XML 18 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
NOTE 2 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
3 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure [Text Block]
NOTE 2 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following:

   
June 30,
 2011
   
March 31,
 2011
 
             
Buildings
 
$
34,637
   
$
34,624
 
Land and improvements
   
13,523
     
13,523
 
Equipment
   
13,635
     
13,266
 
Construction in progress
   
1,404
     
1,375
 
Assets under capital leases
   
11,218
     
11,218
 
     
74,417
     
74,006
 
Less accumulated depreciation
   
(20,837
)
   
(19,755
)
                 
Property and equipment, net
 
$
53,580
   
$
54,251
 

Accumulated depreciation on assets under capital leases as of June 30 and March 31, 2011 was $4.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively.

The Hospitals are located in an area near active and substantial earthquake faults. The Hospitals carry earthquake insurance with a policy limit of $50.0 million. A significant earthquake could result in material damage and temporary or permanent cessation of operations at one or more of the Hospitals.

The State of California has imposed new hospital seismic safety requirements. Under these new requirements, the Hospitals must meet stringent seismic safety criteria in the future. In addition, there could be other remediation costs pursuant to this seismic retrofit.

The State of California has introduced a new seismic review methodology known as HAZUS. The HAZUS methodology may preclude the need for some structural modifications. All four Hospitals requested HAZUS review and received a favorable notice pertaining to structural reclassification. All Hospital buildings, with the exception of one (an administrative building), have been deemed compliant until January 1, 2030 for both structural and nonstructural retrofit.  The Company does not have an estimate of the cost to remediate the seismic requirements for the administrative building as of June 30, 2011.

There are additional requirements that must be complied with by 2030. The costs of meeting these requirements have not yet been determined. Compliance with seismic ordinances will be costly and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's cash flow.  In addition, remediation could possibly result in certain environmental liabilities, such as asbestos abatement.