XML 61 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
9. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
6 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Variable Interest Entity  
NOTE 9 - VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY

Concurrent with the close of the Acquisition, PCHI simultaneously acquired title to substantially all of the real property acquired by the Company in the Acquisition. The Company received $5.0 million and PCHI guaranteed the Company's $47.277 million term loan. The Company remains primarily liable as the borrower under the $47.277 million term loan notwithstanding its guarantee by PCHI. The $47.277 million term loan is cross-collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets and all of the real property of the Hospitals. All of the Company's operating activities are directly affected by the real property that was sold to PCHI, which is a related party entity that is affiliated with the Company through common ownership and control. As of September 30, 2013, PCHI was owned 51% by various physician investors and 49% by Ganesha, which is managed by Dr. Chaudhuri (majority stockholder in the Company).

 

The Company entered into a lease agreement dated March 7, 2005 (amended and restated as of April 13, 2010) under which it leased back from PCHI all of the real estate that it transferred to PCHI (Note 13). The amended lease terminates on the 25-year anniversary of the original lease (March 7, 2005), grants the Company the right to renew for one additional 25-year period, and requires combined annual base rental payments of $8.3 million for all the properties. However, until PCHI refinances the related $47.277 million term loan, the annual base rental payments are reduced to $7.3 million. In addition, the Company offsets, against its rental payments owed to PCHI, interest payments that it makes on the related $47.277 million term loan. Lease payments to PCHI and offsetting interest payments are eliminated in consolidation.

 

GAAP defines variable interest entities (“VIE”) as entities with a level of invested equity that is not sufficient to fund future activities to permit them to operate on a stand-alone basis, or whose equity holders lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Then, for entities identified as a VIE, the guidance sets forth a model to a primary beneficiary based on an assessment of which party to a VIE, if any, bears a majority of the exposure to expected losses, or stands to gain from a majority of its expected returns and has the power to direct activities of the VIE that impacts economic performance. The primary beneficiary of a VIE should consolidate the VIE.

  

The Company determined that it provides the majority of financial support to PCHI through various sources including lease payments, remaining primarily liable under the $47.277 million term loan, and cross-collateralization of the Company's non-real estate assets to secure the $47.277 million term loan. The Company concluded that PCHI is a VIE and it is the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the financial statements of PCHI are included in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

PCHI's assets, liabilities, and deficiency are set forth below.

 

    September 30,
2013
    March 31,
2013
 
             
Cash   $ 184     $ 147  
Property, net     39,052       39,696  
Other     118       49  
Total assets   $ 39,354     $ 39,892  
                 
                 
Debt ($47,277, net of discount) (as guarantor)   $ 45,836     $ 45,530  
Other     468       488  
Total liabilities     46,304       46,018  
                 
Deficiency     (6,950 )     (6,126 )
Total liabilities and accumulated deficit   $ 39,354     $ 39,892  

   

As noted above, PCHI is a guarantor on the $47.277 million term loan should the Company not be able to perform.  PCHI's total liabilities (before debt discount of $1.4 million) represent the Company's maximum exposure to loss. Additionally, the Company is responsible for seismic remediation under the terms of the lease agreement (Notes 2 and 13).

 

PCHI rental income and the Company’s related rental expense of $2.0 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $4.0 million and $3.9 million for the six months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were eliminated upon consolidation.