MICROSTRATEGY

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x The number of shares of the registrant’s class A common stock and class B common stock outstanding on April 23, 2008 was 9,109,734 and 2,770,244, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Except for the consolidated balance sheet of MicroStrategy Incorporated (“MicroStrategy” or the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007, which is derived from audited financial statements, the accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of such financial position and results of operations have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

The consolidated financial statements and notes are presented as required by Form 10-Q and do not contain certain information included in the Company’s annual financial statements and notes. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and the notes thereto filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

The Company must classify a business line as discontinued operations once the Company has committed to a plan to sell the business, as determined pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets”, or SFAS 144. In March 2008, the Company committed to a plan to sell its two non-core businesses, Alarm.com and Angel.com, which focus outside of the business intelligence software and services market. Alarm.com is a provider of web-enabled residential and commercial security and activity monitoring technology, and Angel.com is a provider of interactive voice response telephony systems. Historical financial information presented in the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company’s adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. This statement permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. Subsequent unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings. The Company’s adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (Revised 2007) (SFAS 141R), “Business Combinations”. SFAS 141R will change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS 141R will change the accounting treatment and disclosure for certain specific items in a business combination. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141R will have an impact on accounting for business combinations once adopted but the effect on the Company will be dependent upon acquisitions at that time.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (SFAS 160), “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51”. SFAS 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 160 on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 expands quarterly disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133 about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 161 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Restricted cash and investments consists of cash and investment balances restricted in use by contractual obligations with third parties.

On March 15, 2005, the Company entered into a security agreement with a bank under which the Company posted cash to secure existing letters of credit. These letters of credit are used as security deposits for office leases, including the office lease for the Company’s corporate headquarters, as well as collateral for performance bonds. The Company may invest the cash collateral under the security agreement in certain permitted investments. As of both March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had $1.9 million in cash collateral posted under the security agreement, all invested in money market funds that are included in restricted cash and investments in the accompanying balance sheets.

Accounts receivable, net of allowances, consisted of the following, as of (in thousands):

The Company offsets accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any billed and unpaid items included in deferred revenue and advance payments.

Deferred revenue and advance payments from customers consisted of the following, as of (in thousands):

The Company offsets accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any billed and unpaid items included in deferred revenue and advance payments.

On November 8, 2007 Diagnostic Systems Corp. (DSC), a subsidiary of Acacia Technology Group, filed a complaint for patent infringement against MicroStrategy and a number of other unrelated defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division. The case has been consolidated with Case No. SA CV 07-896 AG (MLGx) pending against other unrelated defendants. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,537,590 directly, contributorily and by inducement by making, using, selling and offering for sale in the United States MicroStrategy 8 Business Intelligence Platform, when used with an appropriate database. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of willful infringement and seeks damages, a finding that the case is exceptional and an award of attorneys fees, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. In its initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) served on December 28, 2007, DSC declined to disclose the amount of its alleged damages, but disclosed that its alleged damages are based on a reasonable royalty theory. MicroStrategy answered the consolidated complaint on December 28, 2007, denied infringement, asserted affirmative defenses of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability, among others, and counter-claimed for declaratory judgment that the ‘590 patent is not infringed, is invalid, and is unenforceable. The Court has scheduled a status and scheduling conference for May 12, 2008. The outcome of this litigation is not presently determinable.

Business Objects filed motions for summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents on October 13, 2005. On January 23, 2006, the Court denied our motion for summary judgment of infringement of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents. The Court granted Business Objects’ motions for summary judgment of non-infringement of the ‘033 patent and of invalidity of the ‘432 and ‘796 patents. The Court denied Business Objects’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the ‘033 patent and denied as moot Business Objects’ motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the ‘432 and ‘796 patents. On February 7, 2006, the Court dismissed without prejudice Business Objects’ counterclaim for declaratory judgment of invalidity of the ‘033 patent. On February 23, 2006, the Court entered judgment in favor of Business Objects and against MicroStrategy. MicroStrategy filed a notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit on March 24, 2006. MicroStrategy’s opening brief on appeal was filed on August 4, 2006. Business Objects’ responsive brief was filed on November 17, 2006. MicroStrategy’s reply brief was filed on December 18, 2006. The Federal Circuit heard oral argument on June 4, 2007. On June 25, 2007, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s judgment in favor of Business Objects and against MicroStrategy on each of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents. MicroStrategy did not file a request for rehearing before the Federal Circuit or file a petition for a writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court.

On March 9, 2006, Business Objects filed a motion seeking reimbursement from MicroStrategy of Business Objects’ attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of approximately $4.7 million. On March 25, 2008, the court issued a memorandum opinion and an order. The court awarded partial fees and expenses to Business Object Americas as the prevailing party. Business Object Americas was awarded reasonable fees and expenses after March 14, 2005 defending against the ‘796 patent, the ‘033 patent and claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the ‘432 patent. Business Objects Americas motion for fees and expenses related to claims 6, 9, 10 and 13 of the ‘432 patent was denied. Business Objects Americas was required to submit a detailed summary of the hours spent after March 14, 2005, the hourly rate charged, and the expenses incurred defending against the ‘796 patent, the ‘033 patent, and claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 of the ‘432 patent. On April 15, 2008, Business Objects submitted its fee petition seeking $2.3 million. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company accrued a $2.3 million reserve related to this claim. The $2.3 million accrual is included in accounts payable and accrued expense in its consolidated balance sheets, and has been recorded as a general and administrative expense in its consolidated statements of operations. The Company intends to vigorously contest the petition. The ultimate liability to the Company resulting from this proceeding may differ materially from the accrued amount.

The Company also is involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, management does not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On January 31, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase a corporate aircraft for delivery in mid-2009, which it expects to begin operating during the 2009 calendar year. The aggregate purchase price for the aircraft is $46.0 million, payable in installments on various dates related to the completion of manufacturing of the aircraft and the delivery of the aircraft. The Company has the option to accelerate the delivery date under certain circumstances if the manufacturer is able to offer the aircraft prior to the scheduled delivery date. The Company expects to meet its payment obligations under this purchase commitment using funds from operations, but may consider using conventional aircraft financing or other borrowing arrangements.

The Company made deposits of $5 million and $2.5 million with regards to this aircraft in January 2007 and September 2007, respectively, and recorded the amount of the deposits in deposits and other assets.

From time to time, the Company enters into certain types of contracts that require it to indemnify parties against third party claims. These contracts primarily relate to agreements under which the Company has agreed to indemnify customers and partners for claims arising from intellectual property infringement. The conditions of these obligations vary and generally a maximum obligation is explicitly stated. Because the conditions of these obligations vary and the maximum is not always explicitly stated, the overall maximum amount of the Company’s indemnification obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these obligations, and as such has not recorded an indemnification liability on its balance sheets as of March 31, 2008 or December 31, 2007. The Company carries coverage under certain insurance policies for certain of these liabilities; however, this coverage may not be sufficient.

On July 28, 2005, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the Company’s repurchase of up to an aggregate of $300.0 million of its class A common stock from time-to-time on the open market (the “2005 Share Repurchase Program”). The timing and amount of any shares repurchased will be determined by the Company’s management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors. The 2005 Share Repurchase Program may be funded using the Company’s working capital, as well as proceeds from any credit facilities and other borrowing arrangements which the Company may enter into in the future. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 79,200 shares of its class A common stock at an average price per share of $67.75 and an aggregate cost of $5.4 million pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program. As of March 31, 2008, the Company had repurchased an aggregate of 2,430,265 shares of its class A common stock at an average price per share of $95.99 and an aggregate cost of $233.3 million pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program.

On April 29, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the 2005 Share Repurchase Program to increase the amount of class A common stock that the Company is authorized to repurchase from $300 million to $800 million in the aggregate. The term of the 2005 Share Repurchase Program was also extended to April 29, 2013, although the program may be suspended or discontinued by the Company at any time.

All of the amounts above relating to average price per share and aggregate cost include broker commissions.

The Company and its subsidiaries conduct business in the U.S. and various foreign countries and are subject to tax in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions. As a result of its business activities, the Company files tax returns that are subject to examination by various federal, state, local, and foreign tax authorities. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examination by tax authorities for years before 2000; however, due to its federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryovers, the federal and state tax authorities may attempt to reduce or fully offset the amount of NOL or tax credit carryovers from tax years ending in 1999 forward that were used in later tax years. The Company is currently under tax audit in the UK and Germany.

The Company recognizes accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in the tax expense account. Penalties, if incurred, would also be recognized as a component of income tax expense. As of March 31, 2008, the amount of accrued interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits was not material.

As of March 31, 2008, if recognized, $8.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate. Unrecognized tax benefits related to cross border transactions are expected to increase by $1.9 million by the end of 2008. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recognized an additional $0.2 million of tax expense related to post-2006 uncertain tax positions.

The following table summarizes the Company’s deferred tax assets, net, and valuation allowance, as of (in thousands):

The valuation allowance as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 relates to foreign net operating loss carryforwards that the Company expects will expire unused.

The Company has estimated its annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year 2008 and applied that rate to its income before income taxes in determining its provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s consolidated annualized effective tax rate from continuing operations was 36.1% and 37.3%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007, primarily as a result of lower foreign pretax losses in certain foreign jurisdictions with no related income tax benefit, as the Company currently lacks evidence that the loss carryforwards in those jurisdictions will be able to be used prior to their expiration.

The Company intends to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed 2008 earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries. “Previously taxed income” related to prior Subpart F deemed dividends is distributed currently; however, no additional tax is incurred on the distribution. Accordingly, the annualized effective tax rate applied to the Company’s pre-tax income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 did not include any provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes on the projected amount of these undistributed 2008 foreign earnings. The Company accrues applicable U.S. federal and state income taxes (net of foreign tax credits) on projected undistributed foreign subsidiary earnings that it intends to repatriate.

In determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, net deferred tax assets, liabilities, valuation allowances, and uncertain tax positions, management is required to make judgments and estimates related to projections of domestic and foreign profitability, the timing and extent of the utilization of both net operating loss carryforwards and capital loss carryforwards, applicable tax rates, transfer pricing methods, expected tax authority positions on audit, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. As a multinational company, the Company is required to calculate and provide for estimated income tax liabilities in each of the tax jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves estimating current tax obligations and exposures in each jurisdiction as well as making judgments regarding the future recoverability of deferred tax assets. Changes in the estimated level of annual pre-tax income, changes in tax laws particularly related to the utilization of net operating losses in various jurisdictions, and changes resulting from tax audits can all affect the overall effective income tax rate which, in turn, impacts the overall level of income tax expense and net income.

Judgments and estimates related to the Company’s projections and assumptions are inherently uncertain; therefore, actual results could differ materially from projections. The timing and manner in which the Company will use the net operating loss carryforwards, research and development tax credit carryforwards, alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards, and foreign tax credit carryforwards in any year, or in total, may be limited by provisions of the Internal Revenue Code regarding changes in the Company’s ownership. Currently, the Company expects to use the tax assets subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations within the carryforward periods. Valuation allowances have been established where the Company expects deferred tax assets to expire unused.

The Company has share-based compensation plans under which directors, officers, employees and other eligible participants have previously received stock option awards. All stock options granted under the Company’s stock plans have terms of five to ten years and generally vest ratably over 5 years. Upon exercise, the Company generally issues new shares in the amount of the award exercised. The Company had 2.3 million shares of class A common stock authorized for option grants as of March 31, 2008. The Company has not issued any material stock option or other share-based compensation awards since the first quarter of 2004, and does not have any current plans to issue additional stock option awards.

In addition, a subsidiary of the Company maintains a share-based compensation plan for its employees that is based upon the equity of the subsidiary. The share-based awards and related expense for this subsidiary have not been significant through March 31, 2008.

The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $44,000 and $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Comprehensive income includes foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on short-term investments, net of related tax effects that have been excluded from net income and reflected in stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income.

The Company’s comprehensive income consisted of the following for the periods indicated (in thousands):

The Company has two classes of common stock: class A common stock and class B common stock. Holders of class A common stock generally have the same rights, including rights to dividends, as holders of class B common stock, except that holders of class A common stock have one vote per share while holders of class B common stock have ten votes per share. Each share of class B common stock is convertible at any time, at the option of the holder, into one share of class A common stock. As such, basic and fully diluted earnings per share for class A and class B common stock are the same. The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on either class A or class B common stock.

Potential common shares are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation when dilutive. Potential common shares consisting of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding employee stock options and warrants are computed using the treasury stock method.

In March 2008, in connection with its consideration of strategic alternatives relating to its non-core Alarm.com and Angel.com businesses, the Company committed to a plan to sell these businesses. The Company made the decision to sell these businesses in order to focus its resources on its core competency of business intelligence software and services. It expects to complete the sale of these businesses within the next twelve months. The associated assets and liabilities of the disposal group have been classified as held-for-sale in accordance with SFAS 144.

The following table summarizes the revenue and pre-tax income generated by these businesses during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.

The Company operates in one reportable segment – business intelligence software and services. The following summary discloses total revenues and long-lived assets, excluding long-term investments and long-term deferred tax assets, according to geographic region (in thousands):

The domestic region consists of the United States and Canada. The EMEA region includes operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The other regions include all other foreign countries, generally comprising Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, no individual country outside the United States accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated revenues.

As of March 31, 2008, total assets in Germany exceeded 10% of consolidated assets. As of March 31, 2007, no individual country outside the United States accounted for 10% or more of consolidated assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, no individual customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s total consolidated revenues.

Domestic intercompany software fee charges to international operations of $10.1 million and $10.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, have been excluded from the above tables and eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact, including without limitation, certain statements regarding industry prospects and our results of operations or financial position, may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The important factors discussed below under “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made herein. Such forward-looking statements represent management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Investors are warned that actual results may differ from management’s expectations.

We are a worldwide provider of business intelligence software that enables companies to analyze the raw data stored across their enterprise to reveal the trends and insights needed to develop solutions to manage their business effectively. Our software delivers this information to workgroups, the enterprise and extranet communities via e-mail, web, fax, wireless and voice communication channels. Businesses can use our software platform to develop user-friendly solutions, proactively refine revenue-generating strategies, enhance cost-efficiency and productivity and improve customer relationships.

The MicroStrategy software platform enables users to query and analyze the most detailed, transaction-level databases, turning data into business intelligence and delivering boardroom quality reports and alerts about the users’ business processes. Our web-based architecture provides reporting, security, performance and standards that are critical for web deployment. With intranet deployments, our products provide employees with information to enable them to make better, more cost-effective business decisions. With extranet deployments, enterprises can use the MicroStrategy software platform to build stronger relationships by linking customers and suppliers via the Internet. We also offer a comprehensive set of consulting, education, technical support and technical advisory services for our customers and strategic partners.

Our core business intelligence (“BI”) business derives its revenues from product licenses and product support and other services. Product licenses revenues are derived from the sale of software licenses for our MicroStrategy 8 business intelligence platform and related products. We license our software to end users through our direct sales organization and through indirect sales channels, such as resellers, systems integrators and original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. Our arrangements with customers typically include: (a) an end-user license fee paid for the use of our products in perpetuity or over a specified term; (b) an annual maintenance agreement that provides for software updates and upgrades and technical support for an annual fee; and (c) a services work order for implementation, consulting and training, generally for a fee determined on a time-and-materials basis or, in certain circumstances, a fixed-fee.

We also have two non-core businesses, Alarm.com and Angel.com, that focus outside of the BI software and services market. Alarm.com is a provider of web-enabled residential and commercial security and activity monitoring technology, and Angel.com is a provider of interactive voice response telephony systems. In March 2008, we committed to a plan to sell these businesses. On our Consolidated Balance Sheets, we classified the associated assets and liabilities of each of these businesses as held-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets”, or SFAS 144. In our Consolidated Statement of Operations, we have classified the operations of these businesses as Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax, because we do not expect to have significant continuing involvement or cash flows from these businesses after the divestitures. All assets and liabilities that are reported in these financial statements as “held-for-sale” are reported at the lower of the carrying cost or fair value less cost to sell.

The following table sets forth certain operating highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):

The business intelligence market is highly competitive and our results of operations depend on our ability to market and sell product offerings that provide customers with greater value than those offered by our competitors. Organizations recently have sought, and we expect will continue to seek, to standardize their various business intelligence applications around a single software platform. This trend presents both opportunities and risks for our business. It offers us the opportunity to increase the size of transactions with new customers and to expand the size of our business intelligence installations with existing customers. On the other hand, it presents the risk that we may not be able to penetrate accounts where a competitor currently is or may become the incumbent business intelligence application provider. In addition, companies with industry leading positions in certain software markets, such as Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and SAP AG, have begun incorporating business intelligence capabilities into their product suites. As a result, our products need to be sufficiently differentiated from these bundled software offerings to create customer demand for our platform and products.

To address these opportunities and challenges, we are implementing a number of initiatives, including:

We base our operating expense budgets on expected revenue trends. Many of our expenses, such as office leases and certain personnel costs, are relatively fixed. We may be unable to adjust spending quickly

enough in any particular period to offset any unexpected revenue shortfall in that period. Accordingly, any shortfall in revenue may cause significant variation in our operating results. We therefore believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and equity and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates, particularly estimates relating to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of net deferred tax assets, and litigation and contingencies, have a material impact on our financial statements and are discussed in detail throughout our analysis of the results of operations discussed below.

In addition to evaluating estimates relating to the items discussed above, we also consider other estimates and judgments, including, but not limited to, those related to software development costs, intangible assets, provision for income taxes, and other contingent liabilities, including liabilities that we deem not probable of assertion. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets, liabilities and equity that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results and outcomes could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

MicroStrategy does not have any material ownership interest in any special purpose or other entities that are not wholly-owned or consolidated into our consolidated financial statements. Additionally, MicroStrategy does not have any material related party transactions as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 57, “Related Party Disclosures.”

For a more detailed explanation of the judgments made in these areas and a discussion of our accounting estimates and policies, refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates” included in Item 7 and “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” (Note 2) included in Item 15 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Since December 31, 2007, there have been no significant changes to our critical accounting estimates and policies.

Impact of Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations on Results of Operations

We conduct a significant portion of our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the currency in which we report our consolidated financial statements. Historically, we have generated a significant portion of our revenues and incurred a significant portion of our expenses in euro and British pound sterling. As currency rates change from quarter to quarter and year over year, our results of operation may be impacted. The table below summarizes the impact (in thousands) of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on certain components of our consolidated statements of operations by showing the increase in revenues or expenses, as applicable, from the prior year.

The term “international” refers to operations outside of the United States and Canada. For example, if there had been no change to foreign currency exchange rates from 2007 to 2008, international product licenses revenues would have been $7.4 million rather than $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. If there had been no change to foreign currency exchange rates from 2007 to 2008, sales and marketing expenses would have been $26.7 million rather than $28.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.

The change in the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates from the three months ended March 31, 2007 to the three months ended March 31, 2008 is primarily due to the significant weakening of the U.S. dollar as compared to the euro and the other principal currencies in which the Company’s foreign subsidiaries conduct business.

Product licenses revenues. The following table sets forth product licenses revenues (in thousands) and percentage changes for the periods indicated:

The following table sets forth the recognized revenue attributable to product licenses transactions, grouped by size, during the periods indicated:

For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, product license transactions with above $500,000 in recognized revenue represented 33.4%, and 27.8% respectively, of our product licenses revenues. During 2008, our top three product license transactions totaled approximately $5.7 million in revenue recognized, compared to $2.9 million during 2007, or 25.6%, and 17.4% of total product licenses revenues during 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Product licenses revenues increased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, due to increases in both the number and the average deal size of product license transactions with above $1.0 million in recognized revenue and an increase in the average deal size of product license transactions with below $500,000 of recognized revenue.

Domestic product licenses revenues. Domestic product licenses revenues increased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to an increase in the average size of domestic transactions with below $500,000 of recognized revenue as well as to an increase in the number of domestic transactions with above $1.0 million in recognized revenue, including one transaction totaling $4.0 million.

International product licenses revenues. International product licenses revenues increased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, with 26.1% of the increase due to an increase in the average deal size of international transactions with below $500,000 of recognized revenue and 73.9% due to favorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Product support and services revenues. The following table sets forth product support revenues (in thousands) and percentage changes for the periods indicated:

Product support revenues. Product support revenues are derived from providing technical software support and software updates and upgrades to customers. Product support revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract, which in most cases is one year.

Both domestic and international product support revenues increased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year. Contributing to this increase was a 16.8% growth in revenue recognized from our installed base of technical support contracts, which includes a high percentage of maintenance renewals from existing contracts, and favorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Consulting revenues. Consulting revenues are derived from helping customers plan and execute the deployment of our software. Consulting revenues increased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, due to increases in the number of billable systems integration hours provided to our customers.

Education revenues. Education revenues are derived from the education and training that we provide to our customers to enhance their ability to fully utilize the features and functionality of our software. Education revenues increased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to growth in the number of students trained.

Cost of revenues. The following table sets forth cost of revenues (in thousands) and percentage changes in cost of revenues for the periods indicated:

Cost of product licenses revenues. Cost of product licenses revenues consists of amortization of capitalized software development costs and the costs of product manuals, media, and royalties paid to third-party software vendors. Capitalized software development costs are amortized over a useful life of three years.

Cost of product licenses revenues decreased slightly during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Cost of product support revenues. Cost of product support revenues consists of product support personnel and related overhead costs.

The increase in cost of product support revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to the expenses related to an increase in product support staffing levels to support our growing customer base. Product support headcount increased 19.0% to 119 at March 31, 2008 from 100 at March 31, 2007.

Cost of consulting revenues. Cost of consulting revenues consists of personnel and related overhead costs. The increase in cost of consulting revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to the expenses related to increase in staffing levels and variable compensation costs to support our growing customer base. Consulting headcount increased 14.8% to 241 at March 31, 2008 from 210 at March 31, 2007.

Cost of education revenues. Cost of education revenues consists of personnel and related overhead costs. The increase in cost of education revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to the expenses related to an increase in staffing levels and variable compensation costs to support our growing customer base. Education headcount increased 19.0% to 50 at March 31, 2008 from 42 at March 31, 2007.

Sales and marketing, general and administrative, and other operating expenses. The following table sets forth (in thousands) sales and marketing, general and administrative and other operating expenses and percentage changes for the periods indicated:

Sales and marketing expenses. Sales and marketing expenses consists of personnel costs, commissions, office facilities, travel, advertising, public relations programs and promotional events, such as trade shows, seminars and technical conferences.

Sales and marketing expenses increased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, with 94.7% of the increase attributable to an increase in staffing levels. Sales and marketing headcount increased 24.1% to 572 at March 31, 2008 from 461 at March 31, 2007.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consists of personnel and other costs of our executive, finance, human resources, information systems and administrative departments, as well as third-party consulting, legal and other professional fees.

General and administrative expenses increased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, with 52.3% of the increase due to an increase in legal costs primarily due to a reserve that we accrued related to a litigation matter, 29.6% of the increase attributable to an increase in staffing levels, 9.0% of the increase due to increases in facility and other related support costs, and 8.0% of the increase due to increases in recruiting costs. General and administrative headcount increased 27.6% to 328 at March 31, 2008 from 257 at March 31, 2007.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses consists of the personnel costs for our software engineering personnel, depreciation of equipment and other related costs.

The following table summarizes research and development expenses and amortization of capitalized software development costs (in thousands) and percentage changes in those costs for the periods indicated:

Research and development expenses increased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the increase in expenses relating to the hiring of staff in the Company’s new China technology center. Research and development headcount increased 31.7% to 295 at March 31, 2008 from 224 at March 31, 2007.

As of March 31, 2008, our research and development resources were allocated to the following projects: 12% to MicroStrategy 8, 72% to new product initiatives, and 16% to other research and development.

Provision for Income Taxes. During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded a provision for income taxes from continuing operations of $5.2 million and $6.2 million, respectively, resulting in an effective tax rate for such periods of 36.1% and 37.3%, respectively. Our effective tax rate decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of lower foreign pretax losses in certain jurisdictions with no related income tax benefit due to a lack of evidence supporting our ability to utilize these losses in the future. Of the $5.2 million provision in the three months ended March 31, 2008, $3.4 million was deferred and was primarily related to the non-cash use of domestic net operating loss carryforwards.

As of March 31, 2008, we had domestic and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $111.7 million and other temporary differences, carryforwards, and credits, which resulted in net deferred tax assets of $62.3 million. We have domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $90.1 million that will begin to expire in 2021, and $21.6 million of foreign net operating loss carryforwards that began to expire in the fourth quarter of 2007. Also, as of March 31, 2008, we had a valuation allowance of $22.1 million (pre-tax) primarily related to certain foreign net operating loss carryforward tax assets that we expect to expire unused.

We intend to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed 2008 earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries. “Previously taxed income” related to prior Subpart F deemed dividends is distributed currently; however, no additional tax is incurred on the distribution. Accordingly, the annualized effective tax rate applied to our pre-tax income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 did not include any provision for U.S. federal and state taxes on the projected amount of these undistributed 2008 foreign earnings. We accrue applicable U.S. federal and state taxes (net of foreign tax credits) on projected undistributed foreign subsidiary earnings that we intend to repatriate.

Discontinued Operations. In March 2008, in connection with its consideration of strategic alternatives relating to our two non-core Alarm.com and Angel.com businesses, we committed to a plan to sell these businesses. As of March 31, 2008, we continued to own and operate these businesses. However, SFAS 144 requires that we report these businesses as “discontinued” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations, because we do not expect to have continuing involvement in, or

cash flows from, these operations after their divestiture. As such, we reclassified revenues and costs associated with the portions of those segments held-for-sale to discontinued operations for all periods represented. The following table summarizes the income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (in thousands), for the periods indicated:

Deferred Revenue and Advance Payments. Deferred revenue and advance payments represent product support and other services fees that are collected in advance and recognized over the contract service period and product licenses revenues relating to multiple element software arrangements that include future deliverables.

The following table summarizes deferred revenue and advance payments (in thousands), as of the dates indicated:

We offset our accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any billed and unpaid items included in deferred revenue and advance payments.

The decrease in billed and unpaid deferred revenue as of March 31, 2008, as compared to December 31, 2007, was primarily attributable to the seasonally large volume of product support invoices generated during the three months ended December 31, 2007 that subsequently were paid. The increase in deferred revenue and advance payments as of March 31, 2008, as compared to March 31, 2007, was primarily attributable to the growth in the number of technical support customers and a high percentage of technical support renewals from our existing customers.

We expect to recognize $116.4 million of deferred revenue and advance payments over the next 12 months. However, the timing and ultimate recognition of our deferred revenue and advance payments depend on our performance of various service obligations, and the amount of deferred revenue and advance payments at any date should not be considered indicative of revenues for any succeeding period.

During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we entered into certain agreements that include future commitments by our customers to purchase products, product support or other services over multi-year periods. Revenue relating to such future commitments by our customers is not included in our deferred revenue balances.

Revenue relating to such agreements will be recognized during the period in which all revenue recognition criteria are met. The timing and ultimate recognition of any revenue from such customer purchase commitments depend on our customers’ meeting their future purchase commitments and our meeting our associated performance obligations related to those purchase commitments.

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash, cash equivalents, investments, and on going collection of our accounts receivable. On March 31, 2008, we had $99.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments. Management believes that existing cash and cash anticipated to be generated by operations will be sufficient to meet working capital requirements and anticipated capital expenditures, including the expenditures set forth in the table below, for at least the next twelve months. Based upon our cash position, we do not currently expect to borrow money to finance our operations.

On March 15, 2005, we entered into a security agreement with a bank under which we posted cash to secure existing letters of credit. These letters of credit are used as security deposits for office leases, including the office lease for our corporate headquarters, as well as collateral for performance bonds. We may invest the cash collateral under the security agreement in certain permitted investments. As of March 31, 2008, we had $1.9 million in cash collateral posted under the security agreement, all invested in money market funds.

On July 28, 2005, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized our repurchase of up to an aggregate of $300.0 million of its class A common stock from time to time on the open market (the “2005 Share Repurchase Program”). The timing and amount of any shares repurchased will be determined our management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors. The 2005 Share Repurchase Program may be funded using our working capital, as well as proceeds from any credit facilities and other borrowing arrangements which we may enter into in the future. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we repurchased an aggregate of 79,200 shares of its class A common stock at an average price per share of $67.75 and an aggregate cost of $5.4 million pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program. As of March 31, 2008, we had repurchased an aggregate of 2,430,265 shares of our class A common stock at an average price per share of $95.99 and an aggregate cost of $233.3 million pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program.

On April 29, 2008, our Board of Directors amended the 2005 Share Repurchase Program to increase the amount of class A common stock that we are authorized to repurchase from $300 million $800 million in the aggregate. The term of the 2005 Share Repurchase Program was also extended April 29, 2013, although the program may be suspended or discontinued by us at any time.

All of the amounts above relating to average price per share and aggregate cost include broker commissions.

On January 31, 2007, we entered into an agreement to purchase a corporate aircraft for delivery in mid-2009, which we expect to begin operating during the 2009 calendar year. The aggregate purchase price for the aircraft is $46.0 million, payable in installments on various dates related to the completion of

manufacturing of the aircraft and the delivery of the aircraft. We have the option to accelerate the delivery date under certain circumstances if the manufacturer is able to offer the aircraft prior to the scheduled delivery date. We expect to meet our payment obligations under this purchase agreement using funds from operations, but may consider using conventional aircraft financing and other borrowing arrangements. We made deposits of $5 million and $2.5 million with regards to this aircraft in January and September 2007, respectively.

We lease office space and computer and other equipment under operating lease agreements. In addition to base rent, we are responsible for certain taxes, utilities and maintenance costs, and several leases include options for renewal or purchase. The following table shows future minimum payments under noncancellable operating leases and agreements with initial terms of greater than one year, net of total future minimum rentals to be received under noncancellable sublease agreements, and future payments under the aircraft purchase agreement, based on the currently expected due dates of the various installments (in thousands):

As of March 31, 2008, we had $8.0 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits. The timing of any payments which could result from these unrecognized tax benefits will depend on a number of factors, and accordingly the amount and period of any future payments cannot be estimated. We do not expect a significant tax payment related to these obligations within the next year.

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $18.1 million and $37.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The major components of net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were net income of $9.1 million, a $2.8 million decrease in deferred taxes, non-cash depreciation and amortization charges of $1.6 million, a $4.4 million decrease in accounts receivable, a $13.2 million increase in deferred revenue and advance payments partially offset by a $12.9 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to a decrease in changes in accounts receivable and deferred revenues and advance payments of $15.9 million and $4.8 million, respectively.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities of $0.7 million and $8.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The major components of net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 consisted primarily of $0.5 million in purchases of property and equipment, and a $0.1 million decrease in restricted cash. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to a reduction in advance deposits on purchase of property and equipment of $5.0 million and a reduction in capitalized software development cost of $2.4 million.

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities was $5.2 million and $41.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 resulted primarily from purchases of treasury stock of $5.4 million, offset by proceeds from the sale of class A common stock from the exercise of stock options of $0.1 million and $0.1 million related to the recognition of excess tax benefits from the share-based arrangements. The decrease in net cash used in financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to a reduction in the purchases of treasury stock of $39.4 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. On March 15, 2005, we entered into a security agreement with a bank under which we posted cash to secure existing letters of credit. These letters of credit are used as security deposits for office leases, including the office lease for our corporate headquarters, as well as collateral for performance bonds. We may invest the cash collateral under the security agreement in certain permitted investments. As of March 31, 2008, we had $1.9 million in cash collateral posted under the security agreement.

We did not enter into any off-balance sheet arrangements during the three months ended March 31, 2008. As of March 31, 2008, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that had or were reasonably likely to have a current or future impact on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As of March 31, 2008 there is no impact of SFAS No. 157 on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. Our adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. This statement permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. Subsequent unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings. Our adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (SFAS 160), “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An Amendment of ARB No. 51”. SFAS 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 160 on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 expands quarterly disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133 about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 161 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

The following discussion about our market risk exposures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

We are exposed to the impact of both interest rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations.

Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investments. We generally invest our excess cash in short-term, highly-rated, fixed rate financial instruments. These fixed rate investments are subject to interest rate risk and may fall in value if interest rates increase.

Foreign Currency Risk. We conduct a significant portion of our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the currency in which we report our consolidated financial statements. International sales accounted for 40.3% and 38.1% of our total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We anticipate that international revenues will continue to account for a significant portion of our total revenues. The functional currency of each of our foreign subsidiaries is the local currency.

Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect as of the applicable balance sheet date and any resulting translation adjustments are included as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity. Revenues and expenses generated from these subsidiaries are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the quarter in which the transactions occur. Gains and losses from transactions in local currencies are included in net income.

Historically, we have generated a significant portion of our revenues and incurred a significant portion of our expenses in euro and the British pound sterling. As a result of transacting in multiple currencies and reporting our financial statements in U.S. dollars, our operating results may be adversely impacted by currency exchange rate fluctuations in the future. Further information on the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on current and comparable periods is further described in Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

We cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations upon our future results. We attempt to minimize our foreign currency risk by converting our excess foreign currency held in foreign jurisdictions to U.S. dollar denominated cash and investment accounts. To date, we have not hedged the risks associated with foreign exchange exposure. Although we may do so in the future, we cannot be sure that any hedging techniques will be successful or that our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows will not be materially adversely affected by exchange rate fluctuations.

As of March 31, 2008, a 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar would have decreased our aggregate reported cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments, and short-term investments by 1.5%.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2008. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2008, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in internal controls. No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

On November 8, 2007, Diagnostic Systems Corp. (DSC), a subsidiary of Acacia Technology Group, filed a complaint for patent infringement against MicroStrategy and a number of other unrelated defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division. The case has been consolidated with Case No. SA CV 07-896 AG (MLGx) pending against other unrelated defendants. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,537,590 directly, contributorily and by inducement, by making, using, selling and offering for sale in the United States MicroStrategy 8 Business Intelligence Platform, when used with an appropriate database. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of willful infringement and seeks damages, a finding that the case is exceptional and an award of attorneys fees, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. In its initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) served on December 28, 2007, DSC declined to disclose the amount of its alleged damages, but disclosed that its alleged damages are based on a reasonable royalty theory. MicroStrategy answered the consolidated complaint on December 28, 2007, denied infringement, asserted affirmative defenses of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability, among others, and counter-claimed for declaratory judgment that the ‘590 patent is not infringed, is invalid, and is unenforceable. The Court has scheduled a status and scheduling conference for May 12, 2008. The outcome of this litigation is not presently determinable, and as such, we are currently unable to estimate the potential range of gain or loss, if any, relating to this action. Accordingly, no provision for this matter has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On December 10, 2003, MicroStrategy filed a complaint for patent infringement against Crystal Decisions, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The lawsuit alleged that Crystal Decisions willfully infringed three patents issued to MicroStrategy relating to: (i) asynchronous control of report generation using a web browser (the ‘033 patent); (ii) management of an automatic OLAP report broadcast system (the ‘796 patent); and (iii) providing business intelligence web content with reduced client-side processing (the ‘432 patent). MicroStrategy sought monetary damages and injunctive relief. Following the filing of the complaint, Crystal Decisions was acquired by Business Objects Americas, Inc. Business Objects Americas, Inc. answered the complaint, denying infringement and seeking a declaration that the patents in suit are invalid and not infringed by Business Objects Americas, Inc. MicroStrategy filed a motion for summary judgment of infringement of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents on October 13, 2005. Business Objects filed motions for summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents on October 13, 2005. On January 23, 2006, the Court denied our motion for summary judgment of infringement of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents. The Court granted Business Objects’ motions for summary judgment of non-infringement of the ‘033 patent and of invalidity of the ‘432 and ‘796 patents. The Court denied Business Objects’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the ‘033 patent and denied as moot Business Objects’ motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the ‘432 and ‘796 patents. On February 7, 2006, the Court dismissed without prejudice Business Objects’ counterclaim for declaratory judgment of invalidity of the ‘033 patent. On February 23, 2006, the Court entered judgment in favor of Business Objects and against MicroStrategy. MicroStrategy filed a notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit on March 24, 2006. MicroStrategy’s opening brief on appeal was filed on August 4, 2006. Business Objects’ responsive brief was filed on November 17, 2006. MicroStrategy’s reply brief was filed on December 18, 2006. The Federal Circuit heard oral argument on June 4, 2007. On June 25, 2007, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s judgment in favor of Business Objects and against MicroStrategy on each of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents. MicroStrategy did not file a request for rehearing before the Federal Circuit or file a petition for a writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court.

On March 9, 2006, Business Objects filed a motion seeking reimbursement from MicroStrategy of Business Objects’ attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of approximately $4.7 million. On March 25, 2008, the court issued a memorandum opinion and an order. The court awarded partial fees and expenses to Business Object Americas as the prevailing party. Business Object Americas was awarded reasonable fees and expenses after March 14, 2005 defending against the ‘796 patent, the ‘033 patent and claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the ‘432 patent. Business Objects Americas motion for fees and expenses related to claims 6, 9, 10 and 13 of the ‘432 patent was denied. Business Objects Americas was required to submit a detailed summary of the hours spent after March 14, 2005, the hourly rate charged, and the expenses incurred defending against the ‘796 patent, the ‘033 patent, and claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 of the ‘432 patent. On April 15, 2008, Business Objects submitted its fee petition seeking $2.3 million. During the first quarter of 2008, we accrued a $2.3 million reserve related to this claim. The $2.3 million accrual is included in accounts payable and accrued expense in our consolidated balance sheets, and has been recorded as a general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations. We intend to vigorously contest the petition. The ultimate liability to us resulting from this proceeding may differ materially from the accrued amount.

We also are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, we do not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing MicroStrategy. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.

If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our class A common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Our quarterly operating results, revenues and expenses may fluctuate significantly, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock

For a number of reasons, including those described below, our operating results, revenues and expenses have in the past varied and may in the future vary significantly from quarter to quarter. These fluctuations could have an adverse effect on the market price of our class A common stock.

Fluctuations in Quarterly Operating Results. Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate, in part, as a result of:

Limited Ability to Adjust Expenses. We base our operating expense budgets on expected revenue trends. Many of our expenses, such as office leases and certain personnel costs, are relatively fixed. We may be unable to adjust spending quickly enough to offset any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any shortfall in revenue may cause significant variation in operating results in any quarter.

Based on the above factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not a good indication of our future performance. It is possible that in one or more future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In that event, the trading price of our class A common stock may fall.

The trading price for our class A common stock has been and may continue to be volatile

The trading price of our class A common stock historically has been volatile and may continue to be volatile. The trading price of our class A common stock may fluctuate widely in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our class A common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.

Revenue recognition accounting pronouncements may adversely affect our reported results of operations

We continuously review our compliance with all new and existing revenue recognition accounting pronouncements. Depending upon the outcome of these ongoing reviews and the potential issuance of further accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations, we may be required to modify our reported results, revenue recognition policies or business practices, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We are subject to income taxes and non-income taxes in a variety of domestic and foreign jurisdictions. Our future income taxes could be adversely affected by earnings that are lower than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates and earnings that are higher than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48, or by changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof.

Our determination of our tax liability is subject to review by applicable domestic and foreign tax authorities. Any adverse outcome of such a review could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant judgment and, in the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Moreover, as a multinational business, we have subsidiaries that engage in many intercompany transactions in a variety of tax jurisdictions where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain.

We also have contingent tax liabilities that, in management’s judgment, are not probable of assertion. If such unasserted contingent liabilities were to be asserted, or become probable of assertion, we may be required to record significant expenses and liabilities in the period in which these liabilities are asserted or become probable of assertion.

As a result of these and other factors, the ultimate amount of tax obligations owed may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and any such difference may materially affect our financial results in future periods in which we change our estimates of our tax obligations or in which the ultimate tax outcome is determined.

If the market for business intelligence software fails to grow as we expect, or if businesses fail to adopt our products, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

Nearly all of our revenues to date have come from sales of business intelligence software and related technical support, consulting and education services. We expect these sales to account for a large portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future. Although demand for business intelligence software has grown in recent years, the market for business intelligence software applications is still evolving. Resistance from consumer and privacy groups to increased commercial collection and use of data on spending patterns and

other personal behavior and European and other governmental restrictions on the collection and use of personal data may impair the further growth of this market, as may other developments. We cannot be sure that this market will continue to grow or, even if it does grow, that businesses will adopt our solutions. We have spent, and intend to keep spending, considerable resources to educate potential customers about business intelligence software in general and our solutions in particular. However, we cannot be sure that these expenditures will help our products achieve any additional market acceptance. If the market fails to grow or grows more slowly than we currently expect, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

We face intense competition, which may lead to lower prices for our products, reduced gross margins, loss of market share and reduced revenue

The markets for business intelligence software, analytical applications and information delivery are intensely competitive and subject to rapidly changing technology. In addition, many companies in these markets are offering, or may soon offer, products and services that may compete with MicroStrategy products.

MicroStrategy faces competitors in several broad categories, including business intelligence software, analytical processes, query and web-based reporting tools, and report delivery. Independent competitors that are primarily focused on business intelligence products include, among others, Actuate, Information Builders and the SAS Institute. We also compete with large software corporations, including suppliers of enterprise resource planning software that provide one or more capabilities competitive with our products, such as IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP AG, Infor and others, and with open source business intelligence vendors, including Pentaho, JasperSoft and others.

Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing or other resources, and greater name recognition than we do. In addition, many of our competitors have strong relationships with current and potential customers and extensive knowledge of the business intelligence industry. As a result, they may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we can. Increased competition may lead to price cuts, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors and the failure to meet the competitive pressures we face may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Current and future competitors may also make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with others. For example, Oracle acquired Hyperion Solutions in April 2007, IBM acquired Cognos in January 2008 and SAP acquired Business Objects in January 2008. By doing so, these competitors may increase their ability to meet the needs of our potential customers. Our current or prospective indirect channel partners may establish cooperative relationships with our current or future competitors. These relationships may limit our ability to sell our products through specific distribution channels. Accordingly, new competitors or alliances among current and future competitors may emerge and rapidly gain significant market share. These developments could limit our ability to obtain revenues from new customers and to maintain technical support revenues from our installed customer base.

Our MicroStrategy 8 suite of products accounts for a substantial portion of our revenue. Because of this revenue concentration, our business could be harmed by a decline in demand for, or in the prices of, our MicroStrategy 8 software as a result of, among other factors, any change in our pricing model, increased competition, a maturation in the markets for these products or other risks described in this document.

A significant portion of our research and development activities and certain other critical business operations are concentrated in a single facility in northern Virginia. We are also a highly automated

business and a disruption or failure of our systems could cause delays in completing sales and providing services. A major earthquake, fire, act of terrorism or other catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business operations or information technology systems could severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations and as a result our future operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

We use strategic channel partners and if we are unable to maintain successful relationships with them, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

In addition to our direct sales force, we use strategic channel partners such as value-added resellers, system integrators and original equipment manufacturers to license and support our products. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, transactions by channel partners for which we recognized revenues accounted for 12.9%, of our total product licenses revenues. Our channel partners generally offer customers the products of several different companies, including products that compete with ours. Because our channel partners generally do not have an exclusive relationship with us, we cannot be certain that they will prioritize or provide adequate resources to selling our products. Moreover, divergence in strategy or contract defaults by any of these channel partners may materially adversely affect our ability to develop, market, sell or support our products.

Although we believe that direct sales will continue to account for a majority of product licenses revenues, we seek to maintain a significant level of indirect sales activities through our strategic channel partners. There can be no assurance that our strategic partners will continue to cooperate with us when our distribution agreements expire or are up for renewal. In addition, there can be no assurance that actions taken or omitted to be taken by such parties will not adversely affect us. Our ability to achieve revenue growth in the future will depend in part on our success in maintaining successful relationships with our strategic partners. If we are unable to maintain our relationships with these strategic partners, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, we rely on our strategic channel partners to operate in accordance with the terms of their contractual agreements with us. For example, our agreements with our channel partners limit the terms and conditions pursuant to which they are authorized to resell or distribute our software and offer technical support and related services. We also typically require our channel partners to represent to us the dates and details of product license transactions sold through to end user customers. If our strategic channel partners do not comply with their contractual obligations to us, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

Our recognition of deferred revenue and advance payments and future customer purchase commitments is subject to future performance obligations and may not be representative of revenues for succeeding periods

Our gross current and long-term deferred revenue and advance payments totaled $120.0 million as of March 31, 2008. We offset our accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any billed and unpaid items, which totaled $39.5 million, resulting in net deferred revenue and advance payments of $80.5 million as of March 31, 2008. The timing and ultimate recognition of our deferred revenue and advance payments depend on various factors, including our performance of various service obligations. We have also entered into certain additional agreements that include future minimum commitments by our customers to purchase products, product support or other services through 2012 totaling approximately $35.5 million. These future commitments are not included in our deferred revenue balances. Because of the possibility of customer changes or delays in customer development or implementation schedules or budgets, and the need for us to satisfactorily perform product support services, deferred revenue and advance payments at any particular date may not be representative of actual revenue for any succeeding period.

We generated net income for each of the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007; however, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. If operating

expenses exceed our expectations or cannot be adjusted accordingly or revenues fall below our expectations, we may cease to be profitable and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. We have significant deferred tax assets, and if we are unable to sustain profitability, we may be required to establish a valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets, which would result in a charge that would adversely affect net income in the period in which the charge is incurred.

Managing our international operations is complex and our failure to do so successfully or in a cost-effective manner could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition

We receive a significant portion of our total revenues from international sales from foreign direct and indirect operations. International sales accounted for 40.3% and 38.1% of our total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our international operations require significant management attention and financial resources.

There are certain risks inherent in our international business activities including:

In addition, compliance with foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that are applicable to our international operations is complex and may increase our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions, and our international operations could expose us to fines and penalties if we fail to comply with these regulations. These laws and regulations include import and export requirements, U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to help ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, partners and other persons with whom we do business will not take actions in violation of our policies or these laws. Any violations of these laws could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, including substantial fines or prohibitions on our ability to offer our products and services to one or more countries, and could also materially damage our reputation, our brand and our international expansion efforts.

These factors may have a material adverse effect on our future international sales and, consequently, on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may lose sales, or sales may be delayed, due to the long sales and implementation cycles for our products, which could reduce our revenues

To date, our customers have typically invested substantial time, money and other resources and involved many people in the decision to license our software products and purchase our consulting and other services. As a result, we may wait nine months or more after the first contact with a customer for that customer to place an order while it seeks internal approval for the purchase of our products and/or services. During this long sales cycle, events may occur that affect the size and/or timing of the order or even cause it to be canceled. For example, our competitors may introduce new products, or the customer’s own budget and purchasing priorities may change.

Even after an order is placed, the time it takes to deploy our products and complete consulting engagements can vary widely. Implementing our product can take several months, depending on the customer’s needs, and may begin only with a pilot program. It may be difficult to deploy our products if the customer has complicated deployment requirements, which typically involve integrating databases, hardware and software from different vendors. If a customer hires a third party to deploy our products, we cannot be sure that our products will be deployed successfully.

Our results in any particular period may depend upon the number and volume of large transactions in that period and these transactions may involve more lengthy, complex and unpredictable sales cycles than other transactions

As existing and potential customers seek to standardize on a single business intelligence vendor, our business may experience larger transactions at the enterprise level and larger transactions may account for a greater proportion of our business. The presence or absence of one or more large transactions in a particular period may have a material positive or negative effect on our revenue and operating results for that period. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, our top three product license transactions totaled approximately $5.7 million in revenue recognized, including one transaction with $4.0 million in revenue recognized, compared to $2.9 million, during the three months ended March 31, 2007, or 25.6% and 17.4% of total product licenses revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These transactions represent significant business and financial decisions for our customers and require considerable effort on the part of customers to assess alternative products and require additional levels of management approval before being concluded. They are also often more complex than smaller transactions. These factors generally lengthen the typical sales cycle and increase the risk that the customer’s purchasing decision may be postponed or delayed from one period to another subsequent or later period or that the customer will alter his purchasing requirements. The sales effort and service delivery scope for larger transactions also require additional resources to execute the transaction. These factors could result in lower than anticipated revenue and earnings for a particular period or in the reduction of estimated revenue and earnings in future periods.

A slowdown or downturn in the financial services industry could adversely affect our business and results of operations

We have a significant number of customers in the financial services industry. When there is a slowdown or downturn in the financial services industry, financial services firms may react to worsening conditions by reducing their capital expenditures in general or by specifically reducing their spending on information technology. In addition, financial services customers may delay or cancel information technology projects or seek to lower their costs by renegotiating vendor contracts. Also, customers with excess information technology resources may choose to take their availability solutions in-house rather than obtain those solutions from us. Moreover, competitors may respond to market conditions by lowering prices and attempting to lure away our customers to lower cost solutions. Prior downturns in the financial services industry have seen an increase in the pace of industry consolidation, which if repeated could result in reduced overall spending on our products. If any of these circumstances remain in effect for an extended period of time, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial results.

We face a variety of risks in doing business with the U.S. and foreign governments, various state and local governments, and agencies, including risks related to the procurement process, budget constraints and cycles, termination of contracts and audits

Our customers include the U.S. government and a number of state and local governments or agencies. There are a variety of risks in doing business with government entities, including:

Procurement. Contracting with public sector customers is highly competitive and can be time-consuming and expensive, requiring that we incur significant upfront time and expense without any assurance that we will win a contract.

Budgetary Constraints and Cycles. Demand and payment for our products and services are impacted by public sector budgetary cycles and funding availability, with funding reductions or delays adversely impacting public sector demand for our products and services.

Termination of Contracts. Public sector customers often have contractual or other legal rights to terminate current contracts for convenience or due to a default. If a contract is terminated for convenience, which can occur if the customer’s needs change, we may only be able to collect for products or services delivered prior to termination and settlement expenses. If a contract is terminated because of default, we may not recover even those amounts, and we may be liable for excess costs incurred by the customer for procuring alternative products or services.

Audits. The U.S. government and state and local governments and agencies routinely investigate and audit government contractors for compliance with a variety of complex laws, regulations, and contract provisions relating to the formation, administration or performance of government contracts, including provisions governing reports of and remittances of fees based on sales under government contracts, price protection, compliance with socio-economic policies, and other terms that are particular to government contracts. If, as a result of an audit or review, it is determined that we have failed to comply with such laws, regulations or contract provisions, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, cost associated with the triggering of price reduction clauses, fines and suspensions or debarment from future government business, and we may suffer harm to our reputation.

Our customers also include a number of foreign governments and agencies. Similar procurement, budgetary, contract and audit risks also apply to our doing business with these entities. In addition, compliance with complex regulations and contracting provisions in a variety of jurisdictions can be expensive and consume significant management resources. In certain jurisdictions our ability to win business may be constrained by political and other factors unrelated to our competitive position in the market. Each of these difficulties could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We depend on technology licensed to us by third parties, and the loss of this technology could impair our software, delay implementation of our products or force us to pay higher license fees

We license third-party technologies that we incorporate into our existing products. There can be no assurance that the licenses for such third-party technologies will not be terminated or that we will be able to license third-party software for future products. In addition, we may be unable to renegotiate acceptable third-party license terms. Changes in or the loss of third party licenses could lead to a material increase in the costs of licensing or to our software products becoming inoperable or their performance being materially reduced, with the result that we may need to incur additional development costs to ensure continued performance of our products, and we may experience a decreased demand for our products.

If we are unable to recruit or retain skilled personnel, or if we lose the services of any of our key management personnel, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, train, assimilate and retain highly skilled personnel. Competition for these employees is intense. We may not be able to retain our current key employees or attract, train, assimilate or retain other highly skilled personnel in the future. Our future success also depends in large part on the continued service of key management personnel, particularly

Michael J. Saylor, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Sanju K. Bansal, our Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. If we lose the services of one or both of these individuals or other key personnel, or if we are unable to attract, train, assimilate and retain the highly skilled personnel we need, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

If we are unable to develop and release product enhancements and new products to respond to rapid technological change in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

The market for our products is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, changing customer demands and evolving industry standards. The introduction of products embodying new technologies can quickly make existing products obsolete and unmarketable. We believe that our future success depends largely on three factors:

Business intelligence applications are inherently complex, and it can take a long time and require significant research and development expenditures to develop and test new products and product enhancements. In addition, customers may delay their purchasing decisions because they anticipate that new or enhanced versions of our products will soon become available. We cannot be sure that we will succeed in developing and marketing, on a timely and cost-effective basis, product enhancements or new products that respond to technological change or new customer requirements, nor can we be sure that any new products and product enhancements will achieve market acceptance. Moreover, even if we introduce such a product, we may experience a decline in revenues of our existing products that is not fully matched by the new product’s revenue. For example, customers may delay making purchases of a new product to permit them to make a more thorough evaluation of the product, or until industry and marketplace reviews become widely available. Some customers may hesitate migrating to a new product due to concerns regarding the complexity of migration and product infancy issues on performance. In addition, we may lose existing customers who choose a competitor’s product rather than migrate to our new product. This could result in a temporary or permanent revenue shortfall and materially affect our business.

The emergence of new industry standards may adversely affect the demand for our existing products

The emergence of new industry standards in related fields may adversely affect the demand for our existing products. This could happen, for example, if new web standards and technologies emerged that were incompatible with customer deployments of our products. MicroStrategy currently supports SQL and MDX standards in database access technology. If we are unable to adapt our products on a timely basis to new standards in database access technology, the ability of MicroStrategy’s products to access customer databases could be impaired. In addition, the emergence of new standards in the field of operating system support could adversely affect the demand for our existing products. MicroStrategy technology is currently compatible with nearly all major operating systems, including, among others, Windows Server, Sun Solaris, IBM AIX, HP’s HP-UX, Red Hat Linux AS and SuSE Linux Enterprise Server. If a different operating system were to gain widespread acceptance, we may not be able to achieve compatibility on a timely basis, resulting in an adverse effect on the demand for our products.

The nature of our products makes them particularly vulnerable to undetected errors, or bugs, which could cause problems with how the products perform and which could in turn reduce demand for our products, reduce our revenue and lead to product liability claims against us

Software products as complex as ours may contain errors and/or defects. Although we test our products extensively, we have in the past discovered software errors in our products after their introduction. Despite

testing by us and by our current and potential customers, errors may be found in new products or releases after commercial shipments begin. This could result in lost revenue, damage to our reputation or delays in market acceptance, which could have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition. We may also have to expend resources and capital to correct these defects.

Our license agreements with customers typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to product liability, warranty and other claims. It is possible, however, that these provisions may not be effective under the laws of certain domestic or international jurisdictions and we may be exposed to product liability, warranty and other claims. A successful product liability claim against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services and brand

We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual commitments to protect our proprietary information. Despite our efforts, these measures can only provide limited protection. Unauthorized third parties may try to copy or reverse engineer portions of our products or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property. Any patents owned by us may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. Any of our pending or future patent applications, whether or not being currently challenged, may not be issued with the scope of the claims we seek, if at all. In addition, the laws of some countries do not provide the same level of protection of our proprietary rights as do the laws of the United States. If we cannot protect our proprietary technology against unauthorized copying or use, we may not remain competitive.

We periodically receive notices from others claiming we are infringing their intellectual property rights, principally patent rights. We expect the number of such claims will increase as the number of products and competitors in our industry segments grows, the functionality of products overlap, and the volume of issued software patents and patent applications continues to increase. Responding to any infringement claim, regardless of its validity, could:

If a successful claim is made against us and we fail to develop or license a substitute technology, our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be adversely affected.

For example November 8, 2007 Diagnostic Systems Corp. (DSC), a subsidiary of Acacia Technology Group, filed a complaint for patent infringement against MicroStrategy and a number of other unrelated defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division. The case has been consolidated with Case No. SA CV 07-896 AG (MLGx) pending against other unrelated defendants. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,537,590 directly, contributorily and by inducement by making, using, selling and offering for sale in the United States MicroStrategy 8 Business Intelligence Platform, when used with an appropriate database. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of willful infringement and seeks damages, a finding that the case is exceptional and an award of attorneys fees, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. In its initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) served on December 28, 2007, DSC

declined to disclose the amount of its alleged damages, but disclosed that its alleged damages are based on a reasonable royalty theory. MicroStrategy answered the consolidated complaint on December 28, 2007, denied infringement, asserted affirmative defenses of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability, among others, and counter-claimed for declaratory judgment that the ‘590 patent is not infringed, is invalid, and is unenforceable. All of the involved parties are proposing a trial date of March 31, 2009. The outcome of this litigation is not presently determinable.

Pending or future litigation could have a material adverse impact on our results of operation and financial condition

In addition to intellectual property litigation, from time to time, we have been subject to other litigation. Where we can make a reasonable estimate of the liability relating to pending litigation and determine that it is probable, we record a related liability. As additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability and revise estimates as appropriate. However, because of uncertainties relating to litigation, the amount of our estimates could be wrong. In addition to the related cost and use of cash, pending or future litigation could cause the diversion of management’s attention and resources.

We could face liability claims relating to Alarm.com products and services and these claims could result in significant costs and liabilities

Our Alarm.com subsidiary provides web-enabled security and activity monitoring technology. We face exposure to liability claims in the event that any Alarm.com product or service results in personal injury or property damage. Although we maintain insurance policies to provide certain coverage for general liability claims, such insurance may not continue to be available on terms acceptable to us and such coverage may not be adequate for liabilities actually incurred. In addition, in the event that any Alarm.com product or service is proved to be defective, we may be required to recall or redesign such products or services, which could result in significant unexpected costs. Any liability claim or product recall could result in harm to our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Government regulations or other standards could have an adverse effect on the operations of our Alarm.com business

The operations of our Alarm.com subsidiary may become subject to certain federal, state, and local regulations and licensing requirements. Many jurisdictions have licensing laws directed specifically toward the home alarm and monitoring industry. We believe that the products and services provided by our Alarm.com subsidiary do not require certain licenses or permits required of traditional providers of home protection and monitoring services. If laws, regulations or licensing requirements in the jurisdictions in which Alarm.com operates were to change or if existing laws, regulations and licensing requirements were to be construed to require Alarm.com to obtain licenses or permits to provide its products and services, we may be required to modify our operations or to utilize resources to maintain compliance with such rules and regulations, or we may become subject to adverse regulatory action, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the business and operating results of our Alarm.com business.

Our Alarm.com subsidiary relies on third-party manufacturers to produce and assemble its products. If these manufacturers experience an interruption in their operations or are otherwise unable to successfully deliver the products to meet our production demands, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

We have outsourced the production and assembly of our Alarm.com products to third-party manufacturers. Any interruption in the operations of our manufacturers could materially adversely affect our ability to meet scheduled deliveries to customers and business partners. In addition, these manufacturing facilities may not be able to increase production on a timely basis, or on terms acceptable to us, to keep up with the requirements of the Alarm.com business. As a result, we may not be able to satisfy customer orders or contractual commitments, leading to the termination of one or more of our contracts or resulting in litigation against us, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial results. Alternative manufacturers may be difficult to find on terms acceptable to us or in a timely manner.

We may not be able to dispose of our Alarm.com or Angel.com businesses on acceptable terms, or at all

In March 2008, in connection with our consideration of strategic alternatives relating to our non-core Alarm.com and Angel.com businesses, we committed to a plan to sell these businesses. We may not be able to effect sales of these businesses on acceptable terms, or at all. The timing of any potential disposition and the effect of any such disposition on our reported results of operations for the period in which any disposition may occur are uncertain, but may materially impact our results of operations for the period in which the sale takes place.

Because of the rights of our two classes of common stock, and because we are controlled by our existing holders of class B common stock, these stockholders could transfer control of MicroStrategy to a third party without the approval of our Board of Directors or our other stockholders, prevent a third party from acquiring MicroStrategy, or limit your ability to influence corporate matters

We have two classes of common stock: class A common stock and class B common stock. Holders of our class A common stock generally have the same rights as holders of our class B common stock, except that holders of class A common stock have one vote per share while holders of class B common stock have ten votes per share. As of April 23, 2008, holders of our class B common stock owned 2,770,244 shares of class B common stock, or 75.3% of the total voting power. Michael J. Saylor, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned 399,800 shares of class A common stock and 2,429,582 shares of class B common stock, or 67.1% of the total voting power, as of April 23, 2008. Accordingly, Mr. Saylor is able to control MicroStrategy through his ability to determine the outcome of elections of our directors, amend our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and take other actions requiring the vote or consent of stockholders, including mergers, going-private transactions and other extraordinary transactions and their terms.

Our certificate of incorporation allows holders of class B common stock, all of whom are current employees or directors of our company or related parties, to transfer shares of class B common stock, subject to the approval of stockholders possessing a majority of the outstanding class B common stock. Mr. Saylor or a group of stockholders possessing a majority of the outstanding class B common stock could, without the approval of our Board of Directors or our other stockholders, transfer voting control of MicroStrategy to a third party. Such a transfer of control could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Mr. Saylor or a group of stockholders possessing a majority of the outstanding class B common stock will also be able to prevent a change of control of MicroStrategy, regardless of whether holders of class A common stock might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over the then current market price. In addition, this concentrated control limits stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that our non-controlling stockholders do not view as beneficial. As a result, the market price of our class A common stock could be adversely affected.

The following table provides information about our repurchases of equity securities during the periods indicated that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:

The Board of Directors has set the date and location of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders for 2008. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 14, 2008, at MicroStrategy’s offices, 1861 International Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102 at 10:00 a.m., local time.

All other items included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are omitted because they are not applicable or the answers thereto are “none.”

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

By:		/s/ Michael J. Saylor
		Michael J. Saylor
		Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer

By:		/s/ Arthur S. Locke, III
		Arthur S. Locke, III
		Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer


		Large accelerated filer x				Accelerated filer ¨
		Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)				Smaller reporting company ¨


		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited except for Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007	1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007	2

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007	3

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	4

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	28

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	29

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	41

Item 5.	Other Information	41

Item 6.	Exhibits	42


	March 31,			December 31,
	2008			2007
	(unaudited)			(audited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	99,877		$	85,194
Restricted cash and investments		2,222			2,982
Accounts receivable, net		44,726			48,551
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		13,628			12,057
Deferred tax assets, net		27,957			29,652
Assets held-for-sale		7,418			6,410

Total current assets		195,828			184,846

Property and equipment, net		8,426			8,992
Capitalized software development costs, net		1,989			2,340
Deposits and other assets		12,126			11,433
Deferred tax assets, net		34,303			35,347

Total Assets	$	252,672		$	242,958

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	23,610		$	21,694
Accrued compensation and employee benefits		24,778			37,687
Deferred revenue and advance payments		78,477			63,583
Liabilities held-for-sale		6,249			5,592

Total current liabilities		133,114			128,556

Deferred revenue and advance payments		2,040			1,936
Other long-term liabilities		9,971			9,137

Total Liabilities		145,125			139,629

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock undesignated, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding		—			—
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 330,000 shares authorized; 14,117 shares issued and 9,109 shares outstanding, and 14,113 shares issued and 9,184 shares outstanding, respectively		14			14
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value; 165,000 shares authorized; 2,770 issued and outstanding		3			3
Additional paid-in capital		448,460			448,229
Treasury stock, at cost, 5,008 and 4,929 shares, respectively		(363,170	)		(357,804	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,984			2,929
Retained earnings		18,256			9,958

Total Stockholders’ Equity		107,547			103,329

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	252,672		$	242,958


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2008			2007
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Revenues
Product licenses	$	22,127		$	16,699
Product support and other services		61,412			52,655

Total revenues		83,539			69,354

Cost of Revenues
Product licenses		559			588
Product support and other services		13,486			10,928

Total cost of revenues		14,045			11,516

Gross profit		69,494			57,838

Operating Expenses
Sales and marketing		28,132			23,168
Research and development		9,736			5,927
General and administrative		17,250			13,118

Total operating expenses		55,118			42,213

Income from continuing operations before financing and other income and income taxes		14,376			15,625

Financing and Other Income
Interest income, net		799			981
Other (expense) income, net		(861	)		48

Total financing and other income (expense)		(62	)		1,029

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		14,314			16,654
Provision for income taxes		5,171			6,208

Income from continuing operations		9,143			10,446
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit ($191 and $368, respectively)		845			601

Net Income	$	8,298		$	9,845

Basic earnings (loss) per share (1):
From continuing operations	$	0.77		$	0.83
From discontinued operations	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.05	)

Basic earnings per share	$	0.70		$	0.78

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share		11,927			12,567

Diluted earnings (loss) per share (1):
From continuing operations	$	0.74		$	0.79
From discontinued operations	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.04	)

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.67		$	0.75

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing diluted earnings per share		12,381			13,159


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2008			2007
Operating activities:
Net income	$	8,298		$	9,845
Plus: Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		845			601

Income from continuing operations		9,143			10,446
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,562			1,742
Bad debt expense		632			70
Deferred taxes		2,753			4,273
Stock-based compensation		44			179
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements		(56	)		(1,887	)
Other, net		10			53
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		4,445			20,333
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1,295	)		940
Deposits and other assets		191			(49	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses, compensation and employee benefits		(12,907	)		(13,763	)
Deferred revenue and advance payments		13,249			18,060
Other long-term liabilities		890			(31	)

Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations		18,661			40,366
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations		(572	)		(2,717	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		18,089			37,649

Investing activities:
Advance deposits on purchases of property and equipment		—			(5,000	)
Purchases of property and equipment, net		(459	)		(1,010	)
Capitalized software development costs		—			(2,419	)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and investments		57			(14	)

Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations		(402	)		(8,443	)
Net cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations		(265	)		(382	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(667	)		(8,825	)

Financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of class A common stock under exercise of employee stock options		124			1,636
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements		56			1,887
Purchases of treasury stock		(5,366	)		(44,740	)

Net cash used in financing activities from continuing activities		(5,186	)		(41,217	)
Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued activities		—			—

Net cash used in financing activities		(5,186	)		(41,217	)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		2,447			391

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		14,683			(12,002	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		85,194			78,980

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	99,877		$	66,978


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2008			2007
Net income	$	8,298		$	9,845
Foreign currency translation adjustment		1,057			153
Unrealized gain on short-term investments,net of applicable taxes		(2	)		—

Comprehensive income	$	9,353		$	9,998


*(in thousands)*	March 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
Assets:
Accounts Receivable	$	5,537	$	5,233
Prepaid Expenses & Other Current Assets		1,155		625
Property and equipment, net		726		552

Total assets		7,418		6,410

Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		2,415		1,775
Accrued compensation and employee benefits		1,080		1,527
Deferred revenue and advance payments		2,754		2,290

Total liabilities		6,249		5,592

Net assets and liabilities of disposal group		1,169		818


	Business Intelligence Software and Services
Geographic regions:	Domestic		EMEA		Other Regions		Consolidated
Three months ended March 31, 2008
Total revenues	$	49,855	$	26,389	$	7,295	$	83,539
Long-lived assets		16,984		3,768		1,789	$	22,541
Three months ended March 31, 2007
Total revenues	$	42,923	$	21,373	$	5,058	$	69,354
Long-lived assets		16,549		3,218		1,781	$	21,548


Quarterly Performance Measures
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2008		2007		% Change
Revenues:
Product licenses revenues	$	22,127	$	16,699	32.5	%
Product support revenues		43,987		38,271	14.9	%
Other services revenues		17,425		14,384	21.1	%

	$	83,539	$	69,354	20.5	%

Cost of revenues		14,045		11,516	22.0	%

Gross Profit	$	69,494	$	57,838	20.2	%

Operating Expenses:
Sales and marketing	$	28,132	$	23,168	21.4	%
Research and development		9,736		5,927	64.3	%
General and administrative		17,250		13,118	31.5	%

	$	55,118	$	42,213	30.6	%

Income from Continuing Operations before Financing and Other Income and Income Taxes	$	14,376	$	15,625	-8.0	%


	Three Months				% Change
	Ended March 31,
	2008		2007
Product Licenses Revenues:
Domestic	$	13,655	$	9,658	41.4	%
International		8,472		7,041	20.3	%

Total product licenses revenues	$	22,127	$	16,699	32.5	%


	Three Months Ended March 31,				% Change
	2008		2007		% Change
Product Support and Services Revenues:
Domestic	$	25,260	$	23,195	8.9	%
International		18,727		15,076	24.2	%

Total product support revenues		43,987		38,271	14.9	%

Consulting		13,671		10,788	26.7	%
Education		3,754		3,596	4.4	%

Total product support and services revenues	$	61,412	$	52,655	16.6	%


	Three Months Ended March 31
	2008			2007
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax:
Alarm.com	$	(662	)	$	47
Angel.com		(183	)		(648	)

Total	$	(845	)	$	(601	)


	March 31, 2008			December 31, 2007			March 31, 2007
Current:
Deferred product licenses revenue	$	2,381		$	3,523		$	3,249
Deferred product support revenue		101,705			99,885			88,054
Deferred other services revenue		12,361			13,603			16,434

		116,447			117,011			107,737
Less: billed and unpaid deferred revenue		(37,970	)		(53,428	)		(34,687	)

	$	78,477		$	63,583		$	73,050

Non-current:
Deferred product licenses revenue	$	262		$	290		$	346
Deferred product support revenue		1,422			1,587			2,217
Deferred other services revenue		1,881			1,299			50

		3,565			3,176			2,613
Less: billed and unpaid deferred revenue		(1,525	)		(1,240	)		(314	)

	$	2,040		$	1,936		$	2,299


	Twelve Months Ended March 31,										Thereafter		Total
	2009		2010		2011		2012		2013		Thereafter		Total
Contractual Obligations:
Operating leases:		12,418		10,022		4,319		1,565		1,199		2,144		31,667
Purchase obligations:		25,000		13,526		—		—		—		—		38,526

Total	$	37,418	$	23,548	$	4,319	$	1,565	$	1,199	$	2,144	$	70,193


Period	(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) (1)		(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
January 1, 2008 – January 31, 2008	0		0	0	$	72,088,199
February 1, 2008 – February 29, 2008	37,000	$	69.24	37,000	$	69,526,246
March 1, 2008 – March 31, 2008	42,200	$	66.44	42,200	$	66,722,381
Total:	79,200	$	67.75	79,200	$	66,722,381


Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24435) and incorporated by reference herein).

3.2		Amended and Restated By-Laws of the registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24435) and incorporated by reference herein).

4.1		Form of Certificate of Class A Common Stock of the registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (File No. 000-24435) and incorporated by reference herein).

10.1†		Executive Vice President Compensation Plan 2008 for Paul N. Zolfaghari.

10.2†		Vice President Compensation Plan 2007 for Paul N. Zolfaghari.

31.1		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer.

31.2		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer.

32		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.