0000088053-11-000544.txt : 20110427 0000088053-11-000544.hdr.sgml : 20110427 20110427110102 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000088053-11-000544 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: N-CSRS PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 7 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20110228 FILED AS OF DATE: 20110427 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20110427 EFFECTIVENESS DATE: 20110427 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: DWS EQUITY TRUST CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001052427 IRS NUMBER: 000000000 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: N-CSRS SEC ACT: 1940 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 811-08599 FILM NUMBER: 11782279 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 345 PARK AVENUE CITY: NEW YORK STATE: NY ZIP: 10154-0004 BUSINESS PHONE: 212-454-6778 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 345 PARK AVENUE CITY: NEW YORK STATE: NY ZIP: 10154-0004 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: SCUDDER EQUITY TRUST/IL DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 20010726 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: KEMPER EQUITY TRUST DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19980106 0001052427 S000023628 DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund C000069598 Class A C000069599 Class C C000069600 Class S C000069601 Institutional Class N-CSRS 1 sr022811saa.htm DWS SELECT ALTERNATIVE ALLOCATION FUND sr022811saa.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM N-CSRS

Investment Company Act file number   811-08599

 
DWS Equity Trust
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154-0004
 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (201) 593-6408

Paul Schubert
100 Plaza One
Jersey City, NJ 07311
 (Name and Address of Agent for Service)

Date of fiscal year end:
8/31
   
Date of reporting period:
2/28/2011

ITEM 1.
REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS
   
 
FEBRUARY 28, 2011
Semiannual Report
to Shareholders
 
DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund
 
Contents
4 Performance Summary
7 Information About Your Fund's Expenses
9 Portfolio Summary
10 Investment Portfolio
12 Statement of Assets and Liabilities
14 Statement of Operations
15 Statement of Changes in Net Assets
16 Financial Highlights
20 Notes to Financial Statements
26 Investment Management Agreement Approval
31 Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant
35 Account Management Resources
36 Privacy Statement
 
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus. To obtain a summary prospectus, if available, or prospectus for any of our funds, refer to the Account Management Resources information provided in the back of this booklet. We advise you to consider the fund's objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The summary prospectus and prospectus contain this and other important information about the fund. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.
 
Although allocation among different asset categories generally limits risk, portfolio management may favor an asset category that underperforms other assets or markets as a whole. The fund expects to invest in underlying funds that emphasize alternatives or non-traditional asset categories or investment strategies, and as a result, it is subject to the risk factors of those underlying funds. Some of those risks include stock market risk, credit and interest rate risk, floating rate risk, volatility in commodity prices, infrastructure and high-yield debt securities, short sales risk and the political, general economic, liquidity and currency risks of foreign investments, which may be particularly significant for emerging markets. Investing in derivatives entails special risks relating to liquidity, leverage and credit that may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Short sales — which involve selling borrowed securities in anticipation of a price decline, then returning an equal number of the securities at some point in the future — could magnify losses and increase volatility. See the prospectus for additional risks and specific details regarding the fund's risk profile.
 
DWS Investments is part of Deutsche Bank's Asset Management division and, within the US, represents the retail asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. and DWS Trust Company.
 
NOT FDIC/NCUA INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE NOT A DEPOSIT NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY
 
Performance Summary February 28, 2011
Average Annual Total Returns as of 2/28/11
Unadjusted for Sales Charge
6-Month
1-Year
Life of Fund*
Class A
7.89%
12.95%
9.54%
Class C
7.58%
12.10%
8.72%
Adjusted for the Maximum Sales Charge
     
Class A (max 5.75% load)
1.69%
6.45%
6.89%
Class C (max 1.00% CDSC)
6.58%
12.10%
8.72%
No Sales Charges
     
Class S
7.97%
13.14%
9.76%
Institutional Class
8.07%
13.14%
9.76%
MSCI World Index+
26.06%
21.67%
7.94%
Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index+
-0.83%
4.93%
7.26%
Blended Index +
14.76%
15.27%
8.41%
 
Sources: Lipper Inc. and Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.
 
 Total returns shown for periods less than one year are not annualized.
 
* The Fund commenced operations on October 1, 2008. Index returns began on September 30, 2008.
 
Performance in the Average Annual Total Returns table above and the Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment line graph that follows is historical and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal fluctuate so your shares may be worth more or less when redeemed. Current performance may differ from performance data shown. Please visit www.dws-investments.com for the Fund's most recent month-end performance. Performance includes reinvestment of all distributions. Unadjusted returns do not reflect sales charges and would have been lower if they had.
 
The gross expense ratios of the Fund, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated December 1, 2010 are 1.86%, 2.63%, 1.70% and 1.52% for Class A, Class C, Class S and Institutional Class shares, respectively, and may differ from the expense ratios disclosed in the Financial Highlights tables in this report. These expense ratios include net expenses of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.
 
Index returns assume reinvestment of dividends and, unlike Fund returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
 
Performance figures do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment (Adjusted for Maximum Sales Charge)
[] DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund — Class A
[] MSCI World Index+
[] Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index+
[] Blended Index+
 
 
The Fund's growth of an assumed $10,000 investment is adjusted for the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. This results in a net initial investment of $9,425.
 
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
 
Performance of other share classes will vary based on the sales charges and the fee structure of those classes.
 
* The Fund commenced operations on October 1, 2008. Index returns began on September 30, 2008.
 
+ The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) World Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted measure of global stock markets including the US, Canada, Europe, Australia and the Far East. The index is calculated using closing local market prices and translates into US dollars using the London close foreign exchange rates.
 
The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged, market-value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues and mortgage securities.
 
The Blended Index consists of 60% in the MSCI World Index and 40% in the Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index.
Net Asset Value and Distribution Information
 
   
Class A
   
Class C
   
Class S
   
Institutional Class
 
Net Asset Value:
2/28/11
  $ 11.36     $ 11.35     $ 11.35     $ 11.35  
8/31/10
  $ 10.72     $ 10.66     $ 10.73     $ 10.72  
Distribution Information:
Six Months as of 2/28/11:
Income Dividends
  $ .20     $ .12     $ .23     $ .23  
 

Lipper Rankings — Global Flexible Portfolio Funds Category as of 2/28/11
Period
Rank
 
Number of Fund Classes Tracked
Percentile Ranking (%)
Class A
1-Year
133
of
204
65
Class C
1-Year
136
of
204
67
Class S
1-Year
131
of
204
64
Institutional Class
1-Year
131
of
204
64
 
Source: Lipper Inc. Rankings are historical and do not guarantee future results. Rankings are based on total return unadjusted for sales charges with distributions reinvested. If sales charges had been included, rankings might have been less favorable.
 
Information About Your Fund's Expenses
 
As an investor of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses. Examples of transaction costs include sales charges (loads) and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following table is intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In addition to the ongoing expenses which the Fund bears directly, the Fund's shareholders indirectly bear the expense of the Underlying Funds in which the Fund invests. These expenses are not included in the Fund's annualized expense ratios used to calculate the expense estimate in the table. In the most recent six-month period, the Fund limited the ongoing expenses the Fund bears directly; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The examples in the table are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (September 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011).
 
The table illustrates your Fund's expenses in two ways:
 
Actual Fund Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Fund using the Fund's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
 
Hypothetical 5% Fund Return. This helps you to compare your Fund's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Fund's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical fund return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
 
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. An account maintenance fee of $6.25 per quarter for Class S shares may apply for certain accounts whose balances do not meet the applicable minimum initial investment. This fee is not included in the table. If it was, the estimate of expenses paid for Class S shares during the period would be higher, and account value during the period would be lower, by this amount.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended February 28, 2011
 
Actual Fund Return
 
Class A
   
Class C
   
Class S
   
Institutional Class
 
Beginning Account Value 9/1/10
  $ 1,000.00     $ 1,000.00     $ 1,000.00     $ 1,000.00  
Ending Account Value 2/28/11
  $ 1,078.90     $ 1,075.80     $ 1,079.70     $ 1,080.70  
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
  $ 1.86     $ 5.71     $ .57     $ .57  
Hypothetical 5% Fund Return
 
Class A
   
Class C
   
Class S
   
Institutional Class
 
Beginning Account Value 9/1/10
  $ 1,000.00     $ 1,000.00     $ 1,000.00     $ 1,000.00  
Ending Account Value 2/28/11
  $ 1,023.01     $ 1,019.29     $ 1,024.25     $ 1,024.25  
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
  $ 1.81     $ 5.56     $ .55     $ .55  
 
* Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 365.
Annualized Expense Ratios**
Class A
Class C
Class S
Institutional Class
DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund
.36%
1.11%
.11%
.11%
 
** The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. These ratios do not include these indirect fees and expenses.
 
For more information, please refer to the Fund's prospectus.
 
Portfolio Summary
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio)
2/28/11
8/31/10
     
Fixed Income — Bond Funds
47%
48%
Equity — Equity Funds
23%
24%
Market Neutral Fund
20%
20%
Fixed Income — Exchange-Traded Funds
6%
5%
Equity — Exchange-Traded Funds
3%
2%
Fixed Income — Money Market Fund
1%
1%
 
100%
100%
 
Asset allocation is subject to change.
 
For more complete details about the Fund's investment portfolio, see page 10. A quarterly Fact Sheet is available upon request. Please see the Account Management Resources section for contact information.
 
Following the Fund's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. This form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. The Fund's portfolio holdings are also posted on www.dws-investments.com from time to time. Please see the Fund's current prospectus for more information.
 
Investment Portfolio as of February 28, 2011 (Unaudited)
   
Shares
   
Value ($)
 
       
Equity — Equity Funds 23.0%
 
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund "Institutional"
    672,657       12,269,265  
DWS Gold & Precious Metals Fund "Institutional"
    405,473       9,224,518  
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund "Institutional"
    2,492,788       24,553,958  
DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund "Institutional"
    3,158,497       24,762,615  
Total Equity — Equity Funds (Cost $56,755,811)
      70,810,356  
   
Equity — Exchange-Traded Funds 3.0%
 
iShares MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index Fund
    100,226       4,356,824  
Vanguard FTSE All World ex-US Small-Cap
    35,535       3,574,110  
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
    25,524       1,283,602  
Total Equity — Exchange-Traded Funds (Cost $7,870,242)
      9,214,536  
   
Fixed Income — Bond Funds 47.6%
 
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund "Institutional"
    2,819,043       30,530,233  
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund "Institutional"*
    6,633,614       30,647,299  
DWS Floating Rate Plus Fund "Institutional"
    3,841,954       36,575,398  
DWS Global Inflation Plus Fund "Institutional"
    4,684,637       48,813,922  
Total Fixed Income — Bond Funds (Cost $131,407,903)
      146,566,852  
   
Fixed Income — Exchange-Traded Fund 6.0%
 
SPDR Barclays Capital International Treasury Bond (Cost $17,723,999)
    309,200       18,344,836  
   
Market Neutral Fund 19.8%
 
DWS Disciplined Market Neutral Fund "Institutional" (Cost $61,705,097)
    6,533,369       61,152,332  
   
Fixed Income — Money Market Fund 1.7%
 
Central Cash Management Fund (Cost $5,336,197)
    5,336,197       5,336,197  
 

   
% of Net Assets
   
Value ($)
 
       
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $280,799,249)+
    101.1       311,425,109  
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net
    (1.1 )     (3,247,475 )
Net Assets
    100.0       308,177,634  
 
* Non-income producing security.
 
+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $281,403,562. At February 28, 2011, net unrealized appreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $30,021,547. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $31,178,625 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $1,157,078.
 
EAFE: Europe, Australasia and Far East
 
FTSE: Financial Times and the London Stock Exchange
 
MSCI: Morgan Stanley Capital International
 
SPDR: Standard & Poor's Depositary Receipt
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels. Level 1 includes quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 includes other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, and credit risk). Level 3 includes significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
 
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of February 28, 2011 in valuing the Fund's investments. For information on the Fund's policy regarding the valuation of investments, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
Assets
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
   
Equity Funds
  $ 70,810,356     $     $     $ 70,810,356  
Exchange-Traded Funds (a)
    27,559,372                   27,559,372  
Bond Funds
    146,566,852                   146,566,852  
Money Market Funds
    5,336,197                   5,336,197  
Market Neutral Fund
    61,152,332                   61,152,332  
Total
  $ 311,425,109     $     $     $ 311,425,109  
 
There have been no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the period ended February 28, 2011.
 
(a) See Investment Portfolio for additional detailed categorizations.
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
as of February 28, 2011 (Unaudited)
 
Assets
 
Investments:
Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds, at value (cost $255,205,008)
  $ 283,865,737  
Investments in non-affiliated Underlying Funds, at value (cost $25,594,241)
    27,559,372  
Total investments, at value (cost $280,799,249)
    311,425,109  
Receivable for investments sold
    250,000  
Receivable for Fund shares sold
    1,764,245  
Interest receivable
    506  
Due from Advisor
    2,803  
Other assets
    59,128  
Total assets
    313,501,791  
Liabilities
 
Payable for investments purchased
    4,819,880  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed
    331,773  
Other accrued expenses and payables
    172,504  
Total liabilities
    5,324,157  
Net assets, at value
  $ 308,177,634  
Net Assets Consist of
 
Distributions in excess of net investment income
    (127,284 )
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
    30,625,860  
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
    118,296  
Paid-in capital
    277,560,762  
Net assets, at value
  $ 308,177,634  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of February 28, 2011 (Unaudited) (continued)
 
Net Asset Value
 
Class A
Net Asset Value and redemption price per share ($266,848,518 ÷ 23,493,682 shares outstanding of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
  $ 11.36  
Maximum offering price per share (100 ÷ 94.25 of $11.36)
  $ 12.05  
Class C
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price (subject to contingent deferred sales charge) per share ($19,461,597 ÷ 1,715,216 shares outstanding of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
  $ 11.35  
Class S
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($20,793,813 ÷ 1,831,293 shares outstanding of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
  $ 11.35  
Institutional Class
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($1,073,706 ÷ 94,574 shares outstanding of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
  $ 11.35  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
Statement of Operations
for the six months ended February 28, 2011 (Unaudited)
 
Investment Income
 
Income distributions from affiliated Underlying Funds
  $ 3,843,802  
Dividends
    292,753  
Total income
    4,136,555  
Expenses:
Administration fee
    130,806  
Distribution and service fees
    354,000  
Services to shareholders
    139,375  
Custodian fee
    1,735  
Professional fees
    33,852  
Trustees' fees and expenses
    3,443  
Reports to shareholders
    26,833  
Registration fees
    40,186  
Other
    2,671  
Total expenses before expense reductions
    732,901  
Expense reductions
    (224,313 )
Total expenses after expense reductions
    508,588  
Net investment income
    3,627,967  
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
 
Net realized gain (loss) from:
       
Sale of affiliated Underlying Funds
    (54,062 )
Sale of non-affiliated Underlying Funds
    (7,637 )
Capital gain distributions from affiliated Underlying Funds
    814,535  
      752,836  
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
    14,292,048  
Net gain (loss)
    15,044,884  
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
  $ 18,672,851  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
 
Six Months Ended February 28, 2011 (Unaudited)
   
Year Ended August 31, 2010
 
Operations:
Net investment income
  $ 3,627,967     $ 3,326,016  
Net realized gain (loss)
    752,836       (152,431 )
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    14,292,048       10,518,735  
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
    18,672,851       13,692,320  
Distributions to shareholders from:
Net investment income:
Class A
    (4,325,238 )     (2,467,572 )
Class C
    (177,526 )     (92,974 )
Class S
    (384,399 )     (146,388 )
Institutional Class
    (19,768 )     (15,431 )
Net realized gains:
Class A
          (488,190 )
Class C
          (29,478 )
Class S
          (25,751 )
Institutional Class
          (2,715 )
Total distributions
    (4,906,931 )     (3,268,499 )
Fund share transactions:
Proceeds from shares sold
    98,173,871       149,618,973  
Reinvestment of distributions
    4,871,292       3,242,630  
Payments for shares redeemed
    (25,319,286 )     (24,491,986 )
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions
    77,725,877       128,369,617  
Increase (decrease) in net assets
    91,491,797       138,793,438  
Net assets at beginning of period
    216,685,837       77,892,399  
Net assets at end of period (including distributions in excess of net investment income and undistributed net investment income of $127,284 and $1,151,680, respectively)
  $ 308,177,634     $ 216,685,837  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
Financial Highlights
Class A
Years Ended August 31,
    2011 a     2010       2009 b
Selected Per Share Data
 
Net asset value, beginning of period
  $ 10.72     $ 9.89     $ 10.00  
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment incomec
    .16       .23       .13  
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    .68       .85       .20  
Total from investment operations
    .84       1.08       .33  
Less distributions from:
Net investment income
    (.20 )     (.21 )     (.44 )
Net realized gains
          (.04 )      
Total distributions
    (.20 )     (.25 )     (.44 )
Net asset value, end of period
  $ 11.36     $ 10.72     $ 9.89  
Total Return (%)d,e,f
    7.89 **     11.08       3.96 **
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data
 
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
    267       191       71  
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)g
    .53 *     .60       1.43 *
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)g
    .36 *     .36       .36 *
Ratio of net investment income (%)
    2.80 *     2.18       1.62 *
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
    3 **     6       28 **
a For the six months ended February 28, 2011 (Unaudited).
b For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009.
c Based on average shares outstanding during the period.
d Total return does not reflect the effect of any sales charges.
e Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced.
f Total return would have been lower if the Advisor had not reduced some affiliated Underlying Funds' expenses.
g The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. This ratio does not include these indirect fees and expenses.
* Annualized
** Not annualized
 
 

Class C
Years Ended August 31,
    2011 a     2010       2009 b
Selected Per Share Data
 
Net asset value, beginning of period
  $ 10.66     $ 9.84     $ 10.00  
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment incomec
    .11       .15       .07  
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    .70       .84       .19  
Total from investment operations
    .81       .99       .26  
Less distributions from:
Net investment income
    (.12 )     (.13 )     (.42 )
Net realized gains
          (.04 )      
Total distributions
    (.12 )     (.17 )     (.42 )
Net asset value, end of period
  $ 11.35     $ 10.66     $ 9.84  
Total Return (%)d,e,f
    7.58 **     10.18       3.23 **
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data
 
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
    19       13       4  
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)g
    1.30 *     1.37       2.25 *
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)g
    1.11 *     1.11       1.11 *
Ratio of net investment income (%)
    2.05 *     1.43       .87 *
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
    3 **     6       28 **
a For the six months ended February 28, 2011 (Unaudited).
b For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009.
c Based on average shares outstanding during the period.
d Total return does not reflect the effect of any sales charges.
e Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced.
f Total return would have been lower if the Advisor had not reduced some affiliated Underlying Funds' expenses.
g The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. This ratio does not include these indirect fees and expenses.
* Annualized
** Not annualized
 
 

Class S
Years Ended August 31,
    2011 a     2010       2009 b
Selected Per Share Data
 
Net asset value, beginning of period
  $ 10.73     $ 9.90     $ 10.00  
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment incomec
    .17       .25       .15  
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    .68       .86       .19  
Total from investment operations
    .85       1.11       .34  
Less distributions from:
Net investment income
    (.23 )     (.24 )     (.44 )
Net realized gains
          (.04 )      
Total distributions
    (.23 )     (.28 )     (.44 )
Net asset value, end of period
  $ 11.35     $ 10.73     $ 9.90  
Total Return (%)d,e
    7.97 **     11.35       4.13 **
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data
 
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
    21       12       2  
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)f
    .33 *     .44       1.15 *
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)f
    .11 *     .11       .11 *
Ratio of net investment income (%)
    3.05 *     2.43       1.87 *
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
    3 **     6       28 **
a For the six months ended February 28, 2011 (Unaudited).
b For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009.
c Based on average shares outstanding during the period.
d Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced.
e Total return would have been lower if the Advisor had not reduced some affiliated Underlying Funds' expenses.
f The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. This ratio does not include these indirect fees and expenses.
* Annualized
** Not annualized
 
 

Institutional Class
Years Ended August 31,
    2011 a     2010       2009 b
Selected Per Share Data
 
Net asset value, beginning of period
  $ 10.72     $ 9.90     $ 10.00  
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment incomec
    .17       .25       .15  
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    .69       .85       .19  
Total from investment operations
    .86       1.10       .34  
Less distributions from:
Net investment income
    (.23 )     (.24 )     (.44 )
Net realized gains
          (.04 )      
Total distributions
    (.23 )     (.28 )     (.44 )
Net asset value, end of period
  $ 11.35     $ 10.72     $ 9.90  
Total Return (%)d,e
    8.07 **     11.25       4.13 **
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data
 
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
    1       1       .6  
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)f
    .21 *     .26       1.11 *
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)f
    .11 *     .11       .11 *
Ratio of net investment income (%)
    3.05 *     2.43       1.87 *
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
    3 **     6       28 **
a For the six months ended February 28, 2011 (Unaudited).
b For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009.
c Based on average shares outstanding during the period.
d Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced.
e Total return would have been lower if the Advisor had not reduced some affiliated Underlying Funds' expenses.
f The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. This ratio does not include these indirect fees and expenses.
* Annualized
** Not annualized
 
 
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
A. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
 
DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund (the "Fund") is a diversified series of DWS Equity Trust (the "Trust"), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), as an open-end management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. The Fund mainly invests in other affiliated DWS funds (the "Underlying DWS Funds") and exchange-traded funds ("ETFs"). ETFs and Underlying DWS Funds are collectively referred to as ("Underlying Funds"). Each Underlying DWS Fund's accounting policies and investment holdings are outlined in the Underlying DWS Funds' financial statements and are available upon request.
 
The Fund offers multiple classes of shares which provide investors with different purchase options. Class A shares are offered to investors subject to an initial sales charge. Class C shares are offered to investors without an initial sales charge but are subject to higher ongoing expenses than Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge payable upon certain redemptions within one year of purchase. Class S shares are not subject to initial or contingent deferred sales charges and are generally not available to new investors except under certain circumstances. Institutional Class shares are offered to a limited group of investors, are not subject to initial or contingent deferred sales charges and have lower ongoing expenses than other classes.
 
Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses and expense reductions, if any, are borne pro rata on the basis of relative net assets by the holders of all classes of shares, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as services to shareholders, distribution and service fees and certain other class-specific expenses. Differences in class-level expenses may result in payment of different per share dividends by class. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting subject to class-specific arrangements.
 
The Fund's financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which require the use of management estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The policies described below are followed consistently by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements.
 
Security Valuation. Investments are stated at value determined as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each day the exchange is open for trading.
 
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels. Level 1 includes quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 includes other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, and credit risk). Level 3 includes significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
 
Investments in the Underlying DWS Funds are valued at the net asset value per share of each class of the Underlying DWS Fund and are categorized as Level 1.
 
ETFs are valued at the most recent sale price or official closing price reported on the exchange (US or foreign) or over-the-counter market on which they trade and are categorized as Level 1. ETFs for which no sales are reported are valued at the calculated mean between the most recent bid and asked quotations on the relevant market or, if a mean cannot be determined, at the most recent bid quotation.
 
Disclosure about the classification of fair value measurements is included in a table following the Fund's Investment Portfolio.
 
Federal Income Taxes. The Fund's policy is to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, which are applicable to regulated investment companies, and to distribute all of its taxable income to its shareholders.
 
From November 1, 2009 through August 31, 2010, the Fund incurred approximately $30,000 of net realized capital losses. As permitted by tax regulations, the Fund intends to elect to defer these losses and treat them as arising in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011.
 
On December 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the "Act") was enacted. Under the Act, net capital losses may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses. Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses. As a transition rule, the Act requires that post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may expire unused, whereas under the previous rules these losses may have been utilized. This change is effective for fiscal years beginning after the date of enactment.
 
The Fund has reviewed the tax positions for the open tax years as of August 31, 2010 and has determined that no provision for income tax is required in the Fund's financial statements. The Fund's federal tax return for the prior fiscal year remains open subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
 
Distribution of Income and Gains. Net investment income of the Fund, if any, is declared and distributed to shareholders annually. Net realized gains from investment transactions, in excess of available capital loss carryforwards, would be taxable to the Fund if not distributed, and, therefore, will be distributed to shareholders at least annually.
 
The timing and characterization of certain income and capital gains distributions are determined annually in accordance with federal tax regulations which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences primarily relate to certain securities sold at a loss. As a result, net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions for a reporting period may differ significantly from distributions during such period. Accordingly, the Fund may periodically make reclassifications among certain of its capital accounts without impacting the net asset value of the Fund.
 
The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
 
Expenses. Expenses of the Trust arising in connection with a specific fund are allocated to that fund. Other Trust expenses which cannot be directly attributed to a fund are apportioned among the funds in the Trust.
 
Contingencies. In the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. The Fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet been made. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
 
Other. Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date plus one basis for daily net asset value calculations. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are reported on trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Distributions of income and capital gains from the Underlying Funds are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost pending basis.
 
B. Purchases and Sales of Underlying Funds
 
During the six months ended February 28, 2011, purchases and sales of affiliated Underlying Funds (excluding money market funds) aggregated $77,595,677 and $7,535,000, respectively. Purchases and sales of non-affiliated Underlying Funds (excluding money market funds) aggregated $10,951,650 and $164,721, respectively.
 
C. Related Parties
 
Management Agreement. Under the Investment Management Agreement with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA" or the "Advisor"), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, the Advisor directs the investments of the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives, policies and restrictions. The Advisor determines the securities, instruments and other contracts relating to investments in Underlying Funds to be purchased, sold or entered into by the Fund or delegates such responsibilities to the Fund's subadvisor. The Advisor does not receive any advisory fee for managing the Fund. However, the Advisor will receive management fees from managing the Underlying DWS Funds in which the Fund invests.
 
QS Investors, LLC ("QS Investors") serves as subadvisor. As subadvisor to the Fund, QS Investors renders strategic allocation services to the Fund. QS Investors is paid by the Advisor, not the Fund, for the services QS Investors provides to the Fund.
 
The Fund does not invest in Underlying DWS Funds for the purpose of exercising management or control; however, investments may represent 5% or more of an Underlying DWS Fund's outstanding shares. At February 28, 2011, the Fund held the following Underlying DWS Funds' outstanding shares: approximately 21% of DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund, 20% of DWS Global Inflation Plus Fund, 14% of DWS Disciplined Market Neutral Fund, 11% of DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund and 5% of DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund.
 
For the period from September 1, 2010 through November 30, 2011, the Advisor has contractually agreed to waive its fees and/or reimburse certain operating expenses of the Fund to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage, interest and indirect expenses of Underlying Funds) of each class as follows:
Class A
.36%
Class C
1.11%
Class S
.11%
Institutional Class
.11%
 
Accordingly, for the six months ended February 28, 2011, the Advisor reimbursed $9,614 and $23 of sub-recordkeeping fees for Class S and Institutional Class shares, respectively.
 
The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which it is invested.
 
Administration Fee. Pursuant to an Administrative Services Agreement, DIMA provides most administrative services to the Fund. For all services provided under the Administrative Services Agreement, the Fund pays the Advisor an annual fee ("Administration Fee") of 0.10% of the Fund's average daily net assets, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly. For the six months ended February 28, 2011, the Administration Fee was $130,806, of which $97,082 was waived and $8,352 is unpaid.
 
Service Provider Fees. DWS Investments Service Company ("DISC"), an affiliate of the Advisor, is the transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent of the Fund. Pursuant to a sub-transfer agency agreement between DISC and DST Systems, Inc. ("DST"), DISC has delegated certain transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent functions to DST. DISC compensates DST out of the shareholder serving fee it receives from the Fund. For the six months ended February 28, 2011, the amounts charged to the Fund by DISC were as follows:
Services to Shareholders
 
Total Aggregated
   
Waived
 
Class A
  $ 8,314     $ 8,314  
Class C
    4,702       4,702  
Class S
    2,778       2,778  
Institutional Class
    119       119  
    $ 15,913     $ 15,913  
 
Distribution and Service Fees. Under the Fund's Class C 12b-1 Plan, DWS Investments Distributors, Inc. ("DIDI"), an affiliate of the Advisor, receives a fee ("Distribution Fee") of 0.75% of average daily net assets of Class C shares. In accordance with the Fund's Underwriting and Distribution Service Agreement, DIDI enters into related selling group agreements with various firms at various rates for sales of Class C shares. For the six months ended February 28, 2011, the Distribution Fee charged to Class C shares by DIDI was $59,961, of which $10,602 is unpaid.
 
In addition, DIDI provides information and administrative services for a fee ("Service Fee") to Class A and C shareholders at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of average daily net assets for each such class. DIDI in turn has various agreements with financial services firms that provide these services and pays these fees based upon the assets of shareholder accounts the firms service. For the six months ended February 28, 2011, the Service Fee was as follows:
Service Fee
 
Total Aggregated
   
Waived
   
Unpaid at February 28, 2011
   
Annualized Effective Rate
 
Class A
  $ 274,052     $ 97,203     $ 52,752       .16 %
Class C
    19,987       4,478       4,389       .19 %
    $ 294,039     $ 101,681     $ 57,141          
 
Underwriting Agreement and Contingent Deferred Sales Charge. DIDI is the principal underwriter for the Fund. Underwriting commissions paid in connection with the distribution of Class A shares for the six months ended February 28, 2011 aggregated $10,682.
 
In addition, DIDI receives any contingent deferred sales charge ("CDSC") from Class C share redemptions occurring within one year of purchase. There is no such charge upon redemption of any share appreciation or reinvested dividends. The CDSC is based on 1% of the value of the shares redeemed for Class C. For the six months ended February 28, 2011, the CDSC for the Fund's Class C shares aggregated $1,090. A deferred sales charge of up to 0.75% is assessed on certain redemptions of Class A shares. For the six months ended February 28, 2011, DIDI received $13 for Class A shares.
 
Typesetting and Filing Service Fees. Under an agreement with DIMA, DIMA is compensated for providing typesetting and certain regulatory filing services to the Fund. For the six months ended February 28, 2011, the amount charged to the Fund by DIMA included in the Statement of Operations under "reports to shareholders" aggregated $10,305, of which $2,217 was unpaid.
 
Trustees' Fees and Expenses. The Fund paid each Trustee not affiliated with the Advisor retainer fees plus specified amounts for various committee services and for the Board Chairperson.
 
Affiliated Cash Management Vehicle. The Fund may invest uninvested cash balances in Central Cash Management Fund, which is managed by the Advisor. The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of Central Cash Management Fund. Central Cash Management Fund does not pay the Advisor an investment management fee. Central Cash Management Fund seeks a high level of current income consistent with liquidity and the preservation of capital.
 
D. Share Transactions
 
The following table summarizes share and dollar activity in the Fund:
   
Six Months Ended
February 28, 2011
   
Year Ended
August 31, 2010
 
   
Shares
   
Dollars
   
Shares
   
Dollars
 
Shares sold
 
Class A
    7,414,776     $ 83,361,452       12,211,173     $ 126,974,147  
Class C
    554,778       6,235,572       896,277       9,296,517  
Class S
    743,923       8,396,870       1,261,688       13,173,957  
Institutional Class
    16,042       179,977       16,610       174,352  
            $ 98,173,871             $ 149,618,973  
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
 
Class A
    385,413     $ 4,305,060       285,200     $ 2,940,407  
Class C
    15,574       173,962       11,496       118,534  
Class S
    33,378       372,502       16,072       165,543  
Institutional Class
    1,771       19,768       1,762       18,146  
            $ 4,871,292             $ 3,242,630  
Shares redeemed
 
Class A
    (2,085,134 )   $ (23,386,247 )     (1,924,458 )   $ (20,063,673 )
Class C
    (67,037 )     (753,740 )     (73,769 )     (769,902 )
Class S
    (99,067 )     (1,112,156 )     (350,853 )     (3,658,411 )
Institutional Class
    (5,935 )     (67,143 )            
            $ (25,319,286 )           $ (24,491,986 )
Net increase (decrease)
 
Class A
    5,715,055     $ 64,280,265       10,571,915     $ 109,850,881  
Class C
    503,315       5,655,794       834,004       8,645,149  
Class S
    678,234       7,657,216       926,907       9,681,089  
Institutional Class
    11,878       132,602       18,372       192,498  
            $ 77,725,877             $ 128,369,617  
 
Investment Management Agreement Approval
 
The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of your Fund's investment management agreement (the "Agreement") with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DWS") and sub-advisory agreement (the "Sub-Advisory Agreement" and together with the Agreement, the "Agreements") between DWS and QS Investors, LLC ("QS Investors") in September 2010.
 
In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the Agreements, shareholders should know that:
 
In September 2010, all but one of the Fund's Trustees were independent of DWS and its affiliates.
 
The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate substantial time to contract review matters. Over the course of several months, the Board's Contract Committee, in coordination with the Board's Fixed Income and Quant Oversight Committee, reviewed comprehensive materials received from DWS, independent third parties and independent counsel. These materials included an analysis of the Fund's performance, fees and expenses, and profitability compiled by the Fund's independent fee consultant. The Board also received extensive information throughout the year regarding performance of the Fund.
 
The Independent Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Independent Trustees were also advised by the Fund's independent fee consultant in the course of their review of the Fund's contractual arrangements and considered a comprehensive report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations (the "IFC Report").
 
In connection with reviewing the Agreements, the Board also reviewed the terms of the Fund's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administrative services agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
 
Based on its evaluation of the information provided, the Contract Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Independent Trustees as a group. The Independent Trustees reviewed the Contract Committee's findings and recommendations and presented their recommendations to the full Board.
 
In connection with the contract review process, the Contract Committee and the Board considered the factors discussed below, among others. The Board also considered that DWS and its predecessors have managed the Fund since its inception, and the Board believes that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interests of the Fund. The Board considered, generally, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in the Fund knowing that DWS managed the Fund. DWS is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Board believes that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
 
While shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, the Fund's Board considers these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DWS's and QS Investors' personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures. In addition, in connection with approving the continuation of the Fund's Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Board noted that it had engaged in a comprehensive review of the agreement in connection with its initial approval in May 2010.
 
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered the terms of the Agreements, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreements. The Board noted that, under the Agreements, DWS and QS Investors provide portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DWS provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel, the resources made available to such personnel, the ability of DWS to attract and retain high-quality personnel, and the organizational depth and stability of DWS. The Board reviewed the Fund's performance and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market indices and a peer universe compiled by the independent fee consultant using information supplied by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper"). The Board also noted that it has put into place a process of identifying "Focus Funds" (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to their benchmark or a peer universe compiled by Lipper), and receives more frequent reporting and information from DWS regarding such funds, along with DWS's remedial plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that for the one-year period ended December 31, 2009, the Fund's performance (Class A shares) was in the 3rd quartile of the applicable Lipper universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has outperformed its benchmark in the one-year period ended December 31, 2009.
 
On the basis of this evaluation and the ongoing review of investment results by the Board, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DWS and QS Investors historically have been and continue to be satisfactory.
 
Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's investment management fee schedule, sub-advisory fee schedule, operating expenses, and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Lipper and the independent fee consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the Fund does not pay any Fund-level investment advisory fees, but does bear an administrative fee. As a result of the administrative fee, the total management fee rates paid by the Fund were lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2009). With respect to the sub-advisory fee paid to QS Investors, the Board noted that the fee is paid by DWS and not directly by the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund's Class A shares total (net) operating expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees) were expected to be higher than the median (3rd quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2009, and analyzing Lipper expense universe Class A expenses less any applicable 12b-1 fees) ("Lipper Universe Expenses"). The Board also reviewed data comparing each share class's total (net) operating expenses to the applicable Lipper Universe Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's total management fee rate as compared to fees charged by DWS and certain of its affiliates for comparable mutual funds and considered differences in fund and fee structures between the DWS Funds. The Board also considered how the Fund's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DWS helped to ensure that the Fund's total (net) operating expenses would remain competitive.
 
The information considered by the Board as part of its review of management fees included information regarding fees charged by DWS and its affiliates to similar institutional accounts and to similar funds offered primarily to European investors ("DWS Europe funds"), in each case as applicable. The Board observed that advisory fee rates for institutional accounts generally were lower than the management fees charged by similarly managed DWS US mutual funds ("DWS Funds"), but also took note of the differences in services provided to DWS Funds as compared to institutional accounts. In the case of DWS Europe funds, the Board observed that fee rates for DWS Europe funds generally were higher than for similarly managed DWS Funds, but noted that differences in the types of services provided to DWS Funds relative to DWS Europe funds made it difficult to compare such fees.
 
On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DWS and QS Investors.
 
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by DWS from advising the DWS Funds along with the estimated costs and pre-tax profits realized by DWS from advising the DWS Funds. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DWS and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality. The Board did not receive profitability information with respect to the Fund (which, as noted above, does not pay any investment advisory fees), but did receive such information with respect to the funds in which the Fund invests. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DWS and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DWS and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available. The Board did not consider the profitability of QS Investors with respect to the Fund. The Board noted that DWS pays QS Investors' fee, and its understanding that the Fund's sub-advisory fee schedule was the product of an arm's length negotiation with DWS.
 
Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board concluded that the Fund's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DWS of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
 
Other Benefits to DWS and QS Investors and Their Affiliates. The Board also considered the character and amount of other incidental benefits received by DWS and QS Investors and their affiliates, including any fees received by DWS for administrative services provided to the Fund and any fees received by an affiliate of DWS for distribution services. The Board also considered benefits to DWS and QS Investors related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, including allocating brokerage to pay for research generated by parties other than the executing broker dealers, which pertain primarily to funds investing in equity securities, along with the incidental public relations benefits to DWS and QS Investors related to DWS Funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DWS products and services. The Board concluded that management fees were reasonable in light of these fallout benefits.
 
Compliance. The Board considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DWS to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of both DWS's chief compliance officer and the Fund's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of DWS compliance personnel; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DWS and its affiliates to compliance matters. The Board also considered the attention and resources dedicated by DWS to the oversight of the investment sub-advisor's compliance program and compliance with the applicable fund policies and procedures.
 
Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board unanimously (including the Independent Trustees) determined that the continuation of the Agreements is in the best interests of the Fund. In making this determination, the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, certain of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the Agreements.
 
Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant
 
October 3, 2010
 
Pursuant to an Order entered into by Deutsche Investment Management Americas and affiliates (collectively, "DeAM") with the Attorney General of New York, I, Thomas H. Mack, have been appointed the Independent Fee Consultant for the DWS Funds (formerly the DWS Scudder Funds). My duties include preparing an annual written evaluation of the management fees DeAM charges the Funds, considering among other factors the management fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services, management fees DeAM charges other clients for like services, DeAM's costs of supplying services under the management agreements and related profit margins, possible economies of scale if a Fund grows larger, and the nature and quality of DeAM's services, including fund performance. This report summarizes my evaluation for 2010, including my qualifications, the evaluation process for each of the DWS Funds, consideration of certain complex-level factors, and my conclusions. I served in substantially the same capacity in 2007, 2008, and 2009.
 
Qualifications
 
For more than 35 years I have served in various professional capacities within the investment management business. I have held investment analysis and advisory positions, including securities analyst, portfolio strategist and director of investment policy with a large investment firm. I have also performed business management functions, including business development, financial management and marketing research and analysis.
 
Since 1991, I have been an independent consultant within the asset management industry. I have provided services to over 125 client organizations, including investment managers, mutual fund boards, product distributors and related organizations. Over the past ten years I have completed a number of assignments for mutual fund boards, specifically including assisting boards with management contract renewal.
 
I hold a Master of Business Administration degree, with highest honors, from Harvard University and Master of Science and Bachelor of Science (highest honors) degrees from the University of California at Berkeley. I am an independent director and audit committee financial expert for two closed-end mutual funds and have served in various leadership and financial oversight capacities with non-profit organizations.
 
Evaluation of Fees for each DWS Fund
 
My work focused primarily on evaluating, fund-by-fund, the fees charged to each of the 118 publicly offered Fund portfolios in the DWS Fund family. For each Fund, I considered each of the key factors mentioned above, as well as any other relevant information. In doing so I worked closely with the Funds' Independent Directors in their annual contract renewal process, as well as in their approval of contracts for several new funds (documented separately).
 
In evaluating each Fund's fees, I reviewed comprehensive materials provided by or on behalf of DeAM, including expense information prepared by Lipper Analytical, comparative performance information, profitability data, manager histories, and other materials. I also accessed certain additional information from the Lipper and Morningstar databases and drew on my industry knowledge and experience.
 
To facilitate evaluating this considerable body of information, I prepared for each Fund a document summarizing the key data elements in each area as well as additional analytics discussed below. This made it possible to consider each key data element in the context of the others.
 
In the course of contract renewal, DeAM agreed to implement a number of fee and expense adjustments requested by the Independent Directors which will favorably impact future fees and expenses, and my evaluation includes the effects of these changes.
 
Fees and Expenses Compared with Other Funds
 
The competitive fee and expense evaluation for each fund focused on two primary comparisons:
 
The Fund's contractual management fee (the advisory fee plus the administration fee where applicable) compared with those of a group of typically 12-15 funds in the same Lipper investment category (e.g. Large Capitalization Growth) having similar distribution arrangements and being of similar size.
 
The Fund's total expenses compared with a broader universe of funds from the same Lipper investment category and having similar distribution arrangements.
 
These two comparisons provide a view of not only the level of the fee compared with funds of similar scale but also the total expense the Fund bears for all the services it receives, in comparison with the investment choices available in the Fund's investment category and distribution channel. The principal figure-of-merit used in these comparisons was the subject Fund's percentile ranking against peers.
 
DeAM's Fees for Similar Services to Others
 
DeAM provided management fee schedules for all of its US domiciled fund and non-fund investment management accounts in any of the investment categories where there is a DWS Fund. These similar products included the other DWS Funds, non-fund pooled accounts, institutional accounts and sub-advisory accounts. Using this information, I calculated for each Fund the fee that would be charged to each similar product, at the subject Fund's asset level.
 
Evaluating information regarding non-fund products is difficult because there are varying levels of services required for different types of accounts, with mutual funds generally requiring considerably more regulatory and administrative types of service as well as having more frequent cash flows than other types of accounts. Also, while mutual fund fees for similar fund products can be expected to be similar, there will be some differences due to different pricing conditions in different distribution channels (e.g. retail funds versus those used in variable insurance products), differences in underlying investment processes and other factors.
 
Costs and Profit Margins
 
DeAM provided a detailed profitability analysis for each Fund. After making some adjustments so that the presentation would be more comparable to the available industry figures, I reviewed profit margins from investment management alone, from investment management plus other fund services (excluding distribution) provided to the Funds by DeAM (principally shareholder services), and DeAM profits from all sources, including distribution. A later section comments on overall profitability.
 
Economies of Scale
 
Economies of scale — an expected decline in management cost per dollar of fund assets as fund assets grow — are very rarely quantified and documented because of inherent difficulties in collecting and analyzing relevant data. However, in virtually every investment category that I reviewed, larger funds tend to have lower fees and lower total expenses than smaller funds. To see how each DWS Fund compares with this industry observation, I reviewed:
 
The trend in Fund assets over the last five years and the accompanying trend in total expenses. This shows if the Fund has grown and, if so, whether total expense (management fees as well as other expenses) have declined as a percent of assets.
 
Whether the Fund has break-points in its management fee schedule, the extent of the fee reduction built into the schedule and the asset levels where the breaks take effect, and in the case of a sub-advised Fund how the Fund's break-points compare with those of the sub-advisory fee schedule.
 
How the Fund's contractual fee schedule compares with trends in the industry data. To accomplish this, I constructed a chart showing how actual latest-fiscal-year contractual fees of the Fund and of other similar funds relate to average fund assets, with the subject Fund's contractual fee schedule superimposed.
 
Quality of Service — Performance
 
The quality-of-service evaluation focused on investment performance, which is the principal result of the investment management service. Each Fund's performance was reviewed over the past 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, as applicable, and compared with that of other funds in the same investment category and with a suitable market index.
 
In addition, I calculated and reviewed risk-adjusted returns relative to an index of similar mutual funds' returns and a suitable market index. The risk-adjusted returns analysis provides a way of determining the extent to which the Fund's return comparisons are mainly the product of investment value-added (or lack thereof) or alternatively taking considerably more or less risk than is typical in its investment category.
 
I also received and considered the history of portfolio manager changes for each Fund, as this provided an important context for evaluating the performance results.
 
Complex-Level Considerations
 
While this evaluation was conducted mainly at the individual fund level, there are some issues relating to the reasonableness of fees that can alternatively be considered across the whole fund complex:
 
I reviewed DeAM's profitability analysis for all DWS Funds, with a view toward determining if the allocation procedures used were reasonable and how profit levels compared with public data for other investment managers.
 
I considered whether DeAM and affiliates receive any significant ancillary or "fall-out" benefits that should be considered in interpreting the direct profitability results. These would be situations where serving as the investment manager of the Funds is beneficial to another part of the Deutsche Bank organization.
 
I considered how aggregated DWS Fund expenses had varied over the years, by asset class and in the context of trends in asset levels.
 
I reviewed the structure of the DeAM organization, trends in staffing levels, and information on compensation of investment management and other professionals compared with industry data.
 
Findings
 
Based on the process and analysis discussed above, which included reviewing a wide range of information from management and external data sources and considering among other factors the fees DeAM charges other clients, the fees charged by other fund managers, DeAM's costs and profits associated with managing the Funds, economies of scale, possible fall-out benefits, and the nature and quality of services provided, in my opinion the management fees charged the DWS Funds are reasonable.
 
Thomas H. Mack
 
Account Management Resources
 
For More Information
 
The automated telephone system allows you to access personalized account information and obtain information on other DWS funds using either your voice or your telephone keypad. Certain account types within Classes A, C and S also have the ability to purchase, exchange or redeem shares using this system.
For more information, contact your financial advisor. You may also access our automated telephone system or speak with a DWS Investments representative by calling the appropriate number below:
For shareholders of Classes A, C and Institutional Class:
(800) 621-1048
For shareholders of Class S:
(800) 728-3337
Web Site
 
www.dws-investments.com
View your account transactions and balances, trade shares, monitor your asset allocation, and change your address, 24 hours a day.
Obtain prospectuses and applications, blank forms, interactive worksheets, news about DWS funds, subscription to fund updates by e-mail, retirement planning information, and more.
Written Correspondence
 
DWS Investments
PO Box 219151
Kansas City, MO 64121-9151
Proxy Voting
 
The fund's policies and procedures for voting proxies for portfolio securities and information about how the fund voted proxies related to its portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30 are available on our Web site — www.dws-investments.com (click on "proxy voting"at the bottom of the page) — or on the SEC's Web site — www.sec.gov. To obtain a written copy of the fund's policies and procedures without charge, upon request, call us toll free at (800) 621-1048.
Principal Underwriter
 
If you have questions, comments or complaints, contact:
DWS Investments Distributors, Inc.
222 South Riverside Plaza
Chicago, IL 60606-5808
(800) 621-1148
 

   
Class A
Class C
Class S
Institutional Class
Nasdaq Symbol
 
SELAX
SELEX
SELSX
SELIX
CUSIP Number
 
233376 722
233376 714
233376 698
233376 680
Fund Number
 
488
788
2088
1488
 
Privacy Statement
FACTS
 
What Does DWS Investments Do With Your Personal Information?
Why?
 
Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do.
What?
 
The types of personal information we collect and share can include:
• Social Security number
• Account balances
• Purchase and transaction history
• Bank account information
• Contact information such as mailing address, e-mail address and telephone number
How?
 
All financial companies need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers' personal information, the reasons DWS Investments chooses to share and whether you can limit this sharing.
 

Reasons we can share your personal information
Does DWS Investments share?
Can you limit this sharing?
For our everyday business purposes — such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders or legal investigations
Yes
No
For our marketing purposes — to offer our products and services to you
Yes
No
For joint marketing with other financial companies
No
We do not share
For our affiliates' everyday business purposes — information about your transactions and experiences
No
We do not share
For our affiliates' everyday business purposes — information about your creditworthiness
No
We do not share
For non-affiliates to market to you
No
We do not share
 

Questions?
Call (800) 621-1048 or e-mail us at dws-investments.info@dws.com
 

Who we are
Who is providing this notice?
DWS Investments Distributors, Inc.; Deutsche Investment Management Americas, Inc.; DeAM Investor Services, Inc.; DWS Trust Company; the DWS Funds
What we do
How does DWS Investments protect my personal information?
To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings.
How does DWS Investments collect my personal information?
We collect your personal information, for example. When you:
• open an account
• give us your contact information
• provide bank account information for ACH or wire transactions
• tell us where to send money
• seek advice about your investments
Why can't I limit all sharing?
Federal law gives you the right to limit only
• sharing for affiliates' everyday business purposes — information about your creditworthiness
• affiliates from using your information to market to you
• sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you
State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing.
Definitions
Affiliates
Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial or non-financial companies. Our affiliates include financial companies with the DWS or Deutsche Bank ("DB") name, such as DB AG Frankfurt and DB Alex Brown.
Non-affiliates
Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and non-financial companies.
Non-affiliates we share with include account service providers, service quality monitoring services, mailing service providers and verification services to help in the fight against money laundering and fraud.
Joint marketing
A formal agreement between non-affiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you. DWS Investments does not jointly market.
 

 
Rev. 09/2010
 
Notes
 
Notes
 
 
   
ITEM 2.
CODE OF ETHICS
   
 
Not applicable.
   
ITEM 3.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
   
 
Not applicable
   
ITEM 4.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
   
 
Not applicable
   
ITEM 5.
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS
   
 
Not applicable
   
ITEM 6.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
   
 
Not applicable
   
ITEM 7.
DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
   
 
Not applicable
   
ITEM 8.
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
   
 
Not applicable
   
ITEM 9.
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
   
 
Not applicable
   
ITEM 10.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
   
 
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Fund’s Board.  The primary function of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to identify and recommend individuals for membership on the Board and oversee the administration of the Board Governance Guidelines. Shareholders may recommend candidates for Board positions by forwarding their correspondence by U.S. mail or courier service to Paul K. Freeman, Independent Chairman, DWS Funds, P.O. Box 101833, Denver, CO 80250-1833.
   
ITEM 11.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
   
 
(a)
The Chief Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on the evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
   
 
(b)
There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
   
ITEM 12.
EXHIBITS
   
 
(a)(1)
Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) is filed and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT.
   
 
(b)
Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)) is furnished and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.906CERT.


Form N-CSRS Item F

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant:
DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund, a series of DWS Equity Trust
   
   
By:
/s/Michael G. Clark
Michael G. Clark
President
   
Date:
April 25, 2011

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


By:
/s/Michael G. Clark
Michael G. Clark
President
   
Date:
April 25, 2011
   
   
   
By:
/s/Paul Schubert
Paul Schubert
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
   
Date:
April 25, 2011

EX-99.CERT 2 ex99cert.htm CERTIFICATION ex99cert.htm

 
President
Form N-CSRS Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act


I, Michael G. Clark, certify that:

1.  
I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund, a series of DWS Equity Trust, on Form N-CSRS;

2.  
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)  
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b)  
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

April 25, 2011
/s/Michael G. Clark
 
Michael G. Clark
 
President
 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Form N-CSRS Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act


I, Paul Schubert, certify that:

1.  
I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund, a series of DWS Equity Trust, on Form N-CSRS;

2.  
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)  
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b)  
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

April 25, 2011
/s/Paul Schubert
 
Paul Schubert
 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

EX-99.906 CERT 3 ex99906cert.htm 906 CERTIFICATION ex99906cert.htm
President
Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act


I, Michael G. Clark, certify that:

1.  
I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund, a series of DWS Equity Trust, on Form N-CSRS;

2.  
Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


April 25, 2011
/s/Michael G. Clark
 
Michael G. Clark
 
President




 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act


I, Paul Schubert, certify that:

1.  
I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund, a series of DWS Equity Trust, on Form N-CSRS;

2.  
Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSRS (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


April 25, 2011
/s/Paul Schubert
 
Paul Schubert
 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

GRAPHIC 4 saa_cover1f0.gif begin 644 saa_cover1f0.gif M1TE&.#EA80%K`./($.*'$FRI,F3*%.J7,FRIH1ZT.O!<$^%2C5ZUBR49ER7.J-9B6+EBTOL*'BST+>'#B!,K7LRXL>/'D"-+GDRYLN7+F#-KWLRYL^?/H`_^#4TZL=R) MADNK3AI8H=BH!/76C7W6+.S5N#>V3MCZ[E/;:E,CG)V[>$7BQI-/'AW@M/+G MT*-+GTZ]NO7KV+-KW\Z]N_?OX,/^BQ]/OKSY\^C3JU_/OKW[]_#CG\Q[6[[] MYLYY([\_/C___Z()YQI]"-@U%VV^&987@)7M-IQPKQV('W'`%CF'Q6."/ M9*&%'U1$_@AD656&:IY99<=NGEEV"&*>:8 M9)9IYIEHIJGFFFRVZ>:;<,8IYYQTUFGGG7CFJ>>>?/;I9YH"_HGA@H(.2N", MA1)&:(_[)7J8?PNUZ"A?D$JDXJ1K-8HI9HA"M2B'+UX:F*2;SA?H@TUZ"N-^ M$59:JDB@G7IX(J.,LJBJBJ2^"E*L+KYX*X*]!LNKKF[!&*F`$?X*7*V:$KOK MJ;Y&*VN%P:(ZK+.`03OKB;@&]U:(*(YZ+;9P:5LKLY>NN"&KLHU++D.\'FJL MNJ**^^F[Q::+[V.N9B3OO_+N"VNS\,XKL%+]HDL7DD2'04+,L)`'FYJK AJT!*+'&0>"5II,<.5VP2P"++2'#)**>L\LHLMXQ30``[ ` end GRAPHIC 5 saa_g10k1a0.gif begin 644 saa_g10k1a0.gif M1TE&.#EA80&``./($.*'$FRI,F3(2>B7,FRIN7EM&E1I6X=6L/L%>'+O4+,:F%-M.U=A5K=&Z'JDB4`FW+,BK M`LD.%!Q8KD?"(Q%TE,M4:4Z[$2-+1GNSLM^4&Q6GI7RV*F2,"`T?UGRY-,_/ MIG>BKMB8-6F2HE/+EKUZ=LW:8@O;WLV;(N[>!:UR]DD\./#CR)/^3FYR.?/G MT#DZC_Z7NO7K):=CWZA]NW?DW;_^6PPOOCQM\R(ASB0O/2S[D>_A$T7?7JM; MJ\5A"M<:?WQ:_CKA)^!CQ`WXDH&28BA^.%]Q M#@*HHH.2H1FYEI.%)1F;8\%U5E5(K[5D5XHY`H9BBP2R%H!B M8(JT%)->6@3E=VN652:+BV69I$9,!=6F05.Z"*>>F.V4IYA\DOAFB($6:MJ@ M2'%YGY#&&>JH>X_6%^FD/U)Z$:*64HHI=)MF^FBGJ2E*I*>D'EBJ;Z=!JJ2; ME9[JZJO^L%:)WXZ,0HCFK;CFJNNNO/;JZZ_`!BOLL,3R&FN.QR8K*:R@*BOA MEK1ZF&:S*U'KK'F0S=IAAY919^VUXGW;F[C@;K?V:\K(7VJJOBD#[!J.N,Q::L,HU/G8SR676Z["O`*\.\5\VWSA4M MD.J:NU:"S_G+;W009XFGT31!.^^S;[65+P!(9Q9UN_(=^YG01^,8\%0=5^QD MUU3+E.QO'6-\Y-1#A\VJU3F!_;/:H8YMU-1NPZUJK/G:G5S^WK/QK3=P?FOY M7X&,RONWW!A"F-?AX`9^*./7.EZ:Y)`_SG;EB..->>;,;GZYYIYW_GGHIU(> M(.&&DYZIZ:'=B:ZMVJ>TBGKAP0W'A'NWMZ$.=-*^5[C[[ZH7;_SQR$?* M[7`C$Y_\\Q1VNU_S/$(_*>OI7;JX]KEO<"F"&ET6MA_OL?`?6TH5$-;U9[ M6N"(LA4R@]$+@*Z3($NB$A,8.:]>J$JW%+_F+>5#RHP;#9Z MTL,XV).7!85BN@%*_""X+;.0C%W^GJ+A1THH'2N]Q&G.01OO?*,_'_:(9PK" M$-8.M344.J5^,ES2E=0DFKXH,77F6N$%"Y=`$D[1-3-43HV0M!4M7JPM;`D. M&[&8D;I5!UOL6U^M0$C"$%4QAFB$T@GKAC8<#A%X\5.?XGS4J07Q\("_TXL5 M7W-&WAAQDAPA(@JS9D<\@:1LK\O?(Z75H"BJ"8.7.J$5.?G%&M():8QIW:6: MZ*5[]8]%^QH3ZTQ6QT[^RS"^#!/HQ$0FTYP)2ZT,'2JC5\NE04DR3V'64$X$76@&2^>5 M8$I49PB]:`1%IU'O-#24'?59XA"VQ^J%U)3/*F6/FN<9G+GTI3"-J4QG2JR1 MMO")D"SC2<$SP)T^YZ,V`>I)A8I(GP(QHT;EZ>B2^D*D,G5 GRAPHIC 6 saa_backcover0.gif begin 644 saa_backcover0.gif M1TE&.#EADP%T`N2ABCEAI6%^-\1$I M9(KAM0AD4T<>M..3)2H4I8P"\2B1B"L2I.22"PJTY98D-0G2E%P*I:)Y'\(D MID5KE@F4BC]ZZ268*D%IYY-NYJGGGGSVZ>>?@`8JZ*"$%FKHH8@FJNBBC#;J MZ*.01BKII)16:NFEF&:JZ::<=NKIIZ"&*NJHI)9JZJFHIJKJJJRVZNJK_K#& M*NNLM-9JZZVXYJKKKKSVZNNOP`8K[+#$%FOLL<@FJ^RRS#;K[+/01BOMM-0F M1QZ=U?(4IWDX9KN3C]DV*>245M*(X$=)8ANLG1L>62Y"9'JK$9X2NM0MM]LR M>R>Y[0ZX$)$BJ6OLOE3Z=Y+`S=)[7[OG!@CP1/<.A'"A9[JTYKXUMCGCN_(6 M^?##0Y8;+Y4<.X2E01.[>5[*(FD\)L@=FSCRO##'>C*^^;(T,T0[X\HBFBS' M+/301!=M]-%()ZWTTDPW[?334$M]MILM^WVVW#'+??<=-=M]]UXYZWW_MY\]^WWWX`'+OC@A!=N^.&( M)Z[XXHPW[OCCD$245V[YY9AGKOGFG'?N^>>@AR[ZZ*27;OKIJ*>N^NJL MM^[ZZ[#'+OOLM-=N^^VXYZ[[[KSW[OOOP%,*9]!O#X]RQ'\KF#?R*^M+)I0& M5VG?NRX_Q![QPF:L_801]1S1E\@/C&*\!IXH8]@GWBU+X(>)_*\9&ZE[-&K*>;:5+7@J;7\$P8KQPW4E*,X)7@4;20&41 M[$`\\Y<"U0"BG"/ZK%3R/A.Z#_N-3!G3P0 M(P!:(2+-&B8K,YZQA2-18T7":#,X6HR. M7L0BU/!XGR]NK8H8"U8%W]C%X!GRD(A,I"(7R^O*7P`RF,(=)S&(:\YC(3*8RE\G,9CKSF=",IC2G2.:IU/*7,N#212?D]B8 M$QPM55;D:]\"899#!KH1J>P;G\+\9:^L.N]?QPYMO(R5T@L3M%WFWY"UOSJYGW.IB,(->,VV/IANBI"Y* MJOS!;D6PU-L1%;AESMWO9Q=D1T*9ER:!O`A\E.LCT%[VAVZ-8UB-)*8BSG;` MM_UO>TW2X9IM.+SZ96&&:R5$]`',B@*6H@\_V^!9:8R)'R-K:E=,PQ'K3+:` M%-D5*2RG%3TX4$:N,4>J%V2.$1&U(0$JQ2`754=\(U1_[V;IQ7M6KW_OV.3N]JK,96Y) 7IR-;U5*;^M2H3K6J5\WJ5KMZD@$!`#L_ ` end GRAPHIC 7 sigmack0.gif begin 644 sigmack0.gif M1TE&.#EAF``:`.)`C1P;>@Q9<&1&C"--JJQHDJ!%EBU%PB3YD:5! MD!%CTMS)TV7/A3IKUHSY$N?/B3B#'MUI=*G3`$IO5GS*,673C3IM,HTJE:I` MK0ZMNN2*]"+(J5"O?E7K]2#;MAWA+IWY5:9 MM84]'H;Z4^Q6Q2NKLA6\MG+=M&,#HP2[V.?EQQ/+`G5+^:]DOS0+=RV9MBAA MU:9CRY[MM3-MQK=[PGQM.7?&NZ45@O4\VK=HW&UM(]Y[.+AIS7!A.Z7L''A@ MW5FE'Z4^7#MPU(\W66\^?7(P9L3(/[MEC7=\>-7*B5]\Z!CZ4,6HKV,%S]<[ M8;NA+>;84#>QUYMZ8?$7DG?IE?365;B?B0Y">%!``#L_ ` end