UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

Investment Company Act file number

811-08599

DWS Equity Trust

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (201) 593-6408

Paul Schubert

100 Plaza One

Jersey City, NJ 07311

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

Date of fiscal year end:

8/31

Date of reporting period:

8/31/2010

ITEM 1.

REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS

AUGUST 31, 2010

Annual Report
to Shareholders

DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund

Contents

4 Performance Summary

7 Information About Your Fund's Expenses

9 Portfolio Management Review

14 Portfolio Summary

15 Investment Portfolio

17 Statement of Assets and Liabilities

19 Statement of Operations

20 Statement of Changes in Net Assets

21 Financial Highlights

25 Notes to Financial Statements

32 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

33 Tax Information

34 New Sub-Advisory Agreement Approval

37 Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant

42 Board Members and Officers

46 Account Management Resources

This report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus. To obtain a summary prospectus, if available, or prospectus for any of our funds, refer to the Account Management Resources information provided in the back of this booklet. We advise you to consider the fund's objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The summary prospectus and prospectus contain this and other important information about the fund. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.

Although allocation among different asset categories generally limits risk, the investment advisor may favor an asset category that underperforms other assets or markets as a whole. The fund expects to invest in underlying funds that emphasize alternatives or non-traditional asset categories or investment strategies, and as a result, it is subject to the risk factors of those underlying funds. Some of those risks include stock market risk, credit and interest rate risk, floating rate risk, volatility in commodity prices, infrastructure and high-yield debt securities, short sales risk and the political, general economic, liquidity and currency risks of foreign investments, which may be particularly significant for emerging markets. Investing in derivatives entails special risks relating to liquidity, leverage and credit that may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Short sales — which involve selling borrowed securities in anticipation of a price decline, then returning an equal number of the securities at some point in the future — could magnify losses and increase volatility. See the prospectus for additional risks and specific details regarding the fund's risk profile.

DWS Investments is part of Deutsche Bank's Asset Management division and, within the US, represents the retail asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. and DWS Trust Company.

NOT FDIC/NCUA INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE NOT A DEPOSIT NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY

Performance Summary August 31, 2010

Average Annual Total Returns as of 8/31/10
Unadjusted for Sales Charge	1-Year	Life of Fund^*
Class A	11.08%	7.80%
Class C	10.18%	6.94%
Adjusted for the Maximum Sales Charge
Class A (max 5.75% load)	4.69%	4.52%
Class C (max 1.00% CDSC)	10.18%	6.94%
No Sales Charges
Class S	11.35%	8.03%
Institutional Class	11.25%	7.98%
MSCI World Index⁺	1.54%	-2.42%
Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index⁺	9.18%	9.72%
Blended Index ⁺	4.94%	3.04%

Sources: Lipper Inc. and Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc.

^* The Fund commenced operations on October 1, 2008. Index returns began on September 30, 2008.

Performance in the Average Annual Total Returns table above and the Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment line graph that follows is historical and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal fluctuate so your shares may be worth more or less when redeemed. Current performance may differ from performance data shown. Please visit www.dws-investments.com for the Fund's most recent month-end performance. Performance includes reinvestment of all distributions. Unadjusted returns do not reflect sales charges and would have been lower if they had.

The gross expense ratios of the Fund, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated December 1, 2009 are 2.12%, 2.94%, 1.84% and 1.80% for Class A, Class C, Class S and Institutional Class shares, respectively, and may differ from the expense ratios disclosed in the Financial Highlights tables in this report. These expense ratios include net expenses of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.

Index returns assume reinvestment of dividends and, unlike Fund returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.

Performance figures do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.

Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment (Adjusted for Maximum Sales Charge)

[] DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund — Class A

[] MSCI World Index⁺

[] Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index⁺

[] Blended Index⁺

The Fund's growth of an assumed $10,000 investment is adjusted for the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. This results in a net initial investment of $9,425.

The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.

Performance of other share classes will vary based on the sales charges and the fee structure of those classes.

^* The Fund commenced operations on October 1, 2008. Index returns began on September 30, 2008.
⁺ The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) World Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted measure of global stock markets including the US, Canada, Europe, Australia and the Far East. The index is calculated using closing local market prices and translates into US dollars using the London close foreign exchange rates.
The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged, market-value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues and mortgage securities.
The Blended Index consists of 60% in the MSCI World Index and 40% in the Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index.

Net Asset Value and Distribution Information
	Class A	Class C	Class S	Institutional Class
Net Asset Value: 8/31/10	$ 10.72	$ 10.66	$ 10.73	$ 10.72
8/31/09	$ 9.89	$ 9.84	$ 9.90	$ 9.90
Distribution Information: Twelve Months as of 8/31/10: Income Dividends	$ .21	$ .13	$ .24	$ .24
Capital Gain Distributions	$ .04	$ .04	$ .04	$ .04

Lipper Rankings — Global Flexible Portfolio Funds Category as of 8/31/10
Period	Rank		Number of Fund Classes Tracked	Percentile Ranking (%)
Class A 1-Year	30	of	180	17
Class C 1-Year	37	of	180	21
Class S 1-Year	24	of	180	14
Institutional Class 1-Year	27	of	180	15

Source: Lipper Inc. Rankings are historical and do not guarantee future results. Rankings are based on total return unadjusted for sales charges with distributions reinvested. If sales charges had been included, rankings might have been less favorable.

Information About Your Fund's Expenses

As an investor of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses. Examples of transaction costs include sales charges (loads) and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following table is intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In addition to the ongoing expenses which the Fund bears directly, the Fund's shareholders indirectly bear the expense of the Underlying Funds in which the Fund invests. These expenses are not included in the Fund's annualized expense ratios used to calculate the expense estimate in the table. In the most recent six-month period, the Fund limited the ongoing expenses the Fund bears directly; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The examples in the table are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (March 1, 2010 to August 31, 2010).

The table illustrates your Fund's expenses in two ways:

• Actual Fund Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Fund using the Fund's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.

• Hypothetical 5% Fund Return. This helps you to compare your Fund's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Fund's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical fund return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. An account maintenance fee of $6.25 per quarter for Class S shares may apply for certain accounts whose balances do not meet the applicable minimum initial investment. This fee is not included in the table. If it was, the estimate of expenses paid for Class S shares during the period would be higher, and account value during the period would be lower, by this amount.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended August 31, 2010
Actual Fund Return	Class A	Class C	Class S	Institutional Class
Beginning Account Value 3/1/10	$ 1,000.00	$ 1,000.00	$ 1,000.00	$ 1,000.00
Ending Account Value 8/31/10	$ 1,046.90	$ 1,042.00	$ 1,047.90	$ 1,046.90
Expenses Paid per $1,000*	$ 1.86	$ 5.71	$ .57	$ .57
Hypothetical 5% Fund Return	Class A	Class C	Class S	Institutional Class
Beginning Account Value 3/1/10	$ 1,000.00	$ 1,000.00	$ 1,000.00	$ 1,000.00
Ending Account Value 8/31/10	$ 1,023.39	$ 1,019.61	$ 1,024.65	$ 1,024.65
Expenses Paid per $1,000*	$ 1.84	$ 5.65	$ .56	$ .56

* Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 365.

Annualized Expense Ratios^**	Class A	Class C	Class S	Institutional Class
DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund	.36%	1.11%	.11%	.11%

** The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. These ratios do not include these indirect fees and expenses.

For more information, please refer to the Fund's prospectus.

Portfolio Management Review

DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund: A Team Approach to Investing

Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA" or the "Advisor"), which is part of Deutsche Asset Management, is the investment advisor for DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund. DIMA and its predecessors have more than 80 years of experience managing mutual funds and DIMA provides a full range of investment advisory services to both institutional and retail clients.

DIMA is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG. Deutsche Bank AG is a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services, including investment management, mutual funds, retail, private and commercial banking, investment banking and insurance.

DWS Investments is the retail brand name of the US asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG and DIMA, representing a wide range of investing expertise and resources. This well-resourced global investment platform brings together a wide variety of experience and investment insight across industries, regions, asset classes and investing styles.

QS Investors, LLC, New York, New York, is the subadvisor for the fund. Please see Note C. Related Parties in the Notes to Financial Statements for details.

Portfolio Management

Robert Wang
Inna Okounkova

Portfolio Managers, QS Investors, LLC

Market Overview and Fund Performance

The views expressed in the following discussion reflect those of the portfolio management team only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. The management team's views are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions and should not be construed as a recommendation. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.

The 12-month reporting period ended August 31, 2010 brought positive performance for most asset classes in the global financial markets. Although a variety of issues periodically weighed on investor sentiment, including the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and concerns about sluggish economic data in the United States, markets generally performed well on the strength of steady global growth trends, low interest rates worldwide, and improving investor risk appetites.

In this environment, DWS Select Alternative Asset Allocation Fund produced a return of 11.08%. In comparison, the fund outperformed the 4.91% return of the broader US equity market, as measured by the Standard & Poor's 500^® (S&P 500) Index, as well as its blended benchmark return of 4.94%.¹ The blended benchmark is made up of the Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) World Index (60%) and the Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index (40%).^2,3 The fund's outperformance can be attributed to both effective allocation among asset classes and the strong results generated by the underlying funds in our portfolio. (Returns are unadjusted for sales charges. If sales charges had been included, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please see pages 4 through 6 for the performance of other share classes and for more complete performance information.)

Since its inception on October 1, 2008, the fund's average annualized total return is 7.80%, besting both the 3.04% return of its blended benchmark and the -3.10% performance of the S&P 500 Index during the same interval. We are pleased that the fund has outperformed the broader market in a period that has been characterized by a bear market (October 2008-March 2009), a historic rally (March 2009-April 2010) and a short, but significant, downturn (May 2010-June 2010). While past performance is no guarantee of future results, of course, we believe this helps illustrate that meaningful diversification is best achieved by investing across all asset classes, and not just among the various segments of the stock market.

Performance Attribution

We define the alternative allocations in terms of three segments: absolute return, real return and nontraditional.

The fund's absolute return segment, which seeks to generate positive returns independent of market direction, is invested in DWS Disciplined Market Neutral Fund. The fund, which holds the largest target weighting in our portfolio at 20% of assets, has a roughly equal weighting in long and short positions. While the fund underperformed the broader US equity market, as would be expected when stock prices post a gain, it nonetheless achieved its goal of delivering a positive return and outperforming its cash benchmark. We believe this fund, which has a very low correlation with both the domestic equity and fixed-income markets, provides an excellent source of diversification for our portfolio.^4,5

The real return allocation — which holds investments whose return should exceed the rate of inflation over time — performed very well during the past year, with all six of the underlying investments outpacing the return of the S&P 500 Index. The top performer was DWS Gold & Precious Metals Fund. While only 3% of our portfolio, the fund nonetheless made a meaningful contribution due to its very strong return. As investors grew more concerned about global governments' efforts to stimulate growth through accommodative monetary policy, the price of gold and other precious metals soared, boosting the shares of metals-related equities. DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund also benefited from these trends, although to a much lesser extent than DWS Gold & Precious Metals Fund, since it has a higher level of exposure to global growth. The fund has a 10% target weighting in our portfolio.

Also performing very well within the real return allocation was DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund, which has a target weighting of 8%. Emerging-markets economies have stayed in relatively strong shape in recent years, which has provided support for government spending on large infrastructure projects — a trend that has been reflected in the share price performance for companies in this sector. DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund, with a target weighting of 10%, delivered a solid return thanks to the combination of its high yield and modest share price appreciation.

Both of the fixed-income funds held in the real return allocation delivered strong double-digit returns during the past year. DWS Global Inflation Plus Fund, which invests in inflation-protected securities issued by global governments, as well as other fixed-income securities, commodity-linked instruments, equities and real estate investments trusts (REITS), gained ground as investors sought to hedge against the possibility of higher inflation. DWS Floating Rate Plus Fund invests in an asset class — variable-rate loans — that benefited from investors' gravitation away from Treasuries and into higher-risk fixed-income investments. The two funds have target weightings of 15% and 12%, respectively.

The nontraditional allocation holds investments that provide diversification but that may not yet be held in traditional portfolios. The top performers in this segment were our two emerging-market investments, DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (targeted at 10%) and DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (8%). Both funds gained ground on the strength of the comparatively robust economic fundamentals in the developing world relative to the industrialized economies. Positive, but less meaningful, contributions came from three exchanged-traded funds (ETFs) we added to the portfolio in the third quarter of 2009: iShares MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index Fund (targeted at 1%), WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (1%), and SPDR Barclays Capital International Treasury Bond Fund (5%).^{6,7, 8} These investments, which we added to the portfolio in order to gain broad exposure to international small-cap equities and international government bonds, were funded by modest reductions in the target weightings for other funds held in the portfolio.

Outlook and Positioning

We believe the fund's various investments provide exposure to the full range of trends in the global economy. Over time we will shift allocations to favor one or more of these trends. Currently, the fund is positioned to benefit from a potential increase in inflation in the next one to two years. While this issue does not appear to be on most investors' radar screens at present, we believe the time to position a portfolio for inflation is before it emerges, not after. We see our investments in global TIPS and commodity-related investments as a potential hedge against the risk of higher inflation, as well as having strong diversification benefits in any market cycle. We have also positioned the fund to capitalize on a weaker US dollar. We believe non-dollar exposure achieves two objectives: hedging against rising US government debt and helping investors diversify away from their domestic-focused investments.

We remain diligent in our search for asset classes that we can incorporate into the portfolio. When we opened this fund in 2008, it was diversified among eight different investments. Today, that number stands at 14. We believe the growing number of investments is helping us achieve our goal of providing our investors with a way to augment their portfolio diversification.

¹ The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
² The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) World Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted measure of global stock markets including the US, Canada, Europe, Australia and the Far East. The index is calculated using closing local market prices and translates into US dollars using the London close foreign exchange rates.
³ The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged, market-value- weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues and mortgage securities.
Index returns assume reinvestment if dividends and, unlike fund returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
⁴ Diversification neither assures a profit nor guarantees against a loss.
⁵ Correlation is a measure of how closely two variables move together over time. A 1.0 equals perfect correlation. A -1.0 equals total negative correlation.
⁶ The iShares MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index Fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, as represented by the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index.
⁷ WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund seeks investment results that correspond to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index.
⁸ The SPDR Barclays Capital International Treasury Bond Fund tracks the Barclays Capital Global Treasury Ex-US Capped Index. The international bond ETF invests at least 80% of securities that are in the underlying index as well as derivatives such as swaps and options. Some of the regions represented in the bond ETF are Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Greece.
An exchange-traded fund (ETF) is a security that tracks an index, a commodity or a basket of assets like an index fund, but trades like a stock on an exchange.

Portfolio Summary

Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio)	8/31/10	8/31/09

Fixed Income — Bond Funds	48%	36%
Equity — Equity Funds	24%	35%
Market Neutral Fund	20%	20%
Fixed Income — Exchange-Traded Funds	5%	5%
Equity — Exchange-Traded Funds	2%	2%
Fixed Income — Money Market Fund	1%	2%
	100%	100%

Asset allocation is subject to change.

For more complete details about the Fund's investment portfolio, see page 15. A quarterly Fact Sheet is available upon request. Please see the Account Management Resources section for contact information.

Following the Fund's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. This form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. A complete list of the Fund's portfolio holdings is also posted on www.dws-investments.com from time to time. Please see the Fund's current prospectus for more information.

Investment Portfolio as of August 31, 2010

	Shares	Value ($)

Equity — Equity Funds 23.5%
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund "Institutional"	629,059	10,278,832
DWS Gold & Precious Metals Fund "Institutional"	284,321	6,476,822
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund "Institutional"	1,946,656	17,091,637
DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund "Institutional"	2,504,581	17,156,379
Total Equity — Equity Funds (Cost $43,017,942)		51,003,670

Equity — Exchange-Traded Funds 2.1%
iShares MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index Fund	92,707	3,177,996
Vanguard FTSE All World ex-US Small-Cap	2,642	215,719
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund	23,864	1,086,051
Exchange-Traded Funds (Cost $4,363,368)		4,479,766

Fixed Income — Bond Funds 47.2%
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund "Institutional"	1,904,373	21,309,939
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund "Institutional"	5,882,214	21,117,149
DWS Floating Rate Plus Fund "Institutional"	2,813,864	25,549,885
DWS Global Inflation Plus Fund "Institutional"	3,322,997	34,193,643
Total Fixed Income — Bond Funds (Cost $94,734,712)		102,170,616

Fixed Income — Exchange-Traded Fund 4.9%
SPDR Barclays Capital International Treasury Bond (Cost $10,451,580)	184,874	10,726,389

Market Neutral Fund 19.7%
DWS Disciplined Market Neutral Fund "Institutional" (Cost $42,109,543)	4,477,995	42,630,516

Fixed Income — Money Market Fund 1.1%
Central Cash Management Fund (Cost $2,481,832)	2,481,832	2,481,832

	% of Net Assets	Value ($)

Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $197,158,977)⁺	98.5	213,492,789
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net	1.5	3,193,048
Net Assets	100.0	216,685,837

⁺ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $197,763,290. At August 31, 2010, net unrealized appreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $15,729,499. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $16,334,054 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $604,555.

EAFE: Europe, Australasia and Far East

FTSE: Financial Times Stock Exchange

MSCI: Morgan Stanley Capital International

SPDR: Standard & Poor's Depositary Receipt

Fair Value Measurements

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels. Level 1 includes quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 includes other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, and credit risk). Level 3 includes significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of August 31, 2010 in valuing the Fund's investments. For information on the Fund's policy regarding the valuation of investments, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

Assets	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total

Equity Funds	$ 51,003,670	$ —	$ —	$ 51,003,670
Market Neutral Fund	42,630,516	—	—	42,630,516
Exchange-Traded Funds (a)	15,206,155	—	—	15,206,155
Bond Funds	102,170,616	—	—	102,170,616
Money Market Funds	2,481,832	—	—	2,481,832
Total	$ 213,492,789	$ —	$ —	$ 213,492,789

There have been no significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the period ended August 31, 2010.

(a) See Investment Portfolio for additional detailed categorizations.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

as of August 31, 2010
Assets
Investments: Investments in Underlying Affiliated Funds, at value (cost $182,344,029)	$ 198,286,634
Investments in Underlying Non-affiliated Funds, at value (cost $14,814,948)	15,206,155
Total investments, at value (cost $197,158,977)	213,492,789
Receivable for investments sold	4,155,000
Receivable for Fund shares sold	3,256,452
Interest receivable	504
Due from Advisor	18,093
Other assets	51,304
Total assets	220,974,142
Liabilities
Payable for investments purchased	3,816,164
Payable for Fund shares redeemed	315,372
Other accrued expenses and payables	156,769
Total liabilities	4,288,305
Net assets, at value	$ 216,685,837
Net Assets Consist of
Undistributed net investment income	1,151,680
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	16,333,812
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)	(634,540)
Paid-in capital	199,834,885
Net assets, at value	$ 216,685,837

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of August 31, 2010 (continued)
Net Asset Value
Class A Net Asset Value and redemption price per share ($190,508,729 ÷ 17,778,627 shares outstanding of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)	$ 10.72
Maximum offering price per share (100 ÷ 94.25 of $10.72)	$ 11.37
Class C Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price (subject to contingent deferred sales charge) per share ($12,922,201 ÷ 1,211,901 shares outstanding of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)	$ 10.66
Class S Net Asset Value, offering and redemption priceper share ($12,368,001 ÷ 1,153,059 shares outstanding of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)	$ 10.73
Institutional Class Net Asset Value, offering and redemption priceper share ($886,906 ÷ 82,696 shares outstanding of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)	$ 10.72

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Statement of Operations

for the year ended August 31, 2010
Investment Income
Income distributions from Underlying Affiliated Funds	$ 3,810,969
Dividends	112,955
Income distributions — affiliated cash management vehicles	4,279
Total income	3,928,203
Expenses: Administration fee	154,715
Distribution and service fees	421,702
Services to shareholders	210,476
Custodian fee	7,489
Professional fees	65,990
Trustees' fees and expenses	7,873
Reports to shareholders	24,257
Registration fees	82,090
Other	3,018
Total expenses before expense reductions	977,610
Expense reductions	(375,423)
Total expenses after expense reductions	602,187
Net investment income	3,326,016
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Net realized gain (loss) from sale of Underlying Affiliated Funds	(472,133)
Capital gain distributions from Underlying Affiliated Funds	319,702
	(152,431)
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	10,518,735
Net gain (loss)	10,366,304
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$ 13,692,320

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets	Year Ended August 31, 2010	Period Ended August 31, 2009*
Operations: Net investment income	$ 3,326,016	$ 402,395
Net realized gain (loss)	(152,431)	830,576
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)	10,518,735	5,815,077
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	13,692,320	7,048,048
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income: Class A	(2,467,572)	(594,015)
Class C	(92,974)	(27,492)
Class S	(146,388)	(10,117)
Institutional Class	(15,431)	(2,203)
Net realized gains: Class A	(488,190)	—
Class C	(29,478)	—
Class S	(25,751)	—
Institutional Class	(2,715)	—
Total distributions	(3,268,499)	(633,827)
Fund share transactions: Proceeds from shares sold	149,618,973	74,234,444
Reinvestment of distributions	3,242,630	625,361
Cost of shares redeemed	(24,491,986)	(3,581,627)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions	128,369,617	71,278,178
Increase (decrease) in net assets	138,793,438	77,692,399
Net assets at beginning of period	77,892,399	200,000
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $1,151,680 and $227,196, respectively)	$ 216,685,837	$ 77,892,399

* For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Financial Highlights

Class A Years Ended August 31,	2010	2009^a
Selected Per Share Data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$ 9.89	$ 10.00
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income^b	.23	.13
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)	.85	.20
Total from investment operations	1.08	.33
Less distributions from: Net investment income	(.21)	(.44)
Net realized gains	(.04)	—
Total distributions	(.25)	(.44)
Net asset value, end of period	$ 10.72	$ 9.89
Total Return (%)^c,d,e	11.08	3.96^**
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)	191	71
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)^f	.60	1.43^*
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)^f	.36	.36^*
Ratio of net investment income (%)	2.18	1.62^*
Portfolio turnover rate (%)	6	28^**
^a For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009. ^b Based on average shares outstanding during the period. ^c Total return does not reflect the effect of any sales charges. ^d Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. ^e Total return would have been lower if the Advisor had not reduced some Underlying Funds' expenses. ^f The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. This ratio does not include these indirect fees and expenses. ^* Annualized ^** Not annualized

Class C Years Ended August 31,	2010	2009^a
Selected Per Share Data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$ 9.84	$ 10.00
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income^b	.15	.07
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)	.84	.19
Total from investment operations	.99	.26
Less distributions from: Net investment income	(.13)	(.42)
Net realized gains	(.04)	—
Total distributions	(.17)	(.42)
Net asset value, end of period	$ 10.66	$ 9.84
Total Return (%)^c,d,e	10.18	3.23^**
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)	13	4
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)^f	1.37	2.25^*
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)^f	1.11	1.11^*
Ratio of net investment income (%)	1.43	.87^*
Portfolio turnover rate (%)	6	28^**
^a For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009. ^b Based on average shares outstanding during the period. ^c Total return does not reflect the effect of any sales charges. ^d Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. ^e Total return would have been lower if the Advisor had not reduced some Underlying Funds' expenses. ^f The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. This ratio does not include these indirect fees and expenses. ^* Annualized ^** Not annualized

Class S Years Ended August 31,	2010	2009^a
Selected Per Share Data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$ 9.90	$ 10.00
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income^b	.25	.15
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)	.86	.19
Total from investment operations	1.11	.34
Less distributions from: Net investment income	(.24)	(.44)
Net realized gains	(.04)	—
Total distributions	(.28)	(.44)
Net asset value, end of period	$ 10.73	$ 9.90
Total Return (%)^c,d	11.35	4.13^**
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)	12	2
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)^e	.44	1.15^*
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)^e	.11	.11^*
Ratio of net investment income (%)	2.43	1.87^*
Portfolio turnover rate (%)	6	28^**
^a For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009. ^b Based on average shares outstanding during the period. ^c Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. ^d Total return would have been lower if the Advisor had not reduced some Underlying Funds' expenses. ^e The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. This ratio does not include these indirect fees and expenses. ^* Annualized ^** Not annualized

Institutional Class Years Ended August 31,	2010	2009^a
Selected Per Share Data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$ 9.90	$ 10.00
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income^b	.25	.15
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)	.85	.19
Total from investment operations	1.10	.34
Less distributions from: Net investment income	(.24)	(.44)
Net realized gains	(.04)	—
Total distributions	(.28)	(.44)
Net asset value, end of period	$ 10.72	$ 9.90
Total Return (%)^c,d	11.25	4.13^**
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)	1	.6
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)^e	.26	1.11^*
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)^e	.11	.11^*
Ratio of net investment income (%)	2.43	1.87^*
Portfolio turnover rate (%)	6	28^**
^a For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009. ^b Based on average shares outstanding during the period. ^c Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. ^d Total return would have been lower if the Advisor had not reduced some Underlying Funds' expenses. ^e The Fund invests in other funds and indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which the Fund is invested. This ratio does not include these indirect fees and expenses. ^* Annualized ^** Not annualized

Notes to Financial Statements

A. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund (the "Fund") is a diversified series of DWS Equity Trust (the "Trust"), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), as an open-end management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. The Fund mainly invests in other affiliated DWS funds (the "Underlying DWS Funds") and exchange-traded funds ("ETFs"). ETFs and Underlying DWS Funds are collectively referred to as ("Underlying Funds"). Each Underlying DWS Fund's accounting policies and investment holdings are outlined in the Underlying DWS Funds' financial statements and are available upon request.

The Fund offers multiple classes of shares which provide investors with different purchase options. Class A shares are offered to investors subject to an initial sales charge. Class C shares are offered to investors without an initial sales charge but are subject to higher ongoing expenses than Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge payable upon certain redemptions within one year of purchase. Class S shares are not subject to initial or contingent deferred sales charges and are generally not available to new investors except under certain circumstances. Institutional Class shares are offered to a limited group of investors, are not subject to initial or contingent deferred sales charges and have lower ongoing expenses than other classes.

Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses and expense reductions, if any, are borne pro rata on the basis of relative net assets by the holders of all classes of shares, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as services to shareholders, distribution and service fees and certain other class-specific expenses. Differences in class-level expenses may result in payment of different per share dividends by class. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting subject to class-specific arrangements.

The Fund's financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which require the use of management estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The policies described below are followed consistently by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements.

Security Valuation. Investments are stated at value determined as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each day the exchange is open for trading.

Investments in the Underlying DWS Funds are valued at the net asset value per share of each class of the Underlying DWS Fund and are categorized as Level 1.

ETFs are valued at the most recent sale price or official closing price reported on the exchange (US or foreign) or over-the-counter market on which they trade and are categorized as Level 1. ETFs for which no sales are reported are valued at the calculated mean between the most recent bid and asked quotations on the relevant market or, if a mean cannot be determined, at the most recent bid quotation.

Disclosure about the classification of fair value measurements is included in a table following the Fund's Investment Portfolio.

Federal Income Taxes. The Fund's policy is to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, which are applicable to regulated investment companies, and to distribute all of its taxable income to its shareholders.

From November 1, 2009 through August 31, 2010, the Fund incurred approximately $30,000 of net realized capital losses. As permitted by tax regulations, the Fund intends to elect to defer these losses and treat them as arising in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011.

The Fund has reviewed the tax positions for the open tax years as of August 31, 2010 and has determined that no provision for income tax is required in the Fund's financial statements. The Fund's federal tax return for the prior fiscal year remains open subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

Distribution of Income and Gains. Net investment income of the Fund, if any, is declared and distributed to shareholders annually. Net realized gains from investment transactions, in excess of available capital loss carryforwards, would be taxable to the Fund if not distributed, and, therefore, will be distributed to shareholders at least annually.

The timing and characterization of certain income and capital gains distributions are determined annually in accordance with federal tax regulations which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences primarily relate to certain securities sold at a loss. As a result, net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions for a reporting period may differ significantly from distributions during such period. Accordingly, the Fund may periodically make reclassifications among certain of its capital accounts without impacting the net asset value of the Fund.

At August 31, 2010, the Fund's components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax-basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income*	$ 1,262,414
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	$ 15,729,499

In addition, the tax character of distributions paid to shareholders by the Fund is summarized as follows:

	Year Ended August 31, 2010	Period Ended August 31, 2009**
Distributions from ordinary income*	$ 3,184,268	$ 633,827
Distributions from long-term capital gains	$ 84,231	$ —

* For tax purposes, short-term capital gains distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.
** For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009.

Offering Costs. Offering costs for the Fund were paid in connection with the offering of shares and were amortized over one year.

Expenses. Expenses of the Trust arising in connection with a specific fund are allocated to that fund. Other Trust expenses which cannot be directly attributed to a fund are apportioned among the funds in the Trust.

Contingencies. In the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. The Fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet been made. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.

Other. Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date plus one basis for daily net asset value calculations. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment security transactions are reported on trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Distributions of income and capital gains from the Underlying Funds are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost pending basis.

B. Purchases and Sales of Underlying Funds

During the year ended August 31, 2010, purchases and sales of Underlying Affiliated Funds (excluding money market funds) aggregated $124,492,592 and $9,255,000, respectively. Purchases and sales of Underlying Non-affiliated Funds (excluding money market funds) aggregated $9,814,209 and $0, respectively.

C. Related Parties

Management Agreement. Under the Investment Management Agreement with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA" or the "Advisor"), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, the Advisor directs the investments of the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives, policies and restrictions. The Advisor determines the securities, instruments and other contracts relating to investments in Underlying Funds to be purchased, sold or entered into by the Fund. The Advisor does not receive any advisory fee for managing the Fund. However, the Advisor will receive management fees from managing the Underlying DWS Funds in which the Fund invests.

QS Investors, LLC ("QS Investors") acts as investment subadvisor to the Fund. On August 1, 2010, members of the Advisor's Quantitative Strategies Group ("QS Group"), including members of the Fund's portfolio management team, separated from the Advisor and formed QS Investors as a separate investment advisory firm unaffiliated with the Advisor (the "Separation"). As an investment subadvisor to the Fund, QS Investors renders strategic asset allocation services to the Fund. QS Investors is paid by the Advisor, not the Fund, for the services QS Investors provides to the Fund.

The Fund does not invest in Underlying DWS Funds for the purpose of exercising management or control; however, investments may represent 5% or more of an Underlying DWS Fund's outstanding shares. At August 31, 2010, the Fund held the following Underlying DWS Fund's outstanding shares: approximately 17% of DWS Global Inflation Plus Fund, 17% of DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund, 12% of DWS Disciplined Market Neutral Fund and 7% of DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund.

For the period from September 1, 2009 through November 30, 2010, the Advisor has contractually agreed to waive its fees and/or reimburse certain operating expenses of the Fund to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage, interest and indirect expense of Underlying Funds) of each class as follows:

Class A	.36%
Class C	1.11%
Class S	.11%
Institutional Class	.11%

Accordingly, for the year ended August 31, 2010, the Advisor reimbursed $12,063 and $9 of sub-recordkeeping fees for Class S and Institutional Class shares, respectively.

In addition, for the year ended August 31, 2010, the Advisor reimbursed the Fund $23,626 of other expenses.

The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of fees and expenses incurred by the Underlying Funds in which it is invested.

Administration Fee. Pursuant to an Administrative Services Agreement, DIMA provides most administrative services to the Fund. For all services provided under the Administrative Services Agreement, the Fund pays the Advisor an annual fee ("Administration Fee") of 0.10% of the Fund's average daily net assets, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly. For the year ended August 31, 2010, the Administration Fee was $154,715, all of which was waived.

Service Provider Fees. DWS Investments Service Company ("DISC"), an affiliate of the Advisor, is the transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent of the Fund. Pursuant to a sub-transfer agency agreement between DISC and DST Systems, Inc. ("DST"), DISC has delegated certain transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent functions to DST. DISC compensates DST out of the shareholder serving fee it receives from the Fund. For the year ended August 31, 2010, the amounts charged to the Fund by DISC were as follows:

Services to Shareholders	Total Aggregated	Waived
Class A	$ 13,722	$ 13,722
Class C	7,569	7,569
Class S	4,257	4,257
Institutional Class	215	215
	$ 25,763	$ 25,763

Distribution and Service Fees. Under the Fund's Class C 12b-1 Plan, DWS Investments Distributors, Inc. ("DIDI"), an affiliate of the Advisor, receives a fee ("Distribution Fee") of 0.75% of average daily net assets of Class C shares. In accordance with the Fund's Underwriting and Distribution Service Agreement, DIDI enters into related selling group agreements with various firms at various rates for sales of Class C shares. For the year ended August 31, 2010, the Distribution Fee charged to Class C shares by DIDI was $66,038, of which $8,090 is unpaid.

In addition, DIDI provides information and administrative services for a fee ("Service Fee") to Class A and C shareholders at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of average daily net assets for each such class. DIDI in turn has various agreements with financial services firms that provide these services and pays these fees based upon the assets of shareholder accounts the firms service. For the year ended August 31, 2010, the Service Fee was as follows:

Service Fee	Total Aggregated	Waived	Unpaid at August 31, 2010	Annual Effective Rate
Class A	$ 334,270	$ 153,971	$ 22,708	.13%
Class C	21,394	5,276	6,585	.18%
	$ 355,664	$ 159,247	$ 29,293

Underwriting Agreement and Contingent Deferred Sales Charge. DIDI is the principal underwriter for the Fund. Underwriting commissions paid in connection with the distribution of Class A shares for the year ended August 31, 2010 aggregated $16,609.

In addition, DIDI receives any contingent deferred sales charge ("CDSC") from Class C share redemptions occurring within one year of purchase. There is no such charge upon redemption of any share appreciation or reinvested dividends. The CDSC is based on 1% of the value of the shares redeemed for Class C. For the year ended August 31, 2010, the CDSC for the Fund's Class C shares aggregated $3,225. A deferred sales charge of up to 0.75% is assessed on certain redemptions of Class A shares. For the year ended August 31, 2010, DIDI received $156 for Class A shares.

Typesetting and Filing Service Fees. Under an agreement with DIMA, DIMA is compensated for providing typesetting and certain regulatory filing services to the Fund. For the year ended August 31, 2010, the amount charged to the Fund by DIMA included in the Statement of Operations under "reports to shareholders" aggregated $5,572, of which $4,859 was unpaid.

Trustees' Fees and Expenses. The Fund paid each Trustee not affiliated with the Advisor retainer fees plus specified amounts for various committee services and for the Board Chairperson.

Affiliated Cash Management Vehicles. The Fund may invest uninvested cash balances in affiliated funds managed by the Advisor. Affiliated cash management vehicles do not pay the Advisor a management fee. The Fund currently invests in Central Cash Management Fund. Prior to October 2, 2009, the Fund invested in Cash Management QP Trust ("QP Trust"). Effective October 2, 2009, QP Trust merged into Central Cash Management Fund. Central Cash Management Fund seeks to provide a high level of current income consistent with liquidity and the preservation of capital.

D. Line of Credit

The Fund and other affiliated funds (the "Participants") shared in a $450 million revolving credit facility provided by a syndication of banks. The Fund could borrow for temporary or emergency purposes, including the meeting of redemption requests that otherwise might require the untimely disposition of securities. The Participants are charged an annual commitment fee which is allocated based on net assets, among each of the Participants. Interest is calculated at a rate per annum equal to the sum of the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.25 percent plus if LIBOR exceeds the Federal Funds Rate the amount of such excess. The Fund could borrow up to a maximum of 10 percent of its net assets under the agreement.

Effective April 1, 2010, the Fund elected not to participate in the revolving credit facility.

E. Share Transactions

The following table summarizes share and dollar activity in the Fund:

	Year Ended August 31, 2010		Period Ended August 31, 2009*
	Shares	Dollars	Shares	Dollars
Shares sold
Class A	12,211,173	$ 126,974,147	7,487,600	$ 67,925,502
Class C	896,277	9,296,517	389,615	3,584,052
Class S	1,261,688	13,173,957	233,962	2,198,802
Institutional Class	16,610	174,352	64,324	526,088
		$ 149,618,973		$ 74,234,444
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
Class A	285,200	$ 2,940,407	69,511	$ 590,845
Class C	11,496	118,534	2,609	22,196
Class S	16,072	165,543	1,190	10,117
Institutional Class	1,762	18,146	259	2,203
		$ 3,242,630		$ 625,361
Shares redeemed
Class A	(1,924,458)	$ (20,063,673)	(355,399)	$ (3,234,344)
Class C	(73,769)	(769,902)	(19,327)	(171,361)
Class S	(350,853)	(3,658,411)	(14,000)	(126,486)
Institutional Class	—	—	(5,259)	(49,436)
		$ (24,491,986)		$ (3,581,627)
Net increase (decrease)
Class A	10,571,915	$ 109,850,881	7,201,712	$ 65,282,003
Class C	834,004	8,645,149	372,897	3,434,887
Class S	926,907	9,681,089	221,152	2,082,433
Institutional Class	18,372	192,498	59,324	478,855
		$ 128,369,617		$ 71,278,178
Initial Capital
Class A	—	$ —	5,000	$ 50,000
Class C	—	—	5,000	50,000
Class S	—	—	5,000	50,000
Institutional Class	—	—	5,000	50,000
		$ —		$ 200,000

* For the period from October 1, 2008 (commencement of operations) to August 31, 2009.

F. Review for Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated the events and transactions subsequent to year end through the date the financial statements were available to be issued, and has determined that there were no material events that would require disclosure in the Fund's financial statements.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Trustees of DWS Equity Trust and Shareholders of DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the investment portfolio of DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund (the "Fund"), a series of DWS Equity Trust, as of August 31, 2010, and the related statement of operations, for the year then ended, and the statement of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2010, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund at August 31, 2010, the results of its operations for the year then ended, and the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Boston, Massachusetts
October 26, 2010

Tax Information (Unaudited)

The Fund paid distributions of $0.0067 per share from net long-term capital gains during its year ended August 31, 2010, of which 100% represents 15% rate gains.

For corporate shareholders, 100% of the ordinary dividends (i.e., income dividends plus short-term capital gains) paid during the Fund's fiscal year ended August 31, 2010, qualified for the dividends received deduction.

For federal income tax purposes, the Fund designates $4,400,000, or the maximum amount allowable under tax law, as qualified dividend income.

Please consult a tax advisor if you have questions about federal or state income tax laws, or on how to prepare your tax returns. If you have specific questions about your account, please call (800) 621-1048.

New Sub-Advisory Agreement Approval

The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously approved the New Sub-Advisory Agreement (the "New Agreement") between Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DWS") and QS Investors, LLC ("QS Investors") in May 2010.

In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the New Agreement, shareholders should know that:

• In May 2010, all but one of the Fund's Trustees were independent of DWS and its affiliates.

• The Board engaged in a comprehensive review of the operational, financial and investment capabilities of QS Investors and the terms of the proposed Separation. As part of this review, the Board also reviewed and considered the terms of the New Agreement.

• To facilitate its review, the Board created several ad hoc subcommittees, each focused on different aspects of the Board's consideration of the Separation, and each comprised solely of Independent Trustees.

• The Board and its subcommittees conducted numerous meetings between January 2010 and May 2010 to review and discuss the Separation, including the New Agreement, and were assisted in this review by their independent legal counsel and fund counsel.

• In the course of its review, the Board requested and received substantial additional information.

• As part of its review process, the Board and its subcommittees met with various representatives of DWS and QS Investors, including key investment personnel and other members of senior management.

• The Board requested and evaluated all information that it deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the New Agreement.

In connection with the approval of the New Agreement, the Board considered the factors described below, among others.

Continuity of Investment Management Services. In reviewing the New Agreement, the Board considered that it had renewed the investment management agreement between DWS and the Fund as part of the annual contract renewal process (the "Annual Review") in September 2009, at which time it had determined that such renewal was in the best interests of the Fund, given the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DWS (among other considerations). In considering the New Agreement, the Board noted that in light of the transition of the group within DWS responsible for day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund to a separate, unaffiliated firm (i.e., QS Investors), it was necessary to approve a sub-advisory agreement between DWS and QS Investors to secure continued access to these same personnel and services. The Board also considered that, despite the change in corporate identity of the portfolio management services provider and the fact that it would no longer be affiliated with DWS, the nature, quality and extent of services provided to the Fund are not expected to change under the New Agreement.

Fees and Expenses. The Board noted that it had concluded during the Annual Review that the overall investment management fees paid by the Fund are reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided. The Board considered that, under the New Agreement, QS Investors' sub-advisory fee would be paid by DWS out of its management fee and not directly by the Fund, and therefore there would be no change in the Fund's overall investment management fees under the New Agreement.

Profitability. The Board noted that it had considered the profitability of DWS during the Annual Review. The Board did not consider the profitability of QS Investors to be a material factor. In particular, the Board noted that QS Investors has not yet commenced operations, and that any projections of profitability are likely to be of limited value. The Board also noted that DWS would pay QS Investors' sub-advisory fee out of its management fee, and further noted that the sub-advisory fee arrangement with respect to the Fund was the product of an arm's length negotiation.

Other Benefits to QS Investors. The Board noted that it had considered fallout benefits to DWS during the Annual Review in its determination that management fees paid were reasonable. The Board also considered the character and amount of incidental benefits expected to be realized by QS Investors in light of the New Agreement, including the incidental public relations benefits to QS Investors related to DWS US mutual funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DWS products and services. The Board noted that QS Investors did not propose to implement a "soft dollar" program. The Board reaffirmed its determination from the Annual Review process that management fees paid were reasonable in light of fallout benefits to its investment advisory service providers.

Compliance. The Board considered QS Investors' proposed compliance program and resources. The Board also considered that DWS would oversee QS Investors' compliance program and its compliance with applicable Fund policies and procedures, and considered the attention and resources DWS would dedicate to that oversight. The Board also noted that it had considered DWS's compliance monitoring capabilities in connection with the Annual Review, at which time it had noted (i) the experience and seniority of both DWS's chief compliance officer and the Fund's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of DWS compliance personnel; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DWS and its affiliates to compliance matters.

Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board unanimously (including the Independent Trustees) determined that the terms of the New Agreement are fair and reasonable and that the approval of the New Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In reaching this conclusion, the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the New Agreement.

Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant

October 9, 2009, As Revised November 20, 2009

Pursuant to an Order entered into by Deutsche Investment Management Americas and affiliates (collectively, "DeAM") with the Attorney General of New York, I, Thomas H. Mack, have been appointed the Independent Fee Consultant for the DWS Funds (formerly the DWS Scudder Funds). My duties include preparing an annual written evaluation of the management fees DeAM charges the Funds, considering among other factors the management fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services, management fees DeAM charges other clients for like services, DeAM's costs of supplying services under the management agreements and related profit margins, possible economies of scale if a Fund grows larger, and the nature and quality of DeAM's services, including fund performance. This report summarizes my evaluation for 2009, including my qualifications, the evaluation process for each of the DWS Funds, consideration of certain complex-level factors, and my conclusions. I served in substantially the same capacity in 2007 and 2008.

Qualifications

For more than 35 years I have served in various professional capacities within the investment management business. I have held investment analysis and advisory positions, including securities analyst, portfolio strategist and director of investment policy with a large investment firm. I have also performed business management functions, including business development, financial management and marketing research and analysis.

Since 1991, I have been an independent consultant within the asset management industry. I have provided services to over 125 client organizations, including investment managers, mutual fund boards, product distributors and related organizations. Over the past ten years I have completed a number of assignments for mutual fund boards, specifically including assisting boards with management contract renewal.

I hold a Master of Business Administration degree, with highest honors, from Harvard University and Master of Science and Bachelor of Science (highest honors) degrees from the University of California at Berkeley. I am an independent director and audit committee financial expert for two closed-end mutual funds and serve in various leadership and financial oversight capacities with non-profit organizations.

Evaluation of Fees for each DWS Fund

My work focused primarily on evaluating, fund-by-fund, the fees charged to each of the 124 publicly offered Fund portfolios in the DWS Fund family. For each Fund, I considered each of the key factors mentioned above, as well as any other relevant information. In doing so I worked closely with the Funds' Independent Directors in their annual contract renewal process, as well as in their approval of contracts for several new funds (documented separately).

In evaluating each Fund's fees, I reviewed comprehensive materials provided by or on behalf of DeAM, including expense information prepared by Lipper Analytical, comparative performance information, profitability data, manager histories, and other materials. I also accessed certain additional information from the Lipper, Strategic Insight, and Morningstar databases and drew on my industry knowledge and experience.

To facilitate evaluating this considerable body of information, I prepared for each Fund a document summarizing the key data elements in each area as well as additional analytics discussed below. This made it possible to consider each key data element in the context of the others.

In the course of contract renewal, DeAM agreed to implement a number of fee and expense adjustments requested by the Independent Directors which will favorably impact future fees and expenses, and my evaluation includes the effects of these changes.

Fees and Expenses Compared with Other Funds

The competitive fee and expense evaluation for each fund focused on two primary comparisons:

The Fund's contractual management fee (the advisory fee plus the administration fee where applicable) compared with those of a group of typically 12-15 funds in the same Lipper investment category (e.g. Large Capitalization Growth) having similar distribution arrangements and being of similar size.

The Fund's total expenses compared with a broader universe of funds from the same Lipper investment category and having similar distribution arrangements.

These two comparisons provide a view of not only the level of the fee compared with funds of similar scale but also the total expense the Fund bears for all the services it receives, in comparison with the investment choices available in the Fund's investment category and distribution channel. The principal figure-of-merit used in these comparisons was the subject Fund's percentile ranking against peers.

DeAM's Fees for Similar Services to Others

DeAM provided management fee schedules for all of its US domiciled fund and non-fund investment management accounts in any of the investment categories where there is a DWS Fund. These similar products included the other DWS Funds, non-fund pooled accounts, institutional accounts and sub-advisory accounts. Using this information, I calculated for each Fund the fee that would be charged to each similar product, at the subject Fund's asset level.

Evaluating information regarding non-fund products is difficult because there are varying levels of services required for different types of accounts, with mutual funds generally requiring considerably more regulatory and administrative types of service as well as having more frequent cash flows than other types of accounts. Also, while mutual fund fees for similar fund products can be expected to be similar, there will be some differences due to different pricing conditions in different distribution channels (e.g. retail funds versus those used in variable insurance products), differences in underlying investment processes and other factors.

Costs and Profit Margins

DeAM provided a detailed profitability analysis for each Fund. After making some adjustments so that the presentation would be more comparable to the available industry figures, I reviewed profit margins from investment management alone, from investment management plus other fund services (excluding distribution) provided to the Funds by DeAM (principally shareholder services), and DeAM profits from all sources, including distribution. A later section comments on overall profitability.

Economies of Scale

Economies of scale — an expected decline in management cost per dollar of fund assets as fund assets grow — are very rarely quantified and documented because of inherent difficulties in collecting and analyzing relevant data. However, in virtually every investment category that I reviewed, larger funds tend to have lower fees and lower total expenses than smaller funds. To see how each DWS Fund compares with this industry observation, I reviewed:

The trend in Fund assets over the last five years and the accompanying trend in total expenses. This shows if the Fund has grown and, if so, whether total expense (management fees as well as other expenses) have declined as a percent of assets.

Whether the Fund has break-points in its management fee schedule, the extent of the fee reduction built into the schedule and the asset levels where the breaks take effect, and in the case of a sub-advised Fund how the Fund's break-points compare with those of the sub-advisory fee schedule.

How the Fund's contractual fee schedule compares with trends in the industry data. To accomplish this, I constructed a chart showing how actual latest-fiscal-year contractual fees of the Fund and of other similar funds relate to average fund assets, with the subject Fund's contractual fee schedule superimposed.

Quality of Service — Performance

The quality-of-service evaluation focused on investment performance, which is the principal result of the investment management service. Each Fund's performance was reviewed over the past 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, as applicable, and compared with that of other funds in the same investment category and with a suitable market index.

In addition, I calculated and reviewed risk-adjusted returns relative to an index of similar mutual funds' returns and a suitable market index. The risk-adjusted returns analysis provides a way of determining the extent to which the Fund's return comparisons are mainly the product of investment value-added (or lack thereof) or alternatively taking considerably more or less risk than is typical in its investment category.

I also received and considered the history of portfolio manager changes for each Fund, as this provided an important context for evaluating the performance results.

Complex-Level Considerations

While this evaluation was conducted mainly at the individual fund level, there are some issues relating to the reasonableness of fees that can alternatively be considered across the whole fund complex:

I reviewed DeAM's profitability analysis for all DWS Funds, with a view toward determining if the allocation procedures used were reasonable and how profit levels compared with public data for other investment managers.

I considered whether DeAM and affiliates receive any significant ancillary or "fall-out" benefits that should be considered in interpreting the direct profitability results. These would be situations where serving as the investment manager of the Funds is beneficial to another part of the Deutsche Bank organization.

I considered how aggregated DWS Fund expenses had varied over the years, by asset class and in the context of trends in asset levels.

I reviewed the structure of the DeAM organization, trends in staffing levels, and information on compensation of investment management and other professionals compared with industry data.

Findings

Based on the process and analysis discussed above, which included reviewing a wide range of information from management and external data sources and considering among other factors the fees DeAM charges other clients, the fees charged by other fund managers, DeAM's costs and profits associated with managing the Funds, economies of scale, possible fall-out benefits, and the nature and quality of services provided, in my opinion the management fees charged the DWS Funds are reasonable.

saa_sigmack0
Thomas H. Mack

Board Members and Officers

The following table presents certain information regarding the Board Members and Officers of the Trust as of August 31, 2010. Each Board Member's year of birth is set forth in parentheses after his or her name. Unless otherwise noted, (i) each Board Member has engaged in the principal occupation(s) noted in the table for at least the most recent five years, although not necessarily in the same capacity; and (ii) the address of each Independent Board Member is c/o Paul K. Freeman, Independent Chairman, DWS Funds, PO Box 101833, Denver, CO 80250-1833. Except as otherwise noted below, the term of office for each Board Member is until the election and qualification of a successor, or until such Board Member sooner dies, resigns, is removed or as otherwise provided in the governing documents of the fund. Because the fund does not hold an annual meeting of shareholders, each Board Member will hold office for an indeterminate period. The Board Members may also serve in similar capacities with other funds in the fund complex. The Length of Time Served represents the year in which the Board Member joined the board of one or more DWS funds now overseen by the Board.

Independent Board Members
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served¹	Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years	Number of Funds in DWS Fund Complex Overseen
Paul K. Freeman (1950) Chairperson since 2009 Board Member since 1993	Consultant, World Bank/Inter-American Development Bank; Governing Council of the Independent Directors Council (governance, education committees); formerly, Project Leader, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (1998-2001); Chief Executive Officer, The Eric Group, Inc. (environmental insurance) (1986-1998)	123
John W. Ballantine (1946) Board Member since 1999	Retired; formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Management Officer, First Chicago NBD Corporation/The First National Bank of Chicago (1996-1998); Executive Vice President and Head of International Banking (1995-1996). Directorships: Healthways, Inc. (provider of disease and care management services); Portland General Electric (utility company); Stockwell Capital Investments PLC (private equity). Former Directorships: First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. and Oak Brook Bank; Prisma Energy International	123
Henry P. Becton, Jr. (1943) Board Member since 1990	Vice Chair and former President, WGBH Educational Foundation. Directorships: Association of Public Television Stations; Lead Director, Becton Dickinson and Company³ (medical technology company); Lead Director, Belo Corporation³ (media company); Public Radio International; Public Radio Exchange (PRX); The PBS Foundation. Former Directorships: Boston Museum of Science; American Public Television; Concord Academy; New England Aquarium; Mass. Corporation for Educational Telecommunications; Committee for Economic Development; Public Broadcasting Service	123
Dawn-Marie Driscoll (1946) Board Member since 1987	President, Driscoll Associates (consulting firm); Executive Fellow, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University; formerly, Partner, Palmer & Dodge (1988-1990); Vice President of Corporate Affairs and General Counsel, Filene's (1978-1988). Directorships: Trustee of 20 open-end mutual funds managed by Sun Capital Advisers, Inc. (since 2007); Director of ICI Mutual Insurance Company (since 2007); Advisory Board, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University; Trustee, Southwest Florida Community Foundation (charitable organization). Former Directorships: Investment Company Institute (audit, executive, nominating committees) and Independent Directors Council (governance, executive committees)	123
Keith R. Fox (1954) Board Member since 1996	Managing General Partner, Exeter Capital Partners (a series of private investment funds). Directorships: Progressive Holding Corporation (kitchen goods importer and distributor); Box Top Media Inc. (advertising); The Kennel Shop (retailer); former Chairman, National Association of Small Business Investment Companies	123
Kenneth C. Froewiss (1945) Board Member since 2001	Adjunct Professor of Finance, NYU Stern School of Business (September 2009-present; Clinical Professor from 1997-September 2009); Member, Finance Committee, Association for Asian Studies (2002-present); Director, Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Group (US) (2004-present); prior thereto, Managing Director, J.P. Morgan (investment banking firm) (until 1996)	123
Richard J. Herring (1946) Board Member since 1990	Jacob Safra Professor of International Banking and Professor, Finance Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (since July 1972); Co-Director, Wharton Financial Institutions Center (since July 2000); Director, Japan Equity Fund, Inc. (since September 2007), Thai Capital Fund, Inc. (since September 2007), Singapore Fund, Inc. (since September 2007). Formerly, Vice Dean and Director, Wharton Undergraduate Division (July 1995-June 2000); Director, Lauder Institute of International Management Studies (July 2000-June 2006)	123
William McClayton (1944) Board Member since 2004	Private equity investor (since October 2009); previously, Managing Director, Diamond Management & Technology Consultants, Inc. (global consulting firm) (2001-2009); Directorship: Board of Managers, YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago; formerly: Senior Partner, Arthur Andersen LLP (accounting) (1966-2001); Trustee, Ravinia Festival	123
Rebecca W. Rimel (1951) Board Member since 1995	President and Chief Executive Officer, The Pew Charitable Trusts (charitable organization) (1994 to present); Trustee, Thomas Jefferson Foundation (charitable organization) (1994 to present); Trustee, Executive Committee, Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce (2001-2007); Trustee, Pro Publica (2007-present) (charitable organization); Director, CardioNet, Inc.² (2009-present) (health care). Formerly, Executive Vice President, The Glenmede Trust Company (investment trust and wealth management) (1983-2004); Board Member, Investor Education (charitable organization) (2004-2005); Director, Viasys Health Care² (January 2007-June 2007)	123
William N. Searcy, Jr. (1946) Board Member since 1993	Private investor since October 2003; Trustee of 20 open-end mutual funds managed by Sun Capital Advisers, Inc. (since October 1998). Formerly, Pension & Savings Trust Officer, Sprint Corporation² (telecommunications) (November 1989-September 2003)	123
Jean Gleason Stromberg (1943) Board Member since 1997	Retired. Formerly, Consultant (1997-2001); Director, Financial Markets US Government Accountability Office (1996-1997); Partner, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P. (law firm) (1978-1996). Directorships: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Former Directorships: Service Source, Inc., Mutual Fund Directors Forum (2002-2004), American Bar Retirement Association (funding vehicle for retirement plans) (1987-1990 and 1994-1996)	123
Robert H. Wadsworth (1940) Board Member since 1999	President, Robert H. Wadsworth & Associates, Inc. (consulting firm) (1983 to present); Director, The Phoenix Boys Choir Association	126

Interested Board Member and Officer⁴
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Trust/ Corporation and Length of Time Served^1,5	Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years	Number of Funds in DWS Fund Complex Overseen
Ingo Gefeke⁷ (1967) Board Member since 2010 Executive Vice President since 2010	Managing Director³, Deutsche Asset Management; Global Head of Distribution and Product Management, DWS Global Head of Trading and Securities Lending. Member of the Board of Directors of DWS Investment GmbH Frankfurt (since July 2009) and DWS Holding & Service GmbH Frankfurt (since January 2010); formerly, Global Chief Administrative Officer, Deutsche Asset Management (2004-2009); Global Chief Operating Officer, Global Transaction Banking, Deutsche Bank AG, New York (2001-2004); Chief Operating Officer, Global Banking Division Americas, Deutsche Bank AG, New York (1999-2001); Central Management, Global Banking Services, Deutsche Bank AG, Frankfurt (1998-1999); Relationship Management, Deutsche Bank AG, Tokyo, Japan (1997-1998)	56

Officers⁴
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served⁵	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years and Other Directorships Held
Michael G. Clark⁶ (1965) President, 2006-present	Managing Director³, Deutsche Asset Management (2006-present); President of DWS family of funds; Director, ICI Mutual Insurance Company (since October 2007); formerly, Director of Fund Board Relations (2004-2006) and Director of Product Development (2000-2004), Merrill Lynch Investment Managers; Senior Vice President Operations, Merrill Lynch Asset Management (1999-2000)
John Millette⁸ (1962) Vice President and Secretary, 1999-present	Director³, Deutsche Asset Management
Paul H. Schubert⁶ (1963) Chief Financial Officer, 2004-present Treasurer, 2005-present	Managing Director³, Deutsche Asset Management (since July 2004); formerly, Executive Director, Head of Mutual Fund Services and Treasurer for UBS Family of Funds (1998-2004); Vice President and Director of Mutual Fund Finance at UBS Global Asset Management (1994-1998)
Caroline Pearson⁸ (1962) Chief Legal Officer, April 2010-present	Managing Director³, Deutsche Asset Management; formerly, Assistant Secretary for DWS family of funds (1997-2010)
Rita Rubin⁹ (1970) Assistant Secretary, 2009-present	Vice President and Counsel, Deutsche Asset Management (since October 2007); formerly, Vice President, Morgan Stanley Investment Management (2004-2007)
Paul Antosca⁸ (1957) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present	Director³, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2006); Vice President, The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) (1990-2006)
Jack Clark⁸ (1967) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present	Director³, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2007); formerly, Vice President, State Street Corporation (2002-2007)
Diane Kenneally⁸(1966) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present	Director³, Deutsche Asset Management
John Caruso¹⁰ (1965) Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer, 2010-present	Managing Director³, Deutsche Asset Management
Robert Kloby⁹ (1962) Chief Compliance Officer, 2006-present	Managing Director³, Deutsche Asset Management

¹ The length of time served represents the year in which the Board Member joined the board of one or more DWS funds currently overseen by the Board.
² A publicly held company with securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
³ Executive title, not a board directorship.
⁴ As a result of their respective positions held with the Advisor, these individuals are considered "interested persons" of the Advisor within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Interested persons receive no compensation from the fund.
⁵ The length of time served represents the year in which the officer was first elected in such capacity for one or more DWS funds.
⁶ Address: 100 Plaza One, Jersey City, NJ 07311.
⁷ The mailing address of Mr. Gefeke is 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154. In addition, Mr. Gefeke is an interested Board Member of certain DWS funds by virtue of his positions with Deutsche Asset Management. As an interested person, Mr. Gefeke receives no compensation from the fund.
⁸ Address: One Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02108.
⁹ Address: 280 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10017.
¹⁰ Address: 60 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005.

The fund's Statement of Additional Information ("SAI") includes additional information about the Board Members. The SAI is available, without charge, upon request. If you would like to request a copy of the SAI, you may do so by calling the following toll-free number: (800) 621-1048.

Account Management Resources


For More Information	The automated telephone system allows you to access personalized account information and obtain information on other DWS funds using either your voice or your telephone keypad. Certain account types within Classes A, C and S also have the ability to purchase, exchange or redeem shares using this system. For more information, contact your financial advisor. You may also access our automated telephone system or speak with a DWS Investments representative by calling the appropriate number below: For shareholders of Classes A, C and Institutional Class: (800) 621-1048 For shareholders of Class S: (800) 728-3337
Web Site	www.dws-investments.com View your account transactions and balances, trade shares, monitor your asset allocation, and change your address, 24 hours a day. Obtain prospectuses and applications, blank forms, interactive worksheets, news about DWS funds, subscription to fund updates by e-mail, retirement planning information, and more.
Written Correspondence	DWS Investments PO Box 219151 Kansas City, MO 64121-9151
Proxy Voting	The fund's policies and procedures for voting proxies for portfolio securities and information about how the fund voted proxies related to its portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30 are available on our Web site — www.dws-investments.com (click on "proxy voting"at the bottom of the page) — or on the SEC's Web site — www.sec.gov. To obtain a written copy of the fund's policies and procedures without charge, upon request, call us toll free at (800) 621-1048.
Principal Underwriter	If you have questions, comments or complaints, contact: DWS Investments Distributors, Inc. 222 South Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606-5808 (800) 621-1148

	Class A	Class C	Class S	Institutional Class
Nasdaq Symbol	SELAX	SELEX	SELSX	SELIX
CUSIP Number	233376 722	233376 714	233376 698	233376 680
Fund Number	488	788	2088	1488

saa_backcover0


ITEM 2.	CODE OF ETHICS

	As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. There have been no amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the code of ethics during the period covered by this report that would require disclosure under Item 2. A copy of the code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.

ITEM 3.	AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

	The fund’s audit committee is comprised solely of trustees who are "independent" (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the "Regulations")). The fund’s Board of Trustees has determined that there are several "audit committee financial experts" (as such term has been defined by the Regulations) serving on the fund’s audit committee including Mr. William McClayton, the chair of the fund’s audit committee. An “audit committee financial expert” is not an “expert” for any purpose, including for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and the designation or identification of a person as an “audit committee financial expert” does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification.

ITEM 4.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

DWS SELECT ALTERNATIVE ALLOCATION FUND

FORM N-CSR DISCLOSURE RE: AUDIT FEES

The following table shows the amount of fees that Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”), the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, billed to the Fund during the Fund’s last two fiscal years. The Audit Committee approved in advance all audit services and non-audit services that E&Y provided to the Fund.

Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Fund

Fiscal Year Ended August 31,	Audit Fees Billed to Fund	Audit-Related Fees Billed to Fund	Tax Fees Billed to Fund	All Other Fees Billed to Fund
2010	$40,865	$0	$7,976	$0
2009	$32,118	$0	$4,380	$0

The above “Tax Fees” were billed for professional services rendered for tax return preparation.

Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers

The following table shows the amount of fees billed by E&Y to Deutsche Investment Management Americas, Inc. (“DIMA” or the “Adviser”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with DIMA (“Control Affiliate”) that provides ongoing services to the Fund (“Affiliated Fund Service Provider”), for engagements directly related to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting, during the Fund’s last two fiscal years.

Fiscal Year Ended August 31,	Audit-Related Fees Billedto Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers	Tax Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers	All Other Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers
2010	$0	$307,930	$0
2009	$0	$420,000	$0

The above “Tax Fees” were billed in connection with tax compliance services and agreed upon procedures.

Non-Audit Services

The following table shows the amount of fees that E&Y billed during the Fund’s last two fiscal years for non-audit services. The Audit Committee pre-approved all non-audit services that E&Y provided to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider that related directly to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting. The Audit Committee requested and received information from E&Y about any non-audit services that E&Y rendered during the Fund’s last fiscal year to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider. The Committee considered this information in evaluating E&Y’s independence.

Fiscal Year
Ended
August 31,

Total
Non-Audit Fees Billed to Fund

(A)

Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (engagements related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund)

(B)

Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (all other engagements)

(C)

Total of (A), (B)

and (C)

2010

$7,976

$307,930

$503,859

$819,765

2009

$4,380

$420,000

$719,000

$1,143,380

All other engagement fees were billed for services in connection with internal control reviews, agreed upon procedures and tax compliance for DIMA and other related entities that provide support for the operations of the Fund.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. Generally, each Fund’s Audit Committee must pre approve (i) all services to be performed for a Fund by a Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and (ii) all non-audit services to be performed by a Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the DIMA Entities with respect to operations and financial reporting of the Fund, except that the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson of each Fund’s Audit Committee may grant the pre-approval for non-audit services described in items (i) and (ii) above for non-prohibited services for engagements of less than $100,000. All such delegated pre approvals shall be presented to each Fund’s Audit Committee no later than the next Audit Committee meeting.

There were no amounts that were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the de minimis exception under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

According to the registrant’s principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, substantially all of the principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm's hours spent on auditing the registrant's financial statements were attributed to work performed by full-time permanent employees of the principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

***

In connection with the audit of the 2009 and 2010 financial statements, the Fund entered into an engagement letter with E&Y. The terms of the engagement letter required by E&Y, and agreed to by the Audit Committee, include provisions in which the parties consent to the sole jurisdiction of federal courts in New York, Boston or the Northern District of Illinois, as well as a waiver of right to a trial by jury and an exclusion of punitive damages.

***

E&Y advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that E&Y had identified three matters that it determined to be inconsistent with the SEC’s auditor independence rules.

First, E&Y advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that, in 2007 and 2008, Deutsche Bank AG (“DB”) provided standard overdraft protection on a depository account to the E&Y member firm in India (“E&Y India”). DB is within the “Investment Company Complex” (as defined by SEC rules) and therefore covered by the SEC auditor independence rules applicable to the Fund. E&Y advised the Audit Committee that E&Y India utilized this arrangement twice in 2007; therefore, the arrangement constituted a lending type arrangement in violation of Rule 2-01(c)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X as described above. E&Y advised the Audit Committee that E&Y believes its independence has not been impacted as it relates to the audit of the Fund. In reaching this conclusion, E&Y noted a number of factors, including that the arrangement did not create a mutual or conflicting interest between E&Y and the Fund and that the arrangement did not involve the Fund, but rather affiliates of the Fund in the Investment Company Complex. E&Y informed the Audit Committee that E&Y India has cancelled the overdraft arrangement.

Second, E&Y advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that, in 2008, an E&Y professional purchased interests in a fund sponsored by a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG that is not audited by E&Y. Subsequent to the purchase, the E&Y professional became a Covered Person (as defined by SEC rules) of the Fund as a result of providing non-audit services to a DB entity within the Investment Company Complex. E&Y informed the Audit Committee that this investment constituted an investment in an affiliate of an audit client in violation of the Rule 2-01(c)(1) of Regulation S-X. E&Y advised the Audit Committee that E&Y believes its independence has not been impacted as it relates to the audit of the Fund. In reaching this conclusion, E&Y noted a number of factors, including that the E&Y professional did not have any financial interest in the Fund and was not involved with the provision of audit services to the Fund. E&Y informed the Audit Committee that the E&Y professional no longer provides any services to any entity within the Investment Company Complex and is no longer deemed to be a Covered Person with respect to the Fund.

Finally, E&Y advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that, in 2008, an E&Y professional whose spouse owned interests in two DWS Funds that are not audited by E&Y, became a Covered Person of the Fund as a result of providing attest services to a DB entity within the Investment Company Complex. E&Y informed the Audit Committee that this investment constituted an investment in an affiliate of an audit client in violation of the Rule 2-01(c)(1) of Regulation S-X. E&Y advised the Audit Committee that E&Y believes its independence has not been impacted as it relates to the audit of the Fund. In reaching this conclusion, E&Y noted a number of factors, including that the E&Y professional did not have any financial interest in the Fund and was not involved with the provision of audit services to the Fund. E&Y informed the Audit Committee that the E&Y professional no longer provides any services to any entity within the Investment Company Complex and is no longer deemed to be a Covered Person with respect to the Fund.


ITEM 5.	AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS

	Not applicable

ITEM 6.	SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

	Not applicable

ITEM 7.	DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

	Not applicable

ITEM 8.	PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

	Not applicable

ITEM 9.	PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

	Not Applicable.

ITEM 10.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

	There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Fund’s Board. The primary function of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to identify and recommend individuals for membership on the Board and oversee the administration of the Board Governance Guidelines. Shareholders may recommend candidates for Board positions by forwarding their correspondence by U.S. mail or courier service to Paul K. Freeman, Independent Chairman, DWS Funds, P.O. Box 101833, Denver, CO 80250-1833.

ITEM 11.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

	(a) The Chief Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on the evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.

	(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

ITEM 12.	EXHIBITS

	(a)(1) Code of Ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed and attached hereto as EX-99.CODE ETH.

	(a)(2) Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) is filed and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT.

	(b) Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)) is furnished and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.906CERT.

Form N-CSR Item F

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant:	DWS Select Alternative Allocation Fund, a series of DWS Equity Trust


By:	/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark President

Date:	October 29, 2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:	/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark President

Date:	October 29, 2010



By:	/s/Paul Schubert Paul Schubert Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:	October 29, 2010

DWS Investments

Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer Code of Ethics

For the Registered Management Investment Companies Listed on Appendix A

Effective Date

[January 31, 2005]

Table of Contents

Page NumberPage Number

I. Overview

II. Purposes of the Officer Code

III. Responsibilities of Covered Officers

A. Honest and Ethical Conduct

B. Conflicts of Interest

C. Use of Personal Fund Shareholder Information

D. Public Communications

E. Compliance with Applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations

IV. Violation Reporting

A. Overview

B. How to Report

C. Process for Violation Reporting to the Fund Board

D. Sanctions for Code Violations

V. Waivers from the Officer Code

VI. Amendments to the Code

VII. Acknowledgement and Certification of Adherence to the Officer Code

IX. Recordkeeping

X. Confidentiality

Appendices

Appendix A: List of Officers Covered under the Code, by Board

Appendix B: Officer Code Acknowledgement and Certification Form

Appendix C: Definitions

Overview

This Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Code of Ethics (“Officer Code”) sets forth the policies, practices, and values expected to be exhibited in the conduct of the Principal Executive Officers and Principal Financial Officers of the investment companies (“Funds”) they serve (“Covered Officers”). A list of Covered Officers and Funds is included on Appendix A.

The Boards of the Funds listed on Appendix A have elected to implement the Officer Code, pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the SEC’s rules thereunder, to promote and demonstrate honest and ethical conduct in their Covered Officers.

Deutsche Asset Management, Inc. or its affiliates (“DeAM”) serves as the investment adviser to each Fund. All Covered Officers are also employees of DeAM or an affiliate. Thus, in addition to adhering to the Officer Code, these individuals must comply with DeAM policies and procedures, such as the DeAM Code of Ethics governing personal trading activities, as adopted pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940.¹ In addition, such individuals also must comply with other applicable Fund policies and procedures.

The DeAM Compliance Officer, who shall not be a Covered Officer and who shall serve as such subject to the approval of the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof), is primarily responsible for implementing and enforcing this Code. The Compliance Officer has the authority to interpret this Officer Code and its applicability to particular circumstances. Any questions about the Officer Code should be directed to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

The DeAM Compliance Officer and his or her contact information can be found in Appendix A.

II.

Purposes of the Officer Code

The purposes of the Officer Code are to deter wrongdoing and to:

•

promote honest and ethical conduct among Covered Officers, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

•

promote full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosures in reports and documents that the Funds file with or submit to the SEC (and in other public communications from the Funds) and that are within the Covered Officer’s responsibilities;

•

promote compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations;

•

encourage the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Officer Code to the DeAM Compliance Officer; and

•

establish accountability for adherence to the Officer Code.

_________________________

¹The obligations imposed by the Officer Code are separate from, and in addition to, any obligations imposed under codes of ethics adopted pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and any other code of conduct applicable to Covered Officers in whatever capacity they serve. The Officer Code does not incorporate any of those other codes and, accordingly, violations of those codes will not necessarily be considered violations of the Officer Code and waivers granted under those codes would not necessarily require a waiver to be granted under this Code. Sanctions imposed under those codes may be considered in determining appropriate sanctions for any violation of this Code.

Any questions about the Officer Code should be referred to DeAM’s Compliance Officer.

III.

Responsibilities of Covered Officers

Honest and Ethical Conduct

It is the duty of every Covered Officer to encourage and demonstrate honest and ethical conduct, as well as adhere to and require adherence to the Officer Code and any other applicable policies and procedures designed to promote this behavior. Covered Officers must at all times conduct themselves with integrity and distinction, putting first the interests of the Fund(s) they serve. Covered Officers must be honest and candid while maintaining confidentiality of information where required by law, DeAM policy or Fund policy.

Covered Officers also must, at all times, act in good faith, responsibly and with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting or being misleading about material facts or allowing their independent judgment to be subordinated. Covered Officers also should maintain skills appropriate and necessary for the performance of their duties for the Fund(s). Covered Officers also must responsibly use and control all Fund assets and resources entrusted to them.

Covered Officers may not retaliate against others for, or otherwise discourage the reporting of, actual or apparent violations of the Officer Code or applicable laws or regulations. Covered Officers should create an environment that encourages the exchange of information, including concerns of the type that this Code is designed to address.

Conflicts of Interest

A “conflict of interest” occurs when a Covered Officer’s personal interests interfere with the interests of the Fund for which he or she serves as an officer. Covered Officers may not improperly use their position with a Fund for personal or private gain to themselves, their family, or any other person. Similarly, Covered Officers may not use their personal influence or personal relationships to influence decisions or other Fund business or operational matters where they would benefit personally at the Fund’s expense or to the Fund’s detriment. Covered Officers may not cause the Fund to take action, or refrain from taking action, for their personal benefit at the Fund’s expense or to the Fund’s detriment. Some examples of conflicts of interest follow (this is not an all-inclusive list): being in the position of supervising, reviewing or having any influence on the job evaluation, pay or benefit of any immediate family member who is an employee of a Fund service provider or is otherwise associated with the Fund; or having an ownership interest in, or having any consulting or employment relationship with, any Fund service provider other than DeAM or its affiliates.

Certain conflicts of interest covered by this Code arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Fund that already are subject to conflict of interest provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act. For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other property) with the Fund because of their status as “affiliated persons” of the Fund. Covered Officers must comply with applicable laws and regulations. Therefore, any violations of existing statutory and regulatory prohibitions on individual behavior could be considered a violation of this Code.

As to conflicts arising from, or as a result of the advisory relationship (or any other relationships) between the Fund and DeAM, of which the Covered Officers are also officers or employees, it is recognized by the Board that, subject to DeAM’s fiduciary duties to the Fund, the Covered Officers will in the normal course of their duties (whether formally for the Fund or for DeAM, or for both) be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions which will have different effects on DeAM and the Fund. The Board recognizes that the participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contract relationship between the Fund and DeAM, and is consistent with the expectation of the Board of the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Fund.

Covered Officers should avoid actual conflicts of interest, and appearances of conflicts of interest, between the Covered Officer’s duties to the Fund and his or her personal interests beyond those contemplated or anticipated by applicable regulatory schemes. If a Covered Officer suspects or knows of a conflict or an appearance of one, the Covered Officer must immediately report the matter to the DeAM Compliance Officer. If a Covered Officer, in lieu of reporting such a matter to the DeAM Compliance Officer, may report the matter directly to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof), as appropriate (e.g., if the conflict involves the DeAM Compliance Officer or the Covered Officer reasonably believes it would be futile to report the matter to the DeAM Compliance Officer).

When actual, apparent or suspected conflicts of interest arise in connection with a Covered Officer, DeAM personnel aware of the matter should promptly contact the DeAM Compliance Officer. There will be no reprisal or retaliation against the person reporting the matter.

Upon receipt of a report of a possible conflict, the DeAM Compliance Officer will take steps to determine whether a conflict exists. In so doing, the DeAM Compliance Officer may take any actions he or she determines to be appropriate in his or her sole discretion and may use all reasonable resources, including retaining or engaging legal counsel, accounting firms or other consultants, subject to applicable law.² The costs associated with such actions may be borne by the Fund, if appropriate, after consultation with the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof). Otherwise, such costs will be borne by DeAM or other appropriate Fund service provider.

After full review of a report of a possible conflict of interest, the DeAM Compliance Officer may determine that no conflict or reasonable appearance of a conflict exists. If, however, the DeAM Compliance Officer determines that an actual conflict exists, the Compliance Officer will resolve the conflict solely in the interests of the Fund, and will report the conflict and its resolution to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof). If the DeAM Compliance Officer determines that the appearance of a conflict exists, the DeAM Compliance Officer will take appropriate steps to remedy such appearance. In lieu of determining whether a conflict exists and/or resolving a conflict, the DeAM Compliance Officer instead may refer the matter to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof), as appropriate. However, the DeAM Compliance Officer must refer the matter to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof) if the DeAM Compliance Officer is directly involved in the conflict or under similar appropriate circumstances.

After responding to a report of a possible conflict of interest, the DeAM Compliance Officer will discuss the matter with the person reporting it (and with the Covered Officer at issue, if different) for purposes of educating those involved on conflicts of interests (including how to detect and avoid them, if appropriate).

_________________________

²For example, retaining a Fund’s independent accounting firm may require pre-approval by the Fund’s audit committee.

Appropriate resolution of conflicts may restrict the personal activities of the Covered Officer and/or his family, friends or other persons.

Solely because a conflict is disclosed to the DeAM Compliance Officer (and/or the Board or Committee thereof) and/or resolved by the DeAM Compliance Officer does not mean that the conflict or its resolution constitutes a waiver from the Code’s requirements.

Any questions about conflicts of interests, including whether a particular situation might be a conflict or an appearance of one, should be directed to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

Use of Personal Fund Shareholder Information

A Covered Officer may not use or disclose personal information about Fund shareholders, except in the performance of his or her duties for the Fund. Each Covered Officer also must abide by the Funds’ and DeAM’s privacy policies under SEC Regulation S-P.

Public Communications

In connection with his or her responsibilities for or involvement with a Fund’s public communications and disclosure documents (e.g., shareholder reports, registration statements, press releases), each Covered Officer must provide information to Fund service providers (within the DeAM organization or otherwise) and to the Fund’s Board (and any committees thereof), independent auditors, government regulators and self-regulatory organizations that is fair, accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable.

Further, within the scope of their duties, Covered Officers having direct or supervisory authority over Fund disclosure documents or other public Fund communications will, to the extent appropriate within their area of responsibility, endeavor to ensure full, fair, timely, accurate and understandable disclosure in Fund disclosure documents. Such Covered Officers will oversee, or appoint others to oversee, processes for the timely and accurate creation and review of all public reports and regulatory filings. Within the scope of his or her responsibilities as a Covered Officer, each Covered Officer also will familiarize himself or herself with the disclosure requirements applicable to the Fund, as well as the business and financial operations of the Fund. Each Covered Officer also will adhere to, and will promote adherence to, applicable disclosure controls, processes and procedures, including DeAM’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures, which govern the process by which Fund disclosure documents are created and reviewed.

To the extent that Covered Officers participate in the creation of a Fund’s books or records, they must do so in a way that promotes the accuracy, fairness and timeliness of those records.

Compliance with Applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations

In connection with his or her duties and within the scope of his or her responsibilities as a Covered Officer, each Covered Officer must comply with governmental laws, rules and regulations, accounting standards, and Fund policies/procedures that apply to his or her role, responsibilities and duties with respect to the Funds (“Applicable Laws”). These requirements do not impose on Covered Officers any additional substantive duties. Additionally, Covered Officers should promote compliance with Applicable Laws.

If a Covered Officer knows of any material violations of Applicable Laws or suspects that such a violation may have occurred, the Covered Officer is expected to promptly report the matter to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

IV.

Violation Reporting

Overview

Each Covered Officer must promptly report to the DeAM Compliance Officer, and promote the reporting of, any known or suspected violations of the Officer Code. Failure to report a violation may be a violation of the Officer Code.

Examples of violations of the Officer Code include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

Unethical or dishonest behavior

•

Obvious lack of adherence to policies surrounding review and approval of public communications and regulatory filings

•

Failure to report violations of the Officer Code

•

Known or obvious deviations from Applicable Laws

•

Failure to acknowledge and certify adherence to the Officer Code

The DeAM Compliance Officer has the authority to take any and all action he or she considers appropriate in his or her sole discretion to investigate known or suspected Code violations, including consulting with the Fund’s Board, the independent Board members, a Board committee, the Fund’s legal counsel and/or counsel to the independent Board members. The Compliance Officer also has the authority to use all reasonable resources to investigate violations, including retaining or engaging legal counsel, accounting firms or other consultants, subject to applicable law.³ The costs associated with such actions may be borne by the Fund, if appropriate, after consultation with the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof). Otherwise, such costs will be borne by DeAM.

How to Report

Any known or suspected violations of the Officer Code must be promptly reported to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

Process for Violation Reporting to the Fund Board

The DeAM Compliance Officer will promptly report any violations of the Code to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof).

Sanctions for Code Violations

Violations of the Code will be taken seriously. In response to reported or otherwise known violations, DeAM and the relevant Fund’s Board may impose sanctions within the scope of their respective authority over the Covered Officer at issue. Sanctions imposed by DeAM could include termination of employment. Sanctions imposed by a Fund’s Board could include termination of association with the Fund.

_________________________

³For example, retaining a Fund’s independent accounting firm may require pre-approval by the Fund’s audit committee.

Waivers from the Officer Code

A Covered Officer may request a waiver from the Officer Code by transmitting a written request for a waiver to the DeAM Compliance Officer.⁴ The request must include the rationale for the request and must explain how the waiver would be in furtherance of the standards of conduct described in and underlying purposes of the Officer Code. The DeAM Compliance Officer will present this information to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof). The Board (or committee) will determine whether to grant the requested waiver. If the Board (or committee) grants the requested waiver, the DeAM Compliance Officer thereafter will monitor the activities subject to the waiver, as appropriate, and will promptly report to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof) regarding such activities, as appropriate.

The DeAM Compliance Officer will coordinate and facilitate any required public disclosures of any waivers granted or any implicit waivers.

VI.

Amendments to the Code

The DeAM Compliance Officer will review the Officer Code from time to time for its continued appropriateness and will propose any amendments to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof) on a timely basis. In addition, the Board (or committee thereof) will review the Officer Code at least annually for its continued appropriateness and may amend the Code as necessary or appropriate.

The DeAM Compliance Officer will coordinate and facilitate any required public disclosures of Code amendments.

VII.

Acknowledgement and Certification of Adherence to the Officer Code

Each Covered Officer must sign a statement upon appointment as a Covered Officer and annually thereafter acknowledging that he or she has received and read the Officer Code, as amended or updated, and confirming that he or she has complied with it (see Appendix B: Acknowledgement and Certification of Obligations Under the Officer Code).

Understanding and complying with the Officer Code and truthfully completing the Acknowledgement and Certification Form is each Covered Officer’s obligation.

The DeAM Compliance Officer will maintain such Acknowledgements in the Fund’s books and records.

VIII.

Scope of Responsibilities

A Covered Officer’s responsibilities under the Officer Code are limited to:

_________________________

⁴Of course, it is not a waiver of the Officer Code if the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof) determines that a matter is not a deviation from the Officer Code’s requirements or is otherwise not covered by the Code.

(1)

Fund matters over which the Officer has direct responsibility or control, matters in which the Officer routinely participates, and matters with which the Officer is otherwise involved (i.e., matters within the scope of the Covered Officer’s responsibilities as a Fund officer); and

(2)

Fund matters of which the Officer has actual knowledge.

IX.

Recordkeeping

The DeAM Compliance Officer will create and maintain appropriate records regarding the implementation and operation of the Officer Code, including records relating to conflicts of interest determinations and investigations of possible Code violations.

Confidentiality

All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to this Officer Code shall be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly. Except as otherwise required by law or this Officer Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the DeAM Compliance Officer, the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof), legal counsel, independent auditors, and any consultants engaged by the Compliance Officer.

Appendices

Appendix A:

List of Officers Covered under the Code, by Board:

Fund Board	Principal Executive Officers	Principal Financial Officers	Treasurer
DWS Funds	Michael Clark	Paul Schubert	Paul Schubert
Germany*	Michael Clark	Paul Schubert	Paul Schubert

* Central Europe and Russia, European Equity, and New Germany Funds

DeAM Compliance Officer:

Joseph S. Yuen

Code of Ethics Compliance

212-454-7443

212-454-4703 fax

As of:

Jan 1, 2009

Appendix B: Acknowledgement and Certification

Initial Acknowledgement and Certification

of Obligations Under the Officer Code

Print Name

Department

Location

Telephone

I acknowledge and certify that I am a Covered Officer under the DWS Investments Principal Executive and Financial Officer Code of Ethics (“Officer Code”), and therefore subject to all of its requirements and provisions.

I have received and read the Officer Code and I understand the requirements and provisions set forth in the Officer Code.

I have disclosed any conflicts of interest of which I am aware to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

I will act in the best interest of the Funds for which I serve as an officer and have maintained the confidentiality of personal information about Fund shareholders.

I will report any known or suspected violations of the Officer Code in a timely manner to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Signature Date

Annual Acknowledgement and Certification

of Obligations Under the Officer Code

Print Name

Department

Location

Telephone

I have received and read the Officer Code, and I understand the requirements and provisions set forth in the Officer Code.

I have adhered to the Officer Code.

I have not knowingly been a party to any conflict of interest, nor have I had actual knowledge about actual or apparent conflicts of interest that I did not report to the DeAM Compliance Officer in accordance with the Officer Code’s requirements.

I have acted in the best interest of the Funds for which I serve as an officer and have maintained the confidentiality of personal information about Fund shareholders.

With respect to the duties I perform for the Fund as a Fund officer, I believe that effective processes are in place to create and file public reports and documents in accordance with applicable regulations.

With respect to the duties I perform for the Fund as a Fund officer, I have complied to the best of my knowledge with all Applicable Laws (as that term is defined in the Officer Code) and have appropriately monitored those persons under my supervision for compliance with Applicable Laws.

I have reported any known or suspected violations of the Officer Code in a timely manner to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

Signature

Date

Appendix C: Definitions

Principal Executive Officer

Individual holding the office of President of the Fund or series of Funds, or a person performing a similar function.

Principal Financial Officer

Individual holding the office of Treasurer of the Fund or series of Funds, or a person performing a similar function.

Registered Investment Management Investment Company

Registered investment companies other than a face-amount certificate company or a unit investment trust.

Waiver

A waiver is an approval of an exemption from a Code requirement.

Implicit Waiver

An implicit waiver is the failure to take action within a reasonable period of time regarding a material departure from a requirement or provision of the Officer Code that has been made known to the DeAM Compliance Officer or the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof).

October 29, 2010	/s/Michael G. Clark
	Michael G. Clark
	President

October 29, 2010	/s/Paul Schubert
	Paul Schubert
	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Annual Report to Shareholders

Annual Report
to Shareholders