XML 18 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
16.    Fair Value Measurements

The accounting framework for determining fair value includes a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to measure fair value, which enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements. The fair value hierarchy consists of three tiers as follows: Level 1, defined as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

Our assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis include cash equivalent money market funds, restricted cash money market funds and foreign currency forward contracts. Cash equivalent money market funds and restricted cash money market funds are invested in U.S. money market funds and various U.S. and foreign bank operating and time deposit accounts, which are due on demand or carry a maturity date of less than three months when purchased. No restrictions have been imposed on us regarding withdrawal of balances with respect to our cash equivalents as a result of liquidity or other credit market issues affecting the money market funds we invest in or the counterparty financial institutions holding our deposits. Money market funds are valued using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets.


Our forward contracts are not traded on an exchange and are therefore valued using conventional calculations or models that are primarily based on observable inputs such as foreign currency exchange rates. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to serve as an economic hedge for the payments related to the agreement to purchase land in Korea (see Note 9). The forward contracts are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes and changes in the fair value of these forward contracts are recorded immediately in earnings in foreign currency (gain) loss, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income. In August 2013, we settled one forward contract, with a notional amount of $39.5 million. The total notional value for the remaining forward contracts was $49.2 million. The fair value of the forward contracts at September 30, 2013, was recorded as an asset of $1.2 million in other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We also measure certain assets and liabilities, including property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and J-Devices, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, such measurements included the consideration of third party valuation reports based on a combination of market and cost approach valuation techniques. The valuation reports contained various inputs including semiconductor industry data, replacement costs, price lists and general information regarding the assets being evaluated. Nonrecurring fair value measurements related to property, plant and equipment impairments reflect the fair value of the assets at the dates the impairments were taken during the period. Our fair value measurements consist of the following:
 
September 30,
2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
(In thousands)
Recurring fair value measurements:
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
Cash equivalent money market funds (Level 1)
$
322,866

 
$
151,066

Restricted cash money market funds (Level 1)
2,681

 
2,680

Foreign currency forward contracts (Level 2)
1,167

 

 
 
 
 
Nonrecurring fair value measurements:
 
 
 
Long-lived assets held for use or disposal (Level 3)
$
1,055

 
$
868

 
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
(In thousands)
Nonrecurring fair value measurements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Losses on long-lived assets held for use or disposal (Level 3)
$
578

 
$
250

 
$
1,446

 
$
586



For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, impairment losses on property, plant and equipment of $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, were recorded in research and development with the remainder recorded in cost of sales. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, all impairment losses on property, plant and equipment were recorded as cost of sales.

We measure the fair value of our debt on a quarterly basis for disclosure purposes. The following table presents the fair value of financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
(In thousands)
Senior notes (Level 1)
$
1,262,938

 
$
1,276,527

 
$
1,061,945

 
$
1,045,000

Convertible senior subordinated notes (Level 1)
83,325

 
56,350

 
371,975

 
250,000

Term loans (Level 2)
302,698

 
318,000

 
269,200

 
250,000

Total debt
$
1,648,961

 
$
1,650,877

 
$
1,703,120

 
$
1,545,000



The estimated fair value of the debt is based primarily on quoted market prices reported on or near the respective balance sheet dates for our senior and senior subordinated notes. The estimated fair value for the debt of our subsidiaries was calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis, which utilized market based assumptions including bond and credit default swap indices and was adjusted for credit risk.