XML 42 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
NOTE 20: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

Accounting guidance related to fair value measurements and disclosures specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

Level 3 – Model-derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs, minimize the use of unobservable inputs, to the extent possible, and considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:

Investment securities:  The fair values of securities available-for-sale are obtained from an independent third party and are based on quoted prices on nationally recognized exchange where available (Level 1).  If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured by utilizing matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2).  Management made no adjustment to the fair value quotes that were received from the independent third party pricing service.

Interest rate swap derivative:  The fair value of the interest rate swap derivative is calculated based on a discounted cash flow model. All future floating cash flows are projected and both floating and fixed cash flows are discounted to the valuation date.  The curve utilized for discounting and projecting is built by obtaining publicly available third party market quotes for various swap maturity terms.

Impaired loans: Impaired loans are those loans in which the Company has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral.  Fair value is generally determined based upon market value evaluations by third parties of the properties and/or estimates by management of working capital collateral or discounted cash flows based upon expected proceeds.  These appraisals may include up to three approaches to value: the sales comparison approach, the income approach (for income-producing property), and the cost approach.  Management modifies the appraised values, if needed, to take into account recent developments in the market or other factors, such as, changes in absorption rates or market conditions from the time of valuation and anticipated sales values considering management’s plans for disposition.  Such modifications to the appraised values could result in lower valuations of such collateral. Estimated costs to sell are based on current amounts of disposal costs for similar assets.  These measurements are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustment upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment.  A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance.
 
Foreclosed real estate:  Fair values for foreclosed real estate are initially recorded based on market value evaluations by third parties, less costs to sell (“initial cost basis”).  Any write-downs required when the related loan receivable is exchanged for the underlying real estate collateral at the time of transfer to foreclosed real estate are charged to the allowance for loan losses.  Values are derived from appraisals, similar to impaired loans, of underlying collateral or discounted cash flow analysis.  Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are updated periodically and assets are marked to current fair value, not to exceed the initial cost basis.  In the determination of fair value subsequent to foreclosure, management also considers other factors or recent developments, such as, changes in absorption rates and market conditions from the time of valuation and anticipated sales values considering management’s plans for disposition.  Either change could result in adjustment to lower the property value estimates indicated in the appraisals.  These measurements are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

The following tables summarize assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

   
2013
 
            
Total Fair
 
(In thousands)
 
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Value
 
Available-for-sale portfolio
            
Debt investment securities:
            
US Treasury, agencies and GSEs
 $-  $16,597  $-  $16,597 
State and political subdivisions
  -   6,587   -   6,587 
Corporate
  -   13,696   -   13,696 
Residential mortgage-backed - US agency
  -   42,142   -   42,142 
Residential mortgage-backed - private label
  -   -   -   - 
Equity investment securities:
                
Mutual funds:
                
Ultra short mortgage fund
  648   -   -   648 
Large cap equity fund
  651   -   -   651 
Other mutual funds
  -   345   -   345 
Common stock - financial services industry
  42   251   -   293 
Total available-for-sale securities
 $1,341  $79,618  $-  $80,959 
                  
Interest rate swap derivative
 $-  $(135) $-  $(135)
 
 
   
2012
 
            
Total Fair
 
(In thousands)
 
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Value
 
Available-for-sale portfolio
            
Debt investment securities:
            
US Treasury, agencies and GSEs
 $-  $6,183  $-  $6,183 
State and political subdivisions
  -   27,471   -   27,471 
Corporate
  -   23,006   -   23,006 
Residential mortgage-backed - US agency
  -   48,251   -   48,251 
Residential mortgage-backed - private label
  -   305   -   305 
Equity investment securities:
                
Mutual funds:
                
Ultra short mortgage fund
  1,291   -   -   1,291 
Large cap equity fund
  1,081   -   -   1,081 
Other mutual funds
  -   319   -   319 
Common stock - financial services industry
  33   399   -   432 
Total available-for-sale securities
 $2,405  $105,934  $-  $108,339 
                  
Interest rate swap derivative
 $-  $(195) $-  $(195)

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).

The following tables summarize assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

 
2013
       
 Total Fair
(In thousands)
          Level 1
        Level 2
      Level 3
 Value
 Impaired loans
 $                   -
 $                  -
 $           258
 $          258
 Foreclosed real estate
 $                   -
 $                  -
 $             69
 $            69
         
         
 
 2012
       
 Total Fair
(In thousands)
          Level 1
        Level 2
      Level 3
 Value
 Impaired loans
 $                   -
 $                  -
 $           773
 $          773
 Foreclosed real estate
 $                   -
 $                  -
 $             96
 $            96
 
The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which Level 3 inputs were used to determine fair value.
 
 
   
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
   
         
 
Valuation
Unobservable
 
Range
 
 
Techniques
Input
 
(Weighted Avg.)
 
At December 31, 2013
     
Impaired loans
Appraisal of collateral
Appraisal Adjustments
  5% - 30%(14%)
 
(Sales Approach)
Costs to Sell
  6% - 50%(12%)
          
Foreclosed real estate
Appraisal of collateral
Appraisal Adjustments
  15% - 15%(15%)
 
(Sales Approach)
Costs to Sell
  6% - 7%(6%)
          

  
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
   
      
 
Valuation
Unobservable
 
Range
 
 
Techniques
Input
 
(Weighted Avg.)
 
At December 31, 2012
    
Impaired loans
Appraisal of collateral
Appraisal Adjustments
  5% - 30%(21%)
  
Costs to Sell
  6% - 15%(12%)
       
Foreclosed real estate
Appraisal of collateral
Appraisal Adjustments
  15% - 15%(15%)
  
Costs to Sell
  6% - 7%(6%)
  
 
As of June 30, 2013, junior subordinated debentures with a carrying value of $5.2 million were transferred from a level 3 classification to a level 2 classification.

Required disclosures include fair value information of financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the consolidated statement of condition, for which it is practicable to estimate that value.  In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument.

The Company has various processes and controls in place to ensure that fair value is reasonably estimated. The Company performs due diligence procedures over third party pricing service providers in order to support their use in the valuation process.
 
While the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique.  Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated.  The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective period-ends, and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates.  As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each period-end.
 
The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities.  Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.  The Company, in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments, used the following methods and assumptions:

Cash and cash equivalents – The carrying amounts of these assets approximate their fair value and are classified as Level 1.

Interest earning time deposits – The carrying amounts of these assets approximate their fair value and are classified as Level 1.

Investment securities – The fair values of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity are obtained from an independent third party and are based on quoted prices on nationally recognized exchange where available (Level 1).  If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured by utilizing matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2).  Management made no adjustment to the fair value quotes that were received from the independent third party pricing service.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock – The carrying amount of these assets approximates their fair value and are classified as Level 2.

Net loans – For variable-rate loans that re-price frequently, fair value is based on carrying amounts.  The fair value of other loans (for example, fixed-rate commercial real estate loans, mortgage loans, and commercial and industrial loans) is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered in the market for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.  Loan value estimates include judgments based on expected prepayment rates.  The measurement of the fair value of loans, including impaired loans, is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
Accrued interest receivable and payable – The carrying amount of these assets approximates their fair value and are classified as Level 1.

Deposits – The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing checking, passbook savings and certain types of money management accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts) and are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.  Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates of deposits to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.  Measurements of the fair value of time deposits are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Borrowings – Fixed/variable term “bullet” structures are valued using a replacement cost of funds approach.  These borrowings are discounted to the FHLBNY advance curve.  Option structured borrowings’ fair values are determined by the FHLB for borrowings that include a call or conversion option.  If market pricing is not available from this source, current market indications from the FHLBNY are obtained and the borrowings are discounted to the FHLBNY advance curve less an appropriate spread to adjust for the option. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
 
Junior subordinated debentures – Current economic conditions have rendered the market for this liability inactive.  As such, the Company was formerly unable to determine a good estimate of fair value, resulting in a Level 3 classification at December 31, 2012.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company was able to secure a quote from its pricing service based on a Discounted Cash Flow methodology which resulted in a Level 2 classification for this borrowing.

Interest rate swap derivative – The fair value of the interest rate swap derivative is obtained from a third party pricing agent and is calculated based on a discounted cash flow model. All future floating cash flows are projected and both floating and fixed cash flows are discounted to the valuation date.  The curve utilized for discounting and projecting is built by obtaining publicly available third party market quotes for various swap maturity terms, and therefore is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31 are presented in the following table:

      
2013
  
2012
 
   
Fair Value
  
Carrying
  
Estimated
  
Carrying
  
Estimated
 
(Dollars In thousands)
 
Hierarchy
  
Amounts
  
Fair Values
  
Amounts
  
Fair Values
 
Financial assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  1  $16,575  $16,575  $8,665  $8,665 
Interest earning time deposits
  1   500   500   2,000   2,000 
Investment securities - available-for-sale
  1   1,341   1,341   2,405   2,405 
Investment securities - available-for-sale
  2   79,618   79,618   105,934   105,934 
Investment securities - held-to-maturity
  2   34,412   34,222   -   - 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
  2   2,440   2,440   1,929   1,929 
Net loans
  3   336,592   343,660   329,247   341,389 
Accrued interest receivable
  1   1,715   1,715   1,717   1,717 
                      
Financial liabilities:
                    
Demand Deposits, Savings, NOW and MMDA
  1  $250,248  $250,248  $228,484  $228,484 
Time Deposits
  2   159,892   160,201   163,321   165,491 
Borrowings
  2   40,853   41,255   34,964   36,054 
Junior subordinated debentures
  2   5,155   4,825   -   - 
Junior subordinated debentures
  3   -   -   5,155   5,155 
Accrued interest payable
  1   86   86   140   140 
Interest rate swap derivative
  2   135   135   195   195