Contingencies and Regulatory Matters

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2019

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Contingencies and Regulatory Matters

CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS

Litigation, Legal and Other Matters.  The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to complaints and administrative proceedings and are defendants in various civil lawsuits that have arisen in the ordinary course of their businesses, including contract disputes; actions alleging negligence, libel, defamation and invasion of privacy; trademark, copyright and patent infringement; violations of applicable wage and hour laws; and statutory or common law claims involving current and former students and employees. Although the outcomes of the legal claims and proceedings against the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, based on currently available information, management believes that there are no existing claims or proceedings that are likely to have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, based on currently available information, management believes it is reasonably possible that future losses from existing and threatened legal, regulatory and other proceedings in excess of the amounts recorded could reach approximately $15 million.

On September 3, 2015, Kaplan sold to ECA substantially all of the assets of KHE nationally accredited on-ground Title IV eligible schools (KHE Campuses). The transaction included the transfer of certain real estate leases that were guaranteed by Kaplan. As part of the transaction, Kaplan retained liability for, among other things, obligations arising under certain lease guarantees. ECA is currently in receivership, has terminated all of its higher education operations and has sold the New England College of Business (NECB). The receiver has repudiated all of ECA’s real estate leases. Although ECA is required to indemnify Kaplan for any amounts Kaplan must pay due to ECA’s failure to fulfill its obligations under real estate leases guaranteed by Kaplan, ECA’s financial situation and the existence of secured and unsecured creditors make it unlikely that Kaplan will recover from ECA. In the second half of 2018, the Company recorded an estimated $17.5 million in losses on guarantor lease obligations in connection with this transaction in other non-operating expense. The Company continues to monitor the status of these obligations and there was no significant change to estimated losses in the first nine months of 2019.

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), a department of the U.K. government responsible for the collection of taxes, has raised assessments against the Kaplan U.K. Pathways business for Value Added Tax (VAT) relating to years 2014 to 2017, which have been paid by Kaplan. In September 2017, in a case captioned Kaplan International Colleges UK Limited v. The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, Kaplan challenged these assessments. The Company believes it has met all requirements under U.K. VAT law and is entitled to recover the £17.3 million receivable related to the assessments and subsequent payments that have been paid through September 30, 2019. Following a hearing held in January 2019 before the First Tier Tax Tribunal, all issues related to EU law in the case were referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union. In the third quarter of 2019, the Company has recorded a full provision of £17.3 million against this receivable to expense, due to recent developments in the case. Of this amount, £14.1 million relates to years 2014 to 2018. If the Company ultimately prevails in this case, the provision will be reversed and a pre-tax credit will be recorded as a reduction to expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The result of the case is expected to be known by the end of 2020.

In a separate matter, there was a legal case awaiting judgment at the Supreme Court in the U.K. as of December 31, 2018 that could have impacted U.K. Pathways’ ability to receive the benefit of an exemption from charging its students VAT on tuition fees. The case could have reversed or amended the law and guidance permitting private

providers to qualify as a “college of a university” and, therefore, receive the benefit of an exemption from charging its students VAT on tuition fees. However the Supreme Court decided the case in the college’s favor. The result was more favorable to private providers working in collaboration with a university than the opposing view. The Supreme Court emphasized five key tests for a private provider to satisfy so that it could exempt its services as a “college of a university”, even if it did not have a constitutional link to the university. Satisfying these tests would generally show that the college had a sufficiently close relationship with the university and its activities were sufficiently integrated with the university, to constitute a “college of a university”. Although the new test has now been incorporated into official HMRC guidance, it is not yet clear how HMRC will apply the Supreme Court judgment and the five key tests in practice.

Department of Education (ED) Program Reviews.  The ED has undertaken program reviews at various KHE locations.

In February 2015, the ED began a program review assessing KU’s administration of its Title IV and Higher Education Act programs during the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 award years. In 2018, Kaplan contributed the institutional assets and operations of KU to Purdue Global, and the university became Purdue Global, under the ownership and control of Purdue University. However, Kaplan retained liability for any financial obligations the ED might impose under this program review and that are the result of actions taken during the time that Kaplan owned the institution. In September 2018, the ED issued a Preliminary Program Report (Preliminary Report) and none of the initial findings in the Preliminary Report carried material financial liability. Although the program review technically covers only the 2013-2015 award years, the ED included a review of the treatment of student financial aid refunds for students who withdrew from a program prior to completion in 2017-2018. In August 2019, the ED issued a Final Program Report, with a nominal financial liability.

There were two other open program reviews at campuses that were part of the KHE Campuses business prior to its sale in 2015 to ECA. The ED’s reports on the program reviews at former KHE Broomall, PA, and Pittsburgh, PA, locations were recently finalized with no additional financial obligation.

Regulatory Matters. In November 2018, Kaplan Learning Institute in Singapore (KLI) was notified by SkillsFuture Singapore (SSG), a statutory board under the Singapore Ministry of Education, that its right to deliver workforce skills qualifications (WSQ) courses under the Leadership & People Management framework would be suspended for six months from December 1, 2018. In June 2019, SSG notified KLI that from July 1, 2019, SSG was suspending KLI’s WSQ Approved Training Organization status for twelve months and terminating its WSQ course accreditation and funding due to findings of non-compliance with WSQ assessment principles. Kaplan Singapore has subsequently begun the process of voluntarily de-registering KLI as a Private Education institution. These actions have and will continue to adversely impact Kaplan Singapore’s revenues and operating results for 2019, as compared to 2018.