Note 11 - New Accounting Pronouncements	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Notes to Financial Statements
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Text Block]	Note 11: New Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016 - 02, “Leases (Topic 842 ).” ASU 2016 - 02 establishes a ROU model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. ASU 2016 - 02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. FASB has issued updated guidance in ASU 2018 - 11, “Leases (Topic 842 ) Targeted Improvements” and ASU 2019 - 01 “Leases (Topic 842 ) Codification Improvements” which provides additional transition options including allowing entities to not apply the lease standard to the comparative periods presented in their financial statements in the year of adoption. ASC Topic 842 provided a package of practical expedients in applying the lease standard to be chosen at the date of adoption. The Company chose to elect the package of practical expedients provided under ASU 2016 - 02 whereby we will not reassess (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. We have also chosen not to apply the recognition requirements of ASU 2016 - 02 to any short-term leases (as defined by related accounting guidance). We will account for lease and non-lease components separately because such amounts are readily determinable under lease contracts. Additionally, we have chosen to elect the use of hindsight, when applicable, in determining the lease term, in assessing the likelihood that a lessee purchase option will be exercised; and in assessing the impairment of ROU assets. The Company determined that it has both operating and finance leases under Topic 842. For operating and finance leases, lease liabilities are initially measured at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments not yet paid, discounted using the discount rate for the lease at the lease commencement date over the lease term. For operating and finance leases, ROU assets are measured at the commencement date as the amount of initial liability, adjusted for lease payments made to the lessor at or before commencement date, minus incentives; and for any initial direct costs incurred by the lessee. Based on the transition method that the Company has chosen to follow, the initial application date of the standard for all existing leases is January 1, 2019. The lease term used for the initial operating ROU asset and lease liability will include the initial lease term in addition to one renewal options the Company thinks it is reasonably certain to exercise. ASC Topic 842 requires that the implicit rate within the lease agreement be used if available. If not available, the Company should use its incremental borrowing rate in effect at the time of lease commencement date. For operating leases with a term of less than 60 months, the Company utilized a 5 -year LIBOR rate of approximately 3%. For operating leases with a term of greater than 60 months, the Company utilized a method of analogizing a current variable rate product to a fixed rate product based on LIBOR curve which results in a discount rate of approximately 6%. The discount rate used for finance leases is 2.05% which is the rate specified in the lease agreements at the present value rate. During the first quarter of 2019, the implementation of this standard resulted in the recording of $10.1 million of ROU assets and lease liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet with no significant impact to the income statement as a result of this standard. Additionally, the Company did not have a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. See Note 8 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information and balances as of March 31, 2019. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016 - 13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326 ): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. In November 2018, Update 2018 - 19 Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, was released that provided additional guidance on this Topic. Among other things, the amendments in this ASU require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. For SEC filers, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with later effective dates for non-SEC registrant public companies and other organizations. Early adoption will be permitted for all organizations for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company has formed a committee that is assessing our data and evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016 - 13. The Company has also selected a third party vendor to assist in generating loan level cash flows and disclosures. The financial impact of adopting this standard is still being evaluated. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017 - 04, Intangibles: Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the amendments eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. In addition, the income tax effects of tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit should be considered when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The amendments also eliminate the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the qualitative impairment test is necessary. The amendments should be applied on a prospective basis. The nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle should be disclosed upon transition. The amendments in this update should be adopted for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact. In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017 - 12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815 ): Targeted improvements to accounting for hedging activities. In October 2018, ASU 2018 - 16, provided additional guidance on this Topic. The purpose of this updated guidance is to better align financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted, ASU 2018 - 16 for the period ending March 31, 2019. The standard requires the modified retrospective transition approach as of the date of adoption. Implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018 - 02, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220 ): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU provides financial statement preparers with an option to reclassify stranded tax effects within AOCI to retained earnings in each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (or portion thereof) are recorded. This standard is effective for all organizations for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Organizations should apply the proposed amendments either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2018 - 02 and, as a result, reclassified $31,818 from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings as of December 31, 2017. The reclassification impacted the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Stockholder’s Equity as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018 - 13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820 ): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This ASU applies to all entities that are required, under existing GAAP, to make disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements. Disclosures removed by this ASU are the amount and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, the policy for timing of transfers between levels and the valuation process for Level 3 measurements. This ASU modifies disclosures relating to investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value. Additional disclosures require by the ASU include: 1 ) change in unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and 2 ) range and weighted average of significant observable inputs used to develop Level 3 measurements. The prospective method of transition is required for the new disclosure requirements. The other amendments should be applied retrospectively. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years or January 1, 2020 for the Company. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard on our consolidated financial statements, but at this time do not believe the standard will have a significant impact on the financial statements.

Note

11:

New Accounting Pronouncements

February 2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

02,

“Leases (Topic

842

).” ASU

2016

establishes a ROU model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than

months. Leases are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. ASU

2016

is effective for fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2018,

including interim periods within those fiscal years. FASB has issued updated guidance in ASU

2018

11,

“Leases (Topic

842

) Targeted Improvements” and ASU

2019

“Leases (Topic

842

) Codification Improvements” which provides additional transition options including allowing entities to

not

apply the lease standard to the comparative periods presented in their financial statements in the year of adoption. ASC Topic

842

provided a package of practical expedients in applying the lease standard to be chosen at the date of adoption. The Company chose to elect the package of practical expedients provided under ASU

2016

whereby we will

not

reassess (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. We have also chosen

not

to apply the recognition requirements of ASU

2016

to any short-term leases (as defined by related accounting guidance). We will account for lease and non-lease components separately because such amounts are readily determinable under lease contracts. Additionally, we have chosen to elect the use of hindsight, when applicable, in determining the lease term, in assessing the likelihood that a lessee purchase option will be exercised; and in assessing the impairment of ROU assets. The Company determined that it has both operating and finance leases under Topic

842.

For operating and finance leases, lease liabilities are initially measured at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments

not

yet paid, discounted using the discount rate for the lease at the lease commencement date over the lease term. For operating and finance leases, ROU assets are measured at the commencement date as the amount of initial liability, adjusted for lease payments made to the lessor at or before commencement date, minus incentives; and for any initial direct costs incurred by the lessee. Based on the transition method that the Company has chosen to follow, the initial application date of the standard for all existing leases is

January 1, 2019.

The lease term used for the initial operating ROU asset and lease liability will include the initial lease term in addition to

one

renewal options the Company thinks it is reasonably certain to exercise. ASC Topic

842

requires that the implicit rate within the lease agreement be used if available. If

not

available, the Company should use its incremental borrowing rate in effect at the time of lease commencement date. For operating leases with a term of less than

months, the Company utilized a

-year LIBOR rate of approximately

3%.

For operating leases with a term of greater than

months, the Company utilized a method of analogizing a current variable rate product to a fixed rate product based on LIBOR curve which results in a discount rate of approximately

6%.

The discount rate used for finance leases is

2.05%

which is the rate specified in the lease agreements at the present value rate. During the

first

quarter of

2019,

the implementation of this standard resulted in the recording of

$10.1

million of ROU assets and lease liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet with

significant impact to the income statement as a result of this standard. Additionally, the Company did

not

have a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. See Note

of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information and balances as of

March 31, 2019.

June 2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

13,

Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic

326

): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. In

November 2018,

Update

2018

Codification Improvements to Topic

326,

Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, was released that provided additional guidance on this Topic. Among other things, the amendments in this ASU require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. For SEC filers, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after

December 15, 2019,

with later effective dates for non-SEC registrant public companies and other organizations. Early adoption will be permitted for all organizations for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after

December 15, 2018.

The Company has formed a committee that is assessing our data and evaluating the impact of adopting ASU

2016

13.

The Company has also selected a

third

party vendor to assist in generating loan level cash flows and disclosures. The financial impact of adopting this standard is still being evaluated.

January 2017,

the FASB issued ASU

No.

2017

04,

Intangibles: Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the amendments eliminate Step

from the goodwill impairment test. The annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should

not

exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. In addition, the income tax effects of tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit should be considered when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The amendments also eliminate the requirements for any reporting unit with a

zero

or negative carrying amount to perform Step

of the goodwill impairment test. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the qualitative impairment test is necessary. The amendments should be applied on a prospective basis. The nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle should be disclosed upon transition. The amendments in this update should be adopted for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2019.

Early adoption is permitted on testing dates after

January 1, 2017.

The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements, but it is

not

expected to have a material impact.

August 2017,

the FASB issued ASU

2017

12,

Derivatives and Hedging (Topic

815

): Targeted improvements to accounting for hedging activities. In

October 2018,

ASU

2018

16,

provided additional guidance on this Topic. The purpose of this updated guidance is to better align financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2018.

The Company adopted, ASU

2018

for the period ending

March 31, 2019.

The standard requires the modified retrospective transition approach as of the date of adoption. Implementation of this standard did

not

have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

February 2018,

the FASB issued ASU

2018

02,

Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic

220

): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU provides financial statement preparers with an option to reclassify stranded tax effects within AOCI to retained earnings in each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (or portion thereof) are recorded. This standard is effective for all organizations for fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2018,

and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Organizations should apply the proposed amendments either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. The Company elected to early adopt ASU

2018

and, as a result, reclassified

$31,818

from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings as of

December 31, 2017.

The reclassification impacted the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Stockholder’s Equity as of and for the year ended

December 31, 2017.

August 2018,

the FASB issued ASU

2018

13,

Fair Value Measurement (Topic

820

): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This ASU applies to all entities that are required, under existing GAAP, to make disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements. Disclosures removed by this ASU are the amount and reasons for transfers between Level

and Level

the policy for timing of transfers between levels and the valuation process for Level

measurements. This ASU modifies disclosures relating to investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value. Additional disclosures require by the ASU include:

) change in unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level

fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and

) range and weighted average of significant observable inputs used to develop Level

measurements. The prospective method of transition is required for the new disclosure requirements. The other amendments should be applied retrospectively. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after

December 15, 2019,

including interim periods within those fiscal years or

January 1, 2020

for the Company. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard on our consolidated financial statements, but at this time do

not

believe the standard will have a significant impact on the financial statements.