreciate in the future.  See “Item 3. Key Information —Risk Factors—Risks Related to Mexico—Devaluations of the Mexican Peso May Affect our Financial Performance.”

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in pesos published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, expressed in pesos per U.S. dollar.

6

	Noon Buying Rate (Ps. Per U.S.$)
Year	High (1)	Low (1)	Average (2)	Period End
2007	11.2692	10.6670	10.9277	10.9169
2008	13.9350	9.9166	11.1415	13.8320
2009	15.4060	12.6318	13.4970	13.0576
2010	13.1940	12.1556	12.6222	12.3825
2011	14.2542	11.5050	12.4270	13.9510
October 2011	13.9310	13.1025	13.4379	13.1690
November 2011	14.2542	13.3826	13.6955	13.6201
December 2011	13.9927	13.4890	13.7746	13.9510
January 2012	13.7502	12.9251	13.4248	12.9251
February 2012	12.9514	12.6250	12.7833	12.7941
March 2012	12.9900	12.6280	12.7523	12.8115

(1) Rates shown are the actual low and high, on a day-by-day basis for each period.

(2) Average of month-end rates.

On April 20, 2012, the noon buying rate for pesos was Ps. 13.12 to U.S.$1.00.

RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Company

Fluctuations in the Cost and Availability of Corn, Wheat and Wheat Flour May Affect Our Financial Performance

Our financial performance may be affected by the price and availability of corn, wheat and wheat flour as each of these raw materials represented 33%, 13% and 5%, respectively, of our cost of sales in 2011.  Mexican and world markets have experienced periods of either over-supply or shortage of corn and wheat, some of which have caused adverse effects on our results of operations.  In recent years, there has been substantial volatility and increases in the price of corn due primarily to increased demand for corn from emerging markets, and partly due to demand for corn-based ethanol in the U.S., which increased our cost of corn and negatively affected our financial condition and results of operation.  Also, there have been increases in the price of wheat, driven by negative weather conditions in certain regions of the world and increased demand worldwide, especially from emerging markets. The price of corn has remained at high levels, reaching a peak in 2011 for recent years. The price of wheat declined significantly from its peak in 2008, and thereafter increased substantially but is still below the prior peak. We believe that the demand and price for corn will increase over the long term in connection with expected rising demand for corn-based ethanol, but mainly from increased demand by emerging markets.

To manage these price risks, we regularly monitor our risk tolerance and evaluate the possibility of using derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to commodity prices.  We currently hedge against fluctuations in the costs of corn and wheat using futures and options contracts according to the Company’s risk management policy, but remain exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to the financial instruments.  In addition, if corn or wheat prices decrease below the levels specified in our various hedging agreements, we would lose the value of a decline in these prices.

Additionally, because of this volatility and price variations, we may not always be able to pass along our increased costs to our customers in the form of price increases.  We cannot always predict whether or when shortages or over-supply of corn and wheat will occur.  In addition, future Mexican or other countries’ governmental actions could affect the price and availability of corn and wheat.  Any adverse developments in domestic and international corn and wheat markets could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

7

Our Current or Future Indebtedness could Adversely Affect Our Business and, Consequently, Our Ability to Pay Interest and Repay Our Indebtedness

Our level of indebtedness could increase our vulnerability to adverse general economic and industry conditions, including increases in interest rates, increases in prices of raw materials, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and market volatility.  Our ability to make scheduled payments on and refinance our indebtedness when due depends on, and is subject to, several factors, including our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, the availability of financing in the Mexican and international banking and capital markets, and our ability to sell assets and implement operating improvements.

We May be Adversely Affected by Increases in Interest Rates

Interest rate risk exists primarily with respect to our floating-rate peso denominated debt, which generally bears interest based on the Mexican equilibrium interbank interest rate, which we refer to as the “TIIE.”  In addition, we have additional interest rate risk with respect to floating-rate dollar-denominated debt, which generally bears interest based on the London interbank offered rate, which we refer to as “LIBOR.” We have significant exposure to exchange rate fluctuation due to our floating-rate peso and dollar-denominated debt.  As a result, if the TIIE or LIBOR rates increase significantly, our ability to service our debt may be adversely affected.

Downgrades of Our Debt May Increase Our Financing Costs or Otherwise Adversely Affect Us or Our Stock Price

Our long-term corporate credit rating and our senior unsecured perpetual bond are rated “BB” by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“Standard & Poor’s”).  Our Foreign Currency Long-Term Issuer Default Rating and our Local Currency Long-Term Issuer Default Rating are rated “BB” by Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”).  Our U.S.$300 million perpetual bond is rated “BB” by Fitch Ratings. These ratings reflect the debt repayment made on February 18, 2011, after applying the net proceeds from the sale of GRUMA’s 8.8% stake in Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. (“GFNorte”). The ratings in effect during 2009 and 2010 were lower, prior to the debt repayment on February 18, 2011, reflecting additional leverage on GRUMA’s capital structure from the termination of GRUMA’s foreign exchange derivative positions and the subsequent conversion of the realized losses into debt.

If our financial condition deteriorates, we may experience future declines in our credit ratings, with attendant consequences.  Our access to external sources of financing, as well as the cost of that financing, could be adversely affected by a deterioration of our long-term debt ratings.  A downgrade in our credit ratings could increase the cost of and/or limit the availability of unsecured financing, which may make it more difficult for us to raise capital when necessary.  If we cannot obtain adequate capital on favorable terms or at all, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

We Expect to Pay Interest and Principal on Our Debt with Cash Generated in Dollars or Pesos, as Needed, But Cannot Assure You That We Will Generate Sufficient Cash Flow in the Relevant Currency at the Required Times From Our Operations

We had approximately 83% of our outstanding debt denominated in dollars,14% in Mexican pesos and 3% in other currencies as of December 31, 2011. We may not generate sufficient cash in the relevant currency from our operations to service the entire amount of our debt in such currency. A devaluation of certain currencies or a change in our business could adversely affect our ability to service our debt.

Increases in the Cost of Energy Could Affect Our Profitability

We use a significant amount of electricity, natural gas and other energy sources to operate our corn and wheat flour mills and processing ovens for the manufacture of tortillas and related products at our domestic and international facilities. These energy costs represented approximately 4% of our cost of sales in 2011.  In addition, considerable amounts of diesel fuel are used in connection with the distribution of our products.  The cost of energy sources may fluctuate widely due to economic and political conditions, government policy and regulation, war, weather conditions or other unforeseen circumstances.  An increase in the price of fuel and other energy sources would increase our operating costs and, therefore, could affect our profitability.

8

The Presence of Genetically Modified Corn in Our Products, Which is Not Approved for Human Consumption, May Have a Negative Impact on Our Results of Operations

As we do not grow our own corn, we are required to buy it from various producers in the United States, Mexico and elsewhere.  Although we only buy corn from farmers and grain elevators who agree to supply us with approved varieties of corn and we have developed a protocol in all our operations, with the exception of Venezuela, to test and monitor our corn for certain strains of bacteria and chemicals that have not been approved for human consumption, we may unwittingly buy genetically modified corn that is not approved for human consumption, and use such raw materials in the manufacture of our products.  This may result in costly recalls, subject us to lawsuits, and may have a negative impact on our results of operations.

In the past, various allegations have been made, mostly in the United States and the European Union, that genetically modified foods are unsafe for human consumption, pose risks of damage to the environment and create legal, social and ethical dilemmas.  Some countries, particularly in the European Union, as well as Australia and some countries in Asia, have instituted a partial limitation on the import of grain produced from genetically modified seeds.  Some countries have imposed labeling requirements and traceability obligations on genetically modified agricultural and food products, which may affect the acceptance of these products.  To the extent that we may unknowingly buy or may be perceived to be a seller of products manufactured with genetically modified corn not approved for human consumption, this may have a significant negative impact on our financial condition and results of operation.

Regulatory Developments May Adversely Affect Our Business

We are subject to regulation in each of the territories in which we operate.  The principal areas in which we are subject to regulation are health, environmental, labor, taxation and antitrust.  The adoption of new laws or regulations in the countries in which we operate may increase our operating costs or impose restrictions on our operations which, in turn, may adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.  Further changes in current regulations may result in an increase in compliance costs, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation.”

Economic and Legal Risks Associated with a Global Business May Affect Our International Operations

We conduct our business in many countries and anticipate that revenues from our international operations will account for a significant portion of our future revenues.  There are risks inherent in conducting our business internationally, including:

·general political and economic instability in international markets;

·limitations in the repatriation, nationalization or governmental seizure of our assets, including cash;

·direct or indirect expropriation of our international assets;

·varying prices and availability of corn, wheat and wheat flour and the cost and practicality of hedging such fluctuations under current market conditions;

·different liability standards and legal systems;

·recent developments in the international credit markets, which could affect capital availability or cost, and could restrict our ability to obtain financing or refinance our existing indebtedness at favorable terms, if at all; and

·intellectual property laws of countries that do not protect our international rights to the same extent as the laws of Mexico.

In addition, we have expanded our operations to China, Malaysia, Australia, England, the Netherlands, Italy, and more recently to Ukraine, Russia and Turkey.  Our presence in these and other markets could present us

9

with new and unanticipated operational challenges.  For example, we may encounter labor restrictions or shortages and currency conversion obstacles, or be required to comply with stringent local governmental and environmental regulations.  Any of these factors could increase our operating expenses and decrease our profitability.

Our Business May Be Adversely Impacted By Risks Related to Our Derivatives Trading Activities

From time to time, we enter into currency and other derivative transactions, pursuant to the Company’s risk management policy, that cover varying periods of time and have varying pricing provisions.  We may incur unrealized losses in connection with potential changes in the value of our derivative instruments as a result of changes in economic conditions, investor sentiment, monetary and fiscal policies, the liquidity of global markets, international and regional political events, and acts of war or terrorism.  See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources,” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Exchange Rate Risk.”

We Cannot Predict the Impact that Changing Climate Conditions, Including Legal, Regulatory and Social Responses Thereto, May Have on Our Business

Various scientists, environmentalists, international organizations, regulators and other commentators believe that global climate change has added, and will continue to add, to the unpredictability, frequency and severity of natural disasters (including, but not limited to droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, freezes, other storms and fires) in certain parts of the world.  In response to this belief, a number of legal and regulatory measures as well as social initiatives have been introduced in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas and other carbon emissions which some believe may be chief contributors to global climate change.  We cannot predict the impact that changing climate conditions, if any, will have on our results of operations or our financial condition. Moreover, we cannot predict how legal, regulatory and social responses to concerns about global climate change will impact our business in the future.

Our Business and Operations May Be Adversely Affected by Global Economic Conditions

The current global macroeconomic environment, characterized by a continuing crisis in the financial markets and the potential threat of a global economic downturn, primarily as a result of the ongoing sovereign debt crisis in the Eurozone, the high degree of unemployment in certain countries, the level of public debt in the U.S. and certain European countries, and the potential impact of budget consolidation measures in the Eurozone, has adversely affected the economy in the United States, Europe and many other parts of the world, including Mexico, and has had significant consequences worldwide, including unprecedented volatility, significant lack of liquidity, loss of confidence in the financial markets, disruptions in the credit sector, reduced business activity, rising unemployment, decline in interest rates and erosion of consumer confidence.  It is uncertain how long the effects of this global macroeconomic instability will continue and how much of an impact it will have on the global economy in general, or the economies in which we operate in particular, and whether slowing economic growth in any such countries could result in our customers’ reducing their spending.  As a result, we may need to lower the prices of certain of our products and services in order to maintain their attractiveness, which could lead to reduced turnover and profit or a decline in demand for our products.  Any such development could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and lead to a drop in the trading price of our shares.

Our Financial Information Prepared under IFRS May Not Be Comparable to Our Financial Information Prepared Under Mexican FRS

We adopted IFRS as of January 1, 2011 and prepared our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.  IFRS differs in certain significant respects from Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP. An analysis of the valuation, presentation and disclosure effects of adopting IFRS and a reconciliation between Mexican FRS and IFRS as of January 1 and December 31, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2010 is set forth in Note 28 to our audited financial statements included in this annual report.  As a result of the adoption of IFRS, our consolidated financial information presented under IFRS for fiscal years 2010 and 2011 may not be comparable to our financial information for previous periods prepared under Mexican FRS.

10

Risks Related to Mexico

Our Results of Operations Could Be Affected by Economic and Social Conditions in Mexico

We are a Mexican company with 34% of our consolidated assets located in Mexico and 34% of our consolidated net sales derived from our Mexican operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.  As a result, Mexican economic conditions could impact our results of operations.

In the past, Mexico has experienced exchange rate instability and devaluation as well as high levels of inflation, domestic interest rates, unemployment, negative economic growth and reduced consumer purchasing power.  These events resulted in limited liquidity for the Mexican government and local corporations. Crime rates and civil and political unrest in Mexico and around the world could also negatively impact the Mexican economy.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Developments in Other Countries Could Adversely Affect the Mexican Economy, the Market Value of our Securities and Our Results of Operations.”

Mexico has experienced periods of slow growth since 2001, primarily as a result of the downturn in the U.S. economy.  The Mexican economy grew by 3.3% in 2007 and by 1.5% in 2008 but contracted by 6.1% in 2009.  In 2010 and 2011, the Mexican economy grew by 5.5% and by 3.9%, respectively.

Developments and trends in the world economy affecting Mexico may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  The Mexican economy is tightly connected to the U.S. economy through international trade (approximately 79% of Mexican exports are directed to the United States), international remittances (billions of dollars from Mexican workers in the United States are the country’s second-largest source of foreign exchange), foreign direct investment (approximately 55% of Mexican foreign direct investment comes from U.S.-based investors), and financial markets (the U.S. and Mexican financial systems are highly integrated).  As the U.S. economy contracts, U.S. citizens consume fewer Mexican imports, Mexican workers in the United States send less money to Mexico, U.S. firms with businesses in Mexico make fewer investments, U.S.-owned banks in Mexico make fewer loans, and the quality of U.S. financial assets held in Mexico deteriorates.  Moreover, the collapse in confidence in the U.S. economy may spread to other economies closely connected to it, including Mexico’s.  The result may be a potentially deep and protracted recession in Mexico.  If the Mexican economy falls into a deep and protracted recession, or if inflation and interest rates increase, consumer purchasing power may decrease and, as a result, demand for our products may decrease.  In addition, a recession could affect our operations to the extent we are unable to reduce our costs and expenses in response to falling demand.

Our Business Operations Could Be Affected by Government Policies in Mexico

The Mexican government has exerted, and continues to exert, significant influence over the Mexican economy.  Mexican governmental actions concerning the economy could have a significant effect on Mexican private sector entities, as well as on market conditions, prices and returns on securities of Mexican issuers, including our securities.  Governmental policies have negatively affected our sales of corn flour in the past and may continue to do so in the future.

Following the 2006 Congressional and Presidential elections in which Felipe Calderón Hinojosa, of the political party Partido Acción Nacional or PAN, was elected president, and the 2009 elections for the Mexican House of Representatives, the Mexican Congress has continued to be politically divided, as no political party in Mexico holds an absolute majority in the Senate or House of Representatives.

Furthermore, Mexican Presidential and Congressional elections are scheduled for July 1, 2012.  The lack of a majority party in the legislature, the lack of alignment between the legislature and the President and any changes that result from the Presidential and Congressional elections could result in political uncertainty or deadlock and prevent the timely implementation of political and economic reforms, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on Mexican economic policy and on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.

The Mexican government supports the commercialization of corn for Mexican corn growers through the Agricultural Incentives and Services Agency (Apoyos y Servicios a la Comercialización Agropecuaria, or

11

ASERCA).  To the extent that this or other similar programs are cancelled by the Mexican government, we may be required to incur additional costs in purchasing corn for our operations, and therefore we may need to increase the prices of our products to reflect such additional costs.  See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation.”

In 2008, the Mexican government created a program to support the corn flour industry (Programa de Apoyo a la Industria de la Harina de Maíz or PROHARINA). This program aimed to mitigate the impact of the rise in international corn prices through price supports designed to aid the consumer and provided through the corn flour industry.  However, the Mexican government cancelled the PROHARINA program in December 2009.  As a result of the cancellation of this program by the Mexican government in December of 2009, we were required to increase the prices of our products to reflect such additional costs.  There can be no assurance that we will maintain our eligibility for other programs similar to PROHARINA that may be implemented, or that the Mexican government will not institute price controls or other actions on the products we sell, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.  See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation—Corn Flour Consumer Aid Program.”

The level of environmental regulations and enforcement in Mexico has increased in recent years.  We expect the trend toward greater environmental regulation and enforcement to continue and to be accelerated as a result of international agreements between Mexico and the United States.  The promulgation of new environmental regulations or higher levels of enforcement may adversely affect us.  See “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation.”

Devaluations of the Mexican Peso May Affect our Financial Performance

Because we have significant international operations generating revenue in different currencies and debt denominated in various currencies, we remain exposed to foreign exchange risks that could affect our ability to meet our obligations and result in foreign exchange losses. In 2010 we posted a net foreign exchange gain of Ps. 144 million and a gain of Ps. 41 million in 2011.  Major devaluation or depreciation of the Mexican peso may limit our ability to transfer or to convert such currency into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making timely payments of interest and principal on our indebtedness.  The Mexican government does not currently restrict, and for many years has not restricted, the right or ability of Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert pesos into U.S. dollars or to transfer other currencies out of Mexico.  The government could, however, institute restrictive exchange rate policies in the future.

High Levels of Inflation and High Interest Rates in Mexico Could Adversely Affect the Business Climate in Mexico and our Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Mexico has experienced high levels of inflation in the past.  The annual rate of inflation, as measured by changes in the National Consumer Price Index was 3.57% for 2009, 4.40% for 2010, and 3.82% for 2011.  From January through March 2012, the inflation rate was 0.97%.  On April 18, 2012, the 28-day CETES rate was 4.33%.  While a substantial part of our debt is dollar-denominated at this time, high interest rates in Mexico may adversely affect the business climate in Mexico generally and our financing costs in the future and thus our financial condition and results of operations.

Developments in Other Countries Could Adversely Affect the Mexican Economy, the Market Value of Our Securities and Our Results of Operations

The Mexican economy may be, to varying degrees, affected by economic and market conditions in other countries.  Although economic conditions in other countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Mexico, investors’ reactions to adverse developments in other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Mexican issuers.  In recent years, economic conditions in Mexico have become increasingly correlated to economic conditions in the United States.  Accordingly, the slow recovery of the economy in the United States, and the uncertainty of the impact it could have on the general economic conditions in Mexico and the United States could have a significant adverse effect on our businesses and results of operations.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Our Results of Operations Could Be Affected by Economic Conditions in Mexico,” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to the United States—Unfavorable General Economic Conditions in the United States Could Negatively Impact Our Financial Performance.”  In addition, economic crises

12

in the United States as well as in Asia, Russia, Brazil, Argentina and other emerging market countries have adversely affected the Mexican economy in the past.

Our financial performance may also be significantly affected by general economic, political and social conditions in the emerging markets where we operate, particularly Mexico, Venezuela and Asia.  Many countries in Latin America, including Mexico and Venezuela, have suffered significant economic, political and social crises in the past, and these events may occur again in the future.  See also “Item 3. Key Information —Risks Related to Venezuela—Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risks.”  Instability in Latin America has been caused by many different factors, including:

·Significant governmental influence over local economies;

·Substantial fluctuations in economic growth;

·High levels of inflation;

·Changes in currency values;

·Exchange controls or restrictions on expatriation of earnings;

·High domestic interest rates;

·Wage and price controls;

·Changes in governmental, economic or tax policies;

·Imposition of trade barriers;

·Unexpected changes in regulation; and

·Overall political, social and economic instability.

Adverse economic, political and social conditions in Latin America may create uncertainty regarding our operating environment, which could have a material adverse effect on our company.

We cannot assure you that the events in other emerging market countries, in the United States, Europe, or elsewhere will not adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

You May Be Unable to Enforce Judgments Against Us in Mexican Courts

We are a Mexican publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable).  Most of our directors and executive officers are residents of Mexico, and a significant portion of the assets of our directors and executive officers, and a significant portion of our assets, are located in Mexico.  You may experience difficulty in effecting service of process upon our company or our directors and executive officers in the United States, or, more generally, outside of Mexico and in enforcing civil judgments of non-Mexican courts in Mexico, including judgments predicated on civil liability under U.S. federal securities laws, against us, or our directors and executive officers.  We have been advised by our General Counsel that there is doubt as to the enforceability of original actions in Mexican courts of liabilities predicated solely on the U.S. federal securities laws.

Risks Related to Venezuela

Our Subsidiaries in Venezuela are Currently Involved in Expropriation Proceedings

On May 12, 2010, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (the “Republic”) published in the Official Gazette of Venezuela decree number 7,394 (the “Expropriation Decree”), which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, movables and real estate of the Company’s subsidiary in Venezuela, Molinos Nacionales, C.A. (“MONACA”). The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to the Company’s subsidiary Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A. (“DEMASECA”).

13

As stated in the Expropriation Decree and in accordance with the Venezuelan Expropriation Law (the “Expropriation Law”), the taking of legal ownership can occur either through an “Amicable Administrative Arrangement” or a “Judicial Order”. Each process requires certain steps as indicated in the Expropriation Law, neither of which has occurred. Therefore, as of this date, no formal transfer of title of the assets covered by the Expropriation Decree has taken place.

GRUMA’s interests in MONACA and DEMASECA are held through two Spanish companies Valores Mundiales, S.L. (“Valores Mundiales”) and Consorcio Andino, S.L. (“Consorcio Andino”). In 2010, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino (collectively, the “Investors”) commenced negotiations with the Republic with the intention of reaching an amicable settlement. GRUMA has participated in these negotiations with a view to continuing its presence in Venezuela by potentially entering into a joint venture with the Venezuelan government that could also include compensation, or, absent a joint venture arrangement, GRUMA may receive compensation for the assets subject to expropriation, which the law requires be fair and reasonable. Those negotiations are ongoing.

The Republic and the Kingdom of Spain are parties to a Treaty on Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments dated November 2, 1995 (the “Investment Treaty”), under which the Investors may settle investment disputes by means of arbitration before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”). On November 9, 2011, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA provided formal notice to the Republic that an investment dispute had arisen as a consequence of the Expropriation Decree and related measures adopted by the Republic. In that notification, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA consented to submit the dispute to ICSID arbitration if the parties are unable to reach an amicable agreement.

The negotiations with the government are ongoing, and the Company cannot assure that those negotiations will be successful or will result in the Investors receiving adequate compensation, if any, for their investments subject to the Expropriation Decree. Additionally, the Company cannot predict the results of any arbitral proceeding, or the ramifications that costly and prolonged legal disputes could have on its results of operations or financial position, or the likelihood of collecting a successful arbitration award. As a result, the net impact of this matter on the Company’s consolidated financial results cannot be reasonably estimated. The Company and its subsidiaries reserve and intend to continue to reserve the right to seek full compensation for any and all expropriated assets and investments under applicable law, including investment treaties and customary international law.

The Venezuelan government has not taken physical control of the assets of MONACA or DEMASECA and has not taken control of their operations. In consequence, GRUMA can validly and legally assert that, as of this date, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino have full legal ownership of MONACA’s and DEMASECA’s rights, interest, shares and assets, respectively, and full control of all operational or managerial decisions of MONACA and DEMASECA, which will not cease until GRUMA, through Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, finally agrees with the Venezuelan government on the terms and conditions to transfer such assets in accordance with the legal and business schemes that are currently being negotiated with the government of Venezuela.

Pending resolution of this matter, based on preliminary valuation reports, no impairment charge on GRUMA’s net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA has been identified. The Company is also unable to estimate the value of any future impairment charge, if one will be taken, or to determine whether MONACA and DEMASECA will need to be accounted for as a discontinued operation. The historical value as of December 31, 2011 of the net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA was Ps.2,271,178 and Ps.165,969, respectively. The Company does not maintain insurance for the risk of expropriation of its investments. For more information, please see “Item 8.  Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risks

Our operations in Venezuela through MONACA and DEMASECA accounted for 16% of our net sales and 14% of our total assets as of December 31, 2011.  In recent years, political and social instability has prevailed in Venezuela.  This unrest presents a risk to our operations in Venezuela which cannot be controlled or accurately measured or estimated.

14

In recent years, Venezuelan authorities have imposed foreign exchange and price controls that apply to products such as corn flour and wheat flour, which have limited our ability to increase our prices in order to compensate for higher costs in raw materials and to convert bolivars into other currencies and transfer funds out of Venezuela.  Pursuant to the foreign exchange controls, the purchase and sale of foreign currency is required to be made at an official rate of exchange, as determined by the Venezuelan government (the “Official Rate”).  In addition, U.S. dollars may be acquired in order to settle certain U.S. dollar-denominated debt incurred pursuant to imports and royalty agreements, and for payment of dividends, capital gains, interest payments or private debt only after proper submission and approval by the Foreign Exchange Administration Board (CADIVI).  We continue to make appropriate submissions to CADIVI.  We expect to be in a position to meet our foreign currency-denominated obligations; however, as long as the system of exchange controls remains in effect, there is no assurance that we will be able to secure the required approvals from CADIVI to have sufficient foreign currency for this purpose.

In addition, as described in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and established a two tier exchange structure on January 11, 2010. On December 30, 2010, the Venezuelan government issued Exchange Agreement No. 14, which established a single exchange rate of 4.30 bolivars per U.S. dollar effective January 1, 2011.  We cannot guarantee that the Venezuelan government will not impose additional price controls, or further devalue its currency or make similar decisions in the future.

Additionally, our Venezuelan operations could be adversely affected since, among other reasons:  (i) 100% of the sales of our operations in Venezuela are denominated in bolivars; (ii) Gruma Venezuela produces products that are subject to price controls; (iii) part of Gruma Venezuela’s sales depend on centralized government procurement policies for its social welfare programs; (iv) we may have difficulties repatriating dividends from Gruma Venezuela, as well as importing some of its requirements for raw materials as a result of the exchange controls; and (v) Gruma Venezuela may face increasing costs in some of our raw materials due to the implementation of import tariffs.

Risks Related to the United States

Unfavorable General Economic Conditions in the United States Could Negatively Impact Our Financial Performance

Net sales in the U.S. constituted 37% of our total sales in 2011.  Unfavorable general economic conditions, such as the current economic slowdown in the United States could negatively affect the affordability of and consumer demand for some of our products.  Under difficult economic conditions, consumers may seek to forego purchases of our products or, if available, shift to lower-priced products offered by other companies.  Softer consumer demand for our products in the United States or in other major markets could reduce our profitability and could negatively affect our financial performance.

Additionally, as the retail grocery trade continues to consolidate and our retail customers grow larger, they could demand lower pricing and increased promotional programs.  Also, our dependence on sales to certain retail customers could increase.  There is a risk that we will not be able to maintain our U.S. profit margin in this environment.

Demand for our products in Mexico may also be disproportionately affected by the performance of the United States economy.  See also “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Mexico—Our Results of Operations Could Be Affected by Economic Conditions in Mexico.”

Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure

Holders of ADSs May Not Be Able to Vote at our Shareholders’ Meetings

Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of ADSs.  There can be no assurance that holders of our shares through ADSs will receive notices of shareholder meetings from our ADS depositary with sufficient time to enable such holders to return voting instructions to our ADS depositary in a timely manner.  Under certain circumstances, a person designated by us may receive a proxy to vote the shares underlying the ADSs at our discretion at a shareholder meeting.

15

Holders of ADSs Are Not Entitled to Attend Shareholder Meetings, and They May Only Vote Through the Depositary

Under Mexican law, a shareholder is required to deposit its shares with a Mexican custodian in order to attend a shareholders’ meeting.  A holder of ADSs will not be able to meet this requirement, and accordingly is not entitled to attend shareholders’ meetings.  A holder of ADSs is entitled to instruct the depositary as to how to vote the shares represented by ADSs, in accordance with procedures provided for in the deposit agreement, but a holder of ADSs will not be able to vote its shares directly at a shareholders’ meeting or to appoint a proxy to do so.  In addition, such voting instructions may be limited to matters enumerated in the agenda contained in the notice to shareholders and with respect to which information is available prior to the shareholders’ meeting.

Holders of ADSs May Not Be Able to Participate in Any Future Preemptive Rights Offering and as a Result May Be Subject to a Dilution of Equity Interest

Under Mexican law, if we issue new shares for cash as a part of a capital increase, other than in connection with a public offering of newly issued shares or treasury stock, we must generally grant our shareholders the right to purchase a sufficient number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage.  Rights to purchase shares in these circumstances are known as preemptive rights.  We may not legally be permitted to allow holders of our shares through ADSs in the United States to exercise any preemptive rights in any future capital increases unless (i) we file a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, with respect to that future issuance of shares or (ii) the offering qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  At the time of any future capital increase, we will evaluate the costs and potential liabilities associated with filing a registration statement with the SEC, as well as the benefits of preemptive rights to holders of our shares through ADSs in the United States and any other factors that we consider important in determining whether to file a registration statement.

We are under no obligation to, and there can be no assurance that we will, file a registration statement with the SEC to allow holders of our shares through ADSs in the United States to participate in a preemptive rights offering.  In addition, under current Mexican law, sales by the ADS depositary of preemptive rights and distribution of the proceeds from such sales to the holders of our shares through ADSs is not possible.  As a result, the equity interest of holders of our shares through ADSs would be diluted proportionately and such holders may not receive any economic compensation.  See “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws—Preemptive Rights.”

The Protections Afforded to Minority Shareholders in Mexico Are Different From Those in the United States

Under Mexican law, the protections afforded to minority shareholders are different from those in the United States.  In particular, the law concerning fiduciary duties of directors, executive officers and controlling shareholders has been recently developed and there is no legal precedent to predict the outcome of any such action.  Additionally, shareholders’ class actions are not available under Mexican law and there are different procedural requirements for bringing shareholder derivative lawsuits.  As a result, in practice it may be more difficult for our minority shareholders to enforce their rights against us, our directors, our executive officers or our controlling shareholders than it would be for shareholders of a U.S. company.

We Have Significant Transactions With Affiliates That Could Create Potential Conflicts of Interest

We purchase some of our raw materials from our shareholder and associate Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (“Archer-Daniels-Midland,” or “ADM”) at market rates and terms.  During 2009, 2010 and 2011, we purchased U.S.$159 million, U.S.$97 million and U.S.$ 147 million of raw materials, respectively, from Archer-Daniels-Midland.  Transactions with affiliates may create the potential for conflicts of interest.  See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions.”

Exchange Rate Fluctuations May Affect the Value of Our Shares

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the peso and the U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar value of an investment in our shares and of dividend and other distribution payments on those shares.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Exchange Rate Information” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Exchange Rate Risk.”

16

Mexican Law Restricts the Ability of Non-Mexican Shareholders to Invoke the Protection of Their Governments With Respect to Their Rights as Shareholders

As required by Mexican law, our bylaws provide that non-Mexican shareholders shall be treated as Mexican shareholders in respect to their ownership interests in us, and shall be deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of their governments under any circumstance, under penalty of forfeit, in favor of the Mexican government, any participation or interest held in us.

Under this provision, a non-Mexican shareholder is deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of its own government by requesting the initiation of a diplomatic claim against the Mexican government with respect to its shareholder’s rights.  However, this provision shall not deem non-Mexican shareholders to have waived any other rights they may have, including any rights under the U.S. securities laws, with respect to their investment in us.

Our Controlling Shareholder Exerts Substantial Control Over Our Company

As of April 26, 2012, Roberto González Barrera and his family controlled approximately 54.41% of our outstanding shares.  See “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws—Changes in Capital stock.”  Consequently, Mr. González Barrera and his family have the power to elect the majority of our directors and to determine the outcome of most actions requiring approval of our stockholders, including the declaration of dividends.  The interests of Mr. González Barrera and his family may differ from those of our other shareholders.  Mr. González Barrera and his family’s holdings are described under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders.”

Mr. González Barrera has pledged and may be required to further pledge part of his shares in us to secure some of his borrowings.  If there is a default and the lenders enforce their rights against any or all of these shares, Mr. González Barrera and his family could lose control over us and a change of control could result. In addition, a change of control could trigger a default in some of our credit agreements and have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.  For more information about this pledge, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”

Archer-Daniels-Midland, Our Strategic Partner, Has Influence Over Some Corporate Decisions; Our Relationship With Archer-Daniels-Midland Could Become Adverse and Hurt Our Performance

Archer-Daniels-Midland owns, directly or indirectly, approximately 23.22% of our outstanding shares.  However, a portion of such interest is held through a Mexican corporation jointly owned with Mr. González Barrera, who has the sole authority to determine how those shares are voted.  Thus, Archer-Daniels-Midland only has the right to vote 18.87% of our outstanding shares.  In addition, Archer-Daniels-Midland has the right to nominate two of the 17 members of our board of directors and their corresponding alternates. As a result, Archer-Daniels-Midland may influence the outcome of actions requiring the approval of our shareholders or our board of directors.  Mr. González Barrera and Archer-Daniels-Midland have also granted each other rights of first refusal in respect of their shares in our company, subject to specified conditions.

Additionally, subject to certain requirements under the Ley del Mercado de Valores, or Mexican Securities Law, Archer-Daniels-Midland may also: (i) request the Chairman of the board or the Chairman of the audit and corporate governance committees to convene a general shareholders’ meeting; (ii) initiate civil lawsuits against members of the board of directors, members of the audit and corporate governance committees, and the chief executive officer for breach of duty; (iii) judicially oppose resolutions adopted at shareholder meetings; and (iv) request the deferral of any vote regarding an issue about which it does not believe it has been sufficiently informed.

Archer-Daniels-Midland owns, directly or indirectly, a 40% interest in our subsidiary, Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V., or Molinera de México, and a 20% interest in our subsidiary, Azteca Milling, L.P., or Azteca Milling.  Additionally, Archer-Daniels-Midland owns a 3% indirect interest in Molinos Nacionales, C.A., or MONACA and a 3% indirect interest in Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A. or DEMASECA.  For more information, please see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Gruma Venezuela.”  These subsidiaries account for 34% of our revenue.  Although we own a majority ownership interest in each of Azteca Milling and Molinera de

17

México, we are required to obtain the consent and cooperation of Archer-Daniels-Midland with respect to certain matters in order to increase our capital expenditures and to implement and expand upon our business strategies in respect of such subsidiaries.

We cannot assure you that our relationships with Archer-Daniels-Midland will be harmonious and successful.  Disagreements with Archer-Daniels-Midland could affect the execution of our strategy and, as a result, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage.

Our Antitakeover Protections May Deter Potential Acquirors

Certain provisions of our bylaws could make it substantially more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us.  These provisions in our bylaws may discourage certain types of transactions involving the acquisition of our securities.  These provisions could discourage transactions in which our shareholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over the then current market price.  Holders of our securities who acquire shares in violation of these provisions will not be able to vote, or receive dividends, distributions or other rights in respect of, these securities and would be obligated to pay us a penalty.  For a description of these provisions, see “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws—Other Provisions—Antitakeover Protections.”

We Are a Holding Company and Depend Upon Dividends and Other Funds From Subsidiaries to Service Our Debt

We are a holding company with no significant assets other than the shares of our subsidiaries.  As a result, our ability to meet our debt service obligations depends primarily on the dividends received from our subsidiaries.  Under Mexican law, companies may only pay dividends:

·from earnings included in year-end financial statements that are approved by shareholders at a duly convened meeting;

·after any existing losses applicable to prior years have been made up or absorbed into stockholders’ equity;

·after at least 5% of net profits for the relevant fiscal year have been allocated to a legal reserve until the amount of the reserve equals 20% of a company’s paid-in capital stock; and

·after shareholders have approved the payment of the relevant dividends at a duly convened meeting.

In addition, Gruma Corporation is subject to covenants in some of its debt agreements which require the maintenance of specified financial ratios and balances and, upon an event of default, prohibit the payment of cash dividends.  For additional information concerning these restrictions on inter-company transfers, see “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Dividends” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We own approximately 83% of the outstanding shares of Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V., or GIMSA, 73% of MONACA, 57% of DEMASECA, 80% of Azteca Milling, L.P. (through Gruma Corporation) and 60% of Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V. Accordingly, we are entitled to receive only our pro rata share of any of these subsidiaries’ dividends.

Furthermore, our ability to repatriate dividends from Gruma Venezuela may be adversely affected by exchange controls and other recent events. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela—Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risks.”

18

ITEM 4Information on the Company.

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. is a publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable) registered in Monterrey, Mexico under the Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles, or Mexican Corporations Law, on December 24, 1971, with a corporate life of 99 years.  Our full legal name is Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., but we are also known by our commercial names:  GRUMA and MASECA.  The address of our principal executive office is Calzada del Valle, 407 Ote., Colonia del Valle, San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, 66220 México and our telephone number is (52) 81 8399-3300.  Our legal domicile is Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.

We were founded in 1949, when Roberto González Barrera, the Chairman of our board of directors, started producing and selling corn flour in Northeastern Mexico as an alternative raw material for producing tortillas.  Prior to our founding, all corn tortillas were made using a rudimentary process.  We believe that the preparation of tortillas using our dry corn flour method presents significant advantages, including greater efficiency and higher quality, which makes tortillas consistent and readily available.  The corn flour process has been a significant impetus for growth, resulting in expanding corn flour and tortilla production and sales throughout Mexico, the United States, Central America, Venezuela, Europe, Asia and Oceania.  In addition, we have diversified our product mix to include wheat flour in Mexico and Venezuela.

One of our most important competitive advantages is our proprietary state-of-the art technology for the manufacturing of corn flour and tortillas and other related products.  We have been developing and advancing our own technology since the founding of our company.  Throughout the years we have been able to achieve vertical integration which is an important part of our competitive advantage.

The following are some significant historical highlights:

·In 1949, Roberto González Barrera and a group of predecessor Mexican corporations founded GIMSA, which is engaged principally in the production, distribution and sale of corn flour in Mexico.

·In 1972, we entered the Central American market with our first operation in Costa Rica.  Today, we have operations in Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua, as well as Ecuador, which we include as part of our Central American operations.

·In 1977, we entered the U.S. market.  Our operations have grown to include products such as tortillas, corn flour, and other tortilla related products.

·From 1989 to 1995, we significantly increased our installed manufacturing capacity in the United States and in Mexico.

·In 1993, we entered the Venezuelan corn flour market through an investment in DEMASECA, a Venezuelan corporation producing corn flour.

·In 1994, we began our packaged tortilla operations in Mexico as part of our strategy to broaden our product lines in Mexico, achieve vertical integration of our corn flour operations and capitalize upon our experience in producing and distributing packaged tortillas in the United States.  We were focused only on the northern part of Mexico.  In addition, in 1994 GRUMA became a publicly listed company in both Mexico and the U.S.

·In 1996, we strengthened our position in the U.S. corn flour market through an association with Archer-Daniels-Midland, which currently owns approximately 23.22% of our outstanding shares.  Through this association we combined our existing U.S. corn flour operations and strengthened our position in the U.S. corn flour market.  This association also allowed us to enter the Mexican wheat flour market by acquiring a 60% ownership interest in Archer-Daniels-Midland’s Mexican wheat flour operations.

19

·From 1997 to 2000, we initiated a significant plant expansion program.  During this period, we acquired or built wheat flour plants, corn flour plants, bread plants and/or tortilla plants in the United States, Mexico, Central America, Venezuela (acquisition of MONACA) and Europe.

·From 2001 to 2003, as a result of a comprehensive review of our business portfolio and our focus on our core businesses, we sold our bread business, under the Breddy brand.

·In 2004, we acquired Ovis Boske, a tortilla company based in the Netherlands, Nuova De Franceschi & Figli, S.P.A., or Nuova De Franceschi & Figli, a corn flour company based in Italy and a small tortilla plant in Las Vegas, Nevada.  We continued to expand capacity and upgrade several of our U.S. operations, the most relevant of which was the expansion of a corn mill in Indiana.  This expansion was completed during the second half of 2005.

·In 2005, we began the construction of a tortilla plant in Pennsylvania, which has been operational since July 2005.  We continued to expand capacity at existing plants.  In addition, Gruma Corporation acquired part of the manufacturing assets of the Mexican food division of Cenex Harvest States or CHS, which consisted of three tortilla plants located in New Brighton, Minnesota; Forth Worth, Texas; and Phoenix, Arizona.  Gruma Corporation also acquired a small tortilla plant near San Francisco, California.  In August, GIMSA acquired 100% of the capital stock of Agroindustrias Integradas del Norte and Agroinsa de México (together, and with their subsidiaries, Agroinsa), a group of companies based in Monterrey, Mexico engaged primarily in the production of corn flour and, to a lesser extent, wheat flour and other products.

·In 2006, during the first quarter, we concluded the acquisitions of two small tortilla plants in Australia (Rositas Investments and Oz-Mex Foods), which strengthened our presence in the Asian and Oceania markets.  In September 2006, we opened our first tortilla plant in Asia, located in Shanghai, China.  We believe the plant has allowed us to strengthen our presence in the Asian markets by improving our service to customers and consumers, allowing us to introduce new products to the Asian market and offer fresher products.  In October 2006, we concluded the acquisition of Pride Valley Foods, a company based in Newcastle, England, that produces tortillas, pita bread, naan, and chapatti.  We believe the acquisition will strengthen our presence in the European market and will provide an opportunity to expand our product portfolio to products similar to tortillas.

·In 2007, we entered into a contract to sell a 40% stake in MONACA to our former partner in DEMASECA.  In conjunction with this transaction, we also agreed to purchase an additional 10% ownership interest in DEMASECA from our former partner.  We also purchased the remaining 49% ownership interest in Nuova De Franceschi & Figli, a corn flour company based in Italy, in which we previously held a 51% ownership interest.  In addition, we made major investments in capacity expansions and upgrades in Gruma Corporation, started the construction of a new tortilla plant in Epping, Australia for Gruma Asia and Oceania, and expanded two of GIMSA’s plants.

·From 2008 to 2010, we made significant capital expenditures for the construction of a tortilla plant in southern California, capacity expansions, general manufacturing and technology upgrades to several of our existing facilities, the construction of a tortilla plant in Epping, Australia, the construction of a wheat mill in Venezuela, and the acquisition of Altera I and Altera II, the leading producer of corn grits in Ukraine.

·In 2011, we acquired Semolina, the Turkish market leading producer of corn grits, two tortilla plants in the U.S. located in Omaha, Nebraska and Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Solntse Mexico, the leading tortilla manufacturer in Russia.

20

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

We are a holding company and conduct our operations through subsidiaries.  The table below sets forth our principal subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011.

Name of Company	Principal Markets	Jurisdiction of Incorporation	Percentage Owned(1)	Products/ Services
Mexican Operations
Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V. (“GIMSA”)	Mexico	Mexico	83%	Corn flour, Wheat flour, Other
Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V.(“Molinera de México”) (2)	Mexico	Mexico	60%	Wheat flour, Other
U.S. and Europe Operations
Gruma Corporation	United States and Europe	Nevada	100%	Packaged tortillas, Other tortilla related products, Corn flour, Flatbreads, Grits, Other
Azteca Milling, LP.(3)	United States	Texas	80%	Corn flour
Central American Operations(4)
Gruma de Guatemala, S.A., Derivados de Maíz Alimenticio, S.A., Industrializadora y Comercializadora de Palmito, S.A., Derivados de Maíz de Guatemala, S.A., Tortimasa, S.A., Derivados de Maíz de El Salvador, S.A., and Derivados de Maíz de Honduras, S.A. (“Gruma Centroamérica”)	Costa Rica, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Ecuador	Costa Rica, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Ecuador	100%	Corn flour, Packaged tortillas, Snacks, Hearts of palm, Rice
Venezuelan Operations(5)
Molinos Nacionales, C.A. (“MONACA”) (6)	Venezuela	Venezuela	73%	Corn flour, Wheat flour, Other products
Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A. (“DEMASECA”) (6)	Venezuela	Venezuela	57%	Corn flour
Other Subsidiaries
Mission Foods (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Gruma Oceania Pty. Ltd., and Mission Foods (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (“Gruma Asia and Oceania”)	Asia and Oceania	China, Malaysia and Australia	100%	Packaged tortillas, Chips, Other products
Productos y Distribuidora Azteca, S.A. deC.V. (“PRODISA”)	Mexico	Mexico	100%	Packaged tortillas, Other related products
Investigación de Tecnología Avanzada,S.A. de C.V. (“INTASA”)	Mexico	Mexico	100%	Construction, Technology and Equipment operations

(1)  Percentage of equity capital owned by us directly or indirectly through subsidiaries.

(2)  Archer-Daniels-Midland indirectly holds the remaining 40% interest.

(3)  Archer-Daniels-Midland indirectly holds the remaining 20% interest.

(4)  As part of a corporate restructuring of our Central American operations, on January 1, 2009, all subsidiaries of Gruma Centroamérica, LLC were transferred to Gruma International Foods, S.L.

21

(5)  Together these subsidiaries are referred to as “Gruma Venezuela.”(6)  Archer-Daniels-Midland holds a 3% indirect interest in both companies and RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. holds a 24.14% indirect interest in MONACA and 40% in DEMASECA.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela—— Our Subsidiaries in Venezuela are Currently Involved in Expropriation Proceedings “—Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure—Archer-Daniels-Midland, Our Strategic Partner, Has Influence Over Some Corporate Decisions; Our Relationship With Archer-Daniels-Midland Could Become Adverse and Hurt Our Performance,” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts—Archer-Daniels-Midland.”

Our subsidiaries accounted for the following percentages and amount of our net sales in millions of pesos for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011.

	Year ended December 31,
	2010				2011
	In Millions of Pesos		Percentage of Net Sales		In Millions of Pesos		Percentage of Net Sales
Gruma Corporation	Ps.	21,451	46	%	Ps.	23,923	42	%
GIMSA		11,853	26			15,386	27
Gruma Venezuela		5,382	12			9,157	16
Molinera de México		3,757	8			4,633	8
Gruma Centroamérica		2,765	6			3,180	6
Others and eliminations		1,024	2			1,366	1
Total	Ps.	46,232	100		Ps.	57,645	100

Association with Archer-Daniels-Midland

We entered into an association with Archer-Daniels-Midland in September 1996.  Archer-Daniels-Midland is one of the world’s largest agricultural processors and traders.  Through our partnership we have improved our position in the U.S. corn flour market and gained an immediate presence in the Mexican wheat flour market.

As a result of this association, we and Archer-Daniels-Midland combined our U.S. corn flour operations to form Azteca Milling, L.P., a limited partnership in which we hold indirectly, 80% and Archer-Daniels-Midland holds indirectly, 20%.  We and Archer-Daniels-Midland agreed to produce and distribute corn flour in the United States through Azteca Milling.  In addition, we acquired 60% of the capital stock of Archer-Daniels-Midland’s wholly-owned Mexican wheat milling operations, Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V. Archer-Daniels-Midland retained the remaining 40%.  We and Archer-Daniels-Midland agreed to produce and distribute wheat flour in Mexico through Molinera de México.  As part of this agreement, we also received U.S.$258.0 million in cash and gained exclusivity rights from Archer-Daniels-Midland in specified corn flour and wheat flour markets.  In return, Archer-Daniels-Midland received 74,696,314 of our then newly issued shares, which represented at that time approximately 22% of our total outstanding shares and the right to designate two of the 17 members of our board of directors and their corresponding alternates.  Currently, Archer-Daniels-Midland owns, directly and indirectly, approximately 23.22% of our outstanding shares and, indirectly, a combined 3% stake in MONACA and DEMASECA.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure—Archer-Daniels-Midland, Our Strategic Partner, Has Influence Over Some Corporate Decisions; Our Relationship With Archer-Daniels-Midland Could Become Adverse and Hurt Our Performance” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts—Archer-Daniels-Midland.”

Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditure program continues to be primarily focused on our core businesses and markets.  Capital expenditures for 2010 and 2011 were U.S.$89 million and U.S.$191 million, respectively. During 2010, capital expenditures were mostly applied to general manufacturing and technology upgrades in Gruma Corporation and GIMSA, and the acquisition of the leading producer of corn grits in Ukraine. During 2011, capital expenditures were primarily applied to production capacity expansions, manufacturing and technology upgrades, particularly in the U.S., Mexico and Europe. We also made certain acquisitions throughout the year, including the purchase of the

22

leading producer of corn grits in Turkey, two tortilla plants in the U.S. and the leading tortilla manufacturer in Russia.

We have budgeted approximately U.S.$200 million for capital expenditures in 2012, which we intend to use mainly for production capacity expansions, general manufacturing and technology upgrades, especially in Gruma Corporation, GIMSA and Molinera de México. We anticipate financing these expenditures throughout the year through internally generated funds and debt. This capital expenditures budget does not include any potential acquisition.

The following table sets forth the aggregate amount of our capital expenditures during the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31
	2010		2011
	(in millions of U.S. dollars)(1)
Gruma Corporation	$	50.0	$	126.9
GIMSA	13.8		19.2
Gruma Venezuela	6.9		3.5
Molinera de México	4.5		5.7
Gruma Centroamérica	3.4		7.1
Others and eliminations	10.0		28.8
Total consolidated	$	88.6	$	191.2

(1)  Amounts in respect of some of the capital expenditures were paid for in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, U.S. dollar amounts presented in the table above may not be comparable to data contained elsewhere in this Annual Report, which is expressed on the basis of the peso/dollar exchange rate as of December 31, 2011, unless otherwise specified.

For more information on capital expenditures for each subsidiary, please see the sections entitled “Operation and Capital Expenditures” under the relevant sections below.

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

We believe we are one of the largest corn flour and tortilla producers and distributors in the world.  We also believe we are one of the leading producers and distributors of corn flour and tortillas in the United States, one of the leading producers of corn flour and wheat flour in Mexico, and one of the leading producers of corn flour and wheat flour in Venezuela. We believe that we are also one of the largest producers of corn flour and tortillas in Central America, and one of the largest producers of tortilla and other flatbreads, including pita, naan, chapatti, pizza bases and piadina in Europe, Asia and Oceania.  Our focus has been and continues to be the efficient and profitable expansion of our core business—corn flour, tortilla, wheat flour and flatbreads.  We pioneered the dry corn flour method of tortilla production, which offers several advantages over the centuries-old traditional wet corn dough method.  These advantages include higher production yields, reduced production costs, more uniform quality and longer shelf life.  The dry corn flour method of production offers significant opportunities for growth.  Using our technology and know-how, we expect to encourage tortilla and tortilla chip producers in the United States, Mexico, Central America, and elsewhere to convert to the dry corn flour method of tortilla and tortilla chip production.  Additionally, we expect to increase the presence of our other core businesses, including packaged tortillas in the United States, Mexico, Central America, Europe, Asia and Oceania, and wheat flour in Mexico and Venezuela.

23

The following table sets forth our revenues by geographic market for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011.

	Year ended December 31,
	2010		2011
	(in millions of pesos)
United States and Europe	Ps.	21,445	Ps.	23,901
Mexico	15,539		19,870
Venezuela	5,382		9,157
Central America	2,765		3,180
Asia and Oceania	1,101		1,537
Total	Ps.	46,232	Ps.	57,645

Strategy

Our strategy for growth is to focus on our core business—corn flour, tortilla, and wheat flour production, as well as to expand our product portfolio towards the flatbreads category in general —and to capitalize upon our leading positions in the corn flour and tortilla industries.  We have taken advantage of the increasing popularity of Mexican food and, more importantly, tortillas, in the U.S., European and Asia and Oceania markets.  We have also taken advantage of the adoption of tortillas by the consumers of several regions of the world for the preparation of different recipes other than Mexican food, and from the flexibility of our wraps and flatbreads category and new product concepts we have launched such as low-fat, carb-balance and multigrain.  Our strategy includes the following key elements:

Expand in the Growing Retail and Food Service Tortilla Markets Where We Currently Have a Presence and to New Regions in the United States:  We believe that the size and growth of the U.S. retail and food service tortilla markets offer significant opportunities for expansion.

Enter and Expand in the Tortilla and Flatbread Markets in Other Regions of the World:  We believe that markets in other continents such as Europe, Asia and Oceania offer us significant opportunities.  We believe our current operations in Europe will enable us to better serve markets in Europe and in the Middle East through stronger vertical integration, improvements in logistical efficiencies, and enhanced knowledge of our local markets.  Our presence in Asia and Oceania will enable us to offer our customers fresh products and respond more quickly to their needs.  We will continue to evaluate ways to profitably expand into these rapidly growing markets.

Maintain Gruma Corporation’s MISSION® and GUERRERO® Tortilla Brands as the First and Second National Brands in the United States:  We intend to achieve this by increasing our efforts at building brand name recognition, and by further expanding and utilizing Gruma Corporation’s distribution network, first in Gruma Corporation’s existing markets, where we believe there is potential for further growth, and second, in regions where Gruma Corporation currently does not have a significant presence but where we believe strong demand for tortillas already exists.

Encourage Transition in Certain Markets from the Traditional Cooked-Corn Method to the Dry Corn Flour Method as Well as New Uses for Corn Flour, and Continue to Establish MASECA as a Leading Brand:  We pioneered the dry corn flour method of tortilla production, which offers several advantages over the centuries-old traditional wet corn dough method.  We continue to view the transition from the traditional method to the dry corn flour method of making tortillas and tortilla chips as the primary opportunity for increased corn flour sales.  We will continue to encourage this transition through improving customer service, advertising and promoting principally our MASECA® brand corn flour, as well as leveraging off of our manufacturing capacity and distribution networks.  We see an opportunity for further potential growth in the fact that the dry corn flour method is more environmentally friendly than the traditional method.  We are also working to expand the use of corn flour in the manufacture of different types of products besides tortillas and tortilla chips.

Expand the corn milling business in Europe through the production and supply of corn grits and other by-products of corn in Europe and the Middle East: The company’s European milling division’s priority is to consolidate itself as a market leader in corn milling and related products for the snack, brewing and breakfast cereals

24

industries, where we believe there is significant potential in these regions. We aim to expand our production capacity through a series of strategic acquisitions located near the major consumption centers, and to invest in technology in order to consolidate our competitive position in the market place.

Continually Improve Service and Quality of Our Products to Customers and Consumers:  We continue to develop customer relationships by ensuring that our customer-service and sales representatives develop an intimate knowledge of their clients’ businesses and by working with clients to help them improve their products, services, and sales to their consumers.  We continuously work to improve service and the quality of our products to consumers, raise consumer awareness of our products, and stay informed of our consumers’ preferences.

Leverage Our Existing Available Production Capacity and Focus on Optimizing Operational Matters:  Our investment program during recent years in plants and operations has resulted in sufficient existing capacity to meet current and foreseeable demand.  We believe that we have the capacity to operate at optimal levels and that our economies of scale and existing operating synergies permit us to remain competitive without additional material capital expenditures.

U.S. and European Operations

Overview

We conduct our United States and European operations principally through our subsidiary, Gruma Corporation, which manufactures and distributes corn flour, packaged tortillas, corn chips and related products.  Gruma Corporation commenced operations in the United States in 1977, initially developing a presence in certain major tortilla consumption markets by acquiring small tortilla manufacturers and converting their production processes from the traditional “wet corn dough” method to our dry corn flour method.  Eventually, we began to build our own state-of-the-art tortilla plants in certain major tortilla consumption markets.  We have vertically integrated our operations by (i) building corn flour and tortilla manufacturing facilities; (ii) establishing corn purchasing operations; (iii) launching marketing and advertising campaigns to develop brand name recognition; (iv) expanding distribution networks for corn flour and tortilla products; and (v) using our technology to design and build proprietary corn flour, tortilla and tortilla chip manufacturing machinery.

In September 1996, we combined our U.S. corn flour milling operations with Archer-Daniels-Midland’s corn flour milling operations into a newly formed limited partnership, known as Azteca Milling, L.P., in which Gruma Corporation holds an 80% interest.  See “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts.”

During 2000, Gruma Corporation opened its first European tortilla and corn chips plant in Coventry, England, initiating our entry into the European market. During 2004, Gruma Corporation concluded two further acquisitions in Europe; a tortilla plant in Holland and a 51% ownership of a corn flour plant in Italy in an effort to strengthen our presence in the region.

In 2006, Gruma Corporation acquired a flatbread plant in the north of England, which enabled us to expand our product portfolio with new types of flatbreads; primarily naan and pita. In addition, Gruma Corporation acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in Nuova De Franceschi & Figli, a corn flour company based in Italy, in which we previously held a 51% ownership interest. In March 2010, we acquired 100% of the share capital of Altera I and Altera II, the leading producer of corn grits in Ukraine, for U.S.$9 million.  We believe this acquisition in Eastern Europe will enable GRUMA to continue its growth strategy in emerging markets in that region.

During 2011, we acquired two tortilla plants in the United States, Albuquerque Tortilla Company and Casa de Oro Foods, for U.S.$9 million and U.S.$23 million, respectively. In July 2011, we acquired Solntse Mexico, the leading tortilla and corn chips manufacturer in Russia, for U.S.$9 million. We believe this acquisition consolidates the presence of GRUMA in Russia and improves our ability to serve countries in Eastern Europe by providing access to lower costs and a closer location to major customers. In November 2011, we acquired Semolina, the Turkish market leading producer of corn grits for U.S.$17 million. The acquisition of Semolina represents a significant milestone for GRUMA’s growth strategy in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Our European milling division’s priority is to consolidate itself as a market leader in corn milling and related products for the snack, brewing and breakfast cereals industries.

25

Gruma Corporation

Gruma Corporation operates primarily through its Mission Foods division, which produces tortillas and related products, and Azteca Milling, L.P., a limited partnership between Gruma Corporation (80%) and Archer-Daniels-Midland (20%) which produces corn flour.  We believe Gruma Corporation is one of the leading manufacturers and distributors of packaged tortillas and related products throughout the United States and Europe through its Mission Foods division.  We believe Gruma Corporation is also one of the leading producers of corn flour in the United States through its Azteca Milling division.

Principal Products.  Mission Foods manufactures and distributes packaged corn and wheat tortillas and related products (which include tortilla chips) under the MISSION® and GUERRERO® brand names in the United States, as well as other minor regional brands.  By continuing to build MISSION® into a strong national brand for the general consumer market and GUERRERO® into a strong Hispanic consumer focused brand, Mission Foods expects to increase market penetration, brand awareness and profitability.  Azteca Milling manufactures and distributes corn flour in the United States under the MASECA® brand.

Sales and Marketing.  Mission Foods serves both retail and food service customers.  In the U.S., retail customers represent approximately 77% of our business, including supermarkets, mass merchandisers and smaller independent stores.  Our food service customers include major chain restaurants, food service distributors, schools, hospitals and the military. In our European business, approximately half of our tortilla production is allocated to retail sales, and the other half to the food service segment, including quick-service restaurants and food processors.

For the U.S. tortilla market, Mission Foods’ current marketing strategy is to increase market penetration by increasing consumer awareness of tortilla products in general, to expand into new regions and to focus on product innovation and customer needs.  Mission Foods promotes its products primarily through cooperative advertising programs with supermarkets as well as radio and television advertising, targeting both Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations.  We believe these efforts have contributed to greater consumer awareness.  Mission Foods also targets food service companies and works with restaurants, institutions and distributors to address their individual needs and provide them with a full line of products.  Mission Foods continuously attempts to identify new customers and markets for its tortillas and related products in the United States and, more recently, in Europe.

Azteca Milling distributes approximately 40% of the corn flour it produces to Mission Foods’ plants throughout the United States and Europe. Azteca Milling’s third-party customers consist largely of other tortilla manufacturers, corn chip producers, retail customers and wholesalers.  Azteca Milling sells corn flour in various quantities, ranging from four-pound retail packages to bulk railcar loads.

We anticipate continued growth in the U.S. market for corn flour, tortillas, and related products.  We believe that the growing consumption of Mexican-style foods by non-Hispanics will continue to increase demand for tortillas and tortilla related products, particularly wheat flour tortillas.  Also influential is the fact that tortillas are no longer solely used as ingredients in Mexican food; for example, tortillas are also used for wraps, which will continue to increase demand for tortillas.  Growth in the U.S. corn flour market is attributable to the conversion of tortilla and tortilla chip producers from the wet corn dough process to our dry corn flour method, the increase of the Hispanic population, the consumption of tortillas and tortilla chips by the general consumer market, and stronger and increased distribution.

Competition and Market Position.  We believe Mission Foods is one of the leading manufacturers and distributors of packaged tortillas and related products throughout the United States and Europe. We believe the tortilla market is highly fragmented, regional in nature and extremely competitive.  Mission Foods’ main competitors are hundreds of tortilla producers who manufacture locally or regionally and tend to be sole proprietorships.  However, a few competitors have a presence in several U.S. regions such as Olé Mexican Foods and Reser’s Fine Foods, among others.  In addition, a few large companies have tortilla manufacturing divisions that compete with Mission Foods, for example, Tyson, Bimbo, Hormel Foods, and General Mills. Mission Food’s largest competitors for branded tortilla are Olé Mexican Foods, Bimbo, and Hormel Foods.

26

Competitors within the corn flour milling industry include Minsa and the corn flour milling divisions of Cargill. Azteca Milling competes with these corn flour manufacturers in the United States primarily on the basis of superior quality, technical support, customer service and brand recognition.  However, we believe there is great potential for growth by converting tortilla and tortilla chip manufacturers that still use the traditional method to our corn flour method.  We believe Azteca Milling is one of the leading producers of corn flour in the United States.

We strongly believe there is significant growth potential for tortillas, wraps and other flatbreads in all geographic areas of Europe and also through multiple channels, for example, in the retail and foodservice channels.  Mexican-based cuisine is gaining popularity in key markets. Likewise, consumer trends indicate a growing need for versatile, healthy, nutritious and tasty food on-the-go, as well as for more interesting food accompaniments. Our products address all of these needs, and their profile allows them to be easily customized to local cultures. Mission Foods is well-placed to both drive and benefit from this situation in the coming years.

We believe Mission Foods is one of the leading tortilla producers in Europe with the main competitors being Santa Maria and General Mills. There are a number of more recent players occupying niche positions in tortilla production, operating in continental Europe and the United Kingdom.

Operation and Capital Expenditures.  Annual total production capacity for Gruma Corporation is estimated at 2.5 million metric tons as of December 31, 2011, with an average utilization of 71% in 2011.  The average size of our plants as of December 31, 2011 was approximately 9,302 square meters (about 100,000 square feet).

Capital expenditures for the past two years were U.S.$177 million, mostly for expansion and upgrades of existing facilities and the construction of a new tortilla plant in southern California, that began production during 2010.  In March of 2010, we acquired 100% of Altera I and Altera II, the leading producer of corn grits in Ukraine for U.S.$9 million.  We believe this acquisition in Eastern Europe will enable GRUMA to continue its growth strategy in emerging markets of the region. During 2011, we acquired two tortilla plants in the United States, Albuquerque Tortilla Company and Casa de Oro Foods for U.S.$9 million and U.S.$23 million, respectively. In July 2011, we acquired Solntse Mexico, the leading tortilla and corn chips manufacturer in Russia, for U.S.$9 million. We believe this acquisition consolidates the presence of GRUMA in Russia and improves our ability to serve countries in Eastern Europe by providing access to lower costs and a closer location to major customers. On November 2011, we acquired Semolina, the Turkish market leading producer of corn grits, for U.S.$17 million. The acquisition of Semolina represents a significant milestone for GRUMA’s growth strategy in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Our European milling division’s priority is to consolidate itself as a market leader in corn milling and related products for the snack, brewing and breakfast cereals industries.

Gruma Corporation’s projected capital expenditures for 2012 will be approximately U.S.$75 million, mainly for production capacity increases and manufacturing and technology upgrades, as well as the construction of a new plant in Florida.  These budgeted capital expenditures do not include any potential acquisitions.

Mission Foods produces its packaged tortillas and other related products at 26 manufacturing facilities worldwide.  Twenty two of these facilities are located in large population centers throughout the United States.  During 2009, Mission Foods closed three manufacturing facilities located in Las Vegas, Fort Worth and El Paso. Mission Foods has shifted production to other plants to achieve savings in overhead costs.  Mission Foods will consider reopening the Fort Worth plant should market demands require additional capacity.  During 2010, Mission Foods closed an additional manufacturing facility located in Phoenix, Arizona.  Outside the United States, Mission Foods has two plants in England, one plant in The Netherlands, and one plant in Russia.

Mission Foods is committed to offering the best quality products to its customers through the implementation of the American Institute of Baking (“AIB”) food safety standards, and Global Food Safety Initiative (“GFSI”) recognized certification schemes such as British Retail Consortium (“BRC”) and Safe Quality Food (“SQF”). Additionally, our plants are regularly evaluated by other third party organizations and customers.

All of the Mission Foods manufacturing facilities worldwide have earned either a superior or excellent category rating from the AIB-GMP audits.  Most of Mission Foods’ U.S. plants have earned the AIB’s highest award, the combined AIB-GMP and AIB-HAACP certification. One of our recently acquired plants is in the process of implementing AIB-GMP audits this year and four other plants have not yet gone through the AIB-HACCP certification process.

27

In 2008 Mission Foods started the BRC certification process at four plants in the U.S. By 2011, thirteen plants had completed the certification process. Additionally, one of our plants is SQF certified. Our plants in England and The Netherlands are also evaluated by third party organizations such as the AIB, International Food Standards and BRC. Our facility in Russia, which was acquired in July of 2011, operates in compliance with Russian food production laws and is audited by multiple clients. The facility is currently working towards HACCP certification.

Azteca Milling produces corn flour at six plants located in Amarillo, Edinburg and Plainview, Texas; Evansville, Indiana; Henderson, Kentucky; and Madera, California.  Gruma Corporation also produces corn flour at our plants in Ceggia, Italy, Cherkassy, Ukraine, and Samsun, Turkey. The majority of our plants are located within important corn growing areas. Due to Azteca Milling’s manufacturing practices and processes, all six facilities located in the U.S. have achieved ISO 9002 certification as well as the AIB certification.  Our corn flour plants in Italy and Ukraine have obtained the BRC certification. Additionally, our corn flour mill in Italy obtained the OHSAS 18001 international workplace safety standards certification, and our corn flour plant in Turkey has obtained the International Featured Standards certification, among others.

Seasonality.  We believe there is no significant seasonality in our products, however part of our products tend to experience a slight volume increase during the summer months.  Tortillas and tortilla chips sell year round, with special peaks during the summer, when we increase our promotion and advertising by taking advantage of several holidays and major sporting events.  Tortilla and tortilla chip sales decrease slightly towards the end of the year when many Mexicans go back to Mexico for the holidays.  Sales of corn flour fluctuate seasonally as demand is higher in the fourth quarter during the holidays because of the preparation of Mexican food recipes that are very popular during this time of the year.

Raw Materials.  Corn is the principal raw material used in the production of corn flour, which is purchased from local producers.  Azteca Milling buys corn only from farmers and grain elevators that agree to supply varieties of corn approved for human consumption.  Azteca Milling tests and monitors its raw material purchases for corn not approved for human consumption, for certain strains of bacteria, fungi metabolites and chemicals.  In addition, Azteca Milling applies certain testing protocols to incoming raw materials to identify genetically modified products not approved for human consumption.

Because corn prices tend to be somewhat volatile, Azteca Milling engages in a variety of hedging activities in connection with the purchase of its corn supplies, including the purchase of corn futures contracts.  In so doing, Azteca Milling attempts to assure corn availability approximately 12 months in advance of harvest time and guard against price volatility approximately six months in advance.  The Texas Panhandle currently is the single largest source of food-grade corn.  Azteca Milling is also involved in short-term contracts for corn procurement with many corn suppliers.  Where suppliers fail to deliver, Azteca Milling can easily access the spot markets.  Azteca Milling does not anticipate any difficulties in securing adequate corn supplies in the future.

Corn flour for Mission Foods U.S. operations is supplied by Azteca Milling, and to a much lesser extent, by GIMSA. Corn flour for Mission Foods European operations is supplied by our corn mill in Italy.

Wheat flour for the production of wheat tortillas and other types of wheat flat breads is purchased from third party producers at prices prevailing in the commodities markets.  Mission Foods believes the market for wheat flour is sufficiently large and competitive to ensure that wheat flour will be available at competitive prices to supply our needs. Contracts for wheat flour supply are made on a short-term basis.

Distribution.  An important element of Mission Foods’ sales growth has been the expansion and improvement of its tortilla distribution network, including a direct-store-delivery system to distribute most of its products.  Tortillas and other freshly made products are generally delivered daily to customers, especially in retail sales and in regions where we have plants.  In regions where we do not have plants, there is no daily distribution and tortillas are sometimes sold refrigerated.  In keeping with industry practice, Mission Foods generally does not have written sales agreements with its customers.  Nevertheless, from time to time, Mission Foods enters into consumer marketing agreements with retailers, in which certain terms on how to market our products are agreed.  Mission Foods has also developed a food service distribution network on the west and east coasts of the United States, and in certain areas of the Midwest.

28

The vast majority of corn flour produced by Azteca Milling in the U.S. is sold to tortilla and tortilla chip manufacturers and is delivered directly from the plants to the customer.  Azteca Milling’s retail customers are primarily serviced by a network of distributors, although a few large retail customers have their corn flour delivered directly to them from the plants.

Almost all of the corn flour and corn grits produced in Europe are sold to beer, snacks, tortilla chip and taco shell manufacturers, and are delivered directly from the plants to the customer. We also supply customers in several industries like breakfast cereals and polenta, among others.  Retail customers are primarily serviced by a network of distributors, although a few large retail customers have their corn flour delivered directly to them from the plants.

Mexican Operations

Overview

Our largest business in Mexico is the manufacture and sale of corn flour, which we conduct through our subsidiary GIMSA.  Through our association with Archer-Daniels-Midland, we have also entered the wheat milling business in Mexico through Molinera de México.  Our other subsidiaries engage in the manufacturing and distribution of packaged tortillas and other related products in northern Mexico, conduct research and development regarding corn flour and tortilla manufacturing equipment, produce machinery for corn flour and tortilla production and construct our corn flour manufacturing facilities.

GIMSA—Corn Flour Operation

Principal Products.  GIMSA produces, distributes and sells corn flour in Mexico, which is then used in the preparation of tortillas and other related products.  GIMSA also produces wheat flour and other related products to a much lesser extent.

In 2011, GIMSA had net sales of Ps.15,386 million.  We believe GIMSA is one of the largest corn flour producers in Mexico.  GIMSA estimates that its corn flour is used in one third of the corn tortillas consumed in Mexico.  It sells corn flour in Mexico mainly under the brand name MASECA®.  MASECA®, a standard fine-textured, white corn flour is a ready-mixed corn flour that becomes a dough when water is added.  This corn dough can then be pressed to an appropriate thickness, cut to shape and cooked to produce tortillas and similar food products.

GIMSA produces over 50 varieties of corn flour for the manufacture of different food products which are developed to meet the requirements of our different types of customers according to the kind of tortillas they produce and markets they serve.  It sells corn flour to tortilla and tortilla chip manufacturers as well as in the retail market.

Sales and Marketing.  GIMSA sells packaged corn flour in bulk principally to thousands of small tortilla manufacturers, or tortillerías, which purchase in 20-kilogram sacks and produce tortillas on their premises for sale to local markets.  To a lesser extent, GIMSA also sells corn flour in bulk to supermarkets’ in-store tortillerías and snack manufacturers. Additionally, GIMSA sells packaged corn flour in the retail market in one-kilogram packages.

The following table sets forth GIMSA’s bulk and retail sales volume of corn flour, and other products for the periods indicated.

	Year Ended December 31, (tons in thousands)
	2009		2010		2011
	Tons	%	Tons	%	Tons	%
Corn Flour
Bulk	1,451	77	1,468	78	1,528	78
Retail	290	16	291	15	292	15
Other	133	7	131	7	139	7
Total	1,874	100	1,890	100	1,959	100

29

Retail sales of corn flour are channeled to two distinct markets:  urban centers and rural areas.  Sales to urban consumers are made mostly through supermarket chains that use their own distribution networks to distribute MASECA® corn flour or through wholesalers who sell the product to smaller grocery stores throughout Mexico.  Sales to rural consumers are made principally through the Mexican government’s social welfare retail chain, a social and distribution program named Distribuidora Conasupo, S.A., or DICONSA, which consists of a network of small government-owned stores and which supplies rural areas with basic food products.

Mexico’s tortilla industry is highly fragmented, consisting mostly of tortillerías, many of which continue to utilize, what is in our opinion, the relatively inefficient wet corn dough method of tortilla production (the traditional method).  We estimate that the traditional wet corn dough method accounts for approximately half of all tortillas produced in Mexico.  Tortilla producers that do not utilize corn flour buy the wet dough from dough producers or buy and mill their own corn and produce wet corn dough themselves.

We believe the preparation of tortillas using the dry corn flour method possesses several advantages over the traditional method.  This traditional method is a rudimentary practice requiring more energy, time and labor because it involves cooking the corn in water and with lime, milling the cooked corn, creating and shaping the dough, and then making tortillas from that dough.  We pioneered the dry corn flour method in which we mill the raw corn in our facilities into corn flour.  Tortilla producers and consumers, once they acquire the corn flour, may then simply add water to transform the flour into wet dough to produce tortillas.  Our internal studies show that the dry corn flour method consumes less water, electricity, fuel and labor.  We estimate that one kilogram of corn processed through the dry corn flour method yields more tortillas on average than a similar amount of corn processed using the traditional method.  Corn flour is also transported more easily and under better sanitary conditions than wet corn dough and has a shelf life of approximately three months, compared with one or two days for wet corn dough.  The market for wet corn dough is limited due to the perishable nature of the product, restricting sales of most wet corn dough producers to their immediate geographic areas.  Additionally, the corn flour’s longer shelf life makes it easier for consumers in rural areas, where tortillerías are relatively scarce, to produce their own tortillas.

We believe in the benefits of our dry corn flour method and also believe that we have substantial opportunities for growth by encouraging a transition to our method.  Corn flour is primarily used to produce corn tortillas, a principal staple of the Mexican diet.  The tortilla industry is one of the largest industries in Mexico as tortillas constitute the single largest component of Mexico’s food industry.  However, there is still reluctance to abandon the traditional practice, particularly in central and southern Mexico, because corn dough producers and/or tortilla producers using the traditional method incur lower expenses by working in an informal economy.  Additionally, such producers are generally not required to comply with environmental regulations, which also represents savings for them.  To the extent regulations in Mexico are enforced and we and our competitors are on the same footing, we expect to benefit from these developments.

GIMSA has embarked on several programs to promote corn flour sales to tortilla producers and consumers.  GIMSA offers incentives to potential customers, such as small independent tortillerías, to convert to the dry corn flour method from the traditional wet corn dough method.  The incentives GIMSA offers include new, easy to use equipment designed specifically for small-volume users, financing, and individualized training.  For example, in order to assist traditional tortilla producers in making the transition to corn flour, GIMSA also sells specially designed mixers made by Tecnomaíz, S.A. de C.V., or Tecnomaíz, one of our research and development subsidiaries.  For more information about our research and development department, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Miscellaneous—INTASA—Technology and Equipment Operations.”  GIMSA also helps its tortillería customers to improve sales by directing consumer promotions to heighten the desirability of their products and increase consumption, which, in turn, should increase corn flour sales and our brand equity.  These efforts to improve sales and strengthen our brand equity by better positioning us among consumers include prime time advertising on television as well as radio, magazine and billboard advertising.

During 2011, GIMSA continued emphasizing the nutritional values of its products in advertising campaigns on radio and television nationwide. GIMSA also continued reinforcing MASECA’s image and brand recognition, associating our brand with sports, exercise and wellness, and emphasizing the benefits of a good nutrition for general health. Following this strategy, we sponsor several professional sports teams including the Mexican Soccer Football Federation (FEMEXFUT), as the official sponsors of Mexico’s national soccer team in all of its categories through the year 2014.

30

GIMSA is aware of the dynamism of the Mexican market. In order to adapt quickly and to anticipate new customers’ needs, GIMSA continued diversifying its sales force in specialized teams to be able to satisfy different types of customers, focusing primarily in increasing product availability and achieving higher market coverage. GIMSA also continues working on the conversion of customers from the traditional process preparing tortillas to our corn flour method, mainly in the central and south regions of Mexico where the traditional method is still widely used.

GIMSA has also created specific business models for its customers to improve the viability of their businesses, primarily in the distribution and delivery process of tortillas to consumers, and the identification and recognition of the use of MASECA as a main ingredient in their products. Our strategy of developing specific sales formats has permitted us to serve customers requiring high frequency delivery and low volume orders as well as customers with high volume consumption with working capital investments needs.

Additionally, the Company undertakes the following ongoing initiatives in an effort to improve operational efficiency, increase consumption of corn flour, and improve on its successful business model to attract new customers:

·initiatives designed to strengthen commercial relations with our existing customers, primarily by offering personalized customer service and sales programs to our customers, including the development of comprehensive business models;

·initiatives designed to increase coverage in regions with low corn flour consumption with special promotions tailored specifically to these markets;

·design of individualized support regarding the type of machinery required for their business, financial advisory and training;

·assistance to customers in the development of new profitable distribution methods to increase their market penetration and sales;

·development of tailored marketing promotions to increase consumption in certain customer segments; and

·assistance to customers in the development of new higher margin products such as tortilla chips, taco shells and enchilada tortillas, reflecting current consumption trends.

Competition and Market Position.  GIMSA faces competition on three levels—from other corn flour producers, from sellers of wet corn dough and from the many tortillerías that produce their own wet corn dough on their premises.  Our estimates indicate that about half of tortilla producers continue to use the traditional wet corn dough method.

GIMSA’s biggest challenge in increasing its market share is the prevalence of the traditional method.  In the corn flour industry, GIMSA’s principal competitors are Grupo Minsa, S.A. de C.V. and a few regional corn flour producers.  OPTIMASA, a subsidiary of Cargill de México, built a corn flour plant and began to offer corn flour in the central region of Mexico, therefore becoming a new competitor for GIMSA since 2005.  We compete against other corn flour manufacturers on the basis of quality, brand recognition, technology, customer service and nationwide coverage.  We believe that GIMSA has certain competitive advantages resulting from its proprietary technology, greater economies of scale and broad geographic coverage, which may provide it with opportunities to more effectively source raw materials and reduce transportation costs.

Operations and Capital Expenditures.  GIMSA currently owns 19 corn flour mills, all of which are located throughout Mexico, typically within corn growing regions and those of large tortilla consumption. GIMSA also owns two more plants, one of which produces wheat flour and the other, corn grits and several types of corn based products. Three of GIMSA’s plants are idle. The Chalco plant has been inactive since October 1999 GIMSA will consider reopening this plant should market demands require additional capacity.  The other two plants (Monterrey y Celaya) have been idle since February 2006. These assets are currently being depreciated.

31

Annual total production capacity for GIMSA is estimated at 2.97 million metric tons as of December 31, 2011, with an average utilization of 66% in 2011. The average size of our plants as of December 31, 2011 was approximately 19,956 square meters (approximately 214,806 square feet).

In recent years, GIMSA’s capital expenditures were primarily used to upgrade technology and corn flour production processes.  GIMSA spent U.S.$33 million for these purposes from 2010 to 2011.  GIMSA currently projects total capital expenditures during 2012 of approximately U.S.$29 million, which will be used primarily for updating technology and production capacity expansion projects.

Pursuant to an agreement between GIMSA and Investigación de Tecnología Avanzada, or INTASA, our wholly-owned subsidiary, INTASA provides technical assistance to each of GIMSA’s operating subsidiaries for which each pays to INTASA a fee equal to 0.5% of its consolidated net sales.  Each of GIMSA’s corn flour facilities uses proprietary technology developed by our technology and equipment operations.  For more information about our in-house technology and design initiatives, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Miscellaneous—INTASA—Technology and Equipment Operations.”

Seasonality.  The demand for corn flour varies slightly with the seasons, with some minor increases during the December holidays.

Raw Materials.  Corn is the principal raw material required for the production of corn flour, and constituted 57% of GIMSA’s cost of sales for 2011.  We purchase corn primarily from Mexican growers and grain elevators, and from world markets at international prices. Most of our domestic corn purchases are made through ASERCA, a governmental program established and supported by the Mexican Ministry of Agriculture, where contracts are entered into once the corn is planted to guarantee price and delivery upon harvest. Compañía Nacional Almacenadora, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of GIMSA, enters into contracts for and purchases the corn, and also monitors, selects, handles and ships the corn.

We believe that the diverse geographic locations of GIMSA’s production facilities in Mexico enables GIMSA to achieve savings in raw material transportation and handling.  In addition, by sourcing corn locally for its plants, GIMSA is better able to communicate with local growers concerning the size and quality of the corn crop and is better able to maintain quality control.  In Mexico, GIMSA purchases corn on delivery in order to strengthen its ability to obtain the highest quality corn on the best terms.

Traditionally, domestic corn prices in Mexico typically follow trends in the international market.  During most periods, the price at which GIMSA purchases corn depends on the price of corn in the international market.  As a result, corn prices are sometimes unstable and volatile.  Additionally, in the past, the Mexican government has supported the price of corn. For more information regarding the government’s effect on corn prices, see “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Our Business Operations Could Be Affected by Government Policies in Mexico” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation.”

In addition to corn, the other principal materials and resources used in the production of corn flour are packaging materials, water, lime, additives and energy.  GIMSA believes that its sources of supply for these materials and resources are adequate, although energy, additives and packaging costs tend to be volatile.

Distribution.  GIMSA’s products are distributed through independent transport firms contracted by GIMSA.  Most of GIMSA’s sales are made free-on-board at GIMSA’s plants, in particular those to tortilla manufacturers.  With respect to other sales, in particular sales to the Mexican government, large supermarket chains, and snack producers, GIMSA pays the freight cost.

Molinera de México—Wheat Flour Operation

Principal Products.  In 1996, in connection with our association with Archer-Daniels-Midland, we entered the wheat milling market in Mexico by acquiring a 60% ownership interest in Archer-Daniels-Midland’s wheat flour operation, Molinera de México.  See “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts.”  Molinera’s main product is wheat flour, although it also sells wheat bran and other byproducts.  Our wheat flour brands are REPOSADA®, PODEROSA® and SELECTA®, among others.

32

Sales and Marketing.  In 2011, approximately 86% of Molinera’s wheat flour production was sold in bulk and 14% was sold for the retail segment.  Most of the bulk sales are made to thousands of traditional bakeries and tortillerías, supermarkets’ in-store bakeries and, to a lesser extent, to cookie and pasta manufacturers.  Most of the retail sales are made to large supermarkets and wholesalers throughout Mexico.  Through wholesalers, our products are distributed to small grocery stores.

Our marketing strategy depends on the type of customer and region.  Overall, our aim is to offer products according to customers’ specifications as well as technical support.  We are trying to increase our market share in bakeries by offering products with consistent quality.  In the retail segment we target small grocery stores through wholesalers, and supermarkets through centralized and national level negotiations.  We are focusing on improving customer service, continuing to increase our distribution of products to supermarkets’ in-store bakeries, and developing new types of pre-mixed flours for the supermarket in-store bakery segment.  We provide direct delivery to supermarkets, supermarkets’ in-store bakeries, wholesalers, industrial customers and some large bakeries.  Most small bakeries and small grocery stores are served by wholesalers.

Competition and Market Position.  We believe that we are one of Mexico’s largest wheat flour producers based on revenues and sales volume.  Molinera de México competes with many small wheat flour producers.  We believe the wheat flour industry is highly fragmented and estimate that there are about 90 participants.  Our main competitors are Altex, Trimex, Tablex, La Espiga, Elizondo, and Anáhuac.

Operations and Capital Expenditures.  We own and operate nine wheat flour plants, including one of which we hold only a 40% ownership interest.  Annual total production capacity for Molinera is estimated at 837 thousand metric tons as of December 31, 2011, with an average utilization of 83% in 2011, including production volume for third parties for which Molinera receives a fee.  On average, the size of our plants as of December 31, 2011 was approximately 12,044 square meters (approximately 129,590 square feet). Capital expenditures in 2010 and 2011 amounted to U.S.$10 million mainly for general upgrades and maintenance.  Molinera de México’s capital expenditures in 2012 are projected to be U.S.$28 million, which will be used primarily for production capacity expansion on several wheat mills and general manufacturing and technology upgrades.

Seasonality.  Molinera’s sales are subject to seasonality.  Higher sales volumes are achieved in the fourth and first quarters during the winter, when we believe per capita consumption of wheat-based products, especially bread and cookies, increases due in part to cold weather and the celebration of holidays occurring during these quarters.

Raw Materials.  Wheat is the principal raw material required for the production of wheat flour and constituted 71% of Molinera’s cost of sales for 2011.  Molinera de México purchases approximately 63% of its wheat from Mexican growers, and 37% from international markets. Molinera de México purchases domestic wheat from local farmers and farmers’ associations through ASERCA, a governmental program established and supported by the Mexican Ministry of Agriculture, where contracts are entered into once the wheat is planted to guarantee price and delivery upon harvest. Wheat is also sourced from foreign producers in the United States and Canada through different trading companies. Purchases are made based on short-term requirements with the aim of maintaining adequate levels of inventories.

In recent years the price of wheat domestically and abroad has been volatile.  Volatility is due to the supply of wheat, which depends on various factors including the size of the harvest (which depends in large part on the weather).

Central American Operations

Overview

In 1972, we entered the Costa Rican market.  Our operations since then have expanded into Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua, as well as Ecuador, which we include as part of our Central American operations.

33

Gruma Centroamérica

Principal Products.  Gruma Centroamérica produces corn flour, and to a lesser extent tortillas and snacks.  We also cultivate and sell hearts of palm and process and sell rice.  We believe we are one of the largest corn flour producers in the region.  We sell corn flour under the MASECA®, TORTIMASA®, MASARICA® and MINSA® brands.  In Costa Rica, we sell packaged tortillas under the TORTI RICA® and MISIÓN® brands.  We operate a Costa Rican snack operation which manufactures tortilla chips, potato chips and similar products under the TOSTY®, RUMBA®, and LA TICA® brand.  Hearts of palm are exported to numerous European countries as well as the United States, Canada, Chile and Mexico.

Sales and Marketing.  79% of Gruma Centroamérica’s sales volume in 2011 derived from the sale of corn flour.

Gruma Centroamérica corn flour bulk sales are oriented predominantly to small tortilla manufacturers through direct delivery and wholesalers.  Supermarkets make up the customer base for retail corn flour.  Bulk sales volume represented approximately 57% and retail sales represented approximately 43% of Gruma Centroamérica’s corn flour sales volume during 2011.

Competition and Market Position.  We believe that we are one the largest corn flour producers in Central America based on revenues and sales volume.  We believe that there is significant potential for growth in Central America as corn flour is used in only approximately 15% of all tortilla production; the majority of tortilla manufacturers use the wet corn dough method.  Additionally, we believe we are one of the largest producers of tortillas and snacks in Costa Rica.

Within the corn flour industry, the brands of our main competitors are: Del Comal, Doña Blanca, Selecta, Bachoza and Instamasa.  However, one of our main growth potentials is to convert tortilla manufacturers that still use the traditional method to our corn flour method.

Operations and Capital Expenditures.  We had an annual installed production capacity of 350 thousand tons for corn flour and other products as of December 31, 2011, with an average utilization of approximately 68% during 2011.  We operate one corn flour plant in each of Costa Rica, Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, for a total of four plants throughout the region.  In Costa Rica, we also have one plant producing tortillas, one plant producing snacks, one plant processing hearts of palm and one plant processing rice.  In Nicaragua and Honduras we have small tortilla plants, while in Guatemala we have a small plant that produces snacks and in Ecuador we have a small facility which processes hearts of palm.  On average, the size of our plants as of December 31, 2011 was approximately 75,574 square meters (approximately 813,472 square feet).

During 2010 and 2011 most of our capital expenditures were oriented towards general manufacturing upgrades and production capacity expansions at existing tortilla plants. Total capital expenditures for the past two years were approximately U.S.$3.4 and U.S.$7.1 million, respectively. Capital expenditures for 2012 are projected to be U.S.$9 million, which will be used primarily for general manufacturing and technology upgrades.

Seasonality.  Typically, corn flour sales volume is lower during the first and fourth quarters of the year due to higher corn availability and lower corn prices.

Raw Materials.  Corn is the most important raw material needed in our operations, representing 41% of the cost of sales during 2011, and is obtained primarily from imports from the United States and from local growers.  None of the countries in which we have corn flour plants restrict corn import permits granted by the United States.  Price fluctuation and volatility are subject to domestic conditions, such as annual crop results and international conditions.

Gruma Venezuela

Overview

In 1993, we entered the Venezuelan corn flour industry through a participation in DEMASECA, a corn flour company in Venezuela.  In August 1999, we acquired 95% of DAMCA International Corporation, a Delaware

34

corporation which owned 100% of MONACA, Venezuela’s second largest corn and wheat flour producer at that time, for approximately U.S.$94 million.  Additionally, Archer-Daniels-Midland acquired the remaining 5% interest in MONACA.

In April of 2006, we entered into a series of transactions to: (i) purchase an additional 10% ownership interest in DEMASECA at a price of U.S.$2.6 million; (ii) purchase a 2% stake in MONACA from Archer-Daniels-Midland at a price of U.S.$3.28 million; and (iii) sell a 3% interest in DEMASECA to Archer-Daniels-Midland at a price of U.S.$780,000.

Additionally, in April of 2006, we entered into a contract for the sale of a stake in MONACA to Rotch Energy Holdings, N.V. (“Rotch”), a controlled entity of our former indirect partner in DEMASECA, Ricardo Fernández Barrueco.  As a result Rotch acquired a 24.14% interest in MONACA, and subsequently pledged its equity interests for the benefit of a Mexican financial institution (the “Rotch Lender”) as security for a loan to a controlled entity of Rotch. In June of 2010, Rotch defaulted under the loan and the stake in MONACA was sold and assigned to a third investor, whose interest is held by a Mexican company, RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.  RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. is not affiliated with our former indirect partner in DEMASECA, Ricardo Fernández Barrueco.

As a result of the aforementioned transactions, we currently own 72.86% in MONACA, RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. owns 24.14% and Archer-Daniels-Midland owns the remaining 3% in MONACA.  In addition, we own 57% in DEMASECA, RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. indirectly owns 40% and Archer-Daniels-Midland owns the remaining 3% in DEMASECA. MONACA and DEMASECA are collectively referred to as “Gruma Venezuela.”

On May 12, 2010, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela published in the Official Gazette of Venezuela decree number 7,394, which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, movables and real estate of our subsidiary company in Venezuela, MONACA. The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to our subsidiary DEMASECA . As of this date, no formal transfer of title of the assets covered by the Expropriation Decree has taken place. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela— Our Subsidiaries in Venezuela are Currently Involved in Expropriation Proceedings,” and “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

DEMASECA and MONACA

Principal Products.  Gruma Venezuela produces and distributes corn flour as well as wheat flour, rice, oats and other products.  We sell corn flour under the brand names JUANA® and DEMASA®.  We sell wheat flour under the ROBIN HOOD®, FLOR DE TRIGO® and POLAR® brand, rice under the MONICA® brand and oats under the LASSIE® brand.

Sales and Marketing.  Venezuelans use corn flour to produce and consume arepas, which are made at home or in restaurants for household consumption rather than manufactured by specialty shops or other large manufacturers.  We sell corn flour in the retail market in one kilogram bags to independent distributors, supermarkets, wholesalers, and governmental social welfare and distribution programs.  We also sell wheat flour, distributing it in 45 kilogram bags and in one kilogram bags.  Bulk sales to customers made up approximately 42% of our total sales volume in 2011.  The remaining 58% of sales in 2011 were in the retail market, which includes independent distributors, supermarkets and wholesalers.

Competition and Market Position.  With the MONACA acquisition in 1999, we significantly increased our share of the corn flour market and entered the wheat flour market.  We believe we are one of the largest corn flour and wheat flour producers in Venezuela.

In corn flour, our main competitor is Alimentos Polar, and, to a lesser extent, Industria Venezolana Maizera PROAREPA, Asoportuguesa and La Lucha.  In wheat flour, our principal competitor is Cargill.

Operation and Capital Expenditures.  We operate five corn flour plants, five wheat flour plants, two rice plants, one pasta plant, and two plants that produce oats and spices in Venezuela with a total annual production

35

capacity of 823 thousand tons as of December 31, 2011 and an average utilization of approximately 68% during 2011.  Two rice plants, representing 71 thousand tons, are temporarily idle.  On average, the size of our plants measured in square meters is approximately 8,961 (approximately 96,454 square feet) as of December 31, 2011.

Capital expenditures for the past two years were U.S.$10.3 million.  Most of this was applied to  general upgrades . Capital expenditures for 2012 are budgeted to be U.S.$15 million and expected to be focused on general manufacturing and technology upgrades mostly related to production efficiencies and compliance with applicable regulations.

Seasonality.  Sales fluctuate seasonally as demand for flour-based products is lower during those months when most schools are closed for vacation.  In addition, sales are higher in November as customers build inventory to satisfy increased demand during the holiday season in December.

Raw Materials.  Corn and wheat are our most important raw materials.  Corn is purchased in Venezuela and is subject to the corn market’s volatility and governmental regulations related to prices, quantities and storage facilities.  Corn prices are fixed by a government agency.  100% of our wheat is purchased from the U.S. and Canada, with its availability and price volatility dependent upon those markets.  We do not engage in any type of hedging activity for our supplies since exchange rate policies and country risk for Venezuela constrain our capacity to transfer funds abroad in order to fund any hedging strategy.

Miscellaneous—INTASA—Technology and Equipment Operations

We have developed our own technology operations since our founding.  Since 1976 our technology and equipment operations have been conducted principally through INTASA, which has two subsidiaries:  Tecnomaíz, S.A. de C.V., or Tecnomaíz, and Constructora Industrial Agropecuaria, S.A. de C.V., or CIASA.  The principal activity of these subsidiaries is to provide research and development, equipment, and construction services to us and small equipment to third parties. Through Tecnomaíz, we also engage in the design, manufacture and sale of machines for the production of tortillas and tortilla chips.  The machinery for the tortilla industry includes a range of capacities, from machines that make 15 to 300 corn tortillas per minute to dough mixers. The equipment is sold under the TORTEC® and BATITEC® trademarks in Mexico.  Tecnomaíz also manufactures high volume energy efficient corn tortilla, wheat tortilla and tortilla chip systems that can produce up to 1,200 corn tortillas per minute, 600 wheat tortillas per minute and 3,000 pounds of chips per hour.

We carry out proprietary technological research and development for corn milling and tortilla production as well as all engineering, plant design and construction through INTASA and CIASA.  These companies administer and supervise the design and construction of our new plants and also provide advisory services and training to employees of our corn flour and tortilla manufacturing facilities.  We manufacture corn tortilla-making machines for sale to tortilla manufacturers and for use in “in-store tortillerías,” as well as high-capacity corn and flour tortilla-makers that are supplied only to us.

GFNorte Investment

As of December 31, 2010, we held approximately 8.8% of the outstanding shares of GFNorte, a Mexican financial services holding company and parent of Banco Mercantil del Norte, S.A., or Banorte, a Mexican bank.  As of the same date, our investment in GFNorte represented Ps.4,296 million.  GFNorte’s results of operations were accounted for in our consolidated results of operations using the equity method of accounting.  For the period ended December 31, 2010, we received Ps.91 million in dividends in respect of our investment in GFNorte.

On February 15, 2011, we concluded the sale of 177,546,496 shares of the capital stock of GFNorte at a price of Ps.52 per common share (the “GFNorte Sale”), resulting in cash proceeds of Ps.9,232,417,792 before fees and expenses.  As a result of the sale of the GFNorte’s shares, we no longer hold shares of GFNorte’s capital stock.

36

REGULATION

Mexican Regulation

Corn Commercialization Program

To support the commercialization of corn for Mexican corn growers, Mexico’s Secretary of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food Ministry (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación, or SAGARPA), through the Agricultural Incentives and Services Agency (Apoyos y Servicios a la Comercialización Agropecuaria, or ASERCA), a government agency founded in 1991, implemented a program designed to promote corn sales in Mexico.  The program includes the following objectives:

·Ensure that the corn harvest is brought to market, providing certainty to farmers concerning the sale of their crops and supply security for the buyer.

·Establish a minimum price for the farmer, and a maximum price for the buyer, which are determined based on international market prices, plus a basic formula specific for each region.

·Implement a corn hedging program to allow both farmers and buyers to minimize their exposure to price fluctuations in the international markets.

To the extent that this or other similar programs are canceled by the Mexican government, we may be required to incur additional costs in purchasing corn for our operations, and therefore we may need to increase the prices of our products to reflect such additional costs.

Corn Flour Consumer Aid Program

Since the end of 2006, the price of corn set by the Chicago Board of Trade and the average price of Mexican corn has increased dramatically due to a number of factors, including the increased use of corn in the manufacture of ethanol, a substitute for gasoline, as well as other bio-fuels.  Consequently, the price of corn flour and corn tortillas, the main food staple in Mexico, increased due to such increases in the international and domestic prices of corn.  In order to stabilize the price of tortillas and provide Mexican families with a consistent supply of corn, corn flour and tortillas at a reasonable price, the Mexican government promoted two agreements among the various parties involved in the corn-flour-tortilla production chain.  The second and last agreement was effective until December 31, 2007. However, the parties to that agreement voluntarily continued to operate under its terms until October 2008.

Upon the expiration of the above-mentioned agreements, the Mexican government created a program to support the corn flour industry (Programa de Apoyo a la Industria de la Harina de Maíz or PROHARINA) in October of 2008.  This program aimed to mitigate the impact of the rise in international corn prices through price supports designed to aid the consumer and provided through the corn flour industry.  Corn flour manufacturers were entitled to receive a subsidy conditioned on selling the corn flour below a maximum price set by the Mexican government.  Beginning in June 2009, the maximum price per kilogram of corn flour established to receive the government subsidy was Ps.5.875.  The total amount of subsidized funds allotted to the Company by the Mexican government under this program in 2009 totaled Ps.1,465 million.  However, the Mexican government cancelled the PROHARINA program in December 2009.

As a result of the cancellation of this program by the Mexican government in December of 2009, we were required to increase the prices of our products to reflect such additional costs.  In addition, there can be no assurance that we will maintain our eligibility for other programs similar to PROHARINA that may be implemented, or that the Mexican government will not institute price controls or other actions on the products we sell, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Environmental Regulations

Our Mexican operations are subject to Mexican federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment.  The principal federal environmental laws are the Ley General de Equilibrio

37

Ecológico y Protección al Ambiente, or General Law of Ecological Equilibrium and Protection of the Environment, or the Mexican Environmental Law, which is enforced by the Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, or Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, or SEMARNAT and the Ley Federal de Derechos or the Mexican Federal Law of Governmental Fees.  Under the Mexican Environmental Law, each of our facilities engaged in the production of corn flour, wheat flour, and packaged tortillas is required to obtain an operating license from state environmental regulations upon initiating operations, and then periodically submit a certificate of operation to maintain the operating license.  Furthermore, the Mexican Federal Law of Governmental Fees requires that Mexican manufacturing plants pay a fee for water consumption and the discharge of residual waste water to drainage, whenever the quality of such water exceeds mandated thresholds.  Rules have been issued concerning hazardous substances and water, air and noise pollution.  In particular, Mexican environmental laws and regulations require that Mexican companies file periodic reports with respect to air and water emissions and hazardous wastes.  Additionally, they also establish standards for waste water discharge.  We must also comply with zoning regulations as well and rules regarding health, working conditions and commercial matters.  SEMARNAT and the Federal Bureau of Environmental Protection can bring administrative and criminal proceedings against companies that violate environmental laws, as well as close non-complying facilities.

We believe we are currently in compliance in all material respects with all applicable Mexican environmental regulations.  The level of environmental regulation and enforcement in Mexico has increased in recent years.  We expect this trend to continue and to be accelerated by international agreements between Mexico and the United States.  To the extent that new environmental regulations are issued in Mexico, we may be required to incur additional remedial capital expenditures to comply.  Management is not aware of any pending regulatory changes that would require additional remedial capital expenditures in a significant amount.

Competition Regulations

The Ley Federal de Competencia Económica or Mexican Competition Law, and the Reglamento de la Ley Federal de Competencia Económica or Regulations of the Mexican Competition Law, regulate monopolies and monopolistic practices, and require Mexican government approval for certain mergers and acquisitions.  The Mexican Competition Law grants the government the authority to establish price controls for products and services of national interest through Presidential decree, and established the Comisión Federal de Competencia, or Federal Competition Commission, to enforce the law.  Mergers and acquisitions and other transactions that may restrain trade or that may result in monopolistic or anti-competitive practices or combinations must be approved by the Federal Competition Commission.  The Mexican Competition Law may potentially limit our business combinations, mergers and acquisitions and may subject us to greater scrutiny in the future in light of our market presence, and we do not believe that this legislation will have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

U.S. Federal and State Regulations

Gruma Corporation is subject to regulation by various federal, state and local agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, Department of Labor, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Transportation, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Agriculture.  We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with all environmental and other legal requirements.  Our food manufacturing and distribution facilities are subject to periodic inspection by various federal, state and local agencies, and the equipment utilized in these facilities must generally be governmentally approved prior to operation.

European Regulation

We are subject to regulation in each country in which we operate in Europe.  We believe that we are currently in compliance with all applicable legal requirements in all material respects.

Central American and Venezuelan Regulation

Gruma Centroamérica and Gruma Venezuela are subject to regulation in each country in which they operate.  We believe that Gruma Centroamérica and Gruma Venezuela are currently in compliance with all applicable legal requirements in all material respects.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela—Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risks” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors— Our Subsidiaries in Venezuela are Currently Involved in Expropriation Proceedings.”

38

Asia and Oceania Regulation

We are subject to regulation in each country in which we operate in Asia and Oceania.  We believe that we are currently in compliance with all applicable legal requirements in all material respects.

ITEM 4A.       Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

ITEM 5Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere herein. Our audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by IASB.  Such consolidated annual financial statements are our first financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Until and including our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, we prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance with Mexican FRS. See Note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements for an analysis of the valuation, presentation and disclosure effects of adopting IFRS and a reconciliation between Mexican FRS and IFRS as of January 1 and December 31, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Following the Company’s adoption of IFRS, the Company is no longer required to reconcile its financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS to U.S. GAAP.

Pursuant to the transitional relief granted by the SEC in respect of the first-time application of IFRS no audited consolidated financial statements and financial information prepared under IFRS for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been included in this annual report. Consequently no discussion is included for the year 2009. For more information about our financial statements in general, see “Presentation of Financial Information” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

Overview of Accounting Presentation

We began reporting under IFRS for the year ending December 31, 2011, with an IFRS adoption date of January 1, 2011 and a transition date to IFRS of January 1, 2010. IFRS has certain mandatory exceptions, as well as limited optional exceptions, in connection with the initial adoption of IFRS, which do not require the retrospective application of IFRS.

We relied on the following applicable mandatory exceptions in IFRS 1:

a)Hedge accounting: Hedge accounting can only be applied prospectively from the transition date to transactions that satisfy the hedge accounting criteria in IAS 39, “Financial instruments: Recognition and measurement”, at that date. Hedging relationships cannot be designated retrospectively, and the supporting documentation cannot be created retrospectively. All of the Company’s hedge contracts satisfy the hedge accounting criteria as of January 1, 2010 and, consequently, these transactions were reflected as hedges in the Company’s balance sheets.

b)Estimates: IFRS estimates as at January 1, 2010 are consistent with the estimates as at the same date made in conformity with Mexican FRS.

Additionally, we applied prospectively the following mandatory exceptions starting January 1, 2010: de-recognition of financial assets and liabilities and non-controlling interest, with no significant effect, since the requirements under Mexican FRS are the same.

39

Below we describe the optional exceptions on which we relied, together with a discussion of the impact that the treatment specified by IFRS would have had absent our election to rely on the relevant exception. See Note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

a)Business combinations. IFRS 1 provides the option to apply IFRS 3, “Business Combinations”, prospectively from the transition date or from a specific date prior to the transition date. This provides relief from full retrospective application that would require restatement of all business combinations prior to the transition date. We elected to apply IFRS 3 prospectively to business combinations occurring after the transition date. Had we not exercised this exception, we would have applied IFRS 3 to all acquisitions prior to the transition date. IFRS differs from Mexican FRS particularly with respect to recognition and valuation of employee benefits obligations, property, plant and equipment and other liabilities. As a result, the assignment of net values would have been different under IFRS.

b)Cumulative translation differences. IFRS 1 allows cumulative translation gains and losses to be reset to zero at the transition date. This provides relief from determining cumulative currency translation differences in accordance with IAS 21, “The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates”, from the date a subsidiary or equity method investee was formed or acquired. We elected to reset all cumulative translation gains and losses to zero in retained earnings at the transition date. Had we not applied this exception, we would have been able to reclassify the translation effect only for subsidiaries in countries experiencing hyperinflation as defined under IFRS.

c)Deemed cost. We elected to use as the deemed costs at transition date the restated cost of property, plant and equipment under Mexican FRS at December 31, 2009. Had we adopted the historical cost methodology under IFRS, the cost of property, plant and equipment would have been recognized based on their historical cost and we would have reversed inflation adjustments. Had we adopted the fair value methodology under IFRS, the cost of our property, plant and equipment would have been determined based on an appraisal at transition date and following periods.

Note 27 to our audited consolidated financial statements discusses new accounting pronouncements under IFRS that will become effective in 2012 or thereafter. We do not currently expect that any of these will have a significant impact on the presentation of our financial statements.

Effects of Inflation

To determine the existence of hyperinflation, we evaluate the qualitative characteristics of the economic environment of each country, as well as the quantitative characteristics established by IFRS, including an accumulated inflation rate equal or higher than 100% in the past three years. Pursuant to this analysis, Mexico is not considered to be hyperinflationary, with annual inflation rates of 3.6% in 2009, 4.4% in 2010 and 3.8% in 2011. Meanwhile, Venezuela is considered a hyperinflationary economy, with annual inflation rates of 25.1% in 2009, 27.2% in 2010 and 27.6% in 2011.

Effects of Devaluation

Because a significant portion of our net sales are generated in U.S. dollars, changes in the peso/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect upon our results of operations as reported in pesos.  When the peso depreciates against the U.S. dollar, Gruma Corporation’s net sales in U.S. dollars represent a larger portion of our net sales in peso terms than when the peso appreciates against the U.S. dollar.  When the peso appreciates against the dollar, Gruma Corporation’s net sales in U.S. dollars represent a smaller portion of our net sales in peso terms than when the peso depreciates against the dollar.  For a description of the peso/dollar exchange rate see “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rate Information.”

On January 8, 2010, the Venezuelan government announced the devaluation of its currency and established a two tier exchange structure.  Pursuant to Exchange Agreement No.14, the official exchange rate of the Venezuelan bolivar (“Bs.”) was devalued from Bs.2.15 to each U.S. dollar to Bs.4.30 for non-essential goods and services and to Bs.2.60 for essential goods.  On December 30, 2010, the Venezuelan government modified Exchange agreement No. 14 and established a single exchange rate of 4.30 bolivars per U.S. dollar effective January 1, 2011.

40

In addition to the above, our net income may be affected by changes in our foreign exchange gain or loss, which may be impacted by significant variations in the peso/dollar exchange rate.  During 2010 and 2011, we recorded a net foreign exchange gain of Ps.144 million and Ps.41 million, respectively.

Monaca Consolidation

Under IFRS we consolidate all subsidiaries in which the Company, directly or indirectly, owns the majority of the common shares, has control, or is the primary beneficiary of the subsidiary’s risks and rewards.

As of this date, no formal transfer of title of the assets of MONACA has occurred.  As a result, as of the date hereof, our subsidiary Valores Mundiales, S.L. has full control of MONACA’s rights, interest, shares and assets and full control of the operational and managerial decisions concerning MONACA. Accordingly, we have consolidated the balance sheet and income statement of MONACA as of December 31, 2011.

Pending the resolution of this matter, based on preliminary valuation reports, no impairment charge on GRUMA’s net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA has been identified; however, we are unable to estimate the value of any future impairment charge, if any, or to determine whether MONACA and DEMASECA will need to be accounted for as a discontinued operation.  As a result, the net impact of this matter on the Company’s consolidated financial results cannot be reasonably estimated. See Notes 5-A and 25 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Currency Issues in Venezuela

Historically, we have been able to convert bolivars into U.S. dollars at the Official Rate in order to settle certain U.S. dollar-denominated debt incurred pursuant to imports and royalty agreements and to pay dividends from our business in Venezuela.  We expect to continue to be able to convert bolivars into U.S. dollars for these purposes.  Accordingly, as of December 31, 2011, the Company’s Venezuelan subsidiaries accounted for U.S. dollar-denominated transactions, monetary assets and liabilities into bolivars using the Official Rate, which may not reflect economic reality.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela—Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risks.”  In addition, the Company’s Venezuelan subsidiaries’ bolivar-denominated financial statements were translated into Mexican pesos using the buying rate published by Banco de México on the applicable balance sheet dates.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

We have identified below the most critical accounting principles that involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and that management believes are important to a more complete understanding of our financial position and results of operations.  These policies are outlined below.

Additional accounting policies that are also used in the preparation of our financial statements are outlined in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

Property, Plant and Equipment

We depreciate our property, plant and equipment over their respective estimated useful lives.  Useful lives are based on management’s estimates of the period that the assets will remain in service and generate revenues.  Estimates are based on independent appraisals and the experience of our technical personnel. We review the assets’ residual values and useful lives each year to determine whether they should be changed, and adjusted if appropriate. To the extent that our estimates are incorrect, our periodic depreciation expense or carrying value of our assets may be impacted.

41

Under IFRS, we are required to test long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable for property, plant and equipment. When the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the difference is accounted for as an impairment loss.  The recoverable amount is the higher of (1) the long-lived asset’s (asset group) fair value less costs to sell, representing the amount obtainable from the sale of the long-lived asset (asset group) in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties less the costs of disposal and (2) the long-lived asset’s (asset group) value in use, representing its future cash flows discounted to present value by using a rate that reflects the current assessment of the time value of money and the risks specific to the long-lived asset (asset group) for which the cash flow estimates have not been adjusted.

The estimates of cash flows take into consideration expectations of future macroeconomic conditions as well as our internal strategic plans.  Therefore, inherent to the estimated future cash flows is a certain level of uncertainty which we have considered in our valuation; nevertheless, actual future results may differ.

Primarily as a result of plant rationalization, certain facilities and equipment are not currently in use in operations.  We have recorded impairment losses related to certain of those assets and additional losses may potentially occur in the future if our estimates are not accurate and/or future macroeconomic conditions differ significantly from those considered in our analysis.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives. Management exercises judgment in assessing the useful lives of other intangible assets including patents and trademarks, customers lists and software for internal use. Under IFRS, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are subject to impairment tests either annually or earlier in the case of a triggering event.

A key component of the impairment test is the identification of cash-generating units and the allocation of goodwill to such cash-generating units. Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using discounted cash flows.  Cash flows are discounted at present value and an impairment loss is recognized if such discounted cash flows are lower than the net book value of the cash-generating units.

These estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized and also the magnitude of any such charge.  We perform internal valuation analyses and consider relevant internal data as well as other market information that is publicly available.

This approach uses significant estimates and assumptions including projected future cash flows (including timing), a discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows and a perpetual growth rate.  Inherent in these estimates and assumptions is a certain level of risk which we believe we have considered in our valuation.  Nevertheless, if future actual results differ from estimates, a possible impairment charge may be recognized in future periods related to the write-down of the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets.

Deferred Income Tax

We record deferred income tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities.  If enacted tax rates change, we adjust the deferred tax assets and liabilities through the provision for income tax in the period of change, to reflect the enacted tax rate expected to be in effect when the deferred tax items reverse. Under IFRS, a deferred tax asset must be recognized for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilized. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, in the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made.  Should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

42

Derivative Financial Instruments

We use derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business, primarily to hedge certain operational and financial risks to which we are exposed, including without limitation:  (i) future and options contracts for certain key production requirements like natural gas, heating oil and some raw materials such as corn and wheat, in order to minimize the cash flow variability due to price fluctuations; (ii) interest rate swaps, with the purpose of managing the interest rate risk related to our debt; and (iii) exchange rate contracts (mainly Mexican peso — U.S. dollar and in other currencies).

We account for derivative financial instruments used for hedging purposes either as cash-flow hedges or fair value hedges with changes in fair value reported in other comprehensive income and earnings, respectively.  Derivative financial instruments not designated as an accounting hedge are recognized at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in income.

When available, we measure the fair value of the derivative financial instruments based on quoted market prices.  If quoted market prices are not available, we estimate the fair value of derivative financial instruments using industry standard valuation models.  When applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market observable inputs, including interest rates and currency rates, among others. Also included in the determination of the fair value of the Company’s liability positions is the Company’s own credit risk, which has been classified as an unobservable input.

Many of the factors used in measuring fair value are outside the control of management, and these assumptions and estimates may change in future periods.  Changes in assumptions or estimates may materially affect the fair value measurement of derivative financial instruments.

Employee Benefits

We recognize liabilities in our balance sheet and expenses in our income statement to reflect our obligations related to our post-employment benefits (retirement plan and seniority premium). The amounts we recognize are determined on an actuarial basis that involve many estimates and accounts for these benefits in accordance with IFRS.

We use estimates in four specific areas that have a significant effect on these amounts: (a) the rate of return we assume our plans will achieve on its investments, (b) the rate of increase in salaries that we assume we will observe in future years, (c) the discount rate that we use to calculate the present value of our future obligations and (d) the expected rate of inflation. The assumptions we have applied are identified in Note 18 to our audited consolidated financial statements. These estimates are determined based on actuarial studies performed by independent experts using the projected unit credit method. The latest actuarial computation was prepared as of December 31, 2011. We review the estimates each year, and if we change them, our reported expense for post-employment benefits may increase or decrease according to market conditions.

Factors Affecting Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In recent years, our financial condition and results of operations have been significantly influenced by some or all of the following factors:

43

·the level of demand for tortillas, corn flour and wheat flour;

·the effects of government policies on imported and domestic corn prices in Mexico;

·the cost and availability of corn and wheat;

·the cost of energy and other related products;

·our acquisitions, plant expansions and divestitures;

·the effect of government initiatives and policies, in particular on price controls and cost of grains in Venezuela; and

·the effect from variations on interest rates and exchange rates.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth our consolidated income statement data on an IFRS basis for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, expressed as a percentage of net sales.  All financial information has been prepared in accordance with IFRS.  For a description of the method, see “Presentation of Financial Information” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview of Accounting Presentation.”

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2011
Income Statement Data
Net sales	100	%	100	%
Cost of sales	68.3		69.6
Gross profit	31.7		30.4
Selling and administrative expenses	26.2		24.3
Other expenses, net	(1.1	)	(0.4	)
Operating income	4.4		5.8
Net comprehensive financing cost	(2.5	)	(0.7	)
Current and deferred income taxes	1.8		3.1
Other items	1.3		8.2
Non-controlling interest	0.4		0.9
Majority net income	0.9		9.1

The following table sets forth our net sales and operating income as represented by our principal subsidiaries for 2010 and 2011.  Net sales and operating income of our subsidiary PRODISA are part of “others and eliminations.”  Financial information with respect to GIMSA includes sales of Ps.419 million and Ps.587 million in 2010 and 2011, respectively, in corn flour to Gruma Corporation, Molinera de México, PRODISA and Gruma Centroamérica.  Financial information with respect to Molinera de México includes sales of Ps.231 million and Ps.277 million in 2010 and 2011, respectively, to GIMSA, Gruma Corporation and PRODISA; financial information with respect to PRODISA includes sales of Ps.97 million and Ps.114 million in 2010 and 2011, respectively, in tortilla related products to Gruma Corporation.

Financial information with respect to INTASA includes sales of, Ps.609 million and Ps.727 million in 2010 and 2011, respectively, in technological support to certain subsidiaries of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. In the process of consolidation, all the aforementioned intercompany transactions are eliminated from the financial statements.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010					2011
	Net Sales		Operating Income			Net Sales		Operating Income
	(in millions of pesos)
Gruma Corporation	Ps.	21,451	Ps.	1,303		Ps.	23,923	Ps.	947
GIMSA	11,853		1,147			15,386		1,771
Gruma Venezuela	5,382		(26		)	9,157		674
Molinera de México	3,757		72			4,633		104
Gruma Centroamérica	2,765		(73		)	3,180		(46		)
Others and eliminations	1,024		(373		)	1,366		(112		)
Total	Ps.	46,232	Ps.	2,050		Ps.	57,645	Ps.	3,338

44

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2010

Consolidated Results

GRUMA’s sales volume increased by 5% to 4,740 thousand metric tons compared with 4,526 thousand metric tons in 2010. This increase was driven mainly by Gruma Corporation and GIMSA. Net sales increased by 25% to Ps.57,645 million compared with Ps.46,232 million in 2010. The increase was due primarily to higher net sales at Gruma Venezuela, GIMSA, and Gruma Corporation, associated with price increases, sales volume growth, and the inflation effect in Venezuela. Sales from non-Mexican operations constituted 66% of consolidated net sales in 2011 and 2010.

Net Sales by Subsidiary:  By major subsidiary, the percentages of consolidated net sales in 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

	Percentage of Consolidated Net Sales
Subsidiary	2011		2010
Gruma Corporation	42	%	46	%
GIMSA	27		26
Gruma Venezuela	16		12
Molinera de México	8		8
Gruma Centroamérica	6		6
Others and eliminations	1		2

Cost of sales increased by 27% to Ps. 40,118 million compared with Ps.31,563 million in 2010, due primarily to higher cost of sales at Gruma Venezuela, GIMSA, and Gruma Corporation associated with higher raw-material costs, sales volume growth, and the inflation effect in Gruma Venezuela. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales increased to 69.6% from 68.3% in 2010 due primarily to Gruma Corporation, as raw-material cost increases were not fully reflected in our prices.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) increased by 16% to Ps. 13,984 million compared with Ps.12,100 million in 2010, due primarily to higher SG&A at Other and Eliminations and Gruma Corporation and, to a lesser extent, Gruma Venezuela and GIMSA. SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 24.3% from 26.2% in 2010, driven mainly by better expense absorption at Gruma Venezuela and, to a lesser extent, GIMSA and Gruma Corporation.

Other expenses, net, were Ps. 204 million compared with Ps.519 million in 2010. The decrease is a result of a one-time charge during 2010 related to the expropriation procedure of our operations in Venezuela, which the company did not have during 2011.

GRUMA’s operating income increased by 63% to Ps.3,338 million compared with Ps.2,050 in 2010, and operating margin improved to 5.8% from 4.4% in 2010, due primarily to Gruma Venezuela, Other and Eliminations and, to a lesser extent, GIMSA.

Net comprehensive financing cost was Ps. 427 million compared with Ps.1,163 million in 2010. The decrease resulted mainly from lower financial expenses in connection with GRUMA’s debt reduction and better interest rates achieved during 2011, and gains on foreign-exchange-rate hedging related to corn procurement. See

45

“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness,” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Liquidity and Capital Resources—Market Risk.”

GRUMA’s equity in earnings of associated companies, net, primarily from GFNorte, represented income of Ps. 4,711 million in 2011 compared with income of Ps.592 million in 2010 primarily derived from the gain on the sale of GRUMA’s stake in GFNorte during February 2011.

Taxes increased 115% to Ps.1,807 million compared with Ps.840 million in 2010 primarily as a result of higher pre-tax income.

GRUMA’s net income was Ps.5,816 million compared with Ps.639 million in 2010. Majority net income was Ps. 5,271 million compared with Ps.432 million in 2010. Both improvements were caused mainly by the gain on the sale of GRUMA’s stake in GFNorte.

Subsidiary Results

Gruma Corporation

Sales volume increased 6% to 1,478 thousand metric tons compared with 1,395 thousand metric tons in 2010. This increase was due mainly to several acquisitions made throughout the year, the one-time effect of one more week of operations during 2011, which occurs every five-to-six years according to Gruma Corporation’s fiscal year-end accounting closings; and organic growth at the European operations.

Net sales increased by 12% to Ps. 23,923 million, compared with Ps.21,451 million in 2010. The increase was driven mostly by the aforementioned sales volume growth coupled with price increases implemented during 2011 in connection with higher raw-material costs.

Cost of sales increased by 16% to Ps. 15,452 million compared with Ps.13,302 million in 2010 due to higher raw-material cost (corn, wheat, and oil) and sales volume growth. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales increased to 64.6% from 62.0% because the aforementioned higher raw-material costs were not fully reflected in our prices.

SG&A increased by 9% to Ps. 7,435 million compared with Ps.6,829 million in 2010 due to sales volume growth, higher sales commissions related to price increases, and higher promotion and advertising expenses . SG&A as a percentage of net sales improved to 31.1% from 31.8% in 2010 in connection with better expense absorption.

Operating income decreased by 27% to Ps. 947 million from Ps.1,303 million in 2010, and operating margin declined to 4% from 6.1%.

GIMSA

Sales volume increased by 4% to 1,959 thousand metric tons compared with 1,890 thousand metric tons in 2010. The increase was a result of the growth in the supermarket segment associated with their organic growth,  market-share gains in the snack producers segment, and customers’ build-up of corn flour inventories at the end of 2011 in anticipation of price increases.

Net sales increased by 30% to Ps. 15,386 million compared with Ps.11,853 million in 2010. The increase was due mainly to price increases and, to a lesser extent, the aforementioned sales volume growth and a non-recurring sale of corn for Ps.574 million.

Cost of sales increased by 30% to Ps. 11,284 million compared with Ps.8,648 million in 2010 due to higher corn costs and, to a lesser extent, the cost of the aforementioned non-recurring sale of corn during 2011 and the sales volume growth. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales increased slightly to 73.3% from 73.0% due to the non- recurring sale of corn which had no margin contribution For a discussion of the discontinuation of Mexican government price supports, please see “Mexican Regulation——Corn Flour Consumer Aid Program.”

SG&A increased by 15% to Ps. 2,286 million compared with Ps.1,981 million in 2010. The increase resulted mainly from the continued strengthening of several programs aimed at attracting traditional tortilla makers,

46

higher promotion and advertising expenses and, to a lesser extent, higher freight expenses coming from capacity constraints at some plants and from increased sales to supermarkets and snack producers (as for transactions with these customers we usually pay freight expenses). SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 14.9% from 16.7% in 2010 due to better expense absorption.

Operating income increased by 54% to Ps. 1,771 million from Ps.1,147 million in 2010, and operating margin increased to 11.5% from 9.7%.

Gruma Venezuela

Sales volume increased 1% to 528 thousand metric tons compared with 523 thousand metric tons in 2010 due to production efficiencies at some plants, which allowed us to expand distribution in certain channels.

Net sales increased by 70% to Ps. 9,157 million compared with Ps.5,382 million in 2010. The increase was due mainly to the inflation effect and price increases and, to a lesser extent, the devaluation of the Mexican Peso and the aforementioned sales volume growth.

Cost of sales increased by 67% to Ps. 6,747 million from Ps.4,047 million in 2010. This increase was primarily due to the inflation effect and higher cost of raw materials (corn and wheat), salary increases and larger benefits for manufacturing employees and, to a lesser extent, the devaluation of the Mexican Peso and the aforementioned sales volume growth. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales decreased to 73.7% from 75.2% due mainly to a better cost absorption as a result of the aforementioned.

SG&A increased by 30% to Ps. 1,736 million compared with Ps.1,335 million in 2010. The increase was due primarily to the inflation effect and, to a lesser extent, the devaluation of the Mexican Peso. SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 19% from 24.8% due to a better expenses absorption.

Operating income increased to Ps. 674 million compared with an operating loss of Ps.26 million in 2010, and operating margin improved to 7.4% from negative 0.5%.

Molinera de México

Sales volume increased by 7% to 564 thousand metric tons compared with 530 thousand metric tons in 2010. This increase was driven by regional pricing strategies, increased market coverage and strengthening of commercial programs, higher demand for pre-mixed flours by the supermarkets, and introduction of new products to the foodservice segment.

Net sales increased by 23% to Ps. 4,633 million compared with Ps.3,757 million in 2010. The increase resulted from higher prices to reflect higher cost of wheat and, to a lesser extent, from the sales volume growth.

Cost of sales increased by 26% to Ps. 3,894 million compared with Ps.3,095 million in 2010 in connection with these higher wheat costs and volume growth . As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales increased to 84% from 82.4% due to higher wheat costs, which were not fully reflected in our prices.

SG&A increased by 9% to Ps. 631 million compared with Ps.578 million in 2010. The increase was due to the ongoing programs oriented towards the aforementioned market coverage expansion and better customer service, higher freight expenses in connection with sales volume growth, and higher intercompany shipments due to capacity constraints at some plants. SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 13.6% from 15.4% in 2010 due to a better expense absorption.

Operating income increased by 45% to Ps. 104 million from Ps.72 million in 2010, and operating margin increased to 2.2% from 1.9%.

Gruma Centroamérica

Sales volume increased by 14% to 229 thousand metric tons compared with 201 thousand metric tons in 2010. The increase was due mainly to shortage of corn within the region due to bad weather conditions, which

47

affected corn crops, the elimination of the subsidy for natural gas in El Salvador by mid-2011, which encouraged the conversion from the traditional method of making tortillas to the corn flour method, and aggressive promotions and advertising campaigns.

Net sales increased by 15% to Ps. 3,180 million from Ps.2,765 million in 2010. The increase was due mainly to the aforementioned sales volume growth.

Cost of sales increased by 17% to Ps. 2,368 million compared with Ps.2,022 million in 2010, due mainly to the sales volume growth, as well as higher corn and energy costs. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales increased to 74.5% from 73.1% due to these cost increases, which was not fully reflected in our prices.

SG&A increased by 5% to Ps.858 million compared with Ps.816 million in 2010, due to sales volume growth, higher promotion and advertising, salary increases, and higher freight tariffs in connection with higher fuel costs. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A declined to 27% from 29.5% in 2010 due to a better expense absorption.

Operating loss was Ps. 46 million compared with a loss of Ps.73 million in 2010, and operating margin improved to negative 1.5% from negative 2.6%.

48

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We fund our liquidity and capital resource requirements, in the ordinary course of business, through a variety of sources, including:

·cash generated from operations;

·uncommitted short-term and long-term lines of credit;

·occasional offerings of medium- and long-term debt; and

·sales of our equity securities and those of our subsidiaries and affiliates from time to time.

Extreme exchange rate volatility in the financial markets during the last two quarters of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 resulted in significant fluctuations in the mark-to-market value of GRUMA’s foreign exchange derivative instruments, which in turn resulted in downgrades in our debt ratings.  As of October 28, 2008, GRUMA’s foreign exchange derivative instruments represented an aggregate negative mark-to-market non-cash unrealized loss of U.S.$788 million.  On November 12, 2008 we entered into a loan agreement with Bancomext in the amount of Ps.3,367 million and applied the proceeds to terminate our commitments arising under all the currency derivative instruments that we had entered into with one of our derivative counterparties and to pay other commitments arising under the currency derivative instruments maturing from the date of such loan agreement with Bancomext (the “2008 Bancomext Peso Facility”).

In addition, we entered into agreements on October 16, 2009 with our remaining derivative counterparties to convert a total of U.S.$738.3 million dollars owing under our terminated foreign exchange derivative instruments into medium- and long-term loans. On February 18, 2011, GRUMA made an early payment of outstanding balances of such bank facilities.  The total amounts of the payments made were U.S.$752.6 million and Ps.773.3 million, payments for which GRUMA used the entirety of the net proceeds from the GFNorte Sale, which totaled Ps.9,005.5 million after fees and expenses, as well as its own resources and others obtained through short-term facilities. As a result of these early payments the aforementioned agreements with our derivative counterparties were terminated.

The reduction in our credit rating and the liquidity scarcity experienced in the global financial markets resulted in a reduction in our ability to issue new debt and reduced the availability of our uncommitted short-term lines of credit during most of 2009.  However, since the significant debt repayment on February 18, 2011 and the rating upgrades by Fitch and Standard & Poor’s, our ability to access credit lines has improved. See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Outstanding Indebtedness.”

On June 16, 2011, we concluded a series of transactions to refinance and terminate our obligations under the 2008 Bancomext Peso Facility. As a result, we entered into the Syndicated Loan Facility, the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility, the Rabobank Loan Facility and the 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility (as defined below). The proceeds of these transactions as well as proceeds from uncommitted short term lines of credit were applied to make an early payment on the outstanding balance of the 2008 Bancomext Peso Facility in the amount of Ps.3,367 million. Additionally, on June 20, 2011 we refinanced and extended the Gruma Corporation Loan Facility.  See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Indebtedness” below for a description of our current principal debt instruments.

Our long-term corporate credit rating and our senior unsecured perpetual bond are rated BB by Standard & Poor’s.  Our Foreign Currency Long-Term Issuer Default Rating and our Local Currency Long-Term Issuer Default Rating are rated BB by Fitch.  Our U.S.$300 million perpetual bond is rated BB by Fitch Ratings. These ratings reflect the debt repayment made on February 18, 2011, after applying the net proceeds from the sale of GRUMA’s 8.8% stake in GFNorte.  The ratings in effect during 2009 and 2010, prior to the debt repayment on February 18, 2011, reflected additional leverage on GRUMA’s capital structure from the termination of GRUMA’s foreign exchange derivative positions and the subsequent conversion of the realized losses into debt.

If our financial condition deteriorates, we may experience future declines in our credit ratings, with attendant consequences.  Our access to external sources of financing, as well as the cost of that financing, has been and may continue to be adversely affected by a deterioration of our long-term debt ratings.  A downgrade in our

49

credit ratings may continue to increase the cost of and/or limit the availability of unsecured financing, which may make it more difficult for us to raise capital when necessary.  If we cannot obtain adequate capital on favorable terms, or at all, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected. However, management believes that its working capital and available external sources of financing are sufficient for our present requirements.

The following is a summary of the principal sources and uses of cash for the two years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011.

	2010			2011
	(thousands of Mexican pesos)
Resources provided by (used in):
Operating activities	Ps.	3,291,138		Ps.	1,751,314
Financing activities	(4,234,431		)	(7,429,059		)
Investing activities	(802,208		)	6,779,129

During 2011, net cash generated from operations was Ps.1,751 million after changes in working capital of Ps.3,611 million, of which Ps.1,422 million was due to an increase in accounts receivable, Ps.3,063 million reflected an increase in inventory and Ps. 1,624 million reflected an increase in accounts payable.  Net cash used by financing activities during 2011 was Ps.7,429 million, including Ps.21,374 million in borrowing payments related to derivative instruments, Ps.992 million in cash interest payments, Ps.523 million of dividends paid to minority shareholders of GIMSA and Ps.156 million in cash receipts in respect of derivative instruments.  Cash used for investment activities during 2011 reflected cash expenditures for Ps.6,779 of which Ps. 1,632 were applied to general manufacturing upgrades and efficiency improvements in our subsidiaries in the U.S. and, to a lesser extent, in our subsidiaries in Mexico and Europe, Ps.709 million for the acquisitions in the U.S. and Europe, and Ps. 9,004 for the sale of our stake in GFNorte. As of December 31, 2010 and 2011, there were no significant restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries of the Company, as defined by Rule 4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X.

Factors that could decrease our sources of liquidity include a significant decrease in the demand for, or price of, our products, each of which could limit the amount of cash generated from operations, and a lowering of our corporate credit rating or any other credit downgrade, which could impair our liquidity and increase our costs with respect to new debt and cause our stock price to suffer.  Our liquidity is also affected by factors such as the depreciation or appreciation of the peso and changes in interest rates.  See “Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Indebtedness.”

As further described below, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. is subject to financial covenants contained in its debt agreements which require it to maintain certain financial ratios and balances on a consolidated basis, among other limitations.  Gruma Corporation is also subject to financial covenants contained in one of its debt agreements which require it to maintain certain financial ratios and balances on a consolidated basis.  A default under any of our existing debt obligations for borrowed money could result in acceleration of the due dates for payment of the amounts owing thereunder and, in certain cases, in a cross-default under some of our existing credit agreements and the indenture governing our perpetual bonds.  See “Item 10. Additional Information—Material Contracts.”

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries are required to maintain a leverage ratio no greater than 3.5:1, and an interest coverage ratio no lower than 2.5:1.  As of March 31, 2012, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.’s leverage ratio was 2.5:1, and the interest coverage ratio was 5.9:1.  The amount of interest that Gruma Corporation pays on its debt may increase if its overall leverage ratio increases above 1.0:1.  See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Indebtedness.”  As of March 31, 2012, Gruma Corporation’s leverage ratio was 1.2:1, therefore the applicable interest rate range under the Gruma Corporation Loan Facility is LIBOR + 150 bp.

Mr. González Barrera has pledged part of his shares in our company to secure some of his borrowings.  If there is a default and the lenders enforce their rights against any or all of these shares, Mr. González Barrera and his family could lose control over us and a change of control could result.  This could trigger a default in some of our credit agreements and the indenture governing our perpetual bonds which have an aggregate principal amount outstanding as of March 31, 2012 of U.S.$715 million and have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.  For more information about this pledge, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”

50

Indebtedness

Our indebtedness bears interest at fixed and floating rates.  As of March 31, 2012, approximately 29% of our outstanding indebtedness bore interest at fixed rates and approximately 71% bore interest at floating rates, with almost all U.S. dollar and Mexican peso floating-rate indebtedness bearing interest based on LIBOR and TIIE, respectively.  From time to time, we partially hedge both our interest rate exposure and our foreign exchange rate exposure as discussed below.  For more information about our interest rate and foreign exchange rate exposures, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

Outstanding Indebtedness

As of March 31, 2012, we had total outstanding long-term debt aggregating approximately Ps.11,541 million (approximately U.S.$901 million).  Approximately 84% of our long-term debt at such date was dollar-denominated, and 16% denominated in Mexican Pesos.

Perpetual Bonds

On December 3, 2004, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. issued U.S.$300 million 7.75% senior unsecured perpetual bonds, which at the time were rated BBB- by Standard & Poor’s Ratings and by Fitch Ratings.  The bonds which have no fixed final maturity date, have a call option exercisable by GRUMA at any time beginning five years after the issue date.  In connection with our refinancing under the Term Loan, the Three-Year Term Loans, the BNP Term Loan and the Refinanced 2005 Facility, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. entered into a supplemental indenture on October 21, 2009 that provided holders of our perpetual bonds with an equal and ratable security interest in certain of our subsidiaries (the “Pledged Shares”).  Due to the early payment of the outstanding balances of several of our current bank facilities using proceeds from the GFNorte Sale, cash and short-term lines of credit, the security interests in the Pledged Shares have been released.  As of December 31, 2011 we have not hedged any interest payments on our U.S.$300 million 7.75% senior unsecured perpetual bonds.

Gruma Corporation

In October 2006, Gruma Corporation entered into a U.S.$100 million 5-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, which was refinanced and extended on June 20, 2011 to U.S.$200 million for an additional 5-year term (the “Gruma Corporation Loan Facility”).  The facility, as refinanced in 2011, has an interest rate based on LIBOR plus a spread of 1.375% to 2% that fluctuates in relation to Gruma Corporations’ leverage and contains less restrictive provisions than those in the facility replaced.  This facility contains covenants that limit Gruma Corporation’s ability to merge or consolidate, and require it to maintain a ratio of total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA of not more than 3.0:1.  In addition, this facility limits Gruma Corporation’s, and certain of its subsidiaries’ ability, among other things, to create liens; make certain investments; make certain restricted payments; enter into any agreements that prohibit the payment of dividends; and engage in transactions with affiliates.  This facility also limits Gruma Corporation’s subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional debt.

Gruma Corporation is also subject to covenants which limit the amounts that may be advanced to, loaned to, or invested in us under certain circumstances.  Upon the occurrence of any default or event of default under its credit agreements, Gruma Corporation generally would be prohibited from making any cash dividend payments to us.  The covenants described above and other covenants could limit our and Gruma Corporation’s ability to help support our liquidity and capital resource requirements

Syndicated Loan Facility

On March 22, 2011 we obtained a U.S.$225 million, five-year senior credit facility through a syndicate of banks (the “Syndicated Loan Facility”).  The Syndicated Loan Facility consists of a term loan (“Term Loan Facility”) and a revolving loan facility (the “Revolving Loan Facility”).  The interest rate for the Term Loan Facility and for the Revolving Loan Facility is either (i) LIBOR or (ii) an interest rate determined by the administrative agent based on its “prime rate” or the federal funds rate, respectively, plus, in either case, (a) 2.25% if the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA (the “Maximum Leverage Ratio”) is greater than or equal to 3.0x, (b) 2.0% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.5x and less than 3.0x, (c) 1.75% if the

51

Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.0x and less than 2.5x and (d) 1.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is less than 2.0x.  The Syndicated Loan Facility contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and a Maximum Leverage Ratio of not more than 3.5:1.  The Syndicated Loan Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Syndicated Loan Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Peso Syndicated Loan Facility

On June 15, 2011 we obtained a Ps.1,200 million, seven-year senior credit facility through a syndicate of banks (the “Peso Syndicated Loan Facility”).  The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility consists of a term loan maturing in June 2018 with yearly principal amortizations beginning on December 2015,  at an interest rate of 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 137.5 and 225 basis points based on the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA. The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and to maintain a Maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 3.5:1.  The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Rabobank Loan Facility

On June 15, 2011 we obtained a U.S.$50 million, five-year senior credit facility from Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (the “Rabobank Loan Facility”).  The Rabobank Loan Facility consists of a revolving loan facility, at in interest rate of LIBOR plus (a) 2.25% if the Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.0x, (b) 2.0% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.5x and less than 3.0x, (c) 1.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.0x and less than 2.5x and (d) 1.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is less than 2.0x.  The Rabobank Loan Facility contains covenants that requires the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and a Maximum Leverage Ratio of not more than 3.5:1.  The Rabobank Loan Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to:  create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Rabobank Loan Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

2011 Bancomext Peso Facility

On June 16, 2011 we obtained a Ps.600 million, seven-year senior credit facility from Bancomext (Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior) (the “2011 Bancomext Peso Facility”).  The 2011Bancomext Peso Facility consists of a term loan maturing in June 2018 at an interest rate of 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 137.5 and 225 basis points based on the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA. The 2011Bancomext Peso Facility contains a covenant that requires us to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1 as well as a covenant that requires us to maintain a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 3.5:1. The 2011Bancomext Peso Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases to create liens.

Other Information

As of December 31, 2011 we were in compliance with all of the covenants and obligations under our existing debt agreements.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had committed lines of credit for the amount of U.S.$325 million from banks in Mexico and the United States of which we have drawn U.S.$306 million dollars.

52

As of March 31, 2012, we had total cash and cash equivalents of Ps.1,292 million.

The following table presents our amortization requirements with respect to our total indebtedness as of March 31, 2012.

Year	In Millions of U.S. Dollars
2012	117
2013	14
2014	26
2015	32
2016	420
2017 and thereafter	419
Total	1,028

The following table sets forth our ratios of consolidated debt to total capitalization (i.e., consolidated debt plus total stockholders’ equity) and consolidated liabilities to total stockholders’ equity as of the dates indicated.  For purposes of these ratios, consolidated debt includes short-term debt.

Date	Ratio of Consolidated Debt to Total Capitalization	Ratio of Consolidated Liabilities to Total Stockholders’ Equity
December 31, 2010	0.63	2.63
December 31, 2011	0.43	1.51
March 31, 2012	0.43	1.50

Capital Expenditures

During 2010, capital expenditures of U.S.$89 million mostly applied to general manufacturing and technology upgrades in Gruma Corporation and GIMSA, and the acquisition of the leading producer of corn grits in Ukraine. During 2011, capital expenditures were U.S.$191 million, most of which were primarily applied to production capacity expansions, manufacturing and technology upgrades especially in the U.S. and, to a lesser extent, in Mexico and Europe. We also made several acquisitions throughout the year, including the leading producer of corn grits in Turkey, two tortilla plants in the U.S. and the leading tortilla manufacturer in Russia .

We have budgeted approximately U.S.$200 million for capital expenditures in 2012, which we intend to use mainly for production capacity expansions, general manufacturing and technology upgrades, especially in Gruma Corporation, GIMSA and Molinera de Mexico. We anticipate financing these expenditures throughout the year through internally generated funds and debt.  This capital expenditures budget does not include any potential acquisition.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Our regular operations expose us to potential defaults when our suppliers and counterparties are unable to comply with their financial or other commitments.  We seek to mitigate this risk by entering into transactions with a diverse pool of counterparties.  However, we continue to remain subject to unexpected third party financial failures that could disrupt our operations.

We are also exposed to risk in connection with our cash management activities and temporary investments, and any disruption that affects our financial intermediaries could also adversely affect our operations.

Our exposure to risk due to trade receivables is limited given the large number of our customers located in different parts of Mexico, the United States, Central America, Venezuela, Europe, Asia and Oceania.  However, we still maintain reserves for potential credit losses.  Our operations in Venezuela represented 16% of our sales and 14% of total assets as of December 31, 2011.  The severe political and economic situation in Venezuela presents a risk to our business that we cannot control and that cannot be accurately measured or estimated. For example, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and established a two tier exchange structure on January 11, 2010.  Pursuant to Exchange Agreement No.14, the official exchange rate of the Venezuelan bolivar (“Bs.”) was devalued

53

from Bs.2.15 to each U.S. dollar to Bs.4.30 for non-essential goods and services and to Bs.2.60 for essential goods.  However, effective January 4, 2011, the fixed exchange rate became 4.30 bolivars for all goods and services.

At this time, we cannot predict the effect that the Venezuelan government’s decision to devalue its currency, or similar decisions the government may take in the future, will have on our suppliers and counterparties. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela—Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risks.”

Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected since, among other reasons:  (i) 100% of the sales of our operations in Venezuela are denominated in bolivars; (ii) Gruma Venezuela produces products that are subject to price controls; (iii) part of Gruma Venezuela’s sales depend on centralized government procurement policies for its social welfare programs; (iv) we may have difficulties repatriating dividends from Gruma Venezuela, as well as importing some of its requirements for raw materials as a result of the exchange controls; and (v) Gruma Venezuela may face increasing costs in some of our raw materials due to the implementation of import tariffs.  In the case of some of our raw materials, we may also face increasing costs due to the implementation of import tariffs.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela—Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risk.”

From time to time, we enter into currency and other derivative transactions that cover varying periods of time and have varying pricing provisions.  Our credit exposure on derivatives contracts is primarily to professional counterparties in the financial sector, arising from transactions with banks, investment banks and other financial institutions.  As of March 31, 2012, the Company had foreign exchange derivative transactions in effect for a nominal amount of U.S.$378 million.  See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Interest Rate Risk.”

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss generated by fluctuations in market prices such as commodities, interest rates and foreign exchange rates.  These are the main market risks to which we are exposed.

During 2011, GIMSA entered into forward transactions in order to hedge the Mexican peso to U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate risk related to the price of the corn purchases for the summer and winter corn harvests in Mexico.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had foreign exchange derivative transactions in effect for a nominal amount of U.S.$378 million with different maturities from April through July 2012.  The purpose of these contracts was to hedge the risks related to exchange rate fluctuations on the price of corn and wheat, which is denominated in U.S. dollars.  See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Interest Rate Risk.”

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

We continuously engage in research and development activities that focus on, among other things:  increasing the efficiency of our proprietary corn flour and corn/wheat tortilla production technology; maintaining high product quality; developing new and improved products and manufacturing equipment; improving the shelf life of certain corn and wheat products; improving and expanding our information technology system; engineering, plant design and construction; and compliance with environmental regulations.  We have obtained 57 patents in the United States since 1968. Twenty of these patents are in force and effect in the United States as of the date hereof and the remaining 37 have expired.  We currently have five new patents in process, four in the United States and one in other countries.  Additionally, two of our registered patents are currently in the process of being published in other countries.

Our research and development is conducted through our subsidiaries INTASA, Tecnomaíz and CIASA.  Through Tecnomaíz, we engage in the design, manufacture and sale of machines for the production of corn/wheat tortillas and tortilla chips.  We carry out proprietary technological research and development for corn milling and tortilla production as well as all engineering, plant design and construction through INTASA and CIASA.  These companies administer and supervise the design and construction of our new plants and also provide advisory services and training to employees of our corn flour and tortilla manufacturing facilities.  We spent Ps.77 million and Ps. 91 million on research and development in 2010 and 2011, respectively.

54

TREND INFORMATION

Our financial results will likely continue to be influenced by factors such as changes in the level of consumer demand for tortillas and corn flour, government policies regarding the Mexican tortilla and corn flour industry, and the cost of corn, wheat and wheat flour.  In addition, we expect our financial results in 2012 to be influenced by:

·volatility in corn and wheat prices;

·increased competition from tortilla manufacturers, especially in the U.S.;

·increase or decrease in the Hispanic population in the United States;

·increases in Mexican food consumption by the non-Hispanic population in the United States; as well as projected increases in Mexican food consumption and use of tortillas in non-Mexican cuisine as tortillas continue to be assimilated into mainstream cuisine in the U.S., Europe, Asia and Oceania, each of which could increase sales;

·volatility in energy costs;

·increased competition in the corn flour business;

·exchange rate fluctuations, particularly increases and decreases in the value of the Mexican peso relative to the Venezuelan bolivar and U.S. dollar;

·civil and political unrest, currency devaluation and other governmental economic policies in Venezuela which may negatively affect the profitability of Gruma Venezuela;

·unfavorable general economic conditions in the United States and globally, such as the recession or economic slowdown, which could negatively affect the affordability of and consumer demand for some of our products; and

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of December 31, 2011 we do not have any outstanding off-balance sheet arrangements.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS

We have commitments under certain firm contractual arrangements to make future payments for goods and services.  These firm commitments secure the future rights to various assets to be used in the normal course of operations.  For example, we are contractually committed to making certain minimum lease payments for the use of property under operating lease agreements. The following table summarizes separately our material firm commitments at December 31, 2011 and the timing and effect that such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.  In February of 2011, we prepaid approximately U.S.$753 million and Ps.773 million of indebtedness.  In addition, the table reflects the timing of principal and interest payments on outstanding debt, which is discussed in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”  We expect to fund the firm commitments with operating cash flow generated in the normal course of business.

55

Contractual Obligations                 and Commercial Commitments	Total	Less than 1 Year	From 1 to 3 Years	From 3 to 5 Years	Over 5 Years
	(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Long-term debt obligations	822.3	—	28.8	402.7	390.8
Operating lease obligations(1)	194.7	44.7	58.1	34.4	57.5
Finance lease obligations	2.4	0.9	1.5	—	—
Purchase obligations(2)	606.9	606.9	—	—	—
Interest payments on our indebtedness (3)	261.5	46.8	81.9	76.1	56.7
Other liabilities(4)	117.1	117.1	—	—	—
Total	2,004.9	816.4	170.3	513.2	505.0
Total in millions of peso equivalent amounts	27,968.4	11,388.8	2,375.7	7,159.1	7,044.8

(1) Operating lease obligations primarily relate to minimum lease rental obligations for our real estate and operating equipment in various locations.

(2) Purchase obligations relate to our minimum commitments to purchase commodities, raw materials, machinery and equipment.

(3) In the determination of our future estimated interest payments on our floating rate denominated debt, we used the interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2011.

(4) Other relates to liabilities for short-term bank loans and the current portion of long-term debt.

ITEM 6Directors, Senior Management and Employees.

MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Our management is vested in our board of directors.  Our day to day operations are handled by our executive officers.

Our bylaws require that our board of directors be composed of a minimum of five and a maximum of twenty-one directors, as decided at our Ordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting.  Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Law, at least 25% of the members of the board of directors must be independent.  Under our bylaws and the Archer-Daniels-Midland association, as long as Archer-Daniels-Midland owns at least 20% of our capital stock, it will have the right to designate two of our directors and their corresponding alternates.  Archer-Daniels-Midland has designated Federico Gorbea, President and Chief Operating Officer of Archer-Daniels-Midland’s operations in Mexico, and Mark Kolkhorst, Corporate Vice President of Archer-Daniels-Midland and President of Archer-Daniels-Midland’s Cocoa and Milling divisions, as members of our board of directors.  Archer-Daniels-Midland has elected Ray G. Young, its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Vikram Luthar, its Group Vice President of Finance, to serve as alternates for Mr. Gorbea and Mr. Kolkhorst, respectively.  In addition, under Mexican law, any holder or group of holders representing 10% or more of our capital stock may elect one director and its corresponding alternate.

The board of directors, which was elected at the Ordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2012, currently consists of 17 directors, with each director having a corresponding alternate director.  The following table sets forth the current members of our board of directors, their ages, years of service, principal occupations, outside directorships, other business activities and experience, their directorship classifications as defined in the Code of Best Corporate Practices issued by a committee formed by the Consejo Coordinador Empresarial, or Mexican Entrepreneur Coordinating Board, and their alternates.  The terms of their directorships are for one year, or for up to thirty additional days if no designation of their substitute has been made or if the substitute has not taken office.

Roberto González Barrera	Age:	81
	Years as Director:	30
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board of GRUMA and GIMSA.
	Outside Directorships:	Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Grupo Financiero Banorte, Chairman of the Boards of Fundación GRUMA, Fundación Banorte and Patronato de Cerralvo, Director of Patronato del Hospital Infantil de México.
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Related
	Alternate:	Joel Suárez Aldana

56

Alejandro Barrientos Serrano	Age:	46
	Years as Director:	Since April 2012
	Principal Occupation:	Chief Financial Officer of GRUMA.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA.
	Business Experience:	President of the Mexico Office of BLADEX and CALYON, Senior Account Executive at Banco Nacional de México, and Senior Auditor at Ruiz, Urquiza & CIA.
	Directorship Type:	Related
	Alternate:	Homero Huerta Moreno
José de la Peña y Angelini	Age:	63
	Years as Director:	3
	Principal Occupation:	Chief Executive Officer of Corporativo Obama.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA.
	Business Experience:	President of the Mexico Office of FCB Worldwide, Chief Operating Officer of Chrysler de México, Executive Vice President Sales and Marketing of GRUMA, Chief Operating Officer of Gruma Latin America.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Mario Ernesto Medina Ramírez
Juan Diez-Canedo Ruiz	Age:	61
	Years as Director:	7
	Principal Occupation:	Chief Executive Officer of Financiera Local.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA.
	Business Experience:	Chief Executive Officer of Fomento y Desarrollo Comercial, Alternate Director of Grupo Financiero Banorte and Banco Mercantil del Norte, Chief Executive Officer of Cintra, Executive Vice President of GRUMA and Grupo Financiero Banorte, Banking Director of Grupo Financiero Probursa, Alternate Chief Executive Officer of Banco Internacional.
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Independent
	Alternate:	Felipe Diez-Canedo Ruiz
Bertha Alicia González Moreno	Age:	58
	Years as Director:	4
	Principal Occupation:	Honorary Life President of Patronato para el Fomento Educativo y Asistencial de Cerralvo.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of Grupo Financiero Banorte, Director of GIMSA, Centro Educativo Universitario Panamericano, Adanec, and Grafo Industrial.
	Business Experience:	Owner and Chief Executive Officer of Uniformes Profesionales de Monterrey and Comercializadora B.A.G.M., Majority Shareholder of Grupo Beryllium.
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Related
	Alternate:	Javier Morales González
Juan Antonio González Moreno	Age:	54
	Years as Director:	18
	Principal Occupation:	Chief Executive Officer of Gruma Asia and Oceania.
	Outside Directorships:	Alternate Director of Grupo Financiero Banorte, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Car Amigo USA.
	Business Experience:	Several positions in GRUMA, including Senior Vice President of Special Projects of Gruma Corporation, President of Azteca Milling, Vice President of Central and Eastern Regions of Mission Foods, President and Vice President of Sales of Azteca Milling, Chief Operating Officer of GIMSA.
	Directorship Type:	Related

57

	Alternate:	Alejandro Vazquez Salido
Federico Gorbea Quintero	Age:	48
	Years as Director:	5
	Principal Occupation:	President and General Manager of Archer Daniels Midland Mexico.
	Outside Directorships:	Chairman of the Board of Terminales de Carga Especializadas, Director of Asociación de Proveedores de Productos Agropecuarios de México.
	Business Experience:	President and General Manager of Compañía Continental de México.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Ray G. Young
Carlos Hank Rhon	Age:	64
	Years as Director:	18
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board of Grupo Financiero Interacciones, Grupo Hermes and Grupo Coin/La Nacional.
	Outside Directorships:	None.
	Business Experience:	Chairman of the Board of Laredo National Bancshares, Director of Banamex-Accival and Mexican Stock Exchange.
	Directorship Type:	Related
	Alternate:	Carlos Hank González
Mark Kolkhorst	Age:	48
	Years as Director:	1
	Principal Occupation:	Corporate Vice President of ADM and President of Cocoa and Milling divisions.
	Outside Directorships:	None.
	Business Experience:	President of Milling Division, President of Specialty Feed Ingredients, Vice President of Sales of Specialty Feed Ingredients, Vice President of ADM/GROWMARK and Tabor Grain.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Vikram Luthar
Mario Martín Laborín Gómez	Age:	60
	Years as Director:	3
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board of ABC Holding and Chief Executive Officer of ABC Holding and ABC Capital.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA, CYDSA, XIGNUX, and Megacable.
	Business Experience:	Chief Executive Officer of Bancomext, Nacional Financiera, Bancomer and Grupo Vector, Chairman of Casa de Bolsa Bancomer.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Alan Castellanos Carmona
Juan Manuel Ley López	Age:	79
	Years as Director:	18
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board of Casa Ley and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Ley.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of Grupo Financiero Banamex-Accival and Telmex.
	Business Experience:	Chief Executive Officer of Casa Ley, Chairman of the Board of the Latin American Association of Supermarkets, Sinaloa-Baja California Consultant Council of Grupo Financiero Banamex-Accival and National Association of Supermarket and Retail Stores.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Juan Manuel Ley Bastidas

58

Bernardo Quintana Isaac	Age:	70
	Years as Director:	17
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board of Empresas ICA.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of BANAMEX and CEMEX.
	Business Experience:	Chief Executive Officer of Empresas ICA.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Diego Quintana Kawage
Juan Antonio Quiroga García	Age:	62
	Years as Director:	12
	Principal Occupation:	Chief Corporate Officer of GRUMA.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA.
	Business Experience:	Vice President of Administration of Gruma Corporation, Chief Administrative and Internal Auditing Officer of GRUMA, Vice President of Operations Control of Gruma Corporation.
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Related
	Alternate:	Alejandro Cortina Gallardo
Alfonso Romo Garza	Age:	61
	Years as Director:	18
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Plenus.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of Synthetic Genomics, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, Agradis and J. Craig Venter Institute.
	Business Experience:	Investor in different industries and companies. He has been involved in the food and beverage, telecommunications, information technology, insurance and financial services, biotechnology, agriculture and real estate industries.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Adrián Rodríguez Macedo
Adrián Sada González	Age:	67
	Years as Director:	18
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board of Vitro.
	Outside Directorships:	Director of ALFA, CYDSA, Regio Empresas, Consejo Mexicano de Hombres de Negocios, and Grupo de Industriales de Nuevo León.
	Business Experience:	Chairman of the Board of Grupo Financiero Serfin, Chief Executive Officer of Banpais.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Manuel Güemes de la Vega
Alejandro Valenzuela del Río	Age:	50
	Years as Director:	Since April 2012
	Principal Occupation:	CEO of Grupo Financiero Banorte
	Outside Directorships:	Director of Grupo Financiero Banorte
	Business Experience:	Mexico’s Country Head of European Aeronautic, Defense and Space Company, and held several positions in the Ministry of Finance and Banco de México
	Directorship Type:	Related
	Alternate:	Sylvia Hernández Benítez
Javier Vélez Bautista	Age:	55
	Years as Director:	9
	Principal Occupation:	Managing Director of Value Link,
	Outside Directorships:	Chiapas Granjas Orgánicas and Financiamiento Progresemos,.
	Business Experience:	Chief Executive Officer of ValueLink, Chief Executive Officer of Nacional Monte de Piedad, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GRUMA, project director at Booz Allen Hamilton

59

Directorship Type:	Independent
Alternate:	Jorge Vélez Bautista

Ms. Bertha Alicia González Moreno and Mr. Juan Antonio González Moreno, members of our board of directors, are children of Mr. Roberto González Barrera, Chairman of our board of directors.  Mr. Carlos Hank Rhon, a member of our board of directors, is the son-in-law of Mr. Roberto González Barrera.  Mr. Carlos Hank González, an alternate member of our board of directors, is the son of Mr. Carlos Hank Rhon and the grandson of Mr. Roberto González Barrera.  Furthermore, Mr. Javier Morales González, an alternate member of our board of directors, is the son of Ms. Bertha Alicia González Moreno and the grandson of Mr. Roberto González Barrera.

Secretary

The secretary of the board of directors is Mr. Salvador Vargas Guajardo, and his alternate is Mr. Guillermo Elizondo Ríos.  Mr. Vargas Guajardo is not a member of the board of directors.

Senior Management

The following table sets forth our executive officers, their ages, years of service, current positions, and prior business experience:

Joel Suárez Aldana	Age:	59
	Years as Executive Officer:	Since February 2012
	Years at GRUMA:	24
	Current Position:	Chief Executive Officer.
	Business Experience:	Various positions within GRUMA including President and Chief Executive Officer of Gruma Corporation, Chief Financial Officer of Gruma Corporation, Chief Financial Officer of Mission Foods, and several senior management positions in the banking sector.
Alejandro Barrientos Serrano	Age:	46
	Years as Executive Officer:	1
	Years at GRUMA:	1
	Current Position:	Chief Financial Officer.
	Business Experience:	President of the Mexico Office of BLADEX and CALYON, Senior Account Executive at Banco Nacional de México, and Senior Auditor at Ruiz, Urquiza & CIA.
Raúl Cavazos Morales	Age:	52
	Years as Executive Officer:	1
	Years at GRUMA:	24
	Current Position:	Chief Treasury Officer.
	Business Experience:	Several finance positions within GRUMA, including Vice President of Corporate Treasury.
Nicolás Constantino Coppola	Age:	64
	Years as Executive Officer:	6
	Years at GRUMA:	12
	Current Position:	Chief Executive Officer, Gruma Venezuela.
	Business Experience:	Vice President Sales and Exports and National Commercialization Manager of the Beverage Division of the Polar’s Group, Director of Sales for the Reynolds Company, National Manager of Sales for Warner Lambert of Venezuela and for the Aliven Company (Best Foods).
Alejandro Cortina Gallardo	Age:	41
	Years as Executive Officer:	1
	Years at GRUMA:	8
	Current Position:	Chief Strategic Planning Officer.

60

	Business Experience:	Finance and Strategic Planning Officer for Marrakech Ltd., International Commerce Officer for Market Access Negotiations for the Ministry of Trade and Development (SECOFI).
Leonel Garza Ramírez	Age:	62
	Years as Executive Officer:	13
	Years at GRUMA:	26
	Current Position:	Chief Procurement Officer.
	Business Experience:	Manager of Quality and Corn Procurement and Vice President of Corn Procurement at GRUMA, Chief Procurement Officer at GAMESA, Quality Control and Research and Development Manager at Kellogg de México.
Roberto Jorge González Alcalá	Age:	48
	Years as Executive Officer:	17
	Years at GRUMA:	17
	Current Position:	Chief Executive Officer, Gruma Mexico and Latin America.
	Business Experience:	Chief Executive Officer of GIMSA.  Several positions within GRUMA’s Central American operations, including Chief Operating Officer, President of the Tortilla Division in Costa Rica, President of the Corn Division in Central America.
Juan Antonio González Moreno	Age:	54
	Years as Executive Officer:	8
	Years at GRUMA:	32
	Current Position:	Chief Executive Officer, Gruma Asia and Oceania.
	Business Experience:	Senior Vice President of Special Projects of Gruma Corporation, President of Azteca Milling, Vice President of Central and Eastern Regions of Mission Foods, President and Vice President of Sales of Azteca Milling, Chief Operating Officer of GIMSA.
Sylvia Elisa Hernández Benítez	Age:	47
	Years as Executive Officer:	9
	Years at GRUMA:	9
	Current Position:	Chief Marketing Officer.
	Business Experience:	Senior Vice President of Marketing for Gruma Latin America, Executive Vice President at FCB Worldwide, different positions at Chrysler de México, including General Marketing Manager, Marketing Manager for automobiles, Brand Manager for imported automobiles and MOPAR brand coordinator.
Homero Huerta Moreno	Age:	49
	Years as Executive Officer:	10
	Years at GRUMA:	27
	Current Position:	Chief Administrative Officer.
	Business Experience:	Various positions within GRUMA including Finance and Administrative Vice President of Gruma Venezuela.
José Antonio Jaikel Aguilar	Age:	45
	Years as Executive Officer:	Since July 2011
	Years at GRUMA:	14
	Current Position:	Chief Executive Officer, Gruma Centroamérica.
	Business Experience:	Several positions within GRUMA including Commercial VP of Gruma Mexico, Operations VP of GRUMA’s tortilla division in Mexico.
Heinz Kollmann	Age:	42
	Years as Executive Officer:	6
	Years at GRUMA:	6

61

	Current Position:	Chief Technology Officer, Wheat Flour Production.
	Business Experience:	Technical Officer of MAISCAM in Camerun, Head miller for BUHLER in Uzwil, Switzerland, Responsible Technician for Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Peru and Bolivia for BUHLER in its Buenos Aires branch office, Production Manager and Special Project Manager for GRAMOVEN/ CARGILL in Venezuela, Production Manager and Special Project Manager for Harinera La Espiga in Mexico.
Juan Antonio Quiroga García	Age:	62
	Years as Executive Officer:	14
	Years at GRUMA:	39
	Current Position:	Chief Corporate Officer.
	Other Positions:	Senior Corporate Controller of GIMSA, Director of GIMSA.
	Business Experience:	Vice President of Administration of Gruma Corporation, Chief Administrative and Internal Auditing Officer of GRUMA, Vice President of Operations Control of Gruma Corporation.
Felipe Antonio Rubio Lamas	Age:	54
	Years as Executive Officer:	10
	Years at GRUMA:	29
	Current Position:	Chief Technology Officer, Corn Flour and Tortilla Production.
	Business Experience:	Several managerial and Senior Vice President positions within Gruma Corporation related to manufacturing processes, engineering, design, and construction of production facilities.
Salvador Vargas Guajardo	Age:	59
	Years as Executive Officer:	15
	Years at GRUMA:	15
	Current Position:	General Counsel.
	Other Positions:	General Counsel of GIMSA.
	Business Experience:	Positions at Grupo Alfa, Protexa and Proeza, Senior Partner of two law firms, including Margáin-Rojas-González-Vargas-De la Garza y Asociados.
David Camilo Vargas Zepeda	Age:	49
	Years as Executive Officer:	Since September 2011
	Years at GRUMA:	Since September 2011
	Current Position:	Chief Human Resources Officer.
	Business Experience:	Several executive positions in HSBC and Bolsa Mexicana de Valores related to human resources.
Alejandro Vázquez Salido	Age:	41
	Years as Executive Officer:	Since April 2012
	Years at GRUMA:	Since April 2012
	Current Position:	Chief Communication and Image Officer.
	Business Experience:	Deputy Officer of Government Relations in Banorte.
Francisco Yong García	Age:	38
	Years as Executive Officer:	2
	Years at GRUMA:	15
	Current Position:	Chief Executive Officer, Gruma Europe.
	Business Experience:	Several managerial and Vice President positions within Gruma Corporation related to Finance and Administration in the United States and Europe.

Mr. Roberto Jorge González Alcalá, Chief Executive Officer of Gruma Mexico and Latin America, and Mr. Juan Antonio González Moreno, Chief Executive Officer of Gruma Asia and Oceania, are sons of Mr. Roberto

62

González Barrera, Chairman of our board of directors.  Mr. Homero Huerta Moreno, our Chief Administrative Officer, is the cousin of Mr. Juan Antonio González Moreno and Ms. Bertha Alicia González Moreno, members of our board of directors.

Audit and Corporate Governance Committees

As required by the Mexican Securities Law, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and our bylaws, an audit committee and a corporate governance committee were appointed by the meeting of the board of directors held on April 25, 2012.  Members of the audit and corporate governance committees were selected from members of the board of directors.  Consequently, as required by the Mexican Securities Law and our bylaws, a chairman for each committee was elected by the General Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2012, from among the members appointed by the board.

The current audit and corporate governance committees are comprised of three members, all of whom are independent directors.  Set forth below are the names of our audit and corporate governance committees members, their positions within the committees, and their directorship type:

Juan Diez-Canedo Ruiz	Position:	Chairman of the audit and corporate governance committees.
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Independent
Mario Martín Laborín Gómez	Position:	Financial Expert of the audit and corporate governance committees.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
José de la Peña y Angelini	Position:	Member of the audit and corporate governance committees.
	Directorship Type:	Independent

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Members of the board of directors are paid a fee of Ps.80,000 for each board meeting they attend.  Additionally, members of the audit and corporate governance committees are paid a fee of Ps.40,000 for each committee meeting they attend.

For 2011, the aggregate amount of compensation paid to all directors, alternate directors, executive officers and audit and corporate governance committees members was approximately Ps.207 million.  The contingent or deferred compensation reserved as of December 31, 2011 was Ps.50 million.

We offer an Executive Bonus Plan that applies to managers, vice presidents, and executive officers.  The variable compensation under this plan can range from 20% to 100% of annual base compensation, depending upon the employee’s level, his individual performance and the results of our operations.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2011, we had a total of 21,318 employees, including 13,224 unionized and 8,094 non-unionized full- and part-time employees.  Of this total, we employed 7,824 persons in Mexico, 6,868 in the United States, 2,045 in Central America, 2,462 in Venezuela, 796 in Asia & Oceania, and 1,323 in Europe.  Total employees for 2009 and 2010 were 19,093 and 19,825, respectively.  Of our total employees as of December 31, 2011, approximately 38% were white-collar and 62% were blue collar.

In Mexico, workers at each of our plants are covered by a separate contract, under which salary revisions take place once each year, usually in January or February.  Non-salary provisions of these contracts are revised bi-annually.  We renewed agreements with the three unions that represent our workers in 2012.

In the United States, Gruma Corporation has five collective bargaining agreements that represent a total of 659 workers at five separate facilities (Pueblo, Tempe, Madera, Henderson and Omaha).  We renewed such agreements on April 25, 2010, March 27, 2011, July 1, 2009 and January 22, 2011, respectively, and have entered

63

into a new agreement in Omaha on April 10, 2012.

In England, we have one collective bargaining agreement covering 25 employees at a facility, which is renewed every 12 months.

In the Netherlands, we are covered by a national labor agreement for bakery workers. This agreement is reviewed every 6 - 24 months, depending on the term of the agreement.

In Australia, we have a collective bargaining agreement covering 102 employees at our facility, which is renewed every 3 years.

Wages are reviewed during the negotiations and wage increases processed according to the terms of each agreement as well as non-monetary provisions of the agreement.  Wage reviews for non-union employees are conducted once each year, typically in March for Mission Foods and depending on the non-union plant, wages reviews are conducted from June through October for Azteca Milling, L.P. We believe our current labor relations are good.

SHARE OWNERSHIP

The following Directors and Senior Managers have GRUMA shares which in each case represent less than 1% of our capital stock: Ms. Bertha Alicia González Moreno, Mr. Juan Diez-Canedo Ruiz, Mr. Joel Suárez Aldana, Mr. Juan Antonio Quiroga García, Mr. Leonel Garza Ramírez, Mr. Javier Morales González, and Mr. Alejandro Vázquez Salido.  In addition, Mr. Roberto González Barrera owns directly and indirectly 279,301,152 shares representing approximately 49.6% of our outstanding shares.

ITEM 7Major Shareholders And Related Party Transactions.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our capital stock as of April 26, 2012 (which consists entirely of Series B Shares) with respect to Mr. González Barrera and Archer-Daniels-Midland and its affiliates, the only shareholders we know to own beneficially more than 5% of our capital stock.  See “Item 9.  The Offer and Listing” for a further discussion of our capital stock.  With the exception of Archer-Daniels-Midland’s right to appoint two members of our board of directors, and their corresponding alternates, the major shareholders do not have different or preferential voting rights with respect to those shares they own.  As of April 26, 2012, our Series B shares were held by more than 442 record holders in Mexico.

Name	Number of Series B Shares		Percentage of Outstanding Shares
Roberto González Barrera and family (1)	282,131,752		50.05	%
Archer-Daniels-Midland (2)	130,901,630		23.22	%
Other shareholders (3)	150,617,327		26.73	%
Total	563,650,709	(4)	100	%

(1)  The shares beneficially owned by Mr. González Barrera and his family include:  249,275,356shares held indirectly by Mr. González Barrera through a trust controlled by him; 30,025,796 shares held indirectly by the aforementioned trust through a Mexican corporation jointly owned with Archer-Daniels-Midland and controlled by Mr. González Barrera; and 2,830,600 shares held by Ms. Bertha Alicia González Moreno.

(2)  Of the shares beneficially owned by Archer-Daniels-Midland, 2,630,716 are held by Archer-Daniels-Midland through its Mexican subsidiary, and 24,566,561 shares are held indirectly by Archer-Daniels-Midland through a Mexican corporation jointly owned with a trust controlled by Mr. González Barrera.  Mr. González Barrera has sole authority to determine how these 24,566,561 shares are voted, and the shares cannot be transferred without the consent of both Archer-Daniels-Midland and Mr. González Barrera.

(3)  This  includes the shares held by our directors and officers (other than Mr. Roberto González Barrera and Ms. Bertha González Moreno) which in each case represent less than 1% of our capital stock.

64

(4)  As of April 26, 2012, our capital stock was represented by 565,174,609 issued Series B, class I, no par value shares (“Series B shares”), of which 563,650,709 shares were outstanding, fully subscribed and paid, and 1,523,900 shares were held in our treasury.

Mr. González Barrera and his family control approximately 54.41% of our outstanding shares and therefore have the power to elect a majority of our 17 directors.  In addition, under Mexican law, any holder or group of holders representing 10% or more of our capital stock may elect one director.  Under our bylaws and the Archer-Daniels-Midland association, as long as Archer-Daniels-Midland owns at least 20% of our capital stock, it will have the right to designate two members of our board of directors and their corresponding alternates. As of April 26, 2012, Archer-Daniels-Midland, directly and indirectly, owned approximately 23.22% of our outstanding shares and controlled the right to vote approximately 18.87% of our outstanding shares. Under the terms of our agreement, Archer-Daniels-Midland may not, without the consent of Mr. Roberto González Barrera, the Chairman of our board of directors, acquire additional shares of us.

We have been informed that Mr. González Barrera has pledged or has been required to pledge part of his shares in us as collateral for loans made to him.  In the event of a default, should the lenders enforce their rights with respect to these shares, Mr. González Barrera and his family could lose their controlling interest in us.  In addition, Mr. González Barrera must give Archer-Daniels-Midland a right of first refusal on any sale of his GRUMA shares if at the time of the sale, he owns directly or indirectly, or as a result of the sale will own directly or indirectly, less than 30% of our outstanding shares.  Should Archer-Daniels-Midland exercise its right, then it could control us.  Archer-Daniels-Midland must also give Mr. González Barrera a right of first refusal on any sale of our shares.

We are not aware of any significant changes in the percentage of ownership of any shareholders which held 5% or more of our outstanding shares during the past three years.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The transactions set forth below were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Transactions with Subsidiaries

We periodically enter into short-term credit arrangements with our subsidiaries, where we provide them with funds for working capital at market interest rates.

At their peak on March 24, 2011, the outstanding balance of loans from GIMSA to GRUMA were Ps.2,835 million and U.S.$20 million.  The average interest rate for these loans for the years 2008 to 2011 was 8.8% for the loans in pesos and 3.86% for the loans in U.S. dollars. As of March 31, 2012, the outstanding balance of loans from GIMSA to Gruma was Ps.1,298 million, the average interest rate for this year up to March 31, 2012 was 5.52%.

In September of 2001, Gruma Corporation started to make loans to us which, at their peak on September 29, 2009, reached the amount of U.S.$100.0 million. We borrowed money from Gruma Corporation at an average rate of 1% from 2009 to 2011. As of March31, 2012 we have no outstanding balance owing to Gruma Corporation or vice versa. During 2011 we made loans to Gruma Corporation at an average interest rate of 1.75% and Gruma Corporation issued several promissory notes related to indebtedness originated by dividends payments owned to us at an average interest rate of 3.6% which were fully paid. As of December 31, 2011, Gruma Corporation had paid off the balance of these loans.

65

Transactions with Archer-Daniels-Midland

We entered into an association with Archer-Daniels-Midland in September 1996.  As a result of this association, (i) we received U.S.$258.0 million in cash, (ii) GRUMA and Archer-Daniels-Midland combined their U.S. corn flour operations under Azteca Milling, our wholly-owned U.S. corn flour operations, and, as a result, Archer-Daniels-Midland received a 20% partnership interest in Azteca Milling, and (iii) we received 60% of the capital stock of Molinera de México, Archer-Daniels-Midland’s wholly-owned Mexican wheat milling operations.  We also gained exclusivity rights from Archer-Daniels-Midland in specified corn flour and wheat flour markets.

In return, Archer-Daniels-Midland received 74,696,314 of our then newly issued shares, which represented approximately 22% of our total outstanding shares at that time, and 20% partnership interest in Azteca Milling, and retained 40% of the capital stock of Molinera de México.  Archer-Daniels-Midland also obtained the right to designate two of our 17 directors and their corresponding alternates.  In addition, Archer-Daniels-Midland acquired 5% of MONACA.  Archer-Daniels-Midland has designated Federico Gorbea, President and Chief Operating Officer of Archer-Daniels-Midland’s operations in México, and Mark Kolkhorst, Corporate Vice President of Archer-Daniels-Midland and President of Archer-Daniels-Midland’s Cocoa and Milling divisions, as members of our Board of Directors.  Archer-Daniels-Midland has elected Ray G. Young, its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Vikram Luthar, its Group Vice President of Finance, to serve as alternates for Mr. Gorbea and Mr. Kolkhorst, respectively.  As of April 26, 2011, Archer-Daniels-Midland, directly and indirectly, owned approximately 23.22% of our outstanding shares and controlled the right to vote approximately 18.87% of our outstanding shares.

During 2009, 2010 and 2011, we purchased U.S.$159 million, U.S.$97 million and U.S.$147 million, respectively, of inventory, including primarily wheat and corn, from Archer-Daniels-Midland Corporation, a shareholder, at market rates and terms.  For more information regarding these transactions, please see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Gruma Venezuela.”

Other Transactions

As of December 31, 2010, we held approximately 8.8% of the outstanding shares of GFNorte, a Mexican financial institution.  In the past, we obtained financing from GFNorte’s subsidiaries at market rates and terms.  For the past eight years, the highest outstanding loan amount has been Ps.600 million (in nominal terms) with an interest rate of 7.3% in June 2011.  In addition, we have insurance contracts in place with Seguros Banorte Generali, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of GFNorte, to manage certain risks associated with some of our subsidiaries.  In 2010 and 2011, we paid insurance premiums of approximately Ps.113,004 and Ps.110,239, respectively.

On February 15, 2011, we concluded the sale of all of our shares of GFNorte’s capital stock.  As a result of the sale, GRUMA no longer holds any stake in GFNorte.

For more information, please see Note 22 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 8Financial Information.

See “Item 18. Financial Statements.”  For information on our dividend policy, see “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Dividends.”  For information on legal proceedings related to us, see “—Legal Proceedings.”

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business, we are party to various legal proceedings, none of which has had or we reasonably expect will have a material adverse effect on us.

66

United States

Labor and Employment Related Claims.

On March 24, 2009, Guadalupe Arevalo, a former employee, filed a class action complaint for damages and equitable relief, currently being heard by the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, for an alleged: (1) failure to pay minimum or contractual wages, pay overtime, and provide accurate wage statements, in violation of the California Labor Code; (2) failure to pay wages due to former employees at the time of resignation and/or discharge; and (3) violation to certain provisions of the California Business and Professions Code.  On June 10, 2010, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint incorporating an additional cause of action for failure to provide meal periods as required by law.  The parties reached a court approved settlement on March 26, 2012 and the case has been dismissed.

Other Claims.

Mary Henderson brought a class action lawsuit against Gruma Corporation for (1) false advertising under the Lanham Act, (2) violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, (3) violations of California’s False Advertising Law, and (4) violations of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act. The complaint alleged that Gruma Corporation’s labeling of its guacamole flavored dip and spicy bean dip products is false and misleading. The complaint was subsequently amended to dismiss the Company under the Lanham Act claim.  The case was settled on November 21, 2011 for U.S.$3,000 and has been dismissed.

Mexico

Asset Tax Claim.

The Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público, or Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, has lodged tax assessments against our Company for an amount of Ps.34.3 million plus penalties, updates and charges, in connection with our asset tax returns for the year 1997.  The Company has filed several appeals to obtain an annulment of these assessments.

Income Tax Claim.

The Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público has lodged tax assessments against our company for the amount of Ps.93.5 million in connection with withholding on interest payments to our foreign creditors for the years 2000, 2001 and 2002.  Mexican authorities claim that our company should have withheld a higher rate than the 4.9% withheld by the Company.  We intend to defend against these claims vigorously.

We believe that the outcome of these claims will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

CNBV Investigation.

On December 8, 2009, the Surveillance Office of the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission, or CNBV) began an investigation into the Company in respect of the timely disclosure of material events reported through the Mexican Stock Exchange during the end of 2008 and throughout 2009 in connection with the Company’s foreign exchange derivative losses and the subsequent conversion of the realized losses into debt.  In 2011, the CNBV commenced an administrative proceeding against the Company for alleged infringements to applicable legislation. The Company has participated in this proceeding in order to demonstrate its compliance with current legislation and to adopt applicable defenses as deemed appropriate in order to protect Gruma’s interests.  As of this date, the aforementioned proceeding is ongoing, and the CNBV has not issued a final resolution in connection therewith.

We intend to vigorously defend against these actions and proceedings. It is the opinion of the Company that the outcome of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

67

Venezuela

Expropriation Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.

On May 12, 2010, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela published the Expropriation Decree, which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, movables and real estate of the Company’s subsidiary in Venezuela, MONACA. The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to the Company’s subsidiary DEMASECA.

As stated in the Expropriation Decree and in accordance with the Venezuelan Expropriation Law, the taking of legal ownership can occur either through an “Amicable Administrative Arrangement” or a “Judicial Order”. Each process requires certain steps as indicated in the Expropriation Law, neither of which has occurred. Therefore, as of this date, no formal transfer of title of the assets covered by the Expropriation Decree has taken place.

GRUMA’s interests in MONACA and DEMASECA are held through two Spanish companies: Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino. In 2010, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino commenced negotiations with the Republic with the intention of reaching an amicable settlement. GRUMA has participated in these negotiations with a view to continuing its presence in Venezuela by potentially entering into a joint venture with the Venezuelan government that could also include compensation, or, absent a joint venture arrangement, GRUMA may receive compensation for the assets subject to expropriation, which the law requires be fair and reasonable. Those negotiations are ongoing.

The Republic and the Kingdom of Spain are parties to the Investment Treaty, under which the Investors may settle investment disputes by means of arbitration before the ICSID. On November 9, 2011, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA provided formal notice to the Republic that an investment dispute had arisen as a consequence of the Expropriation Decree and related measures adopted by the Republic. In that notification, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA also agreed to submit the dispute to ICSID arbitration if the parties are unable to reach an amicable agreement.

The negotiations with the government are ongoing, and the Company cannot assure that those negotiations will be successful or will result in the Investors receiving adequate compensation, if any, for their investments subject to the Expropriation Decree. Additionally, the Company cannot predict the results of any arbitral proceeding, or the ramifications that costly and prolonged legal disputes could have on its results of operations or financial position, or the likelihood of collecting a successful arbitration award. As a result, the net impact of this matter on the Company’s consolidated financial results cannot be reasonably estimated. The Company and its subsidiaries reserve and intend to continue to reserve the right to seek full compensation for any and all expropriated assets and investments under applicable law, including investment treaties and customary international law.

The Venezuelan government has not taken physical control of the assets of MONACA or DEMASECA and has not taken control of their operations. In consequence, GRUMA can validly and legally assert that, as of this date, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino have full legal ownership of MONACA’s and DEMASECA’s rights, interest, shares and assets, respectively, and full control of all operational or managerial decisions of MONACA and DEMASECA, which will not cease until GRUMA, through Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, finally agrees with the Venezuelan government on the terms and conditions to transfer such assets in accordance with the legal and business schemes that are currently being negotiated with the government of Venezuela.

Pending resolution of this matter, based on preliminary valuation reports, no impairment charge on GRUMA’s net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA has been identified. The Company is also unable to estimate the value of any future impairment charge, if one will be taken, or to determine whether MONACA and DEMASECA will need to be accounted for as a discontinued operation. The historical value as of December 31, 2011 of the net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA was Ps.2,271,178 and Ps.165,969, respectively. The Company does not maintain insurance for the risk of expropriation of its investments. Please see Note 25 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a breakdown of financial information concerning MONACA.

68

Intervention Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.

On December 4, 2009, the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas issued an order authorizing the precautionary seizure of assets of all corporations in which Ricardo Fernández Barrueco had any direct or indirect interest.  As a result of Mr. Ricardo Fernández Barrueco’s former indirect ownership of MONACA and DEMASECA, these subsidiaries were subject to the precautionary seizure.  The Ministry of Finance of Venezuela, in light of the precautionary measure ordered by the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas, has made several designations of individuals as special managers and representatives on behalf of the Republic of Venezuela of the shares that were previously owned indirectly by Mr. Ricardo Fernández Barrueco in MONACA and DEMASECA. The last designation was on January 14, 2011.

As a result of the foregoing, MONACA and DEMASECA, as well as Consorcio Andino, S.L. and Valores Mundiales, S.L., as holders of our Venezuelan subsidiaries, have filed a petition as aggrieved third-parties to the proceedings against Mr. Ricardo Fernández Barrueco, as a challenge to the precautionary measures, the seizure and all related actions. MONACA has also filed for corresponding legal remedies. On November 19, 2010, the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas issued a ruling regarding the petitions, in which, the court recognized that MONACA and DEMASECA are companies wholly controlled by Valores Mundiales, S.L. and Consorcio Andino, S.L, respectively.  However, the precautionary measures of seizure issued on December 4, 2009 were upheld by the court, despite the court’s recognition of MONACA and DEMASECA’s ownership.  In virtue of the aforementioned, an appeal has been filed, which is pending resolution as of this date. The People’s Defense Institute for the Access of Goods and Services of Venezuela (“INDEPABIS”) issued an order, on a precautionary basis, authorizing the temporary occupation and operation of MONACA for a period of 90 calendar days from December 16, 2009, which was renewed for the same period on March 16, 2010.  The order expired on June 16, 2010 and as of the date hereof MONACA has not been notified of any extension or similar measure.  INDEPABIS has also initiated a regulatory proceeding against MONACA in connection with alleged failure to comply with regulations governing precooked corn flour and for allegedly refusing to sell this product as a result of the December 4, 2009 precautionary asset seizure described above.  We filed an appeal against these proceedings which has not been resolved as of the date hereof.

Additionally, INDEPABIS initiated an investigation of DEMASECA and issued an order, on a precautionary basis, authorizing the temporary occupation and operation of DEMASECA for a period of 90 calendar days from May 25, 2010, which was extended until November 21, 2010.  INDEPABIS issued a new precautionary measure of occupation and temporary operation of DEMASECA, valid for the duration of this investigation. DEMASECA has challenged these measures but as of the date hereof, no resolution has been issued. The proceedings are still ongoing.

We intend to exhaust all legal remedies available in order to safeguard and protect the Company’s legitimate interests.

Tax Claims.

The Venezuelan tax authorities have lodged certain assessments against MONACA, one of our Venezuelan subsidiaries, related to income tax returns for the years 1998 and 1999, which amounted to U.S.$696 thousand plus related Value Added Tax deficiencies in the amount of U.S.$33.2 thousand.  The case has been appealed and is pending a final decision. Any tax liability arising from the resolution of these claims will be assumed by the previous shareholder, International Multifoods Corporation, in accordance with the purchase agreement by which the Company acquired MONACA. Likewise, MONACA has filed claims with the fiscal authorities in the corresponding tax courts for the amount of U.S.$650 thousand. This matter is pending resolution.

Labor Lawsuits.

In the past, our subsidiary MONACA was named in three labor lawsuits (two brought by Caleteros, as defined below, and one stemming from a workplace accident) seeking damages in the amount of U.S.$1.25 million. The lawsuits and claims are related to issues and rights such as profit sharing, social security, vacation, seniority and indemnity payment issues.  The “Caleteros” who brought the claims are third parties who help freighters unload goods.

69

Finally, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending litigations filed in the normal course of business.  It is the opinion of the Company that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

ITEM 9The Offer And Listing.

TRADING HISTORY

Our Series B Shares have been traded on the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V., or Mexican Stock Exchange, since 1994.  The ADSs, each representing four Series B Shares, commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange in November 1998.  As of December 31, 2011, our capital stock was represented by 563,650,709 issued Series B shares, of which 565,650,709  shares were outstanding, fully subscribed and paid, and 1,523,900 shares were held in our treasury.  As of December 31, 2011, 72,940,304 Series B shares of our common stock were represented by 18,235,076 ADSs held by 7 record holders in the United States.

On October 13, 2008, our Series B Shares were suspended as required by the Mexican Stock Exchange in connection with pending information regarding the publication of events related to the Company’s currency derivative instruments.  Accordingly, our ADSs were also suspended on the New York Stock Exchange on October 20, 2008.  On October 29, 2008, our Series B Shares and our ADSs began trading again as the aforementioned information was released.

PRICE HISTORY

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the annual high and low closing sale prices for the Series B Shares and the ADSs as reported by the Mexican Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange, respectively.

	Mexican Stock Exchange		NYSE
	Common Stock		ADS(2)
	High	Low	High	Low
	(Ps. Per share(1))		(U.S.$ per ADS)
Annual Price History
2007	41.43	32.32	15.71	11.94
2008	35.01	5.85	13.03	1.76
2009	25.67	3.67	7.89	.9214
2010	28.70	16.97	8.99	5.20
2011	28.66	19.61	8.96	6.33
Quarterly Price History
2010
1st Quarter	28.70	23.80	8.98	7.33
2nd Quarter	27.77	19.20	8.99	5.81
3rd Quarter	21.28	16.97	6.63	5.20
4th Quarter	24.94	17.96	8.05	5.67
2011
1st Quarter	27.24	22.17	8.96	7.19
2nd Quarter	24.71	19.61	8.36	6.63
3rd Quarter	25.39	20.00	8.60	6.33
4th Quarter	28.66	23.10	8.54	6.90
2012
1st Quarter	34.39	26.45	10.77	7.79
Monthly Price History
October 2011	26.05	23.10	7.96	6.90
November 2011	28.66	25.38	8.54	7.34
December 2011	28.23	25.69	8.27	7.25
January 2012	28.84	26.45	8.79	7.79
February 2012	31.42	28.75	9.73	8.89
March 2012	34.39	30.85	10.77	9.40
April 2012(3)	37.40	34.08	11.27	10.49

70

(1)  Pesos per share reflect nominal price at trade date.

(2)  Price per ADS in U.S.$; one ADS represents four Series B Shares.

(3)  As of April 20, 2012.

On April 20, 2012, the last reported sale price of the B Shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange was Ps.36.42 per B Share.  On April 20, 2012, the last reported sale price of the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange was U.S.$11.09 per ADS.

MEXICAN STOCK EXCHANGE

The Mexican Stock Exchange, located in Mexico City, is the only stock exchange in Mexico.  Founded in 1907, it is organized as a corporation whose shares were originally held by brokerage firms, which are exclusively authorized to trade on the exchange.  As of June 13, 2008 the Mexican Stock Exchange became a publicly traded company.  Trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange takes place principally through automated systems and is open between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Mexico City time, each business day.  Trades in securities listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange can also be performed off the exchange.  The Mexican Stock Exchange operates a system of automatic suspension of trading in shares of a particular issuer as a means of controlling excessive price volatility.

Settlement is effected three business days after a share transaction on the Mexican Stock Exchange.  Deferred settlement, even by mutual agreement, is not permitted without the approval of the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission, or CNBV).  Most securities traded on the Mexican Stock Exchange, including ours, are on deposit with S.D. Indeval Institución para el Depósito de Valores, S.A. de C.V., or Indeval, a privately owned securities depositary that acts as a clearinghouse for Mexican Stock Exchange transactions.

As of June 2, 2001, the Mexican Securities Law requires issuers to increase the protections offered to minority shareholders and to impose corporate governance controls on Mexican listed companies in line with international standards.  The Mexican Securities Law expressly permits Mexican listed companies, with prior authorization from the CNBV, to include in their bylaws antitakeover defenses such as shareholder rights plans, or poison pills.  Our bylaws include certain of these protections.  See “Additional Information—Bylaws—Antitakeover Protections.”

MARKET MAKER

On September 30, 2009, we entered into an agreement with UBS Casa de Bolsa (“UBS”) pursuant to which UBS acts as a market maker for our common shares listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange.  The purpose of the agreement is to provide liquidity for the Company’s shares. This agreement has been extended in several occasions throughout 2010 and 2011.  On October 11, 2011 the agreement was extended until September 15, 2012.

ITEM 10Additional Information.

BYLAWS

Set forth below is a brief summary of certain significant provisions of our bylaws, according to their last comprehensive amendment.  This description does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to our bylaws, which are incorporated as an exhibit to this Annual Report.

The new Mexican Securities Law of 2006 included provisions seeking to improve the applicable regulations on disclosure of information, minority shareholder rights and corporate governance of the issuers, among other matters.  It also imposes additional duties and liabilities on the members of the board of directors as well as

71

senior officers.  Thus, we were required to carry out a comprehensive amendment of our bylaws through an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting held on November 30, 2006.

Incorporation and Register

We were incorporated in Monterrey, Mexico on December 24, 1971 as a corporation (Sociedad Anónima de Capital Variable) under the Mexican Corporations Law, for a term of 99 years.  On November 30, 2006 we became a publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable), a special corporate form for all Mexican publicly traded companies pursuant to the regulations of the new Mexican Securities Law.

Corporate Purpose

Our main corporate purpose, as fully described in Article Second of our bylaws, is to serve as a holding company and to engage in various activities such as:  (i) purchasing, selling, importing, exporting, and manufacturing all types of goods and products, (ii) issuing any kind of securities and taking all actions in connection therewith (iii) creating, organizing and managing all types of companies, (iv) acting as an agent or representative, (v) purchasing, selling and holding real property, (vi) performing or receiving professional, technical or consulting services, (vii) establishing branches, agencies or representative offices, (viii) acquiring, licensing, or using intellectual or industrial property, (ix) granting and receiving loans, (x) subscribing, issuing and negotiating all types of credit instruments, and (xi) performing any acts necessary to accomplish the foregoing.

Directors

Our bylaws provide that our management shall be vested in the board of directors and our Chief Executive Officer.  Each director is elected by a simple majority of the shares.  Under Mexican law and our bylaws, any holder or group of holders owning 10% or more of our capital stock may elect one director and its corresponding alternate.  The board of directors must be comprised of a minimum of five and a maximum of twenty-one directors, as determined by the shareholders at the annual ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.  Additionally, under the Mexican Securities Law, at least 25% of the members of the board of directors must be independent.  Currently, our board of directors consists of 17 members.

The board of directors shall meet at least four times a year.  These meetings can be called by the Chairman of the board of directors, the Chairman of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committees, or by 25% of the members of the board of directors.  The directors serve for a one year term, or for up to 30 (thirty) additional days, if no designation of their substitute has been made or if the substitute has not taken office.  Directors receive compensation as determined by the shareholders at the annual ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.  The majority of directors are needed to constitute a quorum, and board resolutions must be passed by a majority of the votes present at any validly constituted meeting or by unanimous consent if no meeting is convened.

Under the terms of our association with Archer-Daniels-Midland, it has the right to appoint two of our directors and their corresponding alternates as long as it owns at least 20% of our capital stock.

Our bylaws provide that the board of directors has the authority and responsibility to:  (i) set the general strategies for the business of the Company; (ii) oversee the performance and conduction of business of the Company; (iii) oversee the main risks encountered by the Company, identified by the information submitted by the committees, the Chief Executive Officer and the firm providing the external auditing services; (iv) approve the information and communication policies with shareholders and the market; and (v) instruct the Chief Executive Officer to disclose to the investor public any material information when known.

Additionally, the board of directors has the authority and responsibility to approve, with the previous opinion of the corresponding Committee:  (i) the policies for the use of the Company’s assets by any related party; (ii) related party transactions other than those occurring in the ordinary course of business, those of insignificant amount, and those deemed as done within market prices; (iii) the purchase or sale of 5% or more of our corporate assets; (iv) granting of warranties or the assumption of liabilities for more than 5% of our corporate assets; (v) the appointment, and in its case, removal of the Chief Executive Officer, as the designation of integral compensation policies for all other senior officers; (vi) internal control and internal audit guidelines; (vii) the Company’s accounting guidelines; (viii) the Company’s financial statements; and (ix) the hiring of the firm providing external

72

audit services and, in its case, any services additional or supplemental to the external audit.  The approval of the board in all of these matters is non-delegable.

See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees” for further information about the board of directors.

Audit and Corporate Governance Committees

Under our bylaws and in accordance with the Mexican Securities Law, the board of directors, through the Audit and Corporate Governance Committees as well as through the firm performing the external audit, shall be in charge of the surveillance of the Company.  Such Committees should be exclusively comprised by independent directors and by a minimum of three members, elected by the board of directors at the proposal of the Chairman of the Board.  The Chairman of such Committees shall be exclusively designated and/or removed from office by the annual ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.

For the performance of its duties, the Corporate Governance Committee shall:  (i) render its opinion to the board of directors, pursuant to the Mexican Securities Law; (ii) request the opinion of independent experts, when deemed convenient; (iii) convene shareholders meetings and include issues in the agenda they deem appropriate; (iv) assist the board of directors when making the annual reports; and (v) be responsible for other activity provided by law or our bylaws.

Likewise, for the performance of its duties, the Audit Committee shall:  (i) render its opinion to the board of directors, pursuant to the Mexican Securities Law; (ii) request the opinion of independent experts when deemed convenient; (iii) convene shareholders meetings and include issues in the agenda they deem appropriate; (iv) assess the performance of the external auditing firm, as well as analyze the opinions and reports rendered by the external auditor; (v) discuss the financial statements of the Company and, if appropriate, recommend its approval to the board of directors; (vi) inform the board of directors of the condition of the internal controls and internal auditing systems, including any irregularities detected therein; (vii) prepare the opinion of the report rendered by the Chief Executive Officer; (viii) assist the board of directors when making the annual reports; (ix) request from the senior officers and from other employees, reports relevant to the preparation of the financial information and of any other kind deemed necessary for the performance of their duties; (x) investigate possible irregularities within the Company, as well as carry out the actions deemed appropriate; (xi) request meetings with senior officers in connection with the internal control and internal audit; (xii) inform the board of directors about the material irregularities detected while exerting their duties, and in case of any irregularities, notify the board of directors of any corrective measures taken; (xiii) ensure that the Chief Executive Officer complies with the resolutions taken by the Shareholders’ Meetings and by the board of directors; (xiv) oversee the establishment of internal controls in order to verify that the transactions of the Company conform to the applicable legal regulations; and (xv) be responsible of any other activity provided by law or our bylaws.

Fiduciary Duties - Duty of Diligence

Our bylaws and the Mexican Securities Law provide that the directors shall act in good faith and in our best interest.  In order to fulfill its duty, our directors may:  (i) request information about us that is reasonably necessary to take actions; (ii) require the presence of any officers or other key employees, including the external auditors, that may contribute elements for taking actions at board meetings; (iii) postpone board meetings when a director has not been given sufficient notice of the meeting or in the event that a director has not been provided with the information provided to the other directors; and (iv) discuss and vote on any item requesting, if deemed convenient, the exclusive presence of the members and the secretary of the board of directors.

Our directors may be liable for damages caused when breaching their duty of diligence if such failure causes economic damage to the Company or our subsidiaries, as well as if the director:  (i) fails to attend board or committee meetings and, as a result of such absence, the board was unable to take action, unless such absence is approved by the shareholders meeting; (ii) fails to disclose to the board of directors or the committees material information necessary to reach a decision; and/or (iii) fails to comply with its duties imposed by the Mexican Securities Law or our bylaws.  Members of the board of directors may not represent shareholders at any shareholders’ meeting.

73

Fiduciary Duties - Duty of Loyalty

Our bylaws and the Mexican Securities Law provide that the directors and secretary of the board shall keep confidential any non-public information and matters about which they have knowledge as a result of their position.  Also, directors must abstain from participating, attending or voting at meetings related to matters where they have or may have a conflict of interest.

The directors and secretary of the board of directors will be deemed to have violated their duty of loyalty and will be liable for any damages when they, directly or through third parties, obtain an economic benefit by virtue of their position without legitimate cause.  Furthermore, the directors will fail to comply with their duty of loyalty if they:  (i) vote at a board meeting or take any action where there is a conflict of interest; (ii) fail to disclose a conflict of interest they may have during a board meeting; (iii) knowingly favor a particular shareholder of the Company against the interests of other shareholders; (iv) approve related party transactions without complying with the requirements of the Mexican Securities Law; (v) use Company assets in a manner which infringes upon the policies approved by the board of directors; (vi) unlawfully use material non-public information of the Company; and/or (vii) usurp a corporate business opportunity for their own benefit, or the benefit of a third party, without the prior approval of the board of directors.  Our directors may be liable for damages when breaching their duty of loyalty if such failure causes economic damage to the Company or our subsidiaries.

Civil Actions Against Directors

Under Mexican law, shareholders can initiate actions for civil liabilities against directors through resolutions passed by a majority of the shareholders at a general ordinary shareholders’ meeting.  In the event the majority of the shareholders decide to bring such action, the director against whom such action is brought will immediately cease to be a member of the board of directors.  Additionally, shareholders representing not less than 5% of our outstanding shares may directly bring such action against directors.  Any recovery of damages with respect to such action will be for our benefit and not for the benefit of the shareholders bringing the action.

Chief Executive Officer

According to our bylaws and the Mexican Securities Law, the Chief Executive Officer shall be in charge of running, conducting and executing the Company’s business, complying with the strategies, policies and guidelines approved by the board of directors.

For the performance of its duties the Chief Executive Officer shall:  (i) submit, for the approval of the board of directors, the business strategies of the Company; (ii) execute the resolutions of the Shareholders’ Meetings and of the board of directors; (iii) propose to the Audit Committee, the internal control system and internal audit guidelines of the Company, as well as execute the guidelines approved thereof by the board of directors; (iv) disclose any material information and events that should be disclosed to the investor public; (v) comply with the provisions relevant to the repurchase and placement transactions of the Company’s own stock; (vi) exert any corresponding corrective measures and liability suits; (vii) assure that adequate accounting, registry and information systems are maintained by the Company; (viii) prepare and submit to the board of directors his annual report; (ix) establish mechanisms and internal controls permitting certification that the actions and transactions of the Company conform to the applicable regulations; and (x) exercise his right to file the liability suits referred to in the Mexican Securities Law against related parties or third parties that allegedly cause damage to the Company.

Voting Rights and Shareholders’ Meetings

Each share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at any general meeting of our shareholders.  Shareholders may vote by proxy.  At the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting, any shareholder or group of shareholders representing 10% or more of the outstanding capital stock has the right to appoint one director and his corresponding alternate, with the remaining directors being elected by majority vote.

General shareholders’ meetings may be ordinary or extraordinary.  Extraordinary general shareholders’ meetings are called to consider matters specified in Article 182 of the Mexican Corporations Law, including, principally, changes in the authorized fixed share capital and other amendments to the bylaws, the issuance of preferred stock, the liquidation, merger and spin-off of the Company, changes in the rights of security holders, and

74

transformation from one corporate form to another.  All other matters may be approved by an ordinary general shareholders’ meetings.  Ordinary general shareholders’ meetings must be called to consider and approve matters specified in Article 181 of the Mexican Corporations Law, including, principally, the appointment of the members of the board of directors and the Chairman of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committees, the compensation paid to the directors, the distribution of our profits for the previous year, and the annual reports presented by the board of directors and the Chief Executive Officer.  Our shareholders establish the number of members that will serve on our board of directors at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.

A general ordinary shareholders’ meeting must be held during the first four months after the end of each fiscal year.  In order to attend a general shareholders’ meeting, the day before the meeting shareholders must deposit the certificates representing their capital stock or other appropriate evidence of ownership either with the secretary of our board of directors, with a credit institution, or with Indeval.  The secretary, credit institution or Indeval will hold the certificates until after the general shareholders’ meeting has taken place.

Under our bylaws, the quorum for an ordinary general shareholders’ meeting is at least 50% of the outstanding capital stock, and action may be taken by the affirmative vote of holders representing a majority of the shares present.  If a quorum is not present, a subsequent meeting may be called at which the shareholders present, whatever their number, will constitute a quorum and action may be taken by a majority of the shares present.  A quorum for extraordinary general shareholders’ meetings is at least 75% of the outstanding capital stock, but if a quorum is not present, a subsequent meeting may be called.  A quorum for the subsequent meeting is at least 50% of the outstanding shares.  Action at an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting may only be taken by a vote of holders representing at least 50% of the outstanding shares.

Shareholders’ meetings may be called by the board of directors, the Chairman of the Audit and/or Corporate Governance Committees, or a court.  The Chairman of the board of directors or the Chairman of the Audit or Corporate Governance Committees may be required to call a shareholders’ meeting if holders of at least 10% of our outstanding share capital request a meeting in writing, or at the written request of any shareholder if no shareholders’ meeting has been held for two consecutive years, or, if during a period of two consecutive years, the board of directors’ annual report for the previous year and the Company’s financial statements were not presented to the shareholders, or if the shareholders did not elect directors.

Notice of shareholders’ meetings must be published in the Federal Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation in Monterrey, Nuevo León at least 15 days prior to the meeting.  Shareholders’ meetings may be held without such publication provided that 100% of the outstanding shares are represented.  Shareholders’ meetings must be held within the corporate domicile in Monterrey, Nuevo León.

Under Mexican law, holders of 20% of our outstanding capital stock may have any shareholder action set aside by filing a complaint with a Mexican court of competent jurisdiction within 15 days after the close of the meeting at which such action was taken, by showing that the challenged action violates Mexican law or our bylaws.  Relief under these provisions is only available to holders who were entitled to vote on the challenged shareholder action and whose shares were not represented when the action was taken or, if represented, voted against it.

Dividend Rights and Distribution

Within the first four months of each year, the board of directors must submit our company’s financial statements for the preceding fiscal year to the shareholders for their approval at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.  They are required by law to allocate 5% of any new profits to a legal reserve which is not thereafter available for distribution until the amount of the legal reserve equals 20% of our capital stock (before adjusting for inflation).  Amounts in excess of those allocated to the legal reserve fund may be allocated to other reserve funds as the shareholders determine, including a reserve for the repurchase of our shares.  The remaining balance of new profits, if any, is available for distribution as dividends prior to their approval at the shareholders’ meeting.  Cash dividends on the shares held through Indeval will be distributed by us through Indeval.  Cash dividends on the shares evidenced by physical certificates will be paid when the relevant dividend coupon registered in the name of its holder is delivered to us.  No dividends may be paid, however, unless losses for prior fiscal years have been paid up or absorbed.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Dividends.”

75

Liquidation

Upon our dissolution, one or more liquidators must be appointed by an extraordinary shareholders’ general meeting to wind up its affairs.  If the extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting does not make said appointment, a Civil or District Judge can do so at the request of any shareholder.  All fully paid and outstanding common stock will be entitled to participate equally in any distribution upon liquidation after the payment of the Company’s debts, taxes and the expenses of the liquidation.  Common stock that has not been paid in full will be entitled to these proceeds in proportion to the paid-in amount.

If the extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting does not give express instructions on liquidation, the bylaws stipulate that the liquidators will (i) conclude all pending matters they deem most convenient, (ii) prepare a general balance and inventory, (iii) collect all credits and pay all debts by selling assets necessary to accomplish this task, (iv) sell assets and distribute income, and (v) distribute the amount remaining, if any, pro rata among the shareholders.

Changes in Capital stock

Our outstanding capital stock consists of Class I and Class II series B shares.  Class I shares are the fixed portion of our capital stock and have no par value.  Class II shares are the variable portion of our capital stock and have no par value.  The fixed portion of our capital stock cannot be withdrawn.  The issuance of variable capital shares, unlike the issuance of fixed capital shares, does not require an amendment of the bylaws, although it does require approval at an ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.  The fixed portion of our capital stock may only be increased or decreased by resolution of an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting and an amendment to our bylaws, whereas the variable portion of our capital stock may be increased or decreased by resolution of an ordinary general shareholders’ meetings.  Currently, our outstanding capital stock consists only of fixed capital.

An increase of capital stock may generally be made through the issuance of new shares for payment in cash or in kind, by capitalization of indebtedness or by capitalization of certain items of shareholders’ equity.  An increase of capital stock generally may not be made until all previously issued and subscribed shares of capital stock have been fully paid.  A reduction of capital stock may be effected to absorb losses, to redeem shares, to repurchase shares in the market or to release shareholders from payments not made.

As of April 26, 2012, our capital stock was represented by 565,174,609 issued Series B shares, of which 563,650,709 shares were outstanding, fully subscribed and paid, and 1,523,900 shares were held in our treasury.

Preemptive Rights

In the event of a capital increase through the issuance of shares, other than in connection with a public offering of newly issued shares or treasury stock, a holder of existing shares of a given series at the time of the capital increase has a preferential right to subscribe for a sufficient number of new shares of the same series to maintain the holder’s existing proportionate holdings of shares of that series.  Preemptive rights must be exercised within the period and under the conditions established for such purpose by the shareholders at the corresponding shareholders’ meeting.  Under Mexican law and our bylaws, the exercise period may not be less than 15 days following the publication of notice of the capital increase in the Federal Official Gazette or following the date of the shareholders’ meeting at which the capital increase was approved if all shareholders were represented; otherwise such rights will lapse.

Furthermore, shareholders will not have preemptive rights to subscribe for common stock issued in connection with mergers, upon the conversion of convertible debentures, or in the resale of treasury stock as a result of repurchases on the Mexican Stock Exchange.

Under Mexican law, preemptive rights may not be waived in advance by a shareholder, except under limited circumstances, and cannot be represented by an instrument that is negotiable separately from the corresponding share.  Holders of ADRs may be restricted in their ability to participate in the exercise of preemptive rights.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure—Holders of ADSs May Not Be Able to Participate in Any Future Preemptive Rights Offering and as a Result May Be Subject to a Dilution of Equity Interest.”

76

Restrictions Affecting Non-Mexican Shareholders

Foreign investment in capital stock of Mexican corporations is regulated by the 1993 Foreign Investment Law and by the 1998 Foreign Investment Regulations to the extent they are not inconsistent with the Foreign Investment Law.  The Ministry of Economy and the National Commission on Foreign Investment are responsible for the administration of the Foreign Investment Law and the Foreign Investment Regulations.

Our bylaws do not restrict the participation of non-Mexican investors in our capital stock.  However, approval of the National Foreign Investment Commission must be obtained for foreign investors to acquire a direct or indirect participation in excess of 49% of the capital stock of a Mexican company that has an aggregate asset value that exceeds, at the time of filing the corresponding notice of acquisition, an amount determined annually by the National Foreign Investment Commission.

As required by Mexican law, our bylaws provide that any non-Mexicans who acquire an interest or participation in our capital at any time will be treated as having Mexican nationality for purposes of their interest in us, and with respect to the property, rights, concessions, participations or interests that we may own or rights and obligations that are based on contracts to which we are a party with the Mexican authorities.  Such shareholders cannot invoke the protection of their government under penalty of forfeiting to the Mexican State the ownership interest that they may have acquired.

Under this provision, a non-Mexican shareholder is deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of his own government with respect to his rights as a shareholder, but is not deemed to have waived any other rights he may have with respect to its investment in us, including any rights under U.S. securities laws.  If a shareholder should invoke governmental protection in violation of this provision, his shares could be forfeited to the Mexican government.  Mexican law requires that such a provision be included in the bylaws of all Mexican companies unless such bylaws prohibit ownership of shares by non-Mexicans.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure—Mexican Law Restricts the Ability of Non-Mexican Shareholders to Invoke the Protection of Their Governments with Respect to Their Rights as Shareholders.”

Registration and Transfer

Our shares are evidenced by certificates in registered form.  We maintain a stock registry and, in accordance with Mexican law, only those persons whose names are recorded on the stock registry are recognized as owners of the series B shares.

Other Provisions

Appraisal Rights

Under Mexican law, whenever the shareholders approve a change of corporate purpose, change of our nationality or transformation from one type of corporate form to another, any shareholder entitled to vote on such change or transformation who has voted against it has the right to tender its shares and receive the amount attributable to its shares, provided such shareholder exercises its right to withdraw within 15 days following the adjournment of the meeting at which the change or transformation was approved.  Under Mexican law, the amount which a withdrawing shareholder is entitled to receive is equal to its proportionate interest in our capital stock according to our most recent balance sheet approved by an ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.  The reimbursement may have certain tax consequences.

Share Repurchases

We may repurchase our common stock on the Mexican Stock Exchange at any time at the then market price.  The repurchase of shares will be made by charging our equity, in which case we may keep them without reducing our capital stock, or charging our capital stock, in which case we must convert them into unsubscribed treasury stock.  The ordinary general shareholders’ meeting shall determine the maximum amount of funds to be allocated for the repurchase of shares, which amount shall not exceed our total net profits, including retained earnings.

77

Repurchased common stock will either be held by us or kept in our treasury, pending future sales thereof through the Mexican Stock Exchange.  If the repurchased shares are kept in our treasury, we may not exercise their economic and voting rights, and such shares will not be deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating any quorum or voting at any shareholders’ meeting.  The repurchased shares held by us as treasury shares may not be represented at any shareholder meeting.  The decrease or increase of our capital stock as a result of the repurchase does not require the approval of a shareholders’ meeting or of the board of directors.

Under Mexican securities regulation, our directors, officers, external auditors, the secretary of the board of directors and holders of 10% or more of our outstanding stock may not sell stock to us, or purchase repurchased stock from us, unless the sale or purchase is made through a tender offer.  The repurchase of stock representing 3% or more of our outstanding share capital in any 20 trading-day period must be conducted through a public tender offer.

Repurchase in the Event of Delisting

In the event of the cancellation of the registration of our shares at the Registro Nacional de Valores, or National Registry of Securities, or RNV, whether at our request or at the request of the CNBV, under our bylaws and the regulations of the CNBV, we will be obligated to make a tender offer to purchase all of our shares held by non-controlling shareholders.  Such tender offer shall be made at least at the greater price of the following:  (i) the closing sale price under the terms of the following paragraph, or (ii) the book value of the shares according to the most recent quarterly report submitted to the CNBV and the Mexican Stock Exchange.

The quoted share price on the Mexican Stock Exchange referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be the weighted average share price as quoted on the Mexican Stock Exchange for the last 30 days in which our shares were traded, in a period not greater than six months prior to the date of the public tender offer.  If the number of days in which our shares have traded during the period referred to above is less than 30, then only the actual number of days in which our shares have traded during such period will be taken into account.  If shares have not been exchanged during such period, then the tender offer shall be made at a price equal to at least the book value of the shares.

In connection with any such cancellation of the registration of our shares, we will be required to deposit sufficient funds into a trust account for at least six months following the date of cancellation to ensure adequate resources to purchase at the public tender offer price any remaining outstanding shares from non-controlling shareholders that did not participate in the offer.

If we ask the RNV to cancel the registration of our shares, we will be exempt from carrying out a public tender offer, provided that:  (i) we have the consent of the holders of at least 95% of our outstanding common shares, by a resolution at a shareholders’ meeting; (ii) the aggregate amount offered for the securities in the market is less than 300,000 investment units (UDIs); (iii) the trust referred to in the preceding paragraph is executed, and (iv) notice is given to the CNBV of the execution and cancellation of the trust through the established electronic means.

Within ten business days of the commencement of a public tender offer, our board of directors must prepare and disclose to public investors its opinion with respect to the reasonableness of the tender offer price as well as any conflicts of interest that its members may have in connection with the tender offer.  The opinion of the board of directors may be accompanied by another opinion issued by an independent expert that we may hire.

We may request the approval from the CNBV to use different criteria to determine the price of the shares.  In requesting such approval, the following must be submitted to the CNBV:  (i) the resolution of the board of directors approving such request, (ii) the opinion of the Corporate Governance Committee addressing the reasons why it deems appropriate the use of a different price, and (iii) a report from an independent expert indicating that the price is consistent with the terms of the Mexican Securities Law.

Shareholder’s Conflicts of Interest

Any shareholder that has a direct or indirect conflict of interest with respect to any transaction must abstain from voting thereon at the relevant shareholders’ meeting.  A shareholder that votes on a business transaction in

78

which its interest conflicts with ours may be liable for damages if the transaction would not have been approved without such shareholder’s vote.

Rights of Shareholders

The protections afforded to minority shareholders under Mexican law are different from those in the United States and other jurisdictions.  The law concerning duties and responsibilities of directors and controlling shareholders has not been the subject of extensive judicial interpretation in Mexico, unlike the United States where judicial decisions have been issued regarding the duties of diligence and loyalty, which more effectively protect the rights of minority shareholders.  Additionally, shareholder class actions are not available under Mexican law and there are different procedural requirements for bringing shareholder derivative lawsuits, which permit shareholders in U.S. courts to bring actions on behalf of other shareholders or to enforce rights of the corporation itself.  Shareholders cannot challenge corporate action taken at a shareholders’ meeting unless they meet certain procedural requirements.

In addition, under U.S. securities laws, as a foreign private issuer we are exempt from certain rules that apply to domestic U.S. issuers with equity securities registered under the Exchange Act, including the proxy solicitation rules, the rules requiring disclosure of share ownership by directors, officers and certain shareholders.  We are also exempt from certain of the corporate governance requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, including certain requirements concerning audit committees and independent directors.  A summary of significant ways in which our corporate governance standards differ from those followed by U.S. companies pursuant to NYSE listing standards is available on our website at www.gruma.com.  The information found at this website is not incorporated by reference into this document.

As a result of these factors, in practice it may be more difficult for our minority shareholders to enforce rights against us or our directors or controlling shareholders than it would be for shareholders of a U.S. company.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure—The Protections Afforded to Minority Shareholders in Mexico Are Different From Those in the United States.”

Antitakeover Protections

Our bylaws provide that, subject to certain exceptions as explained below, prior written approval from the board of directors shall be required for any person (as defined hereunder), or group of persons to acquire, directly or indirectly, any of our common shares or rights to our common shares, by any means or under any title whether in a single event or in a set of consecutive events, such that its total shares or rights to shares would represent 5% or more of our outstanding shares.

Prior approval from the board of directors must be obtained each time such ownership threshold (and multiples thereof) is intended to be exceeded, except for persons who, directly or indirectly, are competitors (as such term is defined below) of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries, who must obtain the prior approval of the board of directors for future acquisitions where a threshold of 2% (or multiples thereof) of our common shares is intended to be exceeded.

Pursuant to our bylaws, a “person” is defined as any natural person, corporate entity, trust or similar form of venture, vehicle, entity, corporation or economic or mercantile association or any subsidiaries or affiliates of any of the former or, as determined by the board of directors, any group of persons who may be acting jointly, coordinated or as a whole; and a “competitor” is defined as any person engaged, directly or indirectly, in (i) the business of production and/or marketing of corn or wheat flour, and/or (ii) any other activity carried on by the Company or by any of its subsidiaries or affiliates.

Persons that acquire our common shares in violation of these requirements will not be considered the beneficial owners of such shares under our bylaws and will not be able to vote such shares or receive any dividends, distributions or other rights in respect of these shares.  In addition, pursuant to our bylaws, these holders will be obligated to pay us a penalty in an amount equal to the greater of (i) the market value of the shares such party acquired without obtaining the prior approval of the board of directors and (ii) the market value of shares representing 5% of our capital stock.

79

Board Notices, Meetings, Quorum Requirements and Approvals.  To obtain the prior approval of our board of directors, a potential purchaser must properly deliver a written application complying with the applicable requirements set forth in our bylaws.  Such application shall state, among other things:  (i) the number and class of our shares the person beneficially owns or to which such person has any right, (ii) the number and class of shares the Person intends to acquire, (iii) the number and class of shares with respect to which such Person intends to acquire any right, (iv) the percentage that the shares referred to in (i) represent of our total outstanding shares and of the class or series to which such shares belong, (v) the percentage that the shares referred to in (ii) and (iii) represent of our total outstanding shares and of the class or series to which such shares belong, (vi) the person’s identity and nationality, or in the case of a purchaser which is a corporation, trust or legal entity, the nationality and identity of its shareholders, partners or beneficiaries as well as the identity and nationality of each person effectively controlling such corporation, trust or legal entity, (vii) the reasons and purpose behind such acquisition, (viii) if such person is, directly or indirectly, a competitor of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and if such person has the authority to legally acquire the shares pursuant to our bylaws and Mexican law, (ix) its source of financing the intended acquisition, (x) if the Person is part of an economic group, formed by one or more of its related parties, which intends to acquire shares of our common stock or rights to such shares, (xi) if the person has obtained any financing from one of its related parties for the payment of the shares, (xii) the identity and nationality of the financial institution, if any, that will act as the underwriter or broker in connection with any tender offer, and (xiii) the person’s address for receiving notices.

Either the Chairman, the Secretary or the Alternate Secretary of our board of directors must call a meeting of the board of directors within 10 business days following the receipt of the written application.  The notices for the meeting of the board of directors shall be in writing and sent to each of the directors and their alternates at least 45 calendar days prior to the meeting.  Action by unanimous written consent is not permitted.

Any acquisition of capital shares representing at least 2% or 5%, as the case may be, of our outstanding capital stock, must be approved by at least the majority of the members of our board of directors present at a meeting at which at least the majority of the members is present.  Such acquisitions must be resolved by our board of directors within 60 calendar days following the receipt of the written application described above, unless the board of directors determines that it does not have sufficient information upon which to base its decision.  In such case, the board of directors shall deliver a written request to the potential purchaser for any additional information that it deems necessary to make its determination.  The 60 calendar days referred to above will commence following the receipt of the additional information from the potential purchaser.

Mandatory Tender Offers in the Case of Certain Acquisitions.  If our board of directors authorizes an acquisition of capital shares which increases the purchaser’s ownership to 30% or more, but not more than 50%, of our capital stock, then the purchaser must effect its acquisition by way of a cash tender offer for a specified number of shares equal to the greater of (i) the percentage of common shares intended to be acquired or (ii) 10% of our outstanding capital stock, in accordance with the applicable Mexican securities regulations.

No approval of the board of directors will be required if the acquisition would increase the purchaser’s ownership to more than 50% of our capital stock or result in a change of control, in which case the purchaser must effect its acquisition by way of a tender offer for 100% minus one of our total outstanding capital stock, which tender shall be made pursuant to applicable Mexican laws.

The aforementioned tender offers must be made simultaneously in the Mexican and US stock markets.  Furthermore, an opinion issued by the board of directors regarding any such tender offer must be made available to the public through the authorized means of communication within 10 days after commencement of the tender offer.  In the event of any tender offer, the shareholders shall have the right to hear more competitive offers.

Notices.  In addition to the aforementioned approvals, if a person increases its beneficial ownership by 1% in the case of competitors, or 2% in the case of non-competitors, written notice must be submitted to the board of directors within five days of reaching or exceeding such thresholds.

Exceptions.  The provisions of our bylaws summarized above will not apply to:  (i) transfers of shares by operation of the laws of succession; (ii) acquisitions of shares by (a) any person who, directly or indirectly, has the authority or possibility of appointing the majority of the directors of our board of directors, (b) any company, trusts or similar form of venture, vehicle, entity, corporation or economic or mercantile association, which may be under

80

the control of the aforementioned person, (c) the heirs of the aforementioned person, (d) the aforementioned person when such person is repurchasing the shares of any corporation, trust or similar form of venture, vehicle, entity, corporation or economic or mercantile association referred to in the item (b) above, and (e) the Company or by trusts created by the Company; (iii) any person(s) that as of December 4, 2003 hold(s), directly or indirectly, more than 20% of the shares representing the Company’s capital stock; and (iv) any other exceptions provided for in the Mexican Securities Law and other applicable legal dispositions.

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

Archer-Daniels-Midland

We entered into an association with Archer-Daniels-Midland in September 1996.  We believe that this association improved our position in the U.S. corn flour market by combining our proprietary corn flour technology, our leading position in the corn flour industry in Mexico, the United States, Central America and Venezuela and our operational expertise with Archer-Daniels-Midland’s logistical resources and financial strength.

As a result of this association, (i) we received U.S.$258.0 million in cash, (ii) GRUMA and Archer-Daniels-Midland combined their U.S. corn flour operations under Azteca Milling, our wholly-owned U.S. corn flour operations, and, as a result, Archer-Daniels-Midland received a 20% partnership interest in Azteca Milling, and (iii) we received 60% of the capital stock of Molinera de México, Archer-Daniels-Midland’s wholly-owned Mexican wheat milling operations.  We also gained exclusivity rights from Archer-Daniels-Midland in specified corn flour and wheat flour markets.  In return, Archer-Daniels-Midland received 74,696,314 of our then newly issued shares, which represented at that time approximately 22% of our total outstanding shares and a 20% partnership interest in Azteca Milling in addition to retaining 40% of the capital stock of Molinera de México.  Archer-Daniels-Midland also obtained the right to designate two of the 17 members of our board of directors and their corresponding alternates.

Under the terms of this association, Archer-Daniels-Midland may not, without the consent of Mr. Roberto González Barrera, the Chairman of our board of directors, acquire additional shares of our company.  As of April 26, 2012, Archer-Daniels-Midland owned, directly and indirectly, approximately 23.22% of our outstanding shares.  A total of 24,566,561 of these shares are held by Archer-Daniels Midland through a Mexican corporation jointly owned with Mr. González Barrera and controlled by him.  Thus, Archer-Daniels-Midland only has the right to vote 18.87% of our outstanding shares.  In addition, Archer-Daniels-Midland has the right to nominate two of the 17 members of our board of directors and their corresponding alternates.  Archer-Daniels-Midland did not participate in a preemptive rights offering we completed on May 20, 2008.  Prior to the preemptive rights offering, Archer-Daniels-Midland, directly and indirectly, owned approximately 27.1% of our outstanding shares and controlled the right to vote approximately 22% of our outstanding shares.

Furthermore, Archer-Daniels-Midland must give Mr. González Barrera a right of first refusal on any sale of our shares.  Mr. González Barrera must give Archer-Daniels-Midland a similar right on any sale of his shares in us if at the time of the sale, he owns directly or indirectly, or as a result of the sale will own directly or indirectly, less than 30% of our outstanding shares.  See “Item 7. Major Stockholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions.”

The documents which detail the terms of the association include the Shareholders Agreement by and among us, Roberto González Barrera, Archer-Daniels-Midland and ADM Bioproductos, S.A. de C.V., the Asset Contribution Agreement among Gruma Corporation, Gruma Holding, Inc., ADM Milling Co., Valley Holding, Inc., GRUMA-ADM, and Azteca Milling, L.P., and the Investment Agreement by and between us and Archer-Daniels-Midland, all dated as of August 21, 1996, as well as Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2 to the Shareholders Agreement, dated as of September 13, 1996 and August 18, 1999, respectively.  See “Item 19. Exhibits.”

Perpetual Bonds

On December 3, 2004, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. issued U.S.$300 million 7.75% senior unsecured perpetual bonds.  The bonds which have no fixed final maturity date, have a call option exercisable by GRUMA at any time beginning five years after the issue date.  As of December 31, 2011 we have not hedged any interest payments on our U.S.$300 million 7.75% senior unsecured perpetual bonds.

81

Gruma Corporation

In October 2006, Gruma Corporation entered into a U.S.$100 million 5-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, which was refinanced and extended on June 20, 2011 to U.S.$200 million for an additional 5-year term.  The facility, as refinanced in 2011, has an interest rate based on LIBOR plus a spread of 1.375% to 2.0% that fluctuates in relation to Gruma Corporations’ leverage and contains less restrictive provisions than those in the facility replaced.  This facility contains covenants that limit Gruma Corporation’s ability to merge or consolidate, and require it to maintain a ratio of total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA of not more than 3.0:1.  In addition, this facility limits Gruma Corporation’s, and certain of its subsidiaries’ ability, among other things, to create liens; make certain investments; make certain restricted payments; enter into any agreements that prohibit the payment of dividends; and engage in transactions with affiliates. This facility also limits Gruma Corporation’s subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional debt.

Gruma Corporation is also subject to covenants which limit the amounts that may be advanced to, loaned to, or invested in us under certain circumstances.  Upon the occurrence of any default or event of default under its credit agreements, Gruma Corporation generally is prohibited from making any cash dividend payments to us.  The covenants described above and other covenants could limit our and Gruma Corporation’s ability to help support our liquidity and capital resource requirements.

Syndicated Loan Facility

On March 22, 2011 we obtained a U.S.$225 million, five-year senior credit facility through a syndicate of banks The Syndicated Loan Facility consists of a term loan and a revolving loan facility. The interest rate for the Term Loan Facility and for the Revolving Loan Facility is either (i) LIBOR or (ii) an interest rate determined by the administrative agent based on its “prime rate” or the federal funds rate, respectively, plus, in either case, (a) 2.25% if the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA (the “Maximum Leverage Ratio”) is greater than or equal to 3.0x, (b) 2.0% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.5x and less than 3.0x, (c) 1.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.0x and less than 2.5x and (d) 1.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is less than 2.0x.  The Syndicated Loan Facility contains covenants that requires the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and a Maximum Leverage Ratio of not more than 3.5:1.  The Syndicated Loan Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Syndicated Loan Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Peso Syndicated Loan Facility

On June 15, 2011 we obtained a Ps.1,200 million, seven-year senior credit facility through a syndicate of banks.  The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility consists of a term loan maturing in June 2018 with yearly principal amortizations beginning on December 2015, at an interest rate of 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 137.5 and 225 basis points based on the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA. The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility contains covenants that requires the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 3.5:1. The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Rabobank Loan Facility

On June 15, 2011 we obtained a U.S.$50 million, five-year senior credit facility from Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A..  The Rabobank Loan Facility consists of a revolving loan facility, at in interest rate of LIBOR plus (a) 2.25% if the Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.0x, (b) 2.0% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.5x and less than 3.0x, (c) 1.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.0x and less than 2.5x and (d) 1.50% if the

82

Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is less than 2.0x.  The Rabobank Loan Facility contains covenants that requires the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and a Maximum Leverage Ratio of not more than 3.5:1.  The Rabobank Loan Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to:  create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Rabobank Loan Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

2011 Bancomext Peso Facility

On June 16, 2011 we obtained a Ps.600 million, seven-year senior credit facility from Bancomext (Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior).  The 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility consists of a term loan maturing in June 2018 at an interest rate of 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 137.5 and 225 basis points based on the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA. The 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility contains a covenant that requires us to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1 as well as a covenant that requires us to maintain a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 3.5:1. The 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases to create liens.

EXCHANGE CONTROLS

Mexican law does not restrict our ability to remit dividends and interest payments, if any, to Mexican or non-Mexican holders of our securities.  Payments of dividends to equity-holders generally will not be subject to Mexican withholding tax.  See “—Taxation—Mexican Tax Considerations—Payment of Dividends.”  Mexico has had a free market for foreign exchange since 1991, and the government has allowed the peso to float freely against the U.S. dollar since December 1994.

Our ability to repatriate dividends from Gruma Venezuela may be adversely affected by exchange controls and other recent events.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela—Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risk.”

TAXATION

The following summary contains a description of certain Mexican federal and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Series B Shares or Series B Share ADSs (which are evidenced by ADRs), but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase or hold Series B Shares or ADSs, such as the tax treatment of holders that are dealers or that own (actually or constructively under rules prescribed in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code), 10% or more of the voting shares of GRUMA.

The Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Protocols thereto, or the Tax Treaty, between the United States and Mexico entered into force on January 1, 1994.  The United States and Mexico have also entered into an agreement concerning the exchange of information with respect to tax matters.

The summary is based upon tax laws of the United States and Mexico as in effect on the date of this document, which are subject to change, including changes that may have retroactive effect.  Holders of Series B Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisers as to the Mexican, U.S. or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local tax laws.

Mexican Tax Considerations

The following is a general summary of the principal consequences under the Ley del Impuesto sobre la Renta, or Mexican Income Tax Law, and rules and regulations thereunder, as currently in effect, of an investment in Series B Shares or ADSs by a holder that is not a resident of Mexico and that will not hold Series B Shares or ADSs

83

or a beneficial interest therein in connection with the conduct of a trade or business through a permanent establishment in Mexico.

For purposes of Mexican taxation, a natural person is a resident of Mexico for tax purposes if he has established his home in Mexico, unless he has resided in another country for more than 183 days, whether consecutive or not, in any one calendar year and can demonstrate that he has become a resident of that country for tax purposes, and a legal entity is a resident of Mexico if it was incorporated in Mexico or maintains the principal administration of its business or the effective location of its management in Mexico.  A Mexican citizen is presumed to be a resident of Mexico unless such person can demonstrate the contrary.  If a non-resident of Mexico is deemed to have a permanent establishment or fixed base in Mexico for tax purposes, all income attributable to such permanent establishment or fixed base will be subject to Mexican taxes, in accordance with applicable tax laws.

Tax Treaties

Provisions of the Tax Treaty that may affect the taxation of certain U.S. holders are summarized below.  The United States and Mexico have also entered into an agreement that covers the exchange of information with respect to tax matters.

Mexico has also entered into and is negotiating several other tax treaties that may reduce the amount of Mexican withholding tax to which payment of dividends on Series B Shares or ADSs may be subject.  Holders of Series B Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences, if any, of such treaties.

Under the Mexican Income Tax Law, in order for any benefits from the Tax Treaty or any other tax treaties to be applicable, residence for tax purposes must be demonstrated.

Payment of Dividends

Under the Mexican Income Tax Law, dividends, either in cash or in kind, paid with respect to Series B Shares represented by ADSs are not subject to Mexican withholding tax.  A Mexican corporation will not be subject to any tax if the amount of declared dividends does not exceed the net tax profit account (cuenta de utilidad fiscal neta, or CUFIN).

If we pay a dividend in an amount greater than our CUFIN balance (which may occur in a year when net profits exceed the balance in such accounts), then we are required to pay 30% income tax in 2011 and 2012 (29% income tax in 2013 and 28% in 2014) on an amount equal to the product of the portion of the grossed-up amount which exceeds such balance multiplied by 1.4286 in 2011 and 2012 (1.4085 in 2013 and 1.3889 in 2014).

Taxation of Dispositions

The sale or other disposition of ADSs by a non-resident holder will not be subject to Mexican tax.  Deposits of Series B Shares in exchange for ADSs and withdrawals of Series B Shares in exchange for ADSs will not give rise to Mexican tax or transfer duties.

The sale of Series B Shares by a non-resident holder will not be subject to any Mexican tax if the transaction is carried out through the Mexican Stock Exchange or other securities markets approved by the Mexican Ministry of Finance.  Sales or other dispositions of Series B Shares made in other circumstances generally would be subject to Mexican tax, regardless of the nationality or residence of the transferor.

Under the Mexican Income Tax Law, gains realized by a nonresident holder of shares on the sale or disposition of Series B Shares not conducted through a recognized stock exchange generally are subject to a Mexican tax at a rate of 25% of the gross sale price.  However, if the holder is a resident of a country which (i) is not considered to be a low tax rate country, (ii) its legislation does not contain territorial taxation, and (iii) such income is not subject to a preferential tax regime, the holder may elect to designate a resident of Mexico as its representative, in which case taxes would be payable at the applicable income tax rate on the gain on such disposition of Series B Shares.

84

Pursuant to the Tax Treaty, gains realized by qualifying U.S. holders from the sale or other disposition of Series B Shares, even if the sale is not conducted through a recognized stock exchange, will not be subject to Mexican income tax except that Mexican taxes may apply if:

·50% or more of our assets consist of fixed assets situated in Mexico;

·such U.S. holder owned 25% or more of the Series B Shares representing the capital stock of GRUMA (including ADSs), directly or indirectly, during the 12-month period preceding such disposition; or

·the gain is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base of the U.S. holder in Mexico.

Other Mexican Taxes

A non-resident holder will not be liable for estate, inheritance or similar taxes with respect to its holdings of Series B Shares or ADSs; provided, however, that gratuitous transfers of Series B Shares may in certain circumstances result in imposition of a Mexican tax upon the recipient.  There are no Mexican stamp, issue registration or similar taxes payable by a non-resident holder with respect to Series B Shares or ADSs.

Reimbursement of capital pursuant to a redemption of Series B Shares will be tax exempt up to an amount equivalent to the adjusted contributed capital corresponding to the Series B Shares that will be redeemed.  Any excess distribution pursuant to a redemption will be considered a dividend for tax purposes and we may be taxed as described above.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders, as defined below, of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs.  This summary is based upon the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury regulations, administrative pronouncements of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and judicial decisions, all as in effect on the date of this Annual Report, including the provisions of the Tax Treaty, and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, and to different interpretations. This summary does not describe any state, local, or non-U.S. tax law consequences, or any aspect of U.S. federal tax law other than U.S. federal income tax law (such as the estate tax, gift tax and the Medicare tax on net investment income).

The summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership or disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs.  The summary applies only to U.S. holders that will hold their Series B Shares or ADSs as capital assets and does not apply to special classes of holders such as dealers in securities or currencies, holders with a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, holders that own or are treated as owning 10% or more of our voting Series B Shares (whether held directly or through ADSs or both), tax-exempt entities, financial institutions, insurance companies, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, certain U.S. expatriates, holders liable for the alternative minimum tax, securities traders electing to account for their investment in their Series B Shares or ADSs on a mark-to-market basis, partnerships and other pass-through entities and persons holding their Series B Shares or ADSs in a hedging transaction or as part of a straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction. The following summary assumes that we are not a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”), which we do not believe that we were for our 2011 taxable year and do not currently expect to become for our current taxable year or the foreseeable future.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of Series B Shares or ADSs that is:

85

·a citizen or resident of the United States of America;

·a corporation (or an entity taxable as a corporation) organized in or under the laws of the United States of America or any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

·an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal taxation regardless of its source;

·a trust if (i) a court within the U.S. is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) such trust has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person; or

·otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis with respect to the Series B Shares or ADSs.

If a partnership (or any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of Series B Shares or the ADSs, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A holder of Series B Shares or ADSs that is a partnership, and partners in such partnership, should consult their tax advisors about the United States federal income tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of the Series B Shares or the ADSs, as the case may be.

Prospective investors in the Series B Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the U.S. federal, Mexican or other tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the Series B Shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local tax laws and their entitlement to the benefits, if any, afforded by the Tax Treaty.

Treatment of ADSs

The following summary assumes that the representations contained in the Deposit Agreement are true and that the obligations in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement will be complied with in accordance with their terms. In general, a U.S. holder of ADSs will be treated as the beneficial owner of the Series B Shares represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  Deposits or withdrawals of Series B Shares by U.S. holders in exchange for the ADSs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  U.S. holders that withdraw any Series B Shares should consult their own tax advisors regarding the treatment of any foreign currency gain or loss on any pesos received in respect of such Series B Shares.

Taxation of Distributions

In this discussion, the term “dividends” is used to mean distributions paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (calculated for U.S. federal income tax purposes) with respect to Series B Shares or ADSs.  In general, the gross amount of any dividends will be includible in the gross income of a U.S. holder as ordinary income on the day on which the dividends are received by the U.S. holder in the case of Series B Shares, or by the depositary in the case of ADSs.  Dividends paid by us will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.  To the extent that a distribution exceeds the amount of our earnings and profits (calculated for U.S. federal income tax purposes), it will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. holder’s basis in the Series B Shares or ADSs, and thereafter as capital gain. We do not intend to calculate our earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, a U.S. holder should expect that a distribution on Series B Shares or ADSs generally will be treated as a dividend. Distributions will be paid in pesos and will be includible in the income of a U.S. holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the day that they are received by the U.S. holder in the case of Series B Shares, or by the depositary in the case of ADSs.  U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the treatment of foreign currency gain or loss, if any, on any pesos received by a U.S. holder or depositary that are converted into U.S. dollars on a date subsequent to receipt.

86

Distributions of additional Series B Shares or ADSs to U.S. holders with respect to their Series B Shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all of our shareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

Dividends paid on Series B Shares or ADSs generally will be treated for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes as foreign source passive category income.  In the event Mexican withholding taxes are imposed on such dividends, any such withheld taxes would be treated as part of the gross amount of the dividend includible in income of a U.S. holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and such taxes may be treated as a foreign income tax eligible, subject to generally applicable limitations and conditions under U.S. federal income tax law, for credit against a U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability or, at the U.S. holder’s election, for deduction from gross income in computing the U.S. holder’s taxable income. The calculation and availability of foreign tax credits and, in the case of a U.S. holder that elects to deduct foreign taxes, the availability of deductions, involves the application of complex rules that depend on a U.S. holder’s particular circumstances.  In the event Mexican withholding taxes are imposed, U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits.

U.S. holders should be aware that the IRS has expressed concern that parties to whom ADSs are transferred may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by U.S. holders of ADSs. Accordingly, the discussion above regarding the creditability of Mexican withholding taxes could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the IRS.

Qualified Dividend Income

Certain dividends received by non-corporate U.S. holders that constitute “qualified dividend income” will be subject to a reduced maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate.  Qualified dividend income generally includes, among other dividends, dividends received prior to January 1, 2013, from “qualified foreign corporations.”  In general, the term “qualified foreign corporation” includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States which the U.S. Treasury Department determines to be satisfactory, and which includes an exchange of information program.  The Tax Treaty has been approved for this purpose by the U.S. Treasury Department. In addition, a foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to any dividend paid by the corporation with respect to stock of the corporation that is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States.  For this purpose, a share is treated as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States if an ADR backed by such share is so traded.

Notwithstanding the previous rule, dividends received from a foreign corporation that is a PFIC, as discussed below, in the year in which the dividend was paid (or was a PFIC in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid) will not constitute qualified dividend income.  In addition, the term “qualified dividend income” will not include, among other dividends, any (i) dividends on any share of stock or ADS which is held by a taxpayer for 60 days or less during the 120-day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before the date on which such share or the Series B Shares backing the ADS become ex-dividend with respect to such dividends (as measured under section 246(c) of the Code) or (ii) dividends to the extent that the taxpayer is under an obligation (whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with respects to positions in substantially similar or related property.  Moreover, special rules apply in determining a taxpayer’s foreign tax credit limitation under section 904 of the Code in the case of qualified dividend income.

Individual U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors to determine whether or not amounts received as dividends from us will constitute qualified dividend income subject to a reduced maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate and, in such case, the effect, if any, on the individual U.S. holder’s foreign tax credit.

Taxation of Dispositions

Gain or loss realized by a U.S. holder on the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between such U.S. holder’s adjusted basis in the Series B Shares or the ADSs and the amount realized on the disposition (including any amounts withheld in respect of Mexican withholding tax).  Any such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Series B Shares or ADSs have been held for more than one year as of the time of the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition.  Under current law, certain non-corporate U.S. holders may be

87

eligible for preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax in respect of long-term capital gains.  The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

If Mexican income tax is withheld on the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs, the amount realized by a U.S. holder will include the gross amount of the proceeds of that sale, redemption or other taxable disposition before deduction of the Mexican income tax.  Capital gain or loss realized by a U.S. holder on a sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of a gain from the disposition of a common share that is subject to Mexican income tax, the U.S. holder may not be able to benefit from the foreign tax credit for that Mexican income tax (i.e., because the gain from the disposition would be U.S. source), unless the U.S. holder can apply the credit against U.S. federal income tax payable on other income from foreign sources.  Alternatively, the U.S. holder may take a deduction for the Mexican income tax if it does not elect to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to any foreign income taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year.

U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the foreign tax credit rules to their investment in, and disposition of, Series B Shares or ADSs.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Dividends on, and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, the Series B Shares or ADSs paid to a U.S. holder generally may be subject to the information reporting requirements of the Code and may be subject to backup withholding at the applicable rate unless the holder:

·establishes that it is an exempt holder; or

·provides an accurate taxpayer identification number on a properly completed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred.

The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

Recently enacted legislation requires individual U.S. Holders to report information to the IRS with respect to their investment in Series B Shares or ADSs unless certain requirements are met.  Investors who are individuals and fail to report required information could become subject to substantial penalties. Prospective investors are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this new legislation on their investment in Series B Shares or ADSs.

U.S. Tax Consequences for Non-U.S. Holders

Distributions:

A holder of Series B Shares or ADSs that is not a U.S. holder or a partnership (or any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) (a “non-U.S. holder”) generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on dividends received on Series B Shares or ADSs, unless such income is effectively connected with the conduct by the holder of a U.S. trade or business.

Dispositions:

A non-U.S. holder of Series B Shares or ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on gain realized on the sale of shares or ADSs, unless:

·such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the holder of a U.S. trade or business, or

·in the case of gain realized by an individual holder, the holder is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.

88

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding:

Although non-U.S. holders generally are exempt from backup withholding, a non-U.S. holder may be required to comply with certification and identification procedures in order to establish its exemption from information reporting and backup withholding.

DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act and, in accordance therewith, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC.  These materials, including this Form 20-F and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.  The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

ITEM 11Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to market risks arising from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices.  We use derivative instruments from time to time, on a selective basis, to manage these risks.  In addition, we have also historically used certain derivative instruments for trading purposes.  We adopted a risk management policy that precludes the use of derivative instruments for trading purposes. We maintain and control our treasury operations and overall financial risk through practices approved by our senior management.

RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In 2008 we implemented specific improvements to our internal controls concerning the use of derivative financial instruments.  In addition, we implemented a new risk management policy that besides consolidating such improvements, prohibits the Company from entering into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes with the aim of obtaining profits based on changes in market values.  However, the use of financial derivative instruments for hedging purposes is allowed if used with the objective of mitigating financial risks and associated with a hedged item that is relevant to business activities.

INTEREST RATE RISK

We depend upon debt financing transactions, including debt securities, bank and vendor credit facilities and leases, to finance our operations.  All such financial instruments, as well as the related interest rate derivatives discussed further below, are entered into for other than trading purposes.  These transactions expose us to interest rate risk, with the primary interest-rate risk exposure resulting from changes in the relevant base rates (mostly LIBOR and to a lesser extent, Prime, TIIE and Tasa Promedio Ponderada in Venezuela) which are used to determine the interest rates that are applicable to borrowings under our credit facilities.  We are also exposed to interest rate risk in connection with refinancing of maturing debt.  We had U.S.$322.9 million (Ps.4,505.4 million) of fixed rate debt and U.S.$635.3 million (Ps.8,862.7 million) in floating rate debt as of December 31, 2011.  A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would not have a significant effect on the fair value of our fixed rate debt. The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2011, principal cash flows and the related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates for our debt obligations.

89

	Maturity Dates
	2012	2013	2014	2015	Thereafter	Total	Fair Value
	(in millions of pesos, except percentages)
Liabilities
Debt
Fixed Rate (Ps.)	291.57	28.91	0	0	4,185	4,505	4,512.6
Average Rate	13%	13%	0%	0%	7.75%
Floating Rate (Ps.)	1341.63	17.14	355.8	441.07	6,707.07	8,862.7	8,934.5
Average Rate	4.96%	7%	2.59%	3.39%	3.3%

From time to time, we use derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps for purposes of hedging a portion of our debt, in order to reduce our exposure to increases in interest rates.  Several of these contracts, however, do not qualify for accounting treatment as hedging transactions.

On November 2, 2004, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction with five banks with an aggregate notional amount of U.S.$150 million maturing on April 5, 2008, whereby we fixed the 6-month LIBOR rate associated with the term portion of the 2004 Facility at an average rate of 3.2725%.  The swap transaction provided that the counterparty pay us unless 6-month LIBOR reached 6%, in which case the parties had no obligation to pay any amount for the applicable period.  On September 30, 2005, this interest rate swap was modified resulting in an average fixed rate of 3.2775% and a maturity date of March 30, 2008.  The swap transaction provided that the counterparty pay us unless 6-month LIBOR reached 6%, in which case the parties had no obligation to pay any amount for the applicable period.  However, on March 8, 2006 we modified this 6% level up to 6.5% and 6.75% for the interest payment dates due in 2007, obtaining a fixed average rate of 3.6175% for this year.  In addition, in December 12, 2005 we entered into a new interest rate swap for the 2005 Facility with a single bank, which started on March 30, 2008 and matured on March 30, 2009, whereby we fixed the 6-month LIBOR rate associated with the term portion at an average rate of 4.505%.  The swap transaction provided that the counterparty would pay us unless 6-month LIBOR reached 7%, in which case the parties had no obligation to pay any amount for the applicable period.  After the March 30, 2009 maturity we have not entered into additional swap transactions.

During 2010, the Company had only one interest rate swap contract outstanding, which was entered into by Derivados de Maíz Alimenticio, S.A., our Costa Rican subsidiary, on July 2008 to hedge the interest rate risk associated with certain long-term credit facilities. This swap has an aggregate notional amount of U.S.$20 million and a maturity date of December 28, 2010.  After the December 28, 2010 maturity we did not enter into any additional swap transactions.

Additionally, we entered into some exchange rate forward and option contracts to financially hedge part of the interest payments due in 2006, 2007, 2008 and the first two coupon dates of 2009 corresponding to our U.S.$300 million 7.75% senior unsecured perpetual bonds.  These forward and option contracts have either expired by their own terms or been terminated by the Company.

In the case of our cash and short-term investments, declines in interest rates decrease the interest return on floating rate cash deposits and short-term investments.  A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would not have a significant effect on our results of operations.

In the case of our floating interest rate debt, a rise in interest rates increases the interest expense on floating rate debt.  A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would not have a significant effect on our results of operations.

FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE RISK

Our net sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, Mexican pesos and other currencies.  During 2011, 38% of our revenues were generated in U.S. dollars, 34% in pesos and 28% in other currencies.  In addition, as of

90

December 31, 2011, 67% of our total assets were denominated in currencies other than Mexican pesos, particularly U.S. dollars.  A significant portion of our operations is financed through U.S. dollar-denominated debt.

We believe that we have natural foreign exchange hedges incorporated in our balance sheet, in significant part because we have subsidiaries outside Mexico, and the peso-denominated value of our equity in these subsidiaries is also exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates.  Changes in the peso value of equity in our subsidiaries caused by movements in foreign exchange rates are recognized as a component of equity.  See Note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

As of December 31, 2011, 83.29% of our debt obligations was denominated in U.S. dollars.  The following table sets forth information concerning our U.S. dollar-denominated debt as of December 31, 2011.  The table does not reflect our U.S. dollar sales or our U.S. dollar-denominated assets.

	Expected Maturity Date (U.S. dollar-denominated Debt) as of December 31, 2011
	2012	2013	2014	2015	Thereafter	Total	Fair Value
U.S. dollar-denominated debt	(in millions of pesos)
Syndicated Loan Facility	0	0	348.75	348.75	2,441.25	3,138.75	3,257.6
Rabobank Loan Facility	0	0	0	0	697.5	697.5	721.1
7.75% Perpetual Bond	0	0	0	0	4,185.00	4,185.00	4,192.1
Other U.S. dollar loans	1,247.44	7.39	0	0	1,858.10	3,112.93	3,112.9
TOTAL	1,247.44	7.39	348.75	348.75	9,181.85	11,134.18	11,283.7

An important part of our foreign exchange rate risk relates to our substantial U.S. dollar-denominated debt for our non-U.S. subsidiaries.

During 2007, we entered into forward contracts and exchange rate option contracts (Mexican peso — U.S. dollar) with respect to our foreign exchange exposure related to the 7.75% perpetual notes.  These contracts covered four coupon dates for 2007, as well as four additional dates for 2008 and two for 2009.  Accordingly, the maturity dates for these contracts ranged from March 2007 to June 2009.  These financial instruments have either expired by their terms or were terminated by the Company.

During 2007, we also entered into exchange rate option contracts expiring during 2008 and 2009.  On an average basis, by maturity date, the purchase trades were U.S.$370.5 million against U.S.$420 million of sale trades.  In addition, for 2008 and for the remaining two dates in 2009, we entered into exchange rate options contracts, under which GRUMA could either sell or buy U.S. dollars depending on the behavior of the spot rate, for an aggregate notional amount of U.S.$115 million for each date.  Additionally, at the end of 2007, twelve call contracts maturing on February 28, 2008, were sold with an exchange rate of Ps.12.00 per U.S. dollar.  These contracts were not recognized under hedge accounting principles.  The favorable effect of the contracts due in 2007 of Ps.290.7 million was recognized in our income statement for 2007.  As of December 31, 2007, the unfavorable effect for changes in the fair value of outstanding contracts was Ps.16.8 million, which was also recognized in our income statement.

During 2008, GRUMA entered into foreign exchange derivative instruments which covered varying periods of time and had varying pricing provisions.  The Company primarily entered into swap forwards and options contracts, for which the periodic settlement results depended on the behavior of the spot rate at a future maturity date.  In the first quarter of 2008, we entered into foreign exchange derivative instruments covering a basket of currencies.  In the second quarter of 2008 and through July, August and September of 2008, we entered into foreign exchange derivative instruments mainly in respect of the dollar/peso and the dollar/euro exchange rate.  These derivative instruments were entered into for trading purposes and did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment.

During 2008, we entered into foreign exchange derivative instruments with several counterparties maturing in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.  These financial instruments have either expired by their terms or were terminated by the Company.  See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects——Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

91

We account for our currency derivative instruments using the mark-to-market accounting method.  Extreme exchange rate volatility in the financial markets during the last two quarters of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 resulted in significant fluctuations in the mark-to-market value of GRUMA’s foreign exchange derivative instruments.  These fluctuations were further exacerbated by the leverage features included in certain of these instruments.  As of September 30, 2008, these instruments represented a negative mark-to-market net value of U.S.$291.4 million.  As of October 8, 2008, these instruments represented a mark-to-market unrealized loss of U.S.$684 million.  As of October 28, 2008, these instruments represented an aggregate mark-to-market non-cash charge of U.S.$788 million; of which U.S.$105 million, U.S.$354 million, U.S.$220 million, and U.S.$109 million on instruments scheduled to mature in 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively.

On November 12, 2008, we entered into a loan agreement with Bancomext in the amount of Ps.3,367 million and applied the proceeds to terminate our commitments arising under all the currency derivative instruments that we had entered into with one of our derivative counterparties and to pay other commitments arising under the currency derivative instruments maturing from the date of such loan agreement with Bancomext.  In addition, we entered into agreements on October 16, 2009 with our remaining derivative counterparties to convert a total of U.S.$738.3 million dollars owing under our terminated foreign exchange derivative instruments into medium- and long-term loans, as described below.

In connection with most of its obligations under its foreign exchange derivative instruments, the Company entered into a term sheet on March 19, 2009 that provided for the financing of the obligations that would result from the termination of all of its foreign exchange derivative instruments that it had entered into with the Major Derivative Counterparties.  On March 23, 2009, GRUMA and the Major Derivative Counterparties agreed to terminate all of these derivative instruments and fixed the total amount of obligations payable by GRUMA to the Major Derivative Counterparties at U.S.$668.3 million.  On October 16, 2009, the Company reached an agreement with the Major Derivative Counterparties to convert these derivatives obligations into the Term Loan in the amount of U.S.$668.3 with a tenor of seven and one-half years.  The Term Loan was secured by the Company’s shares in GIMSA, Gruma Corporation and Molinera de México.

In connection with the balance of its foreign exchange derivative instruments, the Company entered into separate term sheets with Barclays, RBS and Standard Chartered during June and July 2009 that provided for the financing of the obligations that would result from the termination of all of its foreign exchange derivative instruments that it had entered into with each of Barclays, RBS and Standard Chartered.  GRUMA and Barclays, RBS and Standard Chartered agreed to terminate all of the derivative instruments owing to these parties and fixed the total amount of obligations payable by GRUMA to Barclays at U.S.$21.5 million, RBS at U.S.$13.9 million and Standard Chartered at U.S.$22.9 million for a total aggregate amount of U.S.$58.3 million.  In addition, during June of 2009, GRUMA entered into a term sheet with BNP that fixed the amount payable by GRUMA to BNP at U.S.$11.8 million.

On October 16, 2009, the Company reached separate agreements with Barclays, RBS and Standard Chartered to convert the obligations that resulted from the termination of all of its foreign exchange derivative instruments entered into with these parties into loans in the amount of U.S.$21.5 million, U.S.$13.9 million and U.S.$22.9 million, respectively, with a tenor of three years.  On October 16, 2009, GRUMA also reached a separate agreement with BNP to convert the obligations that resulted from the scheduled maturity of all of its foreign exchange derivative instruments entered into with BNP into a loan in the amount of U.S.$11.8 million with a tenor of approximately one and one-half years (the “BNP Term Loan”).  As a result of the Term Loan, the Three-Year Term Loans and the BNP Term Loan, the Company converted a total of U.S.$738.3 million dollars owing under our terminated foreign exchange derivative instruments into medium- and long-term loans.

On February 18, 2011, we made an early payment of outstanding balances of several of our current bank facilities, including the Term Loan, the Three-Year Term Loans and the BNP Term Loan, using proceeds from the GFNorte Sale.  As a result of such repayment, the loan agreements relating to the Term Loan, the Three-Year Term Loans and the BNP Term Loan have been terminated.  See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk——Interest Rate Risk.”

As indicated in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements, during 2011, we entered into forward transactions in order to hedge the Mexican peso to U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate risk related to the price of corn purchases for the summer and winter corn harvests in Mexico.  Since these exchange rate derivative financial

92

instruments did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, they were recognized at their estimated fair value and periodic mark-to-market measurement was made.  As of December 31, 2011, we had foreign exchange derivative transactions in effect for a nominal amount of U.S.$106 million with different maturities from January through March 2012, the open positions of these instruments represented a favorable effect of approximately Ps.88.5 million recognized in income.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had foreign exchange derivative transactions in effect for a nominal amount of U.S.$378 million with different maturities from April through July 2012 . The purpose of these contracts was to hedge the risks related to exchange rate fluctuations on the price of corn and wheat, which is denominated in U.S. dollars.

As indicated in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements, operations in Venezuela represented 16% of net sales and 14% of total assets as of December 31, 2011.  In recent years, political and social instability has prevailed in Venezuela, and as described in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and established a two tier exchange structure on January 11, 2010.  On December 30, 2010, the Venezuelan government issued Exchange Agreement No. 14, which established a single exchange rate of 4.30 bolivars per U.S. dollar effective January 1, 2011.

COMMODITY AND DERIVATIVE PRICE RISK

The availability and price of corn and other agricultural commodities are subject to wide fluctuations due to factors outside our control, such as weather, plantings, government (domestic and foreign) farm programs and policies, changes in global demand/supply and global production of similar and competitive crops.  We hedge a portion of our production requirements through commodity futures and options contracts in order to reduce the risk created by price fluctuations and supply of corn, wheat, natural gas and soy oils which exist as part of ongoing business operations.  The open positions for hedges of purchases do not exceed the maximum production requirements for a one-year period.

During 2011, we entered into short-term hedge transactions through commodity futures and options for a portion of our requirements.  All derivative financial instruments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at their fair value as either assets or liabilities.  Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in earnings or accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, depending on whether the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting and is effective as part of a hedge transaction.  Ineffectiveness results when the change in the fair value of the hedge instruments differs from the change in the fair value of the hedged item.

For hedge transactions that qualify and are effective, gains and losses are deferred until the underlying asset or liability is settled, and then are recognized as part of that transaction.

Gains and losses which represent hedge ineffectiveness and derivative transactions that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized in income.

As of December 31, 2011, financial instruments that qualify as hedge accounting represented a favorable effect of Ps.14.9 million, which was recognized as comprehensive income in equity.  From time to time we hedge commodity price risks utilizing futures and options strategies that do not qualify for hedge accounting.  As a result of non-qualification, these derivative financial instruments are recognized at their estimated fair values and are marked to market with the associated effect recorded in current period earnings.  For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized an unfavorable effect of Ps.40.2 million from these contracts.  Additionally, as of December 31, 2011, we realized Ps.52.6 million in net losses on commodity price risk hedges that did not qualify for hedge accounting.

Based on our overall commodity exposure at December 31, 2011, a hypothetical 10 percent decline in market prices applied to the fair value of the instruments would result in a charge to income of Ps.40.4 million (for non-qualifying contracts).

93

COUNTERPARTY RISK

We maintain centralized treasury operations in Mexico for our Mexican operations and in the United States for our U.S. operations.  Liquid assets are invested primarily in government bonds and short-term debt instruments with a minimum “A1/P1” rating for our U.S. operations and “A” for our Mexican operations.  We face credit risk from the potential non-performance by the counterparties in respect of the financial instruments that we utilize.  Substantially all of these financial instruments are unsecured.  We do not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties, which are principally licensed commercial banks with long-term credit ratings.  In addition, we minimize counterparty solvency risk by entering into derivative instruments only with major national and international financial institutions using standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) forms and long form confirmation agreements.  For our Central American operations and Gruma Venezuela, we only invest cash reserves with well-known local banks and local branches of international banks.  In addition, we also keep small investments abroad.

The above discussion of the effects on us of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices is not necessarily indicative of our actual results in the future.  Future gains and losses will be affected by actual changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market exposures, as well as changes in the actual derivative instruments employed during any period.

ITEM 12Description Of Securities Other Than Equity Securities.

American Depositary Shares

Our Series B Shares have been traded on the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V., or Mexican Stock Exchange, since 1994.  The ADSs, each representing four Series B Shares, commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange in November 1998.  As of  April 26, 2012, our capital stock was represented by 565,174,609 issued Series B shares, of which 563,650,709  shares were outstanding, fully subscribed and paid, and 1,523,900  shares were held in our treasury.  As of December 31, 2011, 72,940,304  Series B shares of our common stock were represented by 18,235,076   ADSs held by 7  record holders in the United States.

On October 13, 2008, our Series B Shares were suspended as required by the Mexican Stock Exchange in connection with pending information regarding the publication of events related to the Company’s currency derivative instruments.  Accordingly, our ADSs were also suspended on the New York Stock Exchange on October 20, 2008.  On October 29, 2008, our Series B Shares and our ADSs began trading again as the aforementioned information was released.

Fees and Expenses

The following table summarizes the fees and expenses payable by holders of ADSs to Citibank, N.A. (the “Depositary”) pursuant to the Deposit Agreement dated September 18, 1998:

Service	Rate	By Whom Paid
(1)   Issuance of ADSs upon deposit of Series B Shares (excluding issuances contemplated by paragraphs 3(b) and (5) below)	Up to U.S.$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) issued	Party for whom deposits are made or party receiving ADSs
(2)   Delivery of Series B Shares, property and cash against surrender of ADSs	Up to U.S.$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) surrendered	Party surrendering ADSs or making withdrawal
(3)   Distribution of (a) cash dividend or (b) ADSs pursuant to stock dividends (or other free distribution of stock)	No fee, so long as prohibited by the exchange upon which ADSs are listed	N/A

94

Service	Rate	By Whom Paid
(4)   Distribution of cash proceeds (i.e. upon sale of rights or the sale of any securities or property pursuant to Sections the Deposit Agreement)	Up to $2.00 per 100 ADSs held	Party to whom distribution is made
(5)   Distribution of ADSs pursuant to exercise of rights	Up to $2.00 per 100 ADSs issued	Party to whom distribution is made

In addition to the foregoing, holders of our ADSs are responsible for the following charges pursuant to the Deposit Agreement: (i) taxes (including applicable interest and penalties) and other governmental charges; (ii) such registration fees as may from time to time be in effect for the registration of Series B Shares on the share register and applicable to transfers of Series B Shares to or from the name of Citibank, S.A. (the “Custodian”), the Depositary or any nominees upon the making of deposits and withdrawals, respectively; (iii) such cable, telex and facsimile transmission and delivery expenses as are expressly provided in the Deposit Agreement to be at the expense of the person depositing Series B Shares or holders of ADSs; (iv) the customary expenses and charges incurred by the Depositary in the conversion of foreign currency; and (v) such fees and expenses as are incurred by the Depositary in connection with compliance with exchange control regulatory requirements applicable to Series B Shares, ADSs and ADRs.

Pursuant to the Deposit Agreement, the Depositary may deduct the amount of any taxes or other governmental charges owed from any payments to holders.  It may also sell deposited securities to pay any taxes owed.  Holders may be required to indemnify the Depositary, the Company and the Custodian from any claims with respect to taxes.

PART II

ITEM 13.               Defaults, Dividend Arrearages And Delinquencies.

Not applicable.

ITEM 14.               Material Modifications To The Rights Of Security Holders And Use Of Proceeds.

Not applicable.

ITEM 15.               Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure controls and procedures.  We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2011.  There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.  Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.  Based upon our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Management’s annual report on internal controls over financial reporting.  Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Corporate Officer and other personnel, we conducted an evaluation of the

95

effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS as issued by IASB.  Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.  Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, an independent registered public accounting firm, our independent auditor, issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting on April 30, 2012.

(c) Attestation Report of the registered public accounting firm.  The report of PricewaterhouseCoopers, an independent registered public accounting firm, on our internal control over financial reporting is included herein at page F-2.

(d) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.  There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting:

ITEM 16A.  Audit Committee Financial Expert.

Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Mario Laborín Gómez qualifies as an independent member of the board and as an “audit committee financial expert”, within the meaning of this Item 16A.

ITEM 16B.  Code of Ethics.

We have adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 16B of Form 20-F under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Our code of ethics applies, among others, to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Officer, and persons performing similar functions.  Our code of ethics is available on our web site at www.gruma.com.  If we amend any provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Corporate Officer and persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our web site at the same address.

ITEM 16C.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the fees billed to us and our subsidiaries by our independent auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011:

96

	Year ended December 31,
	2010		2011
	(thousands of Mexican pesos)
Audit fees	Ps.	40,405	Ps.	40,424
Tax fees	6,410		7,397
Other fees	11,941		4,985
Total fees	Ps.	58,756	Ps.	52,806

Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers and its affiliates in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of our interim financial statements and statutory and regulatory audits.

Tax fees in the above table are fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers and its affiliates for tax compliance services, tax planning services and tax advice services.

Other fees in the above table are fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers and its affiliates for non-audit services, mainly related to accounting advice on the implementation of new accounting standards as well as accounting advise on derivative financial instruments, as permitted by the applicable independence rules.

Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures.

We have adopted pre-approval policies and procedures under which all audit and non-audit services provided by our external auditors must be pre-approved by the audit committee.  Any service proposals submitted by external auditors need to be discussed and approved by the audit committee during its meetings, which take place at least four times a year.  Once the proposed service is approved, we or our subsidiaries formalize the engagement of services.  The approval of any audit and non-audit services to be provided by our external auditors is specified in the minutes of our audit committee.  In addition, the members of our board of directors are briefed on matters discussed in the meetings of the audit committee.

ITEM 16D.  Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 16E.  Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.

We did not repurchase any of our Series B Shares or ADSs in 2011.

ITEM 16F.  Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 and through the date of this Annual Report, the principal independent accountant engaged to audit our financial statements, PricewaterhouseCoopers, S.C., has not resigned, indicated that it has declined to stand for re-election after the completion of its current audit or been dismissed.

ITEM 16G.  Corporate Governance.

We are a Mexican corporation with shares listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange and on the NYSE.  Our corporate governance practices are governed by our bylaws and the Mexican corporate governance practices, including those set forth in the Mexican Securities Law, the Circular Única de Emisoras (the “Mexican Circular Única”) issued by the Mexican Banking and Securities Commission and the Reglamento Interior de la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (the “Mexican Stock Exchange Rules”), and to applicable US securities laws including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) and the rules of the NYSE (the “NYSE Rules”) to the extent SOX and the NYSE Rules apply to foreign private issuers like us.  Certain NYSE Rules relating to corporate governance are not applicable to us because of our status as a foreign private issuer.  Specifically, we are permitted to follow home country practices in lieu of certain provisions of Section 303A of the NYSE Rules.  In accordance with the requirement of Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Rules, the following is a summary of significant ways in which our

97

corporate governance practices differ from those required to be followed by U.S. domestic companies under the NYSE’s listing standards.

Independence of our Board of Directors

Under the NYSE Rules, controlled companies like us (regardless of our status as a foreign private issuer) are not required to have a board of directors composed of a majority of independent directors.  However, the Mexican Securities Law requires that, as a listed company in Mexico, at least 25% of the members of our Board of Directors be independent as determined under the Mexican Securities Law.  We have an alternate director for each of our directors.  The Mexican Securities Law further provides that alternates of independent directors be independent as well.  The Mexican Securities Law sets forth detailed standards for establishing independence which differ from those set forth in the NYSE Rules.

Executive Sessions

Under the NYSE Rules, non-management directors must meet at executive sessions without management.  We are not required, under Mexican law, to hold executive sessions in which non-management directors meet without the management or to hold meetings of only independent directors.  Our Board of Directors must meet at least four times per year.

Audit Committee

Under the NYSE Rules, listed companies must have an audit committee with a minimum of three members who are independent directors.  Under the Mexican Securities Law, listed companies are required to have an Audit Committee comprised solely of independent directors.  The members of the Audit Committee are appointed by the Board of Directors, with the exception of its Chairman, who is appointed by the shareholders at the Shareholders’ Meeting.  Currently, our Audit Committee is comprised of 3 members.  Our Audit Committee operates pursuant to the provisions of the Mexican Securities Law and our Bylaws.  A description of the specific functions of our Audit Committee can be found in Item 10.  See “Item 10. Additional Information—Audit and Corporate Governance Committees” for further information about our Audit Committee.

Audit Committee Reports

Under the NYSE Rules, Audit Committees are required to prepare an Audit Committee Report as required by the SEC to be included in the listed company’s annual proxy statement.  As a foreign private issuer, we are not required by the SEC to prepare and file proxy statements.  In this regard, we are subject to Mexican securities law requirements.  We have chosen to follow Mexican law and practice in this regard.

Corporate Governance Committee

Under both NYSE Rules and Mexican securities laws and regulations, listed companies are also required to have a Corporate Governance Committee comprised solely of independent directors.  The Company’s Board of Directors appoints the members of the Corporate Governance Committee, with the exception of its Chairman, who is appointed by the shareholders at a Shareholders’ Meeting.  Currently, our Corporate Governance Committee is comprised of the same three members of our Audit Committee.  Our Corporate Governance Committee operates pursuant to the provisions of the Mexican Securities Law and our Bylaws.  A description of the specific functions of our Corporate Governance Committee can be found in Item 10.  See “Item 10. Additional Information——Audit and Corporate Governance Committees” for further information about our Corporate Governance Committee.

Compensation Committee

Under NYSE Rules, listed companies must have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors.  Under our Bylaws and the Mexican securities laws and regulations, we are not required to have a compensation committee.  Currently, we do not have such a committee.

98

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics

Domestic issuers listed on the NYSE are required to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees and promptly disclose any waivers of such code for directors or executive officers.  We are not required to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines under Mexican law to the same extent as the NYSE Rules.  However, pursuant to regulations of the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores or Mexican Stock Exchange we are required to annually file with the Mexican Stock Exchange a statement relating to our level of adherence to the Mexican Code of Best Corporate Practices.  Our statement can be found on our corporate web page.  We are not required to adopt a Code of Ethics under Mexican law.  However, in April 2003, we adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees.  Our Code of Ethics can also be found on our corporate web page under “Corporate Governance.”

Solicitation of Proxies

Under NYSE Rules, listed companies are required to solicit proxies and provide proxy materials for all meetings of shareholders.  Such proxy solicitations are to be provided to the NYSE.  We are not required to solicit proxies from our shareholders.  Under our Bylaws and Mexican securities laws and regulations, we inform shareholders of all meetings by public notice, which states the requirements for admission to the meeting. Under the deposit agreement relating to our ADSs, holders of our ADSs receive notice of shareholders’ meetings together with information explaining how to instruct the depositary bank to exercise the voting rights of the securities represented by ADSs.

ITEM 16H.Mine Safety Disclosure.

Not Applicable.

PART III

ITEM 17.Financial Statements.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 18.Financial Statements.

See pages F-1 through F-189, incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 19.Exhibits.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, we have filed certain agreements as exhibits to this annual report on Form 20-F.  These agreements may contain representations and warranties by the parties.  These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other party or parties to such agreements and (i) may be intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties to such agreements if those statements turn out to be inaccurate, (ii) may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to such other party or parties and that either have been reflected in the Company’s filings or are not required to be disclosed in those filings, (iii) may apply materiality standards different from what may be viewed as material to investors, and (iv) were made only as of the date of such agreements or such other date(s) as may be specified in such agreements and are subject to more recent developments.  Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe our actual state of affairs at the date hereof.

Documents filed as exhibits to this annual report:

Exhibit No.
1	Our bylaws (estatutos sociales) as amended through May 26, 2008, together with an English translation.(4)
2(a)(1)	Deposit Agreement, dated as of September 18, 1998, by and among us, Citibank, N.A. as Depositary and the Holders and Beneficial Owners of American Depositary Shares Evidenced by American Depositary Receipts Issued Thereunder (including form of American Depositary Receipt).(2)

99

Exhibit No.
2(b)(1)	Indenture, dated as of December 3, 2004, between us and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee representing up to U.S.$300,000,000 of our 7.75% Perpetual Bonds.(3)
2(b)(2)	U.S.$225 million credit facility by and among us, the Lenders party thereto and BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, as Administrative Agent, dated March 22, 2011.(5)
2(b)(3)	U.S.$200 million revolving credit facility among Gruma Corporation, the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Documentation Agent, Swing Line Lender, and Letter of Credit Issuer, dated June 20, 2011.
2(b)(4)	Ps.600 million term loan by and among us and Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C. dated June 16, 2011.
2(b)(5)	Ps.1,200 million credit facility by and among us, the Lenders party thereto and BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, as Administrative Agent, dated June 15, 2011.
2(b)(6)	U.S.$50 million credit facility by and among us and Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. dated June 15, 2011.
4(a)(1)	Shareholders Agreement by and among us, Roberto González Barrera, Archer Daniels-Midland Company and ADM Bioproductos, S.A. de C.V., dated August 21, 1996.(1)
4(a)(2)	Amendment No. 1 to Shareholders Agreement by and among us, Roberto González Barrera, Archer Daniels-Midland Company and ADM Bioproductos, S.A. de C.V., dated September 13, 1996.(3)
4(a)(3)	Amendment No. 2 to Shareholders Agreement by and among us, Roberto González Barrera, Archer Daniels-Midland Company and ADM Bioproductos, S.A. de C.V., dated August 18, 1999.(3)
4(a)(4)	Asset Contribution Agreement among Gruma Corporation, Gruma Holding, Inc., ADM Milling Co., Valley Holding, Inc., GRUMA-ADM, and Azteca Milling, L.P., dated August 21, 1996.(1)
4(a)(5)	Investment Agreement by and between us and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, dated August 21, 1996.(1)
8	List of Principal Subsidiaries.
12(a)(1)	CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 30, 2012.
12(a)(2)	CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 30, 2012.
13	Officer Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 30, 2012.

(1)Previously filed in Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-8266), originally filed with the SEC on January 28, 1998.  Incorporated herein by reference.

(2)Previously filed in Registration Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-9282), originally filed with the SEC on August 13, 1998.  Incorporated herein by reference.

100

(3)Previously filed in Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 1-14852), originally filed with the SEC on July 1, 2002.  Incorporated herein by reference.

(4)Previously filed in Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 1-14852), originally filed with the SEC on June 27, 2008.  Incorporated herein by reference.

(5)Previously filed in Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 1-14852), originally filed with the SEC on June 8, 2011.  Incorporated herein by reference.

101

SIGNATURES

The registrant, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

	GRUMA, S.A.B. de C.V.
		/s/ Juan Antonio Quiroga García
		Juan Antonio Quiroga García
		Chief Corporate Officer
Dated: April 30, 2012

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

CONTENT

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Consolidated financial statements:
Balance sheets	F-3
Income statements	F-4
Statements of comprehensive income	F-5
Statements of changes in equity	F-6
Statements of cash flows	F-7
Notes to the consolidated financial statements	F-8

Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

Table of Contents	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-90
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-92
Consolidated Statements of Income	F-94
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity	F-95
Consolidated Cash Flow Statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009	F-97
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Financial Position For the year ended December 31, 2008	F-98
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-99

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders of

Gruma, S. A. B. de C. V.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of changes in equity and of cash flows, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gruma, S. A. B. de C. V. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), as of December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, and the related consolidated income statements, of comprehensive income, of changes in equity and of cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.  Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included inManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing in Item 15.  Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.  We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and International Standards on Auditing.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, include assets in the amount of Ps.5,839,051 and Ps.3,621,404, respectively, liabilities in the amount of Ps.2,721,870 and Ps.1,931,565, respectively and profit (loss) for the two years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in the amounts of Ps.681,586 and Ps.(169,225), respectively, related to a foreign subsidiary.  As mentioned in Note 25, during 2010 an expropriation decree was issued for the above mentioned subsidiary.  At the date of this report, and as explained in such Note, management of the Company is still in negotiations and therefore the outcome of this matter is uncertain.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, S. C.

/s/ Miguel Angel Puente Buentello

C.P. Miguel Angel Puente Buentello

Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico

April 30, 2012

F-2

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos)

(Notes 1, 2 and 4)

		As of		As of			As of
		January 1,		December 31,			December 31,
	Note	2010		2010			2011
A s s e t s
Current:
Cash and cash equivalents	7	Ps.	1,880,663	Ps.	21,317		Ps.	1,179,651
Trading investments		127,293		79,577			140,255
Derivative financial instruments	20	55,749		13,137			103,413
Accounts receivable, net	8	5,670,752		5,017,797			7,127,208
Inventories	9	7,536,588		7,264,234			10,700,831
Recoverable income tax		427,805		642,474			505,069
Prepaid expenses		336,970		306,557			231,489
Total current assets		16,035,820		13,345,093			19,987,916
Non-current:
Long-term notes and accounts receivable	10	543,295		598,961			626,874
Investment in associates	11	4,020,339		4,436,401			143,700
Property, plant and equipment, net	12	20,043,444		17,930,173			20,515,633
Intangible assets, net	13	2,483,254		2,406,437			2,954,359
Deferred tax assets	14	152,292		210,329			314,136
Total non-current assets		27,242,624		25,582,301			24,554,702
Total Assets		Ps.	43,278,444	Ps.	38,927,394		Ps.	44,542,618
L i a b i l i t i e s
Current:
Short-term debt	15	Ps.	2,203,392	Ps.	2,192,871		Ps.	1,633,207
Trade accounts payable		3,564,372		3,601,829			5,544,105
Derivative financial instruments	20	11,935		4,863			46,013
Provisions	16	247,590		308,801			401,116
Income tax payable		231,574		152,307			624,378
Other current liabilities	17	2,368,388		2,894,694			2,732,215
Total current liabilities		8,627,251		9,155,365			10,981,034
Non-current:
Long-term debt	15	19,572,002		15,852,538			11,472,110
Deferred tax liabilities	14	2,576,819		2,768,015			3,838,316
Employee benefits obligations	18	302,083		350,179			370,402
Provisions	16	82,776		21,353			114,714
Other non-current liabilities		37,751		57,670			53,258
Total non-current liabilities		22,571,431		19,049,755			15,848,800
Total Liabilities		31,198,682		28,205,120			26,829,834
E q u i t y
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock	19	Ps.	6,972,425	Ps.	6,972,425		Ps.	6,972,425
Reserves		16,945		(1,350,082		)	(144,236		)
Retained earnings	19	908,460		1,322,218			6,603,014
Total shareholders’ equity		7,897,830		6,944,561			13,431,203
Non-controlling interest		4,181,932		3,777,713			4,281,581
Total Equity		12,079,762		10,722,274			17,712,784
Total Liabilities and Equity		Ps.	43,278,444	Ps.	38,927,394		Ps.	44,542,618

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except per-share data)

(Notes 1, 2 and 4)

	Note	2010			2011
Net sales		Ps.	46,232,454		Ps.	57,644,749
Cost of sales		(31,563,342		)	(40,117,952		)
Gross profit		14,669,112			17,526,797
Selling and administrative expenses		(12,100,365		)	(13,984,486		)
Other expenses, net	21	(518,732		)	(203,850		)
Operating income		2,050,015			3,338,461
Interest expense		(1,424,152		)	(1,017,122		)
Interest income		33,753			126,389
(Loss) gain from derivative financial instruments		(82,525		)	207,816
Monetary position gain, net		165,869			214,832
Gain from foreign exchange differences, net		143,852			40,885
Comprehensive financing cost, net		(1,163,203		)	(427,200		)
Share of profits of associates		592,235			3,329
Gain from the sale of shares of associate	11	—			4,707,804
Income before income tax		1,479,047			7,622,394
Income tax expense:
Current	23	(578,730		)	(1,004,246		)
Deferred	23	(260,831		)	(802,326		)
		(839,561		)	(1,806,572		)
Consolidated net income		Ps.	639,486		Ps.	5,815,822
Attributable to:
Shareholders		431,779			5,270,762
Non-controlling interest		207,707			545,060
		Ps.	639,486		Ps.	5,815,822
Basic and diluted earnings per share (pesos)		Ps.	0.77		Ps.	9.35
Weighted average shares outstanding (thousands)		563,651			563,651

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos)

(Notes 1, 2 and 4)

	Note	2010			2011
Consolidated net income		Ps.	639,486		Ps.	5,815,822
Other comprehensive income, net:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(1,818,311		)	1,597,671
Actuarial gains and losses	18	(18,949		)	14,061
Share of other comprehensive income of associates		(85,623		)	(5,014		)
Cash flow hedges		—			4,969
Other	14	781			678
		(1,922,102		)	1,612,365
Comprehensive (loss) income		Ps.	(1,282,616	)	Ps.	7,428,187
Attributable to:
Shareholders		(953,269		)	6,486,642
Non-controlling interest		(329,347		)	941,545
		Ps.	(1,282,616	)	Ps.	7,428,187

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos)

(Notes 1, 2 and 4)

	Common stock
	(Note 19-A)			Reserves
				Foreign
				currency												Total
	Number			translation			Share of									share-			Non-
	of shares			adjustment			equity of						Retained			holders’			controlling
	(thousands)	Amount		(Note 19-D)			associates			Other reserves			earnings			equity			interest			Total equity
Balances at January 1, 2010	563,651	Ps.	6,972,425	Ps.	—		Ps.	19,420		Ps.	(2,475	)	Ps.	908,460		Ps.	7,897,830		Ps.	4,181,932		Ps.	12,079,762
Transactions with owners of the Company:
Dividends paid																—			(74,872		)	(74,872		)
	—	—		—			—			—			—			—			(74,872		)	(74,872		)
Comprehensive income:
Net income of the year													431,779			431,779			207,707			639,486
Foreign currency translation adjustment				(1,282,185		)										(1,282,185		)	(536,126		)	(1,818,311		)
Actuarial gains and losses													(18,021		)	(18,021		)	(928		)	(18,949		)
Share of other comprehensive income of associates							(85,623		)							(85,623		)				(85,623		)
Other										781						781						781
Comprehensive loss of the year	—	—		(1,282,185		)	(85,623		)	781			413,758			(953,269		)	(329,347		)	(1,282,616		)
Balances at December 31, 2010	563,651	6,972,425		(1,282,185		)	(66,203		)	(1,694		)	1,322,218			6,944,561			3,777,713			10,722,274
Transactions with owners of the Company:
Dividends paid																—			(524,303		)	(524,303		)
Contribution from non-controlling interest																—			86,626			86,626
																—			(437,677		)	(437,677		)
Comprehensive income:
Net income of the year													5,270,762			5,270,762			545,060			5,815,822
Foreign currency translation adjustment				1,205,213												1,205,213			392,458			1,597,671
Actuarial gains and losses													10,034			10,034			4,027			14,061
Share of other comprehensive income of associates							(5,014		)							(5,014		)				(5,014		)
Cash flow hedges										4,969						4,969						4,969
Other										678						678						678
Comprehensive income of the year	—	—		1,205,213			(5,014		)	5,647			5,280,796			6,486,642			941,545			7,428,187
Balances at December 31, 2011	563,651	Ps.	6,972,425	Ps.	(76,972	)	Ps.	(71,217	)	Ps.	3,953		Ps.	6,603,014		Ps.	13,431,203		Ps.	4,281,581		Ps.	17,712,784

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos)

(Notes 1, 2 and 4)

	2010			2011
Income before taxes	Ps.	1,479,047		Ps.	7,622,394
Restatement effect from companies in hyperinflationary environment	64,899			27,771
Foreign exchange loss (gain) from working capital	434,326			(59,187		)
Net cost of the year for employee benefit obligations	56,148			35,347
Items related with investing activities:
Depreciation and amortization	1,502,534			1,596,643
Impairment of long-lived assets	—			93,808
Written-down fixed assets	—			52,271
Interest income	(7,531		)	(86,846		)
Foreign exchange (gain) loss from cash	(9,635		)	36,797
Share of profit of associates	(592,235		)	(3,329		)
Gain from the sale of shares of associate	—			(4,707,804		)
Loss in sale of fixed assets and damaged assets	64,659			20,812
Items related with financing activities:
Derivative financial instruments	82,525			(207,816		)
Foreign exchange gain from bank borrowings	(561,821		)	(23,953		)
Interest expense	1,391,631			965,128
	3,904,547			5,362,036
Accounts receivable, net	(275,595		)	(1,422,010		)
Inventories	(747,758		)	(3,063,148		)
Prepaid expenses	(126,655		)	101,106
Trade accounts payable	759,773			1,623,802
Accrued liabilities and other accounts payables	561,910			(341,743		)
Income taxes paid	(786,796		)	(561,279		)
Employee benefits obligations and others, net	1,712			52,550
	(613,409		)	(3,610,722		)
Net cash flows from operating activities	3,291,138			1,751,314
Investing activities:
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment	(999,546		)	(1,631,571		)
Sale of property, plant and equipment	139,066			100,726
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired	(106,970		)	(708,664		)
Acquisition of intangible assets	(3,879		)	(22,724		)
Sale of shares of associate	—			9,003,700
Interests collected	7,086			86,403
Dividends received from associates	90,550			—
Acquisition of trading investments	(19,423		)	(49,837		)
Sale of securities held until maturity and others	90,908			1,096
Net cash flows from investing activities	(802,208		)	6,779,129
Cash in excess to be used in financing activities	2,488,930			8,530,443
Financing activities:
Proceeds from debt	458,710			15,219,575
Payment of debt	(3,257,291		)	(21,373,729		)
Interests paid	(1,341,991		)	(991,784		)
Derivative financial instruments (paid) collected	(18,987		)	154,556
Acquisition of subsidiary shares by non-controlling interest	—			86,626
Dividends paid	(74,872		)	(524,303		)
Net cash flows from financing activities	(4,234,431		)	(7,429,059		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(1,745,501		)	1,101,384
Exchange differences and effects from inflation on cash and cash equivalents	(113,845		)	56,950
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year	1,880,663			21,317
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year	Ps.	21,317		Ps.	1,179,651

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

1.ENTITY AND OPERATIONS

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. (GRUMA) is a Mexican company with subsidiaries located in Mexico, the United States of America, Central America, Venezuela, Europe, Asia and Oceania, together referred to as the “Company”. The Company’s main activities are the production and sale of corn flour, wheat flour, tortillas and related products.

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. is a publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable) organized under the laws of Mexico. The address of its registered office is Rio de la Plata 407 in San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, Mexico.

The consolidated financial statements were authorized by the Chief Corporate Office and the Chief Administrative Office of the Company on April 30, 2012.

2.BASIS OF PREPARATION

The consolidated financial statements of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 have been prepared for the first time in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The IFRS also include the International Accounting Standards (IAS) in force, as well as all the related interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), including those previously issued by the Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC).

In accordance with the amendments to the Rules for Public Companies and Other Participants in the Mexican Stock Exchange, issued by the Mexican Banking Securities Exchange Commission on January 27, 2009, the Company is required to prepare its financial statements under IFRS starting in 2012.

The Company decided to adopt IFRS earlier, starting January 1, 2011, therefore, these are the Company’s first consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.

For comparative purposes, the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as required by the IFRS 1 — First-Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards.

The Company modified its accounting policies from Mexican Financial Reporting Standards (Mexican FRS) in order to comply with IFRS starting January 1, 2011. The transition from Mexican FRS to IFRS was recognized in accordance with IFRS 1, setting January 1, 2010 as the transition date. The reconciliation of the effects of the transition from Mexican FRS to IFRS in equity as of January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010, in net income and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010 are disclosed in Note 28 to these financial statements.

A)    BASIS OF MEASUREMENT

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of historical cost, except for the fair value of certain financial instruments as described in the policies below.

F-8

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

2.BASIS OF PREPARATION (continued)

The preparation of financial statements requires that management make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

B)    FUNCTIONAL AND PRESENTATION CURRENCY

The consolidated financial statements are presented in Mexican pesos, which is the functional currency of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.

C)    USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS

The relevant estimates and assumptions are reviewed on a regular basis. The review of accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate was reviewed and in any future period that is affected.

In particular, the information for assumptions, uncertainties from estimates, and critical judgments in the application of accounting policies that have the most significant effect in the recognized amounts in these consolidated financial statements, are described below:

·The useful lives and residual values of property, plant and equipment (Note 12) and of intangible assets (Note 13).

·The assumptions used for the determination of fair values of financial instruments (Note 20).

·The assumptions and uncertainties with respect to the interpretation of complex tax regulations, changes in tax laws, and the amount and timing of future taxable income (Notes 14 and 23).

·The key assumptions in impairment testing for long-lived assets used for the determination of the recoverable amount for the different cash generating units (Notes 12 and 13).

·The actuarial assumptions used for the determination of employee benefits (Note 18).

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

A)ALBUQUERQUE TORTILLA COMPANY

On April 15, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary Gruma Corporation, acquired the business of manufacturing, distributing and selling of corn and wheat flour tortillas of Albuquerque Tortilla Company, which is located in New Mexico, United States, for Ps.102,410 (U.S.$8,882 thousand) paid in cash. This purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method, following the business combination rules. The purpose of this acquisition is to contribute to the growth and strengthening of the Company’s tortilla business in the south-central region of the United States under a strong and recognized brand.

F-9

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (continued)

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired:

Inventories	Ps.	1,753
Property, plant and equipment	47,700
Non-compete agreement	8,993
Customer lists	5,189
Trademarks	17,641
Fair value of identifiable assets	Ps.	81,276
Goodwill	21,134
Total consideration paid in cash	Ps.	102,410

The goodwill recorded for this acquisition represents the value of acquiring an on-going business with an assembled and trained workforce, and business growth prospects in the south-central region of the United States. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs such as advisory fees, appraisal fees, valuation services and legal fees amounted to Ps.2,497 and were recognized in the income statement as follows: Ps.416 as cost of sales and Ps.2,081 as selling and administrative expenses.

No contingent liabilities and contingent consideration arrangements have arisen from this acquisition.

From January 1, 2011 to the acquisition date, this business recorded an estimated revenue of Ps.64,979 and a net loss of approximately Ps.29,475.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company is concluding the process of allocating the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired, based on the assessments made by independent appraisers. The Company estimates that this process will be completed within a period of twelve months from the acquisition date.

B)CASA DE ORO FOODS

On August 25, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary Gruma Corporation, acquired the business of manufacturing, distributing and selling of corn and wheat flour tortillas of Casa de Oro Foods, which is located in Nebraska, United States for Ps.280,615 (U.S.$22,722 thousand) paid in cash. This purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method, following the business combination rules. The strategic location of Casa de Oro will help improve and increase the Company’s coverage in the midwest region of the United States, generating savings in transportation and increasing the production of corn flour tortillas and tortilla chips.

F-10

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (continued)

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired:

Accounts receivable	Ps.	40,026
Inventories	16,808
Prepaid expenses	185
Current liabilities	(21,489		)
Working capital	Ps.	35,530
Property, plant and equipment	122,351
Wheat futures	1,099
Non-compete agreement	7,163
Customer lists	41,372
Trademarks	4,817
Fair value of identifiable assets	Ps.	212,332
Goodwill	68,283
Total consideration paid in cash	Ps.	280,615

The accounts receivable fair value is not significantly different from its contractual value as the receivables are short term, with the full value being collected 30 to 45 days after the acquisition.

The goodwill recorded for this acquisition represents the value of acquiring an on-going business with an assembled and trained workforce, and business growth prospects in the midwest region of the United States. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs such as advisory fees, appraisal fees, valuation services and legal fees amounted to Ps.4,415 and were recognized in the income statement as follows: Ps.1,565 as cost of sales and Ps.2,850 as selling and administrative expenses.

From January 1, 2011 to the acquisition date, this business recorded an estimated revenue of Ps.193,938 and a net income of approximately Ps.11,747.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company is concluding the process of allocating the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired, based on the assessments made by independent appraisers. The Company estimates that this process will be completed within a period of twelve months from the acquisition date.

The Company has filed an idemnification claim with the seller for approximately Ps.15,869 (U.S.$1,186 thousand) for failure of the seller to disclose that one of its major customers had notified the seller that it would discontinue two products. Based upon the seller’s initial responses, it is possible that this claim may not be resolved quickly and may result in litigation. Due to the uncertainty of the outcome of this claim, it was not considered in the purchase price allocation. If the claim results in a favorable resolution for the Company, it will be applied as a reduction of the goodwill recognized for this acquisition.

F-11

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (continued)

C)    SOLNTSE MEXICO

On July 13, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary Gruma International Foods, S.L., acquired all issued and outstanding shares of Solntse Mexico, which is located in Russia, for Ps.104,923 (U.S.$8,781 thousand). Solntse Mexico is the leading producer of corn and wheat flour tortillas, corn chips and other products, under the brand Delicados. This company introduced tortillas and corn chips to the Russian market and currently commands the leading market position in Russia’s retail and foodservice segments. This acquisition represents the Company’s entry into Russia and other Eastern Europe countries.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired:

Cash	Ps.	6,268
Accounts receivable	11,389
Prepaid expenses	240
Inventories	15,000
Current liabilities	(7,329		)
Working capital	Ps.	25,568
Property, plant and equipment	34,173
Intangible assets	1,358
Long term debt	(22,242		)
Deferred tax liabilities	(1,426		)
Fair value of identifiable assets	Ps.	37,431
Goodwill	67,492
Purchase price	Ps.	104,923
Outstanding payment due to contingent consideration	(22,320		)
Total consideration paid in cash	Ps.	82,603

The accounts receivable fair value is not significantly different from its contractual value as the receivables are short term with the full value being collected 30 to 45 days after the acquisition.

The goodwill recorded for this acquisition represents the value of acquiring an on-going business with an assembled and trained workforce, and business growth prospects in the Eastern Europe and Middle East regions. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs such as advisory fees, appraisal fees, valuation services and legal fees amounted to Ps.16,367 (U.S.$1,313 thousand) and were recognized in the income statement as selling and administrative expenses.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company was finalizing the process of allocating the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired, based on the assessments made by independent appraisers. The Company estimates that this process will be completed within a period of twelve months from the acquisition date.

F-12

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (continued)

For the period from July 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, this business contributed revenues of Ps.84,002 and a net income of Ps.5,556. If the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2011, revenues and net income would have increased by approximately Ps.28,034 and Ps.2,711, respectively.

D)    SEMOLINA A.S.

On November 16, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary Gruma International Foods, S.L., acquired all issued and outstanding shares of Semolina A.S., which is located in Turkey, for Ps.230,388 (U.S.$17,035 thousand). Semolina is the leading corn miller in Turkey, and specializes in supplying corn grits for the snack and breakfast cereals industries. The acquisition of Semolina represents a significant milestone for the Company’s growth strategy in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The Company’s European milling division’s priority is to consolidate itself as a market leader in corn milling and related products for the snack, brewing and breakfast cereals industries.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired:

Cash	Ps.	3,405
Accounts receivable	33,742
Prepaid expenses	1,237
Inventories	580
Current liabilities	(45,310		)
Working capital	Ps.	(6,346	)
Property, plant and equipment	48,959
Intangible assets	41
Fair value of identifiable assets	Ps.	42,654
Goodwill	187,734
Purchase price	Ps.	230,388
Outstanding payment due to contingent consideration	(24,413		)
Total consideration paid in cash	Ps.	205,975

The accounts receivable fair value is not significantly different from its contractual value as the receivables are short term with the full value being collected 30 to 45 days after the acquisition.

The goodwill recorded for this acquisition represents the value of acquiring an on-going business with an assembled and trained workforce, and business growth prospects in the Eastern Europe and Middle East regions. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs such as advisory fees, appraisal fees, valuation services and legal fees amounted to Ps.11,259 (U.S.$903 thousand) and were recognized in the income statement as selling and administrative expenses.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company was finalizing the process of allocating the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired, based on the assessments made by independent appraisers. The Company estimates that this process will be completed within a period of twelve months from the acquisition date.

F-13

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

3.   BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (continued)

For the period from November 17, 2011 to December 31, 2011, this business contributed revenues of Ps.42,624 and a net loss of Ps.12,798. If the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2011, revenues would have increased by approximately Ps.296,988 and net loss would have decreased by approximately Ps.12,762.

E)ALTERA LLC AND ALTERA-II LLC

On March 4, 2010, the Company, through its subsidiary Gruma International Foods, S.L., acquired all issued and outstanding shares of Altera LLC and Altera-II LLC (together known as “Altera”), which are considered as the leading producers of corn grits in Ukraine for a total of Ps.107,484 (U.S.$8,717 thousand). The acquisition of Altera represents a significant milestone for the Company’s growth strategy in Russia and Eastern Europe to consolidate itself as a market leader in corn flour and corn grits for the snack and brewing industries. Altera represents a stable business, with an important customer portfolio in the local market and in Russia. Altera has a strategic logistics position due to the fact that it is located in a region with substantial corn production.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired:

Cash	Ps.	514
Accounts receivable		19,630
Prepaid expenses		2,722
Inventories		3,316
Deferred tax assets		7,968
Current liabilities		(11,307	)
Working capital	Ps.	22,843
Property, plant and equipment		12,636
Long term debt		(18,475	)
Fair value of identifiable assets	Ps.	17,004
Goodwill		90,480
Purchase price	Ps.	107,484
Outstanding payment due to contingent consideration		(8,645	)
Total consideration paid in cash	Ps.	98,839

The accounts receivable fair value is not significantly different from its contractual value as the receivables are short term with the full value being collected 30 to 45 days after the acquisition.

The goodwill recorded for this acquisition represents the value of acquiring an on-going business with an assembled and trained workforce, and business growth prospects in Russia and Eastern Europe. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs such as advisory fees, appraisal fees, valuation services and legal fees amounted to Ps.30,965 (U.S.$2,449 thousand) and were recognized in the income statement as selling and administrative expenses.

F-14

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

3.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (continued)

For the period from April 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, this business contributed revenues of Ps.187,742 and a net income of Ps.2,244. If the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2010, revenues would have increased by approximately Ps.80,134 and net income would have decreased by approximately Ps.2,781.

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A)  BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION

a. Subsidiaries

The subsidiaries are all entities (including special purpose entities) over which the Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the group controls another entity. The financial statements of subsidiaries are incorporated in the consolidated financial statements commencing on the date on which the control begins, until the date when that control ceases.

Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated. Unrealized losses are also eliminated. Subsidiaries’ accounting policies have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Company.

At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, the main subsidiaries included in the consolidation were:

	% of ownership
	At January1, 2010	At December 31, 2010	At December 31, 2011
Gruma Corporation and subsidiaries	100.00	100.00	100.00
Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries	83.18	83.18	83.18
Molinos Nacionales, C.A.	72.86	72.86	72.86
Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A.	57.00	57.00	57.00
Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V. and subsidiaries	60.00	60.00	60.00
Gruma International Foods, S.L. and subsidiaries	100.00	100.00	100.00
Productos y Distribuidora Azteca, S.A. de C.V.	100.00	100.00	100.00
Investigación de Tecnología Avanzada, S.A. de C.V. and subsidiaries	100.00	100.00	100.00

b. Transactions with non-controlling interest without change of control

The Company applies a policy of treating transactions with non-controlling interest as transactions with equity owners of the Company. When purchases from non-controlling interest take place, the difference between any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary is recognized as operations with holders of equity instruments; therefore, no goodwill is recognized with these acquisitions. Disposals to non-controlling interests result in gains and losses for the group and are also recorded in equity when there is no loss of control.

F-15

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

c. Business combinations

Business combinations are recognized through the acquisition method of accounting. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is measured as the fair value of the assets given, the liabilities incurred by the Company with the previous owners and the equity instruments issued by the Company. The cost of an acquisition also includes the fair value of any contingent payment.

The related acquisition costs are recognized in the income statement when incurred.

Identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and contingent liabilities in a business combination are measured at fair value at the acquisition date.

The Company recognizes any non-controlling interest as the proportional share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired entity.

The Company recognizes goodwill when the cost including any amount of non-controlling interest in the acquired entity exceeds the fair value at acquisition date of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

B) FOREIGN CURRENCY

a. Transactions in foreign currency

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency of the Company using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at year-end exchange rates. The differences that arise from the translation of foreign currency transactions are recognized in the income statement.

b. Foreign currency translation

The financial statements of the Company’s entities are measured using the currency of the main economic environment where the entity operates (functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Mexican pesos, currency that corresponds to the presentation currency of the Company.

The financial position and results of all of the group entities that have a functional currency which differs from the presentation currency are translated as follows:

·Assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate of the period.

·Income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates.

·All resulting exchange differences are recognized in other comprehensive income as a separate component of equity denominated “Foreign currency translation adjustments”.

F-16

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The Company applies hedge accounting to foreign exchange differences originated between the functional currency of a foreign subsidiary and the functional currency of the Company. Exchange differences resulting from the translation of a financial liability designated as hedge for a net investment in a foreign subsidiary, are recognized in other comprehensive income as a separate component denominated “Foreign currency translation adjustments” while the hedge is effective. See Note 4-L for the accounting of the net investment hedge.

Previous to the peso translation, the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries with functional currency from a hyperinflationary environment are adjusted by inflation in order to reflect the changes in purchasing power of the local currency. Subsequently, assets, liabilities, equity, income, costs, and expenses are translated to the presentation currency at the closing rate at the date of the most recent balance sheet. To determine the existence of hyperinflation, the Company evaluates the qualitative characteristics of the economic environment, as well as the quantitative characteristics established by IFRS of an accumulated inflation rate equal or higher than 100% in the past three years.

The exchange rates used for preparing the financial statements are as follows:

	As of January 1, 2010	As of December 31, 2010	As of December 31, 2011
Pesos per U.S. dollar	13.07	12.35	13.95
Pesos per Euro	18.7358	16.4959	18.0764
Pesos per Swiss franc	12.63	13.22	14.87
Pesos per Venezuelan bolivar	6.0791	2.8721	3.2442
Pesos per Australian dollar	11.7565	12.6341	14.2178
Pesos per Chinese yuan	1.9145	1.8692	2.2161
Pesos per Pound sterling	21.1041	19.3352	21.6797
Pesos per Malaysian ringgit	3.8143	4.0313	4.4035
Pesos per Costa Rica colon	0.0231	0.0239	0.0270
Pesos per Ukrainian hryvnia	—	1.5550	1.7553
Pesos per Russian ruble	—	—	0.4341
Pesos per Turkish lira	—	—	7.3935

C)  CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short term highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than three months. These items are recognized at historical cost, which do not differ significantly from its fair value.

D)  ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Trade receivables are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently valued at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, less provision for impairment. The Company has determined that the amortized cost does not represent significant differences with respect to the invoiced amount from short-term trade receivables, since the transactions do not have relevant associated costs.

F-17

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Allowances for doubtful accounts or impairment represent the Company’s estimates of losses that could arise from the failure or inability of customers to make payments when due. These estimates are based on the ageing of customers’ balances, specific credit circumstances and the Company’s historical bad receivables experience.

E)  INVENTORIES

Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the average cost method. The net realizable value is the estimated selling price of inventory in the normal course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses. The cost of finished goods and production in process comprises raw materials, direct labor, other direct costs and related production overheads. Cost of inventories may also include the transfer from equity of any gains or losses on qualifying cash flow hedges for purchases of raw materials.

F)  INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES

Associates are all entities over which the Company has significant influence over, but does not control the financial and operative decisions. It is assumed that significant influence exists when there is a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights of the other entity or less than 20% when it is clearly demonstrated that such significant influence exists.

Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are initially recognized at cost. The Company’s investment in associates includes goodwill identified on acquisition, net of any accumulated impairment losses.

The Company’s share of its associates’ post-acquisition profits or losses is recognized in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in other comprehensive income is recognized in other comprehensive income. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying value of the investment. When the group’s share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, including any other unsecured receivables, the Company does not recognize further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate. Unrealized gains and losses from transactions held with associates are eliminated from the investment in proportion to the Company’s share in the entity.

Accounting policies of associates have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the group.

G)  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment are valued at acquisition cost, less accumulated depreciation and recognized impairment losses. Cost includes expenses that are directly attributable to the asset acquisition.

F-18

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Subsequent costs, including major improvements, are capitalized and are included in the carrying value of the asset or recognized as a separate asset as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the specific asset will flow to the Company and the costs can be measured reliably. Repairs and maintenance are recognized in the income statement when incurred. Major improvements are depreciated during the remaining useful life of the related asset. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the lower of the lease term or useful life. Land is not depreciated.

Costs of borrowings associated to financing of qualifying assets that require a substantial period of time for acquisition or construction, are capitalized as part of the acquisition cost of these assets, until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale.

Depreciation is calculated over the asset cost less residual value, considering its components separately. Depreciation is recognized in income using the straight-line method and applying annual rates that reflect the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are summarized as follows:

	Years
Buildings	25 - 50
Machinery and equipment	5 - 25
Leasehold improvements	10 *

* The lesser of 10 years or the term of the leasehold agreement.

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the end of each reporting period.

Property, plant, and equipment are subject to impairment tests when certain events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recovered. An impairment loss is recognized for the excess of book value over its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use.

Gains and losses from sale of assets result from the difference between revenues of the transaction and the book value of the assets, which is included in the income statement as other expenses, net.

H)  INTANGIBLE ASSETS

a. Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Company’s share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment, or whenever the circumstances indicate that the value of the asset might be impaired. Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill related to the entity sold.

Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing. The allocation is made to those cash-generating units or groups of cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the business combination in which the goodwill arose, identified according to operating segment.

F-19

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

b. Intangible assets with finite lives

Intangible assets with finite lives are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses. Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives are as follows:

	Years
Non-compete agreements	20
Patents and trademarks	20
Customer lists	20
Software for internal use	3 - 7

c. Indefinite-lived intangible assets

Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but subject to impairment tests on an annual basis or whenever the circumstances indicate that the value of the asset might be impaired.

d. Research and development

Research costs are expensed when incurred.

Costs from development activities are recognized as an intangible asset when such costs can be measured reliably, the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, future economic benefits will be obtained, and the Company pretends and has sufficient resources in order to complete the development and use or sell the asset. The amortization is recognized in income based on the straight-line method during the estimated useful life of the asset.

Development costs that do not qualify as intangible assets are recognized in income when incurred.

I)  IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company performs impairment tests for its property, plant and equipment, intangible assets with finite lives, and investment in associates, when certain events and circumstances suggest that the carrying value of the assets might not be recovered. Indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill are subject to impairment tests at least once a year.

An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. To determine value in use, estimated future cash flows are discounted at present value, using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects time value of money and considering the specific risks associated with the asset. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating unit).

F-20

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. For other assets, impairment losses are reversed if a change in the estimates used for determining the recoverable amount has occurred. Impairment losses are reversed to the extent that the book value does not exceed the book value that was determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss was recognized.

J)  LONG-LIVED ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Long-lived assets are classified as held for sale when (a) their carrying amount is to be recovered mainly through a sale transaction, rather than through continuing use, (b) the assets are held immediately for sale and (c) the sale is considered highly probable in its current condition.

For the sale to be considered highly probable:

·Management must be committed to a sale plan.

·An active program must have begun in order to locate a buyer and to complete the plan.

·The asset must actively be quoted for its sale at a price that is reasonable to its current fair value; and

·The sale is expected to be completed within a year starting the date of classification.

Non-current assets held for sale are stated at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

K)  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Regular purchases and sales of financial instruments are recognized in the balance sheet on the trade date, which is the date when the Company commits to purchase or sell the instrument.

a. Financial assets

Classification

In its initial recognition and based on its nature and characteristics, the Company classifies its financial assets in the following categories: (i) financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, (ii) loans and receivables, (iii) financial assets held until maturity, and (iv) available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired.

i. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

A financial asset is classified at fair value through profit or loss when designated as held for trading or classified as such in its initial recognition. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term. Assets in this category are carried at fair value, and directly attributable transaction costs and corresponding changes of fair value are recognized in the income statement. Derivatives are also categorized as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as current assets if expected to be settled within 12 months; otherwise, they are classified as non-current.

F-21

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

ii. Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for assets with maturities greater than 12 months. Initially, these assets are carried at fair value plus any transaction costs directly attributable to them; subsequently, these assets are recognized at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.

iii. Financial assets held until maturity

When the Company has the intention and capacity to keep debt instruments until maturity, these financial assets are classified as held until maturity. Initially, these assets are carried at fair value plus any transaction costs directly attributable to them; subsequently, these assets are recognized at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.

iv. Available-for-sale financial assets

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in current assets, except for assets with maturities greater than 12 months. These assets are initially recognized at fair value plus any transaction costs directly attributable to them; subsequently, these assets are recognized at fair value. If these assets cannot be measured through an active market, then its fair value is determined through a valuation technique. Profit or losses from changes in the fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income in the period when incurred. At disposition date, such profit or losses are recognized in income.

b. Debt and financial liabilities

Debt and financial liabilities that are non-derivatives are initially recognized at fair value, net of transaction costs directly attributable to them: subsequently, these liabilities are recognized at amortized cost. The difference between the net proceeds and the amount payable is recognized in the income statement during the debt term, using the effective interest rate method.

c. Impairment of financial assets

The Company assesses at each reporting date whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that have occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred “loss event”) and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. See Note 4-D for the accounting policy for the impairment of accounts receivable.

F-22

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

L)  DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value; the transaction costs are recognized in the income statement when incurred. Derivative financial instruments are classified as current, except for maturities exceeding 12 months.

Fair value is determined based on recognized market prices. When not quoted in markets, fair value is determined using valuation techniques commonly used in the financial sector. Fair value reflects the credit risk of the instrument and includes adjustments to consider the credit risk of the Company or the counterparty, when applicable.

The method for recognizing the resulting gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedge and, if so, the nature of the item being hedged. The Company designates derivative financial instruments as follows:

·Hedges of the fair value of recognized assets or liabilities or a firm commitment (fair value hedge);

·Hedges of a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (cash flow hedge); or

·Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation (net investment hedge).

The Company documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, including objectives, strategies for risk management and the method for assessing effectiveness in the hedge relationship.

a. Fair value hedges

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk.

b. Cash flow hedges

For cash flow hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instrument are included as other comprehensive income in equity, based on the evaluation of the hedge effectiveness, and are reclassified to the income statement in the periods when the projected transaction is realized.

Hedge effectiveness is determined when changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged position are compensated with changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedge instrument in a quotient that ranges between 80% and 125% of inverse correlation. Ineffective portions from changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are recognized immediately in the income statement.

When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognized when the forecasted transaction is ultimately registered in the income statement.

F-23

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

c. Net investment hedge

Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. Any gain or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognized in other comprehensive income. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized in the income statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are included in the income statement when the foreign operation is partially disposed of or sold.

M) LEASES

a. Operating leases

Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are recognized in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.

b. Finance leases

Leases where the Company has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases.

Under finance leases, at the initial date, both assets and liabilities are recognized at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments. In order to discount the minimum payments, the Company uses the interest rate implicit in the lease, if this practicable to determine; if not, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate is used.

Lease payments are allocated between the interest expense and the reduction of the pending liability. Interest income is recognized in each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic interest rate on the remaining balance of the liability.

Property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases is depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset and the lease term.

N)  EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

a. Post-employment benefits

In Mexico, the Company has the following defined benefit plans:

·Single-payment retirement plan, when employees reach the required retirement age, which is 60.

·      Seniority premium, after 15 years of service.

The Company has established trust funds in order to meet its obligations for the seniority premium. Employees do not contribute to these funds.

F-24

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The liability recognized in the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation, less the fair value of plan assets, together with adjustments for unrecognized past-service costs. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method.

The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated cash outflows using discount rates in accordance with IAS-19, that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid, and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related liability.

Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. Past service costs are recognized immediately in the income statement, unless the changes to the plan are conditional on the employees remaining in service for a specified period of time (the vesting period). In this case, past-service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

In the United States, the Company has a savings and investment plan that incorporates voluntary employee 401 (k) contributions with matching contributions of the Company in this country. The Company’s contributions are recognized in the income statement when incurred.

In Venezuela, the Company determines severance amounts for employment termination in accordance with the local Labor Law and collective agreements, and transfers these amounts to a trust for each worker. Contributions to each trust are recognized in income when incurred.

b. Termination benefits

Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated by decision of the Company, before the normal retirement date.

The Company recognizes termination benefits as a liability only when there has been a commitment to a detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal. Termination benefits that do not meet this requirement are recognized in the income statement in the period when incurred.

c. Short term benefits

Short term employee benefits are measured at nominal base and are recognized as expenses as the service is rendered. If the Company has the legal or constructive obligation to pay as a result of a service rendered by the employee in the past and the amount can be estimated, an obligation is recognized for short term bonuses or profit sharing.

O)  PROVISIONS

Provisions are recognized when (a) the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events; (b) it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and (c) the amount has been reliably estimated.

F-25

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the specific risks of the obligation. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

P)  SHARE CAPITAL

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

Q)  REVENUE RECOGNITION

Sales are recognized upon shipment to, and acceptance by, the Company’s customers or when the risk of ownership has passed to the customers. Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of returns, discounts, and rebates. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, returns and other adjustments are recognized in the same period that the related sales are recorded and are based upon either historical estimates or actual terms.

R)  INCOME TAXES

The tax expense of the period comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognized in the income statement, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively.

The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date in the countries where the Company and its subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.

Deferred income tax is recognized from the analysis of the balance sheet considering temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates that have been enacted at the date of the balance sheet and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realized or the deferred income tax liability is settled.

Deferred income tax assets are recognized for tax loss carry-forwards not used, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized. In each period-end deferred income tax assets are reviewed and reduced to the extent that it is not probable that the benefits will be realized.

Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Company and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

F-26

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

4.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if the entity has a legally enforceable right to set off assets against liabilities and these are related to income tax levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity.

S)  EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, excluding ordinary shares purchased by the Company and held as treasury shares. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares, which include convertible debt and share options.

T)  SEGMENT REPORTING

An operating segment is a component of the Company that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same entity. Operating results from an operating segment are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief executive officer to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available.

5.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

A)  RISK MANAGEMENT

The Company is exposed to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, interest rate risk, and commodity price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The group’s overall risk management focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on financial performance. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to hedge some of these risks.

Currency risk

The Company operates internationally and thus, is exposed to currency risks, particularly with the U.S. dollar. Currency risks arise from commercial operations, recognized assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign subsidiaries.

The following tables detail the exposure of the Company to currency risks at January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011. The tables show the carrying amount of the Company’s financial instruments denominated in foreign currency.

F-27

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

5.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)

At January 1, 2010:

	Amounts in thousands of Mexican pesos
	U.S. Dollar			Pound sterling			Venezuelan bolivar			Euros			Costa Rica colons and others			Total
Monetary assets:
Current	Ps.	2,061,769		Ps.	38,249		Ps.	1,722,114		Ps.	234,904		Ps.	555,074		Ps.	4,612,110
Non-current	27,536			—			13,822			1,973			15,712			59,043
Monetary liabilities:
Current	(3,908,767		)	(146,826		)	(2,261,136		)	(145,376		)	(364,208		)	(6,826,313		)
Non-current	(16,898,484		)	(745		)	(47,316		)	(58,442		)	(46,246		)	(17,051,233		)
Net position	Ps.	(18,717,946	)	Ps.	(109,322	)	Ps.	(572,516	)	Ps.	33,059		Ps.	160,332		Ps.	(19,206,393	)

At December 31, 2010:

	Amounts in thousands of Mexican pesos
	U.S. Dollar			Pound sterling			Venezuelan bolivar			Euros			Costa Rica colons and others			Total
Monetary assets:
Current	Ps.	1,777,322		Ps.	82,151		Ps.	1,057,283		Ps.	129,748		Ps.	454,600		Ps.	3,501,104
Non-current	24,021			1,270			8,089			2,793			3,642			39,815
Monetary liabilities:
Current	(4,069,370		)	(158,958		)	(1,392,016		)	(222,625		)	(332,376		)	(6,175,345		)
Non-current	(13,550,278		)	(20,049		)	(26,713		)	(34,963		)	(53,075		)	(13,685,078		)
Net position	Ps.	(15,818,305	)	Ps.	(95,586	)	Ps.	(353,357	)	Ps.	(125,047	)	Ps.	72,791		Ps.	(16,319,504	)

At December 31, 2011:

	Amounts in thousands of Mexican pesos
	U.S. Dollar			Pound sterling			Venezuelan bolivar			Euros			Costa Rica colons and others			Total
Monetary assets:
Current	Ps.	2,867,933		Ps.	313,652		Ps.	1,085,573		Ps.	172,257		Ps.	935,694		Ps.	5,375,109
Non-current	20,809			1,428			522			33,608			42,170			98,537
Monetary liabilities:
Current	(4,627,116		)	(173,062		)	(1,970,433		)	(273,115		)	(515,808		)	(7,559,534		)
Non-current	(11,615,016		)	(1,074		)	(22,356		)	(33,253		)	(69,899		)	(11,741,598		)
Net position	Ps.	(13,353,390	)	Ps.	140,944		Ps.	(906,694	)	Ps.	(100,503	)	Ps.	392,157		Ps.	(13,827,486	)

F-28

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

5.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the effects of exchange rate differences on the Company’s monetary assets and liabilities were recognized as follows:

	2010		2011
Exchange differences arising from foreign currency liabilities accounted for as a hedge of the Company’s net investment in foreign subsidiaries, recorded directly to equity as an effect of foreign currency translation adjustments	Ps.	296,636	Ps.	(813,101	)
Exchange differences arising from foreign currency transactions recognized in the income statement	143,852		40,885
	Ps.	440,488	Ps.	(772,216	)

Net sales are denominated in Mexican pesos, U.S. dollars, and other currencies. During 2011, 34% of sales were generated in Mexican pesos and 38% in U.S. dollars. Additionally, at December 31, 2011, 67% of total assets were denominated in different currencies other than Mexican pesos, mainly in U.S. dollars. An important portion of operations are financed through debt denominated in U.S. dollars. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, net sales in foreign currency amounted to Ps. 30,732,369 and Ps.37,819,919, respectively.

An important currency risk for the debt denominated in U.S. dollars is present in subsidiaries that are not located in the United States, which represented 83% of total debt denominated in U.S. dollars.

During 2010 and 2011, the Company carried out forward transactions with the intention of hedging the currency risk of the Mexican peso with respect to the U.S. dollar, related with the price of corn purchases for domestic and imported harvest. These foreign exchange derivative instruments that did not qualify for hedging accounting were recognized at their fair value. At December 31, 2010 and 2011, the open positions of these instruments represented an unfavorable effect of approximately Ps.4,863 and a favorable effect of approximately Ps.88,537, respectively, which was recognized in the income statement.

At December 31, 2011 the Company had foreign exchange derivative instruments for a nominal amount of U.S.$106 million with different maturities, ranging from January to March 2012. The purpose of these instruments is to hedge the risks related to foreign exchange differences in the price of corn, which is denominated in U.S. dollars.

The effect of foreign exchange differences recognized in the income statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, related with the assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency, totaled a gain of Ps.143,852 and Ps.40,885, respectively. Considering the exposure at December 31, 2010 and 2011, and assuming an increase or decrease of 10% in the exchange rates while keeping constant the rest of the variables such as interest rates, the effect after taxes in the Company’s consolidated results will be Ps.605,597 and Ps.128,673, respectively.

F-29

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

5.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)

Interest rate risk

The variations in interest rates could affect the interest income or expense of financial liabilities bearing variable interest rates, and could also modify the fair value of financial liabilities bearing fixed interest rates.

For the Company, interest rate risk is mainly derived from debt financing transactions, including debt securities, bank and vendor credit facilities and leases. These financing transactions generate exposure to interest rate risk, principally due to changes in relevant base rates (mainly, LIBOR, and to a lesser extent, TIIE and Venezuela’s weighted average rate) that are used to determine the interest rates applicable to the borrowings. The Company had Ps.4,281 million in fixed rate debt and Ps.8,824 million in variable rate debt at December 31, 2011.

The following table shows, at December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company’s debt at fixed and variable rates:

	Amounts in thousands of Mexican pesos
	2010		2011
Debt at fixed interest rate	Ps.	3,994,945	Ps.	4,280,821
Debt at variable interest rate	14,050,464		8,824,496
Total	Ps.	18,045,409	Ps.	13,105,317

From time to time, the Company uses derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps for the purposes of hedging a portion of its debt, in order to reduce the Company’s exposure to increases in interest rates.

For variable rate debt, an increase in interest rates will increase interest expense. A hypothetical increase of 100 basis points in interest rates on debt at December 31, 2011 will have an effect on the results of the Company of Ps.88,246, considering debt and interest rates at that date, and assuming that the rest of the variables remain constant.

Commodity price risk and derivatives

The availability and price of corn, wheat and other agricultural commodities and fuels are subject to wide fluctuations due to factors outside of the Company’s control, such as weather, plantings, government (domestic and foreign) farm programs and policies, changes in global demand/supply and global production of similar and competitive crops. The Company hedges a portion of its production requirements through commodity futures and options contracts in order to reduce the risk created by price fluctuations and supply of corn, wheat, natural gas, diesel and soy oils which exist as part of ongoing business operations. The open positions for hedges of purchases do not exceed the maximum production requirements for a period no longer than 18 months.

F-30

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

5.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)

During 2011, the Company entered into short-term hedge transactions through commodity futures and options to hedge a portion of its requirements. All derivative financial instruments are recorded at their fair value as either assets or liabilities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in earnings or accumulated other comprehensive income in equity, depending on whether the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting and is effective as part of a hedge transaction. Ineffectiveness results when the change in the fair value of the hedge instruments differs from the change in the fair value of the position.

For hedge transactions that qualify and are effective, gains and losses are deferred until the underlying asset or liability is settled, and then are recognized as part of that transaction.

Gains and losses which represent hedge ineffectiveness and derivative transactions that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized in the income statement.

At December 31, 2011, financial instruments that qualify as hedge accounting represented a favorable effect of Ps.14,876, which was recognized as comprehensive income in equity.

From time to time the Company hedges commodity price risks utilizing futures and options strategies that do not qualify for hedge accounting. As a result of non-qualification, these derivative financial instruments are recognized at their fair values and the associated effect is recorded in current period earnings. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company recognized an unfavorable effect of Ps.13,228 and Ps.40,207, respectively, from not-settled financial instruments that did not qualify as hedge accounting. Additionally, as of December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company realized Ps.42,970 and Ps.52,626, respectively, in net losses on commodity price risk hedges that did not qualify for hedge accounting.

During 2010, the Company entered into hedge contracts for corn purchases, which were designated as fair value hedges. Therefore, the derivative financial instruments, as well as the assets and liabilities being hedged, are recognized at fair value at the trade date. Changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments and the assets and liabilities being hedged are recognized in income for the year. All contracts were settled in November 2010. As a result of the valuation at fair value, as of December 31, 2010, the balance of Inventories included Ps.162,254 for these contracts.

Based on the Company’s overall commodity exposure at December 31, 2011, a hypothetical 10 percent decline in market prices applied to the fair value of these instruments would result in an effect to the income statement of Ps.40,431 (for non-qualifying contracts).

In Mexico, to support the commercialization of corn for Mexican corn growers, Mexico’s Secretary of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food Ministry (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación, or SAGARPA), through the Agricultural Incentives and Services Agency (Apoyos y Servicios a la Comercialización Agropecuaria, or ASERCA), a government agency founded in 1991, implemented a program designed to promote corn sales in Mexico. The program includes the following objectives:

F-31

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

5.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)

·Ensure that the corn harvest is brought to market, providing certainty to farmers concerning the sale of their crops and supply security for the buyer.

·Establish a minimum price for the farmer, and a maximum price for the buyer, which are determined based on international market prices, plus a basic formula specific for each region.

·Implement a corn hedging program to allow both farmers and buyers to minimize their exposure to price fluctuations in the international markets.

To the extent that this or other similar programs are canceled by the Mexican government, we may be required to incur additional costs in purchasing corn for our operations, and therefore we may need to increase the prices of our products to reflect such additional costs.

Credit risk

The Company’s regular operations expose it to potential defaults when customers, suppliers and counterparties are unable to comply with their financial or other commitments. The Company seeks to mitigate this risk by entering into transactions with a diverse pool of counterparties. However, the Company continues to remain subject to unexpected third party financial failures that could disrupt its operations.

The Company is also exposed to risks in connection with its cash management activities and temporary investments, and any disruption that affects its financial intermediaries could also adversely affect its operations.

The Company’s exposure to risk due to trade receivables is limited given the large number of its customers located in different parts of Mexico, the United States, Central America, Venezuela, Europe, Asia and Oceania. However, the Company still maintains reserves for potential credit losses. Risk control assesses the credit quality of the customer, taking into account its financial position, past experience and other factors.

Since a portion of the clients do not have an independent rating of credit quality, the Company’s management determines the maximum credit risk for each one, taking into account its financial position, past experience, and other factors. Credit limits are established according to policies set by the Company, which also includes controls that assure its compliance.

During 2010 and 2011, credit limits were complied with and, consequently, management does not expect any important losses from trade accounts receivable.

At December 31, 2011 the Company has certain accounts receivable that are neither past due or impaired. The credit quality of such receivables does not present indications of impairment, since the sales are performed to a large variety of clients that include supermarkets, government institutions, commercial businesses and tortilla sellers. At December 31, 2011, none of these accounts receivable presented non-performance by these counterparties.

F-32

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

5.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)

The Company has centralized its treasury operations in Mexico, and in the United States for its operations in that country. Liquid assets are invested primarily in government bonds and short term debt instruments with a minimum grade of “A1/P1” in the case of operations in the United States and “A” for operations in Mexico. The Company faces credit risk from potential defaults of their counterparts with respect to financial instruments they use. Substantially all of these financial instruments are not guaranteed. Additionally, it minimizes the risk of default by the counterparts contracting derivative financial instruments only with major national and international financial institutions using contracts and standard forms issued by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) and operations standard confirmation formats. For operations in Central America and Venezuela, the Company only invests cash reserves with leading local banks and local branches of international banks. Additionally, they maintain small investments abroad.

Investment risk in Venezuela

The Company’s operations in Venezuela represented approximately 16% of consolidated net sales and 14% of total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2011. The recent political and civil instability that has prevailed in Venezuela represents a risk to the business that cannot be controlled and that cannot be accurately measured or estimated.

Also, in recent years the Venezuelan authorities have imposed foreign exchange controls and price controls on certain products such as corn flour and wheat flour. These price controls may limit the Company’s ability to increase prices in order to compensate for the higher cost of raw materials. The foreign exchange controls may limit the Company’s capacity to convert bolivars to other currencies and also transfer funds outside Venezuela.

Various fixed exchange rates have been established by the Venezuelan Government since 2003. Effective January 1, 2010, the Venezuelan Government established an exchange rate of 4.30 bolivars per U.S. dollar.

The Company does not have insurance for the risk of expropriation of its investments. See Note 25 for additional information about the expropriation proceedings of MONACA assets and the measures taken by the People’s Defense Institute for the Access of Goods and Services of Venezuela (Instituto para la Defensa de las Personas en el Acceso a los Bienes y Servicios de Venezuela, or INDEPABIS) in Demaseca.

Given the Company’s operations in Venezuela, the financial position and results of the Company may be negatively affected by a number of factors, including:

a.Decrease in consolidated income due to a possible devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar against the U.S. dollar;

b.Subsidiaries in Venezuela manufacture products subject to price controls;

c.The enactment of the Just Costs and Prices Law (Ley de Costos y Precios Justos) on July 18, 2011, that controls the prices of products affecting the Company’s sales;

d.It may be difficult for subsidiaries in Venezuela to pay dividends, as well as to import some of their requirements of raw materials as a result of the foreign exchange control;

F-33

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

5.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)

e.The costs of some raw materials used by the Venezuelan subsidiaries may increase due to import tariffs, and

f.Inability to obtain a just and reasonable compensation for MONACA’s assets subject to expropriation and if obtained, whether such compensation could be collected.

Liquidity risk

The Company funds its liquidity and capital resource requirements, in the ordinary course of business, through a variety of sources, including:

·cash generated from operations;

·committed and uncommitted short-term and long-term lines of credit;

·offerings of medium- and long-term debt; and

·sales of its equity securities and those of its subsidiaries and affiliates from time to time.

Factors that could decrease the sources of liquidity include a significant decrease in the demand for, or price of, products, each of which could limit the amount of cash generated from operations, and a lowering of the corporate credit rating or any other credit downgrade, which could further impair the liquidity and increase costs with respect to new debt and cause stock price to suffer. The Company’s liquidity is also affected by factors such as the depreciation or appreciation of the peso and changes in interest rates.

The following table shows the remaining contractual maturities of financial liabilities of the Company:

	Less than a year		From 1 to 3 years		From 3 to 5 years		More than 5 years		Total
Short and long term debt	Ps.	1,621,446	Ps.	380,334	Ps.	5,618,137	Ps.	5,715,000	Ps.	13,334,917
Interest payable from short and long term debt	652,883		1,142,966		1,061,734		791,437		3,649,020
Operating leases	624,026		810,297		480,002		801,660		2,715,985
Financing leases	11,762		21,521		—		—		33,283
Trade accounts and other payables	9,301,814		—		—		—		9,301,814
Derivative financial instruments	46,013		—		—		—		46,013
	Ps.	12,257,944	Ps.	2,355,118	Ps.	7,159,873	Ps.	7,308,097	Ps.	29,081,032

The Company expects to meet its obligations with cash flows generated by operations. Additionally, the Company has access to credit lines with various banks to address potential cash needs.

B) CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

The Company’s objectives when managing capital (which includes share capital, borrowings, working capital and cash and cash equivalents) are to maintain a flexible capital structure that reduces the cost of capital to an acceptable level of risk, to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern while taking advantage of strategic opportunities in order to provide sustainable returns for shareholders and benefits to stakeholders.

F-34

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

5.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)

The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. In order to maintain the capital structure, the Company may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, repurchase shares currently issued, issue new shares, issue new debt, issue new debt to replace existing debt with different characteristics and/or sell assets to reduce debt.

In addition, to monitor capital, debt agreements contain financial covenants which are disclosed in Note 15.

6.SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products in different geographical regions. These business units are managed separately because each business segment requires different technology and marketing strategies.

The Company’s reportable segments are as follows:

·Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe):

Manufactures and distributes more than 20 varieties of corn flour that are used mainly to produce and distribute different types of tortillas and tortilla chip products in the United States. The main brands are MASECA for corn flour and MISSION and GUERRERO for packaged tortillas.

·Corn flour division (Mexico):

Engaged principally in the production, distribution and sale of corn flour in Mexico under MASECA brand. Corn flour produced by this division is used mainly in the preparation of tortillas and other related products.

·Corn flour, wheat flour and other products division (Venezuela):

Engaged mainly in producing and distributing grains used principally for industrial and human consumption. The main brands are JUANA, TIA BERTA and DECASA for corn flour; ROBIN HOOD and POLAR for wheat flour; MONICA for rice and LASSIE for oats.

·Other segments:

This section represents those segments whose amounts on an individual basis do not exceed 10% of the consolidated total of net sales, operating income and assets. These segments are:

a)Corn flour, hearts of palm, rice, and other products (Central America).

b)Wheat flour (México).

c)Packaged tortillas (México).

d)Wheat flour tortillas and snacks (Asia and Oceania).

e)Technology and equipment, which conducts research and development regarding flour and tortilla manufacturing equipment, produces machinery for corn flour and tortilla production and is engaged in the construction of the Company’s corn flour manufacturing facilities.

All inter-segment sales prices are market-based. The Chief Executive Officer evaluates performance based on operating income of the respective business units. The accounting policies for the reportable segments are the same as the policies described in Notes 2 and 4.

F-35

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

6.SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)

Segment information as of January 1, 2010:

	Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe)		Corn flour division (Mexico)		Corn flour, wheat flour and other products (Venezuela)		Other segments		Eliminations and corporate expenses		Total
Total assets	Ps.	15,168,451	Ps.	9,878,418	Ps.	6,777,968	Ps.	8,606,853	Ps.	2,846,754	Ps.	43,278,444
Investment in associates	—		—		—		139,139		3,881,200		4,020,339
Total liabilities	7,109,967		2,703,780		3,211,329		4,346,606		13,827,000		31,198,682

Segment information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010:

	Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe)		Corn flour division (Mexico)		Corn flour, wheat flour and other products (Venezuela)			Other segments			Eliminations and corporate expenses			Total
Net sales to external customers	Ps.	21,444,929	Ps.	11,434,119	Ps.	5,381,849		Ps.	7,947,115		Ps.	24,442		Ps.	46,232,454
Inter-segmentnet sales	66,997		418,647		—			981,806			(1,467,450		)	—
Operating income(loss)	1,303,038		1,146,697		(26,200		)	(70,558		)	(302,962		)	2,050,015
Depreciation and amortization	880,457		365,179		112,399			245,252			(100,753		)	1,502,534
Total assets	13,757,697		10,276,449		3,983,891			8,627,963			2,281,394			38,927,394
Investment in associates	—		—		—			140,505			4,295,896			4,436,401
Total liabilities	6,165,517		2,680,233		2,095,555			4,189,938			13,073,877			28,205,120
Expenditures forfixed assets	522,741		174,680		84,752			205,917			20,101			1,008,191

F-36

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

6.SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)

Segment information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011:

	Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe)		Corn flour division (Mexico)		Corn flour, wheat flour and other products (Venezuela)		Other segments			Eliminations and corporate expenses			Total
Net sales to external customers	Ps.	23,900,928	Ps.	14,799,007	Ps.	9,156,603	Ps.	9,643,075		Ps.	145,136		Ps.	57,644,749
Inter-segmentnet sales	196,857		586,733		—		1,128,926			(1,912,516		)	—
Operating income(loss)	946,806		1,770,725		674,068		(183,752		)	130,614			3,338,461
Depreciation and amortization	1,004,467		356,171		135,335		323,051			(76,302		)	1,742,722
Total assets	16,860,083		11,618,882		6,430,234		10,460,321			(826,902		)	44,542,618
Investment in associates	—		—		—		143,700			—			143,700
Total liabilities	7,074,787		3,451,518		3,021,882		3,919,903			9,361,744			26,829,834
Expenditures forfixed assets	858,475		238,958		43,058		404,051			133,762			1,678,304

A summary of information by geographic segment for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 is presented below:

	2010		%	2011		%
Net sales to external customers:
United States and Europe	Ps.	21,444,929	46	Ps.	23,900,928	41
Mexico	15,539,076		34	19,870,195		34
Venezuela	5,381,849		12	9,156,603		16
Central America	2,765,134		6	3,180,155		6
Asia and Oceania	1,101,466		2	1,536,868		3
	Ps.	46,232,454	100	Ps.	57,644,749	100
Capital expenditures:
United States and Europe	Ps.	522,741	52	Ps.	858,475	51
Mexico	329,863		33	470,977		28
Venezuela	84,752		8	43,058		3
Central America	43,477		4	88,508		5
Asia and Oceania	27,358		3	217,286		13
	Ps.	1,008,191	100	Ps.	1,678,304	100

F-37

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

6.SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)

A summary of information by geographic segment at January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, is presented below:

	At January 1, 2010		%	At December 31, 2010		%	At December 31, 2011		%
Identifiable assets
United States and Europe	Ps.	15,168,451	35	Ps.	13,757,697	35	Ps.	16,860,083	38
Mexico	16,664,251		38	16,480,632		43	15,052,360		34
Venezuela	6,777,968		16	3,983,891		10	6,430,234		14
Central America	2,168,294		5	1,928,120		5	2,408,555		5
Asia and Oceania	2,499,480		6	2,777,054		7	3,791,386		9
	Ps.	43,278,444	100	Ps.	38,927,394	100	Ps.	44,542,618	100

7. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents include:

	At January 1,2010		At December 31,2010		At December 31,2011
Cash at bank	Ps.	791,745	Ps.	2,524	Ps.	1,161,899
Short-term investments (less than 3 months)	1,088,918		18,793		17,752
	Ps.	1,880,663	Ps.	21,317	Ps.	1,179,651

8. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable comprised the following:

	At January 1,2010			At December 31, 2010			At December 31, 2011
Trade accounts and notes receivable	Ps.	4,707,528		Ps.	4,350,763		Ps.	6,434,327
Related parties	500,669			238,289			—
Employees	26,752			17,567			31,628
Recoverable value-added tax	216,737			260,308			368,239
ASERCA receivables (Note 5)	30,518			61,097			321,958
Other debtors	440,484			380,152			287,168
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(251,936		)	(290,379		)	(316,112		)
	Ps.	5,670,752		Ps.	5,017,797		Ps.	7,127,208

The age analysis of accounts receivable is as follows:

				Not past due		Past due balances
				date		1 to 120			121 to 240			More than
	Total			balances		days			days			240 days
Accounts receivable	Ps.	5,922,688		Ps.	3,351,286	Ps.	1,599,902		Ps.	339,089		Ps.	632,411
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(251,936		)	—		(27,062		)	(49,637		)	(175,237		)
Total at January 1, 2010	Ps.	5,670,752		Ps.	3,351,286	Ps.	1,572,840		Ps.	289,452		Ps.	457,174

F-38

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

8. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (continued)

					Not past due			Past due balances
	Total				date balances			1 to 120days				121 to 240days				More than 240 days
Accounts receivable	Ps.	5,308,176			Ps.	3,166,147		Ps.	1,571,514			Ps.	116,407			Ps.	454,108
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(290,379			)	—			(30,583			)	(36,765			)	(223,031			)
Total at December 31, 2010	Ps.	5,017,797			Ps.	3,166,147		Ps.	1,540,931			Ps.	79,642			Ps.	231,077
					Not past due			Past due balances
	Total				date balances			1 to 120days				121 to 240days				More than 240 days
Accounts receivable	Ps.		7,443,320		Ps.		4,635,346	Ps.		2,174,062		Ps.		255,623		Ps.		378,289
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(316,112			)	—			(31,130			)	(48,289			)	(236,693			)
Total at December 31, 2011	Ps.		7,127,208		Ps.		4,635,346	Ps.		2,142,932		Ps.		207,334		Ps.		141,596

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the movements on the allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows:

	2010			2011
Beginning balance	Ps.	(251,936	)	Ps.	(290,379	)
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(73,976		)	(130,885		)
Receivables written off during the year	26,232			117,254
Exchange differences	9,301			(12,102		)
Ending balance	Ps.	(290,379	)	Ps.	(316,112	)

9. INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:

	At January 1, 2010		At December 31, 2010		At December 31, 2011
Raw materials, mainly corn and wheat	Ps.	5,815,253	Ps.	5,641,754	Ps.	8,633,094
Finished products	845,178		724,516		917,014
Materials and spare parts	433,148		389,352		639,307
Production in process	217,841		160,239		149,714
Advances to suppliers	153,383		256,829		194,297
Inventory in transit	71,785		91,544		167,405
	Ps.	7,536,588	Ps.	7,264,234	Ps.	10,700,831

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the cost of raw materials consumed and the changes in the inventories of production in process and finished goods, recognized as cost of sales amounted to Ps.26,697,273 and Ps.34,374,608, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company recognized Ps.62,964 and Ps.76,086, respectively, for inventory that was damaged, slow-moving and obsolete.

F-39

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

10. LONG-TERM NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Long-term notes and accounts receivable are as follows:

	At January 1,2010		At December 31,2010		At December 31,2011
Long-term recoverable asset tax	Ps.	119,996	Ps.	119,996	Ps.	209,940
Long-term notes receivable from sale of tortilla machines	8,768		175,653		189,044
Prepaid rent deposits	—		124,127		111,396
Guarantee deposits	119,217		118,842		38,827
Long-term recoverable value-added tax	—		—		35,019
Others	295,314		60,343		42,648
	Ps.	543,295	Ps.	598,961	Ps.	626,874

At December 31, 2011 long-term notes receivable are denominated in pesos, maturing from 2013 to 2016 and bearing an average interest rate of 16.5%.

11. INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATES

At December 31, 2011 investment in common stock of associated companies consisted of an investment in Harinera de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V., which produces wheat flour and related products in Mexico.

During January 2011, the Company decided to sell its 8.7966% interest in the capital stock of Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. (GFNorte). On February 15, 2011, the sale of 177,546,496 shares of the capital stock of GFNorte was concluded, resulting in cash proceeds of Ps.9,232,418, before fees and expenses. The accounting result was a profit before taxes of approximately Ps.4,707,804 net of fees and expenses. The sale was authorized by the Mexican Banking Securities and Exchange Commission (CNBV) and was carried out through a secondary public offering in Mexico and a private offering in the United States and other foreign markets, for a simultaneous global offering.

Until the date of GFNorte’s sale, the Company had significant influence over this associate due to its representation on the Board of Directors and the equity interest of the Company’s principal shareholder in GFNorte.

Investment in associates is comprised of the following:

	AtJanuary 1, 2010		AtDecember 31, 2010		AtDecember 31, 2011
GFNorte	Ps.	3,881,200	Ps.	4,295,896	Ps.	—
Harinera de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V.	139,139		140,505		143,700
	Ps.	4,020,339	Ps.	4,436,401	Ps	143,700

F-40

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

11. INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATES (continued)

The percentage of interest held in associates is:

	AtJanuary 1, 2010		AtDecember 31, 2010		AtDecember 31, 2011
GFNorte	8.7966	%	8.7966	%	—
Harinera de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V.	40	%	40	%	40	%

During 2010, the Company received dividends from GFNorte for a total of Ps.90,549.

In accordance with accounting rules set by the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores, at December 31, 2010 GFNorte presented total assets of Ps.590,558 million and total liabilities of Ps.540,331 million; and for the year ended December 31, 2010 GFNorte presented total revenue of Ps.41,479 million and net income of Ps.6,705 million.

At January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010, the market value of the investment in common stock of GFNorte, which is publicly traded, amounted to Ps.8,493,824 and Ps.10,450,387, respectively.

12. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Changes in property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 were as follows:

	Land and buildings			Machinery and equipment			Leasehold improvements			Construction in progress			Total
At January 1, 2010
Deemed cost	Ps.	8,443,983		Ps.	26,446,725		Ps.	999,649		Ps.	400,610		Ps.	36,290,967
Accumulated depreciation	(2,410,623		)	(13,417,420		)	(419,480		)	—			(16,247,523		)
Net book value	6,033,360			13,029,305			580,169			400,610			20,043,444
For the year ended December 31, 2010
Opening net book value	6,033,360			13,029,305			580,169			400,610			20,043,444
Exchange differences	(413,909		)	(812,890		)	(29,413		)	(209,409		)	(1,465,621		)
Additions	73,770			364,080			10,536			559,805			1,008,191
Disposals	(4,802		)	(167,519		)	(4,038		)	(27,366		)	(203,725		)
Depreciation charge	(177,095		)	(1,163,277		)	(63,977		)	(8,535		)	(1,412,884		)
Transfers and reclassifications (1)	(46,033		)	212,196			17,029			(235,060		)	(51,868		)
Acquisitions through business combinations	5,510			7,038			—			88			12,636
Closing net book value	5,470,801			11,468,933			510,306			480,133			17,930,173
At December 31, 2010
Cost	7,876,090			24,962,403			943,548			480,133			34,262,174
Accumulated depreciation	(2,405,289		)	(13,493,470		)	(433,242		)	—			(16,332,001		)
Net book value	5,470,801			11,468,933			510,306			480,133			17,930,173

F-41

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

12. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued)

	Land and buildings			Machinery and equipment			Leasehold improvements			Construction in progress			Total
For the year ended December 31, 2011
Opening net book value	5,470,801			11,468,933			510,306			480,133			17,930,173
Exchange differences	610,538			1,486,807			74,047			93,434			2,264,826
Additions	148,380			636,835			12,730			880,359			1,678,304
Disposals	(8,607		)	(142,496		)	(175		)	(22,531		)	(173,809		)
Depreciation charge	(198,856		)	(1,217,848		)	(71,244		)	—			(1,487,948		)
Transfers and reclassifications (1)	63,064			662,119			48,011			(721,643		)	51,551
Acquisitions through business combinations	82,928			169,663			—			592			253,183
Impairment	(647		)	—			—			—			(647		)
Closing net book value	6,167,601			13,064,013			573,675			710,344			20,515,633
At December 31, 2011
Cost	8,914,511			28,427,554			1,043,612			710,344			39,096,021
Accumulated depreciation	(2,746,910		)	(15,363,541		)	(469,937		)	—			(18,580,388		)
Net book value	Ps.	6,167,601		Ps.	13,064,013		Ps.	573,675		Ps.	710,344		Ps.	20,515,633

(1)Transfers and reclassifications mainly correspond to capitalizations of construction in progress.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, depreciation expense was recognized as follows:

	2010			2011
Cost of sales	Ps.		1,146,514	Ps.	1,195,318
Selling and administrative expenses	266,370			292,630
	Ps.	1,412,884		Ps.	1,487,948

At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, property, plant and equipment included idle assets with a carrying value of approximately Ps.1,725,797, Ps.1,051,698 and Ps.1,072,382, respectively, resulting from the temporary shut-down of the productive operations of various plants in Mexico, the United States and Venezuela, mainly in the corn flour division in Mexico and packaged tortilla division in the United States.

The Company recognized equipment under finance lease arrangements that are described in Note 24-B.

F-42

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

13. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Changes in intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 were as follows:

	Intangible assets acquired
																Software				Internally
	Goodwill				Covenants not to compete				Patents and trade- marks			Customer lists				for internal use				generated intangible assets			Total
At January 1, 2010
Cost	Ps.		2,169,473		Ps.		461,126		Ps.	107,951		Ps.	100,422			Ps.		735,949		Ps.	105,756		Ps.	3,680,677
Accumulated amortization	—				(306,524			)	(61,908		)	(48,414			)	(687,847			)	(92,729		)	(1,197,422		)
Net book value	2,169,473				154,602				46,043			52,008				48,102				13,027			2,483,255
For the year ended December 31, 2010
Opening net book value	2,169,473				154,602				46,043			52,008				48,102				13,027			2,483,255
Exchange differences	(111,254			)	—				(80		)	(3,081			)	(11,357			)	11,230			(114,542		)
Additions	—				—				3,459			—				—				420			3,879
Disposals	—				—				(4		)	—				(8			)	(2,243		)	(2,225		)
Amortization	—				(22,631			)	(8,158		)	(4,345			)	(7,429			)	(11,817		)	(54,380		)
Additions through business combinations	90,480				—				—			—				—				—			90,480
Closing net book value	2,148,699				131,971				41,260			44,582				29,308				10,617			2,406,437
At December 31, 2010
Cost	2,148,699				461,126				107,471			93,719				563,328				67,606			3,441,949
Accumulated amortization	—				(329,155			)	(66,211		)	(49,137			)	(534,020			)	(56,989		)	(1,035,512		)
Net book value	2,148,699				131,971				41,260			44,582				29,308				10,617			2,406,437
For the year ended December 31, 2011
Opening net book value	2,148,699				131,971				41,260			44,582				29,308				10,617			2,406,437
Exchange differences	214,138				2,587				8,710			12,652				6,829				13,457			258,373
Additions	—				—				18			—				3,841				18,865			22,724
Disposals	—				—				—			—				73				(14,607		)	(14,534		)
Amortization	—				(24,905			)	(8,738		)	(8,719			)	(6,715			)	(7,889		)	(56,966		)
Additions through business combinations	344,643				16,156				22,458			46,562				292				1,107			431,218
Impairment	(92,893			)	—				—			—				—				—			(92,893		)
Closing net book value	2,614,587				125,809				63,708			95,077				33,628				21,550			2,954,359
At December 31, 2011
Cost	2,614,587				480,098				147,577			158,516				640,799				77,166			4,118,743
Accumulated amortization	—				(354,289			)	(83,869		)	(63,439			)	(607,171			)	(55,616		)	(1,164,384		)
Net book value	Ps.	2,614,587			Ps.	125,809			Ps.	63,708		Ps.		95,077		Ps.	33,628			Ps.	21,550		Ps.	2,954,359

At December 31, 2010 and 2011 the Company did not have indefinite-lived intangible assets.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, amortization expense of intangible assets amounted to Ps.54,380 and Ps.56,966, respectively, which were recognized in the income statement as selling and administrative expenses.

Research and development costs of Ps.76,604 and Ps.91,011 were recognized in the income statement for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

F-43

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

13. INTANGIBLE ASSETS (continued)

Goodwill acquired in business combinations is allocated at acquisition date to the cash-generating units (CGU) that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combinations. The carrying values of goodwill allocated to the CGU or a group of CGU are as follows:

Cash-generating unit	At January1, 2010		At December 31, 2010		At December 31, 2011
Mission Foods Division	Ps.	725,869	Ps.	667,283	Ps.	856,474
Gruma Seaham Ltd.	409,171		360,257		339,222
Gruma Corporation	212,765		212,765		212,765
Rositas Investments Pty, Ltd.	173,403		186,354		209,709
Gruma Holding Netherlands B.V.	149,325		141,099		120,877
Agroindustrias Integradas del Norte, S.A. de C.V.	115,099		115,099		115,099
Altera LLC	—		90,480		99,149
Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V.	98,622		98,622		98,622
NDF Azteca Milling Europe SRL	82,720		78,163		93,614
Azteca Milling, L.P.	71,192		67,270		75,986
Gruma Centroamérica	51,207		51,207		51,207
Molinos Azteca de Chiapas, S.A. de C.V.	28,158		28,158		28,158
Harinera de Yucatán, S.A. de C.V.	18,886		18,886		18,886
Harinera de Maíz de Mexicali, S.A. de C.V.	17,424		17,424		17,424
Molinos Azteca, S.A. de C.V.	8,926		8,926		8,926
Harinera de Maíz de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.	6,706		6,706		6,706
Goodwill not yet allocated	—		—		261,763
	Ps.	2,169,473	Ps.	2,148,699	Ps.	2,614,587

With respect to the determination of the CGU’s value in use, the Company’s management considered that a reasonably possible change in the key assumptions used, will not cause that the CGU’s carrying value to materially exceed their value in use.

At December 31, 2011, goodwill acquired in Semolina A.S. and Solntse Mexico for a total of Ps.261,763 had not been allocated to a CGU since the initial accounting for these businesses had not been completed.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized impairment losses on goodwill by Ps.92,893 within “Other expenses” for Gruma Holding Netherlands B.V. and Gruma Seaham Ltd., which are part of the segment “Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe)”. This impairment loss reflected a decrease in the recoverable value of these CGU due to its continued operating losses.

F-44

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

14. DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

A) COMPONENTS OF DEFERRED TAX

The analysis of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities is as follows:

	At January1, 2010						At December 31, 2010						At December 31, 2011
Deferred tax asset:
To be recovered after more than 12 months	Ps.	(1,736,858			)		Ps.		(1,742,919		)		Ps.			(460,365		)
To be recovered within 12 months	(514,890				)		(572,660				)		(698,798					)
	(2,251,748				)		(2,315,579				)		(1,159,163					)
Deferred tax liability:
To be recovered after more than 12 months	4,505,879						4,744,465						4,615,240
To be recovered within 12 months	170,396						128,800						68,103
	4,676,275						4,873,265						4,683,343
Deferred tax liability, net	Ps.	2,424,527					Ps.	2,557,686					Ps.		3,524,180
The principal components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are summarized as follows:
	(Asset) Liability
	At January1, 2010					At December 31, 2010						At December 31, 2011
Net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits	Ps.		(1,650,267	)		Ps.		(1,644,733		)		Ps.		(326,954			)
Customer advances	(189			)		(154				)		(163					)
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(12,279			)		(15,360				)		(14,791					)
Accrued liabilities	(482,869			)		(541,729				)		(672,821					)
Recoverable asset tax	(19,553			)		(15,417				)		(11,023					)
Other	(86,591			)		(98,186				)		(133,411					)
Deferred tax asset	(2,251,748			)		(2,315,579				)		(1,159,163					)
Property, plant and equipment	2,026,879					1,959,515						2,060,121
Prepaid expenses	53,748					39,895						4,999
Inventories	116,648					88,905						63,104
Intangible assets and others	174,620					194,118						277,414
Investment in associates	1,020,318					1,054,891						494,137
Tax consolidation effect	1,121,038					1,534,650						1,696,886
Other	163,024					1,291						86,682
Deferred tax liability	4,676,275					4,873,265						4,683,343
Net deferred tax liability	Ps.		2,424,527			Ps.		2,557,686				Ps.		3,524,180

At December 31, 2011, the Company did not recognize a deferred income tax asset of Ps.3,199,289 for tax loss carryforwards, since sufficient evidence was not available to determine that these tax loss carryforwards will be realizable during their amortization period. These tax losses expire in the year 2021.

F-45

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

14. DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (continued)

The changes in the temporary differences during the year were as follows:

	Balance at January 1, 2010				Recognized in income			Recognized in other comprehen- sive income			Foreign currency translation and others			Balance at December 31, 2010
Net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits	Ps.	(1,650,267		)	Ps.	(25,135	)	Ps.	63		Ps.	30,606		Ps.	(1,644,733	)
Customer advances	(189			)	35			—			—			(154		)
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(12,279			)	(3,017		)	183			(247		)	(15,360		)
Accrued liabilities	(482,869			)	(142,562		)	—			83,702			(541,729		)
Recoverable asset tax	(19,553			)	4,122			20			(6		)	(15,417		)
Others	(86,591			)	(17,485		)	4,583			1,307			(98,186		)
Deferred tax asset	(2,251,748			)	(184,042		)	4,849			115,362			(2,315,579		)
Property, plant and equipment	2,026,879				(31,382		)	(1,291		)	(34,691		)	1,959,515
Prepaid expenses	53,748				(13,853		)	—			—			39,895
Inventories	116,648				(23,676		)	—			(4,067		)	88,905
Intangible assets and others	174,620				56,041			—			(36,543		)	194,118
Investment in associates	1,020,318				13,280			—			21,293			1,054,891
Tax consolidation effect	1,121,038				414,393			(781		)	—			1,534,650
Others	163,024				30,069			(28,282		)	(163,520		)	1,291
Deferred tax liability	4,676,275				444,872			(30,354		)	(217,528		)	4,873,265
Net deferred tax liability	Ps.		2,424,527		Ps.	260,830		Ps.	(25,505	)	Ps.	(102,166	)	Ps.	2,557,686

	Balance at January 1, 2011			Recognized in income			Recognized in other comprehen- sive income			Foreign currency translation and others			Balance at December 31, 2011
Net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits	Ps.	(1,644,733	)	Ps.	1,342,088		Ps.	53		Ps.	(24,362	)	Ps.	(326,954	)
Customer advances	(154		)	(125		)	—			116			(163		)
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(15,360		)	1,260			(1		)	(690		)	(14,791		)
Accrued liabilities	(541,729		)	(59,614		)	(11,724		)	(59,754		)	(672,821		)
Recoverable asset tax	(15,417		)	4,394			—			—			(11,023		)
Others	(98,186		)	(30,973		)	—			(4,252		)	(133,411		)
Deferred tax asset	(2,315,579		)	1,257,030			(11,672		)	(88,942		)	(1,159,163		)
Property, plant and equipment	1,959,515			(8,368		)	297			108,677			2,060,121
Prepaid expenses	39,895			(37,779		)	—			2,883			4,999
Inventories	88,905			(28,839		)	—			3,038			63,104
Intangible assets and others	194,118			44,885			—			38,411			277,414
Investment in associates	1,054,891			(620,090		)	—			59,336			494,137
Tax consolidation effect	1,534,650			162,914			(678		)	—			1,696,886
Others	1,291			32,574			(8,933		)	61,750			86,682
Deferred tax liability	4,873,265			(454,703		)	(9,314		)	274,095			4,683,343
Net deferred tax liability	Ps.	2,557,686		Ps.	802,327		Ps.	(20,986	)	Ps.	185,153		Ps.	3,524,180

F-46

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

14. DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (continued)

B) TAX LOSS CARRYFORWARDS

At December 31, 2011, the Company had tax loss carryforwards which amounted to approximately Ps.11,703,953. Based on projections prepared by the Company’s management of expected future taxable income, it has been determined that only tax losses for an amount of Ps.311,351 will be used. Therefore, the Company did not recognize a deferred tax asset for the difference.

C) UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS

At December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company recognized a liability for uncertain tax positions of Ps.35,865 and Ps.41,264, respectively, excluding interest and penalties. The following table presents a reconciliation of the Company’s uncertain tax positions, excluding interest and penalties:

	2010			2011
Uncertain tax positions at beginning of year	Ps.	85,452		Ps.	40,511
Translation adjustment of the initial balance	(4,720		)	(4,646		)
Increase as result of uncertain tax positions taken in the year	4,570			9,347
Settlements	(46,028		)	(851		)
Reductions due to a lapse of the statute of limitations	(3,409		)	(3,097		)
Uncertain tax positions at end of year	Ps.	35,865		Ps.	41,264

It is expected that the amount of uncertain tax positions will change in the next 12 months; however, the Company does not expect the change to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company had accrued interest and penalties of approximately Ps.2,322 and Ps.3,572 related to uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2010 and 2011, respectively.

D) TAX EFFECTS FROM OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Deferred taxes related to other comprehensive income are comprised of:

	At December 31, 2010			At December 31, 2011
Foreign currency translation adjustments	Ps.	(24,724	)	Ps.	(8,583	)
Actuarial gains and losses	—			(11,725		)
Other movements	(781		)	(678		)
Total	Ps.	(25,505	)	Ps.	(20,986	)

E) TAX CONSOLIDATION

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. is authorized to determine income tax under the tax consolidation regime, together with its subsidiaries in Mexico, according to the authorization of the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit on July 14, 1986, under what is stated in the applicable Law.

F-47

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

14. DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (continued)

In 2011, the Company determined a consolidated tax profit of Ps.8,103,641; which was amortized against consolidated tax loss of 2008. As of December 31, 2011, the Company did not have consolidated tax loss carryforwards. The consolidated tax result differs from the accounting result, mainly in such items taxed and deducted during different timing for accounting and tax purposes, from the recognition of the inflation effects for tax purposes, as well as such items only affecting either the consolidated accounting or taxable income.

Certain Income Tax Law provisions which were reformed, added or derogated for 2010 were published on December 7, 2009, including the following:

·The income tax rate applicable from 2010 to 2012 will be 30%, for 2013 it will be 29% and as of 2014 it will be 28%.  At December 31, 2009, the previously described rate change produced a reduction in the income tax deferred balance of Ps.58,228, with its corresponding effect in the income statement for the year, which was determined based on an expectation of temporary reversion to the effective rates.

·Eliminated the possibility of using credits for the excess of deductions on taxable income for Flat tax purposes (credit of tax loss of flat tax) in order to reduce the income tax to be paid while could be credited against the flat tax base.

·The tax consolidation regime was modified in order to establish that the income tax payment related to the tax consolidation benefits obtained as of 1999 should be partially paid during the sixth to tenth years subsequent to the date when those benefits were embraced.

The tax consolidation benefits previously mentioned come from:

i)Tax losses embraced in the tax consolidation which were not amortized individually by the entity which produced them;

ii)special consolidation items derived from transactions held between the consolidating partnerships and producing benefits;

iii)loss on disposal of shares individually outstanding of deduction by the holding which produced them; and

iv)dividends distributed by the holding and which do not come from the net tax profit account (CUFIN) balance and reinvested CUFIN.

·It is stated that the existing differences between the consolidated CUFIN and reinvested CUFIN balances and the balances of these same accounts of the controlled entities by the Company can produce profits resulting in income tax.

At December 31, 2011, the liability arising from the aforementioned changes in the Income Tax Law amounted to Ps.1,696,886 and is estimated to be incurred as follows:

F-48

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

14. DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (continued)

	Year of payment
	2012		2013		2014		2015		2016 and thereafter			Total
Tax losses	Ps.	55,168	Ps.	56,335	Ps.	142,852	Ps.	204,027	Ps.	1,236,124		Ps.	1,694,506
Special consolidation items	274		206		206		—		—			686
Dividends distributed by the subsidiaries not paid from CUFIN or reinvested CUFIN	678		508		508		—		—			1,694
Total	Ps.	56,120	Ps.	57,049	Ps.	143,566	Ps.	204,027	Ps.		1,236,124	Ps.	1,696,886

The Company, through time, has been recognizing a tax liability compensated with income tax from tax loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2011, income tax payable with defined payment dates was classified in the statement of financial position as short and long-term income tax payable for Ps.56,120 and Ps.107,218, respectively. In addition, the remaining liability, for which a settlement date has not yet determined in accordance with the requirements of the Income Tax Law, was included as a component of the deferred income taxes.

15. DEBT

Debt is summarized as follows:

Short-term:

	At January 1, 2010			At December 31,  2010			At December 31, 2011
Bank loans	Ps.	912,141		Ps.	616,722		Ps.	1,577,873
Current portion of long-term debt	1,273,193			1,555,126			43,572
Financing lease liabilities	18,058			21,023			11,762
	Ps.	2,203,392		Ps.	2,192,871		Ps.	1,633,207
Long-term:
	At January 1, 2010			At December 31, 2010			At December 31, 2011
Bank loans	Ps.		15,808,764	Ps.		12,303,810	Ps.		7,490,256
Perpetual notes	3,661,872			3,463,116			3,960,333
Financing lease liabilities	101,366			85,612			21,521
	Ps.		19,572,002	Ps.		15,852,538	Ps.		11,472,110

F-49

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

15. DEBT (continued)

The terms, conditions and carrying values of loans are as follows:

	Currency	Interestrate	Maturity date	At January1, 2010			At December 31, 2010		At December 31, 2011
Secured bank loan	USD	LIBOR + 2.875%(a)	2010-2017	Ps.		8,634,389	Ps.	7,902,929	Ps.	—
Perpetual notes	USD	7.75%	(b)	3,661,872			3,463,116		3,960,333
Secured bank loans	Pesos	TIIE + 6.21%	2012-2019	3,302,558			3,310,403		—
Credit line	USD	LIBOR + 0.375%	2016	914,900			—		1,858,098
Credit line	USD	LIBOR + 2%	2016	—			—		1,046,250
Secured bank loans	USD	LIBOR + 2.875%(a)	2010-2014	1,517,151			1,150,094		—
Secured bank loans	Pesos	TIIE + 2.875%(a)	2010-2014	1,014,401			814,755		—
Syndicated loan	Pesos	TIIE + 1.5%	2015-2018	—			—		1,189,919
Credit	USD	LIBOR + 2%	2014-2016	—			—		2,071,783
Credit	USD	LIBOR + 2%	2016	—			—		693,296
Credit	USD	2.78% - 4.7%	2010-2012	466,502			336,132		773,142
Credit	Pesos	8.09% - 11.2%	2010-2016	212,121			64,902		70,301
Credit	Bolivars	8.0% y 13.0%	2010-2012	267,479			229,767		279,813
Credit	Euros	1.9% - 3.11%	2011-2012	—			50,821		50,617
Credit	USD	LIBOR + 2%	2013	49,208			5,558		7,394
Credit	Pesos	TIIE +1.5%	2015-2018	—			—		596,786
Credit	USD	LIBOR + 2%	2012	—			—		474,302
Credit	USD	LIBOR + 2.875%	2010-2012	761,929			569,965		—
Credit	USD	LIBOR + 2%	2010-2011	145,126			40,332		—
Credit	Pesos	11.301% - 11.875%	2010-2014	394,654			—		—
Credit	USD	2.23%	2010	313,680			—		—
Financing lease liability	Pesos	13.02%	2010-2013	119,424			106,635		33,283
Total				Ps.	21,775,394		Ps.	18,045,409	Ps.	13,105,317

(a)  Interest rate in effect until July 20, 2012 and annual step-ups thereafter.

(b)  Redeemable starting 2009 at the Company’s option.

At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, short-term debt bore interest at an average rate of 8.43%, 8.16% and 4.34%, respectively.

At December 31, 2011, the annual maturities of long-term debt outstanding were as follows:

Year	Amount
2013	Ps.	35,295
2014	366,560
2015	441,071
2016	5,177,066
2017 and thereafter	5,452,118
Total	Ps.	11,472,110

On February 18, 2011, the Company paid in advance the outstanding balance of several credit facilities as of December 31, 2010. The total amount of payments made were U.S.$753.3 million and Ps.773.3 million, payments for which the Company used the entirety of the net proceeds from the sale of shares of GFNorte (Note 11), as well as its own resources and others obtained through short term facilities.

F-50

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

15. DEBT (continued)

Due to the aforementioned payments, the following loan agreements have been terminated:

·Payment of U.S.$618.3 million corresponding to the loan agreement executed with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent, several banks, and The Bank of New York Mellon as collateral agent, for the financing of U.S.$668.3 million, dated October 16, 2009;

·Payment of U.S.$88.7 million and Ps.773.3 million corresponding to the syndicated loan agreement executed with BBVA Bancomer, S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, as administrative agent, several banks, and The Bank of New York Mellon as collateral agent, for the financing of U.S.$197.0 million, dated October 16, 2009;

·Payment of U.S.$10.4 million corresponding to the unsecured loan agreement executed with ABN Amro Bank, N.V. (which has been transferred to the Royal Bank of Scotland, N.V.) for the financing of U.S.$13.9 million, dated October 16, 2009;

·Payment of U.S.$16.1 million corresponding to the unsecured loan agreement executed with Barclays Bank, PLC for the financing of U.S.$21.5 million, dated October 16, 2009;

·Payment of U.S.$17.2 million corresponding to the unsecured loan agreement executed with Standard Chartered Bank (which has been transferred to Mercantil Commercebank, N.A.) for the financing of U.S.$22.9 million, dated October 16, 2009; and

·Payment of U.S.$2.6 million corresponding to the unsecured loan agreement executed with BNP Paribas for the financing of U.S.$11.8 million, dated October 16, 2009.

On February 21, 2011, the Company concluded all necessary actions required for canceling all pledges granted pursuant to some of the foregoing loan agreements and those related to the Company’s perpetual notes.

As part of the anticipated payment of the debt, the Company canceled debt issuance costs related to these liabilities amounting to Ps.63,815.

The Company has credit line agreements for Ps.4,534 million (U.S.$325 million), from which Ps.935 million (U.S.$67 million) are available as of December 31, 2011. These credit line agreements require a quarterly payment of a commitment fee ranging from 0.2% to 0.9% over the unused amounts.

The outstanding credit agreements contain covenants mainly related to compliance with certain financial ratios and delivery of financial information, which, if not complied with during the period, as determined by creditors, may be considered a cause for early maturity of the debt.

Financial ratios are calculated according to formulas established in the credit agreements. The main financial ratios contained in the credit agreements are the following:

F-51

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

15. DEBT (continued)

·Interest coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to consolidated interest charges, should not be less than 2.50 to 1.00.

·Leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of total consolidated indebtedness (as described in the credit agreements) to consolidated EBITDA, should not exceed 3.5 to 1.00.

At December 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants, as well as the delivery of the required financial information.

16. PROVISIONS

The movements of provisions are as follows:

	Labor provisions			Restoration provision			Taxprovision			Unregulated labor security obligations
Balance at January 1, 2010	Ps.	211,288		Ps.	65,912		Ps.	16,864		Ps.	35,872
Charge (credit) to income:
Additional provisions	110,062			13,199			6,755			10,750
Unused amounts reversed	—			—			(1,014		)	—
Used during the year	(107,133		)	(3,502		)	(12,481		)	—
Exchange differences	(14,035		)	(3,855		)	627			(18,924		)
Balance at December 31, 2010	200,182			71,754			10,751			27,698
Charge (credit) to income:
Additional provisions	157,324			31,148			6,048			15,892
Unused amounts reversed	—			—			(488		)	—
Used during the year	(72,696		)	—			(1,523		)	—
Exchange differences	31,751			12,995			1,830			3,588
Balance at December 31, 2011	Ps.	316,561		Ps.	115,897		Ps.	16,618		Ps.	47,178
Of which current	Ps.	316,561		Ps.	17,801		Ps.	—		Ps.	47,178
Of which non-current	—			98,096			16,618			—

F-52

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

16. PROVISIONS (continued)

	Provision for operating plant closure expenditures			Other			Total
Balance at January 1, 2010	Ps.	—		Ps.	430		Ps.	330,366
Charge (credit) to income:
Additional provisions	19,681			144,170			304,617
Unused amounts reversed	—			—			(1,014		)
Used during the year	—			(144,287		)	(267,403		)
Exchange differences	—			(225		)	(36,412		)
Balance at December 31, 2010	19,681			88			330,154
Charge (credit) to income:
Additional provisions	—			4,604			215,016
Unused amounts reversed	—			—			(488		)
Used during the year	(7,256		)	(99		)	(81,574		)
Exchange differences	2,550			8			52,722
Balance at December 31, 2011	Ps.	14,975		Ps.	4,601		Ps.	515,830
Of which current	Ps.	14,975		Ps.	4,601		Ps.	401,116
Of which non-current	—			—			114,714

Labor provisions

a. Workers’ compensation

In the United States, when permitted by law, the Company self insures against workers’ compensation claims.  As claims are filed for workers’ compensation, the Company recognizes an obligation to settle these claims. Actuarial information is used to estimate the expected outflows of economic resources and projected timing of the settlement of these claims.

b. Legal reserve

The Company’s subsidiaries in the United States have established a provision for the probable settlement of a lawsuit presented by a former employee.

c. Labor liabilities

Subsidiaries in Venezuela established a provision for labor claims filed against the Company related to work accidents and the payment of certain labor benefits, and to meet the terms of the collective labor contracts that, as of the date hereof, are still being negotiated with workers’ unions.

F-53

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

16. PROVISIONS (continued)

Restoration provision

In the United States, the Company has recognized an obligation to remove equipment and leasehold improvements from certain of its leased manufacturing facilities in order to restore the facilities to their original condition, less normal wear and tear as determined by the terms of the lease. The Company has estimated the expected outflows of economic resources associated with these obligations and the probability of possible settlement dates based upon the terms of the lease.  These estimates are used to calculate the present value of the estimated expenditures using the pre-tax rate and taking into account any specific risks associated with these obligations.

Tax provision

In Central America, for the periods from 2005 to 2011, tax authorities have lodged tax assessments against the Company for an amount of Ps.33.7 million (1,250 million colons) in connection with sales and income tax. Based on the criteria of the Company’s management and the opinion of tax consultants hired for the Company’s defense, there is a high probability that a part of these tax assessments will be settled. For this reason, the Company has accrued the necessary amounts to cover the payment of these obligations.

Unregulated labor security obligations

In Venezuela, the Organic Law of Prevention, Conditions and Work Environment (Ley Orgánica de Prevención, Condiciones y Medio Ambiente de Trabajo) establishes the substitution of certain security obligations for other more onerous obligations. This regulation has not been officially released by the Venezuelan government, making it difficult to determine the payment date for this obligation.

Provision for operating plant closure expenditures

This provision was created to cover all expenses related to the closure of a production plant in Venezuela which was surrendered to a government institution due to the expiration of the lease contract, and to cover any damage to the assets to be returned; however, the legal settlement has yet to be concluded.

Other provisions

Estimates due to commitments of the Company in Venezuela including, among others, point of sale promotions to its customers for the exchange of different products, for which it is difficult to determine the specific date to deliver these commitments.

17. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, Other current liabilities include employee benefits payable of Ps.777,481, Ps.730,533 and Ps.959,975, respectively.

F-54

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

18. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS

Employee benefits obligations recognized in the balance sheet, by country, were as follows:

Country	At January 1,2010		At December 31, 2010		At December 31, 2011
Mexico	Ps.	212,976	Ps.	265,834	Ps.	275,799
United States	61,926		64,553		72,247
Venezuela	27,181		19,792		22,356
Total	Ps.	302,083	Ps.	350,179	Ps.	370,402

A) MEXICO

In Mexico, labor obligations recognized by the Company correspond to the single-payment retirement plan and seniority premium. The benefits for the retirement plan and seniority premium are defined benefit plans, based on the projected salary at the date in which the employee is assumed to receive the benefits. Currently, the plan operates under Mexican law, which does not require minimum funding.

The Company has decided to recognize actuarial gains and losses immediately in other comprehensive income.

The reconciliation between the initial and final balances of the present value of the defined benefit obligations (DBO) is as follows:

	2010			2011
DBO at beginning of the year	Ps.	248,726		Ps.	306,098
Add (deduct):
Current service cost	23,435			17,496
Financial cost	20,441			20,964
Actuarial losses for the period	18,949			(14,061		)
Benefits paid	(5,453		)	(15,848		)
DBO at end of the year	Ps.	306,098		Ps.	314,649

At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, liabilities relating to vested employee benefits amounted to Ps.156,153, Ps.180,440 and Ps.193,225, respectively.

The reconciliation between the initial and final balances of the employee benefit plan assets at fair value for the years 2010 and 2011 is shown below:

	2010			2011
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of the year	Ps.	35,750		Ps.	40,264
Add (deduct):
Actual return	5,160			(184		)
Benefits paid	(646		)	(1,230		)
Plan assets at fair value at end of the year	Ps.	40,264		Ps.	38,850

F-55

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

18. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS (continued)

The following table shows the reconciliation between the present value of the defined benefit obligation and the plan assets at fair value, and the projected net liability included in the balance sheet:

	At January 1,2010			At December 31, 2010				At December 31, 2011
Employee benefit (assets) liabilities:
DBO	Ps.	248,726		Ps.	306,098			Ps.	314,649
Plan assets	(35,750		)	(40,264			)	(38,850			)
Projected net liability	Ps.	212,976		Ps.		265,834		Ps.		275,799

At December 31, 2010 and 2011, the components of net cost comprised the following:

	2010			2011
Current service cost	Ps.	23,435		Ps.	17,496
Financial cost	20,441			20,964
Estimated return on plan assets	(3,102		)	(4,447		)
Net cost for the year	Ps.	40,774		Ps.	34,013

The net cost for the year 2010 and 2011 of Ps.40,774 and Ps.34,013, respectively, was recognized as follows:

	2010		2011
Cost of sales	Ps.	4,596	Ps.	2,138
Selling and administrative expenses	36,178		31,875
Net cost for the year	Ps.	40,774	Ps.	34,013

The total amount recognized in other comprehensive income is described below:

	2010		2011
Balance at the beginning of the year	Ps.	—	Ps.	18,949
Actuarial losses that occurred during the year	18,949		(14,061		)
Balance at the end of the year	Ps.	18,949	Ps.	4,888

At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, plan assets stated at fair value and related percentages with respect to total plan assets were analyzed as follows:

	At January 1,2010				At December 31, 2010				At December 31, 2011
Equity securities	Ps.	21,093	59	%	Ps.	23,755	63	%	Ps.	23,692	61	%
Fixed rate securities	14,657		41	%	16,509		37	%	15,158		39	%
Fair value of plan assets	Ps.	35,750	100	%	Ps.	40,264	100	%	Ps.	38,850	100	%

F-56

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

18. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS (continued)

The Company has a policy of maintaining at least 30% of its trust assets in Mexican Federal Government instruments. Guidelines have been established for the remaining 70% and investment decisions are taken in accordance with these guidelines to the extent market conditions and available funds allow it.

As of December 31, 2011, the funds maintained in plan assets were considered sufficient to face the Company’s short-term needs; therefore, the Company’s management has determined that for the time being there is no need for additional contributions to increase these assets.

The estimated long-term return on assets is based on the annual recommendations issued by the Actuarial Commission of the Mexican Association of Actuaries. These recommendations consider historical information and future market expectations. The actual return on plan assets during the year 2011 was 11%.

The main actuarial assumptions used were as follows:

	At January 1, 2010		At December 31, 2010		At December 31, 2011
Discount rate	9.00	%	7.50	%	7.75	%
Future increase rate in compensation levels	4.50	%	4.50	%	4.50	%
Estimated return rate on plan assets	9.00	%	11.50	%	11.00	%
Long-term inflation rate	3.50	%	3.50	%	3.50	%

The impact in DBO for a decrease of 25 basis points in the discount rate amounts to Ps.4,598.

The Company does not expect to contribute during the next fiscal year.

B) OTHER COUNTRIES

In the United States, the Company has a savings and investment plan that incorporates voluntary employee 401(k) contributions with matching contributions from the Company in this country. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, total expenses related to this plan amounted to Ps.6,219 and Ps.1,334, respectively (U.S.$492 and U.S.$107 thousand, respectively). At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, the liability recognized for these items amounted to Ps.61,926, Ps.64,553 and Ps.72,247, respectively (U.S. $4,738, U.S.$5,227 and U.S$5,179 thousand, respectively).

In Venezuela, the Company determines severance payments for employment termination, in accordance with the local Labor Law and collective agreements, and transfers these amounts to a trust for each worker. Contributions to each trust are recognized in the income statement when incurred. Collective agreements include additional benefits upon employment termination and the Company recognizes a liability when the right to receive these benefits is irrevocable. At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, the liability recognized for these items amounted to Ps.27,181, Ps.19,792, and Ps.22,356, respectively.

F-57

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

19. EQUITY

A)  COMMON STOCK

At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company’s outstanding common stock consisted of 563,650,709 Series “B” shares, with no par value, fully subscribed and paid, which can only be withdrawn with stockholders’ approval, and 1,523,900 shares held in Treasury.

B)  RETAINED EARNINGS

In accordance with Mexican Corporate Law, the legal reserve must be increased annually by 5% of annual net profits until it reaches a fifth of the fully paid common stock amount. The legal reserve is included within retained earnings.

Dividends paid are not subject to income tax if paid from the Net Tax Profit Account (CUFIN) and will be taxed at a rate that fluctuates between 32% and 35% if they are paid from the reinvested Net Tax Profit Account. Dividends paid that exceed CUFIN and reinvested CUFIN are subject to an income tax payable at a rate of 30% if paid in 2011. The tax is payable by the Company and may be credited against the normal income tax payable by the Company in the year in which the dividends are paid or in the following two years or, if appropriate, against the flat rate tax for the year. Dividends paid from earnings previously taxed are not subject to any withholding or additional tax payment.

C)  PURCHASE OF COMMON STOCK

The Stockholders’ Meeting approved a Ps.650,000 reserve to repurchase the Company’s own shares. The total amount of repurchased shares cannot exceed 5% of total equity. The difference between the acquisition cost of the repurchased shares and their stated value, composed of common stock and share premium, is recognized as part of the reserve to repurchase the Company’s own shares, which is included within retained earnings from prior years. The gain or loss on the sale of the Company’s own shares is recorded in retained earnings. As of December 31, 2011, the Company carried out net purchases of 1,523,900 of its own shares with a market value of Ps.40,231 at that date.

D) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENTS

Foreign currency translation adjustments consisted of the following as of December 31:

	2010			2011
Balance at beginning of year	Ps.	—		Ps.	(1,282,185	)
Effect of the year from translating net investment in foreign subsidiaries	(1,578,821		)	2,018,314
Exchange differences arising from foreign currency liabilities accounted for as a hedge of the Company’s net investments in foreign subsidiaries	296,636			(813,101		)
	Ps.	(1,282,185	)	Ps.	(76,972	)

F-58

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

19. EQUITY (continued)

The investment that the Company maintains in its operations in the United States and Europe generated a hedge of up to U.S.$375 and U.S.$478 million at December 31, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

At December 31, 2010 and 2011, the accumulated effect of translating net investment in foreign subsidiaries impacted non-controlling interest in the amounts of Ps.(536,126) and Ps.(143,668), respectively.

20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

A) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS BY CATEGORY

The carrying values of financial instruments by category are presented below:

	At January 1, 2010
	Loans, receivables and liabilities at amortized cost		Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		Hedge derivatives		Totalcategories
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Ps.	1,880,663	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	1,880,663
Trading investments	—		127,293		—		127,293
Derivative financial instruments	—		55,749		—		55,749
Accounts receivable	5,670,752		—		—		5,670,752
Non-current notes and accounts receivable	543,295		—		—		543,295
Financial liabilities:
Current debt	Ps.	2,203,392	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	2,203,392
Trade accounts payable and other accounts payable	3,564,372		—		—		3,564,372
Derivative financial instruments	—		11,935		—		11,935
Long-term debt	19,572,002		—		—		19,572,002
Other liabilities (excludes non-financial liabilities)	107,668		—		—		107,668

F-59

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

	At December 31, 2010
	Loans, receivables and liabilities at amortized cost		Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		Hedge derivatives		Totalcategories
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Ps.	21,317	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	21,317
Trading investments	—		79,577		—		79,577
Derivative financial instruments	—		13,137		—		13,137
Accounts receivable	5,017,797		—		—		5,017,797
Non-current notes and accounts receivable	474,834		—		—		474,834
Financial liabilities:
Current debt	Ps.	2,192,871	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	2,192,871
Trade accounts payable and other accounts payable	3,601,829		—		—		3,601,829
Derivative financial instruments	—		4,863		—		4,863
Long-term debt	15,852,538		—		—		15,852,538
Other liabilities (excludes non-financial liabilities)	96,834		—		—		96,834

	At December 31, 2011
	Loans, receivables and liabilities at amortized cost		Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss		Hedge derivatives		Totalcategories
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Ps.	1,179,651	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	1,179,651
Trading investments	—		140,255		—		140,255
Derivative financial instruments	—		88,537		14,876		103,413
Accounts receivable	7,127,208		—		—		7,127,208
Non-current notes and accounts receivable	515,478		—		—		515,478
Financial liabilities:
Current debt	Ps.	1,633,207	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	1,633,207
Trade accounts payable and other accounts payable	5,544,105		—		—		5,544,105
Derivative financial instruments	—		46,013		—		46,013
Long-term debt	11,472,110		—		—		11,472,110
Other liabilities (excludes non-financial liabilities)	45,734		—		—		45,734

F-60

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

B) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, recoverable income tax, trade accounts payable, short-term debt, and other current liabilities approximate their fair value, due to their short maturity. In addition, the net book value of accounts receivable and recoverable taxes represent the expected cash flow to be received.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments is as follows:

	At January 1, 2010
	Carrying amount		Fair value
Assets:
Interest and capital bonds	Ps.	127,293	Ps.	127,293
Derivative financial instruments - corn	14,217		14,217
Derivative financial instruments - other raw materials	39,353		39,353
Long-term notes receivable	8,768		4,859
Liabilities:
Perpetual bonds in U.S. dollars bearing fixed interest at an annual rate of 7.75%	3,661,900		3,666,135
Long-term debt	17,201,352		18,231,481
Derivative financial instruments - other raw materials	4,526		4,526
Derivative financial instruments - interest rate	7,133		7,133

	At December 31, 2010
	Carrying amount			Fair value
Assets:
Interest and capital bonds	Ps.	79,577		Ps.	79,577
Derivative financial instruments - other raw materials (1)	(4,863		)	(4,863		)
Long-term notes receivable	175,653			153,285
Liabilities:
Perpetual bonds in U.S. dollars bearing fixed interest at an annual rate of 7.75%	3,463,116			3,667,950
Long-term debt	13,965,569			15,007,339
Derivative financial instruments - exchange rate	4,863			4,863

(1) At December 31, 2010, the balance of derivative financial instruments for Ps.13,137 was comprised of: (a) margin calls required due to price variations of the underlying asset for Ps.17,258, to be applied against payments, and (b) an unfavorable effect in the valuation of open positions of derivatives at the end of the year for Ps.4,121.

F-61

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

	At December 31, 2011
	Carrying amount		Fair value
Assets:
Interest and capital bonds	Ps.	140,255	Ps.	140,255
Derivative financial instruments - exchange rate	88,537		88,537
Derivative financial instruments - corn	14,876		14,876
Long-term notes receivable	189,044		165,157
Liabilities:
Perpetual bonds in U.S. dollars bearing fixed interest at an annual rate of 7.75%	3,960,333		4,192,115
Long-term debt	7,567,111		7,621,786
Derivative financial instruments - other raw materials	45,922		45,922

The fair values were determined by the Company as follows:

·The fair values of perpetual bonds and derivative financial instruments were determined based on available market prices and/or estimates using market data information and appropriate valuation methodologies for similar instruments.

·The fair value for the rest of the long-term debt was based on the present value of the cash flows discounted at interest rates based on readily observable market inputs.

C) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

At January 1, 2010 derivative financial instruments comprised the following:

			Fair value
Type of contract	Notional amount		Asset		Liability
Corn futures	2,520,000 Bushels		Ps.	6,934	Ps.	—
Corn options	4,410,000 Bushels		7,283		—
Natural gas swaps and options 2011	1,710,000 Mmbtu		1,201		—
Diesel swaps	9,324,000 Gallons		38,152		—
Diesel swaps	441,000 Gallons		—		4,526
Interest rate swaps	$	20,000,000 USD	—		7,133

At December 31, 2009, open positions of corn, natural gas and diesel derivatives were recorded at fair value. These instruments did not qualify as hedge accounting and represented a favorable effect of Ps.63,769, which was recognized in income.

Operations terminated at December 31, 2009 on corn, natural gas and diesel derivatives represented an unfavorable effect of Ps.121,631.

Exchange rate derivative financial instruments were recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2009, there were no open positions on these instruments.

F-62

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

Operations terminated at December 31, 2009 on exchange rate derivatives represented a loss of Ps.485,261, which was recognized in income.

At December 31, 2009, the Company had margin calls of Ps.2,180, which were required due to price variations of the underlying asset to be applied against payments.

At December 31, 2010 derivative financial instruments comprised the following:

			Fair value
Type of contract	Notional amount		Asset		Liability
Natural gas swaps and options 2011	2,090,000 Mmbtu		Ps.	—	Ps.	5,714
Diesel swaps	252,000 Gallons		1,593		—
Exchange rate forwards	$	42,739,822 USD	—		4,863

At December 31, 2010, the Company had no open positions of corn derivatives. Open positions of natural gas and diesel were recorded at fair value. These instruments did not qualify as hedge accounting and represented an unfavorable effect of Ps.13,228, which was recognized in income.

Operations terminated at December 31, 2010 on corn, natural gas and diesel derivatives represented an unfavorable effect of Ps.42,970.

Exchange rate derivative financial instruments were recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2010, open positions on these instruments represented an unfavorable effect of approximately Ps.4,863, which was recognized in income for that year.

Operations terminated at December 31, 2010 on exchange rate derivatives represented a loss of Ps.21,464, which was recognized in income.

At December 31, 2010, the Company had margin calls of Ps.17,258, which were required due to price variations of the underlying asset to be applied against payments.

At December 31, 2011 derivative financial instruments comprised the following:

			Fair value
Type of contract	Notional amount		Asset		Liability
Corn futures	2,090,000 Bushels		Ps.	6,915	Ps.	—
Corn options	2,560,000 Bushels		7,961		—
Natural gas swaps 2012-2013	3,840,000 Mmbtu		—		45,922
Exchange rate forwards	$	106,000,000 USD	88,537		—

At December 31, 2011, open positions of corn and natural gas derivatives were recorded at fair value. Financial instruments that qualify as hedge accounting represented a favorable effect of Ps.14,876, which was recognized as comprehensive income in equity. Financial instruments that did not qualify as hedge accounting represented an unfavorable effect of Ps.40,207, which was recognized in the income statement.

F-63

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

Operations terminated at December 31, 2011 on corn and natural gas derivatives represented an unfavorable effect of Ps.52,626.

Exchange rate derivative financial instruments were recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2011, open positions on these instruments represented a favorable effect of approximately Ps.93,400 thousand, which was recognized in income for the year.

Operations terminated at December 31, 2011 on exchange rate derivatives represented a favorable effect of Ps.207,250.

At December 31, 2011, the Company had no revolving funds denominated “margin calls”, which were required due to price variations of the underlying asset to be applied against payments.

D) FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY

A three-level hierarchy is used to measure and disclose fair values. An instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its valuation.

The following is a description of the three hierarchy levels:

·Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

·Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

·Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its valuations where possible.

a. Determination of fair value

When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is valued using industry standard valuation models. When applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs, including interest rates, currency rates, volatilities, etc. Items valued using such inputs are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some inputs that are readily observable. In addition, the Company considers assumptions for its own credit risk and the respective counterparty risk.

F-64

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

b. Measurement

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized below:

	At January 1, 2010
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Assets:
Interest and capital bonds	Ps.	—	Ps.	127,293		Ps.	—	Ps.	127,293
Plan assets — seniority premium fund	35,750		—			—		35,750
Derivative financial instruments — corn and other raw materials	55,768		—			—		55,768
	Ps.	91,518	Ps.	127,293		Ps.	—	Ps.	218,811
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments — other raw materials	Ps.	4,810	Ps.		—	Ps.	—	Ps.		4,810
Derivative financial instruments — interest rate	—		—			7,133		7,133
	Ps.	4,810	Ps.		—	Ps.	7,133	Ps.		11,943

	At December 31, 2010
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Interest and capital bonds	Ps.	—	Ps.	79,577	Ps.	—	Ps.		79,577
Plan assets — seniority premium fund	40,264		—		—		40,264
Derivative financial instruments — corn and other raw materials	13,137		—		—		13,137
	Ps.	53,401	Ps.	79,577	Ps.	—	Ps.	132,978
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments — exchange rate	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	4,863	Ps.		4,863

	At December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Assets:
Interest and capital bonds	Ps.	—	Ps.	140,255		Ps.	—	Ps.	140,255
Plan assets — seniority premium fund	38,850		—			—		38,850
Derivative financial instruments — corn	14,876		—			—		14,876
Derivative financial instruments — exchange rate	—		88,537			—		88,537
	Ps.	53,726	Ps.	228,792		Ps.	—	Ps.	282,518
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments — other raw materials	Ps.	—	Ps.		—	Ps.	46,013	Ps.		46,013

F-65

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

20. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets

Financial instruments that are negotiated in active markets are classified as Level 1. The valuation techniques and the inputs used in the Company’s financial statements to measure the fair value include the following:

·        Quoted market prices of corn listed on the Chicago Board of Trade.

·        Quoted market prices of natural gas listed on the NYMEX Exchange.

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets

Financial instruments that are classified as Level 2 refer mainly to quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, as well as model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

Level 3 - Valuation techniques

The Company has classified as Level 3 those financial instruments whose fair values are obtained using valuation models that include observable inputs but also include certain unobservable inputs. For the Company, the unobservable input included in the valuation of its liability positions refers solely to the Company’s own credit risk.

The table below includes a roll-forward of the balance sheet amounts for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 for financial instruments classified by the Company within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3, it is due to the use of significant unobservable inputs. However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources); accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due, in part, to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology:

	Derivative financial instruments — interest rate			Derivative financial instruments — exchange rate			Derivative financial instruments — other raw materials
Initial balance at January 1, 2010	Ps.	7,133		Ps.	—		Ps.	—
Losses recognized in the income statement	811			4,863			—
Net settlements paid	(7,944		)	—			—
Ending balance as of December 31, 2010	Ps.	—		Ps.	4,863		Ps.	—
Losses recognized in the income statement	—			—			46,013
Net settlements paid	—			(4,863		)	—
Ending balance as of December 31, 2011	Ps.	—		Ps.	—		Ps.	46,013

F-66

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

21. OTHER EXPENSES, NET

Other expenses, net comprised the following:

	2010			2011
Expenses related to Venezuela legal proceedings	Ps.	(403,712	)	Ps.		—
Net loss from sale of fixed assets	(26,912		)	(4,201			)
Net (loss) gain from sale of scrap	(704		)	1,084
Impairment loss on long-lived assets	—			(93,808			)
Cost of written-down fixed assets	—			(52,271			)
Current employees’ statutory profit sharing	(50,361		)	(36,959			)
Non-recoverable cost of damaged assets	(37,043		)	(17,695			)
Total	Ps.	(518,732	)	Ps.	(203,850		)

22. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EXPENSES

Employee benefit expenses are comprised of the following:

	2010		2011
Salaries, wages and benefits (including termination benefits)	Ps.	3,836,491	Ps.	4,814,297
Social security contributions	338,119		399,078
Employment benefits (Note 18)	56,148		35,347
Total	Ps.	4,230,758	Ps.	5,248,722

23.  INCOME TAX EXPENSE

A)  INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX

The domestic and foreign components of income before income tax are the following:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2010		2011
Domestic	Ps.	665,708	Ps.	5,995,927
Foreign	813,339		1,626,467
	Ps.	1,479,047	Ps.	7,622,394

F-67

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

23.  INCOME TAX EXPENSE (continued)

B)  COMPONENTS OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE

The components of income tax expense are the following:

	2010			2011
Current tax:
Current tax on profits for the year	Ps.	(669,498	)	Ps.	(866,734	)
Adjustments in respect of prior years	90,768			(137,512		)
Total current tax	(578,730		)	(1,004,246		)
Deferred tax:
Origin and reversal of temporary differences	(260,831		)	(1,035,147		)
Offsetting of income tax from foreign dividends	—			232,821
Total deferred tax	(260,831		)	(802,326		)
Total income tax expense	Ps.	(839,561	)	Ps.	(1,806,572	)

Domestic federal, foreign federal and state income taxes in the consolidated statements of income consisted of the following components:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2010			2011
Current:
Domestic federal	Ps.	(179,565	)	Ps.	(316,407	)
Foreign federal	(355,500		)	(644,174		)
Foreign state	(43,665		)	(43,665		)
	(578,730		)	(1,004,246		)
Deferred:
Domestic federal	(271,451		)	(896,374		)
Foreign federal	17,765			88,634
Foreign state	(7,145		)	5,414
	(260,831		)	(802,326		)
Total income taxes	Ps.	(839,561	)	Ps.	(1,806,572	)

F-68

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

23.  INCOME TAX EXPENSE (continued)

C)  RECONCILIATION OF FINANCIAL AND TAXABLE INCOME

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the reconciliation between statutory income tax amounts and the effective income tax amounts is summarized as follows:

	2010			2011
Statutory federal income tax (30% for 2010 and 2011, respectively)	Ps.	(443,714	)	Ps.	(2,286,719	)
Foreign dividends	(278,705		)	—
Effects related to inflation	(197,016		)	119,454
Foreign income tax rate differences	(88,238		)	(67,105		)
Offsetting of income tax from foreign dividends	—			232,821
Tax loss carryforwards used	248,031			186,772
Non-deductible expenses related with legal proceedings in Venezuela	(80,727		)	—
Prior year adjustments and others	808			8,204
Effective income tax (56.8% and 23.7% for 2010 and 2011, respectively)	Ps.	(839,561	)	Ps.	(1,806,572	)

On December 7, 2009 several dispositions of the Income Tax Law were reformed, added or derogated. Among these modifications was the establishment of an income tax rate of 30% for the years 2010 through 2012, 29% for 2013 and 28% from 2014 onwards.

24. COMMITMENTS

A) OPERATING LEASES

The Company is leasing certain facilities and equipment under long-term lease agreements in effect through 2026, which include an option for renewal. These agreements are recognized as operating leases, since the contracts do not transfer substantially all risks and advantages inherent to ownership.

Future minimum lease payments under operating lease agreements are as follows:

	2010		2011
No later than 1 year	Ps.	514,493	Ps.	624,025
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years	1,050,232		1,290,301
Later than 5 years	523,946		801,660
	Ps.	2,088,671	Ps.	2,715,986

Rental expense was approximately Ps.745,613 and Ps.701,370 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

The Company has a lease agreement of an aircraft for a 10-year term, which includes an early purchase option on the following dates: (a) on the fifth anniversary for a total of U.S.$34.7 million and (b) on the seventh anniversary for a total of U.S.$31.6 million.

F-69

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

24. COMMITMENTS (continued)

B) FINANCE LEASES

At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, the net carrying values of assets recorded under finance leases totaled Ps.162,446, Ps.138,407 and Ps.20,922, respectively, and corresponded to transportation and production equipment.

Future minimum lease payments under finance lease agreements are as follows:

	2010			2011
No later than 1 year	Ps.	37,516		Ps.	13,515
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years	91,406			23,805
	128,922			37,320
Future finance charges on finance leases	(22,287		)	(4,037		)
Present value of finance lease liabilities	Ps.	106,635		Ps.	33,283

The present value of finance lease liabilities is as follows:

	2010		2011
No later than 1 year	Ps.	33,545	Ps.	12,432
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years	73,090		20,851
Total	Ps.	106,635	Ps.		33,283

Finance lease agreements include purchase options at fair value at the end of the lease. Additionally, the contracts include the option to renew or extend the lease term for the same amount for each respective contract.

C) OTHER COMMITMENTS

At December 31, 2011, the Company had various outstanding commitments to purchase commodities and raw materials in the United States for approximately Ps.3,742,213 (U.S.$268,259 thousand) and in Mexico for approximately Ps.4,491,900 (U.S.$322,000 thousand), which will be delivered during 2012. The Company has concluded that there are not embedded derivatives resulting from these contracts.

At December 31, 2011, the Company had outstanding commitments to purchase machinery and equipment in Mexico and the United States amounting to approximately Ps.255,724.

F-70

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

25. CONTINGENCIES

MEXICO

Asset Tax Claim.-The Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público, or Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, has lodged tax assessments against the Company for an amount of Ps.34.3 million plus penalties, updates and charges, in connection with the asset tax returns for the year 1997. The Company has filed several appeals to obtain an annulment of these assessments.

Income Tax Claim.- The Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público has lodged tax assessments against the Company for the amount of Ps.93.5 million in connection with withholding on interest payments to its foreign creditors for the years 2000, 2001 and 2002. Mexican authorities claim that the Company should have withheld a higher rate than the 4.9% withheld. The Company intends to defend against these claims vigorously.

The Company believes that the outcome of these claims will not have an adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

CNBV Investigation.-On December 8, 2009, the Surveillance Office of the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission, or CNBV) began an investigation into the Company in respect of the timely disclosure of material events reported through the Mexican Stock Exchange during the end of 2008 and throughout 2009, in connection with the Company’s foreign exchange derivative losses and the subsequent conversion of the realized losses into debt. In 2011, the CNBV commenced an administrative proceeding against the Company for alleged infringements to applicable legislation. The Company has participated in this proceeding in order to demonstrate its compliance with current legislation and to adopt applicable defenses as deemed appropriate in order to protect Gruma’s interests. As of this date, the aforementioned proceeding is ongoing, and the CNBV has not issued a final resolution in connection therewith.

The Company intends to vigorously defend against these actions and proceedings. It is the opinion of the Company that the outcome of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

UNITED STATES

Labor and Employment Related Claim.- On March 24, 2009, Guadalupe Arevalo, a former employee, filed a class action complaint for damages and equitable relief, currently being heard by the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, for an alleged: (1) failure to pay minimum or contractual wages, pay overtime, and provide accurate wage statements, in violation of the California Labor Code; (2) failure to pay wages due to former employees at the time of resignation and/or discharge; and (3) violation to certain provisions of the California Business and Professions Code. On June 10, 2010, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint incorporating an additional cause of action for failure to provide meal periods as required by law. The parties reached a court approved settlement on March 26, 2012, and the case has been dismissed.

F-71

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

25. CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Product Labeling Claim.- Mary Henderson brought a class action lawsuit against Gruma Corporation for (1) false advertising under the Lanham Act, (2) violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, (3) violations of California’s False Advertising Law, and (4) violations of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act. The complaint alleged that Gruma Corporation’s labeling of its guacamole flavored dip and spicy bean dip products is false and misleading. The complaint was subsequently amended to dismiss the Company under the Lanham Act claim. The case was settled for Ps.42 (U.S.$3 thousand) and has been dismissed.

VENEZUELA

Expropriation Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.- On May 12, 2010, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (the “Republic”) published in the Official Gazette of Venezuela decree number 7,394 (the “Expropriation Decree”), which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, movables and real estate of the Company’s subsidiary in Venezuela, Molinos Nacionales, C.A. (“MONACA”). The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to the Company’s subsidiary Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A. (“DEMASECA”).

As stated in the Expropriation Decree and in accordance with the Venezuelan Expropriation Law (the “Expropriation Law”), the taking of legal ownership can occur either through an “Amicable Administrative Arrangement” or a “Judicial Order”. Each process requires certain steps as indicated in the Expropriation Law, neither of which has occurred. Therefore, as of this date, no formal transfer of title of the assets covered by the Expropriation Decree has taken place. The negotiations are ongoing.

GRUMA’s interests in MONACA and DEMASECA are held through two Spanish companies Valores Mundiales, S.L. (“Valores Mundiales”) and Consorcio Andino, S.L. (“Consorcio Andino”). In 2010, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino (collectively, the “Investors”) commenced negotiations with the Republic with the intention of reaching an amicable settlement. GRUMA has participated in these negotiations with a view to continuing its presence in Venezuela by potentially entering into a joint venture with the Venezuelan government, that could also include compensation, or, absent a joint venture arrangement, GRUMA may receive compensation for the assets subject to expropriation, which the law requires be fair and reasonable. Those negotiations are ongoing.

The Republic and the Kingdom of Spain are parties to a Treaty on Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments, dated November 2, 1995 (the “Investment Treaty”), under which the Investors may settle investment disputes by means of arbitration before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”). On November 9, 2011, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA provided formal notice to the Republic that an investment dispute had arisen as a consequence of the Expropriation Decree and related measures adopted by the Republic. In that notification, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA also agreed to submit the dispute to ICSID arbitration if the parties are unable to reach an amicable agreement.

F-72

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

25. CONTINGENCIES (continued)

The negotiations with the government are ongoing, and the Company cannot assure that those negotiations will be successful or will result in the Investors receiving adequate compensation, if any, for their investments subject to the Expropriation Decree. Additionally, the Company cannot predict the results of any arbitral proceeding, or the ramifications that costly and prolonged legal disputes could have on its results of operations or financial position, or the likelihood of collecting a successful arbitration award. As a result, the net impact of this matter on the Company’s consolidated financial results cannot be reasonably estimated. The Company and its subsidiaries reserve and intend to continue to reserve the right to seek full compensation for any and all expropriated assets and investments under applicable law, including investment treaties and customary international law.

The Venezuelan government has not taken physical control of the assets of MONACA or DEMASECA and has not taken control of their operations. In consequence, GRUMA can validly and legally assert that, as of this date, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino have full legal ownership of MONACA’s and DEMASECA’s rights, interest, shares and assets, respectively, and full control of all operational or managerial decisions of MONACA and DEMASECA, which will not cease until GRUMA, through Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, finally agree with the Venezuelan government on the terms and conditions to transfer such assets in accordance with the legal and business schemes that are currently in negotiations with the government of Venezuela.

Pending resolution of this matter, based on preliminary valuation reports, no impairment charge on GRUMA’s net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA has been identified. The Company is also unable to estimate the value of any future impairment charge, if one will be taken, or to determine whether MONACA and DEMASECA will need to be accounted for as a discontinued operation. The historical value as of December 31, 2011 of the net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA was Ps.2,271,178 and Ps.165,969, respectively. The Company does not maintain insurance for the risk of expropriation of its investments.

Below is financial information regarding MONACA as of December 31, 2010 and 2011 (there are no material transactions between MONACA and the Group that need to be eliminated):

	At December 31, 2010			At December 31, 2011
Current assets	Ps.	2,139,422		Ps.	3,656,758
Non-current assets	1,481,982			2,182,293
Total assets	3,621,404			5,839,051
Percentage from consolidated total assets	9.3		%	13.1		%
Current liabilities	1,904,852			2,699,514
Non-current liabilities	26,713			22,356
Total liabilities	1,931,565			2,721,870
Percentage from consolidated total liabilities	6.8		%	10.1		%
Total net assets	1,689,839			3,117,181
Percentage from consolidated total net assets	15.8		%	17.6		%
Non-controlling interest	458,622			846,003
Interest of Gruma in total net assets	Ps.	1,231,217		Ps.	2,271,178

F-73

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

25. CONTINGENCIES (continued)

The condensed statements of income for MONACA for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, are as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2010			2011
Net sales	Ps.	5,331,063		Ps.	9,080,552
Percentage from consolidated net sales	11.4		%	15.8		%
Operating income	37,647			673,588
Percentage from consolidated operating income	1.5		%	20.2		%
Net (loss) income	(169,225		)	681,586
Percentage from consolidated net income	(26.5		)%	11.7		%

Intervention Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.- On December 4, 2009, the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas issued an order authorizing the precautionary seizure of assets of all corporations in which Ricardo Fernández Barrueco had any direct or indirect interest. As a result of Ricardo Fernández Barrueco’s former indirect ownership of MONACA and DEMASECA, these subsidiaries were subject to the precautionary seizure. The Ministry of Finance of Venezuela, in light of the precautionary measure ordered by the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas, has made several designations of individuals as special managers and representatives on behalf of the Republic of Venezuela of the shares that were previously owned indirectly by Ricardo Fernández Barrueco in MONACA and DEMASECA, the last designation was on January 14, 2011.

As a result of the foregoing, MONACA and DEMASECA, as well as Consorcio Andino, S.L. and Valores Mundiales, S.L., as holders of the Venezuelan subsidiaries, have filed a petition as aggrieved third-parties to the proceedings against Ricardo Fernández Barrueco, as a challenge to the precautionary measures, the seizure and all related actions. MONACA has also filed for corresponding legal remedies. On November 19, 2010, the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas issued a ruling regarding the petitions, in which, the court recognized that MONACA and DEMASECA are companies wholly controlled by Valores Mundiales, S.L. and Consorcio Andino, S.L, respectively. However, the precautionary measures of seizure issued on December 4, 2009 were upheld by the court, despite the court’s recognition of MONACA and DEMASECA’s ownership. In virtue of the aforementioned, an appeal has been filed, which is pending resolution as of this date.

The People’s Defense Institute for the Access of Goods and Services of Venezuela (“INDEPABIS”) issued an order, on a precautionary basis, authorizing the temporary occupation and operation of MONACA for a period of 90 calendar days from December 16, 2009, which was renewed for the same period on March 16, 2010. The order expired on June 16, 2010 and as of the date hereof MONACA has not been notified of any extension or similar measure. INDEPABIS has also initiated a regulatory proceeding against MONACA in connection with alleged failure to comply with regulations governing precooked corn flour and for allegedly refusing to sell this product as a result of the December 4, 2009 precautionary asset seizure described above. The Company filed an appeal against these proceedings which has not been resolved as of the date hereof.

F-74

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

25. CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Additionally, INDEPABIS initiated an investigation of DEMASECA and issued an order, on a precautionary basis, authorizing the temporary occupation and operation of DEMASECA for a period of 90 calendar days from May 25, 2010, which was extended until November 21, 2010. INDEPABIS issued a new precautionary measure of occupation and temporary operation of DEMASECA, valid for the duration of this investigation. DEMASECA has challenged these measures but as of the date hereof, no resolution has been issued. The proceedings are still ongoing.

The Company intends to exhaust all legal remedies available in order to safeguard and protect the Company’s legitimate interests.

Tax Claims.-The Venezuelan tax authorities have lodged certain assessments against MONACA, one of the Company’s Venezuelan subsidiaries, related to income tax returns for the years 1998 and 1999, which amounted to Ps.9,709 (U.S.$696 thousand), plus related Value Added Tax deficiencies in the amount of  Ps.460 (U.S.$33.2 thousand). The case has been appealed and is pending a final decision. Any tax liability arising from the resolution of these claims will be assumed by the previous shareholder, International Multifoods Corporation, in accordance with the purchase agreement by which the Company acquired MONACA. Likewise, MONACA has filed claims with the fiscal authorities in the corresponding tax courts for the amount of Ps.9,068 (U.S.$650 thousand). This matter is pending resolution.

Labor Lawsuits.- In the past, MONACA was named in three labor lawsuits (two brought by Caleteros, as defined below, and one stemming from a workplace accident) seeking damages in the amount of Ps.17,438 (U.S.$1,250 thousand). The lawsuits and claims are related to issues and rights such as profit sharing, social security, vacation, seniority and indemnity payment issues. The “Caleteros” who brought the claims are third parties who help freighters unload goods.

Finally, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending litigations filed in the normal course of business. It is the opinion of the Company that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

26.  RELATED PARTIES

Related party transactions were carried out at market value.

A)  SALES OF GOODS

	For the year ended December 31,
	2010		2011
Entities that have significant influence over the entity	Ps.	21,599	Ps.	41,519

F-75

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

26.  RELATED PARTIES (continued)

B)  PURCHASES OF GOODS AND SERVICES

	For the year ended December 31,
	2010		2011
Purchases of goods:
Entities that have significant influence over the entity	Ps.	1,239,716	Ps.	1,836,942
Purchases of services:
Entities that have significant influence over the entity	113,004		110,239
	Ps.	1,352,720	Ps.	1,947,181

C)  KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMPENSATION

Key management includes Board members, alternate Board members, officers and members of the Audit Committee and Corporate Practice Committee. The compensation paid to key management for employee services is shown below:

	2010		2011
Salaries and other short-term employee benefits	Ps.	149,588	Ps.	186,707
Termination benefits	—		20,227
Total	Ps.	149,588	Ps.	206,934

At December 31, 2010 and 2011, the reserve for deferred compensation amounted to Ps.53.7 and Ps.49.8 million, respectively.

D)  BALANCES WITH RELATED PARTIES

At January 1, 2010 and at December 31, 2010 and 2011, the balances with related parties were as follows:

	Natureof thetransaction	AtJanuary 1, 2010		AtDecember 31, 2010		AtDecember 31, 2011
Receivables from related parties:
Entities that have significant influence over the entity	Commercialand services	Ps.	500,669	Ps.	238,289	Ps.	—
Payables from related parties:
Entities that have significant influence over the entity	Commercialand services	Ps.	207,559	Ps.	75,999	Ps.	131,772

The balances payable to related parties at December 31, 2011 expired during 2012 and do not bear interest.

Additionally, during 2011 the Company obtained financing for Ps.600 million from a subsidiary of GFNorte, bearing an interest rate of 7.335%.

F-76

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

27.  FINANCIAL STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE

The new IFRS, which will become effective after the issuance of the Company’s financial statements, are explained below. This list includes those IFRS standards which the Company reasonably expects to apply in the future. The Company has the intention of adopting these new IFRS on the date they become effective.

A)NEW STANDARDS

a. IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments”

IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments” was published in November 2009 and contained requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets. Requirements for financial liabilities were added to IFRS 9 in October 2010. Most of the requirements for financial liabilities were carried forward unchanged from IAS 39. However, some changes were made to the fair value option for financial liabilities to address the issue of own credit risk. In December 2011, the IASB amended IFRS 9 in order to require its application for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015.

b. IFRS 10, “Consolidated Financial Statements”

In May 2011 the IASB issued IFRS 10, “Consolidated Financial Statements”. This standard establishes the principles for the presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities. IFRS 10 defines the principle of control and establishes control as the basis for determining which entities are consolidated in the financial statements. The standard also sets out the accounting requirements for the preparation of consolidated financial statements, as well as the requirements on how to apply the control principle. IFRS 10 supersedes IAS 27, “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” and SIC 12, “Consolidation — Special Purpose Entities”, and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

c. IFRS 11, “Joint Arrangements”

In May 2011 the IASB issued IFRS 11, “Joint Arrangements”. IFRS 11 classifies joint arrangements into two types: joint operations and joint ventures. An entity determines the type of joint arrangement in which it is involved by considering its rights and obligations. For a joint operation, the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are measured in relation to its interest in the arrangement. For a joint venture, an investment is recognized and accounted using the equity method. Proportional consolidation of joint ventures is no longer allowed. IFRS 11 is effective for those annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

d. IFRS 12, “Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities”

IASB issued IFRS 12, “Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities” in May 2011. IFRS 12 requires an entity to disclose information that enables users of financial statements to evaluate the nature and the risks associated with its interest in other entities, such as joint arrangements, associates and special purpose entities. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

F-77

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

27.  FINANCIAL STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE (continued)

e. IFRS 13, “Fair Value Measurement”

In May 2011 the IASB issued IFRS 13, “Fair Value Measurement”. The objective of IFRS 13 is to provide a precise definition of fair value and a single source of fair value measurement and disclosure requirements, when it is required or allowed by other IFRS. IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

B)AMENDMENTS

a. IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments: Disclosures”

In October 2010 the IASB issued the revised IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments: Disclosures”. The standard amended the required disclosures to help users of financial statements evaluate the risk exposures relating to transfers of financial assets and the effect of those risks on an entity’s financial position. The revised IFRS is effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011.

b. IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial Statements”

In June 2011 the IASB issued the revised IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial Statements”. The main change resulting from this amendment was a requirement for entities to group items presented in other comprehensive income (OCI) on the basis of whether they are potentially classifiable to profit or loss subsequently. The amendment did not address which items are presented in OCI. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012.

c. IAS 12, “Income Taxes”

In 2010 the IASB issued the revised IAS 12, “Income Taxes”. The amendment introduces an exception to the existing principle for the measurement of deferred tax assets or liabilities arising on investment property measured at fair value. As a result of the amendments, SIC 21, “Income taxes - recovery of revalued non-depreciable assets”, will no longer apply to investment properties carried at fair value. The amendments also incorporate into IAS 12 the remaining guidance previously contained in SIC 21, which is withdrawn. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012.

d. IAS 19, “Employee Benefits”

In June 2011 the IASB issued the revised IAS 19, “Employee Benefits”. The amendments eliminate the corridor approach and establish the calculation of interest expense on a net basis. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

e. IAS 27, “Separate Financial Statements”

In May 2011 the IASB issued a revised IAS 27 with a new title: “Separate Financial Statements”. This standard includes the provisions on separate financial statements that remained after the control provisions of IAS 27 were included in the new IFRS 10. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

F-78

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

27.  FINANCIAL STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE (continued)

f. IAS 28, “Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures”

In May 2011 the IASB issued a revised IAS 28 with a new title: “Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures”. This standard includes the requirements for joint ventures, as well as associates, to be accounted using the equity method. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

The Company’s management expects that the adoption of the new standards and amendments explained above will not have significant effects in its financial statements.

28.  FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS

Until 2010, the Company prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards. Starting in 2011, the Company prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

In accordance with IFRS 1, “First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”, the Company considered January 1, 2010 as the transition date and January 1, 2011 as the adoption date. The amounts included in the consolidated financial statements for the year 2010 have been reconciled in order to be presented with the same standards and criteria applied in 2011.

In order to determine the balances for adoption of IFRS, the Company considered January 1, 2010 as the date of transition. In preparing these consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS 1, the Company applied certain optional exceptions from full retrospective application of IFRS.

IFRS optional exceptions

The Company applied the following optional exceptions allowed by IFRS:

a.The accounting of business combinations occurred prior to January 1, 2010 was not modified (exception for IFRS 3).

b.The depreciated cost for property, plant and equipment at January 1, 2010 was considered the deemed cost on transition to IFRS, including asset revaluations held in the different countries in which the Company operates (exception for IAS 16).

c.Foreign currency translation adjustments recognized prior to January 1, 2010 were classified in retained earnings (exception to IAS 21).

d.The Company recognized accumulated actuarial gains and losses within retained earnings at the date of transition (exception for IAS 19).

F-79

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

28.  FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (continued)

Set out below are the exceptions that do not apply to the Company:

a.Share-based payment, since the Company does not have these benefits to employees;

b.Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures, since these financial statements were prepared on a consolidated basis, therefore, the Company applied the corresponding IFRS to these investments;

c.Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, associates, and joint ventures, since the date of IFRS adoption for subsidiaries and associates was the same as the date for the parent company;

d.Compound financial instruments, because the Company does not have these types of financial instruments at the date of transition to IFRS;

e.Decommissioning liabilities included in the cost of land, buildings, and equipment, as the Company does not have liabilities of this type;

f.Financial assets or intangible assets accounted for under IFRIC 12, “Service Concession Agreements”, as the Company has not entered into agreements within the scope of IFRIC 12; and

g.Designation of financial instruments previously recognized; measurement of fair value for financial assets and liabilities at initial recognition; transfers of assets from customers; borrowing costs and derecognition of financial liabilities with equity instruments, since the Company does not have these transactions.

IFRS mandatory exceptions

Set out below are the applicable mandatory exceptions in IFRS 1.

a.Hedge accounting

Hedge accounting can only be applied prospectively from the transition date to transactions that satisfy the hedge accounting criteria in IAS 39, “Financial instruments: Recognition and measurement”, at that date. Hedging relationships cannot be designated retrospectively, and the supporting documentation cannot be created retrospectively. All of the Company’s hedge contracts satisfy the hedge accounting criteria as of January 1, 2010 and, consequently, these transactions are reflected as hedges in the Company’s balance sheets.

b.Estimates

IFRS estimates as at January 1, 2010 are consistent with the estimates as at the same date made in conformity with Mexican FRS.

Additionally, the Company applied prospectively the following mandatory exceptions starting January 1, 2010: derecognition of financial assets and liabilities and non-controlling interest, with no significant effect, since the requirements under Mexican FRS are the same.

F-80

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

28.  FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (continued)

The Company has determined that its functional currency is the Mexican peso and the functional currency of its subsidiaries is the currency of the country where each company is located.

The following reconciliations to IFRS are presented below:

A)Reconciliation of consolidated equity as of January 1, 2010

B)Reconciliation of consolidated equity as of December 31, 2010

C)Reconciliation of consolidated net income for the year ended December 31, 2010

D)Reconciliation of consolidated comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2010

E)Description of the effects from the transition to IFRS

F)Description of significant effects from the transition to IFRS in the consolidated cash flow statement for the year ended December 31, 2010

F-81

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

A)  RECONCILIATION OF CONSOLIDATED EQUITY AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010

	Notes of effects from transition to IFRS	MexicanFRS				IFRS Adjustments				IFRS Reclassifications				IFRS
Assets
Current:
Cash and cash equivalents		Ps.	1,880,663			Ps.	—			Ps.	—			Ps.	1,880,663
Trading investments		127,293				—				—				127,293
Derivative financial instruments	q	—				—				55,749				55,749
Accounts receivable, net	q	5,754,256				—				(83,504			)	5,670,752
Inventories	a, c	7,589,080				3,246				(55,738			)	7,536,588
Recoverable income tax	f	632,688				—				(204,883			)	427,805
Prepaid expenses	b, c	496,012				(27,932			)	(131,110			)	336,970
Total current assets		16,479,992				(24,686			)	(419,486			)	16,035,820
Non-current:
Long-term notes and accounts receivable		543,295				—				—				543,295
Investment in associates	n	3,975,652				44,687				—				4,020,339
Property, plant and equipment, net	c, m	19,958,405				(6,496			)	91,535				20,043,444
Intangible assets, net	a, d, e	3,009,171				(194,142			)	(331,775			)	2,483,254
Deferred tax assets	f	—				3,552				148,740				152,292
Total non-current assets		27,486,523				(152,399			)	(91,500			)	27,242,624
Total Assets		Ps.	43,966,515			Ps.	(177,085		)	Ps.	(510,986		)	Ps.	43,278,444
Liabilities
Current:
Short-term debt		Ps.		2,203,392		Ps.		—		Ps.		—		Ps.		2,203,392
Trade accounts payable	q	3,630,974				—				(66,602			)	3,564,372
Derivative financial instruments		11,935				—				—				11,935
Provisions	q	—				—				247,590				247,590
Income tax payable	f	219,722				—				11,852				231,574
Other current liabilities	i, q	2,883,570				(22,955			)	(492,227			)	2,368,388
Total current liabilities		8,949,593				(22,955			)	(299,387			)	8,627,251
Non-current:
Long-term debt	e, g	20,039,868				(90,031			)	(377,835			)	19,572,002
Deferred tax liabilities	f	2,476,245				(48,138			)	148,712				2,576,819
Deferred employees’ statutory profit sharing	h	272,910				(272,910			)	—				—
Employee benefits obligations	i	245,761				56,322				—				302,083
Provisions	k, l, q	—				—				82,776				82,776
Other non-current liabilities	k, l, q	170,575				(67,572			)	(65,252			)	37,751
Total non-current liabilities		23,205,359				(422,329			)	(211,599			)	22,571,431
Total Liabilities		Ps.	32,154,952			Ps.	(445,284		)	Ps.	(510,986		)	Ps.	31,198,682
Equity
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock		Ps.	6,972,425			Ps.	—			Ps.	—			Ps.	6,972,425
Reserves	n, q	—				44,687				(27,742			)	16,945
Retained earnings	a, b, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n	(159,902			)	151,678				916,684				908,460
Foreign currency translation adjustment	j	888,942				—				(888,942			)	—
Total shareholders’ equity		7,701,465				196,365				—				7,897,830
Non-controlling interest		4,110,098				71,834				—				4,181,932
Total Equity		11,811,563				268,199				—				12,079,762
Total Liabilities and Equity		Ps.	43,966,515			Ps.	(177,085		)	Ps.	(510,986		)	Ps.	43,278,444

F-82

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

B)  RECONCILIATION OF CONSOLIDATED EQUITY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010

	Notes of effects from transition to IFRS	MexicanFRS			IFRS Adjustments			IFRS Reclassifications			IFRS
Assets
Current:
Cash and cash equivalents		Ps.	21,317		Ps.	—		Ps.	—		Ps.	21,317
Trading investments		79,577			—			—			79,577
Derivative financial instruments	q	—			—			13,137			13,137
Accounts receivable, net	q	4,843,157			—			174,640			5,017,797
Inventories	a, c	7,283,743			10,711			(30,220		)	7,264,234
Recoverable income tax	f	811,784			—			(169,310		)	642,474
Prepaid expenses	b, c	437,112			(7,696		)	(122,859		)	306,557
Total current assets		13,476,690			3,015			(134,612		)	13,345,093
Non-current:
Long-term notes and accounts receivable		598,961			—			—			598,961
Investment in associates	n	4,441,415			(5,014		)	—			4,436,401
Property, plant and equipment, net	c, m	17,886,784			(56,776		)	100,165			17,930,173
Intangible assets, net	a, d, e	2,889,945			(168,726		)	(314,782		)	2,406,437
Deferred tax assets	f	—			9,102			201,227			210,329
Total non-current assets		25,817,105			(221,414		)	(13,390		)	25,582,301
Total Assets		Ps.	39,293,795		Ps.	(218,399	)	Ps.	(148,002	)	Ps.	38,927,394
Liabilities
Current:
Short-term debt		Ps.	2,192,871		Ps.	—		Ps.	—		Ps.	2,192,871
Trade accounts payable	q	3,674,076			—			(72,247		)	3,601,829
Derivative financial instruments		4,863			—			—			4,863
Provisions	q	—			—			308,801			308,801
Income tax payable	f	79,501			4,808			67,998			152,307
Other current liabilities	i, q	3,223,529			(19,185		)	(309,650		)	2,894,694
Total current liabilities		9,174,840			(14,377		)	(5,098		)	9,155,365
Non-current:
Long-term debt	e, g	16,220,413			(23,742		)	(344,133		)	15,852,538
Deferred tax liabilities	f	2,612,330			(45,544		)	201,229			2,768,015
Deferred employees’ statutory profit sharing	h	247,550			(247,550		)	—			—
Employee benefits obligations	i	276,904			73,275			—			350,179
Provisions	k, l, q	—			—			21,353			21,353
Other non-current liabilities	k, l, q	141,230			(62,207		)	(21,353		)	57,670
Total non-current liabilities		19,498,427			(305,768		)	(142,904		)	19,049,755
Total Liabilities		Ps.	28,673,267		Ps.	(320,145	)	Ps.	(148,002	)	Ps.	28,205,120
Equity
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock		Ps.	6,972,425		Ps.	—		Ps.	—		Ps.	6,972,425
Reserves	j, n, q	—			(10,315		)	(1,339,767		)	(1,350,082		)
Retained earnings	a, b, f, g, h, i, k, l, m , n	311,764			58,629			951,825			1,322,218
Foreign currency translation adjustment	j	(387,942		)	—			387,942			—
Total shareholders’ equity		6,896,247			48,314			—			6,944,561
Non-controlling interest		3,724,281			53,432			—			3,777,713
Total Equity		10,620,528			101,746			—			10,722,274
Total Liabilities and Equity		Ps.	39,293,795		Ps.	(218,399	)	Ps.	(148,002	)	Ps.	38,927,394

F-83

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

28.  FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (continued)

C) RECONCILIATION OF CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

	Notes of effects from transition to IFRS	MexicanFRS						IFRS Adjustments				IFRS Reclassifications				IFRS
Net sales	o, p	Ps.	46,600,537					Ps.	—			Ps.		(368,083	)	Ps.	46,232,454
Cost of sales	a, i, k, m, p	(31,130,798					)	(40,217			)	(392,327			)	(31,563,342				)
Gross profit		15,469,739						(40,217			)	(760,410			)	14,669,112
Selling and administrative expenses	a, j, m, o, p	(12,669,644					)	36,230				533,049				(12,100,365				)
Other expenses, net	p	—						(23,847			)	(494,885			)	(518,732				)
Operating income		2,800,095						(27,834			)	(722,246			)	2,050,015
Other expenses, net	p	(718,171					)	—				718,171				—
Interest expense	g	(1,360,427					)	(63,696			)	(29			)	(1,424,152				)
Interest income	p	29,778						—				3,975				33,753
Loss from derivative financial instruments		(82,525					)	—				—				(82,525				)
Monetary position gain, net		165,869						—				—				165,869
Gain from foreign exchange differences, net		143,852						—				—				143,852
Comprehensive financing cost, net		(1,103,453					)	(63,696			)	3,946				(1,163,203				)
Share of profit of associates		627,333						(35,098			)	—				592,235
Income before income tax		1,605,804						(126,628			)	(129			)	1,479,047
Income tax:
Current	f	(569,981					)	(8,878			)	129				(578,730				)
Deferred	f	(268,737					)	7,906				—				(260,831				)
		(838,718					)	(972			)	129				(839,561				)
Net consolidated income		Ps.				767,086		Ps.		(127,600	)	Ps.	—			Ps.			639,486
Attributable to:
Shareholders		Ps.			541,905			Ps.		(110,126	)	Ps.	—			Ps.		431,779
Non-controlling interest		225,181						(17,474			)	—				207,707
		Ps.		767,086				Ps.		(127,600	)	Ps.	—			Ps.		639,486
Basic earnings per share (pesos)		Ps.	0.96					Ps.		(0.19	)	Ps.	—			Ps.		0.77
Weighted average of outstanding shares (thousands)		563,651						563,651				563,651				563,651

F-84

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

28.  FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (continued)

D)  RECONCILIATION OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

	Notes of effects from transition to IFRS	MexicanFRS			IFRS Adjustments			IFRS
Net consolidated income		Ps.	767,086		Ps.	(127,600	)	Ps.	639,486
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	j	(1,813,010		)	(5,301		)	(1,818,311		)
Actuarial gains and losses	i	—			(18,949		)	(18,949		)
Share of equity of associates	n	(71,020		)	(14,603		)	(85,623		)
Others		781			—			781
		(1,883,249		)	(38,853		)	(1,922,102		)
Comprehensive income		Ps.	(1,116,163	)	Ps.	(166,453	)	Ps.	(1,282,616	)
Attributable to:
Shareholders		Ps.	(805,218	)	Ps.	(148,051	)	Ps.	(953,269	)
Non-controlling interest		(310,945		)	(18,402		)	(329,347		)
		Ps.	(1,116,163	)	Ps.	(166,453	)	Ps.	(1,282,616	)

E)DESCRIPTION OF THE EFFECTS FROM THE TRANSITION TO IFRS

a. Recognition of effects of inflation

In accordance with IAS 29, “Financial reporting in hyper-inflationary economies”, the effects of inflation in the financial information must be recognized for hyper-inflationary economies, when the accumulated inflation rate for the last three years exceeds 100%. Since the Company and its main subsidiaries are located in non-hyper-inflation economies, the effects of inflation recognized under Mexican FRS until 2007 were cancelled for the non-hyper-inflationary periods, except for “Property, plant and equipment” (due to the deemed cost exception of IFRS 1) and for “Goodwill” (due to the business combinations exception).

b. Prepaid expenses

In accordance with IAS 38, “Intangible Assets”, the expenses incurred in the production of advertising or catalogs are recognized in the income statement when incurred. Expenses related with the communication of advertising are recognized in the income statement until the commercials are issued or the insertions are made. At the date of transition, the Company identified the payments of production of advertising or catalogs that were included as prepaid expenses and recognized them in the income statement.

F-85

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

28.  FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (continued)

c. Property, plant and equipment

The Company adopted the revalued book values as deemed cost at the date of transition. In accordance with IAS 16, “Property, plant and equipment”, the Company identified and reclassified from inventories to property, plant and equipment, the spare parts that are expected to be used in a period greater than one year and are attributable to specific machinery.

d. Software for internal use

In accordance with IFRS, the Company reclassified the balance of software for internal use in Intangible Assets. Under Mexican FRS, this balance was presented as Property, plant and equipment.

e. Debt issuance costs

In accordance with IAS 39, “Financial instruments: recognition and measurement”, debt issuance costs (transaction costs) are decreased from the book value of the financial liability and are not presented as a separate asset. The net balance of the debt is the basis for the method of the effective interest rate. At the date of transition, the Company reclassified the debt issuance costs from Intangible Assets to Long-Term Debt.

f. Deferred taxes

IAS 12, “Income taxes” requires that assets and liabilities from deferred taxes are presented net, only when referred to taxes from the same authority for the same subject, and when a legally recognized right is present to net assets and liabilities for current taxes. The Company reclassified at the date of transition the amounts of deferred taxes not subject to netting. Additionally, the Company adjusted deferred taxes according to IAS 12, using the book values of assets and liabilities recognized under IFRS.

g. Long-term debt

In accordance with IAS 39, the financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently at amortized cost, using the effective interest method, which refers to the discount rate that equals the estimated cash flows to be paid during the term of the debt. At the date of transition, the Company recognized the bank debt at amortized cost.

h. Deferred employees’ statutory profit sharing (ESPS)

In accordance with IAS 19, “Employee benefits”, ESPS is considered as an employee benefit, since its payment is based on the service rendered by the employee; the expense for ESPS is recognized only for the current portion. No deferred ESPS is determined based on the comprehensive asset and liability method, since this method only applies to income taxes. Therefore, the Company cancelled the balance for deferred ESPS starting on the date of transition.

F-86

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

28.  FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (continued)

i. Employee benefits

Mexican FRS D-3, “Employee Benefits” establishes that termination benefits, including those that are paid in case of involuntary termination, are considered in actuarial calculations in order to estimate the corresponding liability. For IAS 19, an entity recognizes termination benefits as a liability only when the entity is required to (a) conclude the contract before the retirement date; or (b) establish termination benefits as a result of offers made to promote voluntary dismissal. Therefore, the Company cancelled the provision recognized at the date of transition.

In accordance with IFRS 1, “First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”, the Company recognized accumulated actuarial gains and losses within retained earnings at the date of transition. Therefore, the balance sheet at the date of transition presents the full liability for the Company’s plans. In accordance with IAS 19, the Company will recognize future actuarial gains and losses in other comprehensive income.

j. Foreign exchange translation

According to IFRS 1, an entity that first adopts IFRS does not need to comply with IAS 21, “The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates”, with respect to accumulated translation differences that exist at the date of transition. An entity that adopts IFRS for the first time may use the following exception: (a) the cumulative translation differences of all foreign operations are considered null at the date of transition, and (b) the gain or loss on disposal of the foreign entity will exclude translation differences occurred prior to the date of transition and will only include translation differences after such date.

The Company adopted the exception in order to recognize the balance of cumulative translation differences in retained earnings at the date of transition and to begin a new calculation.

k. Restoration provisions

IAS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets” requires recognition of a liability for the obligations arising from the restoration of assets at fair value where this can be estimated. The asset restoration obligation refers to the legal obligation to enforce the removal of an asset that can be conditioned on a future event that may or may not be under the control of the Company. The Company adopted, at the transition date, the procedure to determine the provision discounting the amount of the liability at the date on which the liability arises and using the discount rate that would have been applied during the period. The asset restoration obligation is adjusted in subsequent periods by applying the discount market rate.

F-87

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

28.  FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (continued)

l. Uncertain tax positions

Under IFRS, an entity should reflect at the balance sheet date, the tax consequences arising from the manner in which the entity expects to pay or recover from the tax authorities. According to IAS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets” and IAS 12 “Income Taxes”, provisions for uncertain tax positions are measured using the weighted average of probability or the best estimate of the likely result. The cumulative probability model is not allowed under IFRS. Pursuant to the above, the Company adjusted the provision for uncertain tax positions under the originally estimated cumulative probability model at the transition date.

m. Idle assets

In accordance with IAS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment” the depreciation of an asset begins when it is available for use and will not cease when the asset becomes idle or is retired from active use. Pursuant to the above, at the transition date, the Company continued depreciating assets held temporarily out of operation and under Mexican FRS C-6 “Property, Plant and Equipment” did not apply depreciation because the idleness of those assets will not affect their remaining useful life.

n. Investment in associates

In accordance with IAS 28 “Investment in Associates”, if an associate uses accounting policies other than those adopted by the investor, appropriate adjustments are made in the financial statements of the associate in order to ensure that the accounting policies of the associate match those used by the investor.

o. Net sales

In accordance with IFRS, the Company reclassified from selling expenses to net sales, freight expenses paid to third parties that are invoiced to customers separately.

In accordance with IFRS accounting policies and presentation rules adopted by the Company, promotion and sales incentive expenses such as coupons, introduction of new products, and in-store display incentives, were reclassified from selling expenses to net sales.

p. Other income (expense), net

Under Mexican FRS, certain items from Other income (expense) were presented after operating income, due to its unusual or infrequent nature. Under IFRS, these items are included in operating income.

q. IFRS reclassifications

In accordance with the adoption of IFRS, the Company made certain reclassifications in order to present its figures in a manner which complies with the new presentation rules.

F-88

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JANUARY 1, 2010 AND AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

28.  FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (continued)

F)DESCRIPTION OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS FROM THE TRANSITION TO IFRS IN THE CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

The Company uses the indirect method for presenting the cash flow statement, which does not differ significantly in its presentation under IFRS from its presentation under Mexican FRS.

F-89

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Grupo Financiero

Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries (the “Financial Group”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income and changes in stockholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and of changes in financial position for the year ended December 31, 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Financial Group’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in Mexico and with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and that they are prepared in conformity with the accounting practices prescribed by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission (the “Commission”). The Financial Group is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Financial Group’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Note 1 to the financial statements describes the Financial Group’s operations. Note 4 describes the accounting criteria established by the Commission in the “General Provisions Applicable to Banking Institutions”, which the Financial Group adheres to for the preparation of its financial information.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Grupo Financiero Banorte, S. A.B. de C. V. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and changes in their stockholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and changes in their financial position for the year ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with the accounting practices prescribed by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission.

Accounting practices prescribed by the Commission vary in certain significant respects from Mexican Financial Reporting Standards. The application of the latter would have affected the determination of stockholders’ equity and net income as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, to the extent summarized in Note 38.

F-90

Accounting practices prescribed by the Commission vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The application of the latter would have affected the determination of stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and net income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, to the extent summarized in Note 39.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been translated into English for the convenience of users.

Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruiz Urquiza, S. C.

Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited

CPC Fernando Nogueda Conde

Monterrey, N.L., Mexico

February 21, 2011

March 25, 2011 for Notes 38 and 39

F-91

GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

(In millions of Mexican pesos)

	2010			2009
ASSETS
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	Ps.	62,497		Ps.	59,268
MARGIN SECURITIES	177			18
INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES
Trading securities	66,181			24,459
Available for sale securities	12,288			11,701
Held to maturity securities	139,913			190,332
	218,382			226,492
DEBTOR BALANCES UNDER REPURCHASE AND RESALE AGREEMENTS	583			4
DERIVATIVES FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
For trading purposes	7,463			4,824
For hedging purposes	596			1,056
	8,059			5,880
PERFORMING LOAN PORTFOLIO
Commercial loans
Business loans	126,483			117,237
Financial institutions’ loans	5,521			7,131
Government loans	47,550			38,993
Consumer loans	27,828			25,712
Mortgage loans	56,168			49,881
TOTAL PERFORMING LOAN PORTFOLIO	263,550			238,954
PAST-DUE LOAN PORTFOLIO
Commercial loans
Business loans	4,417			3,163
Consumer loans	1,276			1,942
Mortgage loans	971			1,049
TOTAL PAST-DUE LOAN PORTFOLIO	6,664			6,154
LOAN PORTFOLIO	270,214			245,108
(Minus) Allowance for loan losses	(8,245		)	(7,535		)
LOAN PORTFOLIO, net	261,969			237,573
ACQUIRED COLLECTION RIGHTS	2,025			2,548
TOTAL LOAN PORTFOLIO, net	263,994			240,121
RECEIVABLES GENERATED BY SECURITIZATIONS	950			432
OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, net	10,864			11,324
MERCHANDISE INVENTORY	49			119
FORECLOSED ASSETS, net	809			928
PROPERTY, FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT, net	9,316			8,622
PERMANENT STOCK INVESTMENTS	3,130			3,036
DEFERRED TAXES, net	1,340			1,411
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets, deferred charges and intangible assets	10,408			9,483
TOTAL ASSETS	Ps.	590,558		Ps.	567,138

MEMORANDUM ACCOUNTS (Note 33)

These balance sheets, consolidated with those of the financial entities and other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are susceptible to consolidation, were prepared according to accounting principles applicable to Financial Service Holding Companies issued by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission according to article 30 of the Law of Financial Institutions. Such principles are consistently applied in the financial statements, which are presented according to sound practices and applicable legal and administrative provisions and reflect all the operations conducted by the Financial Group, its financial service subsidiaries and the other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are consolidated as of the balance sheet dates above. The stockholders’ equity amounts to Ps. 7,016 (nominal value).

The accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets have been approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with the responsibility assigned to them. The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.

F-92

	2010			2009
LIABILITIES
DEPOSITS
Demand deposits	Ps.	149,817		Ps.	137,581
Time deposits
General public	132,673			134,141
Money market	6,347			3,186
Senior debt issued	3,778			—
	292,615			274,908
INTERBANK AND OTHER LOANS
Demand loans	4,837			21
Short-term loans	13,114			13,385
Long-term loans	8,496			7,562
	26,447			20,968
ASSIGNED SECURITIES PENDING SETTLEMENT	—			159
CREDITOR BALANCES UNDER REPURCHASE AND RESALE AGREEMENTS	178,747			185,480
COLLATERAL SOLD OR PLEDGED
Repurchase or resale agreements (creditor balance)	11			2
DERIVATIVES FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
For trading purposes	7,238			4,553
For hedging purposes	3,499			3,822
	10,737			8,375
OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLES
Income tax	711			617
Employee profit sharing	797			676
Creditors from settlements of transactions	867			2,224
Sundry debtors and other payables	9,871			8,968
	12,246			12,485
SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES	17,803			18,168
DEFERRED CREDITS AND ADVANCED COLLECTIONS	1,725			1,619
TOTAL LIABILITIES	540,331			522,164
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
PAID-IN CAPITAL
Common stock	11,971			11,956
Additional paid-in capital	1,673			1,525
	13,644			13,481
OTHER CAPITAL
Capital reserves	3,181			3,154
Retained earnings from prior years	25,492			20,681
Result from valuation of securities available for sale	309			206
Result from valuation of instruments for cash flow hedging	(2,214		)	(1,369		)
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment	(1,000		)	(641		)
Net income	6,705			5,854
	32,473			27,885
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST	4,110			3,608
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	50,227			44,974
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	Ps.	590,558		Ps.	567,138

Dr. Alejandro Valenzuela del RíoChief Executive Officer		Ing. Sergio García Robles GilManaging Director - CFO
Lic. Benjamín Vidargas Rojas Managing Director - Audit	Lic. Jorge Eduardo Vega CamargoDeputy Managing Director — Controller	C.P.C. Nora Elia Cantú SuárezDeputy Managing Director — Accounting and Tax

F-93

GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010, 2009 AND 2008

(In millions of Mexican pesos)

	2010			2009			2008
Interest income	Ps.	41,479		Ps.	45,451		Ps.	50,417
Interest expense	(18,747		)	(22,268		)	(27,789		)
NET INTEREST INCOME	22,732			23,183			22,628
Provision for loan losses	(6,889		)	(8,286		)	(6,896		)
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES	15,843			14,897			15,732
Commission and fee income	9,234			8,291			8,535
Commission and fee expense	(1,548		)	(1,338		)	(1,208		)
Brokerage revenues	1,689			1,244			1,039
Other revenues	1,739			980			746
	11,114			9,177			9,112
NET OPERATING REVENUES	26,957			24,074			24,844
Administrative and promotional expenses	(17,691		)	(17,024		)	(16,687		)
OPERATING INCOME	9,266			7,050			8,157
Other income	1,879			2,438			2,997
Other expenses	(1,298		)	(1,566		)	(1,523		)
	581			872			1,474
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX	9,847			7,922			9,631
Current income tax	(2,735		)	(2,581		)	(2,765		)
Deferred income taxes, net	(70		)	536			245
	(2,805		)	(2,045		)	(2,520		)
INCOME BEFORE EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF UNCONSOLIDATEDSUBSIDIARIES AND ASSOCIATED COMPANIES	7,042			5,877			7,111
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries and associated companies	320			313			276
INCOME BEFORE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST	7,362			6,190			7,387
Noncontrolling interest	(657		)	(336		)	(373		)
NET INCOME	Ps.	6,705		Ps.	5,854		Ps.	7,014

These income statements, consolidated with those of the financial entities and other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are susceptible to consolidation, were prepared according to accounting principles applicable to Financial Service Holding Companies issued by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission according to article 30 of the Law of Financial Institutions. Such principles are consistently applied in the financial statements, which are presented according to sound practices and applicable legal and administrative provisions and reflect all the operations conducted by the Financial Group, its financial service subsidiaries and the other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are consolidated as of the income statement dates above.

The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income have been approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with the responsibility assigned to them.

The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements of income.

Dr. Alejandro Valenzuela del RíoChief Executive Officer		Ing. Sergio García Robles GilManaging Director - CFO
Lic. Benjamín Vidargas RojasManaging Director - Audit	Lic. Jorge Eduardo Vega CamargoDeputy Managing Director —Controller	C.P.C. Nora Elia Cantú SuárezDeputy Managing Director — Accounting and Tax

F-94

GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010, 2009 AND 2008

(In millions of Mexican pesos)

	PAID-IN CAPITAL						OTHER CAPITAL
	Commonstock			Additional paid-in capital			Capital reserves			Retained earnings from prior years			Result from valuation of available for sale securities			Result from valuation of cash flow hedging instruments
Balances, January 1, 2008	Ps.	11,965		Ps.	1,272		Ps.	2,452		Ps.	21,279		—			—
TRANSACTIONS APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS
Issuance (repurchase) of shares	(24		)	199			(72		)	—			—			—
Transfer of prior year’s result	—			—			—			6,810			—			—
Creation of reserves as per General Stockholders’ meeting on April 29, 2008	—			—			340			340			—			—
Dividend declared at the General Stockholders’ meeting on October 6, 2008	—			—			—			(949		)	—			—
Total transactions approved by stockholders	(24		)	199			268			5,521			—			—
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income	—			—			—			—			—			—
Effect of subsidiaries, affiliates and mutual funds	—			(3		)	—			(30		)	(550		)	—
Result from valuation of cash flow hedging instruments	—			—			—			—			—			—
Changes in accounting principles (NIF B-10)	—			—			—			(9,835		)	—			—
Total comprehensive income	—			(3		)	—			(9,865		)	(550		)	—
Noncontrolling interest	—			—			—			—			—			—
Balances, December 31, 2008	11,941			1,468			2,720			16,935			(550		)	—
TRANSACTIONS APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS
Issuance (repurchase) of shares	15			(328		)	83			—			(221		)	—
Transfer of prior year’s result	—			—			—			7,014			—			—
Creation of reserves as per General Stockholders’ meeting on April 30, 2009	—			—			351			(351		)	—			—
Dividend declared at the General Stockholders’ meeting on October 5, 2009	—			—			—			(364		)	—			—
Total transactions approved by stockholders	15			(328		)	434			6,299			(221		)	—
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income	—			—			—			—			—			—
Result from valuation of available for sale securities	—			—			—			—			592			—
Effect of subsidiaries, affiliates and mutual funds	—			(5		)	—			(47		)	—			—
Result from valuation of cash flow hedging instruments	—			—			—			—			—			209
Application of the effect of holding non-monetary assets	—			(4		)	—			(1,640		)	385			(1,578		)
Change in credit card loan rating methodology (net of deferred taxes)	—			—			—			(683		)	—			—
Total comprehensive income	—			(9		)	—			(2,370		)	977			(1,369		)
Noncontrolling interest	—			394			—			(183		)	—			—
Balances, December 31, 2009	11,956			1,525			3,154			20,681			206			(1,369		)
TRANSACTIONS APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS
Issuance (repurchase) of shares	15			146			27			(17		)	(102		)	—
Transfer of prior year’s result	—			—			—			5,854			—			—
Dividend declared at the General Stockholders’ meeting on:
February 15, 2010	—			—			—			(343		)	—			—
April 23, 2010	—			—			—			(343		)	—			—
October 4, 2010	—			—			—			(343		)	—			—
Total transactions approved by stockholders	15			146			27			4,808			(102		)	—
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income	—			—			—			—			—			—
Result from valuation of available for sale securities	—			—			—			—			205			—
Effect of subsidiaries, affiliates and mutual funds	—			2			—			3			—			—
Result from valuation of cash flow hedging instruments	—			—			—			—			—			(845		)
Total comprehensive income	—			2			—			3			205			(845		)
Noncontrolling interest	—						—						—			—
Balances, December 31, 2010	Ps.	11,971		Ps.	1,673		Ps.	3,181		Ps.	25,492		Ps.	309		Ps.	(2,214	)

These statements of changes in stockholder’s equity, consolidated with those of the financial entities and other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are susceptible to consolidation, were prepared according to accounting principles applicable to Financial Service Holding Companies issued by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission according to article 30 of the Law of Financial Institutions. Such principles are consistently applied in the financial statements, which are presented according to sound practices and applicable legal and administrative provisions and reflect all the operations conducted by the Financial Group, its financial service subsidiaries and the other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are consolidated as of the dates above. These consolidated statements of changes in stockholder’s equity were approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with the responsibility assigned to them.

The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity.

F-95

	OTHER CAPITAL
	Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment			Insufficiency in restated stockholders’ equity			Effect of holding non- monetary assets			Net income			Total majority interest			Total non- controlling interest		Total stockholders’ equity
Balances, January 1, 2008	Ps.	—		Ps.	(6,380	)	Ps.	(5,009	)	Ps.	6,810		Ps.	32,389		Ps.	1,667	Ps.	34,056
TRANSACTIONS APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS
Issuance (repurchase) of shares	—			—			—			—			103			—		103
Transfer of prior year’s result	—			—			—			(6,810		)	—			—		—
Creation of reserves as per General Stockholders’ meeting on April 29, 2008	—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Dividend declared at the General Stockholders’ meeting on October 6, 2008	—			—			—			—			(949		)	—		(949		)
Total transactions approved by stockholders	—			—			—			(6,810		)	(846		)	—		(846		)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income	—			—			—			7,014			7,014			—		7,014
Effect of subsidiaries, affiliates and mutual funds	1,095			—			—			—			512			—		512
Result from valuation of cash flow hedging inst.	—			—			(1,267		)	—			(1,267		)	—		(1,267		)
Changes in accounting principles (NIF B-10)	—			6,380			3,455			—			—			—		—
Total comprehensive income	1,095			6,380			2,188			7,014			6,259			—		6,259
Noncontrolling interest	—			—			—			—			—			277		277
Balances, December 31, 2008	1,095			—			(2,821		)	7,014			37,802			1,944		39,746
TRANSACTIONS APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS
Issuance (repurchase) of shares	—			—			—			—			(451		)	—		(451		)
Transfer of prior year’s result	—			—			—			(7,014		)	—			—		—
Creation of reserves as per General Stockholders’ meeting on April 30, 2009	—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Dividend declared at the General Stockholders’ meeting on October 5, 2009	—			—			—			—			(364		)	—		(364		)
Total transactions approved by stockholders	—			—			—			(7,014		)	(815		)	—		(815		)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income	—			—			—			5,854			5,854			—		5,854
Result from valuation of available for sale sec.	—			—			—			—			592			—		592
Effect of subsidiaries, affiliates and mutual funds	(54		)	—			—			—			(106		)	—		(106		)
Effect of the acquisition of the remaining 30% of the subsidiary INB	(1,698		)	—			—			—			(1,698		)	—		(1,698		)
Result from valuation of cash flow hedging inst.	—			—			—			—			209			—		209
Application of the effect of holding non-monetary assets	16			—			2,821			—			—			—		—
Change in credit card loan rating methodology (net of deferred taxes)	—			—			—			—			(683		)	—		(683		)
Total comprehensive income	(1,736		)	—			2,821			5,854			4,168			—		4,168
Noncontrolling interest	—			—			—			—			211			1,664		1,875
Balances, December 31, 2009	(641		)	—			—			5,854			41,366			3,608		44,974
TRANSACTIONS APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS
Issuance (repurchase) of shares	—			—			—			—			69			—		69
Transfer of prior year’s result	—			—			—			(5,854		)	—			—		—
Dividend declared at the General Stockholders’ meeting on:
February 15, 2010	—			—			—			—			(343		)	—		(343		)
April 23, 2010	—			—			—			—			(343		)	—		(343		)
October 4, 2010	—			—			—			—			(343		)	—		(343		)
Total transactions approved by stockholders	—			—			—			(5,854		)	(960		)	—		(960		)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income	—			—			—			6,705			6,705			—		6,705
Result from valuation of available for sale sec.	—			—			—			—			205			—		205
Effect of subsidiaries, affiliates and mutual funds	(359		)	—			—			—			(354		)	—		(354		)
Result from valuation of cash flow hedging inst.	—			—			—			—			(845		)	—		(845		)
Total comprehensive income	(359		)	—			—			6,705			5,711			—		5,711
Noncontrolling interest	—			—			—			—			—			502		502
Balances, December 31, 2010	Ps.	(1,000	)	Ps.	—		Ps.	—		Ps.	6,705		Ps.	46,117		Ps.	4,110	Ps.	50,227

Dr. Alejandro Valenzuela del RíoChief Executive Officer		Ing. Sergio García Robles GilManaging Director - CFO
Lic. Benjamín Vidargas RojasManaging Director - Audit	Lic. Jorge Eduardo Vega CamargoDeputy Managing Director — Controller	C.P.C. Nora Elia Cantú SuárezDeputy Managing Director — Accounting and Tax

F-96

GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

(In millions of Mexican pesos)

	2010			2009
Net income	Ps.	6,705		Ps.	5,854
Items not requiring (generating) resources:
Provision for loan losses	6,889			8,286
Provision for uncollectible or doubtful accounts receivable	164			182
Depreciation and amortization	1,181			954
Other Provisions	430			(1,786		)
Current and deferred income tax	2,805			2,045
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries and associated companies	337			(313		)
	18,511			15,222
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Changes in margin securities	(159		)	(11		)
Changes in investments in securities	7,626			12,312
Changes in debtor balances under repurchase and resale agreements	(579		)	144
Changes in asset position of derivative financial instruments	(2,639		)	501
Change in loan portfolio	(32,062		)	(8,167		)
Changes in acquired collection rights	523			502
Changes in receivables generated by securitizations	(518		)	364
Change in foreclosed assets	94			(94		)
Change in other operating assets	(1,461		)	(969		)
Change in deposits	18,975			15,344
Change in interbank and other loans	5,483			(15,644		)
Change in creditor balances under repurchase and sale agreements	(6,892		)	(7,088		)
Collateral sold or pledged	9			—
Change in liability position of derivative financial instruments	2,684			(717		)
Change in subordinated debentures	(350		)	(2,481		)
Change in other operating liabilities	(3,274		)	(2,365		)
Change in hedging instruments related to operations	136			133
Net operating activity cash flows	6,107			6,986
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds on disposal of property, furniture and fixtures	304			259
Acquisition of property, furniture and fixtures	(2,215		)	(1,447		)
Sale of subsidiaries and associated companies	69
Acquisition of subsidiaries and associated companies	(171		)	(183		)
Sale of other permanent investments	1			1
Acquisition of other permanent investments	—			(1		)
Dividends received	227			135
Net investment activities cash flows	(1,785		)	(1,236		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Dividends paid	(1,029		)	(364		)
Repurchase of shares	69			(451		)
Net financing activity cash flows	(960		)	(815		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	3,362			4,935
Adjustments to cash flows from variation in the foreign exchange rate	(133		)	(63		)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year	59,268			54,396
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year	Ps.	62,497		Ps.	59,268

These statements of cash flows, consolidated with those of the financial entities and other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are susceptible to consolidation, were prepared according to accounting principles applicable to Financial Service Holding Companies issued by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission according to article 30 of the Law of Financial Institutions. Such principles are consistently applied in the financial statements, which are presented according to sound practices and applicable legal and administrative provisions and reflect all the operations conducted by the Financial Group, its financial service subsidiaries and the other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are consolidated as of the dates above. The accompanying Consolidated Statements of cash flows have been approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with the responsibility assigned to them. The attached notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements of cash flows.

Dr. Alejandro Valenzuela del RíoChief Executive Officer		Ing. Sergio García Robles GilManaging Director - CFO
Lic. Benjamín Vidargas RojasManaging Director - Audit	Lic. Jorge Eduardo Vega CamargoDeputy Managing Director — Controller	C.P.C. Nora Elia Cantú SuárezDeputy Managing Director — Accounting and Tax

F-97

GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

(In millions of Mexican pesos)

	2008
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	Ps.	7,014
Items not requiring (generating) resources:
Fair value adjustments of financial instruments	(268		)
Provision for loan losses	6,896
Depreciation and amortization	1,099
Deferred taxes	(245		)
Provisions for other obligations	24
Noncontrolling interest	373
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries and associated companies	(276		)
	14,617
Changes in operating accounts:
Increase in deposits	57,462
Increase in loan portfolio	(52,095		)
Increase from treasury transactions	(220,239		)
Decrease in transactions with securities or derivative financial instruments	194,552
Increase in bank and other loans	13,960
Increase in deferred taxes	(12		)
Net resources generated by operating activities	8,245
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase (decrease) in subordinated debentures	10,403
Issuance of shares	103
Increase in other payables	1,269
Dividends paid	(949		)
Net resources generated by financing activities	10,826
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of property, furniture and fixtures, net	(1,308		)
Increase in permanent stock investments	(644		)
Increase in deferred charges and credits	(1,958		)
Increase in foreclosed assets	(478		)
Increase in other accounts receivable	(1,897		)
Net resources used in investing activities	(6,285		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	12,786
Cash and cash equivalents available at the beginning of the year	41,610
Cash and cash equivalents available at the end of the year	Ps.	54,396

This statement of changes in financial position, consolidated with those of the financial entities and other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are susceptible to consolidation, was prepared according to accounting principles applicable to Financial Service Holding Companies issued by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission according to Article 30 of the Law of Financial Institutions.  Such principles are consistently applied in the financial statements, which are presented according to sound practices and applicable legal and administrative provisions and reflect all the operations conducted by the Financial Group, its financial service subsidiaries and the other companies that form part of the Financial Group and are consolidated as of the dates above.

The accompanying Consolidated Statement of Changes in Financial Position has been approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with the responsibility assigned to them.

The attached notes are an integral part of this consolidated statement of changes in financial position.

Dr. Alejandro Valenzuela del RíoChief Executive Officer		Ing. Sergio García Robles GilManaging Director - CFO
Lic. Benjamín Vidargas RojasManaging Director - Audit	Lic. Jorge Eduardo Vega CamargoExecutive Director Controller	C.P.C. Nora Elia Cantú SuárezGeneral Deputy Director — Accounting and Taxes

F-98

GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010, 2009 AND 2008

(In millions of Mexican pesos, except exchange rates and Note 30)

1 — ACTIVITY AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries (the Financial Group) are authorized by Mexico’s Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (SHCP) to operate as a holding company under the form and terms established by the Laws Regulating Financial Groups, subject to the supervision and monitoring of the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission (the Commission). Their main activities consist of acquiring and managing entities engaged in the financial services industry and supervising their activities, as defined in the above-mentioned law. The Financial Group and its subsidiaries are regulated, depending on their activities, by the Commission, the Mexican National Insurance and Bond Commission, the Mexican National Retirement Savings Systems Commission (the Commissions), the Mexican Central Bank (Banco de México) and other applicable laws and regulations.

The main activity of the Financial Group’s subsidiaries is to carry out financial transactions that include the rendering of full-banking services, securities brokerage activities, management of retirement funds, leasing, the purchase and sale of uncollected invoices and notes, rendering of general warehousing services, annuities (pensions) and providing life insurance and casualty insurance.

Per legal requirements, the Financial Group has unlimited liability for the obligations assumed and losses incurred by each of its subsidiaries.

The powers of the Commission in their capacity as regulator of the Financial Group include reviewing the financial information and requesting modifications to such information.

The Financial Group performs their activities throughout Mexico and the United States of America (U.S.).

The Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements have been approved by the Board of Directors at their January 25, 2011 meeting in accordance with the responsibility assigned to them.

2 — SIGNIFICANT EVENTS DURING THE YEAR

a.Issuance of promissory senior notes

On July 19, 2010, Banco Mercantil del Norte, S.A. de C.V., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Banorte (Banorte) successfully concluded the issuance in the international market of unsecured senior debt promissory notes for a total amount of 300 million USD with a maturity of 5 years and an 4.437% rate (United States Treasury (UST) + 262.5 bps). Standard and Poor’s rated these securities BBB- and Moody’s A3.

b.Listing of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) operations in the OTCQX International Premier platform

On July 15, 2010, the Level 1 ADR’s program (ticker: GBOOY) was authorized to operate in OTCQX International Premier; the highest level in the “Over The Counter” (OTC) market.

F-99

c.Exposure to Compañía Mexicana de Aviación, S.A. de C.V. (CMA)

In August 2010, CMA filed for bankruptcy and suspended its operations. The outstanding balance of the loan granted by Banorte to Gamma Servicios de Negocios, S.A. de C.V. (Gamma Servicios), a CMA subsidiary, totaled Ps.1,576 at the time of such filing. As the loan granted to Gamma Servicios was secured with present and future collection rights derived from the sale of plane tickets using credit card sales in Mexico and the U.S., it was partially amortized by the resources obtained through some of these guarantees. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the outstanding loan balance is Ps. 1,252 and Ps. 1,576, respectively. To date, the reserves that Banorte has constituted to cover potential losses from this loan equal 100% of the outstanding balance. Since the loan’s origination, the collection rights derived from ticket sales have been voluntarily and irrevocably transferred by CMA to the Administration and Payment Trust managed by HSBC Mexico, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero HSBC, and by accounts in custody of banks in the U.S. According to the external Counsel, for the time being, it is impossible to predict the final outcome of the bankruptcy proceeding or the potential losses stemming from this loan.

d.Merger with IXE Grupo Financiero, S.A.B. de C.V. (IXE Grupo Financiero)

On November 17, 2010, the Financial Group and IXE Grupo Financiero signed a merger agreement through an exchange of shares valued at Ps. 16,232 at the moment. The Financial Group will issue approximately 308 million new shares and will exchange them at an exchange ratio of 0.3889943074 shares of the Financial Group for each IXE Grupo Financiero share. Such merger, still subject to government authorization, is expected to be formalized during the first quarter of 2011. The operations of both companies will be merged into a single financial group called Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V.

e.Securitization of Controladora Commercial Mexicana, S.A.B. de C.V.’s loan (CCM)

In December 2010, Banorte securitized CCM’s loan, transferring the risks and benefits related to the loan to a Trust created especially for this transaction (the Trust). The Trust issued Series A stock certificates for Ps. 190, Series B for Ps. 175, Series C for Ps. 168 and Series D for Ps. 63, placed among private investors, which secured the holders the net payment of the funds received from each tranche of CCM’s loan which they are linked to, once the expenses related to the Trust are discounted. The securitization was recorded as a sale and reported in 2010 a profit for Ps. 596. This profit is equivalent to the difference between the received assets recorded at fair value and the book value of the transferred assets.

3 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Monetary unit of the financial statements

The consolidated financial statements and notes as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended include balances and transactions in Mexican pesos of purchasing power of such dates.

Consolidation of financial statements

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include those of the Financial Group and its subsidiaries mentioned below. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

F-100

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group’s consolidated subsidiaries and its equity ownership is as follows:

Banco Mercantil del Norte, S.A. and subsidiaries	92.72	%
Casa de Bolsa Banorte, S. A. de C. V. and subsidiaries	99.99	%
Arrendadora y Factor Banorte, S. A. de C. V.	99.99	%
Almacenadora Banorte, S. A. de C. V.	99.99	%

Conversion of Financial Statements of Banorte USA, Corporation and Subsidiaries (indirect foreign subsidiary)

In order to consolidate the financial statements of Banorte USA, they are first adjusted in the recording and functional currency (U.S. dollar) to conform to the accounting criteria established by the Commission. The financial statements are then converted to the reporting currency (Mexican peso) according to the following methodology:

Foreign operations whose recording and functional currency are one and the same convert their financial statements using the following exchange rates: a) year-end rate for assets and liabilities, b) historical rate for stockholders’ equity, and c) weighted average rate of the period for income, costs and expenses. The conversion effects are presented in the Financial Group’s stockholders’ equity.

Comprehensive Income

This is the change in stockholders’ equity during the year, for items other than distributions and activity in contributed common stock, and is comprised of the net income of the year plus other comprehensive income (loss) items of the same period, which are presented directly in stockholders’ equity without affecting the consolidated statements of income, in accordance with the accounting practices established by the Commission. In 2010 and 2009, comprehensive income includes the net income of the year, the result from valuation of available for sale securities, the effect of subsidiaries, affiliates and mutual funds; the result from valuation of cash flow hedging instruments; the application of the cumulative result of non-monetary asset holdings, and the change in credit card loan rating methodology.

4 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The significant accounting policies of the Financial Group are in conformity with practices prescribed by the Commission through issued accounting standards and other applicable laws, which require Management to make certain estimates and use certain assumptions to determine the valuation of certain items included in the consolidated financial statements and make the required disclosures therein. Even though they may differ in their final effect, management considers the estimates and assumptions to have been adequate under the current circumstances.

Pursuant to accounting Circular A-1, “Basic Framework of the Accounting Criteria Applicable to Banking Institutions”, prescribed by the Commission, the Financial Group’s accounting will adhere to Mexican Financial Reporting Standards (NIF), defined by the Mexican Board for Research and Development of Financial Reporting Standards (CINIF), except when the Commission deems it necessary to apply a specific accounting standard or Circular, considering the fact that financial institutions perform specialized operations.

Recognition of the effects of inflation in financial information

Inflation recognition is done pursuant to NIF B-10 “Inflation Effects” which considers two types of economic environments: a) inflationary, when the accumulated inflation of the three previous years is 26% or over, in which case the inflation effects must be acknowledged; b) non-inflationary, when in the same period inflation is less than 26%; in this case the effects of inflation should not be recorded in the financial statements.

F-101

The cumulative Mexican inflation over the three years prior to 2010 and 2009 was 14.55% and 15.03%, respectively. Therefore, the Mexican economy is considered as non-inflationary according to the NIF B-10 definition. As of January 1, 2008, the Financial Group is no longer adjusting for the effects of inflation. However, assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 include the restatement effects recorded up through December 31, 2007.

The Mexican inflation rates for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were 4.29% and 3.72%, respectively.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are stated at nominal value, except for precious metal coins, which are stated at fair value at the end of the period. Funds available in foreign currency are valued at the FIX exchange rate published by Banco de México at the consolidated balance sheet date.

Trading securities

Trading securities are those owned by the Financial Group, acquired with the intention of selling them for a profit derived from price differences in short-term purchase and sale operations made by the Financial Group as a market participant.

At acquisition they are initially recorded at fair value, which may include either a discount or premium.

These securities (including both capital and accrued interest) are stated at fair value, which is determined by the price vendor contracted by the Financial Group.

The trading securities valuation result is recorded in the results of the period.

Available for sale securities

Securities available for sale are debt or equity securities that are neither classified as trading nor held to maturity, therefore they represent a residual category, which means that, they are purchased with an intention different from the trading or held to maturity securities.

They are valued in the same way as trading securities, but with unrealized gains and losses recognized in other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity.

In an inflationary environment, the result of the monetary position corresponding to the valuation result of securities available for sale is recorded in other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

Held-to-maturity securities

Securities held to maturity consist of debt instruments whose payments are fixed or can be determined with a set maturity, which are acquired with the intent and capability to hold them to maturity.

They are initially recorded at fair value and valued at amortized cost, which means that the amortization of the premium or discount (included in the fair value at which they were initially recorded), is part of the earned interest.

General valuation standards

Upon the sale of trading securities, the valuation result previously recorded in the year’s results is reclassified as part of the gain or loss on the sale. Similarly, upon the sale of available for sale securities, the cumulative valuation result recorded in other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity is reclassified as part of the gain or loss on the sale.

Accrued interest on debt instruments is determined using the effective interest method and is recorded in the corresponding category of investments in securities and in the year’s results.

F-102

Dividends on equity instruments are recorded in the corresponding category of investments in securities and in the year’s results when the right to receive such dividends is established.

The foreign exchange gain or loss on investments in securities denominated in foreign currency is recorded in the year’s results.

Reclassification of securities from held to maturity to available for sale is allowed, provided there is no intention or ability of holding them to maturity. The Commission’s expressed authorization is required to reclassify securities to held to maturity, or from trading to securities available for sale.

If securities held to maturity are reclassified as available for sale, the corresponding valuation result on the reclassification date is recorded in other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity.

An impairment loss on a security is recorded against the year’s results if there is objective evidence of such impairment as a result of one or more events, occurring after the initial recording of the security, that have had an impact on the estimated future cash flows that can be reliably determined. The effect of recording the impairment of securities is shown in Note 6.

A previously recorded impairment loss is reversed against the year’s results if, in a later period, the amount of the loss decreases and such decrease is objectively associated with an event occurring after the impairment was recorded.

The Financial Group periodically verifies whether it’s available for sale securities and those held to maturity show any impairment loss, by means of an evaluation on the quarterly balance sheet date or whenever there are indications of an impairment loss.

Securities are deemed as impaired and therefore incur an impairment loss if and only if there is objective evidence of the impairment loss as a result of a set of events that occurred after their initial value was recorded. Such events should have an impact on the estimated future cash flows, which must be determined in a reliable manner.

These events may include: issuer’s significant financial difficulties; likelihood of the issuer’s filing for bankruptcy or financial reorganization; noncompliance with contractual clauses such as failure to pay interest or the principal; loss of an active market for the securities due to financial difficulties; lower credit rating and sustained reduction in the issue price, in combination with additional information.

In addition to the aforementioned events, objective evidence of impairment loss for a net asset instrument includes information about significant changes with adverse effects that occurred in the technological, market, economic or legal situation in which the issuer operates, and which indicates a possible loss of the cost of investing in the net asset instrument.

The events considered by the model are divided into:

a)Information that the Financial Group has about the securities (breach of contract covenants, financial, economic or legal problems).

b)Information that the Financial Group has about the issuer (issuer’s probability of bankruptcy, financial reorganization and financial difficulties).

c)Information that the market has about the securities (rating assigned by Commission-approved agencies).

d)Information that the market has about the issuer (rating assigned by Commission-approved agencies).

The evaluation model that the Financial Group applies to determine impairment loss incorporates the aforementioned events according to their importance and rates them as per a severity average used to estimate the return on investment. Similarly, it incorporates the existence of guarantees, which contributes to lower impairment losses.

The investments on which impairment losses have been recognized are analyzed on a quarterly basis to identify the possible recovery of their value and, if applicable, reverse the recorded loss in the consolidated statements of income for the year such recovery is achieved.

F-103

Customer repurchase agreements (repos)

This is a transaction through which the purchaser acquires ownership of credit securities for a sum of money and is obligated to transfer the property of another amount of securities of the same kind to the seller of the securities within the agreed term and in exchange for the same price, plus a premium. The purchaser keeps the premium unless agreed otherwise.

Repurchase transactions are recorded according to their economic substance, which is financing with collateral, through which the Financial Group, acting as the purchaser, provides cash as financing in exchange for financial assets that serve as guarantee in case of non-compliance.

On the repurchase agreement transaction contract date, the Financial Group, acting as the seller, records the cash inflow, or else a settlement debtor account as well as a payable account at its fair value, initially at the agreed price, which represents the obligation to reimburse the cash to the purchaser. The account payable is subsequently valued over the term of the repurchase agreement at amortized cost by recognizing the interest from the repurchase agreement in the year’s results using the effective interest method.

As to the collateral granted, the Financial Group reclassifies the financial asset in the consolidated balance sheets as restricted and values it according to the criteria mentioned earlier in this note until the maturity of the repurchase agreement.

The Financial Group, acting as the purchaser, on the repurchase transaction contract date records cash and cash equivalents or a creditor settlement account, with an account receivable at its fair value, initially at the agreed price, which represents the right to recover the cash that was delivered. The receivable is subsequently valued over the life of the repurchase agreement at amortized cost by recognizing the repurchase agreement interest in the year’s results using the effective interest method.

As to the collateral received, the Financial Group records it in off balance sheet memorandum accounts until the repurchase agreement’s maturity, following the guidelines of Circular B-9, “Asset Custody and Management”, issued by the Commission.

Derivatives financial instruments

The Financial Group is authorized to perform two types of transactions involving derivatives financial instruments:

Transactions to hedge the Financial Group’s open risk position: Such transactions involve purchasing or selling derivatives financial instruments to mitigate the risk resulting from one or a group of given transactions.

Transactions for trading purposes: The Financial Group enters into such transactions as a market participant for reasons other than to hedge its exposed position.

Transactions with derivative financial instruments are presented in assets or liabilities, as applicable, under the heading “Derivatives financial instruments”, separating derivatives for trading purposes from those for hedging purposes.

When entering into transactions involving derivatives financial instruments, the Financial Group’s internal policies and norms require an assessment and if necessary determination of different risk exposures for each counterparty in the financial system that have been authorized by the Banco de México to enter into these types of transactions. Regarding corporate customers, a preauthorized credit line by the National Credit Committee must be granted or liquid guarantees must be given through a securitized collateral contract before entering into these types of transactions. Medium and small sized companies and individuals must provide liquid guarantees established in securitized collateral contracts with this type of transactions.

The recognition or cancellation of assets and/or liabilities resulting from transactions involving derivatives financial instruments occurs when these transactions are entered into, regardless of the respective settlement or the delivery date.

F-104

Forward and futures contracts

Forward and futures contracts with trading purposes establish an obligation to buy or sell a financial asset or an underlying at a future date in the quantity, quality and prices pre-established in the contract. Futures contracts are recorded initially by the Financial Group in the consolidated balance sheets as an asset and a liability at fair value, which represents the price agreed in the contract in order to acknowledge the right and obligation to receive and/or deliver the underlying, as well as the right and obligation to receive and/or deliver the cash equivalent to the underlying, object of the contract.

The derivatives are presented in a specific item in assets or liabilities depending on whether their fair value (as a consequence of the rights and/or obligations it establishes) corresponds to a debtor balance or creditor balance. Such debtor or creditor balances in the consolidated balance sheets are offset when the Financial Group has the contractual right to offset the stated amount, the intention to settle the net amount or to realize the asset and cancel the liability simultaneously.

In the case of transactions for trading purposes, their balance represents the difference between the fair value of the contract and the established “forward” price.

Option contracts

Through paying a premium, options contracts grant the right but not the obligation to buy or sell a financial asset or underlying instrument at a given price within an established term.

Options are divided into: options to buy (calls) and options to sell (puts). Both can be used as trading or hedging instruments.

Options can be executed on a specific date or within a certain period of time. The price is agreed in the option and may be exercised at the discretion of the buyer. The instrument used to establish the price is the reference or underlying value.

The premium is the price the holder pays to the issuer for the option rights.

The holder of a call option has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase from the issuer a certain financial asset or underlying instrument at a fixed price (transaction price) within a certain term.

The holder of a put option has the right, but not the obligation, to sell a certain financial asset or underlying instrument at a fixed price (transaction price) within a certain term.

The Financial Group records the option premium as an asset or liability at the transaction date. The fluctuations resulting from market valuation of the option’s premium are recorded by affecting the income statement in the account “Trading results” and the corresponding balance sheet account.

Swaps

These are two-party contracts through which a bilateral obligation is established to exchange a series of cash flows for a certain period of time on pre-set dates at a nominal or reference value.

They are recorded at fair value which corresponds to the net amount between the asset and liability portion for the rights and obligations agreed upon; they are subsequently valued at fair value using the present value of the future flows to receive or grant according to the projections for future implicit applicable rates, discounting the market rate on the valuation date with yield curves given by the price provider. The result of such valuation is recorded in the year’s results.

Management’s risk policies regarding hedging contracts to protect the Financial Group’s balance sheet is to anticipate interest and exchange rate fluctuations, thereby protecting the Shareholders’ Equity.

F-105

For hedging derivatives, the Financial Group applies in all cases the cash flow hedging method and the accumulated compensation method to measure effectiveness. Both methods are approved by current accounting standards. In case ineffective hedges are detected, they are recorded in the year’s results.

The Financial Group documents hedging transactions from the moment that the derivative instruments are designated as hedging transactions. A file for each transaction is created in order to have documented proof as per Circular B-5 paragraph 71, which establishes conditions for the use of hedge accounting.

Accordingly, the Financial Group documents its hedging transactions based on the following guidelines:

·A cash flow hedging transaction is recorded as follows:

a.The effective portion of the hedging instrument’s gain or loss is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity using as an asset or liability account called “derivatives financial instruments” with an offsetting account in the liquid assets or liabilities. The portion determined as ineffective is measured through retrospective test, and when they result in over-hedging, they are immediately recognized in current earnings.

b.The effective hedge component recognized in stockholders’ equity associated with the hedged item is adjusted to equal the lower (in absolute terms) of these items:

I.The accumulated gain or loss of the hedging instrument from its inception.

II.The accumulated change in the fair value (present value) of the hedged item’s expected future cash flows from the  beginning of the transaction.

Valuation method

Since the derivatives used by the Financial Group are considered as conventional (“plain vanilla”), the standard valuation models contained in the derivatives transaction systems and the Financial Group’s risk management is used.

All of the valuation methods that the Financial Group uses result in the fair value of the transactions and are periodically adjusted. Furthermore, they are audited by internal and external auditors, as well as by the financial authorities.

Valuation of the positions is done on a daily basis, and a price provider generates the input used by the transaction and risk management systems. The price provider generates these valuations based on daily market conditions.

The valuation methods are based on the market’s accepted and commonly used principles. At present, derivatives are valued by the cash flow present value method, except in the case of options. This method consists of estimating future derivative flows, using the difference between the derivative’s fixed level and the forward market curves on the valuation date, and then discounting such flows and updating them to the present value. Options are valued under the Black and Scholes method, which in addition to the present value, involves the volatility and probability of occurrence for calculating the premium. Once the option’s market value is obtained, it is compared to the original premium accrued on the valuation date.

Operation strategies

Trading

The Financial Group participates in the derivatives market with trading purposes, and the risk exposures generated are computed within its overall VaR limit.

The trading strategy is submitted on a weekly basis to the Financial Group’s Treasury Committee, which analyzes the current risks and makes any necessary decisions.

The trading strategy is carried out according to market levels and expectations, maximizing the circumstances to obtain a benefit by trading, margin and volatility. Each trading strategy is submitted to the Treasury Committee on a weekly basis for its consideration. The Committee analyzes the risks and then decides accordingly.

F-106

Hedging

The hedging strategy is determined annually and when market conditions require it. Hedging strategies are submitted to the Risk Policies’ Committee.

Hedging transactions comply with the applicable norm set forth in Circular B-5 of the CNBV. This implies, among other things, that the hedge’s effectiveness must be evaluated both prior to its arrangement (prospective) and thereafter (retrospective). These tests are performed on a monthly basis.

The hedging strategy is determined annually and each time the market conditions require. Hedges are used to reduce foreign exchange risks, through both exchange rate forwards and currency swaps, as well as interest rates by means of interest rate swaps. This is done with the purpose of setting the rates paid in debt issued by the Financial Group, thereby insuring its payment, and to make investments that generate greater value for the customers. The main strategy is to insure the Financial Groups’ future income and expenses, maximizing the benefits.

Hedging derivatives can be restated whole or partially due to hedging inefficiencies, maturity or sale of primary position.

Contingencies

To enter the derivatives market, the Financial Group is bound by an agreement to deliver its financial information in a timely manner and to abide by the applicable laws, regulations and provisions, as well as to give written notice to the affected parties in an event that could be considered as early termination, which could lead to a credit contingency. These include the following: bankruptcy filing, payment suspension, restructuring, intervention, liquidation, dissolution or other similar judicial or extra-judicial proceedings that affect the Financial Group; if the statements stipulated in the contract are incorrect; the Financial Group’s failure to fulfill its obligations and/or payments; breach of contract; the Financial Group’s consolidates or merges with another entity thereby transferring a substantial portion of its assets; failure to provide the guarantees that were agreed in the event of noncompliance with obligations or if such guarantees are expired or diminished in value; the Financial Group’s falls into insolvency, lower credit quality or illegality due to changes in the tax or legal legislation; the existence of a ruling, proceeding or embargo against the Financial Group that could substantially affect its ability to fulfill its obligations in a timely manner; or general noncompliance with obligations. Each ground for early termination is subject to the counter-party’s consideration to determine its importance and significance regarding the Financial Group’s ability to comply.

At present no such contingency situations have arisen.

Embedded derivatives

Embedded derivatives are those contract components that do not intend to explicitly originate a derivative financial instrument but rather that the implicit risks generated or hedged by those components differ in their economic and risk features from those of the contract, and therefore display behavior and features similar to those of a common derivative.

Identified embedded derivatives are separated from the host contract for valuation purposes and are treated as a derivative when they meet the features set forth in Circular B-5 paragraph 22. The main embedded derivatives recognized by the Financial Group are from service and leasing contracts established in US dollars.

Loan portfolio

The loan portfolio represents the balance of amounts effectively granted to borrowers plus uncollected accrued interest minus interest collected in advance. The allowance for loan losses from credit risks is presented as a reduction of the loan portfolio.

The unpaid loan balance is classified in the past-due portfolio as follows:

·Loans with bullet payment of principal and interest at maturity: 30 calendar days after being overdue.

F-107

·Loans involving a single principal payment at maturity, but with periodic interest payments: total principal and interest payments 30 and 90 calendar days after being overdue, respectively.

·Loans for which the payment of principal and interest is agreed based on partial periodic payments: 90 calendar days after the first payment is due.

·In the case of revolving loans, whenever payment is outstanding for two billing periods or when they are 60 or more days overdue.

·Overdrawn customer checking accounts are considered as part of the past-due portfolio when such situations arise.

Interest is recognized and accrued as income when earned. The accrual of interest income is suspended when loans are transferred to the past-due portfolio.

The fees charged for the initial granting of loans will be recorded as a deferred credit, which will be amortized as interest income, using the straight-line method over the loan’s contractual term, except those originating from revolving loans, which are amortized over a 12-month period.

Annual credit card fees whether the first annual charge of a renewal, are recorded as a deferred credit and amortized over a 12-month period against the year’s results in the commission and fee income line item.

The costs and expenses associated with the initial granting of a loan are stated as a deferred charge, which is amortized against the year’s earnings as interest expense for the duration of the loan, except those originating from revolving loans and credit cards which are amortized over a 12-month period.

Restructured past-due loans are not considered in the performing portfolio until evidence of sustained payment is obtained; this occurs when credit institutions receive three timely consecutive payments, or a payment is received for periods exceeding 60 days.

Renewed loans in which the borrower has not paid on time or when the accrued interest balance equals at least 25% of the original loan amount are considered past-due until evidence of sustained payment is obtained.

Accrued interest during the period in which the loan was included in the past-due portfolio is recognized as income when collected.

The recognition of interest income is renewed when the portfolio is no longer considered past-due, which occurs when the outstanding balances, including the principal, interest and any other item, are paid in full.

Restructured loans are those whose terms have been modified due to the borrowers’ financial difficulties, and it was decided to grant them a concession. Such modifications may include: reductions in the interest rate, debt forgiveness or term extensions.

The Financial Group regularly evaluates whether a past-due loan should remain in the balance sheet or be written off. Such write-offs are done by canceling the outstanding loan balance against the allowance for loan losses. The Financial Group may opt to eliminate from its assets those past-due loans that are 100% provisioned according to the following parameters:

Commercial loans — Must be classified in past-due loans, with an E risk rating, 100% reserved and unsecured by any fund.

Consumer loans — 180 days or more overdue.

Mortgage loans — 270 days or more overdue.

F-108

Allowance for loan losses

Application of new portfolio classification provisions

The loan portfolio is rated according to the rules issued by the Commission and the internal methodology authorized by such Commission.

In the case of consumer and mortgage loans, the Financial Group applies the general provisions applicable to credit institutions in rating the loan portfolio as issued by the Commission on October 25, 2010 and December 2, 2005, respectively. The Financial Group uses the internal methodology authorized by the Commission for rating commercial loans.

Such provisions also establish general methodologies for the rating and calculation of allowances for each type of loan, while also allowing credit institutions to classify and calculate allowances based on internal methodologies, when previously approved by the Commission.

Since June 2001, the Financial Group has the Commission’s approval to apply its own methodology to commercial loans, called Internal Risk Classification (CIR Banorte). CIR Banorte applies to commercial loans with outstanding balances equal to or greater than 4 million UDIS or its equivalent in Mexican pesos. This methodology is explained below.

The commercial loan portfolio rating procedure requires credit institutions to apply the established methodology (general or internal) based on quarterly information for the periods ending in March, June, September and December of each year, while also recording the allowances determined at the close of each period in their financial statements. Furthermore, during the months following each quarterly close, financial institutions must apply to any loan the respective rating used at the close of the immediately preceding quarter, based on the outstanding balance on the last day of the aforementioned months. The allowances for loan risks that have exceeded the amount required to rate the loan will be cancelled on the date of the following quarterly rating against the period’s results. Additionally, recoveries on previously written-off loan portfolio are recorded in the period’s results.

Derived from the acquisition of INB Financial Corp. (INB) in 2006, the Financial Group applied the loan rating methodologies established by the Commission to INB’s loans, homologating the risk degrees and adjusting the allowance for loan losses derived from applying such methodologies.

On November 30, 2010, the Commission issued Document 121-4/5486/2010, which renews for a two-year period, as of December 1, 2010, the authorization for such internal loan rating methodology.

Commercial loans equal to or greater than 4 million UDIS or its equivalent in Mexican pesos are rated based on the following criteria:

·Debtor’s credit quality

·The loans in relation to the value of the guarantees or the value of the assets in trusts or in “structured” programs, as applicable.

The commercial loan segment includes loans granted to business groups and corporations, state and municipal governments and their decentralized agencies, as well as financing to companies of the financial services sector.

The Financial Group applied the internal risk classification methodology, CIR Banorte, authorized by the Commission to rate the debtor, except in financing granted to state and municipal governments and their decentralized agencies, loans intended for investment projects with their own source of payment and financing granted to trustees that act under trusts and “structured” loan programs in which the affected assets allow for an individual risk evaluation associated with the type of loan, for which the Financial Group applied the procedure established by the Commission.

When evaluating a debtor’s credit quality with the CIR Banorte method, the following risks and payment experiences are classified specifically and independently:

F-109

Risk criteria	Risk factors
1. Financial risk	1.	Financial structure and payment capacity
	2.	Financing sources
	3.	Management and decision-making
	4.	Quality and timeliness of financial information
2. Industry risk	5.	Positioning and market in which debtor participates
		- Target markets
		- Risk acceptance criteria
3. Borrower’s experience	6.	Borrower’s experience
4. Country risk	7.	Country risk

Each of the risk factors is analyzed using descriptive evaluation tables, the result of which indicates the borrower’s rating. This, in turn, is standardized with the risk degrees established by the Commission.

CIR Banorte	Risk level description	Commission classification equivalent
1	Substantially risk free	A1
2	Below minimal risk	A2
3	Minimum risk	A2
4	Low risk	B1
5	Moderate risk	B2
6	Average risk	B3
7	Risk requiring management attention	C1
8	Potential partial loss	C2
9	High loss percentage	D
10	Total loss	E

For commercial loans under 4 million UDIS or its equivalent in Mexican pesos, loans under 900 thousand UDIS to state and municipal governments and their decentralized agencies, mortgage loans and consumer loans, the Financial Group applied the general provisions applicable to credit institutions for classifying the loan portfolio as issued by the Commission.

Acquired loan portfolios

This balance is represented by the acquisition cost of the various loan asset packages acquired by the Financial Group, which are subsequently valued by applying one of the three following methods:

Cost Recovery Method - Payments received are applied against the acquisition cost of the loan portfolio until the balance equals zero. Recoveries in excess of the acquisition cost are recognized in current earnings.

Interest method - The result of multiplying the acquired portfolio’s outstanding balance by the estimated yield is recorded in current earnings. Differences between the Financial Group’s collection estimates and actual collections are reflected prospectively in the estimated yield.

Cash basis method - The amount resulting from multiplying the estimated yield times the amount actually collected is recorded in the income statement, provided it is not greater than the amount obtained by the interest method. The difference between the recorded amount and the amount collected reduces the outstanding portfolio balance, once the entire initial investment has been amortized. Any subsequent recovery will be recorded in the income statement.

For the portfolios valued using the interest method, the Financial Group evaluates them twice a year to verify if the cash flow estimate of its collection rights is consistent with actual recoveries and therefore considered to be effective. The Financial Group uses the cost recovery method on those collection rights in which the expected cash flow estimate is not highly effective. The expected cash flow estimate is considered as “highly effective” if the result of dividing the sum of the flows actually collected by the sum of the expected cash flows is between 0.8 and 1.25 when such effectiveness is evaluated.

F-110

Securitizations involving transfer of ownership

Through securitization transactions involving the transfer of ownership in mortgage and government loans, the Financial Group transfers those financial assets to a trust so that it publicly issues securities through an intermediary. The securities represent the right to the yield on the securitized portfolio and, as compensation the Financial Group receives cash and a receipt, which grants it the right over the trust’s cash flow remnants after paying the holders for their certificates. This receipt is recorded at its fair value under “Receivables generated by securitizations”

The Financial Group provides management services for the transferred financial assets and records the revenue in the period’s earning when accrued. These revenues are stated under “Other income.”

The valuation of the benefits to be received from securitization operations is recorded in the income statement under other income or other expenses, as applicable.

Other accounts receivable and payable

The Financial Group performs a study to quantify the different future events that could affect the amount in accounts receivable over 90 days and thus determine the percentage of non-recoverability in order to calculate its allowance for doubtful accounts. The remaining balance of accounts receivable is reserved at 90 calendar days from the initial recognition.

The balances of asset and liability settlement accounts represent transactions involving the sale and purchase of currency and securities, which are recorded when entered into and are settled within 48 hours.

Merchandise Inventory

This is comprised mainly of finished goods and prior to 2008 was restated to the lower of replacement cost or market. Cost of sales, included in “Other expenses”, is restated using the replacement cost at the time of the sale prior to 2008.

Impairment of the value of long-lived assets and their disposal

The Financial Group has established guidelines to identify and, if applicable, record losses derived from the impairment or decrease in value of long-lived tangible or intangible assets, including goodwill.

Foreclosed assets, net

Foreclosed property or property received as payments in kind are recorded at the lower of their cost or fair value minus the strictly necessary costs and expenses disbursed in the foreclosure. Cost is determined as the forced-sale value established by the judge upon foreclosure or, in the case of payments in kind, the price agreed between the parties involved.

When the value of the asset or the accrued or past due amortizations leading to the foreclosure, net of estimates, is higher than that of the foreclosed property, the difference is recorded in the period’s results under “Other Revenues.”

When the value of the asset or the accrued or past due amortizations leading to the foreclosure, net of estimates, is lower than that of the foreclosed property, its value is adjusted to the asset’s net value.

The carrying value is only modified when there is evidence that the fair value is lower than the recorded carrying value. Reductions in the carrying value of the loan are recorded in the current earnings as they occur.

F-111

The provisions applicable to the new valuation methodology for the allowance for loan losses mentioned above define the valuation methodology for reserves related to either foreclosed property or those assets received as payment in kind, establishing that additional quarterly provisions must be created to recognize the potential decrease in value over time of property awarded under legal proceedings, out-of-court or received as payment in kind and the investments in securities received as foreclosed goods or payment in kind, based on the following guidelines:

I. In the case of collection rights and real property, the provisions referenced in the preceding paragraph must be treated as follows:

Personal property reserves

Time elapsed as ofaward date or receipt as payment in kind (months)	Reserve percentage
Up to 6	0	%
More than 6 and up to 12	10	%
More than 12 and up to 18	20	%
More than 18 and up to 24	45	%
More than 24 and up to 30	60	%
More than 30	100	%

The amount of the reserves to be created will be the result of applying the reserve percentage determined under the preceding table to the value of collection rights or foreclosed property, received as payment in kind or awarded in a court proceeding.

II. Investments in securities must be valued in accordance with the provisions of the Commission’s accounting Circular B-2, using annual audited financial statements and monthly financial information of the issuer.

Following the valuation of foreclosed assets or those received as payment in kind, the reserves resulting from applying the percentages established in the table of Section I above to the estimated value, must be created.

III. In the case of real property, provisions must be created as follows:

Real property reserves

Time elapsed as ofaward date or receipt as payment in kind (months)	Reserve percentage
Up to 12	0	%
More than 12 and up to 24	10	%
More than 24 and up to 30	15	%
More than 30 and up to 36	25	%
More than 36 and up to 42	30	%
More than 42 and up to 48	35	%
More than 48 and up to 54	40	%
More than 54 and up to 60	50	%
More than 60	100	%

The amount of the reserves to be created will be the result of applying the reserve percentage determined under the preceding table to the awarded value of the property based on the accounting criteria. Furthermore, when problems are identified regarding the realization of the value of the foreclosed property, the Financial Group records additional reserves based on management’s best estimates. On December 31, 2010, there are no reserves in addition to those created by the percentage applied based on the accounting criteria that could indicate realization problems with the values of the foreclosed properties.

If appraisals subsequent to the foreclosure or payment in kind result in the recording of a decrease in the value of the collection rights, securities, personal or real property, the reserve percentages contained in the preceding table can be applied to the adjusted value.

F-112

Property, furniture and equipment

Property, furniture and equipment are recorded at acquisition cost. The balances of acquisitions made until December 31, 2007, were restated using factors derived from the value of the UDI of that date.

Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method based on the useful lives of the assets as estimated by independent appraisers.

Permanent stock investments

The Financial Group recognizes its investments in associated companies where it has control or significant influence using the equity method, based on the book values shown in the most recent financial statements of such entities.

Income Taxes (ISR), Business Flat Tax (IETU) and Employee Statutory Profit-Sharing (PTU)

The provisions for ISR, IETU and PTU are recorded in the results of the year in which they are incurred. Deferred taxes are recognized if, based on financial projections, the Financial Group expects to incur ISR or IETU, and records the deferred tax it will pay. The Financial Group will record deferred ISR or IETU, corresponding to the tax it will pay. Deferred taxes are calculated by applying the corresponding tax rate to the applicable temporary differences resulting from comparing the accounting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and including, if any, future benefits from tax loss carryforwards and certain tax credits. The deferred tax assets are recorded only when there is a high probability of recovery.

The net effect of the aforementioned items is presented in the consolidated balance sheets under the “Deferred taxes, net” line.

Intangible assets

Intangible assets are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets provided they are identifiable and generate future economic benefits that are controlled by the Financial Group. The amortizable amount of the intangible asset is assigned on a systematic basis during its estimated useful life. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, and their value is subject to annual impairment tests.

Goodwill

The Financial Group records goodwill when the total fair value of the acquisition cost and the noncontrolling interest is greater than the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business, pursuant to NIF B-7 “Business acquisitions.” As goodwill is considered an intangible asset with an indefinite life, it is subject to impairment tests at least annually according to NIF C-15 “Impairment in the value of long-lasting assets and their disposal.” No indicators of impairment of goodwill have been identified as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Deposits

Liabilities derived from deposits, including promissory notes settled at maturity, are recorded at their funding or placement cost plus accrued interest, determined according to the number of days elapsed at each monthly close, which are charged against results when accrued as an interest expense.

Interbank and other loans

These loans are recorded based on the contractual value, recognizing the interest in the year’s earnings as accrued. The Financial Group records in this item the direct loans obtained from domestic and foreign banks, loans obtained through bids with Banco de Mexico and development fund financing. Furthermore, this includes discounted loan portfolios from funds provided by banks specializing in financing economic, productive or development activities.

F-113

Provisions

Provisions are recognized when the Financial Group has a current obligation that results from a past event and are likely to result in the use of economic resources and can be reasonably estimated.

Employee retirement obligations

According to Mexican Federal Labor Law, the Financial Group has obligations derived from severance payments and seniority premiums payable to employees that cease to render their services under certain circumstances.

Defined benefits plan

The Financial Group records a liability for seniority premiums, pensions and post-retirement medical services as incurred based on calculations by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method, using nominal interest rates. Accordingly, this recognizes the liability whose present value will cover the obligation from benefits projected to the estimated retirement date of the Company’s overall employees, as well as the obligation related to retired personnel.

The balance at the beginning of each period of actuarial gains and losses derived from pension plans exceeding 10% of the greater amount between the defined benefits obligation and plan assets are amortized in future periods against current results, in the case of pension plan, medical service and seniority premiums to retirement.

In the case of seniority premiums related to termination and remuneration at the end of the employment relation, earnings or losses are recognized immediately in the period that are generated, as specified by the NIF D-3 “Employee benefits”.

The Financial Group applies the provision of NIF D-3 related to the recognition of the liability for severance payments for reasons other than restructuring, which is recorded using the projected unit credit method based on calculations by independent actuaries.

Defined contribution plan

As of January 2001, the Financial Group provided a defined contribution pension plan. The participating employees are those hired as of this date as well as those hired prior to such date that enrolled voluntarily. The pension plan is invested in a fund.

The employees who were hired prior to January 1, 2001 and decided to enroll voluntarily in the defined contribution pension plan received a contribution from the Financial Group for prior services equivalent to the actuarial benefit accrued in their previous defined benefit plan that was cancelled. The initial contribution was made from the plan assets that had been established for the original defined benefit plan and participants were immediately assigned 50% of such amount with the remaining 50% to be assigned over 10 years.

The initial payment to the defined contribution plan for past services was financed with funds established originally for the defined benefit plan as a result of the early termination of its obligations and recognized in accordance with the requirements of NIF D-3.

The labor obligations derived from the defined contribution pension plan do not require an actuarial valuation as established in NIF D-3, because the cost of this plan is equivalent to the Financial Group’s contributions made to the plan’s participants.

Foreign currency conversion

Foreign currency transactions are recorded at the applicable exchange rate in effect at the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated into Mexican pesos at the applicable exchange rate at the close of each period. The exchange rate used to establish Mexican peso equivalence is the

F-114

FIX exchange rate published by Banco de México. Foreign exchange fluctuations are recorded in the results of operations.

Interest from outstanding subordinated debentures

Accrued interest from outstanding subordinated debentures is recognized as it is accrued and translated according to the exchange rate in effect at each monthly close.

Transfer of financial assets

The Financial Group may act as the assignor o assignee, as applicable, in this type of transactions. Moreover the Financial Group evaluates whether or not to retain the risks and benefits associated with the asset property to determine whether or not there was a transfer of property in a transaction. In transactions involving the transfer of ownership in financial assets, the assignor yields control and substantially transfers all the risks and benefits over such assets. Therefore, the assignor derecognizes such assets and records the consideration received in the transaction. Conversely, the assignee recognizes such financial assets and the transfer consideration in its accounting records.

Share-based payments

The Financial Group grants stock options to key officers through different payment schemes based on stocks. The Financial Group has established trusts to manage the plans and contributes the necessary funds so that shares can be purchased directly from the market at the initiation of each plan.

The Financial Group records its stock option plans according to the guidelines of NIF D-8, “Share-based payments.” The compensation expense is recorded at fair value as of the date the stock options are granted. The NIF D-8 guidelines stipulate that the fair value determined at the beginning is not revalued at a later date.

The fair value of each share is estimated as of the date granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model or the forwards valuation model, depending on the plans’ features.

Main subsidiaries’ income recognition

Banorte Casa de Bolsa

Permanent stock investments — represented mainly by stockholders’ equity shares of the distributing Investment Companies. Permanent stock investments are originally recorded at their acquisition cost and restated up to December 31, 2007, based on the factor derived from the UDI or the equity method, as applicable, based on the last available financial statements, and if necessary, losses in value are recorded based on the information provided by the affiliated companies’ management. Regarding the mutual funds managed by the Operating Company, the valuation increase is from comparing the original value to the book value one day prior to the close of the period. The valuation effect at book value is recorded in the statement of income under “Share in subsidiaries and affiliates’ income”.

Recognition of income from services, financial advisory and securities purchase-sales — the fees and rates generated by customer securities’ operations are recorded as performed.

Income from financial advisory is recorded when accrued as per the contract.

Securities purchase-sales results are recorded when performed.

Income and expenses are recorded as generated or accrued as per the relative contracts.

Share dividends are recorded at zero value in investments: therefore they only affect the results when the shares are sold.

F-115

Arrendadora y Factor Banorte

Credit from finance leasing operations, net — finance leasing operations are recorded as direct financing, wherein the account receivable is the total amount of the settled rents, and potential profit is the difference between such amount and the cost of the leased properties. Net financed capital is recorded on the general balance sheet, deducting the total of rents from the potential profit.

Loans from operating leasing operations — represent company assets given to a third party for the latter’s temporary use and enjoyment for a given term equal to or over six months. The operating leasing contract rents are recorded as income as accrued.

Loans from factoring operations, net — funded or non-funded factoring is recorded as follows:

·Ceded portfolio — the amount is recorded in loan portfolios, minus the difference between loans and the financed amount.

·Profit from acquired documents (interest) - calculated in advance, per completed month and upon maturity, recorded in factoring, and both are applied to results as accrued.

Recognition of income — interest from leasing and financial factoring is recognized as income as accrued; however the accumulation of interest is suspended whenever the uncollected interest and/or total loan is transferred to past-due loans. Accrued, normal and past-due interest during the period the loan is considered past-due is recognized as income as collected.

Profit to realize from financial leasing is recognized as income as accrued. The final value of the good in financial leasing is recognized as income when purchased.

The fees for credit opening in leasing and factoring operations are recognized as income as accrued.

Afore Banorte-Generali

Recognition of income - the administration fees are recognized as income as accrued.

The Pension Fund can only collect fees from workers charged to their individual accounts and the contributions received. Such fee is determined by the balance of received contributions. It may be a percentage of such concepts, a fixed fee or a combination of both, and can only be made when the worker’s contributions are effectively invested in the Siefores that the Pension Fund manages and the necessary daily provisions have been recorded in the Siefores accounting.

The profit or loss generated from selling investments in Siefores shares is recorded in the income statement as realized.

Seguros Banorte-Generali

Income from premiums — Recognized as follows:

a.The income for group and collective life insurance premiums is recorded in income as the partial payment receipt is issued, deducting the premiums ceded in reinsurance.

b.Income from premiums for accidents, illness and damage is recorded in terms of the policies contracted in the year, even though their term is for over one year, deducting the premiums ceded in reinsurance.

c.Income from rights and surcharges on policies with segmented payments is recorded in income as collected and the uncollected portion is recorded in deferred loans.

F-116

5 — CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, this line item was composed as follows:

	2010		2009
Cash	Ps.	12,308	Ps.	9,415
Banks		46,113		45,949
Other deposits and available funds		4,076		3,904
	Ps.	62,497	Ps.	59,268

On December 31, 2010, “Other deposits and available funds” include Ps. 857 for funds due to be received in 24 and 48 hours, and Ps. 36 in gold and silver coins. In 2009, it included Ps. 1,598 for funds due to be received in 24 and 48 hours, and Ps. 35 in gold and silver coins.

The exchange rate used for the conversion of gold and silver coins (Centenarios and Troy ounces, respectively) was Ps. 17,872.67 and Ps. 399.63, per unit, respectively, in 2010 and Ps. 14,627.95 and Ps. 239.89, per unit, respectively, in 2009.

“Banks” is represented by cash in Mexican pesos and US dollars converted at the exchange rate issued by Banco de México of Ps. 12.3496 and Ps. 13.0659 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively and is made up as follows:

	Mexican pesos				Denominated in US dollars				Total
	2010		2009		2010		2009		2010		2009
Call money	Ps.	3,000	Ps.	2,447	Ps.	3,458	Ps.	653	Ps.	6,458	Ps.	3,100
Deposits with foreign credit institutions		—		—		12,368		15,928		12,368		15,928
Domestic banks		834		370		—		—		834		370
Banco de México		26,345		26,510		108		41		26,453		26,551
	Ps.	30,179	Ps.	29,327	Ps.	15,934	Ps.	16,622	Ps.	46,113	Ps.	45,949

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group had made monetary regulation deposits of Ps. 26,345 and Ps. 26,342, respectively.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the total sum of restricted cash and cash equivalents is Ps. 36,819 and Ps. 33,289, respectively. This includes monetary regulation deposits, futures placed in the domestic and foreign market, call money and contracted transactions pending settlement in 24 and 48 hours.

The interbank loans are documented and accrued at an average rate of return of 0.182% and 0.167% in USD and 4.5% and 4.5% in pesos, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

F-117

6 - INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES

a. Trading securities

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, trading securities are as follows:

	2010											2009
	Acquisition cost			Accrued interest		Valuation increase (decrease)			Book value			Book value
CETES	Ps.		2,544	Ps.	—	Ps.	(1	)	Ps.		2,543	Ps.		926
Bonds	532			25		1			558			520
Development Bonds	3,241			4		3			3,248			3,136
Savings protection bonds (BPAS)	39,000			194		33			39,227			9,494
Bank securities	17,218			12		5			17,235			9,994
UMS	54			1		(2		)	53			—
Securitization certificates	3,114			14		43			3,171			260
Treasury notes	23			—		—			23			65
Other securities	61			1		—			62			—
Investment funds	61			—		—			61			64
	Ps.	65,848		Ps.	251	Ps.	82		Ps.	66,181		Ps.	24,459

During 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group recognized a profit (loss) of Ps. 46 and (Ps. 17), respectively, under “Brokerage revenues” for the fair value valuation of these instruments.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, there are Ps. 58,154 and Ps. 19,310, respectively, in restricted trading securities associated mainly with repurchase operations.

As of December 31, 2010, these investments mature as follows (stated at their acquisition cost):

	One year or less			More than one and up to 5 years			More than 5 and up to 10 years		More than 10 years		Total
CETES	Ps.		2,544	Ps.		—	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.		2,544
Bonds	532			—			—		—		532
Development Bonds	1,070			2,171			—		—		3,241
Savings protection bonds (BPAS)	2,463			35,595			942		—		39,000
Bank securities	13,440			3,778			—		—		17,218
UMS	—			—			54		—		54
Securitization certificates	44			2,870			—		200		3,114
Treasury notes	—			—			23		—		23
Other securities	2			—			27		32		61
Investment funds	—			—			—		61		61
	Ps.	20,095		Ps.	44,414		Ps.	1,046	Ps.	293	Ps.	65,848

F-118

b. Available for sale securities

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, available for sale securities were as follows:

	2010											2009
	Acquisition cost			Accrued interest		Valuation increase (decrease)			Book value			Book value
US Government bonds	Ps.		7,769	Ps.	28	Ps.	76		Ps.		7,873	Ps.		6,603
UMS	248			10		—			258			361
Bonds	1,424			10		85			1,519			2,718
MASTER CARD	—			—		—			—			35
BMV Shares	234			—		134			368			219
EUROBONDS	608			15		34			657			941
PEMEX bonds	833			12		25			870			824
Securitization certificates	755			1		(13		)	743			—
	Ps.	11,871		Ps.	76	Ps.	341		Ps.	12,288		Ps.	11,701

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 there are Ps. 2,674 and Ps. 2,489, respectively, in restricted trading securities.

As of December 31, 2010, these investments mature as follows (stated at their acquisition cost):

	One year or less		More than one and up to 5 years		More than 5 and up to 10 years			More than 10 years		Total
US Gov. Bonds	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.		7,769	Ps.	—	Ps.		7,769
UMS	248		—		—			—		248
Bonds	—		183		1,241			—		1,424
BMV Shares	—		—		—			234		234
EUROBONDS	—		364		244			—		608
PEMEX bonds	63		124		603			43		833
Securitization certificates	—		53		702			—		755
	Ps.	311	Ps.	724	Ps.	10,559		Ps.	277	Ps.	11,871

c. Held to maturity securities

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, held to maturity securities are as follows:

Medium and long-term debt instruments:

	2010									2009
	Acquisition cost			Accrued interest			Book value			Book value
Government bonds- support program for Special Federal Treasury Certificates	Ps.		756	Ps.		3	Ps.		759	Ps.		725
Government bonds	578			28			606			631
Development Bonds	33,035			57			33,092			33,127
Saving protection bonds (BPAS)	71,826			377			72,203			103,759
UMS	2,277			61			2,338			2,470
Bank securities	13,930			91			14,021			26,005
PEMEX bonds	3,207			62			3,269			4,991
Private securitization certificates	13,536			47			13,583			18,582
Other securities	41			1			42			42
	Ps.	139,186		Ps.	727		Ps.	139,913		Ps.	190,332

F-119

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, there are Ps. 125,938 and Ps. 175,369, respectively, in restricted trading securities associated mainly with repurchase operations.

As of December 31, 2010, these investments mature as follows (stated at their acquisition cost):

	One year or less			More than one and up to 5 years			More than 5 and up to 10 years			More than 10 years			Total
Government bonds- support program for Special Federal Treasury Certificates	Ps.		—	Ps.		—	Ps.		—	Ps.		756	Ps.		756
Government bonds	578			—			—			—			578
Development Bonds	22,746			10,289			—			—			33,035
Saving protection bonds (BPAS)	32,683			39,143			—			—			71,826
UMS	—			516			1,761			—			2,277
Bank securities	11,554			1,559			—			817			13,930
PEMEX bonds	—			450			2,757			—			3,207
Private securitization certificates	1,205			5,245			1,933			5,153			13,536
Other securities	3			—			11			27			41
	Ps.	68,769		Ps.	57,202		Ps.	6,462		Ps.	6,753		Ps.	139,186

Some of the investments in securities are given as collateral in derivative transactions without any restriction. Therefore, the receiver has the right to trade them and offer them as collateral.

d. Collateral

The fair value of the collateral given in derivatives’ transactions as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, is as follows:

		2010
		Fair value in millions
Type of collateral:	Instrument category	Pesos		USD	Euros
Cash	—	Ps.	155	243	—
CETES	Trading	232		—	—
UMS	Held to maturity	—		189	—
PEMEX bonds	Held to maturity	—		238	20
UMS	Available for sale	—		10	—
PEMEX bonds	Available for sale	—		58	—
Bank bonds	Available for sale	—		137	—
		Ps.	387	875	20

		2009
		Fair value in millions
Type of collateral:	Instrument category	Pesos		USD	Euros
Cash	—	Ps.	102	164	—
CETES	Trading	120		—	—
UMS	Held to maturity	—		167	—
PEMEX bonds	Held to maturity	—		353	20
UMS	Available for sale	—		13	—
PEMEX bonds	Available for sale	—		56	—
Bank bonds	Available for sale	—		116	—
		Ps.	222	869	20

F-120

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group had no instruments received as collateral.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, interest income from securities was Ps. 11,045 and Ps. 14,458, respectively.

During 2010 and 2009, accrued interest income not collected from impaired instruments was Ps. 2 and Ps. 13, respectively.

The amount recorded for impaired available for sale and held to maturity securities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 was:

Concept	2010		2009
Available for sale securities	Ps.	24	Ps.	81
Held to maturity securities	59		59
	Ps.	83	Ps.	140

7 - CREDITOR BALANCES UNDER REPURCHASE AND RESALE AGREEMENTS

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the creditor balance in repurchase transactions consist of:

Acting as seller of securities

Instrument	2010			2009
CETES	Ps.		2,234	Ps.		697
Development bonds	36,298			36,159
Bonds IPAB	1,855			654
Quarterly IPAB bonds	83,137			86,513
Semi-annual IPAB bonds	26,350			25,587
10-year bonds	1,157			625
20-year bonds	5			491
UDIBONOS	1			1
10-year UDIBONDS	3			3
Government securities	151,040			150,730
Promissory notes	1,884			5,055
CEDES	3,749			9,035
CEBUR Bank	10,975			7,628
Bank securities	16,608			21,718
Private paper	7,005			9,114
CEBUR government short term	3,924			2,481
Mortgage certificates	170			212
CEBUR government	—			1,200
Securitization certificates	—			25
Private securities	11,099			13,032
	Ps.	178,747		Ps.	185,480

With the Financial Group acting as the vendor, accrued premiums charged to the results of operations during 2010 and 2009, totaled Ps. 10,913 and Ps. 13,434, respectively.

During 2010, repurchase transactions carried out by the Financial Group in its capacity as vendor ranged in term from 1 to 91 days.

F-121

Acting as securities purchaser

	2010											2009
Instrument	Repurchase agreement from debtors			Received, sold collateral in repurchase			Debit difference			Credit difference		Repurchase agreement from debtors			Received, sold collateral in repurchase			Debit difference		Credit difference
CETES	Ps.		—	Ps.		—	Ps.		—	Ps.		Ps.		400	Ps.		400	Ps.	—	Ps.	—
Development bonds	50			50			—			—		7,113			7,114			1		2
Quarterly IPAB bonds	158			158			—			—		1			—			1		—
Semi-annual IPAB bonds	1,302			1,301			1			—		390			390			—		—
7-year bonds	—			—			—			—		—			—			—		—
10-year bonds	2,639			2,639			—			—		221			219			2		—
20-year bonds	2,239			2,239			—			—		73			73			—		—
10-year UDIBONDS	—			—			—			—		1,120			1,120			—		—
Government securities	6,388			6,387			1			—		9,318			9,316			4		2
Promissory notes	964			964			—			—		1,785			1,785			—		—
CEDES	3,453			3,446			7			—		—			—			—		—
Bank acceptances	3,050			3,050			—			—		—			—			—		—
Bank securities	7,467			7,460			7			—		1,785			1,785			—		—
Private paper	657			86			571			—		—			—			—		—
CEBUR government	1,510			1,517			4			11		—			—			—		—
Private securities	2,167			1,603			575			11		—			—			—		—
	Ps.	16,022		Ps.	15,450		Ps.	583		Ps.	11	Ps.	11,103		Ps.	11,101		Ps.	4	Ps.	2

With the Financial Group acting as the purchaser, accrued premiums charged to the results of operations during 2010 and 2009 totaled Ps. 2,121 and Ps. 2,173, respectively.

During 2010, repurchase transactions carried out by the Financial Group in its capacity as purchaser ranged in term from 1 to 354 days.

By December 31, 2010, the amount of securities corresponding to guarantees granted and received in repurchase transactions that involved the transfer of property totaled Ps. 3 and Ps. 46, respectively, and by December 31, 2009, the totals were Ps. 120 in guarantees granted and Ps. 4 in guarantees received.

8 - DERIVATIVES FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The transactions carried out by the Financial Group involving derivatives correspond mainly to futures, swaps and options contracts. These transactions are done to hedge various risks and for trading purposes.

As of December 31, 2010, the Financial Group has evaluated the effectiveness of derivatives’ transactions for hedging purposes and has concluded that they are highly effective.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group’s derivatives positions held for trading purposes are as follows:

F-122

	2010					2009
Asset position	Nominal amount			Asset position		Nominal amount			Asset position
Futures
CETES-rate futures	Ps.		500	Ps.	—	Ps.		—	Ps.	—
TIIE-rate futures	160,469			—		600			—
Forwards
Foreign currency forwards	135			72		3,454			313
Options
Foreign currency options	—			—		283			2
Interest rate options	16,493			257		8,485			126
Swaps
Interest rate swaps	289,938			6,106		194,317			2,612
Exchange rate swaps	5,328			1,028		7,377			1,771
Total trading	472,863			7,463		214,516			4,824
Options
Interest rate options	15,550			80		24,200			188
Swaps
Interest rate swaps	28,940			4		27,648			8
Exchange rate swaps	7,496			512		9,996			860
Total hedging	51,986			596		61,844			1,056
Total position	Ps.	524,849		Ps.	8,059	Ps.	276,360		Ps.	5,880

	2010				2009
Liability position	Nominal amount		Liability position		Nominal amount			Liability position
Futures
CETES-rate futures	Ps.	500	Ps.	—	Ps.		—	Ps.	—
TIIE-rate futures	160,469		—		600			—
Forwards
Foreign currency forwards	115		2		2,825			88
Options
Foreign currency options	60		1		287			2
Interest rate options	30,559		272		9,168			71
Swaps
Interest rate swaps	289,954		6,106		194,340			2,713
Exchange rate swaps	5,273		857		7,322			1,679
Total trading	486,930		7,238		214,542			4,553
Swaps
Interest rate swaps	28,940		2,043		27,650			980
Exchange rate swaps	3,921		1,456		4,146			2,842
Total hedging	32,861		3,499		31,796			3,822
Total position	Ps.	519,791	Ps.	10,737	Ps.	246,338		Ps.	8,375

The hedging instruments operated and their main underlying instruments are as follows:

Forwards	Options	Swaps	CCS
Fx-USD	Fx-USD	TIIE 28	TIIE 28
	TIIE 28	TIIE 91	TIIE 91
	TIIE 91	CETES 91	Libor
	Libor	Libor

F-123

The risk management policies and internal control procedures for managing risks inherent to derivatives are described in Note 32.

Transactions carried out for hedging purposes have maturities from 2011 to 2030 and are intended to mitigate the financial risk derived from long-term loans offered by the Financial Group at fixed nominal rates, as well as the exchange rate risk generated by market instruments in the Financial Group’s portfolio.

The book value of collateral used to ensure compliance with obligations derived from currency swap contracts as of December 31, 2010 is USD 632,002 thousand and EUR 20,326 thousand, and as of December 31, 2009 it was USD 704,841 thousand and EUR 20,255 thousand. Futures transactions are made through recognized markets, and as of December 31, 2010 they represent 0.10% of the nominal amount of all the derivatives’ operations contracts; the remaining 99.90% correspond to option and swap transactions in OTC markets.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the collateral was comprised mainly of cash, CETES, ITS BPAS, PEMEX bonds, UMS bonds and bank bonds restricted under the categories of trading, held to maturity and available for sale securities. The restriction maturity date for this collateral is from 2011 to 2030. Their fair value is shown in Note 6 d).

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group had no instruments received as collateral in derivatives’ transactions.

During 2010 and 2009, the net income on financial assets and liabilities associated with derivatives was Ps. 252 and Ps. 200, respectively.

The net amount of estimated gains or losses to date originated by transactions or events that are recorded in cumulative other comprehensive income in the consolidated financial statements and that are expected to be reclassified to earnings within the next 12 months totals Ps. 48.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the main positions hedged by the Financial Group and the derivatives designated to cover such positions are:

Cash flow hedging

The Financial Group has cash flow hedges as follows:

·Forecast funding using TIIE rate Caps and Swaps.

·Recorded liabilities in Mexican pesos using TIIE rate Swaps.

·Recorded liabilities in foreign currency using Cross Currency Swaps.

·Recorded assets in foreign currency using Cross Currency Swaps.

As of December 31, 2010, there are 27 files related to hedging transactions. Their effectiveness ranges between 85% and 100%, well within the range established by the accounting standards in effect (80% to 125%). Furthermore, there is no overhedging on any of the derivatives, so as of December 31, 2010, there are no ineffective portions that the Financial Group has to record in earnings.

The following are the Financial Group’s hedged cash flows as of December 31, 2010 expected to occur and affect earnings:

Concept	Up to 3 months		More than 3 months and up to 1 year		More than 1 and up to 5 years		More than 5 years
Forecasted funding	Ps.	254	Ps.	800	Ps.	3,883	Ps.	1,316
Liabilities in Mexican pesos	111		337		983		19
Liabilities denominated in USD	—		3,932		—		—
Assets denominated in USD	360		378		2,510		7,645
Assets denominated in Euros	—		21		373		—
	Ps.	725	Ps.	5,468	Ps.	7,749	Ps.	8,980

F-124

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, Ps. 2,114 and Ps. 1,404, respectively, were recognized in other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Furthermore, Ps. 43 and Ps. 127, respectively, were reclassified from stockholders’ equity to results.

Trading and hedging derivatives: the loan risk is minimized through means of contractual compensation agreements, in which asset and liability derivatives with the same counterparty are settled for their net balance. Similarly, there may be other types of collateral such as credit lines, depending on the counterparty’s solvency and the nature of the transaction.

The following table shows the value of cash flow hedging comprehensive income:

	Valuation of cash flow hedging instruments			Net change in period			Reclassified to income
Balance, January 1, 2007	Ps.	(58	)	Ps.	—		Ps.	—
Balance, December 31, 2007	Ps.	(308	)	Ps.	(250	)	Ps.	—
Balance, December 31, 2008	Ps.	(1,567	)	Ps.	(1,259	)	Ps.	18
Balance, December 31, 2009	Ps.	(1,394	)	Ps.	173		Ps.	47
Balance, December 31, 2010	Ps.	(2,114	)	Ps.	(720	)	Ps.	42

9 - LOAN PORTFOLIO

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the loan portfolio by loan type is as follows:

	Performing loan portfolio						Past-due loan portfolio						Total
	2010			2009			2010			2009			2010			2009
Commercial loans
Denominated in domestic currency
Commercial	Ps.		99,851	Ps.	90,189		Ps.		3,765	Ps.		2,325	Ps.	103,616		Ps.		92,514
Rediscounted portfolio	5,377			4,831			—			—			5,377			4,831
Denominated in USD
Commercial	20,581			21,471			652			838			21,233			22,309
Rediscounted portfolio	674			746			—			—			674			746
Total commercial loans	126,483			117,237			4,417			3,163			130,900			120,400
Loans to financial institutions	5,521			7,131			—			—			5,521			7,131
Consumer loans
Credit card	11,159			11,801			1,040			1,610			12,199			13,411
Other consumer loans	16,669			13,911			236			332			16,905			14,243
Mortgage loans	56,168			49,881			971			1,049			57,139			50,930
Government loans	47,550			38,993			—			—			47,550			38,993
	137,067			121,717			2,247			2,991			139,314			124,708
Total loan portfolio	Ps.	263,550		Ps.		238,954	Ps.	6,664		Ps.	6,154		Ps.		270,214	Ps.	245,108

As of December 31, 2010, the deferred balance of fees is Ps. 1,623, and the amount recorded in results was Ps. 654. Furthermore, the deferred balance of costs and expenses associated with the initial loan origination is Ps. 328, and the amount recorded in results was Ps. 386. The average term over which the deferred fee balance and the costs and expenses will be recorded is equivalent to the average term of the portfolio balance.

F-125

The average terms of the portfolio’s main balances are: a) commercial, 3 years; b) financial institutions, 3.2 years; c) mortgage, 17.7 years; d) government loans, 8.1 years; and e) consumer, 2.5 years.

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the balance of written off loans that had been fully reserved as past-due loans was Ps. 5,551 and Ps. 8,278, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, revenues from recoveries of previously written-off loan portfolios were Ps. 1,561 and Ps. 848, respectively.

Customer insurance policies that the Financial Group includes as part of the loan portfolio are car insurance; the rest of the policies are not recorded in the general balance sheet and are collected when the loan amortization is charged to the client. The amount of financed car insurance policies by December 31, 2010 and 2009 is Ps. 23 and Ps. 14, respectively.

The loan portfolio grouped into economic sectors as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, is shown below:

	2010					2009
	Amount			Reserve percentage		Amount			Reserve percentage
Private (companies and individuals)	Ps.	130,900		48.44	%	Ps.	120,400		49.12	%
Financial institutions	5,521			2.04	%	7,131			2.91	%
Credit card and consumer	29,104			10.77	%	27,654			11.28	%
Mortgage	57,139			21.15	%	50,930			20.78	%
Government	47,550			17.60	%	38,993			15.91	%
	Ps.		270,214	100	%	Ps.		245,108	100	%

Loan support programs

Special accounting treatment for the Hurricane Alex flood aid program

Given the negative impact of the floods caused by Hurricane Alex, the Financial Group decided to assist in the region’s economic recovery; this includes the states of Nuevo León, Coahuila, Tamaulipas, San Luis Potosí and Oaxaca. The support program included the following:

Car, credit card and consumer loan support consisting of:

·Car loans. Deferral of up to three monthly installments or freezing of balances with no interest charged for three months.

·Credit cards. Minimum monthly payment was waived for up to three months, and in some case balances were frozen without interest charges or penalties for such period.

·Personal and payroll loans. Capital and interest payment deferral for up to 3 months.

In that regard, the Commission issued a special accounting standard in document number 100/042/2010 applicable to the Financial Group from July 1 to September 30, 2010, which authorized the Financial Group not to consider as restructured loans the ones which payment of the principal and interest was deferred for three months according to the Plan, as per paragraph 24 of criterion B-6 “Loan portfolio” and to keep them in the current loans during such period. These loans were considered as performing loans to determine the allowance for loan losses.

If such special standards had not been authorized, the Financial Group would have presented the following loan amounts in the December 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet:

F-126

PERFORMING LOAN PORTFOLIO
Commercial loans
Business loans	Ps.	126,482
Loans to financial institutions	5,521
Government loans	47,550
Consumer loans	27,825
Mortgage loans	56,168
TOTAL PERFORMING LOAN PORTFOLIO	263,546
PAST-DUE LOAN PORTFOLIO
Commercial loans
Business loans	4,417
Consumer loans	1,280
Mortgage loans	971
TOTAL PAST-DUE LOAN PORTFOLIO	6,668
LOAN PORTFOLIO
(Minus) Allowance for loan losses	(8,256			)
LOAN PORTFOLIO, net	261,958
ACQUIRED COLLECTION RIGHTS	2,025
TOTAL LOAN PORTFOLIO, net	Ps.		263,983

Moreover, the period’s net income would have been Ps. 6,693 as a result of the additional Ps. 12 in allowance for loan losses that would have been created if such support had not been provided to the borrowers.

The amount of deferred payments from consumer loans derived from the plans as of December 31, 2010 totals Ps. 6.

Policies and Procedures for Granting Loans

The granting, control and recovery of loans is regulated by the Financial Group’s Credit Manual, which has been authorized by the Board of Directors. Accordingly, administrative portfolio control is performed in the following areas:

I.	Business Areas (includes corporate, commercial, business, governmental and consumer banking), primarily through the branch network
II.	Operations Areas
III.	General Comprehensive Risk Management
IV.	Recovery Management

Similarly, the Financial Group has manuals establishing the policies and procedures to be utilized for credit risk management purposes.

The structure of the credit management process is based on the following stages:

a)	Product design
b)	Promotion
c)	Evaluation
d)	Formalization
e)	Operation
f)	Administration
g)	Recovery

Procedures have also been implemented to ensure that amounts related to the past-due portfolio are timely transferred and recorded in the books and records, and those loans with recovery problems are properly and promptly identified.

F-127

Pursuant to the Commission’s Circular B-6, “Loan Portfolio”, the distressed portfolio is defined as the commercial loans which, based on the current information and facts as well as on the loan revision process, are very unlikely to be fully recovered (both principal and interest) pursuant to the original terms and conditions. The performing and past-due portfolios are susceptible to be identified as a distressed portfolio. The commercial loan rating D and E risk degrees are as follows:

	2010			2009
Performing portfolio	Ps.	2,283		Ps.	1,373
Total rated portfolio	279,798			253,660
Distressed portfolio/total rated portfolio	0.82		%	0.54		%

The Financial Group’s Treasury Department is the central unit responsible for balancing resource requirements and eliminating the interest rate risk derived from fixed rate transactions through the use of hedging and arbitrage strategies.

10 - LOANS RESTRUCTURED IN UDIS

The loans restructured in UDIS correspond to mortgage loans. The balance as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 is detailed below:

	2010		2009
Current portfolio	Ps.	45	Ps.	542
Current accrued interest	—		2
Past-due portfolio	1		14
Past-due accrued interest	—		1
	Ps.	46	Ps.	559

Early termination of mortgage loan borrower support programs

On June 30, 2010 the Federal Government through the SHCP and Banking Institutions signed an agreement for the early termination of the mortgage loan debtors support programs (punto final and UDIS trusts) (the Agreement) consequently as of January 1, 2011 the Financial Group absorbed its part of the early discount granted to mortgage loan debtors participating in the program. As of December 31, 2010, the Financial Group recorded a Ps. 57 reserve to face such obligation.

Below are some of the effects of applying the Agreement that went into effect as of the signing date.

The total amount of Federal Government payment obligations for commercial loans as of December 31, 2010 (Cut-off Date) is Ps. 140, which includes Ps. 138 associated with the conditioned discount portion from loans in Mexican pesos and UDIS; and Ps. 2 associated with the discount applied to those mentioned in number 3.1.2 of Circular 1430. Such amount may vary if there are no indications of sustained payment by March 31, 2011 as per the Agreement.

The Federal Government obligations subject to the Agreement are described below:

	Payment date	Amount
First amortization	December 1, 2011	Ps.	28
Second amortization	June 1, 2012	28
Third amortization	June 1, 2013	28
Fourth amortization	June 1, 2014	28
Fifth amortization	June 1, 2015	28
		Ps.	140

F-128

A monthly financial cost is incorporated to each amortization as of the day following the Cut-off Date and up to the close of the month prior to each payment date. The rate for January 2011 is the arithmetic average of the annual rate of return based on the 91-day CETES discount issued in December 2010, and for the subsequent months the 91-day future CETES rate of the previous month as published by Proveedor Integral de Precios, S.A. on the business day after the Cut-off Date, or that of the nearest month contained in said publication, taken on a 28-day return term, then dividing the resulting rate by 360 and multiplying the result by the number of days effectively elapsed during the period it is accrued, capitalized on a monthly basis.

A rollforward of the allowance for loan losses for the loans included in the Agreement is detailed below:

	2010
Initial balance	Ps.	19
Financial Group support	67
Debt forgiveness, discounts and write-offs	14
Reserves reclassification	(9		)
Contribution to settle fiduciary liability	1
Final balance	Ps.	92

The maximum amount the Financial Group would absorb for loans not susceptible to the Early Termination program and that would be entitled to the discount benefits program is Ps. 14.

Ps. 13 were used to repurchase Special Federal Treasury Certificates (CETES); the remaining balance of Special CETES not repurchased by the Federal Government is Ps. 760 with maturities between 2017 and 2027.

The Financial Group recognized Ps. 330 as an allowance for loan losses and Ps. 56 in deferred taxes as a result of terminating the Trusts.

11 - ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The Financial Group’s portfolio classification, which serves as the basis for recording the allowance for loan losses, is detailed below:

	2010
					Required allowances for losses
Risk category	Loan portfolio				Commercial portfolio			Consumer portfolio		Mortgage portfolio			Total
Exempted portfolio	Ps.		107		Ps.		—	Ps.	—	Ps.		—	Ps.		—
Risk A	66,862				—			75		181			256
Risk A1	115,479				576			—		—			576
Risk A2	65,389				621			—		—			621
Risk B	6,711				—			115		168			283
Risk B1	6,824				101			391		—			492
Risk B2	7,628				51			468		—			519
Risk B3	2,684				274			—		—			274
Risk C	1,944				—			628		92			720
Risk C1	968				219			—		—			219
Risk C2	1,190				552			—		—			552
Risk D	1,992				227			873		317			1,417
Risk E	2,240				1,919			326		—			2,245
Unclassified	(220			)
	Ps.	279,798			Ps.	4,540		Ps.	2,876	Ps.	758		Ps.	8,174
Less: recorded allowance													8,245
Additional allowance													Ps.		71

F-129

	2009
					Required allowances for losses
Risk category	Loan portfolio				Commercial portfolio			Consumer portfolio			Mortgage portfolio			Total
Exempted portfolio	Ps.		56		Ps.		—	Ps.		—	Ps.		—	Ps.		—
Risk A	58,169				—			63			159			222
Risk A1	106,990				495			—			—			495
Risk A2	57,118				520			—			—			520
Risk B	6,269				—			102			184			286
Risk B1	5,700				74			266			—			340
Risk B2	8,249				84			509			—			593
Risk B3	2,579				269			—			—			269
Risk C	2,494				—			795			132			927
Risk C1	1,404				301			—			—			301
Risk C2	803				380			—			—			380
Risk D	2,592				245			1,356			264			1,865
Risk E	1,272				1,008			272			—			1,280
Unclassified	(35			)	—			—			—			—
	Ps.	253,660			Ps.	3,376		Ps.	3,363		Ps.	739		Ps.	7,478
Less: recorded allowance														7,535
Additional allowance														Ps.		57

The sum of the rated loan portfolio includes Ps. 6,124 and Ps. 5,114 in loans granted to subsidiaries whose balance was eliminated in the consolidation process as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The total portfolio balance used as the basis for the classification above includes amounts related to credit commitments, which is recorded in memorandum accounts.

The additional allowances comply with the general provisions applicable to credit institution and the notices issued by the Commission to regulate debtor support programs, denominated in UDIS trusts.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the estimated allowance for loan losses is determined based on portfolio balances at those dates. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the allowance for loan losses includes a reserve for 100% of the delinquent interest owed.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the allowance for loan losses represents 124% and 122%, respectively, of the past-due portfolio.

The estimated allowance includes the classification of loans granted in foreign currency, which are evaluated at the exchange rate in effect as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Credit card rating

Changes in the rating methodology for consumer loan portfolio related to credit card transactions

On August 12, 2009 the Commission issued a resolution amending the general regulations applicable to banking institutions, this change modified the methodology for the classification of revolving consumer loans so that the parameters used for estimating loan loss reserves reflect, the expected 12 months losses of credit cards based on the current environment.

As a result of this modification, the Financial Group opted to recognize against the results of previous years the initial cumulative financial effect resulting from the first application of the provisions mentioned under section I of the second transitory article. This condition occurred in September 2009.

The accounting record originated in the Financial Group for this recognition led to a charge of Ps. 1,102 in the account “Retained earnings” within stockholders’ equity, against claims by the same amount to the account

F-130

“Allowance for loan loss reserves” within the loan portfolio item in the balance sheet. Furthermore, a deferred tax was registered to reflect the change through a charge of Ps. 419in the asset account “Deferred Taxes” in the balance sheet, against a credit in the account “Retained earnings” within stockholders’ equity.

If the recognition of the abovementioned effect would have been made against earnings, the items affected and the amounts recorded and presented at both the balance sheet and the income statement of the Financial Group, would have been:

				Effect			How would be presented
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Stockholders’ equity
Retained earnings from prior years	Ps.	20,681		Ps.	683		Ps.	21,364
Net income	5,854			(683		)	5,171
Total stockholders’ equity	Ps.	44,974		Ps.	—		Ps.	44,974
Consolidated Statement of Income
Provision for loan losses	8,286			1,102			9,388
Net interest income after allowance for loan losses	14,897			(1,102		)	13,795
Deferred income taxes, net	(535		)	(419		)	(954		)
Net income	Ps.	5,854		Ps.	(683	)	Ps.	5,171

Movements in allowance for loan losses

An analysis of the movements in allowance for loan losses is detailed below:

	2010			2009
Balance at the beginning of the year	Ps.	7,535		Ps.	6,690
Increase charged to results	6,841			8,208
Debt forgiveness and write-offs	(6,066		)	(8,464		)
Valuation in foreign currencies and UDIS	(18		)	(19		)
Rebates granted to housing debtors	(70		)	(46		)
Created with profit margin (UDIS Trusts)	34			59
Loan purchase	2			—
Recognized against retained earnings from prior years	—			1,136
Other	(13		)	(29		)
Year-end balance	Ps.	8,245		Ps.	7,535

As of December 31, 2010, the net amount of preventive loan loss reserves charged to the consolidated statement of income totals Ps. 6,889 and Ps. 14 charged to “Other revenues”. These amounts charged to results are made up of Ps. 6,841 credited directly to the estimate and Ps. 34 from the UDIS trust. As of December 31, 2009, the net amount of preventive loan loss reserves charged to the consolidated statement of income totals Ps. 8,282 and is comprised of Ps. 8,286 directly credited to the estimate and Ps. 4 charged to “Other revenues”.

F-131

12 - ACQUIRED COLLECTION RIGHTS

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the acquired collection rights are comprised as follows:

	2010		2009		Valuation Method
Bancomer IV	Ps.	360	Ps.	456	Cash Basis Method
Banamex Mortgage	262		302		Cash Basis Method
Serfin Mortgage	126		160		Cash Basis Method
Bital I	121		171		Cash Basis Method
Bancomer III	111		125		Cash Basis Method
Goldman Sach’s	98		145		Cash Basis Method
Banorte Mortgage	158		196		Interest Method
Solida Mortgage	382		473		Cost Recovery Method
Serfin Commercial II	95		105		Cost Recovery Method
Serfin Commercial I	81		92		Cost Recovery Method
Confia I	72		80		Cost Recovery Method
GMAC Banorte	60		66		Cost Recovery Method
Bital II	58		72		Cost Recovery Method
Banorte Sólida Commercial	34		35		Cost Recovery Method
Cartera Segmento II	7		—		Cost Recovery Method
Santander	—		70		Interest Method (Commercial); Cash Basis Method (Mortgage)
	Ps.	2,025	Ps.	2,548

As of December 31, 2010, the Financial Group recognized income from credit asset portfolios of Ps. 595, together with the respective amortization of Ps. 482, the effects of which were recognized under the “Other income” heading in the consolidated statement of income. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Financial Group recognized income of Ps. 718, together with the respective amortization of Ps. 448.

The Financial Group performs an analysis based on events or information to estimate the amount of expected cash flows to determine the estimated rate of return used in applying the valuation method for the amortization of the receivable. If based on current events information, the analysis demonstrates that the expected future cash flows will decrease to the degree that they will not cover the book value, it will constitute an estimate for non-recoverability or difficult collection against the year’s results for the amount that such expected cash flows are lower than the book value of the receivable.

The result of the expected cash flows of the portfolios Serfín Commercial I, GMAC Banorte, Bital II Solida Mortgage, Serfin Commercial II and Cartera Segmento II were not highly effective since the quotient resulting from dividing the flows collected by the sum of expected cash flows was below 0.8. As a result, the Financial Group decided to move these portfolios to the cost recovery method.

Assets other than cash that the Financial Group has received as part of portfolio collection or recovery have been mainly in real property.

The main feature considered for segmenting acquired portfolios has been the type of loan.

F-132

13 - OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the other accounts receivable balance is as follows:

	2010			2009
Loans to officers and employees	Ps.	1,211		Ps.	1,134
Debtors from liquidation settlement	909			2,706
Real property portfolios	1,864			1,183
Fiduciary rights	4,778			4,104
Sundry debtors in Mexican pesos	1,838			1,182
Sundry debtors in foreign currency	321			928
Other	419			380
	11,340			11,617
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(476		)	(293		)
	Ps.	10,864		Ps.	11,324

The real property portfolios include Ps. 301 that corresponds to the collection rights of the INVEX trust that is valued applying the interest method.

Loans to officers and employees mature in 2 to 30 years and accrue interest at a 6% to 10% rate.

14 - FORECLOSED ASSETS, NET

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the foreclosed assets balance is as follows:

	2010			2009
Personal property	Ps.	64		Ps.	67
Real property	1,107			1,230
Goods pledged for sale	18			14
	1,189			1,311
Allowance for losses on foreclosed assets	(380		)	(383		)
	Ps.	809		Ps.	928

15 - PROPERTY, FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT, NET

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the property, furniture and fixtures balance is as follows:

	2010			2009
Furniture and equipment	Ps.	5,777		Ps.	5,207
Property intended for offices	5,530			5,272
Installation costs	2,888			2,750
	14,195			13,229
Less - Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(4,879		)	(4,607		)
	Ps.	9,316		Ps.	8,622

The depreciation recorded in the results of 2010 and 2009 was Ps. 1,121 and Ps. 997, respectively.

F-133

The average estimated useful lives of the Financial Group’s assets subject to depreciation are listed below:

	Useful Life
Transportation equipment	4 years
Computer equipment	4.7 years
Furniture and fixtures	10 years
Real estate	From 4 to 99 years

16 - PERMANENT STOCK INVESTMENTS

Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries and associated companies are valued according to the equity method, as detailed below:

	Share %		2010		2009
Seguros Banorte Generali, S. A. de C. V.	51	%	Ps.	1,243	Ps.	1,209
Fondo Solida Banorte Generali, S. A. de C. V., SIEFORE	99	%	843		719
Pensiones Banorte Generali, S. A. de C. V.	51	%	524		518
Banorte Investment funds	Various		129		121
Controladora Prosa, S. A. de C. V.	19.73	%	46		49
Servicio Pan Americano de Protección, S. A. de C. V.	8.50	%	—		115
Transporte Aéreo Técnico Ejecutivo, S. A. de C. V.	45.33	%	42		72
Fideicomiso Marhnos (Sólida)	100	%	156		156
Internacional de Inversiones (Sólida)	5.62	%	95		—
Others	Various		52		77
			Ps.	3,130	Ps.	3,036

The Financial Group exercises significant influence over its affiliates valued under the equity method through its representation in the board of directors or equivalent management body, as well as through significant intercompany transactions.

17 - DEFERRED TAXES, NET

The tax reported by the Financial Group is calculated based on the current taxable result of the year and enacted tax regulations. However, due to temporary differences between accounting and tax balance sheet accounts, the Financial Group has recognized a recoverable net deferred tax asset of Ps. 1,340 and Ps. 1,411 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as detailed below:

	2010						2009
	Temporary		Deferred Effect				Temporary			Deferred Effect
	Differences		ISR		PTU		Differences			ISR			PTU
Temporary Differences _ Assets
Allowance for loan losses	Ps.	339	Ps.	119	Ps.	—	Ps.	315		Ps.	110		Ps.	—
Tax loss carryforwards of Uniteller and Banorte USA	11		4		—		—			—			—
Tax loss carryforwards	5		2		—		(72		)	(25		)	—
State tax on deferred assets	10		3		—		6			2			—
Surplus preventive allowances for credit risks over the net tax limit	5,526		1,548		552		4,757			1,332			476
Excess of tax over book value of foreclosed and fixed assets	1,361		374		60		1,132			308			52
PTU	798		239		80		775			232			77
Fees collected in advance	20		6		2		—			—			—
Non-deductible provisions	1,390		417		131		—			—			—
Other assets	46		13		—		1,422			427			135
Total assets	Ps.	9,506	Ps.	2,725	Ps.	825	Ps.	8,335		Ps.	2,386		Ps.	740

F-134

	2010						2009
	Temporary		Deferred Effect				Temporary		Deferred Effect
	Differences		ISR		PTU		Differences		ISR		PTU
Temporary Differences_ Liabilities
Excess of book over tax value of fixed assets and expected expenses	Ps.	33	Ps.	10	Ps.	—	Ps.	16	Ps.	4	Ps.	—
Unrealized loss in available-for-sale securities	75		26		—		—		—		—
Unrealized capital gain from special allowance	170		51		—		125		38		—
ISR payable on UDI trusts	22		6		—		145		40		—
Portfolios acquired	2,126		617		110		2,302		655		111
Capitalizable projects expenses	706		211		71		528		159		53
Reversal of sales costs	8		3		—		16		4		—
Contribution to pension fund	2,000		560		200		1,500		420		150
Federal Home Loan Bank dividends	4		1		—		—		—		—
Intangible assets	64		22		—		—		—		—
Other	953		276		46		260		81		—
Total liabilities	Ps.	6,161	Ps.	1,783	Ps.	427	Ps.	4,892	Ps.	1,401	Ps.	314
Net accumulated asset	Ps.	3,345	Ps.	942	Ps.	398	Ps.	3,443	Ps.	985	Ps.	426
Deferred tax, net					Ps.	1,340					Ps.	1,411

As discussed in Note 27, as of January 1, 2010 and up to December 31, 2012, the applicable income tax rate is 30% and it will be 29% in 2013. Pursuant to the provisions of NIF D-4, “Incomes Taxes”, and INIF 8, “Effects of the Business Flat Tax”, based on financial forecasts, the Financial Group adjusted their balances based on the rates likely to be in effect at the time of their recovery. Additionally, they made forecasts for the IETU and compared it to ISR, and concluded that they will continue to pay ISR. Thus no change was made to the deferred tax calculations.

Banorte USA’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability method. According to this method, the net asset of deferred taxes is determined based on the tax effects of temporary differences between the book and tax base of assets and liabilities. Due to the consolidation of Banorte USA, a net amount of Ps. 38 was added to deferred taxes determined at a rate of 35% as per the tax law of the USA.

18 - OTHER ASSETS

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, other assets are as follows:

	2010			2009
Plan assets held for employee pension plans and savings fund	Ps.	5,303		Ps.	4,255
Other amortizable expenses	2,343			2,200
Accumulated amortization of other expenses	(188		)	(93		)
Goodwill	2,950			3,121
	Ps.	10,408		Ps.	9,483

As of December 31, 2010, the balance of the investments related to provisions for staff pensions and savings fund, is comprised of Ps. 3,827, which corresponds to the defined benefit pension plan, seniority premiums and medical expenses for retirees, Ps. 1,283 for the voluntary defined contribution plan “secure your future” and Ps. 193 for the savings fund. As of December 31, 2009, this balance is comprised of Ps. 3,115 for the defined benefit pension plan, seniority premiums and medical expenses for retirees and Ps. 1,140 for the voluntary defined contribution plan “secure your future” (see Note 23).

F-135

As of December 31, 2010, goodwill was Ps. 2,950 and was comprised of the following: Ps. 28 for the purchase of Banorte Generali, S.A. de C.V., AFORE; Ps. 2,682 for the purchase of INB and Ps. 240 for the purchase of Uniteller. As of December 31, 2009, the goodwill was Ps. 3,121 and was comprised as follows: Ps. 29 for the purchase of Banorte Generali, S.A. de C.V., AFORE; Ps. 2,838 for the purchase of INB; and Ps. 254 for the purchase of Uniteller. As mentioned in Note 4, goodwill is not amortized and is subject to annual impairment tests. No impairment to goodwill value was noted as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.

19 - DEPOSITS

Liquidity Coefficient

The “Investment regime for transactions in foreign currency and conditions to be fulfilled during the term of transactions in such currency”, designed for credit institutions by Banco de México, establishes the mechanism for determining the liquidity coefficient of liabilities denominated in foreign currency.

In accordance with such regime, during 2010 and 2009 the Financial Group generated a liquidity requirement of USD 498,373 thousand and USD 755,917 thousand, respectively, and held investments in liquid assets of USD 1,069,131 thousand and USD 1,230,740 thousand, representing a surplus of USD 570,758 thousand and USD 474,823 thousand, respectively.

Deposits

The liabilities derived from traditional deposits are made up as follows:

	2010		2009
Immediately due and payable deposits
Checking accounts earning no interest:
Cash deposits	Ps.	65,583	Ps.	59,334
Checking accounts in US dollars for individual residents of the Mexican border	637		662
Demand deposits accounts	5,125		4,142
Checking accounts earning interest:
Other bank checking deposit	34,178		35,395
Savings accounts	262		268
Checking accounts in US dollars for individual residents of the Mexican border	1,615		2,055
Demand deposits accounts	42,417		35,705
IPAB checking accounts	—		20
	Ps.	149,817	Ps.	137,581

	2010		2009
Time deposits
General public:
Fixed term deposits	Ps.	25,299	Ps.	25,711
Over the counter investments	43,677		49,156
Promissory note with interest payable at maturity (PRLV) primary market for individuals	61,835		57,819
PRLV primary market for business entities	1,644		1,195
Foreign residents deposits	28		83
Provision for interest	190		177
	132,673		134,141
Money market:
Fixed-term deposits	2,648		459
Over the counter promissory notes	2,208		1,430
Provision for interest	1,491		1,297
	6,347		3,186
	139,020		137,327
Senior debt issued	3,778		—
	Ps.	292,615	Ps.	274,908

F-136

The funding rates which the Financial Group uses as reference are: a) for Mexican pesos, Interbank Interest Rate (TIIE), Average Cost of Funds (CCP) and; b) for foreign currency, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).

These liabilities incur interest depending on the type of instrument and average balance held in the investments. The average interest rates and their currency of reference are shown below:

Immediately due and payable deposits:

	2010								2009
Foreign exchange	1Q		2Q		3Q		4Q		1Q		2Q		3Q		4Q
Mexican pesos and UDIs	0.56	%	0.62	%	0.61	%	0.57	%	0.99	%	0.73	%	0.60	%	0.59	%
Foreign currency	0.03	%	0.03	%	0.03	%	0.03	%	0.05	%	0.04	%	0.03	%	0.03	%
Banorte USA (INB)
Demand deposits accounts	0.18	%	0.14	%	0.07	%	0.12	%	0.19	%	0.09	%	0.12	%	0.13	%
Money market	0.94	%	0.92	%	0.78	%	0.81	%	1.47	%	1.30	%	1.06	%	1.04	%

Time deposits:

	2010								2009
Foreign exchange	1Q		2Q		3Q		4Q		1Q		2Q		3Q		4Q
General public
Mexican pesos and UDIs	3.52	%	3.55	%	3.62	%	3.37	%	5.68	%	4.45	%	3.55	%	3.50	%
Foreign currency	0.84	%	0.91	%	0.80	%	0.69	%	0.91	%	0.79	%	0.90	%	0.79	%
Money market	7.66	%	6.53	%	7.06	%	7.32	%	8.59	%	7.54	%	5.72	%	6.61	%
Banorte USA (INB)	2.76	%	2.76	%	2.61	%	2.39	%	3.84	%	3.56	%	3.19	%	2.95	%

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the terms at which these deposits are traded are as follows:

	2010
	From 1 to 179 days		From 6 to 12 months		More than 1 year		Total
General public
Fixed-term deposits	Ps.	14,879	Ps.	6,062	Ps.	4,358	Ps.		25,299
Over the counter investments	43,614		63		—		43,677
PRLV primary market for individuals	61,345		433		57		61,835
PRLV primary market for business entities	1,610		32		2		1,644
Foreign resident deposits	20		2		6		28
Provision for interest	174		15		1		190
	121,642		6,607		4,424		132,673
Money market:
Fixed-term deposits	—		—		2,648		2,648
Over the counter promissory notes	—		—		2,208		2,208
Provision for interest	—		4		1,487		1,491
	—		4		6,343		6,347
Senior debt issued	—		—		3,778		3,778
	Ps.	121,642	Ps.	6,611	Ps.	14,545	Ps.	142,798

F-137

	2009
	From 1 to 179 days		From 6 to 12 months		More than 1 year		Total
General public
Fixed-term deposits	Ps.	15,740	Ps.	6,972	Ps.	2,999	Ps.	25,711
Over the counter investments	49,105		51		—		49,156
PRLV primary market for individuals	57,337		418		64		57,819
PRLV primary market for business entities	1,170		25		—		1,195
Foreign residents deposits	20		20		43		83
Provision for interest	162		13		2		177
	123,534		7,499		3,108		134,141
Money market:
Fixed-term deposits	—		—		459		459
Over the counter promissory notes	—		—		1,430		1,430
Provision for interest	—		11		1,286		1,297
	—		11		3,175		3,186
	Ps.	123,534	Ps.	7,510	Ps.	6,283	Ps.	137,327

20 - INTERBANK AND OTHER LOANS

The loans received from other banks as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

	Mexican pesos				Denominated in US dollars				Total
	2010		2009		2010		2009		2010		2009
Immediately due
Domestic banks (Call money)	Ps.	4,837	Ps.	21	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	4,837	Ps.	21
	4,837		21		—		—		4,837		21
Short-term:
Banco de México	250		—		—		1,964		250		1,964
Commercial banking	326		204		321		220		647		424
Development banking	6,747		6,233		1,211		1,593		7,958		7,826
Public trusts	3,977		2,801		192		314		4,169		3,115
Provision for interest	87		54		3		2		90		56
	11,387		9,292		1,727		4,093		13,114		13,385
Long-term
Commercial banking	1,524		895		1,284		1,439		2,808		2,334
Development banking	2,421		1,553		267		319		2,688		1,872
Public trusts	2,825		3,236		173		116		2,998		3,352
Provision for interest	—		—		2		4		2		4
	6,770		5,684		1,726		1,878		8,496		7,562
	Ps.	22,994	Ps.	14,997	Ps.	3,453	Ps.	5,971	Ps.	26,447	Ps.	20,968

These liabilities incur interest depending on the type of instrument and average balance of the loans.

F-138

The average interest rates are shown below:

	2010								2009
Foreign exchange	1Q		2Q		3Q		4Q		1Q		2Q		3Q		4Q
Call money
Mexican pesos and UDIs	4.44	%	4.63	%	4.43	%	4.48	%	7.52	%	5.53	%	4.53	%	4.46	%
Other bank loans
Mexican pesos and UDIs	6.01	%	5.55	%	5.56	%	5.59	%	7.61	%	6.51	%	5.66	%	5.48	%
Foreign currency	1.30	%	1.67	%	1.79	%	1.84	%	3.00	%	2.04	%	1.30	%	0.92	%

Banorte USA liabilities accrue interest at an average rate of 4.09% and 1.91% as of December 2010 and 2009, respectively. Moreover, the Arrendadora y Factor Banorte, S.A. de C.V. loans accrue an average interest rate of 6.59% and 6.46% in Mexican pesos and 2.39% and 2.86% in U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

21 - SUNDRY CREDITORS AND OTHER PAYABLES

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the balance of sundry creditors and other payables is as follows:

	2010		2009
Cashier and certified checks and other negotiable instruments	Ps.	1,001	Ps.	796
Provision for employee retirement obligations	3,333		2,773
Provisions for other obligations	2,691		2,291
Other	2,846		3,108
	Ps.	9,871	Ps.	8,968

22 - EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

The Financial Group recognizes the liabilities for pension plans and seniority premium using the projected unit credit method, which considers the benefits accrued at the balance sheet date and the benefits generated during the year.

The amount of current and projected benefits as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, related to the defined benefit pension plan, seniority premiums and retiree medical coverage, determined by independent actuaries, is analyzed below:

	2010
	Pension plan			Seniority premiums			Medical services			Total
Projected benefit obligation (PBO)	Ps.	(778	)	Ps.	(174	)	Ps.	(1,782	)	Ps.	(2,734	)
Fund market value	1,281			306			2,240			3,827
Funded status	503			132			458			1,093
Transition asset (obligation)	15			(7		)	164			172
Unrecognized prior service cost	2			(2		)	—			—
Unrecognized actuarial losses	277			7			564			848
Net projected asset	Ps.	797		Ps.	130		Ps.	1,186		Ps.	2,113

F-139

	2009
	Pension plan			Seniority premiums			Medical services			Total
Projected benefit obligation (PBO)	Ps.	(725	)	Ps.	(149	)	Ps.	(1,633	)	Ps.	(2,507	)
Fund market value	1,125			269			1,749			3,143
Funded status	400			120			116			636
Transition asset (obligation)	22			(10		)	246			258
Unrecognized prior service cost	2			(3		)	—			(1		)
Unrecognized actuarial losses	217			4			488			709
Net projected asset	Ps.	641		Ps.	111		Ps.	850		Ps.	1,602

The Financial Group has a net prepayment (net prepaid asset) of Ps. 3 generated by transferring personnel from Sólida Administradora de Portafolios, S.A. de C.V. (Sólida) to Banorte. Moreover, as of December 31, 2010, a separate fund amounting to Ps. 3,827, (Ps. 3,143 in 2009) has been set aside to meet the above-mentioned obligations, in accordance with NIF D-3 and is recorded under “Other assets”.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the net periodic pension cost is as follows:

	2010			2009
Service cost	Ps.	103		Ps.	95
Interest cost	227			197
Expected return on plan assets	(316		)	(274		)
Amortizations of unrecognized items:
Transition obligation	86			86
Variations in assumptions	30			27
Net periodic pension cost	Ps.	130		Ps.	131

The rates used in the calculation of the projected benefit obligation and return on plan assets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, are shown below:

Concept	2010Nominal		2009Nominal
Discount rate	8.75	%	9.25	%
Rate of wage increase	4.50	%	4.50	%
Rate of increase in costs and expenses of other postretirement benefits	n/a		5.57	%
Long-term inflation rate	3.50	%	3.50	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of the Banorte Brokerage House	10.25	%	10.25	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets	8.75	%	10.00	%

The liability for severance indemnities due to causes other than restructuring, which was also determined by independent actuaries, is comprised as follows:

Concept	2010			2009
Defined and projected benefit obligations	Ps.	(171	)	Ps.	(158	)
Transition obligation	41			62
Net projected liability	Ps.	(130	)	Ps.	(96	)

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the net periodic pension cost is as follows:

Concept	2010		2009
Service cost	Ps.	26	Ps.	27
Interest cost	12		12
Transition obligation	21		21
Variations in assumptions	14		8
Net periodic pension cost	Ps.	73	Ps.	68

F-140

The balance of the employee retirement obligations presented in this Note refers to the Financial Group’s defined benefit pension plan for those employees who remain enrolled.

The labor obligations derived from the defined contribution pension plan do not require an actuarial valuation as established in NIF D-3, because the cost of this plan is equivalent to the Financial Group’s contributions made to the plan. Moreover, this pension plan maintains a fund as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, equivalent to Ps. 1,283 and Ps. 1,140, respectively, which is recorded under “Other assets” and is equivalent to the recorded plan liability.

23 - SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the subordinated debentures in circulation are as follows:

	2010		2009
Preferred subordinated, nonconvertible debentures, maturing in April 2016, denominated in US dollars, at an interest rate of 6.135%, payable semiannually with a final principal payment at maturity (10-year term)	Ps.	4,940	Ps.	5,226
Non preferred subordinated nonconvertible debentures (Q BANORTE 08 debentures), maturing in February 2018, paying interest at the 28-day TIIE rate plus 0.60%.	3,000		3,000
Preferred subordinated nonconvertible debentures (Q BANORTE 08-2), maturing in June 2018, paying interest at the 28-day TIIE rate plus 0.77%.	2,750		2,750
Preferred subordinated nonconvertible debentures, BANORTE 09 maturing in March 2019, paying interest at the 28-day TIIE rate plus 2%, payable in 130 periods of 28 days each.	2,200		2,200
Nonpreferred subordinated nonconvertible debentures, maturing in April 2021, denominated in US dollars, at an interest rate of 6.862%, payable semiannually with a final principal payment at maturity (15-year term).	2,470		2,613
Preferred subordinated nonconvertible debentures, Q BANORTE 08-U maturing in February 2028, paying interest at a 4.95% annual rate.	2,024		1,941
Subordinated debentures, maturing in June 2034, denominated in US dollars, at a 3-months LIBOR interest rate plus 2.75%.	127		135
Preferred subordinated debentures maturing in April 2034, denominated in US dollars, at a 3-months LIBOR interest rate plus 2.72%.	127		135
Accrued interest	165		168
	Ps.	17,803	Ps.	18,168

The costs related to these debentures are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the debt. The amortization charged to results was Ps. 6 and Ps. 8 in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

24 - TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES WITH NON-CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES AND ASSOCIATED COMPANIES

The balances and transactions with subsidiaries and associated companies as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, are as follows:

	Revenues						Accounts receivable
Institution	2010		2009		2008		2010		2009
Seguros Banorte Generali, S. A. de C. V.	Ps.	650	Ps.	598	Ps.	613	Ps.	29	Ps.	9

	Expenses						Accounts payable
Institution	2010		2009		2008		2010		2009
Seguros Banorte Generali, S. A. de C. V.	Ps.	251	Ps.	101	Ps.	300	Ps.	19	Ps.	5

All balances and transactions with the subsidiaries indicated in Note 3 have been eliminated in consolidation.

F-141

Pursuant to article 73 of the LIC (Credit Institutions Law), the loans granted by Banorte to any related party cannot exceed 50% of the basic portion of their net capital. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the amount of the loans granted to related parties is Ps. 8,772 and Ps. 7,362, respectively, representing 47.1% and 46.2%, respectively, of the limit established by the LIC.

Loan portfolio sales

Sale of loan portfolio packages between related parties (nominal values)

In February 2003 Banorte sold Ps. 1,925 of its proprietary portfolio (with interest) to its subsidiary Sólida at a price of Ps. 378. Of this transaction, Ps. 1,891 was related to past-due amounts and Ps. 64 to the performing portfolio. The transaction was recorded based on figures as of August 2002, and therefore the final amount affecting the February 2003 balance sheet was Ps. 1,856, considering the collections made since August 2002. In conjunction with the loan portfolio sold, Ps. 1,577 of the associated allowance for loan losses was transferred as well.

In official letter 601-II-323110 dated November 5, 2003, the Commission established the accounting criteria to be applied to this transaction and issued a series of rulings whereby Banorte must provide detailed information on the activities of this transaction throughout its duration, in the understanding that this transaction was a one-time event and not a recurring portfolio transfer procedure.

Pursuant to the foregoing, below is a summary of the activity of the loan portfolio sold to Sólida since August 2002 and for the years of 2009 and 2010:

	Mexican pesos						Foreign currency						Total
Type of portfolio	Aug 02		Dec 09		Dec 10		Aug 02		Dec 09		Dec 10		Aug 02		Dec 09		Dec 10
Performing loan portfolio
Commercial	Ps.	5	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	5	Ps.	—	Ps.		Ps.	10	Ps.	—	Ps.	—
Mortgage	54		27		20		—		—		—		54		27		20
Total	59		27		20		5		—		—		64		27		20
Past-due portfolio
Commercial	405		361		331		293		110		104		698		471		435
Consumer	81		72		72		—		—		—		81		72		72
Mortgage	1,112		350		323		—		—		—		1,112		350		323
Total	1,598		783		726		293		110		104		1,891		893		830
Total portfolio	Ps.	1,657	Ps.	810	Ps.	746	Ps.	298	Ps.	110	Ps.	104	Ps.	1,955	Ps.	920	Ps.	850
Allowance for loan losses(1)
Commercial	326		349		318		246		110		104		572		459		422
Consumer	77		72		72		—		—		—		77		72		72
Mortgage	669		336		313		—		—		—		669		336		313
Total allowance for loan losses	Ps.	1,072	Ps.	757	Ps.	703	Ps.	246	Ps.	110	Ps.	104	Ps.	1,318	Ps.	867	Ps.	807

(1) Allowances required based on the classification methodology applied in Banorte that maintained a 99.99% equity interest in Sólida during 2010 and 2009.

F-142

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the composition of the Banorte’s loan portfolio, including the loan portfolio sold to Sólida, is as follows:

	Mexican pesos				Foreign Currency				Total
Type of portfolio	Dec 10		Dec 09		Dec 10		Dec 09		Dec 10			Dec 09
Commercial loans	Ps.	148,786	Ps.	133,823	Ps.	13,330	Ps.	11,316	Ps.	162,116		Ps.	145,139
Consumer loans	27,637		25,525		—		—		27,637			25,525
Mortgage loans	54,013		47,378		—		—		54,013			47,378
Performing loan portfolio	230,436		206,726		13,330		11,316		243,766			218,042
Commercial loans	3,954		2,583		252		150		4,206			2,733
Consumer loans	1,348		2,014		—		—		1,348			2,014
Mortgage loans	1,025		1,151		—		—		1,025			1,151
Past-due portfolio	6,327		5,748		252		150		6,579			5,898
Total portfolio	236,763		212,474		13,582		11,466		250,345			223,940
Allowance for loan losses	8,131		7,425		297		384		8,428			7,809
Net portfolio	Ps.	228,632	Ps.	205,049	Ps.	13,285	Ps.	11,082	Ps.	241,917		Ps.	216,131
Allowance for loan losses									128.10		%	132.40		%
% of past-due portfolio									2.63		%	2.63		%

25 - INFORMATION BY SEGMENT

The main operations and balances per concept and/or business segment in the general balance sheet and the statement of income are comprised as follows:

a. The balances by service sector of the Financial Group, without considering the eliminations relative to the consolidation of the financial statements, are as follows:

	2010			2009			2008
Banking sector:
Net income	Ps.	6,035		Ps.	5,132		Ps.	6,543
Stockholders’ equity	44,316			40,348			35,526
Total portfolio	257,957			234,878			236,236
Past-due portfolio	6,523			6,051			4,836
Allowance for loan losses	(7,955		)	(7,358		)	(6,582		)
Total net assets	564,386			548,560			562,433
Brokerage sector:
Net income	403			203			183
Stockholders’ equity	1,883			1,396			1,143
Portfolio balance	174,068			135,621			119,286
Total net assets	10,169			5,273			1,662
Savings sector:
Net income	903			772			579
Stockholders’ equity	5,244			4,727			4,216
Total net assets	40,993			32,026			27,789
Other finance companies sector:
Net Income	500			425			336
Stockholders’ equity	2,136			1,631			1,308
Total portfolio	15,884			13,461			13,913
Past-due portfolio	141			103			74
Allowance for loan losses	(289		)	(177		)	(79		)
Total net assets	Ps.	16,456		Ps.	13,645		Ps.	14,322

F-143

b. The trading results for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

	2010			2009
Valuation results
Trading securities	Ps.	46		Ps.	(17	)
Repurchase or resale agreement	30			(156		)
Derivative financial instruments	382			20
Total valuation results	458			(153		)
Purchase-sale results
Trading securities	455			318
Available for sale securities	214			23
Derivative financial instruments	(143		)	180
Total securities purchase sale	526			521
Spot foreign currency	690			731
Foreign currency forwards	(1		)	154
Foreign currency futures	(2		)	(1		)
Foreign currency valuation	3			(20		)
Minted metals purchase sales	3			4
Minted metals valuation	12			8
Total foreign currency purchase sale	705			876
Total purchase sale results	1,231			1,397
Total trading results	Ps.	1,689		Ps.	1,244

c. The performing loan portfolio, grouped by economic sector and geographical location, is as follows:

	2010
	Geographical location
Economic sector	North		Central		West		South		Total
Agriculture	Ps.	2,473	Ps.	1,094	Ps.	741	Ps.	911	Ps.	5,219
Mining	354		176		19		19		568
Manufacturing	7,830		5,014		1,459		635		14,938
Construction	5,346		7,433		557		2,023		15,359
Public utilities	35		293		2		1		331
Commerce	12,157		10,412		3,493		6,103		32,165
Transportation	1,174		5,062		123		253		6,612
Financial services	8,302		9,233		198		1,300		19,033
Communal, social services	6,680		5,234		1,520		417		13,851
Business groups	9		364		6		5		384
Public administration and services	24,164		16,189		2,188		4,901		47,442
International organization services	2		—		—		—		2
INB	—		—		—		—		9,232
Credit card	—		—		—		—		11,159
Consumer	—		—		—		—		16,668
Mortgage	—		—		—		—		56,168
Other	—		—		—		—		105
Arrendadora y Factor Banorte	—		—		—		—		14,314
Performing loan portfolio	Ps.	68,526	Ps.	60,504	Ps.	10,306	Ps.	16,568	Ps.	263,550

F-144

	2009
	Geographical location
Economic sector	North		Central		West		South		Total
Agriculture	Ps.	2,314	Ps.	1,167	Ps.	581	Ps.	732	Ps.	4,794
Mining	347		18		14		13		392
Manufacturing	7,872		4,725		1,661		688		14,946
Construction	6,042		6,236		546		1,828		14,652
Public utilities	43		252		2		1		298
Commerce	10,543		7,241		3,307		6,031		27,122
Transportation	1,308		6,173		105		269		7,855
Financial services	8,975		11,280		130		1,473		21,858
Communal, social services	2,524		4,242		1,514		369		8,649
Business groups	12		457		2		6		477
Public administration and services	21,403		12,938		2,070		2,516		38,927
INB	—		—		—		—		14,100
Credit card	—		—		—		—		11,801
Consumer	—		—		—		—		13,726
Mortgage	—		—		—		—		47,351
Other	—		—		—		—		54
Arrendadora y Factor Banorte	—		—		—		—		11,952
Performing loan portfolio	Ps.	61,383	Ps.	54,729	Ps.	9,932	Ps.	13,926	Ps.	238,954

d. The past-due loan portfolio, grouped by economic sector and geographical location, is summarized as follows:

	2010
	Geographical location
Economic sector	North		Central		West		South		Total
Agriculture	Ps.	261	Ps.	125	Ps.	46	Ps.	24	Ps.	456
Mining	5		—		1		1		7
Manufacturing	107		250		63		38		458
Construction	297		104		12		21		434
Commerce	329		231		148		159		867
Transportation	17		1,318		8		11		1,354
Financial services	10		13		—		1		24
Communal, social services	45		50		44		30		169
Business groups	—		—		—		1		1
INB	—		—		—		—		505
Credit card	—		—		—		—		1,040
Consumer	—		—		—		—		236
Mortgage	—		—		—		—		971
Arrendadora y Factor Banorte	—		—		—		—		142
Past-due loan portfolio	Ps.	1,071	Ps.	2,091	Ps.	322	Ps.	286	Ps.	6,664

F-145

	2009
	Geographical location
Economic sector	North		Central		West		South		Total
Agriculture	Ps.	77	Ps.	129	Ps.	33	Ps.	20	Ps.	259
Mining	2		3		1		7		13
Manufacturing	121		175		73		46		415
Construction	89		105		12		27		233
Commerce	363		298		147		195		1,003
Transportation	41		27		13		19		100
Financial services	8		15		1		6		30
Communal, social services	74		49		47		37		207
Business groups	1		—		—		—		1
INB	—		—		—		—		1,047
Credit card	—		—		—		—		1,610
Consumer	—		—		—		—		332
Mortgage	—		—		—		—		801
Arrendadora y Factor Banorte	—		—		—		—		103
Past-due loan portfolio	Ps.	776	Ps.	801	Ps.	327	Ps.	357	Ps.	6,154

e. Deposit accounts grouped by product and geographical location are as follows:

	2010
	Geographical location
Product	Monterrey		Mexico City		West		Northwest		Southeast		Treasury and other		Foreign		Total
Non-interest bearing checking accounts	Ps.	14,964	Ps.	22,000	Ps.	6,992	Ps.	8,876	Ps.	7,873	Ps.	89	Ps.	—	Ps.	60,794
Interest-bearing checking accounts	7,532		26,293		4,093		6,041		7,580		166		—		51,705
Savings accounts	1		1		—		—		—		—		—		2
Current account in pesos and preestablished	4,042		5,983		1,612		3,024		2,840		138		—		17,639
Non-interest bearing demand deposits, USD	1,611		818		212		1,177		266		-0		4,435		8,519
Interest bearing demand deposits, USD	2,258		1,398		465		2,038		218		-0		4,520		10,897
Savings accounts in USD	—		—		—		—		—		—		258		258
Over the counter promissory notes	12,623		26,581		6,843		7,551		9,881		1,754		—		65,233
Time deposits, USD	3,307		3,737		1,525		2,307		688		16		13,747		25,327
Money desk customers	17,416		15,940		5,076		3,745		4,001		150		—		46,328
Financial intermediaries	—		—		—		—		—		2,208		3,705		5,913
Total deposits	Ps.	63,754	Ps.	102,751	Ps.	26,818	Ps.	34,759	Ps.	33,347	Ps.	4,521	Ps.	26,665	Ps.	292,615

F-146

	2009
	Geographical location
Product	Monterrey		Mexico City		West		Northwest		Southeast		Treasury and other		Foreign		Total
Non-interest bearing checking accounts	Ps.	13,209	Ps.	19,770	Ps.	5,845	Ps.	7,773	Ps.	7,963	Ps.	70	Ps.	—	Ps.	54,630
Interest-bearing checking accounts	6,417		23,033		4,041		6,192		8,039		162		—		47,884
Savings accounts	1		1		—		—		—		—		—		2
Current account in pesos and preestablished	3,449		5,232		1,492		2,733		2,556		122		—		15,584
Non-interest bearing demand deposits, USD	834		848		199		1,085		221		—		3,694		6,881
Interest bearing demand deposits, USD	2,454		1,570		577		2,463		238		—		5,012		12,314
Savings accounts in USD	—		—		—		—		—		—		265		265
Over the counter promissory notes	11,362		25,040		6,358		7,245		9,009		1,474		—		60,488
Time deposits, USD	3,328		4,095		1,775		2,255		897		17		13,427		25,794
Money desk customers	19,366		14,858		6,953		4,588		2,877		127		—		48,769
Financial intermediaries	—		—		—		—		—		2,277		—		2,277
FOBAPROA checking accounts bearing interest	20		—		—		—		—		—		—		20
Total deposits	Ps.	60,440	Ps.	94,447	Ps.	27,240	Ps.	34,334	Ps.	31,800	Ps.	4,249	Ps.	22,398	Ps.	274,908

26 - TAX ENVIRONMENT

In 2010 and 2009 the Financial Group was subject to ISR and IETU.

Income tax

Income tax (ISR) is calculated considering as taxable or deductible certain inflation effects; as of until December 31, 2010 and 2009, the ISR rate was 30% and 28%, respectively. On December 7, 2009, the decree was published reforming, adding and repealing various provisions of the Income Tax Law that went into effect on January 1, 2010. Temporary provisions were established through which the income tax rate from 2011 to 2012 will be 30%; 29% for 2013 and 28% for 2014.

Book to tax reconciliation

The principal items affecting the determination of the current tax expense of the Financial Group were the annual adjustment for inflation, the nondeductible amount of the allowance for loan losses that was over 2.5% of the average loan portfolio and the valuation of financial instruments.

PTU

The Financial Group determine employee statutory profit sharing based on the criteria established in the guidelines set forth by the Mexican Constitution.

Business Flat Tax

Revenues, as well as deductions and certain tax credits, are determined based on cash flows generated for each period. The rate is 17.5% and 17.0% for 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Asset Tax Law was repealed upon enactment of LIETU; however, under certain circumstances, asset taxes paid in the ten years prior to the year in which ISR is paid, may be refunded, according to the terms of the law.  As of December 31, 2010, the Financial Group has no recoverable asset taxes.

Based on financial projections, pursuant to the provisions in INIF-8, the Financial Group found that it will essentially pay ISR, therefore acknowledging only the deferred ISR.

F-147

27 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

At the Stockholders’ Ordinary General Meeting held on April 23, 2010, the resolution was adopted to transfer the profits of 2009 equal to Ps. 5,854 to the account “earnings from prior years”.

At the Stockholders’ Ordinary General Meetings held on February 15, 2010, April 23, 2010 and October 4, 2010, the resolution was adopted to declare cash dividends of Ps. 343 on each of said dates.

The Financial Group’s shareholders’ common stock as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is comprised as follows:

	Number of shares with a nominal value of Ps. 3.50
	2010	2009	2008
“O” Series	2,018,347,548	2,017,847,548	2,013,997,548

	Historical Amounts
	2010		2009		2008
“O” Series	Ps.	7,016	Ps.	7,000	Ps.	6,986
Restatement in Mexican pesos through December 2007	4,955		4,956		4,955
	Ps.	11,971	Ps.	11,956	Ps.	11,941

Restrictions on profits

Stockholders’ equity distribution, except restated paid-in capital and tax retained earnings, will be subject to a tax payable by the Financial Group at the rate in effect when the dividend is distributed. Any tax paid on such distribution may be credited against the income tax payable of the year in which the tax on the dividend is paid and the two fiscal years following such payment against the year’s tax and its partial payments.

The Financial Group’s net profit is subject to the requirement that at least 5% of net income of each year be transferred to the legal reserve until the reserve equals 20% of capital stock at par value. The legal reserve may not be distributed to the stockholders during the life of the Financial Group, except in the form of a stock dividend. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the legal reserve is Ps. 3,181 and Ps. 2,444, respectively, and represents 27% and 20% of paid-in capital, respectively.

Capitalization ratio (pertaining to Banorte, the Financial Group’s main subsidiary)

The capitalization rules for financial institutions establish requirements for specific levels of net capital, as a percentage of assets subject to both market and credit risk.

The information as of December 31, 2010 sent to Banco de México to review is shown below.

·The capitalization ratio of Banorte as of December 31, 2010 was 16.12% of total risk (market, credit and operational), and 23.68% of credit risk, which in both cases exceed the current regulatory requirements.

F-148

·The amount of net capital, divided by basic and complementary capital, is detailed below (these figures may differ from those in the basic financial statements):

Net capital as of December 31, 2010

Stockholders’ equity	Ps.	44,306
Subordinated debentures and capitalization instruments	5,135
Deduction of investment in securitized instruments	(446		)
Deduction of investments in shares of financial entities	(6,124		)
Deduction of investments in shares of non-financial entities	(3,238		)
Deduction of intangibles and deferred expenses or costs	(264		)
Basic capital	39,369
Debentures and capitalization instruments	12,413
Allowance for loan losses	1,285
Deduction of investment in securitized instruments	(446		)
Complementary capital	13,252
Net capital	Ps.	52,621

Characteristics of the subordinated debentures:

Concept	Issuance amount		Maturity	Basic capital proportion		Complementary capital proportion
Complementary capital debentures 2006	Ps.	5,006	13/10/2016	0	%	100	%
Basic capital debentures 2006	Ps.	2,507	13/10/2021	100	%	0	%
Basic capital debentures 2008	Ps.	3,008	27/02/2018	87	%	13	%
Complementary capital debentures 2008	Ps.	2,056	15/02/2028	0	%	100	%
Complementary capital debentures 2008-2	Ps.	2,760	15/06/2018	0	%	100	%
Complementary capital debentures 2009	Ps.	2,211	18/03/2019	0	%	100	%

Assets subject to risk are detailed below:

Assets subject to market risk

Concept	Positions weighted by risk		Capital requirement
Transactions in Mexican pesos with nominal interest rate	Ps.	47,037	Ps.	3,763
Transactions with debt instruments in Mexican pesos with variable interest rates	10,374		830
Transactions in Mexican pesos with real interest rates or denominated in UDIS	1,802		144
Transactions in UDIS or with yields referenced to the National Consumer Price Index (INPC)	2		—
Transactions in Mexican pesos with nominal interest rates	4,700		376
Exchange transactions	1,604		129
Total	Ps.	65,519	Ps.	5,242

F-149

Assets subject to credit risk

Concept	Assets weighted by risk		Capital requirement
Group III (weighted at 10%)	Ps.	13	Ps.	1
Group III (weighted at 11.5%)	1		—
Group III (weighted at 20%)	11,451		916
Group III (weighted at 23%)	483		39
Group III (weighted at 50%)	2,226		178
Group III (weighted at 57.5%)	608		48
Group III (weighted at 100%)	150		12
Group IV (weighted at 20%)	2,851		228
Group V (weighted at 20%)	7,282		583
Group V (weighted at 50%)	3,723		298
Group V (weighted at 150%)	4,899		392
Group VI (weighted at 50%)	6,445		515
Group VI (weighted at 75%)	5,608		449
Group VI (weighted at 100%)	59,100		4,728
Group VII (weighted at 20%)	845		68
Group VII (weighted at 50%)	99		8
Group VII (weighted at 100%)	72,788		5,823
Group VII (weighted at 115%)	7,556		604
Group VII (weighted at 150%)	635		51
Group VIII (weighted at 125%)	1,948		156
Group IX (weighted at 100%)	19,387		1,551
Sum	208,098		16,648
For permanent shares, furniture and real property, and advance payments and deferred charges	14,086		1,127
Total	Ps.	222,184	Ps.	17,775

Assets subject to credit risk:

Concept	Assets weighted by risk		Capital requirement
Total	Ps.	38,816	Ps.	3,105

28 - FOREIGN CURRENCY POSITION

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group holds certain assets and liabilities in foreign currency, mainly US dollars, converted to the exchange rate issued by Banco de México at Ps. 12.3496 and Ps. 13.0659 per USD 1.00, respectively, as shown below:

	Thousands of US dollars
	2010		2009
Assets	5,543,911		5,497,623
Liabilities	5,234,040		5,166,587
Net asset position in US dollars	309,871		331,036
Net asset position in Mexican pesos	Ps.	3,827	Ps.	4,325

F-150

29 - POSITION IN UDIS

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group holds certain assets and liabilities denominated in UDIS, converted to Mexican pesos based on the current equivalency of Ps. 4.526308 and Ps. 4.340166, per UDI, respectively, as shown below:

	Thousands of UDIS
	2010			2009
Assets	365,531			207,824
Liabilities	454,251			544,676
Net liability position in UDIS	(88,720		)	(336,852		)
Net liability position in Mexican pesos	Ps.	(402	)	Ps.	(1,462	)

30 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share is the result of dividing the net income by the weighted average of the Financial Group’s shares in circulation during the year.

Earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are shown below:

	2010					2009		2008
	Net Income		Weighted share average	Earnings per share		Earnings per share		Earnings per share
Net income per share	Ps.	6,705,043,285	2,018,257,560	Ps.	3.3222	Ps.	2.9021	Ps.	3.4775

31 - RISK MANAGEMENT (unaudited)

Authorized bodies

To ensure adequate risk management of the Financial Group, as of 1997, the Financial Group’s Board of Directors created the Risk Policy Committee (CPR), whose purpose is to manage the risks to which the Financial Group is exposed, and ensure that the performance of operations adheres to the established risk management objectives, guidelines, policies and procedures.

Furthermore, the CPR provides oversight on the global risk exposure limits approved by the Board of Directors, and also approves the specific risk limits for exposure to different types of risk.

The CPR is composed of regular members of the Board of Directors, the CEO of the Financial Group, the Managing of Comprehensive Risk Management, the Managing Director of Long Term Savings, and the Managing Director of the Brokerage House, as well as the Managing Director of Internal Audits, who has the right to speak but not to vote.

To adequately carry out its duties, the CPR performs the following functions, among others:

1.Propose for the approval of the Board of Directors:

·The objectives, guidelines and policies for comprehensive risk management

·The global limits for risk exposure

·The mechanisms for implementing corrective measures

·The special cases or circumstances in which the global and specific limits may be exceeded

F-151

2.    Approve and review at least once a year:

·The specific limits for discretionary risks, as well as tolerance levels for nondiscretionary risks

·The methodology and procedures to identify, measure, oversee, limit, control, report and disclose the different kinds of risks to which the Financial Group is exposed

·The models, parameters and scenarios used to perform the valuation, measurement and control of risks proposed by the Comprehensive Risk Management Unit

3.Approve:

·The methodologies for identification, valuation, measurement and control of risks of the new operations, products and services which the Financial Group intends to introduce into the market

·The corrective measures proposed by the Comprehensive Risk Management Unit

·The manuals for comprehensive risk management

4.Appoint and remove the person responsible for the Comprehensive Risk Management Unit, who is ratified by the Board of Directors.

5.Inform the Board, at least every quarter, of the exposure to risk and its possible negative effects, as well as follow up on limits and tolerance levels.

6.Inform the Board of the corrective measures implemented.

32 - COMPREHENSIVE RISK MANAGEMENT UNIT (UAIR) (unaudited, regarding Banorte, the Financial Group’s main subsidiary)

The function of the UAIR is to identify, measure, oversee, limit, control, report and disclose the different kinds of risk to which the Financial Group is exposed, and which is the responsibility of the Office of Risk Management (DGAR).

The DGAR reports to the CPR in compliance with the requirements set forth in the Commission’s circular, the “General Risk Management Rules Applicable to Credit Financial Groups”, in relation to the independence of the different business areas.

The DGAR focuses Comprehensive Risk Management efforts through six different departments:

·Operating and Credit Risk Management;

·Market Risk Management;

·Credit Management;

·Risk Policy Management;

·Consumer Loan Quality; and

·Risk Management Tools.

The Financial Group currently has methodologies for managing risk in its different phases, such as credit, market, liquidity and operating risk.

The primary objectives of the DGAR are summarized as follows:

·Provide the different business areas with clear rules that facilitate their understanding so as to minimize risks and ensure that they are within the parameters established and approved by the Board of Directors and the Risk Policy Committee.

·Establish mechanisms that provide for follow-up on risk-taking within the Financial Group, ensuring that they are preventive as much as possible, and supported by advanced systems and processes.

·Standardize risk measurement and control.

·Protect the Financial Group’s capital against unexpected losses from market movements, credit losses and operating risks.

·Develop valuation methods for the different types of risks.

F-152

·Establish procedures for portfolio optimization and loan portfolio management.

The Financial Group has segmented risk assessment and management into the following headings:

Credit Risk: Volatility of revenues due to the creation of provisions for impairment of credits and potential credit losses due to nonpayment by a borrower or counterpart.

Market Risk: Volatility of revenues due to changes in the market, which affect the valuation of the positions from operations involving assets, liabilities or generating contingent liabilities, such as: interest rates, exchange rates, price indexes, etc.

Liquidity Risk: Potential loss derived from the impossibility of renewing debts or contracting others under normal conditions for the Financial Group, due to the anticipated or forced sale of assets at unusual discounts to meet its obligations.

Operating Risk: Loss resulting from lack of adaptation or failure in processes, personnel, internal systems or external events. This definition includes Technological Risk and Legal Risk. Technological Risk groups includes all potential losses from damage, interruption, alteration or failures derived from the use of or dependence on hardware, software, systems, applications, networks and any other information distribution channel, while Legal Risk involves the potential loss from penalties for noncompliance with legal and administrative regulations or the issuance of adverse final court rulings in relation to the operations performed by the Financial Group.

Credit risk

Risk that the customers, issuers or counterparts will not comply with their payment obligations; therefore, adequate risk management is essential to maintain a high quality loan portfolio.

The Financial Group credit risk management objectives are as follows:

·Improve the quality, diversification and composition of the loan portfolio to optimize the risk-return ratio.

·Provide senior management with reliable and timely information to support decision-making in credit matters.

·Provide the business departments with clear and sufficient tools to support credit placement and follow up.

·Support the creation of economic value for shareholders by means of efficient credit risk management.

·Define and constantly update the regulatory framework for credit risk management.

·Comply with the credit risk management reporting requirements established by the relevant authorities.

·Perform risk management in accordance with best practices; implementing models, methodologies, procedures and systems based on the latest international advances.

Individual credit risk

The Financial Group segments the loan portfolio into two large groups: the consumer and corporate portfolios.

Individual credit risk for the consumer portfolio is identified, measured and controlled by means of a parametric system (scoring) which includes models for each of the consumer products: mortgage, automotive, payroll credit, personal and credit card.

Individual risk for the corporate portfolio is identified, measured and controlled by means of the Target Markets, the Risk Acceptance Criteria and the Banorte Internal Risk Rating (CIR Banorte).

The Target Markets and Risk Acceptance Criteria are tools which, together with the Internal Risk Rating CIR, form part of the credit strategy of the Financial Group and support the estimate of the credit risk level.

The Target Markets are activities selected by region and economic activity - supported by economic studies and portfolio behavior analyses - in which the Financial Group has interest to place loans.

The Risk Acceptance Criteria are parameters which describe the risks identified by industries, facilitating an estimate of the risk involved for the Financial Group in granting a credit to a customer depending on the economic activity which it performs. The types of risks evaluated in the Risk Acceptance Criteria are the financial risk,

F-153

operating risk, market risk, company lifecycle risk, legal and regulatory risk, credit history and quality of management.

Early Warnings are a set of criteria based on information and indicators of the borrowers and their environment that have been set forth for timely prevention and identification of likely impairment in the loan portfolio, in order to take credit risk mitigating preventive actions in a timely manner.

The CIR Banorte is in line with the “General Regulations Applicable to the Classification Methodology for the Loan Portfolio of Credit Institutions” issued by the Commission on December 2, 2005. The CIR Banorte has been certified by the Commission and by an international external auditor since 2001.

The CIR Banorte is applied to a commercial portfolio equal to or exceeding an amount equivalent in Mexican pesos to four million UDIS at the classification date.

Portfolio credit risk

The Financial Group has designed a portfolio credit risk methodology which, while also including the best and most current international practices with regard to identification, measurement, control and follow up, has been adapted to function within the context of the Mexican financial system.

The credit risk methodology identifies the exposure of all the loan portfolios of the Financial Group, overseeing risk concentration levels based on risk classifications, geographical regions, economic activities, currencies and type of product, for the purpose of ascertaining the portfolio profile and taking actions to diversify it and maximize profit with the lowest possible risk.

The calculation of loan exposure involves the generation of the cash flow from each of the loans, both in terms of principal and interest, for their subsequent discount. This exposure is sensitive to market changes, and facilitates the performance of calculations under different economic scenarios.

Apart from considering loan exposure, the methodology takes into account the probability of default, the recovery level associated with each customer and the sorting of the borrowers based on the Merton model. The probability of default is the probability that a borrower will not comply with its debt obligation to the Financial Group on the terms and conditions originally agreed. The probability of default is based on the transition matrixes which the Financial Group calculates as of the migration of the borrowers to different risk classification levels. The recovery level is the percentage of the total exposure that is expected to be recovered if the borrower defaults on its obligations. The sorting of the borrowers based on the Merton model is intended to tie the future behavior of the borrower to credit and market factors on which, using statistical techniques, the borrower’s “credit health” depends.

The primary results obtained are the expected loss and unexpected loss over a one-year time horizon. The expected loss is the median of the distribution of losses of the loan portfolio, which enables a measurement of the average loss expected in the following year due to noncompliance or variations in the credit status of the borrowers. The unexpected loss is an indicator of the loss expected under extreme circumstances, and is measured as the difference between the maximum loss based on the distribution of losses, at a specific confidence level, which in the case of the Financial Group is 95%, and the expected loss.

The results obtained are used as a tool for better decision-making in granting loans and portfolio diversification, in accordance with the global strategy of the Financial Group. The individual risk identification tools and the portfolio credit risk methodology are reviewed and updated periodically to incorporate new techniques that can support or strengthen them.

As of December 31, 2010, the total portfolio of the Financial Group is Ps. 249,495. The expected loss represents 2.2% and the unexpected loss represents 3.7% of the total operating portfolio. The average expected loss was 2.2% for the period between October and December 2010. As of December 31, 2009, the Financial Group’s total operating portfolio is Ps. 223,019. The expected loss represents 2.4% and the unexpected loss represents 3.9% of the total operating portfolio. The average expected loss was 2.5% for the period between October and December 2009.

F-154

Credit risk of financial instruments

There are specific policies for the origination, analysis, authorization and management of financial instruments to identify, measure, keep track and control credit risk.

The origination policies define the type of financial instruments to operate and how to evaluate the credit quality of different types of issuers and counterparts. Credit quality is assigned by means of a rating obtained by an internal methodology, external rating evaluations or a combination of both. Additionally, there are maximum operating parameters depending on the type of issuer or counterpart, rating and operation type.

Analysis policies include the type of information and variables considered to analyze operations with financial instruments when they’re presented for their authorization by the corresponding committee, including information about the issuer or counterpart, financial instrument, operation destination and market information.

The Credit Committee is the body that authorizes operation lines with financial instruments according to the authorization policies. The authorization request is submitted by the business area and the areas involved in the operation with all the relevant information to be analyzed and, if applicable, authorized by the Committee.

The financial instrument operating lines management policy contemplates the procedures for registration, instrumentation, regulation compliance, revision, consumer monitoring, line management and responsibility of the areas and bodies involved in operating financial instruments.

Concentrating loan risk with financial instruments is managed continuously on an individual level, monitoring maximum operation parameters per counter-party or issuer depending on the rating and type of operation. For portfolios there are economic and internal group risk diversification policies in place. Additionally, concentration is monitored by type of counter-party or issuer, size of the financial institutions and where they operate in order to get the right diversification and avoid unwanted concentrations.

Credit risk is measured by means of the rating associated with the issuer, issue or counterpart, which has an assigned degree of risk measured based on two elements:

1) The probability of delinquency by the issuer, issue or counterpart; expressed as a percentage between 0% and 100%. The higher the rating, the lower the probability of delinquency and vice versa.

2) The gravity of the loss with respect to the operation’s total in the event of noncompliance, expressed as a percentage between 0% and 100%. The better the guarantees or credit structure, the lower the severity of the loss and vice versa.

In order to mitigate credit risk and reduce the gravity of the loss in case of noncompliance, the Financial Group and counter-parts entered into ISDA contracts settling agreements, which contemplate implementing credit lines and using collateral to mitigate losses due to noncompliance.

As of December 31, 2010, the investment in securities exposure to credit risk is Ps. 200,026, of which 99.2% has a rating greater than or equal to A-(mex) on the local scale. This places them in investment grade and the three main issuers other than the Federal Government, Semi-Private agencies and Domestic Financial Institutions represent 20% of the basic capital as of September 2010. Additionally, the investment exposure with the same issuer other than the Federal Government that represents a concentration greater than or equal to 5% of the net capital as of September 2010 has a rating of at least AA+(mex) and is made up of (term and weighted average interest rate): 6-month Bancomer stock certificates for Ps. 11,580 at 5.0%; 4-month Inbursa stock certificates and bonds for Ps. 9,772 at 4.8%; 5-year 8-month certificates of deposit of Pemex for Ps. 7,347 at 4.7%; and 26-year 5-month State and Municipal Governments securitized loan certificates for Ps. 4,085 at 4.9%.

For derivatives, the exposure is (Ps. 3,045), of which 99.9% is rated at least A-(mex) on the local scale, which places them at an investment grade and the three main counterparts other than the Federal Government, Semi-Private agencies and Domestic Financial Institutions represent 3% of the basic capital as of September 2010.

F-155

As of December 31, 2009, the investment in securities exposure to credit risk is Ps. 213,274, of which 99.4% has a rating greater than or equal to A-(mex) on the local scale. This places them in investment grade and the three main issuers other than the Federal Government, Semi-Private agencies and Domestic Financial Institutions represent 23% of the basic capital as of September 2009. Additionally, the investment exposure with the same issuer other than the Federal Government that represents a concentration greater than or equal to 5% of the net capital as of September 2009 has a rating of at least AA+(mex) as is made up of (term and weighted average interest rate): 3-month Bancomer stock certificates for Ps. 14,001 at 4.8%; 5-month Pemex stock certificates and bonds for Ps. 8,445 at 6.2%; 3-month certificates of deposit of the Federal Mortgage Association for Ps. 5,012 at 4.8%; 27-year State and Municipal Governments securitized loan certificates for Ps. 4,321 at 5.3%; 4-month Banobras stock certificates and bonds for Ps. 4,043 at 4.8%; and 11-day Banco Inbursa promissory notes for Ps. 3,004 at 4.6%.

For derivatives, the exposure is (Ps. 2,669), of which 99.9% is rated at least A-(mex) on the local scale, which places them at an investment grade and the three main counterparts other than the Federal Government, Semi-Private agencies and Domestic Financial Institutions represent 5% of the basic capital as of September 2009.

Risk Diversification

In December 2005, the CNBV issued the “General Rules for Risk Diversification in Performing Asset and Liability Transactions Applicable to Credit Institutions”.

These regulations require that the Financial Group perform an analysis of the borrowers and/or loans they hold to determine the amount of their “Common Risk”. Also, the Financial Group must have the necessary documentation to support that a person or group of persons represents a common risk in accordance with the assumptions established under such rules.

In compliance with the risk diversification rules for asset and liability transactions, the following information is provided below:

Basic capital as of September 30, 2010	Ps. 37,233
I. Financing whose individual amount represents more than 10% of basic capital:
Credit transactions
Number of financings	1
Amount of financings taken as a whole	4,437
% in relation to basic capital	12	%
Money market transactions
Number of financings	2
Amount of financings taken as a whole	8,753
% in relation to basic capital	24	%
Overnight transactions
Number of financings	1
Amount of financings taken as a whole	5,455
% in relation to basic capital	15	%
II. Maximum amount of financing with the three largest debtors and common risk groups	Ps. 18,527

Market risk

Value at risk

The exposure to market risk is determined through the calculation of the Value at Risk (“VaR”). The meaning of the VaR under this method is the potential day loss which could be generated in the valuation of the portfolios at a given date. This methodology is used both for the calculation of market risk and for the establishment and control of internal limits.

F-156

The Financial Group applies the nonparametric historical simulation method to calculate the VaR, considering for such purpose a 99% confidence level, using the 500 immediate historical scenarios, multiplying the result by a security factor that fluctuates between 3 and 4 depending on the annual Back Testing results calculated on the previous quarter, considering 10 days to dispose of the risk portfolio in question. These measures ensure that unforeseen volatiles are considered in the main risk factors that affect such portfolios.

Such methodology is applied to all financial instrument portfolios within and beyond the scope of the Financial Group, including money market and treasury transactions, capital, foreign-exchange and derivatives held for trading and hedging purposes, which are exposed to variations in their value due to changes in the risk factors affecting their market valuation (domestic and foreign interest rates, exchange rates and indexes, among others).

The average VaR for the portfolio of financial instruments was Ps. 1,600 for the last quarter 2010.

	4Q09			1Q10			2Q10			3Q10			4Q10
VaR Banorte*	Ps.	2,584		Ps.	3,442		Ps.	2,677		Ps.	2,246		Ps.	1,600
Banorte net capital***	49,679			49,878			50,184			51,187			52,620
VaR / net capital Banorte	5.20		%	6.90		%	5.33		%	4.39		%	3.04		%

* Quarterly Average

*** Sum of net capital at the close of the quarter

Also, the average of the VaR per risk factor for the Financial Group’s portfolio of securities behaved as follows during the fourth quarter of 2010:

Risk factor	VaR
Domestic interest rate	Ps.	1,582
Foreign interest rate	300
Exchange rate	141
Total VaR	Ps.	1,600

The VaR for each of the risk factors presented is determined by simulating 500 historical scenarios of the variables comprising each of such factors, maintaining constant the variables that affect the other risk factors shown. By the same token, the consolidated VaR for the Financial Group considers the correlations of all the risk factors influencing the valuation of the portfolios, for which reason the arithmetical sum of the VaR Factor does not match.

Operations with derivative products

The one-day individual VaR that the Financial Group has for each type of trading and hedging derivatives for the fourth quarter of 2010 is:

Trading derivatives	4Q09		4Q10
Futures
MEXDER rate futures	Ps.	—	Ps.	13
Exchange rate derivatives
Forwards	15		—
Options	—		1
Interest rate options
TIIE	4		3
Libor	—		1
Swap options
Libor	—		2
TIIE	2		5
Rate swaps (IRS) and exchange rate
TIIE swaps	12		11
LIBOR swaps	2		2
Cross currency exchange rate swaps	207		12
Total trading derivatives	Ps.	242	Ps.	50

F-157

Hedging derivatives	4Q09		4Q10
Swaps
Cross currency exchange rate swaps for portfolio hedging in USD	Ps.	8	Ps.	2
Cross currency exchange rate swaps for hedging obligations in USD	145		86
Cross currency exchange rate swaps for hedging bonds in USD	304		220
TIIE swaps for hedging obligations in Mexican pesos	63		30
TIIE swaps for hedging promissory note in Mexican pesos	265		181
Rate operations for hedging portfolio at a fixed rate	59		14
Total hedging derivatives	Ps.	844	Ps.	533

To calculate the VaR for each of the derivatives listed, the non-parametric historic simulation method is applied to a 99% level of confidence and a one-day horizon. For instance, the Value at Risk for TIIE Swaps is Ps. 11. This means that under normal condition, 99 days out of every 100 the maximum potential loss is Ps. 11 in one day.

The trading and hedging derivatives totals are the arithmetic sum of the VaR of each without considering any correlation among them.

Investments in securities

The one-day individual VaR that the Financial Group has for each type of securities for the fourth quarter of 2010 was:

Trading Securities	4Q09		4Q10
Variable rate government bonds	Ps.	7	Ps.	11
Fixed rate government bonds	2		2
Bank bonds	3		—
Securitization certificates	37		20
CEDES	—		2
Capital	13		—
US treasury bonds	3		1
PEMEX eurobonds	28		29
UMS	12		6
Bank eurobonds	107		37
Private company eurobonds	11		8
Total	Ps.	223	Ps.	116

Securities at maturity	4Q09		4Q10
Variable rate government bonds	Ps.	92	Ps.	52
Fixed rate government bonds		4		1
Securitization certificates		42		41
CEDES		4		—
Bank bonds		—		1
PEMEX eurobonds		157		90
UMS		89		64
Zero coupon bank bonds		11		8
Private company eurobonds		4		—
Total	Ps.	403	Ps.	257

F-158

To calculate the VaR for each of the types of securities listed, the non-parametric historic simulation method is applied to a 99% level of confidence and a one-day horizon. For instance, the Value at Risk for trading UMS is Ps. 64. This means that under normal condition, 99 days out of every 100 the maximum potential loss is Ps. 64 in one day.

The trading and hedging derivatives totals are the arithmetic sum of the VaR of each without considering any correlation among them.

Backtesting analysis

To validate the effectiveness of the measurements of the calculation of the daily VaR as a measurement of market risk, the Backtesting analysis is updated each week. This analysis makes it possible to compare the estimated results through the VaR with the actual results generated.

The Backtesting results for the Financial Group during 2010 are as follows:

During 2010 there was only one excess event on November 25th.

Sensitivity analysis and tests under extreme conditions

To improve analysis and obtain the impact of any movements in risk factors, sensitivity analyses and tests under extreme conditions are performed periodically. These analyses foresee potential situations in which the Financial Group might suffer extraordinary losses from the valuation of the financial instruments in which it holds positions.

Sensitivity for derivatives transactions

Sensitivity analysis on derivative transactions is carried out as follows:

·Estimate gain or loss of the securities valuation in the event of:

·A parallel change of +100 basis points of domestic interest rates

·A parallel change of +100 basis points of foreign interest rates

·A 5% devaluation in the MXP/USD and MXP/EUR exchange rate.

The results may be gains or losses depending on the nature of the derivative.

F-159

Trading derivatives	+100 bp domestic rates			+100 bpforeign rates			+5% Exchange rate
Futures
MEXDER rate futures	Ps.	(118	)	Ps.	—		Ps.	—
Exchange rate derivatives
Options	—			—			(2		)
Forwards	—			—			(1		)
Interest rate options
TIIE	(10		)	—			—
Libor	—			12			—
Swap options
Libor				(38		)	(1		)
TIIE	(33		)	—			—
Interest rate swaps (IRS) and exchange rate
TIIE Swaps	(2		)	—			—
LIBOR Swaps	—			28			(1		)
Cross currency exchange rate Swaps	(47		)	—			—
Total trading derivatives	Ps.	(210	)	Ps.	2		Ps.	(5	)

Hedging derivatives	+100 bp domestic rates			+100 BPforeign rates			+5% Exchange rate
Rate swaps and exchange rate
Cross exchange rate Swaps for hedging obligations in USD	Ps.	25		Ps.	(30	)	Ps.	196
Cross exchange rate Swaps for hedging bonds in USD	(239		)	400			(466		)
TIIE Swaps for hedging obligations in Mexican pesos	168			—			—
TIIE Swaps for hedging promissory note in Mexican pesos	617			—			—
TIIE caps for fixed rate loan hedging	28			—			—
Total hedging derivatives	Ps.	599		Ps.	370		Ps.	(270	)

In the event of any of above scenarios, the losses or gains of the trading securities will directly impact the Financial Group’s statements of income and capital hedging derivatives.

Based on the above analysis, it can be concluded that the trading derivatives portfolio is exposed mainly to increases in domestic interest rates and exchange rate devaluations. However, the hedging derivatives portfolio is exposed to foreign interest rate increases without considering the gain of the hedged liability.

Sensitivity for operations with securities

Sensitivity analysis on derivative transactions is carried out as follows:

·Estimate gain or loss of the securities valuation in the event of:

·A parallel change of +100 basis points of domestic interest rates

·A parallel change of +100 basis points of foreign interest rates

·A 5% devaluation in the MXP/USD and MXP/EUR exchange rate.

·A change of +5 basis points in government bonds surcharges

·A change of +50 basis points in sovereign risk

·A change of +10% in the IPC (Consumer Price Index)

The results may be gains or losses depending on the nature of the instrument.

F-160

Trading Securities	+100 bp domestic rates			+100 bp foreign rates			+5% exchange rate		+5 bp rate spreads			+50 bp sovereign risk
Variable rate government bonds	Ps.	(52	)	Ps.	—		Ps.	—	Ps.	(39	)	Ps.	—
Fixed rate government bonds	(14		)	—			—		—			—
Securitization certificates	(4		)	—			—		—			—
CEDES	(2		)	—			—		—			—
US treasury bonds	—			(2		)	1		—			—
PEMEX eurobonds	—			(51		)	64		—			(22		)
UMS	—			(4		)	16		—			(2		)
Bank eurobonds	—			(71		)	90		—			—
Private company eurobonds	—			—			9		—			—
Total	Ps.	(72	)	Ps.	(128	)	Ps.	180	Ps.	(39	)	Ps.	(24	)

Securities held to maturity	+100 bp domestic rates			+100 bp foreign rates			+5% exchange rate		+5 bp rate spreads			+50 bp sovereign risk
Variable rate government bonds	Ps.	(275	)	Ps.	—		Ps.	—	Ps.	(173	)	Ps.	—
Fixed rate government bonds	(6		)	—			—		—			—
Securitization certificates	(25		)	—			—		—			—
Bank bonds	(4		)	—			—		—			—
PEMEX eurobonds	—			(183		)	280		—			(93		)
UMS	—			(116		)	154		—			(59		)
Zero coupon bank bonds	(2		)	(49		)	—		—			—
Private company eurobonds	—			—			—		—			—
Total	Ps.	(312	)	Ps.	(348	)	Ps.	434	Ps.	(173	)	Ps.	(152	)

In the event of any of above scenarios, the losses or gains of the operations with trading securities and securities held to maturity will directly impact the Financial Group’s results.

In conclusion, trading securities and securities held to maturity are exposed to domestic interest rate increases, foreign rate increases, interest rate spreads and deterioration of the sovereign risk.

Liquidity and balance sheet risk

In order to provide a measurement of liquidity risk in the Financial Group and provide follow-up consistently, the Financial Group relies on the use of financial ratios, which include the Liquidity Ratio (Current Assets/Liquid Liabilities). Liquid assets include cash and cash equivalents, trading securities and available for sale securities. By the same token, liquid liabilities include immediate demand deposits, immediate demand interbank loans and short-term loans. The liquidity ratio at the end of the fourth quarter of 2010 is 82.7%, while the average during the quarter is 93.1%, as shown below:

	End of quarter
	4Q09			1Q10			2Q10			3Q10			4Q10
Liquid assets	Ps.	91,931		Ps.	109,668		Ps.	141,019		Ps.	127,518		Ps.	132,713
Liquid liabilities	143,834			132,465			140,406			140,506			160,432
Liquidity ratio	63.9		%	82.8		%	100.4		%	90.8		%	82.7		%

	Average
	4Q09			1Q10			2Q10			3Q10			4Q10
Liquid assets	Ps.	92,729		Ps.	96,900		Ps.	123,044		Ps.	129,638		Ps.	125,871
Liquid liabilities	130,575			124,820			122,584			126,698			135,251
Liquidity ratio	71.0		%	77.6		%	100.4		%	102.3		%	93.1		%

F-161

Average calculation considering the Liquidity Ratio’s weekly estimates.

To quantify and follow up on the liquidity risk for its dollar portfolio, the Financial Group uses the criteria established by Banco de México for the determination of the Liquidity Ratio. It facilitates an evaluation of the differences between the flows of assets and liabilities in different time periods. The above promotes a healthier distribution of terms for these assets.

Also, to prevent concentration risks in relation to payment terms and dates for the Financial Group, gap analysis is performed to match the resources with the funding sources, which detects any concentration in a timely fashion. These analyses are performed separately by currency (Mexican pesos, foreign currency and UDIS).

Furthermore, balance sheet simulation analyses are prepared for the Financial Group, which provides either a systematic or dynamic evaluation of the future behavior of the balance sheet. The base scenario is used to prepare sensitivity analyses for movements in domestic, foreign and real interest rates. Also, tests are performed under extreme conditions to evaluate the result of extreme changes in interest, funding and exchange rates.

As an evaluation measure of the effectiveness of the simulation model, the projections are periodically compared with actual data. Using these tests, the assumptions and methodology used can be evaluated and, if necessary, adjusted.

The operation with derivatives allows a leveling of the differentials between assets and liabilities in different maturity gaps, minimizing the Liquidity Risk. Considering only the contractual obligations of the different types of hedging and trading swaps that the Financial Group operates, a maturity analysis is found below:

	Net position
Gap	Asset position		Liability position			Net
1 month	Ps.	—	Ps.	(2	)	Ps.	(2	)
3 months	—		—			—
6 months	1		—			1
1 year	1		(546		)	(545		)
2 years	2		(5		)	(3		)
3 years	—		(12		)	(12		)
4 years	1		(35		)	(34		)
5 years	1		(43		)	(42		)
7 years	460		(75		)	385
10 years	86		(922		)	(836		)
15 years	12		—			12
20 years	429		(401		)	28
> 20 years	657		(8		)	649
Total	Ps.	1,650	Ps.	(2,049	)	Ps.	(399	)

Operational risk

In January 2003, the Financial Group established a formal operational risk department denominated “Operational Risk Management Department” as part of its Risk Management Strategy.

The Financial Group defines operational risk as the potential loss due to failures or deficiencies in internal controls because of operation processing and storing or in data transfer, and adverse administrative and judicial rulings, frauds or theft (this definition includes technology and legal risk).

Operational Risk Management’s objectives are: a) to enable and support the organization to reach its institutional objectives through operational risk prevention and management; b) to ensure that the existing operational risks and the required controls are duly identified, evaluated and aligned with the organization’s risk strategy; and c) to ensure that operational risks are duly quantified in order to assign the proper capital for operational risk.

F-162

Operational risk management’s cornerstones

I.Policies, objectives and guidelines

The Financial Group has documented the operational risk policies, objectives, guidelines, methodologies and responsible areas.

The Operational Risk Department works closely with the Controllership Department to promote effective Internal Control that defines the proper procedures and controls the mitigation of Operational Risk. The Internal Audit Department follows up on compliance.

Regulations Control, as part of the Internal Control System, performs the following risk-mitigating activities: a) internal control validation; b) institutional regulations management and control; c) monitoring of operating process internal control by means of control indicator reports submitted by the process controllers in the various areas; d) money-laundering prevention process management; e) regulatory provisions controls and follow-up; and f) analysis and assessment of operating processes and projects with the participation of the directors in each process in order to insure proper internal control.

Quantitative and qualitative measuring tools

Operating Losses Database

To record operating loss events, a system has been developed internally known as the “Operating Loss and Events Capture System” (SCERO). This system enables the central information supplier areas to directly record such events online, which are classified by type of event in accordance with the following categories (in line with the Basle II Agreement proposals):

Types of events	Description
Internal fraud	Losses derived from actions intended to defraud, illegally seize ownership or evade the regulations, law or policies of the Institution (excluding diversity/discrimination events) involving at least one internal party.
External fraud	Losses derived from actions taken by third parties intended to defraud, illegally seize ownership or evade the law.
Labor relations and job safety	Losses derived from actions inconsistent with laws or employment, health or safety agreements, or which result in the payment of claims for damages to personnel or diversity/discrimination claims.
Customers, products and business practices	Losses derived from negligence or unintentional breaches which prevent compliance with professional obligations with customers (including trust and adaptation requirements or due to the nature or design of a product.
Natural disasters and other events	Losses due to damage or harm to physical assets due to natural disasters or other events.
Business incidences and system failures	Losses derived from incidences in the business and system failures.
Process execution, delivery and management	Losses derived from errors in transaction processing or in process management, as well as relations with counterparties and suppliers.

This historical database provides the statistics of the operating events experienced by the Financial Group in order to be able to determine the respective trends, frequency, impact and distribution. Furthermore, the database will serve to calculate capital requirements for advanced models in the future.

Legal and tax contingencies database

For the recording and follow-up of legal, administrative and tax issues that may arise from adverse unappealable ruling, an internal system called “Legal Risk Issues Monitoring System” (SMARL) was developed. This system enables the central data supplying areas to record such events directly and on-line, which are then classified by company, sector and legal issue, among others.

F-163

As part of the Financial Group’s Legal Risk management initiative, legal and tax contingencies are estimated by the attorneys that process the issues based on an internal methodology. This makes it possible to create the necessary book reserve to face such estimated contingencies.

Risk management model

The Financial Group and its subsidiaries had defined objectives, which are achieved through different plans, programs and projects. Compliance with such objectives may be adversely affected due to operating risks, for which reason a methodology must be in place to manage them within the organization. Consequently, operational risk management is now an institutional policy defined and supported by senior management.

To perform operational risk management, each of the operating risks involved in the processes must be identified in order to analyze them. In this regard, the risks identified by Regulations Control are recorded in a risk matrix and processed to eliminate or mitigate them (trying to reduce their severity or frequency) and to define the tolerance levels, as applicable. A new Operating Risk Management Model and the technology tool for its implementation are currently been developed.

II.Calculating capital requirement

Pursuant to the Operational Risk Capitalization Rules, the Financial Group has adopted a Basic Model, which is calculated and reported periodically to the authorities. Assets subject to operational risk are found in the corresponding note of the Rules.

III.Information and reporting

The information generated by the databases and the Management Model is processed regularly in order to report the main operating events detected, trends, identified risks (risk matrix) and the mitigating strategies to the Risk Policy Committee and the Board of Directors. The status of the principal initiatives for operating risk mitigation implemented by the different areas of the organization is also reported.

Technology risk

It is defined as the potential loss due to damage, interruption, alteration or failures in the use of or dependence on hardware, software, IT systems, applications, networks and any other data distribution channel for rendering services to customers. Technology risk forms an inherent part of operating risk, for which reason its management is performed throughout the entire organization.

To address operating risk associated with data integrity, the “Integrity Committee” was created. Its objectives include aligning data security and control efforts to a prevention approach, defining new strategies, policies, processes or procedures and solving data security issues that affect or may affect the Financial Group’s assets.

The Financial Group performs the functions for technology risk management set forth by the Commission under the guidelines established by the institutional regulations and the Integrity Committee.

To address the operating risk caused by high impact external events, the Financial Group has a Business Continuity Plan (BCP) and Business Recovery Plan (BRP) based on a same-time data replication system at an alternate computer site. This guarantees the back-up and recovery of critical applications in the event of an operating contingency.

Legal risk

Legal risk is defined as the potential loss due to noncompliance with applicable legal and administrative provisions, adverse administrative and judicial rulings, and imposed penalties.

The legal risk must be measured as an inherent part of operating risk in order to understand and estimate its impact. Therefore, those legal issues which result in actual operating losses in the SMARL system are recorded in the SCERO in accordance with a predetermined classification.

F-164

Based on the statistics of the current legal issues and real loss events, the Financial Group can identify specific legal or operating risks, which are analyzed in order to eliminate or mitigate them in an attempt to reduce or limit their future occurrence or impact.

33 - MEMORANDUM ACCOUNTS

	2010		2009
Banks customers (current accounts)	Ps.	9	Ps.	4
Settlement of customer transactions	1		(80		)
Customer valuables received in custody	172,922		134,480
Customer repurchase agreements	28,647		35,680
Managed trusts	4,348		4,641
	Ps.	205,927	Ps.	174,725
Other contingent assets and liabilities	Ps.	256	Ps.	273
Credit commitments	3,155		2,272
Deposits of assets	2,429		1,632
Assets in trusts or under mandate	124,723		112,942
Managed assets in custody	230,140		158,547
Investment banking transactions on account of third parties (net)	78,069		74,646
Collateral received by the institution	62,224		33,464
Collateral received and sold or given as a pledge by the entity	36,195		43,165
Past-due loan portfolio accrued but not charged interest	136		198
	Ps.	537,327	Ps.	427,139

34 - COMMITMENTS

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group had the following contingent obligations and commitments:

·Other contingent obligations and opening of credits totaling Ps. 3,411 (Ps. 2,545 in 2009), which are recorded in memorandum accounts.

·Certain real property and operating equipment are leased. Total property lease payments for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, were Ps. 207 and Ps. 197, respectively.

35 - CONTINGENCIES

As of December 31, 2010, there are lawsuits filed against the Financial Group in civil and business court cases; however, the Financial Group’s attorneys consider that the claims filed are unsubstantiated and, in the event of an adverse ruling, they would not significantly impact the Financial Group’s consolidated financial position. A reserve of Ps. 118 is recorded for such contentious matters.

36 - SAVINGS PREVENTIVE AND PROTECTION MECHANISM

The objective of the Institute for the Protection of Bank Savings (IPAB) is to protect the deposits of small customers and thereby contribute to maintaining the financial system’s stability and the proper functioning of the payments systems.

According to the Law of Bank Savings Protection (LPAB), the IPAB manages a bank savings protection system that guarantees the payment of bank deposits or loans or credits to Full Service Banking Institution up to an amount equivalent to 400 thousand UDIS per individual or business entity, regardless of the number or type of such obligations in the customer’s favor and charged to a single bank.

F-165

On July 30, 2007, general rules were issued for addressing joint accounts or those in which there is more than one account holder, referred to in art.14 of the LPAB, as well as the rules banks must observe for classifying information relative to transactions associated with guaranteed obligations.

The IPAB plays a major role in the implementation of the LPAB resolutions methods and the Law of Credit Institutions (LIC) as timely and adequate mechanisms for salvaging and liquidating Full Service Banking Institutions in financial trouble that may affect their solvency. The purpose is to provide maximum protection to the public while minimizing the negative impact that salvaging an institution may have on others in the banking system.

During 2010 and 2009, the amount of contributions to the IPAB payable by Banorte for fees amounted to Ps. 1,084 and Ps. 1,073, respectively.

37 — NEW ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

Modification of the consumer and mortgage loan rating methodology.

On October 25, 2010 the Commission issued a resolution to the General Provisions for Banking Institutions modifying the applicable non-revolving consumer and housing mortgage loan rating so that the allowance for loan losses will be calculated on the basis of expected rather than incurred loss. This modification will become effective on March 1, 2011. The Financial Group considers that the initial impact from entry into force of this amendment is approximately Ps. 600 increase in the reserve requirement. This will be recognized in stockholders’ equity no later than March 31, 2011, in the prior year’s results.

38 — DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEXICAN BANKING GAAP AND MEXICAN FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS

The Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the Accounting Practices established by the Commission (“Mexican Banking GAAP”), which differ in certain respects from Mexican Financial Reporting Standards (“MFRS”).

The principal differences and the effect on consolidated net income and consolidated stockholders’ equity are presented below with an explanation of the adjustments. This information is not required by Mexican Banking GAAP.

Reconciliation of stockholders’ equity:

	December 31,
	2010			2009
Stockholders’ equity under Mexican Banking GAAP	Ps.	50,227		Ps.	44,974
Adjustments:
Loan loss reserves (See B)	—			(198		)
Loan origination fees and costs (See A)	277			275
Reserve for foreclosed assets (See C)	143			45
Insurance and postretirement activities (See A)	2,231			1,857
Purchased loan portfolio (See A)	86			(163		)
Securitizations (See D)	(222		)	(179		)
Investment valuation (See A)	—			7
Total adjustments	2,515			1,644
Tax effect on adjustments (See F)	(783		)	(439		)
Noncontrolling interest attributable to adjustments (See G)	(777		)	(645		)
Stockholders’ equity under MFRS	Ps.	51,182		Ps.	45,534

F-166

Reconciliation of net income:

	Year ended December 31,
	2010			2009
Net income under Mexican Banking GAAP	Ps.	6,705		Ps.	5,854
Adjustments:
Loan loss reserves (See B)	198			(101		)
Loan origination fees and costs (See A)	2			126
Reserve for foreclosed assets (See C)	99			90
Insurance and postretirement activities (See A)	374			119
Derivatives (See A)	—			75
Purchased loan portfolio (See A)	249			220
Securitizations (See D)	(43		)	152
Repurchase agreements (See A)	—			24
Investment valuation (See A)	(7		)	19
Change in credit card loan rating methodology (E)	—			(1,102		)
Total adjustments	872			(378		)
Tax effect on adjustments (See F)	(311		)	157
Noncontrolling interest attributable to adjustments (See G)	(150		)	(31		)
Net income under MFRS	Ps.	7,116		Ps.	5,602

Explanation of reconciling items:

A) General

This difference between Mexican Banking GAAP and MFRS is explained further in Note 39, as the accounting treatment under MFRS and U.S. GAAP are the same for this item.

B) Loan loss reserves

Mexican Banking GAAP establishes rules for loan portfolio ratings and general methodologies for the rating and constitution of preventive allowances for loan losses for each type of loan and allows credit institutions to rate and develop preventive allowances based on internal methodologies, previously authorized by the Commission.

According to Circular B-6, “Loan Portfolio”, additional reserves may be recorded to cover risks that are not foreseen by the existing loan portfolio rating methodologies. Before doing so, the Financial Group must report the following to the Commission: a) the origin of the estimates; b) the methodology applied; c) the amount of the estimates; and d) the period over which they are considered to be necessary. Prior to 2007, specific provisions were calculated when it was determined to be probable that the Financial Group would not recover the full contractual principal and interest on a loan (impaired loan).

Under Mexican Banking GAAP debtor support program allowances were canceled during the first quarter of 2007 as they did not meet the requirements mentioned above and additional allowances related to UDI Trusts are recorded in accordance with accounting circulars prescribed by the Commission. Under MFRS, additional reserves are not recorded and reserves for debtor support programs must be established and additional allowances related to UDI Trusts allowances must be reversed.

As disclosed in Note 10, on June 30, 2010 the Federal Government through the SHCP and Banking Institutions signed an agreement for the early termination of the mortgage loan debtors support programs (punto final and UDI trusts) As a result of signing the agreement, the Financial Group reduced its reserve to Ps. 57 related to such obligation. Under MFRS additional reserves for debtor programs were cancelled.

F-167

C) Reserve for foreclosed assets

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, reserves for foreclosed assets are required based on their nature and number of months outstanding. Under MFRS, these assets are recognized at the lower of the corresponding loan’s book value or the fair value of the foreclosed asset. Potential impairment should also be evaluated and recognized, as necessary, on these assets.

D) Securitizations

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, the Financial Group accounts for its securitization transactions as disclosed in Note 4. If it has transferred a financial asset, MFRS requires the Financial Group to assess whether it has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the transferred asset. If it has retained substantially all such risks and rewards, it continues to recognize the transferred asset. If it has transferred substantially all such risks and rewards, it derecognizes the transferred asset. If the Financial Group concludes that it has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the transferred asset, it assesses whether it has retained control over the transferred asset. If it has retained control, it continues to recognize the transferred asset to the extent of its continuing involvement in the transferred asset. If it has not retained control, it derecognizes the transferred asset.

Under MRFS, the securitization transactions entered into by the Financial Group, were evaluated under the “transfer of risks and rewards” approach, concluding that all of such risks and rewards were not transferred, thus, the adjustment represents the reinstatement of the assets and liabilities to the Financial Group’s balance sheet.

E) Change in credit card loan rating methodology

As disclosed in Note 11, in 2009, the cumulative effect of the change in consumer loan rating methodology for credit card operations was charged against retained earnings with the Commission’s expressed authorization. MFRS requires such changes to be recorded in current earnings.

F) Income taxes

MFRS differences as described above, to the extent taxable, are reflected in the MFRS deferred tax balances.

G) Non-controlling interest

The effects of the MFRS differences as described in this Note reflect the amounts assigned to the noncontrolling interests.

39 — DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEXICAN BANKING GAAP AND U.S. GAAP

The Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Mexican Banking GAAP, which differ in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Through December 31, 2007, the Mexican Banking GAAP consolidated financial statements include the effects of inflation as provided for under NIF B-10, “Effects of Inflation”, whereas financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP are presented on a historical cost basis. The application of NIF B-10 represented a comprehensive measure of the effects of price level changes in the inflationary Mexican economy and, as such, was considered a more meaningful presentation than historical cost-based financial reporting for both Mexican and U.S. accounting purposes. Beginning on January 1, 2008, and through December 31, 2010, in accordance with NIF B-10, “Effects of Inflation”, the Financial Group discontinued the recognition of inflation in its financial statements under Mexican Banking GAAP as the cumulative inflation for the preceding three years was less than 26%. Notwithstanding the prior comments, the following reconciliation to U.S. GAAP through December 31, 2007 does not include the reversal of the adjustments required under NIF B-10, as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

The principal differences as they relate to the Financial Group between Mexican Banking GAAP and U.S. GAAP and the effect on consolidated stockholders’ equity and consolidated net income are presented below, with an explanation of the adjustments.

F-168

Reconciliation of stockholders’ equity:

	December 31,
	2010			2009
Stockholders’ equity under Mexican Banking GAAP	Ps.	50,227		Ps.	44,974
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
Loan loss reserves (See A)	2,868			3,034
Loan origination fees and costs (See B)	277			275
Purchased loan portfolio (See C)	86			(163		)
Reserve for foreclosed assets (See E)	143			45
Insurance and postretirement activities (See F)	2,231			1,857
Business combinations (See G)	81			969
Employee retirement obligations (See H)	(1,062		)	(1,029		)
Securitizations (See J)	(26		)	(22		)
Other adjustments (See K)	423			322
Fair value measurements (See L)	(51		)	(63		)
IFC transaction (See M)	(4,244		)	(3,651		)
Income taxes (See N)	(1,602		)	(1,617		)
Total U.S. GAAP adjustments	(876		)	(43		)
Tax effect on U.S. GAAP adjustments (See N)	(1,751		)	(1,794		)
Noncontrolling interest attributable to U.S. GAAP adjustments (See O)	(762		)	(689		)
Stockholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP	Ps.	46,838		Ps.	42,448

Reconciliation of net income:

	Years ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Net income under Mexican Banking GAAP	Ps.	6,705		Ps.	5,854		Ps.	7,014
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
Loan loss reserves (See A)	(166		)	1,668			225
Loan origination fees and costs (See B)	2			126			4
Purchased loan portfolio (See C)	249			220			278
Derivatives (See D)	—			75			(93		)
Reserve for foreclosed assets (See E)	99			90			(210		)
Insurance and postretirement activities (See F)	374			119			286
Business combinations (See G)	1			29			(318		)
Employee retirement obligations (See H)	88			129			55
Capitalized costs (See I)	—			—			68
Securitizations (See J)	(4		)	114			(134		)
Other adjustments (See K)	(129		)	(413		)	(814		)
Fair value measurements (See L)	12			74			(137		)
Income taxes (See N)	15			(3		)	11
Total U.S. GAAP adjustments	541			2,228			(779		)
Tax effect on U.S. GAAP adjustments (See N)	(167		)	(825		)	362
Noncontrolling interest attributable to U.S. GAAP adjustments (See O)	(130		)	(183		)	(121		)
Net income under U.S. GAAP	Ps.	6,949		Ps.	7,074		Ps.	6,476

F-169

A rollforward of the Financial Group’s U.S. GAAP stockholders’ equity balance is as follows:

	2010			2009
Balance at the beginning of the year	Ps.	42,448		Ps.	38,789
Net income under U.S. GAAP	6,949			7,074
Dividends declared	(1,029		)	(364		)
Issuance (repurchase) of shares	69			(451		)
Acquisition of the 30% non-controlling interest of INB	—			(811		)
Other comprehensive loss	(1,599		)	(1,789		)
Balance at the end of the year	Ps.	46,838		Ps.	42,448

I              Explanation of reconciling items:

A)Loan loss reserves

Mexican Banking GAAP establishes rules for loan portfolio ratings and general methodologies for the rating and constitution of preventive allowances for loan losses for each type of loan and allows credit institutions to rate and develop preventive allowances based on internal methodologies, previously authorized by the Commission.

The Financial Group assigns an individual risk category to each commercial loan based on the borrower’s financial and operating risk level, its credit experience and the nature and value of the loans’ collateral. A loan loss reserve is determined for each loan based on a prescribed range of reserves associated to each risk category. In the case of the consumer and mortgage loan portfolio, the risk rating procedure and the establishment of loan reserves considers the accounting periods reporting past-due, the probability of noncompliance, and the severity of the loss in proportion to its amount and the nature of loan guarantees.

The U.S. GAAP methodology for recognition of loan losses is provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 450, “Contingencies”, (previously SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”), and ASC 310 “Receivables” (previously SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”), which establish that an estimated loss should be accrued when, based on information available prior to the issuance of the financial statements, it is probable that a loan has been impaired at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.

For larger non-homogeneous loans, the Financial Group assesses for impairment all individual loans with an outstanding balance greater than 4 million UDI or its equivalent in Mexican Pesos. Under U.S. GAAP, estimated losses on impaired loans, which are individually assessed, are required to be measured at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, the loan’s observable market price or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

To calculate the allowance required for smaller-balance impaired loans and unimpaired loans, historical loss ratios are determined by analyzing historical trends. These ratios are determined by loan type to obtain loss estimates for homogeneous groups of clients. Such historical ratios are updated to incorporate the most recent data reflective of current economic conditions, in conjunction with industry performance trends, geographic or obligor concentrations within each portfolio segment, and any other pertinent information, resulting in the estimation of the allowance for loan losses.

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, loans may be charged-off when collection efforts have been exhausted or when they have been fully provisioned. On the other hand for U.S. GAAP, loans (or portions of particular loans) should be written-off in the period that they are deemed uncollectible.

F-170

On August 12, 2009, the Commission issued a resolution modifying the “General Provisions applicable to Banking Institutions”, which modifies the consumer loan rating methodology to show the expected loss in these operations based on the current environment.

This new methodology requires separating the consumer loan portfolio into two groups: those that refer to credit card operations and those that do not. The consumer loan portfolio that does not include credit card operations will consider the number of unpaid billing periods established by the Financial Group as well as the probability of noncompliance and the severity of the loss according as percentages established by the Commission. If this portfolio has collateral or means of payment in favor of the Financial Group, the covered balance will be considered to have zero unpaid periods for the provisioning purposes.

Regarding credit card loans, such portfolio shall be provisioned and rated on a loan-by-loan basis taking into consideration the probability of noncompliance, the severity of the loss and the exposure to noncompliance. The probability of noncompliance is determined using a formula which considers the number of delinquent payments before the calculation date, the number of payments not made in the previous six months, the percentage represented by the payment made with regards to the total payable balance, and the percentage represented by the payment made in relation to the account’s authorized credit limit. The percentage to be utilized to determine the amount of loss reserves for each credit, results from multiplying the severity of the loss by the probability of noncompliance. The amount of the reserves to record results from multiplying the percentage referred to, by the exposure to noncompliance. Exposure to noncompliance is determined by applying a formula that considers both the total balance of the creditor’s debt and its credit limit. In the case of inactive accounts, a provision equivalent to 2.68% of the credit limit shall be constituted. The resulting effect of applying the revised consumer loan rating method for credit card operations is shown in Note 11.  Given that the methodology remained unchanged for purposes of U.S. GAAP, the adjustment related to the loan loss reserve for credit cards increased when compared to 2008.

U.S. GAAP loan loss reserves are as follows:

Loan loss reserves	2010			2009		2008
Loan loss reserves for ASC 310	Ps.	1,986		Ps.	388	Ps.	523
Loan loss reserves for ASC 450	3,391			4,113		4,728
Total loan loss reserves US GAAP	5,377			4,501		5,251
Mexican Banking GAAP loan loss reserves	8,245			7,535		6,617
Stockholders’ equity adjustment	2,868			3,034		1,366
Net Income adjustment	Ps.	(166	)	Ps.	1,668	Ps.	225

Roll forward of loan loss reserves:

	2010			2009			2008
Beginning of the year	Ps.	4,501		Ps.	5,251		Ps.	2,572
Charge-offs net of recoveries	(6,329		)	(7,560		)	(4,002		)
Charges to income of the year	7,205			6,810			6,681
End of the year	Ps.	5,377		Ps.	4,501		Ps.	5,251

F-171

Ratios:

	December 31,						Percentage
Loan loss reserves for ASC 310	2010		2009		2008		2010		2009		2008
Total reserves	Ps.	1,986	Ps.	388	Ps.	523
Total balances of impaired loans	Ps.	977	Ps.	387	Ps.	153	203.23	%	100.26	%	341.83	%
Total balances of outstanding loans	Ps.	4,731	Ps.	7,596	Ps.	1,256	41.98	%	5.11	%	41.64	%

	December 31,						Percentage
Loan loss reserves for ASC 450	2010		2009		2008		2010		2009		2008
Total reserves	Ps.	3,391	Ps.	4,113	Ps.	4,728
Total balances of impaired loans	Ps.	3,653	Ps.	4,717	Ps.	4,548	92.82	%	87.22	%	103.96	%
Total balances of outstanding loans (1)	Ps.	265,483	Ps.	237,512	Ps.	243,990	1.28	%	1.73	%	1.94	%

(1) The Financial Group has also recorded loan loss reserves in accordance with ASC 450 related to items such as guarantees and other off-balance sheet liabilities. Such balances, which are not included in the total balance of outstanding loans, amounted to Ps. 3,155, Ps. 2,272 and Ps. 2,793 as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Government Sponsored Programs

Mexican banks have participated in a number of debtor relief programs that began in 1995, which caused the Mexican banks to reduce their claims to the outstanding balances of loans meeting certain criterion in accordance with program guidelines. In connection with government sponsored restructurings, Mexican banks had the option of accounting for the full amounts of the loss on the date of the refinancing or deferring the loss and amortizing this loss in the statement of income in subsequent periods. For individual loan restructurings, the Financial Group generally charges off any difference in the carrying amount of the original loan and the restructured loan.

For U.S. GAAP purposes, discounts available for clients as stated in these programs were written-off as the Financial Group estimated that would be the expected reduction on the future cash flows.

B)Loan origination fees and costs

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, fees charged in connection with the issuance of loans are recorded as a deferred credit, which is amortized into interest income over the loan’s term, using the straight line method. Until December 31, 2006, loan origination fees were recognized on a cash basis. This change in accounting principle was applied retrospectively. Costs and expenses associated with the initial granting of the loan are recorded as a deferred charge to be amortized as interest expense over the same period in which the fee income is recognized. This applies only to those costs and expenses that are considered incremental. Until December 31, 2007 loan origination costs were expensed as incurred. This change was applied prospectively given the practical impossibility of determining them for prior years. In addition, annual credit card fees, the fees for unused credit lines, as well as the associated costs and expenses, are amortized in 12 months. Under U.S. GAAP, as required by ASC 310 “Receivables” (previously SFAS No. 91 “Accounting for Nonrefudable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases”), loan origination fees are deferred and recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment of yield (interest income). Likewise, direct loan origination costs defined in the following paragraph are deferred and recognized as a reduction in the yield of the loan. Loan origination fees and related direct loan origination costs for a given loan are offset and only the net amount is deferred and amortized.

F-172

Direct loan origination costs of a completed loan include (a) incremental direct costs of loan origination incurred in transactions with independent third parties for that loan and (b) certain costs directly related to specified activities performed by the lender for that loan. Those activities include evaluating the prospective borrower’s financial condition; evaluating and recording guarantees, collateral, and other security arrangements; negotiating loan terms; preparing and processing loan documents; and closing the transaction.

Credit card fees and costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the period the cardholder is entitled to use the card.

C)Purchased loan portfolio

As discussed below, prior to December 31, 2004 Mexican Banking GAAP had no specific rules covering the accounting treatment of loan portfolios purchases. As collections on the purchased loan portfolios were received, the Financial Group recognized the amounts recovered as investment income. In addition, the Financial Group amortized the cost of the investment based on the percentage of amounts recovered to the acquisition cost of the portfolio acquired, as adjusted by financial projections. Unamortized amounts, if any, were written off when the collection process had ceased.

In 2005, the Financial Group adopted the guidance found in ASC 310 “Receivables” (previously SOP 03-3 “Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer”) for its Mexican Banking GAAP financial statements and applied it prospectively to all existing portfolios held. U.S. GAAP addressed accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor’s initial investment (the amount paid to the seller plus any fees paid or less any fees received) in loans or debt securities (loans) acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. For U.S. GAAP purposes, in 2004 the Financial Group early adopted this guidance and began to apply its requirements for all portfolios purchased after December 31, 2003.

In 2007, the Financial Group adopted the Commission’s new Circular B-11, “Collection Rights”; therefore under Mexican Banking GAAP purchased portfolios are valued using one of the following methods: cash basis method, interest method and cost recovery method, established in such circular.

Under U.S. GAAP, ASC 310 “Receivables” (previously APB 6, “Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans”), addressed the accounting and reporting by purchasers of loans in fiscal years beginning on or before December 15, 2004. This accounting was utilized for all portfolios purchased prior to December 31, 2003.  At the time of acquisition, the sum of the acquisition amount of the loan and the discount to be amortized should not exceed the undiscounted future cash collections that are both reasonably estimable and probable. If these criteria are not satisfied, the loan should be accounted for using the cost-recovery method.

The loan portfolios (generally consisting of troubled loans) purchased at a discount would represent a purchase of a loan portfolio where it is not probable that the undiscounted future cash collections will be sufficient to recover the face amount of the loan and contractual interest. Consequently, under U.S. GAAP, at the time of acquisition, the sum of the acquisition amount of the loan and the discount to be amortized should not exceed the undiscounted future cash collections that are both reasonably estimable and probable. The discount on an acquired loan should be amortized over the period in which the payments are probable of collection only if the amounts and timing of collections, whether characterized as interest or principal, are reasonably estimable and the ultimate collectability of the acquisition amount of the loan and the discount is probable. If these criteria are not satisfied, the loan should be accounted for using the cost-recovery method. Application of the cost-recovery method requires that any amounts received be applied first against the recorded amount of the loan; when that amount has been reduced to zero, any additional amounts received are recognized as income.

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, origination costs and other fees are capitalized as part of the original investment, while for U.S. GAAP purposes those costs are expensed as incurred.

F-173

The Financial Group’s portfolio disclosures and U.S. GAAP methodology applied are disclosed in the following table:

	Stockholders’ equity						Net income
	December 31,						Year ended December 31,									Methodology applied under
Portfolio	2010			2009			2010			2009			2008			U.S. GAAP
Bancrecer I	Ps.	(106	)	Ps.	(131	)	Ps.	25		Ps.	21		Ps.	13		Cost-recovery method
Serfin Santander	14			(57		)	71			3			10			Cost-recovery method
Meseta	34			33			1			48			23			Cost-recovery method
Bancrecer II	(2		)	(2		)	—			—			—			Cost-recovery method
Goldman Sachs	(96		)	(147		)	51			39			42			Cost-recovery method
Cremi	(34		)	(41		)	7			8			13			Cost-recovery method
Banorte Sólida	(104		)	(128		)	24			23			46			Cost-recovery method
Bancomer I	(134		)	(153		)	19			(17		)	(27		)	Cost-recovery method
Bancomer II	—			1			(1		)	(8		)	(2		)	Interest method
Banco Unión	20			10			10			4			(5		)	Interest method
Bital I	6			(17		)	23			30			19			Interest method
Bancomer III	13			36			(23		)	2			6			Interest method
Bancomer IV	288			243			45			68			71			Interest method
Bital II	17			13			4			(1		)	(6		)	Interest method
Banamex Hipotecario	69			80			(11		)	(1		)	20			Interest method
GMAC Banorte	10			14			(4		)	(10		)	7			Interest method
Serfin Comercial I	7			10			(3		)	(6		)	27			Interest method
Serfin Hipotecario	87			73			14			14			17			Interest method
Vipesa	(3		)	—			(3		)	3			4			Interest method
	Ps.	86		Ps.	(163	)	Ps.	249		Ps.	220		Ps.	278

D)Derivatives

Beginning in 2007, under Mexican Banking GAAP, trading instruments are carried at fair value in the balance sheet, and changes in fair value are recognized in current earnings. The Financial Group accounts the hedge instruments as follows:

·For fair value hedges, the transactions are recorded as follows: the fair value of the derivative instrument is recorded in the balance sheet, and changes in the fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged item are recognized in current earnings.

·For cash flow hedges, the transactions are recorded as follows: the fair value of the derivative instrument is recorded in the balance sheet and changes in the effective portion are temporarily recognized as a component of other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and subsequently reclassified to current earnings when affected by the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in current earnings.

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, through December 31, 2008, the Financial Group was not required to bifurcate its embedded derivatives related to service contracts and purchase and sale transactions from their host contracts and record them at their fair value for financial statement purposes.

Through December 31, 2008, under Mexican Banking GAAP, the designation of a derivative instrument as a hedge of a net position (“macro hedging”) was allowed. However, macro hedging is not permitted under U.S. GAAP.

F-174

ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (previously SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”), of U.S. GAAP provides that:

·Derivative financial instruments considered to be an effective hedge from an economic perspective that have not been designated as a hedge for accounting purposes are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized in earnings concurrently with the change in fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities.

·For all derivative instruments that qualify as fair value hedges for accounting purposes, of existing assets, liabilities or firm commitments, the change in fair value of the derivative should be accounted for in the statement of income and be fully or partially offset in the statement of income by the change in fair value of the underlying hedged item; and

·For all derivative contracts that qualify as hedges of future cash flows for accounting purposes, the change in the fair value of the derivative should be initially recorded in other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Once the effects of the underlying hedged transaction are recognized in earnings, the corresponding amount in OCI is reclassified to the statement of income to offset the effect of the hedged transaction. All derivative instruments that qualify as hedges are subject to periodic effectiveness testing. Effectiveness is the derivative instrument’s ability to generate offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the underlying hedged item. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value for a hedged derivative is immediately recognized in earnings, regardless of whether the hedged derivative is designated as a cash flow or fair value hedge.

Under U.S. GAAP, prior to January 1, 2007, the Financial Group’s derivative contracts are not accounted for as hedges for accounting purposes and are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized in earnings concurrently with the change in fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities.

Under U.S. GAAP, certain embedded terms included in host contracts that affect some or all of the cash flows or the value of other exchanges required by the contract in a manner similar to a derivative instrument must be separated from the host contract and accounted for at fair value.

E)Reserve for foreclosed assets

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, assets repossessed or received as payment in kind are recorded at the value at which they were judicially repossessed by order of the courts. If the book value of the loan to be foreclosed on the date of foreclosure is lower than the value of the repossessed asset as judicially determined, the value of the asset is adjusted to the book value of the loan. Foreclosed assets are subsequently valued based on standard provisions established by the Commission depending on the nature of the foreclosed asset and the number of months outstanding.

Until December 31, 2006, in accordance with Mexican Banking GAAP foreclosed assets were considered to be monetary assets, while for U.S. GAAP these were treated as non-monetary assets. As a result of the change in the accounting for foreclosed assets under Mexican Banking GAAP, in 2007 the Financial Group no longer calculated REPOMO related to these assets as they were considered to be non-monetary assets.

Under U.S. GAAP, as required by ASC 310 “Receivables” (previously SFAS No. 15, “Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings”), assets repossessed or received as payment in kind are reported at the time of foreclosure or physical possession at their fair value less estimated costs to sell. Subsequent impairment adjustments should be recognized if the fair value of these assets decreases below the value measured when repossessed or received, determined on an asset by asset basis. Those assets not eligible for being considered as ‘available-for-sale’ are depreciated based on their useful life and are subject to impairment tests.

F-175

F)Insurance and postretirement activities

According to the accounting practices prescribed by the Mexican National Insurance and Surety Commission (Mexican Insurance GAAP), commissions and costs at the origination of each policy are charged to income as incurred. In addition, for life insurance policies, any amount received from individuals is considered as premium income. As required by U.S. GAAP, commissions and costs at origination are capitalized and amortized over the life of the policy using the effective interest method (deferred acquisition costs). Furthermore, premiums received in excess for life insurance policies are recorded as premium income.

Also, under the accounting practices prescribed by the National System of Saving for the Retirement Commission, the direct costs associated with the reception of new clients for the administration of the bills of retirement is recognized in income as incurred. Under U.S. GAAP the costs are capitalized and amortized over the time in which the service is rendered.

Accumulated deferred acquisition costs (DAC) as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 under U.S. GAAP are as follows:

	December 31,
	2010		2009			2008
Life	Ps.	24	Ps.	22		Ps.	20
P&C	316		287			255
Health	28		58			197
Afore	1,640		1,351			1,397
Total accumulated DAC	Ps.	2,008	Ps.	1,718		Ps.	1,869
DAC - net amount charged to net income	Ps.	290	Ps.	(151	)	Ps.	371

Under Mexican Insurance GAAP, certain reserves (disaster) are calculated using internal models previously approved by the Mexican National Insurance and Surety Commission. Generally pension reserves are based on the present value of benefits to be paid together with fees suggested by this Commission. U.S. GAAP establishes the use of a fee that allows policy benefits to be covered through premiums collected for pension reserves. Under U.S. GAAP, provisions for disaster reserves are based on actuarial calculations for losses incurred using the experience of the Financial Group.

The Financial Group recorded a reserve for catastrophic events under Mexican GAAP as a liability which is not allowed by U.S. GAAP.

Loss reserves and unearned premiums:

	December 31,
	2010			2009
Life	Ps.	23		Ps.	68
P&C	(348		)	(267		)
Health	(38		)	(125		)
LAE	(161		)	(107		)
Afore	(343		)	(308		)
Pensions	739			696
Total	(128		)	(43		)
Catastrophic reserve:
P&C	320			252
	320			252
Reinsurance activities	30			(70		)
Total reserves	Ps.	222		Ps.	139

F-176

Summary:

	December 31,
	2010		2009
DAC	Ps.	2,008	Ps.	1,718
Total reserves	222		139
Total adjustments	Ps.	2,230	Ps.	1,857

G)Business combinations

Through December 31, 2004, under Mexican Banking GAAP the excess of the purchase price over the adjusted book value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill (negative goodwill if book value exceeded the purchase price). Effective January 1, 2005, NIF B-7, which substantially conforms to the accounting established by U.S. GAAP, except as it relates to transactions between shareholders, requires the excess of the purchase price over the book value of assets and liabilities acquired to be allocated to the fair value of separately identifiable assets and liabilities acquired.

Under U.S. GAAP, ASC 805, “Business Combinations” (previously SFAS No. 141), requires the excess purchase price over the book value of assets and liabilities acquired to be allocated to the fair value of separately identifiable assets and liabilities acquired. Retail depositor relationships associated with an acquisition of a financial institution by a bank, termed the core deposit intangible, are identified and valued separately. In addition, any negative goodwill (excess of fair value over cost) is first allocated to reduce long-lived assets acquired and if any negative goodwill remains that amount is recognized as an extraordinary gain. The Financial Group’s U.S. GAAP stockholders’ equity and net income balances have been adjusted for differences generated by the balances of both intangible and fixed assets resulting from the Bancrecer acquisition in 2001.

The Financial Group’s subsidiary Banorte, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Banorte USA acquired 70% of the outstanding common stock of INB on November 16, 2006. The total purchase price including acquisition costs, exceeded the estimated fair value of tangible net assets acquired by approximately USD 176 million, of which approximately USD 16 million was assigned to an identifiable intangible asset with the remaining balance recorded by the Financial Group as goodwill. The identifiable intangible asset represents the future benefit associated with the acquisition of the core deposits and is being amortized over a period that approximates the expected attribution of the deposits. Factors that contributed to a purchase price resulting in goodwill include INB’s historical record of earnings, capable management, and the Financial Group’s ability to enter the US market, which are expected to complement and create synergies with the Financial Group’s existing service locations. The results of operations of INB are included in the consolidated earnings of the Financial Group as of the effective date of the acquisition. Certain differences related to Banorte USA, which prepares its financial information in accordance with U.S. GAAP are included in the reconciliation within the corresponding U.S. GAAP adjustments. The goodwill recorded in the acquisition of INB is being accounted for in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other” (previously SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”). Accordingly, goodwill will not be amortized; rather it is being tested annually for impairment. In addition, goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

In conjunction with the acquisition of 70% of the outstanding shares of INB, Banorte entered into a stock option agreement with INB shareholders. The agreement granted Banorte, or its assignees, an irrevocable option to purchase the remaining 30% of the outstanding shares of INB (hereinafter referred to as the “Call Option”). In addition, the agreement granted INB shareholders the option to require Banorte, or its assignees to purchase the remaining 30% of the outstanding shares of INB (hereinafter referred to as the “Put Right”). If Banorte or the INB shareholders exercise the Call Option or the Put Right, each party must purchase or sell the entire 30% of the remaining share of INB. In conformity with recommendations made by the Commission, the Financial Group recognized a liability for the obligation represented by the Put Right at the acquisition date. In subsequent periods, the obligation was revised based on the contractual amount established in the purchase agreement with changes in the value recognized in goodwill. Under U.S. GAAP, the Put Right was recognized as a free standing financial instrument under the premises of ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (previously SFAS No. 150 “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”), and was recorded at the acquisition date at its estimated fair market value, with corresponding changes in fair value recognized in current earnings.

F-177

In April 2009 the Financial Group exercised its call option acquiring the remaining 30% of INB’s shares and as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 is the 100% owner. For purposes of Mexican Banking GAAP this resulted in cancelling the value of the call option that had been recorded upon initial recognition. Under U.S. GAAP, the acquisition of the remaining 30% of the shares of INB, was treated as an equity transaction with no further valuation of the assets or liabilities of INB Financial Corp, and thus no recording of additional goodwill.

H)Employee retirement obligations

Under Mexican Banking GAAP NIF D-3 requires the recognition of a severance indemnity liability calculated based on actuarial computations. Similar recognition criteria under U.S. GAAP are established in ASC 712 “Compensation — Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits” (previously SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits”), which requires that a liability for certain termination benefits provided under an ongoing benefit arrangement such as these statutorily mandated severance indemnities, be recognized when the likelihood of future settlement is probable and the liability can be reasonably estimated. Prior to 2008, Mexican Banking GAAP allowed for the Financial Group to amortize the transition obligation related to the adoption of NIF D-3 over the expected service life of the employees. Beginning in 2008, an amendment to NIF D-3 requires the amortization of the unrecognized transition as of January 1, 2008 over the lesser of the expected remaining service period of employees or over five years. However, U.S. GAAP required the Financial Group to recognize such effect upon initial adoption and does not permit an entity to reduce the accrued liability by any unrecognized items, which results in a difference in the amount recorded under the two accounting principles.

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, pension and seniority premium obligations are determined in accordance with NIF D-3. For U.S. GAAP, such costs are accounted for in accordance with ASC 715 “Compensation — Retirement Benefits” (previously SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pension”), whereby the liability is measured, similar to Mexican Banking GAAP, using the projected unit credit method at net discount rates. Those requirements became effective on January 1, 1989 whereas NIF D-3 became effective on January 1, 1993. Therefore, a difference between Mexican Banking GAAP and U.S. GAAP exists due to the accounting for the transition obligation at different implementation dates.

Postretirement benefits are accounted for under U.S. GAAP in accordance with ASC 715 “Compensation — Retirement Benefits” (previously SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions”), which applies to all post-retirement benefits, such as life insurance provided outside a pension plan or other postretirement health care and welfare benefits expectedto be provided by an employer to current and former employees. The cost of postretirement benefits is recognized over the employees’ service periods and actuarial assumptions are used to project the cost of health care benefits and the present value of those benefits. For Mexican Banking GAAP purposes as required by NIF D-3, the Financial Group accounts for such benefits in a manner similar to U.S. GAAP. The requirements in ASC 715 became effective on January 1, 1993 whereas NIF D-3 became effective on January 1, 2003. Therefore, a difference between Mexican Banking GAAP and U.S. GAAP exists due to the accounting for the transition obligation at different implementation dates.

The Financial Group has adopted the provisions of ASC 715 “Compensation — Retirement Benefits” (SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”).  This statement requires the Financial Group to (1) fully recognize, as an asset or liability, the overfunded or underfunded status of defined pension and other postretirement benefit plans; (2) recognize changes in the funded status through other comprehensive income in the year in which the changes occur; and (3) measure the funded status of defined pension and other postretirement benefit plans as of the date of the its fiscal year-end.

I)Capitalized costs

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, prior to the issuance of NIF C-8, “Intangible Assets”, all expenses incurred in the preoperating or development stages were capitalized. Upon adoption of NIF C-8, research costs and preoperating costs should be expensed as a period cost, unless they can be classified as development costs to be amortized on a straight-line basis after operations commence for a period not exceeding 20 years. Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with ASC 730, “Accounting for Research and Development”, and ASC 340, “Other Assets and Deferred Cost” (previously SFAS No. 2, “Accounting for Research and Development Costs,” and SOP 98-5, “Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities”), such research and preoperating expenses are expensed as incurred.

F-178

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, the Financial Group has capitalized certain significant costs related to implementation projects. For U.S. GAAP purposes, the Financial Group follows the guidance established by ASC 350 “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other” (previously SOP 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use”). This standard establishes that computer software costs incurred in the preliminary project stage should be expensed as incurred. Once the capitalization criteria of the standard have been met, external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use computer software; payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with and who devote time to the internal-use computer software project (to the extent of the time spent directly on the project); and interest costs incurred when developing computer software for internal use should be capitalized. Generally, training costs and data conversion costs should be expensed as incurred. As the U.S. GAAP standard is more stringent, the reconciling item represents an adjustment for items that have been capitalized for Mexican Banking GAAP purposes that do not qualify for capitalization under U.S. GAAP.

J)Securitizations

Mortgage Loan Securitization

During December 2006, the Financial Group securitized mortgage loans in the amount of Ps. 2,147, by transferring such loans to a qualifying special purpose entity (the “Trust”) created specifically for purposes of this transaction. The Trust issued certificates that trade on the Mexican Stock Exchange and guarantees its holders with a specific rate of return. The Financial Group received a subordinated certificate from the Trust, which entitles the Financial Group to retain the excess cash flows in the Trust, after reimbursing the holders of the certificates, which was recorded at its nominal value and classified as an available-for-sale security. Under Mexican Banking GAAP, this securitization was accounted for as a sale and as a result of recognizing the retained interest represented by the subordinated certificate at nominal value no gain or loss on the sale was recognized. As of January 2007, subsequent increases or decreases in the fair value of the subordinated certificate are reflected by an adjustment, net of taxes, being charged or credited to the other comprehensive income portion of stockholders’ equity, which conforms to the accounting established by U.S. GAAP.

Under US GAAP, the securitization met the criteria established by ASC 860 for sale accounting and the securitized loans were derecognized by the Financial Group as of the date of sale. The Financial Group allocated the previous book carrying amount between the loans sold and the subordinated certificate (the retained interest) in proportion to their relative fair values on the date of transfer. The Financial Group recognized a gain on the sale of Ps. 358 by comparing the net sale proceeds (after transaction costs) to the allocated book value of the loans sold. The subordinated certificate was recorded at its relative book value at the date of sale and has been classified as an available-for-sale security under ASC 320. Subsequent increases or decreases in the fair value of the subordinated certificate are reflected by an adjustment, net of taxes, being charged or credited to the other comprehensive income portion of stockholders’ equity.

State and Municipal Government Loans Securitization

During November 2007, the Financial Group securitized state and municipal government loans in the amount of Ps. 5,599 by transferring such loans to a qualifying special purpose entity (the “Trust”) created specifically for purposes of this transaction. The Trust issued certificates that trade on the Mexican Stock Exchange and guarantees its holders with a specific rate of return. The Financial Group retained the 100% of the securitization certificates issued by the Trust and immediately subsequent to the securitization sold them under repurchase agreements. The Financial Group received a subordinated certificate from the Trust, which entitles the Financial Group to retain the excess cash flows in the Trust, after reimbursing the holders of the certificates, which was recorded at its fair value and classified as a trading security. Under Mexican Banking GAAP, this securitization was accounted for as a sale and generated a gain, resulting from the difference between the fair value of the assets received and the carrying value of the transferred assets.

For U.S. GAAP purposes, given that the Financial Group repurchased 100% of the certificates issued by the Trust, the transactions did not meet the sales criteria established by ASC 860 and as a result were accounted for as secured borrowings.

For Mexican Banking GAAP, through December 2008, both subordinated certificates were presented as part of the “Investments in securities” line item in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In 2009, the Financial Group reclassified them to the “Receivables generated by securitizations” line item, due to a change in the Commissions’ accounting criteria

F-179

K)Other adjustments

These include the following:

	Stockholders’ equity						Net income
	December 31,						Year ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009			2008
1) Non-accrual loans	Ps.	428		Ps.	326		Ps.	102		Ps.	157		Ps.	142
2) Guarantees	(5		)	(11		)	6			(18		)	29
3) Repurchase agreements	—			—			—			24			46
4) Investment valuation	—			7			(237		)	(629		)	(1,121		)
5) Equity method investments	—			—			—			53			90
	Ps.	423		Ps.	322		Ps.	(129	)	Ps.	(413	)	Ps.	(814	)

These other adjustments are related to the following differences between Mexican Banking GAAP and U.S. GAAP:

1)Under Mexican Banking GAAP, the recognition of interest income is suspended when certain of the Financial Group’s loans become past due based on criteria established by the Commission. Under U.S. GAAP, the accrual of interest is generally discontinued when, in the opinion of management, there is an indication that the borrower may be unable to make payments as they become due. As a general practice, this occurs when loans are 90 days or more overdue. Any accrued but uncollected interest is reversed against interest income at that time.

2)For U.S. GAAP purposes, guarantees are accounted for under ASC 460 “Guarantees”, which requires that an entity recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. For Mexican Banking GAAP purposes, the Financial Group does not record the fair value of such guarantees in its consolidated financial statements.

3)The repurchase and resale agreements are transactions by which the purchaser acquires ownership of financial instruments for a sum of money and is obligated to transfer instruments of the same kind to the seller of the securities within the agreed term and in exchange for the same price, plus a premium. Under Mexican Banking GAAP repurchase transactions are recorded according to their economic substance, which is financing with collateral, by which the Financial Group, acting as the purchaser, gives cash as financing in exchange for financial assets as guarantee in the event of noncompliance. Prior to September, 2008, repurchase and resale agreements represented the temporary purchase or sale of certain financial instruments in exchange for a specified premium to be paid or received and with the obligation to resell or repurchase the underlying securities and were recorded as sales and purchases of securities, respectively.  A net asset or liability was recorded at the fair value of the commitment to subsequently repurchase or resell the securities, respectively. Under U.S. GAAP, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are transfer transactions subject to specific provisions and conditions that must be met in order for a transaction to qualify as a sale rather than a secured borrowing, In most cases, banks in the U.S. enter into repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions that qualify as secured borrowings. Accordingly, the Financial Group’s assets subject to a repurchase agreement would not be derecognized. Due to changes in Mexican Banking GAAP effective October 2008, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are accounted for as secured borrowings, as is also required under U.S. GAAP.

4)Until December 31, 2008, the investment valuation adjustment was related to a difference in the income recognition for available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities. For U.S. GAAP purposes, the premiums and discounts of such securities are accounted for based on the interest method. Under Mexican Banking GAAP, the Financial Group recognized income based on the straight line method. Additionally, under Mexican Banking GAAP, the Financial Group recognizes the effect of exchange rate fluctuations of its securities available for sale within income of the year. Under U.S. GAAP, this impact is recognized in other comprehensive income. As disclosed in Note 4, due to changes in Mexican Banking GAAP effective January 2009, the investment valuation related to available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities substantially conforms to U.S. GAAP requirements.

F-180

5)Until December 31, 2008, under Mexican Banking GAAP, investments in associated companies in which the Financial Group had more than a 10% ownership, were accounted for by the equity method. For U.S. GAAP purposes, investments in associated companies in which the Financial Group has a 20% to 50% ownership, but not a controlling interest, are accounted for by the equity method. Investments in which the Financial Group has less than a 20% ownership are generally accounted for under the cost method, unless it can demonstrate that it has significant influence.

L)Fair value measurements

For purposes of U.S. GAAP, the Financial Group applies the accounting provisions of ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure” (previously SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements). U.S. GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements and clarifies the definition of exchange price as the price between market participants in an orderly transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability, that is, the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The changes to existing practice resulting from the application of this statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years for financial assets and liabilities. On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued guidance included in ASC 820 (Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-3 “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active”), which was effective upon issuance. The provisions of ASC 820 were deferred until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The effect of adopting ASC 820 as it relates to the Financial Group’s financial assets and liabilities is included in the reconciliation between Mexican Banking GAAP and U.S. GAAP. There was no impact to the Financial Group’s U.S. GAAP balances as a result of adopting this standard related to its nonfinancial assets and liabilities.

The Financial Group applied the following hierarchy for fair value.

Level 1. - Assets and liabilities for which an identical instrument is negotiated in an active market, such as publicly negotiated instruments or futures contracts (highly liquid and actively traded).

Level 2. - Assets and liabilities valued using information observable in the market for similar instruments; prices quoted in inactive markets; or other observable assumptions that can be evidenced with available information in the market for substantially the entire terms of the asset and liability.

Level 3. - Assets and liabilities whose significant valuation assumptions are not readily observable in the market; instruments valued using the best information available, some of which is developed internally, considering the risk premium that a market participant would need.

The Financial Group considers the primary or the best market where the transaction can take place and the assumptions that a market participant would use to value the asset or liability. When possible, the Financial Group uses active markets and observable market prices for identical assets and liabilities. When the identical assets and liabilities are not negotiated in active markets, the Financial Group uses observable market information for similar assets and liabilities. However, certain assets and liabilities are not actively negotiated in observable markets, so the Financial Group has to use alternate valuation methods to measure fair value.

Many over the counter (“OTC”) contracts have bid and ask prices that can be observed in the marketplace. Bid prices reflect the highest price that a party is willing to pay for an asset. Ask prices represent the lowest price that a party is willing to accept for an asset. For financial instruments whose inputs are based on bid-ask prices, the Financial Group does not require that the fair value estimate always be a predetermined point in the bid-ask range. The Financial Group’s policy is to allow for mid-market pricing and adjusting to the point within the bid-ask range that meets the Financial Group’s best estimate of fair value. For offsetting positions in the same financial instrument, the same price within the bid-ask spread is used to measure both the long and short positions.

F-181

Fair value for many OTC contracts is derived using pricing models. Pricing models take into account the contract terms (including maturity) as well as multiple inputs, including, where applicable, commodity prices, equity prices, interest rate yield curves, credit curves, correlation, and creditworthiness of the counterparty, option volatility and currency rates. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the impact of the Financial Group’s own credit spreads is also considered when measuring the fair value of liabilities, including OTC derivatives contracts. Where appropriate, valuation adjustments are made to account for various factors such as liquidity risk (bid-ask adjustments), credit quality and model uncertainty. These adjustments are subject to judgment, are applied on a consistent basis and are based upon observable inputs where available. The Financial Group generally subjects all valuations and models to a review process initially and on a periodic basis thereafter.

Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, the Financial Group’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that the Financial Group believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a non recurring basis. These assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances. These include property, furniture and fixtures, foreclosed assets and goodwill that are written down to fair value when they are determined to be impaired. As mentioned in Note 4, the Financial Group has established guidelines to identify and, if applicable, record losses derived from the impairment or decrease in value of long-lived tangible or intangible assets, including goodwill. No impairment to property, furniture, fixtures, foreclosed assets or goodwill was identified for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. As a result no fair value adjustments to these assets were recorded and the related fair value disclosures were not necessary.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Financial Group did not have any liabilities measured on a non recurring basis; as such, no disclosure was necessary.

Below is a description of the valuation methods used for the instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including the general classification of such instruments according to their fair value hierarchy.

Investments in securities

When reference prices are available in an active market and the financial instruments are negotiated in liquid organized markets, they are considered Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. If market price is not available or is available solely in inactive markets, fair value is estimated using valuation methods, prices established for other instruments with similar characteristics or using discounted cash flows that include assumptions prepared by management. This type of securities is classified in Level 2, and in the event the model includes assumptions prepared by management, the securities are classified in Level 3, following the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative financial instruments

Derivatives quoted on stock exchanges whose fair value is based on quoted market prices are classified in fair value hierarchy Level 1. However, for those derivative contracts quoted over the counter, their fair value is based on widely accepted valuation methods in the market using observable inputs that can be evidenced with information available in the market. Such derivatives are classified in fair value hierarchy Level 2.

F-182

The following fair value hierarchy table presents information regarding the Financial Group’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:

	Fair value measurements as of December 31, 2010
	Quoted prices In active markets for identical instruments		Significant other observable inputs			Significant unobservable inputs		December 31, 2010
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)			(Level 3)		Fair value
Trading securities	Ps.	66,181	Ps.	—		Ps.	—	Ps.	66,181
Available for sale securities	4,415		7,873			—		12,288
Derivative asset position	—		8,059			—		8,059
Derivative liability position	—		(10,737		)	—		(10,737		)
Securitization receivables	—		—			950		950
IFC Transaction	—		—			4,244		4,244
Total	Ps.	70,596	Ps.	5,195		Ps.	5,194	Ps.	80,985

	Fair value measurements as of December 31, 2009
	Quoted prices In active markets for identical instruments		Significant other observable inputs			Significant unobservable inputs		December 31, 2009
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)			(Level 3)		Fair value
Trading securities	Ps.	24,459	Ps.	—		Ps.	—	Ps.	24,459
Available for sale securities	5,098		6,603					11,701
Derivative asset position	—		5,880			—		5,880
Derivative liability position	—		(8,375		)	—		(8,375		)
Securitization receivables	—		—			432		432
IFC Transaction	—		—			3,651		3,651
Total	Ps.	29,557	Ps.	4,108		Ps.	4,083	Ps.	37,748

	Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	Securities
Beginning balance	Ps.	4,083
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)	518
Included in other comprehensive income	593
Ending balance	Ps.	5,194

The definition of fair value under U.S. GAAP, which is based on an exit price notion, differs from the definition established by Mexican Banking GAAP, which is based on a settlement price notion. Therefore, the Financial Group has included a reconciling item in U.S. GAAP reconciliation as a result of adopting this accounting pronouncement.

F-183

M)IFC transaction

At the Banorte Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting held on October 23, 2009 both an increase in its ordinary shareholders’ equity and a modification to its corporate bylaws in order to complete the capitalization of the IFC to become a Banorte stockholder with an investment of USD 150 million were approved, which was settled in November 2009 by turning over to the IFC 3,370,657,357 ordinary nominative “O” Series shares with a nominal value of Ps. 0.10 (ten cents). The IFC liquidated this operation with USD 82.3 million in cash and the capitalization of a credit of USD 67.7 million. Banorte, the IFC and the Financial Group executed a series of agreements in which the IFC is compelled to maintain its share in Banorte for at least five years. After five years the IFC may sell its share to the Financial Group, which will have to purchase it with shares of its own or cash, depending on the Financial Group’s choice and convenience.

For US GAAP purposes, the redeemable shares held by the IFC that allow them to exchange their shares in Banorte for cash or shares of the Financial Group (to be determined by the Financial Group if the IFC excercises their option) has been classified outside the permanent equity in accordance with ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity”, (previously SFAS No. 150 “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”) which requires securities with redemption features that are not solely within the control of the issuer to be classified outside of permanent equity. The initial carrying amount of the redeemable equity security should be its fair value at date of issue. The Financial Group has elected to recognize changes in the redemption value immediately as they occur and adjust the carrying value of the security to equal the redemption value at the end of each reporting period.

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, NIF C-12 “Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Liability, Equity, or Both” requires the Financial Group to record the noncontrolling interest held by the IFC at the original transaction value within stockholders’ equity since the IFC is exposed to the same risks and rewards as any other shareholder of Banorte and given that the intention of the Financial Group is to redeem the IFC’s noncontrolling interest in exchange of the Financial Group’s own shares in the event that the IFC exercises its option. Any future transactions between the Financial Group and the IFC as it relates to this matter will be accounted for directly in stockholders’ equity as it is between common shareholders.

N)Income taxes

Under Mexican Banking GAAP as required by NIF D-4, “Income Taxes”, income tax and employee statutory profit sharing (PTU) are charged to results as they are incurred and the Financial Group recognizes deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the future consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective income tax basis, measured using enacted rates. The effects of changes in the statutory rates are accounted for in the period in which the enactment occurs. The Financial Group recognizes the benefits related to tax loss carryforwards and asset tax credit carryforwards when such amounts are realized. Deferred tax assets are recognized only when it is highly probable that sufficient future taxable income will be generated to recover such deferred tax assets.  Under Mexican Banking GAAP the Financial Group did not recognize deferred tax assets in the acquisition of Bancrecer as their potential utilization was not considered to be highly probable at the acquisition date.

PTU arises from temporary differences between the accounting result and income for PTU purposes and is recognized only when it can be reasonably assumed that such difference will generate a liability or benefit, and there is no indication that circumstances will change in such a way that the liabilities will not be paid or benefits will not be realized.

Under U.S. GAAP, as required by ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (previously SFAS No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”), the Financial Group recognizes deferred income tax and PTU assets and liabilities for the future consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective income tax or PTU bases, measured using enacted rates. The effects of changes in the statutory rates are accounted for in the period when the enactment occurs. Deferred income tax assets are also recognized for the estimated future effects of tax loss carryforwards and asset tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets are reduced by any benefits that, in the opinion of management, more likely than not that the tax assets will be realized. Under U.S. GAAP the Financial Group recognized deferred tax asset related to Bancrecer’s acquisition as their realization was considered to be more likely than not.

F-184

U.S. GAAP differences as described above, to the extent taxable are reflected in the U.S. GAAP deferred tax balances.

O)Noncontrolling interest

The effects of the U.S. GAAP differences as described in this Note reflect the amounts assigned to the noncontrolling interests.

IIConsolidation:

Under Mexican Banking GAAP, the Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries under the control of financial holding companies, except those in the insurance and pension sector. The determination of which companies are deemed to be within the insurance and pension sector is not based solely on the application of a conceptual framework. The SHCP has the right to determine if a company is or is not within the insurance and pension sector, and therefore could be required to consolidate.

Under U.S. GAAP, the basic principle is that when a Financial Group has a controlling financial interest (either through a majority voting interest or through the existence of other control factors) of an entity, such entity’s financial statements should be consolidated, irrespective of whether the activities of the subsidiary are nonhomogeneous with those of the parent.

No adjustments to consolidated net income or consolidated stockholders’ equity result due to the different consolidation principles disclosed above.

IIIAdditional disclosures:

A)Earnings per common share (“EPS”) in accordance with U.S. GAAP

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, EPS is based on the provisions of ASC 260, “Earnings per Share” (previously SFAS No. 128), and is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Basic and diluted earnings per share are based upon, 2,018,257,560, 2,017,132,134, and 2,016,959,232 weighted-average shares outstanding for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Potentially dilutive common shares for all periods presented are not significant. Basic and diluted net income per common share computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP is presented below:

	Year ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to controlling interest	Ps.	3.4776	Ps.	3.5423	Ps.	3.2379

B)Subsequent events

The Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements have been approved by the Board of Directors at their January 25, 2011 meeting in accordance with the responsibility assigned to them. The Financial Group has evaluated events subsequent to December 31, 2010 to assess the need for potential recognition or disclosure in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Such events were evaluated through January 25, 2011, the date the Financial Group’s Mexican Banking GAAP consolidated financial statements were available to be issued.

In an official letter UBVA/012/2011 dated March 8, 2011, the SHCP having previously obtained a positive opinion from the Commission and Banco de México, authorized the merger of the Financial Group as the merging and subsisting entity with IXE Grupo Financiero as the merged and absorbed entity, in accordance with Article 10 of the Law Regulating Financial Groups. The merger is subject to the terms and conditions established by the shareholders of each entity as presented to the SHCP.

F-185

C)Cash flow information

Beginning in 2009, an amendment to Mexican Banking GAAP requires the presentation of a cash flow statement on a prospective basis instead of a statement of changes in financial position. Prior to such date Mexican Banking GAAP established the presentation requirements related to the statement of changes in financial position. The statement of changes in financial position presents the sources and uses of funds during the period measured as the differences, in constant pesos, between the beginning and ending balances of balance sheet items adjusted by the excess (shortfall) in restatement of capital. The monetary effect and the effect of changes in exchange rates are considered cash items in the determination of resources generated from operations due to the fact that they affect the purchasing power of the entity. The following price-level adjusted consolidated statement of cash flows presented for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, includes the impact of U.S. GAAP adjustments in conformity with recommendations established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, SEC Regulations and International Practices Task Force Committees.

Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(In millions of Mexican pesos)

	2010			2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income under U.S. GAAP	Ps.	6,949		Ps.	7,074		Ps.	6,476
Unrealized investment (income) loss	(52		)	350			1,171
Allowance for loan losses	7,056			6,616			6,625
Depreciation and amortization	1,191			953			1,450
Deferred income taxes and employee profit sharing	67			(518		)	(290		)
Other provisions	597			(961		)	(354		)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries and associated companies	(83		)	(131		)	(125		)
Allowance for doubtful accounts	164			182			59
Periodic pension cost	206			160			199
Loss (gain) on sale of property	8			(8		)	—
Loss on sale of foreclosed assets	85			31			273
Loss (gain) on sale of trading securities	455			280			(116		)
Loss (gain) on sale of available for sale securities	157			23			(53		)
Amortization of purchased portfolios	588			566			680
Insurance and postretirement reserves	(375		)	(117		)	(286		)
Amortization of debt issuance fees and costs	(2		)	(126		)	(4		)
Income recognition of purchased portfolios	(249		)	(221		)	(278		)
Other non-cash items	923			535			(2,014		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trading securities	(16,232		)	(23,015		)	(1,455		)
Trading derivative financial instruments	181			(82		)	2,435
Decrease (increase) in settlement accounts payable	1,357			182			(649		)
(Increase) decrease in settlement accounts receivable	(1,804		)	63			1,262
Decrease (increase) in other accounts receivable	1,759			(1,769		)	(4,286		)
Increase in other accounts payable	6,087			3,756			5,709
(Increase) decrease in deferred charges	(1,216		)	623			(1,560		)
(Decrease) increase in deferred credits	(174		)	4			242
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	7,643			(5,550		)	15,111

F-186

	2010			2009			2008
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of property, furniture and equipment	305			259			123
Acquisitions of property, furniture and equipment	(2,364		)	(1,467		)	(1,345		)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets	596			636			758
Treasury transactions - held to maturity securities	17,408			31,284			(219,851		)
Treasury transactions - available for sale securities	(7,056		)	(5,365		)	(4,430		)
Granting of loans	(32,462		)	(8,698		)	(48,294		)
Purchased credit portfolios	(553		)	(391		)	(302		)
Repurchase agreements — purchases	4,566			5,454			(90		)
Other investing activities	123			129			753
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(19,437		)	21,841			(272,678		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
(Repayments of) proceeds from subordinated liabilities	(298		)	(2,481		)	10,343
Issuance (repurchase) of shares	70			(451		)	103
Dividends paid	(1,029		)	(364		)	(949		)
Deposits received	19,005			15,361			53,319
Repayments of bank debt and other loans	5,483			(15,636		)	9,037
Repurchase agreements — sales	(6,883		)	(7,087		)	196,368
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	16,348			(10,658		)	268,221
Effects of exchange rates on cash	(1,032		)	(738		)	2,026
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	3,522			4,895			12,680
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year	59,291			54,396			41,716
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year	62,813			59,291			54,396
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Income taxes	Ps.	2,811		Ps.	2,649		Ps.	4,013
Interest	Ps.	37,356		Ps.	38,934		Ps.	44,630
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities:
Transfers from loans to foreclosed assets	198			523			542
Transfers from purchased credit portfolio to foreclosed assets	488			327			233
Transfers (from) to foreclosed assets from (to) loans and purchased credit portfolio, net	Ps.	(686	)	Ps.	(850	)	Ps.	(775	)

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. In addition, the Financial Group maintains a minimum capital requirement as required by the Commission (regulatory monetary fund), which is included as a cash equivalent.

F-187

D) New accounting pronouncements

On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued ASC 860-10 (previously SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140), which eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity (“QSPE”) and modifies the derecognition provisions of a previously issued accounting standard. ASC 860-10 also requires additional disclosures which focus on the transferor’s continuing involvement with the transferred assets and the related risks retained. ASC 860-10 is effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The adoption of FASB ASC 860-10 (SFAS No. 166) had no effect on the Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements.

On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810-10 (previously SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (R)), which amends the consolidation guidance that applies to variable interest entities. The new guidance requires an entity to carefully reconsider its previous consolidation conclusions, including (1) whether an entity is a variable interest entity (VIE), (2) whether the enterprise is the VIE’s primary beneficiary, and (3) what type of financial statement disclosures are required. ASC 810-10 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The amendments to the consolidation guidance affect all entities and enterprises currently within the scope of ASC 810-10, as well as qualifying special-purpose entities that are currently outside the scope of ASC 810-10 (FIN 46(R)). The adoption of FASB ASC 810-10 (SFAS No. 167) had no effect on the Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13, which contains new guidance on accounting for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. When vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables and allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling price method. The new guidance includes new disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue recognition. The guidance in the ASU will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of FASB ASU 2009-13 had no effect on the Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements.

On January 21, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06. The ASU amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (SFAS No. 157) to add new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This ASU amends guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets under ASC 715, Compensation — Retirement Benefits, to require that disclosures be provided by classes of assets instead of by major categories of assets. The guidance in the ASU is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. In the period of initial adoption, entities will not be required to provide the amended disclosures for any previous periods presented for comparative purposes. However, those disclosures are required for periods ending after initial adoption. The adoption of FASB ASU 2010-06 (SFAS No. 157) had no effect on the Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11 - Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives which is included in the Certification under ASC 815. This update clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements.  Only an embedded credit derivative that is related to the subordination of one financial instrument to another qualifies for the exemption. This guidance became effective for the fiscal years beginning January 1, 2010. Accordingly, the adoption of FASB ASU 2010-11 had no effect on the Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13 - Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (ASU 2010-13. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on

F-188

or after December 15, 2010. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of adopting the guidance in the ASU.

E) International Financial Reporting Standards

In January 2009, the Commission published amendments to the Mexican Securities Law, including the obligation to prepare and present financial statements using International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) beginning in 2012, with early adoption permitted. Financial institutions such as the Financial Group are prohibited from presenting IFRS for purposes of their local filings and must continue to present their basic financial statements in accordance with Mexican Banking GAAP. However, the Financial Group’s equity method investor Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. (“Gruma”) is required to comply with the changes to the Mexican Securities Law and has disclosed in public documents that they intend to early adopt IFRS beginning in 2011. The Financial Group is in the process of assessing the impacts of IFRS on its financial information for purposes of providing such information to Gruma for their future filings.

F-189