-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, AawYnxWwSAx8w9/HcFkudbCemFZxoaiL0k7vRUD4ZNcrPROElatMMlJSzRestfn3 NWD89uDvTxVSCWwfkoVzBQ== 0000000000-05-036075.txt : 20060922 0000000000-05-036075.hdr.sgml : 20060922 20050714143948 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000000000-05-036075 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: UPLOAD PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 FILED AS OF DATE: 20050714 FILED FOR: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001048477 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS [2834] IRS NUMBER: 680397820 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: UPLOAD BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 105 DIGITAL DRIVE CITY: NOVATO STATE: CA ZIP: 94949 BUSINESS PHONE: 4155066700 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 105 DIGITAL DRIVE CITY: NOVATO STATE: CA ZIP: 94949 PUBLIC REFERENCE ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-05-109859 LETTER 1 filename1.txt Postal Code 20549-0303 May 18, 2005 By Facsimile 646.848.4887 and U.S. Mail Stephen Besen, Esq. Shearman & Sterling LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022-6069, RE: BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A Filed: May 17, 2005 by Caduceus Capital Master Fund Limited et al. SEC File No.: 0-26727 Dear Mr. Besen: We have the following comments on your filing. General 1. We note your response to prior comment number one. Please revise the proxy statement to affirmatively indicate that your belief that the election of the Caduceus Nominees would not constitute a change of control under the indenture governing the Company`s 3.5% convertible subordinated notes is based upon your interpretation of the indenture. Clarify whether or not this interpretation is based upon an opinion of counsel. In addition, please disclose that the Company disputes your interpretation. 2. We note the OribMed Entities began to consider seeking to nominate directors in January of 2005 and that a letter was written to the Company`s nominating committee in January of 2005 that requested three OribMed nominees. Notwithstanding the intentions expressed in this letter, a Schedule 13D was not filed until April 15, 2005. Please advise us why the OribMed Entities continued to believe they were eligible to make the certification required by Item 10 of Schedule 13G until this time. In addition, please discuss why the OribMed entities apparently believed they did not hold the subject class with the purpose of effect of influencing the issuer. 3. Advise us, with a view toward revised disclosure, what consideration has been given to disclosing the date by when brokers must receive instructions in order to have the votes reflect security holder selections. Closing Comment Please amend the Schedule 14A promptly to comply with our comments. Include a cover letter with your response to each comment, and note the location of any change in the revised material. If you do not agree with a comment, please tell us why in your response. File your response via EDGAR, tagged as "CORRESP." We may have additional comments based on our review of the revised material and your response to our comments. Please direct any questions to me at (202) 551-3266. Sincerely, Nicholas P. Panos Special Counsel Office of Mergers and Acquisitions -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----