XML 49 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Disclosure Text Block  
Intangible Assets

6. Intangible Assets

 

Changes in Licenses, Franchise rights and Goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 are presented below.

 

Licenses              
                
   U.S. Cellular Wireline Cable Non-Reportable Segment Total
(Dollars in thousands)              
Balance December 31, 2013$ 1,405,759 $ 2,800 $ - $ 15,220 $ 1,423,779
 Acquisitions  41,707   -   2,703   -   44,410
 Transferred to Assets held for sale  (68,288)   -   -   -   (68,288)
 Exchanges, net  15,719   -   -   -   15,719
 Divestitures  -   -   -   (15,220)   (15,220)
 Other  408   -   -   -   408
Balance September 30, 2014$ 1,395,305 $ 2,800 $ 2,703 $ - $ 1,400,808

Franchise Rights  
     
   Cable
(Dollars in thousands)  
Balance December 31, 2013$ 123,668
 Acquisitions  115,629
 Divestitures  (347)
Balance September 30, 2014$ 238,950

Goodwill                 
      TDS Telecom      
   U.S. Cellular Wireline (1) Cable HMS Non-Reportable Segment Total
(Dollars in thousands)                 
                  
Assigned value at time of acquisition$ 622,681 $ 449,898 $ 61,712 $ 118,830 $ 4,317 $ 1,257,438
 Accumulated impairment losses in prior periods  (333,900)   (29,440)   -   -   (515)   (363,855)
 Other  (56,740)   -   -   -   -   (56,740)
Balance December 31, 2013  232,041   420,458   61,712   118,830   3,802   836,843
 Acquisitions  -      33,002   -   -   33,002
 Loss on impairment  -   -   -   (84,000)   -   (84,000)
 Divestitures  -   (2,565)   -   -   -   (2,565)
Balance September 30, 2014$ 232,041 $ 417,893 $ 94,714 $ 34,830 $ 3,802 $ 783,280
                    
(1)On July 31, 2014, TDS Telecom sold certain Wireline markets.

Goodwill Impairment Assessment

 

During the third quarter of 2014, due to a decline in projected revenue and earnings of TDS Telecom's HMS reporting unit compared with previously projected results, TDS determined that an interim impairment test of HMS Goodwill was required. TDS performed the Step 1 Goodwill impairment tests, as defined by GAAP, as of August 1, 2014.

 

The discounted cash flow approach and publicly-traded guideline company method were used to value the HMS reporting unit. The discounted cash flow approach uses value drivers and risks specific to the industry and current economic factors. The cash flow estimates incorporated assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value and may not be indicative of TDS Telecom specific assumptions. The most significant assumptions made in this process were the revenue growth rate (shown as a compound annual growth rate in the table below), the terminal revenue growth rate, the discount rate and capital expenditures as a percentage of revenue (shown as a simple average in the table below).

 

The publicly-traded guideline company method develops an indication of fair value by calculating average market pricing multiples for selected publicly-traded companies. The developed multiples were applied to applicable financial measures of the HMS reporting unit to determine fair value. The discounted cash flow approach and publicly-traded guideline company method were weighted to arrive at the total fair value used for impairment testing.

 

The following table represents key assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the HMS reporting unit as of August 1, 2014 using the discounted cash flow approach. The HMS averages below are based on a ten year projection period. As more fully described in TDS' Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, there are uncertainties associated with these key assumptions, and potential events and/or circumstances that could have a negative effect on the key assumptions.

 

Key assumptions HMS
Revenue growth rate 6.1%
Terminal revenue growth rate 2.5%
Discount rate 11.5%
Capital expenditures as a percentage of revenue 8.6%

Results

As of August 1, 2014, the carrying value of the HMS reporting unit exceeded its fair value; therefore, a Step 2 Goodwill impairment test was performed. The second step compared the implied fair value of reporting unit Goodwill with the carrying amount of that Goodwill. To calculate the implied fair value of Goodwill in this second step, TDS allocated the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that reporting unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amount assigned to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit was the implied fair value of Goodwill. Since the carrying amount of Goodwill exceeded the implied fair value of Goodwill, an impairment loss was recognized for that difference. As a result of the Step 2 Goodwill impairment test, TDS recognized a loss on impairment of $84.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.