XML 59 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Variable Interest Entities
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Variable Interest Entities [Abstract]  
Variable Interest Entities

Note 9 Variable Interest Entities

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-02, Consolidation: Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”).  ASU 2015-02 changes consolidation accounting including revising certain criteria for identifying variable interest entities.  TDS adopted the provisions of this standard as of January 1, 2016.  As a result, certain consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities that were not defined as variable interest entities under previous accounting guidance are defined as variable interest entities under the provisions of ASU 2015-02.  TDS’ modified retrospective adoption of ASU 2015-02 did not change the group of entities which TDS is required to consolidate in its financial statements.  Accordingly, the adoption of ASU 2015-02 did not impact its financial position or results of operations.

Consolidated VIEs

TDS consolidates variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which it has a controlling financial interest as defined by GAAP and is therefore deemed the primary beneficiary.  A controlling financial interest will have both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the VIE activities that most significantly impact economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb the VIE losses and right to receive benefits that are significant to the VIE.  TDS reviews these criteria initially at the time it enters into agreements and subsequently when events warranting reconsideration occur.  These VIEs have risks similar to those described in the “Risk Factors” in TDS’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The following VIEs were formed to participate in FCC auctions of wireless spectrum and to fund, establish, and provide wireless service with respect to any FCC licenses won in the auctions:

  • Advantage Spectrum L.P. (“Advantage Spectrum”) and Frequency Advantage L.P., the general partner of Advantage Spectrum;
  • Aquinas Wireless L.P. (“Aquinas Wireless”); and
  • King Street Wireless L.P. (“King Street Wireless”) and King Street Wireless, Inc., the general partner of King Street Wireless.

 

These particular VIEs are collectively referred to as designated entities.  Historically and as of September 30, 2016, TDS consolidated these VIEs. 

The power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these VIEs is shared.  Specifically, the general partner of these VIEs has the exclusive right to manage, operate and control the limited partnerships and make all decisions to carry on the business of the partnerships.  The general partner of each partnership needs the consent of the limited partner, an indirect TDS subsidiary, to sell or lease certain licenses, to make certain large expenditures, admit other partners or liquidate the limited partnerships.  Although the power to direct the activities of these VIEs is shared, TDS has the most significant level of exposure to the variability associated with the economic performance of the VIEs, indicating that TDS is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs.  Therefore, in accordance with GAAP, these VIEs are consolidated.

In March 2015, King Street Wireless made a $60 million distribution to its owners.  Of this distribution, $6 million was provided to King Street Wireless, Inc. and $54 million was provided to U.S. Cellular. 

FCC Auction 97 ended in January 2015.  TDS participated in Auction 97 indirectly through its interest in Advantage Spectrum.  An indirect subsidiary of TDS is a limited partner in Advantage Spectrum.  Advantage Spectrum applied as a designated entity, and received bid credits with respect to spectrum purchased in Auction 97.  Advantage Spectrum was the winning bidder for 124 licenses for an aggregate bid of $338 million, after its designated entity discount of 25%.  This amount is classified as Licenses in TDS’ Consolidated Balance Sheet.  Advantage Spectrum’s bid amount, less the initial deposit of $60 million paid in 2014, plus certain other charges totaling $2 million, was paid to the FCC in March 2015.  These licenses were granted by the FCC in July 2016.

TDS also consolidates other VIEs that are limited partnerships that provide wireless service.  ASU 2015-02 modified the manner in which limited partnerships and similar legal entities are evaluated under the variable interest model.  A limited partnership is a variable interest entity unless the limited partners hold substantive participating rights or kick-out rights over the general partners.  For certain limited partnerships, U.S. Cellular is the general partner and manages the operations.  In these partnerships, the limited partners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights and, further, such limited partners do not have the authority to remove the general partner.  Therefore, beginning January 1, 2016, these limited partnerships are also recognized as VIEs and are consolidated under the variable interest model.  Prior to the adoption of ASU 2015-02, these limited partnerships were consolidated under the voting interest model. 

The following table presents the classification and balances of the consolidated VIEs’ assets and liabilities in TDS’ Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2016¹

 

2015¹

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

2 

 

$

1 

 

Accounts receivable

 

38 

 

 

 

 

Other current assets

 

6 

 

 

 

 

Licenses2

 

649 

 

 

649 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

96 

 

 

8 

 

Other assets and deferred charges

 

14 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

$

805 

 

$

658 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

$

19 

 

$

 

 

Deferred liabilities and credits

 

11 

 

 

1 

 

 

Total liabilities

$

30 

 

$

1 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

The increase in amounts from December 31, 2015 are primarily due to the adoption of ASU 2015-02 as disclosed above.  ASU 2015-02 was adopted on a modified retrospective basis and, accordingly, prior year amounts have not been revised to reflect the change in guidance.

2

As disclosed above, payments totaling $338 million were made by Advantage Spectrum to the FCC relating to Auction 97.  These licenses were granted and issued as of September 30, 2016.  Although the licenses had not yet been granted as of December 31, 2015, the payments to the FCC were classified as Licenses at such date.

 

Unconsolidated VIEs

TDS manages the operations of and holds a variable interest in certain other limited partnerships, but is not the primary beneficiary of these entities and, therefore, does not consolidate them under the variable interest model outlined in ASU 2015-02.

TDS’ total investment in these unconsolidated entities was $6 million and $5 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and is included in Investments in unconsolidated entities in TDS’ Consolidated Balance Sheet.  The maximum exposure from unconsolidated VIEs is limited to the investment held by TDS in those entities. 

Other Related Matters

TDS made contributions, loans and/or advances to its VIEs totaling $100 million and $281 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively.  TDS may agree to make additional capital contributions and/or advances to these or other VIEs and/or to their general partners to provide additional funding for operations or the development of licenses granted in various auctions.  TDS may finance such amounts with a combination of cash on hand, borrowings under its revolving credit agreement and/or other long-term debt.  There is no assurance that TDS will be able to obtain additional financing on commercially reasonable terms or at all to provide such financial support.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, TDS recorded out-of-period adjustments attributable to the third quarter of 2013 through the second quarter of 2015 related to an agreement with King Street Wireless.  TDS determined that these adjustments were not material to the quarterly periods or the annual results for 2015.  These out-of-period adjustments had the impact  of reducing Net income by $3 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, and Net income attributable to TDS shareholders by $4 million and $3 million, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.